Fedora Extras License Audit
Roozbeh Pournader
roozbeh at farsiweb.info
Wed Jan 24 11:58:29 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 12:27 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The "License" field is insufficient. It is suitable for summing up the
> relevant licence acronyms, but it cannot serve as a substitute for the
> licence terms.
>
> If files included within a project are GPL'ed and other files are licensed
> under a different licence, the combined work must be GPL'ed, too. It
> cannot be LGPL'ed, because the LGPL is _less_ restrictive compared with
> the GPL. For LGPL, all files must be LGPL'ed.
OK, I just opened a bug for Pango and CC-ed you and spot:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224135
Roozbeh
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list