From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 1 04:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807010411.m614BK9d019768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[i18n][zh_CN] Rendering |[i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering |different bold effect |different bold effect -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 1 04:10:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n][zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807010410.m614ArsN019680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n][zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |fangqq at gmail.com Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Component|qt |wqy-bitmap-fonts Flag|needinfo?(yshao at redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 1 05:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 01:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807010511.m615BUCJ029395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2008-07-01 01:11 EST ------- To my opinion, this bug shall be filed to Qt or Xft. Let me explain: With earlier versions of Xft library, fake-bold (automatically emboldening a bitmap glyph produce its bold face) was not supported (http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-bugzilla-noise/2004-October/003643.html ). So, since the first release of wqy-bitmap-fonts, we have been including a pre-made bold face for each bitmap size (9-11pt). We recently stopped doing that (http://wenq.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=655), because we thought that Xft is mature enough for emboldening bitmaps if bold face is not provided. I updated the wqy-bitmap-fonts to reflect this change for Fedora. This also halve the file size for this package. The reported bug seems more like that Xft/Qt is not correct/consistent in handling automatic-emboldening bitmap fonts when bold face is missing. I would suggest either assigning this bug to kde/qt rendering library, or Xft. More input is also welcome to clarify the accurate source of this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 1 05:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 01:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807010518.m615IEPI030411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2008-07-01 01:18 EST ------- just realized Baif had found the right solution to this problem in his reply on May 9. Has this patch been accepted by KDE4 team? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 1 08:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807010827.m618R2oG012071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-07-01 04:27 EST ------- This type of patches has to go to Trolltech, not KDE, and (unless it's already in 4.4) it will most likely not get in before Qt 4.5. Moreover, Qt 3 no longer gets updated, so if Qt 3 doesn't currently support this, this feature will never be supported in Qt 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 1 15:31:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807011531.m61FVUOI029552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-07-01 11:31 EST ------- I need to talk with the lawyers about this one, please hold. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 1 19:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450847] Evince crashes in freetype In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807011918.m61JIAEq025443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Evince crashes in freetype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450847 thepurlieu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thepurlieu at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From thepurlieu at gmail.com 2008-07-01 15:18 EST ------- I have also gotten this crash many times, with matching stacktrace to yours. However, I routinely get this with as few as 2 PDF documents open at once (again, I don't see a reproduceable method of getting it, although it seems to happen more often with very large PDFs (>300 pages)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 2 01:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 21:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450810] Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is very wide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807020132.m621WiUR007433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is very wide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450810 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Incorrect width of slash '/'|Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is |in default Korean font. |very wide ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-01 21:32 EST ------- Un Dotum does not seem to have this problem btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 2 08:08:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 04:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807020808.m6288xfW009484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-02 04:08 EST ------- I am still not really convinced any bold font is involved here in this report. To me it just looks to be the contrast of the light Chinese font and the dark Western font, no? I have generally found Chinese fonts to be pretty faint but maybe it is necessary for them to be so fine to be able render very detailed Hanzi characters? I think there was some discussion somewhat related to this pango issue between Qianqian and Behdad not so long ago on fedora-fonts-list IIRC and also elsewhere. Shao, I think if you specify a Chinese font in the gedit preferences it looks ok, no? So I think this is really comes down to pango. We could try reassigning to pango, but unless someone has some real ideas how to improve it upstream it is probably unlikely to get changed yet. (But sure, I guess the Qt embolden issue is worth pursuing upstream.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 2 08:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 04:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807020828.m628SIoQ032293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-02 04:28 EST ------- If the problems are reported against QT apps I sort of doubt pango is involved. It would be nice to have a confirmation it works as expected in a pango app such as gedit though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 2 09:41:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 05:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807020941.m629fIFl013920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-02 05:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > If the problems are reported against QT apps I sort of doubt pango is involved. No, the complaint was that the rendering in konqueror and gedit is different. Actually Qt seems to be doing the right thing here and it is pango that is using a different font for the Western characters in the screenshot as is a well-known problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 2 15:52:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807021552.m62Fqef6020617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords| |FutureFeature ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-07-02 11:52 EST ------- Nod, such cleanups have been a long-standing todo item of mine. Still pondering the best approach to take here. brainstorm: 1 make each upstream a subpkg 2 kill mathml-fonts altogether, package each upstream separately 3 some combo of 1 and 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 2 17:10:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807021710.m62HA1bc014928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-02 13:10 EST ------- Obviously, I prefer do-it-all-cleanly option 2, but since you're the one doing the work, that's your choice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 2 23:28:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450810] Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is very wide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807022328.m62NSvQ7022006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is very wide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450810 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-07-02 19:28 EST ------- Patch of openoffice to change requires from fonts-korean to baekmuk-ttf-fonts rely on this bug. OO has to be patched again when default Korean font is changed. (bug#453868) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 3 09:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 05:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807030959.m639x6PW003370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-03 05:59 EST ------- bah forgot all about it. having just one arm for now sucks - will address at a later point in my recovery from surgery :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 3 14:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449598] FTBFS fonttools-2.0-0.11.20060223cvs.fc7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807031437.m63Ebu2u023173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FTBFS fonttools-2.0-0.11.20060223cvs.fc7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449598 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-02 17:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=307956) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=307956&action=view) root.log.bz2 root.log for i386 ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-02 17:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=307957) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=307957&action=view) build.log.bz2 build.log for i386 ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-02 17:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=307958) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=307958&action=view) root.log.bz2 root.log for x86_64 ------- Additional Comments From ftbfs at fedoraproject.org 2008-06-02 17:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=307959) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=307959&action=view) build.log.bz2 build.log for x86_64 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-07-03 10:37 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 434409 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 3 14:37:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434409] fonttools failed massrebuild attempt for GCC 4.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807031437.m63EbwQh023200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonttools failed massrebuild attempt for GCC 4.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434409 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ftbfs at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list at redhat.com 2008-05-14 01:32 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-07-03 10:37 EST ------- *** Bug 449598 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 10:10:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041010.m64AABek028271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 10:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041015.m64AFDIc009543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 06:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > About the license please see also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_fonts#Caveats Yes, please update the wiki page (change its status) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_fonts and follow our fonts packaging instructions http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 12:24:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 08:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041224.m64COmIE019150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 08:24 EST ------- BTW utopia is referenced there http://directory.fsf.org/project/utopia/ if that's worth anything -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 13:19:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041319.m64DJBns029019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-04 09:19 EST ------- Cc-ed fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com have more attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 13:18:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041318.m64DIZln028973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 13:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181994] Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041316.m64DGFH4028779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181994 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 13:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181994] Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041317.m64DHxfh009397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181994 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 14:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807041447.m64ElebG024028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-07-04 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > BTW utopia is referenced there http://directory.fsf.org/project/utopia/ if > that's worth anything Not really. The FSF isn't concerned at all with patents, only that it is under a free license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 20:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042039.m64KdX6F002870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 20:40:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042040.m64KeITm003618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 20:41:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042041.m64KfULV015709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 16:41 EST ------- Formal review OK | MUST: rpmlint must be run on every packag? $ rpmlint *rpm khmeros-fonts.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/khmeros-fonts/COPYRIGHT.Fedora 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. (self-inflicted error, not the proposed file) OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? NOK | MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the? Don't add licence files not published upstream - | MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - | MUST: The sources used to build the package must match? Didn't check the srpm. the spec works fine with the upstream zip OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? N/A | MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? N/A | MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly? N/A | MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared? N/A | MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable N/A | MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc OK | MUST: If a package includes something as %doc? N/A | MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A | MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A | MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must? N/A | MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix? N/A | MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must? N/A | MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, N/A | MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include? OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Please do so - | SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the? OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds? N/A | SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary? OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must? N/A | SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should? N/A | SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on? N/A | SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 20:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042052.m64KqjXL006573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 16:52 EST ------- Proposed spec changes: 1. re-word description a little 2. macroify version in archivename 3. kill the external non-upstream-provided license file (even if you kept it it's not necessary to install it this way, %doc takes care of a lot of things) --- khmeros-fonts.spec 2008-07-04 15:40:50.000000000 +0200 +++ khmeros-fonts-nim.spec 2008-07-04 22:49:39.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,27 +1,26 @@ %define fontname khmeros %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define archivename All_KhmerOS_5.0 +%define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 Release: 1%{?dist} -Summary: Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute +Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X License: LGPLv2+ URL: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/khmer/%{archivename}.zip -Source1: COPYRIGHT.Fedora BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description -All font include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes -for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not -necessary to have different size points of the text for each language. -This makes localization possible. Khmer OS System is our system font. It -is hinted, so that it can be used and clearly understood in small sizes. +The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent +sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not +necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. + +They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %prep @@ -36,8 +35,6 @@ install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name} -install -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name} %clean @@ -59,7 +56,6 @@ %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf -%doc %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/COPYRIGHT.Fedora %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 20:55:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042055.m64Ktm8n007485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 16:55 EST ------- Last remark : this font set is very rich, with ~ 1 MiB for the resulting rpm, it would be nice to split it in 2 ~ 500 KiB subpackages (discuss with upstream what would be a user-friendly split) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 20:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042058.m64KwIFK019789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 16:58 EST ------- Anyway: 1. please take care of the licensing (blocker) 2. try to split the file (nice-to-have) 3. work a bit on the package description (as suggested, or if you have better ideas) Then I'll approve the package (don't wait before I leave for summer vacations) Thank you for packaging a new font! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042116.m64LGMFf025047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:16 EST ------- 1. Please complete http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_Extra_fonts 2. Please make sure you've performed the other font packager actions documented on phase 2 of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle Package review will follow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042131.m64LVRWX029049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:31 EST ------- 4. and do check your summary and description, so they're different from un-core-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042129.m64LTnEj016208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:29 EST ------- Spec review of http://get9.net/rpm/un-fonts-extra.spec-1 I see you've strayed quite a bit from our official template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template (checked with meld) 1. Most of your changes look harmless but please do make sure you use the official scriplets and not something else. 2. Also I'm not really sure about the %build %{nil} thing 3. If you can please have upstream publish the sfd files they use and rebuild the fonts from sfds in your package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042137.m64LbmYq018410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:37 EST ------- 5. if upstream has not released a 1.0.2 version yet, and 1.0.2.080608 is an alpha/beta/pre-release of 1.0.2: A. use 1.0.2 as version B. use a 0.X.%{alphatag} release with %{alphatag}=080608 ( see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042140.m64LeSOZ031277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Then I am sorry but better we revert to 1.0 unless there are > strong reasons for shipping a snapshot. There are 4 more MiBs of content with 4 years of work since 1.0. Is that strong enough? However the package should use pre-release conventions http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042142.m64LgWgU019602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:42 EST ------- 6. I'd really name the package un-extra-fonts. un-fonts-extra/un-fonts-core makes it look like they're both subpackages of the same srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:46:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042146.m64LkVPa000461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:46 EST ------- That's all for the informal review. Since a formal review is very time consuming, I'll wait till those first remarks are taken into account before going through the whole http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 21:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042154.m64Lsm0O002320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-04 17:54 EST ------- Does this still need to be reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 4 23:12:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807042312.m64NCjHp013178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-04 19:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Does this still need to be reviewed? Not if you have something to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 09:14:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 05:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807050914.m659EaVp017440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 10:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 06:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807051024.m65AO2aW015306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(lyos.gemininorezel| |@gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-05 06:24 EST ------- Scriplets fixed in new version of full (non-split) rpm. Same URL as original. Split rpms will be orphaned shortly after acceptance. Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 10:38:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 06:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454137] Review Request: thibault-essays1743-fonts - Essays1743 font from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807051038.m65AcHgN018998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-essays1743-fonts - Essays1743 font from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454137 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 11:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 07:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454137] Review Request: thibault-essays1743-fonts - Essays1743 font from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807051105.m65B55Wx013831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-essays1743-fonts - Essays1743 font from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454137 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-05 07:05 EST ------- This one can be closed. Bureaucratic bullshit will not allow me to package these files as a collective... and I will not maintain 5 individual packages that break my highly automated system. URLS will shortly be defunct. Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 11:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 07:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454137] Review Request: thibault-essays1743-fonts - Essays1743 font from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807051111.m65BBHL7027973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-essays1743-fonts - Essays1743 font from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454137 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-05 07:11 EST ------- Packager does not wish to adhere to guidelines long term, and announced his intention to drop packages as soon as they're in the repo => failed review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 11:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 07:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807051110.m65BAUa1015426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-05 07:10 EST ------- Packager does not wish to adhere to guidelines long term, and announced his intention to drop packages as soon as they're in the repo => failed review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 15:56:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 11:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807051556.m65FuHeo024254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 smallvil at get9.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net)| ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-05 11:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 4. and do check your summary and description, so they're different from > un-core-fonts i see, un fonts package will be two kinds of fonts family. un-core-fonts and un-extra-fonts, So I used package name in the original package and i'll repackaging in 1.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 5 23:25:00 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 23:25:00 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <200807052325.m65NP0RR009383@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9269/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec sources Added Files: import.log Log Message: upstream stealth update --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215300135 Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:55:56 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 5 Jul 2008 23:24:12 -0000 1.5 @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ %define archivename GFS_DIDOTCLASS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20070415 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Version: 20080702 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Didot Classic Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -67,16 +67,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -86,11 +84,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Sun Jul 06 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080702-1 +?? Upstream stealth update + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-5 ??? Yet another prep fix?? Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 26 Nov 2007 19:50:45 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 5 Jul 2008 23:24:12 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -6fd26267363090a36118bb0e8576c6a2 GFS_DIDOTCLASS_OT.zip +28b890ca211c17a1fadb0760eee4c246 GFS_DIDOTCLASS_OT.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 23:45:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807052345.m65NjauM026615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 5 23:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807052358.m65Nw6tS018040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 00:10:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807060010.m660Ar7s021572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 00:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807060023.m660NJmI024404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 00:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807060041.m660f86I028900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 06:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 02:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807060652.m666q31C014442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-06 02:52 EST ------- Thanks for review, I'll incorporate the proposed changes (thanks for them!). Here's the question about license: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/node/2739 It should be upstream's forums. I tried several emails on the team page http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/about/team but with no luck yet (all failed to be delivered. Q about splitting: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/node/2740 When I have no luck I'll propose the splitting on my own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 11:23:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 07:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061123.m66BNIDi028875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 07:23 EST ------- There is not 4. I suck :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 11:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 07:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061122.m66BM6bb028621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 07:22 EST ------- Thank you for packaging a new font! This is not a formal review, just initial advice to make sure the actual review can proceed faster later. 1. Please make sure you've followed all the steps outlined in steps 1 and 2.a of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle 2. Please read attentively http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_packaging 3. Please try to stay as close as possible to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template If you feel you need to deviate (umasks, defattrs, etc) please explain in this review why the deviation is justified. 5. Some comments on your spec after a quick overview A. Please do not create a metapackage B. Please adhere to our font naming conventions (mona-fonts-bitmap, mona-fonts-sazanami etc). Unlike other distributions we do not use the ttf affix C. please ask on fedora-devel if it's not possible to detect font package versions automatically. Your hardcoded versions are going to bite you someday. D. you do not need to BR gzip 6. I seem to remember other core fonts packages used to execute mkfontdir in %post with ghosting. However we do not have any official core fonts packaging guidelines right now. If you feel you've fully researched the subject, and found the best solution, do not hesitate to submit a core fonts packaging guideline draft later. I realise this kind of package represents a lot of work (congratulations), and I hope those comments will help you complete it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 11:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 07:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061134.m66BY0of031658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 07:33 EST ------- Ok. Please ping me there when you have a new spec ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 11:32:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 07:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061132.m66BWD6B031348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 07:32 EST ------- If upstream does not answer, do proceed on your own. It's important to try to get issues fixed upstream but do not block on upstream availability too long. I won't be available from end of July till September, so if you stray in this zone, you'll have to wait a little or ask another reviewer. Since most of the review is already done that should not be too difficult. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 11:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 07:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061136.m66BaABP021240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 12:15:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 08:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061215.m66CFb7j011273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-06 08:15 EST ------- Thank you for initial comments: For 1: I did not know the wiki package, however as far as I check the wiki pacakage it seems fine. For 2: Perhaps I've read them For 3: 3-1: Some fedora contributor says that unless umask is set correctly fc-cache creates font cache in a wrong permission: ref: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-March/msg00151.html For example, fonts-japanese package has umask scriptlet. I don't know if this issue has been correctly fixed. If you are sure this is not needed now please let me know it. 3-2: %defattr(0644,-,-,0755) = %defattr(-,root,root,-) and actually I don't think fonts packages must write a explicit umask values which differs from gerenal packaging guidelines. Are there any rationale? 5-AB: Will fix 5-C: Very intentional. Actually I don't want to have this rpm _automatically_ find the version. i.e. If the dependent fonts make update version, then this srpm won't build and someone (or Matt using automated massbuild) complains to me "your srpm won't build, please fix it", which is actually what I am intended. 6. Calling mkfontdir on scriptlet pulls X dependent packages, which is _banned_ on current Fedora packaging: related to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS Actually one day (before the release of F-8) all packages including core fonts are made to not call mkfontdir or chkfontpath on scriptlet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 12:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 08:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061229.m66CTTYh003449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 smallvil at get9.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net)| ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-06 08:29 EST ------- Summary: Un Extra families Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-extra-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-extra-fonts-1.0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. Extra families (10 fonts) * UnPen, UnPenheulim: script * UnTaza: typewriter style * UnBom: decorative * UnShinmun * UnYetgul: old Korean printing style * UnJamoSora, UnJamoNovel, UnJamoDotum, UnJamoBatang Install un-core-fonts for additional fonts. and 1.0.2-pre packaging http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.3.080608.fc9.src.rpm http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-extra-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 12:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 08:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061231.m66CVxxl004369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-06 08:31 EST ------- Summary: Un Core families Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-core-fonts-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. Core families (9 fonts) * UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif * UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif * UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style * UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script * UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke Install un-extra-fonts for additional fonts. and 1.0.2-pre repackaging http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.3.080608.fc9.src.rpm http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 12:33:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 08:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061233.m66CXpQY015927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-06 08:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Ok. Please ping me there when you have a new spec ready. revert to the 1.0 stable release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 12:33:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 08:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061233.m66CXFn3015822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-06 08:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #13) > > this version is prerelease and 1.0 is stable release > > how about you packaging version is 1.0 or 1.0.2-prerelease? > > > > I think a 1.0.2-stable release will take a long time > Oh I see. So I had misunderstood the upstream versioning intention. > Then I am sorry but better we revert to 1.0 unless there are > strong reasons for shipping a snapshot. revert to the 1.0 stable release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 13:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 09:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061323.m66DNGQh017975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-06 09:23 EST ------- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/monafont/monafont.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/monafont/monafont-2.90-2.fc9p.src.rpm dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=698967 dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=698969 * Sun Jul 6 2008 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.90-2 - Gerenal packaing fix according to Fedora fonts packaing conventions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 14:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 10:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061448.m66EmZHO007169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 10:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > For 1: > I did not know the wiki package, however as far as I check the wiki pacakage > it seems fine. I don't see any wiki page on mona in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:In-progress_fonts so you're definitely missing some steps in the fonts packaging workflow. Please check. Those pages were not written for no reason. > For 2: > Perhaps I've read them Can't answer for you. > For 3: > 3-1: Some fedora contributor says that unless umask is set correctly fc-cache > creates font cache in a wrong permission: ref: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-March/msg00151.html I didn't know this link but in any case that's a lot of maybes and since almost all our fonts do not use umask (and have been so for a long time) I doubt there is any problem in real life. > For example, fonts-japanese package has umask scriptlet. This was a mistake of the fonts-japanese packager. Silently changing one package when the same pattern is repeated in many others is wrong. > I don't know if this issue has been correctly fixed. If this issue is real it needs to be addressed by guideline changes so every packager (not just the ones aware of this mail post) can fix his packages. In the meanwhile adding umasks not in the guidelines only adds to the confusion. Thus: ? please remove umasks from your packages ? please submit a guideline change proposal to FPC arguing the need for umask, so the issue can be discussed properly. If FPC deems the umask necessary we'll change all packages including yours. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee > 3-2: %defattr(0644,-,-,0755) = %defattr(-,root,root,-) and actually I don't think > fonts packages must write a explicit umask values which differs from gerenal > packaging guidelines. Are there any rationale? The defattr mask for font packages has been approved by FPC and FESCO with the font spec template. Official page there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate (unfortunately broken by recent mediawiki migration, the page I gave you is a cleaned-up unofficial version). FPC has generally avoided making statements on defattrs, because they can become quite complex. It has let packagers exercise their good judgement on umasks or not. However in the fonts case a correct deffatr is really simple which is why the fonts guidelines include one (you can probably fish the IRC FPC minutes on the subject if you care to). > 5-AB: Will fix > 5-C: Very intentional. Actually I don't want to have this rpm _automatically_ find > the version. Ok, good enough for me > 6. Calling mkfontdir on scriptlet pulls X dependent packages, which is _banned_ > on current Fedora packaging: Ok, right, I was not thinking. The actual rule on this is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy#Install-time_dependencies BTW. I didn't think and didn't have any core fonts packaging guidelines to draw on. Please write some. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 15:10:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061510.m66FACet012970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 11:10 EST ------- On the spec file: 1. it's generally speaking a good idea to limit changes to the official template, that makes rebasing after guideline changes easier. So it may be a good idea to compare your spec with the template in rpmdevtools and try to limit variations. 2. as stated on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template the -f flag to fc-cache should not be necessary starting from F9 and the fontconfig packager requested its removal 3. please remove umasks 4. please add defattrs 5. it's probably a good idea to add some fontconfig rules so fontconfig knows it can substitute mona-sazanami to sazanami (same for VLGothic). See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips 6. URL could be URL: http://%{archivename}.sourceforge.net/ 7. Source0 could be (probably wrong right now): Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{archivename}/%{archivename}-%{version}.tar.bz2 8. upstream tarball includes sfd files, and I dont see fontforge in your BR. Please try to build from sfd sources if possible http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy#Building_from_sources 9. upstream tarball is missing a detached file with licensing statements. Please ask upstream to add it (this would be asked during formal review) This informal review is quickly degenerating in a full review *sigh* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 15:22:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061522.m66FMNPK027676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-06 11:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > 2. as stated on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template > the -f flag to fc-cache should not be necessary starting from F9 and the > fontconfig packager requested its removal Ahh.. actually after setting "umask 000" and calling fc-cache, fontconfig cache is created with 0666 permission, which is wrong... So umask 133 is _definately_ needed and FPC must discuss this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 15:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061525.m66FPotL016972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-06 11:25 EST ------- Specifyin -f option with 'umask 000' also creates 0666 permission fontconfig cache, which is also wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 15:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061542.m66Fg2oS021106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 11:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Specifyin -f option with 'umask 000' also creates 0666 permission fontconfig cache, > which is also wrong. -f has nothing to do with permissions, it's a totally different setting. As for your findings, I don't disagree with them, they just seem not to be a problem in actual life (I suspect changing root default umask is so impacting almost no one does this). Nevertheless, as stated before: ? do not add an umask when the guidelines says you should not ? if you care about the problem have the guidelines changed (it's easy: write a short wiki page on the subject, and submit it to FPC with a mail, the procedure is on FPC's page) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 15:51:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061551.m66FpORQ002808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-06 11:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > As for your findings, I don't disagree with them, they just seem not to be a > problem in actual life (I suspect changing root default umask is so impacting > almost no one does this). sudores is affected by this. > Nevertheless, as stated before: > ? do not add an umask when the guidelines says you should not > ? if you care about the problem have the guidelines changed (it's easy: write a > short wiki page on the subject, and submit it to FPC with a mail, the procedure > is on FPC's page) Are you suggesting that I have to keep a potentially broke scriptlet until FPC discusses this? (and please keep in mind that usually I won't be able to discuss with FPC members just because I live in Japan... At the time I am writing this it is around 1 am) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 15:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061554.m66Fs6Xi024121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 11:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=311102) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311102&action=view) spec diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 16:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061603.m66G3Yhx026674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 12:03 EST ------- So: 1. I've posted a diff you may want to consider, changing your spec a little so it's closer to our templates and easier to review 2. this diff is against the 1.0.2 pre-version spec. I'll let you judge of the version to package, you're better qualified than me and given the timespan between the stable and current version using stable may not necessarily be a good idea. 3. please update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_Extra_fonts as requested on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#2.a 4. As noted on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts since upstream chose a GPL license, please get it to clarify its position WRT GPLv3 and at least add the FSF font exception to their GPL text. If they don't answer in a week, proceed as usual (but no embedding exception sucks for korean users) 5. if possible have upstream release sfds and build from them 6. since this font set includes many fonts, it's probably a good idea to write a fontconfig ruleset so fontconfig puts them in the right families (sans-serif, serif, monospace; cursive, fantasy) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 16:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061606.m66G6lix006699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 12:06 EST ------- 3. and 4. are a MUST (for 4. at least asking, since we won't block on no answer) 1. 5. 6. are a SHOULD, but you can pass on them if you don't agree with them Anyway this version is much closer to review acceptance, thank you for your work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 16:16:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061616.m66GGRn8009195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 12:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Are you suggesting that I have to keep a potentially broke scriptlet until > FPC discusses this? Yes. Because FPC may have a different perspective from you, and the fact most of our fonts have been shipping without this umask for years (including distro default fonts) strongly hints the problem is limited. If you care about it have the guidelines changed, period. Localized workarounds are wrong. If the problem is not important enough to be fixed distro-wide, it's not important enough to be workarounded in your package. > (and please keep in mind that usually I won't be able to discuss > with FPC members just because I live in Japan... At the time I am writing this > it is around 1 am) Get some sleep please then :). A few hours delay won't hurt anyone. FPC discussion happens by mail and in the wiki page submitted to FPC so being in Japan is not a huge problem. Honestly it just takes a few week to have FPC and Fesco approve a guideline change, so just package without the umask for now, and add it back in a few weeks if FPC decides it's a good idea (if it decides it's a bad idea well, I trust FPC more than any individual packager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 16:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061617.m66GHItv030321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u- | |tokyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 16:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061625.m66GPZuD011508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u- | |tokyo.ac.jp) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-06 12:25 EST ------- Sorry, Nicolas, another big problem is found before discussing packagins issues..... After rechecking license issue, README.euc says that ttf font is based on *Kochi font*, which turned before (some years ago) to contain some legal issue and _cannot_ be shipped on Fedora. Although bitmap part is public domain, I think only shipping bitmap part is rather of no use, so I must withdraw this review request. Very sorry for troubling you without checking very fundamental issue carefully... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 16:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061632.m66GWs2Z001916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 12:32 EST ------- np, serves me right by not starting with the licensing bit. I don't care much about the bitmap part, but we have a few bitmap users, so if you want to restart with just this element, it's ok with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 17:07:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061707.m66H7iLH010831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 smallvil at get9.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net)| ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-06 13:07 EST ------- 1. ok 3. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_Extra_fonts -updated wiki page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 6 17:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807061741.m66HfQ65019466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-06 13:41 EST ------- Please don't forget to change the wiki page status next time. Anyway, please do 4. and at least look at the others now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 00:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070023.m670Ni8N025970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 00:23:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070023.m670NQFT025898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-06 20:23 EST ------- mail sent to upstream, waiting for response -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 01:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070108.m6718Su1015471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-06 21:08 EST ------- Stable release 1.0-4 Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-core-fonts-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm Diff URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-core-fonts-1.0.spec-4.patch pre-release 1.0.2-0.4.080608 Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts-1.0.2- 0.4.080608.fc9.src.rpm Diff URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts-1.0.2.spec-4.patch -Refined .spec literal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 01:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070109.m6719qsa015608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-06 21:09 EST ------- Stable release 1.0.1-4 Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-extra-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-extra-fonts-1.0.1-4.fc9.src.rpm Diff URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0/un-extra-fonts-1.0.1.spec-4.patch pre-release 1.0.2-0.4.080608 Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-extra-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2- 0.4.080608.fc9.src.rpm Diff URL: http://get9.net/rpm/4/1.0.2-080608/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2.spec-4.patch - Refined .spec literal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 01:24:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070124.m671OhPO019327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-06 21:24 EST ------- How about: Summary: A font for literacy and beginning readers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 01:26:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 21:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070126.m671QuFh009091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://scripts.sil.org/andik | |a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 04:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 00:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070448.m674m1a6020792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-07 00:48 EST ------- Nicolas, thank you for taking this review, but isn't it better we finish un-fonts-core first, otherwise we are going to be duplicating a lot of review work across the two packages. Once the core review is settled the extra package review should be straightforward. I am not sure it is a good idea to rename the package from the upstream name. I feel more comfortable just keeping the upstream naming, and I think our packaging guidelines should allow and encourage that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 05:06:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 01:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070506.m6756Lqt003420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-07 01:06 EST ------- > There are 4 more MiBs of content with 4 years of work since 1.0. Is that strong enough? Ok, agreed let's go with the new pre-release if Dennis does not have any concerns. :) (Sorry to keep jumping back and forth with the version....) Personally I would rather keep the upstream name un-fonts-core. We do that with other fonts packages too. IMHO upstream naming should take precedence AFAP. Nicolas, how can we get consensus on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 08:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 04:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070822.m678Mk5G010232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-07 04:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Personally I would rather keep the upstream name un-fonts-core. > We do that with other fonts packages too. My preference would be un-core-fonts/un-extra-fonts to minimize confusion with subpackages. Multiple slightly different conventions are user-unfriendly. But I'll let you have the last call on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 08:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 04:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070824.m678O2uM021220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-07 04:24 EST ------- Why not, care to take the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 08:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 04:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807070830.m678Unon023301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-07 04:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I am not sure it is a good idea to rename the package from the upstream name. We have the case here of an upstream naming that's very close to our own conventions, so it's not so clear cut. But in other cases we don't hesitate to rename, so I don't see why not there. IMHO (and Debian has gone this way too lately) we'll need someday to review all our font package names to be more strict and consistent. Consistency pays big time with users and upstream namings are sadly not consistent at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 14:44:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807071444.m67EiOKP006055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-07 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Last remark : this font set is very rich, with ~ 1 MiB for the resulting rpm, it > would be nice to split it in 2 ~ 500 KiB subpackages (discuss with upstream what > would be a user-friendly split) See from upstream: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/node/2740#comment-6623 The problem here is that when I choose some way of splitting package to two sub-packages and upstream will choose it's own separation (and different from ours) then we might face problems when trying to publish new "upstreamised" sub-packages. I'd prefer issuing this package as-is and split it in future based on upstream decision. What you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 14:47:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807071447.m67ElbQb016871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-07 10:47 EST ------- * (updated) http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/khmeros-fonts/khmeros-fonts.spec * (new) http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/khmeros-fonts/khmeros-fonts-5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm [root at dhcp-lab-192 SOURCES]# rpmlint ../SPECS/khmeros-fonts.