rng-tools / rng-utils / core functionality vs extras ?

[Paul Wouters]

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:44:19PM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
>  > The question now is, do I submit the initscripts extension as bug to rng-utils,
>  > or do I submit an rng-tools package that "obsoletes" rng-utils?
>
> The former. Renaming for no good reason is pointless, and just causes confusion.

Well, argubly the correct name is rng-tools, since that's what the upstreams is
called. That's why I hadn't noticed the package to begin with.

I'll file a bug report against rng-utils  and attach the rng init script, since
rng-utils is in Core, where I think it should be.

Paul
-- 
Building and integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155