From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 14:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811011425.mA1EPoqB002698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #38 from Baif 2008-11-01 10:25:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > I'm afraid the part of the above config doesn't do the right thing what you > said at least. "not_eq" affects all of fonts except you explicitly described > there. it exactly overrides the global settings, regardless of whether or not > the result is same. fontconfig config that the font package owns should have > its specific config only. otherwise it should be modified in one fontconfig > has. Yes... You're right. Because I don't know why without the "not_eq"-s the rest of configs do NOT work... I had mail the config to Caius Carlos CHANCE , hope he could get it work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 2 01:59:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811020159.mA21xLwc001855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #24 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-11-01 21:59:20 EDT --- i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I am still waiting for a reply -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 3 02:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:25:02 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030225.mA32P2Kn025108@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #11 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-02 18:24:59 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > + const cairo_font_options_t *options = > + gdk_screen_get_font_options(gdk_screen_get_default()); > > If we're not compiling with system cairo, this might be a problem. Good catch. Filed bug 462798 on that. (It is not new in the patch here.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 05:28:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 00:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030528.mA35SOer015177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-03 00:28:23 EDT --- So is it fixed in current rawhide now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 3 07:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:08:37 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030708.mA378bio025013@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #344063|review?(roc at ocallahan.org) | Flag| | Attachment #344063|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #346004| |review?(roc at ocallahan.org) Flag| | --- Comment #12 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-02 23:08:26 PST --- Created an attachment (id=346004) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346004) font selection in Mozilla's PangoFcFontMap 1.2 Addresses the issues in comment 9 and comment 10 (except for bug 462798). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 07:50:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030750.mA37oYIr003117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #7 from Qiao <29551030 at qq.com> 2008-11-03 02:50:34 EDT --- Yes, it have fixed and I test OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 3 07:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:51:13 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030751.mA37pDlH030347@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346004|review?(roc at ocallahan.org) |review+ Flag| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811032353.mA3NrUj5020448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #39 from Caius CHANCE 2008-11-03 18:53:29 EDT --- AFAIK, cjkunifonts shouldn't use any not_eq in its .conf file because this might probably overrides global settings. The global settings are managed as whole but not this package. Even it tested working we aren't appropriate to include. Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 00:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040003.mA403jjr031704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #40 from Caius CHANCE 2008-11-03 19:03:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322378) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322378) Modified .conf from Baif's. (Reopened for Baif's proposed .conf) I have slightly modified Baif's proposed .conf to using only "eq". This might be able to reduce effects to global settings. Welcome for more discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 07:10:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040710.mA47APQb032594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #41 from Baif 2008-11-04 02:10:24 EDT --- I found it's not easy make all happy... For QT4/KDE4 with my config in LANG=en_US.UTF8 on my PC, English fonts look fine , Chinese fonts look fine. But if the "not_eq"s have gone, the English fonts would NOT with antialias, but why the GTK/GNOME apps would get the fonts to be with "antialias"? It looks that the config does not effect the GTK/GNOME apps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 07:37:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040737.mA47bH1F003673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #42 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-04 02:37:16 EDT --- Do you mean you think it is a Pango bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org Tue Nov 4 07:44:58 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org (bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 23:44:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18546] Can't load some non-latin fonts with pango backend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081104074458.34AED110D172@gamma.macosforge.org> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18546 alp at nuanti.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alp at nuanti.com Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 ------- Comment #13 from alp at nuanti.com 2008-11-03 23:44 PDT ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > No progress with nightly 36309. > > > > That's because the fix in bug #16792 is only for the FreeType backend. > Yes, the 'FreeType backend' now contains the latest Pango code as well and the 'Pango backend' is considered obsolete at the moment. We do need to make this clearer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:00:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 112878] Munhwa CID-keyed fonts are not included In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040800.mA480D5X028825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112878 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(jshin at i18nl10n.co | |m) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kstribley at openoffice.org Tue Nov 4 08:06:23 2008 From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org) Date: 4 Nov 2008 08:06:23 -0000 Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081104080623.14809.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 User kstribley changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|timseves |kstribley -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from kstribley at openoffice.org Tue Nov 4 08:06:21 +0000 2008 ------- I've taken over from Tim since he is now concentrating on other things. Working Graphite patches are in the graphite01 CWS. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From kstribley at openoffice.org Tue Nov 4 08:12:17 2008 From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org) Date: 4 Nov 2008 08:12:17 -0000 Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081104081217.19053.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 User kstribley changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |STARTED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from kstribley at openoffice.org Tue Nov 4 08:12:16 +0000 2008 ------- See the graphite01 CWS for the current state of the patches and also i93645 since we will need the graphite library itself as a module. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 4 08:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811040813.mA48DjZk030592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Nov 4 23:03:37 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:03:37 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042303.mA4N3bnl018645@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346004|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #13 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-04 15:03:32 PST --- Created an attachment (id=346344) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346344) font selection in Mozilla's PangoFcFontMap 1.2 Makes changes to template specializations due to changes in bug 461087, and corrects some errors that showed up in testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Nov 4 23:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:04:11 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811042304.mA4N4B78014883@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346344|font selection in Mozilla's |font selection in Mozilla's description|PangoFcFontMap 1.2 |PangoFcFontMap 1.2.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Nov 5 00:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:50:11 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050050.mA50oBIa012939@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #14 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-11-04 16:50:06 PST --- What errors? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Nov 5 01:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:21:49 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050121.mA51LndN018851@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #15 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-04 17:21:41 PST --- Uninitialized variables: --- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp +++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp @@ -807,1 +807,1 @@ gfxFcPangoFontSet::SortPreferredFonts() - for (PRUint32 r; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) { + for (PRUint32 r = 0; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) { @@ -826,1 +826,1 @@ gfxFcPangoFontSet::SortPreferredFonts() - for (PRUint32 r; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) { + for (PRUint32 r = 0; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) { Wrong test: --- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.h +++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.h @@ -213,1 +213,1 @@ public: - PRBool IsKeyInitialized() { return mKey.IsVoid(); } + PRBool IsKeyInitialized() { return !mKey.IsVoid(); } The aForce parameter to UpdateFontListInternal forces a check for changes now, but that doesn't guarantee invalidation of caches (unless a change is detected). --- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.cpp +++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.cpp @@ -923,6 +923,7 @@ gfxFontconfigUtils::GetLangSupportEntry( // entry->mSupport needs to be recalculated, but this is an // indication that the set of installed fonts has changed, so // update all caches. + mLastConfig = NULL; // invalidates caches UpdateFontListInternal(PR_TRUE); return GetLangSupportEntry(aLang, aWithFonts); } -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 06:26:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050626.mA56QIoi023049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-05 01:26:17 EDT --- Tested this the other day: rpmlint is clean, but I can't get the font to render default for ja on the desktop when I remove other Japanese fonts. (Tagoh mentioned some update to the font .conf file is needed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 07:16:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811050716.mA57G8Sq019792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-05 02:16:07 EDT --- I don't know how you tested it though, this is a Mincho typeface, which is similar to serif. so usually you don't see that on the desktop by default so that most applications defaults sans-serif or monospace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mba at openoffice.org Wed Nov 5 13:10:56 2008 From: mba at openoffice.org (mba at openoffice.org) Date: 5 Nov 2008 13:10:56 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081105131056.9872.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 ------- Additional comments from mba at openoffice.org Wed Nov 5 13:10:54 +0000 2008 ------- >From the last comments I conclude that 3.1 is too ambitious. Right? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From os at openoffice.org Wed Nov 5 13:30:36 2008 From: os at openoffice.org (os at openoffice.org) Date: 5 Nov 2008 13:30:36 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081105133036.18512.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User os changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|OOo 3.1 |OOo 3.x -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from os at openoffice.org Wed Nov 5 13:30:34 +0000 2008 ------- ->mba: Yes, definitely not 3.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 5 15:35:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811051535.mA5FZpcK017715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Baif changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |baifcc at hotmail.com --- Comment #43 from Baif 2008-11-05 10:35:48 EDT --- I'm not really understand the fontconfig with Pango and Qt. But I think the default settings for Qt/KDE on Fedora is not as good as for GTK/GNOME. And I really understand international for Qt is not as good as GTK. :) BTW: Why fonts for Qt/KDE with LANG=zh_CN.UTF8 had been change, which config file will make this happen? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 00:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:47:47 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060047.mA60llbh031583@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346567| |review?(roc at ocallahan.org) Flag| | --- Comment #16 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-05 16:47:34 PST --- Created an attachment (id=346567) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346567) avoid static object Our leak test tools don't seem to like (non-POD?) static objects (even with function scope). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 00:53:20 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:53:20 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060053.mA60rKN3029518@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346567|review?(roc at ocallahan.org) | Flag| | Attachment #346567|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #346569| |review?(roc at ocallahan.org) Flag| | --- Comment #17 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-05 16:53:08 PST --- Created an attachment (id=346569) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346569) avoid static object v2 Putting the smaller object after the larger hash tables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 00:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:54:27 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060054.mA60sRSr001834@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346569|review?(roc at ocallahan.org) |review+ Flag| | --- Comment #18 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-11-05 16:54:18 PST --- (From update of attachment 346569) Sorry, I should have caught that. Thanks. Get back in the landing queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 01:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:42:02 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060142.mA61g2lj019244@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346344|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #346569|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #19 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-05 17:41:32 PST --- Created an attachment (id=346583) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346583) including all changes in one patch Including all changes in one patch. The only new change here is removal of the "static" keyword from the typedef (which some compilers didn't seem to mind/notice). --- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp +++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp @@ -601,8 +601,6 @@ private: PRPackedBool mHaveFallbackFonts; }; - -static typedef FcBool (*FcPatternRemoveFunction)(FcPattern *p, const char *object, int id); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 03:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:53:28 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060353.mA63rS8t020780@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #18 from Parag Nemade 2008-11-05 19:53:21 PST --- is there any build available to test? Is this patch included in latest nightly builds 3.1b1 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 04:02:51 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:02:51 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060402.mA642pS8022938@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #19 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-05 20:02:41 PST --- Not 3.1b1, but in nightly builds: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 10:16:02 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:16:02 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811061016.mA6AG2RG002713@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #20 from Parag Nemade 2008-11-06 02:15:41 PST --- Thanks Karl for your help and patch here. I see that latest nightly builds fixed above reported problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 6 22:54:58 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:54:58 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811062254.mA6Msw68030507@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #20 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-06 14:54:31 PST --- Landed this but had to back out due to: REFTEST TEST-PASS | file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-003.html | REFTEST TEST-KNOWN-FAIL | file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-004.html | REFTEST TEST-KNOWN-FAIL | file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-004-j.html | REFTEST TEST-PASS | file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-005.html | ../../objdir/dist/bin/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 6372 Segmentation fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"} program finished with exit code 139 TinderboxPrint: reftest
176/0/10 Haven't yet succeeded in reproducing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 7 00:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:01:25 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070001.mA701PlJ023433@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #21 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-11-06 16:00:55 PST --- Try it under Valgrind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 7 00:26:50 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:26:50 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070026.mA70QogY002203@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #22 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-06 16:26:46 PST --- (In reply to comment #21) Thanks. Valgrind found the uninitialized variables in comment 15, but it hasn't reported a problem with the bidi test, with debug and optimized builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:54:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070254.mA72s3QN012490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:54:01 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070253.mA72resu012414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:53:39 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070258.mA72wYHL014300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:58:33 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 02:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070257.mA72vOm8014062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-06 21:57:24 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 7 04:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:30:49 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070430.mA74UnN2000830@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #346583|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #23 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-06 20:30:46 PST --- Created an attachment (id=346830) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346830) what eventually landed Thanks, Vlad for your help. Two more uninitialized variables: --- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp +++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ gfxFcPangoFontSet::SortPreferredFonts() if (truncateMarker != NULL && fontSet) { nsAutoRef truncatedSet(FcFontSetCreate()); - for (int f; f < fontSet->nfont; ++f) { + for (int f = 0; f < fontSet->nfont; ++f) { FcPattern *font = fontSet->fonts[f]; if (font == truncateMarker) break; @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ gfx_pango_fontset_get_font(PangoFontset { gfxPangoFontset *self = GFX_PANGO_FONTSET(fontset); - PangoFont *result; + PangoFont *result = NULL; FcPattern *baseFontPattern = NULL; if (self->mBaseFont) { -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 7 04:33:03 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:33:03 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070433.mA74X3wR031629@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Bug 458169 depends on bug 449356, which changed state. Bug 449356 Summary: Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 7 04:32:47 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:32:47 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811070432.mA74Wlfj001484@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|mozilla1.9.1 |mozilla1.9.1b2 --- Comment #24 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-06 20:32:39 PST --- http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d062597e5b3d http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b39e3a7974f2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 7 10:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:08:29 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071008.mA7A8T1g002629@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |463592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 7 15:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433513] promo/fonts needs to be updated for Liberation now hosted at fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811071538.mA7FcNEq024371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513 Grant Shipley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|wsdxxx |current -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Nov 8 10:53:06 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.21, 1.22 fontforge.spec, 1.35, 1.36 sources, 1.21, 1.22 Message-ID: <20081108105307.4C9C0700FB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17849/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontforge.spec sources Added Files: import.log Log Message: F11 cycle version bump --- NEW FILE import.log --- fontforge-20080927-1_fc10:HEAD:fontforge-20080927-1.fc10.src.rpm:1226141478 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- .cvsignore 3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 -0000 1.21 +++ .cvsignore 8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 -0000 1.22 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -fontforge_full-20080828.tar.bz2 -fontforge_htdocs-20080824.tar.bz2 +fontforge_full-20080927.tar.bz2 +fontforge_htdocs-20080927.tar.bz2 Index: fontforge.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v retrieving revision 1.35 retrieving revision 1.36 diff -u -r1.35 -r1.36 --- fontforge.spec 3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 -0000 1.35 +++ fontforge.spec 8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 -0000 1.36 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define docs_version 20080824 +%define docs_version 20080927 %define gettext_package FontForge Name: fontforge -Version: 20080828 +Version: 20080927 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Outline and bitmap font editor @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fontforge/fontforge_full-%{version}.tar.bz2 Source1: fontforge.desktop Source2: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fontforge/fontforge_htdocs-%{docs_version}.tar.bz2 -Source3: fontforge.xml +Source3: fontforge.xml BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Requires: xdg-utils -Requires: autotrace +Requires: autotrace BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel BuildRequires: libtiff-devel @@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel BuildRequires: gettext -Obsoletes: pfaedit -Provides: pfaedit %description FontForge (former PfaEdit) is a font editor for outline and bitmap @@ -119,10 +117,10 @@ %files -f %{gettext_package}.lang -%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS LICENSE htdocs -%{_bindir}/* -%{_libdir}/lib*.so.* +%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* +%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* %{_datadir}/applications/*fontforge.desktop %{_datadir}/fontforge %{_datadir}/pixmaps/fontforge.png @@ -130,16 +128,22 @@ %{_datadir}/mime/packages/fontforge.xml %files devel -%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %{_includedir}/fontforge/ -%{_libdir}/lib*.so +%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/lib*.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc %changelog +* Sat Nov 08 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080927-1 +??? quick & dirty version bump to start working on F11 font packages +??? time to forget about pfaedit +??? take care of rpmlint warnings + * Wed Sep 03 2008 Kevin Fenzi - 20080828-1 - Upgrade to 20080828 - Add Requires on autotrace. Fixes 460668 -- Confirm patch from 459451 is upstream here. +- Confirm patch from 459451 is upstream here. * Fri May 16 2008 Kevin Fenzi - 20080429-1 - Upgrade to 20080429 @@ -172,7 +176,7 @@ ??? quick & dirty version bump to start working on F9 font packages * Sun Aug 26 2007 Kevin Fenzi - 20070511-2 -- Rebuild for BuildID +- Rebuild for BuildID * Thu Jun 7 2007 Kevin Fenzi - 20070511-1 - Update to upstream 20070511 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- sources 3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 -0000 1.21 +++ sources 8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 -0000 1.22 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -3c232a6e412d8b443b0b881332dbc26c fontforge_full-20080828.tar.bz2 -5eee3058485b52208dfca1d46aeb96aa fontforge_htdocs-20080824.tar.bz2 +8866595d4dac77c0c093ed1e104515d3 fontforge_full-20080927.tar.bz2 +cc3e292e75250e8318cb098c1552c98e fontforge_htdocs-20080927.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Nov 8 18:38:46 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch, NONE, 1.1 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.86, 1.87 import.log, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20081108183846.3BBB9700FB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17478/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Added Files: dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch Log Message: major package rework with new subpackage split dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch: --- NEW FILE dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch --- diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf 2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,48 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - DejaVu Sans - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu Serif - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf 2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,48 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - DejaVu Sans Condensed - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu Sans Mono Condensed - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu Serif Condensed - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf 2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,70 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - - - DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed - - - 7.5 - - - false - - - diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:47.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ + + + + + + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + 7.5 + + + false + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ + + + + + + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + 7.5 + + + false + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ + + + + + + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + 7.5 + + + false + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ + + + + + + + DejaVu Sans + + + 7.5 + + + false + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ + + + + + + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + 7.5 + + + false + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ + + + + + + + DejaVu Serif + + + 7.5 + + + false + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf 2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,190 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - Arev Sans - - DejaVu Sans - - - - Bepa - - DejaVu Sans - - - - Bitstream Prima Sans - - DejaVu Sans - - - - Bitstream Vera Sans - - DejaVu Sans - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - DejaVu Sans - - - - Hunky Sans - - DejaVu Sans - - - - Olwen Sans - - DejaVu Sans - - - - SUSE Sans - - DejaVu Sans - - - - Verajja - - DejaVu Sans - - - - - VerajjaPDA - - DejaVu Sans - - - - Bepa Mono - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - - Bitstream Prima Sans Mono - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - - Bitstream Vera Sans Mono - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - - Olwen Sans Mono - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - - SUSE Sans Mono - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - - Bitstream Prima Serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - - Bitstream Vera Serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - - Hunky Serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - - Olwen Serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - - SUSE Serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - - - Verajja Serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - monospace - - - - DejaVu Sans - - sans-serif - - - - DejaVu Serif - - serif - - - - - monospace - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - - - sans-serif - - DejaVu Sans - - - - serif - - DejaVu Serif - - - diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + + + + + Arev Sans + + DejaVu Sans + + + + Bepa + + DejaVu Sans + + + + Bitstream Prima Sans + + DejaVu Sans + + + + Bitstream Vera Sans + + DejaVu Sans + + + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + DejaVu Sans + + + + Hunky Sans + + DejaVu Sans + + + + Olwen Sans + + DejaVu Sans + + + + SUSE Sans + + DejaVu Sans + + + + Verajja + + DejaVu Sans + + + + + VerajjaPDA + + DejaVu Sans + + + + + DejaVu Sans + + sans-serif + + + + + sans-serif + + DejaVu Sans + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf 2008-11-08 12:32:17.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + + + + + Bepa Mono + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + + Bitstream Prima Sans Mono + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + + Bitstream Vera Sans Mono + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + + Olwen Sans Mono + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + + SUSE Sans Mono + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + monospace + + + + + monospace + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf 2008-11-08 12:32:32.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + + + + + Bitstream Prima Serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + + Bitstream Vera Serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + + Hunky Serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + + Olwen Serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + + SUSE Serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + + + Verajja Serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + + + DejaVu Serif + + serif + + + + + serif + + DejaVu Serif + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf 2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,216 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - Arev Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - Bepa - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - Bitstream Prima Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - Bitstream Vera Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - DejaVu Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - Hunky Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - Olwen Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - SUSE Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - Verajja - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - - VerajjaPDA - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - DejaVu Sans Condensed - - DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed - - - - Toga Sans - - DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed - - - - Bepa Mono - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - - Bitstream Prima Sans Mono - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - - Bitstream Vera Sans Mono - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - - Olwen Sans Mono - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - - SUSE Sans Mono - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - - Bitstream Prima Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - - Bitstream Vera Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - - DejaVu Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - - Hunky Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - - Olwen Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - - SUSE Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - - - Verajja Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - - DejaVu Serif Condensed - - DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed - - - - Toga Serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed - - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - monospace - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans - DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed - - sans-serif - - - - DejaVu LGC Serif - DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed - - serif - - - - - monospace - - DejaVu LGC Sans Mono - - - - sans-serif - - DejaVu LGC Sans - - - - serif - - DejaVu LGC Serif - - - diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + + + + + Arev Sans + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + Bepa + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + Bitstream Prima Sans + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + Bitstream Vera Sans + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + DejaVu Sans + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + Hunky Sans + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + Olwen Sans + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + SUSE Sans + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + Verajja + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + + VerajjaPDA + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + sans-serif + + + + + sans-serif + + DejaVu LGC Sans + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + + + + + Bepa Mono + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + + Bitstream Prima Sans Mono + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + + Bitstream Vera Sans Mono + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + + DejaVu Sans Mono + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + + Olwen Sans Mono + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + + SUSE Sans Mono + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + monospace + + + + + monospace + + DejaVu LGC Sans Mono + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf 2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + + + + + Bitstream Prima Serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + + Bitstream Vera Serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + + DejaVu Serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + + Hunky Serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + + Olwen Serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + + SUSE Serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + + + Verajja Serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + serif + + + + + serif + + DejaVu LGC Serif + + + diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf --- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf 2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed - - DejaVu Sans Condensed - - - - Toga Sans - - DejaVu Sans Condensed - - - - DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed - - DejaVu Serif Condensed - - - - Toga Serif - - DejaVu Serif Condensed - - - - - sans-serif - - DejaVu Sans Condensed - - - - serif - - DejaVu Serif Condensed - - - Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.86 retrieving revision 1.87 diff -u -r1.86 -r1.87 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 3 Sep 2008 21:17:02 -0000 1.86 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000 1.87 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ %define fontname dejavu -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}/ +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/ %define archivename %{name}-%{archiveversion} @@ -14,15 +14,53 @@ %define Blocks %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/Blocks.txt %define UnicodeData %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/UnicodeData.txt +# Common description +%define common_desc \ +The DejaVu font set is based on the ???Bitstream Vera??? fonts, release 1.10. Its\ +purpose is to provide a wider range of characters, while maintaining the \ +original style, using an open collaborative development process. + +# Compat description +%define compat_desc \ +This package only exists to help transition pre 2.26-3 DejaVu users to the new\ +package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please\ +do not reference it or depend on it in any way.\ +\ +It can be safely uninstalled. + + +# Subpackage magic - should be generic enough for reuse in other packages +%define font_subpkg(n:f:) \ +\ +%post %{-n*} \ +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi \ +\ +\ +%postun %{-n*} \ +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi\ +\ +\ +%files %{-n*} \ +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) \ +\ +%{-f:%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}%{-f*}} \ +\ +%(echo %* | sed "s+ +\\n+g"| sed "s+^+%{fontdir}+g") + Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.26 -Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist} -Summary: DejaVu fonts, mature typefaces +Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X License: Bitstream Vera and Public Domain URL: http://%{fontname}.sf.net/ Source0: %{?!alphatag:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{fontname}}%{?alphatag:%{fontname}.sourceforge.net/snapshots}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Patch0: %{name}-2.26-fontconfig.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) # Older fontforge versions will not work due to sfd format changes @@ -33,149 +71,175 @@ BuildArch: noarch %description -The DejaVu fonts are a font family based on the ???Bitstream Vera??? fonts release -1.10. Its purpose is to provide a wider range of characters while maintaining -the original look and feel through the process of collaborative development. +%common_desc + + +%package doc +Summary: DejaVu fonts, documentation +Group: User Interface/X -This package includes the typefaces the DejaVu project considers mature. +%description doc +%common_desc +This package consists of the DejaVu project documentation. -%package experimental + +%package compat +Summary: DejaVu fonts, compatibility Group: User Interface/X -Summary: DejaVu fonts, experimental typefaces -# Does not really make sense without the core typefaces -Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.6.23 +Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.6.23 -%description experimental -The DejaVu fonts are a font family based on the "Bitstream Vera" fonts release -1.10. Its purpose is to provide a wider range of characters while maintaining -the original look and feel through the process of collaborative development. +Requires: %{name}-sans, %{name}-serif, %{name}-sans-mono -This package includes the typefaces the DejaVu project considers experimental. +%description compat +%compat_desc -%package -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts +%package lgc-compat +Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility Group: User Interface/X -Summary: DejaVu fonts, Latin Greek Cyrillic subset -# Could possibly conflict with the main package, as there's really no sense to -# install both -#Conflicts: %{name} <= %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.6.23 -%description -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts -The DejaVu fonts are a font family based on the "Bitstream Vera" fonts release -1.10. Its purpose is to provide a wider range of characters while maintaining -the original look and feel through the process of collaborative development. +Requires: %{name}-lgc-sans, %{name}-lgc-serif, %{name}-lgc-sans-mono -This package includes a subset of DejaVu typefaces limited to Latin, Greek and -Cyrillic glyphs. +%description lgc-compat +%compat_desc -%prep -%setup -q -n %{archivename} +%package sans +Summary: DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +%description sans +%common_desc -%build -make %{?_smp_mflags} VERSION=%{version} FC-LANG="" \ - BLOCKS=%{Blocks} UNICODEDATA=%{UnicodeData} +This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, in +their unabridged version. -%check -make check +%font_subpkg -n sans -f *-%{fontname}-sans.conf DejaVuSans.ttf DejaVuSans-*.ttf DejaVuSansCondensed*.ttf -%install -rm -fr %{buildroot} +%package serif +Summary: DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p build/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +%description serif +%common_desc -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -install -m 0644 -p fontconfig/*conf %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +This package consists of the DejaVu serif variable-width font faces, in their +unabridged version. +%font_subpkg -n serif -f *-%{fontname}-serif.conf DejaVuSerif.ttf DejaVuSerif-*.