Build-sys weirdness

Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Wed Oct 25 12:33:36 UTC 2006


Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:11:00 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:14:58 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>>
>>> buildsys at fedoraproject.org wrote:
>>>> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 21 
>>>>     jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc6
>>> This is strange because the rpm I built for FE-devel is
>>> jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7, not .fc6.
>> You forgot to "cvs up" your "common" directory. As a result, you've
>> submitted a .fc6 build request for development, resulting in _two_ (!)
>> src.rpms and .fc7 binary rpms:
> 
> I'm going to re-push the following build-job results for FE development
> after removing the .fc6 src.rpms manually:
> 
>   dnsmasq/2.34-2.fc7
>   eggdrop/1.6.18-4.fc7
>   gaim-gaym/0.96-3.2.289svn.fc7
>   highlight/2.4.8-1.fc7
>   imlib2/1.3.0-1.fc7
>   jd/1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7
>   libburn/0.2.2-2.fc7
>   libopts/27.4-1.fc7
>   qstat/2.10-6.fc7
>   ren/1.0-11.fc7
>   testdisk/6.5-1.fc7

Thank you for pointing what is a problem.

Well, I was just planning to queue jd/1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7.1
(with common directory updated), but isn't it necessary?

Mamoru Tasaka




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list