From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 1 01:05:06 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 01:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec, 1.12, 1.13 cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20081001010506.965837011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10961 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Removed Files: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch Log Message: Unsymlinked 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- cjkunifonts.spec 30 Sep 2008 07:11:28 -0000 1.12 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 1 Oct 2008 01:04:36 -0000 1.13 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ Source6: cidfmap.zh_CN Source7: CIDFnmap.zh_TW Source8: CIDFnmap.zh_CN -Patch0: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir BuildArch: noarch @@ -61,7 +60,6 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{name}-uming-%{version} -%patch0 -p1 -b .1-rhbz459680 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{name}-ukai-%{version} %build @@ -91,7 +89,10 @@ for conf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - ln -s $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + if [ $conf != %{umingbuilddir}/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf ] + then + ln -s $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + fi done for conf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do @@ -208,7 +209,10 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Sep 30 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-4.fc10 +* Wed Oct 01 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-5.fc10 +- Resolves: rhbz#459680 (Unsymlinked 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.) + +* Tue Sep 30 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-4.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 (All .conf files are in fonts.avail and soft linked to fonts.d.) --- cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 07:07:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010707.m9177TEZ017769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|cjkunifonts |qt AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |than at redhat.com --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-01 03:07:28 EDT --- Agreed, reproduced on F10Beta, but pushing this back to Qt since it really looks like a Qt/KDE issue: the changes made to cjkunifonts are just a workaround for this for KDE and the original .conf file clearly should only affect the Chinese font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 07:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010719.m917JvLY020117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-01 03:19:56 EDT --- Might this be the relevant difference? - + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 09:39:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 05:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010939.m919dgJi020738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2008-10-01 05:39:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318174) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318174) Patch for conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 10:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 06:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011054.m91AsrEP005436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 --- Comment #2 from Rahul Bhalerao 2008-10-01 06:54:52 EDT --- Bug filed upstream at, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17856 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 11:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 07:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011125.m91BPukQ012032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #34 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-01 07:25:53 EDT --- /etc/fonts/fonts.dtd defines that "compare" attribute defaults "eq". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465074] New: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465074 Summary: FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo ck-results/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: libXfontcache AssignedTo: sandmann at redhat.com ReportedBy: ftbfs at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: sandmann at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 463452 Classification: Fedora libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Oct 1 16:44:54 2008 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 1 Oct 2008 16:44:54 -0000 Subject: [Issue 94504] Text in text boxes truncated when printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081001164454.29704.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94504 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'rainerbielefeld' |'fedorafonts,rainerbielefe | |ld' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Oct 1 16:44:53 +0000 2008 ------- same on openoffice.org-writer-1:3.0.0-8.1.fc10.x86_64 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 21:28:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463036] Bold u renders badly (blurry) for liberation sans, w too to a smaller extent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012128.m91LSOWY030484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 saurabh at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(saurabh at hotmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from saurabh at hotmail.com 2008-10-01 17:28:23 EDT --- I'm almost certain it's the -Bold.ttf. (It's whatever font firefox picks up). I saw it in the Windows font viewer and other font viewers and it looks similarly blurred. I also discovered that it's apparent (to my untrained eye at least) only at <= 12 pt, and it gets progressively worse at lower pt - it's really bad at 9 pt. Also discovered Mono Bold has a similar problem. Serif doesnt have it afaict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 02:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020229.m922TZUp026615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-01 22:29:33 EDT --- Will you update this un-extra-fonts package submission in line with the final un-core-fonts package when you have time? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 2 05:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:16:00 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020516.m925G0C5010772@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458160 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 2 07:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:21:04 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020721.m927L4jW032422@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458169 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 2 07:21:37 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:21:37 -0700 Subject: [Bug 458169] New: implement downloadable font support on Linux Message-ID: Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Summary: implement downloadable font support on Linux Classification: Components Product: Core Version: Trunk Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: -- Component: GFX: Thebes AssignedTo: nobody at mozilla.org ReportedBy: jdaggett at mozilla.com QAContact: thebes at gfx.bugs CC: dbaron at mozilla.com, pavlov at pavlov.net, blizzard at mozilla.com, diegoliz at gmail.com, vladimir at pobox.com, mozilla at Weilbacher.org, phiw at l-c-n.com, CaptainN at adcstudio.com, deletesoftware at yandex.ru, john at nextraweb.com, grfgguvf at gmail.com, mozbugz at karlt.net, jdaggett at mozilla.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, jakub.rusinek at gmail.com Depends on: 449356 Blocks: 70132 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |blocking1.9.1? As part of the work for bug 441473, support for downloable fonts was implemented on Mac and Windows. For Linux, there's additional work required in our Pango font code to hook into this mechanism, this is being done under bug 449356. Once that bug is complete, the work for this includes: * within font selection code, lookup fonts within the user font object when appropriate * load/unload fonts using downloaded data [src: url()] * lookup specific font faces using the full name of a given face [src: local()] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 2 07:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:22:16 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020722.m927MGXV024416@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458169 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 2 07:22:19 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:22:19 -0700 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020722.m927MJwg024458@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|-- |P1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 2 08:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:21:18 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020821.m928LIJs010788@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|441473 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 2 08:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:56:49 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020856.m928unP9019189@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug 70132 depends on bug 441473, which changed state. Bug 441473 Summary: implement user font set object https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441473 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Oct 3 00:46:43 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:46:43 -0700 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030046.m930khJH006005@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Vladimir Vukicevic (:vlad) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P2 Flag|blocking1.9.1? |blocking1.9.1+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030405.m9345qSm027572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 00:05:51 EDT --- Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good candidate for naming "arabeyes-Thabit-fonts". Maybe after f10 we should consider revising the fonts packaging naming guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030615.m936F06x022383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:14:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319318) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319318) Thabit-fonts.spec-1.patch Bit more cleanup now that Mothanna-fonts is going to be a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936B0cQ022038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462711 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:10:59 EDT --- Strictly this doesn't block bug 462711 (Mothanna-fonts review) but in practice probably most of the changes to this packaging will need to be done for the other package too, so making it block. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:19:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030619.m936JO5r019689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|462711 | --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:19:24 EDT --- rpmlint says: Thabit-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/Thabit-fonts-0.02/OFL.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:21:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030621.m936LsUn023828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:21:54 EDT --- Well comment 12 is after fixing rpmlint warning for ver-rel tagging syntax in the changelog: %changelog -* Mon Sep 08 2008 Subhodip Biswas -0.02-3 -- Packaged seperatly as Thabit and Mothana. -* Tue Sep 02 2008 Subhodip Biswas -0.02-2 +* Mon Sep 08 2008 Subhodip Biswas - 0.02-3 +- Packaged seperately as Thabit and Mothana. + +* Tue Sep 02 2008 Subhodip Biswas - 0.02-2 - Submit for review. + * Fri Aug 29 2008 Khaled Hosny - 0.02-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030624.m936OHf1020550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462711 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030631.m936VYYU022160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 07:51:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 03:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030751.m937pL0T005153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 03:51:20 EDT --- Suggest to target rawhide and F-9 initially - can worry about F8 later. (Not sure why there would be a difference for that between f8 and f9 though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 07:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 03:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030752.m937q9YO005343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 03:52:08 EDT --- Better would be to suggest to upstream not to use spaces in the top directory name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 08:02:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030802.m9382Lgb007963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 04:02:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts > in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there > are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses Sorry, could you elaborate on what this means? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031629.m93GTuxQ029890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031628.m93GSxDo029790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Oct 4 15:22:52 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:22:52 -0700 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041522.m94FMqWC007247@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Bill Gianopoulos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bill at wg9s.com Blocks| |410460 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Oct 5 01:45:23 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:45:23 -0700 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050145.m951jNJO018216@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Samuel Sidler (:sps) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |samuel.sidler at gmail.com Flag|wanted1.9.0.x? |wanted1.9.0.x- --- Comment #15 from Samuel Sidler (:sps) 2008-10-04 18:45:18 PDT --- Doesn't really meet the "wanted" criteria (security, stability, regression from maintenance release) for 1.9.0.x. However, we'll look at a reviewed and baked patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:27:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051827.m95IR3Fv029257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #14 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-10-05 14:27:03 EDT --- ok ..will fix them soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:33:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052033.m95KXtft017507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-05 16:33:54 EDT --- lowercase(In reply to comment #9) > Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good candidate for naming > "arabeyes-Thabit-fonts". lowercase please Appart from that, I really need to find a few hours to review the font packages backlog :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 03:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060345.m963jIBw027563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-05 23:45:17 EDT --- The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named 69oldstandard as you also originally submitted? rpmlint says: 69oldstandard-fonts.src: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which use Greek or Cyrillic script, 69oldstandard-fonts.src: E: no-changelogname-tag 69oldstandard-fonts.src: W: non-coherent-filename oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm 69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm error checking signature of oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. Do you really need these: sans-serif jp en sans-serif DejaVu Sans in the fontconfig file? The srpm file also seems to be corrupted I am afraid: 69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9 warning: user Package does not exist - using root warning: group Package does not exist - using root warning: user Package does not exist - using root warning: group Package does not exist - using root warning: user Ankur does not exist - using root warning: group Ankur does not exist - using root error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/package-review/oldstandard-fonts/oldstand-1.0.ttf.zip;48e9897c: cpio: read -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 03:49:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060349.m963nwAl028132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-05 23:49:58 EDT --- rpmlint on binary package: 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL-FAQ.txt 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL.txt 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which use Greek or Cyrillic script, 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. (In reply to comment #2) > The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named > 69oldstandard as you also originally submitted? Rather I guess you intended to rename it to oldstandard-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 07:22:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060722.m967MmcX003592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-06 03:22:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sorry, could you elaborate on what this means? The package unikurd-fonts-web is sub-package of unikurd-fonts. I could create package unikurd-web-font and then package unikurd-penos-font, but I thought it will be better to have package unikurd-fonts and sub-package them according to actual font (web, penos, ...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Oct 6 20:31:10 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:31:10 -0700 Subject: [Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062031.m96KVANF019605@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at mozilla.org |mozbugz at karlt.net Target Milestone|--- |mozilla1.9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 01:34:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465900] New: Wrong symbol links for confs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Wrong symbol links for confs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 Summary: Wrong symbol links for confs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: baif at pogolinux.com.cn QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: It's seems that the symbiol links in conf.d for cjkunitfonts-uming, after the package was updated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1 Actual results: [baif at office105 conf.avail]$ ll /etc/fonts/conf.d/*uming* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf -> ../cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 45 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-render.conf -> ../cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-render.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/35-ttf-arphic-uming-aliases.conf -> ../cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/35-ttf-arphic-uming-aliases.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf -> ../cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf -> ../cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-ttf-arphic-uming-embolden.conf -> ../cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/90-ttf-arphic-uming-embolden.conf Expected results: [baif at office105 conf.avail]$ ll /etc/fonts/conf.d/*uming* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf -> ../conf.avail/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 45 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-render.conf -> ../conf.avail/25-ttf-arphic-uming-render.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/35-ttf-arphic-uming-aliases.conf -> ../conf.avail/35-ttf-arphic-uming-aliases.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf -> ../conf.avail/41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf -> ../conf.avail/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 2008-10-07 09:14 /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-ttf-arphic-uming-embolden.conf -> ../conf.avail/90-ttf-arphic-uming-embolden.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 02:04:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465900] Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070204.m97242Hu017068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Wrong symbol links for |Symlinks of fontconfig |confs |.conf files are | |inaccurated.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 03:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465900] Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070319.m973JPF4032499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 --- Comment #1 from Baif 2008-10-06 23:19:24 EDT --- It seems that kernel-2.6.27-0.392.rc8.git7.fc10 has a bad /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build symbol link... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 03:27:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465900] Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070327.m973RxvO000999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-06 23:27:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It seems that kernel-2.6.27-0.392.rc8.git7.fc10 has a bad /lib/modules/$(uname > -r)/build symbol link... Nono, I guess is my bad. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 7 03:32:14 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.13,1.14 Message-ID: <20081007033214.D2DAC700DE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19452 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#465900 (Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) - Macro'ed all 'ln -s'. Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- cjkunifonts.spec 1 Oct 2008 01:04:36 -0000 1.13 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 7 Oct 2008 03:31:44 -0000 1.14 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -91,24 +91,28 @@ install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ if [ $conf != %{umingbuilddir}/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf ] then - ln -s $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ + %{__ln_s} ../conf.avail/`basename $conf` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + cd - fi done for conf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - ln -s $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ + %{__ln_s} ../conf.avail/`basename $conf` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + cd - done # backward compat install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -ln -s ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -ln -s ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf +%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf +%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf # catalogue -ln -s %{umingfontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming -ln -s %{ukaifontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai +%{__ln_s} %{umingfontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming +%{__ln_s} %{ukaifontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai # ghostscript install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir} @@ -209,6 +213,10 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog +* Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 +- Resolves: rhbz#465900 (Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) +- Macro'ed all 'ln -s'. + * Wed Oct 01 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-5.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 (Unsymlinked 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.) From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 03:49:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465900] Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070349.m973nO9P004157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-06 23:49:23 EDT --- Done: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Oct 7 07:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:52:23 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070752.m977qNdf028756@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Oct 7 08:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 01:22:59 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070822.m978MxkV001102@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 John Daggett (:jtd) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Oct 7 13:49:55 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:49:55 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071349.m97DntEI020934@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 philippe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:13:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071613.m97GD4gf005121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-07 12:13:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint on binary package: > > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL-FAQ.txt > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL.txt > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an > attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and > medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which > use Greek or Cyrillic script, > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > > (In reply to comment #2) > > The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named > > 69oldstandard as you also originally submitted? > > Rather I guess you intended to rename it to oldstandard-fonts. updated the packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:01:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071701.m97H17YN016916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-07 13:01:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > spec file > > URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts.spec > > > > SRPM URL: > > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm > > > > Description : A fun font from the Crude Factory. > > I am a new Packager and I am looking for a Sponsor. > > spec file > URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/bonvenocf-fonts.spec > > SRPM URL: > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm rebuilt after correcting errors.. spec file URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:27:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466029] New: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029 Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-KOI8-R AssignedTo: than at redhat.com ReportedBy: goeran at uddeborg.