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed*.ttf -%clean -rm -fr %{buildroot} +%package sans-mono +Summary: DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi +%description sans-mono +%common_desc +This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif monospace font faces, in their +unabridged version. -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi +%font_subpkg -n sans-mono -f *-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf DejaVuSansMono*.ttf -%post experimental -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi +%package lgc-sans +Summary: DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +%description lgc-sans +%common_desc -%postun experimental -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi +This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, with +unicode coverage restricted to Latin, Greek and Cyrillic. +%font_subpkg -n lgc-sans -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-sans.conf DejaVuLGCSans.ttf DejaVuLGCSans-*.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed*.ttf -%post -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi +%package lgc-serif +Summary: DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} -%postun -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi +%description lgc-serif +%common_desc +This package consists of the DejaVu serif variable-width font faces, with +unicode coverage restricted to Latin, Greek and Cyrillic. -%files -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README -%doc build/unicover.txt build/langcover.txt build/status.txt +%font_subpkg -n lgc-serif -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-serif.conf DejaVuLGCSerif.ttf DejaVuLGCSerif-*.ttf DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed*.ttf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/20-unhint-small-%{fontname}.conf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/57-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir}/ -%{fontdir}/*.ttf -%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVu*Condensed*.ttf -%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVu*ExtraLight*.ttf -%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVuSerif*Italic.ttf -%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVuLGC*.ttf +%package lgc-sans-mono +Summary: DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +%description lgc-sans-mono +%common_desc -%files experimental -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif monospace font faces, with +unicode coverage restricted to Latin, Greek and Cyrillic. + +%font_subpkg -n lgc-sans-mono -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono.conf DejaVuLGCSansMono*.ttf + + +%prep +%setup -q -n %{archivename} +%patch0 -p1 + + +%build +make %{?_smp_mflags} VERSION=%{version} FC-LANG="" \ + BLOCKS=%{Blocks} UNICODEDATA=%{UnicodeData} + +# Stop the spin people from complaining this file is too big +bzip2 -9 build/status.txt + + +%check +make check -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/20-unhint-small-%{fontname}-experimental.conf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}-experimental.conf -%{fontdir}/DejaVu*Condensed*.ttf -%{fontdir}/DejaVu*ExtraLight*.ttf -%{fontdir}/DejaVuSerif*Italic.ttf +%install +rm -fr %{buildroot} + +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p build/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} + +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -m 0644 -p fontconfig/*conf %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVuLGC*.ttf +%clean +rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts +%files doc %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README -%doc build/unicover-lgc.txt build/langcover-lgc.txt - -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/20-unhint-small-%{fontname}-lgc.conf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/58-%{fontname}-lgc.conf +%doc build/unicover.txt build/status.txt.bz2 +# May as well put it in the common doc package %dir %{fontdir}/ -%{fontdir}/DejaVuLGC*.ttf %changelog +* Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.26-3 +??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines +??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued + for F12) +??? compress status file + * Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.26-2 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 3 Sep 2008 21:17:02 -0000 1.3 +++ import.log 8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_25-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.25-2.fc10.src.rpm:1215806350 dejavu-fonts-2_26-1_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-1.fc10.src.rpm:1217165726 dejavu-fonts-2_26-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476598 +dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315 From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Nov 8 19:33:34 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.87, 1.88 import.log, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20081108193334.269487013A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28112/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: major package rework with new subpackage split Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.87 retrieving revision 1.88 diff -u -r1.87 -r1.88 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000 1.87 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000 1.88 @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.26 -Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ %package compat -Summary: DejaVu fonts, compatibility -Group: User Interface/X +Summary: DejaVu fonts, compatibility +Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.6.23 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.6.23 @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ %package lgc-compat -Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility -Group: User Interface/X +Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility +Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.6.23 @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags} VERSION=%{version} FC-LANG="" \ BLOCKS=%{Blocks} UNICODEDATA=%{UnicodeData} -# Stop the spin people from complaining this file is too big +# Stop the desktop people from complaining this file is too big bzip2 -9 build/status.txt @@ -232,9 +232,13 @@ %dir %{fontdir}/ +%files compat +%files lgc-compat + + %changelog * Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot -- 2.26-3 +- 2.26-4 ??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines ??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued for F12) Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- import.log 8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000 1.4 +++ import.log 8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_26-1_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-1.fc10.src.rpm:1217165726 dejavu-fonts-2_26-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476598 dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315 +dejavu-fonts-2_26-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-4.fc11.src.rpm:1226172743 From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Nov 8 19:54:34 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.88, 1.89 import.log, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20081108195434.CCA5C7013D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32736/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: major package rework with new subpackage split Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.88 retrieving revision 1.89 diff -u -r1.88 -r1.89 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000 1.88 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000 1.89 @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.26 -Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ Summary: DejaVu fonts, compatibility Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.6.23 -Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.6.23 +Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 +Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 Requires: %{name}-sans, %{name}-serif, %{name}-sans-mono @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.6.23 +Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 Requires: %{name}-lgc-sans, %{name}-lgc-serif, %{name}-lgc-sans-mono @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ %changelog * Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot -- 2.26-4 +- 2.26-5 ??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines ??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued for F12) Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- import.log 8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000 1.5 +++ import.log 8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000 1.6 @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_26-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476598 dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315 dejavu-fonts-2_26-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-4.fc11.src.rpm:1226172743 +dejavu-fonts-2_26-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-5.fc11.src.rpm:1226174018 From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Nov 8 23:16:09 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:16:09 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811082316.mA8NG9pD018781@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #1 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2008-11-08 15:16:07 PST --- When this lands, you'll need to adjust the fails-if and skip-if markers in http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/layout/reftests/font-face/reftest.list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:30:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] New: Hinting problems with default Sans font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hinting problems with default Sans font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 Summary: Hinting problems with default Sans font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: clancy.kieran+redhat at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=322983) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322983) Cropped screenshot of Firefox search box Description of problem: There seems to be some strange hinting on certain letter combinations for the Sans font in Fedora 9. This happens in the URL bar and Search box in Firefox, but it probably happens in other applications too. See the screenshots attached. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.3.5-6.fc9.i386 dejavu-fonts-2.24-3.fc9.noarch (I don't know if the default 'Sans' is DejaVu or if 'Sans' is from another package) firefox-3.0.2-1.fc9.i386 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Type the letters 'fi' into the search box in Firefox Actual results: Fonts are strangely hinted, as in the screenshot attached. Expected results: Kerning and hinting should be consistent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:32:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090232.mA92WV2O019792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 --- Comment #1 from Kieran Clancy 2008-11-08 21:32:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322984) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322984) Enlarged region of font, with added colour to highlight strange hinting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090236.mA92a6IG020387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-08 21:36:05 EDT --- That's the fi ligature. I don't think it's Freetype using that ligature, but something higher in the stack, for example Qt 3 applications don't use it, Qt 4 apps do. In Firefox's case, it's probably Pango. But I suspect the real problem is that the font appears to come with a broken fi ligature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:41:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090241.mA92fh9M021197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 --- Comment #3 from Kieran Clancy 2008-11-08 21:41:42 EDT --- Thanks for the quick response. I wasn't really sure what component to assign this bug to; feel free to reassign it somewhere more appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 02:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090247.mA92lLnw021947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-08 21:47:21 EDT --- I'll let Behdad do that because I'm not really sure what the right component is here (but I suspect it's either dejavu-fonts or pango). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 08:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 03:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090804.mA984Ess007150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 03:04:13 EDT --- The font itself is fine. However it has to rely on hinting to make sure f and f ligatures are resized consistently at small sizes. Since we don't use upstream hints for evil patent reasons, the problem is in our freetype/pango autohinting logic. And yes this bug is highly user-visible and very annoying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Nov 9 09:06:56 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 09:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.89, 1.90 import.log, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <20081109090657.050457011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28949/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: major package rework with new subpackage split (last brown paper bag fixup) Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.89 retrieving revision 1.90 diff -u -r1.89 -r1.90 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000 1.89 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 9 Nov 2008 09:06:24 -0000 1.90 @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.26 -Release: 5%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -74,14 +74,16 @@ %common_desc -%package doc -Summary: DejaVu fonts, documentation +%package common +Summary: DejaVu fonts, common files (documentation???) Group: User Interface/X -%description doc +Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-doc < 2.26-6 + +%description common %common_desc -This package consists of the DejaVu project documentation. +This package consists of files used by other DejaVu packages. %package compat @@ -112,7 +114,7 @@ %package sans Summary: DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description sans %common_desc @@ -126,7 +128,7 @@ %package serif Summary: DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description serif %common_desc @@ -140,7 +142,7 @@ %package sans-mono Summary: DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description sans-mono %common_desc @@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ %package lgc-sans Summary: DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description lgc-sans %common_desc @@ -168,7 +170,7 @@ %package lgc-serif Summary: DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description lgc-serif %common_desc @@ -182,7 +184,7 @@ %package lgc-sans-mono Summary: DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description lgc-sans-mono %common_desc @@ -223,12 +225,11 @@ %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files doc +%files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README %doc build/unicover.txt build/status.txt.bz2 -# May as well put it in the common doc package %dir %{fontdir}/ @@ -237,8 +238,8 @@ %changelog -* Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot -- 2.26-5 +* Sun Nov 9 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.26-6 ??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines ??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued for F12) Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- import.log 8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000 1.6 +++ import.log 9 Nov 2008 09:06:25 -0000 1.7 @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315 dejavu-fonts-2_26-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-4.fc11.src.rpm:1226172743 dejavu-fonts-2_26-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-5.fc11.src.rpm:1226174018 +dejavu-fonts-2_26-6_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-6.fc11.src.rpm:1226221359 From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:09:10 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100 Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg> Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:16:57 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:16:57 +0100 Subject: [Fwd: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)] Message-ID: <1226229417.21652.99.camel@arekh.okg> [Of course I had to forget a few recipients] -------- Message transf?r? -------- Sujet: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:14 +0100 Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Nov 9 11:16:57 2008 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:16:57 +0100 Subject: [Fwd: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)] Message-ID: <1226229417.21652.99.camel@arekh.okg> [Of course I had to forget a few recipients] -------- Message transf?r? -------- Sujet: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:14 +0100 Hi, If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11: ? the changes touch one of your packages or ? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb, rpm?) Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in a single place. The complete list of proposed changes is published there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to complete/correct it. This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start soon. Please do respond to the list, stating: ? your requests and comments (if any) ? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11 ? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your stead ? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their packages too. ??? Short proposal summary: ? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in with the repository growth (different packagers followed different conventions) ? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora users ? new comps groups, to group related fonts together (gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc) ? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change (still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on) ? new packaging template and macros (to put in rpm? some other place?) ??? Rationale: ? help spins and users Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias, without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a valid setup. ? help packagers and package reviewers Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify before hitting review stage. ??? Proof of concept: Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page) I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Sun Nov 9 11:53:37 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081109115337.7EBF07011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13913/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log unikurd-web-font.spec Log Message: init --- NEW FILE import.log --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:HEAD:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226231549 --- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec --- %define fontname unikurd-web %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename unikurdweb Name: %{fontname}-font Version: 20020502 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A widely used Kurdish font Group: User Interface/X # FIXME: # Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not* # responding on this License: GPLv3 URL: http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337 Source0: http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like (Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin. %prep %setup -q -c %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc gpl.txt %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf %changelog * Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak - 20020502 - version is now based on date of last issue of the font - %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755) * Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-2 - got rid of -web sub-package - changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font - minor structural changes in SPEC file * Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-1 - initial packaging - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 9 Nov 2008 11:53:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +unikurdweb.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 9 Nov 2008 11:53:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0 unikurdweb.zip From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Sun Nov 9 11:56:17 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081109115617.98D047011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14398/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log unikurd-web-font.spec Log Message: init --- NEW FILE import.log --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:F-10:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226231708 --- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec --- %define fontname unikurd-web %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename unikurdweb Name: %{fontname}-font Version: 20020502 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A widely used Kurdish font Group: User Interface/X # FIXME: # Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not* # responding on this License: GPLv3 URL: http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337 Source0: http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like (Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin. %prep %setup -q -c %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc gpl.txt %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf %changelog * Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak - 20020502 - version is now based on date of last issue of the font - %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755) * Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-2 - got rid of -web sub-package - changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font - minor structural changes in SPEC file * Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-1 - initial packaging - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 9 Nov 2008 11:55:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +unikurdweb.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 9 Nov 2008 11:55:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0 unikurdweb.zip From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Sun Nov 9 11:59:24 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081109115924.753397012A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14961/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log unikurd-web-font.spec Log Message: init --- NEW FILE import.log --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:F-9:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226231838 --- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec --- %define fontname unikurd-web %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename unikurdweb Name: %{fontname}-font Version: 20020502 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A widely used Kurdish font Group: User Interface/X # FIXME: # Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not* # responding on this License: GPLv3 URL: http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337 Source0: http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like (Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin. %prep %setup -q -c %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc gpl.txt %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf %changelog * Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak - 20020502 - version is now based on date of last issue of the font - %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755) * Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-2 - got rid of -web sub-package - changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font - minor structural changes in SPEC file * Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-1 - initial packaging - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 9 Nov 2008 11:58:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +unikurdweb.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 9 Nov 2008 11:58:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0 unikurdweb.zip From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Sun Nov 9 12:01:50 2008 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8 import.log, NONE, 1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081109120150.877DB7011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15729/F-8 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log unikurd-web-font.spec Log Message: init --- NEW FILE import.log --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:F-8:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226232034 --- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec --- %define fontname unikurd-web %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define archivename unikurdweb Name: %{fontname}-font Version: 20020502 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A widely used Kurdish font Group: User Interface/X # FIXME: # Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not* # responding on this License: GPLv3 URL: http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337 Source0: http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like (Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin. %prep %setup -q -c %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc gpl.txt %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf %changelog * Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak - 20020502 - version is now based on date of last issue of the font - %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755) * Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-2 - got rid of -web sub-package - changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font - minor structural changes in SPEC file * Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak - 1.00-1 - initial packaging - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 9 Nov 2008 12:01:20 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +unikurdweb.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 9 Nov 2008 12:01:20 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0 unikurdweb.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 12:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091221.mA9CL9JI008781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 07:21:08 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 12:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091220.mA9CKLrV008608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 07:20:20 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 12:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091222.mA9CMA5B009032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-09 07:22:10 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 15:24:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091524.mA9FOU7l007364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 10:24:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I > am still waiting for a reply Please do not wait for OLPC to respond. Our packaging standards are higher than theirs, any any font package that passed Fedora review will just the OLPC package next time they rebase on a new Fedora version. Just do the requested fixes, so we can have a clean Fedora package OLPC can be referred to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 15:41:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091541.mA9Ff6JE009956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-09 10:41:05 EDT --- You're right, this is the autohinter's fault. If I turn the hinting off entirely, I get unusably blurry fonts, but the ligatures don't look misplaced. So freetype is actually the correct component to file this against (though disabling the ligatures in Pango and Qt 4 might also be a solution, we've done well for years without them, e.g. Qt 3 never used them). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G5fma021443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #28 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-09 11:05:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323015) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323015) font config configuration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:05:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G56li021237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #27 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-09 11:05:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 16:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091603.mA9G3vE6020816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Muayyad Alsadi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alsadi at ojuba.org --- Comment #26 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-09 11:03:56 EDT --- Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora as my first fedora package we need 3 font packages 1. KACST 2. core 3. decorative http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot as you case see they are already split by upstream http://cvs.arabeyes.org/viewcvs/art/khotot/ KACST is not developed by Arabeyes thus they need its own super package while core and decorative should be two subpackages of the same package the core fonts are missing the best font which is simplified naskhi, which can be downloaded from Araveyes fonts team leader and the designer of the fonts http://www.khaledhosny.org/filebrowser KACST's fonts are released under GPLv1 the decorative fonts are GPLv2 and the core fonts are OFL licensed I'll attach my .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 18:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091858.mA9IwYxS005598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #15 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-11-09 13:58:33 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 19:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811091923.mA9JNYhv009561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #16 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-09 14:23:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > ping ? pong! hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for sure.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:18:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092118.mA9LIvem026452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Component|dejavu-fonts |freetype AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092125.mA9LPMsS002306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |clancy.kieran+redhat at gmail. | |com --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-09 16:25:20 EDT --- *** Bug 470704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092125.mA9LPL3N002290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-09 16:25:20 EDT --- Turns out we already have a bug filed about this, Nicolas just reassigned it to freetype. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 368561 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092122.mA9LMChC027131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 16:22:12 EDT --- BTW if the problem is that the current macros used in this package want to take a single font file as argument, then the subpackaging macro I wrote in dejavu yesterday could be used instead. I must admit I was thinking very hard about the un font packages when I wrote them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092127.mA9LRAnx002480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-09 16:27:09 EDT --- Note that there are also fl and ffi ligatures which have the same problem. Should we be tweaking Pango and Qt 4 to kill the use of those useless ligatures entirely? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:27:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092127.mA9LR1A5027794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092135.mA9LZr57029061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-09 16:35:51 EDT --- I'll go ahead and review this in the next few days sometime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092156.mA9LueFU007131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 16:56:39 EDT --- Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, you still need spot to approve it and put it on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be referenced in release notes (a wiki page template is available there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template ) 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK fonts should be in the 65-69 range http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists Of course Behdad has the last say on this, so if you convince him to ok it I'll let this pass. 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use serif fonts to complete HanaMin http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in their next release once you're happy with it 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, just take it into account for your next font package) All in all this was a pleasant spec file to review and I'll have no problem approving it once those little problems are taken care of ? NEEDINFO in the meanwhile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 21:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092159.mA9LxqZu032672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 16:59:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Created an attachment (id=323014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) [details] > spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage Alsadi, as I stated on the list (and in this review) we do not do superpackages in Fedora, so if you want to propose spec files you need to propose one spec per font (ie 3 spec files), not a single spec that packages three different upstream archives in one go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 22:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092201.mA9M1cgk000847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-09 17:01:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Note that there are also fl and ffi ligatures which have the same problem. > > Should we be tweaking Pango and Qt 4 to kill the use of those useless ligatures > entirely? They're not useless, when the software supports them properly the result is better than no ligature (and some fonts rely hugely on them) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 22:08:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092208.mA9M8ERW008979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Component|dejavu-fonts |freetype AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 22:11:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811092211.mA9MBh5a002553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-09 17:11:42 EDT --- Yet: * Qt/KDE 3 never used those ligatures, nobody ever complained about that. * I remember reading about complaints from users of languages with dotless i (mainly Turkish) about the fi and ffi ligatures which hide the dot on the i in several fonts. * Why can't a letter just be a letter? (It's not just ligatures, kerning for letter pairs like To where the o gets moved into the empty space of the T is similarly funky.) All those special cases make the fonts look irregular and inconsistent. Basically, those ligatures cause this bug without bringing any tangible benefit. Even with this bug fixed, they may still get noticed (as in: hey, there's some weird ligature here which jumps to the eyes) and fail in their intent at getting read as the letter pairs/triplets they're supposed to represent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 02:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100239.mAA2d6oW024348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tcallawa at redhat.com | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-11-09 21:39:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass > > 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, > you still need spot to approve it and put it on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts See this https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 10 05:11:52 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:11:52 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100511.mAA5BqD1030605@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #21 from Parag Nemade 2008-11-09 21:11:47 PST --- Will be good if this patch will be available in 3.0.x branch also. Can we have this fix applied to 3.0.5 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 05:12:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100512.mAA5C9iO021440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-10 00:12:08 EDT --- Thank you for taking a review for this package. (In reply to comment #3) > 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, > you still need spot to approve it and put it on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe License tag - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be > referenced in release notes Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK > fonts should be in the 65-69 range > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists > > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if someone could helps me. > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use > serif fonts to complete HanaMin > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names Fixed in the updated package. > 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in > their next release once you're happy with it Sure. > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing hereafter? > 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) Sorry, missed one. fixed. > 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same > order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, > just take it into account for your next font package) Oh, wasn't aware of that. improved a bit in: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100820.mAA8Kj57012616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-10 03:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe > License tag - > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html If you could convince spot to publish this on his "licenses approved for fonts use" wiki page, that would make it easier for the next reviewers. Anyway > > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle > > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be > > referenced in release notes > > Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font Nice. You just need to remove the : before Category to activate them (fixed, I must rework the template help, everyone makes the same mistake) > > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK > > fonts should be in the 65-69 range > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists > > > > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It > > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). > > I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for > Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's > the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if > someone could helps me. Ultimately, Behdad is the best judge of us all on fontconfig stuff. > > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use > > serif fonts to complete HanaMin > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names > > Fixed in the updated package. Nope, the rule I referenced would have been HanaMin serif The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja test. The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Thus I'd advise to 1. keep your original rule 2. add the one I just wrote 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio 4. test test test > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 > > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing > hereafter? It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as Fedora 8 in un-supported. > Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec > SRPM URL: > http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm Appart from the fontconfig bit, you're almost there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 08:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100852.mAA8qimL027141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-10 03:52:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Yet: > * Qt/KDE 3 never used those ligatures, nobody ever complained about that. People did, you just didn't notice it > * I remember reading about complaints from users of languages with dotless i > (mainly Turkish) about the fi and ffi ligatures which hide the dot on the i in > several fonts. If the fonts are buggy they should be fixed. If the fonts are ok but freetype makes a mess of them freetype should be fixed > * Why can't a letter just be a letter? That's a na?ve western view. An awful lot of "letters" in unicode and opentype are not just "letters" but are rendered via various magic of which ligatures are a very small part. The OO.o issue tracker is choke-full of people begging SUN to support this kind of magic (because OO.o right now is even less capable than QT3 was and QT4/pango would be if we followed your suggestion). So users do care about this. (and the OO.o people are working to fix their bugs) DejaVu ligatures are light and not as spectacular than in other fonts. But DejaVu is not the only ligature user. Libertine has them, and so have an increasing number of other fonts (any self-respecting font designer adds them nowadays, because they're one of the key differentiator with legacy fonts) http://www.josbuivenga.demon.nl/tallys.html This is just a freetype autohinter bug. We can't ask font designers to ignore the patented bytecode engine and at the same time not support stuff that work with it. We can't hide your head in the sand while font technology progresses and Microsoft/Adobe invest massively in OpenType to fix its remaining typographical problems. We can't refuse to support stuff that works in other OSes and hope users don't notice. > (It's not just ligatures, kerning for > letter pairs like To where the o gets moved into the empty space of the T is > similarly funky.) This is overtight kerning in the font of which upstream is aware of (and on the TODO fix list). Not ligatures at all. > All those special cases make the fonts look irregular and > inconsistent. For the ligature bit, complain at freetype For the kerning bit, complain at dejavu That's two different problems. Modern fonts are complex beasts. We've progressed a lot in past years but there's still a lot of work to do freetype and free fonts side. Your proposal would not help things at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 09:47:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100947.mAA9lddv028991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Kofler 2008-11-10 04:47:38 EDT --- > That's a na?ve western view. An awful lot of "letters" in unicode and opentype > are not just "letters" but are rendered via various magic of which ligatures > are a very small part. Sorry, I expressed myself badly. I know ligatures and similar constructs are commonplace in some alphabets (Arabic and most of the Indic scripts, for example). So let me correct myself: -> Why can't a Latin letter just be a letter? <- To me all this ligature stuff for Latin letters looks like a solution looking for a problem, i.e. "hey, we have all this complex text layout framework for Arabic and Indic scripts, let's also use it for Latin just to be fancy". > http://www.josbuivenga.demon.nl/tallys.html Those are very good examples of the fi ligature gobbling up the dot on the i. > This is just a freetype autohinter bug. We can't ask font designers to ignore > the patented bytecode engine and at the same time not support stuff that work > with it. They wouldn't have to do anything at all. My proposal is to disable ligatures for Latin letters systemwide in Pango and Qt 4 Scribe, any ligatures provided by fonts would just be ignored (as they were in the past, and still are in e.g. Qt 3 apps). As for the kerning, I know it's a separate issue, I only brought it up here because it's part of the same philosophy of special-casing letter pairs. But let's limit ourselves to ligatures in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 10 10:12:45 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:12:45 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101012.mAAACjHx030402@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #22 from Martin Str?nsk? 2008-11-10 02:12:31 PST --- Yep, fix in 1.9.0.x would be great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 11:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101109.mAAB9i3e011791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-10 06:09:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > > That's a na?ve western view. An awful lot of "letters" in unicode and opentype > > are not just "letters" but are rendered via various magic of which ligatures > > are a very small part. > > Sorry, I expressed myself badly. I know ligatures and similar constructs are > commonplace in some alphabets (Arabic and most of the Indic scripts, for > example). > > So let me correct myself: > -> Why can't a Latin letter just be a letter? <- Because even latin scripts have exceptions that need magic (you wouldn't believe what the africans do with latin letters). > To me all this ligature stuff for Latin letters looks like a solution looking > for a problem, i.e. "hey, we have all this complex text layout framework for > Arabic and Indic scripts, let's also use it for Latin just to be fancy". > > > http://www.josbuivenga.demon.nl/tallys.html > > Those are very good examples of the fi ligature gobbling up the dot on the i. Which is ok for non-turkish users ie turkish needs a special locl rule for ligatures in fonts or even some special magic at pango/harfbuzz level. > > This is just a freetype autohinter bug. We can't ask font designers to ignore > > the patented bytecode engine and at the same time not support stuff that work > > with it. > > They wouldn't have to do anything at all. My proposal is to disable ligatures > for Latin letters systemwide in Pango and Qt 4 Scribe, any ligatures provided > by fonts would just be ignored (as they were in the past, and still are in e.g. > Qt 3 apps). Experience shows this won't lead to any fix freetype-side and we'll just have to enable ligature support under user pressure in a few months, with the bug still unfixed. (hiding ligature problems was already tried firefox-side with no good result) Sorry but ligatures exist and ignoring them in the hope our bugs will magically go away is not a solution. Please spend your energy getting freetype people to fix their stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 11:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101152.mAABqg4T019597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561 --- Comment #21 from Ben Laenen 2008-11-10 06:52:41 EDT --- > To me all this ligature stuff for Latin letters looks like a solution > looking for a problem, i.e. "hey, we have all this complex text layout > framework for Arabic and Indic scripts, let's also use it for Latin just to > be fancy". Ligatures for Latin already existed in Medieval times with the first printing devices. It's not like they suddenly appeared out of nowhere the past decade just because we created the OpenType system. It would be nice though if features can be manually turned on and off by a user... