Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Mon Oct 23 16:42:36 UTC 2006
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rex Dieter (rdieter at math.unl.edu) said:
>> Offhand, I couldn't disagree more. You mean you'd rather live with the
>> bugs
>> that those 100+ package updates fix? No thanks. If you don't want the
>> churn, then don't update your el4 boxen.
>
> So, you're requiring the user to explicitly browse the updates for
> security vs. non-security fixes, for example?
For iteration 1 of enterprise extras, yes. I have yet to see a reasonable
alternative: every proposal I've seen so far adds unreasonable bureaucracy
and/or administrative overhead.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list