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: than at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The file /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc/fonts.dir contains two entries for each font, one for the pcf.gz file and one for a bdf file that isn't included in the package. Apparently, the presence of the bdf entry breaks accesses to these fonts. As an example, it contains: 9x15s.bdf -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-koi8-ub 9x15s.pcf.gz -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-koi8-ub Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-10.fc8.noarch How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install fonts-KOI8-R 2. xfd -fn 9x15 Actual results: Warning: Cannot convert string "9x15" to type FontStruct xfd: no font to display Expected results: A window with the font displayed. Additional info: The bug can be avoided by rerunning mkfontdir in /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc. (And trigger the X server to reread its font files.) But there is no RPM script or other automatic way this is done. It must be done "by hand" after installation by the system administrator. And after doing this, the package fails a verify check by RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Oct 7 20:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:46:09 -0700 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072046.m97Kk9DV017959@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Vladimir Vukicevic (:vlad) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|-- |P3 CC| |vladimir at pobox.com Flag|blocking1.9.1? |blocking1.9.1+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 01:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080104.m98141Ng031117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #30 from Dennis Jang 2008-10-07 21:04:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319715) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319715) un-extra-fonts.spec-5.patch Spec file - http://get9.net/rpm/5/un-extra-fonts.spec - add subpackages with a macro - add description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 08:04:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 04:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429527] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080804.m9884KWM028528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429527 errata-xmlrpc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from errata-xmlrpc 2008-10-08 04:04:19 EDT --- An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0905.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mh at openoffice.org Wed Oct 8 08:52:03 2008 From: mh at openoffice.org (mh at openoffice.org) Date: 8 Oct 2008 08:52:03 -0000 Subject: Changes to multiple issues in www Message-ID: <20081008085203.14520.qmail@openoffice.org> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ProjectIssues User mh has changed several issues in www project. Below is a list of the changed issues you are associated with: 93793 PDF Import Extension: Pop-up window which allows to replace fonts Changes: Component extensions QA contact wg Subcomponent pdfimport Target milestone not determined Version current Comments: change component. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 8 20:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:30:27 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082030.m98KURBH024488@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 kyberneticist at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kyberneticist at yahoo.com --- Comment #168 from kyberneticist at yahoo.com 2008-10-08 13:28:44 PDT --- Hey. I tried slapping font-face into: http://m8y.org/tmp/testcase63.xhtml It works great, except under OSX, where the text shadows get screwed up on the font load. Windows does not have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 22:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465074] FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082255.m98Mt4fo013215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465074 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from FTBFS 2008-10-01 12:37:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318887) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318887) root.log root.log for i386 --- Comment #2 from FTBFS 2008-10-01 12:37:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318888) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318888) build.log build.log for i386 --- Comment #3 from FTBFS 2008-10-01 12:37:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318889) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318889) mock.log mock.log for i386 --- Comment #4 from FTBFS 2008-10-01 12:37:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318890) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318890) root.log root.log for x86_64 --- Comment #5 from FTBFS 2008-10-01 12:37:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318891) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318891) build.log build.log for x86_64 --- Comment #6 from FTBFS 2008-10-01 12:37:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318892) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318892) mock.log mock.log for x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092017.m99KHnjM019520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 16:17:47 EDT --- The design patents in play here have all long since expired, something I didn't notice initially, because I didn't realize that design patents have a much shorter life. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 03:56:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] New: Segmentation fault. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Segmentation fault. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 Summary: Segmentation fault. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: sangu.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: $ gdb fontforge (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/fontforge [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 00:23 GMT 28-Aug-2008. Library based on sources from 23:33 GMT 27-Aug-2008. [New Thread 0xb7fdf700 (LWP 11925)] Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--13-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00479f79 in GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x83d6ce8, as=0xbfffd148, ds=0xbfffd144, ld=0xbfffd140) at gdrawtxt.c:2328 2328 *as = fontinfo->ascent; Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install e2fsprogs.i386 libICE.i386 libSM.i386 libXau.i386 libXcursor.i386 libXdmcp.i386 libXfixes.i386 libXrender.i386 (gdb) bt #0 0x00479f79 in GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x83d6ce8, as=0xbfffd148, ds=0xbfffd144, ld=0xbfffd140) at gdrawtxt.c:2328 #1 0x004bb00c in GTextFieldFit () at gtextfield.c:2596 #2 _GTextFieldCreate (gt=0x83cc0a8, base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe41c, data=0x83d0830, def=0x4fdf60) at gtextfield.c:2692 #3 0x004bb912 in GTextCompletionCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe41c, data=0x83d0830) at gtextfield.c:2732 #4 0x004cb015 in _GHVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe5bc, data=0x0, hcnt=1, vcnt=3, def_box=0x4fe440) at ghvbox.c:573 #5 0x004cb26d in GVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0x0, data=0x0) at ghvbox.c:607 #6 0x00484d6e in GGadgetsCreate (base=0x83a8328, gcd=0xbfffe5b8) at ggadgets.c:1172 #7 0x004834fa in GFileChooserCreateChildren () at gfilechooser.c:1525 #8 GFileChooserCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffe818, data=0x0) at gfilechooser.c:1571 #9 0x004cb015 in _GHVBoxCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffec18, data=0x0, hcnt=1, vcnt=4, def_box=0x4fe400) at ghvbox.c:573 #10 0x004cb182 in GHVGroupCreate (base=0x83a8328, gd=0xbfffec18, data=0x0) at ghvbox.c:633 #11 0x00484d6e in GGadgetsCreate (base=0x83a8328, gcd=0xbfffec14) at ggadgets.c:1172 #12 0x0815b15e in FVOpenFont (title=0x81c20e0 "Open Font", defaultfile=0x0, ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- mult=1) at openfontdlg.c:736 #13 0x08109f84 in GetPostscriptFontName (dir=0x0, mult=1) at fontview.c:1102 #14 0x0810a1f4 in MenuOpen (base=0x0, mi=0x0, e=0x0) at fontview.c:1142 #15 0x0819dbf4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff554) at startui.c:1131 $ dmesg | grep fontforge fontforge[11659]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfe4b4a0 error 4 in libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000] fontforge[11676]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfd76240 error 4 in libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000] fontforge[11682]: segfault at 48 ip 00479f79 sp bfb3eb40 error 4 in libgdraw.so.4.0.5[451000+93000] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20080828-1.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. $fontforge 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 05:11:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100511.m9A5BIh5024267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sangu.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 01:11:15 EDT --- *** Bug 466404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 05:11:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100511.m9A5BGZY024234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 01:11:15 EDT --- This looks like a duplicate of 450709. Look there for the fix/workaround. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 450709 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 08:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100849.m9A8nnol007211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Regression CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Component|babl |pango AssignedTo|dakingun at gmail.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen 2008-10-10 04:49:48 EDT --- The screenshots suggest that the problem is visible in gnome-terminal which (beneath a slew of intermediary libraries) uses pango for font rendering. Therefore I'll reassign the bug to pango so that its maintainers can examine it closely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101059.m9AAxGgx001634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #2 from sangu 2008-10-10 06:59:15 EDT --- After adding Gdraw.ScreenWidthInches: 23 in ~/.Xresources, this issue is fixed. $ xrdb -m ~/.Xresources. Reopend? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:54:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101254.m9ACsfTd028123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #3 from sangu 2008-10-10 08:54:40 EDT --- Whenever fontforge crashes, /var/log/Xorg.0.log updates $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log [...] FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101259.m9ACxokf031076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 sangu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #4 from sangu 2008-10-10 08:59:49 EDT --- Dropped ibm-type1 ( See Also bug 317641 ). Then fontforge uses ibm-type1 fonts(cour.pfa) $ rpm -q --changelog xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 |less * Mon Jan 14 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 7.2-6 - IBM refused to relicense ibm-type1 fonts with permission to modify, so they were dropped (bugzilla 317641) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101352.m9ADqD7q008099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #7 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-10 09:52:12 EDT --- > The screenshots suggest that the problem is visible in gnome-terminal Experiments in gnome-terminal were, in a sense, the easiest but the same type of damage shows up everywhere. In window titles, gnome-panel, dialog to set font rendering properties, you name it. Further checks are showing me that, in regular font sizes and if "Monochrome" is not used, distortions would be the least (to the point that you have to carefuly check for these) if in "Details" smoothing is set to "Greyscale" and hinting to "Slight" (with other choices, including "None", definitely worse). Subpixel ordering does not seem to matter. Changing "Resolution" may also help although results do not seem to be stable or predictable. Switching to "Subpixel smoothing" makes the text essentially unreadable but this is on CRT and not LCD. Do these observations provide some hints? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:16:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101416.m9AEGIrA016460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Ben Laenen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bl.bugs at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-10 10:16:15 EDT --- Just to be on the sure side: did you restart your desktop after doing the updates? Problems like this occur when the font caches get messed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:47:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101447.m9AElaiw020969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #9 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-10 10:47:35 EDT --- > did you restart your desktop after doing the updates? This is a test installation. For various reasons it was rebooted a number of times in the meantime. > Problems like this occur when the font caches get messed up. OK. Any obvious way to clean up those caches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:05:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101505.m9AF513e025497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #10 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-10 11:05:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK. Any obvious way to clean up those caches? Yeah, rebooting should fix all caching problems :-) Perhaps the font files themselves got corrupted? Try to reinstall them (dejavu if I look at the screenschots) if you haven't already. Is this only a few fonts that have this problem or all of them? What about non-GTK applications? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:19:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101719.m9AHJfWd020993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #11 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-10 13:19:40 EDT --- A font which shows up in example screenshots is identified in gnome-terminal "Preferences" as "Monospace 11". Not entirely clear from that description if it comes from dejavu or something else. :-) I tried other possibilities like "Luxi Mono" (there are not too many of those) and different sizes. Although mis-rendering changes it never totally goes away with an exception of "MiscFixed" but these look like not hinted and/or shaped fonts. Wait a minute! It appears that "LucidaTypewriter Sans" and "LucidaTypewriter Sans Bold" are also coming fine (or at least problems are so subtle that I missed those :-). rpm -V dejavu-fonts rpm -V liberation-fonts do not lodge any complaints. Just in case I reinstalled both, with dejavu-fonts-experimental added to that list too for a good change, rebooted and, as you can see from an attached picture, troubles are still there. A bit different with "Best shapes" instead of "Best contrast" but not gone. I have to admit that a terminal window looks after that definitely better. Not sure why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101723.m9AHNkC1020775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #12 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-10 13:23:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320034) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320034) this time shot not from a terminal Look close at letters like A, W, H, p, n and various others. Also r in a window title. At least mis-renderings seem to be consistent through a sample. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:35:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101735.m9AHZk12023601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #13 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-10 13:35:45 EDT --- If it's not the fonts or the font caches then the next thing to look at would be Freetype... Try to reinstall Freetype (again, restart desktop afterwards to be sure programs use it) and if that doesn't work find the previous version of it and install that. btw, did you test the rendering in a Qt/KDE program? Would be good to rule out GTK or Pango here as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 18:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101838.m9AIcY75007169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 14:38:33 EDT --- So, I am confused. How is this different than bug 450709 ? My understanding of this bug: - The ibm type1 fonts were removed. - The cache files were not regenerated - Fontforge tries to use that font and dies because it is not really available. Granted that fontforge shouldn't crash when a font isn't available, but the X server shouldn't lie to it and tell it that it has a font when it does not. So, doesn't regenerating your font cache files (as mentioned in bug 450709 ) fix this issue for you? Or is this somehow another issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 18:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101855.m9AItU7k009005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #14 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-10 14:55:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320048) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320048) results with freetype reinstalled > Try to reinstall Freetype Well, with freetype-2.3.7-1.fc10.x86_64 reinstalled, together with devel libraries (and after recovering from the latest gnome-session breakage :-) the situation improved, although I cannot imagine why, to that extent that if I would not look closely for misrenderings I would likely missed that. Look at a letter d in an attached sample. Some other stuff can be find out too. Turning on "Subpixel smoothing" makes and obvious mess. OTOH this version of freetype was installed on August 28th so I had an ample time to notice something amiss. > btw, did you test the rendering in a Qt/KDE program? Not earlier. They are scarce on this test system. I do have k3b. It looked mostly clean with this exception that before freetype reinstallation an upper case D had a bar across - both in "Devices" on a menu and in directory listings window. Right now this bar vanished. I will try to see what will happen with an earlier version of freetype a bit later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 19:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101945.m9AJjjaw019612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-10 15:45:44 EDT --- Please follow the process described on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular make sure you have a page describing your font on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:In-progress_fonts by the time you post your review request. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102051.m9AKpNZZ002095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-10 16:51:21 EDT --- Thanks. Now that the legal part is done, I've updated the proposed package with the latest upstream version http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts-20080825-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102057.m9AKviEH005881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-10 16:57:42 EDT --- I don't think one is supposed to be both the reviewer and the modifier in a fedora merge ticket :(. Now that I've done the review part someone else needs to apply it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102310.m9ANAXa1029146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #16 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-10 19:10:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320078) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320078) freetype-2.3.6-1.fc10 - "Best contrast" ... and this is "D" with "Best contrast" although otherwise it is hard to find something misrendered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102308.m9AN8Nss028695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #15 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-10 19:08:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320077) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320077) freetype-2.3.6-1.fc10 - "Best shapes" I may be, possibly, a freetype problem although this is hard to be sure as all this depends on various appearance settings and magnifications. Still after reinstalling 2.3.6-1.fc10 either "Full" hinting or none (other seems to be worse) one has to look carefuly for a font damage and bumping up a zoom a notch may give a "clean" terminal window. Saying that this is how "1" looks like with "Best shapes" and a default zoom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 00:38:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466595] New: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*). Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466595 Summary: Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*). Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com ReportedBy: sangu.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Current fc-cache makes fonts.cache files in /var/cache/fontconfig/. then xorg-x11-fonts packages have needess ghost files. $ rpm -ql xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 | grep fonts.cache /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-1 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-2 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-3 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-4 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-5 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-6 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-7 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-8 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.cache-9 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 7.2-6.fc9 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: fontconfig-2.6.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 10:45:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111045.m9BAjt2Z022950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #17 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-11 06:45:54 EDT --- Maybe use a freetype version that has the bytecode interpreter enabled (just google) and use (full) hinting with that (or whatever setting you need in Gnome to enable it). Anyway, just giving some ideas, as I have no idea what's wrong. I don't remember anyone reporting problems like that. If KDE/Qt programs doesn't have the problem one would look into Pango or GTK. Do the problems change (slightly or completely) with the same settings after you reboot or do they stay the same? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 11:11:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466595] Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*). In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111111.m9BBBPGY028604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466595 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |sandmann at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 12:24:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111224.m9BCO9pj011030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-11 08:24:08 EDT --- BTW sometimes mangled text display is a symptom of broken xorg graphic driver and has no relation whatsoever with fonts or font libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 12:22:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466595] Needless ghost files (fonts.cache-*). In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111222.m9BCMTtY012308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466595 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-11 08:22:28 EDT --- If you rework this package please consider aligning it with fedora fonts packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 18:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111804.m9BI4baL009517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #19 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-11 14:04:36 EDT --- > ... mangled text display is a symptom of broken xorg graphic driver I was wondering about that and this sounds now like a more feasible explanation. It is hard to pinpoint those troubles on something like freetype and damage seems to be more elusive that one would expect from errors in just a rendering engine. "Now you see, now you don't" happens all the time with seemingly unconsequential changes. OTOH when a damage is observed then it looks consistent through the same glyph anywhere on a screen. Can that be reconciled with a broken graphic driver? Contrary to comment #17 at least k3b (which is KDE/Qt program) did show font problems - in some circumstances. That it was harder to notice that it could be just fonts used there and/or their sizes. As I noted before LucidaTypewriter turned out to be surprisingly robust with all of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 18:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111813.m9BIDVN2011941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #20 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-11 14:13:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > BTW sometimes mangled text display is a symptom of broken xorg graphic driver > and has no relation whatsoever with fonts or font libraries or worse: broken hardware. I had funny things going on as well once when my video card wasn't sitting well enough in its socket. But usually you'd notice other glitches as well apart from just funny looking fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 18:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111842.m9BIgjW6016656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #21 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-11 14:42:44 EDT --- > But usually you'd notice other glitches ... With 'flowers_and_leaves.jpg' for a background it does not seem likely that I would miss those other glitches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 18:49:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111849.m9BInOxI017608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-11 14:49:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > But usually you'd notice other glitches ... > > With 'flowers_and_leaves.jpg' for a background it does not > seem likely that I would miss those other glitches. Background and fonts do not necessarily share the same cache xorg-side -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 00:09:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120009.m9C097Xd007816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #23 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-11 20:09:06 EDT --- > ... or worse: broken hardware. I booted on the same machine, only different disk partitions, Fedora 9. Just to be sure I used the same xorg.conf file and the same terminal font. Try as I might I cannot find any misrendered glyphs anywhere. I was changing hinting, smoothing, rendering type. Nada. Even "Subpixel smoothing" works without any problems. "Best contrast" or "Best shapes" look better, but that is about it. Reboot that to rawhide and I have samples of bad letters all over the place. Samples of a similar text attached. In both cases they were done with "Subpixel smoothing" (not optimal for that hardware). This is still not bad. The other times I had such samples on rawhide which were just not readable. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 00:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120010.m9C0Aob7008441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #24 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-11 20:10:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320127) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320127) a sample from Fedora 9 - "subpixel smoothing" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 00:13:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120013.m9C0DIBc008577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #25 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-11 20:13:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320128) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320128) a similar text as above on the same hardware but rawhide this time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121257.m9CCvBS4014324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 08:57:09 EDT --- Thank you for continuing to work on this. Anyway: 1. please use lowercase-only package names 2. please add a fontconfig file to each font so it's sorted in the right category 3. please use more descriptive package descriptions so users actually know what they're downloading 4. please make sure the fontconfig scriptlets are actually included in every package Here is a rough draft on how it should be done (I really should be reviewing other font packages instead of rewriting individual package submissions) http://nim.fedorapeople.org/un-extra-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.src.rpm It still needs: 1. proofing and completing of the package descriptions. 2. checking each font is assigned to the correct fontconfig generic family 3. checking the 66 priority is all right (with japanese people at least I think) Some of the changes are probably interesting for un-core as well. Please make all of those changes so I can move to the formal review step. Also the previous remarks on having upstream take a position on GPLv3 / adding font exception / providing sfd sources still stand though we should probably not block on them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] New: cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 Summary: cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, besfahbo at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora cjkunifont 0_2_20080216_1-4_fc10 has been changed to install files in /etc/fonts/conf.avail, deviating from our official packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate As a result it may now install files in an unowned directory, with all the associated problems, since /etc/fonts/conf.avail is not referenced in our guidelines and not provided by filesystem like /etc/fonts/conf.d Moreover /etc/fonts/conf.avail is hosting file templates which are not modifiable, and should be moved to /usr/share to respect the FHS. Any packager that will follow this unfortunate example will now make rpmlint complain. So upholding this pattern would require modifying rpmlint too. This is all a big mess. All those problems would have been identified had the deviation from guidelines been properly discussed on the fonts list beforehand. Please do not deviate from guidelines in the future without public discussion. Since I'm a nice guy, I've posted a guidelines change request here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_spec_template_correction_(fontconfig) Please participate in this guideline change discussion now and abide *strictly* by FPC's ultimate decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121527.m9CFRJMr013496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #32 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 11:27:18 EDT --- Also note that the conf.d/conf.avail changes depend on the discussion of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_spec_template_correction_(fontconfig) which is not an official Fedora guideline yet (and may change during review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:42:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121542.m9CFgMX9016545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |438944 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:41:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] New: Missing fontconfig scriplets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing fontconfig scriplets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Summary: Missing fontconfig scriplets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil at get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, smallvil at get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora The un-core-fonts-*-1.0.2-0.5.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm packages are missing the required scriplets to update fontconfig cache, resulting in broken out-of-the-box installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:55:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121555.m9CFtse0019503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 11:55:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I am little unsure about what to substitute for faces. The families are > generically serif for all the fonts in this package. You basically need to tell fontconfig in the Gentium package "if something asks for Gentium Basic, use Gentium if it's not available" and the reverse in the other package. Plus tell fontconfig it's a serif package. Like I wrote that's the same magic we do for dejavu full and dejavu lgc, just look at their fontconfig files and copy the dejavu full to dejavu lgc rules (replacing with gentium and gentium basic) Don't bother about F-8, it's better to have a good devel package and worry afterwards of previous distros. At this rate F-8 will be EOL-ed before you have any package in the distro :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121622.m9CGMC8F026368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 12:22:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > --unofficial review-- Thank you for the nice unofficial review Ankur, I'll take up from there. Michal: The spec is an almost perfect copy from official guidelines, that makes it easy to review, thanks Blocking remarks 1. unless upstream has confirmed 1.0 is the actual font revision, and it will version further updates, please use 20020502 as version ? check the version 2. Please add a fontconfig file as Ankur suggested. Since unikurd covers unicode blocks Behdad is interested in, I think it shouldn't be too hard to get him to help you (I doubt he wants you to stomp on farsi) ? add some fontconfig rules 3. unless you *know* upstream is going to release new fonts in the same archive, there is no need to prepare for subpackaging. Upstream is just as likely to publish separate archives, which will mean separate packages (see the gfs fonts for examples). If upstream does end up adding new fonts to this very archive, you can always go the obsolete route ? drop the "just in case" subpackaging Non blocking remarks 1. please have upstream add the GPL font exception to their font 2. please have upstream provide sfd sources if they use fontforge -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:28:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121628.m9CGSSGU027115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |oldstandard-fonts - Old |69oldstandard-fonts - Old |Standard Fonts |Standard Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121640.m9CGeqXU030298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 12:40:51 EDT --- Also: 1. please rebuild from sfd sources since they're available. Very basic examples are in the inconsolata package, more complete makefiles in dejavu or liberation 2. please rename the font in the process as upstream does not want us to use the same font name if we rebuild the fonts (just a sed on the sfd before the build) 3. you probably want to target the OTF variant http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Choosing_the_right_font_format_to_package 4. please add a fontconfig rule that substitute your new name to old standard so documents that reference old standards continue to work 5. 69 is probably a bit low as priority, 60 would be fine for a good cyrillic font as this one is 6. why do you feel you need to change hinting for this font? 7. please register it as a serif font in fontconfig Anyway Old standard is a very nice font and I hope you'll make a nice package from it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:44:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121644.m9CGitwO031484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 12:44:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > ok ..will fix them soon I'll review it just as soon as you post a new spec file, I promise :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 18:13:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121813.m9CID6QF019491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 --- Comment #1 from Julian Sikorski 2008-10-12 14:13:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320147) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320147) KDE System Settings aware of the Narrow glyphs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 18:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] New: Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 Summary: Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=320146) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320146) Confused gtk2 font selector Description of problem: Going through various bug reports, mailing list posts and so on I came to the conclusion that applications are being currently fixed in order to support extended fonts attibutes, and that gtk2 font selector is the one that should work properly. Granted, it works for say DejaVu LGC condensed, but does not for Arial Narrow (the condensed glyphs are to be found in separate files, copied over from XP install into .fonts). fc-list outputs the following: [jsikorski at snowball ~]$ fc-list | grep Arial Arial Black:style=Normalny,Normal,oby?ejn?,Standard,????????,Regular,Normaali,Norm?l,Normale,Standaard,???????,Norm?lne,Navadno,Arrunta Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Normalny,Narrow,Normal,oby?ejn?,Standard,????????,Regular,Normaali,Norm?l,Normale,Standaard,???????,Norm?lne,Navadno,Arrunta Arial:style=Pogrubiona kursywa,Negreta cursiva,tu?n? kurz?va,fed kursiv,Fett Kursiv,?????? ??????,Bold Italic,Negrita Cursiva,Lihavoitu Kursivoi,Gras Italique,F?lk?v?r d?lt,Grassetto Corsivo,Vet Cursief,Halvfet Kursiv,Negrito It?lico,?????????? ??????,Tu?n? kurz?va,Fet Kursiv,Kal?n ?talik,Krepko po?evno,nghi?ng ???m,Lodi etzana Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Pogrubiona kursywa,Narrow,Negreta cursiva,tu?n? kurz?va,fed kursiv,Fett Kursiv,?????? ??????,Bold Italic,Negrita Cursiva,Lihavoitu Kursivoi,Gras Italique,F?lk?v?r d?lt,Grassetto Corsivo,Vet Cursief,Halvfet Kursiv,Negrito It?lico,?????????? ??????,Tu?n? kurz?va,Fet Kursiv,Kal?n ?talik,Krepko po?evno,Lodi etzana Arial:style=Kursywa,Cursiva,kurz?va,kursiv,??????,Italic,Kursivoitu,Italique,D?lt,Corsivo,Cursief,It?lico,??????,?talik,Po?evno,nghi?ng,Etzana Arial:style=Normalny,Normal,oby?ejn?,Standard,????????,Regular,Normaali,Norm?l,Normale,Standaard,???????,Norm?lne,Navadno,th???ng,Arrunta Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Pogrubiony,Narrow,Negreta,tu?n?,fed,Fett,??????,Bold,Negrita,Lihavoitu,Gras,F?lk?v?r,Grassetto,Vet,Halvfet,Negrito,??????????,Fet,Kal?n,Krepko,Lodia Arial:style=Pogrubiony,Negreta,tu?n?,fed,Fett,??????,Bold,Negrita,Lihavoitu,Gras,F?lk?v?r,Grassetto,Vet,Halvfet,Negrito,??????????,Fet,Kal?n,Krepko,???m,Lodia Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Kursywa,Narrow,Cursiva,kurz?va,kursiv,??????,Italic,Kursivoitu,Italique,D?lt,Corsivo,Cursief,It?lico,??????,?talik,Po?evno,Etzana [jsikorski at snowball ~]$ Gtk2 font selector gets confused and shows each of the 4 basic styles twice (see attachment), with no visible difference whatsoever. The only application I have found to be able to distinguish between the Narrow and normal styles is the KDE's system settings > installed fonts thingy (also see attachment) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install microsoft core fonts using an rpm package 2. copy over arian{n,ni,nb,nbi}.ttf from a windows installation 3. run fc-cache 4. attempt to select one of the narrow glyphs in the font selector Actual results: Narrow glyphs are unavailable Expected results: Able to select narrow glyphs Additional info: Feel free to reassing this bug, I wasn't sure what to assign it to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Sun Oct 12 18:33:44 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 13416] Font subfamilies merged In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081012183402.8CF61130085@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13416 --- Comment #6 from Julian Sikorski 2008-10-12 11:33:27 PST --- Any updates on this? I have filed a separate bug in Red Hat bugzilla, which might contain some more useful information: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 18:37:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121837.m9CIbFiv025066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |FreeDesktop.org 13416 --- Comment #2 from Julian Sikorski 2008-10-12 14:37:14 EDT --- This might be relat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 18:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121838.m9CIcL3A025292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 --- Comment #3 from Julian Sikorski 2008-10-12 14:38:20 EDT --- This might be related to the mentioned freedesktop bug, but since there was no response in 4 months, I thought that filing it here as well might be a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 00:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130040.m9D0exmt004370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-12 20:40:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > > Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good candidate for naming > > "arabeyes-Thabit-fonts". > > lowercase please The upstream name is clearly Thabit: do you think we should lowercase it? Personally I usually prefer to preserve upstream casing as far as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 00:47:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130047.m9D0lB8u005491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts |Thabit-fonts from |from Arabeyes.org |Arabeyes.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130107.m9D17sOM009528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-12 21:07:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts.spec I still don't understand why the package is being named 69oldstandard-fonts?? Is the correct name oldstandard-fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130253.m9D2rPQc026989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-12 22:53:24 EDT --- (Ok, sorry this probably my fault since I suggested it: I thought conf.avail was in common use.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 13 03:04:49 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20081013030449.5DE087012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17590 Added Files: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch Log Message: * Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-7.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) added patch cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch: Index: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch =================================================================== RCS file: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch diff -N cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch 13 Oct 2008 03:04:19 -0000 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +diff -up cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.orig cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf +--- cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.orig 2008-10-13 12:46:43.000000000 +1000 ++++ cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf 2008-10-13 12:47:28.000000000 +1000 +@@ -9,21 +9,7 @@ + AR PL UMing TW + AR PL UMing TW MBE + +- false + true + false + +- +- +- +- AR PL UMing CN +- AR PL UMing HK +- AR PL UMing TW +- AR PL UMing TW MBE +- +- 17 +- true +- true +- +- + From bobe at openoffice.org Mon Oct 13 04:08:52 2008 From: bobe at openoffice.org (bobe at openoffice.org) Date: 13 Oct 2008 04:08:52 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081013040852.19393.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from bobe at openoffice.org Mon Oct 13 04:08:48 +0000 2008 ------- You were mentioned on /., BTW: http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/10/11/227236.shtml --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Oct 13 04:42:27 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:42:27 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130442.m9D4gRQq002582@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #341049|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-10-12 21:42:06 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=342841) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=342841) font selection in Mozilla's PangoFcFontMap 0.4 This is a proof of concept patch. It still needs a bit of tidying up. Results from Talos on the try server: ref w/patch change Ts (ms) 1435 1463 +2% Tp (ms) 446 441 -1% Tp_RSS (MB) 110 80 -27% Reference log: http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=MozillaTry/1223866852.1223870369.23733.gz w/patch: http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=MozillaTry/1223860252.1223863695.10237.gz The Ts change may be due to gfxFontconfigUtils being initialized earlier, reverting some of the savings from the patch in bug 404857 comment 13. If so, doing some of the initialization lazily should recover that. (Some of it may never be used.) There is more happening in the Tp test than is indicated in the overall result here. The Tp test runs through 400 pages then re-runs through the same set of 400 pages another 9 times. The reported result is an average of some sort over all 10 runs of 400 pages (possibly with some values discarded or other magic thrown in). Without the patch, the mean page load time for the first run is 584 ms, the mean for the second run is 444 ms, and the mean over the remaining runs is 460 ms. The increase after the second run is a bit concerning but it is what would be expected from bug 453200. With this patch, the mean for the first run is 446 ms (-24%), the mean for the second run is 442 ms (~0%), and the mean over the remaining runs is 459 ms (~0%). The time taken for zooming is most related (but not equivalent) to the time for the first run, so IMO having a fast first run is more important than the weight attributed to it in Talos Tp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Oct 13 04:44:16 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:44:16 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130444.m9D4iGXX003325@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |footprint, perf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 13 04:51:51 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.14,1.15 Message-ID: <20081013045151.DA7357012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19488 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: revert to -3 without conf.avail Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 --- cjkunifonts.spec 7 Oct 2008 03:31:44 -0000 1.14 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 13 Oct 2008 04:51:21 -0000 1.15 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Source6: cidfmap.zh_CN Source7: CIDFnmap.zh_TW Source8: CIDFnmap.zh_CN +Patch1: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir BuildArch: noarch @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{name}-uming-%{version} +%patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{name}-ukai-%{version} %build @@ -213,9 +215,12 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog +* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-7.fc10 +- Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) + * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#465900 (Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) -- Macro'ed all 'ln -s'. +- Macro'ed all '%{__ln_s}'. * Wed Oct 01 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-5.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 (Unsymlinked 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.) From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 04:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130451.m9D4psMp014238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #18 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-10-13 00:51:53 EDT --- @ Jens I guess preserving the upstream naming is fine . @Nicolas Had problem with my net connection ..will upload tonight :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 13 05:33:58 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.15,1.16 Message-ID: <20081013053358.D838B7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32494 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: update rel num Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 --- cjkunifonts.spec 13 Oct 2008 04:51:21 -0000 1.15 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 13 Oct 2008 05:33:28 -0000 1.16 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 7.1%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-7.fc10 +* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-7.1.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 13 05:37:13 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.16,1.17 Message-ID: <20081013053713.B86AF7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv603 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: update rel to -8 Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17 --- cjkunifonts.spec 13 Oct 2008 05:33:28 -0000 1.16 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 13 Oct 2008 05:36:43 -0000 1.17 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 7.1%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-7.1.fc10 +* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-8.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:54:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130554.m9D5swYe027368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-13 01:54:58 EDT --- Thanks Nicolas and Jens, Reverted: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66127 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:19:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130619.m9D6JNta000373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 02:19:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (Ok, sorry this probably my fault since I suggested it: I thought conf.avail > was in common use.) It's not in Fedora for various reasons. But let that not stop you from participating to the guideline change review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130622.m9D6MhCS001228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 02:22:42 EDT --- we don't have any mixed-case package right now and I'd rather keep it this way. Mixed case confuses users that update/install from the CLI and fails as soon as there's a windows mirror or a fat usb key involved. So please do use lowercase package names only please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130629.m9D6T743002452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 02:29:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I still don't understand why the package is being named 69oldstandard-fonts?? > Is the correct name oldstandard-fonts? The correct upstream name is Old Standard However upstream has asked us to rename if we rebuilt from sfds I guess 69oldstandard is as good as any renaming (though I'd have used 69-old-standard-fonts) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Oct 13 08:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:48:28 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130848.m9D8mSGr003641@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #7 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-10-13 01:48:26 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > The Ts change may be due to gfxFontconfigUtils being initialized earlier, > reverting some of the savings from the patch in bug 404857 comment 13. If so, > doing some of the initialization lazily should recover that. (Some of it may > never be used.) Yes, removing gfxFontconfigUtils::mAliasTable, which is not used (and the initialization of which this patch would have activated) drops Ts w/patch by about 100 ms to 1350-1360 ms (-5 to -6% wrt the reference without the patch). > Without the patch, ... > The increase after the second run is a bit concerning but it is > what would be expected from bug 453200. No, it's not bug 453200. Fixing that reduces page load times consistently across all runs by 15 - 20 ms (Tp is -5 to -6%). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 09:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130904.m9D94cwR006031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Dennis Jang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) | --- Comment #33 from Dennis Jang 2008-10-13 05:04:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/un-fonts/extra/0.7/un-extra-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/un-fonts/extra/0.7/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc10.src.rpm -fixed subpackage description and fontconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 09:15:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130915.m9D9Fvrd008644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-13 05:15:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 1. unless upstream has confirmed 1.0 is the actual font revision, and it will > version further updates, please use 20020502 as version > ? check the version > My version guess is based on output from gnome-font-viewer. Says: "Version 1.00" > 2. Please add a fontconfig file as Ankur suggested. Since unikurd covers > unicode blocks Behdad is interested in, I think it shouldn't be too hard to get > him to help you (I doubt he wants you to stomp on farsi) > ? add some fontconfig rules > I am somewhat busy at the moment, this might take me some time, but I am definitely for have it packed. > 3. unless you *know* upstream is going to release new fonts in the same > archive, there is no need to prepare for subpackaging. Upstream is just as > likely to publish separate archives, which will mean separate packages (see the > gfs fonts for examples). If upstream does end up adding new fonts to this very > archive, you can always go the obsolete route > ? drop the "just in case" subpackaging > Dropped. > Non blocking remarks > > 1. please have upstream add the GPL font exception to their font See Fedora fonts ml. Just pinged them. > 2. please have upstream provide sfd sources if they use fontforge See Fedora fonts ml. http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font.spec http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font-1.00-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:45:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131745.m9DHjXpT003636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |jonstanley at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 13:45:32 EDT --- The reviewer part is done please close the bug when you've finished all the initial import actions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132038.m9DKcAoC013295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 16:38:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > My version guess is based on output from gnome-font-viewer. > Says: "Version 1.00" Unfortunately since 1.00 is the default in many font creation tools that does not mean anything. Experience shows you can have 6-7 successive font updates that all pretend they are 1.00 :( Unless you've verified with upstream 1.00 is really 1.00, and the next one will be something else, the only safe version to use with fonts that declare themselves as 1.00 is the sfd/ttf file timestamp. > > 2. Please add a fontconfig file as Ankur suggested. Since unikurd covers > > unicode blocks Behdad is interested in, I think it shouldn't be too hard to get > > him to help you (I doubt he wants you to stomp on farsi) > > ? add some fontconfig rules > I am somewhat busy at the moment, this might take me some time, but I am > definitely for have it packed. Ok, I guess this is not a blocker but it would be really nice to have. > > Non blocking remarks > > > > 1. please have upstream add the GPL font exception to their font > > See Fedora fonts ml. Just pinged them. > > > 2. please have upstream provide sfd sources if they use fontforge > > See Fedora fonts ml. This was just to trace it :) You've done it publicly and that's very good. > > http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font.spec Ok, some more nitpicking: please use %defattr(644,root,root,755) So: 1. fix the version 2. use %defattr(644,root,root,755) 3. add fontconfig rules (this can wait after import) 4. continue to ask to GPL exception and sfds But in the meanwhile the package is APPROVED. Thank you for your persistence. You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now. Please don't forget the comps and wiki bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:04:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132104.m9DL4xM3016451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |mnowak at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:04:58 EDT --- Everything is in your hands Michal now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132112.m9DLCHxe021617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #311102|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #319715|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:12:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320232) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320232) Kill conf.avail stuff Thank you for being reactive. Unfortunately that means the use of conf.avail is far too premature (the guideline change process has uncovered problems that won't be fixed short-term) Please apply this patch to use strict guidelines fontconfig install in the meanwhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132130.m9DLUVQn023142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |smallvil at get9.net Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #36 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:30:30 EDT --- Dennis, from now on everything is in your hands -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132127.m9DLRlP3025189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:27:46 EDT --- 1. Anyway, if you revert the conf.avail stuff the package is APPROVED. You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now. Please don't forget the comps and wiki bits. 2. Please apply whatever fixes are relevant to the un-core-fonts packages. If un-core-fonts extra fontconfig files are 66, that means un-core-fonts fontconfig files probably need to be 65 (and you need to check with Jens Petersen that does not break japanese). Lastly, do continue to ask upstream : 3. to add the FSF font exception to their licensing. 4. to publish sfds This font package was unusually complex. Congratulations on staying with us so far :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:42:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132142.m9DLg9xR028247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:42:08 EDT --- Also please split the package in individual font families. I guess you have a good example in un-extra-fonts now. And you need to ask spot to add the Artistic License 2 to the list of approved Fedora font licenses, though I don't think this will be any problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 00:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465900] Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140034.m9E0YkLb000703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465900 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-13 20:34:45 EDT --- Due to bug #466667, reverted: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66127 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 01:41:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140141.m9E1fiSH015669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Dennis Jang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #37 from Dennis Jang 2008-10-13 21:41:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: un-extra-fonts Short Description: Un Extra families Korean TrueType fonts Owners: smallvil Branches: devel F-9 F-8 InitialCC: smallvil Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140537.m9E5bMGf025456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:37:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 112878] Munhwa CID-keyed fonts are not included In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140537.m9E5b1PJ025373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112878 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-14 01:37:01 EDT --- alee-fonts is also under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From wg at openoffice.org Tue Oct 14 13:56:22 2008 From: wg at openoffice.org (wg at openoffice.org) Date: 14 Oct 2008 13:56:22 -0000 Subject: [Issue 94504] Text in text boxes truncated when printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081014135622.18298.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94504 User wg changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|graphicsneedsconfirm |af -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed| |1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target milestone|--- |OOo Later -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from wg at openoffice.org Tue Oct 14 13:56:21 +0000 2008 ------- Reproducible. Reassigned. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141649.m9EGnFEM003603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-14 12:49:14 EDT --- http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141652.m9EGqjiw008570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-14 12:52:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unikurd-web-font Short Description: A widely used Kurdish font Owners: mnowak Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 04:02:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150402.m9F42Mit020104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 --- Comment #1 from Dennis Jang 2008-10-15 00:02:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/un-fonts/core/0.6/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/un-fonts/core/0.6/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.src.rpm - fixed subpackage description and fontconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463036] LiberationSans-Bold 'u' and 'W' blurred in smaller sizes. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150605.m9F65sb8013212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Bold u renders badly |LiberationSans-Bold 'u' and |(blurry) for liberation |'W' blurred in smaller |sans, w too to a smaller |sizes. |extent | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From smallvil at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 15 06:08:25 2008 From: smallvil at fedoraproject.org (Dennis Jang) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/devel un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 un-core-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081015060825.21E627012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: smallvil Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13174/devel Modified Files: import.log un-core-fonts.spec Added Files: un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add fontconfig --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf --- UnBatang serif serif UnBatang --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnBatangBold serif serif UnBatangBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaru fantasy fantasy UnDinaru --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaruBold fantasy fantasy UnDinaruBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaruLight fantasy fantasy UnDinaruLight --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf --- UnDotum sans-serif sans-serif UnDotum --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnDotumBold sans-serif sans-serif UnDotumBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf --- UnGraphic sans-serif sans-serif UnGraphic --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnGraphicBold sans-serif sans-serif UnGraphicBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf --- UnGungseo cursive cursive UnGungseo --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf --- UnPilgi script script UnPilgi --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf --- UnPilgiBold script script UnPilgiBold Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 25 Aug 2008 06:24:04 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Oct 2008 06:07:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ un-core-fonts-1_0_2-0_5_080608_fc10:HEAD:un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.5.080608.fc10.src.rpm:1219645438 +un-core-fonts-1_0_2-0_6_080608_fc9:HEAD:un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9.src.rpm:1224050940 Index: un-core-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel/un-core-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- un-core-fonts.spec 25 Aug 2008 06:24:04 -0000 1.1 +++ un-core-fonts.spec 15 Oct 2008 06:07:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,99 +1,279 @@ %define fontname un-core -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}/ +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/ + %define archivename un-fonts-core %define alphatag 080608 -Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 1.0.2 -Release: 0.5.%{alphatag}%{?dist} -Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? -Group: User Interface/X -License: GPLv2 -URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ -Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +%define common_desc_en \ +The UN set of Korean TrueType fonts is derived from the HLaTeX Type1 fonts \ +made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with \ +FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. \ +The Un Core set is composed of: \ +\ +- UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif \ +- UnDinaru, UnDinaruBold, UnDinaruLight: fantasy \ +- UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif \ +- UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style \ +- UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke \ +- UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script \ + +%define common_desc_ko \ +????????? ???????????? HLaTex??????????????? ??????????????? 1998?????? ????????? ???????????????. \ +2003?????? ??????????????? FontForge??? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????. \ +???????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????. \ +\ +Core ??????: \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: serif \ +- ????????????, ??????????????????, ??????????????????: fantasy \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: sans-serif \ +- ????????????, ??????????????????: sans-serif style \ +- ?????????: cursive, brush-stroke \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: script \ + +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 1.0.2 +Release: 0.6.%{alphatag}%{?dist} +Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? + +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2 +URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ +Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz +Source1: %{name}-batang-fontconfig.conf +Source2: %{name}-batangbold-fontconfig.conf +Source3: %{name}-dinaru-fontconfig.conf +Source4: %{name}-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf +Source5: %{name}-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf +Source6: %{name}-dotum-fontconfig.conf +Source7: %{name}-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf +Source8: %{name}-graphic-fontconfig.conf +Source9: %{name}-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf +Source10: %{name}-gungseo-fontconfig.conf +Source11: %{name}-pilgi-fontconfig.conf +Source12: %{name}-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -%description -This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 -fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with -FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. - -Core families (9 fonts) -- UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif -- UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif -- UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style -- UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script -- UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke +BuildArch: noarch + + +%define un_subpkg() \ +%package %1 \ +Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %2) \ +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %3) \ +Group: User Interface/X \ +\ +\ +%post %1 \ +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi \ +\ +\ +%postun %1 \ +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi\ +\ +\ +%files %1 \ +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) \ +%doc COPYING README \ +\ +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \ +\ +%dir %{fontdir} \ +%{fontdir}%(echo %2)*.ttf + +%un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? +%un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ??????????????? +%un_subpkg dinaru UnDinaru ???????????? +%un_subpkg dinarubold UnDinaruBold ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg dinarulight UnDinaruLight ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg dotum UnDotum ????????? +%un_subpkg dotumbold UnDotumBold ??????????????? +%un_subpkg graphic UnGraphic ???????????? +%un_subpkg graphicbold UnGraphicBold ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg gungseo UnGungseo ????????? +%un_subpkg pilgi UnPilgi ????????? +%un_subpkg pilgibold UnPilgiBold ??????????????? -Install un-extra-fonts for additional fonts. + +%description +%common_desc_en %description -l ko -????????? ???????????? HLaTex??????????????? ??????????????? 1998?????? ????????? ???????????????. -2003?????? ??????????????? FontForge??? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????. -???????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????. - -Core ?????? (9??????) -- ?????????, ???????????????: serif -- ?????????, ???????????????: sans-serif -- ????????????, ??????????????????: sans-serif style -- ?????????, ???????????????: script -- ?????????: cursive, brush-stroke +%common_desc_ko -??????????????? un-extra-fonts??? ?????? ??? ??? ????????????. +%description batang +%common_desc_en +This package includes UnBatang, a serif font. + +%description -l ko batang +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description batangbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnBatangBold, a serif font. + +%description -l ko batangbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dinaru +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaru, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinaru +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. +%description dinarubold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaruBold, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinarubold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dinarulight +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaruLight, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinarulight +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dotum +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko dotum +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dotumbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko dotumbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description graphic +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGraphic, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko graphic +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description graphicbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGraphicBold, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko graphicbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description gungseo +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGungseo, a cursive font. + +%description -l ko gungseo +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description pilgi +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnPilgi, a script font. + +%description -l ko pilgi +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description pilgibold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnPilgiBold, a script font. + +%description -l ko pilgibold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%define un_subpkg() \ -%package %1\ -Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/")\ -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %2)\ -Group: User Interface/X\ -\ -%description %1\ -This package provides the Un Core %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") fonts.\ -\ -%description -l ko %1\ -????????? Core ????????? %(echo %2)?????????.\ -\ -%files %1\ -%defattr(-,root,root,-)\ -%doc COPYING README\ -%dir %{fontdir}/\ -%{fontdir}/Un%(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/")*.ttf - -%un_subpkg batang ?????? -%un_subpkg dinaru ????????? -%un_subpkg dotum ?????? -%un_subpkg graphic ????????? -%un_subpkg gungseo ?????? -%un_subpkg pilgi ?????? %prep %setup -q -n un-fonts + %build + %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} + +install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -pm 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} + +install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batang.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batangbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE3}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinaru.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE4}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarubold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE5}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarulight.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE6}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotum.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE7}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotumbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE8}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphic.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE9}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphicbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE10}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-gungseo.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE11}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgi.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE12}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgibold.conf -install -dm 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -pm 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi %changelog +* Tue Oct 14 2008 Dennis Jang - 1.0.2-0.6.080608 +- fixed subpackage description and fontconfig. + * Wed Jul 16 2008 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.5.080608 - add subpackages with a macro From smallvil at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 15 06:15:01 2008 From: smallvil at fedoraproject.org (Dennis Jang) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/F-9 un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 un-core-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081015061501.827C77012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: smallvil Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17816/F-9 Modified Files: import.log un-core-fonts.spec Added Files: un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add fontconfig --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf --- UnBatang serif serif UnBatang --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnBatangBold serif serif UnBatangBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaru fantasy fantasy UnDinaru --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaruBold fantasy fantasy UnDinaruBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaruLight fantasy fantasy UnDinaruLight --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf --- UnDotum sans-serif sans-serif UnDotum --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnDotumBold sans-serif sans-serif UnDotumBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf --- UnGraphic sans-serif sans-serif UnGraphic --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnGraphicBold sans-serif sans-serif UnGraphicBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf --- UnGungseo cursive cursive UnGungseo --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf --- UnPilgi script script UnPilgi --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf --- UnPilgiBold script script UnPilgiBold Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-9/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 25 Aug 2008 05:51:05 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Oct 2008 06:14:30 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ un-core-fonts-1_0_2-0_5_080608_fc9:F-9:un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.5.080608.fc9.src.rpm:1219643430 +un-core-fonts-1_0_2-0_6_080608_fc9:F-9:un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9.src.rpm:1224051348 Index: un-core-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-9/un-core-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- un-core-fonts.spec 25 Aug 2008 05:51:05 -0000 1.1 +++ un-core-fonts.spec 15 Oct 2008 06:14:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,99 +1,279 @@ %define fontname un-core -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}/ +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/ + %define archivename un-fonts-core %define alphatag 080608 -Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 1.0.2 -Release: 0.5.%{alphatag}%{?dist} -Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? -Group: User Interface/X -License: GPLv2 -URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ -Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +%define common_desc_en \ +The UN set of Korean TrueType fonts is derived from the HLaTeX Type1 fonts \ +made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with \ +FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. \ +The Un Core set is composed of: \ +\ +- UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif \ +- UnDinaru, UnDinaruBold, UnDinaruLight: fantasy \ +- UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif \ +- UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style \ +- UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke \ +- UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script \ + +%define common_desc_ko \ +????????? ???????????? HLaTex??????????????? ??????????????? 1998?????? ????????? ???????????????. \ +2003?????? ??????????????? FontForge??? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????. \ +???????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????. \ +\ +Core ??????: \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: serif \ +- ????????????, ??????????????????, ??????????????????: fantasy \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: sans-serif \ +- ????????????, ??????????????????: sans-serif style \ +- ?????????: cursive, brush-stroke \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: script \ + +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 1.0.2 +Release: 0.6.