About missing reviews
Christian Iseli
Christian.Iseli at licr.org
Mon Jan 1 23:26:59 UTC 2007
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:48:31 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Can (or will) the new shiny package database contain a 'last reviewed'
> field?
Yes, there will be a "reviewed" field, with a date, the ID of the
reviewer and a URL pointing to the review
> We could sort on that and go thru the list from oldest to
> newest.
Yup
> I don't think thats a very good idea personally... If a re-review of a
> package shows problems, why not file them as bugs? The maintainer can
> explain why they might not be real bugs, etc.. also as a bonus this
> could show a package that could be orphaned due to lack of maintainer
> response.
I tend to like the bugzilla way too.
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:07:41 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> If you really really want to do this, we should really really take a
> very hard look at toolizing some of the review process, as has been
> mentioned before. The more specific policy items we can script checks
> for the less manpower we will need to burn on re-reviews. Granted not
> everything that needs to be reviewed can be toolized or scripted, but
> certainly specific policy item that have evolved over time could be,
> like the python-abi defines, or the setting of the Fedora-Extras
> Category in desktop files.
A few tools could help. I was semi-daydreaming some sort of exploded
review entry in the package database, where each must/should item has
its own entry, date of checking, who did the check, that sort of
thing. It sounds darn heavy-weight, but on the other hand, new
must/should item could be checked individually when new packaging rules
are devised, and some of them could be checked by tools like you
suggest...
> I believe re-reviews would have value, but without new tools in place
> to script some of the checking we will continue to be too manpower
> poor for this to be worthwhile compared to other work.
Agreed.
> In the meantime, if a lack of a review trail for fedora.us era
> packages is blocking the ability to spin-up new and interesting
> downstream projects as Jesse suggests, then its worth doing something
> about that now since there is an additional payoff other than general
> cobweb removal.
I did some heavy trimming of my missing_review list, removing packages
appearing before July 2005, and also attempting to remove packages
resulting from name changes. I now have this short list of 82 packages
that appear to be recent, but where I can't find the review ticket. I
already tracked one to a typo in the review ticket summary field. If a
few kind souls have a little spare time, they might lend a hand to
help further shrink this list.
I guess we'll soon need a lore-master... telling us the story of
packages old and new... sounds like a fitting time of the year to tell
stories that start with "Once upon a time" :-)
Cheers,
C
----
andreas bawue net dd_rescue
andreas bierfert lowlatency de koffice-langpack
andreas bierfert lowlatency de koffice
andreas bierfert lowlatency de libetpan
bdpepple ameritech net galago-filesystem
bdpepple ameritech net telepathy-filesystem
cgoorah yahoo com au kadischi
dakingun gmail com exaile
danken cs technion ac il tetex-fonts-hebrew
denis poolshark org NetworkManager-vpnc
devrim commandprompt com python-psycopg2
dm mensa se initng-ifiles
enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de gif2png
eric tanguy univ-nantes fr qucs
extras-orphan fedoraproject org alacarte
extras-orphan fedoraproject org at-poke
extras-orphan fedoraproject org gstreamer08-python
extras-orphan fedoraproject org lirc-kmod-common
extras-orphan fedoraproject org lirc-kmod
extras-orphan fedoraproject org roundup
extras-orphan fedoraproject org thinkpad-kmod-common
extras-orphan fedoraproject org thinkpad-kmod
extras-orphan fedoraproject org v2strip
green redhat com ladspa-swh-plugins
hamzy us ibm com sblim-cmpi-devel
hamzy us ibm com sblim-testsuite
hamzy us ibm com sblim-wbemcli
hamzy us ibm com tog-pegasus
jamatos fc up pt fftw2
jamatos fc up pt pyparsing
jima beer tclug org bwm-ng
jnovy redhat com nedit
jonathan underwood gmail com emacs-common-muse
joost cnoc nl fpc
jspaleta gmail com gpodder
j w r degoede hhs nl dia
j w r degoede hhs nl worminator-data
lmacken redhat com python-formencode
lmacken redhat com python-paste-deploy
lmacken redhat com python-paste-script
lmacken redhat com python-sqlobject
luya_tfz thefinalzone com gdesklets
matthias rpmforge net liboil
ndbecker2 gmail com filelight
ndbecker2 gmail com uncrustify
orion cora nwra com python-numarray
paul all-the-johnsons co uk gconvert
paul all-the-johnsons co uk gtksharp
paul all-the-johnsons co uk lib765
paul all-the-johnsons co uk libdsk
paul xelerance com gaim-otr
paul xelerance com libotr
petersen redhat com ddskk
pnasrat redhat com splint
qspencer ieee org ufsparse
rdieter math unl edu uw-imap
somlo cmu edu argus
splinux fedoraproject org gdmap
splinux fedoraproject org glipper
splinux fedoraproject org gstm
splinux fedoraproject org pessulus
steve silug org perl-Unix-Statgrab
tagoh redhat com apel
tagoh redhat com Canna
tagoh redhat com kasumi
tcallawa redhat com compat-wxPythonGTK2
tcallawa redhat com pam_pkcs11
tcallawa redhat com perl-Class-Accessor
tcallawa redhat com perl-Class-Whitehole
tcallawa redhat com perl-DBD-SQLite2
tcallawa redhat com perl-UNIVERSAL-exports
tcallawa redhat com perl-UNIVERSAL-moniker
tcallawa redhat com stripesnoop
thomas apestaart org libannodex
thomas apestaart org libcmml
thomas apestaart org liboggz
thomas apestaart org mod_annodex
tscherf redhat com libpreludedb
ville skytta iki fi xemacs-packages-base
wart kobold org iwidgets
yufanyufan gmail com audacious-itouch
zing fastmail fm mmv
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list