From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] New: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: apodtele at ucsd.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Dot accents have uneven height with different characters. See attachments. This is similar to bug 240525 which was fixed for Liberation fonts. DejaVu inherited this mis-feature-bug from Vera. I hope it will get fixed. DejaVu team is aware of the issue, but is not making a "decision" on it for whatever reason. ------- Additional Comments From apodtele at ucsd.edu 2008-03-31 23:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=299825) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=299825&action=view) Watch the dots -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010435.m314ZfGK031278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Keywords| |i18n ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-01 00:35 EST ------- Hi, please use some photo editing softrware such as GIMP / Photoshop / etc to confirm if the dots are really have uneven heights. You'll see there are uneven heights on fixed liberation-fonts because of 'illusion' effects of human eyes (proved by dragging horizontal guide lines with those softwares). I need to see there are any resources for me to look into this bug. Fixing this bug should be much easier then liberation-fonts as changes of l-f has been relied on its manufacturer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010458.m314wNPt002607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-01 00:58 EST ------- > $rpm -ql fonts-arabic > (contains no files) > > Thats a little strange isnt it ? That is because, fonts-arabic package has been deprecated since f8. It was split in two packages, paktype-fonts and kacst-fonts. Now fonts-arabic is only a metapackage that installs these two packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Apr 1 08:41:52 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 01:41:52 -0700 Subject: [Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804010841.m318fqcE024817@mrapp53.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927 Bug 378927 depends on bug 394103, which changed state. Bug 394103 Summary: All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Apr 1 08:41:46 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 01:41:46 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804010841.m318fk4d015126@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 Reed Loden [:reed] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Keywords|checkin-needed | Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |mozilla1.9 --- Comment #63 from Reed Loden [:reed] 2008-04-01 01:41:37 PDT --- Checking in gfx/src/thebes/nsThebesDeviceContext.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/gfx/src/thebes/nsThebesDeviceContext.cpp,v <-- nsThebesDeviceContext.cpp new revision: 1.74; previous revision: 1.73 done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 11:17:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011117.m31BHPka013554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-04-01 07:17 EST ------- We need to decide what to do about it. Diaeresis is usually at a different height wompared to the single dot above btw, and the latter is usually bigger as well. So actually the only thing which is incorrect in the screenshot is that the single dot above has different sizes and height. It just happened because of different people making different glyphs, who had different ideas about it. It will get fixed, but needs time to do that properly, because you can see that all fonts are affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 12:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011222.m31CMV24019823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-01 08:22 EST ------- Also the fonts we use for arabic as not necessarily pulled by fonts-arabic (it's only there as compatibility for people who used to have it installed). In the future fonts needed to support a particular language will be declared in the comps group associated with this language (for example arabic-support) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/comps/ This is what is supposed to be exposed to end users in the installers/software updaters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 13:53:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011353.m31DrZtA007039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 ------- Additional Comments From apodtele at ucsd.edu 2008-04-01 09:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=299892) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=299892&action=view) U+0178 and U+03AB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 13:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011354.m31DsWFT016181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 ------- Additional Comments From apodtele at ucsd.edu 2008-04-01 09:54 EST ------- Of course I used GIMP to prepare the first attachment with a few more to follow. I would strongly disagree that "diaeresis is usually at a different height..." It is more usual for fonts to be consistent with respect to this minute details. This is what makes a font rather than a collection of symbols. I am surprised that DejaVu does not have an explicit and written out standard that regulates these minute details. This is probably the reason why it is so easy to find examples illustrated in images attached bellow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:02:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011402.m31E28I4018353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 ------- Additional Comments From apodtele at ucsd.edu 2008-04-01 10:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=299893) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=299893&action=view) Would you rather fix this or work on obsolete glyphs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011411.m31EBcCL011981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-01 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I am surprised that DejaVu does not have an explicit and written out standard > that regulates these minute details. I suppose this is the kind of contribution the project would welcome. > This is probably the reason why it is so > easy to find examples illustrated in images attached bellow. Most font projects are one-man/one-organisation creations. So they don't need any written standard, the designer mostly agrees with himself. DejaVu is a rather unusual example of large community-created font and the associated gouvernance is invented as needs are identified. Also as any FLOSS project progress is incremental and little problems are fixed when reported. While we are lucky to have one of the main designers replying in this ticket, this is really something better discussed on the DejaVu mailing list (that various experts follow). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011422.m31EMBRY014502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 ------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat.com 2008-04-01 10:22 EST ------- > That is because, fonts-arabic package has been deprecated since f8. It was split > in two packages, paktype-fonts and kacst-fonts. Now fonts-arabic is only a > metapackage that installs these two packages. Ah I see. So I removed one package then the other it looks like I was complaining about kacst-fonts, paktype-fonts is a little better since it is not bold but it is still not as good as the font used in f7. That is the font used in standard print (newspapers, books, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011424.m31EO5Hi023978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 ------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat.com 2008-04-01 10:24 EST ------- > In the future fonts needed to support a particular language will be declared in > the comps group associated with this language (for example arabic-support) > > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/comps/ > > This is what is supposed to be exposed to end users in the installers/software > updaters. Nice. That would be much better than yum install '*arabic*' which always cause problems for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011434.m31EYKl1017223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-04-01 10:34 EST ------- The different position of the diaresis compared to single dot above is what we've inherited from Bitstream Vera, I guess we can trust that Bitstream had some explicit and written out rules. The letters with dot above accents were later added in DejaVu, and basically I've seen a lot of (professional) fonts behave quite differently with these dots (whatever you may say about what's usually done, test some fonts out first...), so I can quite easily understand that different developers in our project thought different things here. Basically, we don't have a mismatch either in DejaVu, we behave exactly the same as fonts like Tahoma, Arial, Minion or Myriad. Anyway, what should happen is that the precomposed glyphs should display exactly the same as composed glyphs in the end, we're working to get that right, but it's a lot of work to do these things, as there are just thousands of these glyphs to check and fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439964] [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011441.m31EfbSX029303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [DejaVu-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439964 ------- Additional Comments From apodtele at ucsd.edu 2008-04-01 10:41 EST ------- You are welcome to try to start this discussion on the DejaVu mailing list. I tried to do it before about half a year ago and last month but was largely ignored. The developers were aware of these glitches since day one (as they are inherited from Vera) but prefer not to make a decision. They are very territorial (working on one particular Unicode page) and they don't care about glitches across the board. To fix this will require some agreement between them, which is apparently the bigest obstacle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Apr 1 22:22:53 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:22:53 -0700 Subject: [Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804012222.m31MMrvm005993@mrapp53.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927 Bug 378927 depends on bug 424375, which changed state. Bug 424375 Summary: high dpi - inconsistent widths and heights reported https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424375 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Apr 2 07:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 00:12:15 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804020712.m327CFvZ011188@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #64 from Alexander Sack 2008-04-02 00:11:15 PDT --- note: desktops can set their font dpi independently from the screen dpi (e.g. in gnome through /schemas/desktop/gnome/font_rendering#dpi). For instance, ubuntu defaults to 96 because of X driver bugs. In the long run we might want to discuss if we want to use that dpi setting (if set) as input for our calculations here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 07:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 03:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 395561] [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020755.m327tKXI012111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395561 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-02 03:55 EST ------- This bug cannot be completely fixed in fonts due to limitations in the opentype layout engines. Also if the below base form of Ra is required to be used in Ra+Halant+RA kind of combination, it can be currently obtained with the use of ZWJ as Ra+ZWJ+Halant+Ra. Thus this bug is not worth fixing in font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 07:54:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 03:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 395561] [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020754.m327s5Ek029313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395561 Bug 395561 depends on bug 395531, which changed state. Bug 395531 Summary: [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395531 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 07:54:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 03:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 395531] [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020754.m327s5le029299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [kn_IN] ra + halant + ra is not rendering properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395531 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-02 03:54 EST ------- This bug cannot be completely fixed in fonts due to limitations in the opentype layout engines. Also if the below base form of Ra is required to be used in Ra+Halant+RA kind of combination, it can be currently obtained with the use of ZWJ as Ra+ZWJ+Halant+Ra. Thus this bug is not worth fixing in font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 10:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 06:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331881] [Indic] ra+halant+ZWNJ is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021051.m32ApWam014462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [Indic] ra+halant+ZWNJ is wrongly rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331881 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|lohit-fonts |pango Keywords| |i18n Summary|[kn_IN]ra+halant+ZWNJ is |[Indic] ra+halant+ZWNJ is |wrongly rendering |wrongly rendering ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-02 06:51 EST ------- This is a bug in pango and common for most Indic langs having reph. Thus reassigning to pango. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 11:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021115.m32BFFG8003610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-02 07:15 EST ------- May be kacst-book is the font that you are looking for. May be there is a problem with the font selection done by fontconfig. Anyway since this bug is not indeed a fonts-arabic bug and problem appears with fontconfig, I am reassigning it to fontconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 11:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021117.m32BH2wK019257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|fonts-arabic |fontconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 11:27:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021127.m32BR4BJ005415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rbhalera at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 06:49:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 02:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030649.m336nUvn002432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-03 02:49 EST ------- done packaging waiting for review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 some comment on upstream tarball fonts version should be inside fonts, no need for fontname_version since all ready tarball has version malayalam-fonts doesn't mention upstream project name it will be good if you change its name to 'smc-fonts' or 'smc-malayalam-fonts' since all fonts content different license it will be nice if you can keep the same license for all fonts if possible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:50:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221361] [pango] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow for CJK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031850.m33IouGj001807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [pango] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow for CJK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221361 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221361] [pango] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow for CJK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031850.m33IosOh001692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [pango] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow for CJK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221361 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| | bzcl34nup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:50:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221361] [pango] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow for CJK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031850.m33IoxQT001889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [pango] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow for CJK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221361 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list at redhat.com 2008-04-03 14:50 EST ------- Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 3 23:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:14:43 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804032314.m33NEhhY010063@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 Stephen Donner [:stephend] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Comment #65 from Stephen Donner [:stephend] 2008-04-03 16:14:37 PDT --- Verified FIXED with a fresh install of Fedora Core 7 on: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008040304 Minefield/3.0pre (Was seeing this myself in 1280x800.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 3 23:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:33:27 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804032333.m33NXRAT015996@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 Carsten Book [:Tomcat] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cbook at mozilla.com --- Comment #66 from Carsten Book [:Tomcat] 2008-04-03 16:33:23 PDT --- also verified fixed with Fedora 8 and Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008040313 Minefield/3.0pre ID:2008040313 (Debug Build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 00:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:54:00 -0700 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040054.m340s092025892@mrapp53.