%{alphatag}%{?dist} +Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? + +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2 +URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ +Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz +Source1: %{name}-batang-fontconfig.conf +Source2: %{name}-batangbold-fontconfig.conf +Source3: %{name}-dinaru-fontconfig.conf +Source4: %{name}-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf +Source5: %{name}-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf +Source6: %{name}-dotum-fontconfig.conf +Source7: %{name}-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf +Source8: %{name}-graphic-fontconfig.conf +Source9: %{name}-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf +Source10: %{name}-gungseo-fontconfig.conf +Source11: %{name}-pilgi-fontconfig.conf +Source12: %{name}-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -%description -This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 -fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with -FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. - -Core families (9 fonts) -- UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif -- UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif -- UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style -- UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script -- UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke +BuildArch: noarch + + +%define un_subpkg() \ +%package %1 \ +Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %2) \ +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %3) \ +Group: User Interface/X \ +\ +\ +%post %1 \ +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi \ +\ +\ +%postun %1 \ +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi\ +\ +\ +%files %1 \ +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) \ +%doc COPYING README \ +\ +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \ +\ +%dir %{fontdir} \ +%{fontdir}%(echo %2)*.ttf + +%un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? +%un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ??????????????? +%un_subpkg dinaru UnDinaru ???????????? +%un_subpkg dinarubold UnDinaruBold ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg dinarulight UnDinaruLight ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg dotum UnDotum ????????? +%un_subpkg dotumbold UnDotumBold ??????????????? +%un_subpkg graphic UnGraphic ???????????? +%un_subpkg graphicbold UnGraphicBold ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg gungseo UnGungseo ????????? +%un_subpkg pilgi UnPilgi ????????? +%un_subpkg pilgibold UnPilgiBold ??????????????? -Install un-extra-fonts for additional fonts. + +%description +%common_desc_en %description -l ko -????????? ???????????? HLaTex??????????????? ??????????????? 1998?????? ????????? ???????????????. -2003?????? ??????????????? FontForge??? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????. -???????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????. - -Core ?????? (9??????) -- ?????????, ???????????????: serif -- ?????????, ???????????????: sans-serif -- ????????????, ??????????????????: sans-serif style -- ?????????, ???????????????: script -- ?????????: cursive, brush-stroke +%common_desc_ko -??????????????? un-extra-fonts??? ?????? ??? ??? ????????????. +%description batang +%common_desc_en +This package includes UnBatang, a serif font. + +%description -l ko batang +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description batangbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnBatangBold, a serif font. + +%description -l ko batangbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dinaru +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaru, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinaru +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. +%description dinarubold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaruBold, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinarubold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dinarulight +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaruLight, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinarulight +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dotum +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko dotum +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dotumbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko dotumbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description graphic +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGraphic, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko graphic +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description graphicbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGraphicBold, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko graphicbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description gungseo +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGungseo, a cursive font. + +%description -l ko gungseo +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description pilgi +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnPilgi, a script font. + +%description -l ko pilgi +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description pilgibold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnPilgiBold, a script font. + +%description -l ko pilgibold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%define un_subpkg() \ -%package %1\ -Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/")\ -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %2)\ -Group: User Interface/X\ -\ -%description %1\ -This package provides the Un Core %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") fonts.\ -\ -%description -l ko %1\ -????????? Core ????????? %(echo %2)?????????.\ -\ -%files %1\ -%defattr(-,root,root,-)\ -%doc COPYING README\ -%dir %{fontdir}/\ -%{fontdir}/Un%(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/")*.ttf - -%un_subpkg batang ?????? -%un_subpkg dinaru ????????? -%un_subpkg dotum ?????? -%un_subpkg graphic ????????? -%un_subpkg gungseo ?????? -%un_subpkg pilgi ?????? %prep %setup -q -n un-fonts + %build + %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} + +install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -pm 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} + +install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batang.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batangbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE3}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinaru.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE4}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarubold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE5}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarulight.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE6}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotum.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE7}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotumbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE8}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphic.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE9}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphicbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE10}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-gungseo.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE11}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgi.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE12}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgibold.conf -install -dm 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -pm 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi %changelog +* Tue Oct 14 2008 Dennis Jang - 1.0.2-0.6.080608 +- fixed subpackage description and fontconfig. + * Wed Jul 16 2008 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.5.080608 - add subpackages with a macro From smallvil at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 15 06:23:08 2008 From: smallvil at fedoraproject.org (Dennis Jang) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/F-8 un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 un-core-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20081015062308.DD4557012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: smallvil Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23413/F-8 Modified Files: import.log un-core-fonts.spec Added Files: un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf Log Message: add fontconfig --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-batang-fontconfig.conf --- UnBatang serif serif UnBatang --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-batangbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnBatangBold serif serif UnBatangBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinaru-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaru fantasy fantasy UnDinaru --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaruBold fantasy fantasy UnDinaruBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf --- UnDinaruLight fantasy fantasy UnDinaruLight --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dotum-fontconfig.conf --- UnDotum sans-serif sans-serif UnDotum --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnDotumBold sans-serif sans-serif UnDotumBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-graphic-fontconfig.conf --- UnGraphic sans-serif sans-serif UnGraphic --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf --- UnGraphicBold sans-serif sans-serif UnGraphicBold --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-gungseo-fontconfig.conf --- UnGungseo cursive cursive UnGungseo --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-pilgi-fontconfig.conf --- UnPilgi script script UnPilgi --- NEW FILE un-core-fonts-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf --- UnPilgiBold script script UnPilgiBold Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-8/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 25 Aug 2008 06:27:17 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Oct 2008 06:22:35 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ un-core-fonts-1_0_2-0_5_080608_fc9:F-8:un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.5.080608.fc9.src.rpm:1219645645 +un-core-fonts-1_0_2-0_6_080608_fc9:F-8:un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9.src.rpm:1224051827 Index: un-core-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-8/un-core-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- un-core-fonts.spec 25 Aug 2008 06:27:17 -0000 1.1 +++ un-core-fonts.spec 15 Oct 2008 06:22:38 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,99 +1,279 @@ %define fontname un-core -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}/ +%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/ + %define archivename un-fonts-core %define alphatag 080608 -Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 1.0.2 -Release: 0.5.%{alphatag}%{?dist} -Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? -Group: User Interface/X -License: GPLv2 -URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ -Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +%define common_desc_en \ +The UN set of Korean TrueType fonts is derived from the HLaTeX Type1 fonts \ +made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with \ +FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. \ +The Un Core set is composed of: \ +\ +- UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif \ +- UnDinaru, UnDinaruBold, UnDinaruLight: fantasy \ +- UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif \ +- UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style \ +- UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke \ +- UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script \ + +%define common_desc_ko \ +????????? ???????????? HLaTex??????????????? ??????????????? 1998?????? ????????? ???????????????. \ +2003?????? ??????????????? FontForge??? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????. \ +???????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????. \ +\ +Core ??????: \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: serif \ +- ????????????, ??????????????????, ??????????????????: fantasy \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: sans-serif \ +- ????????????, ??????????????????: sans-serif style \ +- ?????????: cursive, brush-stroke \ +- ?????????, ???????????????: script \ + +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 1.0.2 +Release: 0.6.%{alphatag}%{?dist} +Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? + +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2 +URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ +Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz +Source1: %{name}-batang-fontconfig.conf +Source2: %{name}-batangbold-fontconfig.conf +Source3: %{name}-dinaru-fontconfig.conf +Source4: %{name}-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf +Source5: %{name}-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf +Source6: %{name}-dotum-fontconfig.conf +Source7: %{name}-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf +Source8: %{name}-graphic-fontconfig.conf +Source9: %{name}-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf +Source10: %{name}-gungseo-fontconfig.conf +Source11: %{name}-pilgi-fontconfig.conf +Source12: %{name}-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -%description -This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 -fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with -FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. - -Core families (9 fonts) -- UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif -- UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif -- UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style -- UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script -- UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke +BuildArch: noarch + + +%define un_subpkg() \ +%package %1 \ +Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %2) \ +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %3) \ +Group: User Interface/X \ +\ +\ +%post %1 \ +if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi \ +\ +\ +%postun %1 \ +if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ +fi\ +\ +\ +%files %1 \ +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) \ +%doc COPYING README \ +\ +%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \ +\ +%dir %{fontdir} \ +%{fontdir}%(echo %2)*.ttf + +%un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? +%un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ??????????????? +%un_subpkg dinaru UnDinaru ???????????? +%un_subpkg dinarubold UnDinaruBold ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg dinarulight UnDinaruLight ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg dotum UnDotum ????????? +%un_subpkg dotumbold UnDotumBold ??????????????? +%un_subpkg graphic UnGraphic ???????????? +%un_subpkg graphicbold UnGraphicBold ?????????????????? +%un_subpkg gungseo UnGungseo ????????? +%un_subpkg pilgi UnPilgi ????????? +%un_subpkg pilgibold UnPilgiBold ??????????????? -Install un-extra-fonts for additional fonts. + +%description +%common_desc_en %description -l ko -????????? ???????????? HLaTex??????????????? ??????????????? 1998?????? ????????? ???????????????. -2003?????? ??????????????? FontForge??? ???????????? ????????????????????? ??????????????????. -???????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????. - -Core ?????? (9??????) -- ?????????, ???????????????: serif -- ?????????, ???????????????: sans-serif -- ????????????, ??????????????????: sans-serif style -- ?????????, ???????????????: script -- ?????????: cursive, brush-stroke +%common_desc_ko -??????????????? un-extra-fonts??? ?????? ??? ??? ????????????. +%description batang +%common_desc_en +This package includes UnBatang, a serif font. + +%description -l ko batang +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description batangbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnBatangBold, a serif font. + +%description -l ko batangbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dinaru +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaru, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinaru +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. +%description dinarubold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaruBold, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinarubold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dinarulight +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDinaruLight, a fantasy font. + +%description -l ko dinarulight +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dotum +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko dotum +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description dotumbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko dotumbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description graphic +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGraphic, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko graphic +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description graphicbold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGraphicBold, a sans-serif font. + +%description -l ko graphicbold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description gungseo +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnGungseo, a cursive font. + +%description -l ko gungseo +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description pilgi +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnPilgi, a script font. + +%description -l ko pilgi +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. + +%description pilgibold +%common_desc_en + +This package includes UnPilgiBold, a script font. + +%description -l ko pilgibold +%common_desc_ko + +??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%define un_subpkg() \ -%package %1\ -Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/")\ -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %2)\ -Group: User Interface/X\ -\ -%description %1\ -This package provides the Un Core %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") fonts.\ -\ -%description -l ko %1\ -????????? Core ????????? %(echo %2)?????????.\ -\ -%files %1\ -%defattr(-,root,root,-)\ -%doc COPYING README\ -%dir %{fontdir}/\ -%{fontdir}/Un%(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/")*.ttf - -%un_subpkg batang ?????? -%un_subpkg dinaru ????????? -%un_subpkg dotum ?????? -%un_subpkg graphic ????????? -%un_subpkg gungseo ?????? -%un_subpkg pilgi ?????? %prep %setup -q -n un-fonts + %build + %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} + +install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -pm 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} + +install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batang.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batangbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE3}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinaru.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE4}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarubold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE5}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarulight.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE6}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotum.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE7}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotumbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE8}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphic.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE9}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphicbold.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE10}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-gungseo.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE11}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgi.conf +install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE12}\ + %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgibold.conf -install -dm 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -pm 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : -fi %changelog +* Tue Oct 14 2008 Dennis Jang - 1.0.2-0.6.080608 +- fixed subpackage description and fontconfig. + * Wed Jul 16 2008 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.5.080608 - add subpackages with a macro From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463036] LiberationSans-Bold 'u' and 'W' blurred in smaller sizes. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150629.m9F6TSZh016297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Flag| |needinfo?(saurabh at hotmail.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-15 02:29:26 EDT --- Hi Need Real Name, Ran fontforge and made a testing fix: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.92.devel.tar.gz https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.92.devel.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150956.m9F9uwZO030537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #38 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 05:56:58 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150957.m9F9vQIZ000931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 15 14:11:06 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:11:06 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151411.m9FEB6HL022753@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #169 from Martijn Wargers (Mozilla QA) (IRC: mw22) 2008-10-15 07:09:58 PDT --- Shouldn't this bug be marked fixed now that it seems to be working now in current trunk build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 15 14:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:23:10 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151423.m9FENAQO012753@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #170 from John Daggett (:jtd) 2008-10-15 07:22:05 PDT --- (In reply to comment #169) > Shouldn't this bug be marked fixed now that it seems to be working now in > current trunk build? The depends list still has a bunch of bugs that need to be fixed before this is considered done. Mainly things like Linux support, .otf support on Windows, use of access control headers, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151702.m9FH2uEi002405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:02:55 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:40:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151740.m9FHelwZ011457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:40:46 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151704.m9FH43ck005744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:04:02 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151742.m9FHg1bQ014549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:42:01 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:50:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151650.m9FGov62002919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-15 12:50:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 04:33:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160433.m9G4XwG3032151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Dennis Jang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160605.m9G65UkE013154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-16 02:05:29 EDT --- I see you added fontconfig .conf files. Nicolas, dunno if you want to review those? Dennis: Nicolas was asking for fc-cache scripting for the subpackages: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Fonts it may be even better documented in the fonts packaging guidelines. (Same goes for un-extra-fonts.) ps You don't need to post changes for review after a package has been approved, though sometimes it is useful. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160605.m9G65qkm013271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160614.m9G6EXtp013654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-16 02:14:32 EDT --- > The correct upstream name is Old Standard That is not a valid package name. :) > However upstream has asked us to rename if we rebuilt from sfds > I guess 69oldstandard is as good as any renaming (though I'd have used > 69-old-standard-fonts) I assumed that meant the name of the Fonts not the package itself? The 69 is meaningless to me: as far as I can tell it is just an erroneous prefix coming from the fontconfig conf file priortity?? (I might be almost tempted to suggest then let's not bother to rebuild, but anyway.) old-standard-sfd-fonts, anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160628.m9G6SPLF015644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-16 02:28:24 EDT --- Well there is VLGothic-fonts (and plenty of other mixed case packages in the distro), but I won't fight too much. Though IMHO case in tarball names is generally worth respecting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160643.m9G6hnPT017768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-16 02:43:48 EDT --- I added it to comps-f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Oct 16 16:52:40 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:52:40 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161652.m9GGqeXB005341@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eshepherd at mozilla.com --- Comment #171 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd 2008-10-16 09:51:44 PDT --- Does our implementation handle the entire spec at this point? Currently the doc only covers absolute basics (font-family and src, with no descriptors), and I want to be sure it covers everything we support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161740.m9GHeqkN018730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-16 13:40:52 EDT --- Sorry I meant there https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:39:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161739.m9GHdCJ2018306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-16 13:39:10 EDT --- The scriplets are the same for subpackages as for plain packages and they're described there https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 (official location locked by FPC even I can't change without approval) When you do subpackages you need to be careful to have each subpackage run the scriplets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162027.m9GKRFGv021945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #26 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-16 16:27:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320606) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320606) another sample - this time xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-27.fc10.x86_64 driver With an update to xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-27.fc10.x86_64 a damage seems to shift a bit but it does not disappear. On the attached sample look at "2", "L", "Y" and "s". This is with "Best contrast". Trying this with "Subpixel smoothing" makes it much worse. Hinting seems to revert to "Full" does not matter how else I attempt to set it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:33:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170433.m9H4XlPZ029901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Blocks| |465130 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2008-10-17 00:33:46 EDT --- Behdad, should we take this patch for F10 ? Or are you still holding out for a fontconfig release ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:24:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172024.m9HKOTuA006701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 17:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181733.m9IHX040000617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-18 13:32:59 EDT --- well it would be nice if the conf.avail stuff was arbitrated first -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 18:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181802.m9II2q6J001917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2008-10-18 14:02:52 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=887703 rufscript-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 21:08:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182108.m9IL8RQO027673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2008-10-18 17:08:27 EDT --- I don't see how conf.avail should block our Indic users from having proper fonts in F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 10:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191034.m9JAY715011624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-19 06:34:06 EDT --- fontforge reports too much errors/warnings with exporting ttf. probably Sazanami fonts has underlying problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201217.m9KCHj2u020335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #27 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-20 08:17:44 EDT --- If it's a radeon HDxxxx card, could you try with the radeonhd driver? Just curious if it makes a difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] New: Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (?) at 8pt and 10pt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 Summary: Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse (?) at 8pt and 10pt Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: atorkhov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Cyrillic letter small tse (?, U+0446) is wrongly rendered at 8pt and 10pt - it misses a "tail" at bottom right. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dejavu-fonts-2.24-3.fc9.noarch freetype-2.3.5-6.fc9.x86_64 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open DejaVu Sans in charmap. 2. Select 8pt or 10pt size. 3. Look at ? (U+0446). Actual results: No tail. Expected results: With tail. Additional info: This is font and size of default installation and is quite annoying as is in such way letter is hard to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:13:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201813.m9KIDd5Z021648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #28 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-20 14:13:38 EDT --- The radeon card in question happens to be "ATI Technologies Inc R300 AD [Radeon 9500 Pro]". It does not work with radeonhd. Documentation says so but just in case I tried and documentation is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 19:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201908.m9KJ8NSW000443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #29 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-20 15:08:22 EDT --- I am afraid that a damage I am observing shifts. Sometimes it is rather subtle, and I have to search for it, other times it will be blunt "up in your face". For example, after the last round up updates to 20081020 set, which brought a new kernel, mesa packages, xorg-x11-drv-ati, xorg-x11-server-common and xorg-x11-server-Xorg, after a reboot I can see an extra pixel left of "l" and something eaten in "@". Also changing font scaling may change what is wrong or even "fix" everything. So, contrary to the original subject of this report, troubles may started earlier than 20081007 and I simply missed it. I cannot be even sure now how much earlier as on a casual glance everything may look normal. The only thing which remains constant is that if I will boot, on the same machine, either Fedora 9 or Fedora 8 or CentOS 5.2 then I cannot find any traces of misrendered fonts and I really tried. Making "Rendering" into "Monochrome" in "Appearance Preferences" does "fix", in a sense, all described troubles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 20 22:59:11 2008 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch, NONE, 1.1 fontconfig.spec, 1.108, 1.109 Message-ID: <20081020225911.74C20700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26277 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Added Files: fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch Log Message: * Mon Oct 20 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.0-3 - Add fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch - Resolves: #464470 fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch: --- NEW FILE fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch --- --- conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf 2008-05-04 08:06:25.000000000 +0530 +++ conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf.new 2008-09-26 17:38:38.000000000 +0530 @@ -49,9 +49,16 @@ Lohit Bengali Lohit Gujarati Lohit Hindi + Lohit Marathi + Lohit Maithili + Lohit Kashmiri + Lohit Konkani + Lohit Nepali + Lohit Sindhi Lohit Punjabi Lohit Tamil - Lohit Malayalam + Meera + Lohit Malayalam Lohit Kannada Lohit Telugu Lohit Oriya @@ -111,8 +118,15 @@ Lohit Bengali Lohit Gujarati Lohit Hindi + Lohit Marathi + Lohit Maithili + Lohit Kashmiri + Lohit Konkani + Lohit Nepali + Lohit Sindhi Lohit Punjabi Lohit Tamil + Meera Lohit Malayalam Lohit Kannada Lohit Telugu @@ -153,13 +167,20 @@ Lohit Bengali Lohit Gujarati Lohit Hindi + Lohit Marathi + Lohit Maithili + Lohit Kashmiri + Lohit Konkani + Lohit Nepali + Lohit Sindhi Lohit Punjabi - Lohit Tamil - Lohit Malayalam - Lohit Kannada - Lohit Telugu - Lohit Oriya - LKLUG + Lohit Tamil + Meera + Lohit Malayalam + Lohit Kannada + Lohit Telugu + Lohit Oriya + LKLUG Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.108 retrieving revision 1.109 diff -u -r1.108 -r1.109 --- fontconfig.spec 1 Jun 2008 04:01:12 -0000 1.108 +++ fontconfig.spec 20 Oct 2008 22:58:41 -0000 1.109 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig Version: 2.6.0 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ # reference the new path in %%configure Conflicts: fonts-xorg-base, fonts-xorg-syriac +Patch0: fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch + %description Fontconfig is designed to locate fonts within the system and select them according to requirements specified by @@ -44,6 +46,7 @@ %prep %setup -q +%patch0 -p0 -b .indic %build @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon Oct 20 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.0-3 +- Add fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch +- Resolves: #464470 + * Sat Jun 01 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.0-2 - Fix build. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 23:07:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464470] New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202307.m9KN7kQ1011942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-10-20 19:07:45 EDT --- Built 2.6.0-3.fc10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 21 02:27:45 2008 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.80, 1.81 pango.spec, 1.146, 1.147 sources, 1.80, 1.81 Message-ID: <20081021022745.1065A700FA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7442 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.22.1 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.80 retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -r1.80 -r1.81 --- .cvsignore 22 Sep 2008 23:55:01 -0000 1.80 +++ .cvsignore 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.22.0.tar.bz2 +pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.146 retrieving revision 1.147 diff -u -r1.146 -r1.147 --- pango.spec 23 Sep 2008 02:52:23 -0000 1.146 +++ pango.spec 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.147 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.22.0 -Release: 1.1%{?dist} +Version: 1.22.1 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.22/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ %changelog +* Mon Oct 20 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.1-1 +- Update to 1.22.1 + * Mon Sep 22 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.22.0-1.1 - Rebuild against cairo 1.7.6 - Update cairo and glib required versions Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.80 retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -r1.80 -r1.81 --- sources 22 Sep 2008 23:55:01 -0000 1.80 +++ sources 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 @@ -1 +1 @@ -37a185a3cb5c1a39ade7fdc3e6c75349 pango-1.22.0.tar.bz2 +654ad7e8d414d36a0e0406935d32c3ab pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2 From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Oct 21 11:53:56 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:53:56 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211153.m9LBrupk014468@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #342841|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #344063| |review?(roc at ocallahan.org) Flag| | --- Comment #8 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-10-21 04:53:18 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=344063) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=344063) font selection in Mozilla's PangoFcFontMap 1.0 This includes removal of gfxFontconfigUtils::mAliasTable for startup time improvement, as well as tidying up and making things more robust. It feels like jumping through a couple of hoops to use a PangoFcFontMap, but it seems worth it to avoid risks associated with replacing pango_itemize at this stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 18:50:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211850.m9LIoq7f024789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #30 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-21 14:50:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321081) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321081) sample after 20081021 changes With 20081021 round of updates, which includes pango, mesa, various xorg-x11 drivers, glibc and kernel the damage appears to be lessened. With "Best contrast" I have to look for it although it is not that difficult to find. Attatched is some sample (lower case "t") but one can find more with different glyphs. With "Best shapes" this is much easier and with "Subpixel smoothing" still blatantly obvious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:03:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211903.m9LJ3Pmd026737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 Ben Laenen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bl.bugs at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-21 15:03:23 EDT --- The glyph has hinting instructions in DejaVu to make sure the tail always appears. So you're probably using the Freetype autohinter, and hitting a bug in that (fonts don't have control over the autohinter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:10:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211910.m9LJAk0G004410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-21 15:10:45 EDT --- Erm, how to find out, am I using autohinter or not? I'm not using freetype-freeworld from linva, only stock one from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:19:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211919.m9LJJraU006178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #3 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-21 15:19:52 EDT --- Open your character map and look for U+F000 (?) in DejaVu Sans. If it looks like "88" you're using the autohinter. If it has a different number you're using hinting instructions from the font. If you're only using Fedora packages you most likely have the autohinter enabled and the bytecode interpreter for the hinting instructions disabled (because of a patents issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:59:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211959.m9LJxCY1006030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-21 15:59:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Erm, how to find out, am I using autohinter or not? > > I'm not using freetype-freeworld from linva, only stock one from Fedora. If you're using stock Fedora you have the autohinter, which means the bug should be reassigned to freetype (but do the check Ben suggested first) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212006.m9LK6KSL015945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-21 16:06:19 EDT --- Yes, it's 88, so autohinter. Nothing could be fixed in font itself? Reassign to freetype? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 22 00:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:05:02 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220005.m9M052pi014007@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #9 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-10-21 17:04:45 PDT --- + nsTArray mFontSets; This usually contains one element, right? You probably should make it nsAutoTArray. nsStringArray looks a lot worse than nsTArray. I filed bug 461047 on that. + // mLangStrings owns the memory for keys to mBestLangSupportTable and + // mFontsByLang. The language support and the fonts for each lang are in + // separate tables because mFontsByLang is expected to be used only when + // no default fonts support the language. There would be a large number + // of fonts in entries for languages using Latin script but these do not + // need to be created because default fonts already support these + // languages. As we discussed, let's combine the tables into one and just allow the font list to be missing from some entries. Seems like gfxRefPtrWrap should go into XPCOM and be split into "refcounted object" and "custom-destructor object". How about nsRefObj/nsAutoObj? (The template parameter doesn't need to be a pointer, after all --- nsAutoObj would be useful for HDCs, for example). + class familyComparator { + class langComparator : familyComparator { FamilyComparator, LangComparator + if (existingFamilies.Contains(family, familyComparator())) { + continue; + } Doesn't this get a bit slow? Maybe we should make existingFamilies a hash table? + for (PRUint32 l; l < findLangMatch.Length(); ++l) { + for (PRUint32 l; l < findLangMatch.Length(); ++l) { Don't call variables 'l', it's hard to distinguish from '1' + if(FcFontSetAdd(fontSet, font)) { "if (" (3 occurrences) + while (!mFcFontSet) { + if (mHaveFallbackFonts) + return nsnull; + + SortFallbackFonts(); + mHaveFallbackFonts = PR_TRUE; + } Why is this a 'while' and not an 'if'? + gfxRefPtrWrap mSortPattern; + gfxRefPtrWrap mFcFontSet; + gfxRefPtrWrap mCharSet; + nsTArray mFonts; + int mFcFontsTrimmed; + PRPackedBool mHaveFallbackFonts; Comment these please. + if (mFcFontsTrimmed == mFcFontSet->nfont) { + // finished with mFcFontSet + mFcFontSet.Reset(); + mFcFontsTrimmed = 0; Why reset to 0? That just seems confusing. + const cairo_font_options_t *options = + gdk_screen_get_font_options(gdk_screen_get_default()); If we're not compiling with system cairo, this might be a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 22 00:05:40 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:05:40 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220005.m9M05eW5014285@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #10 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-10-21 17:05:26 PDT --- One thing that would help is a big comment somewhere explaining what the overall strategy is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 22 03:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:44:35 -0700 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220344.m9M3iZR6023079@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |461087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 04:20:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220420.m9M4KHDZ021223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #21 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-10-22 00:20:16 EDT --- i am getting confused .. lowercase or tarball name ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221054.m9MAsPZ3021300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 --- Comment #6 from Ben Laenen 2008-10-22 06:54:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Nothing could be fixed in font itself? Indeed, a font can't influence the behaviour of the autohinter in any way. > Reassign to freetype? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:35:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221835.m9MIZm49022908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-22 14:35:46 EDT --- please use arabeyes-thabit-fonts as package name (I'll find some reason to get VLGothic-fonts fixed later :)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222128.m9MLSxxv016689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com Resolution|DUPLICATE |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Lillian Angel 2008-10-22 17:28:58 EDT --- will be in rawhide in the next couple of days. java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462295] fonts package list need to be updated In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231445.m9NEjeAs007195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462295 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Chris Lumens 2008-10-23 10:45:39 EDT --- Finished updating the font list in anaconda. This should be taken care of in the next build, though we still need to look at using the @Fonts group for the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:13:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231613.m9NGD9LY019722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cchance at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, petersen at redhat.com Component|java-1.6.0-openjdk |cjkunifonts AssignedTo|langel at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231618.m9NGIVIH020663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|cjkunifonts |java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |langel at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Lillian Angel 2008-10-23 12:18:30 EDT --- I have fixed this upstream. It will be in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231659.m9NGxxFC003562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #3 from Qiao <29551030 at qq.com> 2008-10-23 12:59:57 EDT --- *** Bug 467558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 04:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240455.m9O4tpWM031489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #4 from Qiao <29551030 at qq.com> 2008-10-24 00:55:50 EDT --- this bug will cause lots of Java application cannot display Chinese(like bug 467558), and I think it is necessary to add a patch to this package if icedtea6 1.4 won't be include in Fedora 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 05:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461039] liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240526.m9O5Qbp7003605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pacho at condmat1.ci | |encias.uniovi.es) --- Comment #13 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-24 01:26:36 EDT --- Hi Pacho, I have updated the liberation-fonts on: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/ (1.04.92.devel) Please feel free to test if you like and let me know. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:24:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241224.m9OCOI40007077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #5 from Lillian Angel 2008-10-24 08:24:18 EDT --- It will be in F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 19:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253951] Tracker: fonts in fonts-* should be moved to own packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241943.m9OJhksd026808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253951 Bug 253951 depends on bug 253149, which changed state. Bug 253149 Summary: fonts-japanese should be renamed to japanese-bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253149 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 21:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242108.m9OL8S4V019793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pablo.martin-gomez at laposte. | |net --- Comment #9 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-10-24 17:08:27 EDT --- As I'm building this package ( I haven't seen this review request), I will help Ankur to pushed it to the official repos. For the name, I approve the "old-standard-sfd-fonts" name (as the author accept that we just put a suffix). For the fontconfig.conf, it's not my cup of tea, so better you follow Nicolas' advices ^^ I propose this spec (http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/oldstandard.spec) to show how to build the font (without changelog nor fontconfig.conf). I choose to build to .ttf as it seems that the font author prefers it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 10:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461039] liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites and gecko-1.8* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251005.m9PA5gAD002374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 Pacho Ramos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 |liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 |have problems with some |have problems with some |websites |websites and gecko-1.8* Flag|needinfo?(pacho at condmat1.ci | |encias.uniovi.es) | --- Comment #14 from Pacho Ramos 2008-10-25 06:05:40 EDT --- It has the same problem (just tested this morning) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 12:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251252.m9PCq4uo004516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk, | |mark at klomp.org Component|java-1.7.0-icedtea |java-1.6.0-openjdk Blocks|235705 |438944 Resolution|RAWHIDE | AssignedTo|fitzsim at redhat.com |langel at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-25 08:52:02 EDT --- Unfortunately it seems everything's not yummy yet firefox-3.0.2-1.fc10.x86_64 java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1:1.6.0.0-1.1.b12.fc10.x86_64 $ firefox http://www.visibone.com/font/FontTest2.html ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() Oct 25, 2008 2:49:17 PM com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile WARNING: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) JNLPRuntime already initialized /usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 29490 Segmentation fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 12:56:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251256.m9PCusmm005630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-25 08:56:53 EDT --- Another font survey applet which is probably using very similar code is http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/AppletTest.shtml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 12:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251258.m9PCwdLF005838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-25 08:58:39 EDT --- $ firefox http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/AppletTest.shtml ICEDTEAPLUGIN_DEBUG = (null) Initializing JVM... NOT IMPLEMENTED: virtual nsresult IcedTeaPluginInstance::Start() Oct 25, 2008 2:57:10 PM com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl getProfile WARNING: "IOP00511201: (INV_OBJREF) IOR must have at least one IIOP profile" org.omg.CORBA.INV_OBJREF: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1201 completed: No at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:473) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.logging.IORSystemException.iorMustHaveIiopProfile(IORSystemException.java:495) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.ior.IORImpl.getProfile(IORImpl.java:334) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:787) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream_1_0.read_Object(CDRInputStream_1_0.java:761) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.encoding.CDRInputStream.read_Object(CDRInputStream.java:231) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.getIORFromString(INSURLOperationImpl.java:120) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.resolver.INSURLOperationImpl.operate(INSURLOperationImpl.java:130) at com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl.string_to_object(ORBImpl.java:836) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.AccessUtil.getRegistryObject(AccessUtil.java:143) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.registerApplication(JavaBridge.java:1099) at org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge.(JavaBridge.java:364) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at java.awt.Toolkit.loadAssistiveTechnologies(Toolkit.java:786) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:874) at java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:1170) at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:400) at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:438) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:384) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:102) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:99) at sun.awt.EmbeddedFrame.