From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov  1 14:25:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:25:50 -0400
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811011425.mA1EPoqB002698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #38 from Baif <baif at pogolinux.com.cn>  2008-11-01 10:25:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> I'm afraid the part of the above config doesn't do the right thing what you
> said at least. "not_eq" affects all of fonts except you explicitly described
> there. it exactly overrides the global settings, regardless of whether or not
> the result is same. fontconfig config that the font package owns should have
> its specific config only. otherwise it should be modified in one fontconfig
> has.

Yes... You're right.
Because I don't know why without  the "not_eq"-s the rest of configs do NOT
work... 
I had mail the config to Caius Carlos CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com>, hope he
could get it work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  2 01:59:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:59:21 -0400
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811020159.mA21xLwc001855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail |
                   |.com)                       |




--- Comment #24 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com>  2008-11-01 21:59:20 EDT ---
i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I
am still waiting for  a reply

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov  3 02:25:02 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:25:02 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811030225.mA32P2Kn025108@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #11 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-02 18:24:59 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> +    const cairo_font_options_t *options =
> +        gdk_screen_get_font_options(gdk_screen_get_default());
> 
> If we're not compiling with system cairo, this might be a problem.

Good catch.  Filed bug 462798 on that.  (It is not new in the patch here.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 05:28:24 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 00:28:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name
In-Reply-To: <bug-468193-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468193-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811030528.mA35SOer015177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|UPSTREAM                    |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 00:28:23 EDT ---
So is it fixed in current rawhide now?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov  3 07:08:37 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:08:37 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811030708.mA378bio025013@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #344063|review?(roc at ocallahan.org)  |
               Flag|                            |
 Attachment #344063|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #346004|                            |review?(roc at ocallahan.org)
               Flag|                            |




--- Comment #12 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-02 23:08:26 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=346004)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346004)
font selection in Mozilla's PangoFcFontMap 1.2

Addresses the issues in comment 9 and comment 10 (except for bug 462798).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 07:50:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:50:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name
In-Reply-To: <bug-468193-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468193-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811030750.mA37oYIr003117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193





--- Comment #7 from Qiao <29551030 at qq.com>  2008-11-03 02:50:34 EDT ---
Yes, it have fixed and I test OK.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov  3 07:51:13 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:51:13 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811030751.mA37pDlH030347@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346004|review?(roc at ocallahan.org)  |review+
               Flag|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 23:53:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:53:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811032353.mA3NrUj5020448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #39 from Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 18:53:29 EDT ---
AFAIK, cjkunifonts shouldn't use any not_eq in its .conf file because this
might probably overrides global settings. The global settings are managed as
whole but not this package. Even it tested working we aren't appropriate to
include. Cheers.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 00:03:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:03:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040003.mA403jjr031704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680


Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |
         AssignedTo|than at redhat.com             |cchance at redhat.com




--- Comment #40 from Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 19:03:44 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=322378)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322378)
Modified .conf from Baif's.

(Reopened for Baif's proposed .conf)

I have slightly modified Baif's proposed .conf to using only "eq". This might
be able to reduce effects to global settings.

Welcome for more discussion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 07:10:25 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:10:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040710.mA47APQb032594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #41 from Baif <baif at pogolinux.com.cn>  2008-11-04 02:10:24 EDT ---
I found it's not easy make all happy...

For QT4/KDE4 with my config in LANG=en_US.UTF8 on my PC, English fonts look
fine  , Chinese fonts look fine. But if the "not_eq"s have gone, the English
fonts would NOT with antialias, but why the GTK/GNOME apps would get the fonts
to be with "antialias"? 

It looks that the config does not effect the GTK/GNOME apps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 07:37:17 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:37:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040737.mA47bH1F003673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #42 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-04 02:37:16 EDT ---
Do you mean you think it is a Pango bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org  Tue Nov  4 07:44:58 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org (bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org)
Date: Mon,  3 Nov 2008 23:44:58 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18546] Can't load some non-latin fonts with pango backend
In-Reply-To: <bug-18546-6663@https.bugs.webkit.org/>
Message-ID: <20081104074458.34AED110D172@gamma.macosforge.org>

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18546


alp at nuanti.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alp at nuanti.com
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1




------- Comment #13 from alp at nuanti.com  2008-11-03 23:44 PDT -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > No progress with nightly 36309.
> > 
> 
> That's because the fix in bug #16792 is only for the FreeType backend.
> 

Yes, the 'FreeType backend' now contains the latest Pango code as well and the
'Pango backend' is considered obsolete at the moment. We do need to make this
clearer.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 08:00:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:00:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 112878] Munhwa CID-keyed fonts are not included
In-Reply-To: <bug-112878-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-112878-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040800.mA480D5X028825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112878


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DEFERRED
               Flag|needinfo?(jshin at i18nl10n.co |
                   |m)                          |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From kstribley at openoffice.org  Tue Nov  4 08:06:23 2008
From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org)
Date: 4 Nov 2008 08:06:23 -0000
Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology
In-Reply-To: <iz69129@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081104080623.14809.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129


User kstribley changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
             Assigned to|timseves                  |kstribley
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from kstribley at openoffice.org Tue Nov  4 08:06:21 +0000 2008 -------
I've taken over from Tim since he is now concentrating on other things.

Working Graphite patches are in the graphite01 CWS.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From kstribley at openoffice.org  Tue Nov  4 08:12:17 2008
From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org)
Date: 4 Nov 2008 08:12:17 -0000
Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology
In-Reply-To: <iz69129@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081104081217.19053.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129


User kstribley changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|NEW                       |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from kstribley at openoffice.org Tue Nov  4 08:12:16 +0000 2008 -------
See the graphite01 CWS for the current state of the patches and also i93645
since we will need the graphite library itself as a module.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 08:13:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:13:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040813.mA48DjZk030592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail
                   |                            |.com)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Nov  4 23:03:37 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:03:37 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811042303.mA4N3bnl018645@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346004|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #13 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-04 15:03:32 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=346344)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346344)
font selection in Mozilla's PangoFcFontMap 1.2

Makes changes to template specializations due to changes in bug 461087,
and corrects some errors that showed up in testing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Nov  4 23:04:11 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:04:11 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811042304.mA4N4B78014883@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346344|font selection in Mozilla's |font selection in Mozilla's
        description|PangoFcFontMap 1.2          |PangoFcFontMap 1.2.2




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Wed Nov  5 00:50:11 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:50:11 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811050050.mA50oBIa012939@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #14 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org>  2008-11-04 16:50:06 PST ---
What errors?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Wed Nov  5 01:21:49 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:21:49 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811050121.mA51LndN018851@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #15 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-04 17:21:41 PST ---
Uninitialized variables:

--- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp
+++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp
@@ -807,1 +807,1 @@ gfxFcPangoFontSet::SortPreferredFonts()
-            for (PRUint32 r; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) {
+            for (PRUint32 r = 0; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) {
@@ -826,1 +826,1 @@ gfxFcPangoFontSet::SortPreferredFonts()
-    for (PRUint32 r; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) {
+    for (PRUint32 r = 0; r < requiredLangs.Length(); ++r) {

Wrong test:

--- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.h
+++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.h
@@ -213,1 +213,1 @@ public:
-        PRBool IsKeyInitialized() { return mKey.IsVoid(); }
+        PRBool IsKeyInitialized() { return !mKey.IsVoid(); }

The aForce parameter to UpdateFontListInternal forces a check for changes now,
but that doesn't guarantee invalidation of caches (unless a change is
detected).

--- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.cpp
+++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontconfigUtils.cpp
@@ -923,6 +923,7 @@ gfxFontconfigUtils::GetLangSupportEntry(
             // entry->mSupport needs to be recalculated, but this is an
             // indication that the set of installed fonts has changed, so
             // update all caches.
+            mLastConfig = NULL; // invalidates caches
             UpdateFontListInternal(PR_TRUE);
             return GetLangSupportEntry(aLang, aWithFonts);
         }

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 06:26:18 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:26:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050626.mA56QIoi023049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 01:26:17 EDT ---
Tested this the other day: rpmlint is clean, but I can't get the font to render
default for ja on the desktop when I remove other Japanese fonts.  (Tagoh
mentioned some update to the font .conf file is needed.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 07:16:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:16:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050716.mA57G8Sq019792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 02:16:07 EDT ---
I don't know how you tested it though, this is a Mincho typeface, which is
similar to serif. so usually you don't see that on the desktop by default so
that most applications defaults sans-serif or monospace.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From mba at openoffice.org  Wed Nov  5 13:10:56 2008
From: mba at openoffice.org (mba at openoffice.org)
Date: 5 Nov 2008 13:10:56 -0000
Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
In-Reply-To: <iz79878@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081105131056.9872.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878





------- Additional comments from mba at openoffice.org Wed Nov  5 13:10:54 +0000 2008 -------
>From the last comments I conclude that 3.1 is too ambitious. Right?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From os at openoffice.org  Wed Nov  5 13:30:36 2008
From: os at openoffice.org (os at openoffice.org)
Date: 5 Nov 2008 13:30:36 -0000
Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
In-Reply-To: <iz79878@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081105133036.18512.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878


User os changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
        Target milestone|OOo 3.1                   |OOo 3.x
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from os at openoffice.org Wed Nov  5 13:30:34 +0000 2008 -------
->mba: Yes, definitely not 3.1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 15:35:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:35:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811051535.mA5FZpcK017715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680


Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |baifcc at hotmail.com




--- Comment #43 from Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com>  2008-11-05 10:35:48 EDT ---
I'm not really understand the fontconfig with Pango and Qt.
But I think the default settings for Qt/KDE on Fedora is not as good as for
GTK/GNOME. And I really understand international for Qt is not as good as GTK.
:)

BTW: Why fonts for Qt/KDE with LANG=zh_CN.UTF8 had been change, which config
file will make this happen? Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 00:47:47 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:47:47 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811060047.mA60llbh031583@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346567|                            |review?(roc at ocallahan.org)
               Flag|                            |




--- Comment #16 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-05 16:47:34 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=346567)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346567)
avoid static object

Our leak test tools don't seem to like (non-POD?) static objects (even with
function scope).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 00:53:20 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:53:20 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811060053.mA60rKN3029518@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346567|review?(roc at ocallahan.org)  |
               Flag|                            |
 Attachment #346567|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #346569|                            |review?(roc at ocallahan.org)
               Flag|                            |




--- Comment #17 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-05 16:53:08 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=346569)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346569)
avoid static object v2

Putting the smaller object after the larger hash tables.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 00:54:27 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:54:27 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811060054.mA60sRSr001834@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346569|review?(roc at ocallahan.org)  |review+
               Flag|                            |




--- Comment #18 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org>  2008-11-05 16:54:18 PST ---
(From update of attachment 346569)
Sorry, I should have caught that. Thanks. Get back in the landing queue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 01:42:02 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:42:02 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811060142.mA61g2lj019244@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346344|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #346569|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #19 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-05 17:41:32 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=346583)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346583)
including all changes in one patch

Including all changes in one patch.  The only new change here is removal of the
"static" keyword from the typedef (which some compilers didn't seem to
mind/notice).

--- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp
+++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp
@@ -601,8 +601,6 @@ private:
     PRPackedBool mHaveFallbackFonts;
 };
-
-static

 typedef FcBool (*FcPatternRemoveFunction)(FcPattern *p, const char *object,
                                           int id);

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 03:53:28 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:53:28 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811060353.mA63rS8t020780@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #18 from Parag Nemade <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-11-05 19:53:21 PST ---
is there any build available to test? Is this patch included in latest nightly
builds 3.1b1 ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 04:02:51 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:02:51 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811060402.mA642pS8022938@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #19 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-05 20:02:41 PST ---
Not 3.1b1, but in nightly builds:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 10:16:02 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:16:02 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811061016.mA6AG2RG002713@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #20 from Parag Nemade <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-11-06 02:15:41 PST ---
Thanks Karl for your help and patch here. I see that latest nightly builds
fixed above reported problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov  6 22:54:58 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:54:58 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811062254.mA6Msw68030507@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #20 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-06 14:54:31 PST ---
Landed this but had to back out due to:

REFTEST TEST-PASS |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-003.html | 
REFTEST TEST-KNOWN-FAIL |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-004.html | 
REFTEST TEST-KNOWN-FAIL |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-004-j.html | 
REFTEST TEST-PASS |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-005.html | 
../../objdir/dist/bin/run-mozilla.sh: line 131:  6372 Segmentation fault     
"$prog" ${1+"$@"}
program finished with exit code 139
TinderboxPrint: reftest<br/>176/0/10

Haven't yet succeeded in reproducing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov  7 00:01:25 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:01:25 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811070001.mA701PlJ023433@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #21 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org>  2008-11-06 16:00:55 PST ---
Try it under Valgrind.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov  7 00:26:50 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:26:50 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811070026.mA70QogY002203@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #22 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-06 16:26:46 PST ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Thanks.  Valgrind found the uninitialized variables in comment 15, but it
hasn't reported a problem with the bidi test, with debug and optimized builds.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 02:54:03 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:54:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-453016-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-453016-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070254.mA72s3QN012490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016





--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-06 21:54:01 EDT ---
un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 02:53:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:53:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-453017-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-453017-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070253.mA72resu012414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017





--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-06 21:53:39 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 02:58:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:58:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-453016-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-453016-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070258.mA72wYHL014300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016





--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-06 21:58:33 EDT ---
un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 02:57:24 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:57:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-453017-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-453017-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070257.mA72vOm8014062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017





--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-06 21:57:24 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov  7 04:30:49 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:30:49 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811070430.mA74UnN2000830@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #346583|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #23 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-06 20:30:46 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=346830)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=346830)
what eventually landed

Thanks, Vlad for your help.

Two more uninitialized variables:

--- a/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp
+++ b/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ gfxFcPangoFontSet::SortPreferredFonts()
     if (truncateMarker != NULL && fontSet) {
         nsAutoRef<FcFontSet> truncatedSet(FcFontSetCreate());

-        for (int f; f < fontSet->nfont; ++f) {
+        for (int f = 0; f < fontSet->nfont; ++f) {
             FcPattern *font = fontSet->fonts[f];
             if (font == truncateMarker)
                 break;
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ gfx_pango_fontset_get_font(PangoFontset
 {
     gfxPangoFontset *self = GFX_PANGO_FONTSET(fontset);

-    PangoFont *result;
+    PangoFont *result = NULL;

     FcPattern *baseFontPattern = NULL;
     if (self->mBaseFont) {

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov  7 04:33:03 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:33:03 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811070433.mA74X3wR031629@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169


Bug 458169 depends on bug 449356, which changed state.

Bug 449356 Summary: Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov  7 04:32:47 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:32:47 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811070432.mA74Wlfj001484@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|mozilla1.9.1                |mozilla1.9.1b2




--- Comment #24 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-06 20:32:39 PST ---
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d062597e5b3d
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b39e3a7974f2

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov  7 10:08:29 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:08:29 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811071008.mA7A8T1g002629@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |463592




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 15:38:23 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:38:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 433513] promo/fonts needs to be updated for Liberation now
 hosted at fedora
In-Reply-To: <bug-433513-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-433513-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811071538.mA7FcNEq024371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433513


Grant Shipley <gshipley at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|wsdxxx                      |current




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sat Nov  8 10:53:06 2008
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sat,  8 Nov 2008 10:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.21,
	1.22 fontforge.spec, 1.35, 1.36 sources, 1.21, 1.22
Message-ID: <20081108105307.4C9C0700FB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17849/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fontforge.spec sources 
Added Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 cycle version bump


--- NEW FILE import.log ---
fontforge-20080927-1_fc10:HEAD:fontforge-20080927-1.fc10.src.rpm:1226141478


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22
--- .cvsignore	3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 -0000	1.21
+++ .cvsignore	8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 -0000	1.22
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-fontforge_full-20080828.tar.bz2
-fontforge_htdocs-20080824.tar.bz2
+fontforge_full-20080927.tar.bz2
+fontforge_htdocs-20080927.tar.bz2


Index: fontforge.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -r1.35 -r1.36
--- fontforge.spec	3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 -0000	1.35
+++ fontforge.spec	8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 -0000	1.36
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-%define docs_version 20080824
+%define docs_version 20080927
 %define gettext_package FontForge
 
 Name:           fontforge
-Version:        20080828
+Version:        20080927
 Release:        1%{?dist}
 Summary:        Outline and bitmap font editor
 
@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
 Source0:        http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fontforge/fontforge_full-%{version}.tar.bz2
 Source1:        fontforge.desktop
 Source2:        http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fontforge/fontforge_htdocs-%{docs_version}.tar.bz2
-Source3:	fontforge.xml
+Source3:        fontforge.xml
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
 Requires:       xdg-utils
-Requires:	autotrace
+Requires:       autotrace
 
 BuildRequires:  libjpeg-devel
 BuildRequires:  libtiff-devel
@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@
 BuildRequires:  xorg-x11-proto-devel
 BuildRequires:  gettext
 
-Obsoletes:      pfaedit
-Provides:       pfaedit
 
 %description
 FontForge (former PfaEdit) is a font editor for outline and bitmap
@@ -119,10 +117,10 @@
 
 
 %files -f %{gettext_package}.lang
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc AUTHORS LICENSE htdocs
-%{_bindir}/*
-%{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
+%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
+%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
 %{_datadir}/applications/*fontforge.desktop
 %{_datadir}/fontforge
 %{_datadir}/pixmaps/fontforge.png
@@ -130,16 +128,22 @@
 %{_datadir}/mime/packages/fontforge.xml
 
 %files devel
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %{_includedir}/fontforge/
-%{_libdir}/lib*.so
+%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/lib*.so
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Nov 08 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080927-1
+??? quick & dirty version bump to start working on F11 font packages
+??? time to forget about pfaedit
+??? take care of rpmlint warnings
+
 * Wed Sep 03 2008 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20080828-1
 - Upgrade to 20080828
 - Add Requires on autotrace. Fixes 460668
-- Confirm patch from 459451 is upstream here. 
+- Confirm patch from 459451 is upstream here.
 
 * Fri May 16 2008 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20080429-1
 - Upgrade to 20080429
@@ -172,7 +176,7 @@
 ??? quick & dirty version bump to start working on F9 font packages
 
 * Sun Aug 26 2007 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20070511-2
-- Rebuild for BuildID 
+- Rebuild for BuildID
 
 * Thu Jun  7 2007 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20070511-1
 - Update to upstream 20070511


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22
--- sources	3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 -0000	1.21
+++ sources	8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 -0000	1.22
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-3c232a6e412d8b443b0b881332dbc26c  fontforge_full-20080828.tar.bz2
-5eee3058485b52208dfca1d46aeb96aa  fontforge_htdocs-20080824.tar.bz2
+8866595d4dac77c0c093ed1e104515d3  fontforge_full-20080927.tar.bz2
+cc3e292e75250e8318cb098c1552c98e  fontforge_htdocs-20080927.tar.bz2



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sat Nov  8 18:38:46 2008
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sat,  8 Nov 2008 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch, NONE,
	1.1 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.86, 1.87 import.log, 1.3, 1.4
Message-ID: <20081108183846.3BBB9700FB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17478/devel

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec import.log 
Added Files:
	dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch 
Log Message:
major package rework with new subpackage split

dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch:

--- NEW FILE dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch ---
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf	2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
-<fontconfig>
-  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu.conf
-
-        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
-        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
-        derived from Vera.
-
-	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
-	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
-	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
-	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
- -->
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu Sans</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu Sans Mono</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu Serif</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf	2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
-<fontconfig>
-  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-experimental.conf
-
-        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
-        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
-        derived from Vera.
-
-	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
-	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
-	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
-	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
- -->
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu Sans Condensed</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu Sans Mono Condensed</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu Serif Condensed</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf	2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
-<fontconfig>
-  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc.conf
-
-        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
-        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
-        derived from Vera.
-
-	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
-	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
-	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
-	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
- -->
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu LGC Sans</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu LGC Serif</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-  <match target="font">
-    <test name="family">
-      <string>DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed</string>
-    </test>
-    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
-      <double>7.5</double>
-    </test>
-    <edit name="hinting">
-      <bool>false</bool>
-    </edit>
-  </match>
-</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<fontconfig>
+  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf
+
+        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
+        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
+        derived from Vera.
+
+	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
+	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
+	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
+	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
+ -->
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>DejaVu LGC Sans</string>
+    </test>
+    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
+      <double>7.5</double>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="hinting">
+      <bool>false</bool>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<fontconfig>
+  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf
+
+        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
+        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
+        derived from Vera.
+
+	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
+	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
+	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
+	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
+ -->
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</string>
+    </test>
+    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
+      <double>7.5</double>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="hinting">
+      <bool>false</bool>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<fontconfig>
+  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf
+
+        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
+        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
+        derived from Vera.
+
+	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
+	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
+	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
+	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
+ -->
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>DejaVu LGC Serif</string>
+    </test>
+    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
+      <double>7.5</double>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="hinting">
+      <bool>false</bool>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<fontconfig>
+  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf
+
+        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
+        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
+        derived from Vera.
+
+	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
+	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
+	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
+	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
+ -->
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>DejaVu Sans</string>
+    </test>
+    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
+      <double>7.5</double>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="hinting">
+      <bool>false</bool>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<fontconfig>
+  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
+
+        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
+        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
+        derived from Vera.
+
+	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
+	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
+	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
+	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
+ -->
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>DejaVu Sans Mono</string>
+    </test>
+    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
+      <double>7.5</double>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="hinting">
+      <bool>false</bool>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<fontconfig>
+  <!--  /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf
+
+        Disable hinting manually at smaller sizes (< 8ppem)
+        This is a copy of the Bistream Vera fonts fonts rule, as DejaVu is
+        derived from Vera.
+
+	The Bistream Vera fonts have GASP entries suggesting that hinting be
+	disabled below 8 ppem, but FreeType ignores those, preferring to use
+	the data found in the instructed hints. The initial Vera release
+	didn't include the right instructions in the 'prep' table.
+ -->
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>DejaVu Serif</string>
+    </test>
+    <test compare="less" name="pixelsize">
+      <double>7.5</double>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="hinting">
+      <bool>false</bool>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf	2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,190 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
-<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu.conf
-
-     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
-     DejaVu stable families
-
-     ?? 2006-2007 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
--->
-<fontconfig>
-  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Arev Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bepa</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Hunky Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Olwen Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>SUSE Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Verajja</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- In case VerajjaPDA stops declaring itself as Verajja -->
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>VerajjaPDA</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bepa Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Olwen Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>SUSE Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Prima Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Vera Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Hunky Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Olwen Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>SUSE Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- In case Verajja Serif stops declaring itself as DejaVu Serif -->
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Verajja Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
-  <alias>
-    <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    <default>
-      <family>monospace</family>
-    </default>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    <default>
-      <family>sans-serif</family>
-    </default>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    <default>
-      <family>serif</family>
-    </default>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
-  <alias>
-    <family>monospace</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>sans-serif</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>serif</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu-sans.conf
+
+     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
+     DejaVu Sans.
+
+     ?? 2006-2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+-->
+<fontconfig>
+  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Arev Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bepa</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Hunky Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Olwen Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>SUSE Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Verajja</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- In case VerajjaPDA stops declaring itself as Verajja -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>VerajjaPDA</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>sans-serif</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>sans-serif</family>
+    <prefer>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    </prefer>
+  </alias>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf	2008-11-08 12:32:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
+
+     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
+     DejaVu Sans Mono.
+
+     ?? 2006-2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+-->
+<fontconfig>
+  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bepa Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Olwen Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>SUSE Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>monospace</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>monospace</family>
+    <prefer>
+      <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    </prefer>
+  </alias>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/57-dejavu-serif.conf	2008-11-08 12:32:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu-serif.conf
+
+     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
+     DejaVu Serif.
+
+     ?? 2006-2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+-->
+<fontconfig>
+  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Prima Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Vera Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Hunky Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Olwen Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>SUSE Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- In case Verajja Serif stops declaring itself as DejaVu Serif -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Verajja Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>serif</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>serif</family>
+    <prefer>
+      <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    </prefer>
+  </alias>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf	2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,216 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
-<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-dejavu-lgc.conf
-
-     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
-     DejaVu LGC
-
-     ?? 2007 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
--->
-<fontconfig>
-  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Arev Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bepa</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Hunky Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Olwen Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>SUSE Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Verajja</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- In case VerajjaPDA stops declaring itself as Verajja -->
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>VerajjaPDA</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu Sans Condensed</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Toga Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bepa Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Olwen Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>SUSE Sans Mono</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Prima Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Bitstream Vera Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Hunky Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Olwen Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>SUSE Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- In case Verajja Serif stops declaring itself as DejaVu LGC Serif -->
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Verajja Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu Serif Condensed</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Toga Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
-  <alias>
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    <default>
-      <family>monospace</family>
-    </default>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed</family>
-    <default>
-      <family>sans-serif</family>
-    </default>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed</family>
-    <default>
-      <family>serif</family>
-    </default>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
-  <alias>
-    <family>monospace</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>sans-serif</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>serif</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-dejavu-lgc-sans.conf
+
+     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
+     DejaVu LGC Sans.
+
+     ?? 2006-2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+-->
+<fontconfig>
+  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Arev Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bepa</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Hunky Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Olwen Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>SUSE Sans</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Verajja</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- In case VerajjaPDA stops declaring itself as Verajja -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>VerajjaPDA</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>sans-serif</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>sans-serif</family>
+    <prefer>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans</family>
+    </prefer>
+  </alias>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono.conf
+
+     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
+     DejaVu LGC Sans Mono.
+
+     ?? 2006-2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+-->
+<fontconfig>
+  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bepa Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Prima Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Olwen Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>SUSE Sans Mono</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>monospace</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>monospace</family>
+    <prefer>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Mono</family>
+    </prefer>
+  </alias>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf	2008-11-08 12:30:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
+<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/58-dejavu-lgc-serif.conf
+
+     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
+     DejaVu LGC Serif.
+
+     ?? 2006-2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+-->
+<fontconfig>
+  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Prima Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Bitstream Vera Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Hunky Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Olwen Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>SUSE Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- In case Verajja Serif stops declaring itself as DejaVu Serif -->
+  <alias binding="same">
+    <family>Verajja Serif</family>
+    <accept>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </accept>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>serif</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
+  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
+  <alias>
+    <family>serif</family>
+    <prefer>
+      <family>DejaVu LGC Serif</family>
+    </prefer>
+  </alias>
+</fontconfig>
diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf
--- dejavu-fonts-2.26.orig/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf	2007-10-28 21:22:07.000000000 +0100
+++ dejavu-fonts-2.26/fontconfig/61-dejavu-experimental.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
-<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-dejavu-experimental.conf
-
-     Define aliasing and other fontconfig settings for
-     DejaVu experimental families
-
-     ?? 2006-2007 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
--->
-<fontconfig>
-  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Sans Condensed</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Toga Sans</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <alias binding="same">
-    <family>Toga Serif</family>
-    <accept>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif Condensed</family>
-    </accept>
-  </alias>
-  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
-  <alias>
-    <family>sans-serif</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu Sans Condensed</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-  <alias>
-    <family>serif</family>
-    <prefer>
-      <family>DejaVu Serif Condensed</family>
-    </prefer>
-  </alias>
-</fontconfig>


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.86
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -r1.86 -r1.87
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	3 Sep 2008 21:17:02 -0000	1.86
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000	1.87
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 %define fontname    dejavu
-%define fontdir     %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
-%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
+%define fontdir     %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}/
+%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/
 
 %define archivename %{name}-%{archiveversion}
 
@@ -14,15 +14,53 @@
 %define Blocks          %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/Blocks.txt
 %define UnicodeData     %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/UnicodeData.txt
 
+# Common description
+%define common_desc \
+The DejaVu font set is based on the ???Bitstream Vera??? fonts, release 1.10. Its\
+purpose is to provide a wider range of characters, while maintaining the \
+original style, using an open collaborative development process.
+
+# Compat description
+%define compat_desc \
+This package only exists to help transition pre 2.26-3 DejaVu users to the new\
+package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please\
+do not reference it or depend on it in any way.\
+\
+It can be safely uninstalled. 
+
+
+# Subpackage magic - should be generic enough for reuse in other packages
+%define font_subpkg(n:f:) \
+\
+%post %{-n*} \
+if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \
+    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \
+fi \
+\
+\
+%postun %{-n*} \
+if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then \
+    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \
+fi\
+\
+\
+%files %{-n*} \
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) \
+\
+%{-f:%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}%{-f*}} \
+\
+%(echo %* | sed "s+ +\\n+g"| sed "s+^+%{fontdir}+g")
+
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.26
-Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
-Summary: DejaVu fonts, mature typefaces
+Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Summary: DejaVu fonts
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
 License: Bitstream Vera and Public Domain
 URL:     http://%{fontname}.sf.net/
 Source0: %{?!alphatag:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{fontname}}%{?alphatag:%{fontname}.sourceforge.net/snapshots}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
+Patch0:  %{name}-2.26-fontconfig.patch
 
 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 # Older fontforge versions will not work due to sfd format changes
@@ -33,149 +71,175 @@
 BuildArch: noarch
 
 %description
-The DejaVu fonts are a font family based on the ???Bitstream Vera??? fonts release
-1.10. Its purpose is to provide a wider range of characters while maintaining
-the original look and feel through the process of collaborative development.
+%common_desc
+
+
+%package doc
+Summary:  DejaVu fonts, documentation
+Group:    User Interface/X
 
-This package includes the typefaces the DejaVu project considers mature.
+%description doc
+%common_desc
 
+This package consists of the DejaVu project documentation.
 
