linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Wed Oct 4 15:45:28 UTC 2006
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Static linkage against dietlibc, IMO is nothing but a script-kiddy's
> attempt to "pimping Linux". There should not be any room for such
> undertakings.
Extend that logic a little, and we shouldn't allow dietlibc in Extras at
all.
Either dietlibc OK for Extras and for Extras pkgs to link-against/use it, or
not. ATM, I'm personally leaning toward the former, especially in cases
where upstream and the packager/maintainer prefer using dietlibc.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list