(EmbeddedFrame.java:87) at sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame.(XEmbeddedFrame.java:35) at sun.applet.PluginAppletViewer.(PluginAppletViewer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.PluginStreamHandler.(PluginStreamHandler.java:43) at sun.applet.PluginMain.connect(PluginMain.java:101) at sun.applet.PluginMain.(PluginMain.java:83) at sun.applet.PluginMain.main(PluginMain.java:59) Jar string: FontSurveyApplet.jar jars length: 1/usr/lib64/firefox-3.0.2/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 29827 Segmentation fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"} $ JNLPRuntime already initialized -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 17:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455136] no fontconfig file in devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251726.m9PHQW5e013071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455136 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quantumburnz at hotmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #1 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-25 13:26:31 EDT --- The changelog states: * Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-3 - Add fontconfig file (#445136) I just want to confirm this is fixed before I close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455136] no fontconfig file in devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260014.m9Q0EX5S000610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455136 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(jonstanley at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley 2008-10-25 20:14:32 EDT --- Oops, it is. Sorry :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:52:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261052.m9QAq2vN027211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261055.m9QAtFxQ000561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:54:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261054.m9QAslsk032675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 06:54:46 EDT --- Lastly you should not touch the fedora-review flag. Setting it to ? basically means you've committed to reviewing this package, which you can't (since you're the packager), and thus you've deadlocked your own submission. Fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:28:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261128.m9QBSLf7000321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 07:28:20 EDT --- 1. Since Minto Joseph and you are both packaging Hiran's fonts, you should get together and interact with Hiran collectively (see bug #457709). 2. It's not a good idea to keep the versioning in the TTF filename, some apps refer fonts by filename and will get cross with you if it changes every version 3. You should discuss with Minto if you want to adopt a common prefix for your font packages names (for example hiranv-rufscript-fonts and perizia-rufscript-fonts). We've more or less started to do it for big foundries (gfs, sil) and some individual font authors (thibault), it's probably better to generalise the convention to have consistent naming (please subscribe to the fonts SIG list if you haven't done so yet to get informed of packaging convention evolutions) 4. you can drop the -f in the fc-cache invocation for releases ? Fedora 9 ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate 5. Some people want all Fedora-added source files in a package to be prefixed with the package name. You don't follow this convention for your fontconfig file. Please take inspiration from the general packaging guidelines or Minto's package to fix it. ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate ? bug #457709 6. 69 is a bit low, for a latin font like rufscript something between 62 and 64 would be fine ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists 7. Please have upstream publish rufscript in a proper versioned archive with a detached license file you can add in %doc 8. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so they are nicely indented 9. I would have declared rufscript as a cursive font, not a sans-serif one 10. Please add a "Generic name" rule in addition to the "Registering a font in default families" rule ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names This rule is used by fontconfig to complete your font with glyphs from other fonts when it encounters a codepoint your font is missing ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Registering_a_font_in_default_families This rule is used by fontconfig to identify what fonts to use when an application requests a "cursive" font. 11. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases (in the versionned archive you're supposed to request) Despite the long todo list your spec is in good shape overall and it should not take much to get it in a state that can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261131.m9QBVgUC006304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261131.m9QBVPAu000967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:37:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261137.m9QBbF7M007209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 07:37:15 EDT --- Setting needinfo till the requested changes are done. Please remove the flag when the next version of the spec is ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 12:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261226.m9QCQTYI010900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 08:26:27 EDT --- I wanted to wait for a submission with a fixed name, but since I'm doing a font review run today anyway, here is a full review. (on http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/Thabit-fonts-0.02-3.fc9.src.rpm) 1. Please rename package to arabeyes-thabit-fonts 2. You have a typo in Summary 3. Is upstream's URL http://www.arabeyes.org/ or http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot (as referenced in the README) ? 4. Is the description still ok for a Thabit-only package? 5. It's harmless, but a Source2 without Source1 is strange, especially on a new package 6. Please use normal %setup macro in your package. That will simplify the spec a lot (your complex manual unpacking was only necessary because you initially tried to stuff two fonts in a single package) 7. Since upstream uses fontforge for building, please ask upstream to publish sfd sources and build fedora fonts from those sources (we have many packages that do so, for example DejaVu, Liberation, Inconsolata, etc) 8. Some people want all Fedora-added source files in a package to be prefixed with the package name. You don't follow this convention for your fontconfig file. Please use %{name}-fontconfig.conf as suggested by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate 9. I don't know if 65 is the right fontconfig priority for this font. You need to discuss it with Behdad (preferably CC-ing the fedora fonts list) 10. Please only declare thabit-related fontconfig rules in the fontconfig file shipped with the thabit package 11. You probably want a "Generic name" rule in addition to the "Registering a font in default families" rule in your fontconfig file ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names This rule is used by fontconfig to complete your font with glyphs from other fonts when it encounters a codepoint your font is missing ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Registering_a_font_in_default_families This rule is used by fontconfig to identify what fonts to use when an application requests a "cursive" font. 12. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so they are nicely indented with the same rules as other font packages 13. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases (in the versionned source archive you're supposed to request) 14. You can drop the -f flag to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 15. OFL.txt mentions an IBM copyright. Please ask upstream to add a Fontlog.txt to their source release archive (as recommended by SIL for OFL fonts), that clearly identifies what other fonts were used to create this font, so Fedora Legal can check there is no problem 16. Please make sure all the steps up to 2.a (included) have been followed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle In particular we need a wiki page that describes the font to be added to the wiki (for release notes) Well that's a lot of stuff to fix and it's a pity the OLPC folks didn't do a full review before accepting this font package. I'm putting a "NEEDINFO reporter" on this bug and the Mothanna one (since it needs more or less the same fixes). Please remove this flag once you've fixed the previous points. Please don't hesitate to ask questions on the fedora fonts list if there are elements you need help with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 12:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261229.m9QCTT8F011189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 08:29:28 EDT --- Needinfo till a package that conforms to the points listed in bug #461139 is made available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 12:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468580] New: License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468580 Summary: License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295106 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: sergey_feo at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Excuse me for my bad English :-) Description of problem: The Liberation fonts are known to most people as "free" now. But license of Liberation fonts contain some restrictions that makes this fonts not free. Let's see to license of "liberation" fonts - paragraph 5 "Export control": "[...] As required by U.S. law, Client represents and warrants that it: (a) [...]; (b) is not located in a prohibited destination country [...] (currently Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria) [...]". So, please think: Can we say that fonts with such license are free? Hyperbolic variant A: is the font that can not be legally used at California and Columbia free or not free? Hyperbolic variant B: is the font that can be used legally only at Moon free or not free? I understand that Redhat must not break U.S. laws. But it seems that license may not contains such things. Lets see what GNU/FSF writes about it - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html, paragraph below freedoms list: "Thus, you should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to anyone anywhere". And so - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html#exportcontrol: "Sometimes government export control regulations and trade sanctions can constrain your freedom to distribute copies of programs internationally. Software developers do not have the power to eliminate or override these restrictions, but what they can and must do is refuse to impose them as conditions of use of the program. In this way, the restrictions will not affect activities and people outside the jurisdictions of these governments." Please accept this GNU/FSF recommendation and exclude export limitations from license if it is possible. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download archive from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295106 2. Unpack 3. Read file "License.txt", paragraph 5 intently. Imagine that prohibited destination is you home or home of your friend. Actual results: Fonts is not really free. Expected results: Fonts should be free because it was included to Fedora to be free. Additional info: -none- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:03:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261803.m9QI3QpA032710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 14:03:25 EDT --- Ok, I'll take this review 1. Please do not use 69bonvenocf-fonts as package name. Use bonvenocf-fonts or cf-bonveno-fonts (cf-bonveno-fonts is probably better as it will give you a Crude Factory prefix to use with other Crude Factory fonts) 2. Please use install -dm 755 instead of mkdir as suggested by the official spec template 3. You can remove the "for example" comment 4. 69 is a bit low as fontconfig prefix, 64 is probably sufficient for a latin font 5. Use 1.1 as version since upstream provides a nicely versionned archive 6. Since upstream provides sfd sources, please build the ttf from source using fontforge. You have an example of sfd building in bug #467507 for example 7. the font is GPLv2 + font exception (cf README) 8. Why do you want to disable hinting for this font? 9. Why do you want to prepend en to the font? 10. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so they are nicely indented with the same rules as other font packages 11. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases 12. Please fine a way to add Barry Schwartz' name in the summary (flattering font designers is good for our interactions with them) 14. Please update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BonvenoCF_font to remove the font from the wishlist (change the Catzgorization). You should not need packaging powers to do that, just a FAS account All in all, that's not too bad an attempt for a first font package. Fix all this, and I'll sponsor you if that's still needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261810.m9QIAiOt029043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 14:10:43 EDT --- Well, you really need to sed the sfd files too so the font name (as displayed in applications is not Old Standard but Old Standard SFD (or something like this) Appart from that both yours and Ankur's submissions clearly need more baking. Please work together or separately so we have something solid to review (the run of reviews I did today should provide good guidance, just look at them in the fedora-fonts-bugs-list archive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468580] License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261835.m9QIZIHo032539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468580 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:42:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261842.m9QIgoZj001030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 14:42:49 EDT --- also please rename the package sil-gentium-basic-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] New: A bit over-enthusiastic splitting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: A bit over-enthusiastic splitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Summary: A bit over-enthusiastic splitting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil at get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, smallvil at get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 438944 Classification: Fedora While splitting font packages is generally good, separating regular and bold faces of the same font in different packages is a tad over the top. Please keep batang and batang bold in the same package (reiterate for other un core fonts) (at the same time, it's awesome you've managed to package a beast like the un fonts given all the problems you had to solve) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:29:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261929.m9QJTrJW012479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 15:29:52 EDT --- (and same for light when it's available like for dinaru) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270001.m9R01xaQ012943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 20:01:58 EDT --- BTW if you need to see an example of programmaticaly changing a font name at build time, just check how DejaVu does it for DejaVu LGC in its build scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461039] liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites and gecko-1.8* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270015.m9R0FCuQ019537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #15 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-26 20:15:11 EDT --- Hi Pacho, so we might need to move on to xulrunner-1.9 at the moment. How's your findings from users on IRC? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468580] License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270023.m9R0NMNB020442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468580 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-26 20:23:22 EDT --- Reassigning to spot so that Fedora Legal can take care of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 03:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468580] License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270313.m9R3DPYX008052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468580 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-26 23:13:24 EDT --- The version you pulled out of bugzilla is a much older revision. The text you're worried about isn't in the latest version of the Liberation Font license: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/browser/trunk/License.txt Paragraph 5 says (in its entirety): 5. General. If any provision of this agreement is held to be unenforceable, that shall not affect the enforceability of the remaining provisions. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina and of the United States, without regard to any conflict of laws provisions, except that the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods shall not apply. In fact, the wording "destination country" that you quote, never appears in the current license. The only font package that still is under the old license terms seems to be the Fedora 8 package, definitely not rawhide as you've claimed. Closing as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 03:20:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270320.m9R3KHoU009350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |quantumburnz at hotmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #37 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-26 23:20:13 EDT --- My understanding is that this issue is resolved. Please reopen and assign if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271252.m9RCqZvC010804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-27 08:52:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok, I'll take this review > > 1. Please do not use 69bonvenocf-fonts as package name. Use bonvenocf-fonts or > cf-bonveno-fonts (cf-bonveno-fonts is probably better as it will give you a > Crude Factory prefix to use with other Crude Factory fonts) > > 2. Please use install -dm 755 instead of mkdir as suggested by the official > spec template > > 3. You can remove the "for example" comment > > 4. 69 is a bit low as fontconfig prefix, 64 is probably sufficient for a latin > font > > 5. Use 1.1 as version since upstream provides a nicely versionned archive > > 6. Since upstream provides sfd sources, please build the ttf from source using > fontforge. You have an example of sfd building in bug #467507 for example > > 7. the font is GPLv2 + font exception (cf README) > > 8. Why do you want to disable hinting for this font? > > 9. Why do you want to prepend en to the font? > > 10. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so > they are nicely indented with the same rules as other font packages > > 11. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good > idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases > > 12. Please fine a way to add Barry Schwartz' name in the summary (flattering > font designers is good for our interactions with them) > > 14. Please update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BonvenoCF_font to remove the > font from the wishlist (change the Catzgorization). You should not need > packaging powers to do that, just a FAS account > > All in all, that's not too bad an attempt for a first font package. Fix all > this, and I'll sponsor you if that's still needed hi, rebuilt the package with your guidelines, as much as i could understand: SPEC: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm I dint know how to tackle point 8 9 10 I dont think i know enough for sposnorship yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271259.m9RCxqko007484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-27 08:59:51 EDT --- tackled point 8 and 9.. SPEC: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 13:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271316.m9RDGO3F011710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-27 09:16:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > BTW if you need to see an example of programmaticaly changing a font name at > build time, just check how DejaVu does it for DejaVu LGC in its build scripts hi, rebuilt: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 13:42:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271342.m9RDgGpP016334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|langel at redhat.com |dbhole at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 13:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271358.m9RDwFv3023671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 Mark Wielaard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjw at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard 2008-10-27 09:58:14 EDT --- Both these applets worked for me with java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-1.1.b12.fc10.i386 The stack trace suggests there is something wrong with the gnome accessibility java bridge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271442.m9REgaev001476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Component|anaconda |fontconfig AssignedTo|anaconda-maint-list at redhat. |besfahbo at redhat.com |com | --- Comment #4 from Chris Lumens 2008-10-27 10:42:35 EDT --- This happens when running anaconda on a regular system in test mode too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456580] Multiple severe problems with texlive-texfm-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271454.m9REshZR031650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456580 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|438943 | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-27 10:54:42 EDT --- This licensing issue is serious, but it will not be fixed in time for F10. Lifting F10Blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 17:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462531] text of highlighted button in dialog goes black In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271736.m9RHagLx029434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272047.m9RKliJB012586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-27 16:47:43 EDT --- Well they crash reliably there. Maybe that's an x86_64 vs i386 problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:58:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272058.m9RKw2TC008969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #8 from Deepak Bhole 2008-10-27 16:58:02 EDT --- No, it works due to the new Java plugin now being in Fedora. It supports Liveconnect, which is what the Visibone site uses. It should work on 32 and 64-bit systems now. I will close this as soon as I have verified with the new JDK build (currently running). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:21:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272121.m9RLLrpl013437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard 2008-10-27 17:21:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Well they crash reliably there. Maybe that's an x86_64 vs i386 problem? No, I also ran it on an x86_64 system. I suspect there is something different with the setup of the accessibility tools on the systems. It could be that you are still using the old plugin, but it doesn't seem so. Note how it fails while initializing org.GNOME.Accessibility.JavaBridge which tries to use corba to connect to your local orbit to work. Somehow this seems to go wrong. I don't know why though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:31:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461039] liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites and gecko-1.8* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272131.m9RLVc3b020460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #16 from Pacho Ramos 2008-10-27 17:31:37 EDT --- I haven't had much time for finding people on IRC, but I think that this could be closed as there is no problem with xulrunner-1.9 (also, mozilla usually fixes bugs after many time, then, I don't expect to get it fixed in xul-1.8) Do you agree with closing this as it works with xul-1.9? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272142.m9RLgIxH016746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-27 17:42:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I dint know how to tackle point 8 9 10 > > I dont think i know enough for sposnorship yet. Ankur, there's no need to rush, and we'll do it as slowly as you're comfortable with. Baby steps are good. If my requests are difficult to understand there's no shame at all asking for clarifications on the list. Someone else may answer using different words than mine and anyway that creates some on-line documentation for others new packagers (the list is international so no one will object if you have some problems with the pidgin English I use) Likewise, if you find some part of the wiki documentation obscure, just ask for help on the list, and propose a re-wording after you've understood the point. That's another great way to understand packaging and getting sponsored. If you're a bit intimidated by a public mailing list you can exchange private mails with Martin-Gomez Pablo or try to meet in an irc channel. He's also a novice packager, even if he's got a little more experience than you, so you may be a bit more comfortable exchanging tips with him. That being said: You still need to work on 14 8 9 10. Since you've written you've taken care of 8 9 10, you may have uploaded the wrong package version (or I can elaborate if you don't understand those points) 15. Also, you need to Buildrequire fontforge if you use it, otherwise the package won't build in koji or mock. Since you're not sponsored yet you can't test in koji so I strongly suggest installing mock on your system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock) It's a great packager helper. 