-%package experimental
+
+%package compat
+Summary:  DejaVu fonts, compatibility
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Summary:  DejaVu fonts, experimental typefaces
-# Does not really make sense without the core typefaces
-Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
 
+Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.6.23
+Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.6.23
 
-%description experimental
-The DejaVu fonts are a font family based on the "Bitstream Vera" fonts release
-1.10. Its purpose is to provide a wider range of characters while maintaining
-the original look and feel through the process of collaborative development.
+Requires: %{name}-sans, %{name}-serif, %{name}-sans-mono
 
-This package includes the typefaces the DejaVu project considers experimental.
+%description compat
+%compat_desc
 
 
-%package -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts
+%package lgc-compat
+Summary:  DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Summary:  DejaVu fonts, Latin Greek Cyrillic subset
-# Could possibly conflict with the main package, as there's really no sense to
-# install both
-#Conflicts: %{name} <= %{version}-%{release}
 
+Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.6.23
 
-%description -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts
-The DejaVu fonts are a font family based on the "Bitstream Vera" fonts release
-1.10. Its purpose is to provide a wider range of characters while maintaining
-the original look and feel through the process of collaborative development.
+Requires: %{name}-lgc-sans, %{name}-lgc-serif, %{name}-lgc-sans-mono
 
-This package includes a subset of DejaVu typefaces limited to Latin, Greek and
-Cyrillic glyphs.
+%description lgc-compat
+%compat_desc
 
 
-%prep
-%setup -q -n %{archivename}
+%package sans
+Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces
+Group:    User Interface/X
+Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
 
+%description sans
+%common_desc
 
-%build
-make %{?_smp_mflags} VERSION=%{version} FC-LANG="" \
-     BLOCKS=%{Blocks} UNICODEDATA=%{UnicodeData}
+This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, in
+their unabridged version.
 
-%check
-make check
+%font_subpkg -n sans -f *-%{fontname}-sans.conf DejaVuSans.ttf DejaVuSans-*.ttf DejaVuSansCondensed*.ttf
 
 
-%install
-rm -fr %{buildroot}
+%package serif
+Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces
+Group:    User Interface/X
+Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
 
-install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
-install -m 0644 -p build/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
+%description serif
+%common_desc
 
-install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
-install -m 0644 -p fontconfig/*conf %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
+This package consists of the DejaVu serif variable-width font faces, in their
+unabridged version.
 
+%font_subpkg -n serif -f *-%{fontname}-serif.conf DejaVuSerif.ttf DejaVuSerif-*.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed*.ttf
 
-%clean
-rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
+%package sans-mono
+Summary:  DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces
+Group:    User Interface/X
+Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
 
-%post
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
-fi
+%description sans-mono
+%common_desc
 
+This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif monospace font faces, in their
+unabridged version.
 
-%postun
-if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
-fi
+%font_subpkg -n sans-mono -f *-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf DejaVuSansMono*.ttf
 
 
-%post experimental
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
-fi
+%package lgc-sans
+Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
+Group:    User Interface/X
+Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
 
+%description lgc-sans
+%common_desc
 
-%postun experimental
-if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
-fi
+This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, with
+unicode coverage restricted to Latin, Greek and Cyrillic.
 
+%font_subpkg -n lgc-sans -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-sans.conf DejaVuLGCSans.ttf DejaVuLGCSans-*.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed*.ttf
 
-%post -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
-fi
 
+%package lgc-serif
+Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
+Group:    User Interface/X
+Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
 
-%postun -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
-fi
+%description lgc-serif
+%common_desc
 
+This package consists of the DejaVu serif variable-width font faces, with
+unicode coverage restricted to Latin, Greek and Cyrillic.
 
-%files
-%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
-%doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README
-%doc build/unicover.txt build/langcover.txt build/status.txt
+%font_subpkg -n lgc-serif -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-serif.conf DejaVuLGCSerif.ttf DejaVuLGCSerif-*.ttf DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed*.ttf
 
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/20-unhint-small-%{fontname}.conf
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/57-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%dir %{fontdir}/
-%{fontdir}/*.ttf
-%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVu*Condensed*.ttf
-%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVu*ExtraLight*.ttf
-%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVuSerif*Italic.ttf
-%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVuLGC*.ttf
+%package lgc-sans-mono
+Summary:  DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
+Group:    User Interface/X
+Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
 
+%description lgc-sans-mono
+%common_desc
 
-%files experimental
-%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
+This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif monospace font faces, with
+unicode coverage restricted to Latin, Greek and Cyrillic.
+
+%font_subpkg -n lgc-sans-mono -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono.conf DejaVuLGCSansMono*.ttf
+
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n %{archivename}
+%patch0 -p1
+
+
+%build
+make %{?_smp_mflags} VERSION=%{version} FC-LANG="" \
+     BLOCKS=%{Blocks} UNICODEDATA=%{UnicodeData}
+
+# Stop the spin people from complaining this file is too big
+bzip2 -9 build/status.txt
+
+
+%check
+make check
 
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/20-unhint-small-%{fontname}-experimental.conf
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}-experimental.conf
 
-%{fontdir}/DejaVu*Condensed*.ttf
-%{fontdir}/DejaVu*ExtraLight*.ttf
-%{fontdir}/DejaVuSerif*Italic.ttf
+%install
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
+
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p build/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
+
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
+install -m 0644 -p fontconfig/*conf %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
 
-%exclude %{fontdir}/DejaVuLGC*.ttf
 
+%clean
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
-%files -n %{fontname}-lgc-fonts
+%files doc
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README
-%doc build/unicover-lgc.txt build/langcover-lgc.txt
-
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/20-unhint-small-%{fontname}-lgc.conf
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/58-%{fontname}-lgc.conf
+%doc build/unicover.txt build/status.txt.bz2
 
+# May as well put it in the common doc package
 %dir %{fontdir}/
-%{fontdir}/DejaVuLGC*.ttf
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 2.26-3
+??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines
+??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued
+  for F12)
+??? compress status file
+
 * Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 2.26-2
 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	3 Sep 2008 21:17:02 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 dejavu-fonts-2_25-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.25-2.fc10.src.rpm:1215806350
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-1_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-1.fc10.src.rpm:1217165726
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476598
+dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sat Nov  8 19:33:34 2008
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sat,  8 Nov 2008 19:33:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.87, 1.88 import.log,
	1.4, 1.5
Message-ID: <20081108193334.269487013A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28112/devel

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
major package rework with new subpackage split


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.87
retrieving revision 1.88
diff -u -r1.87 -r1.88
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000	1.87
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000	1.88
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.26
-Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
 Summary: DejaVu fonts
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
 
 
 %package compat
-Summary:  DejaVu fonts, compatibility
-Group:    User Interface/X
+Summary: DejaVu fonts, compatibility
+Group:   User Interface/X
 
 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.6.23
 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.6.23
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@
 
 
 %package lgc-compat
-Summary:  DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility
-Group:    User Interface/X
+Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility
+Group:   User Interface/X
 
 Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.6.23
 
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@
 make %{?_smp_mflags} VERSION=%{version} FC-LANG="" \
      BLOCKS=%{Blocks} UNICODEDATA=%{UnicodeData}
 
-# Stop the spin people from complaining this file is too big
+# Stop the desktop people from complaining this file is too big
 bzip2 -9 build/status.txt
 
 
@@ -232,9 +232,13 @@
 %dir %{fontdir}/
 
 
+%files compat
+%files lgc-compat
+
+
 %changelog
 * Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
-- 2.26-3
+- 2.26-4
 ??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines
 ??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued
   for F12)


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- import.log	8 Nov 2008 18:38:15 -0000	1.4
+++ import.log	8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-1_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-1.fc10.src.rpm:1217165726
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476598
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315
+dejavu-fonts-2_26-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-4.fc11.src.rpm:1226172743



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sat Nov  8 19:54:34 2008
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sat,  8 Nov 2008 19:54:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.88, 1.89 import.log,
	1.5, 1.6
Message-ID: <20081108195434.CCA5C7013D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32736/devel

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
major package rework with new subpackage split


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.88
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -r1.88 -r1.89
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000	1.88
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000	1.89
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.26
-Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
 Summary: DejaVu fonts
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@
 Summary: DejaVu fonts, compatibility
 Group:   User Interface/X
 
-Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.6.23
-Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.6.23
+Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3
+Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3
 
 Requires: %{name}-sans, %{name}-serif, %{name}-sans-mono
 
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
 Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility
 Group:   User Interface/X
 
-Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.6.23
+Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3
 
 Requires: %{name}-lgc-sans, %{name}-lgc-serif, %{name}-lgc-sans-mono
 
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
 
 %changelog
 * Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
-- 2.26-4
+- 2.26-5
 ??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines
 ??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued
   for F12)


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- import.log	8 Nov 2008 19:33:03 -0000	1.5
+++ import.log	8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000	1.6
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476598
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-4.fc11.src.rpm:1226172743
+dejavu-fonts-2_26-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-5.fc11.src.rpm:1226174018



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Sat Nov  8 23:16:09 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:16:09 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811082316.mA8NG9pD018781@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #1 from David Baron [:dbaron] <dbaron at mozilla.com>  2008-11-08 15:16:07 PST ---
When this lands, you'll need to adjust the fails-if and skip-if markers in
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/layout/reftests/font-face/reftest.list

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 02:30:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:30:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] New: Hinting problems with default Sans font
Message-ID: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Hinting problems with default Sans font

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704

           Summary: Hinting problems with default Sans font
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 9
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: freetype
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: clancy.kieran+redhat at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Created an attachment (id=322983)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322983)
Cropped screenshot of Firefox search box

Description of problem:
There seems to be some strange hinting on certain letter combinations for the
Sans font in Fedora 9. This happens in the URL bar and Search box in Firefox,
but it probably happens in other applications too. See the screenshots
attached.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.3.5-6.fc9.i386
dejavu-fonts-2.24-3.fc9.noarch (I don't know if the default 'Sans' is DejaVu or
if 'Sans' is from another package)
firefox-3.0.2-1.fc9.i386

How reproducible:
Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Type the letters 'fi' into the search box in Firefox

Actual results:
Fonts are strangely hinted, as in the screenshot attached.

Expected results:
Kerning and hinting should be consistent.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 02:32:31 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:32:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font
In-Reply-To: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811090232.mA92WV2O019792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704





--- Comment #1 from Kieran Clancy <clancy.kieran+redhat at gmail.com>  2008-11-08 21:32:30 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=322984)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322984)
Enlarged region of font, with added colour to highlight strange hinting

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 02:36:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:36:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font
In-Reply-To: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811090236.mA92a6IG020387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704





--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-08 21:36:05 EDT ---
That's the fi ligature. I don't think it's Freetype using that ligature, but
something higher in the stack, for example Qt 3 applications don't use it, Qt 4
apps do. In Firefox's case, it's probably Pango.

But I suspect the real problem is that the font appears to come with a broken
fi ligature.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 02:41:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:41:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font
In-Reply-To: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811090241.mA92fh9M021197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704





--- Comment #3 from Kieran Clancy <clancy.kieran+redhat at gmail.com>  2008-11-08 21:41:42 EDT ---
Thanks for the quick response. I wasn't really sure what component to assign
this bug to; feel free to reassign it somewhere more appropriate.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 02:47:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:47:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font
In-Reply-To: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811090247.mA92lLnw021947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704





--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-08 21:47:21 EDT ---
I'll let Behdad do that because I'm not really sure what the right component is
here (but I suspect it's either dejavu-fonts or pango).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 08:04:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 03:04:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font
In-Reply-To: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811090804.mA984Ess007150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 03:04:13 EDT ---
The font itself is fine. However it has to rely on hinting to make sure f and f
ligatures are resized consistently at small sizes. Since we don't use upstream
hints for evil patent reasons, the problem is in our freetype/pango autohinting
logic.

And yes this bug is highly user-visible and very annoying.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sun Nov  9 09:06:56 2008
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun,  9 Nov 2008 09:06:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.89, 1.90 import.log,
	1.6, 1.7
Message-ID: <20081109090657.050457011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28949/devel

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
major package rework with new subpackage split (last brown paper bag fixup)


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.89
retrieving revision 1.90
diff -u -r1.89 -r1.90
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000	1.89
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	9 Nov 2008 09:06:24 -0000	1.90
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.26
-Release: 5%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
 Summary: DejaVu fonts
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -74,14 +74,16 @@
 %common_desc
 
 
-%package doc
-Summary:  DejaVu fonts, documentation
+%package common
+Summary:  DejaVu fonts, common files (documentation???)
 Group:    User Interface/X
 
-%description doc
+Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-doc < 2.26-6
+
+%description common
 %common_desc
 
-This package consists of the DejaVu project documentation.
+This package consists of files used by other DejaVu packages.
 
 
 %package compat
@@ -112,7 +114,7 @@
 %package sans
 Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description sans
 %common_desc
@@ -126,7 +128,7 @@
 %package serif
 Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description serif
 %common_desc
@@ -140,7 +142,7 @@
 %package sans-mono
 Summary:  DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description sans-mono
 %common_desc
@@ -154,7 +156,7 @@
 %package lgc-sans
 Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description lgc-sans
 %common_desc
@@ -168,7 +170,7 @@
 %package lgc-serif
 Summary:  DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description lgc-serif
 %common_desc
@@ -182,7 +184,7 @@
 %package lgc-sans-mono
 Summary:  DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
 Group:    User Interface/X
-Requires: %{name}-doc = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description lgc-sans-mono
 %common_desc
@@ -223,12 +225,11 @@
 %clean
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
-%files doc
+%files common
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README
 %doc build/unicover.txt build/status.txt.bz2
 
-# May as well put it in the common doc package
 %dir %{fontdir}/
 
 
@@ -237,8 +238,8 @@
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sat Nov 8 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
-- 2.26-5
+* Sun Nov 9 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 2.26-6
 ??? Package split reorganisation, following font family lines
 ??? Create compat packages to ease switchover at F11 time (to be discontinued
   for F12)


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- import.log	8 Nov 2008 19:54:04 -0000	1.6
+++ import.log	9 Nov 2008 09:06:25 -0000	1.7
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-3.fc11.src.rpm:1226169315
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-4.fc11.src.rpm:1226172743
 dejavu-fonts-2_26-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-5.fc11.src.rpm:1226174018
+dejavu-fonts-2_26-6_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-6.fc11.src.rpm:1226221359



From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0001.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0002.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0003.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0004.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0005.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0006.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0007.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0008.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0009.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0010.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0011.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0012.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0013.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0014.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0015.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0016.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0017.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0018.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0019.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0020.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:09:10 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:10 +0100
Subject: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Message-ID: <1226228950.21652.95.camel@arekh.okg>

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/6f1e76c2/attachment-0021.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:16:57 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:16:57 +0100
Subject: [Fwd: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits,
 etc)]
Message-ID: <1226229417.21652.99.camel@arekh.okg>

[Of course I had to forget a few recipients]

-------- Message transf?r? --------

Sujet: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:14 +0100

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/c5eada7d/attachment.sig>

From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  Sun Nov  9 11:16:57 2008
From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:16:57 +0100
Subject: [Fwd: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits,
 etc)]
Message-ID: <1226229417.21652.99.camel@arekh.okg>

[Of course I had to forget a few recipients]

-------- Message transf?r? --------

Sujet: Fedora 11 font package changes proposal (renames, splits, etc)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:09:14 +0100

Hi,

If you've received this message directly (not via a list) you're
concerned by the font package changes proposed for Fedora 11:
? the changes touch one of your packages or
? the changes touch/need one component you're lead on (comps, packagedb,
rpm?)

Please reply to the fedora fonts list however to keep the discussion in
a single place.

The complete list of proposed changes is published there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes

All is open to discussion, and it's on a wiki page, so don't hesitate to
complete/correct it.

This list is pretty ambitious and requires buy-in by many people to be
executed properly. Not to mention that the Fedora 11 cycle will start
soon. Please do respond to the list, stating:
? your requests and comments (if any)
? if you will change your packages along those lines for Fedora 11
? if you will allow other packagers to change your packages in your
stead
? if you totally object to one part of the proposal, and why

Unless there is strong opposition I will apply those changes to my own
packages (and to vera and liberation if their maintainers are ok with
it). However, to be effective, other packagers must change their
packages too.


??? Short proposal summary:

? package renames, to fix the naming discrepancies that have crept in
with the repository growth 
(different packagers followed different conventions)

? package splits, to offer more flexibility to spin groups and fedora
users

? new comps groups, to group related fonts together
(gfs fonts, sil fonts, etc)

? reminder of the ongoing fontconfig guidelines change
(still waiting for fontconfig upstream to comment on)

? new packaging template and macros
(to put in rpm? some other place?)


??? Rationale:

? help spins and users

Wanting serif from dejavu, mono from liberation, and sans from tiresias,
without dragging in all the other dejavu/liberation/tiresias fonts is a
valid setup.

? help packagers and package reviewers

Inconsistent repository and fuzzy rules mean package reviews drag on
while the kinks are ironed out, which is not fun at all for everyone
involved. Much better to have clear conventions packagers can identify
before hitting review stage.


??? Proof of concept:

Dejavu has been used to proof the concepts in rawhide (cf the wiki page)


I hope those proposals will be agreeable to everyone.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-bugs-list/attachments/20081109/c5eada7d/attachment-0001.sig>

From mnowak at fedoraproject.org  Sun Nov  9 11:53:37 2008
From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak)
Date: Sun,  9 Nov 2008 11:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel import.log, NONE,
	1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1,
	1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081109115337.7EBF07011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mnowak

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13913/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log unikurd-web-font.spec 
Log Message:
init



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:HEAD:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226231549


--- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec ---
%define fontname          unikurd-web
%define fontdir           %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define archivename       unikurdweb

Name:           %{fontname}-font
Version:        20020502
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        A widely used Kurdish font

Group:          User Interface/X
# FIXME:
# Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not*
# responding on this
License:        GPLv3
URL:            http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337
Source0:        http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip
BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:      noarch

%description
A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like 
(Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin.


%prep
%setup -q -c %{archivename}


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(644,root,root,755)
%doc gpl.txt
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf


%changelog
* Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 20020502
- version is now based on date of last issue of the font
- %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755)

* Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-2
- got rid of -web sub-package
- changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font
- minor structural changes in SPEC file

* Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-1
- initial packaging
- this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts 
  in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there
  are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	9 Nov 2008 11:53:07 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+unikurdweb.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	9 Nov 2008 11:53:07 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0  unikurdweb.zip



From mnowak at fedoraproject.org  Sun Nov  9 11:56:17 2008
From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak)
Date: Sun,  9 Nov 2008 11:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, 
	NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081109115617.98D047011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mnowak

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14398/F-10

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log unikurd-web-font.spec 
Log Message:
init



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:F-10:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226231708


--- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec ---
%define fontname          unikurd-web
%define fontdir           %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define archivename       unikurdweb

Name:           %{fontname}-font
Version:        20020502
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        A widely used Kurdish font

Group:          User Interface/X
# FIXME:
# Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not*
# responding on this
License:        GPLv3
URL:            http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337
Source0:        http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip
BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:      noarch

%description
A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like 
(Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin.


%prep
%setup -q -c %{archivename}


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(644,root,root,755)
%doc gpl.txt
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf


%changelog
* Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 20020502
- version is now based on date of last issue of the font
- %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755)

* Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-2
- got rid of -web sub-package
- changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font
- minor structural changes in SPEC file

* Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-1
- initial packaging
- this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts 
  in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there
  are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	9 Nov 2008 11:55:47 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+unikurdweb.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	9 Nov 2008 11:55:47 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0  unikurdweb.zip



From mnowak at fedoraproject.org  Sun Nov  9 11:59:24 2008
From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak)
Date: Sun,  9 Nov 2008 11:59:24 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, 
	NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081109115924.753397012A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mnowak

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14961/F-9

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log unikurd-web-font.spec 
Log Message:
init



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:F-9:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226231838


--- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec ---
%define fontname          unikurd-web
%define fontdir           %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define archivename       unikurdweb

Name:           %{fontname}-font
Version:        20020502
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        A widely used Kurdish font

Group:          User Interface/X
# FIXME:
# Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not*
# responding on this
License:        GPLv3
URL:            http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337
Source0:        http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip
BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:      noarch

%description
A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like 
(Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin.


%prep
%setup -q -c %{archivename}


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(644,root,root,755)
%doc gpl.txt
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf


%changelog
* Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 20020502
- version is now based on date of last issue of the font
- %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755)

* Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-2
- got rid of -web sub-package
- changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font
- minor structural changes in SPEC file

* Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-1
- initial packaging
- this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts 
  in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there
  are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	9 Nov 2008 11:58:54 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+unikurdweb.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	9 Nov 2008 11:58:54 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0  unikurdweb.zip



From mnowak at fedoraproject.org  Sun Nov  9 12:01:50 2008
From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak)
Date: Sun,  9 Nov 2008 12:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 unikurd-web-font.spec, 
	NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081109120150.877DB7011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mnowak

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15729/F-8

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log unikurd-web-font.spec 
Log Message:
init



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1_el5:F-8:unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm:1226232034


--- NEW FILE unikurd-web-font.spec ---
%define fontname          unikurd-web
%define fontdir           %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define archivename       unikurdweb

Name:           %{fontname}-font
Version:        20020502
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        A widely used Kurdish font

Group:          User Interface/X
# FIXME:
# Shouldn't we have SFD (or SFD-like) sources? Upstream is *not*
# responding on this
License:        GPLv3
URL:            http://www.kurditgroup.org/node/1337
Source0:        http://www.kurditgroup.org/download/1337/%{archivename}.zip
BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:      noarch

%description
A widely used Kurdish font which supports various Arabic scripts like 
(Arabic, Kurdish, Persian) and also Latin.


%prep
%setup -q -c %{archivename}


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 Unikuweb.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(644,root,root,755)
%doc gpl.txt
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/Unikuweb.ttf


%changelog
* Tue Oct 14 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 20020502
- version is now based on date of last issue of the font
- %%defattr(-,root,root,-) -> %%defattr(644,root,root,755)

* Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-2
- got rid of -web sub-package
- changed name from unikurd-fonts-web to unikurd-web-font
- minor structural changes in SPEC file

* Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 1.00-1
- initial packaging
- this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts 
  in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there
  are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	9 Nov 2008 12:01:20 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+unikurdweb.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/F-8/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	15 Oct 2008 16:45:08 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	9 Nov 2008 12:01:20 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1d0af629e8f4ce4e1722d0cacf2e26b0  unikurdweb.zip



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 12:21:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:21:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091221.mA9CL9JI008781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281





--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-09 07:21:08 EDT ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 12:20:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:20:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091220.mA9CKLrV008608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281





--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-09 07:20:20 EDT ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 12:22:10 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 07:22:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091222.mA9CMA5B009032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281





--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-09 07:22:10 EDT ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 15:24:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:24:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091524.mA9FOU7l007364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 10:24:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I
> am still waiting for  a reply

Please do not wait for OLPC to respond. Our packaging standards are higher than
theirs, any any font package that passed Fedora review will just the OLPC
package next time they rebase on a new Fedora version.

Just do the requested fixes, so we can have a clean Fedora package OLPC can be
referred to.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 15:41:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:41:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font
In-Reply-To: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091541.mA9Ff6JE009956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704





--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-09 10:41:05 EDT ---
You're right, this is the autohinter's fault. If I turn the hinting off
entirely, I get unusably blurry fonts, but the ligatures don't look misplaced.
So freetype is actually the correct component to file this against (though
disabling the ligatures in Pango and Qt 4 might also be a solution, we've done
well for years without them, e.g. Qt 3 never used them).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 16:05:41 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G5fma021443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #28 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-09 11:05:40 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323015)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323015)
font config configuration

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 16:05:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G56li021237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #27 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-09 11:05:05 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323014)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014)
spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 16:03:57 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:03:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091603.mA9G3vE6020816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alsadi at ojuba.org




--- Comment #26 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-09 11:03:56 EDT ---
Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora
as my first fedora package

we need 3 font packages
1. KACST
2. core
3. decorative
http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot
as you case see they are already split by upstream 
http://cvs.arabeyes.org/viewcvs/art/khotot/

KACST is not developed by Arabeyes thus they need its own super package
while core and decorative should be two subpackages of the same package

the core fonts are missing the best font which is simplified naskhi, which can
be downloaded from Araveyes fonts team leader and the designer of the fonts

http://www.khaledhosny.org/filebrowser

KACST's fonts are released under GPLv1
the decorative fonts are GPLv2 and the core fonts are OFL licensed

I'll attach my .spec file

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 18:58:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 13:58:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard
 Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091858.mA9IwYxS005598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947





--- Comment #15 from Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 13:58:33 EDT ---
ping ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 19:23:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 14:23:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard
 Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091923.mA9JNYhv009561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947


Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho |
                   |o.co.in)                    |




--- Comment #16 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in>  2008-11-09 14:23:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> ping ?

pong!

hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for
sure..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:18:57 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:18:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092118.mA9LIvem026452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org
          Component|dejavu-fonts                |freetype
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:25:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:25:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092125.mA9LPMsS002306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561


Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clancy.kieran+redhat at gmail.
                   |                            |com




--- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-09 16:25:20 EDT ---
*** Bug 470704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:25:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:25:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 470704] Hinting problems with default Sans font
In-Reply-To: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470704-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092125.mA9LPL3N002290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470704


Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




--- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-09 16:25:20 EDT ---
Turns out we already have a bug filed about this, Nicolas just reassigned it to
freetype.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 368561 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:22:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:22:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
In-Reply-To: <bug-468618-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468618-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092122.mA9LMChC027131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 16:22:12 EDT ---
BTW if the problem is that the current macros used in this package want to take
a single font file as argument, then the subpackaging macro I wrote in dejavu
yesterday could be used instead.

I must admit I was thinking very hard about the un font packages when I wrote
them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:27:10 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:27:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092127.mA9LRAnx002480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561





--- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-09 16:27:09 EDT ---
Note that there are also fl and ffi ligatures which have the same problem.

Should we be tweaking Pango and Qt 4 to kill the use of those useless ligatures
entirely?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:27:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:27:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092127.mA9LR1A5027794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:35:53 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:35:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
In-Reply-To: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092135.mA9LZr57029061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-09 16:35:51 EDT ---
I'll go ahead and review this in the next few days sometime.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:56:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:56:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092156.mA9LueFU007131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |besfahbo at redhat.com,
                   |                            |tcallawa at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com)




--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 16:56:39 EDT ---
Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass

1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok,
you still need spot to approve it and put it on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts

2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be
referenced in release notes

(a wiki page template is available there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template )

3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK
fonts should be in the 65-69 range
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists

Of course Behdad has the last say on this, so if you convince him to ok it I'll
let this pass.

4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It
probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there).

5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use
serif fonts to complete HanaMin
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names

6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in
their next release once you're happy with it

7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9

8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755)

9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same
order as in rpmdevtool's  spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it,
just take it into account for your next font package)

All in all this was a pleasant spec file to review and I'll have no problem
approving it once those little problems are taken care of

? NEEDINFO in the meanwhile

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:59:52 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:59:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092159.mA9LxqZu032672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 16:59:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Created an attachment (id=323014)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) [details]
> spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage

Alsadi, as I stated on the list (and in this review) we do not do superpackages
in Fedora, so if you want to propose spec files you need to propose one spec
per font (ie 3 spec files), not a single spec that packages three different
upstream archives in one go

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 22:01:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:01:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092201.mA9M1cgk000847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net




--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 17:01:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Note that there are also fl and ffi ligatures which have the same problem.
> 
> Should we be tweaking Pango and Qt 4 to kill the use of those useless ligatures
> entirely?

They're not useless, when the software supports them properly the result is
better than no ligature (and some fonts rely hugely on them)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 22:08:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:08:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (
 =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt
In-Reply-To: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092208.mA9M8ERW008979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com,
                   |                            |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org
          Component|dejavu-fonts                |freetype
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 22:11:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:11:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092211.mA9MBh5a002553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561





--- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-09 17:11:42 EDT ---
Yet:
* Qt/KDE 3 never used those ligatures, nobody ever complained about that.
* I remember reading about complaints from users of languages with dotless i
(mainly Turkish) about the fi and ffi ligatures which hide the dot on the i in
several fonts.
* Why can't a letter just be a letter? (It's not just ligatures, kerning for
letter pairs like To where the o gets moved into the empty space of the T is
similarly funky.) All those special cases make the fonts look irregular and
inconsistent.

Basically, those ligatures cause this bug without bringing any tangible
benefit. Even with this bug fixed, they may still get noticed (as in: hey,
there's some weird ligature here which jumps to the eyes) and fail in their
intent at getting read as the letter pairs/triplets they're supposed to
represent.

</RANT>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 02:39:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:39:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100239.mAA2d6oW024348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|tcallawa at redhat.com         |




--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-11-09 21:39:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass
> 
> 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok,
> you still need spot to approve it and put it on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts

See this
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov 10 05:11:52 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:11:52 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811100511.mAA5BqD1030605@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #21 from Parag Nemade <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-11-09 21:11:47 PST ---
Will be good if this patch will be available in 3.0.x branch also. Can we have
this fix applied to 3.0.5 branch?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 05:12:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:12:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100512.mAA5C9iO021440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) |




--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 00:12:08 EDT ---
Thank you for taking a review for this package.

(In reply to comment #3)
> 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok,
> you still need spot to approve it and put it on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts

I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe
License tag -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html

> 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
> and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be
> referenced in release notes

Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font

> 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK
> fonts should be in the 65-69 range
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists
> 
> 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It
> probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there).

I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for
Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's
the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if
someone could helps me.

> 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use
> serif fonts to complete HanaMin
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names

Fixed in the updated package.

> 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in
> their next release once you're happy with it

Sure.

> 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9

Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
hereafter?

> 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755)

Sorry, missed one. fixed.

> 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same
> order as in rpmdevtool's  spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it,
> just take it into account for your next font package)

Oh, wasn't aware of that. improved a bit in:

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 08:20:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:20:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100820.mAA8Kj57012616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com)




--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-10 03:20:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)

> I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe
> License tag -
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html

If you could convince spot to publish this on his "licenses approved for fonts
use" wiki page, that would make it easier for the next reviewers. Anyway

> > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
> > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be
> > referenced in release notes
> 
> Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font

Nice. You just need to remove the : before Category to activate them (fixed, I
must rework the template help, everyone makes the same mistake)

> > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK
> > fonts should be in the 65-69 range
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists
> > 
> > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It
> > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there).
> 
> I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for
> Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's
> the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if
> someone could helps me.

Ultimately, Behdad is the best judge of us all on fontconfig stuff.

> > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use
> > serif fonts to complete HanaMin
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names
> 
> Fixed in the updated package.

Nope, the rule I referenced would have been

<alias>
  <family>HanaMin</family>
  <default>
    <family>serif</family>
  </default>
</alias>

The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja
test.

