Data Packages Guideline

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:28:45AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 09:35 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > TK> I've added this as a draft guideline so the Packaging Committee
> > TK> can look at it and approve it as an update to the Guidelines.
> > 
> > Since this basically codifies existing process, I think it's fine; it
> > would certainly be good to have it written down in any case.  It's
> > actually 100% process since it doesn't require any changes to the
> > guidelines (%dist is only suggested normally), so I'd suggest that you
> > can just add it.  If you feel the PC does need to vote on it, then +1
> > from me.
> 
> If it's 100% process it should be in Extras/ rather than Packaging/  ...
> So no need to get it approved by the Packaging Committee -- just needs
> to find a good home under Extras/

could you perhaps extend it to mention firmwares and fonts as further
examples for package that should not carry %dists and be the same
cross-distribution (and also handled the same)?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20070303/4417739e/attachment.sig>