From mkokotovich at hotmail.com Sun Apr 1 14:36:24 2007 From: mkokotovich at hotmail.com (Matt Kokotovich) Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:36:24 -0500 Subject: Audacious Update Message-ID: <460FC368.6040809@hotmail.com> Hello, Audacious 1.3 has been released for quite a while now, and I've checked the Fedora Extras repository frequently for my highly anticipated update from its current version of 1.2.2. There are quite a few important bug fixes and feature additions, from what I have read in the release notes. I would really appreciate if an updated version could be added to Extras; I can never get the plugins to work correctly when I compile everything from source. Thanks a lot, I look forward to your response! Matt Kokotovich From fedora at camperquake.de Sun Apr 1 14:41:33 2007 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 16:41:33 +0200 Subject: Audacious Update In-Reply-To: <460FC368.6040809@hotmail.com> References: <460FC368.6040809@hotmail.com> Message-ID: <20070401164133.3fb2ca2a@lain.camperquake.de> Hi. On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:36:24 -0500, Matt Kokotovich wrote > Audacious 1.3 has been released for quite a while now, and I've > checked the Fedora Extras repository frequently for my highly > anticipated update from its current version of 1.2.2. There are > quite a few important bug fixes and feature additions, from what I > have read in the release notes. I would really appreciate if an > updated version could be added to Extras; I can never get the plugins > to work correctly when I compile everything from source. An update is in the queue, expected to be released next week. From mkokotovich at hotmail.com Mon Apr 2 01:15:29 2007 From: mkokotovich at hotmail.com (Matt Kokotovich) Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:15:29 -0500 Subject: Audacious Update In-Reply-To: <20070401164133.3fb2ca2a@lain.camperquake.de> References: <460FC368.6040809@hotmail.com> <20070401164133.3fb2ca2a@lain.camperquake.de> Message-ID: <46105931.5090900@hotmail.com> That is great news, thanks for the reply. Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:36:24 -0500, Matt Kokotovich wrote > > >> Audacious 1.3 has been released for quite a while now, and I've >> checked the Fedora Extras repository frequently for my highly >> anticipated update from its current version of 1.2.2. There are >> quite a few important bug fixes and feature additions, from what I >> have read in the release notes. I would really appreciate if an >> updated version could be added to Extras; I can never get the plugins >> to work correctly when I compile everything from source. >> > > An update is in the queue, expected to be released next week. > > From katzj at redhat.com Mon Apr 2 01:35:31 2007 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:35:31 -0400 Subject: Changing fedora-cvs in bugzilla In-Reply-To: <1175359380.4329.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070328154825.0235dca6@banea.int.addix.net> <20070331175212.63cec6d8@lain.camperquake.de> <1175359380.4329.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1175477731.3140.20.camel@aglarond.local> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 09:43 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > There is a delay. The bugzilla sync was on a daily sync. mmcgrath was > looking into putting it on an hourly cron job like our other account > system syncs. I'm not sure where it is right now. It's actually every four hours. It could be changed to every hour, but the main reason we don't is just to avoid too much load on bugzilla Jeremy From Matt_Domsch at dell.com Mon Apr 2 12:55:27 2007 From: Matt_Domsch at dell.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:55:27 -0500 Subject: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2007-04-02 Message-ID: <20070402125527.GA7665@humbolt.us.dell.com> Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Mon Apr 2 05:00:32 CDT 2007 Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ Total packages: 2876 Number failed to build: 54 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 20 Leaving: 34 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 34 ---------------------------------- Democracy-0.9.5.1-6.fc7 tscherf at redhat.com R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-8.fc6 tcallawa at redhat.com airsnort-0.2.7e-11.fc7 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de atitvout-0.4-6 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de banshee-0.11.5-1.fc7 caillon at redhat.com checkstyle-4.1-4jpp.1.fc7 nsantos at redhat.com csound-5.03.0-9.fc7 dcbw at redhat.com,paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk em8300-kmod-0.16.1-7.2.6.20_1.2997.fc7 ville.skytta at iki.fi fakeroot-1.5.10-13.fc7 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net flumotion-0.2.1-3.fc6 thomas at apestaart.org gift-0.11.8.1-6.fc7 rdieter at math.unl.edu gtk-sharp-1.0.10-12.fc7 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk jflex-1.3.5-2jpp.1.fc7 mwringe at redhat.com jogl-1.0.0-5.7.beta5.fc6 green at redhat.com kooldock-0.3-4.20060720cvs.fc6 mr.ecik at gmail.com kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de libpaper-1.1.20-5.fc6 tcallawa at redhat.com libpolyxmass-0.9.0-6.fc5 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de mlton-20061107-2.fc7 adam at spicenitz.org nomadsync-0.4.2-13.fc6 triad at df.lth.se orpie-1.4.3-5.fc6 lists at forevermore.net pdftk-1.41-3.fc7 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de php-pecl-Fileinfo-1.0.4-1.fc7 fedora at theholbrooks.org prewikka-0.9.8-1.fc7 tscherf at redhat.com python-amara-1.1.9-7.fc7 jamatos at fc.up.pt python-reportlab-2.0-2.fc7 bdpepple at ameritech.net qa-assistant-0.4.90.5-2.fc6 toshio at tiki-lounge.com s3switch-0.0-9.20020912.fc6 paul at xelerance.com scipy-0.5.2-1.fc7 jspaleta at gmail.com steghide-0.5.1-2.fc6 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de sysprof-kmod-1.0.8-1.2.6.20_1.3024.fc7 giallu at gmail.com xmldiff-0.6.7-12.fc6 stickster at gmail.com xsupplicant-1.2.8-1.fc7.1 tcallawa at redhat.com zope-2.9.4-2.fc6 jonathansteffan at gmail.com With bugs filed: 0 ---------------------------------- -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com From Matt_Domsch at dell.com Mon Apr 2 12:57:23 2007 From: Matt_Domsch at dell.