Undefined non-weak symbol from rpmlint

[Mamoru Tasaka]

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> 
>> I am currently reviewing toped :
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200
>>
>> In the review process, I checked the binary rpm rebuilt by rpmlint
>> as "rpmlint toped-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm", and the result was clean.
>> However, once I install toped and try "rpmlint toped", I get lots
>> of "undefined non-weak symbol" complaint like:
>>
>> W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0
>> wxEVT_LOG_ERRMESSAGE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
>> /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 CmdList W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
>> /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 wxEVT_FUNC_BROWSER W: toped
>> undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 Properties W: toped
>> undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5DBboxmlERK3CTM
>> W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0
>> _ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol
>> /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlistD1Ev
>> ............................
>>
>> So my question is:
>> B. Are these complaints BLOCKERs for approving this package?
> 
> Probably.  It should at least be looked into.
> 
> -- Rex
> 

Well, it seems difficult for me to resolve these complaints.
I asked the submitter of this bug to contact upstream, however,
it would be appreciated if someone would resolve this issue.

Mamoru