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/khmeros-fonts-5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/khmeros-fonts-5.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm khmeros-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * Expected, upstream does not provide any. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 15:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454291] New: pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454291 Summary: pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango- devel.x86_64 Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: stransky at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: pango-devel.i386 can't be installed with pango-devel.x86_64 on x86_64 box. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: on x86_64: 1. #yum install pango-devel 2. #yum install pango-devel.i386 Actual results: [komat at dhcp-lab-232 tmp436]$ sudo yum install pango-devel.i386 Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package pango-devel.i386 0:1.20.1-1.fc9 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: pango-devel i386 1.20.1-1.fc9 fedora 320 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total size: 320 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoEngineLang.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoEngineShape.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoFcDecoder.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoFcFont.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoFcFontMap.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoMarkupFormat.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoRenderer.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.10.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.12.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.14.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.16.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.18.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.2.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.20.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.4.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.6.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-1.8.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-all.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/index-deprecated.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-ATSUI-Fonts.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Cairo-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Coverage-Maps.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Engines.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Fonts.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-FreeType-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Glyph-Storage.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Layout-Objects.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Miscellaneous-Utilities.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Modules.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-OpenType-Font-Handling.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Scripts.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Tab-Stops.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Text-Attributes.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Text-Processing.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Version-Checking.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Vertical-Text.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Win32-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-X-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-Xft-Fonts-and-Rendering.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-querymodules.html from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango.devhelp from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango.devhelp2 from install of pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.20.1-1.fc9.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- Expected results: pango-devel.i386 lives with pango-devel.x86_64 Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From doko at openoffice.org Mon Jul 7 16:16:14 2008 From: doko at openoffice.org (doko at openoffice.org) Date: 7 Jul 2008 16:16:14 -0000 Subject: [Issue 19503] redesign Math formulas fonts selection dialogue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080707161614.29733.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=19503 User doko changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|81913 | is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From doko at openoffice.org Mon Jul 7 16:16:41 2008 From: doko at openoffice.org (doko at openoffice.org) Date: 7 Jul 2008 16:16:41 -0000 Subject: [Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080707161641.1533.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User doko changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|81913 | is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From doko at openoffice.org Mon Jul 7 16:16:58 2008 From: doko at openoffice.org (doko at openoffice.org) Date: 7 Jul 2008 16:16:58 -0000 Subject: [Issue 55986] impossible to paste text with diacritic symbols - regression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080707161658.3333.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55986 User doko changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|81913 | is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From doko at openoffice.org Mon Jul 7 16:16:52 2008 From: doko at openoffice.org (doko at openoffice.org) Date: 7 Jul 2008 16:16:52 -0000 Subject: [Issue 87396] Selected font switches back to default font when using non-default language styles (Western/Asian/CTL) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080707161652.2519.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87396 User doko changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|81913 | is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From doko at openoffice.org Mon Jul 7 16:16:52 2008 From: doko at openoffice.org (doko at openoffice.org) Date: 7 Jul 2008 16:16:52 -0000 Subject: [Issue 87396] Selected font switches back to default font when using non-default language styles (Western/Asian/CTL) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080707161652.2519.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87396 User doko changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|81913 | is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 7 19:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807071938.m67JcpMW029262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-07 15:38 EST ------- I'll try to look at your new spec tomorrow or thr day after. I agree that if upstream promised changes for the next version, it's no use anticipating them and packaging as-is (with commitment to adapt once upstream does its new release) is the way to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 06:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 02:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450810] Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is very wide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080601.m6861N0F009410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is very wide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450810 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smallvil at get9.net, | |sangu.fedora at gmail.com Keywords| |MoveUpstream ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-08 02:01 EST ------- Maybe you can ask about the / issue upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 07:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080729.m687TTLd019451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-08 03:29 EST ------- I will keep in my radar - maybe I can get to it next week - unfortunately I don't have time right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 07:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080756.m687u71p028607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-08 03:56 EST ------- >From reply > Thank you. Wait for new version, we will include some square fonts for title. I am not 100% sure they will split it but more that they will talk about it once the new version is out. I just asked on the khmeros mailing list, we will see... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 09:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 05:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807080917.m689HxfS008103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-08 05:17 EST ------- I think so un-fonts and un-fonts-extra, I wish that I think will be more comfortable. un-fonts-core and un-core-fonts are too uncomfortable or the naming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From Matt_Domsch at dell.com Mon Jul 7 21:35:41 2008 From: Matt_Domsch at dell.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:35:41 -0500 Subject: Fedora i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03 Message-ID: <20080707163541.A8977@humbolt.us.dell.com> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Based on the tree as of Thu Jul 3 2008. While I'm waiting on a bugzilla fix, I don't have all bugzilla numbers for existing FTBFS bugs. Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ Total packages: 5874 Number failed to build: 225 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 13 Leaving: 212 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) Of those expected to have worked... aiksaurus-1.2.1-15.fc6 (build/make) uwog anjuta-2.4.1-1.fc10 (buildroot) rishi apr-api-docs-1.2.12-1.fc9 (build/make) bojan ardour-2.4.1-1.fc9 (build/make) green,jwrdegoede astyle-1.21-6.fc8 (build/make) addutko,mtasaka atlas-3.6.0-15.fc10 (build/make) qspencer audacious-plugin-fc-0.2-6 (build/make) mschwendt bes-3.5.3-3.fc9 (build/make) pertusus blacs-1.1-26.fc9.1 (build/make) spot blam-1.8.3-13.fc9 (build/make) alexlan,sindrepb bodhi-0.4.10-3.fc9 (build/make) lmacken,toshio,timlau brutus-keyring-0.9.0-6.fc8 (build/make) bpepple,colding buoh-0.8.2-4.fc9 (build/make) chabotc callweaver-1.2-0.4.rc5.20071230.fc9 (build/make) dwmw2 camstream-0.26.3-12.fc8 (build/make) nomis80 claws-mail-3.4.0-1.fc10 (build/make) awjb compat-db-4.5.20-5.fc9 (build/make) jnovy condor-7.0.0-8.fc9 (build/make) matt conexusmm-0.5.0-3.fc7 (build/make) rvinyard crossfire-1.10.0-4.fc9 (build/make) wart dap-freeform_handler-3.7.7-2.fc9 (build/make) pertusus dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.7-3.fc9 (build/make) pertusus dar-2.3.6-3.fc9 (build/make) xris db4-4.6.21-6.fc9 (build/make) jnovy dmraid-1.0.0.rc14-6.fc9 (build/make) lvm-team,agk,mornfall,bmr,mbroz,mauelsha,dwysocha drivel-2.1.1-0.5.20071130svn.fc9 (build/make) pfrields dvdauthor-0.6.14-5.fc9 (build/make) scop eclipse-3.3.2-12.fc9 (build/make) overholt,oliver,overholt eclipse-subclipse-1.2.4-9.fc9 (build/make) robmv elektra-0.6.10-6.fc9 (build/make) pertusus,kwizart fonttools-2.0-0.11.20060223cvs.fc7 (build/make) roozbeh,fonts-sig freefem++-2.24-2.fc9 (build/make) rathann gdesklets-0.36-1.fc9 (build/make) luya,owentl gdmap-0.7.5-6.fc6 (build/make) splinux genius-1.0.2-3.fc9 (build/make) gemi gimmix-0.4.2-3.fc9 (build/make) awjb gl-117-1.3.2-4.fc7 (build/make) steve glade2-2.12.2-2.fc9 (build/make) mclasen gnome-applet-tvn24-0.2.8-3.fc9 (build/make) orphan gpsim-0.22.0-5.fc8 (build/make) dionysos gstm-1.2-6.fc7 (build/make) splinux gtk+-1.2.10-61.fc9 (build/make) rdieter gtk2hs-0.9.12.1-8.fc9 (build/make) bos,petersen gtk-sharp-1.0.10-12.fc7 (build/make) pfj httpd-2.2.8-3 (build/make) jorton inkscape-0.46-2.fc9 (build/make) lkundrak,lkundrak ipa-1.1.0-2.fc10 (build/make) rcritten,simo itpp-4.0.0-2.fc9 (build/make) edhill java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.16.b09.fc10 (build/make) fitzsim,lkundrak,langel,mjw jgroups-2.2.9.2-3jpp.2 (build/make) dbhole k3b-1.0.5-2.fc10 (build/make) rrakus,rdieter kdesvn-0.14.4-1.fc10 (build/make) orion kdevelop-3.5.2-2.fc10 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl ktechlab-0.3.69-5.fc8 (build/make) chitlesh libapreq2-2.09-0.17.rc2.fc10 (build/make) bojan libdap-3.7.10-2.fc9 (build/make) pertusus libgnomecups-0.2.3-3.fc9 (build/make) davidz libgtksourceviewmm-0.3.1-1.fc8 (build/make) splinux libnc-dap-3.7.0-9.fc9 (build/make) pertusus librra-0.11-2.fc9 (build/make) awjb,abompard libtomoe-gtk-0.6.0-3.fc9 (build/make) ryo,petersen lineakd-0.9-5.fc6 (build/make) xris lineak-defaultplugin-0.9-2.fc6 (build/make) xris lineak-xosdplugin-0.9-2.fc6 (build/make) xris lsdvd-0.16-7.fc9 (build/make) thias mediatomb-0.11.0-1.fc9 (build/make) mwiriadi mimetic-0.9.3-2.fc8 (build/make) ensc mod_python-3.3.1-7 (build/make) jorton moto4lin-0.3-6.fc7 (build/make) jafo mx-2.0.6-3 (build/make) misa mx4j-3.0.1-6jpp.4 (build/make) fnasser MyPasswordSafe-0.6.7-4.20061216.fc9 (build/make) ertzing nethack-vultures-2.1.0-10.fc8 (build/make) meme oooqs2-1.0-3.fc6 (build/make) ausil openbabel-2.2.0-0.5.b5.fc10 (build/make) rathann pan-0.132-2.fc8 (build/make) adalloz,mpeters pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-9.336svn.fc7 (open_missing_mode) leo pekwm-0.1.5-5.fc7 (build/make) errr perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader-0.20-1.fc10 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0702-2.fc9 (build/make) steve,perl-sig perl-Event-Lib-1.03-3.fc10 (build/make) kwizart,perl-sig perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0005-2.fc9 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-SVN-Mirror-0.73-3.fc9 (build/make) iburrell,perl-sig perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.2-3.fc9 (build/make) berrange petitboot-0.0.1-7.fc8 (build/make) dwmw2,jwboyer podsleuth-0.6.0-5.fc10 (build/make) nigelj ppl-0.9-19.fc9 (build/make) bagnara pwlib-1.10.10-6.fc9 (build/make) veillard pysvn-1.5.3-1.fc10 (build/make) ravenoak python-durus-3.5-3.fc7 (build/make) shahms python-tgcaptcha-0.11-3.fc10 (build/make) lmacken python-turboflot-0.1.1-1.fc10 (build/make) lmacken python-TurboMail-2.1-3.fc9 (build/make) lmacken pywbxml-0.1-3.fc9 (build/make) awjb qgo-1.5.4r2-1.fc9 (build/make) kaboom qps-1.9.19-0.2.b.fc7 (build/make) makghosh qt4-theme-quarticurve-0.0-0.11.beta7.fc9 (build/make) kkofler qtiplot-0.9-8.fc9 (build/make) frankb R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-11.fc9.2 (build/make) spot ruby-bdb-0.6.0-1.fc7 (build/make) errr rudeconfig-5.0.5-1.fc7 (build/make) homeless scalapack-1.7.5-2.fc9 (build/make) spot scim-skk-0.5.2-8.fc6 (build/make) ryo scim-tomoe-0.6.0-3.fc10 (build/make) ryo,petersen setools-3.3.4-1.fc9 (build/make) pebenito,dwalsh smarteiffel-2.3-2.fc9 (build/make) gemi spicebird-0.4-5.fc8 (build/make) tuxbrewr stardict-3.0.1-8.fc9 (build/make) cchance,zhu subcommander-1.9.93-2.fc10 (build/make) s4504kr subversion-api-docs-1.4.6-1.fc9 (build/make) bojan sugar-journal-79-3.fc9 (build/make) ausil supertux-0.3.1-1.fc9 (build/make) steve swfdec-gnome-2.22.0-1.fc9 (build/make) bpepple tachyon-0.98-0.6.20070319.fc9 (build/make) rathann tuxcmd-0.6.36-3.fc10 (build/make) tbzatek vtk-5.0.4-21.fc9 (build/make) athimm,orion wyrd-1.4.4-1.fc9 (build/make) till xemacs-21.5.28-6.fc9 (build/make) scop xml-commons-resolver-1.1-1jpp.12 (build/make) fnasser xscorch-0.2.0-12.fc8 (build/make) mgarski xsupplicant-1.2.8-7.fc10 (build/make) spot amanda-2.5.2p1-10.fc9 ['449479 NEW'] (build/make) rbrich aterm-1.0.1-2.fc9 ['440779 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb bacula-2.0.3-13.fc9 ['440905 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) ixs,mmcgrath bitbake-1.8.8-1.fc8 ['440562 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) ixs bmpx-0.40.14-5.fc9 ['449431 NEW'] (build/make) akahl brltty-3.9-2.2.fc9 ['449446 NEW'] (build/make) kasal contacts-0.8-3.fc10 ['449603 NEW'] (build/make) jkeating coolkey-1.1.0-6.fc9 ['440753 NEW'] (build/make) rrelyea,jmagne djvulibre-3.5.20-2.fc9 ['440910 NEW'] (build/make) thias dxpc-3.9.1-0.3.b1.fc9 ['449644 NEW'] (build/make) guthrie ekg2-0.2-0.1.rc1.fc10 ['449637 NEW'] (build/make) rathann erlang-R12B-1.1.fc9 ['449432 NEW'] (build/make) gemi fakechroot-2.5-13.fc9 ['449447 NEW'] (build/make) athimm fakeroot-1.6.4-16.fc9 ['449659 NEW'] (build/make) athimm fish-1.23.0-2.fc9 ['440724 NEW'] (build/make) ascii,oliver fluxstyle-1.0.1-2.fc7 ['440757 NEW'] (build/make) errr fontypython-0.2.0-6.fc7 ['440756 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) cr33dog,fonts-sig freeipmi-0.5.1-3.fc9 ['440875 NEW'] (build/make) pknirsch fwbuilder-2.1.16-2.fc9 ['440846 NEW'] (build/make) ertzing gazpacho-0.7.2-2.fc8 ['440859 NEW'] (build/make) icon gcl-2.6.7-18.fc9 ['440913 NEW'] (build/make) gemi,green glib-1.2.10-29.fc9 ['449582 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter gnupg2-2.0.9-1.fc9 ['449574 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter,nalin gpgme-1.1.6-3.fc9 ['449416 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter graphviz-2.16.1-0.5.fc9 ['449410 NEW'] (build/make) jima HelixPlayer-1.0.9-2.fc9 ['449474 NEW'] (build/make) abompard ht2html-2.0-5.fc6 ['440916 NEW'] (build/make) ifoox jabbin-2.0-0.6.beta2a.fc9 ['440730 NEW'] (build/make) kurzawa kdebluetooth-1.0-0.41.beta8.fc9 ['449604 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) gilboa,scop kickpim-0.5.3-14.fc9 ['449538 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) rdieter klear-0.7.0-1.svn113.fc9 ['440755 NEW'] (build/make) trasher koffice-langpack-1.6.3-1.fc8 ['440758 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb kphotobymail-0.4.1-1.fc7 ['440873 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) kushal ladspa-1.12-9.fc9 ['449542 NEW'] (build/make) thomasvs libFoundation-1.1.3-11.fc9 ['440564 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) athimm libfwbuilder-2.1.16-2.fc9 ['449591 NEW'] (build/make) ertzing libidn-0.6.14-7 ['449440 NEW'] (build/make) jorton libopensync-0.36-2.fc9 ['449510 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb libsigsegv-2.4-6.fc9 ['449607 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter libzzub-0.2.3-12.fc9 ['449661 NEW'] (build/make) akahl,mtasaka lilypond-2.10.33-1.fc8 ['440826 NEW'] (build/make) qspencer linpsk-0.9-3.fc9 ['440778 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) bjensen,sindrepb,sconklin linux-atm-2.5.0-5 ['449613 NEW'] (build/make) dwmw2 lostirc-0.4.6-3.fc8 ['440921 NEW'] (build/make) splinux,splinux lrmi-0.10-4.fc9 ['449509 NEW'] (build/make) pwouters mod_suphp-0.6.3-1.fc9 ['449578 NEW'] (build/make) ixs monodevelop-0.19-6.fc9 ['449441 NEW'] (build/make) pfj mosml-2.01-11.fc9 ['449445 NEW'] (build/make) gemi muine-0.8.8-9.fc9 ['449567 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb muine-scrobbler-0.1.8-5.fc9 ['449482 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb mysql-gui-tools-5.0r12-5.fc9 ['440734 NEW'] (build/make) ausil nco-3.9.3-1.fc9 ['449408 NEW'] (build/make) edhill,pertusus ntfs-config-1.0-0.6.rc5.fc9 ['449585 NEW'] (build/make) laxathom ntl-5.4.2-2.fc9 ['449523 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter oggconvert-0.3.0-14.fc9 ['440943 NEW'] (build/make) ngompa pam_abl-0.2.3-4.fc9 ['449429 NEW'] (build/make) adalloz,tmraz pdsh-2.11-6.fc9 ['440811 NEEDINFO'] (build/make) kg6fnk perl-Class-MethodMaker-2.10-3.fc9 ['449442 NEW'] (build/make) dgregor,perl-sig perl-Crypt-Simple-0.06-5.fc9 ['449495 NEW'] (needs_perl_ExtUtils_MakeMaker) allisson perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.044-3.fc9 ['449470 NEW'] (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-MIME-Lite-3.01-6.fc9 ['449558 NEW'] (build/make) mmcgrath,perl-sig perl-Net-CUPS-0.55-4.fc9 ['449469 NEW'] (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Net-Packet-3.25-3.fc9 ['449473 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb perl-Net-Write-1.00-3.fc9 ['449620 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb perl-Text-CharWidth-0.04-4.fc9 ['449483 NEW'] (build/make) athimm perl-Text-WrapI18N-0.06-3.fc9 ['449435 NEW'] (build/make) athimm perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.63-5.fc9 ['449544 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) shishz,perl-sig pic2aa-0.2.1-3.fc9 ['440764 NEW'] (build/make) kurzawa plague-0.4.4.1-4.fc7 ['440874 NEW'] (build/make) dcbw plotmm-0.1.2-6.fc9 ['440563 NEW'] (build/make) hguemar plplot-5.9.0-1.fc9 ['449488 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) orion python-memcached-1.39-1.fc8 ['440931 NEW'] (build/make) jafo python-pydns-2.3.0-5.fc7 ['440912 NEW'] (build/make) jafo python-pyspf-2.0.3-1.fc8 ['440793 NEW'] (build/make) jafo python-simpletal-4.1-5.fc7 ['440930 NEW'] (build/make) shahms python-tpg-3.1.0-4.fc7 ['440763 NEW'] (build/make) shahms pyzor-0.4.0-11.fc7 ['440790 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) ixs qa-assistant-0.4.90.5-2.fc6 ['440914 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) toshio qcad-2.0.5.0-8.fc9 ['449636 NEW'] (build/make) gemi qmmp-0.1.5-2.fc9 ['449658 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) kvolny,jwrdegoede qscintilla-2.2-1.fc10 ['449423 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter qsynth-0.2.5-7.fc9 ['440736 NEW'] (build/make) nando rapidsvn-0.9.6-1.fc9 ['449500 NEW'] (build/make) timj R-Matrix-0.999375-4.fc9 ['449530 NEW'] (build/make) tmoertel scribus-1.3.4-5.fc9 ['440766 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb sos-1.8-1.fc8 ['440839 NEW'] (build/make) navid straw-0.27-12.fc9 ['440806 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) subhodip svnmailer-1.0.8-3.fc7 ['449666 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) mfleming yoltia-0.22.1-2.fc9 ['440935 NEW'] (build/make) kurzawa zhcon-0.2.6-8.fc9 ['449625 NEW'] (build/make) dchen ---------------------------------- Packages by owner: abompard: HelixPlayer,librra adalloz: pam_abl,pan addutko: astyle agk: dmraid akahl: bmpx,libzzub alexlan: blam allisson: perl-Crypt-Simple ascii: fish athimm: fakechroot,fakeroot,libFoundation,perl-Text-CharWidth,perl-Text-WrapI18N,vtk ausil: mysql-gui-tools,oooqs2,sugar-journal awjb: aterm,claws-mail,gimmix,koffice-langpack,libopensync,librra,pywbxml,scribus bagnara: ppl berrange: perl-Test-AutoBuild bjensen: linpsk bmr: dmraid bojan: apr-api-docs,libapreq2,subversion-api-docs bos: gtk2hs bpepple: brutus-keyring,swfdec-gnome cchance: stardict chabotc: buoh chitlesh: ktechlab colding: brutus-keyring cr33dog: fontypython cweyl: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Gnome2-GConf,perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable,perl-Net-CUPS,perl-RRD-Simple davidz: libgnomecups dbhole: jgroups dcbw: plague dchen: zhcon dgregor: perl-Class-MethodMaker dionysos: gpsim dwalsh: setools dwmw2: callweaver,linux-atm,petitboot dwysocha: dmraid edhill: itpp,nco ensc: mimetic errr: fluxstyle,pekwm,ruby-bdb ertzing: MyPasswordSafe,fwbuilder,libfwbuilder fitzsim: java-1.6.0-openjdk fnasser: mx4j,xml-commons-resolver fonts-sig: fonttools,fontypython frankb: qtiplot gemi: erlang,gcl,genius,mosml,qcad,smarteiffel gilboa: kdebluetooth green: ardour,gcl guthrie: dxpc hguemar: plotmm homeless: rudeconfig iburrell: perl-SVN-Mirror icon: gazpacho ifoox: ht2html ixs: bacula,bitbake,mod_suphp,pyzor jafo: moto4lin,python-memcached,python-pydns,python-pyspf jima: graphviz jkeating: contacts jmagne: coolkey jnovy: compat-db,db4 jorton: httpd,libidn,mod_python jwboyer: petitboot jwrdegoede: ardour,qmmp kaboom: qgo kasal: brltty kg6fnk: pdsh kkofler: kdevelop,qt4-theme-quarticurve kurzawa: jabbin,pic2aa,yoltia kushal: kphotobymail kvolny: qmmp kwizart: elektra,perl-Event-Lib langel: java-1.6.0-openjdk laxathom: ntfs-config leo: pcmanx-gtk2 lkundrak: inkscape,inkscape,java-1.6.0-openjdk lmacken: bodhi,python-TurboMail,python-tgcaptcha,python-turboflot ltinkl: kdevelop luya: gdesklets lvm-team: dmraid makghosh: qps matt: condor mauelsha: dmraid mbroz: dmraid mclasen: glade2 meme: nethack-vultures mfleming: svnmailer mgarski: xscorch misa: mx mjw: java-1.6.0-openjdk mmcgrath: bacula,perl-MIME-Lite mornfall: dmraid mpeters: pan mschwendt: audacious-plugin-fc mtasaka: astyle,libzzub mwiriadi: mediatomb nalin: gnupg2 nando: qsynth navid: sos ngompa: oggconvert nigelj: podsleuth nomis80: camstream oliver: eclipse,fish orion: kdesvn,plplot,vtk orphan: gnome-applet-tvn24 overholt: eclipse,eclipse owentl: gdesklets pebenito: setools perl-sig: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Class-MethodMaker,perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime,perl-Event-Lib,perl-Gnome2-GConf,perl-MIME-Lite,perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable,perl-Net-CUPS,perl-RRD-Simple,perl-SVN-Mirror,perl-XML-LibXSLT pertusus: bes,dap-freeform_handler,dap-hdf4_handler,elektra,libdap,libnc-dap,nco petersen: gtk2hs,libtomoe-gtk,scim-tomoe pfj: gtk-sharp,monodevelop pfrields: drivel pknirsch: freeipmi pwouters: lrmi qspencer: atlas,lilypond rathann: ekg2,freefem++,openbabel,tachyon ravenoak: pysvn rbrich: amanda rcritten: ipa rdieter: glib,gnupg2,gpgme,gtk+,k3b,kdevelop,kickpim,libsigsegv,ntl,qscintilla rishi: anjuta robmv: eclipse-subclipse roozbeh: fonttools rrakus: k3b rrelyea: coolkey rvinyard: conexusmm ryo: libtomoe-gtk,scim-skk,scim-tomoe s4504kr: subcommander sconklin: linpsk scop: dvdauthor,kdebluetooth,xemacs shahms: python-durus,python-simpletal,python-tpg shishz: perl-XML-LibXSLT simo: ipa sindrepb: blam,linpsk,muine,muine-scrobbler,perl-Net-Packet,perl-Net-Write splinux: gdmap,gstm,libgtksourceviewmm,lostirc,lostirc spot: R-RScaLAPACK,blacs,scalapack,xsupplicant steve: gl-117,perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime,supertux subhodip: straw tbzatek: tuxcmd than: kdevelop thias: djvulibre,lsdvd thomasvs: ladspa till: wyrd timj: rapidsvn timlau: bodhi tmoertel: R-Matrix tmraz: pam_abl toshio: bodhi,qa-assistant trasher: klear tuxbrewr: spicebird uwog: aiksaurus veillard: pwlib wart: crossfire xris: dar,lineak-defaultplugin,lineak-xosdplugin,lineakd zhu: stardict -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux From Matt_Domsch at dell.com Mon Jul 7 21:34:43 2008 From: Matt_Domsch at dell.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:34:43 -0500 Subject: Fedora x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2008-07-03 Message-ID: <20080707163443.A8909@humbolt.us.dell.com> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Based on the tree as of Thu Jul 3 2008. While I'm waiting on a bugzilla fix, I don't have all bugzilla numbers for existing FTBFS bugs. Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ Total packages: 5873 Number failed to build: 260 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 38 Leaving: 222 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) Of those expected to have worked... aiksaurus-1.2.1-15.fc6 (build/make) uwog anjuta-2.4.1-1.fc10 (build/make) rishi apr-api-docs-1.2.12-1.fc9 (build/make) bojan ardour-2.4.1-1.fc9 (build/make) green,jwrdegoede astyle-1.21-6.fc8 (build/make) addutko,mtasaka audacious-plugin-fc-0.2-6 (build/make) mschwendt axis-1.2.1-3jpp.9.fc10 (build/make) pcheung bes-3.5.3-3.fc9 (build/make) pertusus blacs-1.1-26.fc9.1 (build/make) spot blam-1.8.3-13.fc9 (build/make) alexlan,sindrepb bodhi-0.4.10-3.fc9 (build/make) lmacken,toshio,timlau brutus-keyring-0.9.0-6.fc8 (build/make) bpepple,colding buoh-0.8.2-4.fc9 (build/make) chabotc callweaver-1.2-0.4.rc5.20071230.fc9 (build/make) dwmw2 camstream-0.26.3-12.fc8 (build/make) nomis80 claws-mail-3.4.0-1.fc10 (build/make) awjb compat-db-4.5.20-5.fc9 (build/make) jnovy condor-7.0.0-8.fc9 (build/make) matt conexusmm-0.5.0-3.fc7 (build/make) rvinyard crossfire-1.10.0-4.fc9 (build/make) wart dap-freeform_handler-3.7.7-2.fc9 (build/make) pertusus dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.7-3.fc9 (build/make) pertusus dar-2.3.6-3.fc9 (build/make) xris db4-4.6.21-6.fc9 (build/make) jnovy dmraid-1.0.0.rc14-6.fc9 (build/make) lvm-team,agk,mornfall,bmr,mbroz,mauelsha,dwysocha drivel-2.1.1-0.5.20071130svn.fc9 (build/make) pfrields dvdauthor-0.6.14-5.fc9 (build/make) scop eclipse-3.3.2-12.fc9 (build/make) overholt,oliver,overholt elektra-0.6.10-6.fc9 (build/make) pertusus,kwizart fonttools-2.0-0.11.20060223cvs.fc7 (build/make) roozbeh,fonts-sig freefem++-2.24-2.fc9 (build/make) rathann gdesklets-0.36-1.fc9 (build/make) luya,owentl gdmap-0.7.5-6.fc6 (build/make) splinux genius-1.0.2-3.fc9 (build/make) gemi gimmix-0.4.2-3.fc9 (build/make) awjb gl-117-1.3.2-4.fc7 (build/make) steve glade2-2.12.2-2.fc9 (build/make) mclasen gnome-applet-tvn24-0.2.8-3.fc9 (build/make) orphan gpsim-0.22.0-5.fc8 (build/make) dionysos gstm-1.2-6.fc7 (build/make) splinux gtk+-1.2.10-61.fc9 (build/make) rdieter gtk2hs-0.9.12.1-8.fc9 (build/make) bos,petersen gtk-sharp-1.0.10-12.fc7 (build/make) pfj httpd-2.2.8-3 (build/make) jorton inkscape-0.46-2.fc9 (build/make) lkundrak,lkundrak ipa-1.1.0-2.fc10 (build/make) rcritten,simo itpp-4.0.0-2.fc9 (build/make) edhill javasqlite-20080420-1.fc10 (build/make) scop jgroups-2.2.9.2-3jpp.2 (build/make) dbhole k3b-1.0.5-2.fc10 (build/make) rrakus,rdieter kdesvn-0.14.4-1.fc10 (build/make) orion kdevelop-3.5.2-2.fc10 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl ktechlab-0.3.69-5.fc8 (build/make) chitlesh libapreq2-2.09-0.17.rc2.fc10 (build/make) bojan libdap-3.7.10-2.fc9 (build/make) pertusus libgnomecups-0.2.3-3.fc9 (build/make) davidz libgtksourceviewmm-0.3.1-1.fc8 (build/make) splinux libnc-dap-3.7.0-9.fc9 (build/make) pertusus librra-0.11-2.fc9 (build/make) awjb,abompard libtomoe-gtk-0.6.0-3.fc9 (build/make) ryo,petersen lineakd-0.9-5.fc6 (build/make) xris lineak-defaultplugin-0.9-2.fc6 (build/make) xris lineak-xosdplugin-0.9-2.fc6 (build/make) xris lsdvd-0.16-7.fc9 (build/make) thias mediatomb-0.11.0-1.fc9 (build/make) mwiriadi mimetic-0.9.3-2.fc8 (build/make) ensc mod_python-3.3.1-7 (build/make) jorton moto4lin-0.3-6.fc7 (build/make) jafo mx-2.0.6-3 (build/make) misa mx4j-3.0.1-6jpp.4 (build/make) fnasser MyPasswordSafe-0.6.7-4.20061216.fc9 (build/make) ertzing nethack-vultures-2.1.0-10.fc8 (build/make) meme oooqs2-1.0-3.fc6 (build/make) ausil openbabel-2.2.0-0.5.b5.fc10 (build/make) rathann pan-0.132-2.fc8 (build/make) adalloz,mpeters pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-9.336svn.fc7 (open_missing_mode) leo pekwm-0.1.5-5.fc7 (build/make) errr perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader-0.20-1.fc10 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0702-2.fc9 (build/make) steve,perl-sig perl-Event-Lib-1.03-3.fc10 (build/make) kwizart,perl-sig perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0005-2.fc9 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.28-2.fc9 (build/make) steve,perl-sig perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-SVN-Mirror-0.73-3.fc9 (build/make) iburrell,perl-sig perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.2-3.fc9 (build/make) berrange petitboot-0.0.1-7.fc8 (build/make) dwmw2,jwboyer pl-5.6.57-2.fc10 (build/make) gemi,mef podsleuth-0.6.0-5.fc10 (build/make) nigelj ppl-0.9-19.fc9 (build/make) bagnara pwlib-1.10.10-6.fc9 (build/make) veillard pysvn-1.5.3-1.fc10 (build/make) ravenoak python-durus-3.5-3.fc7 (build/make) shahms python-reportlab-2.1-2.fc9 (build/make) bpepple python-tgcaptcha-0.11-3.fc10 (build/make) lmacken python-turboflot-0.1.1-1.fc10 (build/make) lmacken python-TurboMail-2.1-3.fc9 (build/make) lmacken pywbxml-0.1-3.fc9 (build/make) awjb qgo-1.5.4r2-1.fc9 (build/make) kaboom qps-1.9.19-0.2.b.fc7 (build/make) makghosh qt4-theme-quarticurve-0.0-0.11.beta7.fc9 (build/make) kkofler qtiplot-0.9-8.fc9 (build/make) frankb R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-11.fc9.2 (build/make) spot ruby-bdb-0.6.0-1.fc7 (build/make) errr rudeconfig-5.0.5-1.fc7 (build/make) homeless scalapack-1.7.5-2.fc9 (build/make) spot scim-skk-0.5.2-8.fc6 (build/make) ryo scim-tomoe-0.6.0-3.fc10 (build/make) ryo,petersen setools-3.3.4-1.fc9 (build/make) pebenito,dwalsh smarteiffel-2.3-2.fc9 (build/make) gemi spicebird-0.4-5.fc8 (build/make) tuxbrewr stardict-3.0.1-8.fc9 (build/make) cchance,zhu subcommander-1.9.93-2.fc10 (build/make) s4504kr subversion-api-docs-1.4.6-1.fc9 (build/make) bojan sugar-journal-79-3.fc9 (build/make) ausil supertux-0.3.1-1.fc9 (build/make) steve swfdec-gnome-2.22.0-1.fc9 (build/make) bpepple tachyon-0.98-0.6.20070319.fc9 (build/make) rathann tuxcmd-0.6.36-3.fc10 (build/make) tbzatek vtk-5.0.4-21.fc9 (build/make) athimm,orion wyrd-1.4.4-1.fc9 (build/make) till xemacs-21.5.28-6.fc9 (build/make) scop xml-commons-resolver-1.1-1jpp.12 (build/make) fnasser xscorch-0.2.0-12.fc8 (build/make) mgarski xsupplicant-1.2.8-7.fc10 (build/make) spot amanda-2.5.2p1-10.fc9 ['449479 NEW'] (build/make) rbrich aterm-1.0.1-2.fc9 ['440779 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb bacula-2.0.3-13.fc9 ['440905 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) ixs,mmcgrath bitbake-1.8.8-1.fc8 ['440562 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) ixs bmpx-0.40.14-5.fc9 ['449431 NEW'] (build/make) akahl brltty-3.9-2.2.fc9 ['449446 NEW'] (build/make) kasal contacts-0.8-3.fc10 ['449603 NEW'] (build/make) jkeating coolkey-1.1.0-6.fc9 ['440753 NEW'] (build/make) rrelyea,jmagne djvulibre-3.5.20-2.fc9 ['440910 NEW'] (build/make) thias dxpc-3.9.1-0.3.b1.fc9 ['449644 NEW'] (build/make) guthrie ekg2-0.2-0.1.rc1.fc10 ['449637 NEW'] (build/make) rathann erlang-R12B-1.1.fc9 ['449432 NEW'] (build/make) gemi fakechroot-2.5-13.fc9 ['449447 NEW'] (build/make) athimm fakeroot-1.6.4-16.fc9 ['449659 NEW'] (build/make) athimm firewalk-5.0-2.fc9 ['449546 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb fish-1.23.0-2.fc9 ['440724 NEW'] (build/make) ascii,oliver fluxstyle-1.0.1-2.fc7 ['440757 NEW'] (build/make) errr fontypython-0.2.0-6.fc7 ['440756 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) cr33dog,fonts-sig freeipmi-0.5.1-3.fc9 ['440875 NEW'] (build/make) pknirsch fwbuilder-2.1.16-2.fc9 ['440846 NEW'] (build/make) ertzing gauche-0.8.13-1.fc9 ['449627 NEW'] (build/make) gemi gauche-gl-0.4.4-3.fc9 ['449490 NEW'] (build/make) gemi gauche-gtk-0.4.1-17.fc9 ['449421 NEW'] (build/make) gemi gazpacho-0.7.2-2.fc8 ['440859 NEW'] (build/make) icon gcombust-0.1.55-13 ['449413 NEW'] (build/make) thias geronimo-specs-1.0-1.M2.2jpp.12 ['449610 NEW'] (build/make) fnasser glib-1.2.10-29.fc9 ['449582 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter gnome-specimen-0.3-1.fc8 ['440868 NEW'] (build/make) splinux gnupg2-2.0.9-1.fc9 ['449574 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter,nalin gpgme-1.1.6-3.fc9 ['449416 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter graphviz-2.16.1-0.5.fc9 ['449410 NEW'] (build/make) jima gridengine-6.1u4-1.fc10 ['449526 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) orion ht2html-2.0-5.fc6 ['440916 NEW'] (build/make) ifoox jabbin-2.0-0.6.beta2a.fc9 ['440730 NEW'] (build/make) kurzawa kdebluetooth-1.0-0.41.beta8.fc9 ['449604 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) gilboa,scop kickpim-0.5.3-14.fc9 ['449538 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) rdieter klear-0.7.0-1.svn113.fc9 ['440755 NEW'] (build/make) trasher koffice-langpack-1.6.3-1.fc8 ['440758 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb kphotobymail-0.4.1-1.fc7 ['440873 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) kushal ladspa-1.12-9.fc9 ['449542 NEW'] (build/make) thomasvs libFoundation-1.1.3-11.fc9 ['440564 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) athimm libfwbuilder-2.1.16-2.fc9 ['449591 NEW'] (build/make) ertzing libgii-1.0.2-6.fc9 ['449484 NEW'] (build/make) kwizart libidn-0.6.14-7 ['449440 NEW'] (build/make) jorton libopensync-0.36-2.fc9 ['449510 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb libsigsegv-2.4-6.fc9 ['449607 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter libstroke-0.5.1-17.fc9 ['449516 NEW'] (build/make) chitlesh libzzub-0.2.3-12.fc9 ['449661 NEW'] (build/make) akahl,mtasaka lilypond-2.10.33-1.fc8 ['440826 NEW'] (build/make) qspencer linpsk-0.9-3.fc9 ['440778 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) bjensen,sindrepb,sconklin linux-atm-2.5.0-5 ['449613 NEW'] (build/make) dwmw2 lostirc-0.4.6-3.fc8 ['440921 NEW'] (build/make) splinux,splinux mod_suphp-0.6.3-1.fc9 ['449578 NEW'] (build/make) ixs monodevelop-0.19-6.fc9 ['449441 NEW'] (build/make) pfj muine-0.8.8-9.fc9 ['449567 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-5.fc9 ['449529 NEW'] (build/make) ifoox mysql-gui-tools-5.0r12-5.fc9 ['440734 NEW'] (build/make) ausil nco-3.9.3-1.fc9 ['449408 NEW'] (build/make) edhill,pertusus ntfs-config-1.0-0.6.rc5.fc9 ['449585 NEW'] (build/make) laxathom ntl-5.4.2-2.fc9 ['449523 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter oggconvert-0.3.0-14.fc9 ['440943 NEW'] (build/make) ngompa pam_abl-0.2.3-4.fc9 ['449429 NEW'] (build/make) adalloz,tmraz pdsh-2.11-6.fc9 ['440811 NEEDINFO'] (build/make) kg6fnk perl-Class-MethodMaker-2.10-3.fc9 ['449442 NEW'] (build/make) dgregor,perl-sig perl-Crypt-Simple-0.06-5.fc9 ['449495 NEW'] (needs_perl_ExtUtils_MakeMaker) allisson perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.044-3.fc9 ['449470 NEW'] (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-MIME-Lite-3.01-6.fc9 ['449558 NEW'] (build/make) mmcgrath,perl-sig perl-Net-CUPS-0.55-4.fc9 ['449469 NEW'] (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Net-Packet-3.25-3.fc9 ['449473 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb perl-Net-Write-1.00-3.fc9 ['449620 NEW'] (build/make) sindrepb perl-Text-CharWidth-0.04-4.fc9 ['449483 NEW'] (build/make) athimm perl-Text-WrapI18N-0.06-3.fc9 ['449435 NEW'] (build/make) athimm perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.63-5.fc9 ['449544 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) shishz,perl-sig pic2aa-0.2.1-3.fc9 ['440764 NEW'] (build/make) kurzawa plague-0.4.4.1-4.fc7 ['440874 NEW'] (build/make) dcbw plotmm-0.1.2-6.fc9 ['440563 NEW'] (build/make) hguemar plplot-5.9.0-1.fc9 ['449488 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) orion python-memcached-1.39-1.fc8 ['440931 NEW'] (build/make) jafo python-pydns-2.3.0-5.fc7 ['440912 NEW'] (build/make) jafo python-pyspf-2.0.3-1.fc8 ['440793 NEW'] (build/make) jafo python-simpletal-4.1-5.fc7 ['440930 NEW'] (build/make) shahms python-tpg-3.1.0-4.fc7 ['440763 NEW'] (build/make) shahms pyzor-0.4.0-11.fc7 ['440790 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) ixs qa-assistant-0.4.90.5-2.fc6 ['440914 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) toshio qcad-2.0.5.0-8.fc9 ['449636 NEW'] (build/make) gemi qmmp-0.1.5-2.fc9 ['449658 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) kvolny,jwrdegoede qscintilla-2.2-1.fc10 ['449423 NEW'] (build/make) rdieter qsynth-0.2.5-7.fc9 ['440736 NEW'] (build/make) nando rapidsvn-0.9.6-1.fc9 ['449500 NEW'] (build/make) timj R-Matrix-0.999375-4.fc9 ['449530 NEW'] (build/make) tmoertel scribus-1.3.4-5.fc9 ['440766 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) awjb sos-1.8-1.fc8 ['440839 NEW'] (build/make) navid straw-0.27-12.fc9 ['440806 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) subhodip svnmailer-1.0.8-3.fc7 ['449666 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) mfleming tomcat5-5.5.26-1jpp.2.fc9 ['449618 NEW'] (build/make) devrim,devrim xlhtml-0.5-8.fc9 ['449476 NEW'] (build/make) abompard xmms-cdread-0.14-13.fc9 ['449468 NEW'] (build/make) jsoeterb yoltia-0.22.1-2.fc9 ['440935 NEW'] (build/make) kurzawa ---------------------------------- Packages by owner: abompard: librra,xlhtml adalloz: pam_abl,pan addutko: astyle agk: dmraid akahl: bmpx,libzzub alexlan: blam allisson: perl-Crypt-Simple ascii: fish athimm: fakechroot,fakeroot,libFoundation,perl-Text-CharWidth,perl-Text-WrapI18N,vtk ausil: mysql-gui-tools,oooqs2,sugar-journal awjb: aterm,claws-mail,gimmix,koffice-langpack,libopensync,librra,pywbxml,scribus bagnara: ppl berrange: perl-Test-AutoBuild bjensen: linpsk bmr: dmraid bojan: apr-api-docs,libapreq2,subversion-api-docs bos: gtk2hs bpepple: brutus-keyring,python-reportlab,swfdec-gnome cchance: stardict chabotc: buoh chitlesh: ktechlab,libstroke colding: brutus-keyring cr33dog: fontypython cweyl: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Gnome2-GConf,perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable,perl-Net-CUPS,perl-RRD-Simple davidz: libgnomecups dbhole: jgroups dcbw: plague devrim: tomcat5,tomcat5 dgregor: perl-Class-MethodMaker dionysos: gpsim dwalsh: setools dwmw2: callweaver,linux-atm,petitboot dwysocha: dmraid edhill: itpp,nco ensc: mimetic errr: fluxstyle,pekwm,ruby-bdb ertzing: MyPasswordSafe,fwbuilder,libfwbuilder fnasser: geronimo-specs,mx4j,xml-commons-resolver fonts-sig: fonttools,fontypython frankb: qtiplot gemi: erlang,gauche,gauche-gl,gauche-gtk,genius,pl,qcad,smarteiffel gilboa: kdebluetooth green: ardour guthrie: dxpc hguemar: plotmm homeless: rudeconfig iburrell: perl-SVN-Mirror icon: gazpacho ifoox: ht2html,mysql-connector-java ixs: bacula,bitbake,mod_suphp,pyzor jafo: moto4lin,python-memcached,python-pydns,python-pyspf jima: graphviz jkeating: contacts jmagne: coolkey jnovy: compat-db,db4 jorton: httpd,libidn,mod_python jsoeterb: xmms-cdread jwboyer: petitboot jwrdegoede: ardour,qmmp kaboom: qgo kasal: brltty kg6fnk: pdsh kkofler: kdevelop,qt4-theme-quarticurve kurzawa: jabbin,pic2aa,yoltia kushal: kphotobymail kvolny: qmmp kwizart: elektra,libgii,perl-Event-Lib laxathom: ntfs-config leo: pcmanx-gtk2 lkundrak: inkscape,inkscape lmacken: bodhi,python-TurboMail,python-tgcaptcha,python-turboflot ltinkl: kdevelop luya: gdesklets lvm-team: dmraid makghosh: qps matt: condor mauelsha: dmraid mbroz: dmraid mclasen: glade2 mef: pl meme: nethack-vultures mfleming: svnmailer mgarski: xscorch misa: mx mmcgrath: bacula,perl-MIME-Lite mornfall: dmraid mpeters: pan mschwendt: audacious-plugin-fc mtasaka: astyle,libzzub mwiriadi: mediatomb nalin: gnupg2 nando: qsynth navid: sos ngompa: oggconvert nigelj: podsleuth nomis80: camstream oliver: eclipse,fish orion: gridengine,kdesvn,plplot,vtk orphan: gnome-applet-tvn24 overholt: eclipse,eclipse owentl: gdesklets pcheung: axis pebenito: setools perl-sig: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Class-MethodMaker,perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime,perl-Event-Lib,perl-Gnome2-GConf,perl-MIME-Lite,perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable,perl-Net-CUPS,perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule,perl-RRD-Simple,perl-SVN-Mirror,perl-XML-LibXSLT pertusus: bes,dap-freeform_handler,dap-hdf4_handler,elektra,libdap,libnc-dap,nco petersen: gtk2hs,libtomoe-gtk,scim-tomoe pfj: gtk-sharp,monodevelop pfrields: drivel pknirsch: freeipmi qspencer: lilypond rathann: ekg2,freefem++,openbabel,tachyon ravenoak: pysvn rbrich: amanda rcritten: ipa rdieter: glib,gnupg2,gpgme,gtk+,k3b,kdevelop,kickpim,libsigsegv,ntl,qscintilla rishi: anjuta roozbeh: fonttools rrakus: k3b rrelyea: coolkey rvinyard: conexusmm ryo: libtomoe-gtk,scim-skk,scim-tomoe s4504kr: subcommander sconklin: linpsk scop: dvdauthor,javasqlite,kdebluetooth,xemacs shahms: python-durus,python-simpletal,python-tpg shishz: perl-XML-LibXSLT simo: ipa sindrepb: blam,firewalk,linpsk,muine,perl-Net-Packet,perl-Net-Write splinux: gdmap,gnome-specimen,gstm,libgtksourceviewmm,lostirc,lostirc spot: R-RScaLAPACK,blacs,scalapack,xsupplicant steve: gl-117,perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime,perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule,supertux subhodip: straw tbzatek: tuxcmd than: kdevelop thias: djvulibre,gcombust,lsdvd thomasvs: ladspa till: wyrd timj: rapidsvn timlau: bodhi tmoertel: R-Matrix tmraz: pam_abl toshio: bodhi,qa-assistant trasher: klear tuxbrewr: spicebird uwog: aiksaurus veillard: pwlib wart: crossfire xris: dar,lineak-defaultplugin,lineak-xosdplugin,lineakd zhu: stardict -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 18:16:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807081816.m68IGtVl011899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 18:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807081816.m68IGfIi011844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-08 14:16 EST ------- Ok. You've done the right moves so far so I'm going to approve the package and sponsor you. Please don't prove me wrong and continue to perfect the package and coordinate with upstream for requested changes. Your remaining packaging steps are outlined there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Since your package includes handwritten fonts, it's probably a good idea to add a fontconfig file that registers its fonts in the correct generic families. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 20:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807082048.m68KmOau010118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 ------- Additional Comments From muepsj at gmail.com 2008-07-08 16:48 EST ------- This is an informal review for getting sponsored. MUST items: Rpmlint: kaappi >: rpmlint gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-1.fc10.src.rpm ../SPECS/gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. kaappi >: - Rpmlint: OK - Package name: OK - Version: Based on a date: OK - Specfile name: OK - Packaging guidelines: OK - Software license: OK - License field in the spec file: OK - License text from the source zip file included in %doc: OK (though could maybe list the two files explicitly) - The spec file is in American English: OK - The spec fils is legible: OK - Source files the same as provided by upstream: OK - Builds into a binary RPM; not architecture dependent, builds ok. OK - No BuildRequires; doesn't depend on any libraries or tools besides the base system: OK - No locales, no need to use %find_lang: OK - No shared libraries: OK - Package not relocatable: OK - Package owns all the created directories: OK - No duplicates in %files: OK - File permissions: OK - Proper %clean section: OK - Consistent macro use: OK - Fonts with a free license are permissible content: OK - No large documentation files, no -doc subpackage: OK - Font doesn't need %doc files for operation: OK - No header files, no -devel subpackage: OK - No static libraries, no -static subpackage: OK - No dependency on pkgconfig: OK - No .la archives: OK - Not a GUI app, no .desktop file: OK - No other packages' files owned: OK - rm -rf %{buildroot}?is run at the beginning of %install: OK - All filenames valid UTF-8: OK Some SHOULD items: - License texts included as a separate file: OK - Description and summary translations not included, probably not available: - - Builds into a binary package probably on all architectures, since has nothing arch dependent: OK - Works as described: The Ambrosia font is available in KDE's appearance configuration's font menus: OK The font also complies with Fedora's Font policy. I think the package is ok for inclusion in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 8 23:44:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 19:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454232] xterm should require xorg-x11-fonts-misc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807082344.m68Nibkw012589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xterm should require xorg-x11-fonts-misc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454232 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-08 19:44 EST ------- (It also purports to support Indic and Arabic...) Or maybe we just need the GNU unifont. Well there are various options. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 05:41:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 01:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807090541.m695fhIL008374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 05:44:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 01:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807090544.m695i4Xa008519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-07-09 01:44 EST ------- I see no reason why this couldn't be a single package, generating 5 .noarch.rpm subpackages. The content does not change frequently (not since 2006), and the 5 are not really individually versioned. Re-opening for clarification. Furthermore, the requester (on IRC) intends not to be a fire-and-forget packager: I intend to maintain the single combination package for as long as possible... ie., something on the order of 2+ years -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 07:16:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 03:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807090716.m697GLuT025218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |matt_domsch at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 09:04:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 05:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807090904.m6994M1w012191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-09 05:04 EST ------- Thanks for sponsorship and approval. Another answer I got from upstream: > Khmer OS & Khmer OS System is preferred in any case. Frankly speaking I don't believe much in upstream's going to separate the one big "All-package" into sub-packages because on their page is anyone able to dl them separately. I believe they'll only add monotype-style font, which I intend to add to "-base" font package (read on). I prepared separation based on visual look, purpose and upstream page http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts: KhmerOS-fonts ? khmeros-fonts-base ? KhmerOS ? KhmerOS_sys ? KhmerOS_content ? khmeros-fonts-handwritten ? KhmerOS_fasthand ? KhmerOS_freehand ? khmeros-fonts-muol ? KhmerOS_muollight ? KhmerOS_muolpali ? KhmerOS_muol ? khmeros-fonts-metalchrieng ? KhmerOS_metalchrieng ? khmeros-fonts-bokor ? KhmerOS_bokor ? khmeros-fonts-siemreap ? KhmerOS_siemreap ? khmeros-fonts-battambang ? KhmerOS_battambang * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/khmeros-fonts/khmeros-fonts.spec * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/khmeros-fonts/khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm (* the old one http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/khmeros-fonts/khmeros-fonts.spec_OLD ) TODO * will prepare fontconfig stuff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 09:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 05:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807090952.m699qU3v013269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-09 05:52 EST ------- One note: I am renaming one font because it contains space ('KhmerOS .ttf'). It makes no sense to me to persist it there. But I have no problem leaving it as-is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 10:03:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807091003.m69A38bb015199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-09 06:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > One note: I am renaming one font because it contains space ('KhmerOS .ttf'). It > makes no sense to me to persist it there. But I have no problem leaving it as-is. Your choice. Most apps won't see the filenames anyway, so it's not big problem. They'll work with the names declared in font metadata -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 15:21:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807091521.m69FLXBr010233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 mvaliyav at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mvaliyav at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mvaliyav at redhat.com 2008-07-09 11:21 EST ------- Unofficial Review - Rpmlint: OK - Package name: OK - Version: Based on a date: OK - Specfile name: OK - Packaging guidelines: OK - Software license: OK - License field in the spec file: OK - License text from the source zip file included in %doc: OK - The spec file is in American English: OK - The spec file is legible: OK - Source files the same as provided by upstream: NOT OK - Builds into a binary RPM; not architecture dependent, builds ok. OK - No BuildRequires; doesn't depend on any libraries or tools besides the base system: OK - No locales, no need to use %find_lang: OK - No shared libraries: OK - Package not relocatable: OK - Package owns all the created directories: OK - No duplicates in %files: OK - File permissions: OK - Proper %clean section: OK - Consistent macro use: OK - No large documentation files, no -doc subpackage: OK - Font doesn't need %doc files for operation: OK - No header files, no -devel subpackage: OK - No static libraries, no -static subpackage: OK - No dependency on pkgconfig: OK - No .la archives: OK - Not a GUI app, no .desktop file: OK - No other packages' files owned: OK - rm -rf %{buildroot} is run at the beginning of %install: OK - All filenames valid UTF-8: OK Found few typos in the %description section in spec file. millenium = millennium sparce = sparse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 9 19:25:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807091925.m69JPgks025846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-09 15:25 EST ------- Thank you for doing this review (even if informally) You're right there are typos in the text. I cut and pasted upstream text which sadly needs proofing; I'll probably run it all through a spellchecker before initial import if the package is approved. I'm surprised about this line - Source files the same as provided by upstream: NOT OK This upstream has been known to replace zip files with new versions without changing their names, but checksumming a new download does not show any change there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Jul 9 21:41:11 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:41:11 -0700 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200807092141.m69LfBp4023107@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 Robert O'Callahan (:roc) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|wanted1.9.1? |wanted1.9.1+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 00:08:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 20:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433513] Liberation font files need to be updated on web site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807100008.m6A08LVd019784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation font files need to be updated on web site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-07-09 20:08 EST ------- Would it be possible to direct the file download from website to the location mentioned in comment #8, for avoiding duplicate effort of maintenance? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 00:31:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 20:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433513] Liberation font files need to be updated on web site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807100031.m6A0VAGq014734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation font files need to be updated on web site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-09 20:31 EST ------- Yes, Liberation Fonts are now hosted at https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ so http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ should be updated to point to there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 01:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807100125.m6A1PTFf031498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-09 21:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > One note: I am renaming one font because it contains space ('KhmerOS .ttf'). It > makes no sense to me to persist it there. But I have no problem leaving it as-is. Have you reported it upstream to the maintainers? Rename is fancy, but I would just "mv KhmerOS{ ,}.ttf". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 03:33:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 23:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433513] Liberation font files need to be updated on web site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807100333.m6A3X3ih011700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Liberation font files need to be updated on web site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|webdev at redhat.com |msechres at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 06:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454785] Ardour2 Pango Error. Session crashed and will no longer open. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807100632.m6A6WHx8009154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Ardour2 Pango Error. Session crashed and will no longer open. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454785 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com, fedora- | |fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com AssignedTo|green at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-07-10 02:32 EST ------- Actually reassigning to the pango guys as Anthony suggested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 07:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454850] New: Cannot build pango from the SRPM in Fedora repository Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454850 Summary: Cannot build pango from the SRPM in Fedora repository Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: libregeek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: I have downloaded the pango SRPM from one of the Fedora mirror(http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/SRPMS/pango-1.20.4-1.fc9.src.rpm) and tried to build a pango RPM. I have used the same SPEC file provided with SRPM but added a simple patch from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441654. However the build failed with the following errors: ../xml/pango-version.xml:162: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined Returns :required_major : ^ ../xml/pango-version.xml:199: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined required_minor : ^ ../xml/pango-version.xml:202: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined required_micro : ^ ../xml/pango-version.xml:205: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined Returns : Message-ID: <200807100752.m6A7qe1s029767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-10 03:52 EST ------- > Have you reported it upstream to the maintainers? I did today. Thx for reminder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 08:12:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807100812.m6A8CXTr001538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-10 04:12 EST ------- Nicolas, ok I sent a mail to fedora-fonts-list proposing your idea of renaming fonts deviating from *-fonts. Sorry, Dennis, starting this discussion here, and thanks for your patience. So I agree let's proceed with un-core-fonts-1.0.2. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 10:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101023.m6AANKYO023816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 ------- Additional Comments From mvaliyav at redhat.com 2008-07-10 06:23 EST ------- - Source files the same as provided by upstream: OK Sorry.. it was a typo from my part .. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 14:45:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101445.m6AEjJVH005332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-10 10:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Nicolas, ok I sent a mail to fedora-fonts-list proposing your idea of renaming > fonts deviating from > *-fonts. > Sorry, Dennis, starting this discussion here, and thanks for your patience. > So I agree let's proceed with un-core-fonts-1.0.2. :) thanks Jens ^^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 15:40:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101540.m6AFeam8009540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 15:45:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101545.m6AFj8Fd018153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-10 11:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: khmeros-fonts Short Description: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Owners: mnowak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: nim Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 16:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101606.m6AG6lhD014746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-10 12:06 EST ------- Please have the fonts SIG CC-ed, not me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 17:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101742.m6AHg06E007582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-10 13:42 EST ------- New (updated) Spec file: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-multisource.spec New (updated) SRPM file: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm New (updated) RPM file: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 18:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101818.m6AIIUR4014361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 ------- Additional Comments From mvaliyav at redhat.com 2008-07-10 14:18 EST ------- Unofficial Review - Rpmlint: OK - Package name: OK - Version: Based on a date: OK - Specfile name: OK - Packaging guidelines: OK - Software license: OK - License field in the spec file: OK - License text from the source zip file included in %doc: OK - The spec file is in American English: OK - The spec file is legible: OK - Source files the same as provided by upstream: OK - Builds into a binary RPM; not architecture dependent, builds ok. OK - No BuildRequires; doesn't depend on any libraries or tools besides the base system: OK - No locales, no need to use %find_lang: OK - No shared libraries: OK - Package not relocatable: OK - Package owns all the created directories: OK - No duplicates in %files: OK - File permissions: OK - Proper %clean section: OK - Consistent macro use: OK - No large documentation files, no -doc subpackage: OK - Font doesn't need %doc files for operation: OK - No header files, no -devel subpackage: OK - No static libraries, no -static subpackage: OK - No dependency on pkgconfig: OK - No .la archives: OK - Not a GUI app, no .desktop file: OK - No other packages' files owned: OK - rm -rf %{buildroot} is run at the beginning of %install: OK - All filenames valid UTF-8: OK Found few typos in the %description section in spec file. millenium = millennium sparce = sparse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 19:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807101931.m6AJVgks020948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-10 15:31 EST ------- Engadget font dropped from package until legal status can be clarified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 10 20:57:47 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:57:47 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807102057.m6AKvlhM030228@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/khmeros-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/spot/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY30198/rpms/khmeros-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/khmeros-fonts added to the repository From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 10 20:58:03 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:58:03 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807102058.m6AKw3Fn030253@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/spot/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY30198/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel added to the repository From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 10 20:58:19 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807102058.m6AKwJif030297@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/khmeros-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/spot/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY30198/rpms/khmeros-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module khmeros-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module khmeros-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 10 20:58:38 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:58:38 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807102058.m6AKwcIZ030320@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/spot/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY30198/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module khmeros-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: khmeros-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/10 20:58:19 spot Exp $ NAME := khmeros-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 10 21:09:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807102109.m6AL9gCx006741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-07-10 17:09 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 00:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110034.m6B0YBHL015992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-10 20:34 EST ------- Mock build provided new rpms: Spec: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-multisource.spec FC9 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC9 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm FC8 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm FC7 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC7 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 06:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110607.m6B67G9N004551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: un-fonts- |Review Request: un-extra- |extra - Korean TrueType |fonts - Korean TrueType |fonts |fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 06:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110629.m6B6TCfT007950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: un-fonts- |Review Request: un-core- |core - Korean TrueType fonts|fonts - Korean TrueType | |fonts ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-11 02:29 EST ------- So my last request I hope is to have subpackages for un-core-fonts. I would suggest: un-core-fonts-{batang,dinaru,dotum,graphic,gungseo,pilgi} and the base fonts can require all those for users that want to install all the families. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 07:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110709.m6B792LK004569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fangqq at gmail.com AssignedTo|fangqq at gmail.com |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|wqy-bitmap-fonts |pango ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-11 03:09 EST ------- Sorry, Behdad... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 07:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: DarkGarden Fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110715.m6B7F4U9015328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DarkGarden Fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 07:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110746.m6B7kSxE020135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list at redhat.com 2008-05-14 04:22 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-11 03:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > So I removed one package then the other it looks like I was complaining about > kacst-fonts, paktype-fonts is a little better since it is not bold but it is > still not as good as the font used in f7. That is the font used in standard > print (newspapers, books, etc) Hmm, I wonder what font you miss from F7? I am not aware of any changes for Arabic since then, except that the fonts were moved to separate packages are Rahul explained. Perhaps you could try fonts-arabic from f7 again and see if that makes a difference: since the paths to the fonts changed and might potentially have affected the priorities. Should we make kacst-fonts optional for Arabic? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 07:51:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110751.m6B7pF1C020989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-11 03:51 EST ------- So I guess this should be named sil-andika-fonts if we are going to move to the new naming conventations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 08:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110801.m6B81S7o013231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-11 04:01 EST ------- > [...] base fonts [...] Sorry I meant base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 08:23:54 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:23:54 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 khmeros-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807110823.m6B8NsDQ014676@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14547/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215764336 --- NEW FILE khmeros-fonts.spec --- %define fontname khmeros %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X License: LGPLv2+ URL: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/khmer/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package base Summary: Base Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description base The Khmer OS fonts include base Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package battambang Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description battambang The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package bokor Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description bokor The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package handwritten Summary: Handwritten Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description handwritten The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package metalchrieng Summary: Old-fashioned Khmer font set by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description metalchrieng The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package muol Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description muol The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package siemreap Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description siemreap The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} # One of the fonts is named 'KhmerOS .ttf' (note the space). # 1) It is apparently a mistake. # 2) Have problems with installing it inside %%files base rename ' ' '' * install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %post base if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post battambang if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post bokor if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post handwritten if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post metalchrieng if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post muol if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post siemreap if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun base if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun battambang if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun bokor if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun handwritten if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun metalchrieng if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun muol if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun siemreap if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files base %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_sys.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_content.ttf %files battambang %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_battambang.ttf %files bokor %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_bokor.ttf %files handwritten %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_fasthand.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_freehand.ttf %files metalchrieng %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_metalchrieng.ttf %files muol %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muol.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muolpali.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muollight.ttf %files siemreap %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_siemreap.ttf %changelog * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 08:23:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 08:23:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dc1ddeb526ccbc06603da880d1e89e7b All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 08:26:18 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:26:18 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 khmeros-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807110826.m6B8QIwV014923@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14803/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:F-9:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215764686 --- NEW FILE khmeros-fonts.spec --- %define fontname khmeros %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X License: LGPLv2+ URL: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/khmer/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package base Summary: Base Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description base The Khmer OS fonts include base Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package battambang Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description battambang The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package bokor Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description bokor The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package handwritten Summary: Handwritten Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description handwritten The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package metalchrieng Summary: Old-fashioned Khmer font set by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description metalchrieng The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package muol Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description muol The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package siemreap Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description siemreap The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} # One of the fonts is named 'KhmerOS .ttf' (note the space). # 1) It is apparently a mistake. # 2) Have problems with installing it inside %%files base rename ' ' '' * install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %post base if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post battambang if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post bokor if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post handwritten if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post metalchrieng if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post muol if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post siemreap if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun base if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun battambang if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun bokor if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun handwritten if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun metalchrieng if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun muol if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun siemreap if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files base %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_sys.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_content.ttf %files battambang %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_battambang.ttf %files bokor %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_bokor.ttf %files handwritten %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_fasthand.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_freehand.ttf %files metalchrieng %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_metalchrieng.ttf %files muol %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muol.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muolpali.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muollight.ttf %files siemreap %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_siemreap.ttf %changelog * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 08:25:29 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 08:25:29 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dc1ddeb526ccbc06603da880d1e89e7b All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 08:32:29 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:32:29 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-8 import.log, NONE, 1.1 khmeros-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807110832.m6B8WTOU015229@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15194/F-8 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:F-8:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215764967 --- NEW FILE khmeros-fonts.spec --- %define fontname khmeros %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X License: LGPLv2+ URL: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/khmer/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package base Summary: Base Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description base The Khmer OS fonts include base Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package battambang Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description battambang The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package bokor Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description bokor The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package handwritten Summary: Handwritten Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description handwritten The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package metalchrieng Summary: Old-fashioned Khmer font set by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description metalchrieng The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package muol Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description muol The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package siemreap Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description siemreap The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} # One of the fonts is named 'KhmerOS .ttf' (note the space). # 1) It is apparently a mistake. # 2) Have problems with installing it inside %%files base rename ' ' '' * install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %post base if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post battambang if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post bokor if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post handwritten if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post metalchrieng if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post muol if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post siemreap if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun base if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun battambang if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun bokor if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun handwritten if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun metalchrieng if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun muol if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun siemreap if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files base %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_sys.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_content.ttf %files battambang %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_battambang.ttf %files bokor %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_bokor.ttf %files handwritten %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_fasthand.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_freehand.ttf %files metalchrieng %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_metalchrieng.ttf %files muol %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muol.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muolpali.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muollight.ttf %files siemreap %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_siemreap.ttf %changelog * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-8/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 08:31:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/F-8/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 08:31:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dc1ddeb526ccbc06603da880d1e89e7b All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 08:34:33 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:34:33 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-4 import.log, NONE, 1.1 khmeros-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807110834.m6B8YXLr015472@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-4 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15409/EL-4 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:EL-4:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215765171 --- NEW FILE khmeros-fonts.spec --- %define fontname khmeros %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X License: LGPLv2+ URL: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/khmer/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package base Summary: Base Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description base The Khmer OS fonts include base Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package battambang Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description battambang The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package bokor Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description bokor The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package handwritten Summary: Handwritten Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description handwritten The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package metalchrieng Summary: Old-fashioned Khmer font set by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description metalchrieng The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package muol Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description muol The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package siemreap Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description siemreap The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} # One of the fonts is named 'KhmerOS .ttf' (note the space). # 1) It is apparently a mistake. # 2) Have problems with installing it inside %%files base rename ' ' '' * install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %post base if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post battambang if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post bokor if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post handwritten if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post metalchrieng if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post muol if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post siemreap if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun base if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun battambang if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun bokor if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun handwritten if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun metalchrieng if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun muol if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun siemreap if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files base %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_sys.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_content.ttf %files battambang %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_battambang.ttf %files bokor %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_bokor.ttf %files handwritten %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_fasthand.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_freehand.ttf %files metalchrieng %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_metalchrieng.ttf %files muol %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muol.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muolpali.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muollight.ttf %files siemreap %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_siemreap.ttf %changelog * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-4/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 08:33:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-4/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 08:33:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dc1ddeb526ccbc06603da880d1e89e7b All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 08:44:00 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:44:00 GMT Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-5 import.log, NONE, 1.1 khmeros-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807110844.m6B8i0tM016084@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-5 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16055/EL-5 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:EL-5:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215765291 --- NEW FILE khmeros-fonts.spec --- %define fontname khmeros %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X License: LGPLv2+ URL: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/khmer/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package base Summary: Base Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description base The Khmer OS fonts include base Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package battambang Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description battambang The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package bokor Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description bokor The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package handwritten Summary: Handwritten Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description handwritten The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package metalchrieng Summary: Old-fashioned Khmer font set by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description metalchrieng The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package muol Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description muol The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %package siemreap Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X %description siemreap The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} # One of the fonts is named 'KhmerOS .ttf' (note the space). # 1) It is apparently a mistake. # 2) Have problems with installing it inside %%files base rename ' ' '' * install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %post base if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post battambang if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post bokor if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post handwritten if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post metalchrieng if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post muol if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %post siemreap if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun base if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun battambang if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun bokor if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun handwritten if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun metalchrieng if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun muol if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun siemreap if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files base %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_sys.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_content.ttf %files battambang %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_battambang.ttf %files bokor %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_bokor.ttf %files handwritten %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_fasthand.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_freehand.ttf %files metalchrieng %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_metalchrieng.ttf %files muol %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muol.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muolpali.ttf %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muollight.ttf %files siemreap %defattr(644,root,root,755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/KhmerOS_siemreap.ttf %changelog * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according to information from .ttf files read via gnome-font-viewer * Mon Jul 7 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-2 - removing Fedora specific license - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 08:43:11 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 10 Jul 2008 20:58:19 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 08:43:11 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dc1ddeb526ccbc06603da880d1e89e7b All_KhmerOS_5.0.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 08:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110855.m6B8tg8W000488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-11 04:55 EST ------- I talked to Nicolas on ##fonts and he persuaded me a base meta-package is a bad idea. (Maybe we need to think how to organize fonts better inside comps.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 09:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110901.m6B91GUU024197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 05:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I do. (But now focusing on being sponsored and having awesome package into the > distribution.) It seems a nice fairy sponsored you. Care to do an official review now? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 09:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807110900.m6B90SAp001497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 05:00 EST ------- yes it would. I hesitated going directly to sil-andika-fonts, but I'd rather change every font package in one go than have packages with different conventions in the same repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 11:09:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111109.m6BB9tQo022406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 07:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Unofficial Review BTW your "Unofficial" reviews seem pretty much "full" reviews to me. Is there any reason why they can't be official? If the problem is you're not sponsored, I unfortunately do not know the level/number of reviews required before one can be sponsored (plus sponsoring someone just because he ok-ed of my packages strikes me as a bit unethical). However, there are pretty simple packaging requests languishing in the Fonts SIG wishlist: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Padauk_fonts ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Conakry_fonts ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ancient_Scripts_fonts (full list here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Font_wishlist ) I'd have no problem sponsoring someone who did one of those (just like I just did for Michal Nowak in bug #454078) Since you've reviewed a font package most of the packaging should have no surprises for you. This page explains how one picks up items in the Fonts SIG wishlist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#2.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 11:15:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111115.m6BBFHu5013983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 07:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This is an informal review for getting sponsored. Thanks for the review! I admit I didn't leave much to be comented on in this package :) Unfortunately I do not know the level/number of reviews required before one can be sponsored. Maybe someone else is monitoring this ticket and knows it better than me? Plus sponsoring someone just because he ok-ed of my packages strikes me as a bit unethical (even if I do wish you could be sponsored so my package is released). However, there are several pretty simple packaging requests languishing in the Fonts SIG wishlist: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Padauk_fonts ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Conakry_fonts ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ancient_Scripts_fonts (full list here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Font_wishlist ) I'd have no problem sponsoring someone who packaged one of those (just like I just did for Michal Nowak in bug #454078) Since you've reviewed a font package most of the packaging should have no surprises for you. If you're interested this page explains how one picks up items in the Fonts SIG wishlist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#2.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 13:24:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429527] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111324.m6BDOcWF014397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429527 riek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|pm_ack? |pm_ack+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 14:46:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111446.m6BEkaN1021109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-11 10:46 EST ------- Let's make this review official then. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 14:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111449.m6BEnF4K021556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 14:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111448.m6BEmNFO021491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-11 10:48 EST ------- Thanks Mintos for the review. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 14:49:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111449.m6BEnpqN030513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 14:51:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111451.m6BEpUiq031168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-11 10:51 EST ------- Thanks Mintos for the review. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 15:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111532.m6BFWBUW006065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 11:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-ambrosia-fonts Short Description: GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 15:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111534.m6BFYHKe006245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 11:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-fleischman-fonts Short Description: GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 15:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111536.m6BFa3LQ030012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 15:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111535.m6BFZdbv006907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 11:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-eustace-font Short Description: GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:19:57 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:19:57 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807111619.m6BGJv3S031316@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsW31285/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts added to the repository From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 16:19:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111619.m6BGJk8c014091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-11 12:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:20:14 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:20:14 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807111620.m6BGKENs031342@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsW31285/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:20:26 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:20:26 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807111620.m6BGKQKT031369@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsW31285/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module gfs-ambrosia-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module gfs-ambrosia-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:20:45 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:20:45 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807111620.m6BGKjDI031402@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsW31285/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module gfs-ambrosia-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: gfs-ambrosia-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/11 16:20:26 kevin Exp $ NAME := gfs-ambrosia-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:22:01 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:22:01 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807111622.m6BGM1fM031511@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsp31456/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:22:14 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:22:14 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807111622.m6BGMEO2031529@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsp31456/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:22:26 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:22:26 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807111622.m6BGMQXS031557@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsp31456/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module gfs-fleischman-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module gfs-fleischman-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:22:39 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:22:39 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807111622.m6BGMd0H031574@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsp31456/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module gfs-fleischman-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: gfs-fleischman-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/11 16:22:26 kevin Exp $ NAME := gfs-fleischman-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:23:06 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:23:06 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-font - New directory Message-ID: <200807111623.m6BGN6TC031643@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-font In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsL31611/rpms/gfs-eustace-font Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-font added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:23:19 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:23:19 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-font/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807111623.m6BGNJX4031668@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-font/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsL31611/rpms/gfs-eustace-font/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-font/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:23:33 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:23:33 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-font Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807111623.m6BGNXQb031694@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-font In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsL31611/rpms/gfs-eustace-font Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module gfs-eustace-font --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module gfs-eustace-font all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 16:23:46 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:23:46 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-font/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807111623.m6BGNk20031720@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-font/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsL31611/rpms/gfs-eustace-font/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module gfs-eustace-font --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: gfs-eustace-font # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/11 16:23:33 kevin Exp $ NAME := gfs-eustace-font SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 16:22:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111622.m6BGMtiA005766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-11 12:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 16:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111621.m6BGLwJK005626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-11 12:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 16:36:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111636.m6BGaYKH017392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2008-07-11 12:36 EST ------- I take back my Comment #10, which seems to be an unrelated issue with this bug. I agree with Jens, this is somewhat related to Pango, but I think it is likely a not-a-bug. The title of the bug is not accurate: what the submitter complained about is the mixing of bitmap Hanzi glyphs with Anti-aliased vector glyphs (he called it bold effect). This might well be a designed feature: if he selected "monospace" as font family, based on the fontconfig setting of wqy-bitmap-fonts, we will use "Dejavu Sans Mono" to display Latin glyphs, and wqy-bitmap-fonts to display the Hanzi glyphs. So, it looks correct to me. If the submitter prefer to use wqy-bitmap-fonts for all glyphs, he should select "WenQuanYi Bitmap Song" as the font name in gedit. If the submitter was complaining about the digits (such as "302" and "320") are inconsistent with Latin glyphs, then I would like to direct him to the old discussion with Behdad: http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com/msg00191.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 16:44:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111644.m6BGih5Z018689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering different bold effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2008-07-11 12:44 EST ------- If the submitter or any of the reporters selected "bold" style and did not get any bold faces displayed, I think he should file a separate bug, as it is different from what the submitter originally reported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 16:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111653.m6BGrp7L020313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: DarkGarden |Review Request: darkgarden- |Fonts - Dark Garden is a |fonts - Dark Garden is a |decorative outline font of |decorative outline font of |unusual shape. |unusual shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 18:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111841.m6BIflDN029419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 19:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111909.m6BJ9idg010564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-07-11 15:09 EST ------- Moving this back to nobody to see if someone actually wants to pick this review up... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 19:26:05 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:26:05 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel gfs-ambrosia-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807111926.m6BJQ5rR029819@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29755/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-ambrosia-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-ambrosia-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Ambrosia fantasy fantasy GFS Ambrosia --- NEW FILE gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec --- %define fontname gfs-ambrosia %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_AMBROSIA Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080624 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. GFS Ambrosia has the main characteristics of the majuscule forms of the early Christian tradition. It has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog * Sun Jul 06 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080624-1 ?? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215804309 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 16:20:26 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 19:25:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_AMBROSIA.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 11 Jul 2008 16:20:26 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 19:25:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +891a6e880ca0ef06223eedfab7c0e035 GFS_AMBROSIA.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 19:36:44 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:36:44 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel gfs-fleischman-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807111936.m6BJaiXb030820@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30667/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-fleischman-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-fleischman-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Fleischman fantasy fantasy GFS Fleischman --- NEW FILE gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec --- %define fontname gfs-fleischman %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_FLEISCHMAN Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. GFS Fleischman was cut by Johann Michael Fleishman, typecutter of the Dutch Ensched?? foundry and follows the baroque style of the mid-18th century ??sthetics. It has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog * Sun Jul 06 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-1 ?? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215804948 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 16:22:26 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 19:36:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_FLEISCHMAN.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 11 Jul 2008 16:22:26 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 19:36:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +adcb048bdca18dd243c0337bdb0c5ecd GFS_FLEISCHMAN.