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:57:23 -0500 Subject: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2007-04-02 Message-ID: <20070402125723.GA7700@humbolt.us.dell.com> Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Mon Apr 2 05:07:01 CDT 2007 Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ Total packages: 2876 Number failed to build: 29 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 2 Leaving: 27 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 27 ---------------------------------- Democracy-0.9.5.1-6.fc7 tscherf at redhat.com R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-8.fc6 tcallawa at redhat.com airsnort-0.2.7e-11.fc7 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de banshee-0.11.5-1.fc7 caillon at redhat.com checkstyle-4.1-4jpp.1.fc7 nsantos at redhat.com csound-5.03.0-9.fc7 dcbw at redhat.com,paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk em8300-kmod-0.16.1-7.2.6.20_1.2997.fc7 ville.skytta at iki.fi fakeroot-1.5.10-13.fc7 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net flumotion-0.2.1-3.fc6 thomas at apestaart.org gift-0.11.8.1-6.fc7 rdieter at math.unl.edu gtk-sharp-1.0.10-12.fc7 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk jflex-1.3.5-2jpp.1.fc7 mwringe at redhat.com jogl-1.0.0-5.7.beta5.fc6 green at redhat.com kooldock-0.3-4.20060720cvs.fc6 mr.ecik at gmail.com kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de libpaper-1.1.20-5.fc6 tcallawa at redhat.com nomadsync-0.4.2-13.fc6 triad at df.lth.se orpie-1.4.3-5.fc6 lists at forevermore.net pdftk-1.41-3.fc7 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de php-pecl-Fileinfo-1.0.4-1.fc7 fedora at theholbrooks.org qa-assistant-0.4.90.5-2.fc6 toshio at tiki-lounge.com scipy-0.5.2-1.fc7 jspaleta at gmail.com steghide-0.5.1-2.fc6 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de sysprof-kmod-1.0.8-1.2.6.20_1.3024.fc7 giallu at gmail.com xmldiff-0.6.7-12.fc6 stickster at gmail.com xsupplicant-1.2.8-1.fc7.1 tcallawa at redhat.com zope-2.9.4-2.fc6 jonathansteffan at gmail.com With bugs filed: 0 ---------------------------------- -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com From fedora at camperquake.de Mon Apr 2 20:34:05 2007 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:34:05 +0200 Subject: Audacious Update In-Reply-To: <46105931.5090900@hotmail.com> References: <460FC368.6040809@hotmail.com> <20070401164133.3fb2ca2a@lain.camperquake.de> <46105931.5090900@hotmail.com> Message-ID: <20070402223405.45d28595@lain.camperquake.de> Hi. On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:15:29 -0500, Matt Kokotovich wrote > That is great news, thanks for the reply. 1.3.1 will hit devel probably tomorrow, and if not too many people complain fc6 will get the port by the weekend. From livinded at deadbytes.net Tue Apr 3 21:52:54 2007 From: livinded at deadbytes.net (livinded) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:52:54 -0700 Subject: find_lang Message-ID: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> I'm packaging kdebluetooth and trying to use find_lang to setup the locale files that are included. The problem is that there are many different files (for each language) that do not follow a specific naming scheme and I'm trying to figure out what to pass to find_lang. Can I just pass "*"? From chris.stone at gmail.com Tue Apr 3 22:04:48 2007 From: chris.stone at gmail.com (Christopher Stone) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:04:48 -0700 Subject: find_lang In-Reply-To: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> Message-ID: On 4/3/07, livinded wrote: > I'm packaging kdebluetooth and trying to use find_lang to setup the > locale files that are included. The problem is that there are many > different files (for each language) that do not follow a specific naming > scheme and I'm trying to figure out what to pass to find_lang. Can I > just pass "*"? I think you can just cat all your lang files into %{name}.lang and use that. From livinded at deadbytes.net Tue Apr 3 22:25:52 2007 From: livinded at deadbytes.net (livinded) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:25:52 -0700 Subject: find_lang Message-ID: <4612D470.10009@deadbytes.net> Why would I cat language files into that. find_lang is supposed to do that for me. From rdieter at math.unl.edu Tue Apr 3 23:16:43 2007 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:16:43 -0500 Subject: find_lang In-Reply-To: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> Message-ID: livinded wrote: > I'm packaging kdebluetooth... I'd suggest taking a look at work already in progress: kdebluetooth Package Review: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/186452 -- Rex From gilboad at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 12:11:12 2007 From: gilboad at gmail.com (Gilboa Davara) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:11:12 +0300 Subject: find_lang (kdebluetooth review) In-Reply-To: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> Message-ID: <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 14:52 -0700, livinded wrote: > I'm packaging kdebluetooth and trying to use find_lang to setup the > locale files that are included. The problem is that there are many > different files (for each language) that do not follow a specific naming > scheme and I'm trying to figure out what to pass to find_lang. Can I > just pass "*"? > Hello there. I'm currently tying to get kdebluetooth reviewed. (Using Rex' kde-redhat packages) In general, there's one blocking issue with getting it out - kdepin: It seems that new(er) versions of bluez-utils no longer supports older pin-helpers - relaying instead on DBUS notifications and as such, bluez-utils must be patched in-order to support the old(er) dbus-less kdebluetooth. Once I'll get F7T3 running, I'll create a patched version of bluez-utils - and if it works, submit the patch to the upstream maintainer. For now, I've uploaded an updated SRPM with a couple of SPEC file clean-ups. [1] - Gilboa [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 From rdieter at math.unl.edu Wed Apr 4 13:34:15 2007 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:34:15 -0500 Subject: find_lang (kdebluetooth review) In-Reply-To: <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> Message-ID: Gilboa Davara wrote: > I'm currently tying to get kdebluetooth reviewed. (Using Rex' kde-redhat > packages) > In general, there's one blocking issue with getting it out - kdepin: > It seems that new(er) versions of bluez-utils no longer supports older > pin-helpers - relaying instead on DBUS notifications and as such, > bluez-utils must be patched in-order to support the old(er) dbus-less > kdebluetooth. In a perfect world, kdebluetooth could use dbus too. :) > Once I'll