rpms/lua/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 lua.spec, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.6, 1.7

[Ville Skyttä]

On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 13:32 -0700, Hans de Goede wrote:

> * Sat Oct 14 2006 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> 5.1.1-1
> - New upstream release 5.1.1
> - Fix detection of readline during compile (iow add readline support back)
[...]
> --- lua.spec	28 Aug 2006 04:24:13 -0000	1.18
> +++ lua.spec	14 Oct 2006 20:32:35 -0000	1.19
> @@ -1,16 +1,14 @@
>  Name:           lua
> -Version:        5.1
> -Release:        7%{?dist}
> +Version:        5.1.1
> +Release:        1%{?dist}
>  Summary:        Powerful light-weight programming language
> -
>  Group:          Development/Languages
>  License:        MIT
[...]
> -BuildRequires:  readline-devel, ncurses-devel
> +BuildRequires:  readline-devel ncurses-devel

Doesn't linking lua with readline mean that the combined work now falls
under the GPL, not MIT?  If so, I think it would be good to change the
License tag to reflect that.  Or if possible, to split the parts that
have been linked with readline into a separate GPL licensed subpackage,
leaving everything else MIT.

Actually maybe even better, look into linking with libedit instead?
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2006-02/msg00472.html