Packaging kernel modules

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 21.02.2007 15:41, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> I guess that's because it is regarded as experimental by its author.

That's why CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL exists ;-)

CU
thl

> 2007/2/21, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>:
>> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 08:29, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>> Hi. Although my laptop is not yet (blame Toshiba) supported by it,
>>> I've been thinking about packaging the omnibook kernel module [1]. Is
>>> there any template I could start with, or shall I just take one of the
>>> kmod-foo specs and edit it accordingly? And are there any other things
>>> I should know about?
>> <obligatory response>
>> Why is the omnibook kernel module not upstream yet?
>> </obligatory response>
>>
>> --
>> Jesse Keating
>> Release Engineer: Fedora
>>
>> --
>> fedora-extras-list mailing list
>> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>>
>>
>>
>