The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after 
conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed
before, so you can't use both in the same file :p

Thus I'd advise to
1. keep your original rule
2. add the one I just wrote
3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
4. test test test

> > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9
> 
> Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
> hereafter?

It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as
Fedora 8 in un-supported.

> Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm

Appart from the fontconfig bit, you're almost there

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 08:52:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:52:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100852.mAA8qimL027141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |




--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-10 03:52:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Yet:
> * Qt/KDE 3 never used those ligatures, nobody ever complained about that.

People did, you just didn't notice it

> * I remember reading about complaints from users of languages with dotless i
> (mainly Turkish) about the fi and ffi ligatures which hide the dot on the i in
> several fonts.

If the fonts are buggy they should be fixed. If the fonts are ok but freetype
makes a mess of them freetype should be fixed

> * Why can't a letter just be a letter?

That's a na?ve western view. An awful lot of "letters" in unicode and opentype
are not just "letters" but are rendered via various magic of which ligatures
are a very small part. The OO.o issue tracker is choke-full of people begging
SUN to support this kind of magic (because OO.o right now is even less capable
than QT3 was and QT4/pango would be if we followed your suggestion). So users
do care about this. (and the OO.o people are working to fix their bugs)

DejaVu ligatures are light and not as spectacular than in other fonts. But
DejaVu is not the only ligature user. Libertine has them, and so have an
increasing number of other fonts (any self-respecting font designer adds them
nowadays, because they're one of the key differentiator with legacy fonts)

http://www.josbuivenga.demon.nl/tallys.html

This is just a freetype autohinter bug. We can't ask font designers to ignore
the patented bytecode engine and at the same time not support stuff that work
with it. We can't hide your head in the sand while font technology progresses
and Microsoft/Adobe invest massively in OpenType to fix its remaining
typographical problems. We can't refuse to support stuff that works in other
OSes and hope users don't notice.

> (It's not just ligatures, kerning for
> letter pairs like To where the o gets moved into the empty space of the T is
> similarly funky.)

This is overtight kerning in the font of which upstream is aware of (and on the
TODO fix list). Not ligatures at all.

> All those special cases make the fonts look irregular and
> inconsistent.

For the ligature bit, complain at freetype
For the kerning bit, complain at dejavu

That's two different problems. Modern fonts are complex beasts. We've
progressed a lot in past years but there's still a lot of work to do freetype
and free fonts side. Your proposal would not help things at all.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 09:47:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:47:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100947.mAA9lddv028991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561





--- Comment #19 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-10 04:47:38 EDT ---
> That's a na?ve western view. An awful lot of "letters" in unicode and opentype
> are not just "letters" but are rendered via various magic of which ligatures
> are a very small part.

Sorry, I expressed myself badly. I know ligatures and similar constructs are
commonplace in some alphabets (Arabic and most of the Indic scripts, for
example).

So let me correct myself:
-> Why can't a Latin letter just be a letter? <-

To me all this ligature stuff for Latin letters looks like a solution looking
for a problem, i.e. "hey, we have all this complex text layout framework for
Arabic and Indic scripts, let's also use it for Latin just to be fancy".

> http://www.josbuivenga.demon.nl/tallys.html

Those are very good examples of the fi ligature gobbling up the dot on the i.

> This is just a freetype autohinter bug. We can't ask font designers to ignore
> the patented bytecode engine and at the same time not support stuff that work
> with it.

They wouldn't have to do anything at all. My proposal is to disable ligatures
for Latin letters systemwide in Pango and Qt 4 Scribe, any ligatures provided
by fonts would just be ignored (as they were in the past, and still are in e.g.
Qt 3 apps).

As for the kerning, I know it's a separate issue, I only brought it up here
because it's part of the same philosophy of special-casing letter pairs. But
let's limit ourselves to ligatures in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov 10 10:12:45 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:12:45 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811101012.mAAACjHx030402@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #22 from Martin Str?nsk? <stransky at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 02:12:31 PST ---
Yep, fix in 1.9.0.x would be great.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 11:09:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:09:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811101109.mAAB9i3e011791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net




--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-10 06:09:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> > That's a na?ve western view. An awful lot of "letters" in unicode and opentype
> > are not just "letters" but are rendered via various magic of which ligatures
> > are a very small part.
> 
> Sorry, I expressed myself badly. I know ligatures and similar constructs are
> commonplace in some alphabets (Arabic and most of the Indic scripts, for
> example).
> 
> So let me correct myself:
> -> Why can't a Latin letter just be a letter? <-

Because even latin scripts have exceptions that need magic (you wouldn't
believe what the africans do with latin letters).

> To me all this ligature stuff for Latin letters looks like a solution looking
> for a problem, i.e. "hey, we have all this complex text layout framework for
> Arabic and Indic scripts, let's also use it for Latin just to be fancy".
> 
> > http://www.josbuivenga.demon.nl/tallys.html
> 
> Those are very good examples of the fi ligature gobbling up the dot on the i.

Which is ok for non-turkish users ie turkish needs a special locl rule for
ligatures in fonts or even some special magic at pango/harfbuzz level.

> > This is just a freetype autohinter bug. We can't ask font designers to ignore
> > the patented bytecode engine and at the same time not support stuff that work
> > with it.
> 
> They wouldn't have to do anything at all. My proposal is to disable ligatures
> for Latin letters systemwide in Pango and Qt 4 Scribe, any ligatures provided
> by fonts would just be ignored (as they were in the past, and still are in e.g.
> Qt 3 apps).

Experience shows this won't lead to any fix freetype-side and we'll just have
to enable ligature support under user pressure in a few months, with the bug
still unfixed. (hiding ligature problems was already tried firefox-side with no
good result)

Sorry but ligatures exist and ignoring them in the hope our bugs will magically
go away is not a solution. Please spend your energy getting freetype people to
fix their stuff.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 11:52:42 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:52:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 368561] ligature-related font rendering bug with 'ff' and 'fi'
In-Reply-To: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-368561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811101152.mAABqg4T019597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561





--- Comment #21 from Ben Laenen <bl.bugs at gmail.com>  2008-11-10 06:52:41 EDT ---
> To me all this ligature stuff for Latin letters looks like a solution
> looking for a problem, i.e. "hey, we have all this complex text layout
> framework for Arabic and Indic scripts, let's also use it for Latin just to
> be fancy".

Ligatures for Latin already existed in Medieval times with the first printing
devices. It's not like they suddenly appeared out of nowhere the past decade
just because we created the OpenType system.

It would be nice though if features can be manually turned on and off by a
user...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 11:52:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:52:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811101152.mAABqdp0019556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) |




--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 06:52:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Nope, the rule I referenced would have been
> 
> <alias>
>   <family>HanaMin</family>
>   <default>
>     <family>serif</family>
>   </default>
> </alias>
> 
> The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja
> test.

Doh, just referred the wrong thing.. :(

> The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after 
> conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed
> before, so you can't use both in the same file :p

Ah, ok.

> Thus I'd advise to
> 1. keep your original rule
> 2. add the one I just wrote
> 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
> 4. test test test

Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow.

> 
> > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9
> > 
> > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
> > hereafter?
> 
> It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as
> Fedora 8 in un-supported.

I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you
because it's going to be EOL'd soon. BTW just noticed that I can't see any
annotations on the template page. I had to do the view source to see. dunno if
it's a problem on my browser, or mediawiki's bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 12:16:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:16:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811101216.mAACGUJc001301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-10 07:16:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)

> > Thus I'd advise to
> > 1. keep your original rule
> > 2. add the one I just wrote
> > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
> > 4. test test test
> 
> Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow.

Then does it work with 65? I thought I understood how fontconfig worked, but
maybe I'm just another confused user

> I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you
> because it's going to be EOL'd soon.

I'm rewriting all the templates anyway because of the number of multi-font
packages we've had to process lately

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Mon Nov 10 18:40:40 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18470] New: conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation
Message-ID: <bug-18470-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470

           Summary: conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation
           Product: fontconfig
           Version: 2.6
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: conf
        AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


As explained in
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2008-October/003030.html

conf.avail can be considered an FHS violation

Can it be moved somewhere in /usr/share?

We'd like to make font packages use the conf.d/conf.avail split in Fedora 11
but our package auditing tools do not like an /etc/fonts/conf.avail read-only
directory at all, strongly hinting the current default should be changed.

And if it has to be changed we'd rather it was changed before scores of
packages depend on the current default.

Fedora 11 packaging cycle will open soonish.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 00:47:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:47:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110047.mAB0luF1008396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request:             |Review Request:
                   |Thabit-fonts from           |arabeyes-thabit-fonts
                   |Arabeyes.org                |




--- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 19:47:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora
> as my first fedora package

Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package.

> we need 3 font packages
> 1. KACST

kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 05:35:42 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:35:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110535.mAB5ZgFW022387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982





--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 00:35:41 EDT ---
This only seems to affect anaconda, so I don't see why this should be a
fontconfig issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 05:36:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:36:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110536.mAB5adu4000564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anaconda-maint-list at redhat.
                   |                            |com
          Component|fontconfig                  |anaconda
         AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com         |anaconda-maint-list at redhat.
                   |                            |com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Tue Nov 11 09:42:01 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18470] /etc/ =?utf-8?b?4oCm?= /conf.
 avail can be considered an FHS violation
In-Reply-To: <bug-18470-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
Message-ID: <20081111094201.3BB9913014F@annarchy.freedesktop.org>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |freedesktop at behdad.org
            Summary|conf.avail can be considered|/etc/?/conf.avail can be
                   |an FHS violation            |considered an FHS violation




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 14:21:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:21:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111421.mABELond007860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 09:21:48 EDT ---
Well, it still fails

java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1:1.6.0.0-3.b12.fc11.x86_64

I'd love to report more info but you have to tell me what would be useful to
resolve the problem

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 14:31:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:31:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111431.mABEV1Sg031317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #13 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 09:31:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I'd love to report more info but you have to tell me what would be useful to
> resolve the problem

It would be good if you could find someone else for which this also still
fails, so we could compare the environments.

The stack trace you get seem to indicate that there is something wrong with the
accessibility support initialization. Is there anything special in your
environment with regard to gnome accessibility being turned on/off, etc.?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 15:25:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:25:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111525.mABFPE7E009431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #31 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-11 10:25:13 EDT ---
> Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package.
till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in
bugzilla

>> we need 3 font packages
>> 1. KACST
> kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time.
I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages
because we have 3 upstream packages
kacst: is from different author
while arabeyes-core and arabeyes-decorative have different license (the first
is GPLed and the second is OFL)

Nicolas Mailhot proposed that each font should be split into a different
package
so at least we need 3 different source rpms because we have three upstreams
they later can be split using some macro into final rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 15:28:59 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:28:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111528.mABFSxsv020573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 10:28:58 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)

> The stack trace you get seem to indicate that there is something wrong with the
> accessibility support initialization. Is there anything special in your
> environment with regard to gnome accessibility being turned on/off, etc.?

I've attached the gconf accessibility information on the failing system

I don't know if it's "special", I never go there

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 15:27:42 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:27:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111527.mABFRgVW020425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 10:27:41 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323178)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323178)
~/.gconf/desktop/gnome/accessibility/keyboard/%gconf.xml on failing system

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 17:26:46 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:26:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111726.mABHQknH005499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #16 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 12:26:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> 
> > The stack trace you get seem to indicate that there is something wrong with the
> > accessibility support initialization. Is there anything special in your
> > environment with regard to gnome accessibility being turned on/off, etc.?
> 
> I've attached the gconf accessibility information on the failing system
> 
> I don't know if it's "special", I never go there

No, it doesn't seem special to me. It seems you have it not enabled.

Now I see from comment #5 that firefox actually segfaults for you, not just
produce that java stack. Still the java stack trace is strange. But lets see if
the crash gives us any more clues why it doesn't work for you.

Could quit all instances of firefox. Then have a terminal where you run it as
"firefox -g", that will drop you in gdb, just type "run" to get firefox running
as normal. Go to the same URL and  then when it crashes again you should be
dropped in gdb again in your terminal. Can you type "bt" and post the output?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 21:35:23 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:35:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112135.mABLZNmI009997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 16:35:22 EDT ---
BTW it worked once. Could not reproduce it 5s later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 21:34:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:34:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112134.mABLY8dm009462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #17 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 16:34:06 EDT ---
$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.EDCMlv
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 31966)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 31969)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 31970)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 31973)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeeb43950 (LWP 31974)]
[New Thread 0x7fffee142950 (LWP 31975)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe5323950 (LWP 31976)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe4922950 (LWP 31977)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 31978)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe3520950 (LWP 31979)]
Detaching after fork from child process 31980.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
11 nov. 2008 22:32:05 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 31978)]
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x504f510, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
JNLPRuntime already initialized
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install
e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.3-2.fc11.x86_64 gnome-keyring-2.25.1-1.fc11.x86_64
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-3.b12.fc11.x86_64
libXcomposite-0.4.0-6.fc11.x86_64 libXrandr-1.2.3-3.fc11.x86_64
libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-4.fc11.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.75-1.fc11.x86_64
libtdb-1.1.1-22.fc10.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.4-1.fc11.x86_64
(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x504f510, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f20750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2acb110,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138,
nativeParams=0x7fffe3f208c0)
    at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2acb6c0,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe3f209c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f209c0,
fpregs=0x7fffe3f209f0)
    at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0x2013230, aStatusType=<value optimized out>,
aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f20a90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x2013230,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f20b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x50432f0,
aStatusMsg=0x50f6e48 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe5b4483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage () from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#10 0x00007fffe5b471fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM () from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#11 0x00007fffe5b47373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage () from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#12 0x00007fffe5b5410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run ()
from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x504e230,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f2108c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x504f518, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 21:39:52 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:39:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112139.mABLdq8k010743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 16:39:51 EDT ---
And with codestyle:

$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.w0KcqD
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 32116)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 32119)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 32120)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 32127)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeeb43950 (LWP 32128)]
[New Thread 0x7fffee142950 (LWP 32129)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe7fff950 (LWP 32130)]
[Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 32127) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 32131)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe4922950 (LWP 32133)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 32153)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe3520950 (LWP 32154)]
Detaching after fork from child process 32155.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
11 nov. 2008 22:36:55 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)
Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar
jars length: 1
JNLPRuntime already initialized
Applet version: 1.1.0

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 32153)]
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x559c9a0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install
e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.3-2.fc11.x86_64 gnome-keyring-2.25.1-1.fc11.x86_64
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-3.b12.fc11.x86_64
libXcomposite-0.4.0-6.fc11.x86_64 libXrandr-1.2.3-3.fc11.x86_64
libgnomecanvas-2.20.1.1-4.fc11.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.75-1.fc11.x86_64
libtdb-1.1.1-22.fc10.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.4-1.fc11.x86_64
(gdb) Host: www.codestyle.org
Port not set.

(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x559c9a0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f20750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x7fffe8226c30,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138, 
    nativeParams=0x7fffe3f208c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x7fffe821c630,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe3f209c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f209c0, 
    fpregs=0x7fffe3f209f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0xd38540, aStatusType=<value optimized out>, aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f20a90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0xd38540,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f20b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x558a770,
aStatusMsg=0x571e0f8 "Applet initialis?.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe501f83b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage () from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#10 0x00007fffe50221fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM () from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#11 0x00007fffe5022373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage () from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#12 0x00007fffe502f10a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run ()
from
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
#13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x559b6c0,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f2108c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x559c9a8, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 22:06:41 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:06:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112206.mABM6fGS005200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 17:06:40 EDT ---
and codestyle:

$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.qcUzX8
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 420)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 423)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 424)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 427)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeed46950 (LWP 428)]
[New Thread 0x7fffee345950 (LWP 429)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe55c5950 (LWP 430)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe4bc4950 (LWP 431)]


ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe3f90950 (LWP 432)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe358f950 (LWP 433)]
Detaching after fork from child process 434.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
11 nov. 2008 23:03:55 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)
Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar
jars length: 1
JNLPRuntime already initialized
Applet version: 1.1.0

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f90950 (LWP 432)]
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x46d1000, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
(gdb) 
(gdb) 
(gdb) Host: www.codestyle.org
Port not set.

(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x46d1000, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f8f750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2a85b20,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138,
nativeParams=0x7fffe3f8f8c0)
    at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2a89540,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe3f8f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f8f9c0,
fpregs=0x7fffe3f8f9f0)
    at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0x23d0b70, aStatusType=<value optimized out>,
aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f8fa90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x23d0b70,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f8fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x2a79eb0,
aStatusMsg=0x4729628 "Applet initialis?.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe3fa483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x46cf330,
message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834
#10 0x00007fffe3fa71fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM
(this=0x46cf330) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289
#11 0x00007fffe3fa7373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x46cf330)
at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247
#12 0x00007fffe3fb410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run
(this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398
#13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x46cfd20,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f9008c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x46d1008, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 22:06:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:06:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112206.mABM68VP017268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 17:06:06 EDT ---
And with even more debuginfo packages installed, visibone:

$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.veZK02
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 326)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff11dd950 (LWP 329)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff05aa950 (LWP 330)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef809950 (LWP 333)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeeb43950 (LWP 334)]
[New Thread 0x7fffee142950 (LWP 335)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe5323950 (LWP 336)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe4922950 (LWP 337)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 338)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe3520950 (LWP 339)]
Detaching after fork from child process 340.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
11 nov. 2008 23:02:17 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe3f21950 (LWP 338)]
JNLPRuntime already initialized
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x4423c00, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x4423c00, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe3f20750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x299ff10,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6c138,
nativeParams=0x7fffe3f208c0)
    at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x29a04a0,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe3f209c0, gpregs=0x7fffe3f209c0,
fpregs=0x7fffe3f209f0)
    at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0x208a480, aStatusType=<value optimized out>,
aStatusText=@0x7fffe3f20a90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x208a480,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe3f20b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x4417aa0,
aStatusMsg=0x44b3708 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe5b4483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x4421f30,
message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834
#10 0x00007fffe5b471fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM
(this=0x4421f30) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289
#11 0x00007fffe5b47373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x4421f30)
at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247
#12 0x00007fffe5b5410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run
(this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398
#13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x4422920,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe3f2108c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x4423c08, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 22:15:05 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:15:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112215.mABMF5xg007133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #22 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 17:15:04 EDT ---
OK, this might be a clue:

#8  0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x2a79eb0,
aStatusMsg=0x4729628 "Applet initialis?.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe3fa483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x46cf330,
message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834

Maybe something isn't handling that ? correctly. I assume you are running with
LANG=fr_FR, could you retry with LANG=C?

On the other hand this might not be it since I am still seeing things work even
when setting LANG=fr_FR. hmmm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 22:57:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:57:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112257.mABMvdM7028774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 17:57:38 EDT ---
Does not change a thing

Visibone:
$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.N15gzE
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 1177)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff5ed6950 (LWP 1180)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff52a3950 (LWP 1181)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeffff950 (LWP 1184)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef5fe950 (LWP 1185)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeebfd950 (LWP 1186)]
[New Thread 0x7fffed8d2950 (LWP 1187)]
[Thread 0x7fffed8d2950 (LWP 1187) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffed8d2950 (LWP 1188)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe99c7950 (LWP 1189)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe8fc6950 (LWP 1199)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe85c5950 (LWP 1200)]
Detaching after fork from child process 1201.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
Nov 11, 2008 11:54:28 PM com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
WARNING: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)
JNLPRuntime already initialized

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe8fc6950 (LWP 1199)]
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x3b62ea0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x3b62ea0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe8fc5750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x7ffff021bf60,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb392b8, 
    nativeParams=0x7fffe8fc58c0) at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x7ffff041d510,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe8fc59c0, gpregs=0x7fffe8fc59c0, 
    fpregs=0x7fffe8fc59f0) at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0xe69690, aStatusType=<value optimized out>, aStatusText=@0x7fffe8fc5a90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0xe69690,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe8fc5b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus
(this=0x7ffff14c8960, aStatusMsg=0x3b6ebd8 "starting applet...") at
nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffea0d683b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage
(this=0x7ffff14cd370, message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834
#10 0x00007fffea0d91fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM
(this=0x7ffff14cd370) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289
#11 0x00007fffea0d9373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage
(this=0x7ffff14cd370) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247
#12 0x00007fffea0e610a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run
(this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398
#13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x7ffff14cdd60,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe8fc608c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x3b62ea8, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 22:58:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:58:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112258.mABMw2Il017187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-11 17:58:01 EDT ---
Codestyle:

$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.HWvZE7
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fe5700 (LWP 1265)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff5ed6950 (LWP 1268)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff52a3950 (LWP 1269)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff4711950 (LWP 1272)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff3c4e950 (LWP 1273)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff324d950 (LWP 1274)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeaf0c950 (LWP 1275)]
[Thread 0x7ffff4711950 (LWP 1272) exited]
[New Thread 0x7ffff4711950 (LWP 1276)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe9aea950 (LWP 1277)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe8da4950 (LWP 1278)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe83a3950 (LWP 1279)]
Detaching after fork from child process 1280.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
Nov 11, 2008 11:56:08 PM com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
WARNING: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)
Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar
jars length: 1
JNLPRuntime already initialized
Applet version: 1.1.0

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe8da4950 (LWP 1278)]
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x5127eb0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
(gdb) Host: www.codestyle.org
Port not set.

(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x5127eb0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x00000034e6c3720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe8da3750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x00000034e6c5004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2aefc00,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb395d8,
nativeParams=0x7fffe8da38c0)
    at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x00000034e7446d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2af01d0,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe8da39c0, gpregs=0x7fffe8da39c0,
fpregs=0x7fffe8da39f0)
    at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x00000034e74461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x00000034e7214b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0x22d7cd0, aStatusType=<value optimized out>,
aStatusText=@0x7fffe8da3a90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x00000034e7215fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x22d7cd0,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x00000034e6df4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe8da3b80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x00000034e6df5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x5119180,
aStatusMsg=0x52428b8 "Applet initialized.") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe8db883b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x51261e0,
message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834
#10 0x00007fffe8dbb1fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM
(this=0x51261e0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289
#11 0x00007fffe8dbb373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x51261e0)
at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247
#12 0x00007fffe8dc810a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run
(this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398
#13 0x00000034e743acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x5126bd0,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe8da408c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x00000034e740cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x5127eb8, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x00000034e743b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x000000388e6073da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x000000388dae64fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:10:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:10:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112310.mABNAd7C020693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Chris Lumens <clumens at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c
                   |                            |om)




--- Comment #7 from Chris Lumens <clumens at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 18:10:38 EDT ---
Jens - so, any idea what could be going on here?  I'm not exactly a font expert
so I'm at a bit of a loss as to what could be the cause of this problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:22:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:22:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112322.mABNMjZT023498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 18:22:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in bugzilla

Thanks.

> I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages
> because we have 3 upstream packages

Yep I think we all agree on this. :)

> they later can be split using some macro into final rpm

I think Nicolas was probably talking about subpackaging of upstream packages
when they provide multiple fonts/faces, yes.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:26:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:26:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112326.mABNQ8Ao003224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |




--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 18:26:06 EDT ---
I guess pango is not seeing the locale information somehow so it doesn't know
what CJK font to choose.

As I recall this regression started happening (very roughly) a week or more
before this bug was filed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 02:18:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:18:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468565] Checkbox won't select on fillable PDF
In-Reply-To: <bug-468565-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468565-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120218.mAC2IjQt025503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468565


Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com, mclasen at redhat.com




--- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 21:18:44 EDT ---
This turns out to be a font configuration problem. See the upstream bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502664

I can fix it by adding 

        <alias binding="same">
          <family>ZapfDingbats</family>
          <accept><family>Dingbats</family></accept>
        </alias>

next to the existing Dingbats alias in the file
/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-urw-aliases.conf.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 02:54:00 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:54:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120254.mAC2s0X6010895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281





--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-11 21:54:00 EDT ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9546

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 02:53:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:53:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120253.mAC2rE71000447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |ON_QA




--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-11 21:53:13 EDT ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9538

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 03:47:05 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:47:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120347.mAC3l516024518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 22:47:04 EDT ---
Sorry, my bad. it works after changing:

<test name="lang">
  <string>ja</string>
</test>

to:

<test name="lang" compare="contains">
  <string>ja</string>
</test>

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-3.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From mclasen at fedoraproject.org  Wed Nov 12 07:00:13 2008
From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.81, 1.82 pango.spec, 1.147,
	1.148 sources, 1.81, 1.82
Message-ID: <20081112070014.09CA570129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mclasen

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11688

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore pango.spec sources 
Log Message:
1.22.2



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.81
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82
--- .cvsignore	21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000	1.81
+++ .cvsignore	12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000	1.82
@@ -1 +1 @@
-pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2
+pango-1.22.2.tar.bz2


Index: pango.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.147
retrieving revision 1.148
diff -u -r1.147 -r1.148
--- pango.spec	21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000	1.147
+++ pango.spec	12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000	1.148
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
 Name: pango
-Version: 1.22.1
+Version: 1.22.2
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 License: LGPLv2+
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Nov 12 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.22.2-1
+- Update to 1.22.2
+
 * Mon Oct 20 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.22.1-1
 - Update to 1.22.1
 


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.81
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82
--- sources	21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000	1.81
+++ sources	12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000	1.82
@@ -1 +1 @@
-654ad7e8d414d36a0e0406935d32c3ab  pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2
+0d4dc87f9b523e9030afccb2d05afe0b  pango-1.22.2.tar.bz2



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 07:13:20 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:13:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120713.mAC7DK44018440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-12 02:13:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Sorry, my bad. it works after changing:
> 
> <test name="lang">
>   <string>ja</string>
> </test>
> 
> to:
> 
> <test name="lang" compare="contains">
>   <string>ja</string>
> </test>

Oh, right. didn't catch it sorry.

Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO
code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for
example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924)

(don't know if this is a big risk, I think this was a long-term fontconfig
plan, Behdad would know)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 08:03:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:03:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120803.mAC83Eml026639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 03:03:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO
> code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for
> example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924)

No. maybe better testing "jp" or do you prefer ja-jp (or ja_jp? dunno) rather
than that?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 09:19:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:19:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120919.mAC9J2KK016358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-12 04:19:01 EDT ---
If there is only one japanese locale by all means just test on "ja-jp" (without
the contains bit). IIRC that was the locale format that worked for the Chinese
people.

However, as always with fontconfig, it's a good idea to test before pushing the
rules on users.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 09:45:18 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:45:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 435549] obsolete with ghostscript-8.62
In-Reply-To: <bug-435549-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-435549-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120945.mAC9jIL3011057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435549


Bug 435549 depends on bug 457684, which changed state.

Bug 457684 Summary: 8.63 was released
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457684

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 10:09:43 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:09:43 -0000
Subject: [Issue 96123] combining characters (diacritics) not displaying
 properly
In-Reply-To: <iz96123@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112100943.8595.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96123


User nmailhot changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|''                        |'fedorafonts'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:09:43 +0000 2008 -------
Probably just an effect of OO.o's current poor support of OpenType features
(both in TTF and OTF fonts)

See issue #16032 or issue #78749



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000
Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters
In-Reply-To: <iz36535@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535





------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 -------
Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a
lot of math-specific codepoints

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 10:17:15 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:17:15 -0000
Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in
 ZED
In-Reply-To: <iz39656@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112101715.11495.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656


User nmailhot changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|''                        |'fedorafonts'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000
Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters
In-Reply-To: <iz36535@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535





------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 -------
Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a
lot of math-specific codepoints

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 10:20:07 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:20:07 -0000
Subject: [Issue 46972] formula editor has no arrow sign like this
In-Reply-To: <iz46972@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112102007.12953.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46972


User nmailhot changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|''                        |'fedorafonts'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:20:06 +0000 2008 -------
dejavu includes maby arrow symbols and is bundled with OO.o

If one arrow symbol is missing in dejavu you can submit a patch to the dejavu
project to support it in the next version (dejavu.sf.net)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000
Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters
In-Reply-To: <iz36535@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535





------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 -------
Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a
lot of math-specific codepoints

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 10:11:31 -0000
Subject: [Issue 36535] Impossible to enter non italic greek characters
In-Reply-To: <iz36535@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112101131.9200.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36535





------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 10:11:31 +0000 2008 -------
Also greek != math in unicode and the STIX project has made unicode.org add a
lot of math-specific codepoints

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From georgaubele at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 13:14:54 2008
From: georgaubele at openoffice.org (georgaubele at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 13:14:54 -0000
Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in
 ZED
In-Reply-To: <iz39656@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112131454.15892.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656





------- Additional comments from georgaubele at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 13:14:54 +0000 2008 -------
Correct weblinks are

Stix: http://www.stixfonts.org/
DejaVu Fonts: http://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/

The Problem is not the availability of symbol fonts on the net, but the
availability of the symbols in the formula editor without much "hand work". So
if the symbol font(s) of OO.o will contain more symbols that can then be reached
by simply typing a shortcut into the formula editor (like "\mapsto") or by
clicking a button in the catalogue, that would solve that issue.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 13:25:28 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 13:25:28 -0000
Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in
 ZED
In-Reply-To: <iz39656@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112132528.21035.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656





------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 13:25:28 +0000 2008 -------
@georgaubele 

I was refering to your comment of Tue Mar 28 14:46:42 +0000 2006 
There is no need to tweak the symbol font anymore since fonts supporting common
math symbols already exist and one of them, dejavu, is now bundled with OO.o

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From georgaubele at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 15:25:43 2008
From: georgaubele at openoffice.org (georgaubele at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 15:25:43 -0000
Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in
 ZED
In-Reply-To: <iz39656@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112152543.4904.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656





------- Additional comments from georgaubele at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 15:25:43 +0000 2008 -------
Ah ... ok, great! I did not realize, that I have installed new fonts with OO.o
3.0.0 :)

So I now start including these fonts into the catalog of the formula editor.

http://dejavu.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/dejavu/trunk/dejavu-fonts/unicover.txt
gives a summery, which symbol is in which font.

A more "visual" way of finding the symbols could be achieved by using the
freeware "dp4 Font Viewer".