get F7T3 running, I'll create a patched version of bluez-utils > - and if it works, submit the patch to the upstream maintainer. I can help incorporate any patches upstream. -- Rex From mattdm at mattdm.org Wed Apr 4 14:05:22 2007 From: mattdm at mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:05:22 -0400 Subject: find_lang (kdebluetooth review) In-Reply-To: <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> Message-ID: <20070404140522.GA22853@jadzia.bu.edu> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:11:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > In general, there's one blocking issue with getting it out - kdepin: > It seems that new(er) versions of bluez-utils no longer supports older > pin-helpers - relaying instead on DBUS notifications and as such, > bluez-utils must be patched in-order to support the old(er) dbus-less > kdebluetooth. > Once I'll get F7T3 running, I'll create a patched version of bluez-utils > - and if it works, submit the patch to the upstream maintainer. > Wouldn't the more useful patch update kdebluetooth to use dbus? -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org Boston University Linux ------> From gilboad at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 14:20:24 2007 From: gilboad at gmail.com (Gilboa Davara) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:20:24 +0300 Subject: find_lang (kdebluetooth review) In-Reply-To: References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> Message-ID: <1175696424.7656.18.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 08:34 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > I'm currently tying to get kdebluetooth reviewed. (Using Rex' kde-redhat > > packages) > > In general, there's one blocking issue with getting it out - kdepin: > > It seems that new(er) versions of bluez-utils no longer supports older > > pin-helpers - relaying instead on DBUS notifications and as such, > > bluez-utils must be patched in-order to support the old(er) dbus-less > > kdebluetooth. > > In a perfect world, kdebluetooth could use dbus too. :) > > > Once I'll get F7T3 running, I'll create a patched version of bluez-utils > > - and if it works, submit the patch to the upstream maintainer. > > I can help incorporate any patches upstream. > > -- Rex > In the mean time, I've managed to FUBAR the old review... somehow I got mixed up between the different people and versions that flew around. To clean up the mess (that I've created...), I'm closing the original BZ and, CC# everybody to a new, hopefully cleaner, review request. New BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 If anyone is willing to do review my request, I'll be eternally grateful. - Gilboa From gilboad at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 14:56:07 2007 From: gilboad at gmail.com (Gilboa Davara) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:56:07 +0300 Subject: find_lang (kdebluetooth review) In-Reply-To: <20070404140522.GA22853@jadzia.bu.edu> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> <20070404140522.GA22853@jadzia.bu.edu> Message-ID: <1175698567.7656.31.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 10:05 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:11:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > In general, there's one blocking issue with getting it out - kdepin: > > It seems that new(er) versions of bluez-utils no longer supports older > > pin-helpers - relaying instead on DBUS notifications and as such, > > bluez-utils must be patched in-order to support the old(er) dbus-less > > kdebluetooth. > > Once I'll get F7T3 running, I'll create a patched version of bluez-utils > > - and if it works, submit the patch to the upstream maintainer. > > > > Wouldn't the more useful patch update kdebluetooth to use dbus? > > Yes it would - by far. But considering how close T4 is, I doubt that I'll have sufficient time to either port the kdebluetooth/KDE DBUS support to 3.5.x (is it even possible?) or add DBUS support for kdepin from scratch. (I'm the packager - not the original upstream developer so I'll need to know my way around the code first) AFAICS, the patch itself [1] looks reasonable enough. However, I want to test it with both kdebluetooth and bluez-gnome don't kick the bucket on this one. - Gilboa [1] http://www.kmobiletools.org/node/228 From livinded at deadbytes.net Wed Apr 4 17:14:51 2007 From: livinded at deadbytes.net (livinded) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:14:51 -0700 Subject: find_lang (kdebluetooth review) In-Reply-To: <1175698567.7656.31.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> <20070404140522.GA22853@jadzia.bu.edu> <1175698567.7656.31.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> Message-ID: <4613DD0B.4060008@deadbytes.net> Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 10:05 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:11:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: >>> In general, there's one blocking issue with getting it out - kdepin: >>> It seems that new(er) versions of bluez-utils no longer supports older >>> pin-helpers - relaying instead on DBUS notifications and as such, >>> bluez-utils must be patched in-order to support the old(er) dbus-less >>> kdebluetooth. >>> Once I'll get F7T3 running, I'll create a patched version of bluez-utils >>> - and if it works, submit the patch to the upstream maintainer. >>> >> Wouldn't the more useful patch update kdebluetooth to use dbus? >> >> > > Yes it would - by far. > But considering how close T4 is, I doubt that I'll have sufficient time > to either port the kdebluetooth/KDE DBUS support to 3.5.x (is it even > possible?) or add DBUS support for kdepin from scratch. (I'm the > packager - not the original upstream developer so I'll need to know my > way around the code first) > > AFAICS, the patch itself [1] looks reasonable enough. > However, I want to test it with both kdebluetooth and bluez-gnome don't > kick the bucket on this one. > > - Gilboa > [1] http://www.kmobiletools.org/node/228 > > The developers of kdebluetooth say that with the release of KDE4 with they plan on rewriting it with dbus support to get it working again with the BlueZ-3.x branch and take advantage of KDE being written to have dbus support. From bugs.michael at gmx.net Wed Apr 4 18:08:51 2007 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:08:51 +0200 Subject: find_lang In-Reply-To: <4612D470.10009@deadbytes.net> References: <4612D470.10009@deadbytes.net> Message-ID: <20070404200851.c019ba3e.bugs.michael@gmx.net> On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:25:52 -0700, livinded wrote: > Why would I cat language files into that. find_lang is supposed to do > that for me. Probably you've misunderstood the reply you've got. The find_lang macro in redhat-rpm-config is not up-to-date and less "mighty" than than /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh in that it lacks the --all-name option you look for. As a work-around, you can either do %find_lang name1 %find_lang name2 cat name2.lang >> name1.lang %files -f name1.lang with as many names as you need. Or you call /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh explicitly instead of using %find_lang: /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %name --all-name %files -f %name.lang Or (and *only* if the language files have a common prefix!) you can do a nasty thing like this: %find_lang name.