linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Tue Oct 3 22:52:43 UTC 2006
> rather than to the packager. Also I don't buy the efficiency argument:
> glibc is used by every single executable in a Fedora environment, and
> therefore is constantly in memory and hot in the cache. There should be
> a powerful argument to link against something other than glibc, and a
> faster startup time seems unconvincing.
Enrico tested the running executables and found those statically linked
against dietlibc to be faster.
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list