From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 00:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904010049.n310neW9005593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-03-31 20:49:40 EDT --- Hey Felix and Nicolas, I have a bit of time for the next week or two to push this forward if it's okay with you. Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/tulrich-tuffy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/tulrich-tuffy-fonts-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Mar 31 2009 Toshio Kuratomi - 1.1-3 - Change fontconfig file to use "sans-serif" generic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483329] cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011028.n31AS8Mc005007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-01 06:28:07 EDT --- => cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-21.fc11.src.rpm => cjkuni-fonts-compat-0.2.20080216.1-21.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /usr/share/fonts/zh_TW /usr/share/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011032.n31AWFpl005922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-01 06:32:14 EDT --- Should all these packages depend on the "fontpackages-filesystem" package? That one provides four directories needed here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011048.n31Amd6v027599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-01 06:48:38 EDT --- If the official template is respected the font subpackages depend on the common subpackage and the common subpackage depends on fontpackages-filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 10:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011056.n31Aurnp011001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-01 06:56:53 EDT --- Then there's a missing dep in "baekmuk-ttf-fonts", because the following unowned directories are found: $ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^baekmuk [...] => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-20.fc11.noarch (rawhide) /etc/fonts provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /etc/fonts/conf.d provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail provided by: fontpackages-filesystem-1.20-2.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 14:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011417.n31EHe7f026510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-01 10:17:37 EDT --- *** Bug 493240 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 19:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904011943.n31JhXEv008159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-01 15:43:32 EDT --- This one is a go. Though I'm sure someone will report someday weird behaviours in apps du to the strange family/style names. You'll need to relay upstream then. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012029.n31KTBHY018417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-01 16:29:10 EDT --- This one is a go ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue on from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012050.n31KodH7012505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-01 16:50:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts Short Description: Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: fonts-sig ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 20:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012038.n31KcUX8009737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-01 16:38:29 EDT --- This one is good. Please do register as co-maintainers for this package :p ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging one of the oldest font packaging requests in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012117.n31LHuTi018552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-01 17:17:56 EDT --- I branched it for F-9 and F-10, but it would not build for either target because the versions of fontforge on those branches does not have support for the python extensions (rawhide does). It is built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012146.n31LkfKB024290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 1 21:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904012149.n31Ln5SJ002381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-04-01 17:49:04 EDT --- Thanks Nicolas and Felix! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tulrich-tuffy-fonts Short Description: Generic sans font Owners: toshio fschwarz Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 2 06:12:59 2009 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 06:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel fontforge-20090224-pythondl.patch, NONE, 1.1 fontforge.spec, 1.43, 1.44 Message-ID: <20090402061259.51CA070120@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8031 Modified Files: fontforge.spec Added Files: fontforge-20090224-pythondl.patch Log Message: Apply patch for python modules loading (fixes #489109) use install -p to fix multiarch issue (fixes #480685) fontforge-20090224-pythondl.patch: --- NEW FILE fontforge-20090224-pythondl.patch --- diff -Nur fontforge-20090224.orig/configure fontforge-20090224/configure --- fontforge-20090224.orig/configure 2008-12-24 14:04:18.000000000 -0700 +++ fontforge-20090224/configure 2009-04-01 22:56:07.000000000 -0600 @@ -26670,6 +26670,7 @@ else PYLIBS="" fi + PYDEFINES="$PYDEFINES, ('SOLIBDIR','\"$libdir/\"')" PY=pyhook/setup.py fi diff -Nur fontforge-20090224.orig/pyhook/loadfontforge.h fontforge-20090224/pyhook/loadfontforge.h --- fontforge-20090224.orig/pyhook/loadfontforge.h 2007-12-23 19:28:35.000000000 -0700 +++ fontforge-20090224/pyhook/loadfontforge.h 2009-04-01 22:49:08.000000000 -0600 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ if ( (lib = dlopen("libgunicode" SO_EXT,RTLD_LAZY))==NULL ) { #ifdef PREFIX - lib = dlopen( PREFIX "/lib/" "libgunicode" SO_EXT,RTLD_LAZY); + lib = dlopen( SOLIBDIR "libgunicode.so.3" ,RTLD_LAZY); #endif } if ( lib==NULL ) { @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ if ( (lib = dlopen("libgutils" SO_EXT,RTLD_LAZY))==NULL ) { #ifdef PREFIX - lib = dlopen( PREFIX "/lib/" "libgutils" SO_EXT,RTLD_LAZY); + lib = dlopen( SOLIBDIR "libgutils.so.1" ,RTLD_LAZY); #endif } if ( lib==NULL ) { @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ if ( (lib = dlopen("libfontforge" SO_EXT,RTLD_LAZY))==NULL ) { #ifdef PREFIX - lib = dlopen( PREFIX "/lib/" "libfontforge" SO_EXT,RTLD_LAZY); + lib = dlopen( SOLIBDIR "libfontforge.so.1" SO_EXT,RTLD_LAZY); #endif } if ( lib==NULL ) { Index: fontforge.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v retrieving revision 1.43 retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u -r1.43 -r1.44 --- fontforge.spec 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 -0000 1.43 +++ fontforge.spec 2 Apr 2009 06:12:28 -0000 1.44 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: fontforge Version: 20090224 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Outline and bitmap font editor Group: Applications/Publishing @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Source1: fontforge.desktop Source2: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fontforge/fontforge_htdocs-%{docs_version}.tar.bz2 Source3: fontforge.xml +Patch1: fontforge-20090224-pythondl.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Requires: xdg-utils @@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} +%patch1 -p1 + mkdir htdocs tar xjf %{SOURCE2} -C htdocs rm -rf htdocs/scripts @@ -68,6 +71,8 @@ %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' htdocs/corpchar.txt %build +export INSTALL='/usr/bin/install -p' + %configure --with-freetype-bytecode=no --with-regular-link --enable-pyextension sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool @@ -142,6 +147,10 @@ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc %changelog +* Sun Apr 02 2009 Kevin Fenzi - 20090224-2 +- Apply patch for python modules loading (fixes #489109) +- use install -p to fix multiarch issue (fixes #480685) + * Thu Feb 26 2009 Kevin Fenzi - 20090224-1 - Upgrade to 20090224 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480685] fontforge multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020618.n326IEYt019047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-02 02:18:13 EDT --- I'm not entirely sure why upstream wants to install them there. :( In any case I have set it to preserve timestamp for now, and that solves this issue. I just noticed that you reported this against f10. Did you need/want a f10 update to fix this? Or is a rawhide update ok? We try and avoid fontforge updates in stable releases in general since it's used to build fonts and we don't want to prevent any of them from building for some reason, but we have been considering an update for f10 for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 06:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 02:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489109] Python scripts don't work with fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904020632.n326WUPu021410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489109 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-02 02:32:30 EDT --- Well, the link would be enough to get 32bit installs working, but would break on any 64bit one. (It hard codes /usr/lib/ instead of /usr/lib64). Anyhow, sorry for the delay here. I have checked in a patch that I think fixes this bug. It should be available in tomorrow's rawhide. Can you test and confirm it's fixed? You can also find the build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1272152 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021321.n32DL8R6025136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|477409 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 2 13:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021321.n32DL4C6024986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446451(F11Target), | |477044(F11-new-font-rules) | --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-02 09:21:03 EDT --- koffice2 regargetted for F12 (removing f11 blockers) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Apr 2 18:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:31:20 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904021831.n32IVKXj020179@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Gabriele Best changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |486559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 08:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493814] New: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 Summary: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field, other packages trying to installing with old name are failing due to this Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): smc-meera-fonts-04.1-5 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1.try installing smc-fonts-meera it will say package does not exist 2. 3. Actual results: it says Expected results: it should still install smc-meera-fonts package Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Apr 3 09:28:03 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090403092803.4147C70134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18272 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Apr 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.1-6 - bugfix 493814 - added 'Provides' field for packages Index: smc-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- smc-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 01:41:38 -0000 1.6 +++ smc-fonts.spec 3 Apr 2009 09:27:32 -0000 1.7 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 04.1 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-dyuthi = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-dyuthi < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-dyuthi-fonts The Dyuthi font package contains fonts for the display of @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ with exceptions +Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-meera = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-meera < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-meera-fonts The Meera font package contains fonts for the display of @@ -59,6 +61,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ +Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-rachana = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-rachana < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-rachana-fonts The Rachana font package contains fonts for the display of @@ -72,6 +75,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2 +Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-raghumalayalam = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-raghumalayalam < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-raghumalayalam-fonts The SMC Malayalam fonts package contains fonts for the display of @@ -84,6 +88,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-suruma = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-suruma < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-suruma-fonts The Suruma font package contains fonts for the display of @@ -96,6 +101,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-kalyani = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-kalyani-fonts The Kalyani font package contains fonts for the display of @@ -108,6 +114,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-anjalioldlipi = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-anjalioldlipi < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-anjalioldlipi-fonts The Anjali OldLipi package contains fonts for the display of @@ -145,6 +152,10 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Fri Apr 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.1-6 +- bugfix 493814 +- added 'Provides' field for packages + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 04.1-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493814] spec file doesn't provide "provides" field In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030935.n339Z4d8013779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-04-03 05:35:04 EDT --- fixed in smc-fonts-04.1-6 i think it will be in tomorrow's rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493814] spec file doesn't provide "provides" field In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030937.n339bl8g012520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-03 05:37:46 EDT --- While you certainly have the option as maintainer to add Provides, you should note that other fedora font packages did not add them and the maintainers of packages depending on them just fixed their deps. Which is the correct long-term fix anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 09:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493814] spec file doesn't provide "provides" field In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904030945.n339j3Ad015863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-04-03 05:45:02 EDT --- see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493792 I think we should keep it till f13 probably -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cmc at openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:03:46 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 3 Apr 2009 11:03:46 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090403110346.15841.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User cmc changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hdu' |'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from cmc at openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:03:45 +0000 2009 ------- We might be able to support the "language" based stuff similarly to what pango does, i.e. in our final fontconfig-using glyph fallback code collect the total failures and catalogue them by language or sommat like that and on a timer make the dbus call to flush pending "missing languages". Like the wiki page says, asking for a specific font to be installed because its missing is tricky given the way fontconfig works makes it hard to know when a font family or "good" replcement font is not really available --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cmc at openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:04:01 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 3 Apr 2009 11:04:01 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090403110401.16353.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User cmc changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |97765 is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:23:14 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 3 Apr 2009 11:23:14 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090403112314.25240.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:23:13 +0000 2009 ------- I think that OO.o is a big enough font users the people working on font installations would be delighted to know its exact requirements to perfect auto-installation. If it works for OO.o it will probably work for everyone else. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:37:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904032037.n33KbxDF002137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:37:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 3 20:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] New: updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 Summary: updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: svidal at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10.i386 on an f10 i686 machine. if I update fontconfig from f10 to rawhide: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 and then update ANY font package Gnome-terminals segfault. I've captured strace -p from the gnome-terminal process here: http://sethdot.org/~skvidal/misc/gterm-strace.txt I have a qemu img where I can duplicate this any time if more testing is needed. This is a big deal b/c it stops anyone from updating with yum from a gnome-terminal from f10-> rawhide/f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 05:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494092] New: Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494092 Summary: Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: hceylan at batoo.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I am using KDE. I can use liberation fonts just fine for KDE applications. However for GTK applications fonts cannot render as antialiased. Here's a matrix of what combination works and what not: GNOME + Liberation NO KDE + Liberation OK Under KDE GTK Apps + Liberation NO Under KDE GTK Apps + Sans Serif / Monospace YES Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rawhide + F10 How reproducible: Everytime I really would like to use Liberation fonts as I favour them on any other ones. Regards, Hasan Ceylan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 23:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042326.n34NQ1MH003216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480452, which changed state. Bug 480452 Summary: [fillets-ng-data] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480452 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 23:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042324.n34NOkLt002707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477385, which changed state. Bug 477385 Summary: [fillets-ng-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 23:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480452] [fillets-ng-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042326.n34NQ0Yi003192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480452 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-04 19:25:59 EDT --- The package now requires gnu-free-sans-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 4 23:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477385] [fillets-ng-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904042324.n34NOjGN002686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Matthias Saou 2009-04-04 19:24:44 EDT --- I'll leave as is. The font package requirement has been updated too (see #480452 for that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 02:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 22:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050237.n352bC45024271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-04-04 22:37:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts Short Description: Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 05:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494158] New: [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel sign for 'E' and Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel sign for 'E' and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494158 Summary: [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel sign for 'E' and Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: arjunaraoc at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 05:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494158] [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel code point for 'E' and 'AI' length mark code points are used In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050546.n355kcVq025183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494158 --- Comment #2 from Arjuna Rao Chavala 2009-04-05 01:46:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338202) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338202) Showing incorrect 'ai' matra rendering -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 05:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494158] [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel code point for 'E' and 'AI' length mark code points are used In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050547.n355lFxM018264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494158 --- Comment #3 from Arjuna Rao Chavala 2009-04-05 01:47:15 EDT --- This problem does not exist with Pothana2000 font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 05:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494158] [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel code point for 'E' and 'AI' length mark code points are used In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050545.n355jDTc018033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494158 Arjuna Rao Chavala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[te_IN] Incorrect rendering |[te_IN] Incorrect rendering |of 'ai' matra when |of 'ai' matra when |dependent vowel sign for |dependent vowel code point |'E' and |for 'E' and 'AI' length | |mark code points are used --- Comment #1 from Arjuna Rao Chavala 2009-04-05 01:45:13 EDT --- Description of problem: [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel code point for 'E' and 'AI' length mark code points are used. This problem is severe for telugu consonants Ma and Ya . For other consonants also, the full consonant is retained along with the glyphs, which is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.3.8 How reproducible: Visit Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit Telugu newspapers with proprietary fonts rendered by Padma Plugin at http://uni.medhas.org/unicode.php5?file=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.andhrajyothy.com%2Feditshow.asp%3Fqry=%2F2009%2Fmar%2F15edit1 2. Look for syllables with 'ai' matra combination like ?? 