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 15:36:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:36:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468565] Checkbox won't select on fillable PDF
In-Reply-To: <bug-468565-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468565-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811121536.mACFaGPm026640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468565


Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |besfahbo at redhat.com
          Component|evince                      |fontconfig
         AssignedTo|krh at redhat.com              |besfahbo at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 15:53:49 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 15:53:49 -0000
Subject: [Issue 39656] Need more symbols and more symbol enhancemens like in
 ZED
In-Reply-To: <iz39656@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112155349.22044.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39656





------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Nov 12 15:53:48 +0000 2008 -------
Just be careful that the dejavu in OO.o is not the latest version, so it may
have a bit less coverage.

I do believe however that if you find significant enhancements in the latest
dejavu version you can ask the OO.o dev to update the bundled dejavu for the
next OO.o release

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 12 22:01:12 2008
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 12 Nov 2008 22:01:12 -0000
Subject: [Issue 84403] Bali Simbar Font
In-Reply-To: <iz84403@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081112220112.10970.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84403


User nmailhot changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|'fedorafonts'             |''
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 01:08:33 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:08:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811130108.mAD18XkF004811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 20:08:32 EDT ---
Sure. Updated.

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-4.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 02:43:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:43:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811130243.mAD2h1hl019566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED




--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 21:43:00 EDT ---
Fixed for me in anaconda-11.4.1.57-1.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov 13 04:06:17 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:06:17 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811130406.mAD46HeA016991@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #339182|                            |approval1.9.0.6?
               Flag|                            |




--- Comment #23 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-12 20:06:13 PST ---
(From update of attachment 339182)
Requesting approval for 1.9.0.6.  This patch changes two lines of code in one
function, plus adds an assertion.  A reftest would land with it.

See comment 14 for discussion on what this bug effects and attachment 339013
for an example of the problem.

The small number of changes makes risk very low.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov 13 04:16:20 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:16:20 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811130416.mAD4GKv8016191@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #24 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-12 20:16:11 PST ---
Fedora bug (so I don't lose it):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov 13 04:25:53 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:25:53 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811130425.mAD4Pr0W017625@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #25 from Parag Nemade <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-11-12 20:25:45 PST ---
Thanks Karl, I have tested your patch on 1.9.0.x branch also. Patch is working
fine and this bug looks like get fixed on 1.9.0.x branch also along with 1.9.1
branch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 19:50:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:50:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131950.mADJoDOM013262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-13 14:50:12 EDT ---
$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.9lJtQ1
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff75ce700 (LWP 16870)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef9ee950 (LWP 16873)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeedbb950 (LWP 16874)]
[New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16877)]
[New Thread 0x7fffed557950 (LWP 16878)]
[New Thread 0x7fffecb56950 (LWP 16879)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe3fa5950 (LWP 16880)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe35a4950 (LWP 16881)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe1f6f950 (LWP 16884)]
Detaching after fork from child process 16885.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
13 nov. 2008 20:40:38 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)]
JNLPRuntime already initialized
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
(gdb) run
The program being debugged has been started already.
Start it from the beginning? (y or n) n
Program not restarted.
(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x0000003ab543720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe296f750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x0000003ab545004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2c12190,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6d5a0,
nativeParams=0x7fffe296f8c0)
    at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x0000003ab5c46d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2c15fd0,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe296f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe296f9c0,
fpregs=0x7fffe296f9f0)
    at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x0000003ab5c461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x0000003ab5a14b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0x23a9640, aStatusType=<value optimized out>,
aStatusText=@0x7fffe296fa90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x0000003ab5a15fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x23a9640,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x0000003ab55f4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe296fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x0000003ab55f5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x4520600,
aStatusMsg=0x45f28e8 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe298483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x4529500,
message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834
#10 0x00007fffe29871fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM
(this=0x4529500) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289
#11 0x00007fffe2987373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x4529500)
at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247
#12 0x00007fffe299410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run
(this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398
#13 0x0000003ab5c3acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x4529ef0,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe297008c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x0000003ab5c0cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x452b1d8, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x0000003ab5c3b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x00007ffff7dd43da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x00007ffff76b627d in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112
(gdb) quit
The program is running.  Exit anyway? (y or n) y
[nim at arekh ~]$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.lWwjGg
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff75ce700 (LWP 16953)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef9ee950 (LWP 16956)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeedbb950 (LWP 16957)]
[New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16960)]
[New Thread 0x7fffed557950 (LWP 16961)]
[New Thread 0x7fffecb56950 (LWP 16962)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe49c6950 (LWP 16963)]
[Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16960) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16964)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe35a4950 (LWP 16965)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16966)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe1f6f950 (LWP 16967)]
Detaching after fork from child process 16968.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
13 nov. 2008 20:42:26 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)
Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar
jars length: 1
JNLPRuntime already initialized

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16966)]
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x48b9a00, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
(gdb) Applet version: 1.1.0
Host: www.codestyle.org
Port not set.

(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x48b9a00, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x0000003ab543720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe296f750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x0000003ab545004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2c3e810,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6d5a0,
nativeParams=0x7fffe296f8c0)
    at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x0000003ab5c46d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2c3ede0,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe296f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe296f9c0,
fpregs=0x7fffe296f9f0)
    at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x0000003ab5c461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x0000003ab5a14b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0x2373b40, aStatusType=<value optimized out>,
aStatusText=@0x7fffe296fa90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x0000003ab5a15fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x2373b40,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x0000003ab55f4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe296fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x0000003ab55f5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x48a3040,
aStatusMsg=0x49a7be8 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe298483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x48b7d30,
message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834
#10 0x00007fffe29871fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM
(this=0x48b7d30) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289
#11 0x00007fffe2987373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x48b7d30)
at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247
#12 0x00007fffe299410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run
(this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398
#13 0x0000003ab5c3acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x48b8720,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe297008c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x0000003ab5c0cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x48b9a08, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x0000003ab5c3b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x00007ffff7dd43da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x00007ffff76b627d in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 19:49:46 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:49:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131949.mADJnkPQ024101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-13 14:49:44 EDT ---
with java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-4.b12.fc11.x86_64

$ firefox -g
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/plugins:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
DISPLAY=:0.0
FONTCONFIG_PATH=/etc/fonts:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/res/Xft
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
    
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/components:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       SHLIB_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
          LIBPATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2:/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
       ADDON_PATH=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2
      MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
      MOZ_TOOLKIT=
        moz_debug=1
     moz_debugger=
which: no ddd in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/home/nim/bin)
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox -x /tmp/mozargs.9lJtQ1
GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc11)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c3/1ecac16bb539cef975213480db69f3c6e4f69c.debug
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/firefox '-UILocale' 'fr'
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffff75ce700 (LWP 16870)]
[New Thread 0x7fffef9ee950 (LWP 16873)]
[New Thread 0x7fffeedbb950 (LWP 16874)]
[New Thread 0x7fffee01a950 (LWP 16877)]
[New Thread 0x7fffed557950 (LWP 16878)]
[New Thread 0x7fffecb56950 (LWP 16879)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe3fa5950 (LWP 16880)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe35a4950 (LWP 16881)]
ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null)
Initializing JVM...
[New Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe1f6f950 (LWP 16884)]
Detaching after fork from child process 16885.
NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start()
13 nov. 2008 20:40:38 com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile
ATTENTION: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile"
org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 1201  completed: No
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120)
 at
com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130)
 at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143)
 at
org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099)
 at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.<init>(JavaBridge.java:364)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786)
 at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874)
 at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170)
 at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400)
 at java.awt.Window.<init>(Window.java:438)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:419)
 at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Frame.java:384)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:102)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:99)
 at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.<init>(EmbeddedFrame.java:87)
 at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.<init>(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35)
 at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.<init>(PluginAppletViewer.java:145)
 at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
 at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
 at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
 at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
 at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.<init>(PluginStreamHandler.java:43)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.<init>(PluginMain.java:83)
 at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe2970950 (LWP 16882)]
JNLPRuntime already initialized
XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
111         if(e.cx && e.frame)
Current language:  auto; currently c++
(gdb) bt
#0  XPCJSContextStack::Pop (this=0x452b1d0, _retval=<value optimized out>) at
xpcthreadcontext.cpp:111
#1  0x0000003ab543720f in ~XPCCallContext (this=0x7fffe296f750) at
xpccallcontext.cpp:333
#2  0x0000003ab545004a in nsXPCWrappedJSClass::CallMethod (this=0x2c12190,
wrapper=<value optimized out>, methodIndex=3, info=0xb6d5a0,
nativeParams=0x7fffe296f8c0)
    at xpcwrappedjsclass.cpp:1775
#3  0x0000003ab5c46d31 in PrepareAndDispatch (self=0x2c15fd0,
methodIndex=<value optimized out>, args=0x7fffe296f9c0, gpregs=0x7fffe296f9c0,
fpregs=0x7fffe296f9f0)
    at xptcstubs_x86_64_linux.cpp:151
#4  0x0000003ab5c461df in SharedStub () from /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
#5  0x0000003ab5a14b4f in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatusWithContext
(this=0x23a9640, aStatusType=<value optimized out>,
aStatusText=@0x7fffe296fa90, 
    aStatusContext=0x0) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:452
#6  0x0000003ab5a15fdf in nsContentTreeOwner::SetStatus (this=0x23a9640,
aStatusType=1, aStatus=<value optimized out>) at nsContentTreeOwner.cpp:479
#7  0x0000003ab55f4f49 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=<value
optimized out>, aStatusMsg=0x7fffe296fb80) at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2374
#8  0x0000003ab55f5028 in nsPluginInstanceOwner::ShowStatus (this=0x4520600,
aStatusMsg=0x45f28e8 "d?marrage de l'applet") at nsObjectFrame.cpp:2341
#9  0x00007fffe298483b in IcedTeaPluginFactory::HandleMessage (this=0x4529500,
message=<value optimized out>) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:2834
#10 0x00007fffe29871fe in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ConsumeMsgFromJVM
(this=0x4529500) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3289
#11 0x00007fffe2987373 in IcedTeaPluginFactory::ProcessMessage (this=0x4529500)
at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:3247
#12 0x00007fffe299410a in IcedTeaRunnableMethod<IcedTeaPluginFactory>::Run
(this=0x17ffffffd0) at IcedTeaPlugin.cc:1398
#13 0x0000003ab5c3acb6 in nsThread::ProcessNextEvent (this=0x4529ef0,
mayWait=1, result=0x7fffe297008c) at nsThread.cpp:510
#14 0x0000003ab5c0cada in NS_ProcessNextEvent_P (thread=0x452b1d8, mayWait=1)
at nsThreadUtils.cpp:227
#15 0x0000003ab5c3b487 in nsThread::ThreadFunc (arg=<value optimized out>) at
nsThread.cpp:254
#16 0x00000038a2829a23 in _pt_root (arg=<value optimized out>) at
../../../mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/pthreads/ptthread.c:221
#17 0x00007ffff7dd43da in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at
pthread_create.c:297
#18 0x00007ffff76b627d in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 20:29:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:29:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811132029.mADKTYa3031862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Andy Lindeberg <alindebe at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 22:00:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:00:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea
 java plugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811132200.mADM0BBi017281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-13 17:00:10 EDT ---
After many more tests it seems the stack is not relevant ? I get it both when
firefow works and when it crashes

However I've found out that disabling the "organise status bar" firefox
extensions reliably made things work.

Thus I suppose the openjdk plugin does something "organise status bar" really
does not like (I've been running this extension for months on rawhide without
any problem before I tried those pages with openjdk)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 22:01:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:01:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811132201.mADM1MRP004643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-13 17:01:21 EDT ---
(22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first fontconfig rule for hanazo is now fine
(22:32:20) nim-nim: tagoh3: but the second one is still reversed
(22:32:26) nim-nim: tagoh3: you need
(22:32:32) nim-nim:   <alias>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:     <family>[fontname]</family>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:     <default>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:       <family>[genericname]</family>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:     </default>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:   </alias>
(22:32:59) nim-nim: with   [fontname]=HanaMin
(22:33:16) nim-nim: and [genericname]=serif

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 02:01:20 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:01:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811140201.mAE21KH4012360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT ---
Doh! I should have a look carefully more.. Thanks for catching this up!

Hopefully this would be a final review for hanazono-fonts.

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 06:49:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:49:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471538] New: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
Message-ID: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538

           Summary: FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 9
          Platform: i386
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
          Priority: medium
         Component: fontforge
        AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com
        ReportedBy: bombayvdmo at yahoo.com.mx
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
$ rpm -q fontfoge
fontforge-20080309-1.fc9.i386

How reproducible:
Open some .otf file

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open FontForge
2. Select some of attached .otf files.

Actual results:
FontForge Abort

Expected results:
Continue Running

Additional info:
Boisik.otf : http://mitek.webpark.cz/boisik/
cmunvi.otf :
ftp://canopus.iacp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/cm_unicode/cm-unicode-0.6.3a-otf.tar.gz

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 06:52:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:52:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
In-Reply-To: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811140652.mAE6qYvX010149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538





--- Comment #2 from V??ctor Daniel <bombayvdmo at yahoo.com.mx>  2008-11-14 01:52:33 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323540)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323540)
Problematic OTF File 2

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 06:51:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:51:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
In-Reply-To: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811140651.mAE6pEaq010047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538





--- Comment #1 from V??ctor Daniel <bombayvdmo at yahoo.com.mx>  2008-11-14 01:51:13 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323539)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323539)
Problematic OTF File 1

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 07:49:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:49:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471542] New: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro
 support
Message-ID: <bug-471542-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471542

           Summary: Build fontforge with cairo, pango and spiro support
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: fontforge
        AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Upstream lately added support for all sorts of nifty libraries, and our
fontforge package needs to be tweaked to accomodate them

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 09:42:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:42:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811140942.mAE9gDq3026578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tagoh at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-14 04:42:11 EDT ---
This one looks good, thank you for your persistence. You can now continue the
font package integration process, starting here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a
Please do not forget the comps and wiki parts.

Reassigning the bug to you since my part is done.

APPROVED

PS Do not forget to subscribe to the low-traffic fedora-fonts-list, since
Fedora 11 packaging changes are being discussed there right now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 10:37:27 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:37:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141037.mAEAbRjp004649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-14 05:37:26 EDT ---
Thanks for the review, Nicolas.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: hanazono-fonts
Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Owners: tagoh
Branches: devel F-10 F-9 F-8
InitialCC: fonts-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Fri Nov 14 10:44:09 2008
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:44:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 import.log, 1.1,
	1.2 sources, 1.4, 1.5 xgridfit.spec, 1.6, 1.7
Message-ID: <20081114104409.EC13A70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24172/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore import.log sources xgridfit.spec 
Log Message:
1.11a


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- .cvsignore	1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000	1.4
+++ .cvsignore	14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000	1.5
@@ -1 +1 @@
-xgridfit-1-9.tar.gz
+xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log	1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000	1.1
+++ import.log	14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000	1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 xgridfit-1_9-1_fc10:HEAD:xgridfit-1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220282275
+xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- sources	1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000	1.4
+++ sources	14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000	1.5
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bb2bb3caee51758852902525b068b56a  xgridfit-1-9.tar.gz
+df07408852d577b1df37d4e4c1361735  xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz


Index: xgridfit.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- xgridfit.spec	1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000	1.6
+++ xgridfit.spec	14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000	1.7
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-%define archivever 1-9
+%define archivever 1-11a
 
 Name:    xgridfit
-Version: 1.9
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Version: 1.11
+Release: 1.a%{?dist}
 Summary: Font hinting tool
 
 # This is where we drop fontforge
@@ -80,10 +80,14 @@
 
 %files doc
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
-%doc docs/*
+%doc docs/* ChangeLog
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 1.11-1.a
+??? update for F11 cycle
+
 * Mon Sep 1 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.9-1
 ??? Major update, many changes



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 11:35:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:35:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] Firefox "organise status bar" extensions conflicts with
 IcedTeaPlugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141135.mAEBZGJx016074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184


Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|The Visibone font test does |Firefox "organise status
                   |not work with the icedtea   |bar" extensions conflicts
                   |java plugin                 |with IcedTeaPlugin




--- Comment #28 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat.com>  2008-11-14 06:35:15 EDT ---
Thanks for debugging this.

Should this be reassigned to firefox? What package provides this "organise
status bar" extension?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 11:47:47 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:47:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432184] Firefox "organise status bar" extensions conflicts with
 IcedTeaPlugin
In-Reply-To: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432184-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141147.mAEBllul031296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184





--- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-14 06:47:45 EDT ---
The extension is there
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/1759

I don't think we package extensions yet

Anyway the extension works both under windows with sun jdk and linux without
openjdk, so I'd tend to think the problem is openjdk-side

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Fri Nov 14 16:15:58 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:15:58 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18470] /etc/ =?utf-8?b?4oCm?= /conf.
 avail can be considered an FHS violation
In-Reply-To: <bug-18470-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
Message-ID: <20081114161558.A9993130057@annarchy.freedesktop.org>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18470





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-14 08:15:57 PST ---
If we could have an opinion on the correct directory name that would un-block
our font guideline change process started there

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 15 17:31:57 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:31:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471751] New: Mathematica required fonts
Message-ID: <bug-471751-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Mathematica required fonts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471751

           Summary: Mathematica required fonts
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: i386
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: xorg-x11-fonts
        AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: q2 at arachnoid.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: xgl-maint at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Created an attachment (id=323695)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323695)
Small image of Mathematica warning dialog

Description of problem:

On the Fedora 10 preview release ISO (Fedora-10-Preview-i386-DVD.iso), two font
RPMs are not included. The closest matches for the missing fonts are:

xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch.rpm
xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch.rpm

Absent these fonts, Mathematica 5.0 will complain about missing fonts and will
render text improperly. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Install and run Fedora 10 preview release. Install and run Mathematica 5.0
(this likely affects other Mathematica versions as well).

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install and run Fedora 10 preview release.
2. Install and run Mathematica 5.0.

Actual results:

1. Error message at Mathematica startup about missing fonts (see attachment).
2. Improperly rendered text within Mathematica.

Expected results:

No error messages, properly rendered text.

Additional info:

Mathematica tends to rely on system fonts for proper operation to a greater
degree than most applications.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 15 19:58:23 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:58:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471751] Mathematica required fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-471751-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471751-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811151958.mAFJwNgQ029246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471751


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
                 CC|                            |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         Resolution|                            |UPSTREAM




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-15 14:58:22 EDT ---
It's been almost a decade fontconfig was introduced and every major GUI app
migrated to it.

Legacy core fonts support is not going away any time soon, but the associated
fonts are *not* going to be installed by default anymore. Users of applications
like Mathematica will just have to install them explicitelly.

That, or ask their application upstream to use the *current* font backend, like
pretty much everyone else.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 15 20:32:31 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:32:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
In-Reply-To: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811152032.mAFKWVa8001962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-15 15:32:30 EDT ---
Sorry for the delay here... 

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
See below - License (OFL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a  heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2
7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a  heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have sane scriptlets. 
OK - Should have dist tag
See below - Should package latest version

Issues: 

1. There is a newer version upstream, might update to that before importing?
20081109

2. One more thing thats confusing me on the legal front that should be
mentioned
here: The fontforge script files that are used to produce the font are under
the 
GPLv2+ license. Since they aren't shipped in the binary package or part 
of the font itself, I guess it's ok that the package license here is OFL, 
but I thought I would mention it here. 

I don't see any blockers here... so this package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 15 21:43:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:43:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
In-Reply-To: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811152143.mAFLhYun011862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-15 16:43:33 EDT ---
Thanks a lot for the review! Will of course import the lastest font version.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: apanov-heuristica-fonts 
Short Description: Heuristica serif font
Owners: nim
Branches: F10, devel
InitialCC: fonts-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 10:42:52 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:42:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 435549] obsolete with ghostscript-8.62, for fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-435549-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-435549-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811161042.mAGAgqUP023454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435549


Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|obsolete with               |obsolete with
                   |ghostscript-8.62            |ghostscript-8.62, for
                   |                            |fedora 11




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org  Sun Nov 16 11:03:30 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org))
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:03:30 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bug 545510] Support user control for OpenType features
In-Reply-To: <bug-545510-214212@http.bugzilla.gnome.org/>
Message-ID: <20081116110330.5B52423F4F6@label.gnome.org>

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510

  pango | general | Ver: 1.20.x




------- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot  2008-11-16 11:03 UTC -------
Probably a dupe of #547472


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 20:16:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:16:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811162016.mAGKG2vm022642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-16 15:16:01 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 20:21:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:21:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
In-Reply-To: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811162021.mAGKL1Li000396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-16 15:21:00 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 21:59:23 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:59:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
In-Reply-To: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811162159.mAGLxNAm017302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317





--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-16 16:59:22 EDT ---
apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 22:23:47 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:23:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
In-Reply-To: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811162223.mAGMNlw5011632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Mon Nov 17 02:23:37 2008
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:23:37 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081117022337.BBB2B70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24619/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
Initial import



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
	<match>
		<test name="lang">
			<string>ja-jp</string>
		</test>
		<test name="family">
			<string>serif</string>
		</test>
		<edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
			<string>HanaMin</string>
		</edit>
	</match>

	<alias>
		<family>HanaMin</family>
		<default>
			<family>serif</family>
		</default>
	</alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	hanazono
%define	fontdir		%{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define	fontconfdir	%{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
%define archivename	%{fontname}-%{version}
%define	priority	66

Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	20081012
Release:	5%{?dist}
Summary:	Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	Copyright only
URL:		http://fonts.jp/hanazono/
Source0:	http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:	noarch

%description
Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with
a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research
Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers
who work together on glyphwiki.org.

This font supports:
 - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997
 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004
 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB)
 - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3)
 - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF)
 - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3)
 - 84 characters in IBM extensions

%prep
%setup -q -T -c -a 0


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}
install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755)
%doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt
%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/*.ttf


%changelog
* Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-5
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config again.

* Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-4
- Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config.

* Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-3
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>
- Drop -f from fc-cache.
- Improve fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-2
- Improve a bit in the spec file.

* Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-1
- Initial packaging.



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:HEAD:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226888502


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	17 Nov 2008 02:23:06 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+hanazono-20081012.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	17 Nov 2008 02:23:06 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a  hanazono-20081012.zip



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Mon Nov 17 02:27:02 2008
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:27:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10 hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081117022702.68F2570131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25245/F-10

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
Initial import for F-10



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
	<match>
		<test name="lang">
			<string>ja-jp</string>
		</test>
		<test name="family">
			<string>serif</string>
		</test>
		<edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
			<string>HanaMin</string>
		</edit>
	</match>

	<alias>
		<family>HanaMin</family>
		<default>
			<family>serif</family>
		</default>
	</alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	hanazono
%define	fontdir		%{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define	fontconfdir	%{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
%define archivename	%{fontname}-%{version}
%define	priority	66

Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	20081012
Release:	5%{?dist}
Summary:	Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	Copyright only
URL:		http://fonts.jp/hanazono/
Source0:	http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:	noarch

%description
Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with
a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research
Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers
who work together on glyphwiki.org.

This font supports:
 - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997
 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004
 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB)
 - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3)
 - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF)
 - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3)
 - 84 characters in IBM extensions

%prep
%setup -q -T -c -a 0


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}
install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755)
%doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt
%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/*.ttf


%changelog
* Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-5
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config again.

* Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-4
- Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config.

* Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-3
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>
- Drop -f from fc-cache.
- Improve fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-2
- Improve a bit in the spec file.

* Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-1
- Initial packaging.



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:F-10:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226888732


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	17 Nov 2008 02:26:31 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+hanazono-20081012.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	17 Nov 2008 02:26:32 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a  hanazono-20081012.zip



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Mon Nov 17 02:28:38 2008
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:28:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9 hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081117022838.6046F70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25577/F-9

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
Initial import for F-9



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
	<match>
		<test name="lang">
			<string>ja-jp</string>
		</test>
		<test name="family">
			<string>serif</string>
		</test>
		<edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
			<string>HanaMin</string>
		</edit>
	</match>

	<alias>
		<family>HanaMin</family>
		<default>
			<family>serif</family>
		</default>
	</alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	hanazono
%define	fontdir		%{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define	fontconfdir	%{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
%define archivename	%{fontname}-%{version}
%define	priority	66

Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	20081012
Release:	5%{?dist}
Summary:	Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	Copyright only
URL:		http://fonts.jp/hanazono/
Source0:	http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:	noarch

%description
Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with
a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research
Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers
who work together on glyphwiki.org.

This font supports:
 - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997
 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004
 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB)
 - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3)
 - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF)
 - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3)
 - 84 characters in IBM extensions

%prep
%setup -q -T -c -a 0


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}
install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755)
%doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt
%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/*.ttf


%changelog
* Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-5
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config again.

* Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-4
- Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config.

* Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-3
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>
- Drop -f from fc-cache.
- Improve fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-2
- Improve a bit in the spec file.

* Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-1
- Initial packaging.



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:F-9:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226888859


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	17 Nov 2008 02:28:08 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+hanazono-20081012.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	17 Nov 2008 02:28:08 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a  hanazono-20081012.zip



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Mon Nov 17 02:54:13 2008
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8 hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 hanazono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20081117025413.500DD70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28507/F-8

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf hanazono-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
Initial import for F-8.



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
	<match>
		<test name="lang">
			<string>ja-jp</string>
		</test>
		<test name="family">
			<string>serif</string>
		</test>
		<edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
			<string>HanaMin</string>
		</edit>
	</match>

	<alias>
		<family>HanaMin</family>
		<default>
			<family>serif</family>
		</default>
	</alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE hanazono-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	hanazono
%define	fontdir		%{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define	fontconfdir	%{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
%define archivename	%{fontname}-%{version}
%define	priority	66

Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	20081012
Release:	5%{?dist}
Summary:	Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	Copyright only
URL:		http://fonts.jp/hanazono/
Source0:	http://fonts.jp/hanazono/%{archivename}.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:	noarch

%description
Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with
a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research
Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers
who work together on glyphwiki.org.

This font supports:
 - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997
 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004
 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB)
 - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3)
 - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF)
 - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3)
 - 84 characters in IBM extensions

%prep
%setup -q -T -c -a 0


%build


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -pm 0644 hanazono.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
install -dm 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}
install -pm 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf


%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi

%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
	%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755)
%doc LISENCE.txt README.txt THANKS.txt
%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/%{priority}-%{fontname}.conf
%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/*.ttf


%changelog
* Fri Nov 14 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-5
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config again.

* Thu Nov 13 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-4
- Try to test the language with the exact match in fontconfig config.

* Wed Nov 12 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-3
- Fix a typo in fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>
- Drop -f from fc-cache.
- Improve fontconfig config.

* Mon Nov 10 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-2
- Improve a bit in the spec file.

* Tue Oct 28 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-1
- Initial packaging.



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
hanazono-fonts-20081012-5_fc9:F-8:hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm:1226890367


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	17 Nov 2008 02:53:42 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+hanazono-20081012.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/F-8/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	16 Nov 2008 20:16:22 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	17 Nov 2008 02:53:42 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+eed4ae19b1fbee96ac334bf7af4c564a  hanazono-20081012.zip



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 04:18:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:18:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170418.mAH4I6LV011826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-16 23:18:05 EDT ---
Thanks. built and updated comps and wiki as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 05:02:36 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:02:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard
 Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170502.mAH52ahe011172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947





--- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in>  2008-11-17 00:02:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > ping ?
> 
> pong!
> 
> hi.. have end semester exams so a little tied up.. will do it this week for
> sure..

hi,

sorry for the delay.. rebuilt with the changes advised by Pablo..

here are the new files..

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec

The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :(
so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this)

The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that?

Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? 


regards,

Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:43:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:43:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard
 Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170943.mAH9hi3C020650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net




--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:43:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)

> The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that?

You have many examples of txt frobbing in the gfs font specs. Pablo can help
you if needed.

Also I'd have added
http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf
in %doc

> Also is there a better documentation for fontconfig rules somewhere? 

I'm not aware of better documentation than
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips
or I wouldn't have bothered writing it in the first place

Again do ask your reviewer (Pablo) or the list if you have problems
understanding part of it. It's a wiki and it can be fixed. It's no use leaving
obscure parts in it for other packagers to fail on.

You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not
forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different
Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc)

Otherwise the fontconfig info in there
http://nim.fedorapeople.org/rpm-fonts/rpm-fonts-1.8.tar.bz2

should apply as-is for Fedora versions < 11 (but not the rest)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:52:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qw4F031095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:52:57 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:52:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9quaS031047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:52:55 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:53:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-466193-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466193-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r2eq031171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:53:01 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:52:55 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qt0c031016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:52:54 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:52:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts -  Gentium Basic
 Font Family
In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qsTn030983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:52:52 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:53:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from
 Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-462711-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-462711-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r10r031138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:53:00 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:53:03 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a
 decorative handwriting based font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467507-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467507-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r30g031221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:53:03 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 22:43:18 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:43:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
In-Reply-To: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811172243.mAHMhIxG018324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-17 17:43:16 EDT ---
Yeah, I am seeing this here as well on f10/rawhide.

Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams.
 Executable based on sources from 00:23 GMT 28-Aug-2008.
 Library based on sources from 23:33 GMT 27-Aug-2008.
*** buffer overflow detected ***: fontforge terminated
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib64/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x3b448ff497]
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x3b448fd340]
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x3b448fc6c9]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__printf_fp+0x1813)[0x3b4484c453]
/lib64/libc.so.6(_IO_vfprintf+0x1d76)[0x3b448475a6]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__vsprintf_chk+0x9d)[0x3b448fc76d]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__sprintf_chk+0x80)[0x3b448fc6b0]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b48944c46]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b48944d78]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b4894511d]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1[0x3b4894f147]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(_SFReadTTF+0x844)[0x3b48952b14]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(_ReadSplineFont+0x730)[0x3b489d6760]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(LoadSplineFont+0xcc)[0x3b489d797c]
/usr/lib64/libfontforge.so.1(ViewPostscriptFont+0x15)[0x3b488cb7a5]
fontforge[0x4c6740]
fontforge[0x5565b8]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x3b4481e546]
fontforge[0x419119]
======= Memory map: ========
00400000-005b0000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 2597372                           
/usr/bin/fontforge
007b0000-00904000 rw-p 001b0000 fd:01 2597372                           
/usr/bin/fontforge
00904000-00909000 rw-p 00904000 00:00 0 
00b03000-00b09000 rw-p 00303000 fd:01 2597372                           
/usr/bin/fontforge
01558000-018c3000 rw-p 01558000 00:00 0                                  [heap]
3b44400000-3b44420000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077902                       
/lib64/ld-2.9.so
3b4461f000-3b44620000 r--p 0001f000 fd:01 7077902                       
/lib64/ld-2.9.so
3b44620000-3b44621000 rw-p 00020000 fd:01 7077902                       
/lib64/ld-2.9.so
3b44800000-3b44968000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077910                       
/lib64/libc-2.9.so
3b44968000-3b44b68000 ---p 00168000 fd:01 7077910                       
/lib64/libc-2.9.so
3b44b68000-3b44b6c000 r--p 00168000 fd:01 7077910                       
/lib64/libc-2.9.so
3b44b6c000-3b44b6d000 rw-p 0016c000 fd:01 7077910                       
/lib64/libc-2.9.so
3b44b6d000-3b44b72000 rw-p 3b44b6d000 00:00 0 
3b44c00000-3b44c84000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077923                       
/lib64/libm-2.9.so
3b44c84000-3b44e83000 ---p 00084000 fd:01 7077923                       
/lib64/libm-2.9.so
3b44e83000-3b44e84000 r--p 00083000 fd:01 7077923                       
/lib64/libm-2.9.so
3b44e84000-3b44e85000 rw-p 00084000 fd:01 7077923                       
/lib64/libm-2.9.so
3b45000000-3b45002000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077942                       
/lib64/libdl-2.9.so
3b45002000-3b45202000 ---p 00002000 fd:01 7077942                       
/lib64/libdl-2.9.so
3b45202000-3b45203000 r--p 00002000 fd:01 7077942                       
/lib64/libdl-2.9.so
3b45203000-3b45204000 rw-p 00003000 fd:01 7077942                       
/lib64/libdl-2.9.so
3b45400000-3b45417000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 7077991                       
/lib64/libpthread-2.9.so
3b45417000-3b45616000 ---p 00017000 fd:01 7077991                       
/lib64/libpthread-2.9.so
3b45616000-3b45617000 r--p 00016000 fd:01 7077991                       
/lib64/libpthread-2.9.so
3b45617000-3b45618000 rw-p 00017000 fd:01 7077991                       
/lib64/libpthread-2.9.so
3b45618000-3b4561c000 rw-p 3b45618000 00:00 0 
3b45800000-3b45812000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 11638419                      
/usr/lib64/libgutils.so.1.0.3
3b45812000-3b45a11000 ---p 00012000 fd:01 11638419                      
/usr/lib64/libgutils.so.1.0.3
3b45a11000-3b45a14000 rw-p 00011000 fd:01 11638419                      
/usr/lib64/libgutils.so.1.0.3
3b45c00000-3b45c05000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 2662617                       
/usr/lib64/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0
3b45c05000-3b45e04000 ---p 00005000 fd:01 2662617                       
/usr/lib64/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0
3b45e04000-3b45e05000 rw-p 00004000 fd:01 2662617                       
/usr/lib64/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0
3b46000000-3b4601a000 r-xp 00000000 fd:01 2662619                       
/usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1.0.0
3b4601a000-3b4621a000 ---p 0001a000 fd:01 2662619                       
/usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1.0.0
3b4621a000-3b4621b000 rw-p 0001a000 fd:0[1]    30669 abort      fontforge

Will see about asking upstream to take a look...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Nov 18 01:16:07 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:16:07 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811180116.mAI1G781008584@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #2 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-17 17:16:00 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=348692)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=348692)
proof of concept for src:url()

This provides src:url() web fonts.  It hasn't had much testing but works on
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-webfonts/test-georgian-ucnobi.html

Currently FcFreeTypeQueryFace is used and so fontconfig-2.4.2 or newer is
required.  I'll need to add support for older versions.  (Our CentOS 5.0 build
and test machines have fontconfig-2.4.1.)

To avoid temporary files (sometimes?) being created by nsIDownloader in system
directories and not-necessarily cleaned up, fonts are loaded into memory
through nsIStreamLoader in order to access them.

This misses an opportunity for sharing glyph caches etc across pages, but that
can be something that is sorted out if/when we have a downloaded-font cache.

A reference to the nsIStreamLoader is held to keep the font data in memory
until the font entry is destroyed.

This makes possible future optimization of nsIStreamLoader (or a new loader
type) such that, when appropriate, the font data is pinned to the disk cache
and the logical address of the data is provided through mmap rather than a
memory copy of the file data.  (This I think would benefit all platforms, even
those on which platform libraries make their own copy of all the data.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 18 08:16:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:16:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
In-Reply-To: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811180816.mAI8Gc4l004739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net




--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-18 03:16:37 EDT ---
Note that upstream released a new version a few days after I had rebuilt
fontforge in rawhide/f11. May be worth trying too

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 18 08:58:05 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:58:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files
In-Reply-To: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471538-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811180858.mAI8w5NE000648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538





--- Comment #5 from V??ctor Daniel <bombayvdmo at yahoo.com.mx>  2008-11-18 03:58:02 EDT ---
$ rpm -q fontforge
fontforge-20080927-1.fc11.i386

$ fontforge
Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams.
 Executable based on sources from 02:38 GMT 27-Sep-2008.
 Library based on sources from 15:05 GMT 25-Sep-2008.
*** buffer overflow detected ***: fontforge terminated
======= Backtrace: =========
...
...
00c9c000-00cb1000 r-xp 00000000 08:0Aborted (core dumped)

$gdb /usr/bin/fontforge fontforge-12150-1226998262.core

GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-23.fc9)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"...

warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfontforge.so.1.0.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libfontforge.so.1.0.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfontforge.so.1.0.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgdraw.so.4.0.5...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgdraw.so.4.0.5.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgdraw.so.4.0.5
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgutils.so.1.0.3...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgutils.so.1.0.3.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgutils.so.1.0.3
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3.0.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3.0.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3.0.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0
Reading symbols from /lib/libdl-2.8.so...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/lib/libdl-2.8.so.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl-2.8.so
Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread-2.8.so...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/lib/libpthread-2.8.so.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread-2.8.so
Reading symbols from /lib/libm-2.8.so...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/lib/libm-2.8.so.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libm-2.8.so
Reading symbols from /lib/libc-2.8.so...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/lib/libc-2.8.so.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc-2.8.so
Reading symbols from /lib/libuuid.so.1.2...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/lib/libuuid.so.1.2.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libuuid.so.1.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.0.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.0.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1.0.0
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-2.8.so...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/lib/ld-2.8.so.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-2.8.so
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/gconv/MACINTOSH.so...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gconv/MACINTOSH.so.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/gconv/MACINTOSH.so
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0
Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s-4.3.0-20080428.so.1...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/lib/libgcc_s-4.3.0-20080428.so.1.debug...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s-4.3.0-20080428.so.1
Core was generated by `fontforge'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
[New process 12150]
#0  0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt full
#0  0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x00b0b660 in raise (sig=<value optimized out>) at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64
 resultvar = <value optimized out>
 pid = <value optimized out>
 selftid = <value optimized out>
#2  0x00b0d028 in abort () at abort.c:88
 act = Could not find the frame base for "abort".
 sigs = Could not find the frame base for "abort".
#3  0x00b4864d in __libc_message (do_abort=<value optimized out>, fmt=<value
optimized out>)
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:170
 ap = <value optimized out>
 fd = 5
 on_2 = <value optimized out>
 list = <value optimized out>
 nlist = <value optimized out>
 cp = <value optimized out>
 written = <value optimized out>
#4  0x00bd7c78 in __fortify_fail (msg=Could not find the frame base for
"__fortify_fail".
) at fortify_fail.c:32
No locals.
#5  0x00bd5d70 in __chk_fail () at chk_fail.c:29
No locals.
#6  0x00bd5468 in _IO_str_chk_overflow (fp=Could not find the frame base for
"_IO_str_chk_overflow".
) at vsprintf_chk.c:35
No locals.
#7  0x00b4d9a3 in __overflow (f=<value optimized out>, ch=Could not find the
frame base for "__overflow".
) at genops.c:248
No locals.
#8  0x00b25de9 in ___printf_fp (fp=<value optimized out>, info=<value optimized
out>, 
    args=<value optimized out>) at printf_fp.c:1206
 outlen = <value optimized out>
 buffer = <value optimized out>
 cp = <value optimized out>
 tmpptr = <value optimized out>
 wstartp = <value optimized out>
 intdig_max = <value optimized out>
 intdig_no = <value optimized out>
 fracdig_max = <value optimized out>
 fracdig_no = <value optimized out>
 width = <value optimized out>
 expscale = <value optimized out>
 ngroups = <value optimized out>
 wbuffer_to_alloc = <value optimized out>
 fracdig_min = <value optimized out>
 dig_max = <value optimized out>
 significant = <value optimized out>
 wcp = <value optimized out>
 chars_needed = <value optimized out>
 spec = <value optimized out>
 added_zeros = <value optimized out>
 decimal = <value optimized out>
 decimalwc = <value optimized out>
 thousands_sep = <value optimized out>
 thousands_sepwc = <value optimized out>
 grouping = <value optimized out>
 special = <value optimized out>
 wspecial = <value optimized out>
 fp_input = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 to_shift = <value optimized out>
 is_neg = 0
 tmpsize = <value optimized out>
 digit = <value optimized out>
 done = <value optimized out>
 cy = <value optimized out>
 wide = 0
 wbuffer = <value optimized out>
 buffer_malloced = <value optimized out>
 expsign = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 exponent = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 fracsize = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 frac = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 tmp = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 scale = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 scalesize = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
 type = Could not find the frame base for "___printf_fp".
#9  0x00b20e92 in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=<value optimized out>, format=<value
optimized out>, 
    ap=<value optimized out>) at vfprintf.c:1580
 info = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal".
 ptr = <value optimized out>
 function_done = <value optimized out>
 alt = <value optimized out>
 is_long = <value optimized out>
 prec = <value optimized out>
 is_negative = <value optimized out>
 number = <value optimized out>
 base = <value optimized out>
 string = <value optimized out>
 space = <value optimized out>
 width = <value optimized out>
 showsign = <value optimized out>
 group = <value optimized out>
 is_char = <value optimized out>
 pad = <value optimized out>
 the_arg = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal".
 left = <value optimized out>
 is_long_double = <value optimized out>
 is_short = <value optimized out>
 use_outdigits = <value optimized out>
 spec = <value optimized out>
 _buffer = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal".
 _avail = <value optimized out>
 thousands_sep = <value optimized out>
 grouping = <value optimized out>
 done = <value optimized out>
 f = <value optimized out>
 lead_str_end = <value optimized out>
 work_buffer = Could not find the frame base for "_IO_vfprintf_internal".
 workstart = <value optimized out>
 workend = <value optimized out>
 ap_save = <value optimized out>
 nspecs_done = <value optimized out>
 save_errno = 20
 readonly_format = <value optimized out>
 jump_table = {1, 0, 0, 4, 0, 14, 0, 6, 0, 0, 7, 2, 0, 3, 9, 0, 5, 8, 8, 8, 8,
8, 8, 8, 8, 
  8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 26, 0, 25, 0, 19, 19, 19, 0, 29, 0, 0, 12, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 21, 0, 0, 0, 
  0, 18, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 26, 0, 20, 15, 19, 19, 19, 10, 15, 28, 0, 11,
24, 23, 17, 22, 12, 
  0, 21, 27, 16, 0, 0, 18, 0, 13}
 step0_jumps = {0, 2233, 5485, 4766, 5570, 3668, 3772, 5253, 2453, 2641, 4267,
4182, -2518, 
  5034, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407,
-2989, 5129, -2518, 
  5168}
 step1_jumps = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2641, 4267, 4182, -2518, 5034, 459,
1713, 1683, 
  1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 5129, -2518, 0}
 step2_jumps = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4267, 4182, -2518, 5034, 459,
1713, 1683, 
  1698, 1128, 1947, -858, -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 5129, -2518, 0}
 step3a_jumps = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4350, 0, 0, 0, 459, 1713, 1683,
1698, 1128, 
  0, 0, 0, 0, -617, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
 step3b_jumps = {0 <repeats 11 times>, -2518, 0, 0, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698,
1128, 1947, -858, 
  -31, 1791, -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 0, 0, 0}
 step4_jumps = {0 <repeats 14 times>, 459, 1713, 1683, 1698, 1128, 1947, -858,
-31, 1791, 
  -617, -539, -2407, -2989, 0, 0, 0}
 step4_jumps = {4445 <repeats 14 times>, 372, 523, 2316, 2441, 4666, 4681,
3370, 2848, 3986, 
  4858, 4969, -1935, 3868, 4445, 4445, 4445}
#10 0x00bd5517 in ___vsprintf_chk (s=<value optimized out>, flags=<value
optimized out>, 
    slen=<value optimized out>, format=Could not find the frame base for
"___vsprintf_chk".
) at vsprintf_chk.c:87
 f = Could not find the frame base for "___vsprintf_chk".
 ret = 0
#11 0x00bd545d in ___sprintf_chk (s=Could not find the frame base for
"___sprintf_chk".
) at sprintf_chk.c:33
 done = 0
#12 0x0021dd11 in privateaddreal (private=0x892fc88, key=0x369dda "BlueScale", 
    val=0.0042127701453864574, def=0.039625) at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:34
 buf = "0.0042127?"
#13 0x0021de33 in cffprivatefillup (private=0x892fc88, dict=0x886f030) at
parsettf.c:3570
No locals.
#14 0x0021e20d in cffinfofillup (info=0xbf9c834c, dict=0x886f030,
strings=0x892a8f0, scnt=398)
    at parsettf.c:3681
No locals.
#15 0x002295cf in readcffglyphs (ttf=0x8872330, info=0xbf9c834c) at
parsettf.c:3699
 hdrsize = <value optimized out>
 fontnames = (char **) 0x88ad770
 strings = (char **) 0x892a8f0
 dicts = (struct topdicts **) 0x88b0600
 subdicts = <value optimized out>
 i = <value optimized out>
 which = <value optimized out>
 gsubs = {cnt = 0, next = 0, keys = 0x0, values = 0x0, lens = 0x0, bias = 0}
 scnt = 398
#16 0x0022d7f7 in _SFReadTTF (ttf=0x8872330, flags=<value optimized out>,
openflags=0, 
    filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf",
fd=0x0)
    at parsettf.c:5450
 info = {emsize = 1000, ascent = 800, descent = 200, vertical_origin = 0,
width_cnt = 618, 
  glyph_cnt = 618, index_to_loc_is_long = 0, is_ttc = 0, is_onebyte = 0,
twobytesymbol = 0, 
  complainedbeyondglyfend = 0, extensionrequested = 0, to_order2 = 0,
complainedmultname = 0, 
  strokedfont = 0, use_typo_metrics = 1, weight_width_slope_only = 0,
optimized_for_cleartype = 0, 
  apply_lsb = 0, openflags = 0, 
  copyright = 0x88b74f8 "Created by ,,, with FontForge 2.0
(http://fontforge.sf.net)", 
  familyname = 0x88af610 "Boisik", fullname = 0x8862c10 "Boisik", weight =
0x892fc78 "Medium", 
  version = 0x889a088 "001.000", fontname = 0x889ca20 "Boisik", xuid = 0x0,
uniqueid = 0, 
  italicAngle = 0, upos = -100, uwidth = 50, strokewidth = 0, fstype = 0,
private = 0x892fc88, 
  map = 0x0, uni_interp = ui_none, pfminfo = {pfmset = 0, winascent_add = 0,
windescent_add = 0, 
    hheadascent_add = 0, hheaddescent_add = 0, typoascent_add = 0,
typodescent_add = 0, 
    subsuper_set = 0, panose_set = 0, hheadset = 1, vheadset = 0, hascodepages
= 0, 
    hasunicoderanges = 0, pfmfamily = 0 '\0', weight = 0, width = 0, 
    panose = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000", fstype = 0, linegap = 90,
vlinegap = 0, 
    hhead_ascent = 841, hhead_descent = -341, os2_typoascent = 0,
os2_typodescent = 0, 
    os2_typolinegap = 0, os2_winascent = 0, os2_windescent = 0, os2_subxsize =
0, os2_subysize = 0, 
    os2_subxoff = 0, os2_subyoff = 0, os2_supxsize = 0, os2_supysize = 0,
os2_supxoff = 0, 
    os2_supyoff = 0, os2_strikeysize = 0, os2_strikeypos = 0, os2_vendor =
"\000\000\000", 
    os2_family_class = 0, codepages = {0, 0}, unicoderanges = {0, 0, 0, 0}},
os2_version = 0, 
  gasp_version = 0, dupnamestate = 0, names = 0x892bbd0, fontcomments = 0x0,
fontlog = 0x0, 
  cvt_names = 0x0, chars = 0x0, layers = 0x0, layer_cnt = 0, bitmaps = 0x0,
cidregistry = 0x0, 
  ordering = 0x0, supplement = 0, cidfontversion = 0, subfontcnt = 0, subfonts
= 0x0, inuse = 0x0, 
  numtables = 10, base_start = 0, cff_start = 3504, cff_length = 306553,
encoding_start = 960, 
  vs_start = 0, gasp_start = 0, glyph_start = 0, glyph_length = 0, gdef_start =
0, gdef_length = 0, 
  gpos_start = 0, gpos_length = 0, gsub_start = 0, gsub_length = 0, g_bounds =
0, 
  bitmapdata_start = 0, bitmapdata_length = 0, bitmaploc_start = 0,
bitmaploc_length = 0, 
  gvar_start = 0, gvar_len = 0, fvar_start = 0, fvar_len = 0, avar_start = 0,
avar_len = 0, 
  cvar_start = 0, cvar_len = 0, head_start = 172, hhea_start = 228,
hmetrics_start = 310088, 
  kern_start = 0, glyphlocations_start = 0, loca_length = 0, maxp_start = 264,
maxp_len = 6, 
  copyright_start = 368, postscript_start = 3472, os2_start = 272, typ1_start =
0, typ1_length = 0, 
  vhea_start = 0, vmetrics_start = 0, vorg_start = 0, pfed_start = 0, tex_start
= 0, bdf_start = 0, 
  fftm_start = 310060, prop_start = 0, lcar_start = 0, opbd_start = 0,
acnt_start = 0, 
  feat_start = 0, mort_start = 0, morx_start = 0, bsln_start = 0, math_start =
0, math_length = 0, 
  cvt_start = 0, cvt_len = 0, prep_start = 0, prep_len = 0, fpgm_start = 0,
fpgm_len = 0, 
  one_of_many = 0, obscomplain = 0, cmpcomplain = 0, unkcomplain = 0,
comcomplain = 0, 
  onlystrikes = 0, onlyonestrike = 0, barecff = 0, platform = 0, specific = 0, 
  anchor_class_cnt = 0, anchor_merge_cnt = 0, ahead = 0x0, alast = 0x0, khead =
0x0, klast = 0x0, 
  vkhead = 0x0, vklast = 0x0, gpos_lookups = 0x0, gsub_lookups = 0x0,
cur_lookups = 0x0, 
  mort_subs_lookup = 0x0, mort_pos_lookup2 = 0x0, mort_r2l = 0, mort_tag_mac =
0, mort_feat = 0, 
  mort_setting = 0, mort_is_nested = 0, morx_classes = 0x0, bsln_values = 0x0,
mort_max = 0, 
  tabs = 0x0, possub = 0x0, sm = 0x0, features = 0x0, chosenname = 0x0,
macstyle = 0, 
  lookup_cnt = 0, feature_cnt = 0, variations = 0x0, macstrids = 0x0, fd = 0x0,
savecnt = 0, 
  savetab = 0x0, last_size_pos = 0, design_size = 0, fontstyle_id = 0,
fontstyle_name = 0x0, 
  design_range_bottom = 0, design_range_top = 0, texdata = {type = tex_unset,
params = {
      0 <repeats 22 times>}}, mark_class_cnt = 0, mark_classes = 0x0,
mark_class_names = 0x0, 
  warned_morx_out_of_bounds_glyph = 0 '\0', badgid_cnt = 0, badgid_max = 0,
badgids = 0x0, 
  creationtime = 1216823215, modificationtime = 1218308786, gasp_cnt = 0, gasp
= 0x0, math = 0x0, 
  bad_ps_fontname = 0, bad_glyph_data = 0, bad_cff = 0, bad_metrics = 0,
bad_cmap = 0, 
  bad_embedded_bitmap = 0, bad_gx = 0, bad_ot = 0, bad_os2_version = 0,
bad_sfnt_header = 0, 
  guidelines = {background = 0, order2 = 0, anyflexes = 0, splines = 0x0,
images = 0x0, refs = 0x0, 
    undoes = 0x0, redoes = 0x0, validation_state = 0, old_vs = 0}, horiz_base =
0x0, 
  vert_base = 0x0}
#17 0x002b8bf6 in _ReadSplineFont (file=0x8872330, 
    filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf",
openflags=0)
    at splinefont.c:1055
 ch2 = <value optimized out>
 ch4 = 79
 ch6 = 10
 ch10 = 130
 ch1 = 79
 ch3 = 84
 ch5 = 0
 ch7 = 0
 ch9 = 6
 sf = <value optimized out>
 ubuf = "Loading font from Boisik.otf\000?\000???j?\021", '\0' <repeats 26
times>, "???k?\021", '\0' <repeats 85 times>,
"?\220\021\000\000???\000\000\000\000???????\000?\220\021\000\000???\220\210\234?y??\000????\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000j?\021\000\000\020\021\000\210\226-\000\001\000\000\000?\220\021\000H\237>\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000?\210\234??T?"
 temp = <value optimized out>
 fromsfd = 0
 i = <value optimized out>
 pt = 0x88af725 ".otf"
 strippedname = 0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf"
 tmpfile = 0x0
 fullname = 0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf"
 archivedir = 0x0
 len = <value optimized out>
 checked = 116
 compression = 0
 wasurl = 0
 nowlocal = 1
 wasarchived = 0
#18 0x002ba21c in ReadSplineFont (
    filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf",
openflags=0)
    at splinefont.c:1224
No locals.
#19 0x002ba309 in LoadSplineFont (
    filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf",
openflags=0)
    at splinefont.c:1297
 sf = (SplineFont *) 0x0
 pt = <value optimized out>
 ept = <value optimized out>
 tobefreed1 = 0x0
 tobefreed2 = 0x0
 extens = {0x3b2f3d ".sfd", 0x3aaeb8 ".pfa", 0x3aaec0 ".pfb", 0x3aae9e ".ttf", 
  0x3aaed6 ".otf", 0x36aa8d ".ps", 0x3aaecc ".cid", 0x3aae48 ".bin", 0x3aae3d
".dfont", 
  0x3b1e66 ".PFA", 0x3b1e6b ".PFB", 0x3b1e70 ".TTF", 0x3b1e75 ".OTF", 0x3b1e7a
".PS", 
  0x3b1e7e ".CID", 0x3b1e83 ".BIN", 0x3b1e88 ".DFONT", 0x0}
#20 0x0019ad7c in ViewPostscriptFont (
    filename=0x88af6f8 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik/Boisik.otf",
openflags=0)
    at fontviewbase.c:1234
 sf = <value optimized out>
#21 0x0810a9b4 in MenuOpen (base=0x0, mi=0x0, e=0x0) at fontview.c:1153
 temp = 0x8863060 "/home/vdmo/Documents/Font Faces/Boisik"
 file = 0x8863087 "Boisik.otf"
 test = <value optimized out>
 fvcnt = 0
 fvtest = <value optimized out>
#22 0x0819f3dc in main (argc=1, argv=0xbf9c9004) at startui.c:1191
 load_prefs = 0x0
 i = 5590599
 recover = 2
 any = 0
 next_recent = -1208311152
 pos = {x = 200, y = 200, width = 379, height = 319}
 wattrs = {mask = 590902, event_masks = 4294967293, border_width = 2,
border_color = 9, 
  background_color = 16777215, cursor = ct_pointer, window_title = 0xad6a45,
icon_title = 0x8, 
  icon = 0x4c, nodecoration = 0, positioned = 1, centered = 0, undercursor = 0,
noresize = 0, 
  restrict_input_to_me = 1, redirect_chars_to_me = 1, is_dlg = 1,
not_restricted = 1, 
  redirect_from = 0xb7faacf8, transient = 0xacdf67, utf8_window_title =
0x81bb50d "FontForge", 
  utf8_icon_title = 0xb7faacf8 "????H???????\220??? ???\230???0???"}
 display = 0x0
 rq = {family_name = 0x88abcd8, point_size = 12, weight = 400, style =
fs_italic, 
  utf8_family_name = 0x0}
 ds = <value optimized out>
 ld = 0
 openflags = -1208309184
 doopen = 0
 quit_request = 0
 times = {116, 105, 109, 101, 115, 44, 99, 108, 101, 97, 114, 108, 121, 117,
44, 117, 110, 
  105, 102, 111, 110, 116, 0}
(gdb) quit

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 04:44:42 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:44:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard
 Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811190444.mAJ4igxb007211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947





--- Comment #19 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in>  2008-11-18 23:44:40 EDT ---
hi,

updated the packages.. I did look at the pdf that youve mentioned.. I couldnt
figure how to include it though, tried a few things but got stuck with errors..

here are the packages..

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

Can you tell me how to change the changelog please?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 04:41:27 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:41:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811190441.mAJ4fRxX006865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955


Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho |
                   |o.co.in)                    |




--- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in>  2008-11-18 23:41:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Ping?

hi,

upadated the package to remove the text errors.. I understand most of the spec
file (manuals clarify everything that i do).. Im stuck on the fontconfig
rules.. Thats why i asked for documentation.. I have no idea whats written in
there and what ive added on given advice..(points 8 9 10) :( i havent much
knowledge on Font families etc.. Any help with that?

here are the updated packages.. 

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec

and okay, Ill start using mock.. 

Ill update the wishlist..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 13:53:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:53:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] New: fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
Message-ID: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: fkp font does not display some english (plain ol' ascii) characters properly

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220

           Summary: fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
                    ascii) characters properly
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
        AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: tcallawa at redhat.com, andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Created an attachment (id=324032)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324032)
string "_{}[]~%@" using fkp font on gnome-terminal

Description of problem:
The fkp font does not display the following characters properly:
- with these, the bottom part is missing: _{}[] (for example, an underscore
cannot even be seen)
- with these, the top part is missing: ~%@ (for example, a tilde cannot even be
seen)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-5.fc8.1.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Choose the fkp font as your gnome-terminal font
2. Try typing out "_{}[]~%@" in the terminal

Actual results:
I've attached an image of how the string "_{}[]~%@" is displayed on the
gnome-terminal.

Expected results:
At least the normal ascii characters should be displayed correctly using this
font.

Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 15:15:10 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:15:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (
 =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt
In-Reply-To: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191515.mAJFFAAv030610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745





--- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com>  2008-11-19 10:15:09 EDT ---
At what dpi?  I can't reproduce it.  Play with the numbers in the following
command line and see which ones hit the bug for you:

$ pango-view  --text ? --font 'dejavu sans 8pt' --dpi 96

Also, a screenshot helps.  At the end, nothing I can do about it here.  Needs
to be reported upstream to FreeType.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 22:25:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:25:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard
 Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811192225.mAJMPso1020655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947





--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-19 17:25:53 EDT ---
you have an example of separate pdf included as %doc in the
yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts

As for the changelog, I'm sure Pablo would be happy to help you, if you told us
precisely what your changelog problem was.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 22:22:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:22:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811192222.mAJMMu2Z014721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-19 17:22:55 EDT ---
Ok, we're slowly getting there.

Please remember to bump the release version each time you change you specfile.

I see that your fontconfig understanding remains problematic. It's a bit
difficult to help you if you do not ask specific questions, fontconfig is a
complex software.

I've really tried to make the fontconfig templates in
http://nim.fedorapeople.org/rpm-fonts/rpm-fonts-1.8.tar.bz2
as simple as I could. What part of it do you not understand?

If you want concrete examples (not abstract templates), just download the
src.rpms of existing Fedora 9/10 font packages (the gfs fonts come to mind) and
look at the fontconfig bits inside using file-roller.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 22:58:25 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:58:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard
 Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457947-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811192258.mAJMwP3C020609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947





--- Comment #21 from Martin-Gomez Pablo <pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net>  2008-11-19 17:58:24 EDT ---
> The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :(
> so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this)
It's quite simple to understand, for exemple, your spec:
Version:        1.1
Release:        1%{?dist}
The number after "Version:" is the version one, it's given by upstream and you
must not change it. So put "1.0" as it's the version of the font.
The "Release:" number is a distro/package specific number, so each time you add
an entry in the changelog, you increment by one this number. So currently, it
should be "3%{?dist}".

Also your changelog format is not correct, you have to add your email address
as said in the guidelines
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs).


> The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that?
You should add the code proposed by Nicolas in the review request of the
bonveno fonts in the %prep section  .

> You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not
> forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different
> Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc)
Ok, so you have to duplicate the XML code I gave you, and just change the first
<family>Old Standard</family> to <family>Old Standard TTF</family>.
For register this font as a serif one, add the following to the fontconfig
file:
<alias>
  <family>serif</family>
  <prefer>
    <family>Old Standard SFD</family>
  </prefer>
</alias>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 04:24:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:24:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811200424.mAK4O1iK016702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955





--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in>  2008-11-19 23:24:00 EDT ---
Hi,

Im okay with the syntax.. Understood the xmllint too.. (The tar file says
output will be .xml.. mines coming .conf..).How do i decide if a font goes
Dejau or serif? Thats what i dont know how to decide..