\* %files -f name.\*.lang Here, "name.\*" is both a regular expression and the file name for the .lang file. Looks weird'n'ugly, is weird'n'ugly, but still works. From gilboad at gmail.com Thu Apr 5 01:41:35 2007 From: gilboad at gmail.com (Gilboa Davara) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:41:35 +0300 Subject: find_lang (kdebluetooth review) In-Reply-To: <4613DD0B.4060008@deadbytes.net> References: <4612CCB6.4060100@deadbytes.net> <1175688672.7656.13.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> <20070404140522.GA22853@jadzia.bu.edu> <1175698567.7656.31.camel@gilboa-work-dev.localdomain> <4613DD0B.4060008@deadbytes.net> Message-ID: <9050516b0704041841p44f6e72bxc18baed06ca3db96@mail.gmail.com> On 4/4/07, livinded wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 10:05 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:11:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > >>> In general, there's one blocking issue with getting it out - kdepin: > >>> It seems that new(er) versions of bluez-utils no longer supports older > >>> pin-helpers - relaying instead on DBUS notifications and as such, > >>> bluez-utils must be patched in-order to support the old(er) dbus-less > >>> kdebluetooth. > >>> Once I'll get F7T3 running, I'll create a patched version of bluez-utils > >>> - and if it works, submit the patch to the upstream maintainer. > >>> > >> Wouldn't the more useful patch update kdebluetooth to use dbus? > >> > >> > > > > Yes it would - by far. > > But considering how close T4 is, I doubt that I'll have sufficient time > > to either port the kdebluetooth/KDE DBUS support to 3.5.x (is it even > > possible?) or add DBUS support for kdepin from scratch. (I'm the > > packager - not the original upstream developer so I'll need to know my > > way around the code first) > > > > AFAICS, the patch itself [1] looks reasonable enough. > > However, I want to test it with both kdebluetooth and bluez-gnome don't > > kick the bucket on this one. > > > > - Gilboa > > [1] http://www.kmobiletools.org/node/228 > > > > > > The developers of kdebluetooth say that with the release of KDE4 with > they plan on rewriting it with dbus support to get it working again with > the BlueZ-3.x branch and take advantage of KDE being written to have > dbus support. > Indeed they are. However, we are require a stop-gate solution until KDE4 is released. (Most likely in F8 live-span) - Gilboa From fedora at camperquake.de Mon Apr 9 11:18:15 2007 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:18:15 +0200 Subject: audacious-plugin build failure Message-ID: <20070409131815.0ee1452c@lain.camperquake.de> Hi. Could someone knowledgable in mock mysteries have a look at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/31226-audacious-plugins-1.3.2-1.fc7/ ? It ought to build against audacious-devel-1.3.2-1.fc7 (which was built earlier and is available locally) and audacious-libs-1.3.2-1.fc7, but somehow wants to pull in an older libs version. I can not figure out the reason for that from the provided log files (and I can not get the audacious-devel-1.3.2-1.fc7 to check since they are not signed and pushed yet). Thanks. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Mon Apr 9 12:29:23 2007 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:29:23 +0200 Subject: audacious-plugin build failure In-Reply-To: <20070409131815.0ee1452c@lain.camperquake.de> References: <20070409131815.0ee1452c@lain.camperquake.de> Message-ID: <461A31A3.9080705@hhs.nl> Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > Could someone knowledgable in mock mysteries have a look at > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/31226-audacious-plugins-1.3.2-1.fc7/ > ? > > It ought to build against audacious-devel-1.3.2-1.fc7 (which was built > earlier and is available locally) and audacious-libs-1.3.2-1.fc7, > but somehow wants to pull in an older libs version. I can not figure > out the reason for that from the provided log files (and I can not > get the audacious-devel-1.3.2-1.fc7 to check since they are not > signed and pushed yet). > > Thanks. > This sounds to something similar as an other weird mock error already discussed on either f-e-l or f-d-l (I don't know as they end up in the same folder with my current mailfilter setup), this was determined to be a yum bug, and yum was fixed, dunno when the fixed yum will be available though. Regards, Hans From dtimms at iinet.net.au Mon Apr 9 21:42:42 2007 From: dtimms at iinet.net.au (David Timms) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:42:42 +1000 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? Message-ID: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> Hi, I noticed that pup updates and yum updates were failing to complete for the last 3 weeks or so. One of the packages was for clamav: installed clamav-db requires clamav version that is currently installed. I guessed this was a packaging error that would be solved in due course. What I realize now is that my clamav package is from freshrpms or rpmforge. Here the virus-definitions were in clamav-db, whereas in extras they are in clamav-data. So, while the EVR is higher -2 to -1, this wont upgrade the freshrpms packages because of the name change. Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be the nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it might be worth suggesting they do similar for their package ? DaveT. From jima at beer.tclug.org Mon Apr 9 21:44:38 2007 From: jima at beer.tclug.org (Jima) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:44:38 -0500 (CDT) Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote: > Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be the > nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it might be > worth suggesting they do similar for their package ? -1, Flamebait ;-) Jima From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Tue Apr 10 09:46:06 2007 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:46:06 +0200 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> Jima wrote : > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote: > > Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be the > > nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it might be > > worth suggesting they do similar for their package ? > > -1, Flamebait ;-) Why? First of all, the package doesn't come from freshrpms, but rpmforge, as I've never packaged it on freshrpms ;-) Second, you should contact Dries and suggest : 1) To remove the rpmforge clamav packages for the Fedora releases which have them in Extras 2) To consider using the clamav-db name instead of clamav-data Then also poke the Extras clamav maintainer to have the proper "Obsoletes: clamav-db <= last-known-V-R" added to the clamav-data package. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 Load : 3.34 6.37 4.87 From denis at poolshark.org Tue Apr 10 13:38:52 2007 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:38:52 +0200 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> Message-ID: <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> Matthias Saou wrote: > Jima wrote : > >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote: >>> Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be the >>> nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it might be >>> worth suggesting they do similar for their package ? >> -1, Flamebait ;-) > > Why? First of all, the package doesn't come from freshrpms, but > rpmforge, as I've never packaged it on freshrpms ;-) > Second, you should contact Dries and suggest : > 1) To remove the rpmforge clamav packages for the Fedora releases which > have them in Extras > 2) To consider using the clamav-db name instead of clamav-data > > Then also poke the Extras clamav maintainer to have the proper > "Obsoletes: clamav-db <= last-known-V-R" added to the clamav-data > package. I read several complaints on fedora-list about the way clamav is packaged in Extras, I think that's why a lot of people use the RPMs from other repos... From alain.portal at free.fr Tue Apr 10 14:03:18 2007 From: alain.portal at free.fr (Alain PORTAL) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:03:18 +0200 Subject: Orphaning Piklab Message-ID: <200704101603.19619.alain.portal@free.fr> Hi, I'm orphaning piklab, an IDE for Microchip PIC microcontroller. I was the french translator and today, I'm in conflict with upstream because he always release new version without waiting translator's work neither prevent translator for a new release. This isn't how I understand collaborative job. So feel free to kick off my name of owners.list. There is a new release since yesterday, I won't packaged it. https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=138852&package_id=156570&release_id=499977 Regards Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en fran?ais http://manpagesfr.free.fr/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jima at beer.tclug.org Tue Apr 10 13:54:55 2007 From: jima at beer.tclug.org (Jima) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:54:55 -0500 (CDT) Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Matthias Saou wrote: > Jima wrote : >> -1, Flamebait ;-) > > Why? Because anytime we get into a discussion involving anything that could be construed as a turf war between Fedora and third-party (wait, second party...I think I coined that catchphrase) repositories, things tend to get ugly. Jima From dtimms at iinet.net.au Tue Apr 10 15:14:34 2007 From: dtimms at iinet.net.au (David Timms) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:14:34 +1000 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <461BA9DA.3000203@iinet.net.au> Denis Leroy wrote: > Matthias Saou wrote: >> Jima wrote : >> >>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote: >>>> Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would >>>> be the nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to >>>> package, it might be worth suggesting they do similar for their >>>> package ? >>> -1, Flamebait ;-) Jima: Can you estimate 'when' it's been discussed before ? >> Why? First of all, the package doesn't come from freshrpms, but >> rpmforge, as I've never packaged it on freshrpms ;-) I didn't spend the time to find out where it was from - sorry about that - but those two repos are the additional ones I have enabled on my system. >> Second, you should contact Dries and suggest : >> 1) To remove the rpmforge clamav packages for the Fedora releases which >> have them in Extras I might even have enabled the wrong fc release with rpmforge repo, I'll need to check that out. >> 2) To consider using the clamav-db name instead of clamav-data Which name fits the guidelines ? {-data is currently in extras} >> Then also poke the Extras clamav maintainer to have the proper >> "Obsoletes: clamav-db <= last-known-V-R" added to the clamav-data >> package. This will achieve what I though we would want in fedora;, but would also be susceptible to rpmforge releasing a later V or R, and causing a change to the rpmforge packages, wouldn't it ? > I read several complaints on fedora-list about the way clamav is > packaged in Extras, I think that's why a lot of people use the RPMs from > other repos... I don't have time at the moment to scan the archives. Can you remember if these seemed like fixable issues while still fitting the fedora packaging guidelines ? Thanks, DavidT. From jima at beer.tclug.org Tue Apr 10 15:51:37 2007 From: jima at beer.tclug.org (Jima) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:51:37 -0500 (CDT) Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <461BA9DA.3000203@iinet.net.au> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> <461BA9DA.3000203@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote: >>> Jima wrote : >>>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote: >>>>> Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be >>>>> the nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it >>>>> might be worth suggesting they do similar for their package ? >>>> -1, Flamebait ;-) > Jima: Can you estimate 'when' it's been discussed before ? This specific issue? I'm not sure it has. I was referring more to the act of starting a thread that pits Fedora