Data Packages Guideline

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:32:17PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le samedi 03 mars 2007 à 20:14 +0100, Axel Thimm a écrit :
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:28:45AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 09:35 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> 
> > > If it's 100% process it should be in Extras/ rather than Packaging/  ...
> > > So no need to get it approved by the Packaging Committee -- just needs
> > > to find a good home under Extras/
> > 
> > could you perhaps extend it to mention firmwares and fonts as further
> > examples for package that should not carry %dists and be the same
> > cross-distribution (and also handled the same)?
> 
> Please don't - fontconfig logic can be very different from distribution
> to distribution and release to release, fonts are *not* a good
> cross-distribution candidate unless you want to promote gigantic
> scriptlets

OK, withdrawing fonts, then, I thought that it would had settled by
now.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20070303/a929f683/attachment.sig>