3.observe incorrect rendering as superimposition of individual glyphs. Actual results: 'ai' matra substituion and rendering Expected results: individual glyphs superimposed which results in incorrect rendering. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 09:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 05:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494092] Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904050900.n3590APJ023541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494092 --- Comment #1 from Hasan Ceylan 2009-04-05 05:00:10 EDT --- I do not know what's going on under the hood but here's what works for me. Credit goes to http://gordonazmo.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-simple-tweak-to-make-your-gtk-fonts-look-nice-in-kde/ I already had gtk-qt-engine-1.1-5.fc11.i586. I cannot test GNOME right now but at least for GTK apps under KDE that solution works for me. So a missing link is resotered by #ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/ I do not know which rpm should be responsible for providing this symbolic link therefore I will leave the subject and category as it is although my initial guess is totally wrong. Hasan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 12:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489109] Python scripts don't work with fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904051251.n35Cp6j1031936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489109 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Felix Schwarz 2009-04-05 08:51:06 EDT --- Verified fixed with fontforge-20090224-2.fc11.i586 (on 32 bit platform). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 5 23:52:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 19:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494092] Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904052352.n35NqJvt015036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494092 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-05 19:52:19 EDT --- Thanks, Hasan. FYI, 10-autohint.conf was not symlinked to conf.d/ has many reasons. '10' is very high priority which overrides most of other specification in other .conf files. Ones might prefer Auto Hint for everything, but there are other ones who don't. There are some users who are in locales that auto hinting blur their default fonts due to glyph complexity. This simply affect their usage. We could work out a more appropriate solutions to suit both cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon Apr 6 07:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:19:10 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904060719.n367JACf013808@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug 70132 depends on bug 486559, which changed state. Bug 486559 Summary: Eldiablo.ttf font doesn't work through @font-face https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486559 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 6 10:33:50 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 6 Apr 2009 10:33:50 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090406103350.15179.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu' |'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu,pl' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|All |Unix, X11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Apr 6 10:33:49 +0000 2009 ------- Fontconfig already gets asked how a font should be substituted ("font fallback"). Fontconfig also gets asked when codepoints are not supported by a font ("glyph fallback"). Other apps also go via fontconfig, so it has a pretty good picture of what is going on: which fonts are available, which fonts are requested, which codepoints/languages need more support and in which font contexts these languages are used. So I think the best approach would be that fontconfig makes a list of suggestions first. The next step is to either broadcast the suggestions directly to AFI or have OOo poll the suggestions once in a while and broadcast them. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 6 11:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494158] [te_IN] Incorrect rendering of 'ai' matra when dependent vowel code point for 'E' and 'AI' length mark code points are used In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904061103.n36B3EJM015597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494158 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-04-06 07:03:14 EDT --- The explicit use the length marks is not approved by Unicode, they are used only for the rendering purpose. The data entered should use the authentic 'ai' matra character only. This is a bug with the data on the given website. The reason Pothana tends to give right output is that, it does not have a glyph for U+25cc, i.e. the dotted circle which is used to notify the invalid syllable, such as a vowel sign without a consonant. The obvious disadvantage of not having dotted circle is that, it may allow users to type in wrong sequences without notifying. So, from both the rendering and font point of view, its not a bug. For getting the right and authentic output with universally valid data, please use the 'AI' Matra character U+0c48, and drop the use if the length mark U+0c56. The problem should be reported back to the website, if possible. >From Pothana's point of view, it should include a glyph for U+25cc at right position to avoid confusion and use of invalid sequences. As I can see, it has the glyph, but not at right position. As pothana is still in packaging process for fedora, the problem can be reported only upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From toshio at fedoraproject.org Mon Apr 6 15:40:43 2009 From: toshio at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?VG9zaGlvIOOBj+OCieOBqOOBvw==?=) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 tulrich-tuffy-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tulrich-tuffy-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090406154043.77BC9700FB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: toshio Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28537/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log tulrich-tuffy-fonts-fontconfig.conf tulrich-tuffy-fonts.spec Log Message: Iniital import. --- NEW FILE import.log --- tulrich-tuffy-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:HEAD:tulrich-tuffy-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1239031994 --- NEW FILE tulrich-tuffy-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif tuffy tuffy sans-serif --- NEW FILE tulrich-tuffy-fonts.spec --- %global fontname tulrich-tuffy %global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Generic sans font Group: User Interface/X License: Public Domain URL: http://tulrich.com/fonts/ Source0: http://tulrich.com/fonts/tuffy-20071106.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRequires: fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Tuffy is an innocuous looking sans font. %prep %setup -q -n tuffy-20071106 %build # be really sure that we don't package pre-generated ttf files rm *.ttf # We use the legacy font forge script to generate the TTF files (instead of a # Python one) because of bug 489109. fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd <<"EOF" i = 1 while ( i < $argc ) Open ($argv[i], 1) Generate ($fontname + ".ttf") PrintSetup (5) PrintFont (0, 0, "", $fontname + "-sample.pdf") Close() i++ endloop EOF %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc LICENSE.txt %changelog * Tue Mar 31 2009 Toshio Kuratomi - 1.1-3 - Change fontconfig file to use "sans-serif" generic. * Sat Mar 07 2009 Felix Schwarz - 1.1-2 - Modified fontforge script to make it compatible with rawhide fontforge * Tue Feb 24 2009 Toshio Kuratomi - 1.1-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 3 Apr 2009 20:38:03 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Apr 2009 15:40:13 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +tuffy-20071106.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 3 Apr 2009 20:38:03 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Apr 2009 15:40:13 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f6b6fed6791ba6fa92af1f5e97c7b81d tuffy-20071106.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 03:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070321.n373LkLJ008071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |letterslaughing-fonts - |chisholm-letterslaughing-fo |Decorative/LED sans-serif |nts - Decorative/LED |font |sans-serif font Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-06 23:21:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 05:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490373] Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070554.n375s1Gi006973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446451(F11Target) | --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-07 01:54:01 EDT --- I suggest doing this after F-11 GA - it is too risky at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 05:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070554.n375sx10003780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446451(F11Target) | --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-07 01:54:59 EDT --- This is going to miss F11 - dropping from F11Target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Apr 7 06:19:28 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090407061928.A6EF170100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19294 Modified Files: baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec Log Message: rebuilt for fedora 11 Index: baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 03:55:39 -0000 1.6 +++ baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec 7 Apr 2009 06:18:58 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Korean bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name} %changelog +* Tue Apr 07 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 2.2-7.fc11 +- Rebuilt for Fedora 11. + * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.2-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Apr 7 06:36:27 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/taipeifonts/devel taipeifonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090407063627.272E470100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/taipeifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22947 Modified Files: taipeifonts.spec Log Message: rebuilt for fedora 11. Index: taipeifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/taipeifonts/devel/taipeifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- taipeifonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 18:24:06 -0000 1.3 +++ taipeifonts.spec 7 Apr 2009 06:35:56 -0000 1.4 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: taipeifonts Version: 1.2 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Bitmap Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name} %changelog +* Tue Apr 07 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 1.2-7.fc11 +- Rebuilt for Fedora 11. + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.2-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491954] [baekmuk-bdf-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070738.n377cZ31028571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491954 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 03:38:35 EDT --- rebuilt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 07:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 03:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491972] [taipeifonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070739.n377dsti025386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491972 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 03:39:54 EDT --- rebuilt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Apr 7 07:44:21 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090407074421.6B29370100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5966 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: Resolves: rhbz#491956 rebuilt for fedora 11 Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 07:35:16 -0000 1.7 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 7 Apr 2009 07:43:51 -0000 1.8 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 21%{?dist} +Release: 22%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -221,6 +221,10 @@ %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Apr 07 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-22 +- Resolves: rhbz#491956. +- Rebuilt for Fedora 11. + * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.2.20080216.1-21 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 08:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491956] [cjkuni-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904070801.n3781561029977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491956 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 04:01:04 EDT --- built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 7 16:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462531] text of highlighted button in dialog goes black In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904071657.n37GvjQI007624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-07 12:57:43 EDT --- I think this should now be fixed. Anyone still seeing this on either F10 or rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 03:28:53 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20090408032853.8939D7011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11377 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: resolves: 433329 (fixed unowned compatibility directories) Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 7 Apr 2009 07:43:51 -0000 1.8 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 03:28:23 -0000 1.9 @@ -10,9 +10,15 @@ %define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} %define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} +%define _cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN +%define _twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW +%define cncompatdir %{_cncompatdir}/TrueType +%define twcompatdir %{_twcompatdir}/TrueType + + Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 22%{?dist} +Release: 23%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -151,8 +157,12 @@ %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf +%dir %{_cncompatdir} +%dir %{_twcompatdir} +%dir %{cncompatdir} +%dir %{twcompatdir} +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} @@ -210,18 +220,19 @@ %__ln_s %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} # backward compat to obsoleted ttf -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc \ - %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc \ - %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir} +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf %clean %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Tue Apr 07 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-22 +* Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#483320 (Declared ownership of compatibility directories.) + +* Tue Apr 07 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-22.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#491956. - Rebuilt for Fedora 11. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 03:51:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483329] cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080351.n383pTr9019610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 23:51:28 EDT --- done http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=96996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 03:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080357.n383vH7F017622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-07 23:57:16 EDT --- Migration from .ttf to .ttc is upstream's decision. Please gracefully provide details info/logs/errors from incompatible softwares. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 04:39:27 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 04:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.17,1.18 Message-ID: <20090408043927.616CD7011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29725 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: resolves: rhbz#483327 (fixed unowned directories.) Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 03:56:31 -0000 1.17 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 04:38:54 -0000 1.18 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 20%{?dist} +Release: 21%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-5 Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 BuildRequires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common @@ -174,6 +175,9 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 2.2-21.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#483327 (Fixed unowned directories.) + * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.2-20 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 05:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 01:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080555.n385tGpT007867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #2 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-04-08 01:55:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Migration from .ttf to .ttc is upstream's decision. > > Please gracefully provide details info/logs/errors from incompatible softwares. You do not understand the problem. The "ghostscript/conf.d/*map.zh_*" files are a set of distribution-specific/value-added config files which tell ghostscript what default CJK fonts to use when pdf files containing CJK text but without embedded font is encountered. On older fedora systems, the config files tell ghostscript to use uming.ttf and ukai.ttf, because those are the fonts *available on the system*. Since upstream has migrated to ttc, and fedora now follow upstream to ship uming.ttc/ukai.ttc instead of uming.ttf/ukai.ttf, the config files now tell ghostscript to use font files which no longer exist. The problem is very well-understood and the solution well-characterised: the content of /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* should always refer to available and valid font files on the system. When the font file names have changed, the config files should be updated to match. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080613.n386DQlS008003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #3 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-08 02:13:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > You do not understand the problem. The "ghostscript/conf.d/*map.zh_*" files are > a set of distribution-specific/value-added config files which tell ghostscript > what default CJK fonts to use when pdf files containing CJK text but without > embedded font is encountered. Have you tested this on rawhide yet? > On older fedora systems, the config files tell ghostscript to use uming.ttf and > ukai.ttf, because those are the fonts *available on the system*. Since upstream > has migrated to ttc, and fedora now follow upstream to ship uming.ttc/ukai.ttc > instead of uming.ttf/ukai.ttf, the config files now tell ghostscript to use > font files which no longer exist. Could you please test on rawhide with installing cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript also? > The problem is very well-understood and the solution well-characterised: the > content of /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* should always refer to > available and valid font files on the system. When the font file names have > changed, the config files should be updated to match. I should've updated all of them, and they are packed in cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080613.n386Di0w011087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 06:25:16 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 CIDFnmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, 1.1, 1.2 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, 1.2 cidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 cidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090408062516.1A6357011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26017 Modified Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW Log Message: updated address of ghostscript locations Index: CIDFnmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/CIDFnmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- CIDFnmap.zh_CN 31 Aug 2007 01:20:20 -0000 1.1 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-GB1 -/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; -/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; +/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: CIDFnmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/CIDFnmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- CIDFnmap.zh_TW 31 Aug 2007 01:20:20 -0000 1.1 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-CNS1 -/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; +/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 31 Aug 2007 01:20:20 -0000 1.1 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; % -/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 31 Aug 2007 01:20:20 -0000 1.1 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; % -/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; Index: cidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- cidfmap.zh_CN 31 Aug 2007 01:20:20 -0000 1.1 +++ cidfmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: cidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- cidfmap.zh_TW 31 Aug 2007 01:20:20 -0000 1.1 +++ cidfmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080627.n386RX5w010829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|/usr/share/ghostscript/conf |ghostscript files referred |.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf |to outdated font info |instead of *.ttc | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 06:30:16 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 cjkunifonts.spec,1.24,1.25 Message-ID: <20090408063016.64FD37011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27076 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: resolves: rhbz#488398 fixed ghostscript files referred to outdated font info Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.24 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -r1.24 -r1.25 --- cjkunifonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 04:01:59 -0000 1.24 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 06:29:46 -0000 1.25 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 11.fc10 +Release: 12.fc10 Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog +* Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - + 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc10 +- Resolves: rhbz#488398 Fixed ghostscript files referred to outdated font info. + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#475743, rhbz#459680 - Fixed Japanese fonts over-priorized by uming fonts in Japanese locale. