From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 08:55:57 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201085557.B96777011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2054/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-3 - cvs commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-3_fc10:HEAD:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233478160 --- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Old Standard serif Old Standard Old Standard TTF Old Standard Old Standard SFD serif Old Standard SFD --- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec --- %define fontname oldstandard %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-sfd-fonts Version: 2.0.2 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/en/fonts.html Source0: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf # guidelines say this can be used BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge,fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description The Old Standard font family is an attempt to revive a specific type of Modern (classicist) style of serif typefaces, very commonly used in various editions printed in the late 19th and early 20th century, but almost completely abandoned later. %prep %setup -q -c -n oldstandard-%{version} for i in $(ls OldStandard*.sfd);do sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/' -e 's/Old \Standard \TT/Old \Standard \SFD/' $i; done for txt in OFL* ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} . %build fontforge -script "-" OldStandard*.sfd < - 2.0.2-3 - corrected the fontconfig * Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-2 - Rebuild according to new packaging guidelines * Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-1 - Rebuilt for f10 with minor changes to spec file. (#457947 at bugzilla) - changed version number as per FONTLOG.txt in source zip file. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 08:55:25 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +oldstand-manual.pdf +oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 1 Feb 2009 08:55:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +f793623cb703f27e6d57d498e7de2e28 oldstand-manual.pdf +9c001e7a2d2f86d3943a8f011aea8bbf oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 11:41:25 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201114125.CAFA97011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24015/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-3 - first koji commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-3_fc10:F-9:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233487888 --- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Old Standard serif Old Standard Old Standard TTF Old Standard Old Standard SFD serif Old Standard SFD --- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec --- %define fontname oldstandard %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-sfd-fonts Version: 2.0.2 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/en/fonts.html Source0: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf # guidelines say this can be used BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge,fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description The Old Standard font family is an attempt to revive a specific type of Modern (classicist) style of serif typefaces, very commonly used in various editions printed in the late 19th and early 20th century, but almost completely abandoned later. %prep %setup -q -c -n oldstandard-%{version} for i in $(ls OldStandard*.sfd);do sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/' -e 's/Old \Standard \TT/Old \Standard \SFD/' $i; done for txt in OFL* ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} . %build fontforge -script "-" OldStandard*.sfd < - 2.0.2-3 - corrected the fontconfig * Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-2 - Rebuild according to new packaging guidelines * Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-1 - Rebuilt for f10 with minor changes to spec file. (#457947 at bugzilla) - changed version number as per FONTLOG.txt in source zip file. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 11:40:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +oldstand-manual.pdf +oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 1 Feb 2009 11:40:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +f793623cb703f27e6d57d498e7de2e28 oldstand-manual.pdf +9c001e7a2d2f86d3943a8f011aea8bbf oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 11:47:55 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201114755.AC1967011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26759/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-3 - first commit to koji --- NEW FILE import.log --- oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-3_fc10:F-10:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233488569 --- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Old Standard serif Old Standard Old Standard TTF Old Standard Old Standard SFD serif Old Standard SFD --- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec --- %define fontname oldstandard %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-sfd-fonts Version: 2.0.2 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/en/fonts.html Source0: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf # guidelines say this can be used BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge,fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description The Old Standard font family is an attempt to revive a specific type of Modern (classicist) style of serif typefaces, very commonly used in various editions printed in the late 19th and early 20th century, but almost completely abandoned later. %prep %setup -q -c -n oldstandard-%{version} for i in $(ls OldStandard*.sfd);do sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/' -e 's/Old \Standard \TT/Old \Standard \SFD/' $i; done for txt in OFL* ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} . %build fontforge -script "-" OldStandard*.sfd < - 2.0.2-3 - corrected the fontconfig * Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-2 - Rebuild according to new packaging guidelines * Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-1 - Rebuilt for f10 with minor changes to spec file. (#457947 at bugzilla) - changed version number as per FONTLOG.txt in source zip file. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 11:47:25 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +oldstand-manual.pdf +oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 1 Feb 2009 11:47:25 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +f793623cb703f27e6d57d498e7de2e28 oldstand-manual.pdf +9c001e7a2d2f86d3943a8f011aea8bbf oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 12:22:15 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10 cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 cf-bonveno-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201122216.223167011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32078/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf cf-bonveno-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sun 1 Feb 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-3 - first commit to koji --- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif BonvenoCF BonvenoCF sans-serif --- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts.spec --- %define fontname cf-bonveno %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: A fun font by Barry Schwartz Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/bonveno.xhtml Source0: http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/fonts/BonvenoCF-1.1.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge, fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A set of fun fonts from the crud factory. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in COPYING README ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build fontforge -script "-" BonvenoCF*.sfd < - 1.1-3 - changed font config file according to files provided in the fontpackages-devel package. * Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-2 - rebuilt as per new font packaging guidelines * Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-1 - rebuilt on fedora 10 (#457955 at bugzilla) --- NEW FILE import.log --- cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:F-10:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233490822 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 00:33:07 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 12:21:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +BonvenoCF-1.1.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Jan 2009 00:33:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 1 Feb 2009 12:21:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +373a25b036bcbdee2daecf05e4b9e43d BonvenoCF-1.1.zip From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 12:24:53 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9 cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 cf-bonveno-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201122453.5E6E17011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32660/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf cf-bonveno-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-3 - first commit to koji --- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif BonvenoCF BonvenoCF sans-serif --- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts.spec --- %define fontname cf-bonveno %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: A fun font by Barry Schwartz Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/bonveno.xhtml Source0: http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/fonts/BonvenoCF-1.1.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge, fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A set of fun fonts from the crud factory. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in COPYING README ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build fontforge -script "-" BonvenoCF*.sfd < - 1.1-3 - changed font config file according to files provided in the fontpackages-devel package. * Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-2 - rebuilt as per new font packaging guidelines * Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-1 - rebuilt on fedora 10 (#457955 at bugzilla) --- NEW FILE import.log --- cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:F-9:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233490976 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 00:33:07 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 12:24:22 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +BonvenoCF-1.1.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Jan 2009 00:33:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 1 Feb 2009 12:24:22 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +373a25b036bcbdee2daecf05e4b9e43d BonvenoCF-1.1.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:39:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011839.n11IdcXs016409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:39:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011837.n11IbrTr016174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:37:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From slankes at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 19:47:10 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201194710.3C4F27011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31377 Modified Files: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec Log Message: fix typo in description Index: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 22:11:44 -0000 1.1 +++ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 1 Feb 2009 19:46:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030527 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Group: User Interface/X @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ %description -This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book +This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name comes from the book Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope. Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Feb 01 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-2 +- Fix typo in description + * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-1 - Initial packaging From palango at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 20:11:31 2009 From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201201131.E268C7011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1817/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Jan 28 2009 Paul Lange - 20050524-1 - initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-20050524-1_fc10:HEAD:yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-20050524-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233518597 --- NEW FILE yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Yanone Tagesschrift Yanone Tagesschrift fantasy --- NEW FILE yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec --- %define fontname yanone-tagesschrift %define fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf %define archivename YanoneTagesschrift Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20050524 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A serif decorative latin font Group: User Interface/X License: CC-BY URL: http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/tagesschrift/ Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Serif decorative latin TTF font by Jan Gerner, suitable for titles and short runs of text. It was created in a font-workshop at the university of Weimar in 2005. %prep %setup -q -c %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Wed Jan 28 2009 Paul Lange - 20050524-1 - initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 18:38:26 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 20:11:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +YanoneTagesschrift.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 1 Feb 2009 18:38:26 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 1 Feb 2009 20:11:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +97950e396bc61974732b3db902cc9817 YanoneTagesschrift.zip From slankes at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 20:19:08 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201201908.8EA0D7011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3411/F-10 Modified Files: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec Log Message: fix typo in description Index: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 22:26:34 -0000 1.1 +++ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 1 Feb 2009 20:18:38 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030527 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Group: User Interface/X @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ %description -This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book +This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name comes from the book Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope. Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Feb 01 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-2 +- Fix typo in description + * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-1 - Initial packaging From slankes at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 20:19:08 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201201908.A8D327011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3411/F-9 Modified Files: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec Log Message: fix typo in description Index: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 22:26:34 -0000 1.1 +++ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 1 Feb 2009 20:18:38 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030527 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Group: User Interface/X @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ %description -This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book +This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name comes from the book Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope. Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Feb 01 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-2 +- Fix typo in description + * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-1 - Initial packaging From palango at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 22:24:45 2009 From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [SPAM] rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 vollkorn-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 vollkorn.otf, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090201222445.6E6187011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19443/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf vollkorn-fonts.spec vollkorn.otf Log Message: * Fri Jan 30 2009 Paul Lange - 1.008-1 - initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- vollkorn-fonts-1_008-1_fc10:HEAD:vollkorn-fonts-1.008-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233526980 --- NEW FILE vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Vollkorn Vollkorn serif --- NEW FILE vollkorn-fonts.spec --- %define fontname vollkorn %define fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf %define archivename Vollkorn Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.008 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A serif latin font with good readability Group: User Interface/X License: CC-BY URL: http://www.grafikfritze.de/?p=43 #http://www.grafikfritze.de/download.php?download=1 Source0: %{fontname}.otf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{archivename}.pdf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Serif latin OTF font by Friedrich Althausen with focus on good readability. Because of this it is relatively dark and strong and has emphasized serifs. Vollkorn will especially work good in reading-sizes with its familiar and smooth overall picture. %prep %setup -q -c -T install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} . %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.pdf %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Fri Jan 30 2009 Paul Lange - 1.008-1 - initial packaging --- NEW FILE vollkorn.otf --- OTTO t ?,  ?+?\?? ??? ? E????B ? ??J?   , 4 9 > B N Z ^ b f q x } ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??b l\????????????m????????????@?????z??u?e`C ????v?T?11??8g+qG???????"???t ????????????Z?O?P????`?U?`?l{1Ojr?????m??H%?HR?????|?}?~g?Wxs?x?~???fe[wr ??B????@ ?]+ ,O???R?{?? ? 4??{??o5??w`?- i ?~??>???rN?( ?????np????a ??????zL?y??k?????y????B???????????????~?{?}V??}ya??7???-KZPCnu??~???????????????????Y?????f???????????? ??# ;?~/ O ?I ?????{c?P ?< T?? ?? ?, ?6 ??" it????????sllsul ???????????: E??? _ ?????$ Y[PS^Ux????g?[?O????????j?c?t??????????????(??r?? ?] ??N ?0????n?? ?h?H h? ?A ???? 4 ????M9 p ????????* ?N2 ?9 <;?AA>? 7v? R??{`????K? ???????t? ,DI???????+f. ?aaPE????? 7y??? z?i "x. q ????0 T U?S ???????????????k?? ?a?]HvI\?}x??? O ?I ?????{c?[ R?r?zw?D? ?D?l?g?i?y?y??d?Jbpuj[?{?h?t?n-<//?1????????????XhXo>*(??(?????9???8?9???9?8???9?8???8`?O?-?.?P?O?.?.?O?P?.?-?O?P?-?-?P ??m??ut?? ??t?0;n8*)?,??UfUm9##??1?$??? ?re?NNYE????? ?K?d?UVO\/?F`????? ??? l?abi????????????y?M?????? D ?YOr??n?? x?????a ????? ??u?Y? ?d?|?h????????????}]?]?T?&#W??????~aai\L ??wll~o__|?????? d?g?b{~?~???svfk=,.??*?P??? ??????? ????? ??w?{??s?A? ??? ??? }?r???&^?>GV? ??????R????? ????????????????y?~? ?GZN???? ????? ??\? ?x?{???? ?)?????w??? ;e@?$?4??????7?{?3???rd?V` ????{?}?7???Od???? ?}? ??? B???????Z?q?/?? ??????????? ?y ????? s7 G~??? ?w? ??T ???z??w ???/?? ????? ?? v U }???} h??? ?^ >%"W????? ?}? v?Tw ?? ?^ ??}ac ?w????? ??p?? ??{?W? ????????~??w ?? ???????????v |q??? ??Y? ?43 ?8 ?g??lv???w ??\????? ? ?7 ?? ??????L?? ?k`?l w? ??4? ?w b? M? ? X2 ???tv?? ?pv?Mw? ?qv?(??w ? ? ?w? ~?} v?   ? J V b | ? ?  ! 2 : @ H O [ c k q x  ' 7 @ F N U \ c j q ? ? , 3 ? ?M??????5?W??U?Z:?????;DS??????T????T???L?y?e??h? ~????1^? A f w ?!K!?"V"?#<#?$>$?$?%)%<%D%h%?& &L&\&t&?&?&?&?&?&?' ''*'d'm(%)D)?**?*?++M+~+?,,E,?,?,?--?..&.?/?/?0'0q0?1;1?1?2 2?373?44d4?4?5p5?6a6?7c7?7?7?8?8?8?9'9B9?9?::f:?:?:?; ;`:???v?#?????R??S??????????s?|?O???????????????~?[???????ee????????v???_????? ?z??K?_`G?????????????E?_?\bPpC?[U????? ???Q?`]J??????????????t?Z?a`SkH?WM???????}??N?a`K???????????s?????% ???|v?+?? ???i?A??G? ???c_XjeTMn?????????u????????tmr}kaew???????!???_v????@???v?u?yB?"??D?????????z?v????]?R???????E??Y???\?????????Y??n?~??`???nv?????@w?{?}???/??D@?E?2???????z????l??w?{?;g?V? ??????#??t/u???v?=??w??????????v?R????????????????y???}Q???~d?? {???~??$?????}~??????v?|?c????????????????~?}?}K????T??~???????????{v?@???w? ?????`? ?I?=??`?p?????~?oj?cYh??n??????????x?_??o?Y?????????????????r?1? ?} q ? ???0v????# ???sv????h?t ?ZU??h? ?J??? ?7/?"?3f??m??0????????L?}?z??T?#?L?9???v?v?x????3?;??=?Z??(?k}[!?Q ?z ??!?P?????? ?????j?n? ???? ??x?z????? ??x?}??????g??$ h? ?????<.?8$ E% ??u$ 2 6?$ }& n? $ " ?o?$ ?? ?&?*?$ .?"??$ 5 ??{$ =??$ Ff? $ ??D??v?b?!?!?W??????????? ?????P??.r??_???L???????8?T?|n????????wv?????????????????~?}?d?n?kj?a?l??D?????????~?YO??Z\???M9??oQ??????|~?rS?aac??p???? ??????????P?h?????????????t?y??? |?]?q?}????v?^?????????yv??????? ??~?????uv??w??[??????{??lZ:?r???? ] ???'?;"-???+|os??y???????????????? ?_??p ? ???????*?C?v????%?.?;????O??????? Z?~?uO?h???~??{????u???dwY????Q?n?v?????n?6? ?'????L???????? ^???yN?>????|?W???:???|?|?X??y???gwU?~??Q??+?=????????O??lv???w????N?6????????????y?{?{?\?x??_??s?k?|???z?~? _C ??????W?%?\??h??{?}???c?*?d????? ??w ??????x???T????????????????????????tv?????9????????????{???|d???aQ?.?g??6????L??????{??z`?_i?bb[??m?????????h?? ?D??L?eo?|?`?}?||??mg?mmQ??u????????????1?o`?A???o???f?P????????q}???}V????h??S??C?????E????????!??z??g?? ????\?????z??l^?aa\??u???? ??????\???R?] ???+?G&?4FH(v?0??]? ?????~YQ??Z]?D?:6?w?n?u??aZ?{?????lu??v????????????^?? ??????31?`?= ???????!" ???!hu ?v?Tw9???J!E% J??!?4? ???(???r8 r? ??r>  ?k?!}& ?*?!g ??! ????!_ ??????h ???{???i?5???q?`??- ????????(??r?? ?] e?!v?v?TwH0?'?!p ??????????? ?? ?, ?6?=?r!3??`' 3y?`$ ??? ?=?q???? ?0??? ? a ? ?  ??N?,?Q ?W?j p ?? ???? ???????? ??? ??, ??6 ??????01!?$ ???v??w?!????t?e?KnX? ??@?????? ????v??w? ?a???h?b?Sn]JK~???????@?????????????????hv?|???????????????spzg?l?q?x???y?o?}n?o?w{?1?v?v????????t?d?LtXMH? ??K???u???]49GbYs?J?S;%4L? ? >????????A?]??????"?|2?n???????U?4?PZtf<??Y???b?]ZjoR??W?m?X????????????l?)v?????????????>???????????tu]qO"3?? ?!x????Z?5AhIP??v?????????????XfX?V?eYd^[X??????_?X?L??????q?j?w??????????~?v?v??w??????????????Z?_?P??????`?K?`{l]A? ?Y????????????\?i?V??????\?R?^|hkPqc????????v??w?????????????T?Z?[??????`?I?bqYgT? .??????$? ??????_???i$? ?%X? {?j?x???~u?s???????a?gg]?? ||t??~????????????????rlmvnddu??????4?????????? :???r??E*??? ?$?? ???????????|?ZR??w$V?i????? ???????\?r?a?wvQsF???hp????????skkwpd??????w??:???)??????z~?|?I??,{z????P??y???????c???o???v?Dw??B/??? `?= ??v/? ?? `?CB ???x/????%??? ???B????C0???/t??????? ??[???????Z ?e0?7?u/???v??w?????? ?Q?P?4}w????????????????~??v?v?w????????? ?S?K?9~w????????????????'?? ?R?N?6x}w??????????????????zv?f??????????????A ?? N ??i?zw???Ye?LP?4w??\a??P W??????|?O??/y?N????? ??4?9u?Q???? ???%?v?o???f??? ?????a?FGQ?*e??;?????a?-PY?,L?? ??? ?x ?*d ??- ???? W PVLD?Ek?p??~? qBN?[_??x??0 ? i???? ?3??wv????????y?w?,????f?\???????????Y???{?yw??m???E???2?g??9 98?8GG? ??????`M?O?R?? X\???????????????????.???.?W??c???????a????/????????Z?9 <8?))??2?g!?$?Z?Z??(?c??"????: ?B?T?'?? ?y 4 ??????MJ??b%;Pw??G??&!H?h?h?'???z %?%????[??p??????}???^?o??[?????????? `\wGAV??kSgRf@?(LX ??j\????????'I??|???????p?-DdB'? ?0??????_?<? |??o?X^paK??#???????4?????@G??sf????????>I??{??????W4??$?????????? _TrFCY??m????~~efZxr ? ?(y\JdB'_?b?j?L?~?uj?a?????? ??????J?{p??{??R??`v?#??w??????;??zn????????F2?M?. f 9H??XUEzx??|??N?m???Z? ?(?k??|????U?t?i?????2X??r?u??!?H?h:?K?Z???/?_U?[:? v??w???????"xx????+?2??&??????'??????????v?u? ??y?F????jZ\oG????;?>?p??K}s?3?\?v?aw???N????? ?s? ??k?p??~? qR?r???BWP{???????c?q?W????????????????sv???w?!?h?t &? ??U??]W{????????r? ??qv??w?}??????E @N??VE ??qv?}?rw?????5?????Y??F ???(E ???m? ko??s???H?k ?Y?~?L???????????????}??? S?F_???X?Fv?8???????w? ??s?????;V?{?$??'2A? ?r?? ?] ???????`???o???cw????????vlfyve???kqvns?g??????r?l????????o????m?@???y?6 @@ ???m????,???U S~?? ???k?E?y6 @ ?R P?????f?^ }& ??^ hu ??m?9?h?$Zg ??m?! ?x?gZv??m?H??y 6 @ ????8?i??????3G g ??8?????! 0?G T?}". T??G ??????!???????P??iMOXdTZU???????qrsqg_?h??????j?i?????MLc???j??a?j???j??? j????{#?8??????8?"%66$???????F56HF36F???#5?????f??}y????????????????y?????????umpxyo??q?P???????|o??}?|?u??????R|????C????B????????l??????v?????-??8????1??????????s?f?t???????x?q]??s?????????}o?utl??z??????????l??ci?qg????????????????????????????r????b??po??????????vt?xwv??x????????????s?c? ?,;?? \?u?S???~?}??j~nas??M???]?b?Q ?z ??!#????????????a?????????|?|cZVE^O??{?I??0)?(>a??~????????|??????R?=???????????????????V}?Ry|?????????????????'????v?Xw?}?;c?U? ???? ?M?9w?}?;d?V? ??????v?{??nw????????p?|?????BI??=??? ?c???????????n?ow?{?#l?A??nw????|ws?C?:?N?PL>w?}?%??K?f?Mw?}??}?K? ????`{v??w?9??x?r???,??#????????????????|?$!:?,Z{v??w???x?r??????#??????????v?~?~|?$?:? ,?????b?y??????aG3? ???????D??|??I?? ?:??????7?????(???y{??????G?? ????-?aD????????? ?:??????7J??]???c??????????j?%mk?b??? ???? ???=w?{?Go?M???????t?u?]??????A??????9????5??wz??f?]?_?{}?z??h?RU|`T+?;?8?>????????w?Y??????????????????}?^?w?`r4qDlR?x?x?v?g???????]?X?c?g?q?v?KWJl5?>Q???????r????????a?m?t?y?dkf\D"?S??????d?N?Q?@????w???????F2FA((I?? ?yai?l\?rr???????\H/\?ru?~?????Wig?_????????Gii?a?????? ?ag? ??c?Q?G?6??t|g~{V?a?b????f?????:}z????-?????g]?Z?L?????????????J?Mv?a?????bw?e????:j??rxy???????????OO??`????????????????t???????Z?X?K???????'????????T?R?U?:?t?g~{R?\?]??8?F?ntq?I?9??????l?s?v?fR?P?V?S?S??????4????-????m{?%"Y?????i[L??C?V??????h?[?????w???}{z?{?$? p??sd?? i?d?j????? ??{ ? ?V?&|??qv?}??;w??G??_???j+ in??s\P?e?mkr|ph????????????=?{?? ??1 ??Fv?w??????~r????????WV?o?g_]{csm?K???w?S?ske~eee??lYXw??????p?y???????U????????_?????YcVyZD?4?6?k??????o?n?3?WzI??Kv?5????p?bm??[CG_dQWlobedd???????????\?j?i????|??PP?KpKV?h??????????????????h?_Wsn1~|u??????????????????v????w?????6?????????{??g?|?l??c????h???{??z_?ohoa?{???????????????c?????????????_???jv???????x?&?;??lW[pqefvwpmop???????????k?r?s???????bv?^x_f?s??????????????????x?lg|yM??x???????????????|???????w?M??? ?5??????????pjslrk????rMIU`?Vl??????????????????o?\????????????Rp??a?}~?????????????????P?v?;??6w????????????????V'^??w?x?j????????u?.?d^???wd?ldb??u??0 ???pv????d?T?6?w?X? ?D??????? ??W QWOF??J* ????x???Q?O?}???O?O???}?O?P???}?Q?P?}[???g?i?????i?i?????i?g?????g?g???x????qm??Z?a\??m?|?z?? #f$? ? ?????????????~I`Hf&????R?C?? ?7????_??T? `???`???????zMfL??Z? ?x ?*d ???q?GZN????????????{?S?XSI???????????????{c?s?????e ???????? ??? ? 0M??n??????G??u?HONX2%??=_?N?=M ???m3 ?[_??x??0 ? i?????_!?=???vp??? ? 0M??n??????G??u?HONX2N?[_??x??0 ? i?M? ?-???Z? ???o {v K?A|??l?? ?`???Z? ?x ??@????? ??? l?jYh??????????p?qx|??????a ?I ?????{c? |L ?e ???}v?2? ?h???m?????p??k?p????~??oqB|N??[_s ??I ????|?{c? ?L |????*??? i?!??3 ?[is ??J??????tL?( ?????nn????a????M ? ??J ??????y??O ?I ?????{c?P ? ????? ?.??} ? ?I?>??^?o??? uBN ??????w?Tgg?S?uy~??| g  ??`???????????tvw?w D ?l mX|d?U????z???ue??S{?_? ??????????|]?U?]? Y??{?y??m?? A??* XSI??? ????????????????? ???H????????????`?_?Y?V?=??//???tX?gD [ig ????? ???????rc?U` ???????????f???iU < ? [  H?h?h?'?? ?Nm???}?U???????b??ha?~??? ??~?gc?qrR??j?????????? < ??J??? c|v ?6??????????????=?y?Z????????????????{???z`?~?f ?a?sg?sq?o?u?IAv? fK ????? ?( , ???uu?d?R?g?yz?v?wg?NOabI?9????z%@4? ?`??W sL ? ,QWj ????? y6 @ ???sv???????w UDb?*???{v S?O ??~{?l ?h?r ?1+?b??????????? ???*?????}??V ?Q? ?6?f ???J??2w ??4 N?K ???????? ??~?rP?kki??g?????????? ?o ???????~?V ? ??k?p??~? qR ?c ?@??????w ?O???w RF[?? g?dQ?< ???????????{?|?~U???C ??hv?G? ? lm??s??????? ??????}? ???? ??U?h ?t?V?????????????????} ????? ?,???t?d?L ????^?????? ?;?k ????? ???[????????eh_??| ??D?/?0? -? ?d?fe??v?} ???? ??K et????????nrlsojON? ???O ??????????{ ????? ????? ???? ?4v ?? ??? ??? ????\????????????? ??J ??o ?? ??|v?3? ??]?? ??(?Q ??? v?Dw ?? ~?????? W???? ?~?~~ }?e ?p mj????? ??v?(??w ? ?s k??wv?;? u  ?D?v?fw ????????y ??} ?? [?  ? $ ? g ? ? ?   ( 2 8 B L V ` j t ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  *4>DNpz????????????? (2<FLn|??????$28 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??  Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 18:40:05 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Vollkorn.pdf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 1 Feb 2009 18:40:05 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +b06f4d12d6640399ea943deb84d36ca9 Vollkorn.pdf From cchance at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 1 23:16:20 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch, NONE, 1.1 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090201231620.0451E7011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25694 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Added Files: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch Log Message: resolves: rhbz#475743 patched uming 64-...conf for less over-prioritized. cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch: --- NEW FILE cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch --- diff -up cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf.2-rhbz475743 cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf --- cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf.2-rhbz475743 2008-02-19 16:25:21.000000000 +1000 +++ cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf 2009-02-02 01:18:23.000000000 +1000 @@ -1,25 +1,40 @@ - - serif - - AR PL UMing HK - AR PL UMing CN - - - - sans-serif - - AR PL UMing HK - AR PL UMing CN - - - - monospace - - AR PL UMing HK - AR PL UMing CN - - + + + zh + + + serif + + + AR PL UMing HK + AR PL UMing CN + + + + + zh + + + sans-serif + + + AR PL UMing HK + AR PL UMing CN + + + + + zh + + + monospace + + + AR PL UMing HK + AR PL UMing CN + + Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 22 Jan 2009 02:16:39 -0000 1.2 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 1 Feb 2009 23:15:49 -0000 1.3 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 17%{?dist} +Release: 18%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ Source7: CIDFnmap.zh_TW Source8: CIDFnmap.zh_CN Patch1: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch +Patch2: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667 +%patch2 -p1 -b .2-rhbz475743 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{ukaibuilddir} %build @@ -192,6 +194,10 @@ %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#475743 +- Fixed Japanese fonts over-priorized by uming fonts in Japanese locale. + * Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Refined package dependencies and compat font symlinks. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 2 01:27:10 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf, 1.1, 1.2 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf, 1.1, 1.2 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf, 1.1, 1.2 baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec, 1.14, 1.15 Message-ID: <20090202012710.7B5567011E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15580 Modified Files: 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-18.fc11 - Updated fontconfig .conf files based on fontpackages templates. Index: 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf 16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000 1.1 +++ 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf 2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,19 +1,21 @@ - - + + - - - Baekmuk Batang - - serif - - - - serif - - Baekmuk Batang - - + + + ko + + + serif + + + Baekmuk Batang + + + + Baekmuk Batang + + serif + + Index: 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf 16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000 1.1 +++ 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf 2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,19 +1,21 @@ - - + + - - - Baekmuk Dotum - - sans-serif - - - - sans-serif - - Baekmuk Dotum - - + + + ko + + + sans-serif + + + Baekmuk Dotum + + + + Baekmuk Dotum + + sans-serif + + Index: 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf 16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000 1.1 +++ 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf 2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,19 +1,21 @@ - - + + - - - Baekmuk Gulim - - monospace - - - - monospace - - Baekmuk Gulim - - + + + ko + + + monospace + + + Baekmuk Gulim + + + + Baekmuk Gulim + + monospace + + Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 00:01:04 -0000 1.14 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000 1.15 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 17%{?dist} +Release: 18%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-18.fc11 +- Updated fontconfig .conf files based on fontpackages templates. + * Tue Jan 27 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-17.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Fixed obsoletion of baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020807.n128711a011271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:41:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483530] New: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530 Summary: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora The Lohit Bengali font has dashes instead of glyphs for the actual Bengali characters in the following positions: U+09F2 BENGALI RUPEE MARK U+09F3 BENGALI RUPEE SIGN U+09F4 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR ONE U+09F5 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR TWO U+09F6 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR THREE U+09F8 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR ONE LESS THAN THE DENOMINATOR U+09F9 BENGALI CURRENCY DENOMINATOR SIXTEEN Either the glyphs should be designed and added to the font, or the dashes should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020853.n128rlc9015372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-02 03:53:44 EDT --- I'll look at it later but in the meanwhile no, I didn't revoque my approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483530] Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020942.n129gN2V028666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-02 04:42:22 EDT --- Yep, I noticed that recently. I am trying to get these and such missing glyphs added to the font asap. Not sure why there were dashes put on those places. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From palango at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 2 15:04:28 2009 From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 vollkorn.otf, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090202150428.D08F77011E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3578 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Removed Files: vollkorn.otf Log Message: removed vollkorn.otf from cvs repository Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 2 Feb 2009 15:03:58 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ Vollkorn.pdf +vollkorn.otf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 2 Feb 2009 15:03:58 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ b06f4d12d6640399ea943deb84d36ca9 Vollkorn.pdf +ae1ff36998848463c56bb74bebcced6f vollkorn.otf --- vollkorn.otf DELETED --- From palango at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 2 15:16:53 2009 From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel vollkorn-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090202151653.51FA87011E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6691 Modified Files: vollkorn-fonts.spec Log Message: update spec file Index: vollkorn-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/vollkorn-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- vollkorn-fonts.spec 1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000 1.1 +++ vollkorn-fonts.spec 2 Feb 2009 15:16:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.008 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A serif latin font with good readability Group: User Interface/X @@ -61,5 +61,8 @@ %changelog +* Mon Feb 02 2009 Paul Lange - 1.008-2 +move vollkorn.otf file out of the cvs repo + * Fri Jan 30 2009 Paul Lange - 1.008-1 - initial packaging From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:26:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483589] New: terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589 Summary: terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: terminus-font AssignedTo: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: On F-10, xterm, xlsfonts, emacs, cannot use the terminus font, even though terminus-font-x11 is installed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): terminus-font-x11-4.28-1.fc10.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. xlsfonts | grep terminus Actual results: No output. Expected results: A few dozen lines with terminus font names. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021845.n12Ijcwm001144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021845.n12IjxjR001232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 20:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472695] exa-master-upgrade breaks glyph rendering with OLPC XO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022041.n12KfLKW003188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472695 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-02 15:41:20 EDT --- Daniel is this still an issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 22:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022239.n12MdxOG019561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|pango |xorg-x11-drv-ati AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |airlied at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 22:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022244.n12MixhT028777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Fran?ois Cami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |francois.cami at free.fr Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #37 from Fran?ois Cami 2009-02-02 17:44:56 EDT --- Jan, could you test the latest build in Koji at : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=95 ( currently xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.10.0-2.fc10 ) and report. If it still persists, please attach dmesg and /var/log/Xorg.0.log as uncompressed attachments. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022323.n12NNnvR027745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #51 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 18:23:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > Replace 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf this conf, check if the Chinese are > not antialias within the range. Could you kindly have a test? Thanks. BTW, would the first too over-ruled to force all non-uming have antialias enabled? ===== The two are somehow overlapped: 11 >= pixelsize <= 17 OR 8 >= pixelsize <= 12 becomes 8 >= pixelsize <- 17 which font sizes 8 - 17 would have antialias disabled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022338.n12NcIaW030437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcepl at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) --- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-02 18:38:15 EDT --- Patrice, are you gone for good, even for this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022342.n12NgWZN008021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-02 18:42:30 EDT --- 1. you have a typo in you -common description 2. \ after %common_desc in book description is probably unnecessary Otherwise this looks like a very fine package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022344.n12NiDaq031729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #52 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 18:44:12 EDT --- This makes when uming pixelsize < 17, has antialias and hinting off. Please kindly test: ===== AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE false AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 17 true true AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 17 false false -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022348.n12NmDRe009151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 18:48:12 EDT --- Patched in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 3 00:01:28 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch, NONE, 1.1 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090203000128.0F6D570134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9162 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Added Files: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch Log Message: * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 - Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17. cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch: --- NEW FILE cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch --- diff -up cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.3-rhbz459680 cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf --- cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.3-rhbz459680 2009-02-03 09:53:25.000000000 +1000 +++ cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf 2009-02-03 09:56:12.000000000 +1000 @@ -2,14 +2,38 @@ - - - AR PL UMing CN - AR PL UMing HK - AR PL UMing TW - AR PL UMing TW MBE - - true - false - + + + AR PL UMing CN + AR PL UMing HK + AR PL UMing TW + AR PL UMing TW MBE + + false + + + + + AR PL UMing CN + AR PL UMing HK + AR PL UMing TW + AR PL UMing TW MBE + + 17 + true + true + + + + + AR PL UMing CN + AR PL UMing HK + AR PL UMing TW + AR PL UMing TW MBE + + 17 + false + false + + Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 1 Feb 2009 23:15:49 -0000 1.3 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 00:00:57 -0000 1.4 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 18%{?dist} +Release: 19%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Source8: CIDFnmap.zh_CN Patch1: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch Patch2: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch +Patch3: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667 %patch2 -p1 -b .2-rhbz475743 +%patch3 -p1 -b .3-rhbz459680 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{ukaibuilddir} %build @@ -194,6 +196,10 @@ %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#459680 +- Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17. + * Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#475743 - Fixed Japanese fonts over-priorized by uming fonts in Japanese locale. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030020.n130KO8S015028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #330210|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #53 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 19:20:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330696) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330696) Screen with .conf in last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030024.n130OsxW006261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-02 19:24:53 EDT --- thai-scalable-fonts is the correct new naming? Assuming so I will create the new cvs module and import http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thai-scalable-fonts.spec http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thai-scalable-fonts-0.