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 11:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101152.mAABqdp0019556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-10 06:52:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Nope, the rule I referenced would have been > > > HanaMin > > serif > > > > The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja > test. Doh, just referred the wrong thing.. :( > The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after > conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed > before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Ah, ok. > Thus I'd advise to > 1. keep your original rule > 2. add the one I just wrote > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio > 4. test test test Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow. > > > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 > > > > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing > > hereafter? > > It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as > Fedora 8 in un-supported. I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you because it's going to be EOL'd soon. BTW just noticed that I can't see any annotations on the template page. I had to do the view source to see. dunno if it's a problem on my browser, or mediawiki's bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 12:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811101216.mAACGUJc001301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-10 07:16:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Thus I'd advise to > > 1. keep your original rule > > 2. add the one I just wrote > > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio > > 4. test test test > > Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow. Then does it work with 65? I thought I understood how fontconfig worked, but maybe I'm just another confused user > I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you > because it's going to be EOL'd soon. I'm rewriting all the templates anyway because of the number of multi-font packages we've had to process lately -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Mon Nov 10 18:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18470] New: conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470 Summary: conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: conf AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com As explained in http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2008-October/003030.html conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation Can it be moved somewhere in /usr/share? We'd like to make font packages use the conf.d/conf.avail split in Fedora 11 but our package auditing tools do not like an /etc/fonts/conf.avail read-only directory at all, strongly hinting the current default should be changed. And if it has to be changed we'd rather it was changed before scores of packages depend on the current default. Fedora 11 packaging cycle will open soonish. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 00:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110047.mAB0luF1008396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |Thabit-fonts from |arabeyes-thabit-fonts |Arabeyes.org | --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-10 19:47:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora > as my first fedora package Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package. > we need 3 font packages > 1. KACST kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 05:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110535.mAB5ZgFW022387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 00:35:41 EDT --- This only seems to affect anaconda, so I don't see why this should be a fontconfig issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 05:36:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811110536.mAB5adu4000564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anaconda-maint-list at redhat. | |com Component|fontconfig |anaconda AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |anaconda-maint-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Tue Nov 11 09:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:42:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18470] /etc/ =?utf-8?b?4oCm?= /conf. avail can be considered an FHS violation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081111094201.3BB9913014F@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freedesktop at behdad.org Summary|conf.avail can be considered|/etc/?/conf.avail can be |an FHS violation |considered an FHS violation -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111421.mABELond007860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 09:21:48 EDT --- Well, it still fails java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1:1.6.0.0-3.b12.fc11.x86_64 I'd love to report more info but you have to tell me what would be useful to resolve the problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 14:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111431.mABEV1Sg031317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #13 from Mark Wielaard 2008-11-11 09:31:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I'd love to report more info but you have to tell me what would be useful to > resolve the problem It would be good if you could find someone else for which this also still fails, so we could compare the environments. The stack trace you get seem to indicate that there is something wrong with the accessibility support initialization. Is there anything special in your environment with regard to gnome accessibility being turned on/off, etc.? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111525.mABFPE7E009431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #31 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-11-11 10:25:13 EDT --- > Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package. till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in bugzilla >> we need 3 font packages >> 1. KACST > kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time. I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages because we have 3 upstream packages kacst: is from different author while arabeyes-core and arabeyes-decorative have different license (the first is GPLed and the second is OFL) Nicolas Mailhot proposed that each font should be split into a different package so at least we need 3 different source rpms because we have three upstreams they later can be split using some macro into final rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111528.mABFSxsv020573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 10:28:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > The stack trace you get seem to indicate that there is something wrong with the > accessibility support initialization. Is there anything special in your > environment with regard to gnome accessibility being turned on/off, etc.? I've attached the gconf accessibility information on the failing system I don't know if it's "special", I never go there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:27:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111527.mABFRgVW020425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 10:27:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323178) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323178) ~/.gconf/desktop/gnome/accessibility/keyboard/%gconf.xml on failing system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 17:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111726.mABHQknH005499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #16 from Mark Wielaard 2008-11-11 12:26:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > > The stack trace you get seem to indicate that there is something wrong with the > > accessibility support initialization. Is there anything special in your > > environment with regard to gnome accessibility being turned on/off, etc.? > > I've attached the gconf accessibility information on the failing system > > I don't know if it's "special", I never go there No, it doesn't seem special to me. It seems you have it not enabled. Now I see from comment #5 that firefox actually segfaults for you, not just produce that java stack. Still the java stack trace is strange. But lets see if the crash gives us any more clues why it doesn't work for you. Could quit all instances of firefox. Then have a terminal where you run it as "firefox -g", that will drop you in gdb, just type "run" to get firefox running as normal. Go to the same URL and then when it crashes again you should be dropped in gdb again in your terminal. Can you type "bt" and post the output? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 21:35:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112135.mABLZNmI009997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 16:35:22 EDT --- BTW it worked once. Could not reproduce it 5s later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 21:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112134.mABLY8dm009462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 16:34:06 EDT --- $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.EDCMlv GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 31966)] [New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 31969)] [New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 31970)] [New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 31973)] [New Thread 0x7fffeeb43950 (LWP 31974)] [New Thread 0x7fffee142950 (LWP 31975)] [New Thread 0x7fffe5323950 (LWP 31976)] [New Thread 0x7fffe4922950 (LWP 31977)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 31978)] [New Thread 0x7fffe3520950 (LWP 31979)] Detaching after fork from child process 31980. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 11 nov. 2008 22:32:05 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 31978)] XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x504f510, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ JNLPRuntime already initialized Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.3-2.fc11.x86_64 gnome-keyring-2.25.1-1.fc11.x86_64 java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-3.b12.fc11.x86_64 libXcomposite-0.4.0-6.fc11.x86_64 libXrandr-1.2.3-3.fc11.x86_64 libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-4.fc11.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.75-1.fc11.x86_64 libtdb-1.1.1-22.fc10.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.4-1.fc11.x86_64 (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x504f510, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f20750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2acb110, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138, nativeParams=0x7fffe3f208c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2acb6c0, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe3f209c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f209c0, fpregs=0x7fffe3f209f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0x2013230, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f20a90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x2013230, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f20b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x50432f0, aStatusMsg=0x50f6e48 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe5b4483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #10 0x00007fffe5b471fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #11 0x00007fffe5b47373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #12 0x00007fffe5b5410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x504e230, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f2108c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x504f518, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 21:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112139.mABLdq8k010743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 16:39:51 EDT --- And with codestyle: $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.w0KcqD GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 32116)] [New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 32119)] [New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 32120)] [New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 32127)] [New Thread 0x7fffeeb43950 (LWP 32128)] [New Thread 0x7fffee142950 (LWP 32129)] [New Thread 0x7fffe7fff950 (LWP 32130)] [Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 32127) exited] [New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 32131)] [New Thread 0x7fffe4922950 (LWP 32133)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 32153)] [New Thread 0x7fffe3520950 (LWP 32154)] Detaching after fork from child process 32155. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 11 nov. 2008 22:36:55 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar jars length: 1 JNLPRuntime already initialized Applet version: 1.1.0 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 32153)] XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x559c9a0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.3-2.fc11.x86_64 gnome-keyring-2.25.1-1.fc11.x86_64 java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-3.b12.fc11.x86_64 libXcomposite-0.4.0-6.fc11.x86_64 libXrandr-1.2.3-3.fc11.x86_64 libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-4.fc11.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.75-1.fc11.x86_64 libtdb-1.1.1-22.fc10.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.4-1.fc11.x86_64 (gdb) Host: www.codestyle.org Port not set. (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x559c9a0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f20750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x7fffe8226c30, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138, nativeParams=0x7fffe3f208c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x7fffe821c630, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe3f209c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f209c0, fpregs=0x7fffe3f209f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0xd38540, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f20a90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0xd38540, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f20b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x558a770, aStatusMsg=0x571e0f8 "Applet initialis?.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe501f83b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #10 0x00007fffe50221fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #11 0x00007fffe5022373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #12 0x00007fffe502f10a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so #13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x559b6c0, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f2108c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x559c9a8, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112206.mABM6fGS005200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 17:06:40 EDT --- and codestyle: $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.qcUzX8 GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 420)] [New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 423)] [New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 424)] [New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 427)] [New Thread 0x7fffeed46950 (LWP 428)] [New Thread 0x7fffee345950 (LWP 429)] [New Thread 0x7fffe55c5950 (LWP 430)] [New Thread 0x7fffe4bc4950 (LWP 431)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe3f90950 (LWP 432)] [New Thread 0x7fffe358f950 (LWP 433)] Detaching after fork from child process 434. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 11 nov. 2008 23:03:55 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar jars length: 1 JNLPRuntime already initialized Applet version: 1.1.0 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f90950 (LWP 432)] XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x46d1000, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) Host: www.codestyle.org Port not set. (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x46d1000, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f8f750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2a85b20, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138, nativeParams=0x7fffe3f8f8c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2a89540, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe3f8f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f8f9c0, fpregs=0x7fffe3f8f9f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0x23d0b70, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f8fa90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x23d0b70, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f8fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x2a79eb0, aStatusMsg=0x4729628 "Applet initialis?.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe3fa483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x46cf330, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 #10 0x00007fffe3fa71fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM (this=0x46cf330) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289 #11 0x00007fffe3fa7373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x46cf330) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247 #12 0x00007fffe3fb410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run (this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398 #13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x46cfd20, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f9008c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x46d1008, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:06:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:06:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112206.mABM68VP017268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 17:06:06 EDT --- And with even more debuginfo packages installed, visibone: $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.veZK02 GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 326)] [New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 329)] [New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 330)] [New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 333)] [New Thread 0x7fffeeb43950 (LWP 334)] [New Thread 0x7fffee142950 (LWP 335)] [New Thread 0x7fffe5323950 (LWP 336)] [New Thread 0x7fffe4922950 (LWP 337)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 338)] [New Thread 0x7fffe3520950 (LWP 339)] Detaching after fork from child process 340. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 11 nov. 2008 23:02:17 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 338)] JNLPRuntime already initialized XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x4423c00, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x4423c00, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f20750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x299ff10, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138, nativeParams=0x7fffe3f208c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x29a04a0, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe3f209c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f209c0, fpregs=0x7fffe3f209f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0x208a480, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f20a90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x208a480, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f20b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x4417aa0, aStatusMsg=0x44b3708 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe5b4483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x4421f30, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 #10 0x00007fffe5b471fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM (this=0x4421f30) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289 #11 0x00007fffe5b47373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x4421f30) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247 #12 0x00007fffe5b5410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run (this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398 #13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x4422920, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f2108c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x4423c08, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:15:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112215.mABMF5xg007133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #22 from Mark Wielaard 2008-11-11 17:15:04 EDT --- OK, this might be a clue: #8 0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x2a79eb0, aStatusMsg=0x4729628 "Applet initialis?.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe3fa483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x46cf330, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 Maybe something isn't handling that ? correctly. I assume you are running with LANG=fr_FR, could you retry with LANG=C? On the other hand this might not be it since I am still seeing things work even when setting LANG=fr_FR. hmmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:57:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112257.mABMvdM7028774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 17:57:38 EDT --- Does not change a thing Visibone: $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.N15gzE GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 1177)] [New Thread 0x7ffff5ed6950 (LWP 1180)] [New Thread 0x7ffff52a3950 (LWP 1181)] [New Thread 0x7fffeffff950 (LWP 1184)] [New Thread 0x7fffef5fe950 (LWP 1185)] [New Thread 0x7fffeebfd950 (LWP 1186)] [New Thread 0x7fffed8d2950 (LWP 1187)] [Thread 0x7fffed8d2950 (LWP 1187) exited] [New Thread 0x7fffed8d2950 (LWP 1188)] [New Thread 0x7fffe99c7950 (LWP 1189)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe8fc6950 (LWP 1199)] [New Thread 0x7fffe85c5950 (LWP 1200)] Detaching after fork from child process 1201. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() Nov 11, 2008 11:54:28 PM com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile WARNING: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) JNLPRuntime already initialized Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe8fc6950 (LWP 1199)] XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x3b62ea0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x3b62ea0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe8fc5750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x7ffff021bf60, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb392b8, nativeParams=0x7fffe8fc58c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x7ffff041d510, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe8fc59c0, gpregs=0x7fffe8fc59c0, fpregs=0x7fffe8fc59f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0xe69690, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe8fc5a90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0xe69690, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe8fc5b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x7ffff14c8960, aStatusMsg=0x3b6ebd8 "starting applet...") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffea0d683b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x7ffff14cd370, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 #10 0x00007fffea0d91fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM (this=0x7ffff14cd370) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289 #11 0x00007fffea0d9373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x7ffff14cd370) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247 #12 0x00007fffea0e610a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run (this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398 #13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x7ffff14cdd60, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe8fc608c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x3b62ea8, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 22:58:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112258.mABMw2Il017187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-11 17:58:01 EDT --- Codestyle: $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.HWvZE7 GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 1265)] [New Thread 0x7ffff5ed6950 (LWP 1268)] [New Thread 0x7ffff52a3950 (LWP 1269)] [New Thread 0x7ffff4711950 (LWP 1272)] [New Thread 0x7ffff3c4e950 (LWP 1273)] [New Thread 0x7ffff324d950 (LWP 1274)] [New Thread 0x7fffeaf0c950 (LWP 1275)] [Thread 0x7ffff4711950 (LWP 1272) exited] [New Thread 0x7ffff4711950 (LWP 1276)] [New Thread 0x7fffe9aea950 (LWP 1277)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe8da4950 (LWP 1278)] [New Thread 0x7fffe83a3950 (LWP 1279)] Detaching after fork from child process 1280. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() Nov 11, 2008 11:56:08 PM com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile WARNING: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar jars length: 1 JNLPRuntime already initialized Applet version: 1.1.0 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe8da4950 (LWP 1278)] XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x5127eb0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) Host: www.codestyle.org Port not set. (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x5127eb0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe8da3750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2aefc00, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb395d8, nativeParams=0x7fffe8da38c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2af01d0, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe8da39c0, gpregs=0x7fffe8da39c0, fpregs=0x7fffe8da39f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0x22d7cd0, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe8da3a90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x22d7cd0, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe8da3b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x5119180, aStatusMsg=0x52428b8 "Applet initialized.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe8db883b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x51261e0, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 #10 0x00007fffe8dbb1fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM (this=0x51261e0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289 #11 0x00007fffe8dbb373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x51261e0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247 #12 0x00007fffe8dc810a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run (this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398 #13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x5126bd0, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe8da408c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x5127eb8, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112310.mABNAd7C020693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Chris Lumens 2008-11-11 18:10:38 EDT --- Jens - so, any idea what could be going on here? I'm not exactly a font expert so I'm at a bit of a loss as to what could be the cause of this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112322.mABNMjZT023498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 18:22:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in bugzilla Thanks. > I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages > because we have 3 upstream packages Yep I think we all agree on this. :) > they later can be split using some macro into final rpm I think Nicolas was probably talking about subpackaging of upstream packages when they provide multiple fonts/faces, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112326.mABNQ8Ao003224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 18:26:06 EDT --- I guess pango is not seeing the locale information somehow so it doesn't know what CJK font to choose. As I recall this regression started happening (very roughly) a week or more before this bug was filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468565] Checkbox won't select on fillable PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120218.mAC2IjQt025503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468565 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2008-11-11 21:18:44 EDT --- This turns out to be a font configuration problem. See the upstream bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502664 I can fix it by adding ZapfDingbats Dingbats next to the existing Dingbats alias in the file /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-urw-aliases.conf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120254.mAC2s0X6010895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:54:00 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120253.mAC2rE71000447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:53:13 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 03:47:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120347.mAC3l516024518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-11 22:47:04 EDT --- Sorry, my bad. it works after changing: ja to: ja Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 12 07:00:13 2008 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.81, 1.82 pango.spec, 1.147, 1.148 sources, 1.81, 1.82 Message-ID: <20081112070014.09CA570129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11688 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.22.2 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.81 retrieving revision 1.82 diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82 --- .cvsignore 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 +++ .cvsignore 12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000 1.82 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2 +pango-1.22.2.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.147 retrieving revision 1.148 diff -u -r1.147 -r1.148 --- pango.spec 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.147 +++ pango.spec 12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000 1.148 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.22.1 +Version: 1.22.2 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ %changelog +* Wed Nov 12 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.2-1 +- Update to 1.22.2 + * Mon Oct 20 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.1-1 - Update to 1.22.1 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.81 retrieving revision 1.82 diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82 --- sources 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 +++ sources 12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000 1.82 @@ -1 +1 @@ -654ad7e8d414d36a0e0406935d32c3ab pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2 +0d4dc87f9b523e9030afccb2d05afe0b pango-1.22.2.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 07:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120713.mAC7DK44018440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-12 02:13:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Sorry, my bad. it works after changing: > > > ja > > > to: > > > ja > Oh, right. didn't catch it sorry. Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924) (don't know if this is a big risk, I think this was a long-term fontconfig plan, Behdad would know) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 08:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120803.mAC83Eml026639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-12 03:03:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO > code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for > example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924) No. maybe better testing "jp" or do you prefer ja-jp (or ja_jp? dunno) rather than that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 09:19:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120919.mAC9J2KK016358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-12 04:19:01 EDT --- If there is only one japanese locale by all means just test on "ja-jp" (without the contains bit). IIRC that was the locale format that worked for the Chinese people. However, as always with fontconfig, it's a good idea to test before pushing the rules on users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 09:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435549] obsolete with ghostscript-8.62 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120945.mAC9jIL3011057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435549 Bug 435549 depends on bug 457684, which changed state. Bug 457684 Summary: 8.63 was released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457684 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:09:43 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:09:43 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96123] combining characters (diacritics) not displaying properly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112100943.8595.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96123 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:09:43 +0000 2008 ------- Probably just an effect of OO.o's current poor support of OpenType features (both in TTF and OTF fonts) See issue #16032 or issue #78749 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000 Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 ------- Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a lot of math-specific codepoints --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:17:15 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:17:15 -0000 Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in ZED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112101715.11495.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000 Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 ------- Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a lot of math-specific codepoints --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:20:07 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:20:07 -0000 Subject: [Issue 46972] formula editor has no arrow sign like this In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112102007.12953.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46972 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:20:06 +0000 2008 ------- dejavu includes maby arrow symbols and is bundled with OO.o If one arrow symbol is missing in dejavu you can submit a patch to the dejavu project to support it in the next version (dejavu.sf.net) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000 Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 ------- Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a lot of math-specific codepoints --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000 Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 ------- Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a lot of math-specific codepoints --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From georgaubele at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 13:14:54 2008 From: georgaubele at openoffice.org (georgaubele at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 13:14:54 -0000 Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in ZED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112131454.15892.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656 ------- Additional comments from georgaubele at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 13:14:54 +0000 2008 ------- Correct weblinks are Stix: http://www.stixfonts.org/ DejaVu Fonts: http://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/ The Problem is not the availability of symbol fonts on the net, but the availability of the symbols in the formula editor without much "hand work". So if the symbol font(s) of OO.o will contain more symbols that can then be reached by simply typing a shortcut into the formula editor (like "\mapsto") or by clicking a button in the catalogue, that would solve that issue. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 13:25:28 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 13:25:28 -0000 Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in ZED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112132528.21035.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 13:25:28 +0000 2008 ------- @georgaubele I was refering to your comment of Tue Mar 28 14:46:42 +0000 2006 There is no need to tweak the symbol font anymore since fonts supporting common math symbols already exist and one of them, dejavu, is now bundled with OO.o --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From georgaubele at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 15:25:43 2008 From: georgaubele at openoffice.org (georgaubele at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 15:25:43 -0000 Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in ZED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112152543.4904.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656 ------- Additional comments from georgaubele at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 15:25:43 +0000 2008 ------- Ah ... ok, great! I did not realize, that I have installed new fonts with OO.o 3.0.0 :) So I now start including these fonts into the catalog of the formula editor. http://dejavu.