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 06:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080642.n386gR5L014083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-04-08 02:42:27 EDT --- Please kindly test if this rpm solves your problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1284552 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 06:50:16 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/devel chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090408065016.DC5F370137@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32211/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Wed Apr 8 2009 Ankur Sinha - Initial rpm build --- NEW FILE chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy letters laughing letters laughing fantasy --- NEW FILE chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec --- %global fontname chisholm-letterslaughing %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename lleqcdd.zip Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030323 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://glyphobet.net/fonts/free/?font=lleqcdd Source0: %{archivename} Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font %prep %setup -q -n letters %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %changelog * Sun Mar 23 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20030323-1 - Initial RPM build - bugzilla #491530 --- NEW FILE import.log --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1_fc10:HEAD:chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10.src.rpm:1239173489 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Apr 2009 03:21:53 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 8 Apr 2009 06:49:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +lleqcdd.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Apr 2009 03:21:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 8 Apr 2009 06:49:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9c5bdc7761cd5079125f7a468f873321 lleqcdd.zip From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 07:04:01 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-10 chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090408070401.6053A7011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4226/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Wed Apr 8 2009 Ankur Sinha - initial rpm build --- NEW FILE chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy letters laughing letters laughing fantasy --- NEW FILE chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec --- %global fontname chisholm-letterslaughing %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename lleqcdd.zip Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030323 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://glyphobet.net/fonts/free/?font=lleqcdd Source0: %{archivename} Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font %prep %setup -q -n letters %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %changelog * Sun Mar 23 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20030323-1 - Initial RPM build - bugzilla #491530 --- NEW FILE import.log --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1_fc10:F-10:chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10.src.rpm:1239174315 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Apr 2009 03:21:53 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 8 Apr 2009 07:03:30 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +lleqcdd.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Apr 2009 03:21:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 8 Apr 2009 07:03:30 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9c5bdc7761cd5079125f7a468f873321 lleqcdd.zip From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 07:06:23 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-9 chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090408070623.78B3E7011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5234/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-fontconfig.conf chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Wed Apr 8 2009 Ankur Sinha fantasy letters laughing letters laughing fantasy --- NEW FILE chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec --- %global fontname chisholm-letterslaughing %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename lleqcdd.zip Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030323 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://glyphobet.net/fonts/free/?font=lleqcdd Source0: %{archivename} Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font %prep %setup -q -n letters %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %changelog * Sun Mar 23 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20030323-1 - Initial RPM build - bugzilla #491530 --- NEW FILE import.log --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1_fc10:F-9:chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10.src.rpm:1239174501 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Apr 2009 03:21:53 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 8 Apr 2009 07:05:52 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +lleqcdd.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Apr 2009 03:21:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 8 Apr 2009 07:05:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9c5bdc7761cd5079125f7a468f873321 lleqcdd.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080704.n3874Mt6021116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 Bug 477447 depends on bug 489117, which changed state. Bug 489117 Summary: Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080704.n3874Kfh021076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Felix Schwarz 2009-04-08 03:04:20 EDT --- Package built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=97005 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080718.n387ID8C021259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 03:18:13 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 07:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904080719.n387JZnI024314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-08 03:19:36 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From toshio at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 14:48:52 2009 From: toshio at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?VG9zaGlvIOOBj+OCieOBqOOBvw==?=) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel test2,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20090408144852.D1E117011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: toshio Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22368 Added Files: test2 Log Message: Test adding a file --- NEW FILE test2 --- From toshio at fedoraproject.org Wed Apr 8 14:56:06 2009 From: toshio at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?VG9zaGlvIOOBj+OCieOBqOOBvw==?=) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel test2,1.1,NONE Message-ID: <20090408145606.1348C7011A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: toshio Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tulrich-tuffy-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24066 Removed Files: test2 Log Message: Remove test. --- test2 DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 15:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081530.n38FUrhp028216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 15:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081530.n38FUstL028242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477447, which changed state. Bug 477447 Summary: [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 15:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904081530.n38FUaSj026621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #11 from Felix Schwarz 2009-04-08 11:30:36 EDT --- New package built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1285504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 15:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] New: [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 Summary: [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: arjunaraoc at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 494158 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494158 +++ Description of problem: Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.3.8 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Type the letters for ?? ?? with out the space between them in gedit (u+0c15,u+0c3E,u+0c37,u+0c4d,space(0x20) 2. 3. Actual results: ???? Expected results: ?? ?? (without intervening space ) Additional info: This is common part of telugu /Indian names consisting of Prakash. substitution should occur only for ka followed by viram and then sha This problem is present for Pothana2000 also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082213.n38MDp8L025419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #6 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-04-08 18:13:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338816) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338816) log of how it was broken Note that it says: 'Can't find the font file /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf' (The correct path is "/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082211.n38MBMoN025213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #5 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-04-08 18:11:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Please kindly test if this rpm solves your problem: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1284552 Still broken, just in different ways. The base name now changes to ttc, but the full path is wrong. I'll attach logs later. Sorry I cannot share the pdf test file - it contains proprietary info - but if you can find a equivalent pdf, the test is simply: "gs -dNOPAUSE file.pdf" to see the logs I am posting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082217.n38MHNLr027773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #7 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-04-08 18:17:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=338817) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338817) new brokenness with rpms from comment 5 Different brokenness with rpms from comment 5. Note now it says "Can't find the font file /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc" The new rawhide rpm puts the file at /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc (note the extra bits "-uming"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 8 22:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904082220.n38MKLo7027101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #8 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-04-08 18:20:21 EDT --- The config.d/*map* files just need to match exactly the locations and naming of the fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kamataki at openoffice.org Thu Apr 9 03:30:21 2009 From: kamataki at openoffice.org (kamataki at openoffice.org) Date: 9 Apr 2009 03:30:21 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090409033021.29526.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User kamataki changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,dta|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,dta |rdon,fedorafonts,hdu,khira|rdon,fedorafonts,hdu,kamat |no,masayan,mba,meywer,norb|aki,khirano,masayan,mba,me |usan,ralphie,rene,thb,tora|ywer,norbusan,ralphie,rene |' |,thb,tora' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 12:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091205.n39C5GO4032372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium --- Comment #1 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-04-09 08:05:15 EDT --- The problem still exists in Fedora 11 Beta (Gnome LiveCD) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091613.n39GDQlE003324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:13:26 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 9 16:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904091610.n39GA0ci031802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-09 12:10:00 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 05:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495252] Texts/Fonts are crappy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904110519.n3B5JWGw021856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495252 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, mclasen at redhat.com Component|gnome-desktop |pango AssignedTo|rstrode at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bochecha at fedoraproject.org Sat Apr 11 20:42:50 2009 From: bochecha at fedoraproject.org (Mathieu Bridon) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel nafees-web-naskh-update-preferred-family.pe, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090411204250.741B370098@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: bochecha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10248 Modified Files: .cvsignore nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec sources Added Files: nafees-web-naskh-update-preferred-family.pe Log Message: Updated to 1.2 release and fixed RHBZ#490830 with a fontforge script, while not fixed upstream. --- NEW FILE nafees-web-naskh-update-preferred-family.pe --- #!/usr/bin/fontforge fontfile = $1 Open(fontfile) SetTTFName(0x409, 16, 'Nafees Web Naskh') Generate('NafeesWeb.ttf') Close() Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2007 03:50:20 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 11 Apr 2009 20:42:19 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -NafeesWeb-20070820.zip +nafees-web-naskh-20080509.zip Index: nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel/nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 04:06:04 -0000 1.5 +++ nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec 11 Apr 2009 20:42:19 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,21 +1,30 @@ %define fontname nafees-web-naskh %define archivename NafeesWeb -%define archivedate 20070820 +%define archivedate 20080509 Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 1.0 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Version: 1.2 +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script Group: User Interface/X License: Bitstream Vera URL: http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/NafeesWeb.zip -# NOTE: the original archive is unversioned, so we rename it to add a date stamp -Source0: %{archivename}-%{archivedate}.zip + +## NOTE: the original archive is unversioned, so we rename it to add a date stamp +# The Source0 is obtained by doing the following: +# $ wget -S http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/NafeesWeb.zip +# $ mv %{archivename} %{fontname}-%{archivedate}.zip +Source0: %{fontname}-%{archivedate}.zip + +## Fix RHBZ# while not fixed upstream +Source1: %{fontname}-update-preferred-family.pe + BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch Requires: fontpackages-filesystem BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +BuildRequires: fontforge %description @@ -29,7 +38,8 @@ %setup -q -c %build -#nop +# Fix RHBZ#490830 while not fixed upstream +%{_bindir}/fontforge %{SOURCE1} %{archivename}.ttf %install rm -rf %{buildroot} @@ -48,6 +58,13 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sat Apr 11 2009 Mathieu Bridon - 1.2-2 +- added comment explaining how the source is obtained (as it is modified from upstream) +- temporary fix for RHBZ#490830 while not fixed upstream + +* Sat Apr 11 2009 Mathieu Bridon - 1.2-1 +- update to 1.2 release + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 6 Oct 2007 03:50:20 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 11 Apr 2009 20:42:19 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -ad8bc7947df986d30306868f7a9c6096 NafeesWeb-20070820.zip +ad8bc7947df986d30306868f7a9c6096 nafees-web-naskh-20080509.zip From bochecha at fedoraproject.org Sat Apr 11 20:58:52 2009 From: bochecha at fedoraproject.org (Mathieu Bridon) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/F-10 nafees-web-naskh-update-preferred-family.pe, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090411205852.BD03670098@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: bochecha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15024 Modified Files: .cvsignore nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec sources Added Files: nafees-web-naskh-update-preferred-family.pe Log Message: Update to 1.2 release and fix RHBZ#490830 with a fontforge script while not fixed upstream. --- NEW FILE nafees-web-naskh-update-preferred-family.pe --- #!/usr/bin/fontforge fontfile = $1 Open(fontfile) SetTTFName(0x409, 16, 'Nafees Web Naskh') Generate('NafeesWeb.ttf') Close() Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2007 03:50:20 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 11 Apr 2009 20:58:21 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -NafeesWeb-20070820.zip +nafees-web-naskh-20080509.zip Index: nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/F-10/nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec 6 Oct 2007 03:50:20 -0000 1.1 +++ nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec 11 Apr 2009 20:58:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,21 +1,30 @@ +%define fontname nafees-web-naskh %define archivename NafeesWeb -%define archivedate 20070820 -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/nafees +%define archivedate 20080509 -Name: nafees-web-naskh-fonts -Version: 1.0 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 1.2 +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script Group: User Interface/X License: Bitstream Vera URL: http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/NafeesWeb.zip -# NOTE: the original archive is unversioned, so we rename it to add a date stamp -Source0: %{archivename}-%{archivedate}.zip -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + +## NOTE: the original archive is unversioned, so we rename it to add a date stamp +# The Source0 is obtained by doing the following: +# $ wget -S http://www.crulp.org/Downloads/NafeesWeb.zip +# $ mv %{archivename} %{fontname}-%{archivedate}.zip +Source0: %{fontname}-%{archivedate}.zip + +## Fix RHBZ# while not fixed upstream +Source1: %{fontname}-update-preferred-family.pe + +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -Provides: nafees-web-naskh-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontconfig +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +BuildRequires: fontforge %description @@ -29,41 +38,44 @@ %setup -q -c %build -#nop +# Fix RHBZ#490830 while not fixed upstream +%{_bindir}/fontforge %{SOURCE1} %{archivename}.ttf %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} #fonts -install -d -m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} +%_font_pkg *.ttf -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} -fi +%doc +%dir %{_fontdir} +%changelog +* Sat Apr 11 2009 Mathieu Bridon - 1.2-2 +- added comment explaining how the source is obtained (as it is modified from upstream) +- temporary fix for RHBZ#490830 while not fixed upstream -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} - fi -fi +* Sat Apr 11 2009 Mathieu Bridon - 1.2-1 +- update to 1.2 release +* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-5 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild -%files -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +* Sun Dec 21 2008 Bernie Innocenti 1.0-4 +- Builddep on fontpackages-devel -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/*.ttf +* Sun Dec 21 2008 Bernie Innocenti 1.0-3 +- Typo: fontdir -> _fontdir +* Sun Dec 21 2008 Bernie Innocenti 1.0-2 +- Updated to current Fedora font packaging guidelines -%changelog * Sat Sep 15 2007 Bernardo Innocenti 1.0-1 - Initial packaging, borrowing many things from abyssinica-fonts Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 6 Oct 2007 03:50:20 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 11 Apr 2009 20:58:21 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -ad8bc7947df986d30306868f7a9c6096 NafeesWeb-20070820.zip +ad8bc7947df986d30306868f7a9c6096 nafees-web-naskh-20080509.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 21:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112113.n3BLDGtc014735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-11 17:13:16 EDT --- nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 11 21:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904112119.n3BLJNa7015584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #3 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-04-11 17:19:24 EDT --- I can't get any answer from upstream :-/ As it is potentially an important usability issue, I patched the font myself and updated the package (including an update to 1.2 release). It should land soon in Rawhide, can you try it ? I also rebuilt it for F10, and it should land in the updates-testing repository soon see comment #2 for the bodhi URL). As F9 is due to be EOLed in less than 3 months, I did not update the package for F9. I can do it too if someone needs it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 19:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904121902.n3CJ28iO005232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sun Apr 12 20:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 561907] Show explicit font coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090412204413.0D67A23F591@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907 gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x Christian Persch (IRC: chpe) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greffrath at leat.rub.de ------- Comment #2 from Christian Persch (IRC: chpe) 2009-04-12 20:45 UTC ------- *** Bug 578489 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 23:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122323.n3CNN7Ju011800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-12 19:23:06 EDT --- Hello Subhodip, What is the status of the updates required to this package for the review? It would be great to get this into Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 12 23:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904122323.n3CNN0If013647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #37 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-12 19:22:57 EDT --- Hello Subhodip, What is the status of the updates required to this package for the review? It would be great to get this into Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 03:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904130308.n3D382U5015334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #15 from Warren Togami 2009-04-12 23:08:02 EDT --- Is this going to be fixable before F-11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131932.n3DJWlxt029940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-13 15:32:47 EDT --- nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nafees-web-naskh-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3508 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 13 19:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904131955.n3DJt27O005310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Ben Laenen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bl.bugs at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Ben Laenen 2009-04-13 15:55:00 EDT --- This isn't a font bug I think. If the preferred family shows "Nafees" then upstream wants to see the font being called "Nafees" and not "Nafees Web Naksha". The latter is just the name that has to be displayed when the system can't handle preferred families. The problem should be fixed in the font selectors instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Apr 14 00:12:39 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.85, 1.86 pango.spec, 1.158, 1.159 sources, 1.86, 1.87 Message-ID: <20090414001239.31C0A700B2@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5001 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.24.1 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.85 retrieving revision 1.86 diff -u -r1.85 -r1.86 --- .cvsignore 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 -0000 1.85 +++ .cvsignore 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.86 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.24.0.tar.bz2 +pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.158 retrieving revision 1.159 diff -u -r1.158 -r1.159 --- pango.spec 26 Mar 2009 04:03:40 -0000 1.158 +++ pango.spec 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.159 @@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.24.0 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 1.24.1 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 URL: http://www.pango.org -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) # We need to prereq this so we can run pango-querymodules Prereq: glib2 >= %{glib2_version} @@ -39,17 +39,16 @@ Patch0: pango-1.21.4-lib64.patch %description -Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis +Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis on internationalization. Pango can be used anywhere that text layout is needed, -though most of the work on Pango so far has been done in the context of the -GTK+ widget toolkit. Pango forms the core of text and font handling for -GTK+. +though most of the work on Pango so far has been done in the context of the +GTK+ widget toolkit. Pango forms the core of text and font handling for GTK+. -Pango is designed to be modular; the core Pango layout engine can be used +Pango is designed to be modular; the core Pango layout engine can be used with different font backends. -The integration of Pango with Cairo provides a complete solution with high -quality text handling and graphics rendering. +The integration of Pango with Cairo provides a complete solution with high +quality text handling and graphics rendering. %package devel Summary: Development files for pango @@ -96,7 +95,7 @@ # autoconf uses powerpc not ppc host=`echo $host | sed "s/^ppc/powerpc/"` -# Make sure that the host value that is passed to the compile +# Make sure that the host value that is passed to the compile # is the same as the host that we're using in the spec file # compile_host=`grep 'host_triplet =' pango/Makefile | sed "s/.