Housekeeping (Was Re: FE Package Status of Sep 4, 2006)

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Wart schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> 28 Packages not present in the development repo
>> -> most of them probably should be marked as dead.package in cvs. If
>> they get re-submitted later they should go though a full review again.
> 
> Be careful with this.  Some of these packages were recently built, but
> didn't make it to the repo in time for the report (wfut, for example)

That why I had this add the end of my mail:

>> [...]
>> make sure that all "problem indicators" that are listed in two reports
>> in a row get attention by somebody
>> [...]

CU
thl