Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?

Sat Oct 28 21:18:34 UTC 2006

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:12:14PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> > Even if I had stayed with 1.2.X packages there would have been problems
> > coexisting with the atrpms repository...
> 
> Why? This only happens if you ignore that these packages exist
> and are used by a large number of people.

No answer on this one?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061028/3491827c/attachment.sig>