Patents != patents ?
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Sep 29 08:56:18 UTC 2006
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> >I would ask the patent holders if they can explicitely allow Fedora
> >redistribution of vtk if it is deemed a viable modus by fedora
> >(legal?).
>
> Which license is vtk under? If it is BSD-like I understand the issue, but
> if it's (L)GPL the license text says it implies that the authors give a
> royalty-free license of their own patents for anyone using the code under
> the (L)GPL, and this is actually quite common I think, and then there is
> no issue, we (all (L)GPL software) already have a license for the patents.
Unfortunately it's BSD like. I wasn't aware of this kind of difference
between the licenses, thanks for clarifying.
Still the issue remains: The authors have hold of the patents and
fedora extras would need special permission. Would fedora
extras/legal/"" go along?
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060929/7a640ed6/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list