* = //"` @@ -116,7 +115,7 @@ echo "$PANGOXFT_SO not found; did not build with Xft support?" ls $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} exit 1 -fi +fi # We need to have separate 32-bit and 64-bit pango-querymodules binaries # for places where we have two copies of the Pango libraries installed. @@ -224,6 +223,10 @@ %changelog +* Mon Apr 13 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.24.1-1 +- Update to 1.24.1 +- See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.1.news + * Wed Mar 26 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-2 - Remove weird Requires(pre). - Resolves #486641 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.86 retrieving revision 1.87 diff -u -r1.86 -r1.87 --- sources 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 -0000 1.86 +++ sources 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.87 @@ -1 +1 @@ -d209f41079833cd2ef2c5e580ab9c5ee pango-1.24.0.tar.bz2 +af0beac1dd1825e241c5728081f16acd pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 05:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140539.n3E5dlWt019088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-14 01:39:46 EDT --- Warren, how are you installing wqy-bitmap-fonts? Through @chinese-support? Given that the font is not installed by default for non-Chinese users, I am not certain this is a blocker but it would certainly be nice to improve the longing standing CJK-related fontconfig problems. I guess one workaround may be to install wqy-zenhei-fonts in addition to wqy-bitmap-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 05:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140554.n3E5s3uZ021460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446451(F11Target) | --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-14 01:54:02 EDT --- Too late for f11 alas so dropping off Target list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 05:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491957] [culmus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140557.n3E5vOWV022222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491957 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-14 01:57:23 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 05:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491976] [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140558.n3E5wLq4022311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491976 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Blocks|446451(F11Target) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 07:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140742.n3E7g9sp009642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-14 03:42:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Warren, how are you installing wqy-bitmap-fonts? Through @chinese-support? (Apparently) > I guess one workaround may be to install wqy-zenhei-fonts in addition to > [or instead of??] wqy-bitmap-fonts. Unfortunately wqt-zenhei overrides ja default font on ja desktop even... so needs fixing too IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 09:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484536] [ml_IN] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140918.n3E9Ifci030959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 --- Comment #3 from Rajeesh 2009-04-14 05:18:39 EDT --- smc-fonts-meera and smc-fonts-rachana are updated by removing the ? shapes. We are in the process of updating other fonts in the group also. As soon as a new upstream release is made, I will update and rebuild the fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 09:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484536] [ml_IN] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904140934.n3E9YxJ6002086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-04-14 05:34:58 EDT --- thanks for update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 13:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141323.n3EDNDUX023372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #18 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-14 09:23:12 EDT --- still happens on current rawhide with packages: cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11 cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-3.fc11 vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-3.fc11 wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.9.9-9.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 18:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495252] Texts/Fonts are crappy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141836.n3EIa29Y009259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495252 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|pango |xorg-x11-drv-ati AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |xgl-maint at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2009-04-14 14:36:02 EDT --- Radeon M6. More likely to be a driver bug than a gnome bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 14 19:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495252] Texts/Fonts are crappy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904141951.n3EJp9Gf025431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495252 Fran?ois Cami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fcami at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |airlied at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(fabian.deutsch at gm | |x.de) --- Comment #2 from Fran?ois Cami 2009-04-14 15:51:08 EDT --- Thanks for the bug report, Could you add /var/log/messages and /var/log/Xorg.0.log as uncompressed text/plain attachment to this bug ? Note : probable duplicate of bug # 490651 . Fabian, please add yourself as CC there. --- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 00:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495820] New: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820 Summary: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: cje at btinternet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: in the default font and size used in firstboot the '5' digit is a slightly different width, i think. so in the 'date and time' settings screen the text shuffles a bit as the seconds and minutes tick through 05/15/25 etc. ah, actually, it looks like it's a hinting problem - this happens with 'full' and 'medium' but not with 'slight' or 'none'. not sure if that means it's a problem with freetype rather than the font. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.3.9-3.fc11.i586 dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch How reproducible: always. Steps to Reproduce: 1.install fedora 2.in firstboot go to date&time screen 3.watch the time ticking and observe text layout alternatively log in and enable seconds display and 12 hour mode on the panel clock and watch that. Actual results: layout 'jiggles' as numbers change. Expected results: no jiggling. Additional info: i think this has been like this for a year at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491957] [culmus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150621.n3F6L99f008435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491957 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-04-15 02:21:08 EDT --- The package is already rebuilt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150638.n3F6cOiK011650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to |wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides |be installed by default in |Japanese desktop (so can't |@chinese-support group |be installed by default in | |@chinese-support group) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 06:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150651.n3F6pUTJ014293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-15 02:51:29 EDT --- It is not something I want to do but another easier workaround for this issue would be not to install wqy-bitmap-fonts by default in @chinese-support. In the longer term I would prefer really just to install outline fonts for languages by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495820] numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150731.n3F7V9tu020463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Component|dejavu-fonts |freetype AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-15 03:31:08 EDT --- If it happens only with some autohinter settings it's clearly an autohinter bug. Please file a report in the freetype component of freedesktop bugzilla (CC-ing fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 07:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491957] [culmus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150732.n3F7WmKn020763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491957 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-15 03:32:47 EDT --- Then please close the bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 08:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475233] pango update i386 conflicts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904150846.n3F8kcHH004501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475233 Christopher Hill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hilldev at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Christopher Hill 2009-04-15 04:46:37 EDT --- I'm getting the same error. Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoMarkupFormat.html conflicts between attempted installs of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 and pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-querymodules.html conflicts between attempted installs of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 and pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495820] numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151241.n3FCfIhf015802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820 --- Comment #2 from cje at btinternet.com 2009-04-15 08:41:17 EDT --- okay, i will do that. but are you certain that it _must_ be the freetype autohinter? aren't some of the hinting things stored in the fonts themselves? i did try a couple of other fonts and couldn't reproduce the same behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Apr 15 12:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] New: hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 Summary: hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font Product: freetype Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: medium Component: general AssignedTo: wl at gnu.org ReportedBy: cje at btinternet.com CC: freedesktop at behdad.org, fedora-fonts-bugs- list at redhat.com using the default dejavu sans font on fedora 11 snap1 numerals aren't all the same width when 'full' or 'medium' hinting is enabled. this leads to a 'jiggling text' effect on ticking clocks. versions are: freetype-2.3.9-3.fc11.i586 dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch for more details see redhat bug 495820 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495820] numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151258.n3FCwCmA021072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-15 08:58:11 EDT --- The Fedora freetype package is built without the interpreter for hinting bytecode for patent reasons, so yes, if you're using the Fedora freetype package, it must be the autohinter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 12:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495820] numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151257.n3FCvLLK020979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820 cje at btinternet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |FreeDesktop.org 21197 --- Comment #3 from cje at btinternet.com 2009-04-15 08:57:21 EDT --- freetype bug raised. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 13:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495820] numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151302.n3FD28An020198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820 --- Comment #5 from cje at btinternet.com 2009-04-15 09:02:08 EDT --- ah, right. thanks for the explanation. makes sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Apr 15 16:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415160202.220E713005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 --- Comment #1 from Werner Lemberg 2009-04-15 09:02:01 PST --- Reading the redhat bug description I see that you are not using the TT hinter. With the autohinter I fear this problem is unavoidable. It probably has to be handled on a level higher than FreeType: If you pass a font to the library, the autohinter simply doesn't know that the digits 0-9 are intended to have the same width. As you certainly aware there are fonts containing `old digits' which intentionally have different widths. I can imagine that there is an option to `fontconfig' which forces the same width to all digits if the autohinter is used (probably using the average value of all digit widths). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Apr 15 16:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090415162042.5EE5513005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 --- Comment #2 from whyoh 2009-04-15 09:20:40 PST --- thanks for the quick response. hmm. can't the library tell that the numerals are all the same width in the unhinted font? if so then might there be an option or rule to tell the autohinter: "numerals are special - don't hint them (much) if they're all the same width in this font"? i think that would be enough for me. but i'm a little hesitant about where (if at all) it's appropriate to assert the "specialness" of numerals vs hinting. and what should we say when everyone starts raising "my numerals are fuzzy!!" bugs? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151802.n3FI2lcD027472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0.112-3.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 15 18:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904151802.n3FI2gFd027187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-15 14:02:41 EDT --- google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 03:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160307.n3G37vQ8006186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #17 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-15 23:07:56 EDT --- hi Jens are you sure you are using the rawhide version of wqy-zenhei-fonts (0.8.38-2.f11)? in Feb. I already removed all the font preference from 44-wqy-zenhei.conf (see my reply earlier), so if the font order are not right, I don't think it has to do with the configuration files of for wqy-zenhei-fonts. Let me know what you find out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 03:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160342.n3G3gTWx009409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #20 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-15 23:42:27 EDT --- but you are requesting to display fonts at 100pt, and the bitmaps shall not be used for this in the first place! I seriously don't believe this is the problem of wqy-bitmap-fonts (and the fontconfig orders), there must be something wrong for choosing fonts at larger font sizes. I highly suspect this is related to what reported in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576890 since wqy-bitmap-fonts has been fine for F9 and F10, and nothing has been changed, why would it suddenly became a problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Apr 16 05:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416051522.8FE5C13005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 --- Comment #3 from Werner Lemberg 2009-04-15 22:15:21 PST --- It's completely irrelevant whether the unhinted numerals have the same width or not. In a TrueType font, the hinting instructions modify the advance width as needed, and this information is not available to the autohinter. There are two possibilities: Either FreeType gets an option for the autohinting module to instruct that some glyphs (numerals and probably some others too) should have the same width, or the library which uses FreeType does this. IMHO it should be the latter. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 05:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160553.n3G5rH17031750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(wtogami at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #21 from Warren Togami 2009-04-16 01:53:16 EDT --- 100pt is not desired, 100pt only demonstrates easily that one is bitmap, the other truetype. It uses bitmap + truetype at ANY size. I don't know the answers to this. I only know that the behavior changed since F-10 and it is now worse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Apr 16 06:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416062101.ED593130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-04-15 23:21:01 PST --- The autohinter already has lots of heuristics based on individual Latin characters. I'd rather it also handles the issue at hand (that is, if all input ASCII glyphs have the same width, they should be hinted to have the same output width also). There is no place for this kind of tweak higher in the stack really. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Apr 16 06:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416062821.3312813005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 --- Comment #5 from Werner Lemberg 2009-04-15 23:28:20 PST --- Behdad, it's not clear to me what you mean with `all input ASCII glyphs have the same width'. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 07:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904160708.n3G78hr9013292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-16 03:08:42 EDT --- I am using the latest package in rawhide (devel). Then perhaps it is 65-nonlatin.conf? :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Apr 16 07:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090416072925.35589130058@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 --- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-04-16 00:29:24 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > Behdad, it's not clear to me what you mean with `all input ASCII glyphs > have the same width'. I mean, if the unhinted, design width, of the ASCII digit glyphs are all the same, the autohinter should ensure that their hinted width is also the same. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 17:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450774] CVE-2008-1808 FreeType off-by-one flaws In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904161720.n3GHK3nl029891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450774 --- Comment #18 from Vincent Danen 2009-04-16 13:20:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339880) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339880) patch for freetype1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 16 20:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450774] CVE-2008-1808 FreeType off-by-one flaws In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904162012.n3GKCpMW011515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450774 Vincent Danen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|484441 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 03:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170341.n3H3fcuq003966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #19 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-16 23:41:37 EDT --- if 65-nonlatin has not been changed from F10 to F11, then I don't think it caused this problem either (while, it did cause difficulties for CJK font selections as I described in the upstream bug, but that was already taken care of by the past revisions of all the 3rd party font config hacks, such as those for wqy-zenhei and wqy-bitmap-song, the only thing we can do better is to incorporate these hacks into fontconfig upstream, but, this is a different problem). I still give my biggest suspicion to cairo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 03:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170353.n3H3rQDI005754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #20 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-16 23:53:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I still give my biggest suspicion to cairo. sorry, this comment was actually talking about Bug#492510. > FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja" Which Japanese font did you expect to be selected as the first? From your fc-match output, I can't find any specific settings that gives higher priority for a Japanese font. Does a japanese-specific fontconfig setting exist? (by the way, I really think fedora should have a language-selector-%locale% type of configurations for each cjk language, like in Ubuntu, that can save a lot of troubles). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 04:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170407.n3H47Rs3008400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #22 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-17 00:07:26 EDT --- then I think the best strategy would be check those packages that got updated from F10 to F11. My biggest suspicion is still cairo, the next biggest one is the font matching algorithm in fontconfig. Again, the expected behavior should be: when there exist vector fonts, bitmap fonts shall never be used at a size it does not cover unless someone explicitly re-specify the font-size in the fontconfig. F11 was the first case that I heard this rule was broken. CJK fonts, particularly bitmap fonts, are the easiest one to be blamed, if anything in the chain of font-rendering got wrong. But this can not be the reason to abandon all the past effort for making them to work in order to cover the mistakes of other pieces in the chain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 05:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170556.n3H5uXs7027285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #23 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-17 01:56:32 EDT --- I'm afraid current fontconfig config from wqy-bitmap-fonts are totally broken as well as 65-nonlatin.conf. apparently the priority list affects everything. we don't have to use it for the language specific font. we have to use the language specific overrides rule at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Locale-specific_overrides to apply it for specific languages. After getting rid of it from both of wqy-bitmapsong.conf and 65-nonlatin.conf on rawhide, WenQuanYi Bitmap Song won't appears with requesting 100pt. and this issue looks gone then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 06:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170607.n3H67USq030278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-17 02:07:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > > FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja" > > Which Japanese font did you expect to be selected as the first? VL Gothic > Does a japanese-specific fontconfig setting exist? Yes, vlgothic-fonts should have font .conf. > (by the way, I really think fedora should have a language-selector-%locale% > type of configurations for each cjk language, like in Ubuntu, that can save a > lot of troubles). Do you have a URL? I would like to look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 06:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170655.n3H6t0vN011147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #336973|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #24 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-17 02:55:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=339961) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339961) proposed fontconfig config I've polished a lot from my previous proposal. it won't depends on other fonts. just works for the desired situation. this should be valid for current our policy as well. I've tested it on rawhide and it works as expected. 1. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> rendering is ok with Japanese font 2. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> rendering is ok with Japanese font 3. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> rendering is ok with Chinese outlined font 4. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is used to render ??? 5. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --markup --text '??? test' --font "Sans 100" --> rendering is ok with Japanese font 6. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --markup --text '??? test' --font "Sans 12" --> rendering is ok with Japanese font 7. LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> rendering all is ok with outlined font 8. (bonus)PANGO_LANGUAGE=zh LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is used to render ??? Which fonts are used on English locale to display non-latin characters really depends on lang tag or PANGO_LANGUAGE. so case 8 is to confirm it, but anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 07:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904170705.n3H75whZ013843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #25 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-17 03:05:57 EDT --- Oh, please update the config as needed if it's close to serif rather than sans-serif. just reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459#c3 and realized it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 10:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171052.n3HAqOtk025421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #22 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-17 06:52:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I am using the latest package in rawhide (devel). > > Then perhaps it is 65-nonlatin.conf? :-/ Probably it is. I don't see any fault in the config for wqy-zenhei-fonts except the numeral prefix maybe? Anyway it should be a separate issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI4Nkb032759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-17 14:04:21 EDT --- beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 17 18:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904171804.n3HI4Sq3031594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 04:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904180427.n3I4R2cW013352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 Arjuna Rao Chavala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arjunaraoc at googlemail.com --- Comment #1 from Arjuna Rao Chavala 2009-04-18 00:27:01 EDT --- There is no problem with another telugu font e-telugu OT.ttf from http://www.uni-hamburg.de/Wiss/FB/10/IndienS/Kniprath/INDOLIPI/Indolipi.htm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From karsten at fedoraproject.org Sat Apr 18 12:33:03 2009 From: karsten at fedoraproject.org (Karsten Hopp) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.159,1.160 Message-ID: <20090418123303.BC58A700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: karsten Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16489 Modified Files: pango.spec Log Message: - autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.159 retrieving revision 1.160 diff -u -r1.159 -r1.160 --- pango.spec 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.159 +++ pango.spec 18 Apr 2009 12:32:33 -0000 1.160 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango Version: 1.24.1 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 1%{?dist}.1 License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ # autoconf uses powerpc not ppc host=`echo $host | sed "s/^ppc/powerpc/"` +# autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) +host=`echo $host | sed "s/^s390\(x\)*-redhat/s390\1-ibm/"` case "$host" in alpha*|ia64*|powerpc64*|s390x*|sparc64*|x86_64*) @@ -223,6 +225,10 @@ %changelog +* Sat Apr 18 2009 Karsten Hopp 1.24.1-1.1 +- autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) + + * Mon Apr 13 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.24.1-1 - Update to 1.24.1 - See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.1.news From karsten at fedoraproject.org Sat Apr 18 12:39:54 2009 From: karsten at fedoraproject.org (Karsten Hopp) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/F-11 pango.spec,1.159,1.160 Message-ID: <20090418123954.127A1700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: karsten Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18782 Modified Files: pango.spec Log Message: - autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/F-11/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.159 retrieving revision 1.160 diff -u -r1.159 -r1.160 --- pango.spec 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.159 +++ pango.spec 18 Apr 2009 12:39:23 -0000 1.160 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango Version: 1.24.1 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 1%{?dist}.1 License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ # autoconf uses powerpc not ppc host=`echo $host | sed "s/^ppc/powerpc/"` +# autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) +host=`echo $host | sed "s/^s390\(x\)*-redhat/s390\1-ibm/"` # Make sure that the host value that is passed to the compile # is the same as the host that we're using in the spec file @@ -223,6 +225,9 @@ %changelog +* Sat Apr 18 2009 Karsten Hopp 1.24.1-1.1 +- autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) + * Mon Apr 13 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.24.1-1 - Update to 1.24.1 - See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.1.news From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496389] New: Incorrect Opentype Font Exporting and Printing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Incorrect Opentype Font Exporting and Printing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496389 Summary: Incorrect Opentype Font Exporting and Printing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i586 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: zhoujingmiller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I labelled this bug as relevant to freetype for it is related to font rendering issues in general. This problem could be reproduced as follows: Open an odt file, with opentype fonts specified within, with abiword and export (print) it to pdf. Use pdffonts to list the embedded fonts within in the pdf. Then the terminal result shows that the opentype font is replaced by times new roman. Open an odt file, with opentype fonts specified within, with abiword and export (print) it to ps. Then evince fails to open the file. Open an odt file, with opentype fonts specified within, with kword (2.0 rc1), under gnome, and export it to pdf. Then kword crashes. However if the file is opened via kword under kde, kword then export the file to pdf, and pdffonts show that the pdf does include the embedded "real" opentype fonts. Set application font to some opentype fonts and open openoffice.org writer. Then we will notice that the openoffice.org application font is not the opentype font specified. Also, openoffice.org cannot use opentype fonts within the document, nor can openoffice.org display opentype fonts correctly within the document. The document mentioned above is an odt file. I didnt notice any other application that has such behavior. I am also sure that this problem is reproducible on fedora 10. However, since I am using fedora 11 rawhide right now, I filed it as a fedora 11 bug. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype.i586 2.3.9-3.fc11 koffice-kword.i586 2:1.9.99.0-1.fc12 openoffice.org-writer.i586 1:3.1.0-9.2.fc11 pango.i586 1.24.1-1.fc11 pangomm.i586 2.24.0-1.fc11 qt.i586 1:4.5.0-14.fc11 abiword.i586 1:2.6.8-2.fc11 kdebase-devel.i586 6:4.2.2-2.fc11 kdelibs.i586 6:4.2.2-5.fc11 Expected results: Abiword, Openoffice.org, Kword, and all other applications are supposed to export documents with opentype fonts to pdf with real opentype fonts, not with any kind of other substitution fonts, and those applications are supposed to do so under every desktop environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 15:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496389] Incorrect Opentype Font Exporting and Printing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904181535.n3IFZKap013656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496389 --- Comment #1 from zhoujingmiller at gmail.com 2009-04-18 11:35:19 EDT --- Here's the website that states that freetype 2 supports opentype: http://www.freetype.org/freetype2/index.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 18 23:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904182341.n3INf03M020455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 --- Comment #2 from Arjuna Rao Chavala 2009-04-18 19:40:59 EDT --- I have investigated more The problem does not occur for Lohit telugu and Pothana in MS windows xp system. For lohit-kannada, the problem occurs for only AA, I, E matras. For Telugu, it occurs for all matras of Ksha akhn (akhand). I logged a bug in Pango also ( http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579398) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191218.n3JCIVCS008113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #26 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-19 08:18:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Created an attachment (id=339961) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339961) [details] > proposed fontconfig config > > I've polished a lot from my previous proposal. it won't depends on other fonts. > just works for the desired situation. this should be valid for current our > policy as well. hi Akira unfortunately, I could not upgrade my F10 to rawhide due to some dependency error, so I can not test it. But just from reading the fontconfig file, I am pretty sure it will lose most of the desired features this font was designed for, please read: http://markmail.org/message/waeyjb3hqkpglfgk and indeed, the current version of 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf [1] contains the following block: WenQuanYi Bitmap Song sans-serif 16 AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni in another word, if the font size requested is greater than 16px, it SHOULD be replaced by ShanHeiSun (Uming). Thus, the behavior you reported should not happen with this conf file per se (force bitmaps at 100pt). So, I am not convinced that 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf needs to be changed to correct the error you reported. (In reply to comment #25) >Oh, please update the config as needed if it's close to serif rather than >sans-serif. just reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459#c3 >and realized it. as acknowledged by other Chinese font designers, it is not really proper to assign a "serif" or "sans-serif" tag for bitmap glyphs optimized for small sizes as all the "serif" features are degenerated. The purpose of these bitmaps are for screen display of Chinese, no matter what font styles they are, to reduce blurry. That's why I put bitmaps in the first place for both aliases in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911 But one thing I can update, which is the fall-back font names. Currently, if the pixel size is >16px or <10px, it will fallback to Ukai for serif, and Uming for sans-serif. If it is more proper to use Uming for serif and ZenHei as the fallback sans-serif. I can make this change if you want. [1] https://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-10/61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf?revision=1.5&view=markup&sortby=log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191243.n3JChL4i008346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #27 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-19 08:43:20 EDT --- just realized that "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" was renamed to "AR PL UMing CN". So, the replacement rules I mentioned above may not valid. Can you please do the following test on your system: 1. install wqy-bitmap-fonts, uming, wqy-zenhei-fonts (make sure you use the original package) 2. download the attached new 61-wqy-bitmapfonts.conf and replace the /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/61-wqy* (or /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-wqy*, they should be the same file) 3. do your test and tell me the results for Sans and Serif. here are my changes: --- 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf 2009-04-19 08:35:49.000000000 -0400 +++ 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf.orig 2009-04-19 08:35:36.000000000 -0400 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ 16 - AR PL UMing CN + AR PL ZenKai Uni @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ 10 - AR PL UMing CN + AR PL ZenKai Uni @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ 16 - WenQuanYi Zen Hei + AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ 10 - WenQuanYi Zen Hei + AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 12:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191244.n3JCiOeh008455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #28 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-19 08:44:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340232) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340232) update Uming font name for F11 use Uming as serif fallback and ZenHei as sans fallback -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 19:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191909.n3JJ9AOj013617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #29 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-19 15:09:10 EDT --- Finally, I upgraded my F10 to F11. I believe the changed "ShanHeiSun" font name caused the problem you have seen (in this case, it wasn't cairo, I take back my previous suspicions). Here were my tests: 1. edit 61-wqy-bitmapfonts.conf, replace line#100 and #114 from "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" to "AR PL UMing CN" (Uming should have been installed for chinese-support), and make sure "wqy-zenhei-fonts" was NOT installed. 2. do your pango-view tests, everything should work as expected, no more bitmaps: when LANG=en_US.UTF-8 and , the Han glyphs were rendered with VL Gothic; without specifying under en_US locale, it will use UMing, as I explained previously; if LANG=ja or LANG=zh, they will use the preferred fonts for the respective locale. @Akira: can you repeat the test above and let me know if you think the results are ok with you? I will commit this change when I get your confirmation. Now, things are getting a little bit complicated if I install wqy-zenhei-fonts. As I said, for Chinese, UMing is a serif font, and ZenHei is a sans-serif font. So, ideally, I should use the patch I posted earlier this morning. However, this is related to Bug#476459: if I install wqy-zenhei-fonts, VL Gothic will be replaced by ZenHei. Looking into the settings, I realized that it wasn't 44-wqy-zenhei.conf, as Jens originally suspected; the problem was caused by 65-nonlatin.conf. Actually, I think the font order in the current 65-nonlatin.conf is fine: as it does not assume specific language, I believe it is a good idea to put large-coverage fonts in front of small ones (see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911). The only problem is, there is no Japanese specific font priority settings to boost VL Gothic for ja locale! Here is Ubuntu's way to solve this: a list of language specific (CJK only) fontconfig settings are stored in conf.avail, named with "{29,69,99}-language-selector-xxxx.conf" where xxxx include zh-cn, zh-hk, zh-..., ja-jp and ko-kr. For a given desktop locale, it will link the corresponding conf file to conf.d. Although it is a little bit messy, but I think it serves the purpose well: 65-nonlatin is the default font order without assuming any specific lang, if you want to overwrite that for a specific locale, you have to add a lang-specific conf file. @Jens: if you want to take a look at language-selector, you can download the tar ball at http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/language-selector , untar it and check out the fontconfig folder. If we are short of time for F11, I can temporarily add a xx-wqy-zenhei.conf and set VL Gothic in front of ZenHei when lang=ja; in that case, we can still install Zen Hei for Chinese-support. please let me know how you want to proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 19 19:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904191910.n3JJApfY008891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #23 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-19 15:10:49 EDT --- just for the record, I posted my diagnosis to this problem as the comment to Bug#492510. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 03:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200308.n3K38FBi015312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #30 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-19 23:08:14 EDT --- I'd prefer not describing other font name there, particularly when happening the font name changed like this case or one prefers other fonts etc. they could override their .fonts.conf though, it's not convenient. ideally a common config should be applied by just installing the package. my proposed config would reasonably works for even that case and is simply enough. Anyway I'll try your proposal here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 03:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904200314.n3K3EOvQ016275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #31 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-19 23:14:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > and indeed, the current version of 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf [1] contains the > following block: > > > > WenQuanYi Bitmap Song > > > sans-serif > > > 16 > > > AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni > > > > in another word, if the font size requested is greater than 16px, it SHOULD be > replaced by ShanHeiSun (Uming). Thus, the behavior you reported should not > happen with this conf file per se (force bitmaps at 100pt). So, I am not > convinced that 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf needs to be changed to correct the error > you reported. Is it something you mentioned the above comment my proposal is missing? my proposal just leaves it to other config but ensure to use WenQuanYi Bitmap Song for requesting a pixelsize between 10px and 16px. it would works as long as users installs preferred Chinese fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Mon Apr 20 16:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 20854] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420163143.4E1B0130058@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |NOTOURBUG --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-20 09:31:42 PST --- All the mime-types associated with *.otf have magic data associated, so front-ends should be able to detect which is which by using magic in case of conflict. Adding weight for one or the other would cause more problems than it would solve. So file a bug against the applications that fail to detect the files correctly instead. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Mon Apr 20 16:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 20854] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090420165200.6748E13005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |seb128 at ubuntu.com --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2009-04-20 09:51:59 PST --- *** Bug 20603 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473903] font size isn't restored upon login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904201915.n3KJFqZV015861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473903 Bryan Christ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496703 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 19:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496703] New: font size isn't restored upon login Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: font size isn't restored upon login https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496703 Summary: font size isn't restored upon login Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: bryan.christ at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 473903 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- BZ 473903 is unresolved for Fedora 11. Steps to reproduce: 1. Log in and fonts are the wrong size. 2. Open gnome-appearance-properties. 