Thanks both for your clarifications and patience.. Ill upload the new packages
once ive checked them (will try using mock).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-5
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, 
	NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5
Message-ID: <20081120181355.727CB700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/EL-5

Modified Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch 
Log Message:
clean up fkp font, bz 472220

artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch:

--- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch ---
diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf
--- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig	2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf	2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 STARTFONT 2.1
 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1
 SIZE 16 75 75
-FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4
+FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4
 STARTPROPERTIES 21
 POINT_SIZE 160
 WEIGHT 10
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m"
 AVERAGE_WIDTH 80
 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859"
 CHARSET_ENCODING "1"
-_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5."
+_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7."
 ENDPROPERTIES
 CHARS 256
 STARTCHAR char0
 ENCODING 0
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 7C
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char1
 ENCODING 1
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char2
 ENCODING 2
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char3
 ENCODING 3
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 8 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char4
 ENCODING 4
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char5
 ENCODING 5
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char6
 ENCODING 6
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char7
 ENCODING 7
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 4 4 2 2
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char8
 ENCODING 8
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char9
 ENCODING 9
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 6 1 1
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char10
 ENCODING 10
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char11
 ENCODING 11
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 0E
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char12
 ENCODING 12
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char13
 ENCODING 13
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 08
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char14
 ENCODING 14
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 11 0 -1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char15
 ENCODING 15
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char16
 ENCODING 16
-SWIDTH 480 0
[...8183 lines suppressed...]
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char238
 ENCODING 238
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 38
@@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char239
 ENCODING 239
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char240
 ENCODING 240
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 FE
@@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char241
 ENCODING 241
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 30
@@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char242
 ENCODING 242
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char243
 ENCODING 243
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char244
 ENCODING 244
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 13 3 -4
 BITMAP
 70
@@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char245
 ENCODING 245
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 12 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char246
 ENCODING 246
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char247
 ENCODING 247
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 5 0 2
 BITMAP
 76
@@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char248
 ENCODING 248
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 3 1 7
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char249
 ENCODING 249
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 2 2 3 3
 BITMAP
 C0
@@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char250
 ENCODING 250
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char251
 ENCODING 251
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char252
 ENCODING 252
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char253
 ENCODING 253
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char254
 ENCODING 254
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 D8
@@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char255
 ENCODING 255
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR


Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-5/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	2 Aug 2007 16:55:50 -0000	1.4
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	20 Nov 2008 18:13:25 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
 Version:        1.3
-Release:        5%{?dist}
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 Source0:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source1:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source2:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
+Patch0:		artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch
 
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:      noarch
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2
-
+%patch0 -p0
 
 %build
 for lang in de en se; do
@@ -88,6 +89,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-6
+- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
+
 * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-5
 - Rebuilt for FC6
 



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-10
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, 
	NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5
Message-ID: <20081120181355.ABD04700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/F-10

Modified Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch 
Log Message:
clean up fkp font, bz 472220

artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch:

--- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch ---
diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf
--- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig	2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf	2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 STARTFONT 2.1
 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1
 SIZE 16 75 75
-FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4
+FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4
 STARTPROPERTIES 21
 POINT_SIZE 160
 WEIGHT 10
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m"
 AVERAGE_WIDTH 80
 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859"
 CHARSET_ENCODING "1"
-_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5."
+_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7."
 ENDPROPERTIES
 CHARS 256
 STARTCHAR char0
 ENCODING 0
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 7C
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char1
 ENCODING 1
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char2
 ENCODING 2
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char3
 ENCODING 3
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 8 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char4
 ENCODING 4
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char5
 ENCODING 5
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char6
 ENCODING 6
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char7
 ENCODING 7
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 4 4 2 2
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char8
 ENCODING 8
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char9
 ENCODING 9
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 6 1 1
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char10
 ENCODING 10
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char11
 ENCODING 11
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 0E
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char12
 ENCODING 12
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char13
 ENCODING 13
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 08
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char14
 ENCODING 14
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 11 0 -1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char15
 ENCODING 15
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char16
 ENCODING 16
-SWIDTH 480 0
[...8183 lines suppressed...]
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char238
 ENCODING 238
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 38
@@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char239
 ENCODING 239
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char240
 ENCODING 240
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 FE
@@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char241
 ENCODING 241
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 30
@@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char242
 ENCODING 242
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char243
 ENCODING 243
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char244
 ENCODING 244
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 13 3 -4
 BITMAP
 70
@@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char245
 ENCODING 245
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 12 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char246
 ENCODING 246
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char247
 ENCODING 247
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 5 0 2
 BITMAP
 76
@@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char248
 ENCODING 248
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 3 1 7
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char249
 ENCODING 249
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 2 2 3 3
 BITMAP
 C0
@@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char250
 ENCODING 250
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char251
 ENCODING 251
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char252
 ENCODING 252
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char253
 ENCODING 253
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char254
 ENCODING 254
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 D8
@@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char255
 ENCODING 255
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR


Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-10/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000	1.4
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	20 Nov 2008 18:13:25 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
 Version:        1.3
-Release:        5%{?dist}.1
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 Source0:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source1:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source2:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
+Patch0:		artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch
 
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:      noarch
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2
-
+%patch0 -p0
 
 %build
 for lang in de en se; do
@@ -88,6 +89,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-6
+- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
+
 * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-5
 - Rebuilt for FC6
 



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-8 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch,
	NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5
Message-ID: <20081120181355.F2C01700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-8
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/F-8

Modified Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch 
Log Message:
clean up fkp font, bz 472220

artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch:

--- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch ---
diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf
--- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig	2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf	2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 STARTFONT 2.1
 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1
 SIZE 16 75 75
-FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4
+FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4
 STARTPROPERTIES 21
 POINT_SIZE 160
 WEIGHT 10
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m"
 AVERAGE_WIDTH 80
 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859"
 CHARSET_ENCODING "1"
-_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5."
+_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7."
 ENDPROPERTIES
 CHARS 256
 STARTCHAR char0
 ENCODING 0
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 7C
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char1
 ENCODING 1
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char2
 ENCODING 2
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char3
 ENCODING 3
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 8 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char4
 ENCODING 4
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char5
 ENCODING 5
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char6
 ENCODING 6
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char7
 ENCODING 7
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 4 4 2 2
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char8
 ENCODING 8
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char9
 ENCODING 9
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 6 1 1
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char10
 ENCODING 10
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char11
 ENCODING 11
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 0E
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char12
 ENCODING 12
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char13
 ENCODING 13
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 08
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char14
 ENCODING 14
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 11 0 -1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char15
 ENCODING 15
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char16
 ENCODING 16
-SWIDTH 480 0
[...8183 lines suppressed...]
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char238
 ENCODING 238
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 38
@@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char239
 ENCODING 239
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char240
 ENCODING 240
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 FE
@@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char241
 ENCODING 241
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 30
@@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char242
 ENCODING 242
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char243
 ENCODING 243
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char244
 ENCODING 244
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 13 3 -4
 BITMAP
 70
@@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char245
 ENCODING 245
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 12 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char246
 ENCODING 246
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char247
 ENCODING 247
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 5 0 2
 BITMAP
 76
@@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char248
 ENCODING 248
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 3 1 7
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char249
 ENCODING 249
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 2 2 3 3
 BITMAP
 C0
@@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char250
 ENCODING 250
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char251
 ENCODING 251
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char252
 ENCODING 252
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char253
 ENCODING 253
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char254
 ENCODING 254
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 D8
@@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char255
 ENCODING 255
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR


Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-8/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000	1.4
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	20 Nov 2008 18:13:25 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
 Version:        1.3
-Release:        5%{?dist}.1
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 Source0:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source1:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source2:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
+Patch0:		artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch
 
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:      noarch
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2
-
+%patch0 -p0
 
 %build
 for lang in de en se; do
@@ -88,6 +89,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-6
+- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
+
 * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-5
 - Rebuilt for FC6
 



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Thu Nov 20 18:13:56 2008
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, 
	NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5
Message-ID: <20081120181356.81D1E700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/devel

Modified Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch 
Log Message:
clean up fkp font, bz 472220

artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch:

--- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch ---
diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf
--- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig	2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf	2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 STARTFONT 2.1
 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1
 SIZE 16 75 75
-FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4
+FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4
 STARTPROPERTIES 21
 POINT_SIZE 160
 WEIGHT 10
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m"
 AVERAGE_WIDTH 80
 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859"
 CHARSET_ENCODING "1"
-_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5."
+_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7."
 ENDPROPERTIES
 CHARS 256
 STARTCHAR char0
 ENCODING 0
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 7C
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char1
 ENCODING 1
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char2
 ENCODING 2
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char3
 ENCODING 3
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 8 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char4
 ENCODING 4
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char5
 ENCODING 5
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char6
 ENCODING 6
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char7
 ENCODING 7
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 4 4 2 2
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char8
 ENCODING 8
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char9
 ENCODING 9
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 6 1 1
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char10
 ENCODING 10
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char11
 ENCODING 11
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 0E
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char12
 ENCODING 12
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char13
 ENCODING 13
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 08
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char14
 ENCODING 14
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 11 0 -1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char15
 ENCODING 15
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char16
 ENCODING 16
-SWIDTH 480 0
[...8183 lines suppressed...]
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char238
 ENCODING 238
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 38
@@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char239
 ENCODING 239
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char240
 ENCODING 240
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 FE
@@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char241
 ENCODING 241
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 30
@@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char242
 ENCODING 242
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char243
 ENCODING 243
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char244
 ENCODING 244
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 13 3 -4
 BITMAP
 70
@@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char245
 ENCODING 245
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 12 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char246
 ENCODING 246
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char247
 ENCODING 247
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 5 0 2
 BITMAP
 76
@@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char248
 ENCODING 248
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 3 1 7
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char249
 ENCODING 249
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 2 2 3 3
 BITMAP
 C0
@@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char250
 ENCODING 250
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char251
 ENCODING 251
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char252
 ENCODING 252
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char253
 ENCODING 253
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char254
 ENCODING 254
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 D8
@@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char255
 ENCODING 255
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR


Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000	1.4
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	20 Nov 2008 18:13:26 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
 Version:        1.3
-Release:        5%{?dist}.1
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 Source0:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source1:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source2:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
+Patch0:		artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch
 
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:      noarch
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2
-
+%patch0 -p0
 
 %build
 for lang in de en se; do
@@ -88,6 +89,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-6
+- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
+
 * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-5
 - Rebuilt for FC6
 



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Thu Nov 20 18:13:56 2008
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-9 artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch,
	NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5
Message-ID: <20081120181356.44BC0700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/F-9

Modified Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch 
Log Message:
clean up fkp font, bz 472220

artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch:

--- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch ---
diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf
--- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig	2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf	2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 STARTFONT 2.1
 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1
 SIZE 16 75 75
-FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4
+FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4
 STARTPROPERTIES 21
 POINT_SIZE 160
 WEIGHT 10
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m"
 AVERAGE_WIDTH 80
 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859"
 CHARSET_ENCODING "1"
-_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5."
+_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7."
 ENDPROPERTIES
 CHARS 256
 STARTCHAR char0
 ENCODING 0
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 7C
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char1
 ENCODING 1
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char2
 ENCODING 2
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char3
 ENCODING 3
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 8 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char4
 ENCODING 4
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char5
 ENCODING 5
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char6
 ENCODING 6
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char7
 ENCODING 7
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 4 4 2 2
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char8
 ENCODING 8
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char9
 ENCODING 9
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 6 1 1
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char10
 ENCODING 10
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char11
 ENCODING 11
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 0E
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char12
 ENCODING 12
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char13
 ENCODING 13
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 08
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char14
 ENCODING 14
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 11 0 -1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char15
 ENCODING 15
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char16
 ENCODING 16
-SWIDTH 480 0
[...8183 lines suppressed...]
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char238
 ENCODING 238
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 38
@@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char239
 ENCODING 239
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char240
 ENCODING 240
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 FE
@@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char241
 ENCODING 241
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 30
@@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char242
 ENCODING 242
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char243
 ENCODING 243
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char244
 ENCODING 244
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 13 3 -4
 BITMAP
 70
@@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char245
 ENCODING 245
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 12 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char246
 ENCODING 246
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char247
 ENCODING 247
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 5 0 2
 BITMAP
 76
@@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char248
 ENCODING 248
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 3 1 7
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char249
 ENCODING 249
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 2 2 3 3
 BITMAP
 C0
@@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char250
 ENCODING 250
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char251
 ENCODING 251
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char252
 ENCODING 252
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char253
 ENCODING 253
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char254
 ENCODING 254
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 D8
@@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char255
 ENCODING 255
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR


Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/F-9/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	2 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0000	1.4
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	20 Nov 2008 18:13:26 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
 Version:        1.3
-Release:        5%{?dist}.1
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 Source0:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source1:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source2:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
+Patch0:		artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch
 
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:      noarch
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2
-
+%patch0 -p0
 
 %build
 for lang in de en se; do
@@ -88,6 +89,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-6
+- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
+
 * Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-5
 - Rebuilt for FC6
 



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Thu Nov 20 18:13:55 2008
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-4
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch, 
	NONE, 1.1 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3
Message-ID: <20081120181355.514EA700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-4
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv722/EL-4

Modified Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch 
Log Message:
clean up fkp font, bz 472220

artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch:

--- NEW FILE artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch ---
diff -up artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf
--- artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf.orig	2008-11-20 12:18:43.000000000 -0500
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3/fkp.bdf	2008-11-20 12:18:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 STARTFONT 2.1
 FONT -artwiz-fkp-medium-r-normal--16-160-75-75-m-80-ISO8859-1
 SIZE 16 75 75
-FONTBOUNDINGBOX 8 16 0 -4
+FONTBOUNDINGBOX 9 16 0 -4
 STARTPROPERTIES 21
 POINT_SIZE 160
 WEIGHT 10
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ SPACING "m"
 AVERAGE_WIDTH 80
 CHARSET_REGISTRY "ISO8859"
 CHARSET_ENCODING "1"
-_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.5."
+_XMBDFED_INFO "Edited with xmbdfed 4.7."
 ENDPROPERTIES
 CHARS 256
 STARTCHAR char0
 ENCODING 0
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 7C
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char1
 ENCODING 1
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ A5
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char2
 ENCODING 2
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ E7
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char3
 ENCODING 3
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 8 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char4
 ENCODING 4
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char5
 ENCODING 5
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char6
 ENCODING 6
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char7
 ENCODING 7
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 4 4 2 2
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char8
 ENCODING 8
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char9
 ENCODING 9
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 6 1 1
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char10
 ENCODING 10
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 16 0 -4
 BITMAP
 FF
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ FF
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char11
 ENCODING 11
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 0E
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char12
 ENCODING 12
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char13
 ENCODING 13
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 08
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ F8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char14
 ENCODING 14
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 11 0 -1
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ F2
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char15
 ENCODING 15
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ DB
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char16
 ENCODING 16
-SWIDTH 480 0
[...8183 lines suppressed...]
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -3925,8 +3938,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char238
 ENCODING 238
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 10 1 0
 BITMAP
 38
@@ -3942,8 +3955,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char239
 ENCODING 239
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 3C
@@ -3958,8 +3971,8 @@ C6
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char240
 ENCODING 240
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 7 0 1
 BITMAP
 FE
@@ -3972,8 +3985,8 @@ FE
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char241
 ENCODING 241
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 30
@@ -3986,8 +3999,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char242
 ENCODING 242
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 60
@@ -4002,8 +4015,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char243
 ENCODING 243
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 9 1 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4018,8 +4031,8 @@ FC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char244
 ENCODING 244
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 13 3 -4
 BITMAP
 70
@@ -4038,8 +4051,8 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char245
 ENCODING 245
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 12 0 0
 BITMAP
 18
@@ -4057,8 +4070,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char246
 ENCODING 246
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 9 0 0
 BITMAP
 66
@@ -4073,8 +4086,8 @@ CC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char247
 ENCODING 247
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 7 5 0 2
 BITMAP
 76
@@ -4085,8 +4098,8 @@ DC
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char248
 ENCODING 248
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 3 1 7
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4095,8 +4108,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char249
 ENCODING 249
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 2 2 3 3
 BITMAP
 C0
@@ -4104,15 +4117,15 @@ C0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char250
 ENCODING 250
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char251
 ENCODING 251
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 8 10 0 0
 BITMAP
 03
@@ -4128,8 +4141,8 @@ F0
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char252
 ENCODING 252
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 6 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 FC
@@ -4140,8 +4153,8 @@ C4
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char253
 ENCODING 253
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 5 0 5
 BITMAP
 78
@@ -4152,8 +4165,8 @@ C8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char254
 ENCODING 254
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 5 7 1 1
 BITMAP
 D8
@@ -4166,8 +4179,8 @@ D8
 ENDCHAR
 STARTCHAR char255
 ENCODING 255
-SWIDTH 480 0
-DWIDTH 8 0
+SWIDTH 540 0
+DWIDTH 9 0
 BBX 0 0 0 0
 BITMAP
 ENDCHAR


Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/EL-4/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	2 Aug 2007 16:55:48 -0000	1.2
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	20 Nov 2008 18:13:24 -0000	1.3
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
 Version:        1.3
-Release:        3%{?dist}
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 Source0:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-en-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source1:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-de-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
 Source2:        http://dl.sf.net/artwizaleczapka/artwiz-aleczapka-se-sources-1.3.tar.bz2
+Patch0:		artwiz-aleczapka-fkp-cleanups.patch
 
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:      noarch
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} -a1 -a2
-
+%patch0 -p0
 
 %build
 for lang in de en se; do
@@ -88,6 +89,16 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-6
+- font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
+
+* Sat Sep 23 2006 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-5
+- Rebuilt for FC6
+
+* Tue Feb 14 2006 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de>
+1.3-4
+Rebuild for Fedora Extras 5
+
 * Sat Dec 31 2005 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de>
 1.3-3
 - apply fixes from Dawid Gajownik



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 18:15:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:15:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201815.mAKIFGmB003159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2008-11-20 13:15:15 EDT ---
This wasn't a gnome-terminal bug, the fkp font had some incomplete characters
(and in the case of an underscore, no character at all). I've fixed this up,
and updates should be hitting all branches shortly.

(I ended up packaging up the tool I used to make the edits, since it greatly
simplified the process: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 )

Thanks for the report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 18:30:29 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:30:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201830.mAKIUT59011105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220





--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-20 13:30:28 EDT ---
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 18:30:25 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:30:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201830.mAKIUP1Z011079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220





--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-20 13:30:25 EDT ---
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 18:30:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:30:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201830.mAKIUM2c005955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220





--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-20 13:30:21 EDT ---
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 18:39:35 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:39:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor
In-Reply-To: <bug-472418-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472418-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201839.mAKIdZdL007492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 18:55:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:55:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457955-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201855.mAKItMkU010899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955





--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-20 13:55:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (The tar file says
> output will be .xml.. mines coming .conf..).

Yes, that was a mistake in the documentation, now fixed, thanks for reporting

>How do i decide if a font goes
> Dejau or serif? Thats what i dont know how to decide..

DejaVu Sans is a font name, serif is a generic name.
Is the tar documentation not clear enough on where you should use generics and
where you should use font names?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 19:45:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:45:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468598] How to add fonts?
In-Reply-To: <bug-468598-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468598-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201945.mAKJjh3E020955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468598


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 19:46:23 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:46:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468598] How to add fonts?
In-Reply-To: <bug-468598-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468598-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811201946.mAKJkNop021162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468598


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |h.pillay at ieee.org




--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-20 14:46:22 EDT ---
*** Bug 471891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 21 11:00:41 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:00:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811211100.mALB0fWF022853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220





--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-21 06:00:40 EDT ---
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 21 11:02:00 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:02:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811211102.mALB20Sf017383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220





--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-21 06:01:59 EDT ---
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 21 11:00:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:00:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811211100.mALB0iTr016904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From farnold at fedoraproject.org  Fri Nov 21 13:15:09 2008
From: farnold at fedoraproject.org (Frank Arnold)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.8,
	1.9 linux-libertine-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.8, 1.9
Message-ID: <20081121131509.264CE700FA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: farnold

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17870

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore linux-libertine-fonts.spec sources 
Log Message:
* Fri Nov 21 2008 Frank Arnold <frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de> 4.1.8-1
- Updated to 4.1.8
- Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- .cvsignore	3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000	1.8
+++ .cvsignore	21 Nov 2008 13:14:37 -0000	1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz
+LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz


Index: linux-libertine-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/linux-libertine-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- linux-libertine-fonts.spec	3 Sep 2008 21:23:24 -0000	1.9
+++ linux-libertine-fonts.spec	21 Nov 2008 13:14:37 -0000	1.10
@@ -1,18 +1,20 @@
 %define archivename     LinLibertineSRC
 %define fontdir         %{_datadir}/fonts/linux-libertine
 
+
 Name:          linux-libertine-fonts
-Version:       2.7.9
-Release:       2%{?dist}
+Version:       4.1.8
+Release:       1%{?dist}
 Summary:       Linux Libertine Open Fonts
 Group:         User Interface/X
 License:       GPLv2+ with exceptions or OFL
 URL:           http://linuxlibertine.sf.net
-Source:        http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-2.7.tgz
+Source:        http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-%{version}.tgz
 BuildRoot:     %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:     noarch
 BuildRequires: fontforge
 
+
 %description
 The Linux Libertine Open Fonts are a TrueType font family for practical
 use in documents. They were created to provide a free alternative to
@@ -27,9 +29,18 @@
 %build
 fontforge -script "-" *.sfd <<EOF
 i = 1
-while ( i < \$argc )
-  Open (\$argv[i], 1)
-  Generate (\$fontname + ".ttf")
+while (i < \$argc)
+  Open(\$argv[i], 1)
+  fontname = StrJoin(StrSplit(\$fontname, "O"), "")
+  familyname = StrJoin(StrSplit(\$familyname, " O"), "")
+  fullname = StrJoin(StrSplit(\$fullname, " O"), "")
+  SetFontNames(fontname, familyname, fullname)
+  ScaleToEm(2048)
+  RoundToInt()
+  SetFontOrder(2)
+  SelectAll()
+  AutoInstr()
+  Generate(\$fontname + ".ttf")
   Close()
   i++
 endloop
@@ -38,9 +49,8 @@
 
 %install
 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
 install -d -m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
-install -p -m 0644 *.ttf  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
+install -p -m 0644 *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
 
 
 %clean
@@ -49,26 +59,30 @@
 
 %post
 if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
+  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
 fi
 
 
 %postun
-if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then
+if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then
   if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
+    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
   fi
 fi
 
 
 %files
 %defattr(644,root,root,755)
-%doc Bugs Readme *.txt
+%doc Readme *.txt
 %dir %{fontdir}
 %{fontdir}/*.ttf
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 21 2008 Frank Arnold <frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de> 4.1.8-1
+- Updated to 4.1.8
+- Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt
+
 * Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 -  2.7.9-2
 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- sources	3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000	1.8
+++ sources	21 Nov 2008 13:14:38 -0000	1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-9a34ee20358d3c5aae7d46ed15e43d73  LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz
+e7357378dc803cf6a2823cae032caf24  LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz



From farnold at fedoraproject.org  Fri Nov 21 13:44:24 2008
From: farnold at fedoraproject.org (Frank Arnold)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.8,
	1.9 linux-libertine-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.8, 1.9
Message-ID: <20081121134425.051A5700FA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: farnold

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26584

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore linux-libertine-fonts.spec sources 
Log Message:
* Fri Nov 21 2008 Frank Arnold <frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de> 4.1.8-1
- Updated to 4.1.8
- Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- .cvsignore	3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000	1.8
+++ .cvsignore	21 Nov 2008 13:43:53 -0000	1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz
+LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz


Index: linux-libertine-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10/linux-libertine-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- linux-libertine-fonts.spec	3 Sep 2008 21:23:24 -0000	1.9
+++ linux-libertine-fonts.spec	21 Nov 2008 13:43:53 -0000	1.10
@@ -1,18 +1,20 @@
 %define archivename     LinLibertineSRC
 %define fontdir         %{_datadir}/fonts/linux-libertine
 
+
 Name:          linux-libertine-fonts
-Version:       2.7.9
-Release:       2%{?dist}
+Version:       4.1.8
+Release:       1%{?dist}
 Summary:       Linux Libertine Open Fonts
 Group:         User Interface/X
 License:       GPLv2+ with exceptions or OFL
 URL:           http://linuxlibertine.sf.net
-Source:        http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-2.7.tgz
+Source:        http://dl.sf.net/linuxlibertine/%{archivename}-%{version}.tgz
 BuildRoot:     %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:     noarch
 BuildRequires: fontforge
 
+
 %description
 The Linux Libertine Open Fonts are a TrueType font family for practical
 use in documents. They were created to provide a free alternative to
@@ -27,9 +29,18 @@
 %build
 fontforge -script "-" *.sfd <<EOF
 i = 1
-while ( i < \$argc )
-  Open (\$argv[i], 1)
-  Generate (\$fontname + ".ttf")
+while (i < \$argc)
+  Open(\$argv[i], 1)
+  fontname = StrJoin(StrSplit(\$fontname, "O"), "")
+  familyname = StrJoin(StrSplit(\$familyname, " O"), "")
+  fullname = StrJoin(StrSplit(\$fullname, " O"), "")
+  SetFontNames(fontname, familyname, fullname)
+  ScaleToEm(2048)
+  RoundToInt()
+  SetFontOrder(2)
+  SelectAll()
+  AutoInstr()
+  Generate(\$fontname + ".ttf")
   Close()
   i++
 endloop
@@ -38,9 +49,8 @@
 
 %install
 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
 install -d -m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
-install -p -m 0644 *.ttf  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
+install -p -m 0644 *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
 
 
 %clean
@@ -49,26 +59,30 @@
 
 %post
 if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
+  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
 fi
 
 
 %postun
-if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then
+if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then
   if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
+    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
   fi
 fi
 
 
 %files
 %defattr(644,root,root,755)
-%doc Bugs Readme *.txt
+%doc Readme *.txt
 %dir %{fontdir}
 %{fontdir}/*.ttf
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Nov 21 2008 Frank Arnold <frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de> 4.1.8-1
+- Updated to 4.1.8
+- Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt
+
 * Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 -  2.7.9-2
 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- sources	3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 -0000	1.8
+++ sources	21 Nov 2008 13:43:53 -0000	1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-9a34ee20358d3c5aae7d46ed15e43d73  LinLibertineSRC-2.7.tgz
+e7357378dc803cf6a2823cae032caf24  LinLibertineSRC-4.1.8.tgz



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 09:33:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:33:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (
 =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt
In-Reply-To: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811220933.mAM9XG5B016076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745





--- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov at gmail.com>  2008-11-22 04:33:15 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=324401)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324401)
Bad rendering at 10pt

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 09:32:46 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:32:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (
 =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt
In-Reply-To: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811220932.mAM9Wkpl016024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745





--- Comment #8 from Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov at gmail.com>  2008-11-22 04:32:45 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=324400)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324400)
Bad rendering at 8pt

Here are screenshots from gnome charmap at 8 and 10 pt.
I was unable to reproduce it with pango-view too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 10:40:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:40:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221040.mAMAe2gR027254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Google Droid fonts          |Google Droid fonts
                   |specification               |licensing




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 10:39:26 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:39:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] New: Google Droid fonts specification
Message-ID: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Google Droid fonts specification

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635

           Summary: Google Droid fonts specification
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: distribution
        AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: notting at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
            Blocks: 182235,446451
    Classification: Fedora


Google has released for quite a long time a high-quality set of "Droid" fonts
as part of the Android platform. They have a high-visibility for average users
because of all the Google press barrage. The-Eula-protected Android SDK has
been superseded lately by a public source repository.

http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts

The NOTICE file in this directory is a Fedora-friendly Apache License. However
the font metadata embedded in the files claims:

? This font software is the valuable property of Ascender Corporation and/or
its suppliers and its use by you is covered under the terms of a license
agreement. This font software is licensed to you by Ascender Corporation for
your personal or business use on up to five personal computers. You may not use
this font software on more than five personal computers unless you have
obtained a license from Ascender to do so. Except as specifically permitted by
the license, you may not copy this font software.

If you have any questions, please review the license agreement you received
with this font software, and/or contact Ascender Corporation.

Contact Information:
Ascender Corporation
Web http://www.ascendercorp.com/ ?

But Ascender will redirect you to Google, which is as usual silent.

To check it,
1. download a raw TTF file
2. open it in Fontforge
3. -> Elements
4. -> Font Info
5. -> TTF Name
6. -> License (License URL is fun too)

This has so far discouraged Fedora and Debian packaging, even though wild Droid
packages have started to appear, people are incorporating Droid material in
derivatives, and one of those may eventually make it in the repo without
raising Legal bells.

Thus I have two questions:
1. is the legal situation clear enough to allow Fedora packaging as is
2. since Google won't step down to replying to solicitations by mere mortals,
can an official Fedora or Red Hat enquiry be made to clarify the situation?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 11:00:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:00:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472637] New: libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
 file or directo
Message-ID: <bug-472637-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637

           Summary: libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
                    file or directo
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: fontforge
        AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:

Starting fontforge from the CLI results in

$ fontforge DroidSans.ttf 
Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams.
 Executable based on sources from 02:38 GMT 27-Sep-2008.
 Library based on sources from 15:05 GMT 25-Sep-2008.
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org  Sat Nov 22 11:18:31 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org))
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:18:31 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bug 561907] Show explicit font coverage
In-Reply-To: <bug-561907-214212@http.bugzilla.gnome.org/>
Message-ID: <20081122111831.7CBA523F510@label.gnome.org>

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907

  gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x

Nicolas Mailhot changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-
                   |                            |list at redhat.com




-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907.



From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org  Sat Nov 22 11:21:22 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org))
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:21:22 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bug 561908] New: Allow printing of font glyph tables
Message-ID: <bug-561908-214212@http.bugzilla.gnome.org/>

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908

  gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x
           Summary: Allow printing of font glyph tables
           Product: gucharmap
           Version: 2.24.x
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: Normal
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: gucharmap-maint at gnome.bugs
        ReportedBy: Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net
         QAContact: gucharmap-maint at gnome.bugs
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
     GNOME version: Unspecified
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


gucharmap should allow direct printing or export as pdf of the glyph tables of
a font, so they can be used as paper reference or in other contexts where
keeping a gucharmap window open is not possible


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 11:23:27 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:23:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (
 =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt
In-Reply-To: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221123.mAMBNRf5006712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745





--- Comment #10 from Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov at gmail.com>  2008-11-22 06:23:26 EDT ---
I've played with font setting in gnome appearance properties, it now renders
properly for 10 pt, and I can't find setting with wrong rendering at that size.
But it renders without the tail for 8 pt with Medium and Full hinting.