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm which looks ok to me on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030035.n130Z2bw008349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) | --- Comment #10 from Patrice Dumas 2009-02-02 19:35:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Patrice, are you gone for good, even for this review? No, I am ready to do the review. I am still waiting for an answer to Comment #8, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 3 01:10:04 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel CIDFnmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, 1.1, 1.2 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, 1.2 cidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 cidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, 1.2 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090203011004.1323870134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18191 Modified Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#483329 - Reowned font directory by -common subpackage. - Updated font paths in ghostscript files. Index: CIDFnmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/CIDFnmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- CIDFnmap.zh_CN 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.1 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_CN 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-GB1 -/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; -/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; +/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: CIDFnmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/CIDFnmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- CIDFnmap.zh_TW 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.1 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_TW 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-CNS1 -/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; +/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.1 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; % -/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.1 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; % -/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; Index: cidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- cidfmap.zh_CN 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.1 +++ cidfmap.zh_CN 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: cidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- cidfmap.zh_TW 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.1 +++ cidfmap.zh_TW 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 00:00:57 -0000 1.4 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.5 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 19%{?dist} +Release: 20%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{_fontdir} %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -196,6 +197,11 @@ %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#483329 +- Reowned font directory by -common subpackage. +- Updated font paths in ghostscript files. + * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 - Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 01:12:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:12:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030112.n131CmbM023699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 3 01:27:47 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090203012747.1738270134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20596 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: splited ghostscript files into subpackage Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.5 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 01:27:16 -0000 1.6 @@ -87,6 +87,30 @@ %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO +%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ghostscript files. +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: ghostscript >= 8.63-4 +Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-ukai-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Conflicts: cjkuni-fonts-common <= 0.2.20080216.1-19 +Obsoletes: cjkuni-fonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-20 + +%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript +%common_desc + +CJK Unifonts ghostscript files. + +%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN +%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN +%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN + %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font common files. Group: User Interface/X @@ -201,6 +225,7 @@ - Resolves: rhbz#483329 - Reowned font directory by -common subpackage. - Updated font paths in ghostscript files. +- Splited ghostscript files into subpackage. * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 01:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483329] cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030137.n131bsms028245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 20:37:53 EDT --- 1 and 2 have been resolved: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 01:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:54:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030154.n131sjIj021894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-02 20:54:45 EDT --- hmm, so are you saying that "gothic" isn't a family name or just get rid of it because of duplicate to the project name? then what I should do in this package for new policy is just to make the package name lower-case. I'd a bit prefer vlgothic-proportional-fonts rather than vlgothic-p-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 3 02:08:32 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel FAPIcidfmap.ko, 1.1, 1.2 baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec, 1.15, 1.16 cidfmap.ko, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090203020832.6561270134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26743 Modified Files: FAPIcidfmap.ko baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec cidfmap.ko Log Message: resolves: rhbz#483327 updated ghostscript font paths splited ghostscripts into subpackage Index: FAPIcidfmap.ko =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.ko,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- FAPIcidfmap.ko 24 Sep 2007 06:46:22 -0000 1.1 +++ FAPIcidfmap.ko 3 Feb 2009 02:08:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/Baekmuk-Batang << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; -/Baekmuk-Dotum << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-dotum/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; -/Baekmuk-Gulim << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-gulim/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; -/Baekmuk-Headline << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-hline/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Batang << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Dotum << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Gulim << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Headline << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; % -/Baekmuk-Batang-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; -/Baekmuk-Dotum-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-dotum/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; -/Baekmuk-Gulim-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-gulim/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; -/Baekmuk-Headline-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-hline/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Batang-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Dotum-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Gulim-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Headline-Regular << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; % -/Adobe-Korea1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Adobe-Korea1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000 1.15 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 02:08:01 -0000 1.16 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 18%{?dist} +Release: 19%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -84,12 +84,34 @@ %_font_pkg -n hline -f *-%{fontname}-hline*.conf hline.ttf +%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript +Summary: Ghostscript files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: ghostscript >= 8.63-4 +Requires: %{fontname}-batang-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-dotum-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-gulim-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-hline-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Conflicts: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common <= 2.2-18 +Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common < 2.2-19 + +%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript +%common_desc + +This is ghostscript files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts. + +%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%{gsdir}/cidfmap.ko +%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.ko + %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common Summary: Common files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-5 Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 +BuildRequires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc @@ -99,10 +121,10 @@ %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README +%dir %{_fontdir} %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} -%{gsdir}/ %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} @@ -152,6 +174,12 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-19.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#483327 +- Reowned font directory by subpackage -common. +- Splited ghostscript files to subpackage -ghostscript. +- Updated paths in ghostscript files. + * Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-18.fc11 - Updated fontconfig .conf files based on fontpackages templates. Index: cidfmap.ko =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/cidfmap.ko,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- cidfmap.ko 24 Sep 2007 06:46:22 -0000 1.1 +++ cidfmap.ko 3 Feb 2009 02:08:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -/Baekmuk-Batang << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Batang << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; /Baekmuk-Batang-Regular /Baekmuk-Batang ; -/Baekmuk-Dotum << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-dotum/dotum.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Dotum << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/dotum.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; /Baekmuk-Dotum-Regular /Baekmuk-Dotum ; -/Baekmuk-Gulim << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-gulim/gulim.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Gulim << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/gulim.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; /Baekmuk-Gulim-Regular /Baekmuk-Gulim ; -/Baekmuk-Headline << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-hline/hline.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; +/Baekmuk-Headline << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/hline.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ; /Baekmuk-Headline-Regular /Baekmuk-Headline ; /Adobe-Korea1 /Baekmuk-Batang ; From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030213.n132DTf1025340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 21:13:28 EDT --- 1 & 2 have been resolved: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81270 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030328.n133SPVW007480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #54 from Baif 2009-02-02 22:28:22 EDT --- >1.Could you kindly have a test? Thanks. :( Sorry, since I got a new job, I have no additional resources... My personal laptop is running F8 with KDE 3.5. I only have a livecd for testing. >2.BTW, would the first too over-ruled to force all non-uming have >antialias enabled? Yup. It seems that, this 25-ttfxxx-bitmap.conf disabled the antialias for other fonts in my f10 kde livecd. Where is this bug originated... >3. The two are somehow overlapped I'm not sure of that. Since the targets are "size", and "pixelsize". And The first "not_eq" match should be there to enabled antialias on F10 KDE LiveCD. How about yours? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030347.n133lvW5022545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #55 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 22:47:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > :( Sorry, since I got a new job, I have no additional resources... My personal > laptop is running F8 with KDE 3.5. I only have a livecd for testing. That' alright. >2.BTW, would the first too over-ruled to force all non-uming have > >antialias enabled? > Yup. It seems that, this 25-ttfxxx-bitmap.conf disabled the antialias for other > fonts in my f10 kde livecd. Where is this bug originated... The .conf in comment #52 should not affect global antialias configuration. > >3. The two are somehow overlapped > I'm not sure of that. Since the targets are "size", and "pixelsize". Hmm I should get back and check what is the differences. > And The first "not_eq" match should be there to enabled antialias on F10 KDE > LiveCD. I personally think whether antialias is enabled or not globally, should not be controlled by cjkuni-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030357.n133vUq0024463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #56 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-02 22:57:29 EDT --- Still looking for extra testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030424.n134O4E4022081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:24:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 05:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030523.n135NFu8001346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #57 from Baif 2009-02-03 00:23:14 EDT --- Maybe, the reason for disabling antialias for other fonts is: Uming has alias as Serif San fonts in the other conf file. And KDE/Qt apps vs GNOME/GTK apps have different fonts display on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 07:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030715.n137FeL3023542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-03 02:15:39 EDT --- read the naming guidelines carefully; you'll see we try very hard to avoid unnecessary repetitions, and to get something close to what the font files declare in their metadata -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 08:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030850.n138oh9w010739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-03 03:50:42 EDT --- Just to explain that AFAIK the only difference between the two faces is in the non-Japanese glyphs, so it only affects apps where the font is explicitly chosen, eg openoffice and user config of fonts in other apps. VL Gothic is a fixed width font (ie Latin glyphs are half-width of Japanese character, so good for monospace) VL PGothic is variable width in Latin glyphs (so more natural for sans,serif) (Japanese glyphs are always fixed and full width) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030921.n139Lc3A026675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477465, which changed state. Bug 477465 Summary: [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:21:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030921.n139LbRx026648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-03 04:21:35 EDT --- It is imported and built now for rawhide: did the EOL process for the old package and added now one to comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rbhalera at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 3 09:30:20 2009 From: rbhalera at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Bhalerao) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel 59-sil-gentium-basic-book.conf, NONE, 1.1 59-sil-gentium-basic.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090203093020.D3DA370134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: rbhalera Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22223 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 59-sil-gentium-basic-book.conf 59-sil-gentium-basic.conf sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial upload --- NEW FILE 59-sil-gentium-basic-book.conf --- Gentium Book Basic serif serif Gentium Book Basic --- NEW FILE 59-sil-gentium-basic.conf --- Gentium Gentium Basic Gentium Alt Gentium Basic Gentium Basic serif serif Gentium Basic --- NEW FILE sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sil-gentium-basic %define fontconf 59-%{fontname} %define common_desc \ Gentium Basic and Gentium Book Basic are font families based on the\ original Gentium design, but with additional weights. Both families come \ with a complete regular, bold, italic and bold italic set of fonts. \ These "Basic" fonts support only the Basic Latin and Latin-1 Supplement \ Unicode ranges, plus a selection of the more commonly used extended Latin\ characters, with miscellaneous diacritical marks, symbols and punctuation. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/Gentium_Basic Source0: GentiumBasic_110.zip Source1: %{fontconf}.conf Source2: %{fontconf}-book.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description %common_desc %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf GenBas*.ttf %package common Summary: SIL Genitum Basic fonts, common files (documentation???) Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-book-fonts Summary: SIL Gentium Basic Family fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-book-fonts %common_desc\ The "Book" family is slightly heavier. %_font_pkg -n book -f %{fontconf}-book.conf GenBkBas*.ttf %prep %setup -q -n "Gentium Basic 1.1" for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done # Convert to UTF-8 iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 GENTIUM-FAQ.txt -o GENTIUM-FAQ.txt_ touch -r GENTIUM-FAQ.txt GENTIUM-FAQ.txt_ mv GENTIUM-FAQ.txt_ GENTIUM-FAQ.txt %build echo "Nothing to do in Build." %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} # Repeat for every font family install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-book.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf\ %{fontconf}-book.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc FONTLOG.txt GENTIUM-FAQ.txt OFL-FAQ.txt OFL.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Fri Jan 30 2009 - 1.1-3.fc11 - Changed the naming for srpm. * Wed Jan 28 2009 - 1.1-2.fc11 - Changes according to package naming guidelines post-1.13 fontpackages. * Tue Jan 06 2009 - 1.1-1.fc11 - Following new packaging guidelines. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 3 Feb 2009 04:24:21 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 3 Feb 2009 09:29:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GentiumBasic_110.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 3 Feb 2009 04:24:21 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 3 Feb 2009 09:29:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +44b3bc7b766f411f57e6eae28768dfbb GentiumBasic_110.zip From pravins at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 3 09:35:29 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090203093529.35B7270134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24456 Modified Files: samyak-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Feb 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-3 - renamed font package as per fedora new Font_package_naming guideline - updated spec Index: samyak-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- samyak-fonts.spec 12 Jan 2009 10:45:29 -0000 1.6 +++ samyak-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 09:34:58 -0000 1.7 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.2.1 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions @@ -21,70 +21,80 @@ %description %common_desc -%package common +%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts Summary: Common files for smc-fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem - -%description common +Provides: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{name}-common < 1.2.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts %common_desc -%package devanagari +%package -n %{fontname}-devanagari-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Devanagari script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description devanagari +Provides: %{name}-devanagari = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{name}-devanagari < 1.2.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-devanagari-fonts This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Devanagari. -%package tamil +%_font_pkg -n devanagari %{fontname}-devanagari/Samyak-*.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Tamil script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description tamil +Provides: %{name}-tamil = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{name}-tamil < 1.2.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Tamil. +%_font_pkg -n tamil %{fontname}-tamil/*.ttf -%package malayalam +%package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description malayalam +Provides: %{name}-malayalam = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{name}-malayalam < 1.2.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Malayalam. -%package gujarati +%_font_pkg -n malayalam %{fontname}-malayalam/*.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Gujarai script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description gujarati +Provides: %{name}-gujarati = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{name}-gujarati < 1.2.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Gujarati. -%package oriya +%_font_pkg -n gujarati %{fontname}-gujarati/*.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Oriya script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description oriya +Provides: %{name}-oriya = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{name}-oriya < 1.2.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Oriya. -%_font_pkg -n devanagari %{fontname}-devanagari/Samyak-*.ttf - -%_font_pkg -n tamil %{fontname}-tamil/*.ttf - -%_font_pkg -n malayalam %{fontname}-malayalam/*.ttf - %_font_pkg -n oriya %{fontname}-oriya/*.ttf -%_font_pkg -n gujarati %{fontname}-gujarati/*.ttf - %prep %setup -q -n samyak-fonts-%{version} @@ -105,12 +115,16 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files common +%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING README AUTHORS %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Tue Feb 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-3 +- renamed font package as per fedora new Font_package_naming guideline +- updated spec + * Mon Jan 12 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-2 - bugzilla 477451 - updated spec From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031020.n13AKNA7008582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-03 05:20:22 EDT --- It seems that with baekmuk-ttf-XXX-2.2-19.fc11, cjkuni-XXXX-0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11 Japanese glyphs are shown correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031201.n13C1TZE002385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-03 07:01:26 EDT --- just a warning: FPC and fesco demanded for subpackages that contain fonts to be renamed foo-fonts, but the common subpackage does not contain any font and should keep its old naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Why_is_the_common_subpackage_in_the_multi-font-families_templates_named_foo-fonts-common_and_not_foo-common-fonts.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477400] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031246.n13CkXvY003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Smetana 2009-02-03 07:46:32 EDT --- I found the following Debian bug regarding the imlib2 fonts: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393743 I will follow the Debian's example and drop the fonts (and images when we're at it) from the package -- they're required by the demo programs only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 13:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477400] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031353.n13DrBDA032109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400 Tomas Smetana changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tomas Smetana 2009-02-03 08:53:10 EDT --- Should be fixed in imlib2-1.4.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 13:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031353.n13DrCFB032135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477400, which changed state. Bug 477400 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 3 16:12:37 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.83, 1.84 pango.spec, 1.151, 1.152 sources, 1.84, 1.85 Message-ID: <20090203161237.919F670134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24101 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.23.0CVS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.83 retrieving revision 1.84 diff -u -r1.83 -r1.84 --- .cvsignore 16 Dec 2008 07:27:02 -0000 1.83 +++ .cvsignore 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000 1.84 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.22.4.tar.bz2 +pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.151 retrieving revision 1.152 diff -u -r1.151 -r1.152 --- pango.spec 16 Dec 2008 07:27:02 -0000 1.151 +++ pango.spec 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000 1.152 @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.22.4 +Version: 1.23.0 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries -Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.22/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 +Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 URL: http://www.pango.org BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ %changelog +* Tue Feb 3 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.23.0-1 +- Update to 1.23.0 + * Tue Dec 16 2008 Matthias Clasen - 1.22.4-1 - Update to 1.22.4 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.84 retrieving revision 1.85 diff -u -r1.84 -r1.85 --- sources 16 Dec 2008 07:27:02 -0000 1.84 +++ sources 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000 1.85 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7c3f3748052799746d73c6d3a0cc1205 pango-1.22.4.tar.bz2 +358a87607c0a5b4889bab52b1cf5e921 pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 18:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031843.n13IhHZA006884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Michal Jaegermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #38 from Michal Jaegermann 2009-02-03 13:43:14 EDT --- I tried to check if I still can find some font damage but as long as gnome-settings-daemon refuses to start (see bug 471676) there is not much I can do. Any font property changes, and much more, are just ignored. OTOH, as I noted before, I stopped seeing the problem a while ago. At least nothing blatant like it used to show up. Still others apparently stumbled into the same issue after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040051.n140pdlA026617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #30 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 19:51:38 EDT --- There are .conf templates from package fontpackages. I applied from that. cjkuni-fonts is patched: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269 baekmuk-ttf-fonts is patched: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81270 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040052.n140qd01021951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #58 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 19:52:38 EDT --- Wait for feedback from rawhide users: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 01:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040118.n141IP87031400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state. Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 01:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040118.n141IOM8031366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 20:18:23 EDT --- latest; http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040215.n142FHZM008147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040215.n142FGBW008109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 21:15:15 EDT --- latest: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Feb 4 02:39:27 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.32,1.33 Message-ID: <20090204023927.1538A70130@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26909 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: created subpackage -compat as meta-package for installing all font families Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.32 retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -r1.32 -r1.33 --- liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 22:53:43 -0000 1.32 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 4 Feb 2009 02:38:56 -0000 1.33 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -34,9 +34,6 @@ Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace families. -%files -%{nil} - %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +52,21 @@ %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name} +%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat +Summary: Compatibility files of Liberation font families. +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts = 1.04.93-6 +Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 + +%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat +%common_desc + +Meta-package for installing all three font families: Sans, Serif, Mono. + +%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat +%{nil} + %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X @@ -115,6 +127,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-7.fc11 +- Create -compat subpackage as meta-package for installing all font families. + * Tue Jan 20 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.04.93-6.fc11 - Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:40:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040240.n142e5w8012297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040240.n142e6lT012334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040245.n142jq83008107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |skvidal at fedoraproject.org Component|liberation-fonts |comps AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |notting at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-03 21:45:51 EDT --- hi rel-eng, please rename rpm in comps.xml from 'liberation-fonts' to 'liberation-fonts-compat': http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Feb 4 03:16:07 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.33,1.34 Message-ID: <20090204031607.7EBB070141@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1087 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: Fixed inter-package dependencies problem of last update. Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34 --- liberation-fonts.spec 4 Feb 2009 02:38:56 -0000 1.33 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 4 Feb 2009 03:15:37 -0000 1.34 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts >= 1.04.93-6 +Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc @@ -56,8 +58,9 @@ Summary: Compatibility files of Liberation font families. Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts = 1.04.93-6 -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 +Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %common_desc @@ -127,6 +130,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-8.fc11 +- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies. + * Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-7.fc11 - Create -compat subpackage as meta-package for installing all font families. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 03:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040352.n143qcIP026906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Component|fontconfig |cjkuni-fonts Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-03 22:52:37 EDT --- No comment from Behdad so can probably close this for now. Dunno if it is worth discussing the change of behaviour upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 05:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040550.n145oJvT007525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 00:50:18 EDT --- oops, i changed samyak-fonts-common also to samyak-common-fonts ok i will change it to samyak-fonts-common again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Feb 4 08:16:53 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090204081653.7225570130@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20471 Modified Files: samyak-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Feb 04 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-4 - renamed samyak-common-fonts to samyak-fonts-common Index: samyak-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- samyak-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2009 09:34:58 -0000 1.7 +++ samyak-fonts.spec 4 Feb 2009 08:16:22 -0000 1.8 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.2.1 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions @@ -21,19 +21,19 @@ %description %common_desc -%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%package common Summary: Common files for smc-fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Provides: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: %{name}-common < 1.2.1-3 -%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +Provides: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{fontname}-common-fonts < 1.2.1-4 +%description common %common_desc %package -n %{fontname}-devanagari-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Devanagari script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions Provides: %{name}-devanagari = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-devanagari < 1.2.1-3 @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Tamil script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions Provides: %{name}-tamil = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-tamil < 1.2.1-3 @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions Provides: %{name}-malayalam = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-malayalam < 1.2.1-3 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Gujarai script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions Provides: %{name}-gujarati = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-gujarati < 1.2.1-3 @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Oriya script Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions Provides: %{name}-oriya = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-oriya < 1.2.1-3 @@ -115,12 +115,15 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%files common %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING README AUTHORS %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Wed Feb 04 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-4 +- renamed samyak-common-fonts to samyak-fonts-common + * Tue Feb 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-3 - renamed font package as per fedora new Font_package_naming guideline - updated spec From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040825.n148PBMS006785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Tomas Smetana changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #4 from Tomas Smetana 2009-02-04 03:25:10 EDT --- Tvtime contains two fonts: FreeMonoBold and tvtimeSansBold. They're both originate from the GNU FreeFont collection -- FreeMonoBold can be replaced by the one we have in freefont package. The problem is with tvtimeSansBold which is FreeSansBold with additional glyphs used as "icons" in the OSD menus. I'm not sure how to solve this issue properly...: - Create tvtime fonts subpackage with the two fonts placed somewhere in /usr/share/fonts which would have zero impact on the tvtime and its users but the FreeMonoBold may happen to be installed twice - Make tvtime depend on the freefont package and use both fonts from there, which would mean that the OSD would not look so fancy (no big change in usability though) and the user would have to install rather big font package - Make tvtime depend on the freefont package but use only FreeMonoBold from there and then either: a) have tvtimeSansBold packaged spearately b) have tvtimeSansBold packaged with tvtime ad a) This solution makes little sense to me: the tvtimeSansBold has no value for any application but tvtime and still the user would have to install 3.5 MB freefont package ad b) The user would have to install 3.5 MB additional fonts but FreeMonoBold would be packaged just once and tvtime would carry its specific font with it. Which way should I prefer? Could you please give me some advice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040831.n148VCPi002187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-04 03:31:11 EDT --- built it for rawhide with update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041347.n14Dldix016135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041349.n14DnB1x009927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-04 08:49:11 EDT --- Ok, I see. Filed a package review for renaming. Bug#484042. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041520.n14FKVIl032136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-04 10:20:30 EDT --- As I am now actually using F-10 on a day-to-day basis, I will be able to fix this issue. This might not be fixed in this (old) "terminus-font" package, though, as the package needs to be renamed to fit in with Fedora's new guidelines on naming and packaging fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041527.n14FRmBx008843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-04 10:27:47 EDT --- So far, the package names were as follows: SRPM: terminus-font RPM: terminus-font-x11 (X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes) RPM: terminus-font-console (console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets) The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase". I can't see any foundry, upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname", so my package would need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"? Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could sound better and be less redundant and confusing. Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. But what happens with the console fonts? %{name}-console would violate the [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. Or are all the "fonts" rules only applying to X11 fonts anyway and there are no rules for console fonts? I could do a "-n terminus-font-console" to keep the old package name in the latter case. Anyway, I'd really like to build the package with the console fonts in the same source package if possible. [1] http://www.is-vn.bg/hamster/ (Partly) related bugs: bug 477433: nted's "convert to new font pkg guidelines" bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c7 bug 483589: current terminus-font-x11's registering of the X11 fonts broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589#c0 If any part of this is better discussed on fedora-fonts-list, feel free to do so. I am subscribed there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Wed Feb 4 19:07:54 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.152,1.153 Message-ID: <20090204190754.6364070130@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11718 Modified Files: pango.spec Log Message: * Wed Feb 4 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.23.0-2 - Move pango-view from pango-devel to pango Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.152 retrieving revision 1.153 diff -u -r1.152 -r1.153 --- pango.spec 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000 1.152 +++ pango.spec 4 Feb 2009 19:07:24 -0000 1.153 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango Version: 1.23.0 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ %doc pango-view/HELLO.txt %{_libdir}/libpango*-*.so.* %{_bindir}/pango-querymodules* +%{_bindir}/pango-view %{_libdir}/pango %doc %{_mandir}/man1/* @@ -219,11 +220,13 @@ %{_libdir}/libpango*.so %{_includedir}/* %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/* -%{_bindir}/pango-view %doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pango %changelog +* Wed Feb 4 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.23.0-2 +- Move pango-view from pango-devel to pango + * Tue Feb 3 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.23.0-1 - Update to 1.23.0 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 19:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041919.n14JJ6gO001483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #18 from Bill Nottingham 2009-02-04 14:19:05 EDT --- As the package maintainer, you can do that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 20:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484109] New: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: michal at harddata.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Before an update there were installed liberation-fonts-1.04.93-6.fc11 and liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-6.fc11. The current update "obsoleted" liberation-fonts and "replaced" it with liberation-fonts-common. In yum.log: Feb 04 12:55:50 Installed: liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-8.fc11.noarch Feb 04 12:58:20 Erased: liberation-fonts Only there are no actual fonts after these operations. It appears that the idea was to replace those with 'liberation-fonts-compat' package. A typo in specs? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.04.93-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 20:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484109] liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042043.n14Khw0P021581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 15:43:57 EDT --- Yes, the latest liberation rawhide package releases are "strange" I'll probably won't be able to find the time soonish to try to understand them. Caius: how about you just follow the templates strictly, taking inspiration from how mgopen (or dejavu, or vera...) obsoleted cleanly their old monolithic fonts package, instead of trying to come up with a new obsoletion pattern? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042109.n14L9Dic022512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tagoh at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:09:12 EDT --- I'd have used vl-gothic not vlgothic but your choice is ok too. Upgrade paths work and the package looks sane. (catalogue is probably leftover cruft since you don't use it, and checking the package is ok would be easier if you used the same line order as the template, but that does not change the result) ??? APPROVED ??? Please do not forget to update comps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042118.n14LIE8Z030173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:18:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > So far, the package names were as follows: > > SRPM: terminus-font > RPM: terminus-font-x11 > (X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes) > RPM: terminus-font-console > (console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets) > > The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named > [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase". > > I can't see any foundry, foundry is just a shorthand for upstream, if an upstream releases several fonts so they are clearly grouped together. It is optional > upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean > fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname", Font family name is nothing special that's how your font calls itself in GUI font lists. You can't have a font file without a familyname or apps would not know how to refer to it. > so my package would > need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"? "When foundryname, projectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts affix, this affix should be dropped from them" Don't panic and just read attentively http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Clarifications you'll see this kind of case is covered > Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could > sound better and be less redundant and confusing. > > Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will > call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the > [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. This is ok > But what happens with the console fonts? Console fonts can't be processed by fontconfig so they're not a "font" covered by the guidelines and you can name the subpackage that contains them whatever you want, as long as it's not some form of foo-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042129.n14LT7sX026922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042129.n14LT6Bi026906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477336 Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:29:05 EDT --- 1. For FreeMonoBold the case is clear-cut: just add a dep on the canonical package providing it and symlink it from there (but you probably want to wait till bug #477336 is resolved) 2. for tvtimeSansBold you need to split it in a subpackage that conforms to fonts packaging guidelines, and likewise make your main package depend on this subpackage and symlink the file from here (of course that's assuming the special icons are worth it) If you decide to drop the icons, the second subpackage is not necessary (we won't ship tvtimeSansBold at all) and you probably also want to think on replacing FreeMonoBold by DejaVu Sans Mono Bold which will already be installed on most user systems, bringing your download requirements even lower (so depend on dejavu-sans-mono-fonts and symlink from here) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042137.n14LbwaL028876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski 2009-02-04 16:37:57 EDT --- Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. I'm pretty busy at the moment, and this is low on my personal priority list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042150.n14LogBd004742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:50:41 EDT --- Maybe Jeffrey or Jon can step in as co-maintainers since their packages depend on yours? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042155.n14LtraX005883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-04 16:55:53 EDT --- Ah, thanks! I'll submit for review an SRPM updated to today's standards when I am back from FOSDEM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050214.n152E5TC026801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:14:05 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DIvN026608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:17 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DKDW026640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CHfv020719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:16 EDT --- allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CJeN020751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050218.n152IKIi023118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:18:20 EDT --- yum-3.2.21-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050219.n152J3FO023480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050220.n152KphG029816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:20:50 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050225.n152PdDS032298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:25:38 EDT --- yum-3.2.21-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050224.n152OTbc031721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:24:29 EDT --- allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050223.n152NJhv031279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:23:18 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 5 03:15:28 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.34,1.35 Message-ID: <20090205031529.1EC847011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7128 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Feb 05 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-9.fc11 - Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies with reference of dejavu. Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.34 retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35 --- liberation-fonts.spec 4 Feb 2009 03:15:37 -0000 1.34 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 5 Feb 2009 03:14:57 -0000 1.35 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -21,12 +21,9 @@ URL: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4 -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-serif < 1.04.93-4 -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-mono < 1.04.93-4 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -Buildrequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils %description %common_desc @@ -38,8 +35,6 @@ Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts >= 1.04.93-6 -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc @@ -57,10 +52,10 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat Summary: Compatibility files of Liberation font families. Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %common_desc @@ -74,6 +69,9 @@ Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc @@ -86,6 +84,9 @@ Summary: Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Obsoletes: liberation-serif-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Provides: liberation-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc @@ -99,6 +100,9 @@ Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Obsoletes: liberation-mono-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Provides: liberation-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts %common_desc @@ -130,6 +134,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Thu Feb 05 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-9.fc11 +- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies with reference of dejavu. + * Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-8.fc11 - Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 06:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050644.n156iTFB007321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477374, which changed state. Bug 477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 06:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050644.n156iSAv007291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-05 01:44:27 EDT --- The package is now updated to new guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 08:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050818.n158IKfa027331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Smetana 2009-02-05 03:18:19 EDT --- Thank you Nicolas. I didn't know about the FAQ... I will try to out some other fonts to see how it looks like -- they're used in OSD only so the metrics is quite important. But it might be the best solution after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 5 09:28:09 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090205092809.B91ED1F82DD@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 5 20:12:09 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 fontpackages.spec, 1.8, 1.9 import.log, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.7, 1.8 fontconfig.prov, 1.1, NONE macros.fontconfig, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090205201209.9F4AA7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30021/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Removed Files: fontconfig.prov macros.fontconfig Log Message: 1.18 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 +++ .cvsignore 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.8 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.16.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- fontpackages.spec 27 Jan 2009 09:49:32 -0000 1.8 +++ fontpackages.spec 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.9 @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ %define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.16 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 1.18 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Group: Development/System @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@ License: LGPLv3+ URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -Source1: fontconfig.prov -Source2: macros.fontconfig BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -58,7 +56,7 @@ for dir in fontbasedir fontconfig_masterdir \ fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \ - macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) + rpm/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) done install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \ @@ -70,9 +68,7 @@ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} -install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} -install -m 0755 -D -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/rpm/fontconfig.prov -install -m 0755 -D -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.fontconfig +install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) @@ -89,8 +85,6 @@ %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig -%{_libdir}/rpm/fontconfig.prov -%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.fontconfig %files devel @@ -99,10 +93,22 @@ %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros* %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} -%{ftcgtemplatedir}/* +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt %changelog +* Thu Feb 5 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.18-1 +??? Panu wants autoprovides in rpm proper, drop it +??? Guidelines people are ok with multiple ownership of directories, make the + fonts macro auto-own the directory font files are put into + +* Sat Jan 31 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.17-1 +??? Tweak and complete documentation +??? Merge the autoprovides stuff and try to make it actually work + * Tue Jan 27 2009 Richard Hughes - 1.16-2 - Add fontconfig.prov and macros.fontconfig so that we can automatically Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- import.log 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 +++ import.log 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ fontpackages-1_14-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm:1231978787 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232058014 fontpackages-1_16-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232573931 +fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- sources 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 +++ sources 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.8 @@ -1 +1 @@ -9d449121a0762b0e08cd1fdf99c10e92 fontpackages-1.16.tar.bz2 +afcfbffe48379897aaaf7260ec2f931d fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2 --- fontconfig.prov DELETED --- --- macros.fontconfig DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431355] oowriter .odt - Nimbus Roman No9 L linespacing seems to be changed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052102.n15L219k029485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431355 Marcelo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmtsales at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Marcelo 2009-02-05 16:01:58 EDT --- I have a similar problem. In F10, after the last openoffice update to version 3.0.1-15.2, my ooocalc spreadsheets are taking more horizontal space than before. It seems the horizontal spacing has changed. I can be mistaken, but I think only the numbers are more spaced, I can't see any difference in the space between letters. But I'm sure something has changed, because I have some spreadsheets which were exactly as wide as my screen and now they don't fit anymore. The font used is Arial. I can see no noticeable difference in ooowriter documents. Does this make sense? Is this possibly related to the bug reported by the OP? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 23:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:27:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052327.n15NRY5a030651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Fran?ois Cami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #39 from Fran?ois Cami 2009-02-05 18:27:32 EDT --- Thank you for the bug report. This particular bug was fixed and a update package was published for download. Please feel free to report any further bugs you find. You can obtain the updated package by typing 'yum update ' or using the graphical updater, Software Update. Closing as original reporter confirms it is fixed for him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 04:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 23:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484109] liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060449.n164n95g002863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |caio at dejieshi.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-05 23:49:08 EDT --- Patch with reference of dejavu-fonts: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060507.n1657wRR005851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060507.n1657xqT005877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477451, which changed state. Bug 477451 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060524.n165OWAR010000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:24:32 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060523.n165N1nf009471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060522.n165Mw2L010429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:22:57 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 06:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060628.n166S6T3023295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |caio at dejieshi.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Feb 6 08:33:26 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090206083326.1711E1B804A@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061246.n16CkSbg008301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-06 07:46:27 EDT --- Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vlgothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese TrueType fonts Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061351.n16DpDnd025102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Bug 477406 depends on bug 481484, which changed state. Bug 481484 Summary: Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 477406 depends on bug 481501, which changed state. Bug 481501 Summary: Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-06 08:51:11 EDT --- We're now using the system copies of the dustin-*-fonts. What's left to look into is SteveHand alias steve.ttf. There's now a system sj-stevehand-fonts (thanks Sven!). Rex, can you please check how to get Blinken to use the system copy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:58:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061458.n16EwKmc008911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061608.n16G8Vr6025092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:08:28 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061609.n16G92Y0025796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:09:01 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061847.n16Il7hM028060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-02-06 13:47:05 EDT --- I may be able to get to this next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 19:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450774] CVE-2008-1808 FreeType off-by-one flaws In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061958.n16JwJIZ012584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450774 Josh Bressers (Security Response Team) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484441 Depends on| |484442 Depends on| |484443 Depends on| |484444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Feb 7 08:05:44 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090207080544.494191F82E0@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 03:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484536] New: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 Summary: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Various fonts in the smc-fonts package, especially smc-fonts-meera, which is installed on every Fedora machine because of being being "default" in compts, have default glyphs shaped like an R in circle for some Malayalam characters. For example, Meera has the following default glyphs in places that it should not have: U+0D44, U+0D62, U+0D63, U+0D71, U+0D72, U+0D73, U+0D74, U+0D79, U+0D7A, U+0D7B U+0D7C, U+0D7D, U+0D7E, U+0D7F Also, there are several default glyphs in places that Unicode may use for future encoding of Malayalam characters, like U+0D00 and U+0D29. All those R in cirlces should be removed from the font, to make the font Unicode-complying. Alternatively, Meera can be replaced by a standard font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 8 08:01:07 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090208080107.ED0C91F82DD@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 09:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484536] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080904.n1894MX0001577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 --- Comment #1 from Santhosh Thottingal 2009-02-08 04:04:21 EDT --- The following code points were added to Unicode 5.1 by Unicode consortium 0D7A MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU NN(???) 0D7B MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU N(???) 0D7C MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU RR(???) 0D7D MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU L(???) 0D7E MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU LL(???) 0D7F MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU K(???) Please note that these glyphs are already present in Malayalam(ml_IN) fonts and mapped to ? + ? + zwj, ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj ? + ? + zwj respectively. Large amount of data encoded using this standard(5.0) is present in digital format. By duplicating the encoding by defining new code points for these glyphs, Unicode brought dual encoding issue for Malayalam. Dual encoding without canonical equivalence brings chaos to Unicode Malayalam including security issues. And it makes existing application buggy while handling Malayalam. So accepting these code points to our application should be done with extreme care. We should keep backward compatibility and at the same time we should avoid dual encoding. There are two options: a) Unicode consortium should define canonical equivalence between the existing representation and newly defined duplicate code points b) Unicode consortium should deprecate the new code points(this is recommended, since the new code points does not bring any advantage other than issues to existing data and application both in technical and security aspects ) It is because of this reason , Swathanthra Malayalam Computing(SMC), the FOSS developer community which develops/maintains these fonts decided to postpone adding these glyphs to fonts(Not only to fonts, but existing applications too) until Unicode resolve the above mentioned issues. SMC had already informed Unicode about the problems by the document No: L2/08-038. You can see a copy here http://wiki.smc.org.in/images/2/23/SMC_Unicode_5.1.pdf. If this bug is a serious concern for you, you may also contact Unicode consortium to resolve the issue asap. Unicode 5.1 compliance means backward compatibility to 5.0 and older versions also. If we want to keep backward compatibility we should keep the existing glyph-code-point mapping. At the same time if we duplicate those glyphs for another code point in the font, that is a serious issue. This bug should postponed till Unicode take any decision on this problem. Regarding other new code points in Unicode 5.1 version, we are planning to add those glyphs to fonts in their next versions(No font in Malayalam has those glyphs as of now). The R sign in the unassigned code point positions will be removed as and when Unicode defines characters for them in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 8 09:12:38 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.94, 1.95 import.log, 1.11, 1.12 Message-ID: <20090208091239.4B30F700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2029/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: autoprovides Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.94 retrieving revision 1.95 diff -u -r1.94 -r1.95 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 23:04:00 -0000 1.94 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Feb 2009 09:12:05 -0000 1.95 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.28 -Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ BuildRequires: %{Blocks} %{UnicodeData} BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13 +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.17 %description %common_desc @@ -252,10 +252,12 @@ %doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README %doc build/unicover.txt build/status.txt.bz2 -%dir %{_fontdir} - %changelog +* Thu Feb 5 2009 +- 2.28-4 +??? Test build with new fontpackages and in-rpm auto-font-provides + * Fri Jan 16 2009 - 2.28-3 ??? Fix lgc-serif obsoletes Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 23:04:00 -0000 1.11 +++ import.log 8 Feb 2009 09:12:06 -0000 1.12 @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_28-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229879833 dejavu-fonts-2_28-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232060001 dejavu-fonts-2_28-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232147011 +dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234084218 From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sun Feb 8 09:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 346419] Add Baseline table support (align scripts in a line of text) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090208092327.D47FF23F537@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419 pango | general | Ver: unspecified ------- Comment #9 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-02-08 09:23 UTC ------- This is from a private conversation with an Adobe font expert about baseline support. He said that very few layout engines support the baseline feature, and that the only existing application publicly available is that in Flash 10. Some documentation here: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AS3LCR/Flash_10.0/flash/text/engine/TextBaseline.html -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 8 09:34:48 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090208093448.5CD5A700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5401/devel Modified Files: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: autoprovides Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 06:55:56 -0000 1.1 +++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 8 Feb 2009 09:34:17 -0000 1.2 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081007 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ %changelog +* Sun Feb 8 2009 +- 20081007-4 +??? test new rpm font autoprovides + * Sun Jan 25 2009 - 20081007-3 ??? renamed to ???apanov-edrip-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 27 Jan 2009 06:55:57 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 8 Feb 2009 09:34:17 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3.fc11.src.rpm:1233039319 +apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234085608 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 09:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080939.n189dlhF009926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 09:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080939.n189dm4u009952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state. Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 09:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080938.n189cBCj007892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 09:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080938.n189cCMR007917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state. Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 8 21:58:14 2009 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <20090208215814.5E7AB700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 8 21:58:14 2009 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <20090208215814.208AB700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts added to the repository From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 8 21:58:28 2009 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20090208215828.8B996700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module vlgothic-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module vlgothic-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From kevin at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 8 21:58:28 2009 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <20090208215828.D2B92700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module vlgothic-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: vlgothic-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2009/02/08 21:58:28 kevin Exp $ NAME := vlgothic-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082158.n18LwE12032149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:58:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090510.n195AlER012063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Component|comps |wqy-zenhei-fonts AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |fangqq at gmail.com Summary|make wqy-zenhei-fonts |allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to |default in @chinese-support |be installed by default in |group |@chinese-support group QAContact|katzj at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 00:10:46 EDT --- Can we soften the font config so that wqy-zenhei-fonts can be installed by default by Chinese without taking over the whole desktop? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090529.n195Tv4o017198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fangqq at gmail.com) | --- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-09 00:29:56 EDT --- hi Jens I am not entirely sure if I understood "setting as default" and "not overriding", maybe you can explain it a little bit more? As you know, Uming is a Song/Mincho style font, therefore, it is close to "serif" alias, and wqy-zenhei is a Hei/Gothic font with sans-serif styled glyphs for both proportional and monospaced faces (in a single ttc). On Ubuntu, uming is used as the default serif and wqy-zenhei as the default sans-serif for zh locales. is this what you intend to achieve? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090534.n195YsaN018021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 00:34:53 EDT --- This is almost done thanks to kind people have been updating publican.spec for the fonts changes so far. I will update for sazanami-fonts now, which just leaves us waiting for the lohit-fonts subpackage rename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:38:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090638.n196c07K029443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 01:37:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I am not entirely sure if I understood "setting as default" and "not > overriding", maybe you can explain it a little bit more? I wrote "install as default", ie meaning install the package by default. Overriding means that installation should not override other default desktop fonts, like dejavu-fonts and cjkuni-fonts > As you know, Uming is a Song/Mincho style font, therefore, it is close to > "serif" alias, and wqy-zenhei is a Hei/Gothic font with sans-serif styled > glyphs for both proportional and monospaced faces (in a single ttc). On Ubuntu, > uming is used as the default serif and wqy-zenhei as the default sans-serif for > zh locales. is this what you intend to achieve? Eventually maybe. :) What about Ukai? Last I tested wqy-zenhei was still too aggressive in priority to coexist with cjkuni-fonts. Thanks for the information about ubuntu's defaults. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 07:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 02:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484536] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090704.n19749sl031456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-02-09 02:04:09 EDT --- santhosh, thanks for update chill characters are from 7A to 7F so if we are not supporting those characters we can simply keep blank at those position but adding shape ? which has different unicode value U+24c7 in those places make this font Unicode incompatible u+ 0d44 u+ 0d62 u+ 0d63 U+ 0d70 - wrong shape U+ 0d71 U+ 0d72 U+ 0d73 U+ 0d74 U+ 0d75 also above are some more places where unicode has given shapes then also meera has ? sign there this is wrong and it makes it unicode incompatible (some out of these are added in Unicode 5.1 in that case only blank is require) IMHO we do not need to put R shapes in Reserved spaces as those code point are already not implemented in any application (pango, qt), typing is also not allowed for those characters and adding those shapes in font increasing its size unnecessarily i think there is no harm in removing those shapes from font It will be very good if we can say Meera font is Unicode 5.0 compatible :) Roozbeh Thanks for notifying these thing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 9 08:00:50 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090209080050.C2D721F82EB@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091416.n19EGX1n028178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #59 from Baif 2009-02-09 09:16:29 EDT --- How to get update to rawhide from Fedora Alpha KDE Live CD? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484613] crash with "double free or corruption (out)" in pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091429.n19ETSWm031237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484613 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Component|firefox |pango AssignedTo|gecko-bugs-nobody at fedorapro |besfahbo at redhat.com |ject.org | --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-09 09:29:27 EDT --- I don?t see anything like Firefox crash. Reassigning to pango component for further investigation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091437.n19EbF0O031948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #60 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-09 09:37:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #59) > How to get update to rawhide from Fedora Alpha KDE Live CD? Enable rawhide repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091544.n19FiRPS014902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #5 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-09 10:44:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I wrote "install as default", ie meaning install the package by default. > > Overriding means that installation should not override other default desktop > fonts, like dejavu-fonts and cjkuni-fonts ok, that's fine (zenhei had never overrode dejavu), I will change the settings when I update the fontconfig file to follow the new guideline (I am still not able to compile due to %{_fontdir} definition #478891). However, I would like to remind that this basically means Uming will "override" sans-serif and monospace and all Chinese will be displayed as bitmaps. Also there is no way to use Dejavu and zenhei together anymore. > > Eventually maybe. :) What about Ukai? > this is up to you and the Chinese i18n. I rarely see people use Ukai as desktop fonts despite that fontconfig default settings giving it high priority, as it is designed mostly for printing, and it look very blurry on screen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091703.n19H3gXi001658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-02-09 12:03:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331334) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331334) New spec Nicholas, how does this look? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 22:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092218.n19MIU5o011938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 rex.camposagrado at ascendercorp.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rex.camposagrado at ascenderco | |rp.com --- Comment #10 from rex.camposagrado at ascendercorp.com 2009-02-09 17:18:29 EDT --- Ascender just released OpenType Pro versions of the Droid fonts here: http://www.droidfonts.co?m . This might be interesting to creative professionals who would like to use the Droid fonts in their design projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092321.n19NLI4h032032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 18:21:17 EDT --- Okay I think if you restrict wqy-zenhei-fonts to just zh, which has similarly been done to fedora cjkuni-fonts and baekmuk-ttf-fonts recently with font conf directives to restrict to one language (to avoid unihan issues, etc) then we can start to think about this seriously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092321.n19NL9mK012444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092324.n19NOAeL013037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 18:24:09 EDT --- Though better in the long term would be to get the font included in fontconfig's /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf file like dejavu, cjkuni, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092337.n19NblSM015868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #8 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-09 18:37:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Though better in the long term would be to get the font included in > fontconfig's /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf file like dejavu, cjkuni, etc. Certainly. I heard the fontconfig developers were re-working on the default font priorities last year, but then, nothing has happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092355.n19NtKfi019716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #329052|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From fangq at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 05:38:10 2009 From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.18,1.19 Message-ID: <20090210053810.9695570121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4532 Modified Files: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: use fontpackages macros Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 11 May 2008 18:45:23 -0000 1.18 +++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 05:37:40 -0000 1.19 @@ -1,25 +1,22 @@ -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d -%define wqyroot wqy-bitmapfont-gb18030 -%define wqyfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/wenquanyi -%define fontdir %{wqyfontdir}/bitmap -%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d - -Name: wqy-bitmap-fonts -Summary: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts -Version: 0.9.9 -Release: 6%{?dist} -# for font embedding exception please see -# http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException -License: GPLv2 with exceptions -URL: http://wqy.sourceforge.net/en/ -Group: User Interface/X -Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-bitmapfont-bdf-gb18030-%{version}-0.tar.gz -Source1: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: bdftopcf, mkfontdir -Requires: fontconfig >= 2.3 -#Patch0: %{name}-%{version}-fix-mono.patch +%define fontname wqy-bitmap +%define fontconf 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf +%define wqyroot wqy-bitmapfont-gb18030 + +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 0.9.9 +Release: 7%{?dist} +Summary: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts + +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2 with exceptions +URL: http://wenq.org/enindex.cgi +Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-bitmapfont-bdf-gb18030-%{version}-0.tar.gz +Source1: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description The Wen Quan Yi bitmap font is a manually fine-tuned @@ -39,54 +36,42 @@ %prep %setup -q -n %{wqyroot} -#%patch0 -p0 + %build make wqyv1 + %install -rm -rf %{buildroot} -install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{wqyfontdir} -install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -p -m644 *pt.pcf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/ -install -p -m644 fonts.alias %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/ -install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -install -p -m644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/ -touch %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/fonts.dir - -# Install catalogue symlink -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} -ln -sf %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} +rm -fr %{buildroot} + +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.pcf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} + +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} + +ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean -rm -rf %{buildroot} +rm -fr %{buildroot} + + +%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.pcf -%files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README LOGO.png -%dir %{wqyfontdir} -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/*pt.pcf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf -%{fontdir}/fonts.alias -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%{catalogue}/%{name} - -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi +%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog +*Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang 0.9.9-7 +- use fontpackages macros + *Tue May 11 2008 Qianqian Fang 0.9.9-6 - remove bold font files, as Xft can do fake-emboldening byitself From fangq at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 05:46:46 2009 From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.19,1.20 Message-ID: <20090210054647.1B75A70121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5815 Modified Files: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: use fontpackages macros Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.19 -r1.20 --- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 05:37:40 -0000 1.19 +++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 05:46:15 -0000 1.20 @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel, bdftopcf Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description From fangq at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 05:50:18 2009 From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.20,1.21 Message-ID: <20090210055018.8DDAD70121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6488 Modified Files: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: add bdftopcf as dependency Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21 --- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 05:46:15 -0000 1.20 +++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 05:49:48 -0000 1.21 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9.9 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ %changelog +*Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang 0.9.9-8 +- add bdftopcf to BuildRequires + *Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang 0.9.9-7 - use fontpackages macros From fangq at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 07:00:49 2009 From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel wqy-unibit-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090210070049.371367012C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17006 Modified Files: wqy-unibit-fonts.spec Log Message: use fontpackages macros Index: wqy-unibit-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- wqy-unibit-fonts.spec 4 Oct 2007 01:45:36 -0000 1.1 +++ wqy-unibit-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 07:00:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/wenquanyi-unibit -%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d +%define fontname wqy-unibit -Name: wqy-unibit-fonts -Summary: WenQuanYi Unibit Bitmap Font -Version: 1.1.0 -Release: 4%{?dist} -# for font embedding exception please see -# http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException -License: GPLv2 with exceptions -URL: http://wqy.sourceforge.net/en/ -Group: User Interface/X -Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-unibit-bdf-%{version}-1.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: bdftopcf, mkfontdir +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 1.1.0 +Release: 5%{?dist} +Summary: WenQuanYi Unibit Bitmap Font + +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2 with exceptions +URL: http://wenq.org/enindex.cgi +Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-unibit-bdf-%{version}-1.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel, bdftopcf +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description The Wen Quan Yi Unibit is designed as a dual-width (16x16,16x8) @@ -34,46 +34,36 @@ http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?Unicode_Chart_EN %prep -%setup -q -n wqy-unibit +%setup -q -n %{fontname} + %build make %install -rm -rf %{buildroot} -install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -p -m644 *.pcf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/ - -# Install catalogue symlink -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -ln -sf %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} +rm -fr %{buildroot} + +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.pcf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} %clean -rm -rf %{buildroot} +rm -fr %{buildroot} + + +%_font_pkg *.pcf -%files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/*.pcf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%{catalogue}/%{name} - -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi +%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog +*Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang 1.1.0-5 +- use fontpackages macro + *Sun Sep 30 2007 Qianqian Fang 1.1.0-4 - more spec file clean up From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 07:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100749.n1A7nM01013273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #61 from Baif 2009-02-10 02:49:21 EDT --- Could you test it in KDE? Things do not work out for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 07:53:50 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090210075350.2D8D21F82EA@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Feb 10 08:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:53:47 -0800 Subject: [Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100853.n1A8rlLB006466@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927 Bug 378927 depends on bug 469933, which changed state. Bug 469933 Summary: Default window size is much bigger than its content if the display resolution is high https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469933 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101024.n1AAOLWx000302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #62 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-10 05:24:19 EDT --- Could you tell me what is your testing env and procedures please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 11:48:52 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090210114852.3FC4D70121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9696/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- vlgothic-fonts-20090204-1_fc10:HEAD:vlgothic-fonts-20090204-1.fc10.src.rpm:1234266408 --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf --- VL Gothic false ja-jp monospace VL Gothic monospace VL Gothic VL Gothic monospace --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf --- VL PGothic false ja-jp sans-serif VL PGothic sans-serif VL PGothic VL PGothic sans-serif --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fonts.spec --- %define priority 66 %define fontname vlgothic %define archivename VLGothic-%{version} %define fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname} %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d %define common_desc \ VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090204 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts < 20090204-1 Provides: VLGothic-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description %common_desc This package provides the monospace VLGothic font. %package common Summary: Common files for VLGothic Japanese TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-p-fonts Summary: Proportional Japanese TrueType font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20090204-1 Provides: VLGothic-fonts-proportional = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-p-fonts %common_desc This package provides the VLGothic font with proportional glyphs for some non-Japanese characters. %prep %setup -q -n VLGothic %build %{nil} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pgothic.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gothic.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf %{fontconf}-gothic.conf; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} %files common %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %doc README* LICENSE* %dir %{_fontdir} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-gothic.conf VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf %_font_pkg -n p -f %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf %changelog * Wed Feb 4 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-1 - New upstream release. - Update spec file for new packaging policy. - Renamed VLGothic-fonts to vlgothic-fonts. - Renamed VLGothic-fonts-proportional to vlgothic-p-fonts. - Added vlgothic-fonts-common. * Fri Dec 5 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081203-2 - update fontconfig config according to Fontconfig packaging tips. * Thu Dec 4 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081203-1 - update to 20081203 release. - clean up spec file. - changed the priority prefix for fontconfig to 66 according to Fontconfig packaging tips. * Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 - update to 20081029 release. * Tue Sep 9 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20080908-1 - update to 20080908 release. * Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080624-1.fc10 - update to 20080624 release * Wed May 7 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080429-1 - update to 20080429 release - rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf * Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2.fc9 - move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage - rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage - use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage - add fc-cache scriptlets and drop superfluous removal of old font config - drop the docs subpackage - use fontname, fontdir, and fontconfdir macros - improve summaries and descriptions - do not require fontconfig - drop VLGothic obsoletes and provides * Sat Jan 12 2008 Ryo Dairiki - 20071215-1 - Update to 20071215 * Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20071015-2 - Rename the font directory. - Fix font selection problem in Flash 9. - Make it remove the old configuration files on updating. * Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20071015-1 - Update to 20071015 - Make it separated into subpackages * Sat Sep 09 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070901-1 - Update to 20070901 * Sat Jun 02 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070507-1 - Update to 20070507 * Sun Apr 22 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070328-1 - Update to 20070328 * Wed Jan 03 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070101-1 - Update to 20070101 * Sun Dec 10 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-5 - Decrease the priority of the VLGothic fonts lower than DejaVu fonts. - Now config files are replaced by every updating. * Wed Nov 29 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-4 - Fix the mistyped dist tag. * Sat Nov 18 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-3 - Modify the specfile along with the Fedora Extras packaging policy. * Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-2 - Modify the specfile. * Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-1 - Preparing for Fedora Extras. * Sat Oct 28 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061021-2 - Update to 20061021. * Tue Sep 19 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20060913-2 - Update to 20060913. * Thu Aug 31 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20060831-1 - Initial packaging. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02 VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 11:53:49 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel vlgothic-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090210115349.5E05370121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10757 Modified Files: vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-2 - clean up. Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000 1.1 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 10 Feb 2009 11:53:19 -0000 1.2 @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ %define fontname vlgothic %define archivename VLGothic-%{version} %define fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname} -%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d %define common_desc \ VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\ @@ -10,7 +9,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090204 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD @@ -94,6 +93,9 @@ %changelog +* Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-2 +- clean up. + * Wed Feb 4 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-1 - New upstream release. - Update spec file for new packaging policy. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 12:02:37 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090210120237.6926370121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12200/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2_fc11:F-10:vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234267291 --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf --- VL Gothic false ja-jp monospace VL Gothic monospace VL Gothic VL Gothic monospace --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf --- VL PGothic false ja-jp sans-serif VL PGothic sans-serif VL PGothic VL PGothic sans-serif --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fonts.spec --- %define priority 66 %define fontname vlgothic %define archivename VLGothic-%{version} %define fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname} %define common_desc \ VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090204 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts < 20090204-1 Provides: VLGothic-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description %common_desc This package provides the monospace VLGothic font. %package common Summary: Common files for VLGothic Japanese TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-p-fonts Summary: Proportional Japanese TrueType font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20090204-1 Provides: VLGothic-fonts-proportional = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-p-fonts %common_desc This package provides the VLGothic font with proportional glyphs for some non-Japanese characters. %prep %setup -q -n VLGothic %build %{nil} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pgothic.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gothic.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf %{fontconf}-gothic.conf; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} %files common %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %doc README* LICENSE* %dir %{_fontdir} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-gothic.conf VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf %_font_pkg -n p -f %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf %changelog * Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-2 - clean up. * Wed Feb 4 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-1 - New upstream release. - Update spec file for new packaging policy. - Renamed VLGothic-fonts to vlgothic-fonts. - Renamed VLGothic-fonts-proportional to vlgothic-p-fonts. - Added vlgothic-fonts-common. * Fri Dec 5 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081203-2 - update fontconfig config according to Fontconfig packaging tips. * Thu Dec 4 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081203-1 - update to 20081203 release. - clean up spec file. - changed the priority prefix for fontconfig to 66 according to Fontconfig packaging tips. * Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 - update to 20081029 release. * Tue Sep 9 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20080908-1 - update to 20080908 release. * Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080624-1.fc10 - update to 20080624 release * Wed May 7 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080429-1 - update to 20080429 release - rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf * Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2.fc9 - move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage - rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage - use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage - add fc-cache scriptlets and drop superfluous removal of old font config - drop the docs subpackage - use fontname, fontdir, and fontconfdir macros - improve summaries and descriptions - do not require fontconfig - drop VLGothic obsoletes and provides * Sat Jan 12 2008 Ryo Dairiki - 20071215-1 - Update to 20071215 * Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20071015-2 - Rename the font directory. - Fix font selection problem in Flash 9. - Make it remove the old configuration files on updating. * Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20071015-1 - Update to 20071015 - Make it separated into subpackages * Sat Sep 09 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070901-1 - Update to 20070901 * Sat Jun 02 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070507-1 - Update to 20070507 * Sun Apr 22 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070328-1 - Update to 20070328 * Wed Jan 03 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070101-1 - Update to 20070101 * Sun Dec 10 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-5 - Decrease the priority of the VLGothic fonts lower than DejaVu fonts. - Now config files are replaced by every updating. * Wed Nov 29 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-4 - Fix the mistyped dist tag. * Sat Nov 18 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-3 - Modify the specfile along with the Fedora Extras packaging policy. * Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-2 - Modify the specfile. * Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-1 - Preparing for Fedora Extras. * Sat Oct 28 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061021-2 - Update to 20061021. * Tue Sep 19 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20060913-2 - Update to 20060913. * Thu Aug 31 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20060831-1 - Initial packaging. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 10 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 10 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02 VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 10 12:05:51 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf, NONE, 1.1 vlgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090210120551.6E79170121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12984/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2_fc11:F-9:vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234267503 --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf --- VL Gothic false ja-jp monospace VL Gothic monospace VL Gothic VL Gothic monospace --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf --- VL PGothic false ja-jp sans-serif VL PGothic sans-serif VL PGothic VL PGothic sans-serif --- NEW FILE vlgothic-fonts.spec --- %define priority 66 %define fontname vlgothic %define archivename VLGothic-%{version} %define fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname} %define common_desc \ VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090204 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic Source0: http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts < 20090204-1 Provides: VLGothic-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description %common_desc This package provides the monospace VLGothic font. %package common Summary: Common files for VLGothic Japanese TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-p-fonts Summary: Proportional Japanese TrueType font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20090204-1 Provides: VLGothic-fonts-proportional = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-p-fonts %common_desc This package provides the VLGothic font with proportional glyphs for some non-Japanese characters. %prep %setup -q -n VLGothic %build %{nil} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pgothic.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gothic.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf %{fontconf}-gothic.conf; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} %files common %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %doc README* LICENSE* %dir %{_fontdir} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-gothic.conf VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf %_font_pkg -n p -f %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf %changelog * Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-2 - clean up. * Wed Feb 4 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090204-1 - New upstream release. - Update spec file for new packaging policy. - Renamed VLGothic-fonts to vlgothic-fonts. - Renamed VLGothic-fonts-proportional to vlgothic-p-fonts. - Added vlgothic-fonts-common. * Fri Dec 5 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081203-2 - update fontconfig config according to Fontconfig packaging tips. * Thu Dec 4 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081203-1 - update to 20081203 release. - clean up spec file. - changed the priority prefix for fontconfig to 66 according to Fontconfig packaging tips. * Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20081029-1 - update to 20081029 release. * Tue Sep 9 2008 Akira TAGOH - 20080908-1 - update to 20080908 release. * Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080624-1.fc10 - update to 20080624 release * Wed May 7 2008 Jens Petersen - 20080429-1 - update to 20080429 release - rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf * Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen - 20071215-2.fc9 - move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage - rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage - use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage - add fc-cache scriptlets and drop superfluous removal of old font config - drop the docs subpackage - use fontname, fontdir, and fontconfdir macros - improve summaries and descriptions - do not require fontconfig - drop VLGothic obsoletes and provides * Sat Jan 12 2008 Ryo Dairiki - 20071215-1 - Update to 20071215 * Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20071015-2 - Rename the font directory. - Fix font selection problem in Flash 9. - Make it remove the old configuration files on updating. * Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20071015-1 - Update to 20071015 - Make it separated into subpackages * Sat Sep 09 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070901-1 - Update to 20070901 * Sat Jun 02 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070507-1 - Update to 20070507 * Sun Apr 22 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070328-1 - Update to 20070328 * Wed Jan 03 2007 Ryo Dairiki - 20070101-1 - Update to 20070101 * Sun Dec 10 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-5 - Decrease the priority of the VLGothic fonts lower than DejaVu fonts. - Now config files are replaced by every updating. * Wed Nov 29 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-4 - Fix the mistyped dist tag. * Sat Nov 18 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-3 - Modify the specfile along with the Fedora Extras packaging policy. * Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-2 - Modify the specfile. * Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061026-1 - Preparing for Fedora Extras. * Sat Oct 28 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20061021-2 - Update to 20061021. * Tue Sep 19 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20060913-2 - Update to 20060913. * Thu Aug 31 2006 Ryo Dairiki - 20060831-1 - Initial packaging. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 10 Feb 2009 12:05:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 10 Feb 2009 12:05:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02 VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101211.n1ACBFUc024308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-10 07:11:14 EDT --- Thanks. packages has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101212.n1ACCttQ024604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477479, which changed state. Bug 477479 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101212.n1ACCsfb024572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-10 07:12:53 EDT --- new package has been approved and available on devel, F-10 and F-9 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101605.n1AG5RAs018476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-10 11:05:25 EDT --- It is worth noting that the "Pro" fonts are not under a Free License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101647.n1AGlVDP005885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #12 from rex.camposagrado at ascendercorp.com 2009-02-10 11:47:30 EDT --- While the necessity for Ascender to offer the Droid Pro fonts under a free license may not be extremely well received by the open-source community, please be aware that while we partner with several open-source providers and are happy to build fonts for these partners, no business model exists for font vendors if we were to release our IP directly under an open license. For the record, Our http://www.DroidFonts.com site does not offer any fonts under any free license. We have taken the Droid fonts under Apache v2 and have enhanced the Droid fonts as allowed under Apache v2. We are now offering the enhanced Droid Pro fonts under a proprietary EULA for a license fee, with proper credit being given to the underlying Apache covered portion of the fonts which we are licensing. We built the Droid Pro fonts because the professional graphic design and creative market was asking for them (in part to support the Android effort), but these users require enhanced character ranges and sometimes want OTF format fonts. There are also OEMs which require additional language support and additional weights and styles of Droid. >From our perspective, this is a win-win situation. The open community has another outstanding set of fonts (to add to the Liberation fonts we built for Red Hat) and we have the opportunity to satisfy demands for additional Droid support. We see this as very much like the business models of the Linux OS providers, who often supply a good base OS for free and then are able to stay in business by providing enhancements and support. I hope this helps to explain what we're up to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101702.n1AH2G3V031253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-10 12:02:15 EDT --- No, I understand what you're doing. I may disagree with your motivations (I do work for a company whose entire model is based around FOSS licensing), but I understand them. My post was intended to clarify to anyone who might come across your post and start to package the Pro fonts for submission in Fedora, as I would have to immediately block such an action on licensing grounds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101720.n1AHKjFQ002869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #14 from Rex Camposagrado 2009-02-10 12:20:44 EDT --- Correction to my previous Comment #12: While the necessity for Ascender to (not) offer the Droid Pro fonts under a free license may not be extremely well received by the open-source community, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Feb 10 19:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:36:02 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101936.n1AJa2Xn016584@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Tim Riley [:timr] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |timr at mozilla.com --- Comment #172 from Tim Riley [:timr] 2009-02-10 11:34:15 PST --- helpwanted, qawanted were added way back in 2004-05-03 without a comment. Are these still needed? What help or QA support is wanted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101934.n1AJYoQH010029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #9 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-10 14:34:49 EDT --- here I have a problem: in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf, I used alias sections to set the preferences, I remember this is the recommended way of setting the priorities, however, if I want to use lang tags, I may have to write this whole section using match and prepend, or kill the whole section. Jens, is this what you want to do? ---------------------------------------------------- serif Bitstream Vera Serif DejaVu Serif WenQuanYi Zen Hei sans-serif Bitstream Vera Sans DejaVu Sans WenQuanYi Zen Hei monospace Bitstream Vera Sans Mono DejaVu Sans Mono WenQuanYi Zen Hei Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Feb 10 19:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101948.n1AJmLvs023294@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 David Baron [:dbaron] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|helpwanted, qawanted | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Wed Feb 11 02:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 347237] Making Pango use a given cairo_font_face_t In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090211021309.EEE8C23EF75@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237 pango | general | Ver: unspecified Bug flys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mozbugbox at yahoo.com.au -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Feb 11 07:49:05 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090211074905.F16821F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 09:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110930.n1B9U36W029983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #10 from Rajeesh 2009-02-11 04:30:02 EDT --- Hi Nicolas, Can we close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485050] New: Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050 Summary: Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: There are few characters added to Indic codespace in Unicode 5.1. They are currently not handled according to their properties/script mechanism. Thus there needs support for these characters to be added to pango for proper rendering. List of these characters can be found here: http://rahulpmb.blogspot.com/2008/04/unicode-5.html Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485050] Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111135.n1BBZAWp029412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485050] Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111132.n1BBWNCc003899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-11 06:32:22 EDT --- Bug filed upstream : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485050] Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111140.n1BBelWH030730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |rbhalera at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 13:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111343.n1BDhFLs026982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477412, which changed state. Bug 477412 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477412 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 13:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477412] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111343.n1BDhEUe026957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477412 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-11 08:43:12 EDT --- The font is (unnecessarily) bundled with Latex sources auto-generated from Doxygen; the sources can be used without the font file, but even then, are less useful than the pre-generated HTML documentation, as they do not provide symlinks. I'm thus removing the entire latex subdirectory -- building for Rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 16:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111608.n1BG8Mqn013018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwayne at translate.org.za --- Comment #18 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-11 11:08:18 EDT --- Bad news from me. I had this problem, removed all the X11 fonts and things worked. A then added a number of cool fonts and bang its broken again with this error: Help! Server claimed font -misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I ran fc-cache against each directory separately but this changed nothing. How the H^ll do I know which font is breaking this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 16:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111626.n1BGQCTc008844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #19 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-11 11:26:10 EDT --- Just remember I did a 'yum groupupdate Fonts' to make sure my default fonts included all standard installs. Things broke at some stage after that. But I've tracked this down, if I do: yum remove cjkunifonts-uming fontforge now works yum groupupdate Fonts This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically cjkunifonts-uming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111815.n1BIFJiu014693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #20 from Adam Goode 2009-02-11 13:15:18 EDT --- 1.8.27-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111815.n1BIFKCP014719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477397, which changed state. Bug 477397 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112145.n1BLjJA3029635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-11 16:45:18 EDT --- 1. This bit is not strictly necessary # Repeat for every font family -- Sans Mono 2. This one isn't either now that multiple ownership of font dirs was approved; %_font_pkg will now auto-own this dir %dir %{_fontdir} 3. having upstream publish an official sfd version and build from it would be preferred (not a blocker) 4. You need to add a Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} to the main package or it won't pull common in (and it's necessary for fontconfig-filesystem) The last one is the only real problem and it's a minor one ??? APPROVED ??? Please do not forget to fix those little problems, and continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 23:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112341.n1BNfG4q011269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rdtennent at hotmail | |.com) --- Comment #20 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-11 18:41:13 EDT --- I have to ask ?wrong question? ? are you able to reproduce it with Fedora 10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 00:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120012.n1C0CnaU016845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #10 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-11 19:12:48 EDT --- ok, I just killed the alias sections in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf. Basically, this means users have to manually select this font to use in their desktop or browsers; if they want to use dejavu and zenhei together, they have to code up their conf file, or wish one day the ancient font orders in 65-nonlatin get updated. Jens, let me know if this is good, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 03:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120349.n1C3ngEU023605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-11 22:49:41 EDT --- This has been in for a long time, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 03:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120351.n1C3pDK1000727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-11 22:51:09 EDT --- This has been in for a long time, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120533.n1C5XSxC009335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:33:28 EDT --- new package was built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120532.n1C5WAfK018634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:32:09 EDT --- new package was built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120532.n1C5WCgi018709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 478891, which changed state. Bug 478891 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120546.n1C5kKKC011492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #8 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:46:20 EDT --- sorry, the above comment meant to posted at Bug#476459. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120544.n1C5i4kh020585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #7 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-12 00:44:03 EDT --- Also, as I mentioned before, I set up a sub-project to complete Google's Droid Sans Fallback. In the past 3 months, we used our web-based application (demo http://wenq.org/demo/fontopia_droid_tutorial.htm) and completed all 4300+ missing Han glyphs in CJK basic (U4E00-U9FC3). In the past month, we have been doing the final review and are about to release a new font soon (named "WenQuanYi Micro Hei"). Micro hei is only 4M in size with high quality glyphs. I strongly recommend shipping this font with F11 (possibly default install for Chinese support). The latest nightly-build of the font can be found at http://wenq.org/daily/microhei/wqy-microhei-0.2-nightlybuild.tar.gz I will submit a new package request soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Feb 12 05:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:50:08 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120550.n1C5o8lj001862@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Brad Lassey (:blassey) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 12 08:01:58 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090212080158.40D001F824A@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 14:47:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:47:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121447.n1CElbvb004990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 14:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121447.n1CElceC005021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477435, which changed state. Bug 477435 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 15:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121518.n1CFIF9Z011823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange 2009-02-12 10:18:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hartke-aurulent-fonts Short Description: A sans-serif font for use as primary interface font Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:47:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121847.n1CIlCdr026904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 13:47:11 EDT --- If we cannot determine the license of a file, we cannot include it. Please remove the avatar font from all branches and push updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 05:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130522.n1D5Mlod008623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-13 00:22:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > ok, I just killed the alias sections in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf. Basically, this > means users have to manually select this font to use in their desktop or > browsers; if they want to use dejavu and zenhei together, they have to code up > their conf file, or wish one day the ancient font orders in 65-nonlatin get > updated. You could still include the old config file in avail.d/. > Jens, let me know if this is good, thanks I tried wqy-zenhei-fonts-0.8.34-2.20081027cvs.fc11 and it still behaves the same way for me on a Japanese desktop, overriding the default Japanese font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130636.n1D6a4VK001005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:36:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Feb 13 07:50:55 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090213075055.96D7D1F824A@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:06:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130906.n1D96w9U031261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-13 04:06:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > yum remove cjkunifonts-uming > fontforge now works > yum groupupdate Fonts > This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts > installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically > cjkunifonts-uming. Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rbhalera at fedoraproject.org Fri Feb 13 12:08:28 2009 From: rbhalera at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Bhalerao) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-fonts/devel lohit-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20090213120828.B4C3570123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: rbhalera Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11092 Modified Files: lohit-fonts.spec Log Message: Updated according to new font packaging guidelines Index: lohit-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/lohit-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- lohit-fonts.spec 9 Sep 2008 12:08:11 -0000 1.9 +++ lohit-fonts.spec 13 Feb 2009 12:07:58 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,97 +1,271 @@ -%define xfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts -%define langlist "bengali hindi gujarati tamil punjabi kannada malayalam oriya telugu marathi maithili kashmiri konkani nepali sindhi" +%define fontname lohit -Name: lohit-fonts -Version: 2.3.1 -Release: 1%{?dist} -Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts - -Group: User Interface/X -License: GPLv2 -URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Lohit -Source: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/released/lohit/lohit-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - -%description -This package provides Hindi, Bengali, Gujarati, Punjabi, Tamil, -Kannada, Malayalam, Oriya, Telugu, Marathi, Maithili, Kashmiri, -Konkani, Nepali and Sindhi TrueType/Opentype fonts. - -# mk_pkg -%define mk_pkg() \ -%package -n lohit-fonts-%1\ -Summary: Free %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") font\ -Group: User Interface/X \ -# strictly we only need to provide bn, gu, hi, pa, ta \ -Provides: ttfonts-%2 = 1.8-2\ -Obsoletes : ttfonts-%2 <= 1.8-1\ -\ -\ -%description -n lohit-fonts-%1\ -This package provides a free %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") truetype/opentype font.\ -\ -%files -n lohit-fonts-%1\ -%defattr(-, root, root, -)\ -%doc COPYING README AUTHORS\ -%dir %{xfontdir}/lohit-%1\ -%{xfontdir}/lohit-%1/*.ttf\ -\ -%post -n lohit-fonts-%1 \ -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir} \ -fi \ -\ -%postun -n lohit-fonts-%1 \ -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then \ - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir} \ - fi \ -fi - -%mk_pkg bengali bn -%mk_pkg gujarati gu -%mk_pkg hindi hi -%mk_pkg kannada kn -%mk_pkg malayalam ml -%mk_pkg oriya or -%mk_pkg punjabi pa -%mk_pkg tamil ta -%mk_pkg telugu te -%mk_pkg marathi mr -%mk_pkg maithili mai -%mk_pkg kashmiri ks -%mk_pkg konkani kok -%mk_pkg nepali ne -%mk_pkg sindhi sd +%define common_desc \ +The fonts named 'Lohit' which means 'Red' in Sanskrit were initially released \ +by Red Hat. The complete collection currently supports scripts for 15 Indian \ +Languages. + + +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 2.3.1 +Release: 2%{?dist} +Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts + +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2 +URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ +Source: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/released/lohit/lohit-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel + +%description +%common_desc + + +%package common +Summary: Common files of Lohit fonts +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem + +%description common +%common_desc + +This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. + +%package -n %{fontname}-bengali-fonts +Summary: Free Bengali font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-bengali = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-bengali < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-bengali-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Bengali truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n bengali lohit_bn.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts +Summary: Free Gujarati font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-gujarati = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-gujarati < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Gujarati truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n gujarati lohit_gu.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-hindi-fonts +Summary: Free Gujarati font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-hindi = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-hindi < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-hindi-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Hindi truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n hindi lohit_hi.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-kannada-fonts +Summary: Free Kannada font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-kannada = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-kannada < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-kannada-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Kannada truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n kannada lohit_kn.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-kashmiri-fonts +Summary: Free Kashmiri font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-kashmiri = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-kashmiri < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-kashmiri-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Kashmiri truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n kashmiri lohit_ks.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-konkani-fonts +Summary: Free Konkani font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-konkani = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-konkani < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-konkani-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Konkani truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n konkani lohit_kok.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-maithili-fonts +Summary: Free Maithili font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-maithili = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-maithili < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-maithili-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Maithili truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n maithili lohit_mai.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts +Summary: Free Malayalam font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-malayalam = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-malayalam < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Malayalam truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n malayalam lohit_ml.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-marathi-fonts +Summary: Free Marathi font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-marathi = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-marathi < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-marathi-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Marathi truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n marathi lohit_mr.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-nepali-fonts +Summary: Free Nepali font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-nepali = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-nepali < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-nepali-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Nepali truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n nepali lohit_ne.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts +Summary: Free Oriya font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-oriya = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-oriya < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Oriya truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n oriya lohit_or.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-punjabi-fonts +Summary: Free Punjabi font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-punjabi = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-punjabi < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-punjabi-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Punjabi truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n punjabi lohit_pa.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-sindhi-fonts +Summary: Free Sindhi font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-sindhi = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-sindhi < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-sindhi-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Sindhi truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n sindhi lohit_sd.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts +Summary: Free Tamil font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-tamil = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-tamil < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Tamil truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n tamil lohit_ta.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-telugu-fonts +Summary: Free Telugu font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: lohit-fonts-telugu = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-telugu < 2.3.1-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-telugu-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Telugu truetype/opentype font. +%_font_pkg -n telugu lohit_te.ttf %prep -%setup -q -n lohit-fonts-%{version} +%setup -q + %build -echo "Nothing to do in Build." + %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -for i in "%{langlist}" -do - install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{xfontdir}/lohit-$i - install -m 0644 $i/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{xfontdir}/lohit-$i -done +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p */*.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +#install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ +# %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} + + +%files common +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%doc COPYING README AUTHORS ChangeLog + +%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog +* Fri Feb 13 2009 Rahul Bhalerao - 2.3.1-2.fc11 +- Updated according to new font packaging guidelines. * Tue Sep 09 2008 Rahul Bhalerao - 2.3.1-1 - Bug 216400: [te_IN] anaconda GUI - Release Notes button overlaps with other text * Wed Aug 20 2008 Rahul Bhalerao - 2.3.0-1 - Forked Lohit Hindi into Marathi, Maithili, Kashmiri, Konkani, Sindhi and Nepali. -- Bug 215902: [hi_IN, mr_IN]Incorrect extent of 0x093f when attached to a composite character which has width greater than a single character (hi_IN & maybe others) +- Bug 215902: [hi_IN, mr_IN]Incorrect extent of 0x093f when attached to a composite character which has + width greater than a single character (hi_IN & maybe others) - Bug 445176: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph - Improved Anchoring(blwm Anchor-0) for Hindi font. - Corrected positioning of U+0953 for Hindi font. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131225.n1DCP6mB010637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-13 07:25:05 EDT --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131514.n1DFELdG018491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #13 from Qianqian Fang 2009-02-13 10:14:20 EDT --- Was your desktop font set as "sans"? and your lang=ja? Can you attach the 44-wqy-zenhei.conf file and the debug output: FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131606.n1DG60NO019567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paul Lange 2009-02-13 11:05:59 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hartke-aurulent-fonts (change to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts) New Branches: none Owners: palango I did a mistake with the package name when filling it into the Request. Sorry for that! Could you please rename the package to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts . Thank you very much and sorry for the circumstances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131733.n1DHXVvl006324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #22 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-13 12:33:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > yum remove cjkunifonts-uming > > fontforge now works > > yum groupupdate Fonts > > This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break. So the default fonts > > installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically > > cjkunifonts-uming. > > Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or > cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug. Its related in that it does the same thing, but on a different font. See bug 485472 for a report against cjkunifonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] New: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: dwayne at translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: cjkunifonts breaks fontforge operation. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum groupinstall Fonts - ensures we have a standard font install 2. fontforge - breaks 3. yum remove cjkunifonts-uming 4. fontforge - words Actual results: When crashing we get a message like this: Help! Server claimed font -some font file name (I can't remember it) existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault Expected results: fontforge works regardless of whether these fonts are installed. Additional info: A similar problem was reported in bug 450709 against xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 23:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132306.n1DN6ZaS009663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #11 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-02-13 18:06:34 EDT --- Just removed it. Upstream said they might not ship it any more in their next release. Building right now on Koji for F9, F10 and Rawhide. Will land in the repositories soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140130.n1E1UCGh016589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-02-13 20:30:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Feb 14 07:46:22 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090214074622.D52391B8033@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 09:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140922.n1E9MFuA011807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #32 from Ryo Dairiki 2009-02-14 04:22:14 EDT --- On Fedora-10, the same bug appears after usual update. VLGothic fonts: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch Baekmuk fonts: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-dotum-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-batang-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-ttf-fonts-hline-2.2-9.fc10.noarch baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-5.fc9.noarch Is this also related to this report? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141250.n1ECoKY2018265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477420, which changed state. Bug 477420 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141250.n1ECoJH6018235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:50:18 EDT --- Looks nice. Maybe some over-enthusiastic providing, but that's a maintainer choice. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F BTW: would be even nicer is lohit was built from sources in %build like other well-behaved floss fonts such as liberation or dejavu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141254.n1ECsFlg000819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:54:14 EDT --- A new package request will be very welcome :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141253.n1ECrito000732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:53:43 EDT --- Will all the font changes in rawhide it would probably not be total waste if people with CJK knowledge did install all the rawhide font packages and check we do the right thing for sans/serif/monospace for CJK languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141258.n1ECwMFq001703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 07:58:21 EDT --- Always feel free to close bugs once you've done the changes and checked they do what was intended, reporters are not always timely available to close bugs :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141258.n1ECwNem001733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477458, which changed state. Bug 477458 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 13:44:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:44:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] New: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: kee at ketan.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=331920) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331920) Rendering comparison Description of problem: After installing vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch, some Japanese characters are incorrectly rendered with a different font (apparently a Chinese one). More specifically, when an ASCII alphabetical character is followed some Japanese characters (Japanese punctuations for example), the followed characters are not rendered with the VLGothic font, but with a Chinese one. This does not happen with VLGothic-fonts-20081029-1.fc10.noarch and before. See attached image for comparison. gedit is used for capturing. The "monospace" font and the "sans-serif" font causes this problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Display a Japanese text with "monospace" or "sans-serif" font. Actual results: Some characters are rendered with a Chinese font. Expected results: Characters should be rendered with the VLGothic font. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 14:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485566] New: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: As you know, fontconfig finds proper fonts for text rendering, depending on locales of process and text to render. It works properly in the most cases, but there are some sever cases. For example, if you type only "@" or "}" in gedit, it uses glyph of VLGothic in Japanese locale. However, if you type "a" after the first character, it changes one's mind to choose glyphs of DejaVu fonts. It's very annoying for Japanese users. In the worst cases, the width of the indentations of sourcecode seems different. (As the width of the " " glyphs are differ between VLGothic and DejaVu) How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login X11 as a Japanese. 2. Open gedit and change the configuration to use "Monospace". 3. Type "@" on the first line, and "@a" on the first line. Actual results: "@" seems differ between the two lines. Expected results: "@" seems the same between the two lines. The same glyph should be used for rendering the two "@". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 14:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485566] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141434.n1EEYNDZ005279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 --- Comment #1 from Ryo Dairiki 2009-02-14 09:34:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331924) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331924) A new configuration file to force fontconfig to prefer DejaVu glyphs to Japanese glyphs. This configuration make fontconfig prefer DejaVu glyphs to Japanese glyphs in rendering English. When you apply this, fontconfig uses DejaVu glyphs for rendering "@" in Japanese locale. Note, this configuration will not affect on font selection order for Japanese characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 15:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141526.n1EFQT2l014027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Ryo Dairiki changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clone Of| |#485562 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 15:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485566] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141524.n1EFOM7Y027454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Ryo Dairiki changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #331924|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from Ryo Dairiki 2009-02-14 10:24:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331925) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331925) A new configuration file to force fontconfig to prefer DejaVu glyphs to Japanese glyphs. A new configuration file to force fontconfig to prefer DejaVu glyphs to Japanese glyphs. After installing this configuration, fontconfig uses DejaVu glyph as far as possible even in Japanese locale. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From palango at fedoraproject.org Sat Feb 14 16:27:00 2009 From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel Makefile,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090214162700.AF44170136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17519/devel Modified Files: Makefile Log Message: change devel/Makefile to new cvs name Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- Makefile 13 Feb 2009 06:36:21 -0000 1.1 +++ Makefile 14 Feb 2009 16:26:30 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Makefile for source rpm: hartke-aurulent-fonts # $Id$ -NAME := hartke-aurulent-fonts +NAME := hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common From palango at fedoraproject.org Sat Feb 14 16:36:40 2009 From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090214163640.6874D7012C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: palango Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19009/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log Log Message: * Sat Feb 14 2009 Paul Lange - 20070504-1 - initial import --- NEW FILE hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Aurulent Sans Aurulent Sans sans-serif --- NEW FILE hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec --- %define fontname hartke-aurulent-sans %define fontconf 63-%{fontname}-fonts-fontconfig.conf %define fontconfmono 64-%{fontname}-fonts-fontconfig.conf %define archivename AurulentSans-20070504 %define common_desc \ Aurulent Sans is a sans-serif font developed for use as the primary interface\ font on X Windows on GNU/Linux. It includes the latin alphabet, digits, and\ punctuation, as well as some accents. It is created by Stephen G. Hartke. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070504 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A sans-serif font for use as primary interface font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.geocities.com/hartke01/ Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.tgz Source1: %{fontname}-fonts-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{fontname}-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf Source3: %{archivename}.pdf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description %common_desc This package includes the Aurulent Sans font family. %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} AurulentSans-*.otf %package common Summary: Common files of the Aurulent font family Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts Summary: Aurulent Sans Mono font family Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts %common_desc This package includes the Aurulent Sans Mono font family. %_font_pkg -n mono -f %{fontconfmono} AurulentSansMono-*.otf %prep %setup -q -c install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} . %build #Nothing to do yet. Asked upstream for sources on Feb 01 2009. %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} # Repeat for every font family install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconfmono} for fconf in %{fontconf}\ %{fontconfmono}; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc README *.pdf %changelog * Sun Feb 1 2009 Paul Lange - 20070504-1 - initial packaging --- NEW FILE hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- monospace Aurulent Sans Mono Aurulent Sans Mono monospace --- NEW FILE import.log --- hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-1_fc10:HEAD:hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-1.fc10.src.rpm:1234629201 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Feb 2009 06:36:21 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 14 Feb 2009 16:36:10 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +AurulentSans-20070504.pdf +AurulentSans-20070504.tgz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Feb 2009 06:36:21 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 14 Feb 2009 16:36:10 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +68ec032a385b1f8b295c1a371db0579a AurulentSans-20070504.pdf +a56076e91469e5ed65a714ac666b3def AurulentSans-20070504.tgz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 16:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485569] New: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485569 Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: john.ellson at comcast.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: After various font rpm churn on rawhide my 32 bit application would crash with a malloc failure because of a messed up font cache. One could wonder: a) why is the 32 bit cache different from the 64 bit? b) why isn't fontconfig keeping them both uptodate? but I have a simpler request: "man fc-cache" states: Note that fc-cache must be executed once per architecture to generate font information customized for that architecture. but it isn't possible to do this on x86_64 because only the 64 bit version of /usr/bin/fc-cache is installed, even if both i386 and x86_64 fontconfig rpms are installed. ** Request that /usr/bin/fc-cache-64 and /usr/bin/fc-cache-32 both be installed, and that a new /usr/bin/fc-cache shell script be created that runs them both. The man page also says: On a subsequent run, fc-cache will augment the cache information files with the information for the new architecture. but apparently this didn't work through some series of font rpm upgrades. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. cd /var/cache/fontconfig 2. rm * 3. fc-cache Actual results: Only *x86-64.cache-2 files created Expected results: Both *x86.cache-2 and *x86-64.cache-2 files created Additional info: Any ugly workaround to the current situation is: rpm -e --nodeps --allmatches fontconfig fontconfig-devel yum install fontconfig.i386 fc-cache yum install fontconfig.x86_64 fontconfig-devel.x86_64 fc-cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 18:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141824.n1EIOf1b022989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 21:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142144.n1ELiKWO010937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 16:44:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Created an attachment (id=331334) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331334) [details] > New spec > > Nicholas, how does this look? This one looks better, however to completely convert freefont you should: 1. rename the base package to gnu-free-fonts http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F 2. build from the sfd sources upstream publishes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Building_from_sources 3. add a few fontconfig rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F 4. try to stay closer to the template by using the same declaration order and spacing lines (makes it so much easier to check in a diff tool) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Can_I_re-indent.2Fre-order_the_fonts_packaging_template.3F 5. remove the "Requires: fontconfig". It is contrary to packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Install-time_dependencies 6. probably be more conservative with provides http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F 7. use -compat as metapackage if you need one http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#But_my_old_package_is_replaced_by_several_new_packages.21 8. use nice names for your subpackages via -n as suggested by the templates http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_font_packaging_changes_are_needed_with_post-1.13_fontpackages.3F Piece of cake :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Sat Feb 14 22:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:04:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Bug 20120] New: Display font script coverage info in the UI Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20120 Summary: Display font script coverage info in the UI Product: PackageKit Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: General AssignedTo: richard at hughsie.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com To make fonts auto-install work coverage auto-provides are being added to font packages. However, those provides are not only useful for auto-installation. Users are just as interested to know they can use a font package to render Greek or Catalan or Arabic when browsing the package repository manually. Please transform those provides in user-friendly information added to font package descriptions in packagekit GUI frontends. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 22:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142252.n1EMqgYg023200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.2.0-6 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 22:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142252.n1EMqhcf023230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477406, which changed state. Bug 477406 Summary: kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 05:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150559.n1F5xoK7032239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clone Of|#485562 |475743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 15 08:11:05 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090215081105.DF9F31F8256@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Sun Feb 15 10:35:41 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Feb 2009 10:35:41 -0000 Subject: [Issue 76587] WW8: MathType object displayed without brackets etc. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090215103541.22109.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76587 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'hcostelha,kpalagin' |'fedorafonts,hcostelha,kpa | |lagin' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151812.n1FIC5Rb004289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state. Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151814.n1FIEpXT004643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-15 13:14:50 EDT --- confirmed fixed in rawhide please close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151813.n1FID7Or004447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state. Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151812.n1FIC46F004264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-15 13:12:04 EDT --- Latest spec shows a dep on a dejavu package name that will go away before F11 beta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151813.n1FID6Wr004421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-15 13:13:05 EDT --- Latest spec shows a dep on a dejavu package name that will go away before F11 beta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151821.n1FILAm7022022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151821.n1FIL8Nt021980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-15 13:21:07 EDT --- comps.xml is updated close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151833.n1FIX53A007706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-15 13:33:04 EDT --- Will do. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151836.n1FIaOu8024754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477374, which changed state. Bug 477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151836.n1FIaNCH024721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |oron at actcom.co.il Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-15 13:36:22 EDT --- 1. your -compat package needs to obsolete culmus-fonts < thisversion-thisrelease for the upgrade path to work http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#But_my_old_package_is_replaced_by_several_new_packages.21 2. if you don't add a suitably threatening description to your compat package people will do stupid stuff such as adding new deps on it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=82799 3. Your descriptions and summaries may need a little work, maybe ask the Hebrew localization team for help? http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/he 4. I'd have followed /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf a bit more closely to make sure the fonts are registered in the correct generic families but that's your choice to make of course The Obsolete bit is the only part which is likely to be a big problem short term -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 15 22:05:57 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.36, 1.37 fontconfig.spec, 1.118, 1.119 sources, 1.37, 1.38 Message-ID: <20090215220557.8D87A70127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5701 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6 - Update to 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.36 retrieving revision 1.37 diff -u -r1.36 -r1.37 --- .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000 1.36 +++ .cvsignore 15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000 1.37 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.95.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.118 retrieving revision 1.119 diff -u -r1.118 -r1.119 --- fontconfig.spec 27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000 1.118 +++ fontconfig.spec 15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000 1.119 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.95 -Release: 1.git.66.gb162bfb%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.96 +Release: 1.g0b290a6%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6 +- Update to 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6 + * Tue Jan 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb - Update to 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.37 retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38 --- sources 27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000 1.37 +++ sources 15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000 1.38 @@ -1 +1 @@ -d568673bb06705503b66eac28c2a2e51 fontconfig-2.6.95.tar.gz +6b466e0d15417d8d0431a18d1a259c43 fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz From behdad at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 15 22:30:52 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.119,1.120 Message-ID: <20090215223052.328A670127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8539 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Log Message: * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 - Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.119 retrieving revision 1.120 diff -u -r1.119 -r1.120 --- fontconfig.spec 15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000 1.119 +++ fontconfig.spec 15 Feb 2009 22:30:21 -0000 1.120 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.96 -Release: 1.g0b290a6%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.97 +Release: 1.g945d6a4%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 +- Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 + * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6 - Update to 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6 From behdad at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 15 22:31:52 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore,1.37,1.38 sources,1.38,1.39 Message-ID: <20090215223152.56F7A70127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8997 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 - Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.37 retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38 --- .cvsignore 15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000 1.37 +++ .cvsignore 15 Feb 2009 22:31:22 -0000 1.38 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.97.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.38 retrieving revision 1.39 diff -u -r1.38 -r1.39 --- sources 15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000 1.38 +++ sources 15 Feb 2009 22:31:22 -0000 1.39 @@ -1 +1 @@ -6b466e0d15417d8d0431a18d1a259c43 fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz +addd72182847a156db9f5f7aa7fb6e91 fontconfig-2.6.97.tar.gz From behdad at fedoraproject.org Sun Feb 15 22:46:47 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.120,1.121 Message-ID: <20090215224647.3831670127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11739 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Log Message: * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4 - Another try. Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.120 retrieving revision 1.121 diff -u -r1.120 -r1.121 --- fontconfig.spec 15 Feb 2009 22:30:21 -0000 1.120 +++ fontconfig.spec 15 Feb 2009 22:46:16 -0000 1.121 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig Version: 2.6.97 -Release: 1.g945d6a4%{?dist} +Release: 2.g945d6a4%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4 +- Another try. + * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 - Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160204.n1G2425Q003638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com Component|VLGothic-fonts |cjkunifonts AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor |cchance at redhat.com |ge.net | Summary|vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f |Chinese fonts is used for |c10 makes some Japanese |Japanese desktop after |characters get rendered |vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f |with a different font |c10 installed --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-15 21:04:01 EDT --- Better reassigning to cjkunifonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434753] Sometimes can't display VLGothic via "sansserif" family. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160210.n1G2AkmB005213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434753 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-15 21:10:44 EDT --- Thanks for testing. closing so that the update is available on F-9 and F-10 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160221.n1G2LAhg021777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-15 21:21:09 EDT --- BTW I don't see lowercase name in bugzilla though, is it intentional or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160234.n1G2YRZ2008780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 21:34:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331999) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331999) fc-match-4.output.bz2 output for > FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160233.n1G2X0mT008583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 21:32:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Was your desktop font set as "sans"? and your lang=ja? Yes it is a default Japanese rawhide install. > Can you attach the 44-wqy-zenhei.conf file You mean it works for you in a japanese desktop session? ;-) 35f7bdfcc512ac6cb03a520e702a0c45 /etc/fonts/conf.d/44-wqy-zenhei.conf (I am not excluding a fontconfig bug: at least the behaviour seems have changed...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160251.n1G2pc3j027278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 21:51:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > On Fedora-10, the same bug appears after usual update. > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-dotum-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-batang-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-hline-2.2-9.fc10.noarch > baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-5.fc9.noarch It sounds like it could be. What if you remove the baekmuk fonts? (They are not default for Hangul anymore anyway.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 03:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160302.n1G32oAL014341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-15 22:02:49 EDT --- Can you post the output of: rpm -qa \*fonts\* | sort It would be hopeful if you can narrow down which font package is causing the problem. It might be baekmuk-ttf for example? (see also end of bug 475743 comment 32) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 07:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160710.n1G7AlQT029450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-02-16 02:10:46 EDT --- Nicholas, thanks for the suggestions. Here are the updates: 1. added obsoletes to -compat. 2. added the suitable description. 3. so far, I haven't been able to find any documentation on culmus project's website or anywhere to derive proper description for every subpackage. So keeping the same generic one. 4. the .conf are derived from the original files from the upstream project, only split between subpackages. Hope that works for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 07:52:52 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew Message-ID: <20090216075252.1DD571B8046@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On x86_64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On i386: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew On ppc64: tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew Please resolve this as soon as possible. From caolanm at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 09:08:55 2009 From: caolanm at fedoraproject.org (Caolan McNamara) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090216090855.62F7C70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: caolanm Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11950 Modified Files: tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec Log Message: fonts-hebrew -> culmus-fonts-compat Index: tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel/tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec 8 Sep 2008 14:16:49 -0000 1.5 +++ tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec 16 Feb 2009 09:08:25 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ Summary: Culmus Hebrew fonts support for tetex Name: tetex-fonts-hebrew Version: 0.1 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} URL: http://culmus.sf.net Source: tetex-fonts-hebrew-%{version}.tar.gz # No version specified. License: GPL+ Group: Applications/Text BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: tetex, tetex-afm, fonts-hebrew -Requires: tetex fonts-hebrew +BuildRequires: tetex, tetex-afm, culmus-fonts-compat +Requires: tetex culmus-fonts-compat BuildArch: noarch Requires(post): /usr/bin/texhash /usr/bin/updmap-sys Requires(postun): /usr/bin/texhash /usr/bin/updmap-sys @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ /usr/bin/texhash %changelog +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Caol??n McNamara 0.1-10 +- fonts-hebrew -> culmus-fonts-compat + * Mon Sep 8 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 0.1-9 - fix license tag From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 09:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485685] New: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't work. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't work. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 Summary: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't work. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't work. Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: sangu.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=332015) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332015) embeddedbitmap bold in firefox ( http://cndic.naver.com/font.nhn ) Description of problem: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't work. Then, the others gtk2 programs work well. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4.fc11 How reproducible: always in firefox Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rhughes at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 11:35:08 2009 From: rhughes at fedoraproject.org (Richard Hughes) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch, NONE, 1.1 fontconfig.spec, 1.121, 1.122 Message-ID: <20090216113508.13E4F70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: rhughes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4358 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Added Files: fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch Log Message: * Mon Feb 16 2009 Richard Hughes - 2.6.97-3.g945d6a4 - Correct the rpm provide name to be font(), not Font(). fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch: --- NEW FILE fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch --- diff -urp fontconfig-2.6.97.old/src/fcformat.c fontconfig-2.6.97/src/fcformat.c --- fontconfig-2.6.97.old/src/fcformat.c 2009-02-16 11:14:54.000000000 +0000 +++ fontconfig-2.6.97/src/fcformat.c 2009-02-16 11:17:01.000000000 +0000 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ #define FCMATCH_FORMAT "%{file:-|basename}: \"%{family[0]:-}\" \"%{style[0]:-}\"" #define FCLIST_FORMAT "%{?file{%{file}: }}%{=unparse}" -#define PKGKIT_FORMAT "%{[]family{Font(%{family|downcase|delete( )})\n}}%{[]lang{Font(:lang=%{lang|downcase|translate(_,-)})\n}}" +#define PKGKIT_FORMAT "%{[]family{font(%{family|downcase|delete( )})\n}}%{[]lang{font(:lang=%{lang|downcase|translate(_,-)})\n}}" static void Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.121 retrieving revision 1.122 diff -u -r1.121 -r1.122 --- fontconfig.spec 15 Feb 2009 22:46:16 -0000 1.121 +++ fontconfig.spec 16 Feb 2009 11:34:37 -0000 1.122 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig Version: 2.6.97 -Release: 2.g945d6a4%{?dist} +Release: 3.g945d6a4%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root Source1: 25-no-bitmap-fedora.conf +# behdad has this in his local tree +Patch1: fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch + BuildRequires: gawk BuildRequires: expat-devel BuildRequires: freetype-devel >= %{freetype_version} @@ -44,6 +47,7 @@ %prep %setup -q +%patch1 -p1 %build @@ -131,6 +135,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Richard Hughes - 2.6.97-3.g945d6a4 +- Correct the rpm provide name to be font(), not Font(). + * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4 - Another try. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161211.n1GCBsJd000836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 sangu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Using bold in firefox, |Embolden Font with |embeddedbitmap option |embeddedbitmap is ugly in |does't work. |firefox. Status Whiteboard|Using bold in firefox, | |embeddedbitmap option | |does't work. | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161213.n1GCDEFR000987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 --- Comment #1 from sangu 2009-02-16 07:13:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332027) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332027) Embolden font in fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161241.n1GCfDTd007253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha 2009-02-16 07:41:11 EDT --- Packages: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec It builds fine.. I am still having trouble with the %package etc part.. This package too, the rpm names arent as they are supposed to be.. Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/SRPMS/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-general-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-lower-case-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-small-caps-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Ive tried what the multi spec has in it.. Got stuck there.. Doing anything else with the spec gives me "%post file not found".. I've been stuck there for almost two weeks until i atleast managed to build this. One of you will have to please tell me how to do that part properly.. The fontforge warning/error persists. It gives a 0 exit status though.. Am waiting for a reply from the mailing list for confirmation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161314.n1GDE3SL014211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161314.n1GDE1Xf014144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485702] New: fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702 Summary: fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontpackages AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1130220 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1130229 The latter one has a lot of Provides:font(bar) in build.log, while the former does not have any. This is because in /usr/lib/rpm/fontconfig.prov $fcquery aborts immediately if fontconfig is not installed (also see "root.log"s) Since - For packages not related to fonts, "BR: fontconfig" is not needed - Current font packaging guidelines "suggests" to include "BR: fontpackages-devel" (I don't know if this is "should" or "must" or just "is better") adding "R: fontconfig" to fontpackages-devel seems the best idea Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontpackages-devel-1.18-1.fc11 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Rebuild srpm related to fonts which seems to match current font packaging guidelines with mockbuild 2. rpm -q --provides Actual results: None of the virtual Provides related to fonts can be seen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485702] fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161421.n1GELauS012288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-16 09:21:35 EDT --- I'll push a new fontpackage release this evening (CET). It's almost ready, I was just waiting to make sure Behdad and Panu didn't change their mind again (they pushed the rpm/fontconfig plumbing a few hours ago in koji) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161454.n1GEsdp7007067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|cjkuni-fonts |fontconfig AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161453.n1GEr1q0006791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-16 09:52:55 EDT --- fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 again reproduces this problem...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161551.n1GFpULa016711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161555.n1GFtsEC017983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 10:55:53 EDT --- This one might be duplicated to bug #475743. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161554.n1GFsFPI003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #35 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 10:54:14 EDT --- I have only built on rawhide. Let me backport that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161546.n1GFk1NM014615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 10:46:01 EDT --- Not reproducible in latest yum update: cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10.noarch fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 16:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:49:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161649.n1GGno44023776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-02-16 11:49:50 EDT --- This is what George said about the error,"It indicates an internal problem in fontforge that will sometimes cause an error. You can correct it by rewriting fontforge's code so that it handles rounding errors better. This is not something I can do, but if you can please do so.". I certainly cannot rewrite the code to fontforge. How should i handle it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5dVn027966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5cpu027941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5aD4027918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5Zsj027889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485746] (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5ZsH027872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481434, 479371, 474734, | |474522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485746] New: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746 Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is a tracker bug for tracking all hinting issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 18:31:28 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 fontpackages.spec, 1.9, 1.10 import.log, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20090216183128.EF6FE70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15454/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.19 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- .cvsignore 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.8 +++ .cvsignore 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- fontpackages.spec 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.9 +++ fontpackages.spec 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.10 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.18 +Version: 1.19 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -13,8 +13,11 @@ License: LGPLv3+ URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) +BuildRequires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3 + %description This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros @@ -23,7 +26,6 @@ %package filesystem Summary: Directories used by font packages -Group: User Interface/X License: Public Domain %description filesystem @@ -33,9 +35,10 @@ %package devel Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages -Group: User Interface/X -Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontconfig > 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4 +Requires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3 %description devel This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to @@ -98,6 +101,13 @@ %changelog +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.19-1 +??? Add a fontconfig dep to -devel so font autoprovides work (bz#485702) +??? Drop duplicated group declarations, rpm has been fixed (bz#470714) +??? Add partial templates for fonts subpackages of non-font source packages +??? Make them noarch (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages) + * Thu Feb 5 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.18-1 ??? Panu wants autoprovides in rpm proper, drop it Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- import.log 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.8 +++ import.log 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.9 @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232058014 fontpackages-1_16-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232573931 fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977 +fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- sources 5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000 1.8 +++ sources 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -afcfbffe48379897aaaf7260ec2f931d fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2 +e46a2ed63b41f3dd113609aaa5c8f437 fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:41:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485702] fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161841.n1GIfbAf018284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-16 13:41:35 EDT --- A new fontpackages has been pushed however it depends for other reasons on the new rpm that will be pushed koji-side tomorrow Feel free to re-start the build as soon as this new rpm is deployed on the builders (if I miss it) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1131126&name=srpm.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 19:49:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec, 1.10, 1.11 import.log, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20090216194951.CD0B970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29767/devel Modified Files: fontpackages.spec import.log Log Message: workaround current crufty koji Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 --- fontpackages.spec 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.10 +++ fontpackages.spec 16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000 1.11 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: fontpackages Version: 1.19 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Group: Development/System @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ %package filesystem Summary: Directories used by font packages +Group: Development/System License: Public Domain %description filesystem @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ %package devel Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages +Group: Development/System Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} Requires: fontconfig > 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4 @@ -102,6 +104,8 @@ %changelog * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.19-2 +??? workaround the fact koji is not ready yet - 1.19-1 ??? Add a fontconfig dep to -devel so font autoprovides work (bz#485702) ??? Drop duplicated group declarations, rpm has been fixed (bz#470714) Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- import.log 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.9 +++ import.log 16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000 1.10 @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ fontpackages-1_16-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232573931 fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977 fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006 +fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732 From spot at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 19:58:42 2009 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel tiresias-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216195842.7D86470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31207 Modified Files: tiresias-fonts.spec Log Message: fix packaging Index: tiresias-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel/tiresias-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- tiresias-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 20:36:45 -0000 1.2 +++ tiresias-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 19:58:12 -0000 1.3 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Low vision fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} License: GPLv3+ Group: User Interface/X Source0: http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/infofont.zip @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ The Keyfont V2 family is specialized for use in labeling keycaps. -%_font_pkg -n key-v2 -f %{fontconf}-keyfont-v2.conf "TIREKV__.ttf" +%_font_pkg -n key-v2 -f %{fontconf}-keyfont-v2.conf TIREKV__.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-lp-fonts Summary: Specialized font for large print publications @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.0-4 +- fix packaging + * Thu Jan 15 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.0-3 - rework to meet new font packaging guidelines From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485702] fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161958.n1GJw8wU008205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-16 14:58:07 EDT --- Oh, well, I can't wait. Pushed a band-aid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702 Just don't try to use the templates in there before koji is updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462295] fonts package list need to be updated In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162032.n1GKWPh5016718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462295 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:05:15 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162148.n1GLmcJn010117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #6 from Toshio Kuratomi 2009-02-16 16:48:38 EDT --- I've renamed the VLGothic-fonts entry in bugzilla to vlgothic-fonts. It's not possible in bugzilla to have two components that only differ in case so hopefully this is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:27:02 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 import.log, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.6, 1.7 xgridfit.spec, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20090216232702.E5FBF70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5661/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sources xgridfit.spec Log Message: 1.17a Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- .cvsignore 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.6 +++ .cvsignore 16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -xgridfit-1-17.tar.gz +xgridfit-1-17a.tar.gz Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.3 +++ import.log 16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ xgridfit-1_9-1_fc10:HEAD:xgridfit-1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220282275 xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397 xgridfit-1_17-1_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233346359 +xgridfit-1_17-2_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-2.a.fc11.src.rpm:1234826759 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- sources 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.6 +++ sources 16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -82b4f14d1bb1fb89a38da0cff19cb05e xgridfit-1-17.tar.gz +943b0540441d7184977f60b1b0dc4a59 xgridfit-1-17a.tar.gz Index: xgridfit.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- xgridfit.spec 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.8 +++ xgridfit.