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 19:48:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807111948.m6BJmom3008430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-11 15:48 EST ------- sorry about this, I dropped a s when cut and pasting the package name, the real package is gfs-eustace-fonts New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-eustace-fonts Short Description: GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:24:58 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:24:58 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-artemisia-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <200807112024.m6BKOwR0008429@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8356/devel Modified Files: gfs-artemisia-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215807827 Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- gfs-artemisia-fonts-fontconfig.conf 26 Nov 2007 19:32:11 -0000 1.1 +++ gfs-artemisia-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:24:09 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ - GFS Artemisia Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:48:53 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:24:09 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -%define fontname gfs-artemisia +%define fontname gfs-artemisia %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Artemisia fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -59,16 +59,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -78,11 +76,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070415-7 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-6 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:29:27 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:29:27 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <200807112029.m6BKTRj7008635@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8595/devel Modified Files: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec Added Files: gfs-baskerville-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE gfs-baskerville-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Baskerville fantasy fantasy GFS Baskerville --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215808097 Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:50:47 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:28:42 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontname gfs-baskerville -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontname gfs-baskerville +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_BASKERVILLE_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070327 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: GFS Baskerville Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces18th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -62,22 +64,23 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -85,11 +88,17 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{fontdir} +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070415-8 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070327-7 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:33:06 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:33:06 GMT Subject: rpms/edrip-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 edrip-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <200807112033.m6BKX6KO008903@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8828/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore edrip-fonts.spec sources Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- edrip-fonts-20080710-1_fc10:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080710-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215808287 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- .cvsignore 26 May 2008 20:25:19 -0000 1.5 +++ .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -edrip-src-20080523.tar.bz2 +edrip-src-20080710.tar.bz2 Index: edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- edrip-fonts.spec 4 Jun 2008 17:34:10 -0000 1.8 +++ edrip-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -0000 1.9 @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ %define archivename %{fontname}-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20080523 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 20080710 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Edrip decorative font Group: User Interface/X @@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ Patch0: edrip-fonts-license.patch -BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) -BuildArch: noarch +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) +BuildArch: noarch + BuildRequires: xgridfit BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 @@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ install -m 0644 -p Edrip-*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -# Would be higher prio if the coverage was better +# Would be higher prio if the coverage was more complete install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf @@ -53,13 +54,13 @@ %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi @@ -69,11 +70,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/Edrip-*.ttf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20080710-1 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Jun 4 2008 - 20080523-2 ??? Fix URL Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- sources 26 May 2008 20:25:19 -0000 1.5 +++ sources 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -e370ad776b3f98fe638e164935c00fb0 edrip-src-20080523.tar.bz2 +e450ea109fb70d2ca337cdbf3d57ec63 edrip-src-20080710.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:37:00 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:37:00 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <200807112037.m6BKb01P009401@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9342/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec Added Files: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Bodoni Classic fantasy fantasy GFS Bodoni Classic --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215808489 Index: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:52:06 -0000 1.5 +++ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:36:06 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontname gfs-bodoni-classic -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontname gfs-bodoni-classic +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_BODONICLASS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Bodoni Classic oblique Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces18th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -57,22 +59,23 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -80,11 +83,17 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{fontdir} +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070415-7 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-6 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:40:20 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:40:20 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-bodoni-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <200807112040.m6BKeKlB009645@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9595/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215808757 Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- gfs-bodoni-fonts-fontconfig.conf 26 Nov 2007 19:41:21 -0000 1.1 +++ gfs-bodoni-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:39:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ - GFS Bodoni Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:53:24 -0000 1.5 +++ gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:39:34 -0000 1.6 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Bodoni fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -56,16 +56,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -75,11 +73,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070415-6 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-5 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:46:43 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:46:43 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-complutum-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200807112046.m6BKkh7X010112@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10004/devel Modified Files: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec Added Files: gfs-complutum-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE gfs-complutum-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Complutum fantasy fantasy GFS Complutum --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215809112 Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:54:38 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:45:41 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontname gfs-complutum -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontname gfs-complutum +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_COMPLUTUM_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070413 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: GFS Complutum Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces16th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -67,22 +69,23 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -90,11 +93,17 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{fontdir} +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070413-8 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070413-7 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:47:10 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:47:10 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel gfs-didot-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807112047.m6BKlAIR010214@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10068/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- gfs-didot-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 26 Nov 2007 19:50:44 -0000 1.1 +++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:46:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ - GFS Didot @@ -19,4 +13,10 @@ serif + + serif + + GFS Didot + + Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 5 Jul 2008 23:24:12 -0000 1.5 +++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:46:23 -0000 1.6 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080702 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: GFS Didot Classic Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20080702-2 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Sun Jul 06 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080702-1 ?? Upstream stealth update Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 5 Jul 2008 23:24:12 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 11 Jul 2008 20:46:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215300135 +gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-2_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-2.fc10.src.rpm:1215809169 From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:49:06 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:49:06 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-didot-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 gfs-didot-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200807112049.m6BKn60h010542@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10411/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-didot-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809267 Index: gfs-didot-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- gfs-didot-fonts-fontconfig.conf 27 Nov 2007 21:09:49 -0000 1.1 +++ gfs-didot-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:48:22 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ - Palatino @@ -13,6 +7,12 @@ GFS Didot + + GFS Didot Classic + + GFS Didot + + GFS Didot Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-didot-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:57:18 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-didot-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:48:22 -0000 1.5 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070616 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Didot fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,16 +55,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -74,11 +72,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070616-7 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070616-6 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:49:43 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:49:43 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-gazis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 gfs-gazis-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <200807112049.m6BKnheF010664@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10528/devel Modified Files: gfs-gazis-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-gazis-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-3_fc10:HEAD:gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-3.fc10.src.rpm:1215809328 Index: gfs-gazis-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- gfs-gazis-fonts-fontconfig.conf 27 Nov 2007 21:13:43 -0000 1.1 +++ gfs-gazis-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:48:59 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ - GFS Gazis @@ -13,4 +7,10 @@ serif + + serif + + GFS Gazis + + Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:58:29 -0000 1.5 +++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:48:59 -0000 1.6 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080318 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: GFS Gazis Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -66,16 +66,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -85,11 +83,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20080318-3 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080318-2 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:50:35 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:50:35 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200807112050.m6BKoZWV010806@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10668/devel Modified Files: gfs-neohellenic-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215809363 Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- gfs-neohellenic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 26 Nov 2007 19:57:54 -0000 1.1 +++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:49:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ - GFS Neohellenic Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 21:59:45 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:49:44 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -%define fontname gfs-neohellenic +%define fontname gfs-neohellenic %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Neohellenic fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -75,16 +75,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -94,11 +92,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070415-6 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-5 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:51:20 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:51:20 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel gfs-olga-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-olga-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200807112051.m6BKpKqL010972@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10795/devel Modified Files: gfs-olga-fonts.spec Added Files: gfs-olga-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE gfs-olga-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Olga fantasy fantasy GFS Olga --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215809420 Index: gfs-olga-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/gfs-olga-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-olga-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:01:04 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-olga-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:50:30 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontname gfs-olga +%define fontname gfs-olga %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_OLGA_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Olga experimental oblique font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces20th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -54,22 +56,23 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -77,11 +80,17 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{fontdir} +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20060908-6 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-5 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:52:02 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:52:02 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-porson-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 gfs-porson-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200807112052.m6BKq214011090@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10953/devel Modified Files: gfs-porson-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-porson-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215809463 Index: gfs-porson-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- gfs-porson-fonts-fontconfig.conf 27 Nov 2007 21:21:18 -0000 1.1 +++ gfs-porson-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:51:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ - GFS Porson @@ -13,4 +7,10 @@ serif + + serif + + GFS Porson + + Index: gfs-porson-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-porson-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:02:31 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-porson-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:51:14 -0000 1.5 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: GFS Porson Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -66,16 +66,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -85,11 +83,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20060908-8 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-7 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:54:45 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:54:45 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel gfs-solomos-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-solomos-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200807112054.m6BKsjZo011529@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11403/devel Modified Files: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec Added Files: gfs-solomos-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE gfs-solomos-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Solomos fantasy fantasy GFS Solomos --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809630 Index: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:03:49 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:54:01 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontname gfs-solomos -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontname gfs-solomos +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_SOLOMOS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20071114 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Solomos oblique Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces19th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -61,22 +63,23 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -84,11 +87,17 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{fontdir} +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf + +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20071114-7 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20071114-6 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:55:32 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:55:32 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel gfs-theokritos-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <200807112055.m6BKtW2E011634@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11507/devel Modified Files: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec Added Files: gfs-theokritos-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE gfs-theokritos-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Theokritos fantasy fantasy GFS Theokritos --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809664 Index: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 30 Apr 2008 22:45:48 -0000 1.4 +++ gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:54:35 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontname gfs-theokritos +%define fontname gfs-theokritos %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_THEOKRITOS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: GFS Theokritos decorative font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces20th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -61,22 +63,23 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf + %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -84,11 +87,17 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{fontdir} +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf + +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20070415-7 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Wed Apr 30 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-6 ??? Yet another prep fix?? From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:57:39 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:57:39 GMT Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 stix-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.2, 1.3 stix-fonts-integrals-fontconfig.conf, 1.2, 1.3 stix-fonts-pua-fontconfig.conf, 1.2, 1.3 stix-fonts-sizes-fontconfig.conf, 1.2, 1.3 stix-fonts-variants-fontconfig.conf, 1.2, 1.3 stix-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <200807112057.m6BKvd9l011841@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11759/devel Modified Files: stix-fonts-fontconfig.conf stix-fonts-integrals-fontconfig.conf stix-fonts-pua-fontconfig.conf stix-fonts-sizes-fontconfig.conf stix-fonts-variants-fontconfig.conf stix-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- stix-fonts-0_9-7_fc10:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809789 Index: stix-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- stix-fonts-fontconfig.conf 1 Nov 2007 18:20:55 -0000 1.2 +++ stix-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:56:41 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,12 +1,5 @@ - STIXGeneral Index: stix-fonts-integrals-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts-integrals-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- stix-fonts-integrals-fontconfig.conf 1 Nov 2007 18:20:55 -0000 1.2 +++ stix-fonts-integrals-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:56:41 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,12 +1,5 @@ - STIXIntegrals Index: stix-fonts-pua-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts-pua-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- stix-fonts-pua-fontconfig.conf 1 Nov 2007 18:20:55 -0000 1.2 +++ stix-fonts-pua-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:56:41 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,12 +1,5 @@ - STIXNonUnicode Index: stix-fonts-sizes-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts-sizes-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- stix-fonts-sizes-fontconfig.conf 1 Nov 2007 18:20:55 -0000 1.2 +++ stix-fonts-sizes-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:56:41 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,12 +1,5 @@ - STIXSize1 Index: stix-fonts-variants-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts-variants-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- stix-fonts-variants-fontconfig.conf 1 Nov 2007 18:20:55 -0000 1.2 +++ stix-fonts-variants-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:56:41 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,12 +1,5 @@ - STIXVariants Index: stix-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- stix-fonts.spec 1 Nov 2007 18:20:55 -0000 1.3 +++ stix-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:56:41 -0000 1.4 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ %build -# Source format not available +# Nothing there %install @@ -137,72 +137,61 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} - fi +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %post pua -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun pua -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} - fi +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %post integrals -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun integrals -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} - fi +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %post sizes -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun sizes -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} - fi +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi - %post variants -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun variants -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} - fi +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi @@ -211,7 +200,7 @@ %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} +%dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/STIXGeneral*otf @@ -240,6 +229,11 @@ %changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 0.9-7 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + + * Thu Nov 1 2007 ??? 0.9-6 ??? Add some fontconfig aliasing rules From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 11 20:58:32 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:58:32 GMT Subject: rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807112058.m6BKwWTu012016@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11854/devel Modified Files: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-fontconfig.conf yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec Added Files: import.log Log Message: ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup --- NEW FILE import.log --- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3_fc10:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3.fc10.src.rpm:1215809853 Index: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-fontconfig.conf 10 Jan 2008 21:54:30 -0000 1.1 +++ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-fontconfig.conf 11 Jul 2008 20:57:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,17 +1,16 @@ - Yanone Kaffeesatz - sans-serif + fantasy + + fantasy + + Yanone Kaffeesatz + + Index: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 10 Jan 2008 21:54:30 -0000 1.1 +++ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:57:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf %clean @@ -48,16 +48,14 @@ %post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : - fi fi @@ -65,13 +63,17 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.pdf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/*.otf -%changelog +%changelog +* Fri Jul 11 2008 +- 20061120-4 +??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup + * Sun Nov 25 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 20061120-3 ??? initial packaging From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 21:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454171] Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807112157.m6BLvqjd032650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-ambrosia-fonts - GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454171 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 21:58:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454172] Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807112158.m6BLwQ5V032763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-fleischman-fonts - GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454172 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 11 23:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807112355.m6BNtO8v018318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-07-11 19:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 09:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:54:53 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807120954.m6C9sr9D010032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com BugsThisDependsOn|261961 | Summary|Review Request: ?colier- |Review Request: ecolier- |court-fonts - ?colier court|court-fonts - ?colier court |fonts |fonts ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 05:54 EST ------- Sadly FPC and FESCO decided on a solution that does not work in the stead of the one proposed and tested (proving once again the power of FUD), but here are updated packages anyway http://nim.fedorapeople.org/ecolier-court-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 10:29:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 06:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454174] Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121029.m6CAThZx022681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-eustace-font - GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454174 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 06:29 EST ------- Thanks a lot and sorry for the bother -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 13:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121340.m6CDevCS011575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |mnowak at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 13:42:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121342.m6CDgmkN019077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 13:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121344.m6CDiZbb019188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 13:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121344.m6CDiMia011950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 09:44 EST ------- Ok, since this is languishing in neither-land I'll do a formal review now (seems I've spent the week reviewing font packages anyway) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 13:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:59:30 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121359.m6CDxUTE021365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-07-12 09:59 EST ------- * Sat Jul 12 2008 - 20070702-1 ? Stop waiting for upstream to answer distribution change requests ? FESCO chickened out on UTF-8 names ? FESCO decision unimplementable due to bug #455119 ? Sync spec style with the way our font packaging guidelines have evolved ? Package both fonts in a single package I'm going to consider they are two faces of the same font ? Register in new fontconfig generic families Using weird characters to enumerate changelog entries to annoy the people who expressed concern about this is just childish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 14:03:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121403.m6CE3coL014847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 10:03 EST ------- Formal review: OK | MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package? rpmlint *rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? NOK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? There's nothing terribly wrong with the package, but our font guidelines have evolved a little since it was created, and it's time to re-sync it with the fonts spec template in rpmdevtools. (since it's unlikely a new upstream version will ever cause a package refresh) I like to see a minimal diff when I compare a font spec to the current template in meld. OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? OK | MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the? OK | MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The sources used to build the package must match? OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? N/A | MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? N/A | MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly? N/A | MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared? N/A | MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable N/A | MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc N/A | MUST: If a package includes something as %doc? N/A | MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A | MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A | MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must? N/A | MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix? N/A | MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must? N/A | MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, N/A | MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include? OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. N/A | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license - | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock - | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? N/A | SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should usually require base? N/A | SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on? N/A | SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of shortlist? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 14:13:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121413.m6CEDaUO023659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 10:13 EST ------- In addition please add a wiki page on this package on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Packaged_fonts using the following template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template This won't make the package any better but will give Google and our users some visibility on available fonts in Fedora, contributing to our world domination plan. That's all for this review. Reciprocating with a review of bug #261881, bug #452663, bug #454175, or even bug #454176 would be appreciated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 14:21:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:21:29 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121421.m6CELTLJ024915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 10:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Using weird characters to enumerate changelog entries to annoy the people who > expressed concern about this is just childish. Changelog is UTF-8 land and this has never been contested. There are scores (if not more) of packages in Fedora now (and for several versions) that have UTF-8 there. It passes rpmlint fine (modulo the new nobreakspace warning someone added without checking it actually worked) I'm sorry if you can't envision that someone working on extending the distribution unicode support does not limit himself to ASCII. If I agreed with you I wouldn't be packaging those in the first place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 14:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:49:15 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121449.m6CEnFIv021113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-07-12 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > > > Using weird characters to enumerate changelog entries to annoy the people who > > expressed concern about this is just childish. I found that utf8 illustrated changelog very funny. > Changelog is UTF-8 land and this has never been contested. There are scores (if > not more) of packages in Fedora now (and for several versions) that have UTF-8 > there. It passes rpmlint fine (modulo the new nobreakspace warning someone added > without checking it actually worked) The issue is not with utf8 in the changelog but with different characters for each line, though, here, they are admitedly meaningful. This may be fun for the reviewers and fedora maintainers, for the user I think that it is likely to be scary. More generally, I like the check character for the changelog item, but I find the smiling face not very relevant, maybe a watch (231A) would be better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 15:03:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:03:56 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807121503.m6CF3uep023439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 11:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > (In reply to comment #29) > > > > > Using weird characters to enumerate changelog entries to annoy the people who > > > expressed concern about this is just childish. > > I found that utf8 illustrated changelog very funny. Thank you. > The issue is not with utf8 in the changelog but with different > characters for each line, though, here, they are admitedly meaningful. I try to write meaningful changelogs and the UTF-8 bits are part of it. Like any maintainer, sometimes I succeed, sometimes not. > This may be fun for the reviewers and fedora maintainers, for the user > I think that it is likely to be scary. Almost any changelog, with UTF-8 or not is going to be scary for users. > More generally, I like the check character for the changelog item, > but I find the smiling face not very relevant, maybe a watch (231A) would be > better? I've reverted to - for the version line since sadly that's what rpmlint insists on and I don't want to upset reviewers that don't understand it does not change anything. However if you review this package I can sprinkle watches there if you want :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 15:55:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455136] New: no fontconfig file in devel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455136 Summary: no fontconfig file in devel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: roadstencil-fonts AssignedTo: jonstanley at gmail.com ReportedBy: jonstanley at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com There is no fontconfig file in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 12 15:58:30 2008 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:58:30 GMT Subject: rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel roadstencil-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 roadstencil-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807121558.m6CFwUFB018169@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17846 Modified Files: roadstencil-fonts.spec Added Files: roadstencil-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add fontconfig file (#445136) --- NEW FILE roadstencil-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy roadstencil Index: roadstencil-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel/roadstencil-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- roadstencil-fonts.spec 5 May 2008 06:53:25 -0000 1.1 +++ roadstencil-fonts.spec 12 Jul 2008 15:57:30 -0000 1.2 @@ -4,13 +4,14 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Roadstencil Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/andyfitz/237 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/andyfitz/andyfitz_-_roadstencil.otf +Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ install -pm 644 *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} +install -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf %clean @@ -56,6 +58,9 @@ %changelog +* Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-3 +- Add fontconfig file (#445136) + * Sun May 04 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-2 - Correct source From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 12 17:12:16 2008 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:12:16 GMT Subject: rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel roadstencil-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <200807121712.m6CHCG4H005083@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4951 Modified Files: roadstencil-fonts.spec Log Message: actually package the fontconfig file Index: roadstencil-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel/roadstencil-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- roadstencil-fonts.spec 12 Jul 2008 15:57:30 -0000 1.2 +++ roadstencil-fonts.spec 12 Jul 2008 17:11:20 -0000 1.3 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Roadstencil Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,9 +55,13 @@ %doc %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf %changelog +* Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-4 +- fix build failure from previous + * Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-3 - Add fontconfig file (#445136) From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 12 18:48:27 2008 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:48:27 GMT Subject: rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel roadstencil-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 roadstencil-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <200807121848.m6CImRoe017483@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17423 Modified Files: roadstencil-fontconfig.conf roadstencil-fonts.spec Log Message: Fix fontconfig file Index: roadstencil-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel/roadstencil-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- roadstencil-fontconfig.conf 12 Jul 2008 15:57:30 -0000 1.1 +++ roadstencil-fontconfig.conf 12 Jul 2008 18:47:38 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,7 +1,16 @@ - - fantasy - + + + + roadstencil - - - + + fantasy + + + + fantasy + + roadstencil + + + Index: roadstencil-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel/roadstencil-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- roadstencil-fonts.spec 12 Jul 2008 17:11:20 -0000 1.3 +++ roadstencil-fonts.spec 12 Jul 2008 18:47:38 -0000 1.4 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Roadstencil Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ %changelog +* Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-5 +- Fix the fontconfig file + * Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-4 - fix build failure from previous From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 21:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807122101.m6CL1UJh017269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-12 17:01 EST ------- See also http://ospublish.constantvzw.org/?p=560 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 12 21:28:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:28:01 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807122128.m6CLS0TT013537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-12 17:28 EST ------- Can you indicate the location of the latest spec and srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 01:41:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130141.m6D1fNoF016389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 01:47:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130147.m6D1lsc4017210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-12 21:47 EST ------- rpmlint: asana-math-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation - no archive provided with font, so no separate readme or license Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=712405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 01:57:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130157.m6D1vkwI018581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-07-12 21:57 EST ------- Thanks Nicolas, but the license isn't really the hold up here (we've already decided that is ok), it is the larger issue of design patents in play. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 06:36:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130636.m6D6axqX032098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 02:36 EST ------- Ok. Anyway if you want more info Adobe-side, Thomas Phinney seems to be the contact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 07:01:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 03:01:33 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130701.m6D71XHT027891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 03:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > Can you indicate the location of the latest spec and srpm? Thank you for looking at this package! The latest spec is currently in comment #28 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 08:07:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130807.m6D87DsM013719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 04:07 EST ------- Formal review: OK | MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package? rpmlint *rpm asana-math-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. However it's probably a good idea to package ftp://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/Asana-Math/README.1ST as %doc too OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? NOK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? NOK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? Unfortunately Asana claims to be OFL, but reuses material from pxfont which is GPL + Exception. ftp://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/pxfonts/COPYRIGHT Please contact the Asana author to check he got authorization from pxfonts authors to relicense the glyphs (a mail would be fine), and if not have him relicense Asana. If upstream has a relicensing authorization please package it as %doc. (you can also try to contact pxfonts authors) N/A | MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the? OK | MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - | MUST: The sources used to build the package must match? Builds fine with upstream's material. If upstream uses fontforge and fontforge sources could be available, that would be even better. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? N/A | MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? N/A | MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly? N/A | MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared? N/A | MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable N/A | MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc N/A | MUST: If a package includes something as %doc? N/A | MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A | MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A | MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must? N/A | MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix? N/A | MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must? N/A | MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, N/A | MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include? OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. NOK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license Please ask upstream to publish a nice versionned zip with detached license file (and sfd sources?) while you're at it. - | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock - | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? N/A | SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should usually require base? N/A | SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on? N/A | SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of shortlist? Additional info 1. The font looks serify to me, not fantasy (fontconfig rule) 2. the embedded version has changed from CTAN to OFLB so presumably the author takes care or versionning there. You don't need to use a date as version. 3. if it gets approved do not forget to register in the engineering comps group 4. you can CC and probably to your exchanges with upstream 5. don't forget to update the wiki with the result of your investigations Thank you very much for looking at Asana. I realise it's not as easy as it should have been, but it would be insanely great to have it packaged, and our scitech users would love to have it available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 08:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130828.m6D8SeDR006140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 04:28 EST ------- un-fonts and un-extra-fonts would be ok with me. And I like your spec file. But I'll wait for Jens to be finished with un-code before approving this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 08:35:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130835.m6D8ZNWX015138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 04:35 EST ------- Seems Debian made the same analysis BTW http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=458047 But they didn't make upstream clarify. Bad Debian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 09:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 05:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807130906.m6D960l8020198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 05:05 EST ------- http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/chemoelectric/208 shows you can upload zip files to OFLB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Jul 13 09:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:42:17 -0700 Subject: [Bug 295193] Allow downloading STIX fonts / bundle STIX fonts with firefox for better MathML experience In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200807130942.m6D9gHCB020517@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 12:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131239.m6DCds04011718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-13 08:39 EST ------- What info should I provide Nicolas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 12:58:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131258.m6DCwpbp022424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 08:58 EST ------- Just provide the info you've done what's asked in the review so I can close this bug at last :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 13:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454850] Cannot build pango from the SRPM in Fedora repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131311.m6DDBULx024921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Cannot build pango from the SRPM in Fedora repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454850 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-13 09:11 EST ------- Something broken with your XML tools setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 14:06:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131406.m6DE6Mv9025117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-13 10:06 EST ------- Upstream has authorization to use these images. Can we get this one approved? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 No one cared to say that I had got authorization to use the images. Simple misunderstanding here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 14:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131404.m6DE4Wsh024519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-13 10:04 EST ------- What upstream has done here is 200% legal :) Included clarification as README.license in %doc - new SRPM (spec is the same): http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/asana-math-fonts-0.914-1.fc9.src.rpm ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Young Ryu > To: Apostolos Syropoulos > Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2008 2:13:23 AM > Subject: Re: pxfonts and Asana Math > > > I want pxfonts/txfonts to be available in public > for not only document preparation/printing/publication > but also for further modification/revision/improvement. > You can change/copy/re-distribute them. I do not intend > to put any restriction. Your revision and distribution of > the fonts will be absolutely OK. There should be no > legal problem. If GPL causes any problem, I will > drop it and make it completely free for any purpose. > > Young Ryu > > Apostolos Syropoulos wrote: > > Dear Sir, > > > > My name is Apostolos Syropoulos and recently I released my Asana Math Open > Type > > font, which is partially a derived work of your pxfonts. I have released the > font > > under the Open Font License > (http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL_web), > > but someone told me that there is some legal problem because you had released > your > > pxfonts with the GPL (the OFL was written a few months ago!). Could you please > let me know if > > there is any problem at all? And if there is how can be fixed? The font is > absolutely free and I > > am making no money from it. > > > > Sincerely yours, > > > > A.S. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 14:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131457.m6DEvKFk032380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 10:57 EST ------- Minor nitpick: cp %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_DIR could be cp %{SOURCE2} . I think Otherwise very fine work it's not always easy to get information for upstream. You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 15:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131504.m6DF4IQo008929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 11:04 EST ------- This one still needs a little work. 1. don't do an otf cp in %prep, use the more elegant form you did for asana 2. please add a trace of upstream's permission in %doc. Those kinds of things tend to be lost and cause problems later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 15:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131511.m6DFBsWg002402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 11:11 EST ------- BTW asana-math-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 15) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 15:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131527.m6DFRXP4012778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-13 11:27 EST ------- Will do official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 15:28:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131528.m6DFSMsa004954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-13 11:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: asana-math-fonts Short Description: An OpenType font with a MATH table Owners: jstanley Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 15:52:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131552.m6DFqHjb009003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-13 11:52 EST ------- New SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/icelandic-fonts-1.001-1.fc9.src.rpm spec is the same Added information about upstream's permission - http://www.galdrasyning.is/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=418&Itemid=46&lang=en -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 16:22:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131622.m6DGMOjP020960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-13 12:22 EST ------- MUST Items: PASS - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. PASS - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . PASS - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format PASS - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . PASS - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . PASS - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. PASS - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) ... PASS - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. PASS - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read PASS - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - did sha1sum; sources matches NA - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. NA - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, NA - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires NA - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NA - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files NA - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state PASS - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. PASS - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. PASS - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with PASS - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} PASS - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the PASS - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. PASS - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. NA - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files NA - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix NA - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require NA - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. NA - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file PASS - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. PASS - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} PASS - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - UTF8 + ASCII (sub-set of UTF*) SHOULD Items: NA - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) NA - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain NA - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - no deps - no mock PASS - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. PASS - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - took a look via gnome-font-viewer PASS - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. NA - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. NA - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) NA - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, Overall: PASS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 16:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131636.m6DGaDRK015336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 12:36 EST ------- Please add the copy of the http://www.galdrasyning.is/ permission text in your README (with a "taken from foo URL" header). Next thing you know they'll reorganise their website and your link will point nowhere (If they had made it a txt file we could have just Source-d it directly from this URL) I don't see a 1.001 in the OTF file I download from OFLB, just a 1.000 (will translate in 1.0 for rpm) but I may have a proxy serving an older file between me and upstream. I'd package the font preview in %doc but that's purely optional and we'll certainly need to figure a streamlined way to generate this kind of preview ourselves in all our font packages someday. But that's me being a perfectionist. The legal uncertainty has been cleared, and your package is already better than some I know. You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 16:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131640.m6DGem5U015965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 12:40 EST ------- Many thanks. I you don't have anything else to add please set the fedora-review flag to "+" now, so the PASS is official ???? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 16:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131657.m6DGvmm9025724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-13 12:57 EST ------- Sure. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 17:00:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131700.m6DH0rBR019012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 17:00:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131700.m6DH0d3J018968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-13 13:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: icelandic-fonts Short Description: Font with Icelandic Magical Staves Owners: jstanley Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 17:27:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131727.m6DHRZ3Z022960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mnowak at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 13:27 EST ------- Michal Nowak: congratulation on your first package and first official review. Hope you'll do many more of them in the future. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: andika-fonts Short Description: A font for literacy and beginning readers Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:09:21 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:09:21 GMT Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807131909.m6DJ9LrH017717@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/icelandic-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsK17644/rpms/icelandic-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/icelandic-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:09:40 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:09:40 GMT Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807131909.m6DJ9e8T017814@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsK17644/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel added to the repository From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 19:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131908.m6DJ8vkd012105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-13 15:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:09:56 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:09:56 GMT Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807131909.m6DJ9u9Z017872@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/icelandic-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsK17644/rpms/icelandic-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module icelandic-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module icelandic-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:10:15 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:10:15 GMT Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807131910.m6DJAFJd017906@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsK17644/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module icelandic-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: icelandic-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/13 19:09:56 kevin Exp $ NAME := icelandic-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:11:02 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:11:02 GMT Subject: rpms/andika-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807131911.m6DJB262018187@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz18138/rpms/andika-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:11:14 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:11:14 GMT Subject: rpms/andika-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807131911.m6DJBESE018252@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz18138/rpms/andika-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:11:32 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:11:32 GMT Subject: rpms/andika-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807131911.m6DJBWJA018288@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz18138/rpms/andika-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module andika-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module andika-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 19:10:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131910.m6DJAsYv005554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-13 15:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:11:49 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:11:49 GMT Subject: rpms/andika-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807131911.m6DJBn9I018312@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz18138/rpms/andika-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module andika-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: andika-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/13 19:11:32 kevin Exp $ NAME := andika-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:19:50 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:19:50 GMT Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807131919.m6DJJohc019149@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/asana-math-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsg19052/rpms/asana-math-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/asana-math-fonts added to the repository From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 19:19:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807131919.m6DJJLP7013559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-13 15:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:20:10 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:20:10 GMT Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807131920.m6DJKABT019183@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsg19052/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:20:26 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:20:26 GMT Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807131920.m6DJKQCm019216@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/asana-math-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsg19052/rpms/asana-math-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module asana-math-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module asana-math-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 19:20:54 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:20:54 GMT Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807131920.m6DJKsmi019292@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsg19052/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module asana-math-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: asana-math-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/13 19:20:27 kevin Exp $ NAME := asana-math-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 13 20:25:41 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:25:41 GMT Subject: rpms/andika-fonts/devel andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 andika-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807132025.m6DKPf63003319@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3286/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf andika-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial packaging --- NEW FILE andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Andika sans-serif sans-serif Andika --- NEW FILE andika-fonts.spec --- %define fontname andika %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d # Someday SIL will release sanely named archives %define archivename AndikaBasicR_10 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A font for literacy and beginning readers Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/Andika # Actual download URL # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=%{archivename}&filename=%{archivename}.zip Source0: %{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description Andika is a sans serif, Unicode-compliant font designed especially for literacy use, taking into account the needs of beginning readers. The focus is on clear, easy-to-perceive letterforms that will not be readily confused with one another. A sans serif font is preferred by some literacy personnel for teaching people to read. Its forms are simpler and less cluttered than those of most serif fonts. For years, literacy workers have had to make do with fonts that were not really suitable for beginning readers and writers. In some cases, literacy specialists have had to tediously assemble letters from a variety of fonts in order to get all of the characters they need for their particular language project, resulting in confusing and unattractive publications. Andika addresses those issues. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} # Text files sanitization for txt in *.txt ; do # Unicode compliant, check iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 -o $txt.1 $txt fold -s $txt.1 > $txt.2 sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.2 touch -r $txt $txt.2 mv $txt.2 $txt rm $txt.1 done %build # Source format not available %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Tue Jun 24 2008 - 1.0-1 ??? Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- andika-fonts-1_0-1_fc10:HEAD:andika-fonts-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215980688 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Jul 2008 19:11:32 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 13 Jul 2008 20:24:58 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +AndikaBasicR_10.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Jul 2008 19:11:32 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 13 Jul 2008 20:24:58 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +1a8b028ccea53e93fc4f34ca226f2b02 AndikaBasicR_10.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 13 20:32:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807132032.m6DKWoN6024673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-13 16:32 EST ------- All done. Thanks to everyone involved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 14 02:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807140211.m6E2B7Xm002023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-13 22:11 EST ------- Hmm I think we should stick with un-core-fonts since that is what upstream calls them. Probably subpackaging un-extra-fonts is not necessary like un-core-fonts though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 14 02:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] different font used for ASCII In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807140229.m6E2TOq5004394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [i18n] [zh_CN] different font used for ASCII https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[i18n] [zh_CN] Rendering |[i18n] [zh_CN] different |different bold effect |font used for ASCII -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Jul 14 13:01:44 2008 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:01:44 GMT Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel README.license, NONE, 1.1 asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf, NONE, 1.1 icelandic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807141301.m6ED1i4H016843@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10274/devel Added Files: README.license asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf icelandic-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial commit --- NEW FILE README.license --- For permission to use source images, refer to http://www.galdrasyning.is/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=418&Itemid=46&lang=en --- NEW FILE asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf --- OTTO )%? "Rf with Reserved Font Name Icelandic. This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is copied below, and is also available with a FAQ at: http://scripts.sil.org/OFL ----------------------------------------------------------- SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE Version 1.1 - 26 February 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------- PREAMBLE The goals of the Open Font License (OFL) are to stimulate worldwide development of collaborative font projects, to support the font creation efforts of academic and linguistic communities, and to provide a free and open framework in which fonts may be shared and improved in partnership with others. The OFL allows the licensed fonts to be used, studied, modified and redistributed freely as long as they are not sold by themselves. The fonts, including any derivative works, can be bundled, embedded, redistributed and/or sold with any software provided that any reserved names are not used by derivative works. The fonts and derivatives, however, cannot be released under any other type of license. The requirement for fonts to remain under this license does not apply to any document created using the fonts or their derivatives. DEFINITIONS "Font Software" refers to the set of files released by the Copyright Holder(s) under this license and clearly marked as such. This may include source files, build scripts and documentation. "Reserved Font Name" refers to any names specified as such after the copyright statement(s). "Original Version" refers to the collection of Font Software components as distributed by the Copyright Holder(s). "Modified Version" refers to any derivative made by adding to, deleting, or substituting -- in part or in whole -- any of the components of the Original Version, by changing formats or by porting the Font Software to a new environment. "Author" refers to any designer, engineer, programmer, technical writer or other person who contributed to the Font Software. PERMISSION & CONDITIONS Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of the Font Software, to use, study, copy, merge, embed, modify, redistribute, and sell modified and unmodified copies of the Font Software, subject to the following conditions: 1) Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in Original or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself. 2) Original or Modified Versions of the Font Software may be bundled, redistributed and/or sold with any software, provided that each copy contains the above copyright notice and this license. These can be included either as stand-alone text files, human-readable headers or in the appropriate machine-readable metadata fields within text or binary files as long as those fields can be easily viewed by the user. 3) No Modified Version of the Font Software may use the Reserved Font Name(s) unless explicit written permission is granted by the corresponding Copyright Holder. This restriction only applies to the primary font name as presented to the users. 4) The name(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) or the Author(s) of the Font Software shall not be used to promote, endorse or advertise any Modified Version, except to acknowledge the contribution(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) and the Author(s) or with their explicit written permission. 5) The Font Software, modified or unmodified, in part or in whole, must be distributed entirely under this license, and must not be distributed under any other license. The requirement for fonts to remain under this license does not apply to any document created using the Font Software. TERMINATION This license becomes null and void if any of the above conditions are not met. DISCLAIMER THE FONT SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT, PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER RIGHT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE FONT SOFTWARE OR FROM OTHER DEALINGS IN THE FONT SOFTWARE.  !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 Icelandic ?0 ?R????x?q ?}????~?X?K??????h?e???9????e ????????????????9?r?6??????)?%?S??????9??????{?m??s?????8?u???g{??g?#?s?5??ea???? ????W?2?????? i??W??????????j?{??????????????????w?????{?i?e??????7?;?m??????E?? _?3ge?q?? ?2????}?gy_uAA;']?????)y??????w?S?K?Iw?a?q??W?o?,?}w?k???{?o???eU5-?yyqs?q?c?R?{???M?????????q?_i?T???}?>???4????{o?g?=??H?D??]?????kkW??}?*{???8?[?uM???????????SE?'?}W?{?????????om9WS?v???L???u?????w?w?w?w?w?w??m? ?G[?E???m???s?e?m{?}???g?o???n?}???????????????K?????wq???????e?o?"??????????*???s??}?{o??w???.?????k????{??a???????}???s?u]m????????????????Zy?????e?u?}{?}?{?w?1?O?{?y??8??^?A}????????w??N}?y?w?&??????%u}{?? ??y???????(y???/?e????{k??s??????????*y????s??????????????g?}???y}u?w?????????????M????[iU?z??)?s?C?????????????????2????}ug}g?_??????o??????(????}g+?????}k?y??&oo?y?????J??N???????/?y?W?}??????E ??? ?:??? ?????????rs???H?Z?M?&?6? ?X{?7O?B??5?"??P?g?????!?Xg}???{???{?????????}?y?Y????a??????m????q?????????????c?u?u??????(???????wo?(>?E ?????r!?7N?????????X?l??????F?|??z?t?]?}`??????????????f?T]z?????@?????C???t?/???????????$?f?? ???????Z??L???}?e???c??????:?}?K?OT?Q??}? ?`?????I?q?we??X?n?2????i????????????`?????7????=????>??????z?b?z????F?? Lz?,???????6??Z?)Z?v?`?l???L?!?????????k?W?R$??n?FT??????t?Wkw?z?Jr1b?fw? h? 8?Q?????l?o???? iiTtT???'?$?`?????????U?'?h????????????????y?}}Z?=???>?!?z??????????4?'??Fi1`?Z????????????'`?Cv4? ????????????a`??|??? .,A`&?y?z??????`}???????????O??Wz&k?????t}???ww???w???????|t?t?fl??????`?q????????R?v???????2???????@?4?z at C??????`?k?Q?Z??]???h?R???????????L?????h??????:??????}?&??=#???z? ?????Z?q?n??????h?]?f?)y???w?????[?????|??}? ?L?????????;????]?|??>?w???8?????????????}?Wtn?F?#?w?z???z???z?thw?z?7?oyt?i?k?????ho???t?Q?wi8+?fh}}????Z???}????????q????w?w?w??hw???w??;?,?Ukw?w???w?w?w??c?Tw? w?? ?????'??6????z?????n???u????f?~?u?????????j?????j?d?????????L?v?Ln?Z?t?k?z?k???z??I?|[?|????^??[????zc?????}???Z]??nF?;?.???????}??q?dK}?t?????????f?????xXp|{?{?{???w?w?]??)?Iqb?'?????n?q??t||~???t????????????~?~ru?????p???????????????@????x?ay?Wmvis?{?_z?Mr?h???W?\?aJ?U???????l?}:??~?6???)???e?}??????_????wtz??p??tw`?}f???q?????????`????}?????n????????y?n??ZfQ????qCi?k??????????|???2???"?$?-h?t????????????v??? I???w?w?w?w?w?w?^w???w?w???w?????,???????????[3??????^??MJ?{?x???kL_?_N_?v?^?,oz[m$???;?k]7????t???w?}#????ku=??!????????H???9???z?????????gb?????~?Yy??/{x??N?\?,I~\?????????????Y?~?k??????????i{flfks?f?d????????{?????????????,?}??IY???`???nIF?v???????^vY?V?s????????P??????F[??????v?}????????????{?\?{{{y??|?c?????t?sk{y~???p?????q????QQ???????????????(???N???N?????n?n?A?x????????vxF????????????u??????k?q???????????q?????y?v! ?sn{kxf??L??k,^?l,?i????Q????M??K??????f????L??^??????i?[??????9???????????????q?ck??l???????t?khDB?{insxqs??Y?v{?9kvT?p~?'/^).{???D??????????&???????"????????F? ??+??A?T??????3????????????n?nsqfI?In?????v??????? ??y?????????????is'?Fyn??????????????n??l????"?W??w?w?w?w?w?w?????]?????????<-??????z????v?t?BJ|y??%~???d?~?~sT??@lqlg??v??l?%yo?? ??????????~??????????_?~????W????'?I???????y?????~Cb?Y?????????U?{?-\??5?R????????%?t?il|?i???{?+O????-?~???X??8?????????????????y??EP?f?0?&??Y????dE?4???R????????\????????=??????????? \?l?TH?w~\Ty\?ia?j??!?#?idtt{~?q?:?&??-????t?=\q??????P???MTv]t?8???\????????OW?d????????+?+?i??|???????E????]|?3G???J???R?GW?M???n????v??????0?b?nJ?|???????M?{{l~?~?g????????b????~~???o?n??L?tln?|m????LW=??dgf?v????????!???b?????8?vk?w?n?y???????? ???WvY??JZ????????????????v?7??w?w?w?w?w??p??w?w?w?w?L???N?????W????)R??]?k???D?Q_???????.????z????B?{{?o?????Z???????~u???l?w?~?uD?|~???{???{???y?|]K????8w?u????????w??????;????????????????}?_??Q?????C?u1Ky???d?????wo?????j??sl_?ne?T?Vo?x???}???qw???duyhw~?K?]a?~?????q??_a?y??w????ghP?! ???R??????p?q?y??T????I??M????I??????V????????????? ??KC??n??????h?ycb~e?j???????????f?w???????z\??????s?u????j?I?I<a???u?KTq?@????????>??2????????????h??&????????f?\???~?s???????????x??m?????????d?B&?}?u:~}??b7?Q|????w?????{B[?M??p?????f?G??p?????D????w?w?w?w???w?-w????L?G?|?#????????jj??????????[??vwW~?O~D?V???]??e?t?m????????????????????IjB???e??Bm????????????|????G??J?)=b???~?|??|???w???w???ze??;^??D?t?f????R??|?v????????G?=??????E??m?V?wc~????????``?b??b?re???;Q|???:?-?^.=v??? ????]?ArL??=??'c?h???????????6???????????o?Ozwyto????????|?w?3?$j????[??????????????????T??^?Nhk????J`|?y???Dv?r??????Q???|?I?O?g???|???j?w??^???N?B?)8???????Q?L???zp~wt???V??`?r???l???=???r?Yu?[?????????????c?GB??&?Y?j??????0?? ?????!?????J?`?h?$y???5??O????hVSL?[?|????pwL????t????????;???Q?m??????^N??`??>8j?!,?]?????????????w??????????????????[?[?Q?O??????I?|????????@????????3? ?t?p??g???.B????????,?oB[?????????????`????????~????? ?q????????????DI???cy?????????????????V???j?????????????m?e?8tt?w???Em?e?QIcQI)?~D?z????=?y???????????????j?E??!?????.??????5w????^|?????????????yLg??f?tg`ur?|?~?@?????\L??1?????6?z?????S??????7??qw???t?E????&???}]???????????r??$g2?i????(??q?_?????b?X???L?uv?????????z?x??(2??????????????H?z??????????i????????u?S???g?xz?zL}?x???b???????]?2pi??xb?I???=?e?Gn??????1????????????b??????d??????i?v ???n????X??U??r?q6Q??w????]???????????????g?1q???????????????????z}e?????*?4?g???}~???????????????????>?#??~uq???}Nr?????????????????????`?@?S?x?????N????????????????i????????q????Jb??????x?u?g????????????V???~?@?Yn???g`usp??iz?????????????p??B??#f??????????-??????????????e?4,G???uX?gg??????????????????i4?????l??u?`???[?w?lu??????????>?U?l????????C!??k??Ge?u???????;???i?g???`?,?zs???????????p|[??????????w??zn?w?????????????z??g????????????q?u?O???zQJ?|?G???@@?????????????! ?????????6??????6zv???|}???|??????<]?????????Q?????????????k????S???????w?}?ug??x???=?????@??uSx?w??nV??????[??T???????u?X???}?iV?????S???????????????X??_????x?????b??????????????L??????????E?????s????i????????????C]????}????Q??i?z?z?`Js?z??????????q???X|?????d???????}???}?f?x??]?E?}?z???????q?u??l????z}???/]????}?p]??n??????????p??Lvw?w?w?w????z????@?????????m?2X??g?x????????V???? j?z?b??????zlswls?}?????????g????S?3????O{?|?Vgse}w?}???????i????u???x???????????p?c?|?q????e?z?V??g????}??????<?J?g???????z?H?????????????o?p??bzi??????&q????????????}????}?l^k???????j?|????l?n???z?z?xe??H?l?zl?Y???X??????j}??v?????HznY?b???v?|???ss??{?C??l??X?????????????????<???w?w?w?w?w?w?w?w?w?w???| ??! Yh>???" ?h># ????????Zs~$ Yh>% ?UD& Ys~' Ye???/V?yUh>( Y?>) ?h>* ?g?+ y?, ?Wa- ?Z?W. ?@?/ ?M)0 Z??w?w????1 ??????[????2 ?? ?^???w?w???w?w?w?w?w?w?w??Rw?w?w?w???$??????(?Q??a????W?0???????'? ????????3 ??4 ??|?5 ?B??6 ????7 ????8 ??|h9 N?|?: N?y?; ?B?T< ??|?Om????????= N??T> d? ? %@ ???A ???B ???C ?A?????D ???E ??F ???G ??H ???I ???????J ? ??K ???L ???M ??|d???N ??jO ???P ??BQ ??ZR ??3S ???T "?U ???V ???W ??X ?@Y ???Z ???[ ??\ ??u] ??^ ?Y???????R?|?? ?L?v???~?W?W?-?-??g????????????._ ?N?ga??????` ?Na ??????????b ??c ??d ???a?Ne ?.f ?g ??h ???i L?????????w?w?w?*??w?????w??(? ???<_?.?F????k ???l ???m ???????!?!???????w?w?'??s??????????y? ??n ?t?o ?u ?Q??q ??r ???is ?/??t ?i ?u ?i ?u ?s ??z ?{ ?*?| ?? ?u ?u ?u ???? ?2??? ?u ??? ??w?w??w?w?w?????8??'??? ? ??? ?h???????f????4????r???????????"?2? ??? ??? ??? ??? h{Vo????s? ?bM? ?T?? ?3m? ?;[? ???? ?x(? ??? ???? ??u? ?pA? ?xs? ?pN? ??? ??%? ????4??w??8Tw?w?w???"?????W????r? ??? ???? ??B? ?j? ???? ?????|y??k?x?s? ??U? ??? ?\???f??w?w?.w?.w?Mw?If? ???/? ?W2? ??B? ?{? ~4w?w??w?w?????H???N???Z??? ?? ?F? ???? ??.? ??#? ? ?x? ???)? ?{? ????? ?Z? ???? ????? ??C? ????? ?U? ????? ?g? ?6?v???f?>???D?^?_????? ???Et??r???_????????| ??! Yh>???" ?h># ????????Zs~$ Yh>% ?UD& Ys~' Ye???/V?yUh>( Y?>) ?h>* ?g?+ y?, ?Wa- ?Z?W. ?@?/ ?M)0 Z??w?w????1 ??????[????2 ?? ?^???w?w???w?w?w?w?w?w?w??Rw?w?w?w???$??????(?Q??a????W?0???????'? ????????3 ??4 ??|?5 ?B??6 ????7 ????8 ??|h9 N?|?: N?y?; ?B?T< ??|?Om????????= N??T> d? ? %@ ???A ???B ???C ?A?????D ???E ??F ???G ??H ???I ???????J ? ??K ???L ???M ??|d???N ??jO ???P ??BQ ??ZR ??3S ???T "?U ???V ???W ??X ?@Y ???Z ???[ ??\ ??u] ??^ ?Y???????R?|?? ?L?v???~?W?W?-?-??g????????????._ ?N?ga??????` ?Na ??????????b ??c ??d ???a?Ne ?.f ?g ??h ???i L?????????w?w?w?*??w?????w??(? ???<_?.?F????k ???l ???m ???????!?!???????w?w?'??s??????????y? ??n ?t?o ?u ?Q??q ??r ???is ?/??t ?i ?u ?i ?u ?s ??z ?{ ?*?| ?? ?u ?u ?u ???? ?2??? ?u ??? ??w?w??w?w?w?????8??'??? ? ??? ?h???????f????4????r???????????"?2? ??? ??? ??? ??? h{Vo????s? ?bM? ?T?? ?3m? ?;[? ???? ?x(? ??? ???? ??u? ?pA? ?xs? ?pN? ??? ??%? ????4??w??8Tw?w?w???"?????W????r? ??? ???? ??B? ?j? ???? ?????|y??k?x?s? ??U? ??? ?\???f??w?w?.w?.w?Mw?If? ???/? ?W2? ??B? ?{? ~4w?w??w?w?????H???N???Z??? ?? ?F? ???? ??.? ??#? ? ?x? ???)? ?{? ????? ?Z? ???? ????? ??C? ????? ?U? ????? ?g? ?6?v???f?>???D?^?_????? ???Et??r???_?????????l?}??????u???+?????????????????t?glH???l?X?q?`v?H?k?y??????????C???????????s?m?i?7?{????j?K?|??l? ???????G?????????p?W??T????t?y?~c3? zk??}0?y?w???????????????????=???????n??4?8????m????v??#????}?k???????????=?y?)n??????/? q????????w?6?T???r??????L?j?E?:? ??g???gY.?o?????????????????????A?????"?????????l???y???????????w?T??p??q??? 8? E? '{????|?]?t??? _??????????|?p?*?u?V? wv???????????????????????????~?W??a?v?2??z???j?d?{?6v??????????O?k?Fk??????X?Fuof\?~?s?w???????0?!?????n?b?w??????X??z?M?y???}A??u?}?????}?=?L?|?{?X???m???????$?????n?+??U???u?m??????o????6?O?5?w??????n??5?Mu?k???P_{u?%?D?T?9??????Gg????????V?????P?0???\???2???x???3?????:???????????{{OhX???????????????q??~??9Vs??????????h??????vtCAL???^????????????s?i???????x??n?\?????{{???{?v?????Yi?X???xv???t?~?X6?????`?~??3????C???Os?????????????}?vsf|a?~?????????????K\ahf?v?????????????????x?~??pf?N~k?????|~???i??????{c?y~?q???????vv~}???v?c???i??qym???y?????????{{?t???y?v???????S~D???\? ????6?????????~????~?4n?{????????????1{?????????nn~{?Iv??\4K?????????????????q^^ts???????????????{WAxy??????????????????i???sn?#vv?U?N?? tr???+??????m???*3opW[?xh?w?U??c????!?}?e?????????????????}zEPag??n?|?wu????/?W??S?`??v??D - 1.001-2 - Change font filename to something sane * Sun Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.001-1 - Change version to match font file - Include license explanation - Change around spec a little * Mon May 05 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-1 - Initial package --- NEW FILE import.log --- icelandic-fonts-1_001-2_fc9:HEAD:icelandic-fonts-1.001-2.fc9.src.rpm:1216040417 From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Jul 14 13:20:39 2008 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:20:39 GMT Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel README.license, NONE, 1.1 asana-math-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 asana-math-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807141320.m6EDKdQC017897@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17836/devel Added Files: README.license asana-math-fonts-fontconfig.conf asana-math-fonts.spec asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf import.log Log Message: initial commit --- NEW FILE README.license --- ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Young Ryu > To: Apostolos Syropoulos > Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2008 2:13:23 AM > Subject: Re: pxfonts and Asana Math > > > I want pxfonts/txfonts to be available in public > for not only document preparation/printing/publication > but also for further modification/revision/improvement. > You can change/copy/re-distribute them. I do not intend > to put any restriction. Your revision and distribution of > the fonts will be absolutely OK. There should be no > legal problem. If GPL causes any problem, I will > drop it and make it completely free for any purpose. > > Young Ryu > > Apostolos Syropoulos wrote: > > Dear Sir, > > > > My name is Apostolos Syropoulos and recently I released my Asana Math Open > Type > > font, which is partially a derived work of your pxfonts. I have released the > font > > under the Open Font License > (http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL_web), > > but someone told me that there is some legal problem because you had released > your > > pxfonts with the GPL (the OFL was written a few months ago!). Could you please > let me know if > > there is any problem at all? And if there is how can be fixed? The font is > absolutely free and I > > am making no money from it. > > > > Sincerely yours, > > > > A.S. --- NEW FILE asana-math-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- pxfonts asana-math asana-math serif serif asana-math --- NEW FILE asana-math-fonts.spec --- %define fontname asana-math %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.914 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: An OpenType font with a MATH table Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/asyropoulos/219 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/asyropoulos/asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: README.license BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description An OpenType font with a MATH table that can be used with XeTeX to typeset math content %prep cp %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_DIR %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 644 %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/asana-math.otf install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} install -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc README.license %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog * Sun Jul 13 2008 Jon Stanley - 0.914-1 - Change version - Include license readme - Fix fontconfig file * Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 20080120-1 - Initial package --- NEW FILE asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf --- OTTO {  q ?& 8) #?| Copyright (C) 2000 Young Ryu. Copyright (C) 1997, 1999 Claudio Beccari. with Reserved Font Name Asana Math. Copyright (c) 2000 Young Ryu, with Reserved Font Name pxfonts. Copyright (c) 1997, 1999 Claudio Beccari, with Reserved Font Name gsmn1000. This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is copied below, and is also available with a FAQ at: http://scripts.sil.org/OFL ----------------------------------------------------------- SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE Version 1.1 - 26 February 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------- PREAMBLE The goals of the Open Font License (OFL) are to stimulate worldwide development of collaborative font projects, to support the font creation efforts of academic and linguistic communities, and to provide a free and open framework in which fonts may be shared and improved in partnership with others. The OFL allows the licensed fonts to be used, studied, modified and redistributed freely as long as they are not sold by themselves. The fonts, including any derivative works, can be bundled, embedded, redistributed and/or sold with any software provided that any reserved names are not used by derivative works. The fonts and derivatives, however, cannot be released under any other type of license. The requirement for fonts to remain under this license does not apply to any document created using the fonts or their derivatives. DEFINITIONS "Font Software" refers to the set of files released by the Copyright Holder(s) under this license and clearly marked as such. This may include source files, build scripts and documentation. "Reserved Font Name" refers to any names specified as such after the copyright statement(s). "Original Version" refers to the collection of Font Software components as distributed by the Copyright Holder(s). "Modified Version" refers to any derivative made by adding to, deleting, or substituting -- in part or in whole -- any of the components of the Original Version, by changing formats or by porting the Font Software to a new environment. "Author" refers to any designer, engineer, programmer, technical writer or other person who contributed to the Font Software. PERMISSION & CONDITIONS Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of the Font Software, to use, study, copy, merge, embed, modify, redistribute, and sell modified and unmodified copies of the Font Software, subject to the following conditions: 1) Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in Original or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself. 2) Original or Modified Versions of the Font Software may be bundled, redistributed and/or sold with any software, provided that each copy contains the above copyright notice and this license. These can be included either as stand-alone text files, human-readable headers or in the appropriate machine-readable metadata fields within text or binary files as long as those fields can be easily viewed by the user. 3) No Modified Version of the Font Software may use the Reserved Font Name(s) unless explicit written permission is granted by the corresponding Copyright Holder. This restriction only applies to the primary font name as presented to the users. 4) The name(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) or the Author(s) of the Font Software shall not be used to promote, endorse or advertise any Modified Version, except to acknowledge the contribution(s) of the Copyright Holder(s) and the Author(s) or with their explicit written permission. 5) The Font Software, modified or unmodified, in part or in whole, must be distributed entirely under this license, and must not be distributed under any other license. The requirement for fonts to remain under this license does not apply to any document created using the Font Software. TERMINATION This license becomes null and void if any of the above conditions are not met. DISCLAIMER THE FONT SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT, PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER RIGHT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, [...2892 lines suppressed...] ? f ? ? 7 ? ? 4 ? ? 1 ? ? . ? ? + ? ? ( ? ? % ? ? " ?   ? Y Z  ? ?] ?f ? ? ?] ?f ? ?     ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ?  ? ?  ? ?  ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ?  ? ?  ? ?? ? ?? ?h ? ?? ?h? ? ?? ?h? ? ?? ?h? ( h W  ?? ( h W  ?? ?? ?J ??0 ?? ?J ??@ ?? ?F ??P ?? ?F ??` ?Q ? ? % ?Q ? ? %? ? ? X X ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?S ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ?S ? ? ?S ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? P R j ? ! ? ? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ? + ? ?????? ? ???? ??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ' ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ] ] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  --- NEW FILE import.log --- asana-math-fonts-0_914-1_fc9:HEAD:asana-math-fonts-0.914-1.fc9.src.rpm:1216041556 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 14 16:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807141642.m6EGg3Ku028516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-14 12:42 EST ------- Our aim when subpackaging is to help users. If Dennis Jang feels subpackaging and making possible to install only subsets of un-extras will make users happy, he should subpackage. OTOH if he thinks most users will always want the whole set, he can pass. Above all we want to avoid situations when users do not install un-extras at all because they feel it's too bulky for their usb key/livecd/micro-laptop/etc (while they would have installed a smaller subset happily). But this is something only a user of this language can decide on. I'll happily approve a guidelines-compliant un-extra package (subpackaged or not) as soon as you're done with un-core -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 14 20:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807142006.m6EK6RNj015503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 mvaliyav at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mvaliyav at redhat.com 2008-07-14 16:06 EST ------- Made changes. Please review. Source RPM: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts-2.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Spec File: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 01:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807150125.m6F1PZio032579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-14 21:25 EST ------- Yep, agreed: I was just trying to make the point that I consider subpackaging a blocker for un-core but optional (ie up to the maintainer) for un-extra. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 03:21:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433513] promo/fonts needs to be updated for Liberation now hosted at fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807150321.m6F3Lbir020106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: promo/fonts needs to be updated for Liberation now hosted at fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Liberation font files need |promo/fonts needs to be |to be updated on web site |updated for Liberation now | |hosted at fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 05:44:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807150544.m6F5iGq6016582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-07-15 01:44 EST ------- http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/thibault-fonts.spec is more what was requested, with 4 subpackages generated, one per font. A few other minor cleanups. There's more review to be done, but that's as far as I got tonight in fixing it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 05:41:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433513] promo/fonts needs to be updated for Liberation now hosted at fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807150541.m6F5fi5O008198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: promo/fonts needs to be updated for Liberation now hosted at fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-07-15 01:41 EST ------- FYI, liberation-fonts released from 1.04.beta2 to 1.04. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 10:58:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436520] [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151058.m6FAwTUo005082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520 dtardon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caolanm at redhat.com |dtardon at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 10:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436520] [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151059.m6FAxUGh028746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520 dtardon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 11:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151125.m6FBPMHf000680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-15 07:25 EST ------- khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 11:27:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151127.m6FBRbKs001034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-15 07:27 EST ------- khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 11:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151140.m6FBeJQV012146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-15 07:40 EST ------- This is starting to look good! Some suggested changes: --- padauk-fonts.spec 2008-07-14 22:01:31.000000000 +0200 +++ padauk-fonts-nim.spec 2008-07-15 13:24:52.000000000 +0200 @@ -4,11 +4,10 @@ %define archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4 - Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.4 +Version: 2.4 Release: 1%{?dist} -Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script +Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL @@ -21,13 +20,22 @@ BuildArch: noarch %description -Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters -in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs. -At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. +Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters +in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs. +At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. The font is a smart font using a Graphite description. + %prep -%setup -q -n font-source +%setup -q -c +for txt in doc/*.txt ; do + fold -s $txt > $txt.new + sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new + touch -r $txt $txt.new + mv $txt.new $txt +done + + %build # Nothing there @@ -36,11 +44,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf - +install -m 0644 -p font-source/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf %clean @@ -61,17 +68,19 @@ %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%doc doc/*.txt + +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf + %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf -%doc ../doc/*.txt %changelog * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-1 - Changed versioning -- Added configuration file, -- Added more description +- Added configuration file, +- Added more description - Added license file * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph - 20080617-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 11:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151148.m6FBmSjx013405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-15 07:48 EST ------- 1. Upstream unfortunately created an archive with no top-dir. While your solution will sort-of work people (davej) are going to complain you leave stray files on the hard drive after a build. When upstream forgets the top-dir in an archive, use the -c %setup option 2. .txt munging to avoid rpmlint complaining of DOS end-of-files (with a fold added in as a bonus, notice how we try to preserve the orginal timestamp so it's build-invariant) 3. use 65 not 61 as fontconfig prefix. As noted on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists 55-64 space is reserved for fonts with common LGC scripts (and myanmar isn't) 4. minor cosmetic whitespace changes (while I was at it) 5. Lastly, please use Padauk not padauk in your fontconfig rules. As you can check in nautilus (or another tool) the fonts declare their name with a leading capital -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 12:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151205.m6FC5cwr017127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-15 08:05 EST ------- Thanks for this! I added a note to the I18N docs beat. (one more language covered on the wikipedia front page:-) Thanks for adding to comps too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 12:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151248.m6FCm70s018234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 15:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454291] pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151510.m6FFA999024561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454291 kharrison at shensol.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kharrison at shensol.com ------- Additional Comments From kharrison at shensol.com 2008-07-15 11:10 EST ------- same results can be achieved with later version (1.20.4-1.fc9) and # yum install pango-devel.{i386,x86_64} ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: pango-devel i386 1.20.4-1.fc9 updates 321 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 15:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454291] pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151524.m6FFOA5g017740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454291 ------- Additional Comments From kharrison at shensol.com 2008-07-15 11:24 EST ------- Would just like to add that there is a work around for this problem. Download the RPM (or look in /var/cache/yum/updates/packages after the above yum failure) and force the install via: # rpm -i --force pango-devel-1.20.4-1.fc9.i386.rpm (or whatever version you are trying to install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 16:44:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151644.m6FGikbl002935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 mvaliyav at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mvaliyav at redhat.com 2008-07-15 12:44 EST ------- Thank you for the comments. I have made the changes. Please review.. Source RPM: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts-2.4-2.fc8.src.rpm Spec File: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 18:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151820.m6FIKjLY021347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |mvaliyav at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-15 14:20 EST ------- Since you've done all the requested changes (and I know I can be a difficult reviewer) I'm going to approve the package and sponsor you. Please don't show me wrong and continue to take good care of this package. Your remainning packaging steps are outlined there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a don't forget to do them all including the comps and wiki part. The i18n group will probably want to discuss with you the priority given to this package in comps. I hope you'll be interested in packaging more fonts for Fedora in the future. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 18:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807151834.m6FIY2oO023941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 mvaliyav at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mvaliyav at redhat.com 2008-07-15 14:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: padauk-fonts Short Description: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Owners: mintojoseph Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 19:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] New: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: beland at alum.mit.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com I did a fresh installation of Fedora 9 using the network install method and adding Office/Productivity software in addition to the default set. I'm seeing undisplayable glyphs on the following pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuation#Unicode http://www.wikipedia.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenician_alphabet#Encoding I would expect a default installation to be able to display all glyphs that appear in Wikipedia, so that readers can learn about them. Many non-English glyphs, even fairly obscure ones, are displayed properly, which is excellent. It would be nice to finish off the rest. I don't know if this is a flaw in Pango, if I would need to install additional font RPMs, or something else. This is with firefox-3.0-1.fc9.i386 and pango-1.20.4-1.fc9.i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 15 22:10:39 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:10:39 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807152210.m6FMAd0d012054@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY12007/rpms/padauk-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 15 22:10:57 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:10:57 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807152210.m6FMAvf8012074@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY12007/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 15 22:11:11 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:11:11 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807152211.m6FMBBhM012101@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY12007/rpms/padauk-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module padauk-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module padauk-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 15 22:11:24 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:11:24 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807152211.m6FMBO7j012132@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY12007/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module padauk-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: padauk-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/15 22:11:11 kevin Exp $ NAME := padauk-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 22:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807152210.m6FMAJBA012116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-15 18:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 22:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807152257.m6FMv4B6019236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-15 18:57 EST ------- Mock build provided new rpms from new spec file provided by mdomsch: Spec: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts.spec Rawhide SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm FC9 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC7 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Rawhide Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm FC9 Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8 Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC7 Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Rawhide Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm FC9 Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8 Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC7 Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Rawhide Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm FC9 Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8 Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC7 Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Rawhide StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm FC9 StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8 StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC7 StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 15 23:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807152300.m6FN0HaH020032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-15 19:00 EST ------- Corrections made to previous post. Mock build provided new rpms from new spec file provided by mdomsch: Spec: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts.spec Rawhide SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm FC9 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC7 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Rawhide Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm FC9 Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm FC8 Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm FC7 Essays1743 RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm Rawhide Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm FC9 Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm FC8 Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm FC7 Isabella RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm Rawhide Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm FC9 Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm FC8 Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm FC7 Rockets RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm Rawhide StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm FC9 StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm FC8 StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm FC7 StayPuft RPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 05:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807160536.m6G5auhD009669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-16 01:36 EST ------- I am going to sponsor Dennis, so removing needsponsor for this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 07:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807160735.m6G7ZRXj004107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-16 03:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=311926) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311926&action=view) un-core-fonts.spec-5.patch Here is a patch which implements the subpackaging with a macro. I put in a couple of FIXME for the ko text in the macro - please have a look and fix them up as appropriate. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sba at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:16:48 2008 From: sba at openoffice.org (sba at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jul 2008 08:16:48 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080716081648.11600.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 User sba changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Priority|P2 |P3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from sba at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:16:47 +0000 2008 ------- This is not a P2. No crash, no loss of data. No discussion on this please. If all submitters could set their "personal priority", then ALL issues would be a P1 and show stoppers. Makes no sense as then there would NEVER ever be a final version. Does not work withour rules that everybody follows. See http://www.openoffice.org/scdocs/ddIssues_EnterModify.html#priority Set to P3. Thanks for your comprehension. I spoke to hdu on this. We believe that cairo text rendering in involved in your problem. Set CMC on cc. See issue 85470 for details of the cairo integration. Please try the following: Quit office and all its processes, set the environment variable SAL_ENABLE_CAIROTEXT to 0 (Default is 1), Then restart the office (from the shell you set the variable of course :-=) and look at the document. Please comment, thx. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From sba at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:19:09 2008 From: sba at openoffice.org (sba at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jul 2008 08:19:09 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080716081909.13847.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 User sba changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts' |'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu,sba' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from sba at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:19:09 +0000 2008 ------- Set CCs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cmc at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:39:15 2008 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jul 2008 08:39:15 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080716083915.275.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 ------- Additional comments from cmc at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:39:15 +0000 2008 ------- Its always a possibility. What I also like to see are the font settings, a screenshot of the fonts tab in gnome-appearance-properties should suffice to see what they are, and the output of fc-list. Are these fonts available anywhere for download ? (or does it happen with easier to get fonts like "Liberation" or "DejaVu") --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cmc at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:39:15 2008 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jul 2008 08:39:15 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080716083915.275.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 ------- Additional comments from cmc at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 08:39:15 +0000 2008 ------- Its always a possibility. What I also like to see are the font settings, a screenshot of the fonts tab in gnome-appearance-properties should suffice to see what they are, and the output of fc-list. Are these fonts available anywhere for download ? (or does it happen with easier to get fonts like "Liberation" or "DejaVu") --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 12:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161257.m6GCviwK028749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|pango |dejavu-fonts ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-16 08:57 EST ------- > I would expect a default installation to be able to display all glyphs that appear in Wikipedia Well, Wikipedia will always have characters that cannot be displayed. Simply because it's always over the edge of what Unicode encodes, while a stable distro is a bit behind that. Anyway, font issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 13:06:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161306.m6GD6ZMZ022014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-16 09:06 EST ------- We gladly accept patches for more glyphs at DejaVu :-) But I don't see us having a script like Phoenician really... But I even doubt you could find a Free font for each glyph in Unicode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 13:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161320.m6GDK4KW000443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-16 09:20 EST ------- DejaVu only accepts modern scripts like Ogham ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 13:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161325.m6GDPp0k025218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-16 09:25 EST ------- Let me also note that we are working on a feature for F10 or more realistically F11 to have a notification box pop up and suggest installing a font whenever a character cannot be displayed. That may well "fix" this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 14:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161446.m6GEk285009104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 ------- Additional Comments From beland at alum.mit.edu 2008-07-16 10:46 EST ------- So I take it I can't solve this problem temporarily by just installing some additional RPMs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 15:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161501.m6GF10CH022890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-16 11:00 EST ------- I guess you can install a lot of fonts for all kinds of script to solve it for most scripts. For Phoenician, look at the Aegean font at http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ for example (no idea if there are rpms available in Fedora). But don't expect to get *all* glyphs from Unicode (which defines approximately 100000 different characters) covered by your fonts. In the mean time, I don't really see much point in distributing fonts for scripts like Phoenician by default... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 15:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161510.m6GFAblX024900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-16 11:10 EST ------- also check latest version of "freefont sans" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 15:24:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807161524.m6GFOsNa027355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-16 11:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I guess you can install a lot of fonts for all kinds of script to solve it for > most scripts. For Phoenician, look at the Aegean font at > http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ for example (no idea if there are rpms > available in Fedora). They're not. New Fedora font packagers are of course welcome. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ancient_Scripts_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From vgivanovic at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 16:11:26 2008 From: vgivanovic at openoffice.org (vgivanovic at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jul 2008 16:11:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080716161126.27458.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 User vgivanovic changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from vgivanovic at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 16:11:24 +0000 2008 ------- Where does it say that P2's HAVE to involve crashes or loss of data??? It is a bug that HAS NO WORKAROUND. It is a bug that makes one NOT USE the product. A major feature, DISPLAY OF TEXT, is broken. It is a MAJOR usability problem. It HAS TO BE FIXED for the next release. Seems like a P2 to me. I used to work in SQE, for Sun as a matter of fact, and I get really, really upset when I see cases where people play with priority or severity just to get around fixing a bug for a release. It is dishonest as well. At this point I'm so disgusted with the behavior of 'sga' that I'm simply going to close the bug. I want no further association with this issue. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From es at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 20:51:26 2008 From: es at openoffice.org (es at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jul 2008 20:51:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080716205126.5114.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 User es changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from es at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 20:51:25 +0000 2008 ------- @vgivanovic: Please calm down. I can understand you are upset but let people who fix the issues set the priority according to rules AND ressources. In the end, the priority is not that important if the bug is fixed, right? ;) Now your bug has the correct - on your opinion - prio but is closed. That's neither what you wanted. So please reconsider, do what SBA and CMC asked/adviced you to do and comment. Thanx! Reopening --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 21:22:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807162122.m6GLMorI030788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-07-16 17:22 EST ------- Reviewing... rpmlint cleanups requested. thibault-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) thibault-fonts.src: E: description-line-too-long A collection of fonts from thibault.org, including Isabella, Essays1743, StayPuft, and Rockets. thibault-fonts.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog thibault-fonts.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 thibault-fonts-essays1743.noarch: E: summary-too-long Thibault.org font based on the typeface used in a 1743 English translation of Montaigne's Essays thibault-fonts-essays1743.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog thibault-fonts-essays1743.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 thibault-fonts-rockets.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog thibault-fonts-staypuft.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog thibault-fonts-isabella.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 8 warnings. License tag should be "LGPLv2+", and only at the top, no extra one needed in each %package. BuildRoot could be better. Preferred is %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) other cleanups noted on IRC. Not sure what to do about each of the subpackages owning /usr/share/fonts/thibault/. But seems nuts to make 4 new subdirs under there just to solve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 16 21:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807162139.m6GLdWCS026380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-16 17:39 EST ------- Updated per above mentioned suggestions. http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts.spec Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cloph at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 22:34:05 2008 From: cloph at openoffice.org (cloph at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jul 2008 22:34:05 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080716223405.3120.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 ------- Additional comments from cloph at openoffice.org Wed Jul 16 22:34:03 +0000 2008 ------- *** Issue 45358 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 11:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455717] New: Update sources to version 1.04. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455717 Summary: Update sources to version 1.04. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs- list at redhat.com Description of problem: Version 1.04 is released. Update sources to version 1.04. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberations-fonts-1.04-0.1.beta2.fc10 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: Source update is needed. Expected results: Source is updated. Additional info: Nil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 12:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455717] Update sources to version 1.04. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171224.m6HCO2LK008569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Update sources to version 1.04. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455717 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-07-17 08:24 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=56515 done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From vgivanovic at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 12:53:49 2008 From: vgivanovic at openoffice.org (vgivanovic at openoffice.org) Date: 17 Jul 2008 12:53:49 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080717125349.27614.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 ------- Additional comments from vgivanovic at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 12:53:48 +0000 2008 ------- @es I re-reviewed the criteria for priority, and I did not see any mention of resources. I understand that resources are alway finite, but that should only affect the order in which the bugs are fixed. What's happening here is a P2 is being swept under the rug in order to make a release, rather than shipping with open P2's. In both cases, the product is the same, the bug is not fixed, but one case is honest, the other dishonest. Since I have seen no reason (yet) to change my mind about these issues, and since I suspect that you folks are equally unmoved, perhaps we should just drop the discussion and get on with our lives. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From es at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 13:07:51 2008 From: es at openoffice.org (es at openoffice.org) Date: 17 Jul 2008 13:07:51 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080717130751.6523.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 User es changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |INVALID -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from es at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 13:07:50 +0000 2008 ------- @vgivanovic: the purpose of my comment was not to discuss about prio but to make you focus on the bug, the things CMS/SBA asked you, in order to make this issue move further. Apparently you're stucked on that prio argument and don't want to give us more valuable info. Up to you. I'll then close as "invalid" for we cannot get all the info we need. Feel free to reopen if you change your mind and can provide this info. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From es at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 13:08:14 2008 From: es at openoffice.org (es at openoffice.org) Date: 17 Jul 2008 13:08:14 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080717130814.6908.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 User es changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from es at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 13:08:14 +0000 2008 ------- closed --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 17 14:32:00 2008 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:32:00 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 padauk-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807171432.m6HEW09I019260@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19135/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf padauk-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial Commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- padauk-fonts-2_4-2_fc8:HEAD:padauk-fonts-2.4-2.fc8.src.rpm:1216304464 --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Padauk sans-serif sans-serif Padauk --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts.spec --- %define fontname padauk %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=Padauk # The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs. At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. The font is a smart font using a Graphite description. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in doc/*.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p font-source/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc doc/*.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-2 - Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules - Changed fontconfig prefix * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-1 - Changed versioning - Added configuration file - Added more description - Added license file * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph - 20080617-1 - initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Jul 2008 22:11:11 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Jul 2008 14:31:09 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Jul 2008 22:11:11 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Jul 2008 14:31:09 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 15:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455754] New: Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455754 Summary: Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: liberation-fonts on Fedora 9 needed to be updated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.03-1.fc9 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: Version 1.03. Expected results: Version 1.04. Additional info: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 16:04:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455754] Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171604.m6HG4Lt4031691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455754 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 16:03:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455754] Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171603.m6HG3QDc031620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455754 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-17 12:03 EST ------- liberation-fonts-1.04-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 16:03:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455754] Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171603.m6HG3DBk018352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455754 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-07-17 12:03 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=56541 built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 18:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455783] New: xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455783 Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com ReportedBy: yocum at fnal.gov QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2-9 (probably) How reproducible: n/a Steps to Reproduce: 1. Look here: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/9/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ 2. Note the distinct lack of a xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2-6.fc9.noarch.rpm package 3. profit! Actual results: n/a Expected results: n/a Additional info: Was this omission on purpose or an accident? Thanks, Dan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 18:53:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455787] New: chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.fc9 is missing from F9 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455787 Summary: chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.fc9 is missing from F9 Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: chkfontpath AssignedTo: krh at redhat.com ReportedBy: yocum at fnal.gov QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.fc9 is missing from F9 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.fc9 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go here: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/9/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ 2.Note a distinct lack of chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm 3.profit! Actual results: Tried to build and install MS corefonts from sourceforge.net and couldn't install them. Expected results: Expected to be able to install MS corefonts from sf.net Additional info: Was this intentional or an accident? Thanks, Dan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 19:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455787] chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.fc9 is missing from F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171916.m6HJG63C021278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.fc9 is missing from F9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455787 krh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From krh at redhat.com 2008-07-17 15:16 EST ------- We no longer use xfs and thus chkfontpath isn't used either. For more info: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 19:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455783] xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171925.m6HJPRJL003007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455783 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-17 15:25 EST ------- Fonts are being progressively reorganised in Fedora and for all practical purposes xorg fonts are legacy, not licensed the right way, or simply irrelevant. Useful xorg fonts have been spun in their own packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 19:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455783] xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807171935.m6HJZQ7Z004911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455783 ------- Additional Comments From yocum at fnal.gov 2008-07-17 15:35 EST ------- I can't argue with that, except that my personal favorite font for terminals, Luxi Mono, is no longer available unless I install xorg-x11-fonts-truetype from F8. This is a decent font on LCD laptops and I haven't found it's equal. I'm getting older and my eyesight is getting worse, and this is a nice font that doesn't tire me out so much. You youngin's gotta 'member us old folks, ok? Thanks, Dan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 20:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455783] xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807172006.m6HK6G1Y011382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455783 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-17 16:06 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Luxi_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From vgivanovic at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 20:28:29 2008 From: vgivanovic at openoffice.org (vgivanovic at openoffice.org) Date: 17 Jul 2008 20:28:29 -0000 Subject: [Issue 90735] fonts displayed are thin, weak, malformed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080717202829.1744.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 ------- Additional comments from vgivanovic at openoffice.org Thu Jul 17 20:28:28 +0000 2008 ------- Yes, I am stuck on the "priority issue". I think the stated criteria should be followed, or the criteria should be changed. If you'd like me to or you want to reopen this bug as a P2, I'll follow up with the requested information. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 21:07:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437689] xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807172107.m6HL7Frk023758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437689 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list at redhat.com 2008-05-14 02:38 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 21:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 272521] Handle fonts with many styles gracefully In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807172106.m6HL6gu3022445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Handle fonts with many styles gracefully Alias: x-fontstyle-support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272521 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 Bug 272521 depends on bug 273621, which changed state. Bug 273621 Summary: QT hides some styles of popular FLOSS fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273621 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list at redhat.com 2008-05-13 23:10 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 17 21:20:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455783] xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807172120.m6HLKBBS030262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2 package is missing in F9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455783 ------- Additional Comments From yocum at fnal.gov 2008-07-17 17:20 EST ------- In the infinite words of James T. Kirk: KAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHNNN! Oh, well. :-( Thanks for the pointer. Dan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 18 08:10:48 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:10:48 GMT Subject: rpms/edrip-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 edrip-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <200807180810.m6I8AmuP010091@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10058/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore edrip-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: some more coverage ???? Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- .cvsignore 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -0000 1.6 +++ .cvsignore 18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -edrip-src-20080710.tar.bz2 +edrip-src-20080717.tar.bz2 Index: edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- edrip-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -0000 1.9 +++ edrip-fonts.spec 18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -0000 1.10 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ %define archivename %{fontname}-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20080710 +Version: 20080717 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Edrip decorative font @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ %changelog +* Fri Jul 17 2008 +- 20080717-1 +???? More cyrillic coverage + * Fri Jul 11 2008 - 20080710-1 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ edrip-fonts-20080710-1_fc10:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080710-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215808287 +edrip-fonts-20080717-1_fc10_nim:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080717-1.fc10.nim.src.rpm:1216368564 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- sources 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -0000 1.6 +++ sources 18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -e450ea109fb70d2ca337cdbf3d57ec63 edrip-src-20080710.tar.bz2 +22887d7871edef64ccc67b7e0107050f edrip-src-20080717.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 10:03:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453077] fonts-indic is deprecated and should be removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807181003.m6IA3GMV016857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-indic is deprecated and should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453077 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 10:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453081] fonts-sinhala is deprecated and should be removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807181003.m6IA3VEZ016937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-sinhala is deprecated and should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453081 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 18 14:19:24 2008 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:19:24 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 padauk-fonts.spec,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807181419.m6IEJOG0005748@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5724 Added Files: padauk-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts.spec --- %define fontname padauk %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=Padauk # The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs. At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. The font is a smart font using a Graphite description. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in doc/*.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p font-source/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc doc/*.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-2 - Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules - Changed fontconfig prefix * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-1 - Changed versioning - Added configuration file - Added more description - Added license file * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph - 20080617-1 - initial package From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 18 14:23:16 2008 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:23:16 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 sources,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <200807181423.m6IENGVW005930@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5856 Modified Files: sources Log Message: update source Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Jul 2008 22:11:11 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 18 Jul 2008 14:22:28 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 18 14:26:16 2008 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:26:16 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 padauk-fonts.spec,NONE,1.1 sources,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <200807181426.m6IEQGBR006110@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6049 Modified Files: sources Added Files: padauk-fonts.spec Log Message: initial commit --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts.spec --- %define fontname padauk %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=Padauk # The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs. At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. The font is a smart font using a Graphite description. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in doc/*.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p font-source/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc doc/*.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-2 - Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules - Changed fontconfig prefix * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-1 - Changed versioning - Added configuration file - Added more description - Added license file * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph - 20080617-1 - initial package Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Jul 2008 22:11:11 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 18 Jul 2008 14:25:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 18 14:29:03 2008 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:29:03 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807181429.m6IET3bN006191@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6185 Added Files: padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add conf file --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Padauk sans-serif sans-serif Padauk From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Fri Jul 18 14:30:33 2008 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:30:33 GMT Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807181430.m6IEUXnR006325@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6314 Added Files: padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add conf file --- NEW FILE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Padauk sans-serif sans-serif Padauk From mox at openoffice.org Fri Jul 18 20:01:43 2008 From: mox at openoffice.org (mox at openoffice.org) Date: 18 Jul 2008 20:01:43 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080718200143.5090.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 ------- Additional comments from mox at openoffice.org Fri Jul 18 20:01:42 +0000 2008 ------- The work of this bug continues in cws cairocanvastext01. The cws now has working cairo canvas text for X11, Mac OS X/Quartz and (hopefully) Windows. The rendering is not 100% perfect, but several problems are actually due to VCL backends and/or canvas implementation, not the cairo text rendering. The internal VCL API is NOT exposed anymore. Instead, a platform independent glyph layout array + font id is passed to canvas, as described in vcl/inc/vcl/sysdata.hxx. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 20:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182025.m6IKP6X0027925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|matt_domsch at dell.com |sundaram at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 21:06:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182106.m6IL6Ij5008847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-18 17:06 EST ------- Fix the rpmlint warnings. While the mixed tab and spacing warnings are less serious, the permissions are definitely wrong. srpm: thibault-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Essays1743-1.0-ttf.tar.gz 0777 thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Rockets-ttf.tar.gz 0777 thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission StayPuft.tar.gz 0777 thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Isabella.tar.gz 0777 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Spec file: thibault-fonts.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? OK | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? OK | MUST: successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files NOK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Please fix the incorrect permissions OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license OK | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? Add a font config file as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template and in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 21:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182127.m6ILR25D005534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-18 17:27 EST ------- I would recommend following the standard template specified at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template It would ease the review process quite a bit if you follow that which is always a good thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 21:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182134.m6ILYjIU013025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 21:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182135.m6ILZoGr013455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-18 17:35 EST ------- OK | MUST: rpmlint is clean OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? Shouldn't the font directory name be consistent? Under /usr/share/docs it is gfs-nicecore-fonts and it is just called gfs-nicefore under /usr/share/fonts. I suppose that is a matter of taste since font packages don't seem to follow any particular convention here. OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? OK | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? OK | MUST: successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license OK | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 21:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182137.m6ILbA5i007232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 21:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182136.m6ILaov7007173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 23:34:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182334.m6INYtNG031754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-18 19:34 EST ------- OK | MUST: rpmlint is clean OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? OK | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? OK | MUST: successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license OK | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 23:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:45:07 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182345.m6INj74C001062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 23:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:55:52 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182355.m6INtqIV002500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-18 19:55 EST ------- OK | MUST: rpmlint is clean OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? OK | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? OK | MUST: successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license OK | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? Please fix the typos: licence and traditionnal before you commit. The UTF-8 details have been hashed out already and I don't have much to add. I don't understand French and can't read the text file provided but I see the reference to OFL. Perhaps you should add a README.dist and include a note in English too? Probably not needed as the fonts are useful only for French folks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 18 23:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:56:23 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807182356.m6INuNqf028245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 00:01:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807190001.m6J01Hea029129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 05:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807190526.m6J5QYnp018096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From airlied at redhat.com 2008-07-19 01:26 EST ------- I think that isn't the packagers real name, and I thought the CLA didn't permit anonymous contributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 07:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807190754.m6J7sjeT032174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-19 03:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't the font directory name be consistent? Under /usr/share/docs it is > gfs-nicecore-fonts and it is just called gfs-nicefore under /usr/share/fonts. I > suppose that is a matter of taste since font packages don't seem to follow any > particular convention here. If you look at the contents of your /usr/share/fonts we rather consistently drop the suffix. putting a lots of -fonts subdirs in a fonts dir seemed rather useless. Anyway, thanks a lot for taking the time to do the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-nicefore-fonts Short Description: GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 07:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807190755.m6J7tTSq032722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-19 03:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-jackson-fonts Short Description: GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 07:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:57:51 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807190757.m6J7vp9t000457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-19 03:57 EST ------- Ok, I'll do this on import. Thank you for looking at that contentious package New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ecolier-court-fonts Short Description: ?colier court fonts Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 09:44:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455754] Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807190944.m6J9iDpa023807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455754 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-19 05:44 EST ------- liberation-fonts-1.04-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update liberation-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-6559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:00:42 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:00:42 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807191400.m6JE0gqq024104@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsU24065/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:00:54 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:00:54 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807191400.m6JE0sRM024121@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsU24065/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:01:05 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:01:05 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807191401.m6JE154u030705@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsU24065/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module gfs-nicefore-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module gfs-nicefore-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:01:18 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:01:18 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807191401.m6JE1Inv030722@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsU24065/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module gfs-nicefore-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: gfs-nicefore-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/19 14:01:06 kevin Exp $ NAME := gfs-nicefore-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 14:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191401.m6JE1cSY030172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-19 10:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 14:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191400.m6JE0UZP029943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-19 10:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:01:47 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:01:47 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807191401.m6JE1lOI030823@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz30744/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:02:02 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:02:02 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807191402.m6JE226l030845@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz30744/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:02:19 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:02:19 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807191402.m6JE2JHS030895@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz30744/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module gfs-jackson-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module gfs-jackson-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:02:35 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:02:35 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807191402.m6JE2Zj4030922@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsz30744/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module gfs-jackson-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: gfs-jackson-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/19 14:02:19 kevin Exp $ NAME := gfs-jackson-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:03:22 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:03:22 GMT Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807191403.m6JE3MVo031003@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO30959/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:03:37 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:03:37 GMT Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807191403.m6JE3beM031026@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO30959/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:03:49 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:03:49 GMT Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807191403.m6JE3n4K031051@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO30959/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module ecolier-court-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module ecolier-court-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 14:04:00 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:04:00 GMT Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807191404.m6JE40l5031066@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO30959/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module ecolier-court-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: ecolier-court-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/19 14:03:49 kevin Exp $ NAME := ecolier-court-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 14:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:03:09 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191403.m6JE39Kv024886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-19 10:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 15:45:14 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:45:14 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel gfs-nicefore-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807191545.m6JFjEpX011274@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11246/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-nicefore-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial packaging --- NEW FILE gfs-nicefore-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Nicefore fantasy fantasy GFS Nicefore --- NEW FILE gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec --- %define fontname gfs-nicefore %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_NICEFORE Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. GFS Nicefore is a typical Byzantine sample of the 5th-7th century period. It has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog * Sun Jul 06 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-1 ?? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216482262 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Jul 2008 14:01:06 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Jul 2008 15:44:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_NICEFORE.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Jul 2008 14:01:06 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Jul 2008 15:44:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +02fcaf05448bb0df6696567975014132 GFS_NICEFORE.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 15:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191550.m6JFoGgq013486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-19 11:50 EST ------- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 16:02:51 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:02:51 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel gfs-jackson-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-jackson-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807191602.m6JG2pKl018784@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18706/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-jackson-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-jackson-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial packaging --- NEW FILE gfs-jackson-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Jackson fantasy fantasy GFS Jackson --- NEW FILE gfs-jackson-fonts.spec --- %define fontname gfs-jackson %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_JACKSON Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. GFS Jackson is an edition of the font cut, in 1788, by Joseph Jackson on commission by the Cambridge University in preparation of the edition of the Beza codex containning the New Testament from the 5th-6th century. Theodore Beza was the erudite scholar from Geneva who had given the codex as a gift to the University in 1581. It has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog * Sun Jul 06 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-1 ?? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216483310 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Jul 2008 14:02:19 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Jul 2008 16:02:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_JACKSON.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Jul 2008 14:02:19 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Jul 2008 16:02:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +73d235051292e23bc807c71d8c951e6b GFS_JACKSON.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 16:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191629.m6JGTilF019057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-19 12:29 EST ------- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Jul 19 16:38:53 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:38:53 GMT Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel README-Fedora.txt, NONE, 1.1 ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ecolier-court-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 lisez_moi.txt, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807191638.m6JGcr6o020178@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20150/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: README-Fedora.txt ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf ecolier-court-fonts.spec import.log lisez_moi.txt Log Message: Initial packaging ??? --- NEW FILE README-Fedora.txt --- [Unofficial English translation of lisez_moi.txt] WARNING The two fonts named: ??? Ecolier court ??? Ecolier lignes court are released under the OFL (Open Font Licence): http://scripts.sil.org/OFL An (unofficial) translation in French is available here: http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/OFL-Unofficial-fr.html Please read the conditions of use of the two fonts listed here. If you want to display my fonts on your site, please add it the OFL logo (with its link), the OFL translation and the lisez_moi.txt file. You can also (and this is often preferable), link to my site: http://perso.orange.fr/jm.douteau/ The author makes those fonts available to everyone free of charge and disclaims any responsibility for possible malfunctions. Those fonts were created by Jean-Marie Douteau. e-mail : douteau.ecolier at orange.fr --- NEW FILE ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Ecolier_court cursive cursive Ecolier_court Ecolier_lignes_court fantasy fantasy Ecolier_lignes_court --- NEW FILE ecolier-court-fonts.spec --- %define fontname ecolier-court %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070702 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: ??colier court cursive fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://perso.orange.fr/jm.douteau/page_ecolier.htm # The author links to third-party licence documents not included there Source0: http://perso.orange.fr/jm.douteau/polices/ecl_cour.ttf Source1: http://perso.orange.fr/jm.douteau/polices/ec_cour.ttf Source2: http://perso.orange.fr/jm.douteau/polices/lisez_moi.txt Source3: README-Fedora.txt Source4: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description ??colier are a set of Latin fonts created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimic the traditional cursive writing French children are taught in school. He kindly released two of them under the OFL, which are redistributed in this package. %prep %setup -q -c -T iconv -f iso-8859-15 -t utf-8 %{SOURCE2} > lisez_moi.txt touch -r %{SOURCE2} lisez_moi.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} . %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Sat Jul 19 2008 - 20070702-1 ??? Stop waitting for upstream to answer distribution change requests ??? FESCO chickened out on UTF-8 names ??? FESCO decision unimplementable due to bug #455119 ??? Sync spec style with the way our font packaging guidelines have evolved ??? Package both fonts in a single package I'm going to consider they are two faces of the same font ??? Register in new fontconfig generic families ??? Add upstream readme translation as asked in review * Sun Nov 25 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 1.00-0.4.20070628 ??? sync with packaging guidelines * Sat Sep 8 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 1.00-0.2.20070628 ??? use more accurate naming ??? add an ASCII alias as suggested in review * Tue Aug 28 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 1.00-0.1.20070628 ??? Initial packaging (based on DejaVu & Charis specs) --- NEW FILE import.log --- ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-1_fc10:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216485467 --- NEW FILE lisez_moi.txt --- AVERTISSEMENT Les 2 polices nomm?es?: Ecolier court Ecolier lignes court sont plac?es sous licence OFL (Open Font Licence): http://scripts.sil.org/OFL Une traduction (non-officielle) en langue fran?aise est disponible ici : http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/OFL-Unofficial-fr.html Merci de prendre connaissance des conditions d'utilisation des 2 polices cit?es ci-dessus. Si vous souhaitez afficher mes polices sur votre site, merci d'y joindre le logo de la licence OFL (avec son lien) ainsi que la traduction et le fichier lisez-moi.txt. Vous pouvez ?galement (et c'est souvent pr?f?rable), mettre un lien vers mon site : http://perso.orange.fr/jm.douteau/ L?auteur met gratuitement ces polices ? la disposition de chacun et d?cline toute responsabilit? concernant d??ventuels dysfonctionnements. Ces polices de caract?res ont ?t? cr??es par Jean-Marie Douteau e-mail?: douteau.ecolier at orange.fr Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Jul 2008 14:03:49 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Jul 2008 16:38:06 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +ec_cour.ttf +ecl_cour.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Jul 2008 14:03:49 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Jul 2008 16:38:06 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +22138c551a0252edca92171e20c20a40 ec_cour.ttf +5a096077d2619ad399799f07fbaa1d78 ecl_cour.ttf From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 16:43:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:43:23 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_ecolier-court-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191643.m6JGhNjX015570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-19 12:43 EST ------- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 18:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191834.m6JIY4Fb031527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |bl.bugs at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 18:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438944] Fedora 10 Target Tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191833.m6JIXgqd031482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora 10 Target Tracker Alias: F10Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438944 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |455981 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 18:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] New: Missing locl romanian magic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 Summary: Missing locl romanian magic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Tasks/Ro_fonts DejaVu has all the glyphs Romanian uses but is missing some necessary locl magic already available in SIL and proprietary fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 18:46:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191846.m6JIktNl006405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-19 14:46 EST ------- I've been told by a Romanian person (as I explicitly asked about this) that they don't expect to see the S/T with comma below if they type the S/T with cedilla... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 19:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191912.m6JJCJro010176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-19 15:12 EST ------- Romanians seems to be in disagreement :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 19:18:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807191918.m6JJInfR010964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-19 15:18 EST ------- My personal view is that it shouldn't be done. The S/T with cedilla code points are no longer unified with the Romanian letters S/T with comma below, so they should never appear like them anymore, and if they do, it's a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 21:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807192127.m6JLRlwM029629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-19 17:27 EST ------- It should be done because locl is an *optional* font feature. The application is free to request it or not. Unfortunately pango always turns locl on based on laguage. It should be configurable at pango's level, preferably in way that allows application to modify it via pango markup. It's okay for the default pango settings to turn locl on for Romania because the Romanian Academy typographic standard requires commas not cedillas for Romanian text. The only possible trouble spot is a Turkish name. But that name could be marked-up as being in the Turkish language in the document [well, not in plain text]. BTW, if you ever saw a Romanian document rendered with mixed cedillas and commas you wouldn't doubt the necessity of locl. Adobe introduced ROM/locl because they (and 99% of commercial fonts) remap "t with cedilla" to "t with comma" regardless of locale, based on the assumption that "t with cedilla" is not used in any language [There's a post on Adobe forums, but I'm too tired to find it now]. Mixed diacritics look like ?rap for Romanian text in the pre-Unicode 3.0 encoding, which sadly is still far more widespread at least on the web [check with Google]. A [mild] picture of mixed diacritics is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_alphabet#Adobe.2FLinotype.2FVista_de-facto_standard. This visual inconsistency is why Adobe Pro fonts can also map "s with cedilla" to "s with comma" when ROM/locl is turned on. FYI: Vista fonts and the Linotype fonts [you can check on their site] behave the same way. Now assume DejaVu, which currently doesn't honor ROM/locl, is used in a document together with a font that does honor the ROM/locl substituion, not necessarily a comercial one, e.g. one of the free SIL fonts[*]. You'd get mixed diacritics again. Granted this is not in the same font, but it is still in the same document and it looks bad... Footnote [*] SIL fonts use ROM/ccmp to do the mapping, but pango turns that on too. I'm not aware of any other fonts except those from SIL that work this way. Please don't make dejavu work that way. I'd rather have you adopt the Adobe standard which is used in hundreds of fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 19 22:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] New: No OpenType Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 Summary: No OpenType Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: linux-libertine-fonts AssignedTo: frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de ReportedBy: gaburici at cs.umd.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,kevin at tummy.com Description of problem: OpenType variants of the fonts (available from upstream) are not packaged. These are usable with XeTeX which Fedora now ships in texlive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 20 02:38:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807200238.m6K2culV003212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-19 22:38 EST ------- Rpmlint errors/warnings fixed. Fontconfig files added. http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts.spec http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 05:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807210517.m6L5Hn13004104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From smallvil at get9.net 2008-07-21 01:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312229) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312229&action=view) 4 to 5 patch Spec file - http://get9.net/rpm/5/un-fonts-core.spec this patch is a little modification, But main description disappear and short length of spec file but will untidy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bernd_schoeler at openoffice.org Mon Jul 21 10:22:47 2008 From: bernd_schoeler at openoffice.org (bernd_schoeler at openoffice.org) Date: 21 Jul 2008 10:22:47 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080721102247.20224.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User bernd_schoeler changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'bahein,benjamin_schallar,|'bahein,benjamin_schallar, |ckolivas,cwoollard,fedoraf|bernd_schoeler,ckolivas,cw |onts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masaya|oollard,fedorafonts,iorsh, |n,msundman,simos' |jeongkyu,masayan,msundman, | |simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 12:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211205.m6LC5uAN009611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-21 08:05 EST ------- Ugh, Unicode seems to have made an even bigger mess out of this than I originally thought... So, apparently both U+015E-U+015F, U+0162-U+0163, and U+0218-U+021B can still all be used for Romanian. With the extra string attached to U+0218-U+021B that they should be used when a distinct shape with comma below is needed. So you're still allowed the U+015E-U+015F, U+0162-U+0163 glyphs to write Romanian apparently. And since Unicode only cares about code points, it didn't give any clue on how fonts or renderers are supposed to know when distinct glyphs are needed. Yet Unicode expects them to clean up the mess they've made. > It should be done because locl is an *optional* font feature. I thought it was obligated if a language was passed to the renderer (but I may be wrong on this). > Adobe introduced ROM/locl because they (and 99% of commercial fonts) remap > "t with cedilla" to "t with comma" regardless of locale That's just bad, t with cedilla _is_ used sometimes. I think it was even proposed a long time ago to be used in French for when a t sounds like /s/, like "rela?ion" (didn't catch on unfortunately :-) ). Unicode itself mentions Semitic transliteration (but I guess that needs a lot of other glyphs those fonts don't have). So far I've only found three Adobe fonts with Romanian glyphs and two didn't have the locl rule, so it looks like Adobe doesn't do it often either. They all have indeed t with comma below in the place of t with cedilla. If you have documents with mixed diacritics you can blame it on that practice, _not_ the absence of locl rules in the font. I've also checked the MS Vista fonts once (usually they make the de facto standard rules since their fonts are most widely spread). Segoe UI and the new versions of Arial, Times New Roman etc. don't have locl rules or anything else and have t with cedilla at U+0162-U+0163 (I think the old versions known as the corefonts were pre-Unicode 3.0). The C-fonts which were made by another foundry have t with comma below at U+0162-U+0163 like Adobe fonts, and have a salt (stylistic alternate) _and_ a locl feature for s with cedilla glyphs to s with comma below for Romanian. Also, one thing I'm asking myself is: why doesn't Gentium have locl rules (or ccmp rules)? It's a more recent font compared to Doulos and Charis, so the SIL people seem to have changed their minds about it, and I'd like to know their reasons before changing anything in DejaVu. So, short conclusion: how it's dealt with it seems to just depend on the foundry that made the fonts, and it also seems to depend on who you ask. So far, I haven't seen enough yet to be sure that a locl rule is needed. Also, don't always assume commercial fonts have it right. As said above, the same fonts have t with comma below in place of t with cedilla, together with a s with cedilla, which is the worst thing you can do here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 13:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456084] Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211344.m6LDiZTN032726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456084 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 14:56:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211456.m6LEu3mH010677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-07-21 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I think that isn't the packagers real name, and I thought the CLA didn't permit > anonymous contributions. I've confirmed that it is his real name. There is no legal holdup here (that I am aware of). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 16:12:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211612.m6LGCtVD027149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-21 12:12 EST ------- Please use the setup macro. You might also want to look at rewriting the spec to follow the template since the current style appears odd. Other than that APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 19:38:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211938.m6LJcQFI009246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-21 15:38 EST ------- Odd. I see the .otf files in the binary distribution, but they don't seem to be providing the .fea files for otf fonts, and I can't get the sdf files to generate otf files either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 19:44:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456084] Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211944.m6LJiDeu005737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456084 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 19:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456084] Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211944.m6LJiqBA005826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456084 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-07-21 15:44 EST ------- rpmlint has this to say: gfs-garaldus-fonts.src: E: no-spec-file OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? OK | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? OK | MUST: successfully compile, build OK | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license OK | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? Fix the odd rpmlint warning and you are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 19:52:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456084] Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807211952.m6LJqqr4012510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456084 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-21 15:52 EST ------- I guess I pay for the fact rpmlint is broken in rawhide by the new rpm, so I can't run it. However I do know what that warning means (font spec filename ? rpm filename) so I'll fix it before import Thanks you for the lighting-fast review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-garaldus-fonts Short Description: GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 21 20:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807212023.m6LKNXN7013946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-21 16:23 EST ------- I've filed a bug with upstream about this issue: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2023902&group_id=89513&atid=590374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 03:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807220318.m6M3Ib8K032391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-21 23:18 EST ------- Modified to more closely follow fedora's policies, and per my experience with thibault-fonts. Spec URL: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Mock built for FC7, FC8, and FC9 RPMS: FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm SRPMS: FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 10:40:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221040.m6MAecl4006843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 06:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > So, apparently both U+015E-U+015F, U+0162-U+0163, and U+0218-U+021B can still > all be used for Romanian. With the extra string attached to U+0218-U+021B that > they should be used when a distinct shape with comma below is needed. So > you're still allowed the U+015E-U+015F, U+0162-U+0163 glyphs to write Romanian > apparently. Microsoft took about 7 years to include U+0218-U+021B in *some* Windows XP fonts, which happened only after Romanian got into the EU :) Some XP fonts (Georgia, Courier) still don't have the proper glyphs, even after the update [http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=0ec6f335-c3de-44c5-a13d-a1e7cea5ddea&displaylang=en] (google "EU font expansion update if that ugly link doesn't work). The result is that documents using the pre-Unicode 3.0 encoding (U+015E-U+015F, U+0162-U+0163) still dominate. > > It should be done because locl is an *optional* font feature. > > I thought it was obligated if a language was passed to the renderer (but I may be wrong on this). Currently Uniscribe (the XP renderer) doesn't honor it at all. At least in XP SP3. > > Adobe introduced ROM/locl because they (and 99% of commercial fonts) remap > > "t with cedilla" to "t with comma" regardless of locale > > That's just bad, t with cedilla _is_ used sometimes. I think it was even > proposed a long time ago to be used in French for when a t sounds like /s/, > like "rela?ion" (didn't catch on unfortunately :-) ). Unicode itself mentions > Semitic transliteration (but I guess that needs a lot of other glyphs those > fonts don't have). I agree it's bad. *Very few* commercial fonts have a proper "t with cedilla". Verdna and Tahoma are only significant ones. Everything else follows the Adobe standard. You can check commercial fonts at Linotypes' website. Below is a link that restricts the search to fonts that support the Romanian characters: [http://www.linotype.com/featuresearch?cf[]=adobece&cf[]=euro&cf[]=latinext] You have to enter a test string yourself, since that doesn't go in the URL. Use: a??i?s?t??s?t?. > So far I've only found three Adobe fonts with Romanian glyphs and two didn't > have the locl rule, so it looks like Adobe doesn't do it often either. They > all have indeed t with comma below in the place of t with cedilla. If you have > documents with mixed diacritics you can blame it on that practice, _not_ the > absence of locl rules in the font. You probably looked at old fonts. All the Pro fonts they are currently shipping have complete support for Romanian, with a "t with cedilla" substituted by the comma variant regardles of locale, and with a ROM/locl feature that *additionally* substitutes "s with cedilla" with "s with comma". Vista C-series fonts have exactly the same feature set, as you pointed out. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_alphabet#Adobe.2FLinotype.2FVista_de-facto_standard] > Also, one thing I'm asking myself is: why doesn't Gentium have locl rules (or > ccmp rules)? It's a more recent font compared to Doulos and Charis, so the SIL > people seem to have changed their minds about it, and I'd like to know their > reasons before changing anything in DejaVu. You need to ask them. IMHO, their implementation of the remapping via ccmp violates the OpenType 1.4 standard: ccmp should *not* depend on the langage. > > So, short conclusion: how it's dealt with it seems to just depend on the > foundry that made the fonts, and it also seems to depend on who you ask. So > far, I haven't seen enough yet to be sure that a locl rule is needed. The are some variations, but 99% of commercial fonts follow the Adobe standard. Check on Linotype's website! Unfortunately you cannot check for locl there. But the Romanian locl issue has be debated to death on typophile forums, and the opinion leaders there (fokes that run foundries) follow the Adobe standard, locl included. > Also, don't always assume commercial fonts have it right. As said above, the > same fonts have t with comma below in place of t with cedilla, together with a > s with cedilla, which is the worst thing you can do here. Adobe fonts look ok with locl on. Adobe assumed that Microsoft would implement locl sooner rather than later. InDesign CS3 supports locl in it's own renderer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 10:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221052.m6MAqgpf012435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 06:52 EST ------- .fea files are an Adobe standard. FontForge can export and import them, but normally stores the OpenType features inside it's own .sfd files, together with the glyphs. So the upstream doesn't need to provide .fea files, although working with text .fea files, like Adobe's foundry does, has some definite advantages. I posted the link to an Adobe ATypl presentation on the fedora-fonts-list on this issue. As for generating OpenType CFF fonts, I have no trouble doing it from the FontForge "File/Generate Fonts..." menu; just choose "OpenType (CFF)" as output format. My FontForge scripting skills are lacking, so I don't know how to do it non-interactively. Btw, the link for the bug report doesn't work for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 11:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221131.m6MBVj5H015480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-22 07:31 EST ------- OK, I guess it doesn't break anything else to add this (except your Turkish texts when reading in Romanian locale...). But it still goes against my philosophy of "don't fix problems of the past, but make sure you don't make more problems that you need to fix in the future". So, is this only for latn{ROM} and latn{MOL}, or are there other dialects that need it as well? If you know any, the full list of languages that can be used in OpenType is at http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/languagetags.htm so you can check if it's there. Similar issue, the s/t with cedilla code point should be canonically the same as s/t + combining cedilla. In short, that would mean that when you write such a sequence you need to get a t with comma below as well for Romanian. But I'm not entirely sure how to do that yet... Probably a "calt" (contextual alternate) feature for the combining cedilla, but that's not applied by default in Pango unfortunately, we could misuse "ccmp" (glyph composition/decomposition) for it, but I'd like to see "calt" turned on once, and this way I can use the Romanian community to push Behdad :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 11:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221155.m6MBt1oX022550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 07:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > So, is this only for latn{ROM} and latn{MOL}, or are there other dialects that > need it as well? If you know any, the full list of languages that can be used > in OpenType is at http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/languagetags.htm > so you can check if it's there. As you pointed out, Adobe's fonts do this for latn{MOL} as well. But Moldavians have their own academy (and country), so I don't know it this is appropriate or not. Wikipedia doesn't have a page on their alphabet. I guess Adobe is preparing Moldavians for an an anschluss ;) No other languages should need it, or if they do, Adobe ignores them for now... > > Similar issue, the s/t with cedilla code point should be canonically the same > as s/t + combining cedilla. In short, that would mean that when you write such > a sequence you need to get a t with comma below as well for Romanian. But I'm > not entirely sure how to do that yet... Probably a "calt" (contextual > alternate) feature for the combining cedilla, but that's not applied by > default in Pango unfortunately, we could misuse "ccmp" (glyph > composition/decomposition) for it, but I'd like to see "calt" turned on once, > and this way I can use the Romanian community to push Behdad :-) Can you provide a test string string for the combining business? Fontmatrix does not rely on pango for OpenType features, so I can test it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 12:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221203.m6MC3YgH021146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-22 08:03 EST ------- U+015E-U+0163 (s and t with cedilla): ? ? ? ? U+0218-U+021B (s and t with comma below): ? ? ? ? S/T + U+0327 (combining cedilla): S? s? T? t? S/T + U+0326 (combining comma below): S? s? T? t? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 12:04:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221204.m6MC4nig021288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-22 08:04 EST ------- oops, second line was wrong. This is the correct list: U+015E-U+0163 (s and t with cedilla): ? ? ? ? U+0218-U+021B (s and t with comma below): ? ? ? ? S/T + U+0327 (combining cedilla): S? s? T? t? S/T + U+0326 (combining comma below): S? s? T? t? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 12:10:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221210.m6MCAqha026237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 08:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > But the Romanian locl issue has be debated to death on typophile forums, and the > opinion leaders there (fokes that run foundries) follow the Adobe standard, locl > included. For reference purposes, I'm linking to John Hudson's comment on typophile: [http://www.typophile.com/node/2764#comment-22015]. John is co-founder Tiro Typeworks, which jointly registered with Adobe the locl feature tag: [http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_ko.htm#locl] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 12:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221214.m6MCEYoU023600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-22 08:14 EST ------- There's apparently some issue with the Gagauz language as well. The wikipedia page uses comma below, but Unicode people don't seem to know what to use http://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2002-m10/0020.html ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 12:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221252.m6MCqtoA002447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 08:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > There's apparently some issue with the Gagauz language as well. The wikipedia > page uses comma below, but Unicode people don't seem to know what to use > http://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2002-m10/0020.html ... I check the OpenType spec: Gagauz has the language tag GAG. So, you can do something special for it, assuming you know what to do. So far I haven't seen any fonts that pay attention to it, so I'd say do nothing now. Like the email you pointed to said, let some Gagauz speak up before we decide anything for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 13:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221307.m6MD7Jrb002354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-22 09:07 EST ------- I think that on this subject, the current opinion of an Unicode guru such as Everson would be very valuable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 14:13:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221413.m6MEDfdo014736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 10:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I think that on this subject, the current opinion of an Unicode guru such as > Everson would be very valuable. This is an OpenType issue, not an Unicode issue, but surely some expert opinion would not hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 14:24:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221424.m6MEOddq016615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-22 10:24 EST ------- Everson's document about Gagauz is here: http://www.evertype.com/alphabets/gagauz.pdf Basically he says they use comma below, but some may prefer cedilla... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 14:37:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221437.m6MEbJJ5019436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 10:37 EST ------- Full quote: Gagauzi in Russia use Cyrillic; Gagauzi in Romania use Latin. Note that in Romania, Gagauz uses the characters S WITH COMMA BELOW and T WITH COMMA BELOW. In inferior Gagauz typography, the glyphs for these characters are sometimes drawn with CEDILLAs, but it is strongly recommended to avoid this practice. However, because Gagauz is a Turkic language, it may be left to the user to decide whether S WITH COMMA BELOW (as in Romanian) or S WITH CEDILLA (as in Turkish) is preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 14:41:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221441.m6MEf4KR020441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 10:41 EST ------- Btw, Everson is wrong about the use of quotes in Romanian (http://www.evertype.com/alphabets/romanian.pdf), so I wouldn't take him as the ultimate guru... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 14:43:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221443.m6MEhL2a023571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-22 10:43 EST ------- Everson is a type designer, not just an Unicode expert. And what I meant was his opinion on the whole locl thing, not on Gagauz only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 22 15:51:32 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:32 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807221551.m6MFpWPn015495@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO15424/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 22 15:51:46 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:46 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807221551.m6MFpkLJ015535@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO15424/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 22 15:51:58 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:58 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807221551.m6MFpwFI015591@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO15424/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module gfs-garaldus-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module gfs-garaldus-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 22 15:52:11 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:52:11 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807221552.m6MFqBSj015624@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsO15424/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module gfs-garaldus-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: gfs-garaldus-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/22 15:51:58 kevin Exp $ NAME := gfs-garaldus-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 15:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456084] Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221552.m6MFq3WA004973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456084 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-22 11:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 19:11:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221911.m6MJBhbp014514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-22 15:11 EST ------- I have tried to generate them via a fontforge script, but it runs into some error condition and fails. I would be happy to talk to fontforge folks and see how to script this, but... Upstream says: "I produce them by transforming Libertines EM from 2048 down to 1000 and then with generate font files...." This means that the otf versions are going to be lower quality and suffer from rounding issues anyhow. Why not just use the ttf ones? Sorry the link didn't work, sourceforge is junk. It has different links based on if you are logged in or not. If you go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxlibertine/ and then 'tracker' you should be able to see the bug under "feature requests". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 22 19:43:32 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:43:32 GMT Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel gfs-garaldus-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807221943.m6MJhWYc007484@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7380/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-garaldus-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial packaging ??? --- NEW FILE gfs-garaldus-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- GFS Garaldus fantasy fantasy GFS Garaldus --- NEW FILE gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec --- %define fontname gfs-garaldus %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename GFS_GARALDUS Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080707 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. It has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.otf %changelog * Mon Jul 21 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080707-1 ?? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216755659 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Jul 2008 15:51:58 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 22 Jul 2008 19:42:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_GARALDUS.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Jul 2008 15:51:58 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 22 Jul 2008 19:42:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +7638996769c9162f0d8b8885c18af68f GFS_GARALDUS.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 19:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456084] Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807221950.m6MJoZ62021588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-garaldus-fonts - GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456084 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-22 15:50 EST ------- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 21:23:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807222123.m6MLNeMY010356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 17:23 EST ------- Well, I'm currently working with "upstream" Philipp to improve Romanian support. So I had to export the fonts myself to OpenType/CCF. With the 20080607 version of fontforge, I get a warning that 2048 is an unusual value (the usual being 1000), but the export is otherwise successful. E.g. na OTF with support for ROM/locl is here: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/ro/LinLibertine.otf. It doesn't look to me that any downscaling took place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 21:31:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807222131.m6MLVVmN011791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 17:31 EST ------- Update: actually for the font I just gave you a link, I do get a warning when I open it in fontforge: "Stack got too big in uniE00A In LinLibertine, in glyph uniE00A, 'CFF ' advance width (1556) and'hmtx' width (2874) do not match. (Subsequent mismatches will not be reported)". The glyph E00A is the Libertine logo, which is quite complex. But other glyphs have no trouble. I'll point Philipp to this thread. Maybe, he can shed some light, or perhaps simplify the logo a bit, so we can get high quality OTF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 21:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807222143.m6MLh05k009289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-22 17:42 EST ------- You don't need OTF for the features you care about. TTF is as much a valid OpenType format as OTF. 2048 is the default TrueType grid. That strongly hints the font was designed for the TrueType format. By converting to OTF you're winning absolutely nothing quality-wise (and lose OO.o compatibility). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 21:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807222147.m6MLlMi3010118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 17:47 EST ------- I know that TTF is valid OpenType, but the curves are not cubic in TT, are they? I checked the E00A glyph in my font and the original, and mine cannot be displayed by pango-view, so fontforge complains for good reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 22:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807222227.m6MMRhb3021829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-22 18:27 EST ------- Just changing the container format to OTF won't transform quadratic splines in cubic you know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 23:13:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807222313.m6MND1Ue025088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 19:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312405) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312405&action=view) Screenshot for the unbelievers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 22 23:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807222315.m6MNFT9b030008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-22 19:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Just changing the container format to OTF won't transform quadratic splines in > cubic you know. No, but exporting the original sfd as OpenType/CFF will! Maybe you should open the sources and tell us which part or "All layers cubic" you don't undrestand. See screenshot! Btw, support for Romanian locl has been completed by Philipp with a little help from me. So expect a new version upstream anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 00:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807230039.m6N0dVvr010467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 08:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807230810.m6N8A97R023219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-23 04:10 EST ------- 1. Please add a page on this font in the wiki to document this font (using the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template template) Please make sure your other fonts are documented too. (This is used on pages like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_inclusion_history which are referenced in the distro release notes) 2. look at the gfs fonts for example to see how to fix the warning. We consider this kind of change a non-functionnal recoding 3. The TTF/OTF issue is currently being discussed in bug #455995. Please join the discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 08:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807230854.m6N8smrY025067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-23 04:54 EST ------- Oh well, I really didn't want to tackle dual OTF/TTF packaging now, especially for a font which is highly likely to be used in OO.o. Please comment on http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2008-July/msg00059.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 11:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231119.m6NBJZwh017983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-23 07:19 EST ------- I dare you to look at the rendered output of the ttf and otf glyphs at one meter size and pick out the ones with the cubic splines... Really, the quadratic splines which are made from the cubic ones really are virtually the same quality, and if you overlay both you can only really see it at very big sizes, certainly not the sizes you get out of your printer, let alone from your computer screen. Your brain also won't be able to tell which is the better curve (except you're some kind of superhuman with capabilities for visually making accurate derivatives of the curves... ;-) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 12:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231222.m6NCMXMi003357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-23 08:22 EST ------- New SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/sportrop-fonts-0.9-3.fc9.src.rpm Same SPEC This fixes the rpmlint warning above and splits OTF and TTF into subpackages in a generic way - see my post to fedora-fonts-list for more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 14:44:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445291] button labels fail if language support is a subset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231444.m6NEiTpb024255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: button labels fail if language support is a subset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445291 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 14:51:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445291] button labels fail if language support is a subset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231451.m6NEpgL7032219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: button labels fail if language support is a subset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445291 jreiser at bitwagon.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From jreiser at bitwagon.com 2008-07-23 10:51 EST ------- This problem occurs with the official default kickstart of Fedora 9 (the CURRENT release), not some "old kickstart." This problem occurs with repsect to changing the *Languages*, and making no changes to the fonts. The current question is whether rawhide for Fedora 10 has fixed the problem regarding a subset of the *Languages*. I'll answer when I can make a rawhide install, probably as soon as F10 Alpha. Daily rawhide is too unstable to run. Rawhide in Mock suffers from a lack of documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:19:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231519.m6NFJcOA004761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-23 11:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312487) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312487&action=view) Mystery screenshot 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231521.m6NFLWMg005366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-23 11:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312488) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312488&action=view) Mystery screenshot 2 Which one do you find easier to read, this or the previous screenshot? Btw, I realize this has more to do with hinting rather than cubic vs. quadratic. Still it is a valid basis for comparison. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231530.m6NFU5jB032756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-23 11:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312489) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312489&action=view) "I'm am clueless" screenshot 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231534.m6NFYjiw007478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-23 11:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312491) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312491&action=view) "I'm am clueless" screenshot 2 OTOH, at lager (display) sizes, it's impossible to tell the difference. A good way to check is to overlap the maximized image viewer windows and gradually fade out one of them, e.g. using compiz's Alt+SrollWheel feature. In conclusion, I was full of hot air on the cubic vs. quadratic issue. Hinting matters a lot more for the user experience... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:37:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231537.m6NFbZWd001490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-23 11:37 EST ------- Last note on this: all test were with fonts generated at 2048em. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231540.m6NFeJxI002237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-23 11:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) Well, you've said it yourself, that's not an issue of quadratic vs cubic splines. Freetype can do automatic hinting as well if you want. And Fontforge can make automatic ttf hinting instructions as well. This is not an issue of ttf being better or worse than otf, but these otf having hinted added by FontForge and the ttf not. If you manually hint the ttfs, the situation will be the other way around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231548.m6NFmkiN003590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-23 11:48 EST ------- Two questions: 1) Isn't the auto-hinter on by default? 2) Isn't the state machine-based ttf hinting unusable in Fedora due to Apple's patent? All screenshots were from pango-view. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 15:54:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231554.m6NFsBFr004606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-23 11:54 EST ------- 1) depends on the distro. I think fedora has it on by default, but you can easily change it yourself 2) yeah, but many will turn on the bytecode interpreter anyway with third party packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 18:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445291] button labels fail if language support is a subset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231829.m6NITslh005661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: button labels fail if language support is a subset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445291 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jreiser at bitwagon.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-23 14:29 EST ------- Language groups that do not need special encoding fonts do not declare any font. So if your kickstart omits the fonts group, and you unselect all the language groups which may have added other fonts to the mix, you end with a font-less system and no text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 18:35:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231835.m6NIZELU001323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-23 14:35 EST ------- If the only difference you see is from one font version being autohinted by fontforge, and the other not, there is a bug in the way the autohinter is configured on your system and the bug should be reassigned to pango and the pango maintainer. Of course the other solution would be for the libertine packager to script addition of hints to its truetype, but system autohinting is supposed to make that unecessary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Jul 23 18:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 16818] fontformat in match pattern is not respected? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080723184630.369B4130058@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16818 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 19:28:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807231928.m6NJS0MG011252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-23 15:28 EST ------- Vasile, are you saying that XeTeX can't use TrueType OpenType fonts and only handles CFF OpenType? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 23 21:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807232106.m6NL6gYm001421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-23 17:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Vasile, are you saying that XeTeX can't use TrueType OpenType fonts and only > handles CFF OpenType? No, XeTeX can "handle" both flavors of OpenType. I put handle in quotes because XeTeX internally generates an exteneded dvi (.xdv), which is then ran through a driver to produce pdf; I don't think postscript output is possible. One can tell XeTeX to write the xdv to a file, but I don't know of any viewers for xdv. On Linux the driver that converts xdv to pdf is xdvipdfmx. (On Macs one can also choose xdv2pdf, which makes use of AAT - Apple's Advanced Typography). So, font support on Linux is entirely dependent on what xdvipdfmx does. Given that the extended dvi stuff was originally developed for East Asian languaes, the English documentation is a bit spotty. Here's what I've been able to determine: - both TrueType and and OpenType/CFF are supported and are embedded in the pdf. - for both formats xdvipdfmx uses the CID encoding for the embedded font. XeTeX understands only UTF-8. The conversion of encodings is handled transparently by xdvipdfmx, and the pdf is searchable except for ligatures. (In contrast, pdftex 1.4 can handle those correctly). - there is confusion whether "bare" type-1 fonts are well supported or not by xdvipdfmx. I've seen things go both ways. The default fonts for XeTeX are Latin Modern, which come as type-1 (and work). Unfortunately, in Fedora you cannot select them manually (say after switching to another font set), because that requires the OTF files, which Fedora doesn't ship. TeXLive upstream includes both type-1 and OTF/CFF versions of Latin Modern. To further complicate this issue, direct type-1 support was apparently added in Feb 2008 for fonts that support the EU1 (TeX) encoding, which apparently is exactly Unicode. See this: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/euenc/. Insofar I refrained from filing a bug on Fedora's TeXLive for missing the Latin Modern OTF's... - finally, xdvipdfmx searches both the traditional TeX map paths and makes use of fontconfig to find fonts. I think fontconfig takes precedence. at least when PDFs are generated. I was living under the misguided impression that CFF was superior for printing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 02:10:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240210.m6O2AeRA006984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-23 22:10 EST ------- khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 02:12:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240212.m6O2Cttt007881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-23 22:12 EST ------- khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 02:10:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240210.m6O2AgRn007027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|RAWHIDE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |5.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 05:34:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445291] button labels fail if language support is a subset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807240534.m6O5YrQa012941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: button labels fail if language support is a subset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445291 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2008-07-24 01:34 EST ------- I appreciate that this happens with F9, but it's something I don't plan on fixing. F10 may have this fixed, I'm not sure, which is why I asked you to try it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 11:21:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241121.m6OBLfSq028033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-24 07:21 EST ------- OK, I quickly pushed the locl rules for S/T with cedilla in DejaVu before the freeze for the next release this weekend. So please test the latest snapshot at http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ and see if it works as expected (no need to test the condensed fonts, they'll get updated as well soon). Also test out if everything else like ligatures and mark placement (combining diacritic placement) still work for Romanian. I didn't make changes to the combining cedilla yet, I don't know how to properly tackle that yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 12:45:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241245.m6OCjANJ009951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 08:45 EST ------- I had a quick look at the Sans. Results: ? locl - OK ? mark - HM (S/s cedilla both OK, T/t cedilla still shifted) The rest were tested with locl on: ? salt - OK (checked J) ? liga - OK (checked ff) ? mark - NO (as expected) I also found a way to make the combining work, see next message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 12:48:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241248.m6OCmojW010267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 08:48 EST ------- To make the combining (i) look good and (ii) work with locl you do not need a contextual substitution. A "ligature" is enough! See the Adobe feature file doc: you only need a type-4, not a type-6 substitution for this. I decided to put these in a rlig table for latn{MOL,ROM}. Of course, this rlig has to come before the locl, so locl can affect ti. I'm attaching some screenshots first and later some patches later (but there's some fiddle with those). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 12:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241252.m6OCqDsZ011088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 08:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312554&action=view) Turning on both rlig and locl works as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 12:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241251.m6OCpIrn010983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 08:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312553) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312553&action=view) The new ROM rlig feature activated. It looks much better than with mark on! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 12:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241250.m6OCoBRM010740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 08:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312552) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312552&action=view) My version of Sans, no features enabled - all test glyphs use combining! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Jul 24 13:03:47 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Jul 2008 13:03:47 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080724130347.3422.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Jul 24 13:03:41 +0000 2008 ------- After some discussion, the consensus Fedora-side seems to be that shipping OpenType TT (as opposed to OpenType CFF) fonts just for OpenOffice is not reasonable, so all our future font packages are likely to use the font creator preferred format (which happens to be OpenType CFF, don't ask me why, I blame Adobe years of marketing) http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2008-July/msg00088.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 13:04:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241304.m6OD40EQ013263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 09:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=312555) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312555&action=view) Giant patch ball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 13:05:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241305.m6OD5lfu019485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 gaburici at cs.umd.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #312555|Giant patch ball |Giant patch ball for description| |Romanian comman and cedilla | |ligatures. Attachment #312555|application/x-bzip- |text/plain mime type|compressed-tar | Attachment #312555|0 |1 is patch| | ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 09:05 EST ------- (From update of attachment 312555) You could also add a breve and a, i circumflex to the rlig. But I don't know the combining unicodes for those... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Jul 24 13:21:33 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Jul 2008 13:21:33 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080724132133.12831.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 3.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Jul 24 13:21:29 +0000 2008 ------- The good news is that CFF subsetting looks good for OOo 3.2, maybe even 3.1. Including hints and all that. Though CFF fonts may be common they are strange beasts, e.g. the length of some charstring opcodes depends on all instructions ever executed for one glyph and there are sooo many other implicit assumptions... anyway, the prototype works very well and getting it integrated into 3.x is quite certain. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 13:41:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241341.m6ODfTPQ025105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-24 09:41 EST ------- No, we prefer using anchors to place diacritics. We don't want them in ccmp, liga or rlig features. We've had plenty of discussions about this in the past, and even had a lot of these as ligatures in the past, but removed them because we thought it was a bad idea. With anchors it's just much more maintainable. The problem with the T/t with cedilla is just the missing cedilla anchor in the T and t glyphs. Easy to make it work, but that's counted as "feature" so something for after the release :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 14:02:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241402.m6OE2RjE023114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 10:02 EST ------- How about using abvs and blws tables for these ligatures? Tag: 'abvs' Friendly name: Above-base Substitutions Registered by: Microsoft Function: Substitutes a ligature for a base glyph and mark that's above it. UI suggestion: This feature should be on by default. Tag: "blws" Friendly name: Below-base Substitutions Registered by: Microsoft Function: Produces ligatures that comprise of base glyph and below-base forms. UI suggestion: This feature should be on by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 14:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241409.m6OE93qD029993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 10:09 EST ------- Btw, your suggestion to use calt for changing presumably just the accent when it follows S or T in Romanian seem to be a bit different than what the standard says calt is for: Tag: 'calt' Friendly name: Contextual Alternates Registered by: Adobe Function: In specified situations, replaces default glyphs with alternate forms which provide better joining behavior. Used in script typefaces which are designed to have some or all of their glyphs join. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Jul 24 14:16:33 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Jul 2008 14:16:33 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080724141633.9667.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Jul 24 14:16:29 +0000 2008 ------- Thank you for the status update! