New Comps Groups

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Thu Nov 30 04:20:35 UTC 2006


On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 22:49 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> I don't see anything stopping that from happening now.
> 
> Either:
>  1. write the above interface for repodata and then have yum be able to
> understand that info
>  2. use the existing comps format and just have yum be able to look up
> pkgs by the group they belong to. So for the above you would do:
>    Take the intersection of /Language/Python, /Development/Library,
> and /Security/Cryptography and display those pkgs.
> Then comps looks like:
> 
>   <group>
>    <name>/Security/Cryptography</name>
>    <package>python-gpgme</package>
>    <package>gpgme</package>
>    <package>gnupg</package>
>   </group>
>   <group>
>    <name>/Development/Library</name>
>    <package>python-gpgme</package>
>    <package>gpgme</package>
>   </group>
> 
So perhaps all we need is free reign to do this in comps.  Which, from
previous messages from jeremy, seems to imply we would need to have
separate comps.xml files for the installer and for the repo.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061129/41ec1921/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list