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/dejavu/trunk/dejavu-fonts/unicover.txt gives a summery, which symbol is in which font. A more "visual" way of finding the symbols could be achieved by using the freeware "dp4 Font Viewer". --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 15:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468565] Checkbox won't select on fillable PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811121536.mACFaGPm026640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468565 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|evince |fontconfig AssignedTo|krh at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 15:53:49 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 15:53:49 -0000 Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in ZED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112155349.22044.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 15:53:48 +0000 2008 ------- Just be careful that the dejavu in OO.o is not the latest version, so it may have a bit less coverage. I do believe however that if you find significant enhancements in the latest dejavu version you can ask the OO.o dev to update the bundled dejavu for the next OO.o release --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 22:01:12 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Nov 2008 22:01:12 -0000 Subject: [Issue 84403] Bali Simbar Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081112220112.10970.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84403 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts' |'' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 01:08:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130108.mAD18XkF004811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-12 20:08:32 EDT --- Sure. Updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 02:43:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:43:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130243.mAD2h1hl019566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-12 21:43:00 EDT --- Fixed for me in anaconda-11.4.1.57-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 13 04:06:17 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:06:17 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130406.mAD46HeA016991@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #339182| |approval1.9.0.6? Flag| | --- Comment #23 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-12 20:06:13 PST --- (From update of attachment 339182) Requesting approval for 1.9.0.6. This patch changes two lines of code in one function, plus adds an assertion. A reftest would land with it. See comment 14 for discussion on what this bug effects and attachment 339013 for an example of the problem. The small number of changes makes risk very low. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 13 04:16:20 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:16:20 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130416.mAD4GKv8016191@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #24 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-12 20:16:11 PST --- Fedora bug (so I don't lose it): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 13 04:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:25:53 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811130425.mAD4Pr0W017625@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #25 from Parag Nemade 2008-11-12 20:25:45 PST --- Thanks Karl, I have tested your patch on 1.9.0.x branch also. Patch is working fine and this bug looks like get fixed on 1.9.0.x branch also along with 1.9.1 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 19:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131950.mADJoDOM013262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-13 14:50:12 EDT --- $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.9lJtQ1 GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff75ce700 (LWP 16870)] [New Thread 0x7fffef9ee950 (LWP 16873)] [New Thread 0x7fffeedbb950 (LWP 16874)] [New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16877)] [New Thread 0x7fffed557950 (LWP 16878)] [New Thread 0x7fffecb56950 (LWP 16879)] [New Thread 0x7fffe3fa5950 (LWP 16880)] [New Thread 0x7fffe35a4950 (LWP 16881)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)] [New Thread 0x7fffe1f6f950 (LWP 16884)] Detaching after fork from child process 16885. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 13 nov. 2008 20:40:38 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)] JNLPRuntime already initialized XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) run The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) n Program not restarted. (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x0000003ab543720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe296f750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x0000003ab545004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2c12190, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6d5a0, nativeParams=0x7fffe296f8c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x0000003ab5c46d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2c15fd0, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe296f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe296f9c0, fpregs=0x7fffe296f9f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x0000003ab5c461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x0000003ab5a14b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0x23a9640, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe296fa90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x0000003ab5a15fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x23a9640, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x0000003ab55f4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe296fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x0000003ab55f5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x4520600, aStatusMsg=0x45f28e8 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe298483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x4529500, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 #10 0x00007fffe29871fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM (this=0x4529500) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289 #11 0x00007fffe2987373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x4529500) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247 #12 0x00007fffe299410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run (this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398 #13 0x0000003ab5c3acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x4529ef0, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe297008c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x0000003ab5c0cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x452b1d8, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x0000003ab5c3b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x00007ffff7dd43da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x00007ffff76b627d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112 (gdb) quit The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y [nim at arekh ~]$ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.lWwjGg GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff75ce700 (LWP 16953)] [New Thread 0x7fffef9ee950 (LWP 16956)] [New Thread 0x7fffeedbb950 (LWP 16957)] [New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16960)] [New Thread 0x7fffed557950 (LWP 16961)] [New Thread 0x7fffecb56950 (LWP 16962)] [New Thread 0x7fffe49c6950 (LWP 16963)] [Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16960) exited] [New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16964)] [New Thread 0x7fffe35a4950 (LWP 16965)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16966)] [New Thread 0x7fffe1f6f950 (LWP 16967)] Detaching after fork from child process 16968. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 13 nov. 2008 20:42:26 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar jars length: 1 JNLPRuntime already initialized Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16966)] XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x48b9a00, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) Applet version: 1.1.0 Host: www.codestyle.org Port not set. (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x48b9a00, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x0000003ab543720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe296f750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x0000003ab545004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2c3e810, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6d5a0, nativeParams=0x7fffe296f8c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x0000003ab5c46d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2c3ede0, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe296f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe296f9c0, fpregs=0x7fffe296f9f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x0000003ab5c461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x0000003ab5a14b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0x2373b40, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe296fa90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x0000003ab5a15fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x2373b40, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x0000003ab55f4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe296fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x0000003ab55f5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x48a3040, aStatusMsg=0x49a7be8 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe298483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x48b7d30, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 #10 0x00007fffe29871fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM (this=0x48b7d30) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289 #11 0x00007fffe2987373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x48b7d30) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247 #12 0x00007fffe299410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run (this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398 #13 0x0000003ab5c3acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x48b8720, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe297008c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x0000003ab5c0cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x48b9a08, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x0000003ab5c3b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x00007ffff7dd43da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x00007ffff76b627d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 19:49:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131949.mADJnkPQ024101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-13 14:49:44 EDT --- with java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-4.b12.fc11.x86_64 $ firefox -g MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 DISPLAY=:0.0 FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2 MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox MOZ_TOOLKIT= moz_debug=1 moz_debugger= which: no ddd in (/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin) /usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.9lJtQ1 GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug (no debugging symbols found) (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ffff75ce700 (LWP 16870)] [New Thread 0x7fffef9ee950 (LWP 16873)] [New Thread 0x7fffeedbb950 (LWP 16874)] [New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16877)] [New Thread 0x7fffed557950 (LWP 16878)] [New Thread 0x7fffecb56950 (LWP 16879)] [New Thread 0x7fffe3fa5950 (LWP 16880)] [New Thread 0x7fffe35a4950 (LWP 16881)] ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... [New Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)] [New Thread 0x7fffe1f6f950 (LWP 16884)] Detaching after fork from child process 16885. NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() 13 nov. 2008 20:40:38 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)] JNLPRuntime already initialized XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 111 if(e.cx && e.frame) Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) bt #0 XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=) at xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111 #1 0x0000003ab543720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe296f750) at xpccallcontext.cpp:333 #2 0x0000003ab545004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2c12190, wrapper=, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6d5a0, nativeParams=0x7fffe296f8c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775 #3 0x0000003ab5c46d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2c15fd0, methodIndex=, args=0x7fffe296f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe296f9c0, fpregs=0x7fffe296f9f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151 #4 0x0000003ab5c461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so #5 0x0000003ab5a14b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext (this=0x23a9640, aStatusType=, aStatusText=@0x7fffe296fa90, aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452 #6 0x0000003ab5a15fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x23a9640, aStatusType=1, aStatus=) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479 #7 0x0000003ab55f4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe296fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374 #8 0x0000003ab55f5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x4520600, aStatusMsg=0x45f28e8 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341 #9 0x00007fffe298483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x4529500, message=) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834 #10 0x00007fffe29871fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM (this=0x4529500) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289 #11 0x00007fffe2987373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x4529500) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247 #12 0x00007fffe299410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod::Run (this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398 #13 0x0000003ab5c3acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x4529ef0, mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe297008c) at nsThread.cpp:510 #14 0x0000003ab5c0cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x452b1d8, mayWait=1) at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227 #15 0x0000003ab5c3b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=) at nsThread.cpp:254 #16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=) at ../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221 #17 0x00007ffff7dd43da in start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:297 #18 0x00007ffff76b627d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 20:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132029.mADKTYa3031862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 22:00:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132200.mADM0BBi017281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-13 17:00:10 EDT --- After many more tests it seems the stack is not relevant ? I get it both when firefow works and when it crashes However I've found out that disabling the "organise status bar" firefox extensions reliably made things work. Thus I suppose the openjdk plugin does something "organise status bar" really does not like (I've been running this extension for months on rawhide without any problem before I tried those pages with openjdk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 22:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811132201.mADM1MRP004643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-13 17:01:21 EDT --- (22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first fontconfig rule for hanazo is now fine (22:32:20) nim-nim: tagoh3: but the second one is still reversed (22:32:26) nim-nim: tagoh3: you need (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:32) nim-nim: [fontname] (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:32) nim-nim: [genericname] (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:32) nim-nim: (22:32:59) nim-nim: with [fontname]=HanaMin (22:33:16) nim-nim: and [genericname]=serif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 02:01:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140201.mAE21KH4012360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT --- Doh! I should have a look carefully more.. Thanks for catching this up! Hopefully this would be a final review for hanazono-fonts. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 06:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] New: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: bombayvdmo at yahoo.com.mx QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -q fontfoge fontforge-20080309-1.fc9.i386 How reproducible: Open some .otf file Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open FontForge 2. Select some of attached .otf files. Actual results: FontForge Abort Expected results: Continue Running Additional info: Boisik.otf : http://mitek.webpark.cz/boisik/ cmunvi.otf : ftp://canopus.iacp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/cm_unicode/cm-unicode-0.6.3a-otf.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 06:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140652.mAE6qYvX010149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 --- Comment #2 from V??ctor Daniel 2008-11-14 01:52:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323540) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323540) Problematic OTF File 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 06:51:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140651.mAE6pEaq010047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 --- Comment #1 from V??ctor Daniel 2008-11-14 01:51:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323539) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323539) Problematic OTF File 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 07:49:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471542] New: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471542 Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Upstream lately added support for all sorts of nifty libraries, and our fontforge package needs to be tweaked to accomodate them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 09:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140942.mAE9gDq3026578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tagoh at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-14 04:42:11 EDT --- This one looks good, thank you for your persistence. You can now continue the font package integration process, starting here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the comps and wiki parts. Reassigning the bug to you since my part is done. APPROVED PS Do not forget to subscribe to the low-traffic fedora-fonts-list, since Fedora 11 packaging changes are being discussed there right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 10:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141037.mAEAbRjp004649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-14 05:37:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Nicolas. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hanazono-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 F-8 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Nov 14 10:44:09 2008 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.4, 1.5 xgridfit.spec, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <20081114104409.EC13A70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24172/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sources xgridfit.spec Log Message: 1.11a Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- .cvsignore 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.4 +++ .cvsignore 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -xgridfit-1-9.tar.gz +xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ xgridfit-1_9-1_fc10:HEAD:xgridfit-1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220282275 +xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sources 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.4 +++ sources 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -bb2bb3caee51758852902525b068b56a xgridfit-1-9.tar.gz +df07408852d577b1df37d4e4c1361735 xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz Index: xgridfit.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- xgridfit.spec 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.6 +++ xgridfit.spec 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define archivever 1-9 +%define archivever 1-11a Name: xgridfit -Version: 1.9 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Version: 1.11 +Release: 1.a%{?dist} Summary: Font hinting tool # This is where we drop fontforge @@ -80,10 +80,14 @@ %files doc %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc docs/* +%doc docs/* ChangeLog %changelog +* Fri Nov 14 2008 +- 1.11-1.a +??? update for F11 cycle + * Mon Sep 1 2008 - 1.9-1 ??? Major update, many changes From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] Firefox "organise status bar" extensions conflicts with IcedTeaPlugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141135.mAEBZGJx016074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 Mark Wielaard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|The Visibone font test does |Firefox "organise status |not work with the icedtea |bar" extensions conflicts |java plugin |with IcedTeaPlugin --- Comment #28 from Mark Wielaard 2008-11-14 06:35:15 EDT --- Thanks for debugging this. Should this be reassigned to firefox? What package provides this "organise status bar" extension? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 11:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432184] Firefox "organise status bar" extensions conflicts with IcedTeaPlugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811141147.mAEBllul031296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-14 06:47:45 EDT --- The extension is there https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/1759 I don't think we package extensions yet Anyway the extension works both under windows with sun jdk and linux without openjdk, so I'd tend to think the problem is openjdk-side -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Fri Nov 14 16:15:58 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:15:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18470] /etc/ =?utf-8?b?4oCm?= /conf. avail can be considered an FHS violation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081114161558.A9993130057@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-14 08:15:57 PST --- If we could have an opinion on the correct directory name that would un-block our font guideline change process started there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 17:31:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471751] New: Mathematica required fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Mathematica required fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471751 Summary: Mathematica required fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com ReportedBy: q2 at arachnoid.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=323695) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323695) Small image of Mathematica warning dialog Description of problem: On the Fedora 10 preview release ISO (Fedora-10-Preview-i386-DVD.iso), two font RPMs are not included. The closest matches for the missing fonts are: xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch.rpm xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch.rpm Absent these fonts, Mathematica 5.0 will complain about missing fonts and will render text improperly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Install and run Fedora 10 preview release. Install and run Mathematica 5.0 (this likely affects other Mathematica versions as well). Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install and run Fedora 10 preview release. 2. Install and run Mathematica 5.0. Actual results: 1. Error message at Mathematica startup about missing fonts (see attachment). 2. Improperly rendered text within Mathematica. Expected results: No error messages, properly rendered text. Additional info: Mathematica tends to rely on system fonts for proper operation to a greater degree than most applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 19:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471751] Mathematica required fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151958.mAFJwNgQ029246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471751 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-15 14:58:22 EDT --- It's been almost a decade fontconfig was introduced and every major GUI app migrated to it. Legacy core fonts support is not going away any time soon, but the associated fonts are *not* going to be installed by default anymore. Users of applications like Mathematica will just have to install them explicitelly. That, or ask their application upstream to use the *current* font backend, like pretty much everyone else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 20:32:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152032.mAFKWVa8001962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-15 15:32:30 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here... OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License (OFL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2 7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag See below - Should package latest version Issues: 1. There is a newer version upstream, might update to that before importing? 20081109 2. One more thing thats confusing me on the legal front that should be mentioned here: The fontforge script files that are used to produce the font are under the GPLv2+ license. Since they aren't shipped in the binary package or part of the font itself, I guess it's ok that the package license here is OFL, but I thought I would mention it here. I don't see any blockers here... so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 21:43:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811152143.mAFLhYun011862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-15 16:43:33 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review! Will of course import the lastest font version. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apanov-heuristica-fonts Short Description: Heuristica serif font Owners: nim Branches: F10, devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 10:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435549] obsolete with ghostscript-8.62, for fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811161042.mAGAgqUP023454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435549 Xose Vazquez Perez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|obsolete with |obsolete with |ghostscript-8.62 |ghostscript-8.62, for | |fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sun Nov 16 11:03:30 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 545510] Support user control for OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081116110330.5B52423F4F6@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510 pango | general | Ver: 1.20.x ------- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-16 11:03 UTC ------- Probably a dupe of #547472 -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:16:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162016.mAGKG2vm022642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:16:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 20:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162021.mAGKL1Li000396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-16 15:21:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 21:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162159.mAGLxNAm017302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-16 16:59:22 EDT --- apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 16 22:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811162223.mAGMNlw5011632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 17 02:23:37 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081117022337.BBB2B70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24619/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp serif HanaMin HanaMin serif --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec --- %define fontname hanazono %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename %{fontname}-%{version} %define priority 66 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081012 Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/ Source0: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers who work together on glyphwiki.org. This font supports: - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB) - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3) - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF) - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3) - 84 characters in IBM extensions %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-5 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config again. * Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-4 - Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config. * Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-3 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - Drop -f from fc-cache. - Improve fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-2 - Improve a bit in the spec file. * Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-1 - Initial packaging. --- NEW FILE import.log --- hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:HEAD:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226888502 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Nov 2008 02:23:06 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +hanazono-20081012.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Nov 2008 02:23:06 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a hanazono-20081012.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 17 02:27:02 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10 hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081117022702.68F2570131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25245/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial import for F-10 --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp serif HanaMin HanaMin serif --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec --- %define fontname hanazono %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename %{fontname}-%{version} %define priority 66 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081012 Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/ Source0: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers who work together on glyphwiki.org. This font supports: - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB) - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3) - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF) - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3) - 84 characters in IBM extensions %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-5 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config again. * Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-4 - Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config. * Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-3 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - Drop -f from fc-cache. - Improve fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-2 - Improve a bit in the spec file. * Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-1 - Initial packaging. --- NEW FILE import.log --- hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:F-10:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226888732 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Nov 2008 02:26:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +hanazono-20081012.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Nov 2008 02:26:32 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a hanazono-20081012.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 17 02:28:38 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9 hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081117022838.6046F70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25577/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial import for F-9 --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp serif HanaMin HanaMin serif --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec --- %define fontname hanazono %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename %{fontname}-%{version} %define priority 66 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081012 Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/ Source0: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers who work together on glyphwiki.org. This font supports: - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB) - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3) - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF) - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3) - 84 characters in IBM extensions %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-5 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config again. * Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-4 - Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config. * Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-3 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - Drop -f from fc-cache. - Improve fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-2 - Improve a bit in the spec file. * Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-1 - Initial packaging. --- NEW FILE import.log --- hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:F-9:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226888859 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Nov 2008 02:28:08 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +hanazono-20081012.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Nov 2008 02:28:08 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a hanazono-20081012.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 17 02:54:13 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8 hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081117025413.500DD70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28507/F-8 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Initial import for F-8. --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp serif HanaMin HanaMin serif --- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec --- %define fontname hanazono %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define archivename %{fontname}-%{version} %define priority 66 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081012 Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/ Source0: http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch %description Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers who work together on glyphwiki.org. This font supports: - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB) - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3) - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF) - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3) - 84 characters in IBM extensions %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : fi %files %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %dir %{fontdir}/ %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog * Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-5 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config again. * Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-4 - Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config. * Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-3 - Fix a typo in fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - Drop -f from fc-cache. - Improve fontconfig config. * Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-2 - Improve a bit in the spec file. * Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081012-1 - Initial packaging. --- NEW FILE import.log --- hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:F-8:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226890367 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Nov 2008 02:53:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +hanazono-20081012.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Nov 2008 02:53:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a hanazono-20081012.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170418.mAH4I6LV011826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH 2008-11-16 23:18:05 EDT --- Thanks. built and updated comps and wiki as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 05:02:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170502.mAH52ahe011172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-17 00:02:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > ping ? > > pong! > > hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for > sure.. hi, sorry for the delay.. rebuilt with the changes advised by Pablo.. here are the new files.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :( so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this) The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:43:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:43:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170943.mAH9hi3C020650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:43:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? You have many examples of txt frobbing in the gfs font specs. Pablo can help you if needed. Also I'd have added http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf in %doc > Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? I'm not aware of better documentation than http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips or I wouldn't have bothered writing it in the first place Again do ask your reviewer (Pablo) or the list if you have problems understanding part of it. It's a wiki and it can be fixed. It's no use leaving obscure parts in it for other packagers to fail on. You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc) Otherwise the fontconfig info in there http://nim.fedorapeople.org/rpm-fonts/rpm-fonts-1.8.tar.bz2 should apply as-is for Fedora versions < 11 (but not the rest) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qw4F031095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:57 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9quaS031047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:55 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:53:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r2eq031171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:53:01 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qt0c031016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:54 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qsTn030983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:52:52 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:53:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r10r031138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:53:00 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 09:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r30g031221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-17 04:53:03 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 22:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811172243.mAHMhIxG018324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-17 17:43:16 EDT --- Yeah, I am seeing this here as well on f10/rawhide. Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 00:23 GMT 28-Aug-2008. Library based on sources from 23:33 GMT 27-Aug-2008. *** buffer overflow detected ***: fontforge terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib64/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x3b448ff497] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3b448fd340] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3b448fc6c9] /lib64/libc.so.6(__printf_fp+0x1813)[0x3b4484c453] /lib64/libc.so.6(_IO_vfprintf+0x1d76)[0x3b448475a6] /lib64/libc.so.6(__vsprintf_chk+0x9d)[0x3b448fc76d] /lib64/libc.so.6(__sprintf_chk+0x80)[0x3b448fc6b0] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b48944c46] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b48944d78] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b4894511d] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b4894f147] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(_SFReadTTF+0x844)[0x3b48952b14] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(_ReadSplineFont+0x730)[0x3b489d6760] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(LoadSplineFont+0xcc)[0x3b489d797c] /usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(ViewPostscriptFont+0x15)[0x3b488cb7a5] fontforge[0x4c6740] fontforge[0x5565b8] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x3b4481e546] fontforge[0x419119] ======= Memory map: ======== 00400000-005b0000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 2597372 /usr/bin/fontforge 007b0000-00904000 rw-p 001b0000 fd:01 2597372 /usr/bin/fontforge 00904000-00909000 rw-p 00904000 00:00 0 00b03000-00b09000 rw-p 00303000 fd:01 2597372 /usr/bin/fontforge 01558000-018c3000 rw-p 01558000 00:00 0 [heap] 3b44400000-3b44420000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077902 /lib64/ld-2.9.so 3b4461f000-3b44620000 r--p 0001f000 fd:01 7077902 /lib64/ld-2.9.so 3b44620000-3b44621000 rw-p 00020000 fd:01 7077902 /lib64/ld-2.9.so 3b44800000-3b44968000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077910 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3b44968000-3b44b68000 ---p 00168000 fd:01 7077910 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3b44b68000-3b44b6c000 r--p 00168000 fd:01 7077910 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3b44b6c000-3b44b6d000 rw-p 0016c000 fd:01 7077910 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3b44b6d000-3b44b72000 rw-p 3b44b6d000 00:00 0 3b44c00000-3b44c84000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077923 /lib64/libm-2.9.so 3b44c84000-3b44e83000 ---p 00084000 fd:01 7077923 /lib64/libm-2.9.so 3b44e83000-3b44e84000 r--p 00083000 fd:01 7077923 /lib64/libm-2.9.so 3b44e84000-3b44e85000 rw-p 00084000 fd:01 7077923 /lib64/libm-2.9.so 3b45000000-3b45002000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077942 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3b45002000-3b45202000 ---p 00002000 fd:01 7077942 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3b45202000-3b45203000 r--p 00002000 fd:01 7077942 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3b45203000-3b45204000 rw-p 00003000 fd:01 7077942 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3b45400000-3b45417000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077991 /lib64/libpthread-2.9.so 3b45417000-3b45616000 ---p 00017000 fd:01 7077991 /lib64/libpthread-2.9.so 3b45616000-3b45617000 r--p 00016000 fd:01 7077991 /lib64/libpthread-2.9.so 3b45617000-3b45618000 rw-p 00017000 fd:01 7077991 /lib64/libpthread-2.9.so 3b45618000-3b4561c000 rw-p 3b45618000 00:00 0 3b45800000-3b45812000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 11638419 /usr/lib64/libgutils.so.1.0.3 3b45812000-3b45a11000 ---p 00012000 fd:01 11638419 /usr/lib64/libgutils.so.1.0.3 3b45a11000-3b45a14000 rw-p 00011000 fd:01 11638419 /usr/lib64/libgutils.so.1.0.3 3b45c00000-3b45c05000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 2662617 /usr/lib64/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 3b45c05000-3b45e04000 ---p 00005000 fd:01 2662617 /usr/lib64/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 3b45e04000-3b45e05000 rw-p 00004000 fd:01 2662617 /usr/lib64/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 3b46000000-3b4601a000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 2662619 /usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1.0.0 3b4601a000-3b4621a000 ---p 0001a000 fd:01 2662619 /usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1.0.0 3b4621a000-3b4621b000 rw-p 0001a000 fd:0[1] 30669 abort fontforge Will see about asking upstream to take a look... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Nov 18 01:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:16:07 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811180116.mAI1G781008584@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #2 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-17 17:16:00 PST --- Created an attachment (id=348692) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=348692) proof of concept for src:url() This provides src:url() web fonts. It hasn't had much testing but works on http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-webfonts/test-georgian-ucnobi.html Currently FcFreeTypeQueryFace is used and so fontconfig-2.4.2 or newer is required. I'll need to add support for older versions. (Our CentOS 5.0 build and test machines have fontconfig-2.4.1.) To avoid temporary files (sometimes?) being created by nsIDownloader in system directories and not-necessarily cleaned up, fonts are loaded into memory through nsIStreamLoader in order to access them. This misses an opportunity for sharing glyph caches etc across pages, but that can be something that is sorted out if/when we have a downloaded-font cache. A reference to the nsIStreamLoader is held to keep the font data in memory until the font entry is destroyed. This makes possible future optimization of nsIStreamLoader (or a new loader type) such that, when appropriate, the font data is pinned to the disk cache and the logical address of the data is provided through mmap rather than a memory copy of the file data. (This I think would benefit all platforms, even those on which platform libraries make their own copy of all the data.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 08:16:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811180816.mAI8Gc4l004739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-18 03:16:37 EDT --- Note that upstream released a new version a few days after I had rebuilt fontforge in rawhide/f11. May be worth trying too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 08:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811180858.mAI8w5NE000648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 --- Comment #5 from V??ctor Daniel 2008-11-18 03:58:02 EDT --- $ rpm -q fontforge fontforge-20080927-1.fc11.i386 $ fontforge Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 02:38 GMT 27-Sep-2008. Library based on sources from 15:05 GMT 25-Sep-2008. *** buffer overflow detected ***: fontforge terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= ... ... 00c9c000-00cb1000 r-xp 00000000 08:0Aborted (core dumped) $gdb /usr/bin/fontforge fontforge-12150-1226998262.core GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-23.fc9) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"... warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfontforge.so.1.0.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libfontforge.so.1.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfontforge.so.1.0.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgdraw.so.4.0.5...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgdraw.so.4.0.5.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgdraw.so.4.0.5 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgutils.so.1.0.3...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgutils.so.1.0.3.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgutils.so.1.0.3 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3.0.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3.0.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 Reading symbols from /lib/libdl-2.8.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libdl-2.8.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl-2.8.so Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread-2.8.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libpthread-2.8.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread-2.8.so Reading symbols from /lib/libm-2.8.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libm-2.8.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm-2.8.so Reading symbols from /lib/libc-2.8.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libc-2.8.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc-2.8.so Reading symbols from /lib/libuuid.so.1.2...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libuuid.so.1.2.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libuuid.so.1.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.0.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.0.0 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-2.8.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/ld-2.8.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-2.8.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/gconv/MACINTOSH.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gconv/MACINTOSH.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/gconv/MACINTOSH.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0 Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s-4.3.0-20080428.so.1...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/lib/libgcc_s-4.3.0-20080428.so.1.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s-4.3.0-20080428.so.1 Core was generated by `fontforge'. Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. [New process 12150] #0 0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt full #0 0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall () No symbol table info available. #1 0x00b0b660 in raise (sig=) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 resultvar = pid = selftid = #2 0x00b0d028 in abort () at abort.c:88 act = Could not find the frame base for "abort". sigs = Could not find the frame base for "abort". #3 0x00b4864d in __libc_message (do_abort=, fmt=) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:170 ap = fd = 5 on_2 = list = nlist = cp = written = #4 0x00bd7c78 in __fortify_fail (msg=Could not find the frame base for "__fortify_fail". ) at fortify_fail.c:32 No locals. #5 0x00bd5d70 in __chk_fail () at chk_fail.c:29 No locals. #6 0x00bd5468 in _IO_str_chk_overflow (fp=Could not find the frame base for "_IO_str_chk_overflow". ) at vsprintf_chk.c:35 No locals. #7 0x00b4d9a3 in __overflow (f=, ch=Could not find the frame base for "__overflow". ) at genops.c:248 No locals. #8 0x00b25de9 in ___printf_fp (fp=, info=, args=) at printf_fp.c:1206 outlen = buffer = cp = tmpptr = wstartp = intdig_max = intdig_no = fracdig_max = fracdig_no = width = expscale = ngroups = wbuffer_to_alloc = fracdig_min = dig_max = significant = wcp = chars_needed = spec = added_zeros = decimal = decimalwc = thousands_sep = thousands_sepwc = grouping = special = wspecial = fp_input = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". to_shift = is_neg = 0 tmpsize = digit = done = cy = wide = 0 wbuffer = buffer_malloced = expsign = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". exponent = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". fracsize = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". frac = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". tmp = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". scale = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". scalesize = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". type = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp". #9 0x00b20e92 in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=, format=, ap=) at vfprintf.c:1580 info = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal". ptr = function_done = alt = is_long = prec = is_negative = number = base = string = space = width = showsign = group = is_char = pad = the_arg = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal". left = is_long_double = is_short = use_outdigits = spec = _buffer = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal". _avail = thousands_sep = grouping = done = f = lead_str_end = work_buffer = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal". workstart = workend = ap_save = nspecs_done = save_errno = 20 readonly_format = jump_table = {1, 0, 0, 4, 0, 14, 0, 6, 0, 0, 7, 2, 0, 3, 9, 0, 5, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 26, 0, 25, 0, 19, 19, 19, 0, 29, 0, 0, 12, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 21, 0, 0, 0, 0, 18, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 26, 0, 20, 15, 19, 19, 19, 10, 15, 28, 0, 11, 24, 23, 17, 22, 12, 0, 21, 27, 16, 0, 0, 18, 0, 13} step0_jumps = {0, 2233, 5485, 4766, 5570, 3668, 3772, 5253, 2453, 2641, 4267, 4182, -2518, 5034, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 5129, -2518, 5168} step1_jumps = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2641, 4267, 4182, -2518, 5034, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 5129, -2518, 0} step2_jumps = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4267, 4182, -2518, 5034, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 5129, -2518, 0} step3a_jumps = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4350, 0, 0, 0, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 0, 0, 0, 0, -617, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0} step3b_jumps = {0 , -2518, 0, 0, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 0, 0, 0} step4_jumps = {0 , 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 0, 0, 0} step4_jumps = {4445 , 372, 523, 2316, 2441, 4666, 4681, 3370, 2848, 3986, 4858, 4969, -1935, 3868, 4445, 4445, 4445} #10 0x00bd5517 in ___vsprintf_chk (s=, flags=, slen=, format=Could not find the frame base for "___vsprintf_chk". ) at vsprintf_chk.c:87 f = Could not find the frame base for "___vsprintf_chk". ret = 0 #11 0x00bd545d in ___sprintf_chk (s=Could not find the frame base for "___sprintf_chk". ) at sprintf_chk.c:33 done = 0 #12 0x0021dd11 in privateaddreal (private=0x892fc88, key=0x369dda "BlueScale", val=0.0042127701453864574, def=0.039625) at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:34 buf = "0.0042127?" #13 0x0021de33 in cffprivatefillup (private=0x892fc88, dict=0x886f030) at parsettf.c:3570 No locals. #14 0x0021e20d in cffinfofillup (info=0xbf9c834c, dict=0x886f030, strings=0x892a8f0, scnt=398) at parsettf.c:3681 No locals. #15 0x002295cf in readcffglyphs (ttf=0x8872330, info=0xbf9c834c) at parsettf.c:3699 hdrsize = fontnames = (char **) 0x88ad770 strings = (char **) 0x892a8f0 dicts = (struct topdicts **) 0x88b0600 subdicts = i = which = gsubs = {cnt = 0, next = 0, keys = 0x0, values = 0x0, lens = 0x0, bias = 0} scnt = 398 #16 0x0022d7f7 in _SFReadTTF (ttf=0x8872330, flags=, openflags=0, filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf", fd=0x0) at parsettf.c:5450 info = {emsize = 1000, ascent = 800, descent = 200, vertical_origin = 0, width_cnt = 618, glyph_cnt = 618, index_to_loc_is_long = 0, is_ttc = 0, is_onebyte = 0, twobytesymbol = 0, complainedbeyondglyfend = 0, extensionrequested = 0, to_order2 = 0, complainedmultname = 0, strokedfont = 0, use_typo_metrics = 1, weight_width_slope_only = 0, optimized_for_cleartype = 0, apply_lsb = 0, openflags = 0, copyright = 0x88b74f8 "Created by ,,, with FontForge 2.0 (http://fontforge.sf.net)", familyname = 0x88af610 "Boisik", fullname = 0x8862c10 "Boisik", weight = 0x892fc78 "Medium", version = 0x889a088 "001.000", fontname = 0x889ca20 "Boisik", xuid = 0x0, uniqueid = 0, italicAngle = 0, upos = -100, uwidth = 50, strokewidth = 0, fstype = 0, private = 0x892fc88, map = 0x0, uni_interp = ui_none, pfminfo = {pfmset = 0, winascent_add = 0, windescent_add = 0, hheadascent_add = 0, hheaddescent_add = 0, typoascent_add = 0, typodescent_add = 0, subsuper_set = 0, panose_set = 0, hheadset = 1, vheadset = 0, hascodepages = 0, hasunicoderanges = 0, pfmfamily = 0 '\0', weight = 0, width = 0, panose = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000", fstype = 0, linegap = 90, vlinegap = 0, hhead_ascent = 841, hhead_descent = -341, os2_typoascent = 0, os2_typodescent = 0, os2_typolinegap = 0, os2_winascent = 0, os2_windescent = 0, os2_subxsize = 0, os2_subysize = 0, os2_subxoff = 0, os2_subyoff = 0, os2_supxsize = 0, os2_supysize = 0, os2_supxoff = 0, os2_supyoff = 0, os2_strikeysize = 0, os2_strikeypos = 0, os2_vendor = "\000\000\000", os2_family_class = 0, codepages = {0, 0}, unicoderanges = {0, 0, 0, 0}}, os2_version = 0, gasp_version = 0, dupnamestate = 0, names = 0x892bbd0, fontcomments = 0x0, fontlog = 0x0, cvt_names = 0x0, chars = 0x0, layers = 0x0, layer_cnt = 0, bitmaps = 0x0, cidregistry = 0x0, ordering = 0x0, supplement = 0, cidfontversion = 0, subfontcnt = 0, subfonts = 0x0, inuse = 0x0, numtables = 10, base_start = 0, cff_start = 3504, cff_length = 306553, encoding_start = 960, vs_start = 0, gasp_start = 0, glyph_start = 0, glyph_length = 0, gdef_start = 0, gdef_length = 0, gpos_start = 0, gpos_length = 0, gsub_start = 0, gsub_length = 0, g_bounds = 0, bitmapdata_start = 0, bitmapdata_length = 0, bitmaploc_start = 0, bitmaploc_length = 0, gvar_start = 0, gvar_len = 0, fvar_start = 0, fvar_len = 0, avar_start = 0, avar_len = 0, cvar_start = 0, cvar_len = 0, head_start = 172, hhea_start = 228, hmetrics_start = 310088, kern_start = 0, glyphlocations_start = 0, loca_length = 0, maxp_start = 264, maxp_len = 6, copyright_start = 368, postscript_start = 3472, os2_start = 272, typ1_start = 0, typ1_length = 0, vhea_start = 0, vmetrics_start = 0, vorg_start = 0, pfed_start = 0, tex_start = 0, bdf_start = 0, fftm_start = 310060, prop_start = 0, lcar_start = 0, opbd_start = 0, acnt_start = 0, feat_start = 0, mort_start = 0, morx_start = 0, bsln_start = 0, math_start = 0, math_length = 0, cvt_start = 0, cvt_len = 0, prep_start = 0, prep_len = 0, fpgm_start = 0, fpgm_len = 0, one_of_many = 0, obscomplain = 0, cmpcomplain = 0, unkcomplain = 0, comcomplain = 0, onlystrikes = 0, onlyonestrike = 0, barecff = 0, platform = 0, specific = 0, anchor_class_cnt = 0, anchor_merge_cnt = 0, ahead = 0x0, alast = 0x0, khead = 0x0, klast = 0x0, vkhead = 0x0, vklast = 0x0, gpos_lookups = 0x0, gsub_lookups = 0x0, cur_lookups = 0x0, mort_subs_lookup = 0x0, mort_pos_lookup2 = 0x0, mort_r2l = 0, mort_tag_mac = 0, mort_feat = 0, mort_setting = 0, mort_is_nested = 0, morx_classes = 0x0, bsln_values = 0x0, mort_max = 0, tabs = 0x0, possub = 0x0, sm = 0x0, features = 0x0, chosenname = 0x0, macstyle = 0, lookup_cnt = 0, feature_cnt = 0, variations = 0x0, macstrids = 0x0, fd = 0x0, savecnt = 0, savetab = 0x0, last_size_pos = 0, design_size = 0, fontstyle_id = 0, fontstyle_name = 0x0, design_range_bottom = 0, design_range_top = 0, texdata = {type = tex_unset, params = { 0 }}, mark_class_cnt = 0, mark_classes = 0x0, mark_class_names = 0x0, warned_morx_out_of_bounds_glyph = 0 '\0', badgid_cnt = 0, badgid_max = 0, badgids = 0x0, creationtime = 1216823215, modificationtime = 1218308786, gasp_cnt = 0, gasp = 0x0, math = 0x0, bad_ps_fontname = 0, bad_glyph_data = 0, bad_cff = 0, bad_metrics = 0, bad_cmap = 0, bad_embedded_bitmap = 0, bad_gx = 0, bad_ot = 0, bad_os2_version = 0, bad_sfnt_header = 0, guidelines = {background = 0, order2 = 0, anyflexes = 0, splines = 0x0, images = 0x0, refs = 0x0, undoes = 0x0, redoes = 0x0, validation_state = 0, old_vs = 0}, horiz_base = 0x0, vert_base = 0x0} #17 0x002b8bf6 in _ReadSplineFont (file=0x8872330, filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf", openflags=0) at splinefont.c:1055 ch2 = ch4 = 79 ch6 = 10 ch10 = 130 ch1 = 79 ch3 = 84 ch5 = 0 ch7 = 0 ch9 = 6 sf = ubuf = "Loading font from Boisik.otf\000?\000???j?\021", '\0' , "???k?\021", '\0' , "?\220\021\000\000???\000\000\000\000???????\000?\220\021\000\000???\220\210\234?y??\000????\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000j?\021\000\000\020\021\000\210\226-\000\001\000\000\000?\220\021\000H\237>\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000?\210\234??T?" temp = fromsfd = 0 i = pt = 0x88af725 ".otf" strippedname = 0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf" tmpfile = 0x0 fullname = 0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf" archivedir = 0x0 len = checked = 116 compression = 0 wasurl = 0 nowlocal = 1 wasarchived = 0 #18 0x002ba21c in ReadSplineFont ( filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf", openflags=0) at splinefont.c:1224 No locals. #19 0x002ba309 in LoadSplineFont ( filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf", openflags=0) at splinefont.c:1297 sf = (SplineFont *) 0x0 pt = ept = tobefreed1 = 0x0 tobefreed2 = 0x0 extens = {0x3b2f3d ".sfd", 0x3aaeb8 ".pfa", 0x3aaec0 ".pfb", 0x3aae9e ".ttf", 0x3aaed6 ".otf", 0x36aa8d ".ps", 0x3aaecc ".cid", 0x3aae48 ".bin", 0x3aae3d ".dfont", 0x3b1e66 ".PFA", 0x3b1e6b ".PFB", 0x3b1e70 ".TTF", 0x3b1e75 ".OTF", 0x3b1e7a ".PS", 0x3b1e7e ".CID", 0x3b1e83 ".BIN", 0x3b1e88 ".DFONT", 0x0} #20 0x0019ad7c in ViewPostscriptFont ( filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf", openflags=0) at fontviewbase.c:1234 sf = #21 0x0810a9b4 in MenuOpen (base=0x0, mi=0x0, e=0x0) at fontview.c:1153 temp = 0x8863060 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik" file = 0x8863087 "Boisik.otf" test = fvcnt = 0 fvtest = #22 0x0819f3dc in main (argc=1, argv=0xbf9c9004) at startui.c:1191 load_prefs = 0x0 i = 5590599 recover = 2 any = 0 next_recent = -1208311152 pos = {x = 200, y = 200, width = 379, height = 319} wattrs = {mask = 590902, event_masks = 4294967293, border_width = 2, border_color = 9, background_color = 16777215, cursor = ct_pointer, window_title = 0xad6a45, icon_title = 0x8, icon = 0x4c, nodecoration = 0, positioned = 1, centered = 0, undercursor = 0, noresize = 0, restrict_input_to_me = 1, redirect_chars_to_me = 1, is_dlg = 1, not_restricted = 1, redirect_from = 0xb7faacf8, transient = 0xacdf67, utf8_window_title = 0x81bb50d "FontForge", utf8_icon_title = 0xb7faacf8 "????H???????\220??? ???\230???0???"} display = 0x0 rq = {family_name = 0x88abcd8, point_size = 12, weight = 400, style = fs_italic, utf8_family_name = 0x0} ds = ld = 0 openflags = -1208309184 doopen = 0 quit_request = 0 times = {116, 105, 109, 101, 115, 44, 99, 108, 101, 97, 114, 108, 121, 117, 44, 117, 110, 105, 102, 111, 110, 116, 0} (gdb) quit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:44:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190444.mAJ4igxb007211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #19 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-18 23:44:40 EDT --- hi, updated the packages.. I did look at the pdf that youve mentioned.. I couldnt figure how to include it though, tried a few things but got stuck with errors.. here are the packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Can you tell me how to change the changelog please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 04:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190441.mAJ4fRxX006865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-18 23:41:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ping? hi, upadated the package to remove the text errors.. I understand most of the spec file (manuals clarify everything that i do).. Im stuck on the fontconfig rules.. Thats why i asked for documentation.. I have no idea whats written in there and what ive added on given advice..(points 8 9 10) :( i havent much knowledge on Font families etc.. Any help with that? here are the updated packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec and okay, Ill start using mock.. Ill update the wishlist.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 13:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] New: fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 Summary: fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa at redhat.com, andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=324032) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324032) string "_{}[]~%@" using fkp font on gnome-terminal Description of problem: The fkp font does not display the following characters properly: - with these, the bottom part is missing: _{}[] (for example, an underscore cannot even be seen) - with these, the top part is missing: ~%@ (for example, a tilde cannot even be seen) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-5.fc8.1.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Choose the fkp font as your gnome-terminal font 2. Try typing out "_{}[]~%@" in the terminal Actual results: I've attached an image of how the string "_{}[]~%@" is displayed on the gnome-terminal. Expected results: At least the normal ascii characters should be displayed correctly using this font. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 15:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191515.mAJFFAAv030610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-11-19 10:15:09 EDT --- At what dpi? I can't reproduce it. Play with the numbers in the following command line and see which ones hit the bug for you: $ pango-view --text ? --font 'dejavu sans 8pt' --dpi 96 Also, a screenshot helps. At the end, nothing I can do about it here. Needs to be reported upstream to FreeType. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192225.mAJMPso1020655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-19 17:25:53 EDT --- you have an example of separate pdf included as %doc in the yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts As for the changelog, I'm sure Pablo would be happy to help you, if you told us precisely what your changelog problem was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:22:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192222.mAJMMu2Z014721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-19 17:22:55 EDT --- Ok, we're slowly getting there. Please remember to bump the release version each time you change you specfile. I see that your fontconfig understanding remains problematic. It's a bit difficult to help you if you do not ask specific questions, fontconfig is a complex software. I've really tried to make the fontconfig templates in http://nim.fedorapeople.org/rpm-fonts/rpm-fonts-1.8.tar.bz2 as simple as I could. What part of it do you not understand? If you want concrete examples (not abstract templates), just download the src.rpms of existing Fedora 9/10 font packages (the gfs fonts come to mind) and look at the fontconfig bits inside using file-roller. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 22:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811192258.mAJMwP3C020609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #21 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-11-19 17:58:24 EDT --- > The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :( > so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this) It's quite simple to understand, for exemple, your spec: Version: 1.1 Release: 1%{?dist} The number after "Version:" is the version one, it's given by upstream and you must not change it. So put "1.0" as it's the version of the font. The "Release:" number is a distro/package specific number, so each time you add an entry in the changelog, you increment by one this number. So currently, it should be "3%{?dist}". Also your changelog format is not correct, you have to add your email address as said in the guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs). > The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? You should add the code proposed by Nicolas in the review request of the bonveno fonts in the %prep section . > You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not > forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different > Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc) Ok, so you have to duplicate the XML code I gave you, and just change the first Old Standard to Old Standard TTF. For register this font as a serif one, add the following to the fontconfig file: serif Old Standard SFD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 04:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811200424.mAK4O1iK016702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2008-11-19 23:24:00 EDT --- Hi, Im okay with the syntax.. Understood the xmllint too.. (The tar file says output will be .xml.. mines coming .conf..).How do i decide if a font goes Dejau or serif? Thats what i dont know how to decide.. Thanks both for your clarifications and patience.. Ill upload the new packages once ive checked them (will try using mock). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-5 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20081120181355.727CB700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-5 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/EL-5 Modified Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec Added Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch Log Message: clean up fkp font, bz 472220 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch: --- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch --- diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf --- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig 2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf 2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ STARTFONT 2.1 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1 SIZE 16 75 75 -FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4 +FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4 STARTPROPERTIES 21 POINT_SIZE 160 WEIGHT 10 @@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m" AVERAGE_WIDTH 80 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859" CHARSET_ENCODING "1" -_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5." +_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7." ENDPROPERTIES CHARS 256 STARTCHAR char0 ENCODING 0 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 7C @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char1 ENCODING 1 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char2 ENCODING 2 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char3 ENCODING 3 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 8 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char4 ENCODING 4 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP 18 @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char5 ENCODING 5 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char6 ENCODING 6 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char7 ENCODING 7 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 4 4 2 2 BITMAP 60 @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char8 ENCODING 8 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char9 ENCODING 9 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 6 1 1 BITMAP 78 @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char10 ENCODING 10 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char11 ENCODING 11 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 0 0 BITMAP 0E @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char12 ENCODING 12 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 10 1 0 BITMAP FC @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char13 ENCODING 13 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 1 0 BITMAP 08 @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char14 ENCODING 14 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 11 0 -1 BITMAP 18 @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char15 ENCODING 15 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char16 ENCODING 16 -SWIDTH 480 0 [...8183 lines suppressed...] +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char238 ENCODING 238 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 10 1 0 BITMAP 38 @@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char239 ENCODING 239 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char240 ENCODING 240 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP FE @@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char241 ENCODING 241 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 7 1 1 BITMAP 30 @@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char242 ENCODING 242 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 60 @@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char243 ENCODING 243 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char244 ENCODING 244 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 13 3 -4 BITMAP 70 @@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char245 ENCODING 245 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 12 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char246 ENCODING 246 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char247 ENCODING 247 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 5 0 2 BITMAP 76 @@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char248 ENCODING 248 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 3 1 7 BITMAP 78 @@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char249 ENCODING 249 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 2 2 3 3 BITMAP C0 @@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char250 ENCODING 250 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char251 ENCODING 251 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char252 ENCODING 252 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 5 0 5 BITMAP FC @@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char253 ENCODING 253 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 5 0 5 BITMAP 78 @@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char254 ENCODING 254 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 7 1 1 BITMAP D8 @@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char255 ENCODING 255 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-5/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 2 Aug 2007 16:55:50 -0000 1.4 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 20 Nov 2008 18:13:25 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Version: 1.3 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Set of (improved) artwiz fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Source0: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source1: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source2: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 +Patch0: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2 - +%patch0 -p0 %build for lang in de en se; do @@ -88,6 +89,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-6 +- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220) + * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-5 - Rebuilt for FC6 From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-10 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20081120181355.ABD04700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/F-10 Modified Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec Added Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch Log Message: clean up fkp font, bz 472220 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch: --- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch --- diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf --- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig 2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf 2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ STARTFONT 2.1 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1 SIZE 16 75 75 -FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4 +FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4 STARTPROPERTIES 21 POINT_SIZE 160 WEIGHT 10 @@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m" AVERAGE_WIDTH 80 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859" CHARSET_ENCODING "1" -_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5." +_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7." ENDPROPERTIES CHARS 256 STARTCHAR char0 ENCODING 0 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 7C @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char1 ENCODING 1 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char2 ENCODING 2 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char3 ENCODING 3 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 8 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char4 ENCODING 4 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP 18 @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char5 ENCODING 5 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char6 ENCODING 6 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char7 ENCODING 7 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 4 4 2 2 BITMAP 60 @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char8 ENCODING 8 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char9 ENCODING 9 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 6 1 1 BITMAP 78 @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char10 ENCODING 10 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char11 ENCODING 11 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 0 0 BITMAP 0E @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char12 ENCODING 12 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 10 1 0 BITMAP FC @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char13 ENCODING 13 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 1 0 BITMAP 08 @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char14 ENCODING 14 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 11 0 -1 BITMAP 18 @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char15 ENCODING 15 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char16 ENCODING 16 -SWIDTH 480 0 [...8183 lines suppressed...] +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char238 ENCODING 238 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 10 1 0 BITMAP 38 @@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char239 ENCODING 239 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char240 ENCODING 240 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP FE @@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char241 ENCODING 241 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 7 1 1 BITMAP 30 @@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char242 ENCODING 242 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 60 @@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char243 ENCODING 243 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char244 ENCODING 244 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 13 3 -4 BITMAP 70 @@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char245 ENCODING 245 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 12 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char246 ENCODING 246 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char247 ENCODING 247 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 5 0 2 BITMAP 76 @@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char248 ENCODING 248 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 3 1 7 BITMAP 78 @@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char249 ENCODING 249 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 2 2 3 3 BITMAP C0 @@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char250 ENCODING 250 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char251 ENCODING 251 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char252 ENCODING 252 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 5 0 5 BITMAP FC @@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char253 ENCODING 253 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 5 0 5 BITMAP 78 @@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char254 ENCODING 254 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 7 1 1 BITMAP D8 @@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char255 ENCODING 255 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-10/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000 1.4 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 20 Nov 2008 18:13:25 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Version: 1.3 -Release: 5%{?dist}.1 +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Set of (improved) artwiz fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Source0: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source1: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source2: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 +Patch0: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2 - +%patch0 -p0 %build for lang in de en se; do @@ -88,6 +89,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-6 +- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220) + * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-5 - Rebuilt for FC6 From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-8 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20081120181355.F2C01700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/F-8 Modified Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec Added Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch Log Message: clean up fkp font, bz 472220 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch: --- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch --- diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf --- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig 2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf 2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ STARTFONT 2.1 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1 SIZE 16 75 75 -FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4 +FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4 STARTPROPERTIES 21 POINT_SIZE 160 WEIGHT 10 @@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m" AVERAGE_WIDTH 80 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859" CHARSET_ENCODING "1" -_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5." +_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7." ENDPROPERTIES CHARS 256 STARTCHAR char0 ENCODING 0 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 7C @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char1 ENCODING 1 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char2 ENCODING 2 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char3 ENCODING 3 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 8 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char4 ENCODING 4 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP 18 @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char5 ENCODING 5 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char6 ENCODING 6 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char7 ENCODING 7 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 4 4 2 2 BITMAP 60 @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char8 ENCODING 8 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char9 ENCODING 9 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 6 1 1 BITMAP 78 @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char10 ENCODING 10 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char11 ENCODING 11 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 0 0 BITMAP 0E @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char12 ENCODING 12 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 10 1 0 BITMAP FC @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char13 ENCODING 13 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 1 0 BITMAP 08 @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char14 ENCODING 14 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 11 0 -1 BITMAP 18 @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char15 ENCODING 15 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char16 ENCODING 16 -SWIDTH 480 0 [...8183 lines suppressed...] +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char238 ENCODING 238 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 10 1 0 BITMAP 38 @@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char239 ENCODING 239 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char240 ENCODING 240 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP FE @@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char241 ENCODING 241 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 7 1 1 BITMAP 30 @@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char242 ENCODING 242 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 60 @@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char243 ENCODING 243 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char244 ENCODING 244 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 13 3 -4 BITMAP 70 @@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char245 ENCODING 245 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 12 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char246 ENCODING 246 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char247 ENCODING 247 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 5 0 2 BITMAP 76 @@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char248 ENCODING 248 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 3 1 7 BITMAP 78 @@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char249 ENCODING 