FESCo Meeting Summary for 2007-02-08
Michael Schwendt
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Thu Feb 15 14:17:57 UTC 2007
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:00:19 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > mktemp -ud also returns a new path with every invocation. A buildroot that
> > becomes a moving target (even when overriding %_tmppath) is impractical for
> > --short-circuit builds or anything where you would want to examine the
> > buildroot contents.
>
> Without a unique buildroot for each build, you're back to the problem of
> overwriting or picking something up that you didn't put there in the first
> place.
No, because every spec file does "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" at the beginning
of %install. All that is needed is making %_tmppath point to the user's
private space. And that is highly recommended for many years.
> I do believe the patches that were sent upstream to do BuildRoot
> internally within RPM make use of unique directories per build.
Raises the question why there is a draft on making a specific BuildRoot
mandatory?
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list