against outside repository maintainers. >>> 2) To consider using the clamav-db name instead of clamav-data > Which name fits the guidelines ? {-data is currently in extras} Guidelines? Third-party repositories don't have to follow any guidelines besides their own (which is both good and bad). >>> Then also poke the Extras clamav maintainer to have the proper >>> "Obsoletes: clamav-db <= last-known-V-R" added to the clamav-data >>> package. > This will achieve what I though we would want in fedora;, but would also be > susceptible to rpmforge releasing a later V or R, and causing a change to the > rpmforge packages, wouldn't it ? This is the turf war angle I mentioned earlier. >> I read several complaints on fedora-list about the way clamav is packaged >> in Extras, I think that's why a lot of people use the RPMs from other >> repos... > I don't have time at the moment to scan the archives. Can you remember if > these seemed like fixable issues while still fitting the fedora packaging > guidelines ? It seems to me that issues with how a package is designed should be brought up via Requests For Enhancement in Bugzilla, not as complaints on a mailing list. I think RFEs have a better chance of being addressed. Jima From marc_schwartz at comcast.net Tue Apr 10 15:50:55 2007 From: marc_schwartz at comcast.net (Marc Schwartz) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:50:55 -0500 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> Message-ID: Denis Leroy wrote: > Matthias Saou wrote: >> Jima wrote : >> >>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote: >>>> Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would >>>> be the nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to >>>> package, it might be worth suggesting they do similar for their >>>> package ? >>> -1, Flamebait ;-) >> >> Why? First of all, the package doesn't come from freshrpms, but >> rpmforge, as I've never packaged it on freshrpms ;-) >> Second, you should contact Dries and suggest : >> 1) To remove the rpmforge clamav packages for the Fedora releases which >> have them in Extras >> 2) To consider using the clamav-db name instead of clamav-data >> >> Then also poke the Extras clamav maintainer to have the proper >> "Obsoletes: clamav-db <= last-known-V-R" added to the clamav-data >> package. > > I read several complaints on fedora-list about the way clamav is > packaged in Extras, I think that's why a lot of people use the RPMs from > other repos... Not just the packaging, but the lack of updates to the application (not the virus sigs): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230075 I have given up on FE's packaging at this point and gone ahead and updated from source to 0.90.1 on FC6. While there were some changes that needed to be made in configs, etc, it wasn't tragic. Enrico is going to have to address this at some point, or perhaps step aside and let someone else take on the burden. I appreciate his hesitancy regarding compatibility issues, but we all deal with that at some point or another in the life span of applications. Marc Schwartz From dtimms at iinet.net.au Tue Apr 10 15:56:48 2007 From: dtimms at iinet.net.au (David Timms) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:56:48 +1000 Subject: otrs-2.1.5 - can it operate with selinux on ? Message-ID: <461BB3C0.1030107@iinet.net.au> Hi I've had otrs-1 something and now 2.1.5 installed and working OKish. After I rebooted the machine it was no longer working and in fact I expect that I had previously setenforce 0 to disable selinux: with selinux enforcing, it is now giving the errors below. Can any otrs users state whether they are using it with selinux disabled or enabled ? If you have got it working with selinux enabled, is it working by default, or did you have to "take steps" :-) DaveT. ===== Apr 11 01:57:02 otrs kernel: audit(1176220622.775:14): avc: denied { unix_read unix_write } for pid=2162 comm="httpd" key=44442322 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tclass=shm Apr 11 01:57:02 otrs kernel: audit(1176220622.777:15): avc: denied { unix_read unix_write } for pid=2162 comm="httpd" key=44442321 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tclass=shm From chitlesh at fedoraproject.org Tue Apr 10 16:07:43 2007 From: chitlesh at fedoraproject.org (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:07:43 +0200 Subject: Orphaning Piklab In-Reply-To: <200704101603.19619.alain.portal@free.fr> References: <200704101603.19619.alain.portal@free.fr> Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0704100907mbd50729t36532aae903bc18b@mail.gmail.com> On 4/10/07, Alain PORTAL wrote: > I'm orphaning piklab, an IDE for Microchip PIC microcontroller. Hello, I'm willing to takeover :) what is the exact procedure ? chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Tue Apr 10 16:15:17 2007 From: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Mamoru Tasaka) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:15:17 +0900 Subject: Orphaning Piklab In-Reply-To: <13dbfe4f0704100907mbd50729t36532aae903bc18b@mail.gmail.com> References: <200704101603.19619.alain.portal@free.fr> <13dbfe4f0704100907mbd50729t36532aae903bc18b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <461BB815.6060300@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > On 4/10/07, Alain PORTAL wrote: >> I'm orphaning piklab, an IDE for Microchip PIC microcontroller. > > Hello, > I'm willing to takeover :) > what is the exact procedure ? > > > chitlesh Please check bug 208250. Mamoru From fedora at leemhuis.info Tue Apr 10 16:36:10 2007 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:36:10 +0200 Subject: PLEASE READ: This list is going to be closed end of this week Message-ID: <461BBCFA.2090802@leemhuis.info> Hi all! fedora-extras-list is going to be closed as discussed in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-March/msg00004.