Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?

[Jeffrey C. Ollie]

On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 23:18 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:12:14PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> > > Even if I had stayed with 1.2.X packages there would have been problems
> > > coexisting with the atrpms repository...
> > 
> > Why? This only happens if you ignore that these packages exist
> > and are used by a large number of people.
> 
> No answer on this one?

If atrpms and FE both have asterisk packages it would be difficult to
use both repos at the same time.  In any case, the fact that a package
exists in another repo is not a good enough reason to keep it out of FE.

Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061028/7f3c2de3/attachment.sig>