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 14:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241428.m6OESV7Y001376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 10:28 EST ------- Okay, I finished reading all the OpenType tag descriptions. The current spec doesn't have a type-6 table designated for the purpose you want (replacing diacritics). So, if you want to avoid making ligatures at all cost, Redhat would have to register a new OpenType tag... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 15:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241503.m6OF3Ic0005312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-24 11:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > So, if you want to avoid making ligatures at all cost, Redhat would > have to register a new OpenType tag... Ben is not @rh. He's one of the top DejaVu people, and was kind enough to get an account in Fedora bugzilla -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 15:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241514.m6OFEINr011577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-24 11:14 EST ------- Yeah, I'm not even a fedora user :-) abvs and blws are used for Indic scripts only. I think I've mentioned before somewhere, if there's no good feature, we can misuse ccmp for it. It's common practice to misuse ccmp to replace i by dotless i before a diacritic above, and renderers also apply ccmp by default and can handle this. calt would still be more beautiful though (also for the dotless i situation), but it's not applied by default (even though the specs suggest otherwise). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 15:45:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807241545.m6OFjF0t012053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-24 11:45 EST ------- Well, I tried to add a calt table: I can enter what should be substituted, but when I try to click on the box where the replacement should go, FontForge segfaults. So, this feature will have to wait a little longer. Anyway, given the complete lack of support in commercial fonts for this feature, I don't think we'll see users asking about it anytime soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 20:32:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456580] Multiple severe problems with texlive-texfm-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807242032.m6OKWgvK014261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Multiple severe problems with texlive-texfm-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456580 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |twaugh at redhat.com, | |tcallawa at redhat.com, fedora- | |fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |182235, 438943 nThis| | Severity|low |high Priority|low |high ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-24 16:32 EST ------- 1. The textlive-texfm lists Utopia among its licenses. That probably means it includes Adobe Utopia or its derivatives. The Adobe Utopia font design is patented by Adobe and Fedora legal has not decided if Utopia and its derivatives were safe enough to be allowed in the repository yet (see bug #452317). In the meanwhile we should not ship any of those fonts in Fedora. 2. The textlive-texfm includes tex-gyre fonts. As the authors freely admit they lifted the GNU Ghostscript GPL fonts, changed their format, modified the result, and relicensed it all under their own license [1]. They don't list any authorization for this from the previous rights holders in their package. Since we can not ship the GPL bits they lifted under another license, and we can not ship the bits they added under the GPL without tex-gyre people authorization, the whole thing is un-distributable and must be removed [2] [1] page 8 of http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/tex-gyre/afp05.pdf [2] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2008-July/msg00111.html In addition: A. This package is a legal nightmare and mixes material from many different origins and licensing (making any audit difficult, even though we *know* fonts are a legal minefield) B. This package is a livecd and bandwidth nightmare (monolithic dump of 56 MiBs of data !!!) C. This package wastes huge amounts of space by shipping the same fonts in many different formats, even though only one would be enough D. This package ships bulky forks of material already present in other distro packages (ghostscript font data), and no effort is made to consolidate them. Even though TEX users are not the only ones interested in ghostscript font fixes, and the PS1 format used by ghostscript fonts is probably the main remaining reason why the xorg package maintainers can not drop type1 support in X. E. This package ships resources that would be highly useful to most of our users (truetype and opentype fonts), but hides them in a tex-specific directory not exposed by system font libs. (some of them are even in our wishlists) For all those reasons: a. Please drop the Utopia fonts from the package immediately b. Please drop the Tex-gyre fonts from the package immediately c. Please notify the Tex-gyre authors on the behalf of Fedora so they fix their licensing d. Once this is done please package the Tex-Gyre fonts in a separate package (using the tex-gyre upstream releases, not the texlive repackaging). Since the TEX-Gyre font preferred modification format is metatype (as documented in their presentation) that means a package that build OpenType CFF fonts (OTF) from metatype sources (to respect the GPL) e. please use the distribution official font template for this package. When fonts are usable system wide they should be packaged as system font, and tex packages modified to use the system version. f. please add to this package fontconfig rules that declare the tex-gyre fonts valid substitutes to the adobe and ghostscript fonts g. please have this package subpackaged in a subpackage per font family (or create a separate package per font family) h. please work with the Ghostscript packager so Ghostscript is switched use those packages, so the old PS1 fonts can be retired (making ajax happy) i. Please work with the Ghostscript packager so Ghostscript and Tex-Gyre licensing is switched to GPL+font exception (so the fonts can be safely embedded in pdfs) j. please do the same repackaging for every truetype and opentype font in the package, so their licensing can be individually checked, they get installed system-wide (benefiting non-tex users), and the monster package is broken up in granular livecd-olpc-bandwidth friendly packages. Each time do use the distro font packaging guidelines (including the build-from-source bit), and do start from the font real upstreams (not the texlive/CTAN middlemen) http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException e. You can keep other fonts in legacy format in your package. But frankly if I were you I'd drop them. Each one needs legal crosschecking and if no one cared enough to convert them to a modern OTF/TTF format they're probably not that useful. Either way that part of the package should be user-optional at least -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 21:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807242118.m6OLI6vO022128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-24 17:18 EST ------- Hi Jon, After discussing it on various forums the consensus seems to be that only the OTF (OpenType CFF) version should be packaged. So you can simplify the whole thing considerably. I apologize for waiting so long to get this part clarified -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 21:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807242131.m6OLViWM024562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |twaugh at redhat.com, | |tcallawa at redhat.com, fedora- | |fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 24 21:35:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807242135.m6OLZbAL025385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 00:21:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455754] Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807250021.m6P0LPUU018595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Backport version 1.04 to Fedora 9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455754 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 06:28:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807250628.m6P6S8Is008165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-25 02:28 EST ------- Sorry for the slow response. Those two files are quite different. Which one are you intending for the review? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From softadm at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 06:35:28 2008 From: softadm at openoffice.org (softadm at openoffice.org) Date: 25 Jul 2008 06:35:28 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080725063528.7463.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from softadm at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 06:35:22 +0000 2008 ------- Big thanks for finally announcing a target milestone ;-) My vote for OOo-3.1, since many users expected this feature to already appear in 3.0 Best regards, Wolfgang --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 06:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807250633.m6P6XEAs010519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-25 02:33 EST ------- I am assuming attachment 312229. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 07:36:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807250736.m6P7alhA018695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-25 03:36 EST ------- Just to clarify, these two points: > [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in > the review. > [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. > > 87edeb65586b85d4ce10c1fab4f1e1aa un-fonts-core-1.0.2-080608.tar.gz are just referring to this: > Please provide the final srpm package and I am happy to approve this package. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 07:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807250735.m6P7ZGwQ018539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-07-25 03:35 EST ------- Here is my review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. 87edeb65586b85d4ce10c1fab4f1e1aa un-fonts-core-1.0.2-080608.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Please provide the final srpm package and I am happy to approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 12:15:07 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 25 Jul 2008 12:15:07 -0000 Subject: [Issue 92062] Use only Unicode-Symbols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080725121507.23964.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92062 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'rainerbielefeld,regina,tr|'fedorafonts,rainerbielefe |oodon' |ld,regina,troodon' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 12:17:05 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 25 Jul 2008 12:17:05 -0000 Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080725121705.25127.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'ih' |'fedorafonts,ih' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 12:17:04 +0000 2008 ------- DejaVu includes Greek --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 13:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807251301.m6PD1SS1007151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-25 09:01 EST ------- I'll start the review process now but since I'll be unavailable till september in a few days someone else will probably have to finish it (or you'll have to wait or be very reactive) 1. Please make sure you've done all the steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#2.a and in particular the wiki-related ones http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Gentium_Basic_fonts 2. Gentium Basic is OFL, not GPL 3. Its homepage is http://scripts.sil.org/Gentium_Basic 4. Please make sure to touch the txt files so your recoding does not change their timestamp each time you rebuild them (look at one of the gfs fonts specs for example) 5. please use sil-gentium-basic-fonts as package name 6. for fedora versions ? 9 you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache 7. You can flesh up your description a bit. You can take inspiration from Debian's packaging http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=GentiumBasic_110_diff&filename=ttf-sil-gentium-basic_1.1.diff.gz 8. Since the font is effectively a limited Gentium with more faces, you need to teach fontconfig to substitute it to Gentium (and the Gentium packager will need to do it the other way). Look how it's done for dejavu and dejavu lgc, that's just a little fontconfig file to add -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 13:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807251312.m6PDCeDE008928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-25 09:12 EST ------- Looking at it a bit more, the TTF file size is 3 times the OTF file so the last one is probably incomplete. Package the TTF file (sorry) Also you can use %setup. The gfs fonts only use unzip directly because GFS releases fonts in a weird Apple zip variant %setup can not cope with So just: 1. revert to a simple package 2. that only includes the TTF file 3. and uses %setup 4. and take care of your missing wiki page and I'll approve the whole lot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 25 13:19:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807251319.m6PDJg8R009804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-07-25 09:19 EST ------- Neither of those URLs work.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From burmashave at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:25:55 2008 From: burmashave at openoffice.org (burmashave at openoffice.org) Date: 25 Jul 2008 14:25:55 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080725142555.22240.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from burmashave at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:25:48 +0000 2008 ------- Thanks for announcing the milestone, hdu! Thanks to all the dev's, etc. who are moving this forward. We appreciate it very much. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:26:25 2008 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 25 Jul 2008 14:26:25 -0000 Subject: [Issue 78749] some Latin text needs CTL processing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080725142625.23792.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|OOo 3.0 |OOo 3.x -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:26:24 +0000 2008 ------- target --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From burmashave at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:25:55 2008 From: burmashave at openoffice.org (burmashave at openoffice.org) Date: 25 Jul 2008 14:25:55 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080725142555.22240.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from burmashave at openoffice.org Fri Jul 25 14:25:48 +0000 2008 ------- Thanks for announcing the milestone, hdu! Thanks to all the dev's, etc. who are moving this forward. We appreciate it very much. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 26 05:56:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807260556.m6Q5uJgG007846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-26 01:56 EST ------- qt-4.3.4-14.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 26 14:45:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807261445.m6QEjXOY018378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-07-26 10:45 EST ------- Builds cleanly in mock. rpmlint output: tex-fontools.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL tex-fontools.src: W: invalid-license GPL 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The package contains a copy of the GPL v2 license, but not COPYING file. However, according to the docs it is licensed under GPLv2 (and not GPLv2+), so I think the license tag should be GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 26 16:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807261644.m6QGilFA000899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-07-26 12:44 EST ------- A major problem: lcdf-typetools is not available in the Fedora repositories, so until that is packaged, this is somewhat blocked. Nonetheless, see below. I am not a sponsor, so cannot officially review the package since your sponsor must do that, so here is a "pre-review" which will hopefully save a sponsor some time. Legend: GOOD: + BAD: - Not Applicable: N/A Still in Progress or questinable: ? - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. See Above + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . ? MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . The Requires for texlive-latex should be replaced with Requires: tex(latex) For consistency %buildroot should be %{buildroot} throughout. Similarly with %_mandir/%{_mandir} The preferred value for BuildRoot is %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) but the one that is currently used is the second best, so not a blocker. I notice that the Perl module dependencies are correctly detected by rpm, so no need for explicit perl module dependencies. + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. See rpmlint output + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. upstream: 4c879bc479d48965a99abfaebd1b9101 fontools.zip package: 4c879bc479d48965a99abfaebd1b9101 fontools-20070807.zip + MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. N/A MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines] ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. BuildRequires: texlive-texmf is really desireable, as this will define %{_texmf_main}, which you should use instead of%{_texmf}, I think. Currently the BuildRequires: /usr/binkpsewich actually does pull this in, but I think it should be an explicit package dependency. Related to that, I wonder about this macro at the top: %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")} would it not be preferable to have the following? %{!?_texmf_main: %define _texmf_main %{_datadir}/texmf} This is up for debate, and we really need to get some tex packaging guidelines sorted out. + MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. + MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. + MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ([wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT] ). - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#macros macros section of Packaging Guidelines] . See above about use of {} in macros. + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines] . N/A MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. N/A MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. T + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: + SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Note: it would be nice if a COPYING file was included. N/A SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. + SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See [wiki:Self:PackageMaintainers/MockTricks MockTricks] for details on how to do this. + SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Currently can't be installed since lcdf-typetools is not in repos. N/A SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. + SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 26 16:58:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807261658.m6QGwmG2002777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-07-26 12:58 EST ------- lcdf-typetools was in the Fedora Extras repo up until before FC6, so can be resurrected from CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 26 17:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807261700.m6QH0TRR003343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-26 13:00 EST ------- Oops. The lcdf-typetools I have on my box are indeed from a different repo. So, first I have to package those for Fedora. I'll come back to this package once that's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From chrullrich at openoffice.org Sat Jul 26 17:09:26 2008 From: chrullrich at openoffice.org (chrullrich at openoffice.org) Date: 26 Jul 2008 17:09:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080726170926.7286.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User chrullrich changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'bahein,benjamin_schallar,|'bahein,benjamin_schallar, |bernd_schoeler,ckolivas,cw|bernd_schoeler,chrullrich, |oollard,fedorafonts,iorsh,|ckolivas,cwoollard,fedoraf |jeongkyu,masayan,msundman,|onts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masaya |simos' |n,msundman,simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 26 17:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807261707.m6QH77ls004297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-07-26 13:07 EST ------- OK. when you submit lcdf-typetools for review, please add the bugzilla number to the "depends on" box of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 26 17:14:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807261714.m6QHEe64005012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-07-26 13:14 EST ------- One other thing, Source0 should contain a full URL to the zip archive: ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/utilities/fontools.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 10:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271006.m6RA60Iw031975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-27 06:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I am not a sponsor, so cannot officially review the package since your sponsor > must do that, so here is a "pre-review" which will hopefully save a sponsor some > time. I don't think there is any requirement for the sponsor to be the one who reviews the first package. You can check a new contributor behaviour with third-party reviews too. As for the sponsorship bit, should the TEX community wish to be more involved in Fedora, and package more TEX-related stuff, I'm sure something could be arranged (additional work alert!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 12:05:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271205.m6RC5ZYO015735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mvaliyav at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-07-27 08:05 EST ------- *** Bug 456799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Jul 27 13:36:20 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:36:20 GMT Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.49, 1.50 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.84, 1.85 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.49, 1.50 Message-ID: <200807271336.m6RDaKfP029187@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29147/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore dejavu-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: Summertime release??? Dedicated to the letter Ben ?? Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.49 retrieving revision 1.50 diff -u -r1.49 -r1.50 --- .cvsignore 19 May 2008 20:50:26 -0000 1.49 +++ .cvsignore 27 Jul 2008 13:35:50 -0000 1.50 @@ -1 +1 @@ -dejavu-fonts-2.25.tar.bz2 +dejavu-fonts-2.26.tar.bz2 Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.84 retrieving revision 1.85 diff -u -r1.84 -r1.85 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 16 Jul 2008 16:51:56 -0000 1.84 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2008 13:35:50 -0000 1.85 @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ %define UnicodeData %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/UnicodeData.txt Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.25 -Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Version: 2.26 +Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts, mature typefaces Group: User Interface/X @@ -176,10 +176,16 @@ %changelog -* Wed Jul 16 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 2.25-4 +* Sun Jul 26 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.26-1 +?? New release at last + +* Wed Jul 16 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway +- 2.25-4 - note Public Domain contributions -* Wed Jul 16 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 2.25-3 +* Wed Jul 16 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway +- 2.25-3 - fix license tag * Fri Jul 11 2008 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 11 Jul 2008 19:59:30 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 27 Jul 2008 13:35:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_25-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.25-2.fc10.src.rpm:1215806350 +dejavu-fonts-2_26-1_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-1.fc10.src.rpm:1217165726 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.49 retrieving revision 1.50 diff -u -r1.49 -r1.50 --- sources 19 May 2008 20:50:26 -0000 1.49 +++ sources 27 Jul 2008 13:35:50 -0000 1.50 @@ -1 +1 @@ -d1aadb2a9dbf7d815f99c10efeb28e4a dejavu-fonts-2.25.tar.bz2 +26bae23fdfaba1020a88bcbf147ccd79 dejavu-fonts-2.26.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 14:05:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271405.m6RE5kwF004390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 14:06:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271406.m6RE6cvg004571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 15:59:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271559.m6RFxAqJ014715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-27 11:59 EST ------- OK, not enough caffeine today. http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/sportrop-fonts-0.9-4.fc9.src.rpm is the SOURCE RPM :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 15:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271557.m6RFvf8A019397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-27 11:57 EST ------- New SRPM: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/sportrop-fonts-0.9-4.fc9.noarch.rpm Same SPEC Wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sportrop_Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 16:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271646.m6RGks5v021040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-07-27 12:46 EST ------- - | MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package? rpmlint is broken in rawhide by the new rpm and I've no time to locate another copy OK | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package? OK | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package? OK | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines? OK | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved? OK | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must? OK | MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the? - | MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - | MUST: The sources used to build the package must match? Didn't check the srpm. the spec works fine with the upstream sip OK | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build? N/A | MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build N/A | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed? N/A | MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly? N/A | MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared? N/A | MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable? OK | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates OK | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files OK | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable N/A | MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc N/A | MUST: If a package includes something as %doc? N/A | MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A | MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A | MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must? N/A | MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix? N/A | MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must? N/A | MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, N/A | MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include? OK | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already OK | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST? OK | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. N/A | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license - | SHOULD: The description and summary section ? translations? OK | SHOULD: The package builds in mock - | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures OK | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package? OK | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? N/A | SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should usually require base? N/A | SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on? N/A | SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of shortlist? APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 16:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807271659.m6RGxlW9022445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2008-07-27 12:59 EST ------- Nicolas, can't we either close this OBSOLETE, or you make whatever changes you like? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 27 21:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807272125.m6RLP9M7025097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 jonstanley at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jonstanley at gmail.com 2008-07-27 17:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sportrop-fonts Short Description: A multiline decorative font Owners: jstanley Branches: F-9 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 28 04:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807280435.m6S4Zam7023186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-28 00:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 28 09:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807280934.m6S9Y6Je001695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-28 05:34 EST ------- Fixed upstream in 2.26. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 28 10:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807281041.m6SAf1fJ011037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-07-28 06:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'll start the review process now but since I'll be unavailable till september > in a few days someone else will probably have to finish it (or you'll have to > wait or be very reactive) Thanks. > > 2. Gentium Basic is OFL, not GPL > Oops. My fault. > http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=GentiumBasic_110_diff&filename=ttf-sil-gentium-basic_1.1.diff.gz > > 8. Since the font is effectively a limited Gentium with more faces, you need to > teach fontconfig to substitute it to Gentium (and the Gentium packager will need > to do it the other way). Look how it's done for dejavu and dejavu lgc, that's > just a little fontconfig file to add I am little unsure about what to substitute for faces. The families are generically serif for all the fonts in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 28 10:45:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807281045.m6SAjqFg011860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-07-28 06:45 EST ------- Nicolas, The archive name in the %setup section has to be written with '\' to escape the spaces on F-8 machines but does not work on F-9. %setup -q -n "Gentium\ Basic\ 1.1" Could you please confirm which is the correct way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 29 01:20:51 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:20:51 GMT Subject: rpms/sportrop-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <200807290120.m6T1Kpwk012489@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sportrop-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsw12454/rpms/sportrop-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/sportrop-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 29 01:20:52 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:20:52 GMT Subject: rpms/sportrop-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <200807290120.m6T1Kq8e012526@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sportrop-fonts In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsw12454/rpms/sportrop-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module sportrop-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module sportrop-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 29 01:20:51 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:20:51 GMT Subject: rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <200807290120.m6T1KpAm012500@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsw12454/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 29 01:20:52 2008 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:20:52 GMT Subject: rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <200807290120.m6T1KqDW012541@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsw12454/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module sportrop-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: sportrop-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/29 01:20:52 kevin Exp $ NAME := sportrop-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 29 01:37:03 2008 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:37:03 GMT Subject: rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sportrop-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sportrop-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <200807290137.m6T1b3FM014085@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13994/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sportrop-fonts-fontconfig.conf sportrop-fonts.spec Log Message: initial commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- sportrop-fonts-0_9-4_fc9:HEAD:sportrop-fonts-0.9-4.fc9.src.rpm:1217295341 --- NEW FILE sportrop-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Sportrop fantasy fantasy Sportrop --- NEW FILE sportrop-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sportrop %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9 Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: A multiline decorative font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/gluk/287 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/gluk/gluk_-_Sportrop.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description A neat multiline font %prep %setup -c chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 644 Sportrop.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} install -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc OFL_FAQ.txt OFL_License.txt tabl_c.jpg %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Sun Jul 27 2008 Jon Stanley - 0.9-4 - Revert package split, package only TTF - Use %%setup macro * Wed Jul 23 2008 Jon Stanley - 0.9-3 - Split OTF and TTF into subpackages * Wed Jul 23 2008 Jon Stanley - 0.9-2 - Fixed rpmlint warning in license and license FAQ * Tue Jul 22 2008 Jon Stanley - 0.9-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Jul 2008 01:20:52 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 29 Jul 2008 01:36:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +gluk_-_Sportrop.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Jul 2008 01:20:52 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 29 Jul 2008 01:36:32 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +315aaea18c37aa085a4ab2856d5d991d gluk_-_Sportrop.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 02:53:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807290253.m6T2rBps003444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-28 22:53 EST ------- ok, so where are we here? Shall we just stick with the truetype fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 07:25:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807290725.m6T7PDGP008696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-29 03:25 EST ------- I'd say do nothing for now, that is stick to TTFs. The long term plan in Fedora is (now) to prefer CFF OTFs, and upstream Philipp also likes it that way. But the 2.8 LL has some problems with 2048em OTFs: the font logo (U+E00A) is broken in Pango, and worse, I'm getting all glyphs broken if I include LL as 2048em OTF in a XeTeX pdf, but the downscaled 1000em OTF works fine with XeTeX. This could be a bug in dvipdfmx because it converts OTFs to type 1 CID before inclusion... The 2048em TTF works better for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 08:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453079] fonts-hebrew is deprecated and should be removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807290842.m6T8gWSx021550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-hebrew is deprecated and should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453079 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 08:42:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453075] fonts-arabic is deprecated and should be removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807290842.m6T8g7Jf022068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-arabic is deprecated and should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453075 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 09:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448078] [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807290911.m6T9Bj3C027308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|[ml-IN] Font size problem |[ml-IN] Font size problem |with Meera |with Meera -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Tue Jul 29 09:15:18 2008 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:15:18 GMT Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 smc-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <200807290915.m6T9FI9T028698@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28663 Modified Files: .cvsignore smc-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Jul 29 2008 Pravin Satpute 04.1-1 - new upstream release - fontconfig rule for size adjustment of Meera is added - two new fonts kalyani and anjalioldlipi - bugfix 448078 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 16 Apr 2008 05:36:29 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 29 Jul 2008 09:14:48 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ malayalam-fonts-04.zip +malayalam-fonts-04.1.zip Index: smc-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- smc-fonts.spec 16 Apr 2008 05:36:29 -0000 1.1 +++ smc-fonts.spec 29 Jul 2008 09:14:48 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ %define fontname smc %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} - +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 04 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Version: 04.1 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 @@ -59,17 +59,35 @@ The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. +%package kalyani +Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +%description kalyani +The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of +new Malayalam Scripts. + +%package anjalioldlipi +Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +%description anjalioldlipi +The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of +traditional Malayalam Scripts. + %prep -%setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-%{version} +%setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-04 %build echo "Nothing to do in Build." %install -rm -fr %{buildroot} +rm -rf %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p $RPM_BUILD_DIR/malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/90-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} @@ -99,6 +117,16 @@ %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi +%post kalyani +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : +fi + +%post anjalioldlipi +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : +fi + %postun dyuthi if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then @@ -134,6 +162,20 @@ fi fi +%postun kalyani +if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then + if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : + fi +fi + +%postun anjalioldlipi +if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then + if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then +%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : + fi +fi + #%{fontdir} is shared by following packages since they all are for malayalam script only %files dyuthi %defattr(-,root,root,-) @@ -144,6 +186,7 @@ %files meera %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc *.txt +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/90-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/Meera*.ttf @@ -165,8 +208,25 @@ %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/suruma*.ttf +%files kalyani +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc *.txt +%dir %{fontdir} +%{fontdir}/Kalyani*.ttf + +%files anjalioldlipi +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc *.txt +%dir %{fontdir} +%{fontdir}/AnjaliOldLipi.ttf %changelog +* Tue Jul 29 2008 Pravin Satpute 04.1-1 +- new upstream release +- fontconfig rule for size adjustment of Meera is added +- two new fonts kalyani and anjalioldlipi +- bugfix 448078 + * Tue Apr 15 2008 Pravin Satpute 04-6 - corrected meera fonts description it is for traditional script Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 16 Apr 2008 05:36:29 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 29 Jul 2008 09:14:48 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -a88a77e6b22ac077c729234c15671908 malayalam-fonts-04.zip +492cb9ec6bf69d775e987c1ca06b4003 malayalam-fonts-04.1.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 09:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457021] New: Crash on startup, missing font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 Summary: Crash on startup, missing font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,roozbeh at gmail.com fontforge-20080309-1.fc9.x86_64 $ fontforge Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:48 GMT 9-Mar-2008. Library based on sources from 22:48 GMT 9-Mar-2008. Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--13-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 09:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448078] [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807290924.m6T9O0uV028711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-07-29 05:23 EST ------- this bug is fixed in upstream malayalam-fonts-04.1.zip built it for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 14:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807291423.m6TENBXF017312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 14:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807291423.m6TENOn1021434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-29 10:23 EST ------- *** Bug 454148 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 14:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807291423.m6TENN9h021406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-29 10:23 EST ------- Last my comment 12 was my misunderstanding.. resubmitting *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 457062 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 15:26:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457021] Crash on startup, missing font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807291526.m6TFQaka007407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Crash on startup, missing font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-29 11:26 EST ------- This seems like it might be a duplicate of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Can you remove the xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 package and see if that resolves it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 15:48:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457094] New: Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457094 Summary: Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?23940 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: gaburici at cs.umd.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Description of problem, adapted from [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Tasks/Ro_fonts#The_Unicode_map_for_Type_1_fonts_needs_to_alias_U.2B021A.2FB_to_U.2B0162.2F3]: PostScript Type 1 (PS1) fonts don't have a native Unicode map. Contrary to popular belief, Type 1 fonts can store more than 256 glyphs in a pfb file, but these can only be addressed by AGL name. At most 256 glyphs can be accessed by a numeric index, for which various encodings schemes exist. A PS1 font can even specify its own 8-bit encoding scheme in the afm file; this is common practice for PS1 fonts targeting Central and Eastern Europe. The 8-bit encoding scheme is irrelevant however for Unicode applications. Unicode-enabled libraries, like freetype, define their own mapping from Unicode to AGL names, normally using the list published by Adobe. Adobe once decided that "t with cedilla" is not used in any language, so the AGL name "Tcommaaccent", which is a glyph of T with a comma below, is actually mapped by Adobe to the Unicode code point U+0162, which is supposed to represent a t with cedilla. New OpenType fonts from Adobe also contain a glyph with the AGL name "uni021A", which is visually identical to identical to "Tcommaaccent". As you'd expect, "uni021A" is mapped to U+021A. Unfortunately, old PS1 fonts do not a have a "uni021A" in their pfb. Thus, using the Adobe-provide AGL to Unicode mapping for PS1 fonts, the code point U+021A remains unmapped. Fontconfig will therefore choose to borrow the glyph from a another font, even though the glyph is present in the pfb. This problem is illustrated by the following OpenOffice screenshot: [http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/oo/ro-font-test.png]. Practically all PostScript type 1 fonts that ship with Fedora suffer from this problem. Microsoft's Uniscribe automatically handles this issue by remapping U+21A/B to U+162/3 when the former glyphs are missing. Unfortunately, the Pango/fonconfig/freetype stack did't use to do this until 2008-07-27, so most new Romanian documents cannot be displayed with Type 1 fonts properly. The extra mapping has now been added in the CVS of freetype. A test SRPM is available here: [http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/freetype-2.3.8-0.3.20080729cvs.fc9.src.rpm]. Note that because it is built from CVS sources, it buildrequires libtool 2.2.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 16:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457094] Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807291603.m6TG3Xac016618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457094 gaburici at cs.umd.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |435737 ------- Additional Comments From gaburici at cs.umd.edu 2008-07-29 12:03 EST ------- If anyone is foolish enough (like me) to upgrade their libtool, a SRPM is here: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/libtool-2.2.4-0.1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 16:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457021] Crash on startup, missing font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807291635.m6TGZg7d022241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Crash on startup, missing font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-07-29 12:35 EST ------- Indeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 22:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457021] Crash on startup, missing font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807292212.m6TMCh9H019348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Crash on startup, missing font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-29 18:12 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 450709 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 22:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807292212.m6TMChqr019388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-29 18:12 EST ------- *** Bug 457021 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 29 22:14:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455995] No OpenType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807292214.m6TME0cS019455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-07-29 18:13 EST ------- ok. Closing this bug now. Thanks for all the info, and please do reopen or file a new bug when you think we should look at switching to the OTF's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 30 11:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807301112.m6UBCPcb003916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Wed Jul 30 13:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 545510] Support user control for OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080730132915.5E7BD23F596@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510 pango | general | Ver: 1.20.x Vasile Gaburici changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 30 16:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807301656.m6UGul6d002592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 mnowak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 30 17:02:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807301702.m6UH2xlm003693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 ------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com 2008-07-30 13:02 EST ------- * Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-1 - initial packaging - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 30 19:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457298] New: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: drepper at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Description of problem: The em-dash character U2014 has an incorrect glyph at least in the serif font. It displays as ? instead. See the attached crop of a screenshot (this is firefox showing the code described below). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.04-1.fc9.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.store this in a file >>> start <<< should be em-dash >> — << 
should be em-dash >> — <<
em-dash = U2014 = &#8212 >>> end <<< 2.view in firefox 3. Actual results: see attached screenshot Expected results: correctly displayed em-dash Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat.com 2008-07-30 15:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=313022) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313022&action=view) Crop of screenshot showing code above in firefox -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 30 19:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807301915.m6UJFsTv025056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 ------- Additional Comments From bl.bugs at gmail.com 2008-07-30 15:15 EST ------- Restarting your desktop should fix it. That's usually a font caching problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 31 02:25:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807310225.m6V2PCO6029020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-07-30 22:25 EST ------- I will do a triage very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 31 04:21:54 2008 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:21:54 GMT Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <200807310421.m6V4LsJt003794@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3586 Modified Files: .cvsignore VLGothic-fonts.spec sources Log Message: update to 20080624 release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 7 May 2008 07:40:25 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 31 Jul 2008 04:21:24 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -VLGothic-20080429.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20080624.tar.bz2 Index: VLGothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel/VLGothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- VLGothic-fonts.spec 7 May 2008 07:40:25 -0000 1.13 +++ VLGothic-fonts.spec 31 Jul 2008 04:21:24 -0000 1.14 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20080429 +Version: 20080624 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Source2: 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +# added for f9 can be dropped in f11: Obsoletes: %{name}-monospace < 20071215-2 %description @@ -105,11 +106,14 @@ %changelog +* Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080624-1.fc10 +- update to 20080624 release + * Wed May 7 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080429-1 - update to 20080429 release - rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf -* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2 +* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2.fc9 - move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage - rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage - use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- sources 7 May 2008 07:40:25 -0000 1.9 +++ sources 31 Jul 2008 04:21:24 -0000 1.10 @@ -1 +1 @@ -5e87dc26f34d6539b5229e1e30643deb VLGothic-20080429.tar.bz2 +d508d04eeac3d6c74eacfbc258c236b3 VLGothic-20080624.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 31 15:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807311554.m6VFsRno030069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 31 16:28:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807311628.m6VGSn1P003388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-07-31 12:28 EST ------- 1.) This comment is useless: # for example: install -pm 644 *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} 2.) You mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags 3.) Use %setup macro instead of the following: %prep unzip %{SOURCE0} %build cd darkgarden-1.1 And after that is done, please do not move the files around in %build, there's no need to. 4.) Another useless comment, please remove it %changelog #DarkGarden * Mon Jul 21 2008 Lyos Gemini Norezel 1.1-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 31 16:30:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807311630.m6VGUELp005033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-07-31 12:30 EST ------- Also, please use a more descriptive %description. One you used in this request should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 31 21:08:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200807312108.m6VL8hCN018703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-07-31 17:08 EST ------- Spec and src updated: Spec URL: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.