Build-sys weirdness
Mamoru Tasaka
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Wed Oct 25 12:33:36 UTC 2006
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:11:00 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:14:58 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>>
>>> buildsys at fedoraproject.org wrote:
>>>> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 21
>>>> jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc6
>>> This is strange because the rpm I built for FE-devel is
>>> jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7, not .fc6.
>> You forgot to "cvs up" your "common" directory. As a result, you've
>> submitted a .fc6 build request for development, resulting in _two_ (!)
>> src.rpms and .fc7 binary rpms:
>
> I'm going to re-push the following build-job results for FE development
> after removing the .fc6 src.rpms manually:
>
> dnsmasq/2.34-2.fc7
> eggdrop/1.6.18-4.fc7
> gaim-gaym/0.96-3.2.289svn.fc7
> highlight/2.4.8-1.fc7
> imlib2/1.3.0-1.fc7
> jd/1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7
> libburn/0.2.2-2.fc7
> libopts/27.4-1.fc7
> qstat/2.10-6.fc7
> ren/1.0-11.fc7
> testdisk/6.5-1.fc7
Thank you for pointing what is a problem.
Well, I was just planning to queue jd/1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7.1
(with common directory updated), but isn't it necessary?
Mamoru Tasaka
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list