linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:11 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> writes:
>>>> RC> In addition to all this, another issue has popped up, which IMO
>>>> RC> renders shipping static libs as part of Fedora very questionable
>>>> RC> (to say the least)
>>>> RC> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209316
>>>>
>>>> Surely this is a bug in RPM, 
>>> RH's rpm maintainers don't seem to agree, they closed it "WONTFIX" :(
>> It was jbj that closed it it WONTFIX, not the RH rpm maintainer.
> 
> <*grin*/> I am aware about this, nevertheless I regard anybody who
> closes bugs on an FC package (Note: this PR was against rpm*fc5.*.rpm)
> to be a RH maintainer.

Anybody in the fedorabugs group has the ability to close bugs in all of 
Fedora. It doesnt have to be a RH maintainer and moreover the bug was 
not closed.

Rahul