Data Packages Guideline

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:04:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net> writes:
> 
> AT> If the existing guidelines cover this (which they do), then why
> AT> add it?
> 
> Because it needs to be written down somewhere.
> 
> AT> Anything for the packaging guidelines needs to be voted upon.
> 
> No disagreement, but this isn't a modification to the packaging
> guidelines.

It was suggested as one.

> Are you sure you understand what's being discussed here?  How would
> anyone know about the procedure for doing this if it weren't in the
> wiki somewhere?

I understand, I'm not that dense. ;)

Did you read the following parts in my mail?

> the addition is perhaps better made in the review guidelines.
> [...] But, as said, this probably just needs to be a clarification
> elsewhere.

I suggested twice to put it in the wiki, just not in the packaging
guidelines.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20070303/9006ad07/attachment.sig>