linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Enrico Scholz]

paul at xelerance.com (Paul Wouters) writes:

>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582
> ...
> But I don't think we should start using different c libraries for
> random binaries.

Tickets above are not for "random binaries" but for projects which are
designed for dietlibc. Using glibc for them would make binaries larger,
slower and increases memory usage without providing a single gain.



Enrico