.h files in non-devel package?

Tue Nov 28 05:48:35 UTC 2006

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 21:07 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Thus Gérard is right, -devel subpackage is not needed.
> 
> Why not call the main package -devel and forget the whole issue?

In and of itself, it is *only* a development package, similar to the GNU
toolchain (gcc/binutils/etc). Hence, (as I see it) there is no need for
the -devel naming since it does not have a corresponding runtime-only
component.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061127/bf6e2ef7/attachment.sig>