hunspell dictionaries, do I have to make 28 review request ?
Caolan McNamara
caolanm at redhat.com
Thu Feb 8 18:34:28 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 12:24 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Caolan McNamara (caolanm at redhat.com) said:
> > To that end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227811
> > is the Afrikaans dict. The question is, can I avoid having to making 27
> > extra review requests for the remaining dictionaries that I want to
> > split out of OOo (http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/) and get a
> > sort of blanket approval based off the Afrikaans dict review ?
>
> Is it essentially templated?
Yeah, they're all essentially the same, except the license differs as
LGPL/GPL/BSD from case to case. rpmdiff is silent on all of them.
I mean, I don't *really* mind making 27 separate package reviews, but
we've got a lot of package reviews outstanding already and it just seems
a little time-consuming to rinse and repeat so many times rather than
handle them all as one single request.
C.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list