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000 1.9 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define archivever 1-17 +%define archivever 1-17a Name: xgridfit Version: 1.17 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2.a%{?dist} Summary: Font hinting tool # This is where we drop fontforge @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ %build -# Nothing to do %install @@ -84,26 +83,29 @@ %changelog -* Fri Jan 30 2009 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.17-2.a + +* Fri Jan 30 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.17-1 -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.11-1.a ??? update for F11 cycle -* Mon Sep 1 2008 +* Mon Sep 1 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.9-1 ??? Major update, many changes ??? Only package xsltproc support for now -* Sun May 18 2008 +* Sun May 18 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.6-3 ??? Lots of new makefile goodness -* Thu Mar 13 2008 +* Thu Mar 13 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.5-2 ??? Fix path munging -* Tue Mar 11 2008 +* Tue Mar 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.5-1 ??? Initial Fedora packaging From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216233348.43A3170101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel Modified Files: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 8 Feb 2009 09:34:17 -0000 1.2 +++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:17 -0000 1.3 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081007 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X @@ -59,69 +59,71 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt README -%dir %{_fontdir} - %changelog -* Sun Feb 8 2009 -- 20081007-4 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20081007-5 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Feb 8 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20081007-4 ??? test new rpm font autoprovides -* Sun Jan 25 2009 +* Sun Jan 25 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081007-3 ??? renamed to ???apanov-edrip-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081007-2 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081007-1 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Wed Sep 3 2008 +* Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080826-2 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge -* Mon Sep 1 2008 +* Mon Sep 1 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080826-1 ?? Still more extended cyrillic coverage -* Fri Jul 17 2008 +* Fri Jul 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080717-1 ???? More cyrillic coverage -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080710-1 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup -* Wed Jun 4 2008 +* Wed Jun 4 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080523-2 ??? Fix URL ??? Register in new fantasy generic -* Mon May 26 2008 +* Mon May 26 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080523-1 ?? Add bold italic typeface to the font package ?? Use new upstream makefile magic to simplify spec -* Sun May 18 2008 +* Sun May 18 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080515-2 ??? Add bold & italic typeface to the font package -* Fri Apr 4 2008 +* Fri Apr 4 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080330-1 ??? Fast upstream changes -* Tue Mar 27 2008 +* Tue Mar 27 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080317-3 ??? Fix source URL ??? Add more fontconfig magic -* Wed Mar 26 2008 +* Wed Mar 26 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080317-1 ??? Fedora import -* Thu Mar 13 2008 +* Thu Mar 13 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080310-1 ??? Initial packaging From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090216233348.6C16970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel Modified Files: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 30 Jan 2009 20:04:27 -0000 1.3 +++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.4 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090125 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Heuristica font Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,27 +55,30 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -*Fri Jan 30 2009 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20090125-2 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +*Fri Jan 30 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090125-1 -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081109-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Sun Nov 16 2008 +* Sun Nov 16 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081109-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? - 20081109-1 ??? Fedora import -* Fri Oct 10 2008 +* Fri Oct 10 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080825-1 ?? FE-LEGAL lifted ??? update package in review request -* Fri Jun 20 2008 +* Fri Jun 20 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080619-1 ?? Initial packaging From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec,1.95,1.96 Message-ID: <20090216233348.E068170101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/dejavu-fonts/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.95 retrieving revision 1.96 diff -u -r1.95 -r1.96 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 8 Feb 2009 09:12:05 -0000 1.95 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.96 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.28 -Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ BuildRequires: %{Blocks} %{UnicodeData} BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.17 +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ %package compat Summary: DejaVu fonts compatibility package -Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 @@ -67,7 +66,6 @@ %package lgc-compat Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility package -Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 @@ -81,7 +79,6 @@ %package common Summary: Common files for the Dejavu font set -Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-doc < 2.26-6 @@ -94,14 +91,12 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < 2.28-2 -Provides: %{name}-sans = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc @@ -114,14 +109,12 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: Variable-width serif font faces -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < 2.28-2 -Provides: %{name}-serif = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc @@ -134,14 +127,12 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts Summary: Monospace sans-serif font faces -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 Obsoletes: %{name}-sans-mono < 2.28-2 -Provides: %{name}-sans-mono = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %common_desc @@ -154,7 +145,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 @@ -172,7 +162,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts Summary: Variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 @@ -190,7 +179,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts Summary: Monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 @@ -254,7 +242,12 @@ %changelog -* Thu Feb 5 2009 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.28-5 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages +??? drop compatibility provides as announced at F11 alpha time + +* Thu Feb 5 2009 - 2.28-4 ??? Test build with new fontpackages and in-rpm auto-font-provides From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233349.22D7270101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/ecolier-court-fonts/devel Modified Files: ecolier-court-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- ecolier-court-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 12:02:40 -0000 1.6 +++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.7 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ %define fontconf 61-%{fontname} %define common_desc\ -This set of Latin fonts was created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimic the \ +??colier court fonts were created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimic the \ traditional cursive writing French children are taught in school. \ \ He kindly released two of them under the OFL, which are redistributed in \ @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070702 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ %package common Summary: Common files of the ??colier Court font set -Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common @@ -49,7 +48,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-lignes-fonts Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts with lines -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-lignes < 20070702-7 @@ -107,27 +105,29 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} - %changelog -* Sat Jan 17 2009 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070702-8 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sat Jan 17 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070702-7 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines -* Wed Dec 17 2008 +* Wed Dec 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070702-5 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpm unicode bug to fix koji build -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070702-4 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070702-3 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Sat Jul 19 2008 +* Sat Jul 19 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070702-1 ??? Stop waitting for upstream to answer distribution change requests ??? FESCO chickened out on UTF-8 names From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec,1.11,1.12 Message-ID: <20090216233349.5D8DE70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/fontpackages/devel Modified Files: fontpackages.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- fontpackages.spec 16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000 1.11 +++ fontpackages.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.12 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: fontpackages Version: 1.19 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Group: Development/System @@ -14,9 +14,8 @@ URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) -BuildRequires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3 +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) %description @@ -26,7 +25,6 @@ %package filesystem Summary: Directories used by font packages -Group: Development/System License: Public Domain %description filesystem @@ -36,11 +34,9 @@ %package devel Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages -Group: Development/System Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontconfig > 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4 -Requires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3 +Requires: fontconfig %description devel This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to @@ -104,6 +100,8 @@ %changelog * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.19-3 +??? remove workaround and explicit version checks - 1.19-2 ??? workaround the fact koji is not ready yet - 1.19-1 From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.12, 1.13 Message-ID: <20090216233348.A83FF70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 23:43:32 -0000 1.12 +++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.13 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.10 -Release: 14%{?dist} +Release: 15%{?dist} Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ %package compat Summary: Bitstream Vera, compatibility -Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts < 1.10-9 Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts, %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts @@ -40,7 +39,6 @@ %package common Summary: Common files of the Bitstream Vera font set -Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common @@ -51,7 +49,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: Variable-width sans-serif Bitstream Vera fonts -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < 1.10-13 @@ -67,7 +64,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: Variable-width serif Bitstream Vera fonts -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < 1.10-13 @@ -82,7 +78,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts Summary: Monospace sans-serif Bitstream Vera fonts -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-sans-mono < 1.10-13 @@ -118,11 +113,13 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.TXT -%dir %{_fontdir} - %changelog -* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.10-15 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.10-14 ??? update for new naming guidelines ??? build with new fontpackages (1.15) From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216233349.A2ACC70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:25:25 -0000 1.2 +++ gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.3 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080624 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -77,9 +77,13 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080624-4 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 20080624-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20090216233350.1224D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:28:57 -0000 1.8 +++ gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.9 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070327 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: GFS Baskerville Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -80,18 +80,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070327-11 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070327-10 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070327-9 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070327-8 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <20090216233350.51FF770136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:30:55 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: GFS Bodoni Classic oblique Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -75,18 +75,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-10 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-9 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-8 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-7 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090216233350.9C8BD70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:32:35 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: GFS Bodoni fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -63,18 +63,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-9 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-8 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-7 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-6 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20090216233349.CE88E70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:27:14 -0000 1.8 +++ gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.9 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: GFS Artemisia fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -66,18 +66,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-10 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-9 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-8 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-7 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233350.D2E0970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:34:18 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070413 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: GFS Complutum Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -85,19 +85,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070413-11 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070413-10 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070413-9 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070413-8 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <20090216233351.1360470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:35:56 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080702 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: GFS Didot Classic Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -74,18 +74,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080702-5 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080702-4 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080702-3 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080702-2 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel gfs-didot-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233351.51A3D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-didot-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-didot-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:37:36 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-didot-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070616 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: GFS Didot fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -62,18 +62,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070616-10 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070616-9 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070616-8 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070616-7 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216233351.8057070101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel/gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- gfs-eustace-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:39:21 -0000 1.2 +++ gfs-eustace-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.3 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -78,14 +78,18 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080303-4 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216233351.BA71970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:41:00 -0000 1.2 +++ gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.3 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -78,14 +78,18 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080303-4 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216233352.064D470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:42:45 -0000 1.2 +++ gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.3 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080707 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -74,14 +74,18 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080707-4 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080707-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080707-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090216233352.3AD2C70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:44:27 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080318 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: GFS Gazis Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -73,14 +73,18 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080318-6 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080318-5 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080318-4 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216233352.6F0BC70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- gfs-jackson-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:46:11 -0000 1.2 +++ gfs-jackson-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.3 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -80,15 +80,18 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080303-4 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090216233352.D624D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:49:49 -0000 1.2 +++ gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.3 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -76,14 +76,18 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080303-4 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080303-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233352.A106470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:47:54 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: GFS Neohellenic fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -82,18 +82,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 -- 20070415-8 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-9 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-8 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-7 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-6 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel gfs-olga-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233353.27A1D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-olga-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-olga-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-olga-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/gfs-olga-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-olga-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:51:36 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-olga-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: GFS Olga experimental oblique font Group: User Interface/X @@ -72,19 +72,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20060908-9 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-8 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-7 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-6 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel gfs-porson-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233353.6B14470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-porson-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-porson-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-porson-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-porson-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:53:31 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-porson-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: GFS Porson Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -73,19 +73,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20060908-11 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-10 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-9 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20060908-8 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233353.A815970136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:55:21 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20071114 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: GFS Solomos oblique Greek font Group: User Interface/X @@ -79,19 +79,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20071114-10 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20071114-9 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20071114-8 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20071114-7 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel sil-andika-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090216233354.5C38970136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/sil-andika-fonts/devel Modified Files: sil-andika-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: sil-andika-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/sil-andika-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sil-andika-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 06:57:20 -0000 1.1 +++ sil-andika-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: A font for literacy and beginning readers Group: User Interface/X @@ -79,22 +79,25 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Jan 25 2009 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.0-5 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Jan 25 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0-4 ??? renamed to ???sil-andika-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Tue Jun 24 2008 +* Tue Jun 24 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0-1 ??? Initial packaging From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel stix-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233354.D5ADB70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/stix-fonts/devel Modified Files: stix-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: stix-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- stix-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 21:27:32 -0000 1.6 +++ stix-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.7 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-pua-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, PUA glyphs -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-pua < 0.9-10 @@ -58,7 +57,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-integrals-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional integral glyphs -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-integrals < 0.9-10 @@ -74,7 +72,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sizes-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional glyph sizes -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-sizes < 0.9-10 @@ -90,7 +87,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-variants-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional glyph variants -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{name}-variants < 0.9-10 @@ -154,28 +150,30 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf STIXGeneral*otf %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Fri Jan 16 2009 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 0.9-11 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Fri Jan 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 0.9-10 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 0.9-9 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 0.9-8 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 0.9-7 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup - -* Thu Nov 1 2007 +* Thu Nov 1 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 0.9-6 ??? Add some fontconfig aliasing rules ??? 0.9-4 From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090216233353.DE43070101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:57:03 -0000 1.6 +++ gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 -Release: 11%{?dist} +Release: 12%{?dist} Summary: GFS Theokritos decorative font Group: User Interface/X @@ -78,19 +78,22 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070415-12 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-11 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-10 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070415-7 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel sil-charis-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090216233354.9A37F70139@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/sil-charis-fonts/devel Modified Files: sil-charis-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sil-charis-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.1 +++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.2 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.104 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Group: User Interface/X @@ -67,10 +67,13 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 4.104-7 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + * Tue Jan 27 2009 - 4.104-6 ??? renamed to ???sil-charis-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090216233354.21BAB70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/google-droid-fonts/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 -0000 1.3 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.4 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here Version: 1.0.112 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ %package common Summary: Common files of the Droid font set -Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common @@ -52,7 +51,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: A humanist sans serif typeface -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts @@ -66,7 +64,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts Summary: A humanist monospace sans serif typeface -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts @@ -80,7 +77,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: A serif typeface -Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts @@ -138,27 +134,29 @@ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt -%dir %{_fontdir} - %changelog -* Sat Jan 31 2009 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.0.112-5 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sat Jan 31 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0.112-4 ??? fix-up fontconfig installation for sans and mono -* Fri Jan 16 2009 +* Fri Jan 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0.112-3 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpmbuild UTF-8 handling bug - 1.0.112-2 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines ??? Do strange stuff with Sans Fallback (CJK users please check) -* Tue Dec 9 2008 +* Tue Dec 9 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0.112-1 ?? Licensing bit clarified in bug #472635 ?? Fedora submission -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.0.107-1 ?? Initial built using ???fontpackages??? From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Feb 16 23:33:55 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090216233355.1C39370101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel Modified Files: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec Log Message: Prepare for F11 mass rebuild Index: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 20:00:45 -0000 1.4 +++ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.5 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080723 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,23 +55,26 @@ %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.pdf -%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Nov 23 2008 +* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20080723-4 +??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages + +* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080723-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? -* Fri Nov 14 2008 +* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080723-2 ??? Rebuild using new rpm-font -* Mon Sep 1 2008 +* Mon Sep 1 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20080723-1 ??? Upstream stealth update -* Fri Jul 11 2008 +* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 20061120-4 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162340.n1GNe9M6002889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-16 18:40:08 EDT --- 1. your package names are broken because you're missing the -n switch to %package as documented in the template. Since your names are broken the auto-posts do not work 2. be careful to put the doc in the common subpackage not the main package 3. After koji's update next week-end you'll be able to drop all the "Group: User Interface/X" in subpackages, they'll be inherited from the main package declaration 4. You can ignore the fontforge warning since this is nothing you can do about short of changing the fontforge code, which is not your priority :p Please update your package accordingly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From goranrakic at openoffice.org Tue Feb 17 01:44:33 2009 From: goranrakic at openoffice.org (goranrakic at openoffice.org) Date: 17 Feb 2009 01:44:33 -0000 Subject: [Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090217014433.16866.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User goranrakic changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli |vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo |rafonts,haktar,hdu,hin,ior|rafonts,goranrakic,haktar, |sh,jeevesbond,jlp,kami_,ma|hdu,hin,iorsh,jeevesbond,j |nens,masayan,moyogo,munzir|lp,kami_,manens,masayan,mo |taha,nusorn,obr,ousia,raba|yogo,munzirtaha,nusorn,obr |uke,ralphie,samphan,silver|,ousia,rabauke,ralphie,sam |ex,simos,utomo99' |phan,silverex,simos,utomo9 | |9' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:21:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477054] [fontconfig] Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170221.n1H2LEj2031686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477054] [fontconfig] Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170220.n1H2KOJB031453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Rebuild against |[fontconfig] Rebuild |fontpackages-devel |against fontpackages-devel |depending on |depending on |fontpackages-filesystem |fontpackages-filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170219.n1H2JckA030867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please drop fonts-related |[filesystem] Please drop |directories from filesystem |fonts-related directories | |from filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170221.n1H2Lp7b031793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477333] [brettfont-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170223.n1H2N3pK032018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[brettfont-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477331] [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170222.n1H2MTaB031970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[asana-math-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170225.n1H2PemC032513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[freefont] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170226.n1H2QpnI032419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[cave9] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477368] [a2ps] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170226.n1H2QRUG032365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[a2ps] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170225.n1H2P6kP032119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[darkgarden-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170227.n1H2Rup6000352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[culmus-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477385] [fillets-ng-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170231.n1H2VNxs001029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[fillets-ng-data] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477382] [enscript] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170229.n1H2TssY000501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[enscript] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477375] [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170229.n1H2T4UN000427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[denemo] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170230.n1H2UbgA000684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[extremetuxracer] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:27:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477372] [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170227.n1H2RVip032537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[childsplay] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477386] [flumotion] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170231.n1H2VtDw000787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[flumotion] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477378] [e16-themes] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170229.n1H2TWbT032636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[e16-themes] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477393] [GraphicsMagick] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170234.n1H2YS4i001391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[GraphicsMagick] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477389] [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170233.n1H2XWAS001293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Summary|Please convert to new font |[ghostscript-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477387] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170232.n1H2WW6B001189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Summary|Please convert to new font |[fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170235.n1H2Zj6I001523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[hanazono-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477390] [glob2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170233.n1H2XvnP000957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[glob2] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477398] [icelandic-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170236.n1H2aKP2001572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[icelandic-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170236.n1H2af8v001612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[inconsolata-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477394] [groff] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170235.n1H2ZBmI001319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Summary|Please convert to new font |[groff] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170238.n1H2c57n002134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[k3d] Please convert to new |packaging guidelines |font packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477407] [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170241.n1H2f7lp002797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|kdelibs: Please convert to |[koffice] Please convert to |new font packaging |new font packaging |guidelines |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170241.n1H2fscB002552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[khmeros-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170238.n1H2cmwP001855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[kacst-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170237.n1H2bPDf001726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[jomolhari-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477413] [liblo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170245.n1H2jk5c003648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[liblo] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:44:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477411] [libeXosip2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170244.n1H2iGmB003180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[libeXosip2] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170246.n1H2kkr8003531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[lilypond] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170243.n1H2heu4002788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 21:43:39 EDT --- bug 477407 was moved from kdelibs to koffice - maybe it should be closed as a duplicate of this now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170247.n1H2lwtM004103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[lklug-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477426] [monafont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170250.n1H2oRlg004741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[monafont] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477422] [mapserver] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170249.n1H2n8Jc004269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[mapserver] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:51:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477429] [myanmar3-unicode-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170251.n1H2p1JR004826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[myanmar3-unicode-fonts] |packaging guidelines |Please convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170248.n1H2maD2003803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[madan-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:49:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477424] [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170249.n1H2nop5003967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[meanwhile] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477431] [nethack-vultures] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170251.n1H2pX7j004569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[nethack-vultures] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170247.n1H2lNuR003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[linux-libertine-fonts] |packaging guidelines |Please convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170252.n1H2q4NP005272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[padauk-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477443] [poker3d-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170255.n1H2tjbJ005952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[poker3d-data] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170252.n1H2qSR9005330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[paktype-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170256.n1H2uWFe006134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[python-matplotlib] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477444] [pygame] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170256.n1H2u7n8005573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[pygame] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477439] [pgfouine] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170252.n1H2qvfU004753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[pgfouine] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477442] [poker2d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170255.n1H2t8cT005317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[poker2d] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170259.n1H2xioE006538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[sazanami-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477459] [sportrop-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170300.n1H30EJq006895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[sportrop-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:57:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477446] [python-reportlab] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170257.n1H2v4mF006307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[python-reportlab] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477449] [roadstencil-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170257.n1H2vwY8006376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[roadstencil-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477464] [TeXmacs] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170301.n1H310N9006587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[TeXmacs] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170258.n1H2wYjJ005898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[rosegarden4] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477463] [texlive-texmf] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170300.n1H30acF006524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[texlive-texmf] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170257.n1H2vVr7005783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[python-tgcaptcha] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170301.n1H31Yxk006760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[thibault-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170303.n1H33fpi007529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[tvtime] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477476] [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170305.n1H35RQQ007975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[unikurd-web-font] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477477] [urw-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170306.n1H36iCe007807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[urw-fonts] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170304.n1H34PAK007140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Summary|Please convert to new font |[un-core-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170303.n1H333Q9007055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[tuxtype2] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170302.n1H32brJ007009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[tuxpaint] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170304.n1H34t7S007234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[un-extra-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170302.n1H328oN006910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Please convert to new font |[tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] |packaging guidelines |Please convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:08:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:08:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477487] [xpilot-ng] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170308.n1H38abB008395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[xpilot-ng] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170307.n1H37CaC008256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[wastesedge] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477483] [widelands] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170307.n1H37bDA008309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[widelands] Please convert |packaging guidelines |to new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:09:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477488] [xplanet] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170309.n1H394tV008134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[xplanet] Please convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477486] [xorg-x11-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170308.n1H38CXA008034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |[xorg-x11-fonts] Please |packaging guidelines |convert to new font | |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485857] New: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485857 Summary: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: tinh911 at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=332166) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332166) Vietnamese Unicode characters The Liberation fonts are missing the Vietnamese Unicode characters. I am not a typography geek so I don't know which group those characters belong to. I attached a file to show all the unicode characters of Vietnamese in normal case and uppercase, I use Arial font for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170343.n1H3hmNp015705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 22:43:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > I have only built on rawhide. Let me backport that. May be better to test first on f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170405.n1H45QGw019627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 23:05:25 EDT --- Behdad, could you please update on this important issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170411.n1H4BDhG020737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dwayne at translate. | |org.za) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170411.n1H4B0ni020565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WORKSFORME | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170413.n1H4DHPc021068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 23:13:16 EDT --- Hi Dwayne, is that still reproducible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170534.n1H5YYp3000888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dwayne at translate. | |org.za) | --- Comment #3 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-17 00:34:33 EDT --- # confirmed that cjkunifonts-uming is not installed rpm -qa | grep cjk # confirmed fontforge works fontforge # Install default fonts - only cjkunifonts-uming missing and installed yum groupinstall Fonts # Check fontforge fontforge Results: Still broken... Error message: I'll past it as a comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170541.n1H5fZsD002560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 --- Comment #5 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-17 00:41:34 EDT --- Just for clarity... yum installed the following: Installing: cjkunifonts-uming noarch 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10 updates 10 M And the Fontforge version was: [heather at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fontforge fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170538.n1H5cG7B001807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 --- Comment #4 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-02-17 00:38:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332176) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332176) Error output from fontforge run fontforge > errors.log 2>&1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 06:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170619.n1H6JLpB008883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170758.n1H7wnf4025419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-17 02:58:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332188) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332188) screenshot with new fontconfig And screenshot with new fontconfig fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 Japanese font glyphs are not used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170757.n1H7vWCh025270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-17 02:57:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332187) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332187) screenshot with old fontconfig (In reply to comment #34) > fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 again reproduces this problem...... To clarify this, screenshot again. This one with (the old) fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11.i386 . Looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170819.n1H8J3U8028713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-17 03:19:03 EDT --- Yes, I see un-core-fonts being used on the ja desktop - I will try to get the fontconfig files there updated soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171059.n1HAxEBY031193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171059.n1HAxGXh031244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Bug 477427 depends on bug 477408, which changed state. Bug 477408 Summary: [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171059.n1HAxFUs031218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477408, which changed state. Bug 477408 Summary: [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477476] [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171058.n1HAwrgw030988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171058.n1HAwshq031012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477476, which changed state. Bug 477476 Summary: [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 12:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171206.n1HC6MlQ013962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #14 from Victor Bogado 2009-02-17 07:06:20 EDT --- I'm sorry for taking so long, my personal life is a little messed up right now, but I will do this as soon as I can manage it. I use stock F10, never ventured into Rawhide, so how do I do this, can I install it on my system or should I install a entirely new rawhide system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 15:22:19 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE VLGothic-fontconfig-monospace.conf, 1.2, NONE VLGothic-fontconfig-proportional.conf, 1.2, NONE VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.18, NONE sources, 1.13, NONE Message-ID: <20090217152219.99E297012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25068 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile VLGothic-fontconfig-monospace.conf VLGothic-fontconfig-proportional.conf VLGothic-fonts.spec sources Log Message: This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts. --- Makefile DELETED --- --- VLGothic-fontconfig-monospace.conf DELETED --- --- VLGothic-fontconfig-proportional.conf DELETED --- --- VLGothic-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 15:23:04 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-10 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf, 1.2, NONE 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf, 1.1, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.16, NONE branch, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.12, NONE Message-ID: <20090217152304.8381B7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25230 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf Makefile VLGothic-fonts.spec branch sources Log Message: This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts. --- 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf DELETED --- --- 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf DELETED --- --- Makefile DELETED --- --- VLGothic-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- branch DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 15:23:51 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf, 1.2, NONE 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf, 1.1, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.13, NONE branch, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.9, NONE Message-ID: <20090217152351.32E1A7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25437 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf Makefile VLGothic-fonts.spec branch sources Log Message: This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts. --- 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf DELETED --- --- 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf DELETED --- --- Makefile DELETED --- --- VLGothic-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- branch DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:03:13 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec,1.12,1.13 Message-ID: <20090217190313.1D5917012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20313/fontpackages/devel Modified Files: fontpackages.