Package review status

[Hans de Goede]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> writes:
> 
> HdG> I maintain close to 100 packages, I'm sure quite a few of them
> HdG> stem from fedora.us and the last thing I want is maintainance
> HdG> work without any real gains.
> 
> Having clean packages which follow the packaging guidelines is a real
> gain.
> 

True, but they are already clean and follow the guidelines, this 
exercise can lead to much hairsplitting leading to unneeded updates and 
thus unneeded work. First lets create a set of rules for re-review and 
then discuss this further. For example what if a spelling error is found 
in a %description, does that warrant a new release (even if only for 
development)? What if its a 100Mb package, does it then still warrant a 
new release etc?

Regards,

Hans