linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:11 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>>>> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> writes:
> >> RC> In addition to all this, another issue has popped up, which IMO
> >> RC> renders shipping static libs as part of Fedora very questionable
> >> RC> (to say the least)
> >> RC> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209316
> >>
> >> Surely this is a bug in RPM, 
> > RH's rpm maintainers don't seem to agree, they closed it "WONTFIX" :(
> 
> It was jbj that closed it it WONTFIX, not the RH rpm maintainer.

<*grin*/> I am aware about this, nevertheless I regard anybody who
closes bugs on an FC package (Note: this PR was against rpm*fc5.*.rpm)
to be a RH maintainer.

Ralf