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-March/msg00197.html and agreed on by FESCo on it 20070308 meeting: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00482.html fedora-extras-list will thereby get closed soon, probably on Friday or Saturday this week; no further posting will be possible here. fedora-devel-list will be the mailing that acts as the direct successor for fedora-extras-list; all subscriber on this list that are not yet on fedora-devel-list got invited there some minutes ago. If you want to subscribe manually go to https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list Note that fedora-devel list is medium to high traffic list; the average was 55 to 60 mails each day in the past two months which is way more than fedora-extras-list saw in the last weeks. Further: Please note that besides fedora-devel-list there are other lists that in parts act as successor for fedora-extras-list at redhat.com as well. Maily: fedora-maintainers at redhat.com -> to announce important changes that might be relevant for other maintainers as well. The list is also for discussions that are for fedora-maintainers only, but we proably should try to do all discussions on fedora-devel-list, as everybody can participate there -- that includes people that sooner or later hopefully become fedora-maintainers. fedora-packaging at redhat.com -> This mailing list provides a discussion forum for RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora. CU thl From tibbs at math.uh.edu Tue Apr 10 16:55:00 2007 From: tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) Date: 10 Apr 2007 11:55:00 -0500 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> Message-ID: >>>>> "MS" == Marc Schwartz writes: MS> While there were some changes that needed to be made in configs, MS> etc, it wasn't tragic. It's pretty damn tragic if your running installation happens to break because the maintainer happens to push an update on the weekend you're out of town. You simply cannot require manual intervention for a simple update. F7 can get the new version. Really, Enrico's doing the proper thing here. The only complaint I'd make at the moment is that he's left in the "Your installation is OUTDATED" message that I get in my logs every day. But unless there are unpatched security issues in the stable release, I just don't see what the fuss is about. - J< From marc_schwartz at comcast.net Tue Apr 10 17:38:23 2007 From: marc_schwartz at comcast.net (Marc Schwartz) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:38:23 -0500 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <1176226703.5072.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 11:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "MS" == Marc Schwartz writes: > > MS> While there were some changes that needed to be made in configs, > MS> etc, it wasn't tragic. > > It's pretty damn tragic if your running installation happens to break > because the maintainer happens to push an update on the weekend you're > out of town. You simply cannot require manual intervention for a > simple update. F7 can get the new version. > > Really, Enrico's doing the proper thing here. The only complaint I'd > make at the moment is that he's left in the "Your installation is > OUTDATED" message that I get in my logs every day. But unless there > are unpatched security issues in the stable release, I just don't see > what the fuss is about. Jason, The issue is: 1. As far as I can see, unless you can point me to it, the latest version of clamav is not in any of the relevant repos targeted for F7. 2. This means that you will have to deal with this clamav upgrade post the F7 upgrade and face the same issues that you would face now on FC6 relative to config file breakage. 3. There are comments and pointers to scripts in the Bugzilla report that I referenced, by me and others, relative to at least possible and reasonable 'automated' upgrade processes during the RPM installation procedures. As far as I and others can tell, Enrico seems to be resistant to even exploring and testing these as possible options. 4. Take note of this post by Luca Gibelli of ClamAV a month ago, relative to the burden being placed on their signature update servers by users of versions prior to 0.90.x: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.user/25389 There are compelling reasons to upgrade beyond security patches and related considerations. Regards, Marc From jima at beer.tclug.org Tue Apr 10 17:44:57 2007 From: jima at beer.tclug.org (Jima) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:44:57 -0500 (CDT) Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <1176226703.5072.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> <1176226703.5072.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Marc Schwartz wrote: > The issue is: > > 1. As far as I can see, unless you can point me to it, the latest > version of clamav is not in any of the relevant repos targeted for F7. Huh? fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-data-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-data-empty-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-devel-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-filesystem-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-lib-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-milter-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-milter-sysv-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-server-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-server-sysv-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm fedora/extras/development/i386/clamav-update-0.90.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm Looks to me like 0.90.1 should be in F7. > 3. There are comments and pointers to scripts in the Bugzilla report > that I referenced, by me and others, relative to at least possible and > reasonable 'automated' upgrade processes during the RPM installation > procedures. As far as I and others can tell, Enrico seems to be > resistant to even exploring and testing these as possible options. While I may or may not agree with Enrico's positions on workarounds (which I readily admit I haven't looked at), I do respect his decision to hold off 0.90.1 until F7. Major bumps (especially ones that have serious potential to break installs) generally shouldn't happen within a release. Jima From tibbs at math.uh.edu Tue Apr 10 17:48:21 2007 From: tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) Date: 10 Apr 2007 12:48:21 -0500 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: <1176226703.5072.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> <1176226703.5072.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: >>>>> "MS" == Marc Schwartz writes: MS> 1. As far as I can see, unless you can point me to it, the latest MS> version of clamav is not in any of the relevant repos targeted for MS> F7. Currently in F7 is clamav-0.90.1-2. - J< From marc_schwartz at comcast.net Tue Apr 10 18:07:58 2007 From: marc_schwartz at comcast.net (Marc Schwartz) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:07:58 -0500 Subject: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ? In-Reply-To: References: <461AB352.3060100@iinet.net.au> <20070410114606.69d7619d@python3.es.egwn.lan> <461B936C.6040909@poolshark.org> <1176226703.5072.