249 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 2 2 3 3 BITMAP C0 @@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char250 ENCODING 250 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char251 ENCODING 251 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char252 ENCODING 252 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 5 0 5 BITMAP FC @@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char253 ENCODING 253 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 5 0 5 BITMAP 78 @@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char254 ENCODING 254 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 7 1 1 BITMAP D8 @@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char255 ENCODING 255 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-8/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000 1.4 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 20 Nov 2008 18:13:25 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Version: 1.3 -Release: 5%{?dist}.1 +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Set of (improved) artwiz fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Source0: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source1: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source2: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 +Patch0: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2 - +%patch0 -p0 %build for lang in de en se; do @@ -88,6 +89,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-6 +- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220) + * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-5 - Rebuilt for FC6 From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 20 18:13:56 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20081120181356.81D1E700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/devel Modified Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec Added Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch Log Message: clean up fkp font, bz 472220 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch: --- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch --- diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf --- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig 2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf 2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ STARTFONT 2.1 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1 SIZE 16 75 75 -FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4 +FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4 STARTPROPERTIES 21 POINT_SIZE 160 WEIGHT 10 @@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m" AVERAGE_WIDTH 80 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859" CHARSET_ENCODING "1" -_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5." +_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7." ENDPROPERTIES CHARS 256 STARTCHAR char0 ENCODING 0 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 7C @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char1 ENCODING 1 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char2 ENCODING 2 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char3 ENCODING 3 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 8 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char4 ENCODING 4 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP 18 @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char5 ENCODING 5 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char6 ENCODING 6 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char7 ENCODING 7 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 4 4 2 2 BITMAP 60 @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char8 ENCODING 8 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char9 ENCODING 9 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 6 1 1 BITMAP 78 @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char10 ENCODING 10 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char11 ENCODING 11 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 0 0 BITMAP 0E @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char12 ENCODING 12 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 10 1 0 BITMAP FC @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char13 ENCODING 13 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 1 0 BITMAP 08 @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char14 ENCODING 14 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 11 0 -1 BITMAP 18 @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char15 ENCODING 15 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char16 ENCODING 16 -SWIDTH 480 0 [...8183 lines suppressed...] +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char238 ENCODING 238 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 10 1 0 BITMAP 38 @@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char239 ENCODING 239 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char240 ENCODING 240 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP FE @@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char241 ENCODING 241 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 7 1 1 BITMAP 30 @@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char242 ENCODING 242 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 60 @@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char243 ENCODING 243 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char244 ENCODING 244 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 13 3 -4 BITMAP 70 @@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char245 ENCODING 245 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 12 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char246 ENCODING 246 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char247 ENCODING 247 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 5 0 2 BITMAP 76 @@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char248 ENCODING 248 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 3 1 7 BITMAP 78 @@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char249 ENCODING 249 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 2 2 3 3 BITMAP C0 @@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char250 ENCODING 250 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char251 ENCODING 251 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char252 ENCODING 252 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 5 0 5 BITMAP FC @@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char253 ENCODING 253 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 5 0 5 BITMAP 78 @@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char254 ENCODING 254 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 7 1 1 BITMAP D8 @@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char255 ENCODING 255 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000 1.4 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 20 Nov 2008 18:13:26 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Version: 1.3 -Release: 5%{?dist}.1 +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Set of (improved) artwiz fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Source0: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source1: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source2: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 +Patch0: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2 - +%patch0 -p0 %build for lang in de en se; do @@ -88,6 +89,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-6 +- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220) + * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-5 - Rebuilt for FC6 From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 20 18:13:56 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-9 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20081120181356.44BC0700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/F-9 Modified Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec Added Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch Log Message: clean up fkp font, bz 472220 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch: --- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch --- diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf --- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig 2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf 2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ STARTFONT 2.1 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1 SIZE 16 75 75 -FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4 +FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4 STARTPROPERTIES 21 POINT_SIZE 160 WEIGHT 10 @@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m" AVERAGE_WIDTH 80 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859" CHARSET_ENCODING "1" -_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5." +_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7." ENDPROPERTIES CHARS 256 STARTCHAR char0 ENCODING 0 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 7C @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char1 ENCODING 1 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char2 ENCODING 2 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char3 ENCODING 3 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 8 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char4 ENCODING 4 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP 18 @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char5 ENCODING 5 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char6 ENCODING 6 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char7 ENCODING 7 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 4 4 2 2 BITMAP 60 @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char8 ENCODING 8 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char9 ENCODING 9 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 6 1 1 BITMAP 78 @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char10 ENCODING 10 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char11 ENCODING 11 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 0 0 BITMAP 0E @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char12 ENCODING 12 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 10 1 0 BITMAP FC @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char13 ENCODING 13 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 1 0 BITMAP 08 @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char14 ENCODING 14 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 11 0 -1 BITMAP 18 @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char15 ENCODING 15 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char16 ENCODING 16 -SWIDTH 480 0 [...8183 lines suppressed...] +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char238 ENCODING 238 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 10 1 0 BITMAP 38 @@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char239 ENCODING 239 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char240 ENCODING 240 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP FE @@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char241 ENCODING 241 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 7 1 1 BITMAP 30 @@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char242 ENCODING 242 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 60 @@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char243 ENCODING 243 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char244 ENCODING 244 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 13 3 -4 BITMAP 70 @@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char245 ENCODING 245 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 12 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char246 ENCODING 246 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char247 ENCODING 247 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 5 0 2 BITMAP 76 @@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char248 ENCODING 248 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 3 1 7 BITMAP 78 @@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char249 ENCODING 249 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 2 2 3 3 BITMAP C0 @@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char250 ENCODING 250 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char251 ENCODING 251 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char252 ENCODING 252 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 5 0 5 BITMAP FC @@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char253 ENCODING 253 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 5 0 5 BITMAP 78 @@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char254 ENCODING 254 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 7 1 1 BITMAP D8 @@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char255 ENCODING 255 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-9/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000 1.4 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 20 Nov 2008 18:13:26 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Version: 1.3 -Release: 5%{?dist}.1 +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Set of (improved) artwiz fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Source0: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source1: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source2: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 +Patch0: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2 - +%patch0 -p0 %build for lang in de en se; do @@ -88,6 +89,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-6 +- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220) + * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-5 - Rebuilt for FC6 From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-4 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20081120181355.514EA700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-4 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/EL-4 Modified Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec Added Files: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch Log Message: clean up fkp font, bz 472220 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch: --- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch --- diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf --- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig 2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf 2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ STARTFONT 2.1 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1 SIZE 16 75 75 -FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4 +FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4 STARTPROPERTIES 21 POINT_SIZE 160 WEIGHT 10 @@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m" AVERAGE_WIDTH 80 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859" CHARSET_ENCODING "1" -_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5." +_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7." ENDPROPERTIES CHARS 256 STARTCHAR char0 ENCODING 0 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 7C @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char1 ENCODING 1 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char2 ENCODING 2 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char3 ENCODING 3 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 8 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char4 ENCODING 4 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP 18 @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char5 ENCODING 5 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char6 ENCODING 6 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char7 ENCODING 7 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 4 4 2 2 BITMAP 60 @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char8 ENCODING 8 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char9 ENCODING 9 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 6 1 1 BITMAP 78 @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char10 ENCODING 10 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 16 0 -4 BITMAP FF @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char11 ENCODING 11 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 0 0 BITMAP 0E @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char12 ENCODING 12 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 10 1 0 BITMAP FC @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char13 ENCODING 13 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 10 1 0 BITMAP 08 @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char14 ENCODING 14 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 11 0 -1 BITMAP 18 @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char15 ENCODING 15 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char16 ENCODING 16 -SWIDTH 480 0 [...8183 lines suppressed...] +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 9 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char238 ENCODING 238 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 10 1 0 BITMAP 38 @@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char239 ENCODING 239 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 3C @@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char240 ENCODING 240 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 7 0 1 BITMAP FE @@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char241 ENCODING 241 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 7 1 1 BITMAP 30 @@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char242 ENCODING 242 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 60 @@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char243 ENCODING 243 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 9 1 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char244 ENCODING 244 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 13 3 -4 BITMAP 70 @@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char245 ENCODING 245 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 12 0 0 BITMAP 18 @@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char246 ENCODING 246 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 9 0 0 BITMAP 66 @@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char247 ENCODING 247 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 7 5 0 2 BITMAP 76 @@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char248 ENCODING 248 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 3 1 7 BITMAP 78 @@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char249 ENCODING 249 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 2 2 3 3 BITMAP C0 @@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char250 ENCODING 250 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char251 ENCODING 251 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 8 10 0 0 BITMAP 03 @@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char252 ENCODING 252 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 6 5 0 5 BITMAP FC @@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char253 ENCODING 253 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 5 0 5 BITMAP 78 @@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char254 ENCODING 254 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 5 7 1 1 BITMAP D8 @@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8 ENDCHAR STARTCHAR char255 ENCODING 255 -SWIDTH 480 0 -DWIDTH 8 0 +SWIDTH 540 0 +DWIDTH 9 0 BBX 0 0 0 0 BITMAP ENDCHAR Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-4/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 2 Aug 2007 16:55:48 -0000 1.2 +++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 20 Nov 2008 18:13:24 -0000 1.3 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Version: 1.3 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Set of (improved) artwiz fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Source0: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source1: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 Source2: http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2 +Patch0: artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2 - +%patch0 -p0 %build for lang in de en se; do @@ -88,6 +89,16 @@ %changelog +* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-6 +- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220) + +* Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.3-5 +- Rebuilt for FC6 + +* Tue Feb 14 2006 Andreas Bierfert +1.3-4 +Rebuild for Fedora Extras 5 + * Sat Dec 31 2005 Andreas Bierfert 1.3-3 - apply fixes from Dawid Gajownik From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201815.mAKIFGmB003159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-20 13:15:15 EDT --- This wasn't a gnome-terminal bug, the fkp font had some incomplete characters (and in the case of an underscore, no character at all). I've fixed this up, and updates should be hitting all branches shortly. (I ended up packaging up the tool I used to make the edits, since it greatly simplified the process: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 ) Thanks for the report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:30:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201830.mAKIUT59011105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-20 13:30:28 EDT --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201830.mAKIUP1Z011079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-20 13:30:25 EDT --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:30:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201830.mAKIUM2c005955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-20 13:30:21 EDT --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:39:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201839.mAKIdZdL007492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 18:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201855.mAKItMkU010899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-20 13:55:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (The tar file says > output will be .xml.. mines coming .conf..). Yes, that was a mistake in the documentation, now fixed, thanks for reporting >How do i decide if a font goes > Dejau or serif? Thats what i dont know how to decide.. DejaVu Sans is a font name, serif is a generic name. Is the tar documentation not clear enough on where you should use generics and where you should use font names? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:45:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:45:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468598] How to add fonts? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201945.mAKJjh3E020955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468598 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 20 19:46:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468598] How to add fonts? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811201946.mAKJkNop021162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468598 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |h.pillay at ieee.org --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-20 14:46:22 EDT --- *** Bug 471891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 11:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211100.mALB0fWF022853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 06:00:40 EDT --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 11:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:02:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211102.mALB20Sf017383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-21 06:01:59 EDT --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 21 11:00:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811211100.mALB0iTr016904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From farnold at fedoraproject.org Fri Nov 21 13:15:09 2008 From: farnold at fedoraproject.org (Frank Arnold) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 linux-libertine-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20081121131509.264CE700FA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: farnold Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17870 Modified Files: .cvsignore linux-libertine-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Fri Nov 21 2008 Frank Arnold 4.1.8-1 - Updated to 4.1.8 - Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- .cvsignore 3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000 1.8 +++ .cvsignore 21 Nov 2008 13:14:37 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz +LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz Index: linux-libertine-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/linux-libertine-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- linux-libertine-fonts.spec 3 Sep 2008 21:23:24 -0000 1.9 +++ linux-libertine-fonts.spec 21 Nov 2008 13:14:37 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,18 +1,20 @@ %define archivename LinLibertineSRC %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/linux-libertine + Name: linux-libertine-fonts -Version: 2.7.9 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 4.1.8 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Linux Libertine Open Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions or OFL URL: http://linuxlibertine.sf.net -Source: http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-2.7.tgz +Source: http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-%{version}.tgz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge + %description The Linux Libertine Open Fonts are a TrueType font family for practical use in documents. They were created to provide a free alternative to @@ -27,9 +29,18 @@ %build fontforge -script "-" *.sfd < 4.1.8-1 +- Updated to 4.1.8 +- Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt + * Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.7.9-2 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 21 Nov 2008 13:14:38 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -9a34ee20358d3c5aae7d46ed15e43d73 LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz +e7357378dc803cf6a2823cae032caf24 LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz From farnold at fedoraproject.org Fri Nov 21 13:44:24 2008 From: farnold at fedoraproject.org (Frank Arnold) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 linux-libertine-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20081121134425.051A5700FA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: farnold Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26584 Modified Files: .cvsignore linux-libertine-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Fri Nov 21 2008 Frank Arnold 4.1.8-1 - Updated to 4.1.8 - Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- .cvsignore 3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000 1.8 +++ .cvsignore 21 Nov 2008 13:43:53 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz +LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz Index: linux-libertine-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10/linux-libertine-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- linux-libertine-fonts.spec 3 Sep 2008 21:23:24 -0000 1.9 +++ linux-libertine-fonts.spec 21 Nov 2008 13:43:53 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,18 +1,20 @@ %define archivename LinLibertineSRC %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/linux-libertine + Name: linux-libertine-fonts -Version: 2.7.9 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 4.1.8 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Linux Libertine Open Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions or OFL URL: http://linuxlibertine.sf.net -Source: http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-2.7.tgz +Source: http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-%{version}.tgz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge + %description The Linux Libertine Open Fonts are a TrueType font family for practical use in documents. They were created to provide a free alternative to @@ -27,9 +29,18 @@ %build fontforge -script "-" *.sfd < 4.1.8-1 +- Updated to 4.1.8 +- Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt + * Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.7.9-2 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 21 Nov 2008 13:43:53 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -9a34ee20358d3c5aae7d46ed15e43d73 LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz +e7357378dc803cf6a2823cae032caf24 LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 09:33:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220933.mAM9XG5B016076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-11-22 04:33:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324401) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324401) Bad rendering at 10pt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 09:32:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811220932.mAM9Wkpl016024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-11-22 04:32:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324400) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324400) Bad rendering at 8pt Here are screenshots from gnome charmap at 8 and 10 pt. I was unable to reproduce it with pango-view too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 10:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221040.mAMAe2gR027254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Google Droid fonts |Google Droid fonts |specification |licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 10:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] New: Google Droid fonts specification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Google Droid fonts specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 Summary: Google Droid fonts specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: distribution AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 182235,446451 Classification: Fedora Google has released for quite a long time a high-quality set of "Droid" fonts as part of the Android platform. They have a high-visibility for average users because of all the Google press barrage. The-Eula-protected Android SDK has been superseded lately by a public source repository. http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts The NOTICE file in this directory is a Fedora-friendly Apache License. However the font metadata embedded in the files claims: ? This font software is the valuable property of Ascender Corporation and/or its suppliers and its use by you is covered under the terms of a license agreement. This font software is licensed to you by Ascender Corporation for your personal or business use on up to five personal computers. You may not use this font software on more than five personal computers unless you have obtained a license from Ascender to do so. Except as specifically permitted by the license, you may not copy this font software. If you have any questions, please review the license agreement you received with this font software, and/or contact Ascender Corporation. Contact Information: Ascender Corporation Web http://www.ascendercorp.com/ ? But Ascender will redirect you to Google, which is as usual silent. To check it, 1. download a raw TTF file 2. open it in Fontforge 3. -> Elements 4. -> Font Info 5. -> TTF Name 6. -> License (License URL is fun too) This has so far discouraged Fedora and Debian packaging, even though wild Droid packages have started to appear, people are incorporating Droid material in derivatives, and one of those may eventually make it in the repo without raising Legal bells. Thus I have two questions: 1. is the legal situation clear enough to allow Fedora packaging as is 2. since Google won't step down to replying to solicitations by mere mortals, can an official Fedora or Red Hat enquiry be made to clarify the situation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 11:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472637] New: libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637 Summary: libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Starting fontforge from the CLI results in $ fontforge DroidSans.ttf Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 02:38 GMT 27-Sep-2008. Library based on sources from 15:05 GMT 25-Sep-2008. libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sat Nov 22 11:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 561907] Show explicit font coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081122111831.7CBA523F510@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907 gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sat Nov 22 11:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 561908] New: Allow printing of font glyph tables Message-ID: If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908 gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x Summary: Allow printing of font glyph tables Product: gucharmap Version: 2.24.x Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: general AssignedTo: gucharmap-maint at gnome.bugs ReportedBy: Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net QAContact: gucharmap-maint at gnome.bugs CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com GNOME version: Unspecified GNOME milestone: Unspecified gucharmap should allow direct printing or export as pdf of the glyph tables of a font, so they can be used as paper reference or in other contexts where keeping a gucharmap window open is not possible -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 11:23:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221123.mAMBNRf5006712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #10 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-11-22 06:23:26 EDT --- I've played with font setting in gnome appearance properties, it now renders properly for 10 pt, and I can't find setting with wrong rendering at that size. But it renders without the tail for 8 pt with Medium and Full hinting. Resolution is set to 86 dpi in that dialog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 12:11:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221211.mAMCBB0N010050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-22 07:11:10 EDT --- 86dpi is borderline for good text rendering. Microsoft has been targetting 100dpi for example for at least a decade in windows (reduced to 96 to give margins to shoddy hardware manufacturers). If your hardware is really 86dpi (as in actual pixels per inch), there's not much the best font can do (screens sold to computer gamers have often this kind of low pixel density but gamers are not known for reading lots of text) In paper print, for example, standard is 600dpi and 150 is already a bad-quality magazine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 12:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221218.mAMCIEvT015513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #12 from Ben Laenen 2008-11-22 07:18:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > 86dpi is borderline for good text rendering. Microsoft has been targetting > 100dpi for example for at least a decade in windows (reduced to 96 to give > margins to shoddy hardware manufacturers). > > If your hardware is really 86dpi (as in actual pixels per inch), there's not > much the best font can do (screens sold to computer gamers have often this kind > of low pixel density but gamers are not known for reading lots of text) > > In paper print, for example, standard is 600dpi and 150 is already a > bad-quality magazine. Low resolution or not, at these sizes there's no reason the autohinter shouldn't be able to render the tail correctly. It manages to do it with ? just fine as can be seen on the screenshots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sat Nov 22 12:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 561908] Allow printing of font glyph tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081122122221.3123923F4F9@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908 gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x Christian Persch (IRC: chpe) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Comment #1 from Christian Persch (IRC: chpe) 2008-11-22 12:22 UTC ------- Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 162370 *** -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sat Nov 22 12:56:14 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 162370] Print the table! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081122125614.7B63123F4F9@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com ------- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-22 12:56 UTC ------- Note that bug #561908 is slightly different -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:43:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221643.mAMGhFe6021697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:43:13 EDT --- apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 16:56:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221656.mAMGuY46026008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:56:33 EDT --- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 17:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811221700.mAMH005o030844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 11:59:59 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 21:05:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472637] libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811222105.mAML5jCj001495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-11-22 16:05:44 EDT --- Which fontforge version? This looks like a newer one than rawhide? output of: rpm -q libpng rpm -V libpng And where can I find the DroidSans.ttf ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 21:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472637] libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811222113.mAMLDxn3002400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-22 16:13:58 EDT --- $ rpm -q libpng libpng-2:1.2.31-2.fc10.x86_64 $ rpm -V libpng $ rpm -q fontforge fontforge-20080927-1.fc11.x86_64 $ rpm -V fontforge In F11 rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68830 http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 22 22:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811222233.mAMMXBuu013469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 Daniel Berlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dannyb at google.com --- Comment #1 from Daniel Berlin 2008-11-22 17:33:10 EDT --- Not sure why you think "Google won't step down to replying to solicitations by mere mortals". Every query i'm aware of about this situation has been answered (some by me personally). If you sent a query that was not answered, please privately provide me details so i can make sure it doesn't happen again. In any case, the licensing info embedded on the fonts was simply wrong when it was pushed out, and is being corrected. They are licensed under Apache 2.0. The fixed TTF files should be pushed to GIT soon, if they aren't there already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 08:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811230815.mAN8FhTH026866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-23 03:15:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) . > Every query i'm aware of about this situation has been answered (some by me > personally). Thank you for the answer. I guess is was my frustration speaking, the Droid fonts have been announced a long time ago, and the situation is still not fixed > In any case, the licensing info embedded on the fonts was simply wrong when it > was pushed out, and is being corrected. > They are licensed under Apache 2.0. > The fixed TTF files should be pushed to GIT soon, if they aren't there already. They aren't today. I don't know if we can touch them at all before they are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 11:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231100.mANB0LfU022090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-23 06:00:20 EDT --- BTW, I hadn't noticed but it seems even wikipedia is aware of the problem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droid_(font)#License_controversy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 23 11:05:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811231105.mANB5YT0023140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-23 06:05:32 EDT --- P.P.S. A nice versionned tarball or zip with a detached license text on an official site that does not require digging in git to find the fonts would be appreciated Are the fonts at version 1.0.107, or will the next font dump use the same versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 24 05:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:47:22 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240547.mAO5lM6s004889@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #348692|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #349707| |review?(roc at ocallahan.org) Flag| | --- Comment #3 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-23 21:47:11 PST --- Created an attachment (id=349707) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=349707) src:url() v1.0 This version works even with older versions of fontconfig. A build is available here: https://build.mozilla.org/tryserver-builds/2008-11-23_20:06-ktomlinson at mozilla.com-try-afd5aedcbcf/ Note that this doesn't support src:local(), which I intend to do using a different implementation of gfxFcFontEntry. (In reply to comment #2) > A reference to the nsIStreamLoader is held to keep the font data in memory > until the font entry is destroyed. The nsIStreamLoader* arg could be an nsISupports*, I assume. Let me know if you prefer that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 24 08:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:58:00 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811240858.mAO8w0dN001988@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #4 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-11-24 00:57:56 PST --- Basically looks great to me. + * Ownership of the returned gfxFontEntry is passed to the caller, + * who must either AddRef() or delete. Should these functions be changed (in a separate patch) to return already_AddRefed? + // Helper function to be called from InitPattern() to change the pattern + // so that it matches the CSS style descriptors and so gets properly + // sorted in font selection. This also avoids synthetic style effects + // being added by the renderer when the style of the font itself does not + // match the descriptor provided by the author. + void ConformPattern(); I'd like a better name here. Perhaps "AdjustPatternToCSS"? + * gfxWebFcFontEntry: I think gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry would be a better name. + FcPatternGetInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, 0, &fontWeight); + int cssWeight = gfxFontconfigUtils::FcWeightForBaseWeight(mWeight); + if (cssWeight != fontWeight) { + FcPatternDel(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT); + FcPatternAddInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, cssWeight); + } Is there a reason not to do Del/Add unconditionally here? Ditto for FC_SLANT and setting FC_FULLNAME. + PRUint8 savedStyle = aStyle.style; + aStyle.style = FONT_STYLE_NORMAL; + fontEntry = static_cast + (mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(utf16Family, aStyle, needsBold)); + aStyle.style = savedStyle; This is yuck. Can we make aStyle a const reference and just use a temporary copy here? + // User fonts are already filtered by slant (but not size) in + // mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(). Aren't you working around that by retrying FindFontEntry with FONT_STYLE_NORMAL, in FindFontPattern? + if (!