Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora

Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Fri Sep 8 12:58:25 UTC 2006


Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 12:46 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> Is this fixed scrollkeeper going to be issued as an update for FC-5 or
>>> am I going to have to retain ownership of /usr/share/omf in the FC-5
>>> branches of my affected package(s)?
>> Looking in cvs, I see that scrollkeeper only owns /usr/share/omf in the 
>> development "branch", and not the older (e.g. FC-5) branches. So I shall 
>> continue to have my packages own /usr/share/omf for the older releases 
>> when necessary.
> 
> That's fine for older branches.
> 

I still see no resolution or any solution in sight for the fact that 
most packages which currently own /usr/share/omf don't require 
scrollkeeper and that thus scrollkeeper owning /usr/share/omf now isn't 
any help at all, and thus all the filed bugs are a bit bogus.

Regards,

Hans





More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list