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1176228478.5072.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 12:48 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "MS" == Marc Schwartz writes: > > MS> 1. As far as I can see, unless you can point me to it, the latest > MS> version of clamav is not in any of the relevant repos targeted for > MS> F7. > > Currently in F7 is clamav-0.90.1-2. Thanks to both Jason and Jima for the pointer. I stand corrected on that issue. Marc From chitlesh at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 11 10:41:04 2007 From: chitlesh at fedoraproject.org (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:41:04 +0200 Subject: Packaging LabPlot In-Reply-To: <459A881C.9080507@gmail.com> References: <45965E3E.5070304@gmail.com> <13dbfe4f0701020307r7a18d08bp931cbcf45d880b75@mail.gmail.com> <459A881C.9080507@gmail.com> Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0704110341i22eb996fjc105b82176611a0a@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, recently, I've removed Paul F.Johnson from the reviewer's list. (no response since 2 months) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 Thus I'm looking for a reviewer :) I'm hoping to deploy Labplot on the nodes at my university by the time of F7 in favour for opensource software (fedora). http://clunixchit.blogspot.com/2006/12/migration-to-fedora-core-in-progress.html#links Possibly someone will back my effort. Paul F.Johson, you can still catch up the review :) regards, Chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com From limb at jcomserv.net Wed Apr 11 11:52:41 2007 From: limb at jcomserv.net (Jon Ciesla) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:52:41 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Packaging LabPlot In-Reply-To: <13dbfe4f0704110341i22eb996fjc105b82176611a0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <45965E3E.5070304@gmail.com> <13dbfe4f0701020307r7a18d08bp931cbcf45d880b75@mail.gmail.com> <459A881C.9080507@gmail.com> <13dbfe4f0704110341i22eb996fjc105b82176611a0a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <31464.65.192.24.190.1176292361.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> You scratch my back, I scratch yours? :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 > Hello there, > > recently, I've removed Paul F.Johnson from the reviewer's list. (no > response since 2 months) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 > > Thus I'm looking for a reviewer :) > > I'm hoping to deploy Labplot on the nodes at my university by the time > of F7 in favour for opensource software (fedora). > http://clunixchit.blogspot.com/2006/12/migration-to-fedora-core-in-progress.html#links > Possibly someone will back my effort. > > Paul F.Johson, you can still catch up the review :) > > regards, > Chitlesh > -- > http://clunixchit.blogspot.com > > -- > fedora-extras-list mailing list > fedora-extras-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > -- novus ordo absurdum From chitlesh at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 11 12:55:28 2007 From: chitlesh at fedoraproject.org (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:55:28 +0200 Subject: Packaging LabPlot In-Reply-To: <31464.65.192.24.190.1176292361.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> References: <45965E3E.5070304@gmail.com> <13dbfe4f0701020307r7a18d08bp931cbcf45d880b75@mail.gmail.com> <459A881C.9080507@gmail.com> <13dbfe4f0704110341i22eb996fjc105b82176611a0a@mail.gmail.com> <31464.65.192.24.190.1176292361.squirrel@mail.jcomserv.net> Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0704110555x7fc35f92y431682659d8d01f6@mail.gmail.com> On 4/11/07, Jon Ciesla wrote: > You scratch my back, I scratch yours? :) Hello, Mamuro already joined as the reviewer and I've already some packages under my name. I'll see what I can do this weekend. Chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com From fedora at leemhuis.info Fri Apr 13 17:01:04 2007 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:01:04 +0200 Subject: EOF Message-ID: <461FB750.5030105@leemhuis.info> Dear fedora-extras-list, good bye, you served us well over the last 2 1/3 years. Thanks for everything, we'll miss you! Sincerely yours. thl, speaking for all Fedora Extras contributors P.S.: If you are wondering what this mail is about: it should be the last mail that gets send and distributed by this list. I'm going to disallow posting now and thus close the list as announced in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-April/msg00033.html The archives of course stay open. Please use fedora-devel-list instead in the future. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 18 21:55:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175898] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV_XS - Comma-separated values manipulation routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704182155.l3ILtw6t007092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CSV_XS - Comma-separated values manipulation routines Alias: perl-Text-CSV_XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175898 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Text-CSV_XS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 23:12:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174504] Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704272312.l3RNCqwA023749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174504 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 19:12 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wine-docs New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 27 23:13:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704272313.l3RNDnIJ023809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-04-27 19:13 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wine New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 05:48:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176733] Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704300548.l3U5m58C026124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 30 12:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176733] Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200704301210.l3UCACjm011896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-04-30 08:09 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-DB Updated Fedora Owners: rpm at timj.co.uk,Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.