(list->Contains(fontName))) { Lose unnecessary parens. +PRBool +gfxPlatformGtk::IsFontFormatSupported(nsIURI *aFontURI, PRUint32 aFormatFlags) +{ + // reject based on format flags + if (aFormatFlags & (gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_EOT | gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_SVG)) { + return PR_FALSE; + } Can we avoid blacklisting and write this code to just return true for the formats we know we can support? jdaggett, do you want to review this too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 18:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811241819.mAOIJ6Bs004684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-24 13:19:05 EDT --- I've spoken with Chris DiBona at Google on this issue, and he assures me that this is simply an accidental oversight. We should see an updated font drop in the next week (this week is an holiday week in the US, which may temporarily delay it). Nicolas, we'll just wait for this new drop to package these up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From thb at openoffice.org Mon Nov 24 20:56:06 2008 From: thb at openoffice.org (thb at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Nov 2008 20:56:06 -0000 Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081124205606.17864.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User thb changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 3.1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from thb at openoffice.org Mon Nov 24 20:56:06 +0000 2008 ------- Awesome work, I love it. Canvas changes verified. @hdu: could you please have a quick look at the vcl changes (that look good in general, but OutputDevice::GetLayoutData should rather skip the mtf action generation). Ok with the 3.1 target? The remainder is just merged from cairosource01 and thusly irrelevant. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 24 21:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:36:05 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242136.mAOLa5Uc027541@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #5 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-24 13:35:53 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > + * Ownership of the returned gfxFontEntry is passed to the caller, > + * who must either AddRef() or delete. > > Should these functions be changed (in a separate patch) to return > already_AddRefed? I think so. I find it confusing to pass around references to objects that have a reference count of zero. > > + // Helper function to be called from InitPattern() to change the pattern > + // so that it matches the CSS style descriptors and so gets properly > + // sorted in font selection. This also avoids synthetic style effects > + // being added by the renderer when the style of the font itself does not > + // match the descriptor provided by the author. > + void ConformPattern(); > > I'd like a better name here. Perhaps "AdjustPatternToCSS"? That sounds fine. > + * gfxWebFcFontEntry: > > I think gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry would be a better name. gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry has the advantage of indicating that the font has already been downloaded. And I guess src:local() faces would really be web fonts too (but not downloaded fonts) because the family and style properties are obtained from the web (even if the font data is not). > > + FcPatternGetInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, 0, &fontWeight); > + int cssWeight = gfxFontconfigUtils::FcWeightForBaseWeight(mWeight); > + if (cssWeight != fontWeight) { > + FcPatternDel(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT); > + FcPatternAddInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, cssWeight); > + } > > Is there a reason not to do Del/Add unconditionally here? Ditto for FC_SLANT > and setting FC_FULLNAME. I'd like to leave these conditional. For FC_WEIGHT, the only reason is to avoid the reallocation of memory for the property value and the memmove back and forth of all the trailing properties and pointers to their values. The weight is expected to often (maybe usually) already have the right value. For FC_SLANT, there is the additional benefit of retaining the distinction between italic and oblique where possible. For FC_FULLNAME, if there is an existing value, then that is the best value as it comes from the OpenType name table. Appending style to family should only be a fallback. > + PRUint8 savedStyle = aStyle.style; > + aStyle.style = FONT_STYLE_NORMAL; > + fontEntry = static_cast > + (mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(utf16Family, aStyle, needsBold)); > + aStyle.style = savedStyle; > > This is yuck. Can we make aStyle a const reference and just use a temporary > copy here? Yes, this is yuck. Constructing a gfxFontStyle always requires a memory allocation because it has an nsCString member, which is always forced to be non-empty, even though it doesn't get used here. What I think would look nicest here would be to change the FindFontPattern() gfxFontStyle argument to thebes style and weight arguments. That would avoid the new gfxFontStyle allocation in SortPreferredFonts, and confine all the gfxFontStyle yuck to within FindFontPattern. Then modifying gfxUserFontSet::FindFontEntry arguments so that only the information actually used needs to be provided, and/or modifying gfxFontStyle so that the nsCString member can be empty, can be considered as future improvements. > > + // User fonts are already filtered by slant (but not size) in > + // mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(). > > Aren't you working around that by retrying FindFontEntry with > FONT_STYLE_NORMAL, in FindFontPattern? SlantIsAcceptable() also accepts faces with FONT_STYLE_NORMAL/FC_SLANT_ROMAN when the requested style is not normal/roman (as an oblique can be synthesized from normal/roman). > +PRBool > +gfxPlatformGtk::IsFontFormatSupported(nsIURI *aFontURI, PRUint32 aFormatFlags) > +{ > + // reject based on format flags > + if (aFormatFlags & (gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_EOT | > gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_SVG)) { > + return PR_FALSE; > + } > > Can we avoid blacklisting and write this code to just return true for the > formats we know we can support? Maybe. The editor's draft http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-fonts/#font-reference and the 2002 working draft http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-webfonts/#src currently suggests returning true only for formats we know we can support: "The user agent will recognize the name of font formats that it supports, and will avoid downloading fonts in formats that it does not recognize." This code was copied from the code for Mac and Windows, so I suggest considering making that change to all platforms in a separate bug, probably bug 465452. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Nov 24 21:40:25 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:40:25 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242140.mAOLePxK030055@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #6 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-11-24 13:40:16 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Should these functions be changed (in a separate patch) to return > > already_AddRefed? > > I think so. I find it confusing to pass around references to objects that > have a reference count of zero. Please file a bug on that. > I'd like to leave these conditional. > > For FC_WEIGHT, the only reason is to avoid the reallocation of memory for the > property value and the memmove back and forth of all the trailing properties > and pointers to their values. The weight is expected to often (maybe usually) > already have the right value. > > For FC_SLANT, there is the additional benefit of retaining the distinction > between italic and oblique where possible. > > For FC_FULLNAME, if there is an existing value, then that is the best value as > it comes from the OpenType name table. Appending style to family should only > be a fallback. OK. > > + PRUint8 savedStyle = aStyle.style; > > + aStyle.style = FONT_STYLE_NORMAL; > > + fontEntry = static_cast > > + (mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(utf16Family, aStyle, needsBold)); > > + aStyle.style = savedStyle; > > > > This is yuck. Can we make aStyle a const reference and just use a temporary > > copy here? > > Yes, this is yuck. > > Constructing a gfxFontStyle always requires a memory allocation because it has > an nsCString member, which is always forced to be non-empty, even though it > doesn't get used here. > > What I think would look nicest here would be to change the FindFontPattern() > gfxFontStyle argument to thebes style and weight arguments. That would avoid > the new gfxFontStyle allocation in SortPreferredFonts, and confine all the > gfxFontStyle yuck to within FindFontPattern. > > Then modifying gfxUserFontSet::FindFontEntry arguments so that only the > information actually used needs to be provided, and/or modifying gfxFontStyle > so that the nsCString member can be empty, can be considered as future > improvements. OK > > + // User fonts are already filtered by slant (but not size) in > > + // mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(). > > > > Aren't you working around that by retrying FindFontEntry with > > FONT_STYLE_NORMAL, in FindFontPattern? > > SlantIsAcceptable() also accepts faces with FONT_STYLE_NORMAL/FC_SLANT_ROMAN > when the requested style is not normal/roman (as an oblique can be synthesized > from normal/roman). OK > This code was copied from the code for Mac and Windows, so I suggest > considering making that change to all platforms in a separate bug, probably > bug 465452. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 22:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242225.mAOMPB73020930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #8 from steve 2008-11-24 17:25:10 EDT --- Hi Tom, I tried the updated font today, but am sorry to report that it seems like you may have missed the "[" and "]" characters when submitting your fix. All the other reported characters (ie: ~_@%{}) look neat !! Thanks for the work ! In addition to this I noticed that the back-tick character '`' ...shows up somewhat like a really small straight dash instead of a slanted tick. Fixing this too would be much appreciated ! thanks a lot, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 22:35:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242235.mAOMZtnp029023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-11-24 17:35:54 EDT --- So, I'm not sure what you're expecting [] to look like in the fkp font, but the font design doesn't include the horizontal line ends, that's not an oversight, it is intentional. I think that the back-tick is intentionally a high, short horizontal line, it doesn't show the same sort of clipping that some of the other characters had. It would be possible to perhaps make a derived font that changed these items, but it wouldn't really be fkp anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 22:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472835] New: Add VAG Rounded aliases to Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add VAG Rounded aliases to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835 Summary: Add VAG Rounded aliases to Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mgopen-fonts AssignedTo: paskalis at di.uoa.gr ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: paskalis at di.uoa.gr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: According to discussions on the Open Font Library List Modata is a derivative of the well-known VAG Rounded font Volkwagen AG put in the public domain when it had no longer use of it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAG_Rounded http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openfontlibrary/2008-November/001559.html Therefore, the Fedora package shipping Modata should include aliasing rules that tell fontconfig to use Modata when it encounters a document or web page using VAG Rounded or one of its derivatives (it seems VAG rounded was good enough every proprietary foundry jumped on it when it was PDed and created their own version). Common font names used by VAG derivatives are "VAG Rounded Std" "VAG Rundschrift" "VAG Rounded" This can be done at the time the package is converted to new F11 packaging guidelines if FPC approves http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 23:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811242316.mAONGUsa003815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 18:16:28 EDT --- Probably be good to add i18n-team too to initialcc next time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Nov 25 00:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:53:54 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250053.mAP0rsmr006452@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #7 from John Daggett (:jtd) 2008-11-24 16:53:43 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > > A reference to the nsIStreamLoader is held to keep the font data in memory > > until the font entry is destroyed. > > The nsIStreamLoader* arg could be an nsISupports*, I assume. > Let me know if you prefer that. I think that seems better, it would eliminate the need for gfx to link against necko, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Nov 25 01:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:18:36 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250118.mAP1IavK011600@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #8 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-24 17:18:31 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > I think that seems better, it would eliminate the need for gfx to link against > necko, right? Thanks to XPCOM (or virtual functions) gfx doesn't need to link against necko. It would just save including nsIStreamLoader.h in gfxPangoFonts.h and adding necko to the include path for gfx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Nov 25 01:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:19:12 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250119.mAP1JBY5012086@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #9 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-24 17:19:07 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) > It would just save including nsIStreamLoader.h in gfxPangoFonts.h and Sorry, in gfxPangoFonts.cpp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Nov 25 03:35:06 2008 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.81, 1.82 pango.spec, 1.147, 1.148 sources, 1.81, 1.82 Message-ID: <20081125033506.DFF8170105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19241 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.22.3 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.81 retrieving revision 1.82 diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82 --- .cvsignore 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 +++ .cvsignore 25 Nov 2008 03:34:36 -0000 1.82 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2 +pango-1.22.3.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.147 retrieving revision 1.148 diff -u -r1.147 -r1.148 --- pango.spec 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.147 +++ pango.spec 25 Nov 2008 03:34:36 -0000 1.148 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.22.1 +Version: 1.22.3 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ %changelog +* Mon Nov 24 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.3-1 +- Update to 1.22.3 + * Mon Oct 20 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.1-1 - Update to 1.22.1 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.81 retrieving revision 1.82 diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82 --- sources 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 +++ sources 25 Nov 2008 03:34:36 -0000 1.82 @@ -1 +1 @@ -654ad7e8d414d36a0e0406935d32c3ab pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2 +8909ddbde2f2e91eb0c79202e1051a84 pango-1.22.3.tar.bz2 From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Nov 25 03:41:12 2008 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.148,1.149 sources,1.82,1.83 Message-ID: <20081125034112.E0FC170105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20387 Modified Files: pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.22.3 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.148 retrieving revision 1.149 diff -u -r1.148 -r1.149 --- pango.spec 12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000 1.148 +++ pango.spec 25 Nov 2008 03:40:42 -0000 1.149 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.22.2 +Version: 1.22.3 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -40,11 +40,20 @@ Patch0: pango-1.21.4-lib64.patch %description -Pango is a system for layout and rendering of internationalized text. +Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis +on internationalization. Pango can be used anywhere that text layout is needed, +though most of the work on Pango so far has been done in the context of the +GTK+ widget toolkit. Pango forms the core of text and font handling for +GTK+. +Pango is designed to be modular; the core Pango layout engine can be used +with different font backends. + +The integration of Pango with Cairo provides a complete solution with high +quality text handling and graphics rendering. %package devel -Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text +Summary: Development files for pango Group: Development/Libraries Requires: pango = %{version}-%{release} Requires: libXrender-devel @@ -58,12 +67,9 @@ Requires: pkgconfig %description devel -The pango-devel package includes the header files and developer docs +The pango-devel package includes the header files and developer documentation for the pango package. -Install pango-devel if you want to develop programs which will use -pango. - %prep %setup -q -n pango-%{version} @@ -218,6 +224,9 @@ %changelog +* Mon Nov 24 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.3-1 +- U[date to 1.22.3 + * Wed Nov 12 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.2-1 - Update to 1.22.2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.82 retrieving revision 1.83 diff -u -r1.82 -r1.83 --- sources 12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000 1.82 +++ sources 25 Nov 2008 03:40:42 -0000 1.83 @@ -1 +1 @@ -0d4dc87f9b523e9030afccb2d05afe0b pango-1.22.2.tar.bz2 +8909ddbde2f2e91eb0c79202e1051a84 pango-1.22.3.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:24:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251324.mAPDOYpG013071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #324611|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 13:24:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251324.mAPDO8u6012986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835 --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis 2008-11-25 08:24:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324611) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324611) fontconfig file for modata Is such a fontconfig file ok for the modata alias? I am not very familiar with fontconfig syntax, so I copy/pasted from the relevant DejaVu fontconfig settings. As for the new packaging guidelines I will wait for the FPC approval before proceeding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org Tue Nov 25 18:27:28 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org (bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:27:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18546] Can't load some non-latin fonts with pango backend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081125182728.DE81613AE211@gamma.macosforge.org> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18546 ------- Comment #14 from awilliamson at mandriva.com 2008-11-25 10:27 PDT ------- "Yes, the 'FreeType backend' now contains the latest Pango code as well and the 'Pango backend' is considered obsolete at the moment. We do need to make this clearer." Can you give me some more info on this? How are we supposed to use / test the latest Pango stuff, then? The 'FreeType backend' seems to build without any Pango build dependencies... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 19:39:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811251939.mAPJdtZA025273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-25 14:39:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is such a fontconfig file ok for the modata alias? I am not very familiar with > fontconfig syntax, so I copy/pasted from the relevant DejaVu fontconfig > settings. You have simpler and cleaner fontconfig templates in the fontpackages stuff referenced on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation Unlike the spec part, they are not F11-oriented and should work as-is with current packaging guidelines (you want to look at the fontconfig template named substitution-font-template.conf) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Nov 26 06:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:05:26 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260605.mAQ65Qus016169@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug 70132 depends on bug 457821, which changed state. Bug 457821 Summary: need to rebuild user font set objects when style sheets are disabled/enabled or rules are modified/added/removed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457821 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:09:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 360901] Smaller fonts in X in F8T3 after login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260809.mAQ89eMC013246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360901 --- Comment #12 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 03:09:40 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 370441] subpixel on by default? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260813.mAQ8DoGr014799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370441 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 03:13:49 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 08:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391191] wrong verify options in rpm package for fonts.dir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260835.mAQ8ZJXC015644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391191 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 03:35:18 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From meywer at openoffice.org Wed Nov 26 09:48:49 2008 From: meywer at openoffice.org (meywer at openoffice.org) Date: 26 Nov 2008 09:48:49 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081126094849.26858.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 ------- Additional comments from meywer at openoffice.org Wed Nov 26 09:48:49 +0000 2008 ------- Just have seen, that issue 74754 is fixed (even I don't know which way). So couldn't be solved this problem too? btw. I really don't understand, how it can happen, that in OO AND pdf there are shown characters, which in ps and print are replaced by a little empty box. E.g. character unicode hex2012 in font Arial on a linux-system with installed M$-fonts. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:48:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432572] xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi package corrupts fonts in grace, lesstif In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260948.mAQ9m60A015146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432572 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 04:48:05 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 09:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434647] X server segfaults in libXfont fs_cleanup_bfont() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260955.mAQ9tUgi017809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434647 --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 04:55:29 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 10:04:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436610] 'yum remove glibc.ppc64' wants to remove ppc32 packages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261004.mAQA4FqW021012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436610 --- Comment #11 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:04:14 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 10:34:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444281] Provides: freetype2-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261034.mAQAYpAZ032678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:34:50 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 10:48:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261048.mAQAm8DW029537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #324611|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 00:53:31 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #4 from Sarantis Paskalis 2008-11-26 05:48:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324701) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324701) modata fontconfig Could you please check the attached fontconfig configuration (this is modata specific). I can't see how to clean it up further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 10:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450980] Unable to install pango-devel for i386 and x86_64 at the same time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261051.mAQApZ1K030735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450980 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:51:33 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 13:12:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 387491] =?utf-8?q?_=C3=B8_character_is_wrong_in_?= "nimbus sans l condensed" at size 20 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261312.mAQDCC2r006698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387491 Noura Elhawary changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nelhawar at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Noura Elhawary 2008-11-26 08:12:11 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 13:16:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:16:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 370441] subpixel on by default? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261316.mAQDGCCf030395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370441 Dan Winship changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #2 from Dan Winship 2008-11-26 08:16:11 EDT --- gdm appears to use grayscale smoothing in F10. I don't know what the graphical boot screen uses because I don't have a graphical-boot-supported graphics card. The installer is still definitely broken. (I am assuming that this the installer is not *deliberately* setting the font smoothing mode wrong though, but rather, it's just inheriting a broken default from somewhere.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 13:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 387491] =?utf-8?q?_=C3=B8_character_is_wrong_in_?= "nimbus sans l condensed" at size 20 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261340.mAQDeWR4013842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387491 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede 2008-11-26 08:40:31 EDT --- This still happens in F-10, changing version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 19:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261913.mAQJDk02009933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley 2008-11-26 14:13:45 EDT --- Fixing version to align with rawhide again. Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 19:13:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261913.mAQJDhlj009874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 00:46:48 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley 2008-11-26 14:13:42 EDT --- Fixing version to align with rawhide again. Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 19:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472637] libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261913.mAQJDjHr009916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 00:47:01 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley 2008-11-26 14:13:44 EDT --- Fixing version to align with rawhide again. Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Nov 26 19:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:45:07 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811261945.mAQJj72c027514@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #10 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2008-11-26 11:44:57 PST --- There's a tiny bit of updating needed after bug 457821 landed: * you'll want to adjust the reftest.list for additional reftests that landed * you'll want to add the assertion to your UpdateFontList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 01:37:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270137.mAR1b1vI012536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-26 20:37:00 EDT --- Not sure if I tested well enough, or what happened, but this is back in f10-final unfortunately. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 01:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270145.mAR1jsSE028627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:46:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270246.mAR2kurj007249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-26 21:46:55 EDT --- Yeah my bad I retested anaconda-11.4.1.57-1 and it was broken too. Actually testing more I realise this is not a new bug: it affects Chinese fonts in F8 and F9 anaconda too. Now in F10 Chinese is ok but Japanese broken instead - presumably the fontconfig default priorities changed that. But this needs to be fixed by some kind of lang tagging or locale setting in anaconda. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270255.mAR2tCFx009044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-26 21:55:12 EDT --- > it affects Chinese fonts in F8 and F9 anaconda too. I meant Chinese installs (they get Japanese glyphs appearing when they exist). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 27 05:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:41:39 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270541.mAR5fdDw002811@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug 70132 depends on bug 457825, which changed state. Bug 457825 Summary: support use of access control headers to allow cross-site downloadable fonts https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457825 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Nov 27 09:03:40 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:03:40 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270903.mAR93dVf021811@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Peter Weilbacher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466956 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:03:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18723] New: RFE: fontconfig-level locl patching Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18723 Summary: RFE: fontconfig-level locl patching Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Due to Han unification and other similar stuff parts of some fonts may not be suitable for all locales. This is handled by the locl flag in modern opentype fonts. However there are still many non-opentype fonts in the wild, and it is not possible to convert them all at once (when the license permits it). There should be a way in fontconfig for font distributors to patch in via a config file the locl characteristics of a font. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:11:18 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:11:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18724] New: RFE: font merging Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724 Summary: RFE: font merging Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback). Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge) For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family. There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:22:04 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:22:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18725] New: RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18725 Summary: RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Historically font formats only allowed four faces regular, bold, italic, bold italic. You had to use a separate font family to distribute condensed, heavy etc variants This has changed (cf http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx ) and modern fonts such as DejaVu include all faces under a single family name. Applications such as OO.o are being fixed to handle multifaced fonts Unfortunately there are still many historic fonts in the wild distributed in several sets of four faces (gs fonts, arial narrow, arial bold, etc). Those fonts currently appear under different family names in fontconfig-using apps. This is perturbing to users, since the same faces of historic and modern fonts are not handled the same way. Microsoft did some sort of magic in uniscribe to hide this distinction (irrelevant to users). Please provide a documented config pattern for font distributors that enables them to declare to fontconfig "font family A and font family B are the same, please expose all the associated faces under A name to users". (of course an application asking explicitely for B should still get it, but users would only see A in font lists) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:30:44 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:30:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18726] New: RFE: help write locale-specific tests Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18726 Summary: RFE: help write locale-specific tests Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Due to Han unification there is often a need for font distributors to test if a font name is requested in a chinese, japanese or korean context. However, there are many chinese locales and writing an exact match is not possible. The current pattern (used by Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc) in this case is zh but we do not really want to match every locale containing "ze". We want to match every ze-foo locale, not jze-foo or foo-ze Please add a documented fonts.conf pattern to fontconfig that allows distributors to specify such an exact match. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:35:14 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:35:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18727] New: RFE: allow use of iso 15924 codes Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18727 Summary: RFE: allow use of iso 15924 codes Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com There are a lot of scripts in the wild and the most accurate standard way to specify them is using iso 15924 codes http://www.unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html Please make it possible to write font patterns using iso 15924 codes in fonts.conf -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:41:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18728] New: RFE: allow direct query of font files Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18728 Summary: RFE: allow direct query of font files Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: fc-list AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Fontconfig can give you a lot of information about installed fonts. Unfortunately that requires installation in the first place and does not help people that just want to check the capabilities of a set of font files before installing them. To take an analogy, rpm has a query flag that will work on all the installed package base, but you can also ask it to examine a set of uninstalled packages using the -p flag (rpm -q -p /tmp/foo*rpm) Please enhance fontconfig utilities so it is possible to make them introspect a set of on-disk font files instead of working on the fonts installed on the system. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:23:45 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:23:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18724] RFE: font merging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081127092345.679AF130057@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-27 01:23:40 PST --- Make "documented way" a "documented fonts.conf config pattern". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Nov 27 09:24:08 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:24:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18723] RFE: fontconfig-level locl patching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081127092408.AD6DC130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18723 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-27 01:24:07 PST --- Make "a way" a "documented fonts.conf config pattern". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 12:17:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471103] Font spacing wrong in menus and text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271217.mARCH7pb031297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471103 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 16:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450061] [ro] Create (U+0218..021B,2011) glyphs in Lat2-Terminus16. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811271641.mARGfMku004336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450061 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 R?zvan Sandu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro --- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:23:04 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 01:46:58 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:46:58 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280146.mAS1kwUa016159@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|implement downloadable font |[@font-face] implement |support on Linux |downloadable font support | |on Linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 12:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:40:42 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281240.mASCegxd029173@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #26 from A S Alam 2008-11-28 04:40:33 PST --- I tested nightly build for 3.1 (1.9.1) and it is working for my language. But Will it be possible to backport to 3.0.0.x? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 15:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:27:15 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281527.mASFRF18027083@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #11 from Bill Gianopoulos 2008-11-28 07:27:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=349707) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=349707) [details] With this patch installed, There is a one row remnant of the magenta background visible in the upper right corner of the Acid3 test. Additionally, this testcase from bug 457194, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=340544, fails. If I install the Ahem font on my system and modify the test to use the installed font rather than @font-face, the test passes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 15:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:35:18 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281535.mASFZHOf030535@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bill Gianopoulos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |467084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 17:57:56 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:57:56 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281757.mASHvujt030637@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #12 from Bill Gianopoulos 2008-11-28 09:57:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > Additionally, this testcase from bug 457194, > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=340544, fails. If I install the > Ahem font on my system and modify the test to > use the installed font rather than @font-face, the test passes. Oddly, in investigating this issue I found that this testcase fails under Windows as well, even though Windows does not show the issue under Acid3. I filed bug 467084 on that issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473481] New: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/506469 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: holger at layer-acht.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora From: "Nikos Asimakis" To: submit at bugs.debian.org Subject: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:54:11 +0200 Package: ttf-liberation Version: 1.04.92-1 Severity: normal After updating to version 1.04.92-1 the character ? (U+03BC, GREEK SMALL LETTER MU) appears ugly when using Liberation Sans. When using Liberation Sans Bold, Italic and all the variants of Liberation Serif and Mono, ? appears OK. You can see the problem in GNOME Character Map, when using Liberation Sans as GNOME's default application font and in Firefox. I am attaching a small html to demonstrate the problem: Liberation Fonts Test

Liberation Sans
???

