EPEL owners (was: Re: owners owners.epel.list,1.42,1.43)
Ville Skyttä
ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sun Feb 25 11:12:05 UTC 2007
On Sunday 25 February 2007, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Author: ausil
>
> Update of /cvs/extras/owners
> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8651
>
> Modified Files:
> owners.epel.list
> Log Message:
> add missing items from EPEL list
Looks like this was done without asking the respective package owners whether
they're interested in maintaining those packages in EPEL. I know I wasn't
asked, yet rpmlint and rpmdevtools were imported by someone else but assigned
to me. Please don't do that - in worst cases that may mean the packages are
effectively unmaintained as the reports go to people who have no plans to do
anything about them.
There were also some "branched for infrastructure" commits lately; were the
newly added EPEL owners asked in those cases?
As a side note, I most likely will be interested in maintaining some EPEL5
packages later, but probably not EPEL4.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list