Resolution is set to 86 dpi in that dialog.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 12:11:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:11:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (
 =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt
In-Reply-To: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221211.mAMCBB0N010050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net




--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-22 07:11:10 EDT ---
86dpi is borderline for good text rendering. Microsoft has been targetting
100dpi for example for at least a decade in windows (reduced to 96 to give
margins to shoddy hardware manufacturers).

If your hardware is really 86dpi (as in actual pixels per inch), there's not
much the best font can do (screens sold to computer gamers have often this kind
of low pixel density but gamers are not known for reading lots of text)

In paper print, for example, standard is 600dpi and 150 is already a
bad-quality magazine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 12:18:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:18:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (
 =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt
In-Reply-To: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467745-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221218.mAMCIEvT015513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745





--- Comment #12 from Ben Laenen <bl.bugs at gmail.com>  2008-11-22 07:18:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> 86dpi is borderline for good text rendering. Microsoft has been targetting
> 100dpi for example for at least a decade in windows (reduced to 96 to give
> margins to shoddy hardware manufacturers).
> 
> If your hardware is really 86dpi (as in actual pixels per inch), there's not
> much the best font can do (screens sold to computer gamers have often this kind
> of low pixel density but gamers are not known for reading lots of text)
> 
> In paper print, for example, standard is 600dpi and 150 is already a
> bad-quality magazine.

Low resolution or not, at these sizes there's no reason the autohinter
shouldn't be able to render the tail correctly. It manages to do it with ? just
fine as can be seen on the screenshots.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org  Sat Nov 22 12:22:21 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org))
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:22:21 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bug 561908] Allow printing of font glyph tables
In-Reply-To: <bug-561908-214212@http.bugzilla.gnome.org/>
Message-ID: <20081122122221.3123923F4F9@label.gnome.org>

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908

  gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x

Christian Persch (IRC: chpe) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




------- Comment #1 from Christian Persch (IRC: chpe)  2008-11-22 12:22 UTC -------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you
find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 162370 ***


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561908.



From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org  Sat Nov 22 12:56:14 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org))
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:56:14 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bug 162370] Print the table!
In-Reply-To: <bug-162370@bugzilla.gnome.org>
Message-ID: <20081122125614.7B63123F4F9@label.gnome.org>

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370

  gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x

Nicolas Mailhot changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net |fedora-fonts-bugs-
                   |                            |list at redhat.com




------- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot  2008-11-22 12:56 UTC -------
Note that bug #561908 is slightly different


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:43:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:43:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
In-Reply-To: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452317-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221643.mAMGhFe6021697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317





--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:43:13 EDT ---
apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:56:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:56:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221656.mAMGuY46026008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:56:33 EDT ---
artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 17:00:00 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:00:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221700.mAMH005o030844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281





--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:59:59 EDT ---
unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-10000

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 21:05:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:05:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472637] libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
 or directo
In-Reply-To: <bug-472637-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472637-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811222105.mAML5jCj001495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-22 16:05:44 EDT ---
Which fontforge version? 
This looks like a newer one than rawhide?

output of: 

rpm -q libpng 

rpm -V libpng 

And where can I find the DroidSans.ttf ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 21:13:59 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:13:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472637] libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
 or directo
In-Reply-To: <bug-472637-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472637-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811222113.mAMLDxn3002400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-22 16:13:58 EDT ---
$ rpm -q libpng 
libpng-2:1.2.31-2.fc10.x86_64
$ rpm -V libpng 
$ rpm -q fontforge
fontforge-20080927-1.fc11.x86_64
$ rpm -V fontforge

In F11 rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68830

http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 22:33:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:33:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811222233.mAMMXBuu013469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635


Daniel Berlin <dannyb at google.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dannyb at google.com




--- Comment #1 from Daniel Berlin <dannyb at google.com>  2008-11-22 17:33:10 EDT ---
Not sure why you think "Google won't step down to replying to solicitations by
mere mortals".
Every query i'm aware of about this situation has been answered (some by me
personally).
If you sent a query that was not answered, please privately provide me details
so i can make sure it doesn't happen again.

In any case, the licensing info embedded on the fonts was simply wrong when it
was pushed out, and is being corrected.
They are licensed under Apache 2.0.
The fixed TTF files should be pushed to GIT soon, if they aren't there already.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 23 08:15:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:15:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811230815.mAN8FhTH026866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-23 03:15:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
.
> Every query i'm aware of about this situation has been answered (some by me
> personally).

Thank you for the answer. I guess is was my frustration speaking, the Droid
fonts have been announced a long time ago, and the situation is still not fixed

> In any case, the licensing info embedded on the fonts was simply wrong when it
> was pushed out, and is being corrected.
> They are licensed under Apache 2.0.
> The fixed TTF files should be pushed to GIT soon, if they aren't there already.

They aren't today. I don't know if we can touch them at all before they are
fixed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 23 11:00:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:00:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811231100.mANB0LfU022090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-23 06:00:20 EDT ---
BTW, I hadn't noticed but it seems even wikipedia is aware of the problem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droid_(font)#License_controversy

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 23 11:05:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:05:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811231105.mANB5YT0023140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-23 06:05:32 EDT ---
P.P.S. A nice versionned tarball or zip with a detached license text on an
official site that does not require digging in git to find the fonts would be
appreciated

Are the fonts at version 1.0.107, or will the next font dump use the same
versions?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov 24 05:47:22 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:47:22 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811240547.mAO5lM6s004889@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #348692|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #349707|                            |review?(roc at ocallahan.org)
               Flag|                            |




--- Comment #3 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-23 21:47:11 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=349707)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=349707)
src:url() v1.0

This version works even with older versions of fontconfig.
A build is available here:

https://build.mozilla.org/tryserver-builds/2008-11-23_20:06-ktomlinson at mozilla.com-try-afd5aedcbcf/

Note that this doesn't support src:local(), which I intend to do using a
different implementation of gfxFcFontEntry.

(In reply to comment #2)
> A reference to the nsIStreamLoader is held to keep the font data in memory
> until the font entry is destroyed.

The nsIStreamLoader* arg could be an nsISupports*, I assume.
Let me know if you prefer that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov 24 08:58:00 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:58:00 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811240858.mAO8w0dN001988@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #4 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org>  2008-11-24 00:57:56 PST ---
Basically looks great to me.

+     * Ownership of the returned gfxFontEntry is passed to the caller,
+     * who must either AddRef() or delete.

Should these functions be changed (in a separate patch) to return
already_AddRefed?

+    // Helper function to be called from InitPattern() to change the pattern
+    // so that it matches the CSS style descriptors and so gets properly
+    // sorted in font selection.  This also avoids synthetic style effects
+    // being added by the renderer when the style of the font itself does not
+    // match the descriptor provided by the author.
+    void ConformPattern();

I'd like a better name here. Perhaps "AdjustPatternToCSS"?

+ * gfxWebFcFontEntry:

I think gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry would be a better name.

+    FcPatternGetInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, 0, &fontWeight);
+    int cssWeight = gfxFontconfigUtils::FcWeightForBaseWeight(mWeight);
+    if (cssWeight != fontWeight) {
+        FcPatternDel(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT);
+        FcPatternAddInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, cssWeight);
+    }

Is there a reason not to do Del/Add unconditionally here? Ditto for FC_SLANT
and setting FC_FULLNAME.

+        PRUint8 savedStyle = aStyle.style;
+        aStyle.style = FONT_STYLE_NORMAL;
+        fontEntry = static_cast<gfxFcFontEntry*>
+            (mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(utf16Family, aStyle, needsBold));
+        aStyle.style = savedStyle;

This is yuck. Can we make aStyle a const reference and just use a temporary
copy here?

+            // User fonts are already filtered by slant (but not size) in
+            // mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry().

Aren't you working around that by retrying FindFontEntry with
FONT_STYLE_NORMAL, in FindFontPattern?

+    if (!(list->Contains(fontName))) {

Lose unnecessary parens.

+PRBool
+gfxPlatformGtk::IsFontFormatSupported(nsIURI *aFontURI, PRUint32 aFormatFlags)
+{
+    // reject based on format flags
+    if (aFormatFlags & (gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_EOT |
gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_SVG)) {
+        return PR_FALSE;
+    }

Can we avoid blacklisting and write this code to just return true for the
formats we know we can support?

jdaggett, do you want to review this too?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 18:19:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:19:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811241819.mAOIJ6Bs004684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2008-11-24 13:19:05 EDT ---
I've spoken with Chris DiBona at Google on this issue, and he assures me that
this is simply an accidental oversight. We should see an updated font drop in
the next week (this week is an holiday week in the US, which may temporarily
delay it).

Nicolas, we'll just wait for this new drop to package these up.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From thb at openoffice.org  Mon Nov 24 20:56:06 2008
From: thb at openoffice.org (thb at openoffice.org)
Date: 24 Nov 2008 20:56:06 -0000
Subject: [Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering
In-Reply-To: <iz88613@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081124205606.17864.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613


User thb changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
        Target milestone|OOo Later                 |OOo 3.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from thb at openoffice.org Mon Nov 24 20:56:06 +0000 2008 -------
Awesome work, I love it. Canvas changes verified.

@hdu: could you please have a quick look at the vcl changes (that look good in
general, but OutputDevice::GetLayoutData should rather skip the mtf action
generation). Ok with the 3.1 target?

The remainder is just merged from cairosource01 and thusly irrelevant.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov 24 21:36:05 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:36:05 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811242136.mAOLa5Uc027541@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #5 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-24 13:35:53 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> +     * Ownership of the returned gfxFontEntry is passed to the caller,
> +     * who must either AddRef() or delete.
> 
> Should these functions be changed (in a separate patch) to return
> already_AddRefed?

I think so.  I find it confusing to pass around references to objects that
have a reference count of zero.

> 
> +    // Helper function to be called from InitPattern() to change the pattern
> +    // so that it matches the CSS style descriptors and so gets properly
> +    // sorted in font selection.  This also avoids synthetic style effects
> +    // being added by the renderer when the style of the font itself does not
> +    // match the descriptor provided by the author.
> +    void ConformPattern();
> 
> I'd like a better name here. Perhaps "AdjustPatternToCSS"?

That sounds fine.

> + * gfxWebFcFontEntry:
> 
> I think gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry would be a better name.

gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry has the advantage of indicating that the font has
already been downloaded.  And I guess src:local() faces would really be web
fonts too (but not downloaded fonts) because the family and style properties
are obtained from the web (even if the font data is not).

> 
> +    FcPatternGetInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, 0, &fontWeight);
> +    int cssWeight = gfxFontconfigUtils::FcWeightForBaseWeight(mWeight);
> +    if (cssWeight != fontWeight) {
> +        FcPatternDel(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT);
> +        FcPatternAddInteger(mPattern, FC_WEIGHT, cssWeight);
> +    }
> 
> Is there a reason not to do Del/Add unconditionally here? Ditto for FC_SLANT
> and setting FC_FULLNAME.

I'd like to leave these conditional.

For FC_WEIGHT, the only reason is to avoid the reallocation of memory for the
property value and the memmove back and forth of all the trailing properties
and pointers to their values.  The weight is expected to often (maybe usually)
already have the right value.

For FC_SLANT, there is the additional benefit of retaining the distinction
between italic and oblique where possible.

For FC_FULLNAME, if there is an existing value, then that is the best value as
it comes from the OpenType name table.  Appending style to family should only
be a fallback.

> +        PRUint8 savedStyle = aStyle.style;
> +        aStyle.style = FONT_STYLE_NORMAL;
> +        fontEntry = static_cast<gfxFcFontEntry*>
> +            (mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(utf16Family, aStyle, needsBold));
> +        aStyle.style = savedStyle;
> 
> This is yuck. Can we make aStyle a const reference and just use a temporary
> copy here?

Yes, this is yuck.

Constructing a gfxFontStyle always requires a memory allocation because it has
an nsCString member, which is always forced to be non-empty, even though it
doesn't get used here.

What I think would look nicest here would be to change the FindFontPattern()
gfxFontStyle argument to thebes style and weight arguments.  That would avoid
the new gfxFontStyle allocation in SortPreferredFonts, and confine all the
gfxFontStyle yuck to within FindFontPattern.

Then modifying gfxUserFontSet::FindFontEntry arguments so that only the
information actually used needs to be provided, and/or modifying gfxFontStyle
so that the nsCString member can be empty, can be considered as future
improvements.

> 
> +            // User fonts are already filtered by slant (but not size) in
> +            // mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry().
> 
> Aren't you working around that by retrying FindFontEntry with
> FONT_STYLE_NORMAL, in FindFontPattern?

SlantIsAcceptable() also accepts faces with FONT_STYLE_NORMAL/FC_SLANT_ROMAN
when the requested style is not normal/roman (as an oblique can be synthesized
from normal/roman).

> +PRBool
> +gfxPlatformGtk::IsFontFormatSupported(nsIURI *aFontURI, PRUint32 aFormatFlags)
> +{
> +    // reject based on format flags
> +    if (aFormatFlags & (gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_EOT |
> gfxUserFontSet::FLAG_FORMAT_SVG)) {
> +        return PR_FALSE;
> +    }
> 
> Can we avoid blacklisting and write this code to just return true for the
> formats we know we can support?

Maybe.

The editor's draft http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-fonts/#font-reference and the
2002 working draft http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-webfonts/#src currently suggests
returning true only for formats we know we can support: "The user agent will
recognize the name of font formats that it supports, and will avoid
downloading fonts in formats that it does not recognize."

This code was copied from the code for Mac and Windows, so I suggest
considering making that change to all platforms in a separate bug, probably
bug 465452.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Mon Nov 24 21:40:25 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:40:25 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811242140.mAOLePxK030055@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #6 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org>  2008-11-24 13:40:16 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Should these functions be changed (in a separate patch) to return
> > already_AddRefed?
> 
> I think so.  I find it confusing to pass around references to objects that
> have a reference count of zero.

Please file a bug on that.

> I'd like to leave these conditional.
> 
> For FC_WEIGHT, the only reason is to avoid the reallocation of memory for the
> property value and the memmove back and forth of all the trailing properties
> and pointers to their values.  The weight is expected to often (maybe usually)
> already have the right value.
> 
> For FC_SLANT, there is the additional benefit of retaining the distinction
> between italic and oblique where possible.
> 
> For FC_FULLNAME, if there is an existing value, then that is the best value as
> it comes from the OpenType name table.  Appending style to family should only
> be a fallback.

OK.

> > +        PRUint8 savedStyle = aStyle.style;
> > +        aStyle.style = FONT_STYLE_NORMAL;
> > +        fontEntry = static_cast<gfxFcFontEntry*>
> > +            (mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry(utf16Family, aStyle, needsBold));
> > +        aStyle.style = savedStyle;
> > 
> > This is yuck. Can we make aStyle a const reference and just use a temporary
> > copy here?
> 
> Yes, this is yuck.
> 
> Constructing a gfxFontStyle always requires a memory allocation because it has
> an nsCString member, which is always forced to be non-empty, even though it
> doesn't get used here.
> 
> What I think would look nicest here would be to change the FindFontPattern()
> gfxFontStyle argument to thebes style and weight arguments.  That would avoid
> the new gfxFontStyle allocation in SortPreferredFonts, and confine all the
> gfxFontStyle yuck to within FindFontPattern.
> 
> Then modifying gfxUserFontSet::FindFontEntry arguments so that only the
> information actually used needs to be provided, and/or modifying gfxFontStyle
> so that the nsCString member can be empty, can be considered as future
> improvements.

OK

> > +            // User fonts are already filtered by slant (but not size) in
> > +            // mUserFontSet->FindFontEntry().
> > 
> > Aren't you working around that by retrying FindFontEntry with
> > FONT_STYLE_NORMAL, in FindFontPattern?
> 
> SlantIsAcceptable() also accepts faces with FONT_STYLE_NORMAL/FC_SLANT_ROMAN
> when the requested style is not normal/roman (as an oblique can be synthesized
> from normal/roman).

OK

> This code was copied from the code for Mac and Windows, so I suggest
> considering making that change to all platforms in a separate bug, probably
> bug 465452.

OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 22:25:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:25:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811242225.mAOMPB73020930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220


steve <steve at lonetwin.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |




--- Comment #8 from steve <steve at lonetwin.net>  2008-11-24 17:25:10 EDT ---
Hi Tom,

I tried the updated font today, but am sorry to report that it seems like you
may have missed the "[" and "]" characters when submitting your fix.

All the other reported characters (ie: ~_@%{}) look neat !! Thanks for the work
!

In addition to this I noticed that the back-tick character '`' ...shows up
somewhat like a really small straight dash instead of a slanted tick.

Fixing this too would be much appreciated !

thanks a lot,
- steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 22:35:55 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:35:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472220] fkp font does not display some english (plain ol'
 ascii) characters properly
In-Reply-To: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472220-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811242235.mAOMZtnp029023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472220


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




--- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2008-11-24 17:35:54 EDT ---
So, I'm not sure what you're expecting [] to look like in the fkp font, but the
font design doesn't include the horizontal line ends, that's not an oversight,
it is intentional.

I think that the back-tick is intentionally a high, short horizontal line, it
doesn't show the same sort of clipping that some of the other characters had.

It would be possible to perhaps make a derived font that changed these items,
but it wouldn't really be fkp anymore.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 22:52:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:52:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472835] New: Add VAG Rounded aliases to
Message-ID: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Add VAG Rounded aliases to

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835

           Summary: Add VAG Rounded aliases to
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: mgopen-fonts
        AssignedTo: paskalis at di.uoa.gr
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: paskalis at di.uoa.gr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:

According to discussions on the Open Font Library List Modata is a derivative
of the well-known VAG Rounded font Volkwagen AG put in the public domain when
it had no longer use of it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAG_Rounded
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openfontlibrary/2008-November/001559.html

Therefore, the Fedora package shipping Modata should include aliasing rules
that tell fontconfig to use Modata when it encounters a document or web page
using VAG Rounded or one of its derivatives (it seems VAG rounded was good
enough every proprietary foundry jumped on it when it was PDed and created
their own version).

Common font names used by VAG derivatives are
"VAG Rounded Std"
"VAG Rundschrift"
"VAG Rounded"

This can be done at the time the package is converted to new F11 packaging
guidelines if FPC approves
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 23:16:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:16:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese
 Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811242316.mAONGUsa003815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-24 18:16:28 EDT ---
Probably be good to add i18n-team too to initialcc next time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Nov 25 00:53:54 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:53:54 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811250053.mAP0rsmr006452@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #7 from John Daggett (:jtd) <jdaggett at mozilla.com>  2008-11-24 16:53:43 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > A reference to the nsIStreamLoader is held to keep the font data in memory
> > until the font entry is destroyed.
> 
> The nsIStreamLoader* arg could be an nsISupports*, I assume.
> Let me know if you prefer that.

I think that seems better, it would eliminate the need for gfx to link against
necko, right?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Nov 25 01:18:36 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:18:36 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811250118.mAP1IavK011600@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #8 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-24 17:18:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I think that seems better, it would eliminate the need for gfx to link against
> necko, right?

Thanks to XPCOM (or virtual functions) gfx doesn't need to link against necko.

It would just save including nsIStreamLoader.h in gfxPangoFonts.h and adding
necko to the include path for gfx.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Nov 25 01:19:12 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:19:12 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811250119.mAP1JBY5012086@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #9 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-24 17:19:07 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It would just save including nsIStreamLoader.h in gfxPangoFonts.h and

Sorry, in gfxPangoFonts.cpp.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From mclasen at fedoraproject.org  Tue Nov 25 03:35:06 2008
From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/pango/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.81, 1.82 pango.spec, 1.147,
	1.148 sources, 1.81, 1.82
Message-ID: <20081125033506.DFF8170105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mclasen

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19241

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore pango.spec sources 
Log Message:
1.22.3



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.81
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82
--- .cvsignore	21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000	1.81
+++ .cvsignore	25 Nov 2008 03:34:36 -0000	1.82
@@ -1 +1 @@
-pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2
+pango-1.22.3.tar.bz2


Index: pango.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.147
retrieving revision 1.148
diff -u -r1.147 -r1.148
--- pango.spec	21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000	1.147
+++ pango.spec	25 Nov 2008 03:34:36 -0000	1.148
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
 Name: pango
-Version: 1.22.1
+Version: 1.22.3
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 License: LGPLv2+
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Nov 24 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.22.3-1
+- Update to 1.22.3
+
 * Mon Oct 20 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.22.1-1
 - Update to 1.22.1
 


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.81
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82
--- sources	21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000	1.81
+++ sources	25 Nov 2008 03:34:36 -0000	1.82
@@ -1 +1 @@
-654ad7e8d414d36a0e0406935d32c3ab  pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2
+8909ddbde2f2e91eb0c79202e1051a84  pango-1.22.3.tar.bz2



From mclasen at fedoraproject.org  Tue Nov 25 03:41:12 2008
From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:41:12 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.148,1.149 sources,1.82,1.83
Message-ID: <20081125034112.E0FC170105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mclasen

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20387

Modified Files:
	pango.spec sources 
Log Message:
1.22.3



Index: pango.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.148
retrieving revision 1.149
diff -u -r1.148 -r1.149
--- pango.spec	12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000	1.148
+++ pango.spec	25 Nov 2008 03:40:42 -0000	1.149
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
 Name: pango
-Version: 1.22.2
+Version: 1.22.3
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 License: LGPLv2+
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
@@ -40,11 +40,20 @@
 Patch0: pango-1.21.4-lib64.patch
 
 %description
-Pango is a system for layout and rendering of internationalized text.
+Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis 
+on internationalization. Pango can be used anywhere that text layout is needed,
+though most of the work on Pango so far has been done in the context of the 
+GTK+ widget toolkit. Pango forms the core of text and font handling for 
+GTK+.
 
+Pango is designed to be modular; the core Pango layout engine can be used 
+with different font backends.
+
+The integration of Pango with Cairo provides a complete solution with high 
+quality text handling and graphics rendering. 
 
 %package devel
-Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
+Summary: Development files for pango
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Requires: pango = %{version}-%{release}
 Requires: libXrender-devel
@@ -58,12 +67,9 @@
 Requires: pkgconfig
 
 %description devel
-The pango-devel package includes the header files and developer docs
+The pango-devel package includes the header files and developer documentation
 for the pango package.
 
-Install pango-devel if you want to develop programs which will use
-pango.
-
 %prep
 %setup -q -n pango-%{version}
 
@@ -218,6 +224,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Nov 24 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.22.3-1
+- U[date to 1.22.3
+
 * Wed Nov 12 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.22.2-1
 - Update to 1.22.2
 


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.82
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u -r1.82 -r1.83
--- sources	12 Nov 2008 06:59:43 -0000	1.82
+++ sources	25 Nov 2008 03:40:42 -0000	1.83
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0d4dc87f9b523e9030afccb2d05afe0b  pango-1.22.2.tar.bz2
+8909ddbde2f2e91eb0c79202e1051a84  pango-1.22.3.tar.bz2



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 25 13:24:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:24:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to
In-Reply-To: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811251324.mAPDOYpG013071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835


Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #324611|application/octet-stream    |text/plain
          mime type|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 25 13:24:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:24:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to
In-Reply-To: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811251324.mAPDO8u6012986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835





--- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr>  2008-11-25 08:24:08 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=324611)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324611)
fontconfig file for modata

Is such a fontconfig file ok for the modata alias?  I am not very familiar with
fontconfig syntax, so I copy/pasted from the relevant DejaVu fontconfig
settings.

As for the new packaging guidelines I will wait for the FPC approval before
proceeding.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org  Tue Nov 25 18:27:28 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org (bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18546] Can't load some non-latin fonts with pango backend
In-Reply-To: <bug-18546-6663@https.bugs.webkit.org/>
Message-ID: <20081125182728.DE81613AE211@gamma.macosforge.org>

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18546





------- Comment #14 from awilliamson at mandriva.com  2008-11-25 10:27 PDT -------
"Yes, the 'FreeType backend' now contains the latest Pango code as well and the
'Pango backend' is considered obsolete at the moment. We do need to make this
clearer."

Can you give me some more info on this? How are we supposed to use / test the
latest Pango stuff, then? The 'FreeType backend' seems to build without any
Pango build dependencies...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 25 19:39:55 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:39:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to
In-Reply-To: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811251939.mAPJdtZA025273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-25 14:39:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)

> Is such a fontconfig file ok for the modata alias?  I am not very familiar with
> fontconfig syntax, so I copy/pasted from the relevant DejaVu fontconfig
> settings.

You have simpler and cleaner fontconfig templates in the fontpackages stuff
referenced on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation

Unlike the spec part, they are not F11-oriented and should work as-is with
current packaging guidelines (you want to look at the fontconfig template named
substitution-font-template.conf)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Wed Nov 26 06:05:26 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:05:26 -0800
Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face
In-Reply-To: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811260605.mAQ65Qus016169@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Bug 70132 depends on bug 457821, which changed state.

Bug 457821 Summary: need to rebuild user font set objects when style sheets are disabled/enabled or rules are modified/added/removed
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457821

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 08:09:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:09:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 360901] Smaller fonts in X in F8T3 after login
In-Reply-To: <bug-360901-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-360901-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260809.mAQ89eMC013246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360901





--- Comment #12 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 03:09:40 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 08:13:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:13:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 370441] subpixel on by default?
In-Reply-To: <bug-370441-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-370441-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260813.mAQ8DoGr014799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370441





--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 03:13:49 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 08:35:19 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:35:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 391191] wrong verify options in rpm package for fonts.dir
In-Reply-To: <bug-391191-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-391191-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260835.mAQ8ZJXC015644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391191





--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 03:35:18 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From meywer at openoffice.org  Wed Nov 26 09:48:49 2008
From: meywer at openoffice.org (meywer at openoffice.org)
Date: 26 Nov 2008 09:48:49 -0000
Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and
 Glyph Fallback)
In-Reply-To: <iz45128@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20081126094849.26858.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128





------- Additional comments from meywer at openoffice.org Wed Nov 26 09:48:49 +0000 2008 -------
Just have seen, that issue 74754 is fixed (even I don't know which way).
So couldn't be solved this problem too?

btw. 
I really don't understand, how it can happen, that in OO AND pdf there are shown
characters, which in ps and print are replaced by a little empty box.
E.g. character unicode hex2012 in font Arial on a linux-system with installed
M$-fonts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 09:48:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:48:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 432572] xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi package corrupts fonts in grace, 
 lesstif
In-Reply-To: <bug-432572-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-432572-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260948.mAQ9m60A015146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432572





--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 04:48:05 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 09:55:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:55:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 434647] X server segfaults in libXfont fs_cleanup_bfont()
In-Reply-To: <bug-434647-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-434647-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260955.mAQ9tUgi017809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434647





--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 04:55:29 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 10:04:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:04:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 436610] 'yum remove glibc.ppc64' wants to remove ppc32
 packages.
In-Reply-To: <bug-436610-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-436610-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261004.mAQA4FqW021012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436610





--- Comment #11 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 05:04:14 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 10:34:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:34:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 444281] Provides: freetype2-devel
In-Reply-To: <bug-444281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-444281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261034.mAQAYpAZ032678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281





--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 05:34:50 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 10:48:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:48:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to
In-Reply-To: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261048.mAQAm8DW029537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10

Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #324611|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 00:53:31 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

--- Comment #4 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr>  2008-11-26 05:48:07 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=324701)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324701)
modata fontconfig

Could you please check the attached fontconfig configuration (this is modata
specific).

I can't see how to clean it up further.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 10:51:35 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:51:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450980] Unable to install pango-devel for i386 and x86_64 at
 the same time
In-Reply-To: <bug-450980-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450980-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261051.mAQApZ1K030735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450980





--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 05:51:33 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 13:12:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:12:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 387491] =?utf-8?q?_=C3=B8_character_is_wrong_in_?=
 "nimbus sans l  condensed" at size 20
In-Reply-To: <bug-387491-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-387491-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261312.mAQDCC2r006698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387491


Noura Elhawary <nelhawar at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nelhawar at redhat.com




--- Comment #1 from Noura Elhawary <nelhawar at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 08:12:11 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 13:16:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:16:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 370441] subpixel on by default?
In-Reply-To: <bug-370441-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-370441-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261316.mAQDGCCf030395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370441


Dan Winship <dwinship at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|8                           |10




--- Comment #2 from Dan Winship <dwinship at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 08:16:11 EDT ---
gdm appears to use grayscale smoothing in F10. I don't know what the graphical
boot screen uses because I don't have a graphical-boot-supported graphics card.
The installer is still definitely broken. (I am assuming that this the
installer  is not *deliberately* setting the font smoothing mode wrong though,
but rather, it's just inheriting a broken default from somewhere.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 13:40:32 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:40:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 387491] =?utf-8?q?_=C3=B8_character_is_wrong_in_?=
 "nimbus sans l  condensed" at size 20
In-Reply-To: <bug-387491-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-387491-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261340.mAQDeWR4013842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387491


Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|8                           |10




--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 08:40:31 EDT ---
This still happens in F-10, changing version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 19:13:46 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:13:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472835] Add VAG Rounded aliases to
In-Reply-To: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472835-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261913.mAQJDk02009933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472835


Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|10                          |rawhide




--- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2008-11-26 14:13:45 EDT ---
Fixing version to align with rawhide again.  Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 19:13:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:13:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261913.mAQJDhlj009874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10

Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|10                          |rawhide




--- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 00:46:48 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

--- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2008-11-26 14:13:42 EDT ---
Fixing version to align with rawhide again.  Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 19:13:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:13:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472637] libpng.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
 or directo
In-Reply-To: <bug-472637-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472637-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261913.mAQJDjHr009916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472637


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10

Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|10                          |rawhide




--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 00:47:01 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

--- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2008-11-26 14:13:44 EDT ---
Fixing version to align with rawhide again.  Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Wed Nov 26 19:45:07 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:45:07 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811261945.mAQJj72c027514@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #10 from David Baron [:dbaron] <dbaron at mozilla.com>  2008-11-26 11:44:57 PST ---
There's a tiny bit of updating needed after bug 457821 landed:
 * you'll want to adjust the reftest.list for additional reftests that landed
 * you'll want to add the assertion to your UpdateFontList

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 01:37:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:37:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270137.mAR1b1vI012536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 20:37:00 EDT ---
Not sure if I tested well enough, or what happened, but this is back in
f10-final unfortunately. :-(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 01:45:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:45:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270145.mAR1jsSE028627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 02:46:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:46:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270246.mAR2kurj007249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982





--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 21:46:55 EDT ---
Yeah my bad I retested anaconda-11.4.1.57-1 and it was broken too.