16. running rpmlint on the result produces those warnings cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1/COPYING cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1/README To fix this warning you need something like for txt in COPYING README ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done (the touch is necessary so you don't end up with new doc timestamps after each builds) You have more complete examples of txt files fixing in the gfs font packages. Just browse some specs there http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ Mostly, we want new packagers to understand why their spec files contain X or Y, not just copy templates blindly, so please DO ask every time you feel you're performing black magic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272149.m9RLnZIU023329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #10 from Deepak Bhole 2008-10-27 17:49:34 EDT --- Ah, weird. I could've sworn I saw it work on 64-bit. I don't have access to a 64-bit box right now, but I will try it there again when I get to the office tomorrow and report accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:54:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272154.m9RLsB1k018693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-27 17:54:10 EDT --- This one is much nicer but you need to work on renaming the font at build time inside the sfds and also to work on the fontconfig rules. Please take some time with Pablo on those. Also it needs the same doc fix as bonveno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 02:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280206.m9S26Wom025712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |69oldstandard-fonts - Old |oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old |Standard Fonts |Standard Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 02:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280241.m9S2fGGm032272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-27 22:41:15 EDT --- Do you think we should make an exception for dotum though since it will pull in another 2.5MB for all users? 4.6M un-core-fonts-dotum-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm 2.5M un-core-fonts-dotumbold-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 03:45:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280345.m9S3jBJd009814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-27 23:45:10 EDT --- I don't like exceptions much, you end up removing them later generally. And I tend to believe that anyone who's actually interested in dotum will want the bold too. I suppose dotum is a special case because want to install korean support for everyone by default, even for people who didn't ask for it (but is it really ok to provide korean without bold when we have it available?). If we're that short of space for F10 you can make it an exception, but IMHO it will end up in the default install set in a few releases anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 08:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280823.m9S8Nnk7027023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard 2008-10-28 04:23:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Ah, weird. I could've sworn I saw it work on 64-bit. I don't have access to a > 64-bit box right now, but I will try it there again when I get to the office > tomorrow and report accordingly. I did run it on a x86_64 box (although against the upstream plugin on f9) and it works. I suspect it isn't something plugin specific but something to do with the gnome java accessibility bridge. Some setup on the reporters machine must trip it up. But if someone could replicate on a f10/rawhide x86_64 setup that would help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:20:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280920.m9S9KXUX031600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281720.m9SHKGeH001289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #14 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-10-28 13:20:15 EDT --- Some comments: 1- When you make a change, you increase the "Dist" number, not the "Version" one's. 2- Paste the following after the "%setup" for i in $(ls OldStandard*.ttf.sfd); do sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/' -e 's/Old Standard TT/Old Standard SFD/' $i; done It's the renaming of the font just before the building. 3- A little improvement to the fontconfig rules, add the following : Old Standard Old Standard SFD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:28:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468580] License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281728.m9SHS4MK002754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468580 --- Comment #3 from sergey 2008-10-28 13:28:04 EDT --- Excuse me for reporting bug for inappropriate fonts version. And thanks for quick detailed answer :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:09:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281809.m9SI9wpW010210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pablo.martin-gomez at laposte. | |net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:17:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281817.m9SIHEA4011657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 00:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290054.m9T0sX9q007716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-28 20:54:32 EDT --- cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-8.fc10 still has conf.avail: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66127 (build) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=792449 (uming info) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=792450 (ukai info) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 29 01:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:03:14 -0700 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290103.m9T13EXZ019144@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 --- Comment #16 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2008-10-28 18:03:07 PDT --- Stuart, can we get a review here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 01:09:38 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.17,1.18 Message-ID: <20081029010938.2E82E70134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19372 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-9.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- cjkunifonts.spec 13 Oct 2008 05:36:43 -0000 1.17 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:09:07 -0000 1.18 @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ %define umingfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming %define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai %define fcdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d -%define fcdiravail %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.avail %define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d @@ -10,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -87,23 +86,13 @@ # fontconfig config files install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir} -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail} for conf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - if [ $conf != %{umingbuilddir}/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf ] - then - cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - %{__ln_s} ../conf.avail/`basename $conf` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ - cd - - fi + install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ done for conf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdiravail}/ - %{__ln_s} ../conf.avail/`basename $conf` $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ - cd - + install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ done # backward compat @@ -174,8 +163,7 @@ %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType %{umingfontdir}/*.ttc -%{fcdiravail}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -202,8 +190,7 @@ %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/TODO %dir %{ukaifontdir} %{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc -%{fcdiravail}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -215,7 +202,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-8.fc10 +* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-9.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 01:16:33 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.18,1.19 Message-ID: <20081029011633.5578B70134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20058 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: retag Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:09:07 -0000 1.18 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:16:02 -0000 1.19 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 9.1%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-9.fc10 +* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-9.1.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 01:19:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290119.m9T1Jpxe020070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 01:25:57 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.19,1.20 Message-ID: <20081029012557.2E0A770134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20999 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: retag as f11 Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.19 -r1.20 --- cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:16:02 -0000 1.19 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:25:26 -0000 1.20 @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 9.1%{?dist} +Release: 9.2%.fc11 +#Release: 9.1%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Mon Oct 13 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-9.1.fc10 +* Wed Oct 29 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-9.2.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 01:27:22 2008 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.20,1.21 Message-ID: <20081029012722.E13F870134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21159 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: correction of retag to f11 Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21 --- cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:25:26 -0000 1.20 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 01:26:52 -0000 1.21 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 9.2%.fc11 +Release: 9.2.fc11 #Release: 9.1%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 01:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290155.m9T1t6Ub025912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-28 21:55:05 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 01:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290156.m9T1uCDC026124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-28 21:56:12 EDT --- Built on rawhide (dist-f11), but need to clone to f10, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 02:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466667] cjkunifont install packages in inexistent directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290201.m9T21Ph9027060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466667 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #7 from Caius CHANCE 2008-10-28 22:01:24 EDT --- Keep opened as f10 is not selectable in bz yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 04:23:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428389] monospace font is strange on gnome-terminal. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290423.m9T4NPRM009165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428389 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 29 04:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:34:11 -0700 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290434.m9T4YB4S012758@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Stuart Parmenter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #339182|review?(pavlov at pavlov.net) |review+ Flag| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 05:42:04 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.15, 1.16 sources, 1.11, 1.12 Message-ID: <20081029054204.B20C770134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5546 Modified Files: .cvsignore VLGothic-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 - update to 20081029 release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- .cvsignore 9 Sep 2008 02:55:11 -0000 1.5 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2008 05:41:33 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ VLGothic-20080624.tar.bz2 VLGothic-20080908.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20081029.tar.bz2 Index: VLGothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel/VLGothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 --- VLGothic-fonts.spec 9 Sep 2008 02:55:11 -0000 1.15 +++ VLGothic-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 05:41:33 -0000 1.16 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20080908 +Version: 20081029 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ %changelog +* Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 +- update to 20081029 release. + * Tue Sep 9 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20080908-1 - update to 20080908 release. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- sources 9 Sep 2008 02:55:11 -0000 1.11 +++ sources 29 Oct 2008 05:41:33 -0000 1.12 @@ -1 +1 @@ -429cd76f7cb6635160da12e28460efef VLGothic-20080908.tar.bz2 +c7ef9b60744cba71b7ea7ff402812f4d VLGothic-20081029.tar.bz2 From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 06:12:58 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.8, 1.9 59-VLGothic-sans.conf, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20081029061258.52C5370134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8483 Modified Files: .cvsignore VLGothic-fonts.spec sources Removed Files: 59-VLGothic-sans.conf Log Message: * Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 - update to 20081029 release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 23 Nov 2006 00:10:23 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2008 06:12:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ VLGothic-20061026.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20081029.tar.bz2 Index: VLGothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9/VLGothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- VLGothic-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2008 06:44:43 -0000 1.12 +++ VLGothic-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 06:12:27 -0000 1.13 @@ -3,18 +3,19 @@ %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20071215 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 20081029 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -Source1: 59-VLGothic-sans.conf +Source1: 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf Source2: 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +# added for f9 can be dropped in f11: Obsoletes: %{name}-monospace < 20071215-2 %description @@ -100,12 +101,25 @@ %files proportional %doc README* LICENSE* %dir %{fontdir}-proportional -%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/59-VLGothic-sans.conf +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/59-VLGothic-proportional.conf %{fontdir}-proportional/VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf %changelog -* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2 +* Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 +- update to 20081029 release. + +* Tue Sep 9 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20080908-1 +- update to 20080908 release. + +* Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080624-1.fc10 +- update to 20080624 release + +* Wed May 7 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080429-1 +- update to 20080429 release +- rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf + +* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2.fc9 - move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage - rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage - use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 12 Jan 2008 02:31:32 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 29 Oct 2008 06:12:27 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -830fe98b9c5ba833e9eab9f6570a0d3c VLGothic-20071215.tar.bz2 +c7ef9b60744cba71b7ea7ff402812f4d VLGothic-20081029.tar.bz2 --- 59-VLGothic-sans.conf DELETED --- From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 06:36:29 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20081029063629.7161770134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9777 Added Files: 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf Log Message: --- NEW FILE 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf --- VL PGothic false sans-serif jp en sans-serif DejaVu Sans VL PGothic From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 29 06:52:03 2008 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-8 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf, 1.1, 1.2 VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.8, 1.9 59-VLGothic-sans.conf, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20081029065203.70DE070134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-8 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11286 Modified Files: .cvsignore 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf VLGothic-fonts.spec sources Added Files: 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf Removed Files: 59-VLGothic-sans.conf Log Message: * Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 - update to 20081029 release. --- NEW FILE 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf --- VL PGothic false sans-serif jp en sans-serif DejaVu Sans VL PGothic Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-8/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 17 Jan 2008 07:36:55 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2008 06:51:33 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ VLGothic-20071215.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20081029.tar.bz2 Index: 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-8/59-VLGothic-monospace.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf 18 Oct 2007 14:28:57 -0000 1.1 +++ 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf 29 Oct 2008 06:51:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -9,20 +9,24 @@ false + + + + monospace + + + jp + + + en + + monospace + DejaVu Sans Mono VL Gothic - - - - monospace - - - DejaVu Sans Mono - - Index: VLGothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-8/VLGothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- VLGothic-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2008 07:06:13 -0000 1.9 +++ VLGothic-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2008 06:51:33 -0000 1.10 @@ -3,18 +3,19 @@ %define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20071215 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 20081029 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -Source1: 59-VLGothic-sans.conf +Source1: 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf Source2: 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +# added for f9 can be dropped in f11: Obsoletes: %{name}-monospace < 20071215-2 %description @@ -100,12 +101,25 @@ %files proportional %doc README* LICENSE* %dir %{fontdir}-proportional -%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/59-VLGothic-sans.conf +%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/59-VLGothic-proportional.conf %{fontdir}-proportional/VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf %changelog -* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2 +* Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 +- update to 20081029 release. + +* Tue Sep 9 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20080908-1 +- update to 20080908 release. + +* Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080624-1.fc10 +- update to 20080624 release + +* Wed May 7 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080429-1 +- update to 20080429 release +- rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf + +* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2.fc9 - move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage - rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage - use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-8/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 17 Jan 2008 07:36:55 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 29 Oct 2008 06:51:33 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -830fe98b9c5ba833e9eab9f6570a0d3c VLGothic-20071215.tar.bz2 +c7ef9b60744cba71b7ea7ff402812f4d VLGothic-20081029.tar.bz2 --- 59-VLGothic-sans.conf DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:48:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244384] Firefox font antialises too much In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291548.m9TFmTca012344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244384 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, skasal at redhat.com Component|pangomm |pango AssignedTo|denis at poolshark.org |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291715.m9THFAi6032151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291720.m9THK8XU009389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|438943 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:34:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291734.m9THYZfC013918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-29 13:34:34 EDT --- We've merged a lot of Asian (Korean...) fonts lately, maybe it's one of them You really need to have Behdad audit the fontconfig priority level given to all recent CJK fonts (and I include fonts in the pipeline like hanazono). For example, I've seen CJK packages that proposed 59 as priority, when our guidelines (which match upstream's) state the highest priority for a non LGC font should be 65. I hope we'll not repeat the arms race between Chinese/Japanese/Korean users where each one tries to one-up the other and put himself higher in the priority queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 29 19:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:50:22 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291950.m9TJoMTT022264@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug 70132 depends on bug 458861, which changed state. Bug 458861 Summary: downloading fonts periodically fails under Mac OS X https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 29 23:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:39:22 -0700 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292339.m9TNdMAK005828@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |mozilla1.9.1b2 Flag| |in-testsuite+ --- Comment #17 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2008-10-29 16:39:17 PDT --- Fixed: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8feeaada71eb In testsuite: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c8b770c2fe89 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f404bcc1b7f6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 11:58:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301158.m9UBwOHs003233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Qiao <29551030 at qq.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:04:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462531] text of highlighted button in dialog goes black In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302004.m9UK4gb9009991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com, | |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|pango |xorg-x11-drv-geode AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |xgl-maint at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jeremy Katz 2008-10-30 16:04:41 EDT --- Warren points to this upstream bug -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15700 Which also at least has a workaround -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 23:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461039] liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites and gecko-1.8* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302339.m9UNdXIC013202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 02:06:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310206.m9V26wjV016560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Baif changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |baif at pogolinux.com.cn --- Comment #35 from Baif 2008-10-30 22:06:57 EDT --- It's true that "A font package must not override global antialiasing settings.". Please read the conf I had modified a little bit which enclosed with this reply. And it should replace: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 02:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310212.m9V2CFfE017507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #36 from Baif 2008-10-30 22:12:14 EDT --- AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE none AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE true AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE hintfull AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE true AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 8 12 false AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 11 17 false -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 03:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310320.m9V3K6XO015406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #37 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-30 23:20:05 EDT --- I'm afraid the part of the above config doesn't do the right thing what you said at least. "not_eq" affects all of fonts except you explicitly described there. it exactly overrides the global settings, regardless of whether or not the result is same. fontconfig config that the font package owns should have its specific config only. otherwise it should be modified in one fontconfig has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 05:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244384] Firefox font antialises too much In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310520.m9V5KFDo015916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244384 --- Comment #24 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-10-31 01:20:13 EDT --- Well beyond me. Belongs in FF land and how it does fonts really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.