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- fontpackages.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.12 +++ fontpackages.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:02:42 -0000 1.13 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -%define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ -%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ -%define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ +%global spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ +%global ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ +%global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages Version: 1.19 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090217190949.A4E2A7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel Modified Files: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:17 -0000 1.3 +++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname apanov-edrip -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname apanov-edrip +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename edrip-src-%{version} +%global archivename edrip-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081007 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090217190949.C6B1870136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel Modified Files: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.4 +++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname apanov-heuristica -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname apanov-heuristica +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename heuristica-src-%{version} +%global archivename heuristica-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090125 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090217190950.A826570136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-ambrosia -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-ambrosia +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_AMBROSIA +%global archivename GFS_AMBROSIA Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080624 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.13, 1.14 Message-ID: <20090217190950.050887012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.13 +++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000 1.14 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname bitstream-vera -%define archivename ttf-bitstream-vera +%global fontname bitstream-vera +%global archivename ttf-bitstream-vera -%define common_desc \ +%global common_desc \ The Vera fonts are high-quality Latin fonts donated by Bitstream. \ These fonts have been released under a liberal license, see the \ licensing FAQ in COPYRIGHT.TXT or the online up-to-date version \ From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190950.746297012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/ecolier-court-fonts/devel Modified Files: ecolier-court-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- ecolier-court-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.7 +++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname ecolier-court -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname} +%global fontname ecolier-court +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname} -%define common_desc\ +%global common_desc\ ??colier court fonts were created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimic the \ traditional cursive writing French children are taught in school. \ \ From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20090217190951.4F2637012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.8 +++ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000 1.9 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-bodoni-classic -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-bodoni-classic +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_BODONICLASS_OT +%global archivename GFS_BODONICLASS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20090217190950.E0D187012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.9 +++ gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-artemisia -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-artemisia +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_ARTEMISIA_OT +%global archivename GFS_ARTEMISIA_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec,1.96,1.97 Message-ID: <20090217190950.3910A70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/dejavu-fonts/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.96 retrieving revision 1.97 diff -u -r1.96 -r1.97 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000 1.96 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000 1.97 @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@ -%define fontname dejavu -%define archivename %{name}-%{archiveversion} +%global fontname dejavu +%global archivename %{name}-%{archiveversion} -#define alphatag .20080512svn2226 -#define alphatag .rc1 +#global alphatag .20080512svn2226 +#global alphatag .rc1 -#define archiveversion 2.24-20080512-2226 -%define archiveversion %{version} +#global archiveversion 2.24-20080512-2226 +%global archiveversion %{version} # Let the perl maintainer worry about Unicode.org data files -%define Blocks %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/Blocks.txt -%define UnicodeData %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/UnicodeData.txt +%global Blocks %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/Blocks.txt +%global UnicodeData %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/UnicodeData.txt # Common description -%define common_desc \ +%global common_desc \ The DejaVu font set is based on the ???Bitstream Vera??? fonts, release 1.10. Its\ purpose is to provide a wider range of characters, while maintaining the \ original style, using an open collaborative development process. # Compat description -%define compat_desc \ +%global compat_desc \ This package only exists to help transition pre 2.26-3 DejaVu users to the new\ package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please\ do not reference it or depend on it in any way.\ From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20090217190951.89D9E7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.8 +++ gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000 1.9 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-bodoni -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-bodoni +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_BODONI_OT +%global archivename GFS_BODONI_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20090217190951.1980C70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000 1.9 +++ gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-baskerville -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-baskerville +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_BASKERVILLE_OT +%global archivename GFS_BASKERVILLE_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070327 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20090217190951.F2BCB7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.8 +++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000 1.9 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-didot-classic -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-didot-classic +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_DIDOTCLASS_OT +%global archivename GFS_DIDOTCLASS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080702 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190951.C298E70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-complutum -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-complutum +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_COMPLUTUM_OT +%global archivename GFS_COMPLUTUM_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070413 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090217190952.9945B7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-fleischman -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-fleischman +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_FLEISCHMAN +%global archivename GFS_FLEISCHMAN Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel gfs-didot-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190952.37DE77012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-didot-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-didot-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-didot-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-didot-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-didot -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-didot +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_DIDOT_OT +%global archivename GFS_DIDOT_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070616 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090217190952.69E4B70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel/gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-eustace-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-eustace-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-eustace -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-eustace +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_EUSTACE +%global archivename GFS_EUSTACE Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190953.8D2F370143@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-neohellenic -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-neohellenic +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_NEOHELLENIC_OT +%global archivename GFS_NEOHELLENIC_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20090217190953.1749670136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.8 +++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000 1.9 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-gazis -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-gazis +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_GAZIS +%global archivename GFS_GAZIS Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080318 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090217190952.D13DA7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-garaldus -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-garaldus +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_GARALDUS +%global archivename GFS_GARALDUS Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080707 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090217190953.5860F7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-jackson-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-jackson-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-jackson -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-jackson +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_JACKSON +%global archivename GFS_JACKSON Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090217190954.CF2BE7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/google-droid-fonts/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.4 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define fontname google-droid +%global fontname google-droid -%define download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts +%global download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts -%define common_desc \ +%global common_desc \ The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender's \ Steve Matteson, as a commission from Google to create a set of system fonts \ for its Android platform. The goal was to provide optimal quality and comfort \ From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190954.638F770145@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-solomos -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-solomos +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_SOLOMOS_OT +%global archivename GFS_SOLOMOS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20071114 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel gfs-olga-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190953.F423C70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-olga-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-olga-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-olga-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/gfs-olga-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-olga-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-olga-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-olga -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-olga +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_OLGA_OT +%global archivename GFS_OLGA_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:55 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel sil-andika-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090217190955.5439D7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/sil-andika-fonts/devel Modified Files: sil-andika-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: sil-andika-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/sil-andika-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sil-andika-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.2 +++ sil-andika-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define fontname sil-andika -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname sil-andika +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf # Someday SIL will release sanely named archives -%define archivename AndikaBasicR_10 +%global archivename AndikaBasicR_10 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090217190953.BEAF67012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000 1.3 +++ gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-nicefore -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-nicefore +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_NICEFORE +%global archivename GFS_NICEFORE Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080303 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190954.9846570146@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-theokritos -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-theokritos +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_THEOKRITOS_OT +%global archivename GFS_THEOKRITOS_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070415 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:55 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel sil-charis-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090217190955.8DE6870136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/sil-charis-fonts/devel Modified Files: sil-charis-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sil-charis-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.2 +++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname sil-charis -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname sil-charis +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename CharisSIL +%global archivename CharisSIL Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.104 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:55 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel stix-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190955.CDD387012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/stix-fonts/devel Modified Files: stix-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: stix-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- stix-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.7 +++ stix-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -%define fontname stix -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname} +%global fontname stix +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname} -%define archivename STIXBeta +%global archivename STIXBeta -%define common_desc \ +%global common_desc \ The mission of the Scientific and Technical Information Exchange (STIX) font \ creation project is the preparation of a comprehensive set of fonts that serve \ the scientific and engineering community in the process from manuscript \ From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel gfs-porson-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090217190954.302CB70144@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-porson-fonts/devel Modified Files: gfs-porson-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: gfs-porson-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- gfs-porson-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000 1.7 +++ gfs-porson-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname gfs-porson -%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname gfs-porson +%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename GFS_Porson_OT +%global archivename GFS_Porson_OT Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20060908 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:56 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090217190956.5491970136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel Modified Files: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000 1.5 +++ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:26 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -%define fontname yanone-kaffeesatz -%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontname yanone-kaffeesatz +%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf -%define archivename YanoneKaffeesatz +%global archivename YanoneKaffeesatz Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080723 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Feb 17 19:09:56 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel xgridfit.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20090217190956.140767012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/xgridfit/devel Modified Files: xgridfit.spec Log Message: switch to global Index: xgridfit.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- xgridfit.spec 16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000 1.9 +++ xgridfit.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -%define archivever 1-17a +%global archivever 1-17a Name: xgridfit Version: 1.17 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171924.n1HJOiYJ007056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2009-02-17 14:24:44 EDT --- Oh, is that all? ;) I'll get started. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171924.n1HJOZ55002319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2009-02-17 14:24:34 EDT --- Oh, is that all? ;) I'll get started. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171923.n1HJNnK1002105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 14:23:48 EDT --- Add the font bug list in CC so we don't miss issue updates again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171948.n1HJmuNL009035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 14:48:55 EDT --- Ok, my bad for not being crystal-clear. & is one of the few reserved characters in XML, you can't use it as-is. I'd say replace it with & http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-predefined-ent Also, while I'm at it 1. next week the new koji will allow srpm building with rawhide rpm, and rawhide rpm has support for group inheritance, so you can drop all the Group: User Interface/X from subpackages 2. for some reason upstream decided is was smart to add GPL&GNU to the font names this release. So for interoperability reasons with other distros and documents that use the old font names, it's better to use the substitution template to alias the old names /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf (at least for the fonts in the "old pack" at http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts/web/Old_BPG_GPL_GNU_Fonts.zip ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171955.n1HJt7FX015814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 14:55:06 EDT --- np, I know what messed up means :( You can do scratch builds in koji, for dist-f11, they'll use the new fontpackages. If you don't have access to a rawhide system, just look at the templates in the last bz2 archive on http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/fontpackages/ you don't need to actually install it to check the txt template files :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172001.n1HK1Pas012511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-17 15:01:24 EDT --- 1. Well, that's nice, but I'll be building these fonts for older releases as well, so I'll keep them. It doesn't hurt. 2. Okay, fixed, along with the & replacement across the board. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-3.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172035.n1HKZA4J021449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcepl at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-17 15:35:09 EDT --- While at it -- couldn't you reconsider dependency solely on bitstream-vera fonts? Why would deja fonts (default in Fedora and based on bistream-vera) are not enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172047.n1HKl3FH024514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 --- Comment #4 from Adrian Reber 2009-02-17 15:47:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > While at it -- couldn't you reconsider dependency solely on bitstream-vera > fonts? Why would deja fonts (default in Fedora and based on bistream-vera) are > not enough? I am lost what I have to do with the font dependencies. The wiki has too much information and I have no clue. It just needs some font and I do not care which one. So if you know what needs to be changed in the spec file... You are welcome to do the necessary changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172154.n1HLs46M006471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-17 16:54:03 EDT --- [matej at viklef coreutils]$ rpm -qR fbida |grep fonts bitstream-vera-fonts [matej at viklef coreutils]$ I am just hijacking this bug -- it has absolutely nothing to do with this bug as such. I am just complaining that fbida (uselessly, IMHO) brings to my computer bitstream-vera-fonts, which are identical to deja fonts except only for ISO 8859-1 (deja fonts work well for all languages of the world). I will take a look at the spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:11:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172211.n1HMB6Ct016476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 17:11:05 EDT --- missing the trailing ";", an SGML/XML entity has the "&something;" format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172216.n1HMGbc4017664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-17 17:16:36 EDT --- Argh. Fixed. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-4.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172240.n1HMep8i016641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 17:40:50 EDT --- Very fine work on a non-trivial package. I don't see any obvious problem now. ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172242.n1HMg8vj016827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 17:42:07 EDT --- You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a as usual -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172259.n1HMxp2O024593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-17 17:59:50 EDT --- Actually my issue seems to be fixed in Rawhide (not in F10, why?) Concerning the naming of the fonts -- what font exactly you need? From looking at the package itself, I don't see any hard requirements. So then dejavu-sans-mono-fonts (I think same FAQ says that it should be Monospace) should fit the bill perfectly, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 06:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180602.n1I62Np9002773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #12 from Rajeesh 2009-02-18 01:02:22 EDT --- Thanks, I just wanted to have a confirmation :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:50:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180850.n1I8oSDN026206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, | |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor | |ge.net, tagoh at redhat.com Component|Package Review |vlgothic-fonts AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor | |ge.net --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 03:50:27 EDT --- Thanks. but strangely I don't see either of them at the component list at search page only. though it's available at the combo box on show_bug.cgi and submit-bug page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 09:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 partially unusable on F-10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180942.n1I9gxf3005068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|terminus-font-x11 unusable |terminus-font-x11 partially |on F-10 |unusable on F-10 --- Comment #2 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 04:42:58 EDT --- The Gnome terminal (using the new and slow font rendering magic) can use terminus. emacs and xterm (apparently using the old and quick font rendering magic) cannot. This gives a better idea as to where to look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 09:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180954.n1I9sBJO012717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #12 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-02-18 04:54:09 EDT --- I'm wondering something: I remove the font at %prep time, which means it is still included in the srpm right ? Is that a potential legal issue ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 13:15:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:15:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444281] Provides: freetype2-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181315.n1IDFDF6025373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281 --- Comment #2 from Ed Avis 2009-02-18 08:15:12 EDT --- This is still the case in Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:08:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181508.n1IF8DAt014668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-18 10:08:12 EDT --- Yep. You need to make a modified tarball that doesn't have that font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ajax at fedoraproject.org Wed Feb 18 19:11:27 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/libXfont/devel .cvsignore, 1.16, 1.17 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 libXfont.spec, 1.42, 1.43 sources, 1.17, 1.18 libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch, 1.1, NONE libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090218191127.65332700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19423/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log libXfont.spec sources Removed Files: libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch Log Message: libXfont 1.4.0 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17 --- .cvsignore 28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000 1.16 +++ .cvsignore 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.17 @@ -1 +1 @@ -libXfont-1.3.3.tar.bz2 +libXfont-1.4.0.tar.bz2 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ libXfont-1_3_3-1_fc10:HEAD:libXfont-1.3.3-1.fc10.src.rpm:1219949211 +libXfont-1_4_0-1_fc11:HEAD:libXfont-1.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234984215 Index: libXfont.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/libXfont.spec,v retrieving revision 1.42 retrieving revision 1.43 diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43 --- libXfont.spec 28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000 1.42 +++ libXfont.spec 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.43 @@ -1,17 +1,13 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library Name: libXfont -Version: 1.3.3 +Version: 1.4.0 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -Source0: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 - -Patch1: libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch -Patch2: libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch -Patch3: libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch +Source0: http://www.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 BuildRequires: xorg-x11-util-macros BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel @@ -41,12 +37,9 @@ %prep %setup -q -%patch1 -p1 -b .visibility -%patch2 -p1 -b .retry -%patch3 -p1 -b .no-fc %build -autoreconf -v --install || exit 1 +export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Os" %configure --disable-static make %{?_smp_mflags} @@ -85,7 +78,6 @@ %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontconf.h %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontencc.h %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontmisc.h -%{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontmod.h %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontshow.h %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontutil.h %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontxlfd.h Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- sources 28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000 1.17 +++ sources 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -4f174b9613f87cf00d731da428a1b194 libXfont-1.3.3.tar.bz2 +3a8e06b25912ef339d70a8ba003da9b5 libXfont-1.4.0.tar.bz2 --- libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch DELETED --- --- libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch DELETED --- --- libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch DELETED --- From ajax at fedoraproject.org Wed Feb 18 19:21:57 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/libXfont/devel libXfont.spec,1.43,1.44 Message-ID: <20090218192157.CD2FF700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23809 Modified Files: libXfont.spec Log Message: * Wed Feb 18 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4.0-2 - libXfont 1.4.0 Index: libXfont.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/libXfont.spec,v retrieving revision 1.43 retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u -r1.43 -r1.44 --- libXfont.spec 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.43 +++ libXfont.spec 18 Feb 2009 19:21:27 -0000 1.44 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library Name: libXfont Version: 1.4.0 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org @@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/xfont.pc %changelog +* Wed Feb 18 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4.0-2 +- libXfont 1.4.0 + * Thu Aug 28 2008 Adam Jackson 1.3.3-1 - libXfont 1.3.3. - libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch: Retry font server connections faster. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477368] [a2ps] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVrlt012677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:52 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477372] [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVupf012757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:55 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVsrL012707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:53 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVpvw012619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:50 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVh6W012477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:41 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477375] [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVxak012819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:58 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477333] [brettfont-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVmsT012541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:47 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477331] [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVlsL012523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:45 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVwTB012792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:57 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVnPW012580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:48 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477054] [fontconfig] Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVjca012502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:31:44 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXHZV014630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:16 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480455] [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXLDs014702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:21 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXKIx014684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:20 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480469] [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXTt3014861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:29 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXMVd014717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:21 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480453] [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXJDP014663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480461] [mapnik] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXPF9014767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:24 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXVF1014914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:31 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480459] [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXOoV014743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:23 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480449] [ember-media] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXGO9014595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480449 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:15 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWIgw013386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480445] [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXDaS014546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:12 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480462] [mapserver] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXQVi014789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480462 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:26 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXEqk014565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:13 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477413] [liblo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWPMY013542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:24 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477394] [groff] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWCD4013276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:11 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477464] [TeXmacs] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWsiq014146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:54 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481423] [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXZ48014968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:35 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWwYs014253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:57 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477390] [glob2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWA0o013238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:10 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477382] [enscript] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW29v012904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:01 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477439] [pgfouine] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWg2X013880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:42 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXCLf014513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:11 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXUHV014882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:30 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXRV2014814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:27 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477487] [xpilot-ng] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX9ql014473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:09 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477477] [urw-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX5TT014383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:04 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWxWb014276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:59 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480452] [fillets-ng-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXItj014648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480452 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477444] [pygame] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWjBK013940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:45 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477483] [widelands] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX8ef014431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:07 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477424] [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWZ7S013742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:34 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXWr9014926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:31 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWpbv014069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:50 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXFIe014582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:14 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477442] [poker2d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWhmu013899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:43 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477386] [flumotion] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW6Pb013075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:06 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX1aw014299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:00 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXS3e014830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:28 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXYGu014945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:32 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477378] [e16-themes] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW19B012854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:00 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWJP1013407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWTTi013631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:29 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWVs1013670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:30 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477463] [texlive-texmf] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWr5i014125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:53 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477443] [poker3d-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWiOc013917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:44 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX2ZP014320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:01 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477393] [GraphicsMagick] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWBHs013257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:10 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX68B014400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:05 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWeVa013837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:39 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX30V014349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:02 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWHao013352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:16 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWYQU013724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:33 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477459] [sportrop-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWrEa014110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:52 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWMtN013487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:21 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWFp5013335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:14 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477407] [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWLxx013450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:19 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWfeb013858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:41 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWqJ3014088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:51 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW3an012976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:02 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWmL0014019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:48 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477398] [icelandic-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWEpL013317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:13 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477411] [libeXosip2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWOlL013520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:23 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477389] [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW9Tl013214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:09 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWRgp013563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:25 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477486] [xorg-x11-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX92M014456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:08 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWDf6013295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:12 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477446] [python-reportlab] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWlHk014000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:47 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWkXs013978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:46 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477449] [roadstencil-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWogf014052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:49 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477488] [xplanet] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXBAL014491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:10 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477422] [mapserver] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWXue013699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:32 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477426] [monafont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWaWn013757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:35 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWuDr014170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:55 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477387] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW8hm013148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:07 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477431] [nethack-vultures] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWd2u013819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:38 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477429] [myanmar3-unicode-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWcne013797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:37 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477385] [fillets-ng-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW5Tj013025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:04 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWvHS014195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:56 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWSZg013597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:32:27 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXb1m014999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:36 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181953.n1IJrElB022397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-18 14:53:12 EDT --- *** Bug 477407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181953.n1IJrGfO022427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477407, which changed state. Bug 477407 Summary: [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477407] [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181953.n1IJrDk9022359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-18 14:53:12 EDT --- let's close this one, and track any stragglers in bug #477409 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477409 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182029.n1IKTEY4031770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:29:13 EDT --- Did you hit the "Refresh Components/Versions/Milestones" button ? You have to do that anytime you change between redhat and fedora components. I see the lowercase one here in that list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486221] New: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro %{fontdir} Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro %{fontdir} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486221 Summary: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro %{fontdir} Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontpackages AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: $ grep fontdir /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec [...] %dir %{fontdir} Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontpackages-devel-1.15-1.fc10.