3. Fonts magically fix themselves for the remainder of the session. 4. Logout of session and log back in. 5. Font problem returns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496703] font size isn't restored upon login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202127.n3KLRCJt015219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496703 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-04-20 17:27:11 EDT --- Is gnome-settings-daemon running in your session before you start gnome-appearance-properties ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 21:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496703] font size isn't restored upon login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202130.n3KLUmQX015897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496703 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Christ 2009-04-20 17:30:47 EDT --- yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 20 23:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496703] font size isn't restored upon login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904202357.n3KNv5ZR009941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496703 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-04-20 19:57:04 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 496531 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 08:34:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496795] New: UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 Summary: UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil at get9.net ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, smallvil at get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Just realized that gucharmap displays glyphs at CJK Unified Ideographs with UnDotum for Sans even if I run it on ja locale, because of the fontconfig config. Please use the locale-specific overrides rule instead of the simple priority lists rule. that breaks other locale-specific overrides rule. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.install un-core-fonts-dotum and vlgothic-fonts 2.run gucharmap with LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 3.set Sans as a font and right-click on any glyphs at CJK Unified Ideographs Actual results: rendered with UnDotum Expected results: rendered with VL Gothic Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 09:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496806] New: previously installed 3rd party font gets lost after yum update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: previously installed 3rd party font gets lost after yum update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496806 Summary: previously installed 3rd party font gets lost after yum update Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: yshao at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: previously installed 3rd party font gets lost after yum update Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F10 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install fonts-chinese-zysong-0.1-5.el5.noarch.rpm on f10 2. system update 3. zysong disappeared. Actual results: [root at localhost fonts]# rpm -ivh /home/shao/Download/fonts-chinese-zysong-0.1-5.el5.noarch.rpm warning: /home/shao/Download/fonts-chinese-zysong-0.1-5.el5.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 37017186 error: Failed dependencies: /usr/sbin/chkfontpath is needed by fonts-chinese-zysong-0.1-5.el5.noarch fonts-chinese >= 3.02-12.el5 is needed by fonts-chinese-zysong-0.1-5.el5.noarch ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6 is needed by fonts-chinese-zysong-0.1-5.el5.noarch Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211107.n3LB77uC003956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211106.n3LB6saT003931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211106.n3LB6dvn003892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 11:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211107.n3LB7Li6003976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211318.n3LDIVaM003208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-21 09:18:30 EDT --- I think correct Source URL is http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/ipagp00301.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 21 13:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904211318.n3LDIcCs003245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-21 09:18:37 EDT --- I think correct Source URL is http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/ipag00301.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 01:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220115.n3M1FTkU006511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 21:15:29 EDT --- Yes, you're right. updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 02:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220253.n3M2rb95021341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 22:53:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm Just updated to correct the source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 02:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220253.n3M2r6wn021251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 22:53:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm Just updated to correct the source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 02:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220252.n3M2qTjq021184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-21 22:52:28 EDT --- Yes, you're right. updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220801.n3M81ZVU015237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:01:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313843 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-gothic-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url 5ae6783ec8c1e0c6579eb2033bfc78f9 ipag00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220801.n3M81U1Y015202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:01:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313839 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-pgothic-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-pgothic-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url ab5e7e962b358a5579d08f09a9d07ebf ipagp00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220816.n3M8GOZs018608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 04:16:23 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-pgothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220815.n3M8FHg9013509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 04:15:15 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-gothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220817.n3M8HqsE013950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:17:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314104 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-pmincho-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-pmincho-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url be6bd5e5f09da8773d0361128340a0f1 ipamp00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220818.n3M8IAAQ018888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-04-22 04:18:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314105 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-mincho-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-mincho-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA ==> ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url 583645bf37f787b2edec30e7d763e8b3 ipam00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 08:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220824.n3M8OEQZ020027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 04:24:13 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing so quick :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-pmincho-fonts Short Description: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 09:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904220959.n3M9xa76006499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-22 05:59:35 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipa-mincho-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 22 10:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497090] New: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090 Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: runab at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In case of conjuncts with Yaphala (U09CD+U09AF), multiple Yaphala signs can be typed consecutively giving rise to invalid conjunct combinations. e.g ????????? (?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?) This error could be replicated in gedit, kwrite and Openoffice.org Writer Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-indic: 2.3.8-1.fc11 gedit : 2.26.1-1.fc11 openoffice.org: 3.1.0-9.2.fc11 kdebase : 4.2.2-2.fc11 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit 2. Type in the following unicode values (for the above example) : U0995+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF Actual results: The last 3 U09CD+U09AF pairs are allowed as part of the conjunct Expected results: The U09CD+U09AF pair should not be allowed to be rendered after another U09CD+U09AF. i.e. only one U09CD+U09AF pair can be used when combining with another consonant to form a conjunct. Additional info: Please do note that: U09AF+U09CD+U09AF is a valid conjunct combination, where two U09AF characters combine to form a conjunct (???) Screenshots: gedit: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/gedit-ya.png kwrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/kwrite-ya.png oowrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/oowrite-ya.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jbfaure at openoffice.org Wed Apr 22 17:59:17 2009 From: jbfaure at openoffice.org (jbfaure at openoffice.org) Date: 22 Apr 2009 17:59:17 -0000 Subject: [Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090422175917.14562.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User jbfaure changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli |vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo |rafonts,goranrakic,haktar,|rafonts,goranrakic,haktar, |hdu,hin,iorsh,jeevesbond,j|hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev |lp,kami_,manens,masayan,mo|esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma |yogo,munzirtaha,nusorn,obr|sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu |,ousia,rabauke,ralphie,sam|sorn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ral |phan,silverex,simos,utomo9|phie,samphan,silverex,simo |9' |s,utomo99' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 01:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230151.n3N1pYBV010553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 21:51:33 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 02:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230212.n3N2Cofv022212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 22:12:49 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 02:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230217.n3N2HwZP015357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 22:17:57 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 02:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904230221.n3N2Lo8G016349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-22 22:21:49 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 06:53:05 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423065305.3843C70104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10714/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-gothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:HEAD:ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240469500 --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAGothic monospace ja-jp monospace IPAGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-gothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipag%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 06:52:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipag00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 06:52:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +5ae6783ec8c1e0c6579eb2033bfc78f9 ipag00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 06:54:43 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423065443.6615C70104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11371/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:HEAD:ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240469624 --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPGothic sans-serif ja-jp sans-serif IPAPGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pgothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipagp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 06:54:12 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipagp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 06:54:12 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ab5e7e962b358a5579d08f09a9d07ebf ipagp00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:01:21 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423070121.41EF370104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13134/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-mincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:HEAD:ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240469732 --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-mincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipam%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:00:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipam00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:00:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +583645bf37f787b2edec30e7d763e8b3 ipam00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:10:08 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423071008.804CD70104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15896/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:HEAD:ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240470119 --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAPMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pmincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipamp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:09:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipamp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:09:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +be6bd5e5f09da8773d0361128340a0f1 ipamp00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:28:49 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423072849.38EC870104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19725/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-gothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-11:ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240470983 --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAGothic monospace ja-jp monospace IPAGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-gothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipag%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:28:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipag00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:28:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +5ae6783ec8c1e0c6579eb2033bfc78f9 ipag00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:32:49 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423073249.2DA7670104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20604/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-11:ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240471760 --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPGothic sans-serif ja-jp sans-serif IPAPGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pgothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipagp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:32:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipagp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:32:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ab5e7e962b358a5579d08f09a9d07ebf ipagp00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:36:06 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423073606.C763370104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22127/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-mincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-11:ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240472001 --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-mincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipam%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:36:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipam00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:36:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +583645bf37f787b2edec30e7d763e8b3 ipam00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:39:15 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423073915.9642B70104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22786/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-11:ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240472200 --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAPMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pmincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipamp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:38:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipamp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:38:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +be6bd5e5f09da8773d0361128340a0f1 ipamp00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:42:56 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423074256.9FB8970104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24016/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-gothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-10:ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240472423 --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAGothic monospace ja-jp monospace IPAGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-gothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipag%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:42:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipag00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:42:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +5ae6783ec8c1e0c6579eb2033bfc78f9 ipag00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:48:33 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423074834.07C5470104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25359/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-10:ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240472610 --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPGothic sans-serif ja-jp sans-serif IPAPGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pgothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipagp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:48:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipagp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:48:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ab5e7e962b358a5579d08f09a9d07ebf ipagp00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:50:06 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423075006.C0FC270104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26165/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-mincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-10:ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240472960 --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-mincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipam%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:49:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipam00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:49:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +583645bf37f787b2edec30e7d763e8b3 ipam00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 07:56:45 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423075646.09C8470104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28159/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-10:ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240473042 --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAPMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pmincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipamp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 07:56:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipamp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 07:56:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +be6bd5e5f09da8773d0361128340a0f1 ipamp00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 09:42:36 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423094236.2410970104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16569/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-gothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-9:ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240479657 --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAGothic monospace ja-jp monospace IPAGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-gothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-gothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipag%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 09:42:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipag00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:51:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 09:42:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +5ae6783ec8c1e0c6579eb2033bfc78f9 ipag00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 09:43:55 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423094355.3828070104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17120/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-9:ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240479788 --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPGothic sans-serif ja-jp sans-serif IPAPGothic --- NEW FILE ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pgothic %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipagp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Gothic (sans-serif) style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 09:43:24 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipagp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 01:53:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 09:43:24 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ab5e7e962b358a5579d08f09a9d07ebf ipagp00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 09:45:16 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423094516.55A6970104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17529/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-mincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-9:ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240479863 --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-mincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-mincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipam%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 09:44:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipam00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:14:35 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 09:44:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +583645bf37f787b2edec30e7d763e8b3 ipam00301.zip From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 09:47:03 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423094703.1151970104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18178/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-003_01-2_fc10:F-9:ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc10.src.rpm:1240479957 --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- IPAPMincho serif ja-jp serif IPAPMincho --- NEW FILE ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec --- %global priority 65 %global fontname ipa-pmincho %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global archiveversion 00301 %global archivename ipamp%{archiveversion} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X License: IPA URL: http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ Source0: http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Mincho style font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. * Tue Apr 21 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-1 - Initial package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 09:46:32 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ipamp00301.