Liberation Sans Bold
???

Liberation Sans Italic
???

Liberation Sans Bold Italic
???


Liberation Serif
???

Liberation Serif Bold
???

Liberation Serif Italic
???

Liberation Serif Bold Italic
???


Liberation Mono
???

Liberation Mono Bold
???

Liberation Mono Italic
???

Liberation Mono Bold Italic
???

-- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ttf-liberation depends on: ii defoma 0.11.10-0.2 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ttf-liberation recommends no packages. ttf-liberation suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:02:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281902.mASJ2dg4002533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Holger Levsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Debian BTS 506469 --- Comment #1 from Holger Levsen 2008-11-28 14:02:38 EDT --- orignally filed as http://bugs.debian.org/506469 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:39:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281939.mASJdxrl008379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2008-11-28 14:39:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325034) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325034) test case I am attaching testcase as attachment, but I am not sure what the reporter means -- the letter looks to me roughly same in any Liberation font I have (liberation-fonts-1.04.90-1.fc10.noarch). Switching to ASSIGNED so that developers have responsibility to do whatever they want to do with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:44:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281944.mASJi8wu014270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2008-11-28 14:44:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325035) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325035) sshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 19:44:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811281944.mASJiLav014313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 20:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282008.mASK8b6J013354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 --- Comment #4 from Holger Levsen 2008-11-28 15:08:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325036) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325036) this is how it looks here... this is how it looks here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 20:12:16 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:12:16 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282012.mASKCGmr025582@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #13 from Bill Gianopoulos 2008-11-28 12:12:10 PST --- It appears that the issue in bug 467084 is likely a regression from bug 457821. So, that could very well be the cause of the issue here as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 21:32:41 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:32:41 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282132.mASLWfip015176@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #14 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-28 13:32:34 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > > Created an attachment (id=349707) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=349707) > > With this patch installed, There is a one row remnant of the magenta background > visible in the upper right corner of the Acid3 test. Yes. I see that too, but that wasn't there when I last checked (when I think the patch was against 26f6c6c90a43 - Nov 12/13). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Nov 28 23:43:06 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:43:06 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811282343.mASNh66x010227@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #349707|review?(roc at ocallahan.org) | Flag| | Attachment #349707|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #15 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-28 15:42:58 PST --- Created an attachment (id=350535) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=350535) src:url() v1.1 * Addressed review comments. * Changed nsIStreamLoader* arg to nsISupports* as the font entry doesn't care what type of loader it is. * Lazy FT_Init_FreeType to avoid a Ts regression of 10-20 ms. (It looks like there is a Tp gain of 0.5-1% probably due to keeping a reference to the PangoCoverage on the PangoFont.) There is still an occasional shutdown crash that needs to be addressed. This happens due to cairo caching its font structures that hold a reference to the FT_Face. During _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data these font structures are destroyed, during which our callback calls FT_Done_Face, but FT_Done_FreeType has already been called from ~gfxPlatformGtk. (FT_Done_FreeType destroys any faces not already Done). I assume the same problem exists with the gfxFT2Fonts backend. #4 #5 0x00007f42d4d791ad in FT_Done_Face () from /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so.6 #6 0x00007f42cc679889 in ~gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry (this=0x38eba70) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp:345 #7 0x00007f42cc66177e in gfxFontEntry::Release (this=0x38eba70) at ../../../dist/include/thebes/gfxFont.h:145 #8 0x00007f42cc672f69 in ReleaseDownloadedFontEntry (data=0x38eba70) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp:2669 #9 0x00007f42cc6891b4 in _cairo_user_data_array_fini (array=0x3a1a0a0) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-array.c:392 #10 0x00007f42cc68b202 in *INT__moz_cairo_font_face_destroy ( font_face=0x3a1a090) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-font-face.c:206 #11 0x00007f42cc6cec11 in _cairo_ft_unscaled_font_destroy ( abstract_font=0x3a9b1b0) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-ft-font.c:519 #12 0x00007f42cc68bba6 in _cairo_unscaled_font_destroy ( unscaled_font=0x3a9b1b0) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-font-face.c:759 #13 0x00007f42cc6d14e9 in _cairo_ft_scaled_font_fini (abstract_font=0x3a15860) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-ft-font.c:1739 #14 0x00007f42cc6a17b2 in _cairo_scaled_font_fini_internal ( scaled_font=0x3a15860) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-scaled-font.c:733 #15 0x00007f42cc6a17d6 in _cairo_scaled_font_fini (scaled_font=0x3a15860) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-scaled-font.c:744 #16 0x00007f42cc6a0cc7 in _cairo_scaled_font_map_destroy () at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-scaled-font.c:387 #17 0x00007f42cc68bbba in _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data () at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-font-face.c:767 #18 0x00007f42cc68b075 in _moz_cairo_debug_reset_static_data () at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-debug.c:64 #19 0x00007f42cc66901f in ~gfxPlatform (this=0x28269d0) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPlatform.cpp:262 #20 0x00007f42cc6808fc in ~gfxPlatformGtk (this=0x28269d0) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPlatformGtk.cpp:148 #21 0x00007f42cc6691da in gfxPlatform::Shutdown () at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPlatform.cpp:249 #22 0x00007f42c8d5b5c2 in nsThebesGfxModuleDtor (self=0x2826970) at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/src/thebes/nsThebesGfxFactory.cpp:150 #23 0x00007f42d8dd5e2b in nsGenericModule::Shutdown (this=0x2826970) at nsGenericFactory.cpp:340 #24 0x00007f42d8dd5e55 in ~nsGenericModule (this=0x2826970) at nsGenericFactory.cpp:237 #25 0x00007f42d8dd5fe7 in nsGenericModule::Release (this=0x2826970) at nsGenericFactory.cpp:245 #26 0x00007f42d8e3c8bf in nsCOMPtr::assign_assuming_AddRef ( this=0x28755d0, newPtr=0x0) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.h:495 #27 0x00007f42d8e3c954 in nsCOMPtr::assign_with_AddRef ( this=0x28755d0, rawPtr=0x0) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.h:1171 #28 0x00007f42d8e3f4d1 in nsCOMPtr::operator= (this=0x28755d0, rhs=0x0) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.h:640 #29 0x00007f42d8e3eb0a in nsNativeModuleLoader::ReleaserFunc ( aHashedFile=0x2824528, aLoadData=@0x28755d0) at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/components/nsNativeComponentLoader.cpp:219 #30 0x00007f42d8e3f320 in nsBaseHashtable::s_EnumStub ( table=0x239c5f0, hdr=0x28755c0, number=4, arg=0x7fffe21b6300) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsBaseHashtable.h:346 #31 0x00007f42d8dc4961 in PL_DHashTableEnumerate (table=0x239c5f0, etor=0x7f42d8e3f2c8 ::s_EnumStub(PLDHashTable*, PLDHashEntryHdr*, unsigned int, void*)>, arg=0x7fffe21b6300) at pldhash.c:735 #32 0x00007f42d8e3f3a4 in nsBaseHashtable::Enumerate ( this=0x239c5f0, enumFunc=0x7f42d8e3eae8 , userArg=0x0) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsBaseHashtable.h:221 #33 0x00007f42d8e3eacd in nsNativeModuleLoader::UnloadLibraries ( this=0x239c5e8) at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/components/nsNativeComponentLoader.cpp:258 #34 0x00007f42d8e38484 in nsComponentManagerImpl::Shutdown (this=0x239c530) at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/components/nsComponentManager.cpp:747 #35 0x00007f42d8ddac3c in NS_ShutdownXPCOM_P (servMgr=0x0) at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/build/nsXPComInit.cpp:843 Possible solutions are 1) Check whether FT_Done_FreeType has been called before calling FT_Done_Face. This may be fairly simple, but its ugly leaving the reference to the FT_Face in cairo's caches. 2) Be more careful about shutdown order. Some things will need to be shutdown before _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data and some after. 3) Use a refcounted object count references to the FT_Library (whenever an FT_Face is created or destroyed) and call FT_Done_FreeType when these reach zero. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473551] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: rrdtool AssignedTo: kaboom at oobleck.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: kaboom at oobleck.net, jwilson at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11. Please change your package deps to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:05:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291105.mATB5u18027707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473552 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473552] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552 Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mapnik AssignedTo: rezso at rdsor.ro ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rezso at rdsor.ro, snecklifter at gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 473551 Classification: Fedora The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11. Please change your package deps to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291111.mATBB7O7028598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|473552 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:11:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473552] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291111.mATBB5GQ028546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Depends on|473551 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473552] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291110.mATBAGbx023426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|473553 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473552] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291109.mATB9Ab0022982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:10:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:10:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473553] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291110.mATBAF1o023375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473553 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Depends on|473552 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473553] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473553 Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: openoffice.org AssignedTo: caolanm at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: caolanm at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, jnavrati at gmail.com Depends on: 473552 Classification: Fedora The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11. Please change your openoffice.org-langpack-ar deps to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 Currently, most users will have full, not lgc versions installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:11:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291111.mATBBeUB028740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-29 06:11:38 EDT --- *** Bug 473550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:14:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473554] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473554 Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: foobillard AssignedTo: mitr at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: mitr at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11. Please change your foobillard deps to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 Currently, most users will have full, not lgc versions installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:18:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:18:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473556] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291118.mATBIt7F029978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473556 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Depends on|446451 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:17:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473556] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473556 Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-PDF-API2 AssignedTo: bjohnson at symetrix.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: bjohnson at symetrix.com, fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 446451 Classification: Fedora The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11. Please change your perl-PDF-API2 deps to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 Currently, most users will have full, not lgc versions installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:38:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473559] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473559 Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fbida AssignedTo: adrian at lisas.de ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: adrian at lisas.de, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of resources. For Fedora 11, please consider changing the fbida deps on bitstream-vera-fonts to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full version of the fonts. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:40:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473560] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473560 Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ember-media AssignedTo: atorkhov at gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: wart at kobold.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, atorkhov at gmail.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of resources. For Fedora 11, please consider changing the fbida deps on bitstream-vera-fonts to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full version of the fonts. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:46:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473563] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473563 Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: xblast AssignedTo: hdegoede at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: hdegoede at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of resources. For Fedora 11, please consider changing the xblast deps on bitstream-vera-fonts to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full version of the fonts. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:42:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473561] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473561 Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: e16 AssignedTo: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no, wart at kobold.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, atorkhov at gmail.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of resources. For Fedora 11, please consider changing the e16 deps on bitstream-vera-fonts to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full version of the fonts. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473562] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473562 Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: e16-docs AssignedTo: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no, wart at kobold.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, atorkhov at gmail.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of resources. For Fedora 11, please consider changing the e16-docs deps on bitstream-vera-fonts to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full version of the fonts. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 11:47:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473564] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473564 Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: chess AssignedTo: hdegoede at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: hdegoede at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, atorkhov at gmail.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of resources. For Fedora 11, please consider changing the chess deps on bitstream-vera-fonts to one or several of: dejavu-fonts-sans dejavu-fonts-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-serif dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full version of the fonts. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927 The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 12:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 07:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473553] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811291250.mATCohGs008694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473553 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Sat Nov 29 12:56:32 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:56:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18725] RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081129125632.4DDE2130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18725 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Sat Nov 29 12:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:56:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 18727] RFE: allow use of iso 15924 codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081129125645.9CABE130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18727 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ivazquez at fedoraproject.org Sat Nov 29 16:37:27 2008 From: ivazquez at fedoraproject.org (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools.spec,1.13,1.14 Message-ID: <20081129163727.D4E7170113@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ivazquez Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21028/fonttools/devel Modified Files: fonttools.spec Log Message: Rebuild for Python 2.6 Index: fonttools.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel/fonttools.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- fonttools.spec 16 Sep 2008 17:10:29 -0000 1.13 +++ fonttools.spec 29 Nov 2008 16:36:57 -0000 1.14 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: fonttools Version: 2.2 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back Group: Development/Tools @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ %changelog +* Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams - 2.2-2 +- Rebuild for Python 2.6 + * Tue Sep 16 2008 Matt Domsch - 2.2-1 - update to 2.2, drop upstreamed patch, fix FTBFS BZ#434409 From ivazquez at fedoraproject.org Sat Nov 29 16:37:28 2008 From: ivazquez at fedoraproject.org (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontypython/devel fontypython.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20081129163728.3827670113@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ivazquez Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontypython/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21028/fontypython/devel Modified Files: fontypython.spec Log Message: Rebuild for Python 2.6 Index: fontypython.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontypython/devel/fontypython.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- fontypython.spec 15 Sep 2008 21:38:33 -0000 1.5 +++ fontypython.spec 29 Nov 2008 16:36:57 -0000 1.6 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: fontypython Version: 0.3.6 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: TTF font manager Group: Applications/Multimedia @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ %changelog +* Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams - 0.3.6-2 +- Rebuild for Python 2.6 + * Mon Sep 15 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 0.3.6-1 - update to 0.3.6 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 29 20:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473556] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811292004.mATK4EfB019056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473556 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ivazquez at fedoraproject.org Sun Nov 30 00:53:51 2008 From: ivazquez at fedoraproject.org (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools.spec,1.14,1.15 Message-ID: <20081130005351.9060470117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ivazquez Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10271/fonttools/devel Modified Files: fonttools.spec Log Message: Fix locations for Python 2.6 Index: fonttools.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel/fonttools.spec,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 --- fonttools.spec 29 Nov 2008 16:36:57 -0000 1.14 +++ fonttools.spec 30 Nov 2008 00:53:21 -0000 1.15 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: fonttools Version: 2.2 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back Group: Development/Tools @@ -63,13 +63,16 @@ %{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fontTools/*/*.py* %{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fontTools/*/*/*.py* %{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fontTools/misc/eexecOp.so -%{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fonttools-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info +%{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fonttools-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info %{_bindir}/ttx %{_mandir}/man1/ttx.1.gz %changelog +* Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams - 2.2-3 +- Fix locations for Python 2.6 + * Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams - 2.2-2 - Rebuild for Python 2.6 From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Nov 30 07:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:39:58 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300739.mAU7dw28008054@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #16 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-29 23:39:48 PST --- >(In reply to comment #15) > 2) Be more careful about shutdown order. Some things will need to be shutdown > before _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data and some after. This isn't a practical option with system-cairo. cairo's cached font structures can be released when other fonts are added through other users of the library after gfxPlatform has shut down. Another options: 4) Find out the FT_Library that cairo is using from the FT_Face from a cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face, and use that instead of using a separate FT_Library. There is some appeal in using the same FT_Library as cairo rather than having two identical FT_Librarys. This approach would be making the assumption that cairo won't "Done" its FT_Library until cairo_debug_reset_static_data, but I can't think of a good reason why cairo might change its behavior to do this. All these approaches except (4) are assuming that our callback function pointer on the cairo font face will point to a function in a library that is still in memory. I was surprised to see that NS_ShutdownXPCOM_P() [including nsNativeModuleLoader::UnloadLibraries()] doesn't actually seem to be unloading XPCOM module libraries. If thebes (or necko) may be unloaded from memory, some other options are: 5) Force cairo to empty its holdover fonts (unreferenced fonts). This would require creation and destruction of 256 cairo_scaled_fonts. 6) Modifying cairo to not holdover unreferenced fonts with external destroy_hooks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Nov 30 07:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:52:07 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811300752.mAU7q7aX009801@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #17 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-11-29 23:51:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #16) > All these approaches except (4) are assuming that our callback function pointer > on the cairo font face will point to a function in a library that is still in > memory. Please ignore the "except (4)". At the time I wrote that, (4) was something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 12:01:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301201.mAUC1Kl2001035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high CC| |apevec at redhat.com Severity|medium |high --- Comment #2 from Alan Pevec 2008-11-30 07:01:19 EDT --- compat packages don't help, packages depending on rrdtools don't build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=963810&name=root.log > Error: Missing Dependency: dejavu-lgc-fonts is needed by package rrdtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 13:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301333.mAUDXUpx011816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-11-30 08:33:29 EDT --- Maybe I was not clear enough? Do *NOT* try to depend on the compat packages. They're not here long term. Use the others -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 13:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811301355.mAUDt1ch021451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|high |urgent --- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec 2008-11-30 08:55:00 EDT --- Your message is clear, but mine wasn't: I wanted to say that it's _urgent_ to fix rrdtool - it's basically broken in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Nov 30 20:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:58:15 -0800 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302058.mAUKwFGI004462@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 --- Comment #18 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-11-30 12:58:06 PST --- It seems like option 6 is the way to go. Or perhaps 7) add a cairo API to flush unreferenced fonts (or unreferenced fonts with external destroy_hooks) Basically, it's an API bug for cairo to require external destroy_hooks to work indefinitely far in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 30 22:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472695] exa-master-upgrade breaks glyph rendering with OLPC XO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302205.mAUM5EKI003047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472695 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 00:49:34 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Nov 30 23:38:44 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:38:44 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811302338.mAUNch4d010871@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-30 15:38:40 PST --- (In reply to comment #23) > Requesting approval for 1.9.0.6. This patch changes two lines of code in one > function, plus adds an assertion. A reftest would land with it. : > The small number of changes makes risk very low. Thank you Karl for your work on this. I just want to chime in in agreement that it would be very good to get this patch included on the stable branch - the consequences for Indic users are quite serious: a lot of English pages are quite unreadable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.