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jdaggett at mozilla.com AssignedTo|nobody at mozilla.org |jdaggett at mozilla.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 00:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:54:16 -0700 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040054.m340sGNJ014799@mrapp54.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 01:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:06:02 -0700 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040106.m34162xV007201@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pavlov at pavlov.net, | |roc at ocallahan.org, | |vladimir at pobox.com Priority|P4 |P2 --- Comment #39 from John Daggett (:jtd) 2008-04-03 18:05:55 PDT --- Given the wider prevalence of condensed/expanded faces on platforms like Mac OS X and the increasing number of open source fonts like the Deja Vu family which contain condensed/expanded faces, I'm going to bump up the priority of this one. Without this attribute these faces are effectively unusable, since no combination of font-xxx attributes will resolve to a condensed face if a normal face is around. On Windows, where font families are currently unified using the "four faces per family" rule, the font-family attribute can be used but this doesn't work when name unification is done to include a fuller set of faces within a single font family, as is done under Mac OS X. Stuart says he has a work-in-progress patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 04:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:00:16 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040400.m3440GMT026584@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #67 from Josh Lee 2008-04-03 21:00:12 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=313529) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=313529) Huge form elements in print preview I'm still seeing huge form elements in print preview; not sure if that's because of this bug or not. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008040304 Minefield/3.0pre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 05:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:03:31 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040503.m3453V1E018070@mrapp53.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #68 from ruslan 2008-04-03 22:03:24 PDT --- Verified FIXED at Windows XP SP2 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008040305 Minefield/3.0pre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 05:26:24 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:26:24 -0700 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040526.m345QOti007548@mrapp54.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #40 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2008-04-03 22:26:16 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=313538) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=313538) patch for style system end Here's a patch that gets this through the style system (it was already half-implemented) so you guys have something to test with. This passes style system mochitests, but the "FIXME" comments should really be fixed before landing. (I used the existing constant structure in layout/base/nsStyleConsts.h, which may not be ideal, but it should work.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 05:29:25 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:29:25 -0700 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040529.m345TPHS021011@mrapp53.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 David Baron [:dbaron] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #313538|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #41 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2008-04-03 22:29:23 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=313539) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=313539) patch for style system end Er, missed one thing that's important for handling dynamic changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Apr 4 07:17:09 2008 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:17:09 GMT Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <200804040717.m347H9Lp018784@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18715 Modified Files: samyak-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Apr 4 2008 Pravin Satpute 1.2.0-2 - given proper license name - fc-cache now run on samyak-langname folder Index: samyak-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- samyak-fonts.spec 28 Feb 2008 06:26:41 -0000 1.3 +++ samyak-fonts.spec 4 Apr 2008 07:16:24 -0000 1.4 @@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ Name: samyak-fonts Version: 1.2.0 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts Group: User Interface/X -License: GPLv3 of later with font exceptions +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions URL: https://sarovar.org/projects/samyak/ Source: samyak-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz BuildArch: noarch @@ -36,13 +36,13 @@ \ %post -n samyak-fonts-%1 \ if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir} \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir}/samyak-%1 \ fi \ \ %postun -n samyak-fonts-%1 \ if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then \ if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir} \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir}/samyak-%1 \ fi \ fi @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Apr 04 2008 Pravin Satpute 1.2.0-2 +- given proper license name +- fc-cache now run on samyak-langname folder + * Thu Feb 28 2008 Pravin Satpute - 1.2.0-1 - update to samyak-fonts-1.2.0 from upstream cvs - major bug fixes for devanagari and malayalam From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Apr 4 08:38:05 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:38:05 -0700 Subject: [Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804040838.m348c5Jc031735@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927 Mats Palmgren changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |402196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440169] FTBFS: Fails To Build From Source Blocker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041554.m34FsHbU014816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FTBFS: Fails To Build From Source Blocker Alias: FTBFS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440169 ftbfs at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |440756 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440756] New: FTBFS fontypython-0.2.0-6.fc7 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440756 Summary: FTBFS fontypython-0.2.0-6.fc7 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock -results-core/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: fontypython AssignedTo: cr33dog at gmail.com ReportedBy: ftbfs at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com fontypython-0.2.0-6.fc7.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440756] FTBFS fontypython-0.2.0-6.fc7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041606.m34G6nVw019599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FTBFS fontypython-0.2.0-6.fc7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440756 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 11:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=300619) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=300619&action=view) root.log.bz2 root.log for i386 ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 11:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=300620) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=300620&action=view) build.log.bz2 build.log for i386 ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 11:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=300621) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=300621&action=view) root.log.bz2 root.log for x86_64 ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 11:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=300622) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=300622&action=view) build.log.bz2 build.log for x86_64 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2008-04-04 12:06 EST ------- OK - it looks like the desktop file needs to be updated. If someone wants to update it, great - if not I will get to it within a week. There is a new upstream version anyway... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Apr 4 20:09:04 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:09:04 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <200804042009.m34K94Wr017220@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17116/devel Modified Files: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec sources Log Message: 20080318 Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:26:24 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 4 Apr 2008 20:08:21 -0000 1.4 @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ %define archivename GFS_GAZIS Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20070417 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Version: 20080318 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Gazis Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ %changelog +* Fri Apr 4 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080318-1 +??? Upstream stealth update + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070417-5 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 27 Nov 2007 21:13:43 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 4 Apr 2008 20:08:21 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -d2ffa76b50c0002bdf12f1d638101195 GFS_GAZIS.zip +49549ec24bd20627bfcc8c0486fb2b12 GFS_GAZIS.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 20:37:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042037.m34Kb07W016870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |337271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 20:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] New: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.secarica.ro OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs- list at redhat.com,marius.stracna at mobexpert.ro Description of problem: When used on a system configured for Romanian language, liberation-fonts generates wrong characters: - "T with cedilla below" (Unicode 0162) instead of "T with comma below" (Unicode 021A) - "t with cedilla below" (Unicode 0163) instead of "t with comma below" (Unicode 021B) - "S with cedilla below" (Unicode 015E) instead of "S with comma below" (Unicode 0218) - "s with cedilla below" (Unicode 015F) instead of "s with comma below" (Unicode 0219) For non-Romanian developers: there is no such thing as ?cedilla-below? characters in Romanian language; please see http://www.secarica.ro Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts.noarch 0:1.0-4.fc9 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install latest Fedora (development) 2. Configure it for Romanian language 3. Open a new text document in OpenOffice.org 4. Press AltGr+s and AltGr+t (and Shift for capitals) to insert the specific Romanian characters. Actual results: Characters with cedilla below are inserted in the document. Expected results: Characters with comma below should be inserted. Additional info: This is a historical bug for Romanian language implementations, still not solved . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org Fri Apr 4 21:27:23 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org (bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 12530] CSS3: Support the font-stretch property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080404212723.7342E3B1BE7@localhost> http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12530 contact at nickshanks.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mitz at webkit.org ------- Comment #14 from contact at nickshanks.com 2008-04-04 14:27 PDT ------- Adding mitz since he fixed up bug 6484 this week. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Apr 4 21:50:25 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:50:25 GMT Subject: rpms/edrip-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 edrip-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <200804042150.m34LoPqW003950@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3830/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore edrip-fonts.spec sources Log Message: 20080330 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 26 Mar 2008 23:35:39 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 4 Apr 2008 21:49:48 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -edrip-src-20080317.tar.bz2 +edrip-src-20080330.tar.bz2 Index: edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- edrip-fonts.spec 28 Mar 2008 07:30:31 -0000 1.3 +++ edrip-fonts.spec 4 Apr 2008 21:49:48 -0000 1.4 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ %define debug_package %{nil} Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20080317 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 20080330 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Edrip decorative font Group: User Interface/X @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ %changelog +* Fri Apr 4 2008 +- 20080330-1 +??? Fast upstream changes + * Tue Mar 27 2008 - 20080317-3 ??? Fix source URL Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 26 Mar 2008 23:35:39 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 4 Apr 2008 21:49:48 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -5326d63b28602caefcce501858dc4809 edrip-src-20080317.tar.bz2 +c5b34537485e737c3ccd295afba3388b edrip-src-20080330.tar.bz2 From mru at openoffice.org Wed Apr 2 08:08:12 2008 From: mru at openoffice.org (mru at openoffice.org) Date: 2 Apr 2008 08:08:12 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080402080812.12492.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 ------- Additional comments from mru at openoffice.org Wed Apr 2 08:08:10 +0000 2008 ------- *** Issue 87708 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Apr 2 16:22:59 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 2 Apr 2008 16:22:59 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silently Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080402162259.7701.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'meywer,mmp,ssa,us' |'fedorafonts,meywer,mmp,ss | |a,us' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From ka at openoffice.org Thu Apr 3 02:12:43 2008 From: ka at openoffice.org (ka at openoffice.org) Date: 3 Apr 2008 02:12:43 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silently Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080403021243.10521.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 User ka changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|ka |hdu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|STARTED |NEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from ka at openoffice.org Thu Apr 3 02:12:42 +0000 2008 ------- reassigned to HDU --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Apr 3 08:42:47 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 3 Apr 2008 08:42:47 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080403084247.8901.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,meywer,mmp,ss|'fedorafonts,hdu,meywer,mm |a,us' |p,ssa,us' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assigned to|hdu |requirements -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|gsl |specs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QA contact|issues at gsl |issues at specs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Silently Failing is Bad Pr|Silent Failing is Bad Prac |actice (Font fallback) |tice (Font fallback and Gl | |yph Fallback) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subcomponent|code |www -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target milestone|OOo Later |--- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|OOo 1.1.4 |OOo 2.4.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Apr 3 08:42:45 +0000 2008 ------- @requirements: please define a nice UI for this and then reassign it to the framework(?) team In the GSL layers the functionality is already there: - to find out which font substitution is applied for which font on a specific output device do - call OutputDevice::SetFont(requested_font) - call OutputDevice::GetFontMetric() => the font that is actually used is right there in the result, including its font properties - to find out where glyph fallback is applied on a specific output device for a particular string do - call OutputDevice::HasGlyphs() to find out the parts of the string that the current font don't support --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Apr 5 17:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:34:39 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804051734.m35HYdVP011176@mrapp54.