Actually testing more I realise this is not a new bug: it affects Chinese fonts
in F8 and F9 anaconda too.
Now in F10 Chinese is ok but Japanese broken instead - presumably the
fontconfig default priorities changed that.
But this needs to be fixed by some kind of lang tagging or locale setting in
anaconda.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 02:55:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:55:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270255.mAR2tCFx009044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982





--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 21:55:12 EDT ---
> it affects Chinese fonts in F8 and F9 anaconda too.

I meant Chinese installs (they get Japanese glyphs appearing when they exist).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov 27 05:41:39 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:41:39 -0800
Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face
In-Reply-To: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811270541.mAR5fdDw002811@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Bug 70132 depends on bug 457825, which changed state.

Bug 457825 Summary: support use of access control headers to allow cross-site downloadable fonts
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457825

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Nov 27 09:03:40 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:03:40 -0800
Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-449356-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811270903.mAR93dVf021811@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Peter Weilbacher <mozilla at Weilbacher.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |466956




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:03:45 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18723] New: RFE: fontconfig-level locl patching
Message-ID: <bug-18723-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18723

           Summary: RFE: fontconfig-level locl patching
           Product: fontconfig
           Version: 2.6
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: medium
         Component: library
        AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


Due to Han unification and other similar stuff parts of some fonts may not be
suitable for all locales.

This is handled by the locl flag in modern opentype fonts.

However there are still many non-opentype fonts in the wild, and it is not
possible to convert them all at once (when the license permits it).

There should be a way in fontconfig for font distributors to patch in via a
config file the locl characteristics of a font.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:11:18 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18724] New: RFE: font merging
Message-ID: <bug-18724-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724

           Summary: RFE: font merging
           Product: fontconfig
           Version: 2.6
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: medium
         Component: library
        AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core
multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback).
Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to
avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge)

For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though
from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family.

There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify
via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when
bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only
allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it"


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:22:04 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18725] New: RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names
Message-ID: <bug-18725-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18725

           Summary: RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names
           Product: fontconfig
           Version: 2.6
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: library
        AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


Historically font formats only allowed four faces regular, bold, italic, bold
italic. You had to use a separate font family to distribute condensed, heavy
etc variants

This has changed (cf http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx ) and
modern fonts such as DejaVu include all faces under a single family name.
Applications such as OO.o are being fixed to handle multifaced fonts

Unfortunately there are still many historic fonts in the wild distributed in
several sets of four faces (gs fonts, arial narrow, arial bold, etc). Those
fonts currently appear under different family names in fontconfig-using apps.
This is perturbing to users, since the same faces of historic and modern fonts
are not handled the same way. Microsoft did some sort of magic in uniscribe to
hide this distinction (irrelevant to users).

Please provide a documented config pattern for font distributors that enables
them to declare to fontconfig "font family A and font family B are the same,
please expose all the associated faces under A name to users".

(of course an application asking explicitely for B should still get it, but
users would only see A in font lists)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:30:44 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:30:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18726] New: RFE: help write locale-specific tests
Message-ID: <bug-18726-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18726

           Summary: RFE: help write locale-specific tests
           Product: fontconfig
           Version: 2.6
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: medium
         Component: library
        AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


Due to Han unification there is often a need for font distributors to test if a
font name is requested in a chinese, japanese or korean context. However, there
are many chinese locales and writing an exact match is not possible.

The current pattern (used by Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc) in this case is

<test compare="contains" name="lang">
   <string>zh</string>
</test>

but we do not really want to match every locale containing "ze". We want to
match every ze-foo locale, not jze-foo or foo-ze

Please add a documented fonts.conf pattern to fontconfig that allows
distributors to specify such an exact match.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:35:14 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18727] New: RFE: allow use of iso 15924 codes
Message-ID: <bug-18727-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18727

           Summary: RFE: allow use of iso 15924 codes
           Product: fontconfig
           Version: 2.6
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: library
        AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


There are a lot of scripts in the wild and the most accurate standard way to
specify them is using iso 15924 codes
http://www.unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html

Please make it possible to write font patterns using iso 15924 codes in
fonts.conf


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:41:37 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:41:37 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18728] New: RFE: allow direct query of font files
Message-ID: <bug-18728-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18728

           Summary: RFE: allow direct query of font files
           Product: fontconfig
           Version: 2.6
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: medium
         Component: fc-list
        AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


Fontconfig can give you a lot of information about installed fonts.
Unfortunately that requires installation in the first place and does not help
people that just want to check the capabilities of a set of font files before
installing them.

To take an analogy, rpm has a query flag that will work on all the installed
package base, but you can also ask it to examine a set of uninstalled packages
using the -p flag (rpm -q -p /tmp/foo*rpm)

Please enhance fontconfig utilities so it is possible to make them introspect a
set of on-disk font files instead of working on the fonts installed on the
system.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:23:45 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18724] RFE: font merging
In-Reply-To: <bug-18724-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
Message-ID: <20081127092345.679AF130057@annarchy.freedesktop.org>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-27 01:23:40 PST ---
Make "documented way"  a "documented fonts.conf config pattern".


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Thu Nov 27 09:24:08 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18723] RFE: fontconfig-level locl patching
In-Reply-To: <bug-18723-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
Message-ID: <20081127092408.AD6DC130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18723





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-27 01:24:07 PST ---
Make "a way"  a "documented fonts.conf config pattern".


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 12:17:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:17:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 471103] Font spacing wrong in menus and text
In-Reply-To: <bug-471103-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471103-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811271217.mARCH7pb031297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471103


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 16:41:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:41:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450061] [ro] Create (U+0218..021B,2011) glyphs in
 Lat2-Terminus16.
In-Reply-To: <bug-450061-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450061-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811271641.mARGfMku004336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450061


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10

R?zvan Sandu <razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro




--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-25 21:23:04 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 01:46:58 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:46:58 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811280146.mAS1kwUa016159@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169


John Daggett (:jtd) <jdaggett at mozilla.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|implement downloadable font |[@font-face] implement
                   |support on Linux            |downloadable font support
                   |                            |on Linux




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 12:40:42 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:40:42 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811281240.mASCegxd029173@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #26 from A S Alam <apbrar at gmail.com>  2008-11-28 04:40:33 PST ---
I tested nightly build for 3.1 (1.9.1) and it is working for my language.
But Will it be possible to backport to 3.0.0.x?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 15:27:15 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:27:15 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811281527.mASFRF18027083@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #11 from Bill Gianopoulos <bill at wg9s.com>  2008-11-28 07:27:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=349707)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=349707) [details]

With this patch installed, There is a one row remnant of the magenta background
visible in the upper right corner of the Acid3 test.

Additionally, this testcase from bug 457194,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=340544, fails.  If I install the
Ahem font on my system and modify the test to
use the installed font rather than @font-face, the test passes.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 15:35:18 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:35:18 -0800
Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face
In-Reply-To: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811281535.mASFZHOf030535@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Bill Gianopoulos <bill at wg9s.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |467084




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 17:57:56 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:57:56 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811281757.mASHvujt030637@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #12 from Bill Gianopoulos <bill at wg9s.com>  2008-11-28 09:57:49 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)

> Additionally, this testcase from bug 457194,
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=340544, fails.  If I install the
> Ahem font on my system and modify the test to
> use the installed font rather than @font-face, the test passes.

Oddly, in investigating this issue I found that this testcase fails under
Windows as well, even though Windows does not show the issue under Acid3.  I
filed bug 467084 on that issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:01:57 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:01:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473481] New: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans
 regular
Message-ID: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481

           Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans
                    regular
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
               URL: http://bugs.debian.org/506469
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: liberation-fonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: holger at layer-acht.org
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


From: "Nikos Asimakis" <nikos.asimakis at gmail.com>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:54:11 +0200

Package: ttf-liberation
Version: 1.04.92-1
Severity: normal

After updating to version 1.04.92-1 the character ? (U+03BC, GREEK
SMALL LETTER MU) appears ugly
when using Liberation Sans.

When using Liberation Sans Bold, Italic and all the variants of
Liberation Serif and Mono, ? appears OK.

You can see the problem in GNOME Character Map, when using Liberation
Sans as GNOME's default
application font and in Firefox.

I am attaching a small html to demonstrate the problem:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
  <title>Liberation Fonts Test</title>
</head>
<body>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;">
  Liberation Sans<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-weight:bold;">
  Liberation Sans Bold<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Sans Italic<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Sans Bold Italic<br />???</p>
  <hr />
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;">
  Liberation Serif<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-weight:bold;">
  Liberation Serif Bold<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Serif Italic<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Serif Bold Italic<br />???</p>
  <hr />
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;">
  Liberation Mono<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-weight:bold;">
  Liberation Mono Bold<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Mono Italic<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Mono Bold Italic<br />???</p>
</body>
</html>

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ttf-liberation depends on:
ii  defoma                       0.11.10-0.2 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f

ttf-liberation recommends no packages.

ttf-liberation suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:02:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:02:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281902.mASJ2dg4002533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481


Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    External Bug ID|                            |Debian BTS 506469




--- Comment #1 from Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>  2008-11-28 14:02:38 EDT ---
orignally filed as http://bugs.debian.org/506469

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:39:59 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:39:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281939.mASJdxrl008379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481





--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2008-11-28 14:39:58 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=325034)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325034)
test case

I am attaching testcase as attachment, but I am not sure what the reporter
means -- the letter looks to me roughly same in any Liberation font I have
(liberation-fonts-1.04.90-1.fc10.noarch).

Switching to ASSIGNED so that developers have responsibility to do whatever
they want to do with it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:44:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:44:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281944.mASJi8wu014270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481





--- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2008-11-28 14:44:07 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=325035)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325035)
sshot

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:44:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:44:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281944.mASJiLav014313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 20:08:37 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:08:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811282008.mASK8b6J013354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481





--- Comment #4 from Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>  2008-11-28 15:08:36 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=325036)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325036)
this is how it looks here...

this is how it looks here...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 20:12:16 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:12:16 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811282012.mASKCGmr025582@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #13 from Bill Gianopoulos <bill at wg9s.com>  2008-11-28 12:12:10 PST ---
It appears that the issue in bug 467084 is likely a regression from bug 457821.
 So, that could very well be the cause of the issue here as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 21:32:41 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:32:41 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811282132.mASLWfip015176@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #14 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-28 13:32:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> > Created an attachment (id=349707)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=349707)
> 
> With this patch installed, There is a one row remnant of the magenta background
> visible in the upper right corner of the Acid3 test.

Yes.  I see that too, but that wasn't there when I last checked (when I think
the patch was against 26f6c6c90a43 - Nov 12/13).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Fri Nov 28 23:43:06 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:43:06 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811282343.mASNh66x010227@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #349707|review?(roc at ocallahan.org)  |
               Flag|                            |
 Attachment #349707|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #15 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-28 15:42:58 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=350535)
 --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=350535)
src:url() v1.1

* Addressed review comments.

* Changed nsIStreamLoader* arg to nsISupports* as the font entry doesn't care
what type of loader it is.

* Lazy FT_Init_FreeType to avoid a Ts regression of 10-20 ms.
(It looks like there is a Tp gain of 0.5-1% probably due to keeping a
reference to the PangoCoverage on the PangoFont.)

There is still an occasional shutdown crash that needs to be addressed.  This
happens due to cairo caching its font structures that hold a reference to the
FT_Face.  During _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data these font
structures are destroyed, during which our callback calls FT_Done_Face, but
FT_Done_FreeType has already been called from ~gfxPlatformGtk.
(FT_Done_FreeType destroys any faces not already Done).

I assume the same problem exists with the gfxFT2Fonts backend.

#4  <signal handler called>
#5  0x00007f42d4d791ad in FT_Done_Face () from /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so.6
#6  0x00007f42cc679889 in ~gfxDownloadedFcFontEntry (this=0x38eba70)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp:345
#7  0x00007f42cc66177e in gfxFontEntry::Release (this=0x38eba70)
    at ../../../dist/include/thebes/gfxFont.h:145
#8  0x00007f42cc672f69 in ReleaseDownloadedFontEntry (data=0x38eba70)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPangoFonts.cpp:2669
#9  0x00007f42cc6891b4 in _cairo_user_data_array_fini (array=0x3a1a0a0)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-array.c:392
#10 0x00007f42cc68b202 in *INT__moz_cairo_font_face_destroy (
    font_face=0x3a1a090)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-font-face.c:206
#11 0x00007f42cc6cec11 in _cairo_ft_unscaled_font_destroy (
    abstract_font=0x3a9b1b0)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-ft-font.c:519
#12 0x00007f42cc68bba6 in _cairo_unscaled_font_destroy (
    unscaled_font=0x3a9b1b0)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-font-face.c:759
#13 0x00007f42cc6d14e9 in _cairo_ft_scaled_font_fini (abstract_font=0x3a15860)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-ft-font.c:1739
#14 0x00007f42cc6a17b2 in _cairo_scaled_font_fini_internal (
    scaled_font=0x3a15860)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-scaled-font.c:733
#15 0x00007f42cc6a17d6 in _cairo_scaled_font_fini (scaled_font=0x3a15860)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-scaled-font.c:744
#16 0x00007f42cc6a0cc7 in _cairo_scaled_font_map_destroy ()
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-scaled-font.c:387
#17 0x00007f42cc68bbba in _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data ()
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-font-face.c:767
#18 0x00007f42cc68b075 in _moz_cairo_debug_reset_static_data ()
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/cairo/cairo/src/cairo-debug.c:64
#19 0x00007f42cc66901f in ~gfxPlatform (this=0x28269d0)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPlatform.cpp:262
#20 0x00007f42cc6808fc in ~gfxPlatformGtk (this=0x28269d0)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPlatformGtk.cpp:148
#21 0x00007f42cc6691da in gfxPlatform::Shutdown ()
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/thebes/src/gfxPlatform.cpp:249
#22 0x00007f42c8d5b5c2 in nsThebesGfxModuleDtor (self=0x2826970)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/gfx/src/thebes/nsThebesGfxFactory.cpp:150
#23 0x00007f42d8dd5e2b in nsGenericModule::Shutdown (this=0x2826970)
    at nsGenericFactory.cpp:340
#24 0x00007f42d8dd5e55 in ~nsGenericModule (this=0x2826970)
    at nsGenericFactory.cpp:237
#25 0x00007f42d8dd5fe7 in nsGenericModule::Release (this=0x2826970)
    at nsGenericFactory.cpp:245
#26 0x00007f42d8e3c8bf in nsCOMPtr<nsIModule>::assign_assuming_AddRef (
    this=0x28755d0, newPtr=0x0) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.h:495
#27 0x00007f42d8e3c954 in nsCOMPtr<nsIModule>::assign_with_AddRef (
    this=0x28755d0, rawPtr=0x0) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.h:1171
#28 0x00007f42d8e3f4d1 in nsCOMPtr<nsIModule>::operator= (this=0x28755d0,
    rhs=0x0) at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.h:640
#29 0x00007f42d8e3eb0a in nsNativeModuleLoader::ReleaserFunc (
    aHashedFile=0x2824528, aLoadData=@0x28755d0)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/components/nsNativeComponentLoader.cpp:219
#30 0x00007f42d8e3f320 in nsBaseHashtable<nsHashableHashKey,
nsNativeModuleLoader::NativeLoadData,
nsNativeModuleLoader::NativeLoadData>::s_EnumStub (
    table=0x239c5f0, hdr=0x28755c0, number=4, arg=0x7fffe21b6300)
    at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsBaseHashtable.h:346
#31 0x00007f42d8dc4961 in PL_DHashTableEnumerate (table=0x239c5f0,
    etor=0x7f42d8e3f2c8 <nsBaseHashtable<nsHashableHashKey,
nsNativeModuleLoader::NativeLoadData,
nsNativeModuleLoader::NativeLoadData>::s_EnumStub(PLDHashTable*,
PLDHashEntryHdr*, unsigned int, void*)>, arg=0x7fffe21b6300)
    at pldhash.c:735
#32 0x00007f42d8e3f3a4 in nsBaseHashtable<nsHashableHashKey,
nsNativeModuleLoader::NativeLoadData,
nsNativeModuleLoader::NativeLoadData>::Enumerate (
    this=0x239c5f0,
    enumFunc=0x7f42d8e3eae8 <nsNativeModuleLoader::ReleaserFunc(nsIHashable*,
nsNativeModuleLoader::NativeLoadData&, void*)>, userArg=0x0)
    at ../../dist/include/xpcom/nsBaseHashtable.h:221
#33 0x00007f42d8e3eacd in nsNativeModuleLoader::UnloadLibraries (
    this=0x239c5e8)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/components/nsNativeComponentLoader.cpp:258
#34 0x00007f42d8e38484 in nsComponentManagerImpl::Shutdown (this=0x239c530)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/components/nsComponentManager.cpp:747
#35 0x00007f42d8ddac3c in NS_ShutdownXPCOM_P (servMgr=0x0)
    at /home/karl/moz/dev/xpcom/build/nsXPComInit.cpp:843

Possible solutions are

1) Check whether FT_Done_FreeType has been called before calling FT_Done_Face.
   This may be fairly simple, but its ugly leaving the reference to the
   FT_Face in cairo's caches.

2) Be more careful about shutdown order.  Some things will need to be shutdown
   before _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data and some after.

3) Use a refcounted object count references to the FT_Library (whenever an
   FT_Face is created or destroyed) and call FT_Done_FreeType when these reach
   zero.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:00:48 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:00:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473551] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551

           Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: rrdtool
        AssignedTo: kaboom at oobleck.net
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: kaboom at oobleck.net, jwilson at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11.
Please change your package deps to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif


http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:05:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:05:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291105.mATB5u18027707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |473552




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:05:55 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:05:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473552] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473552-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552

           Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: mapnik
        AssignedTo: rezso at rdsor.ro
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: rezso at rdsor.ro, snecklifter at gmail.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
        Depends on: 473551
    Classification: Fedora


The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11.
Please change your package deps to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif


http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:11:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:11:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291111.mATBB7O7028598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|473552                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:11:05 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:11:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473552] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473552-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473552-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291111.mATBB5GQ028546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451
         Depends on|473551                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:10:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:10:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473552] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473552-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473552-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291110.mATBAGbx023426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|473553                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:09:10 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:09:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473552] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473552-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473552-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291109.mATB9Ab0022982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473552


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |473553




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:10:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:10:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473553] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473553-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473553-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291110.mATBAF1o023375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473553


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451
         Depends on|473552                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:09:10 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:09:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473553] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473553-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473553

           Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: openoffice.org
        AssignedTo: caolanm at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    jnavrati at gmail.com
        Depends on: 473552
    Classification: Fedora


The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11.
Please change your openoffice.org-langpack-ar deps to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

Currently, most users will have full, not lgc versions installed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:11:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:11:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291111.mATBBeUB028740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-29 06:11:38 EDT ---
*** Bug 473550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:14:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:14:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473554] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473554-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473554

           Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: foobillard
        AssignedTo: mitr at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: mitr at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11.
Please change your foobillard deps to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

Currently, most users will have full, not lgc versions installed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:18:55 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:18:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473556] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473556-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473556-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291118.mATBIt7F029978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473556


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451
         Depends on|446451                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:17:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:17:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473556] New: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473556-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473556

           Summary: Fix dejavu-* dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: perl-PDF-API2
        AssignedTo: bjohnson at symetrix.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: bjohnson at symetrix.com,
                    fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
        Depends on: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


The dejavu-fonts and dejavu-lgc-fonts packages are gone in Fedora 11.
Please change your perl-PDF-API2 deps to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

Currently, most users will have full, not lgc versions installed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:38:24 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:38:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473559] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
 dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473559-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473559

           Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
                    dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: fbida
        AssignedTo: adrian at lisas.de
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: adrian at lisas.de, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is
a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users
will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of
resources.

For Fedora 11, please consider changing the fbida deps on bitstream-vera-fonts
to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full
version of the fonts.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:40:23 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:40:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473560] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
 dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473560-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473560

           Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
                    dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: ember-media
        AssignedTo: atorkhov at gmail.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: wart at kobold.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    atorkhov at gmail.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is
a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users
will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of
resources.

For Fedora 11, please consider changing the fbida deps on bitstream-vera-fonts
to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full
version of the fonts.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:46:03 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:46:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473563] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
 dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473563-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473563

           Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
                    dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: xblast
        AssignedTo: hdegoede at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: hdegoede at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is
a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users
will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of
resources.

For Fedora 11, please consider changing the xblast deps on bitstream-vera-fonts
to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full
version of the fonts.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:42:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:42:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473561] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
 dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473561-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473561

           Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
                    dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: e16
        AssignedTo: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no, wart at kobold.org,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, atorkhov at gmail.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is
a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users
will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of
resources.

For Fedora 11, please consider changing the e16 deps on bitstream-vera-fonts to
one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full
version of the fonts.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:43:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:43:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473562] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
 dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473562

           Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
                    dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: e16-docs
        AssignedTo: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no, wart at kobold.org,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, atorkhov at gmail.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is
a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users
will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of
resources.

For Fedora 11, please consider changing the e16-docs deps on
bitstream-vera-fonts to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full
version of the fonts.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 11:47:59 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:47:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473564] New: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
 dependencies
Message-ID: <bug-473564-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473564

           Summary: Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu
                    dependencies
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: chess
        AssignedTo: hdegoede at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: hdegoede at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, atorkhov at gmail.com
            Blocks: 446451
    Classification: Fedora


Bitstream Vera has long been deprecated in Fedora in favour of DejaVu, which is
a community fork and extension of the Bitsream release. The majority of users
will have DejaVu installed on system and pulling Vera in is a waste of
resources.

For Fedora 11, please consider changing the chess deps on bitstream-vera-fonts
to one or several of:

 dejavu-fonts-sans
 dejavu-fonts-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-serif
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono
 dejavu-fonts-lgc-serif

Nowadays LGC is only installed for special cases, and people use the full
version of the fonts.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68927

The compat packages are transitory and will be gone in F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 12:50:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 07:50:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473553] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473553-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473553-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291250.mATCohGs008694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473553


Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Sat Nov 29 12:56:32 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:56:32 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18725] RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names
In-Reply-To: <bug-18725-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
Message-ID: <20081129125632.4DDE2130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18725


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Sat Nov 29 12:56:45 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 18727] RFE: allow use of iso 15924 codes
In-Reply-To: <bug-18727-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
Message-ID: <20081129125645.9CABE130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18727


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From ivazquez at fedoraproject.org  Sat Nov 29 16:37:27 2008
From: ivazquez at fedoraproject.org (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools.spec,1.13,1.14
Message-ID: <20081129163727.D4E7170113@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ivazquez

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21028/fonttools/devel

Modified Files:
	fonttools.spec 
Log Message:
Rebuild for Python 2.6


Index: fonttools.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel/fonttools.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- fonttools.spec	16 Sep 2008 17:10:29 -0000	1.13
+++ fonttools.spec	29 Nov 2008 16:36:57 -0000	1.14
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           fonttools
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back
 
 Group:          Development/Tools
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet+rpm at gmail.com> - 2.2-2
+- Rebuild for Python 2.6
+
 * Tue Sep 16 2008 Matt Domsch <mdomsch at fedoraproject.org> - 2.2-1
 - update to 2.2, drop upstreamed patch, fix FTBFS BZ#434409
 



From ivazquez at fedoraproject.org  Sat Nov 29 16:37:28 2008
From: ivazquez at fedoraproject.org (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontypython/devel fontypython.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20081129163728.3827670113@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ivazquez

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontypython/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21028/fontypython/devel

Modified Files:
	fontypython.spec 
Log Message:
Rebuild for Python 2.6


Index: fontypython.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontypython/devel/fontypython.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- fontypython.spec	15 Sep 2008 21:38:33 -0000	1.5
+++ fontypython.spec	29 Nov 2008 16:36:57 -0000	1.6
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           fontypython
 Version:        0.3.6
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        TTF font manager
 
 Group:          Applications/Multimedia
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet+rpm at gmail.com> - 0.3.6-2
+- Rebuild for Python 2.6
+
 * Mon Sep 15 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 0.3.6-1
 - update to 0.3.6
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 20:04:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:04:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473556] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473556-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473556-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811292004.mATK4EfB019056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473556


Bernard Johnson <bjohnson at symetrix.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From ivazquez at fedoraproject.org  Sun Nov 30 00:53:51 2008
From: ivazquez at fedoraproject.org (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:53:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools.spec,1.14,1.15
Message-ID: <20081130005351.9060470117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ivazquez

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10271/fonttools/devel

Modified Files:
	fonttools.spec 
Log Message:
Fix locations for Python 2.6


Index: fonttools.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel/fonttools.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- fonttools.spec	29 Nov 2008 16:36:57 -0000	1.14
+++ fonttools.spec	30 Nov 2008 00:53:21 -0000	1.15
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           fonttools
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back
 
 Group:          Development/Tools
@@ -63,13 +63,16 @@
 %{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fontTools/*/*.py*
 %{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fontTools/*/*/*.py*
 %{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fontTools/misc/eexecOp.so
-%{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fonttools-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info
+%{python_sitearch}/FontTools/fonttools-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info
 %{_bindir}/ttx
 %{_mandir}/man1/ttx.1.gz
 
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet+rpm at gmail.com> - 2.2-3
+- Fix locations for Python 2.6
+
 * Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet+rpm at gmail.com> - 2.2-2
 - Rebuild for Python 2.6
 



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Sun Nov 30 07:39:58 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:39:58 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811300739.mAU7dw28008054@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #16 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-29 23:39:48 PST ---
>(In reply to comment #15)
> 2) Be more careful about shutdown order.  Some things will need to be shutdown
>    before _cairo_font_face_reset_static_data and some after.

This isn't a practical option with system-cairo.  cairo's cached font
structures can be released when other fonts are added through other users of
the library after gfxPlatform has shut down.

Another options:

4) Find out the FT_Library that cairo is using from the FT_Face from
   a cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face, and use that instead of using a
   separate FT_Library.

   There is some appeal in using the same FT_Library as cairo rather than
   having two identical FT_Librarys.  This approach would be making the
   assumption that cairo won't "Done" its FT_Library until
   cairo_debug_reset_static_data, but I can't think of a good reason why
   cairo might change its behavior to do this.

All these approaches except (4) are assuming that our callback function pointer
on the cairo font face will point to a function in a library that is still in
memory.

I was surprised to see that NS_ShutdownXPCOM_P() [including
nsNativeModuleLoader::UnloadLibraries()] doesn't actually seem to be unloading
XPCOM module libraries.  

If thebes (or necko) may be unloaded from memory, some other options are:

5) Force cairo to empty its holdover fonts (unreferenced fonts).  This would
   require creation and destruction of 256 cairo_scaled_fonts.

6) Modifying cairo to not holdover unreferenced fonts with external
   destroy_hooks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Sun Nov 30 07:52:07 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:52:07 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811300752.mAU7q7aX009801@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #17 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz at karlt.net>  2008-11-29 23:51:57 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> All these approaches except (4) are assuming that our callback function pointer
> on the cairo font face will point to a function in a library that is still in
> memory.

Please ignore the "except (4)".  At the time I wrote that, (4) was something
else.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 30 12:01:20 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:01:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811301201.mAUC1Kl2001035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551


Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|medium                      |high
                 CC|                            |apevec at redhat.com
           Severity|medium                      |high




--- Comment #2 from Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com>  2008-11-30 07:01:19 EDT ---
compat packages don't help, packages depending on rrdtools don't build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=963810&name=root.log

> Error: Missing Dependency: dejavu-lgc-fonts is needed by package rrdtool

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 30 13:33:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:33:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811301333.mAUDXUpx011816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-30 08:33:29 EDT ---
Maybe I was not clear enough? Do *NOT* try to depend on the compat packages.
They're not here long term. Use the others

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 30 13:55:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:55:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies
In-Reply-To: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473551-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811301355.mAUDt1ch021451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551


Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|high                        |urgent




--- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com>  2008-11-30 08:55:00 EDT ---
Your message is clear, but mine wasn't: I wanted to say that it's _urgent_ to
fix rrdtool - it's basically broken in rawhide now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Sun Nov 30 20:58:15 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:58:15 -0800
Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on
 Linux
In-Reply-To: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-458169-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811302058.mAUKwFGI004462@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169





--- Comment #18 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc at ocallahan.org>  2008-11-30 12:58:06 PST ---
It seems like option 6 is the way to go. Or perhaps

7) add a cairo API to flush unreferenced fonts (or unreferenced fonts with
external destroy_hooks)

Basically, it's an API bug for cairo to require external destroy_hooks to work
indefinitely far in the future.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 30 22:05:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:05:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472695] exa-master-upgrade breaks glyph rendering with OLPC XO
In-Reply-To: <bug-472695-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472695-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811302205.mAUM5EKI003047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472695


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10

Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 00:49:34 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Sun Nov 30 23:38:44 2008
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:38:44 -0800
Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on
 parts of some English webpages
In-Reply-To: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-455647-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200811302338.mAUNch4d010871@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-30 15:38:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Requesting approval for 1.9.0.6.  This patch changes two lines of code in one
> function, plus adds an assertion.  A reftest would land with it.
:
> The small number of changes makes risk very low.

Thank you Karl for your work on this.  I just want to chime in in agreement
that it would be very good to get this patch included on the stable branch -
the consequences for Indic users are quite serious: a lot of English pages are
quite unreadable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.