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 02:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 09:46:32 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +be6bd5e5f09da8773d0361128340a0f1 ipamp00301.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497311] New: Dependent Vowel (0CBC) are Render as Independenet vowel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Dependent Vowel (0CBC) are Render as Independenet vowel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497311 Summary: Dependent Vowel (0CBC) are Render as Independenet vowel Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: mshao at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 497292 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 497292 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #497292 +++ Description of problem: U+0CBC (unicode points) is not showing Dotted circle before it, so Render as Independent Vowel, but it is Dependent, so one Dotted Circle should be there (Unicode also support that only) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.14.9-3.el5 also reproduce in pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1.Type the unicode of U+0CBC in gedit 2. Test with kedit 3. Actual results: character is as inDependent vowel (no dotted circle) Expected results: character should be as Dependent vowel (should be a dotted circle) Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 10:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497309] New: Some unicode do not shown correctly shape in Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Some unicode do not shown correctly shape in Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497309 Summary: Some unicode do not shown correctly shape in Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: mshao at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 497306 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 497306 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #497306 +++ Description of problem: U+0CE2 and U+0CE3 do not show the correctly shape Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.22.1-1.fc10 How reproducible:everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1.Type the unicode, like U+0CE2 and U+0CE3 2.Test with kedit 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: The actual results and the expected results will be shown in attachment. --- Additional comment from mshao at redhat.com on 2009-04-23 06:17:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340922) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340922) Expect results --- Additional comment from mshao at redhat.com on 2009-04-23 06:18:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=340923) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=340923) The wrong results -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231138.n3NBcc1D021964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:38:37 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231139.n3NBdTcL028881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:39:28 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:39:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231139.n3NBdtBB028944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:39:54 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 11:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231139.n3NBd2bm028820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-23 07:39:01 EDT --- available on koji now. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 13:00:58 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090423130058.96C7370104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14291 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:00:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 13:00:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02 VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 00:39:55 -0000 1.3 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:00:27 -0000 1.4 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090204 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 20090422 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 +- New upstream release. + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20090204-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 13:02:37 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090423130237.118EB70104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14838 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:02:06 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 13:02:06 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02 VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 00:39:55 -0000 1.3 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:02:06 -0000 1.4 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090204 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 20090422 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 +- New upstream release. + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20090204-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 13:09:34 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423130934.0E66270104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16294 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 10 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:09:03 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 10 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 13:09:03 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02 VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0000 1.1 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:09:03 -0000 1.2 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090204 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 20090422 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ %changelog +* Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 +- New upstream release. + +* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20090204-3 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild + * Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-2 - clean up. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 13:32:36 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090423133236.E153B70104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20804 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 10 Feb 2009 12:05:21 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:32:06 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 10 Feb 2009 12:05:21 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 23 Apr 2009 13:32:06 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02 VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 +dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 12:05:21 -0000 1.1 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:32:06 -0000 1.2 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090204 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 20090422 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ %changelog +* Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 +- New upstream release. + +* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20090204-3 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild + * Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-2 - clean up. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 13:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231351.n3NDpEd3026424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-04-23 09:51:13 EDT --- hi, sorry for this.. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From fangq at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 18:18:30 2009 From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-11 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090423181830.4A38F70104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv677 Modified Files: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf Log Message: update outdated Uming font names (Bug#492510) Index: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-11/61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf 11 May 2008 18:26:37 -0000 1.5 +++ 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf 23 Apr 2009 18:17:59 -0000 1.6 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ 16 - AR PL ZenKai Uni + AR PL UMing CN @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ 10 - AR PL ZenKai Uni + AR PL UMing CN @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ 16 - AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni + WenQuanYi Zen Hei @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ 10 - AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni + WenQuanYi Zen Hei From fangq at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 18:22:59 2009 From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-11 wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.22,1.23 Message-ID: <20090423182300.01F2270104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1401 Modified Files: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: update spec (Bug#492510) Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-11/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.22 retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23 --- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 07:13:12 -0000 1.22 +++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 18:22:29 -0000 1.23 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9.9 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ %changelog +*Thu Apr 23 2009 Qianqian Fang 0.9.9-10 +- correct outdated uming font names for F11 (#492510) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.9.9-9 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From fangq at fedoraproject.org Thu Apr 23 18:32:24 2009 From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf, 1.5, 1.6 wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec, 1.22, 1.23 Message-ID: <20090423183224.DAE0170104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2893 Modified Files: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: update outdated Uming font names (Bug#492510) Index: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf 11 May 2008 18:26:37 -0000 1.5 +++ 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf 23 Apr 2009 18:31:54 -0000 1.6 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ 16 - AR PL ZenKai Uni + AR PL UMing CN @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ 10 - AR PL ZenKai Uni + AR PL UMing CN @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ 16 - AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni + WenQuanYi Zen Hei @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ 10 - AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni + WenQuanYi Zen Hei Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.22 retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23 --- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 07:13:12 -0000 1.22 +++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 18:31:54 -0000 1.23 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9.9 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ %changelog +*Thu Apr 23 2009 Qianqian Fang 0.9.9-10 +- correct outdated uming font names for F11 (#492510) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.9.9-9 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 23 18:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495252] Texts/Fonts are crappy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904231844.n3NIieK4029141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495252 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com Blocks|446452(F11Blocker) |497399(F11XorgBlocker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 05:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497309] Some unicode do not shown correctly shape in Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904240531.n3O5ViYX026558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497309 --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-04-24 01:31:43 EDT --- Please file and track Indic bugs upstream. No point in keeping them here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ja at openoffice.org Fri Apr 24 08:41:37 2009 From: ja at openoffice.org (ja at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Apr 2009 08:41:37 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090424084137.17800.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 ------- Additional comments from ja at openoffice.org Fri Apr 24 08:41:33 +0000 2009 ------- *** Issue 23402 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 19:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480685] fontforge multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904241907.n3OJ77Q0007434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 --- Comment #4 from Philippe Troin 2009-04-24 15:07:06 EDT --- An F10 update would be nice, but is not stricly necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 20:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242015.n3OKFCuF029011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #37 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-04-24 16:15:09 EDT --- As it seems that the packages have been uploaded and pushed in Bodhi, I close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 24 22:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480685] fontforge multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904242226.n3OMQP8o020035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-24 18:26:24 EDT --- Well, I raised the subject, but it didn't seem to get much interest. ;( I guess I would say lets go ahead and close this now. If a f10 update happens, I will be sure and get these changes in that build. Thanks for the bug report and info. Feel free to reopen this or file a new bug if you spot anything further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 15:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] New: Upgrade path is broken Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Upgrade path is broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Summary: Upgrade path is broken Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Liberation-fonts consists of a single package, liberation-fonts in Fedora 10. In F11 this package is missing, also nothing obsoletes or provides it. This makes any packages that Requires: liberation-fonts not being able to install on a pure installation of F11, and liberation-fonts not updating from F10 to F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 21:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252159.n3PLxRis018630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-25 17:59:26 EDT --- wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.9.9-10.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.9.9-10.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 25 22:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904252243.n3PMhXwe025098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #33 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-25 18:43:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Is it something you mentioned the above comment my proposal is missing? my > proposal just leaves it to other config but ensure to use WenQuanYi Bitmap Song > for requesting a pixelsize between 10px and 16px. it would works as long as > users installs preferred Chinese fonts. I need more tests on your config files. But at least from what I saw at this point, the replacement only happens for Sans, not for serif and mono. Generally speaking, users who like bitmaps also prefer to use bitmap Han glyphs for all alias (sans, serif and mono). Also, because the Latin fonts are lot better than the Latin glyphs in this bitmap, synthesizing the Latin fonts with the bitmap Han glyphs are also preferred. In addition, I noticed that you used "zh" as lang filter, this limits the use of this font for zh only, which does not solve the font-mosaic problems under non-cjk locales while the original 61-wqy-bitmapfonts.conf does. Before 61-nonlatin gets updated, I prefer to have these rules active for all non-ja and non-ko locales (at least en). In order to use your config file, the above points need to be addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 03:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270337.n3R3bJrf023373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #34 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-26 23:37:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Generally speaking, users who like bitmaps also prefer to use bitmap Han glyphs > for all alias (sans, serif and mono). Sure. I was just following 3rd at comment #4 which makes sense to me. it may be hard to categorize Chinese fonts to those three and I don't know how much difference of the bitmap fonts in the design among Song, Ming, Kai and so on. but IMHO it should be aligned to one of them as they are, no matter how much sizes those fonts are available since it's named like so. because they should/could more or less contains any difference defining in the design regardless of the font size. > In addition, I noticed that you used > "zh" as lang filter, this limits the use of this font for zh only, which does > not solve the font-mosaic problems under non-cjk locales while the original > 61-wqy-bitmapfonts.conf does. Before 61-nonlatin gets updated, I prefer to have > these rules active for all non-ja and non-ko locales (at least en). I'm not sure if I hear what you mean. at least that rule will be applied as long as you run applications under Chinese locale or rendering engine requires it to display a text tagged blahblahblah in the pango markup say. which cases are you really concerned? do you prefer to use the Chinese outlined fonts for English as well but the bitmap fonts from Latin fonts if the size available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 04:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497768] New: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497768 Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Machine with Rawhide, having Maithili(mai_IN) language only, while checking font for language, it is showing "Lohit Hindi", while maithili fonts are installed on machine. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.i586 lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. in gnome-terminal run, 2. $fc-match 3. Actual results: [aalam at 333-333 ~]$ echo $LANG mai_IN [aalam at 333-333 ~]$ fc-match lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular" Expected results: "Lohit Maithili" Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 06:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270658.n3R6wWj7025735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-27 02:58:31 EDT --- The liberation-fonts provides does not exist in Fedora 11. This is similar to what was done to other font packages. So you can not install a package that depends on liberation-fonts in F11, and you can not update a system to F11 if it includes a package depending on liberation-fonts not replaced by a new package with fixed requires This was an intentional choice to force packagers to take into account the new F11 package layout. However F11 itself should not include such a package, and the upgrade path works for pure Fedora packages, so it s NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270713.n3R7Duao025270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-27 03:13:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The liberation-fonts provides does not exist in Fedora 11. This is similar to > what was done to other font packages. So you can not install a package that > depends on liberation-fonts in F11, and you can not update a system to F11 if > it includes a package depending on liberation-fonts not replaced by a new > package with fixed requires > > This was an intentional choice to force packagers to take into account the new > F11 package layout. > > However F11 itself should not include such a package, and the upgrade path > works for pure Fedora packages, so it s NOTABUG I don't think that's a valid point: if you have a F10 system with some package requiring liberation-fonts, it will not be removed if the package that required it no longer requires it. However, if the new F11 package requires the new liberation-fonts-subpackage, you will end up with a file clash, which is not what is supposed to happen. "Forcing" other maintainers is not a good thing if it means that upgrades don't work automatically. At least for people wanting to yum upgrade this is a pain in the ass. Now that F11 is going gold soon, I think you SHOULD put in the obsoletes, since every package that has already been built in F11 has taken the renamal into account- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 07:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904270724.n3R7OTDR027057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-27 03:24:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The liberation-fonts provides does not exist in Fedora 11. This is similar to > what was done to other font packages. So you can not install a package that > depends on liberation-fonts in F11, and you can not update a system to F11 if > it includes a package depending on liberation-fonts not replaced by a new > package with fixed requires > > This was an intentional choice to force packagers to take into account the new > F11 package layout. > > However F11 itself should not include such a package, and the upgrade path > works for pure Fedora packages, so it s NOTABUG No. upgrading path from F-10 -> F-11 MUST be preserved. This is not related to font packaging policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Mon Apr 27 17:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 21197] hinted numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of dejavu sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090427174316.930C613005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21197 Werner Lemberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Werner Lemberg 2009-04-27 10:43:15 PST --- This is now fixed in the FreeType git repository. Please test. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 27 17:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496806] previously installed 3rd party font gets lost after yum update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904271752.n3RHq95T012374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496806 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-27 13:52:08 EDT --- This is not a problem in Fedora, this is a problem in the third-party font package. It needs to be updated to respect the Fedora packaging conventions (for example we've asked for years not to depend explicitly on ttmkfdir) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280500.n3S509Fo009315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 05:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904280511.n3S5BXT7011646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fangqq at gmail.com) --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-28 01:11:32 EDT --- Does this build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=99342 address this issue also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 09:07:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] New: [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Summary: [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: installed gnome desktop in maithili (mai_IN), later install punjabi-support (pa_IN). and tried to login gnome-desktop Punjabi, kde applications are not showing fonts, but square box Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kdebase-4.2.2-2.fc11.i586 qt-4.5.0-14.fc11.i586 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.i586 lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch kde-l10n-Punjabi-4.2.2-1.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Evertime Steps to Reproduce: 1. add punjabi support (yum groupinstall punjabi-support) 2. logout and login Punjabi locale 3. run kate or kwrite Actual results: actually showing square box instead of font glyph Expected results: proper font glyph should shown Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 28 13:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904281326.n3SDQRGt016086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #36 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-28 09:26:25 EDT --- just tried the proposed package at comment #32. and I don't see anything better than current version of the package regardless of modifying 65-nonlatin.conf. have you ever tried to test everything at comment #24 before pushing the update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487061] Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290326.n3T3QXft030852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 --- Comment #3 from Akihiro Nomura 2009-04-28 23:26:31 EDT --- I tried a patch proposed in #485566 and it solves my problem. I think this is the same behaviour to older VLGothic-* packages as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:41:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290341.n3T3fO62009947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290341.n3T3fP5H009984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290340.n3T3edFC009856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fangqq at gmail.com) | --- Comment #37 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-28 23:40:38 EDT --- this update is basically identical to the patch posted in comment #27 (in #27, the diff was made reversed). And the behavior should match what I described in comment #29. In short, this patch by itself will not solve the problem you reported, because it depends on the solution to Bug#476459. I assume Jens is going to add a separate config file for VL Gothic to specify it as the default ja sans font. With this file in place, both Bug#476459 and this bug should be solved. I will mark this Bug#476459 as dependent to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485566] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290344.n3T3iCuk001289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Akihiro Nomura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sacredfox at hotmail.com --- Comment #3 from Akihiro Nomura 2009-04-28 23:44:11 EDT --- I tried this patch to vlgothic-* fonts, into /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/66-vlgothic-*.conf. This patch seems to resolve following issues (or make them to original state), which have been occurred since new fontconfig rules applied to VLGothic*. 1. In monospace, "@" glyph is rendered sometimes in vlgothic or sometimes in dejavu mono and their width is different. (This bug) 2. Some English alphabet and numbers in the applets in gnome-panel looks like monospace and hard to read. I don't know why this occur and is resolved by this patch. 3. Some ambiguous width character (like ?) in gnome-terminal is rendered as fill-width but treated as half-width, I mentioned this issue in Bug #487061. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 03:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290344.n3T3ilP6001372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fangqq at gmail.com |tagoh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 04:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290402.n3T429c0004793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #38 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-29 00:02:07 EDT --- Akira, I reassigned Bug#476459 since you are the maintainer of vlgothic-fonts. I want to make sure you understand my rationales for solving these two bugs: first of all, 65-nolatin sets the default font orders for cjk fonts, it does not, and perhaps should not, assume which locale is preferred, therefore, it won't solve the font variant issues for CJK. The solution is to introduce language-specific font config files. Unfortunately, Fedora does not have language-selector settings as in Ubuntu. Currently, the language specific font orders for Chinese is done by the fontconfig files associated with the default Chinese font (Zen Hei and Bitmap Song). However, Japanese does not have such config files, and completely relies on 65-nonlatin (which is not only out-dated, but also giving zh locale a lower priority). Therefore, either you want to introduce a Japanese specific font config file to set the preferred font orders for lang=ja, or you simply define VL Gothic as the default Sans for ja in the vlgothic-fonts config files, just like the file you proposed for this bug (you do need to replace zh to ja and reset the font names). I believe that a better solution would be the first one in the long run, but for now, the second solution is not bad either (in the future, this file can directly renamed to language-selector-ja_JP.conf or something like that). Let me know if this is making sense to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497309] [kn_IN]Some unicode do not shown correctly shape in Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290701.n3T71w8P014557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497309 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, psatpute at redhat.com, | |svenkate at redhat.com Resolution| |UPSTREAM Summary|Some unicode do not shown |[kn_IN]Some unicode do not |correctly shape in |shown correctly shape in |Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) |Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) Bug 497309 depends on bug 497306, which changed state. Bug 497306 Summary: Some unicode do not shown correctly shape in Kannada(U+0CE2 and U+0CE3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497306 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-04-29 03:01:57 EDT --- http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580703 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 07:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904290753.n3T7rdh3024246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-04-29 03:53:38 EDT --- Fresh install of rawhide 20090428 with kde desktop, then bug exist with kde -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479521] Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291356.n3TDu8jA031722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 --- Comment #2 from Pander 2009-04-29 09:56:06 EDT --- Please also fix LiberationSerif-BoldItalic, see line 57: Ascender - Liberation Seri Bold Italic from: ttx -d . -t name LiberationSerif-BoldItalic.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 13:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479521] Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291357.n3TDvj8M007387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 Pander changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #3 from Pander 2009-04-29 09:57:44 EDT --- Please check all metadata in output of "ttx -d . -t name" for unwanted &# HTML codes. Python (and other) XML parsers crash on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 14:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291458.n3TEwg8S016394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |awilliam at redhat.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) --- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-29 10:58:41 EDT --- Triaging. Blocks F11Target not F11Blocker because upgrading via yum is not our supported method (preupgrade is). -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 15:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291510.n3TFAiN9027204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 --- Comment #2 from seth vidal 2009-04-29 11:10:43 EDT --- Adam, Both are supported. And both are what people WILL be using. This is unacceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473903] font size isn't restored upon login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291606.n3TG6XnA001796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473903 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Mason 2009-04-29 12:06:32 EDT --- This happened to me again today when I logged in. I checked to see if gnome-settings-daemon was running: $ ps -ef | grep gnome-settings | grep -v grep $ and it wasn't. Restarting gnome-settings-daemon put the fonts back the way they are supposed to be. I would assume this means that gnome-settings-daemon is dying for some reason. Maybe this is a duplicate of Bug 464385? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 16:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291629.n3TGTda6007289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 --- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-29 12:29:38 EDT --- as discussed via IRC, I was just going on what I heard when I asked about yum-based distro upgrades (ask wwoods for his take). actions of triage team are just the triager's best effort, not manna from heaven; you could add this to F11Blocker list if you like. releng has ultimate power over that list. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 29 17:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904291712.n3THCXwL017615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-04-29 13:12:32 EDT --- Seth, can you test to see whether updating gtk+ and pango first, restarting g-t, then installing the font package makes any difference? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 03:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300330.n3U3Uuha027656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #39 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-29 23:30:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Akira, I reassigned Bug#476459 since you are the maintainer of vlgothic-fonts. So what? that's not a bug in vlgothic-fonts though ;) > I want to make sure you understand my rationales for solving these two bugs: > first of all, 65-nolatin sets the default font orders for cjk fonts, it does > not, and perhaps should not, assume which locale is preferred, therefore, it > won't solve the font variant issues for CJK. The solution is to introduce > language-specific font config files. Unfortunately, Fedora does not have > language-selector settings as in Ubuntu. Currently, the language specific font > orders for Chinese is done by the fontconfig files associated with the default > Chinese font (Zen Hei and Bitmap Song). However, Japanese does not have such > config files, and completely relies on 65-nonlatin (which is not only > out-dated, but also giving zh locale a lower priority). Not really. I have looked at language-selector though, basically what they have done is same to what we do. only difference is, they've done to switch the config physically outside fontconfig, but we do in fontconfig with checking the language. I don't think Ubuntu way is the right thing since it doesn't use the expected fonts for the language. i.e. if select -zh-cn.conf, even Japanese text will be rendered with Chinese font. > Therefore, either you want to introduce a Japanese specific font config file to > set the preferred font orders for lang=ja, or you simply define VL Gothic as > the default Sans for ja in the vlgothic-fonts config files, just like the file > you proposed for this bug (you do need to replace zh to ja and reset the font > names). I'm not sure what you mean. the language-specific overrides rule is to do that. but it really conflicts to the simple priority list. actually getting rid of it makes the language-specific overrides rule working and this issue is also gone. Since we've sometimes ever seen the font order issue between Chinese and Japanese desktop/installer etc, I'm beginning to think that the simple priority list is evil. > I believe that a better solution would be the first one in the long run, but > for now, the second solution is not bad either (in the future, this file can > directly renamed to language-selector-ja_JP.conf or something like that). I don't like the language-selector idea, because it may be hard to get rid of that feature once we've implemented. people may gets confused with it. That would be good to update all of fonts in F-12 which has the simple priority list and are supposed to work for the specific language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 03:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300341.n3U3f2LN004838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #40 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-29 23:41:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > this update is basically identical to the patch posted in comment #27 (in #27, > the diff was made reversed). And the behavior should match what I described in > comment #29. In short, this patch by itself will not solve the problem you > reported, because it depends on the solution to Bug#476459. No. I've tried the new package /without/ wqy-zenhei-fonts to be sane. you should get rid of the bug number from the errata if that isn't supposed to fix this bug. > going to add a separate config file for VL Gothic to specify it as the default > ja sans font. With this file in place, both Bug#476459 and this bug should be > solved. I'm afraid not. it won't helps. relying on the simple priority list only depends on the order of the config files to work as expected. we have to stop the priority race shortly and make happy for all of languages which would conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 03:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300356.n3U3uFdV007524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #41 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-29 23:56:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > So what? that's not a bug in vlgothic-fonts though ;) I am just pointing out a solution to these two issues, you like to call it a bug or "feature request", it does not matter. > Not really. I have looked at language-selector though, basically what they have > done is same to what we do. only difference is, they've done to switch the > config physically outside fontconfig, but we do in fontconfig with checking the > language. the key difference is not to separate them from the standard fontconfig files, but to make only one set of files linked under a given locale. sure you probably don't not necessarily follow ubuntu's way, but the idea, a (set of) locale-specific fontconfig settings is missing for cjk in fedora (at least for ja). > > I don't think Ubuntu way is the right thing since it doesn't use the expected > fonts for the language. i.e. if select -zh-cn.conf, even Japanese text will be > rendered with Chinese font. then please propose a better solution, which can avoid overriding in both ways. > I'm not sure what you mean. the language-specific overrides rule is to do that. > but it really conflicts to the simple priority list. actually getting rid of it > makes the language-specific overrides rule working and this issue is also gone. > Since we've sometimes ever seen the font order issue between Chinese and > Japanese desktop/installer etc, I'm beginning to think that the simple priority > list is evil. > can you explain what do you mean by "simple priority list"? are you referring to 65-nonlatin? or are you referring to font-specific config files? if it is the latter case, we are talking about the same thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 04:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300406.n3U46DgE009399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #42 from Qianqian Fang 2009-04-30 00:06:12 EDT --- and also can you tell me why you can not the following config file to vlgothic-fonts to make it a preferred fonts for ja locale? VL PGothic sans-serif VL Gothic monospace ja VL PGothic if VL Gothic is only installed when selecting ja language, you can even use this sans-serif DejaVu Sans Bitstream Vera Sans VL PGothic monospace DejaVu Sans Mono Bitstream Vera Sans Mono VL Gothic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300508.n3U58s6Y012289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #43 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-30 01:08:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > the key difference is not to separate them from the standard fontconfig files, > but to make only one set of files linked under a given locale. sure you > probably don't not necessarily follow ubuntu's way, but the idea, a (set of) > locale-specific fontconfig settings is missing for cjk in fedora (at least for > ja). Yes, I know. and fontconfig is capable to do that with the language-specific overrides rule. it can constructs the font list from them and works similarly unless the simple priority list rule prevents. > then please propose a better solution, which can avoid overriding in both ways. I do ;) can you point out any cases that the language-specific overrides rule doesn't work instead? I should asked you same question but I didn't get the certain reply for my comment #34 yet though. > can you explain what do you mean by "simple priority list"? are you referring > to 65-nonlatin? or are you referring to font-specific config files? if it is > the latter case, we are talking about the same thing. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists We are talking about the same thing? I don't think so since you apparently dislikes it and you are proposing to do that outside fontconfig for single language but not to make happier with all of CJK and non-CJK languages with English locale say at once. (In reply to comment #42) > and also can you tell me why you can not the following config file to > vlgothic-fonts to make it a preferred fonts for ja locale? Sorry? can you point out what's difference between the above and current vlgothic-fonts' config? it looks similar to me except it's provided separately because those are subpackaged. and I don't really like to contain the font name not owned. > > > > > sans-serif > > DejaVu Sans > Bitstream Vera Sans > VL PGothic > > > > monospace > > DejaVu Sans Mono > Bitstream Vera Sans Mono > VL Gothic > > > Whether or not this works properly really depends on the order of the config files, which isn't the right direction to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 05:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300553.n3U5rqih019598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-30 01:53:52 EDT --- I ll take a look at it around mid may when I m back from my current trip if no one beats me to it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300715.n3U7FCx4010519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-30 03:15:10 EDT --- Let's separate the discussion on bitmap-song and zenhei properly. from bug 492510: > Actually, I think the font order in the current 65-nonlatin.conf is fine: as it > does not assume specific language, I believe it is a good idea to put > large-coverage fonts in front of small ones (see > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911). The only problem is, there > is no Japanese specific font priority settings to boost VL Gothic for ja > locale! Right, 66-vlgothic-fonts.conf comes after.. > Here is Ubuntu's way to solve this: a list of language specific (CJK only) > fontconfig settings are stored in conf.avail, named with > "{29,69,99}-language-selector-xxxx.conf" where xxxx include zh-cn, zh-hk, > zh-..., ja-jp and ko-kr. For a given desktop locale, it will link the > corresponding conf file to conf.d. Although it is a little bit messy, but I > think it serves the purpose well: 65-nonlatin is the default font order without > assuming any specific lang, if you want to overwrite that for a specific > locale, you have to add a lang-specific conf file. I tested language-selector - it actually has a problem currently: eg its settings will override CJK fonts even when other CJK locale for app is specified. > If we are short of time for F11, I can temporarily add a xx-wqy-zenhei.conf and > set VL Gothic in front of ZenHei when lang=ja That doesn't sound like the right fix IMHO but perhaps I am missing something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 07:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300741.n3U7fV7O015075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #25 from Akira TAGOH 2009-04-30 03:41:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > > If we are short of time for F11, I can temporarily add a xx-wqy-zenhei.conf and > > set VL Gothic in front of ZenHei when lang=ja > > That doesn't sound like the right fix IMHO but perhaps I am missing something. I agree with this. why don't we just restrict to apply ZenHei for only Chinese? adding something not-owned by the package looks ugly and isn't the right thing to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 08:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904300813.n3U8D8iE021606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |high --- Comment #2 from A S Alam 2009-04-30 04:13:06 EDT --- All Applications for KDE is not working! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 30 11:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200904301142.n3UBgSB4025582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, | |than at redhat.com Component|fontconfig |qt AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |than at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-30 07:42:27 EDT --- OK, let's pull those over to qt then, hopefully someone there can take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.