Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Mon Oct 23 15:18:27 UTC 2006


Matthew Miller wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:13:12PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Sure.. however for Enterprise stuff... there are different
>> expectations for what is wanted than the latest and greatest. I was
>> trying to get some discussion before people start having to fix the
>> engines after the airplane is in the air..
> 
> I agree that it's essential to stop the free-for-all package churn that
> Extras goes through. It's pretty impressive, but an enterprise extras
> can't have 100+ packages updating every week.

Offhand, I couldn't disagree more.  You mean you'd rather live with the bugs
that those 100+ package updates fix?  No thanks.  If you don't want the
churn, then don't update your el4 boxen.

-- Rex




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list