Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Fri Sep 8 12:58:25 UTC 2006
Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 12:46 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> Is this fixed scrollkeeper going to be issued as an update for FC-5 or
>>> am I going to have to retain ownership of /usr/share/omf in the FC-5
>>> branches of my affected package(s)?
>> Looking in cvs, I see that scrollkeeper only owns /usr/share/omf in the
>> development "branch", and not the older (e.g. FC-5) branches. So I shall
>> continue to have my packages own /usr/share/omf for the older releases
>> when necessary.
>
> That's fine for older branches.
>
I still see no resolution or any solution in sight for the fact that
most packages which currently own /usr/share/omf don't require
scrollkeeper and that thus scrollkeeper owning /usr/share/omf now isn't
any help at all, and thus all the filed bugs are a bit bogus.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list