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 Sylvain Pasche changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daly at ctcnet.net --- Comment #69 from Sylvain Pasche 2008-04-05 10:34:29 PDT --- *** Bug 426918 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Apr 7 06:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:29:42 -0700 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804070629.m376Tgln018994@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #42 from Stuart Parmenter 2008-04-06 23:29:38 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=314023) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=314023) v0.5 - dbaron's layout style stuff + windows font implementation this mostly implements font-stretch on windows. narrower and wider aren't supported yet and there are some bugs. this doesn't do any kind of synthetic width stuff so you have to have font families with various widths installed for it to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 07:12:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 03:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070712.m377CKNV010364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |251890 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-07 03:12 EST ------- bug#251890 need to be resolved by manufacturer before this one to be handled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 09:30:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070930.m379UlxT005207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 14:47:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071447.m37ElwBv020129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 ------- Additional Comments From razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro 2008-04-07 10:47 EST ------- There is also an issue for the Romanian language; please see bug #440992 R?zvan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Apr 7 17:14:13 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:14:13 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804071714.m37HEDgm005324@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #70 from Ryan Daly 2008-04-07 10:14:11 PDT --- I see that this has been verified fixed. 3.0b5 still possesses this flaw, which is the latest beta available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Apr 7 17:16:43 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:16:43 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804071716.m37HGhn9006294@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #71 from Wolfgang Rosenauer 2008-04-07 10:16:37 PDT --- It was fixed after cut off of 3.0b5 and verified with nightly builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Apr 7 17:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:23:42 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804071723.m37HNgFI008379@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #72 from Ryan Daly 2008-04-07 10:23:31 PDT --- Ahh, OK. Is there going to be another beta release that I can test? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 00:37:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355271] Konqueror should respect fontconfig aliasing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080037.m380bDKP011380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Konqueror should respect fontconfig aliasing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355271 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 00:37:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344451] Please package fontconfig orth files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080037.m380beZr011543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please package fontconfig orth files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344451 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 12:08:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081208.m38C8rtd008314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-08 08:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=301623) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=301623&action=view) patch for Lohit-Kannada.sfd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 13:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081314.m38DEvHW011483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-08 09:14 EST ------- Fixed in lohit-fonts-kannada-2.2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:09:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090609.m3969BX4000674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 14:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091404.m39E4vaY012438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Status Whiteboard|pleaForReproductionFF3 |firefox3INSUFFICIENT_DATAmas | |sClosing ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-04-09 10:04 EST ------- Since there are insufficient details provided in this report for us to investigate the issue further, and we have not received feedback to the information we have requested above, we will assume the problem was not reproducible, or has been fixed in one of the updates we have released for the reporter's distribution. Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade to the latest update of their distribution, and if this issue turns out to still be reproducible in the latest update, please reopen this bug with additional information. Closing as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. [This is a mass-closing request, if you think that this bug shouldn't be closed, please, reopen with additional information.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 22:41:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804092241.m39MfN4S026122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-04-09 18:41 EST ------- What total bull crap. I cannot test firefox 3 until it is available in a stable release of fedora. I like your plan of action, "please test something which is not available", oh since you cannot test this, I'm closing the bug. Using a 3rd party repo (remi) I tested minefield and it appears the bug still exits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 02:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:50:48 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804100250.m3A2omWN029384@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 Sylvain Pasche changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mozilla-bugs at freigeist.org --- Comment #73 from Sylvain Pasche 2008-04-09 19:50:44 PDT --- *** Bug 428024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 06:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304441] Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100654.m3A6sWHZ028064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304441 Bug 304441 depends on bug 251890, which changed state. Bug 251890 Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 06:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100654.m3A6sVlB028040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 Bug 440992 depends on bug 251890, which changed state. Bug 251890 Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 06:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100654.m3A6sUs5028012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-10 02:54 EST ------- Fixed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/liberation-fonts/1.03/1.fc9/noarch/liberation-fonts-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/liberation-fonts/1.03/1.fc9/src/liberation-fonts-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=45785 Close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 07:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100711.m3A7BxSP026858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-10 03:11 EST ------- thanks jensp for comments modified spec file as per suggestions links for updates files: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-3.fc9.src.rpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 07:23:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221361] [pango] [zh_CN] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100723.m3A7N01I001211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [pango] [zh_CN] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221361 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[pango] ascii text space and|[pango] [zh_CN] ascii text |punctuation is narrow for |space and punctuation is |CJK |narrow Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup Flag| |needinfo?(phuang at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-10 03:22 EST ------- Does this still happen under F9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 08:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221361] [pango] [zh_CN] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100840.m3A8eC0t016555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [pango] [zh_CN] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221361 phuang at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(phuang at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2008-04-10 04:40 EST ------- I can not reproduce it in my F9 test box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 14:10:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101410.m3AEAjls016280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 ------- Additional Comments From cody at zone38.net 2008-04-10 10:10 EST ------- Is there a .tar.gz version on the way for us non-RH-using folks? Or should I generate one using alien? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 14:14:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101414.m3AEE4sF016905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 ------- Additional Comments From cody at zone38.net 2008-04-10 10:14 EST ------- Never mind; I managed to get the .tar.gz out of the source file. But it (and a zip version) should still be made available for posting on http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 14:14:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433513] Liberation font files need to be updated on web site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101414.m3AEEwtc017068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation font files need to be updated on web site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 ------- Additional Comments From cody at zone38.net 2008-04-10 10:14 EST ------- Version 1.03 from bug 251890 needs to be posted on the web site in tarball and zip format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:37:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101737.m3AHbpck002010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-04-10 13:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302030) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302030&action=view) reproducing the bug with Rawhide gnome-terminal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:38:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101738.m3AHcciv030996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-04-10 13:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302031) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302031&action=view) not reproducible with xterm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101736.m3AHaKDj030623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|firefox |pango Version|7 |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-04-10 13:36 EST ------- OK, I screwed up on this bug. I am sorry. However, this is really not firefox fault. When testing with gnome-terminal and xterm, it works well with xterm (will attach screenshots for both), but not with gnome-terminal. Which leads directly to the possible candidate for this issue, which is pango (used by all Gnome apps & firefox, but not by xterm). Reassigning. And it is well reproducible with Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101739.m3AHdVDm002325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-04-10 13:39 EST ------- Using xterm-234-1.fc9.i386 gnome-terminal-2.22.1-1.fc9.i386 pango-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 18:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:12:49 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804101812.m3AICnbV012810@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #74 from Johannes 'fish' Ziemke 2008-04-10 11:12:44 PDT --- I'm running the latest nightly builded snapshot (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008041004 Minefield/3.0pre) and i have still the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 18:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:14:25 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804101814.m3AIEPia024736@mrapp54.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #75 from Johannes 'fish' Ziemke 2008-04-10 11:14:15 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=314897) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=314897) Still the same bug on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008041004 Minefield/3.0pre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 19:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:32:12 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804101932.m3AJWC2x032033@mrapp54.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #76 from Ryan Daly 2008-04-10 12:32:05 PDT --- I'm still seeing problems, too. I'll attach an image of misaligned text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 19:33:15 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:33:15 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804101933.m3AJXFaP024895@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #77 from Ryan Daly 2008-04-10 12:33:08 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=314927) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=314927) Text misalignment on FF3 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008041004 Minefield/3.0pre) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 20:11:06 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:11:06 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804102011.m3AKB6Vu004919@mrapp54.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #78 from Johannes 'fish' Ziemke 2008-04-10 13:10:54 PDT --- xdpyinfo shows: dimensions: 2048x768 pixels (493x185 millimeters) resolution: 106x105 dots per inch That's at least close enough to the real size (i haven't measure it). Its a multiple monitor setup on my Laptop (12" Display + 17" external TFT). BTW: Please see my initially opened bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428024 My problem happens only when i start X with one monitor and enable the second one with xrandr. That's reproducible every time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 20:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102020.m3AKKl9f004236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-10 16:20 EST ------- xterm probably still uses the old legacy so-called core X11 support. Pretty much everything else uses the new (for more-than-five-years-old values of new) fontconfig font system. The core X11 font backend and the fontconfig backend do not have access to the same fonts (in particular we do not install old fonts in weird formats in fontconfig, and we do not install modern complex fonts in core X11). Install a modern font package instead of the one you're using in xterm and you'll be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 20:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:28:18 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804102028.m3AKSIeX031258@mrapp53.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #79 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-04-10 13:28:15 PDT --- (In reply to comment #78) > xdpyinfo shows: > dimensions: 2048x768 pixels (493x185 millimeters) > resolution: 106x105 dots per inch > My problem happens only when i start X with one monitor and enable the second > one with xrandr. That's reproducible every time. You need to check xdpyinfo when the problem occurs. Some drivers are known to miscalculate DPI when xrandr is used, and firefox can't be blamed for quirking when Xorg feeds it garbage information (ie you're probably hitting an Xorg bug. Get it fixed Xorg side) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 10 21:20:27 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:20:27 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200804102120.m3ALKRg0021295@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #80 from Johannes 'fish' Ziemke 2008-04-10 14:20:18 PDT --- I'v investigated that a little bit more. Seams that, at least now (don't know whether that's the same as with the versions before, it happens there but i don't know if only in this case), i can reproduce it every time that way: Steps to reproduce: 1. Start X with only my laptop-display attached, external monitor's vga cable is not plugged in. xdpyinfo shows: dimensions: 1024x768 pixels (246x185 millimeters) resolution: 106x105 dots per inch 2. Start firefox 3. Plug the external monitor in 4. Run xrandr --output VGA --left-of LVDS --mode 1024x768 -> the desktop gets extended, xdpyinfo shows: dimensions: 2048x768 pixels (493x185 millimeters) resolution: 106x105 dots per inch 5. Open a new firefox window -> the bug occures There are other combination where the bug does _NOT_ occurs: Starting/restarting (stop+start) firefox after changing the desktop size with xrandr -> everything is fine and Have the external monitor plugged in upon starting X (it will get to clone mode without xrandr). In that case xdpyinfo shows: dimensions: 1024x768 pixels (269x201 millimeters) resolution: 97x97 dots per inch After extending the desktop with the same xrandr command, xdpyinfo shows: dimensions: 2048x768 pixels (536x201 millimeters) resolution: 97x97 dots per inch ...and everything works fine.. So it seams to happens only if there is no second monitor attached on starting X... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 23:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102344.m3ANiiMD019628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-10 19:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302088) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302088&action=view) Sources Tarball Reply to comment #22. Sorry about that. Attaching source tarball in bugzilla as official way for public to download is not supposed to be the case, because it should be hosted in public servers but not bugzilla. There are requests from Fedora community to host this font package. We are looking at working on that after Fedora 9 released. For people who are keen on testing the latest version, please download this attached file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 23:50:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102350.m3ANoShO016339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-10 19:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Never mind; I managed to get the .tar.gz out of the source file. But it (and a zip version) should still be > made available for posting on http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/. I don't have the permission on the website. It is managed by another team and we have coherent communication to update the versions on http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/. Please kindly be patient. Finally, thank you very much for supporting on our commitment to liberation-fonts by using it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 23:50:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251890] Exchanged and incomplete glyphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102350.m3ANol49021036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 00:29:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110029.m3B0TLQb023296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 00:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110056.m3B0u0tC000325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-10 20:55 EST ------- Hi Razvan, I don't have AltGr key on my keyboard to perform the following step: 4. Press AltGr+s and AltGr+t (and Shift for capitals) to insert the specific Romanian characters. I used gucharmap to manually check the characters, here are the findings: - "S with cedilla below" (Unicode 015E) and "s with cedilla below" (Unicode 015F) look alright, it looks like cedilla but not comma (I read the http://www.secarica.ro). - "T with cedilla below" (Unicode 0162) and "t with cedilla below" (Unicode 0163) look incorrectly. As you mention, they are like 'T' and 't' with a comma below but not a cedilla. Please be aware that, the latest Fedora is using 'Sans', 'Serif', 'Monospace' alias as its default fonts which they are variable depends on availability of installed fonts. I am taking screenshots and reporting to author about this. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 01:09:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110109.m3B19ZDR030785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-10 21:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302093) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302093&action=view) Test Case created and used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 01:09:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110109.m3B194eB030719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation fonts contains incorect characters for Romanian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-10 21:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302092) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302092&action=view) Screenshot of triage. The 'T' and 't' have comma below them that is not right. They should look like the 'S' and 's' on the left the them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 01:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110156.m3B1uvFx011347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Liberation fonts contains |[ro] "T/t with cedilla |incorect characters for |below" rendered as "T/t with |Romanian language |comma below" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 04:44:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441995] New: [mai_IN] fc-list does not show Maithili language name Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441995 Summary: [mai_IN] fc-list does not show Maithili language name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs- list at redhat.com,petersen at redhat.com Description of problem: fc-list does not list Maithili language. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.fc-list :lang=mai 2. 3. Actual results: Maithili language not listed. Expected results: fc-list should list Maithili Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 06:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221361] [pango] [zh_CN] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110627.m3B6RA03024327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [pango] [zh_CN] ascii text space and punctuation is narrow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221361 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 06:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253951] Tracker: fonts in fonts-* should be moved to own packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110638.m3B6cLad030116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: fonts in fonts-* should be moved to own packages Alias: GenericFontNames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253951 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ousia at openoffice.org Thu Apr 10 21:17:17 2008 From: ousia at openoffice.org (ousia at openoffice.org) Date: 10 Apr 2008 21:17:17 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080410211717.1380.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from ousia at openoffice.org Thu Apr 10 21:17:10 +0000 2008 ------- This bug is already three years old. The milestone is targeted for later. The question that arises here is: later than what? Later than version 3.0? I don't know whether this is the most important/critical issue that OOo has. But not being able to use OpenType fonts (althought it seems that they will be displayed in OOo 3.0) makes OOo less usable. Just in case it might help, I think that considering cairo for efficient PDF generation would be interesting and helpful. But I wonder whether cairo could generate hybrid PDF files. Thanks, Pablo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From jurf at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 00:56:29 2008 From: jurf at openoffice.org (jurf at openoffice.org) Date: 11 Apr 2008 00:56:29 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080411005629.15153.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from jurf at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 00:56:24 +0000 2008 ------- More votes for this issue. I sympathise with the previous poster's frustration at seeing this defect milestoned as "OOo Later". Three years ago there may still have been a little bit of scepticism regarding OTF, but there's no question now about it not being the standard. We're not asking for OpenType *feature* support on this issue, just the ability to embed OTFs in exported PDFs, which is something that any PDF-printer-driver program can do (eg PDFCreator). This should not be flagged as feature but DEFECT. At the very least the blurb writers could be a little more honest when flaunting OOo's PDF export feature, but somehow I doubt that "The PDF export feature will screw up your layout unless you only use TrueType fonts" is quite so attractive to potential punters. Grrrrr... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mbayer at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 11:40:20 2008 From: mbayer at openoffice.org (mbayer at openoffice.org) Date: 11 Apr 2008 11:40:20 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080411114020.4733.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from mbayer at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 11:40:12 +0000 2008 ------- Although I also think that the current situation is unsatisfying, I want to remind my fellow users of our issue description guidelines (just click above on the links ?issue type?, ?priority?, and so on): this IS an issue of the type ?feature? and of the priority ?3?. And what makes things worse is not the fact that this issue is open for more than 3 years now, but that 3 years ago Adobe announced to ?phase out? PostScript Type 1 fonts and to target only on OpenType fonts, and that hence OOo must support OpenType fonts just as it supported (and sill supports) Type 1 fonts. Thus I also feel that the target ?later? does not reflect the community's wishes and prioritizing for OpenType support appropriately. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 12:11:27 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 11 Apr 2008 12:11:27 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080411121127.24317.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 12:11:15 +0000 2008 ------- On the Linux side I can tell you the majority of the new fonts we've integrated in Fedora these past months were OTF fonts, and at the same time a lot of old unmaintained Type1 fonts were dropped from the distribution. The the switch to OTF is pretty much already happening on our platform. OTF fonts work everywhere except for OO.o --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From simos at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 12:13:25 2008 From: simos at openoffice.org (simos at openoffice.org) Date: 11 Apr 2008 12:13:25 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080411121325.407.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from simos at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 12:13:21 +0000 2008 ------- What can the community do to help with this issue in a more active way? There have been several similar cases in other FOSS projects as well (for example, in Firefox) where bugs have been bugging us for years. If we were to get a contributor/developer to work on this, what would they have to do? On which part of the code tree would they need to look? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From adrianjohnson at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 14:03:41 2008 From: adrianjohnson at openoffice.org (adrianjohnson at openoffice.org) Date: 11 Apr 2008 14:03:41 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080411140341.28809.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from adrianjohnson at openoffice.org Fri Apr 11 14:03:34 +0000 2008 ------- > > What can the community do to help with this issue in a more active way? > Implement font subsetting for CFF based OpenType fonts that is suitable for PS > printing and PDF export. Done: http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=cairo;a=blob;h=53c5a175dffc11f038c6ea07dc709c80ef80e073;hb=9166686abd92f8b2c7067002b051220e2f8fe780;f=src/cairo-cff-subset.c Licensed under MPL/LGPL or ask me if you want a different license. All you have to do is integrate the code into OpenOffice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From owner at bugs.kde.org Sun Apr 13 16:27:24 2008 From: owner at bugs.kde.org (owner at bugs.kde.org) Date: 13 Apr 2008 16:27:24 -0000 Subject: [Bug 57485] [test case] Wrong font selected when HTML specifies fontconfig aliases In-Reply-To: <20030420225925.57485.futhark77@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080413162724.17889.qmail@ktown.kde.org> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57485 lemma confuego org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marciano northwestern edu ------- Additional Comments From lemma confuego org 2008-04-13 18:27 ------- *** Bug 74286 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 03:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433513] Liberation font files need to be updated on web site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140345.m3E3jsJB023766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation font files need to be updated on web site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-13 23:45 EST ------- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302088 It's the 1.03 on bug 251890, which is ready to be updated to website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 05:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140540.m3E5e2pC012509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-14 01:40 EST ------- Well the version number is a little funny: dunno if they really mean 0.4, but maybe it is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 05:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140538.m3E5cU2V012047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-14 01:38 EST ------- Thanks. The install directory should be just %fontsdir: ie please remove the "-fonts" suffix from the dir in %install and %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140608.m3E68KXc017467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-14 02:08 EST ------- Putting a comment about the shared dir in the spec file would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140622.m3E6MiFX023539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From pravi.a at ippimail.com 2008-04-14 02:22 EST ------- * We don't want to have version embedded with font names - we used to have Rachana_w01, Rachana_g01 inside the fonts and we decided best way is not to have the versions as a newer version font cannot show the documents which use older version of fonts. We needed the version difference to be visible to the users, so we are keeping the version in filename. * It is not necessary that everyone use the entire tarball but individual fonts and so we are keeping version for each font. * you can change the rpm package name to anything you wish. * All fonts are developed by different authors and we can't decide on a common license. I don't see it as a problem because the package is an aggregation and not a derivative work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140652.m3E6q1AO028686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-14 02:52 EST ------- done the modification as per suggestions see the changelog for modifications link for updated files http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 07:06:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140706.m3E763bR032206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-14 03:06 EST ------- Pravin, its really upto you how to name and version the upstream project. My concern about version is, the version '04' for a tarball looks odd, unlike many other project that would follow 'a.b.c' kind of format. But its ok as far as its not creating any problem. Another concern is since it is an aggregation of multiple projects, how are you going to going to maintain the version of aggregation w.r.t. the individual fonts' versions? Will the version '04' be updated to a higher value for any change in any of the files inside the tarball, as is the case with lohit and samyak? This came to my mind because, it was observed earlier that, some font was added to the tarball without the version of tarball being updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 07:34:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140734.m3E7YDXU004323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-14 03:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > * We don't want to have version embedded with font names It's your choice to make of course. My advice as a packager would be to have a foo-a.b.tar.bz2 for font foo with license X packaged as foo-fonts-x.y, and a bar-c.d.tar.bz2 for font bar with license Y packaged as bar-fonts-c.d, but you can perfectly choose srpm multiplexing hell with a single source archive mixing all sorts of different stuff. The user will mostly not see the difference (except when trying to locate the right component to report bugs on), all the complexity will be packager-side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 08:04:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140804.m3E84eqR011312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From pravi.a at ippimail.com 2008-04-14 04:04 EST ------- The updates required till now is applicable for all the fonts and we have to update al the fonts and hence a common version made sense to us. I don't see we might need to change that. As for adding packages to the tarball - we created this tarball mainly for Fedora - as everyone else (debian packaging and other users) were happy with using individual fonts. So I thought till Fedora is fully happy with the tarball and start packaging it, we can change it as needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 08:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140854.m3E8skpw017195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-14 04:54 EST ------- In that case I strongly advise you to go with one tarball per font project (one version, one license file), with simple packages that follow closely the Fedora guidelines. I'm sure Debian will be happy about it too (in fact we share an irc channel with the debian font packagers and they moan about the same things as us) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 09:09:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140909.m3E99f1m020327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-14 05:09 EST ------- Now no need for this now, i have handled all the complexity at packaging side already since i have done subpackaging for this tarball according to fedora packaging guidline's, and it is in process of new package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 Soon it will get included in Fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 14 09:29:15 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 14 Apr 2008 09:29:15 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080414092915.16048.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 14 09:29:11 +0000 2008 ------- @nmailhot: Fedora is replacing its Type1 fonts by their CFF-OTF counterparts? That is very interesting and changes the priority of the feature request. @adrianjohnson: good to see you here. Welcome! I had a closer look at the PS export and especially its font handling. For CFF fonts the fallback method seems to be used: The glyph outlines get wrapped into a Type1, but hints are lost. Of course hints in Type1 fonts are not as important as for TTFs, but since the conversion between CFF and Type1 can be done without any loss, I was hoping for that. I already have some code that does that, but it is not reliable enough yet. If we need a quick solution the fallback to outlines seems to be a reasonable alternative though. On the other hand experts advocating CFF outlines over TTF outlines seem to be extremely sensitive about this topic. The full-CFF to subset-CFF conversion used in cairo's PDF export is very nice indeed. Thanks for the pointer! We'll need CFF-subsetting on Windows too, but don't have any use for other parts of cairo on that platform yet. There are not too many deep dependencies into cairo's infrastructure, so if breaking this part out is technically feasible I'd like to do it, if you agree. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From jeongkyu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 14 09:54:37 2008 From: jeongkyu at openoffice.org (jeongkyu at openoffice.org) Date: 14 Apr 2008 09:54:37 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080414095437.6689.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User jeongkyu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'bahein,benjamin_schallar,|'bahein,benjamin_schallar, |ckolivas,cwoollard,fedoraf|ckolivas,cwoollard,fedoraf |onts,iorsh,masayan,nmailho|onts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masaya |t,simos' |n,nmailhot,simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Mon Apr 14 13:18:22 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 14 Apr 2008 13:18:22 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080414131822.14349.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Mon Apr 14 13:18:11 +0000 2008 ------- hdu> @nmailhot: Fedora is replacing its Type1 fonts by their CFF-OTF counterparts? hdu> That is very interesting and changes the priority of the feature request. It's not a project goal but has been happening de facto lately. Active font projects use TTF or OTF format. In fact except for projects that specifically target OO.o on Linux, OTF is the default format for new fonts, because it's the default in font creation tools (both open and closed). Therefore the number of shipped OTF fonts grows. OTF works well in every major Linux GUI app but OO.o. At the same time if a font still uses the Type1 format, that's because no one is working on it. Therefore any new problem report (technical or legal) can lead to the conclusion there's no one to fix it. Since Fedora does not ship unmaintained material, the direct result is that the font gets pulled. Unlike a few years ago we have alternatives font-side, so problematic Type1 fonts (such as the ones that used to be bundled with Xorg) are not tolerated anymore. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From adrianjohnson at openoffice.org Mon Apr 14 14:01:35 2008 From: adrianjohnson at openoffice.org (adrianjohnson at openoffice.org) Date: 14 Apr 2008 14:01:35 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080414140135.15012.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from adrianjohnson at openoffice.org Mon Apr 14 14:01:30 +0000 2008 ------- > I had a closer look at the PS export and especially its font > handling. For CFF fonts the fallback method seems to be used: The > glyph outlines get wrapped into a Type1, but hints are lost. Of course > hints in Type1 fonts are not as important as for TTFs, but since the > conversion between CFF and Type1 can be done without any loss, I was > hoping for that. I already have some code that does that, but it is > not reliable enough yet. If we need a quick solution the fallback to > outlines seems to be a reasonable alternative though. On the other > hand experts advocating CFF outlines over TTF outlines seem to be > extremely sensitive about this topic. Yes, subsetting CFF to Type 1 would be better. I looked into this when I wrote the CFF subsetting but never got around to actually writing any code. Preserving the hinting in PDF was the priority while subsetting CFF to Type 1 for PS was in the "nice to have" category. > The full-CFF to subset-CFF conversion used in cairo's PDF export is > very nice indeed. Thanks for the pointer! We'll need CFF-subsetting on > Windows too, but don't have any use for other parts of cairo on that > platform yet. There are not too many deep dependencies into cairo's > infrastructure, so if breaking this part out is technically feasible > I'd like to do it, if you agree. You are welcome to use the code. I am interested in seeing free software have full support for OTF/CFF fonts. The only dependencies I am aware of are cairo-array.c and cairo-hash.c. Of course it would also be nice for cairo to receive any bug fixes and enhancements you make to the code. I have been thinking about whether adding API to cairo to expose the font subsetting code would be useful. I don't know if anything like that would be useful to you. However breaking out whatever you need is probably the easiest solution. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141402.m3EE2Gua017053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-14 10:02 EST ------- Review: + scratch build in koji works fine + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a88a77e6b22ac077c729234c15671908 malayalam-fonts-04.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + font is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141404.m3EE45sO012747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-14 10:04 EST ------- Pravin, you may continue with the CVSAdmin procedure now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150416.m3F4Gwgv008113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-15 00:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: smc-fonts Short Description: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Owners: pravins Branches: F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150433.m3F4XNAS002994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-15 00:33 EST ------- I suggest simplifying the spec file with the replacement s/-n %{fontname}-fonts-//g before importing to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150431.m3F4V71C002686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:54:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150454.m3F4snNC006793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-15 00:54 EST ------- Jens, done it is working nice :) http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 05:03:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150503.m3F53FDx016524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-15 01:03 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 20:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804152003.m3FK3VHI008269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-04-15 16:03 EST ------- gnome-terminal by default uses vte's xft backend, not pango. It will definitely be a pango bug if you can reproduce it in gedit. Otherwise, it may be someone else at fault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 16 05:16:06 2008 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:16:06 GMT Subject: rpms/smc-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200804160516.m3G5G6DF012509@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/smc-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsW12462/rpms/smc-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/smc-fonts added to the repository From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 16 05:16:11 2008 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:16:11 GMT Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200804160516.m3G5GBrp012523@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsW12462/rpms/smc-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/smc-fonts/devel added to the repository From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 16 05:16:16 2008 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:16:16 GMT Subject: rpms/smc-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 import.log,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200804160516.m3G5GGG6012548@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/smc-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsW12462/rpms/smc-fonts Added Files: Makefile import.log Log Message: Setup of module smc-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module smc-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; --- NEW FILE import.log --- From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 16 05:16:21 2008 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:16:21 GMT Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200804160516.m3G5GLS7012564@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsW12462/rpms/smc-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module smc-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: smc-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/04/16 05:16:17 petersen Exp $ NAME := smc-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 16 05:37:04 2008 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:37:04 GMT Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200804160537.m3G5b44E012981@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12876/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Apr 15 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-6 - corrected meera fonts description it is for traditional script --- NEW FILE smc-fonts.spec --- %define fontname smc %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 04 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/smc Source: http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-%{version}.zip BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %description The smc-fonts package contains fonts for the display of traditional and new Malayalam Script. %package dyuthi Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions %description dyuthi The smc-fonts-dyuthi package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. %package meera Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions %description meera The smc-fonts-meera package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. %package rachana Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ %description rachana The smc-fonts-rachana package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. %package raghumalayalam Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 %description raghumalayalam The smc-fonts-malayalam package contains fonts for the display of new Malayalam Scripts. %package suruma Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions %description suruma The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. %prep %setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-%{version} %build echo "Nothing to do in Build." %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post dyuthi if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post meera if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post rachana if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post raghumalayalam if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post suruma if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun dyuthi if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi fi %postun meera if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi fi %postun rachana if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi fi %postun raghumalayalam if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi fi %postun suruma if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi fi #%{fontdir} is shared by following packages since they all are for malayalam script only %files dyuthi %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc *.txt %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/Dyuthi*.ttf %files meera %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc *.txt %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/Meera*.ttf %files rachana %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc *.txt %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/Rachana*.ttf %files raghumalayalam %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc *.txt %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/RaghuMalayalamSans*.ttf %files suruma %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc *.txt %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/suruma*.ttf %changelog * Tue Apr 15 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-6 - corrected meera fonts description it is for traditional script * Tue Apr 15 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-5 - removed -n {fontname}-fonts from all fields * Mon Apr 14 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-4 - added comment about sharing directory in spec file - fontdir will be 'smc' only instead of 'smc-fonts' earlier * Wed Apr 9 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-3 - defattr now comes after files - s/malayalam/Malayalam in description - removed '-fonts' from fontdir variable value * Fri Apr 4 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-2 - done changes in spec file as suggested in review request - changed variable name from xfontdir to fontdir * Thu Apr 3 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-1 - initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Apr 2008 05:16:17 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 16 Apr 2008 05:36:29 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +malayalam-fonts-04.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Apr 2008 05:16:17 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 16 Apr 2008 05:36:29 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +a88a77e6b22ac077c729234c15671908 malayalam-fonts-04.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 05:53:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160553.m3G5raAZ006022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-16 01:53 EST ------- Done, smc-ftons is now in fedora-cvs once it is sink with repos, you can install it from fedora-rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 06:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160604.m3G64H3L031496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-16 02:04 EST ------- sorry for typo package name is smc-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 07:17:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160717.m3G7HPKR021738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-16 03:17 EST ------- Please do not forget to update comps in cvs and the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Triaging/Pipeline page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 09:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160922.m3G9MZsW014967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-16 05:22 EST ------- nicolas thanks for reminder :) surely i will do this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 09:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160925.m3G9PXXQ015837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 ------- Additional Comments From apeter at redhat.com 2008-04-16 05:25 EST ------- Pravins, Nicolas, Rahul, Jensp, thanks a lot for all help to include smc-font in Fedora. Regards Ani -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 15:58:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390171] Broken links in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161558.m3GFwJkW007209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Broken links in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390171 cowan at bnl.gov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cowan at bnl.gov ------- Additional Comments From cowan at bnl.gov 2008-04-16 11:58 EST ------- so this has been fixed for months and no update released for f8!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 17:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390171] Broken links in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161707.m3GH7AnE023651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Broken links in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390171 ------- Additional Comments From cowan at bnl.gov 2008-04-16 13:07 EST ------- and I can't even just do yum --enablerepo=development update xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi or even yum --enablerepo=development upgrade xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi !!! ... Transaction Check Error: file /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 from install of xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch conflicts with file from package xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi-7.2-3.fc8.noarch ... and of course there are dependencies on these font packages, so I can't simply rpm -e them without --nodeps, which is just asking for even more trouble. I even needed --noscripts to finally get rid of the 75dpi, 100dpi, and misc font packages. but all to no avail as yum update|upgrade|install still exit with the same file conflict error as above!? figures. Either this bug should not be closed, or some other bugs need to be opened? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 17:47:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 390171] Broken links in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161747.m3GHlahA000442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Broken links in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390171 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-16 13:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > and I can't even just do > yum --enablerepo=development update xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi > or even > yum --enablerepo=development upgrade xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi > !!! > ... > Transaction Check Error: > file /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 from install of > xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch conflicts with file from package > xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi-7.2-3.fc8.noarch This is due to bug 251451 (owned by many packages) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 05:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443008] New: ugly ligatures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443008 Summary: ugly ligatures Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: dan.colascione at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: See attached screenshot. DejaVu is the default font, and its western ligatures look, well, ugly, and are disconcerting. I can reproduce the problem with GTK programs but not QT ones. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.18 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Use DejaVu LGC or another font with ligatures 2. Type "confirms" (or "firefox") western text into Pango-using program 3. See apparent ugly baseline shift Actual results: Ugly ligatures makes text look misaligned Expected results: Characters that appear to share a baseline Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From dan.colascione at gmail.com 2008-04-18 01:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302837) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302837&action=view) ugly ligatures -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 05:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443008] ugly ligatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180556.m3I5uiou023495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ugly ligatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443008 ------- Additional Comments From dan.colascione at gmail.com 2008-04-18 01:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302839) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302839&action=view) same word, MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 Disabling Pango eliminates the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 09:51:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180951.m3I9p88q018079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-04-18 05:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302865) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302865&action=view) reproduction in gedit (compating with xterm) (In reply to comment #12) > gnome-terminal by default uses vte's xft backend, not pango. > > It will definitely be a pango bug if you can reproduce it in gedit. > Otherwise, it may be someone else at fault. Well, did you try? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 11:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443008] ugly ligatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181111.m3IBBtDm017667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ugly ligatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443008 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-04-18 07:11 EST ------- IIRC, that problem happened when using the Freetype autohinter. Switching to the proper bytecode interpreter for font hinting solves that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 11:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443008] ugly ligatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181136.m3IBafbC022145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ugly ligatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443008 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-18 07:36 EST ------- Then that's a freetype not pango bug IMHO. Please report it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436520] [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181240.m3ICenQW004149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|No support for font-stretch |[RFE] No support for font- |above the vcl level |stretch above the vcl level ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-04-18 08:40 EST ------- I need to check with the xml guys as to how we should describe this in the file format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 14:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246654] Some fonts not rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181408.m3IE8lVJ006048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Some fonts not rendering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246654 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-04-18 10:08 EST ------- Ah, so by doesn't show up the reporter means hexboxes are drawn. Easy one. Install a proper font. xterm works because you have a bitmap X font installed that covers those chars. Anything using client-side fonts doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443008] ugly ligatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181658.m3IGwsWS031808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ugly ligatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443008 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-04-18 12:58 EST ------- yeah, it's autohinter issue with freetype. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 04:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210449.m3L4nhTr005553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 ------- Additional Comments From razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro 2008-04-21 00:49 EST ------- Hello and thanks ! Please use *the Alt key at right of the spacebar on any US keyboard* to reproduce this. Regards, R?zvan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 04:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210456.m3L4uSKG006989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 ------- Additional Comments From razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro 2008-04-21 00:56 EST ------- Hello, Caius & all, IMPORTANT - regarding comment #3 and attached image, please note that the comma characters are the *good* ones, the cedilla characters the *wrong* ones ! That is exactly the reverse of comment #3. Please see the correct assignements of Unicode codes in the text of my initial bug. Regards, R?zvan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 05:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440992] [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210522.m3L5MDN0011582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ro] "T/t with cedilla below" rendered as "T/t with comma below" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440992 ------- Additional Comments From razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro 2008-04-21 01:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303102) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303102&action=view) Example of right and wrong Romanian characters in DejaVu Serif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Tue Apr 22 20:41:55 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 22 Apr 2008 20:41:55 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88583] AutoCorrection changes Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080422204155.10115.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88583 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'sba,va' |'fedorafonts,sba,va' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 07:04:53 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Apr 2008 07:04:53 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080423070453.10933.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'hdu,pl,thb' |'fedorafonts,hdu,pl,thb' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 07:04:52 +0000 2008 ------- >From a distributor point of view not having OO.o behave as a one-of-a-kind for text rendering would be a huge boon. Please adopt the same text layout and rendering stack as other FLOSS applications (that is to say fontconfig + freetype +pango/harfbuzz + cairo on the Linux side). I suppose there would be a lot of commonalities with Firefox, so working with them on a common set of solutions would be great. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/TextLayout http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/TextLayout2008Attendees --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 07:20:36 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Apr 2008 07:20:36 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080423072036.17323.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|2867,43495 |2867,43495,82986 is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From os at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 08:14:50 2008 From: os at openoffice.org (os at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Apr 2008 08:14:50 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88583] AutoCorrection changes Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080423081450.5010.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88583 User os changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|os |va -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|regression | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from os at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 08:14:48 +0000 2008 ------- The acorxxxx.dat files contain the arrow replacment with formatting. While creating replacements the CheckBox 'Text only' has to be checked to get a simple text-to-text replacement. Otherwise a real odt-document will be added to the autocorrection file. It has to be fixed in the extras. reassigned to va regression keyword removed --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mox at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 11:01:26 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Apr 2008 11:01:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080423110126.20081.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 11:01:22 +0000 2008 ------- Hi, I agree that using pango/harfbuzz for layout, instead of the OOo-specific one is highly desired. However, to be eligible as a replacement for VCL (and justify the amount of work), it would need to provide SAME or BETTER font layout as VCL does currently AND have that level of quality as CROSS PLATFORM library. Just porting one platform is not enough. So a layout replacement would need to support equally well AT LEAST - Unix/X11, Windows and Mac OS X. Preferably using platform native functions on Win/Mac when possible, while ensuring there are not major differences on layout on different platforms. (Mozilla/Firefox is aiming at "no differences", I guess). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From va at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 13:23:50 2008 From: va at openoffice.org (va at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Apr 2008 13:23:50 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88583] AutoCorrection changes Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080423132350.9866.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88583 User va changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |STARTED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from va at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 13:23:49 +0000 2008 ------- VA: You live and learn. ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From va at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 13:58:35 2008 From: va at openoffice.org (va at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Apr 2008 13:58:35 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88583] AutoCorrection changes Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080423135835.5471.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88583 User va changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|STARTED |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |FIXED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from va at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 13:58:34 +0000 2008 ------- . --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Apr 23 17:54:34 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Apr 2008 17:54:34 -0000 Subject: [Issue 54944] Provide way to mark forced font replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080423175434.16431.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54944 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'hdu,jeongkyu,maxweber,mey|'fedorafonts,hdu,jeongkyu, |wer,pl,ssa,us' |maxweber,meywer,pl,ssa,us' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 20:29:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436520] [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232029.m3NKTewv012587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-04-23 16:29 EST ------- Adding FutureFeature keyword to RFE's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Apr 24 08:54:18 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Apr 2008 08:54:18 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080424085418.4468.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |LATER -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target milestone|--- |OOo Later -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Apr 24 08:54:15 +0000 2008 ------- The original issue here is that the current OOo-Canvas based on cairoquartz doesn't render text yet. Since Quartz can render beautiful text in its sleep if it gets a proper Quartz CGContext, I'm very sure this is a bug in the cairoquartz01 child workspace. I'll debug into it when I'll resync CWS aquabmpfixes01 to something >= DEV300_m6. Other than that I'm afraid this issuezilla item is already drifting way off topic. I'll comment only ONCE on the other suggestions here. If needed please open focussed issues. --- Great ideas here! Thanks! I'll get right on it! On a second thought some Pango related questions come to mind: P1.) is Pango's layout engine that much better than Apple's native ATSUI or CoreText? P2.) is it at least that much better than Window's native Uniscribe? P3.) what are the specific benefits over ICU's layout engine that OOo uses on Unix? do specific http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac bugs have showstopper qualities? P4.) isn't Pango being obsoleted by HarfBuzz / Graphite on Unix? P5.) wouldn't we loose the "justified text" feature, that some/most author prefer? Also some related questions about Cairo's text rendering: C1.) is it that much better than Apple's native ATSUI or CoreText? C2.) is it at least that much better than Window's native Uniscribe? C3.) since CWS cairotext01 (http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS? Path=SRC680%2Fcairotext01) our Unix port supports it already It used to be better because of subpixel-rendering, but nowadays distributions switched exactly THAT feature off, so what are the remaining killer features? Speaking of text rendering on Unix I'd like to mention that during the live-time of OOo's unix codebase Xft (now unmaintained), STSF (now unmaintained) and "pure" XLFD were "the right thing to do" de jour. The answers to P1/P2/C1/C2 are such that even Pango itself just wraps the native layout engines. And since OOo uses UTF-16, Pango's interface is UTF-8 and the native layout engines are using UTF-16 again the roundtrip would be a nice way to warm up the cpu. For nothing! But getting rid of native text justification and losing access to the real layout engines for their potential advanced typography features. I'd also like to mention that a major difference between a browser and a word processor is that a browser aims especially for screen rendering whereas a word processor usually targets a non-screen device. In other words: most people would complain if their document's pages re-flowed when they changed the word processors zoom level (which corresponds to a Browser's default text size setting). This difference is responsible for application-layer problems like issue 88539 (Writer rendering), issue 51508 (Calc rendering) or issue #thb# (Impress rendering). Since people especially mean these issues when they comment on OOo text rendering problems they would be surprised that even if we did the herculean task to rip out the guts of GSL to replace it with the "recommended stack" these problems (and other niceties like issue 79878!) would remain just as before. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 11:28:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241128.m3OBSu6W014808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-24 07:28 EST ------- included in fedora package name: smc-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mox at openoffice.org Thu Apr 24 19:03:20 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Apr 2008 19:03:20 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080424190320.9270.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Thu Apr 24 19:03:16 +0000 2008 ------- Hi hdu, thanks for the comments. I also don't want this issue to become endless tug war, so I just clarify some things. Note that I don't really have a perfect solution to offer, neither I'm expecting the text layout to be solved anytime soon. ... Yes, the quartz failing is just a bug, and does not need the level of changes that I'm describing here. The core of the discussion is that OpenOffice.org has been and in many respects is still not proactive in integrating with the other open source projects, causing OpenOffice.org to remain a huge, non-shared (with other projects) codebase. This means OOo needs to have e.g. it's own set of developers for all of text rendering and fonts, because no other project is working on that code. The reason for working with cairo based font rendering and layout is the same as using cairo library anywhere in the OOo: Yes, OOo could do everything by itself with directly using functions of native platforms + OOo specific crossplatform layer. However, OOo can also use cairo (among others) as the crossplatform layer, that can REMOVE the code that OOo currently has. While it creates another layer of API, if it (eventually) can become the only API (just like Mozilla Firefox 3 has), then the rest of the OOo code can be optimized for that API. And OOo developers can also work with cairo developers to improve that library (which already pretty good exactly thanks to contributions from MULTIPLE independent projects). => more shared code, less OOo-specific code. ... For graphics rendering cairo is the unquestioned choice. It seems to be a good choice for font rendering too. To me, text layout is completely unknown area. I do know that pango nowadays uses harfbuzz, which is a collaborative project between Gnome and KDE. So that's pretty good coverage on UNIX/X11. However, high quality crossplatform support is the key here. Only X11 is not enough. ... So currently I'm targetting just font rendering, and hoping a good layout solution comes up some day. And I'm not saying things cannot go to the other direction too. For example on UNIX, hunspell has originated from inside OOo and now distributions are standardising on it, and replacing the aspell/pspell/myspell alternatives. That's not crossplatform, but it's a nice step forward. If OOo's text layout is superior to others, why not create a crossplatform textlayout module -- with "libtextlayout" -library that can then be used by other projects (and is nicely isolated for OOo)? It would need to become an independent hunspell-like "sourceforge" project (i.e. outside of OOo CWS hassles and schedules) to truly enable sharing and collaboration. ... Open source gives best results when you are proactive with ways of sharing and collaboration. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 22:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444238] New: freetype thinks fonts hrger*.pfa are broken Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444238 Summary: freetype thinks fonts hrger*.pfa are broken Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: keiths at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 22:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444240] New: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240 Summary: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: keiths at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: The freetype library in Fedora 8 and rawhide believes that the font hrger.pfa (and related) are broken. freetype-2.1.9-6.el4 and freetype-2.2.1-19.el5 both work (/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa is identical in all cases, from the ghostscript-fonts-5.50.x packages). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.3.5-3.fc8 (rawhide checked, too) ghostscript-fonts-5.50-18.fc8 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc `freetype-config --cflags` ft.c `freetype-config --libs` 2. run resultant executable 3. Actual results: /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: NO WORKY: error = 3 (error 3 is "broken file"/Ivalid_Format) Expected results: /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa: WORKY Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From keiths at redhat.com 2008-04-25 18:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303832) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303832&action=view) testcase -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 14:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444281] New: Provides: freetype2-devel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281 Summary: Provides: freetype2-devel Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: ed at membled.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com It would be handy if the freetype-devel package had Provides: freetype2-devel for compatibility with other rpm-based distros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 02:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444240] freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804270205.m3R25KKM007774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-04-26 22:05 EST ------- *** Bug 444238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 02:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444238] freetype thinks fonts hrger*.pfa are broken In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804270205.m3R25JL9007754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: freetype thinks fonts hrger*.pfa are broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444238 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-04-26 22:05 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444240 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 02:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444240] freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804270206.m3R261ii006962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-04-26 22:06 EST ------- Should go upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mox at openoffice.org Sun Apr 27 12:24:20 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Apr 2008 12:24:20 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080427122420.29254.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User mox changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |53225) Work in Progress - | |v2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Sun Apr 27 12:24:18 +0000 2008 ------- Created an attachment (id=53225) Work in Progress - v2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mox at openoffice.org Sun Apr 27 12:40:02 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Apr 2008 12:40:02 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080427124002.7666.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User mox changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|LATER | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Sun Apr 27 12:40:00 +0000 2008 ------- With the WIP2 patch, I'm able to get fonts rendered in cairo with correct colors, size, bold/italic, underline, and shadow. Underlines and shadows seem to be rendered manually by the Canvas (not by the font). The patch is still using string based rendering (not glyph by glyph), so advanced layouting is missing. I'm getting the native font ID (with all the styling already set) for the selected VCL Font, and rendering with that native font. I needed to add an additional function: sal_IntPtr OutputDevice::GetFontId( const Font& rFont, float fExactHeight ); to get the native font id. I guess the long term solution would be to add struct SystemFontData to vcl/inc/vcl/sysdata.hxx and fill it appropriately. So on Mac, I can get cairo-rendered text with e.g. Zapfino font showing up nicely :) With 1 line of platform-specific code... This replaces the hundreds of lines of code of all the DrawText, DrawTextArray functions in vcl/source and their platform specific implementations. Any suggestions on how to get the glyph-by-glyph information with rendering::XTextLayout and/or from VCL is greatly appreciated. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 01:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444377] New: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444377 Summary: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs- list at redhat.com,roozbeh at farsiweb.info Description of problem: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. It has the following error messages right after the splash screen has flashed on the desktop: $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 fontforge Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:48 GMT 9-Mar-2008. Library based on sources from 22:48 GMT 9-Mar-2008. Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--12-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. ????????????? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080309-1.fc9.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Installed fontforge rpm on F8->F9 system. 2. Start gnome-terminal by Alt-F2 > 'gnome-terminal'. 3. Input fontforge. 4. Check results. Actual results: fontforge started. Expected results: fontforge crashed with error messages. Additional info: N/A. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 01:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444377] fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280150.m3S1oRgM012926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444377 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|fontforge |xorg-x11-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 01:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444377] fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280150.m3S1ocVv012413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444377 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kevin at tummy.com |xgl-maint at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 01:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444377] fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280149.m3S1nBU0011828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444377 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-04-27 21:49 EST ------- Removal of entries in /usr/share/X11/Type1/fonts.dir does resolve the problem: cour.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 cour.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 cour.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 cour.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 courb.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 courb.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 courb.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 courb.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 courbi.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 courbi.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 courbi.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 courbi.pfa -ibm-courier-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 couri.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 couri.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-1 couri.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-3 couri.pfa -ibm-courier-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-iso8859-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 01:58:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444377] fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280158.m3S1wrKM014157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444377 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |235705 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 05:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444392] New: Task: Convert liberation-fonts into a open source font project. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444392 Summary: Task: Convert liberation-fonts into a open source font project. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs- list at redhat.com Description of problem: Convert liberation-fonts into a open source font project, by means of migration from TTF to SFD format, rework on the RPM package, host publicly on fedorahosted.org, etc. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.03-1 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: N/A Expected results: N/A Additional info: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 28 10:45:34 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 28 Apr 2008 10:45:34 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080428104534.20926.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 28 10:45:31 +0000 2008 ------- > With 1 line of platform-specific code... This replaces the hundreds of lines of code of all the DrawText, DrawTextArray functions Great! If text justification, text decorations (like underline/strikethrough/emphasis marks), multi-line controls, etc. still work I'm quite impressed. Also supporting all the exotic use cases for rendering old metafiles would be nice. > Any suggestions on how to get the glyph-by-glyph information with > rendering::XTextLayout and/or from VCL is greatly appreciated use SalLayout::GetNextGlyphs() that interface is a little ad-hoc though and will be replaced by a container/iterator style interface, but the changes for users of that call will be trivial --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 28 11:30:27 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 28 Apr 2008 11:30:27 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080428113027.29236.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 28 11:30:25 +0000 2008 ------- Another comment: From my POV the harfbuzz project will be the "libtextlayout" of the FOSS world. On the other hand VCL's text layout main focus is to do the delicate balancing act between - not needing to rewrite all OOo application layer code from ground up - trying to give them support for the modern text layout So for writing new applications using OOo's wrapper layer around existing layout engines is not a good idea. But OOo will still be needed in the future. It could become much thinner though if the FOSS layout engines committed themselves to attack the really fascinating topic of full blown text justification and advanced typographic styles for OpenType (and eventually Graphite) fonts. Especially if the layout results were compatible with their counterparts from other platforms. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 03:44:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290344.m3T3imLF019336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 apeter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[ml_IN] Wrong shape of |[ml_IN] Wrong shape for |conjuncts formed using 0D30 |conjuncts formed using 0D30 |(xRa) in a word |(xRa) in a word -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 03:44:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] New: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape of conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: aalam at redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list at redhat.com,petersen at redhat.com Description of problem: When conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) is used in a word, the alignment is wrong, ie, the whole word do not appear to be in one line, looks as if its in a zig-zag shape. The vowels used with conjunct also is in wrong alignment How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. In gedit type any consonant, say 0D2C 2. Followed by, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D3F, 0D1F, 0D4D, 0D1F, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above steps are executed, the glyph formed using 0D2C, 0D4D, 0D30,0D3F in the above word is not in alignment with the whole word Expected results: The whole word must be in a single line in same alignment and with no zig-zag shape. Additional info: For ref: see screenshot attached on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016, in comment#65 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 03:51:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444561] New: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561 Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: aalam at redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list at redhat.com,petersen at redhat.com Description of problem: Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph, instead the conjunct, 0D4D and 0D30 just appear in key sequence. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. In gedit, type 0D1A,0D28,0D4D, 0D26, 0D4D, 0D30, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: In the above step, when 0D28,0D4D, 0D26, 0D4D, 0D30 is typed the conjunct formed using 0D28,0D4D, 0D26 is followed by 0D4D and 0D30. Expected results: In the above step, when 0D28,0D4D, 0D26, 0D4D, 0D30 is typed the conjunct formed using 0D28,0D4D, 0D26 must have the pre-based glyph that is formed using 0D4D and 0D30. Additional info: For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 04:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290404.m3T44VM9023175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 ------- Additional Comments From apeter at redhat.com 2008-04-29 00:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304063) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304063&action=view) Screenshot for glyph in correct shape -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 04:01:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444563] New: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: aalam at redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list at redhat.com,petersen at redhat.com Description of problem: When 0D2F is combined with a conjunct/consonant and followed by 0D15, instead of conjunct/consonant combining with 0D2F, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit, type 0D07, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15, 0D3E, 0D30, 0D4D, 200D Actual results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D2F gets combined with 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 Expected results: When above characters are used, when 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24,0D4D, 0D2F, 0D3E, 0D15, 0D4D, 0D15 is done, 0D28, 0D4D, 0D24 should get combined with 0D2F. Additional info: For ref: please see the screehshot on comment #65 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 04:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444563] [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290407.m3T47bdp024013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 ------- Additional Comments From apeter at redhat.com 2008-04-29 00:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304064) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304064&action=view) Screenshot for correct combination -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 05:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290555.m3T5tJP2006483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 07:06:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290706.m3T76AiZ018501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-29 03:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304075) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304075&action=view) A patched ttf file Ani, could you please test this font file before I can build it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 10:28:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291028.m3TASn4D022179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #304075|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-29 06:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304092) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304092&action=view) Updated file Ani, please discard the previous file. This is the updated file that needs to be tested asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 10:30:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444561] [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291030.m3TAUIe4022808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-29 06:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304094) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304094&action=view) A patched ttf file Ani, this font file has the fix for the reported bug. Could you please test the same? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 10:29:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444563] [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291029.m3TATrlm022314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-29 06:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304093) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304093&action=view) fixed ttf file Ani, this font file has the fix for the reported bug. Could you please test the same? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291206.m3TC60OU008663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-29 08:05 EST ------- Updated file attached on bug #444563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444561] [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291205.m3TC5E6S008378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-29 08:05 EST ------- Updated file attached on bug #444563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444561] [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291206.m3TC6n8Y008807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561 ------- Additional Comments From apeter at redhat.com 2008-04-29 08:06 EST ------- Rahul: this is working fine in the updated font Thanks Ani -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:05:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444563] [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291205.m3TC5oqr008604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 ------- Additional Comments From apeter at redhat.com 2008-04-29 08:05 EST ------- Rahul: Font has been tested and working fine. Thanks Ani -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444563] [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291204.m3TC4ZjO007925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #304093|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-29 08:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304111) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304111&action=view) A patched ttf file This is updated one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:07:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291207.m3TC7YOg012117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 ------- Additional Comments From apeter at redhat.com 2008-04-29 08:07 EST ------- Rahul: This is fixed in the updated font. Thanks Ani -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:49:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444377] fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291249.m3TCnYIT017114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fontforge crashes by missing -ibm-courier-medium-.. fonts on F8->F9 system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444377 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xgl-maint at redhat.com AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |krh at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 18:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434647] X server segfaults in libXfont fs_cleanup_bfont() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291830.m3TIUjmg025960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: X server segfaults in libXfont fs_cleanup_bfont() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434647 ------- Additional Comments From f.middleton at apogeect.com 2008-04-29 14:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304148) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304148&action=view) Xorg.0.log with several backtraces Linux apogee8.apogeect.com 2.6.24.4-64.fc8 #1 SMP Sat Mar 29 09:54:46 EDT 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux xorg-x11-server-Xorg.i386 1.3.0.0-44.fc8 This crash has become more frequent with more recent updates (updates are current). To reproduce, start Firefox and go to E-Bay. May have to revert to FC3 (rock solid on this machine) until this is fixed :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:28:40 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Apr 2008 19:28:40 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080429192840.28888.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User mox changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |53263) Work in progress v3 | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:28:37 +0000 2008 ------- Created an attachment (id=53263) Work in progress v3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:33:41 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Apr 2008 19:33:41 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080429193341.2460.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User mox changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hdu,pl,thb' |'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu,pl,th | |b' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |STARTED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:33:39 +0000 2008 ------- With the WIP3 patch I'm now using SalLayout for layouting (text to glyps) and then using ::getNextGlyphs and rendering with cairo_show_glyphs. Weirdly enough, this produces very ugly result (no proper layout adjustments done) and is much worse than using the cairo "toy" api, cairo_show_text directly. So something's still missing wrt. SalLayout stuff. I'll attach screenshots so you get the idea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:51:42 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Apr 2008 19:51:42 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080429195142.4725.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:51:40 +0000 2008 ------- Created an attachment (id=53264) not so working... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:55:14 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Apr 2008 19:55:14 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080429195514.7962.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 19:55:12 +0000 2008 ------- Created an attachment (id=53265) fine except for rotated text --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 20:01:41 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Apr 2008 20:01:41 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080429200141.11554.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 20:01:34 +0000 2008 ------- Created an attachment (id=53266) Reference image (using VCL canvas) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 20:08:51 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Apr 2008 20:08:51 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080429200851.16083.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Tue Apr 29 20:08:50 +0000 2008 ------- Ha! I take my words back. The cairo_show_glyphs IS better layed out, but looks uglier, because there is the fonts are rendered too small. The same problem existed with cairo_show_text too, but was not noticeable due to cairo doing smaller layout too. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 30 12:27:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804301227.m3UCRome025929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-30 08:27 EST ------- Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 30 12:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444561] [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804301227.m3UCRhV0025886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-30 08:27 EST ------- Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 30 12:27:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444563] [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804301227.m3UCRavl025847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-30 08:27 EST ------- Fixed in lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:49:32 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:49:32 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <200804302149.m3ULnW4S001714@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1633/devel Modified Files: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 20:57:49 -0000 1.5 +++ gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:48:53 -0000 1.6 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Artemisia fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -82,6 +83,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-6 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-5 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:51:23 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:51:23 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <200804302151.m3ULpNvB001846@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1824/devel Modified Files: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 20:58:55 -0000 1.5 +++ gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:50:47 -0000 1.6 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070327 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Baskerville Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -89,6 +90,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070327-7 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070327-6 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:52:45 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:52:45 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200804302152.m3ULqjYR001962@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1936/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:00:01 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:52:06 -0000 1.5 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Bodoni Classic oblique Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -84,6 +85,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-6 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-5 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:54:00 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:54:00 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <200804302154.m3ULs0L4002128@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2053/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:16:21 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:53:24 -0000 1.5 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: GFS Bodoni fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -79,6 +80,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-5 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-4 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:55:16 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:55:16 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <200804302155.m3ULtGrC002301@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2244/devel Modified Files: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:23:05 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:54:38 -0000 1.4 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070413 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Complutum Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -94,6 +95,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070413-7 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070413-6 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:56:35 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:56:35 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <200804302156.m3ULuZK2002415@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2389/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:24:14 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:55:56 -0000 1.4 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: GFS Didot Classic Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -90,6 +91,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-5 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-4 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:57:54 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:57:54 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel gfs-didot-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <200804302157.m3ULvsSG002536@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2506/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-didot-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:25:20 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-didot-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:57:18 -0000 1.4 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070616 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Didot fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -78,6 +79,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070616-6 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070616-5 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 21:59:04 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:59:04 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <200804302159.m3ULx4K4002704@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2650/devel Modified Files: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 4 Apr 2008 20:08:21 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:58:29 -0000 1.5 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080318 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: GFS Gazis Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -89,6 +90,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080318-2 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Fri Apr 4 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080318-1 ??? Upstream stealth update From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 22:00:24 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:00:24 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <200804302200.m3UM0OBM002889@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2853/devel Modified Files: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:27:28 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:59:45 -0000 1.4 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: GFS Neohellenic fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -98,6 +99,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-5 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-4 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 22:01:41 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:01:41 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel gfs-olga-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <200804302201.m3UM1f5t009258@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4143/devel Modified Files: gfs-olga-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-olga-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/gfs-olga-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-olga-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:28:32 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-olga-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:01:04 -0000 1.4 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: GFS Olga experimental oblique font Group: User Interface/X @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -81,6 +82,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20060908-5 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-4 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 22:03:07 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:03:07 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel gfs-porson-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <200804302203.m3UM37Aq009386@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9358/devel Modified Files: gfs-porson-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-porson-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-porson-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:29:38 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-porson-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:02:31 -0000 1.4 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Porson Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -89,6 +90,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20060908-7 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-6 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 22:04:26 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:04:26 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <200804302204.m3UM4QlQ009529@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9489/devel Modified Files: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:30:43 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:03:49 -0000 1.4 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20071114 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Solomos oblique Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -88,6 +89,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20071114-6 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20071114-5 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 30 22:46:24 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:46:24 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <200804302246.m3UMkOhd011518@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11452/devel Modified Files: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec Log Message: ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 17 Mar 2008 21:31:48 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:45:48 -0000 1.4 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Theokritos decorative font Group: User Interface/X @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} +chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new @@ -88,6 +89,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-6 +??? Yet another prep fix?? + * Mon Mar 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-5 ??? RIP OSX zip metadata. You won't be missed.