Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change (was: Re: jd)

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Thu Oct 26 11:38:55 UTC 2006


On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:54:04 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:

> Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 03:17 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> >> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>> Package needs work. See bottom of build log:
> >>> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=20286
> >>>
> >> Well, this is due to desktop-file-install change (0.10->0.11).
> >> desktop-file-install 0.11 no longer accepts like X-Fedora or
> >> X-RedHat-Base...
> > 
> > Huh, really?  That would sound like a bug in desktop-file-install to me.
> > 
> > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ar01s03.html
> 
> Well, this is real. You can check this by:
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/20286-jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7/ppc/build.log
> Please see the bottom line of this log.
> 
> Mamoru

Still, the question is whether to fix desktop-file-install or our
spec files?

The build.log only says that either this is the new and expected behaviour
or there is a bug in d-f-i. Does desktop-file-validate give the same output?




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list