Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild

[Ryan Skadberg]

I'd be willing to take over straw (as I am one of the maintainers of
straw), but am currently not an extras contributor.  I looked over the
process and it seems like most of it is based on putting a new package
in to extras.  Since this is just taking over the maintainership of a
package, is there a different path to take?

Skadz


On 9/18/06, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The deadline for the FE mass rebuild for FC6 was today, 153 packages
> which are still in the devel (package) repo have not had their
> needs.rebuild file treated in CVS.
>
> Attachments:
> - not-treated.txt: the 153 packages above
> - not-treated-already-removed.txt: not treated, but already removed
> - not-treated-deps.txt: packages that have dependencies to the above or
>   subpackages of the above, but are not listed in the above
>
> The not-treated-deps.txt list is informational -- it may contain false
> positives and lack some packages, and it does not take build
> dependencies into account.  Maintainers of packages listed in it may
> want to look into it anyway.
>
> Cleanup of packages listed in not-treated.txt from the devel package
> repo will start today.  Changing their status to orphaned and removing
> them from comps will be done a bit later, and packages that have
> dependencies to those removed will be cleaned up incrementally in the
> next few days.  Package dirs in CVS will be taken care of later, but
> anyway I suppose before FC-6 is branched.
>
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
>
>
>