Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras

[Ralph Angenendt]

Mike McGrath wrote:
> This is a tricky topic to discuss because the answer isn't so clear.
> On the one hand we should hold the EPEL packages to a high standard
> because that just comes along with being 'enterprise'.  On the other
> hand, we should assume our users will be knowledgeable professionals
> who, if need be, have their own policies and procedures in place to
> update packages and would therefore find broken packages before they
> make it into production environments.

Do you really think so (nothing against your positive view of users)?
Aren't there loads of people running RHEL because they get *support*
with it as they do not have the knowledge inhouse?

Regards,

Ralph


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061023/24f0856b/attachment.sig>