hunspell dictionaries, do I have to make 28 review request ?

[Caolan McNamara]

On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 12:43 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "CM" == Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> writes:
> 
> CM> I mean, I don't *really* mind making 27 separate package reviews,
> CM> but we've got a lot of package reviews outstanding already and it
> CM> just seems a little time-consuming to rinse and repeat so many
> CM> times rather than handle them all as one single request.
> 
> We really want to have a review URL to put in the package database,
> and I don't know that we've ever allowed multiple packages to be
> reviewed in a single ticket.
> 
> So rather than having to go through a bunch of discussion to make new
> policy, it might just be simpler for someone to review the first one,
> then waste ten minutes in front of bugzilla entering "This is packaged
> identically to the first one; see (URL).  APPROVED".  (Of course, they
> should be checking to make sure that's actually the case.)

sure. not a problem. I'll pause on the first dict, and mirror any
required changed into the other and pile them on afterwards.

C.