Soon to be marked dead packages
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
Sat Oct 7 07:54:52 UTC 2006
Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>> "DJ" == Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> DJ> If they still compile, perhaps we can automate building some of
>> DJ> them until a maintainer steps up ?
>>
>> They need actual maintainers, not just some automated rebuilds. What
>> happens if there's a security problem or a decision needs to be made
>> about updates?
>
> The same thing that happens if I say I'll maintain them today, rebuild
> them, and then the day that FC6 is released, say I don't want them anymore.
>
The orphan removal policy was created because the Fedora Project must
sustainably grow in a responsible way. If maintainers are unwilling to
maintain packages, the responsible thing to do is to declare the
packages orphaned and move on.
If a maintainer with a bad attitude did as you described, that would be
a breach of responsibility. The organization may decide to take
measures to either enforce responsibility or revoke access in the event
of willful non-compliance with project policies and processes.
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list