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install fontpackages-devel Actual results: uses non-existing %{fontdir} Expected results: uses existing %{_fontdir} Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182220.n1IMKWNq026328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? 2009-02-18 17:20:31 EDT --- Nicolas, this bug is assigned to you, see comment 2 and comment 4. Do you intend to take care of it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182256.n1IMuEGS002028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477476] [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182256.n1IMuGqr002093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 Bug 477476 depends on bug 481494, which changed state. Bug 481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182256.n1IMuFcE002068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481494, which changed state. Bug 481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182313.n1INDYCB006326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #8 from Oron Peled 2009-02-18 18:13:33 EDT --- * Someone called my name ;-) [yes, I'm the slow Hebrew l10n coordinator] * Historically the Culmus project distributed its fonts as: - Culmus (the regular fonts you just re-packaged) - Culmus fancy fonts. Extra free fonts. They are currently still packaged as: fonts-hebrew-fancy-0.20051122-4.fc10.noarch - Lately they added a third category -- Ancient fonts (for ancient Semitic scripts). All these are linked from: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/ [it's a bit confusing as the normal "Download" links of sourceforge only lead you to the "regular" Culmus fonts] * Some of the fancy fonts are unique. E.g: the "Ktav-Yad" is the only free "hand-writing" font in Hebrew. * As for naming: - For consistency to end users, i think the fonts in the "fancy" category should be named just like the other Culmus fonts. Example: culmus-ktav-yad-fonts and not: culmus-fancy-ktav-yad-fonts. [the split to "fancy" was done for economy (bandwidth) reasons not really functional ones]. - Of course we can group the "fancy" ones via a meta-package that requires each of them. But I don't think it worth the trouble and it may confuse people to think it's yet another font from this collection. - We can add the "Ancient" ones in this go (if you have time for this) But IMO their name should contain "ancient", as they actually represent different scripts). E.g: culmus-ancient-hebrew-paleo-gezer-fonts What? this is getting too much. Maybe settle for: ancient-hebrew-paleo-gezer-fonts * For any help/rants etc., just mail me (on http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/he you can see my email as my bugzilla account. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190050.n1J0ojxB028714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |486248 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190050.n1J0oi2r028681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 19:50:44 EDT --- This review request is for renaming the old terminus-font package according to the new font policies (bug 480482). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ndim at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 19 00:56:14 2009 From: ndim at fedoraproject.org (Hans Ulrich Niedermann) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/terminus-font/F-10 terminus-font.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20090219005614.E1D7B700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ndim Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/terminus-font/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8791 Modified Files: terminus-font.spec Log Message: * Thu Feb 19 2009 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 4.28-1.fc10.1 - generate fonts.dir at build time (bug 483589) Index: terminus-font.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/terminus-font/F-10/terminus-font.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- terminus-font.spec 7 Dec 2008 12:54:05 -0000 1.8 +++ terminus-font.spec 19 Feb 2009 00:55:44 -0000 1.9 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: terminus-font Version: 4.28 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 1%{?dist}.1 Summary: Clean fixed width font BuildArch: noarch @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildRequires: /usr/bin/bdftopcf +BuildRequires: /usr/bin/mkfontdir # This directory is owned by the fontconfig package. @@ -120,20 +121,18 @@ # Fedora specific docs and examples mkdir -p docs/console docs/x11 -%{__cp} -p "%{SOURCE10}" docs/console/README.fedora -%{__cp} -p "%{SOURCE20}" docs/x11/README.fedora -%{__cp} -p "%{SOURCE21}" docs/x11/Xresources.example +cp -p "%{SOURCE10}" docs/console/README.fedora +cp -p "%{SOURCE20}" docs/x11/README.fedora +cp -p "%{SOURCE21}" docs/x11/Xresources.example %install %{__rm} -rf "%{buildroot}" %{__make} DESTDIR="%{buildroot}" TESTDIR= install install-ref -# Create %%ghost files (to simulate files created by mkfontdir) -(cd "%{buildroot}%{local_x11_font_dir}" && \ - touch fonts.dir fonts.scale fonts.alias encodings.dir) # Install catalogue symlink %{__mkdir_p} "%{buildroot}%{catalogue}" %{__ln_s} -f "%{local_x11_font_dir}" "%{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}:unscaled" +/usr/bin/mkfontdir "%{buildroot}%{local_x11_font_dir}" %clean @@ -145,11 +144,8 @@ %doc README README-BG %doc docs/x11/README.fedora docs/x11/Xresources.example %dir %{local_x11_font_dir} -%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.dir -%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.scale -%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.alias -%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/encodings.dir %{catalogue}/%{name}:unscaled +%{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.dir %{local_x11_font_dir}/ter-520n.pcf.gz %{local_x11_font_dir}/ter-g14b.pcf.gz %{local_x11_font_dir}/ter-x32n.pcf.gz @@ -339,9 +335,6 @@ if [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ]; then /usr/bin/fc-cache -f %{global_font_dir} ||: fi -if [ -x /usr/bin/mkfontdir ]; then - /usr/bin/mkfontdir %{local_x11_font_dir} ||: -fi %postun x11 @@ -555,6 +548,9 @@ %changelog +* Thu Feb 19 2009 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 4.28-1.fc10.1 +- generate fonts.dir at build time (bug 483589) + * Sun Sep 21 2008 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 4.28-1 - Update to upstream's 4.28 release. - Add -dv1, -ge1, -ij1 patches for more general appeal in cyrillic world. From ndim at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 19 01:00:15 2009 From: ndim at fedoraproject.org (Hans Ulrich Niedermann) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/terminus-font/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.4, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.4, NONE terminus-font-console.README.fedora, 1.3, NONE terminus-font-x11.README.fedora, 1.2, NONE terminus-font-x11.Xresources.example, 1.1, NONE terminus-font.spec, 1.8, NONE Message-ID: <20090219010015.613C1700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ndim Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/terminus-font/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9463 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources terminus-font-console.README.fedora terminus-font-x11.README.fedora terminus-font-x11.Xresources.example terminus-font.spec Log Message: terminus-font package renamed to terminus-fonts according to new rules: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- NEW FILE dead.package --- terminus-font package renamed to terminus-fonts according to new rules: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- .cvsignore DELETED --- --- Makefile DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- --- terminus-font-console.README.fedora DELETED --- --- terminus-font-x11.README.fedora DELETED --- --- terminus-font-x11.Xresources.example DELETED --- --- terminus-font.spec DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190117.n1J1HGs5001268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #2 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 20:17:15 EDT --- Releng ticket for removal of the old package: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190119.n1J1JR0K001579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480482, which changed state. Bug 480482 Summary: [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190119.n1J1JQds001546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 20:19:24 EDT --- *** Bug 480482 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190119.n1J1JPQF001538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 20:19:24 EDT --- This issue has been turned over to the review request for the new terminus-fonts package over at bug 486248. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 486248 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190130.n1J1UgZN004074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #4 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 20:30:41 EDT --- Koji scratch build results: dist-f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1137853 dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1137855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190201.n1J21Qoj010605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:01:23 EDT --- Actually a fixed package is already available and was waiting for someone who would volunteers confirming a fix though.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190200.n1J20JdJ010126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477424, which changed state. Bug 477424 Summary: [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477424] [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190200.n1J20IBg010102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Josh Boyer 2009-02-18 21:00:17 EDT --- Removed the font from the package. It was stupid to have it there to begin with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190205.n1J25LYV011641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:05:20 EDT --- Ah, thanks. I wasn't aware of that. yes, it works fine after hitting a button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190202.n1J22q6i010772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:02:51 EDT --- Actually a fixed package is already available and was waiting for someone who would volunteers confirming a fix though.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:07:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190207.n1J27pAT012195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |202356 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190219.n1J2J1j5014350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:19:01 EDT --- forgot to get back the flag to avoid a confusion.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 19 05:56:16 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 fontpackages.spec, 1.13, 1.14 import.log, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20090219055616.E5422700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32667/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.20 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- .cvsignore 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.9 +++ .cvsignore 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.10 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- fontpackages.spec 17 Feb 2009 19:02:42 -0000 1.13 +++ fontpackages.spec 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.14 @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.19 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 1.20 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Group: Development/System @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Feb 18 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.20-1 +??? global-ization + * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.19-3 ??? remove workaround and explicit version checks Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 --- import.log 16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000 1.10 +++ import.log 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.11 @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977 fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006 fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732 +fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234998636 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- sources 16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000 1.9 +++ sources 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.10 @@ -1 +1 @@ -e46a2ed63b41f3dd113609aaa5c8f437 fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2 +b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7 fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190632.n1J6WeDj030949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Sylvain Beucler 2009-02-19 01:32:39 EDT --- Fixed in 1.08.20090120-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190632.n1J6Wfjw030976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480454, which changed state. Bug 480454 Summary: [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190931.n1J9VRUo002086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com Platform|i386 |All Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #8 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-19 04:31:25 EDT --- Reopening because of the fontforge instability issue. Regenerating the font cache files ("fc-cache /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1") doesn't help as the missing font files are referenced in the xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 package, in the files /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir and .../fonts.scale. Removing that package helps of course for running fontforge, but then you're missing some fonts you may want to have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 10:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:12:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191012.n1JACOui011282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(rdtennent at hotmail | |.com) | --- Comment #23 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-19 05:12:20 EDT --- I could reproduce this on F-10. More infos about this can be found in the comments of bug #466404: > Whenever fontforge crashes, /var/log/Xorg.0.log updates > $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log > [...] > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 > FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1 When fontforge crashed on me, only these two files referenced "cour.pfa" in any way: /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.scale After I uninstalled and reinstalled xorg-x11-fonts-Type1, fontforge worked again and the two files didn't reference cour.pfa anymore. It seems to me that the mkfontdir, mkfontscale commands in the %post/%postun scripts fail to remove references to fonts that are removed from the fonts.dir, fonts.scale files. In that case, the problem is not in the fonts packages, but in these tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 10:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191019.n1JAJd1l012895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #9 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-19 05:19:38 EDT --- I just installed the font package again, and it doesn't crash anymore. See my comment on bug 450709 re: mkfontdir/mkfontscale issues. So in order to test this I guess you would have to install and old version of xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 that contained the IBM fonts with non-open source licenses and the update to the current version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 10:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191038.n1JAcg1A017674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fedora-fonts-bugs | |-list at redhat.com) --- Comment #10 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-19 05:38:41 EDT --- After I got fontforge working (bug #466404 and bug #450709), I looked into the font metadata: It says that the font family is "PaperCuts 2.0". Would the resultant, compliant package name be "extremetuxracer-papercuts2_0-fonts"? Two font files are included which have the same font in what I think is bold and outline weight. Still, the outline file says it is "bold" in its metadata. Should I fix this? Can you help me to do this properly? The license for both files is this: - "Names/Copyright": "Made for ETR by cpicon92. Based on Paper Cuts Daniel Poeira, licensed under the GPL. Czech alphabet and U+00A0, U+2009 and U+202f by Petr Pisar, 2007." - "TTF Names/License": "The use of this font is granted subject to GNU General Public License." - "TTF Names/Descriptor": "A combination of Free Sans Bold Oblique and Paper Cuts, made by cpicon92 for Extreme Tux Racer" I know that GPL isn't an ideal license for a font, but is that acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 13:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:06:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191306.n1JD6gsb020235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046 Phil Knirsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 13:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191306.n1JD6jcm020316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477046, which changed state. Bug 477046 Summary: [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 19 21:19:06 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-10 fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 fontpackages.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090219211906.44E36700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15440/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Added Files: fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch Log Message: 1.20 fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch: --- NEW FILE fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch --- diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec --- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec 2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100 +++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec 2009-02-19 21:30:43.000000000 +0100 @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ %package common Summary: Common files of +Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ # Repeat for every font family ??? %package -n %{fontname}--fonts Summary: +Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}--fonts diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec --- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec 2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100 +++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec 2009-02-19 21:28:23.000000000 +0100 @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ %package fonts-common Summary: Common files of Group: User Interface/X -BuildArch: noarch Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description fonts-common @@ -31,7 +30,6 @@ %package -fonts Summary: Group: User Interface/X -BuildArch: noarch Requires: %{name}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}--fonts diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec --- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec 2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100 +++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec 2009-02-19 22:08:19.000000000 +0100 @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ %package -fonts Summary: Group: User Interface/X -BuildArch: noarch Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description -fonts Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 19 Feb 2009 21:18:35 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- fontpackages.spec 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.2 +++ fontpackages.spec 19 Feb 2009 21:18:36 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -%define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ -%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ -%define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ +%global spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ +%global ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ +%global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.15 +Version: 1.20 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@ License: LGPLv3+ URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +Patch0: %{name}-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch + BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + %description This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to create font packages. @@ -35,7 +38,7 @@ Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages Group: User Interface/X -Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} %description devel This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to @@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ %prep %setup -q +%patch0 -p1 -b .badrpm %build @@ -56,7 +60,7 @@ for dir in fontbasedir fontconfig_masterdir \ fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \ - macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) + rpm/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) done install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \ @@ -68,7 +72,7 @@ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} -install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} +install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) @@ -93,10 +97,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros* %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} -%{ftcgtemplatedir}/* +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt %changelog +* Tue Feb 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.20-1 +??? backport rawhide package to F-9 & F-10 + * Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.15-1 ??? lua-ize the main macro Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 19 Feb 2009 21:18:36 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ fontpackages-1_11-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229379612 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232131877 +fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235078269 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 19 Feb 2009 21:18:36 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4 fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 +b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7 fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Feb 19 21:19:09 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-9 fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 fontpackages.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090219211909.DE19C700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15468/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Added Files: fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch Log Message: 1.20 fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch: --- NEW FILE fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch --- diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec --- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec 2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100 +++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec 2009-02-19 21:30:43.000000000 +0100 @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ %package common Summary: Common files of +Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ # Repeat for every font family ??? %package -n %{fontname}--fonts Summary: +Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}--fonts diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec --- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec 2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100 +++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec 2009-02-19 21:28:23.000000000 +0100 @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ %package fonts-common Summary: Common files of Group: User Interface/X -BuildArch: noarch Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description fonts-common @@ -31,7 +30,6 @@ %package -fonts Summary: Group: User Interface/X -BuildArch: noarch Requires: %{name}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}--fonts diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec --- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec 2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100 +++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec 2009-02-19 22:08:19.000000000 +0100 @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ %package -fonts Summary: Group: User Interface/X -BuildArch: noarch Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description -fonts Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- fontpackages.spec 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.2 +++ fontpackages.spec 19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -%define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ -%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ -%define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ +%global spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ +%global ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ +%global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.15 +Version: 1.20 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@ License: LGPLv3+ URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +Patch0: %{name}-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch + BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + %description This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to create font packages. @@ -35,7 +38,7 @@ Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages Group: User Interface/X -Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} %description devel This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to @@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ %prep %setup -q +%patch0 -p1 -b .badrpm %build @@ -56,7 +60,7 @@ for dir in fontbasedir fontconfig_masterdir \ fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \ - macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) + rpm/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) done install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \ @@ -68,7 +72,7 @@ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} -install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} +install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) @@ -93,10 +97,15 @@ %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros* %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} -%{ftcgtemplatedir}/* +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt %changelog +* Tue Feb 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.20-1 +??? backport rawhide package to F-9 & F-10 + * Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.15-1 ??? lua-ize the main macro Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ fontpackages-1_11-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229380405 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232131899 +fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235078292 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4 fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 +b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7 fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k9QT005441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |486269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k8M3005411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k79G005382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477401 Depends on| |431368 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 04:46:06 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201029.n1KAT3PP013431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 05:29:02 EDT --- 1. a fontconfig ruleset would be nice http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F 2. FPC will want you to use %global not %define soonish http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define 3. Are you sure you want to provide the old name? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F Anyway, nothing here is blocking ??? APPROVED ??? Please do not forget the other steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201141.n1KBfdTL031021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 06:41:38 EDT --- Let me comment about the rpmlint output (available at http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-4.fc10/rpmlint.txt): terminus-fonts.spec:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. terminus-fonts.src:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. The /lib/kbd/consolefonts directory belongs to the kbd package, and the kbd package itself hardcodes it as /lib/..., not /%{_lib} or %{_libdir} or anything with macros. Following rpmlint's suggestions would likely break things. terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/63-terminus.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/63-terminus.conf Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/terminus:unscaled /usr/share/fonts/terminus Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. All the other packages putting symlinks into the /etc/X11/fontpath.d directory also use absolute symlinks, so I am following a common practise here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201158.n1KBwCbK002762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(rhbugs at n-dimensio | |nal.de) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 06:58:11 EDT --- 1. You can safely drop this comment # Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does # update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most # recent file as version. 2. Are you sure you want to keep this Provide? Provides: terminus-font-x11 = 4.28-2 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F 3. You can probably use the common_desc trick found in /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec to simplify your spec 4. Group: User Interface/X is a bit ironic for the console package 5. If you only push your package to rawhide (as you should do), I think you can assume filesystem is at the right version Requires: filesystem >= 2.4.11-1 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_change_my_package_in_stable_releases_in_addition_to_Rawhide.2Fdevel.3F 6. FPC will ask you to use globals instead of defines soonish http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define 7. Do you really need to hardcode /etc in the catalog path? 8. It's a bit saner to put Provides/Obsoletes next to other rpm dependency rules (requires/buildrequires) 9. you do not need %dir %{_fontdir} anymore https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.20-1.fc10 10. really adding a fontconfig file which is effectively a noop helps no one. Please take a look at the templates in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ they're not hard a all to fill 11. the symlinks warning of rpmlint is totally bogus and FRPC already decided to have it nuked http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201324.n1KDOeTF023331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rhbugs at n-dimensio | |nal.de) | --- Comment #7 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:24:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. You can safely drop this comment > # Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does > # update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most > # recent file as version. Dropped. > 2. Are you sure you want to keep this Provide? > Provides: terminus-font-x11 = 4.28-2 No. Dropped. (Turned out not to be useful after all, I had misread the rpm output.) > 3. You can probably use the common_desc trick found in > /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec > to simplify your spec Done. > 4. Group: User Interface/X is a bit ironic for the console package It is, but I cannot see any fitting rpm group. "Application/Text" does not work either, because this is a font, not an application processing text. "System Environment/Base" is the group of the kbd package which contains the other console fonts, but terminus-fonts-console is not a required basic part of the system environment either. So, in the absences of a "Others" group, I don't see a group where this package would really fit into. Groups are not really used any more anyway, as far as I understand it, so it probably has no consequences anyway. If you want the terminus-fonts-console package in a specific, different group, I'm happy to change it, of course. > 5. If you only push your package to rawhide (as you should do), I think you can > assume filesystem is at the right version > Requires: filesystem >= 2.4.11-1 > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_change_my_package_in_stable_releases_in_addition_to_Rawhide.2Fdevel.3F Dropped. F-10 shipped a newer filesystem package, and that is all I cared about. > 6. FPC will ask you to use globals instead of defines soonish > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define Changed. > 7. Do you really need to hardcode /etc in the catalog path? No. Changed to %{_sysconfdir}. > 8. It's a bit saner to put Provides/Obsoletes next to other rpm dependency > rules (requires/buildrequires) Done. > 9. you do not need %dir %{_fontdir} anymore > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.20-1.fc10 Changed: Removed the %dir, and versioned the build requirement for fontpackages-devel. > 10. really adding a fontconfig file which is effectively a noop helps no one. > Please take a look at the templates in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ they're > not hard a all to fill Added a simple fontconfig file now. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips read as if anything going beyond that empty noop fontconfig file was optional, and did not mention those (really useful) templates. > 11. the symlinks warning of rpmlint is totally bogus and FRPC already decided > to have it nuked > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks Good. I am ignoring those now. I have uploaded the a version as terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 with all the above changes incorporated: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts.spec http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10.src.rpm http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts-fontconfig.conf http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/ http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/terminus-fonts-package.git;a=summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201329.n1KDTjZj026220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #8 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:29:44 EDT --- Koji scratch build of terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 for dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142218 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201342.n1KDgRwN027834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #9 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:42:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Koji scratch build of terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 for dist-f11: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142218 This failed due to No Package Found for fontpackages-devel >= 1.20 However, now that I have removed the %dir %{_fontdir}, I need to require this version, right? Hmm. The fontpackages-1.20/changelog.txt suggests that requiring 1.18 would be more appropriate, and koji has dist-f11 builds of 1.18 and 1.19, so that should solve it. I'll be uploading and test building terminus-fonts-4.28-6.fc10 with fontpackages-devel >= 1.18 shortly: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-6.fc10/ http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/terminus-fonts-package.git;a=summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201349.n1KDnX3W001962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #10 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:49:32 EDT --- Successful dist-f11 terminus-fonts-4.28-6.fc10 koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142253 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201715.n1KHFf3i024777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #41 from Ryo Dairiki 2009-02-20 12:15:40 EDT --- At last, I've found that cjkunifonts-uming package is the cause of this problem in my environment. It seems like gryphs from that package are chosen in some cases, even in Japanese environments. Japanese period followed by an alphabet is the one example. After uninstalling that package, the problem goes away. And I've confirmed that reinstalling this package caused the problem again. I'll send you a detailed report later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201724.n1KHOY0e019763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fedora-fonts-bugs | |-list at redhat.com) | --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 12:24:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > After I got fontforge working (bug #466404 and bug #450709), I looked into the > font metadata: > > It says that the font family is "PaperCuts 2.0". Would the resultant, compliant > package name be "extremetuxracer-papercuts2_0-fonts"? A strict reading of guidelines would be extremetuxracer-papercuts-2-0-fonts but unless there is a 1.0 somewhere I'd say just drop the whole 2.0 thing and use extremetuxracer-papercuts-fonts > Two font files are included which have the same font in what I think is bold > and outline weight. Still, the outline file says it is "bold" in its metadata. > Should I fix this? Can you help me to do this properly? Outline is not a "weight", and the fonts should belong to two different font families. Modern fonts can only have faces/styles differing in weight (bold/heavy), width (condensed/stretched), slant (italic/oblique), anything else confuses applications. Still, they both say they're the "PaperCuts 2.0" font family in "BoldOblique". They should be font family A in Bold and font family B in bold (and drop the silly version-in-name) That should be easy enough to fix with fontforge but needs to be done upstream. I advise packaging them as extremetuxracer-papercuts-fonts and extremetuxracer-papercuts-outline-fonts with the files unchanged from upstream, and having the fonts fixed upstream > The license for both files is this: > - "Names/Copyright": "Made for ETR by cpicon92. Based on Paper Cuts Daniel > Poeira, licensed under the GPL. Czech alphabet and U+00A0, U+2009 and U+202f by > Petr Pisar, 2007." > - "TTF Names/License": "The use of this font is granted subject to GNU General > Public License." > - "TTF Names/Descriptor": "A combination of Free Sans Bold Oblique and Paper > Cuts, made by cpicon92 for Extreme Tux Racer" > I know that GPL isn't an ideal license for a font, but is that acceptable? We accept fonts under the GPL even if their use in embedding context is subject to debate. If you can reach the various authors and make them re-license under the GPL+font exception (with a specified GPL version range) that would be better of course. Current freefont is GPLv3 + font exception, but the version they used may have had some other licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 16:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201659.n1KGxMMU020121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 11:59:21 EDT --- Yes, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips should really be revised, but I can't find the time and no one else seems to bother. Anyway your 4.28-6 seems fine. Thank you for taking the time to fix the problems ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201734.n1KHYUbs022110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477375, which changed state. Bug 477375 Summary: [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:34:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477375] [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201734.n1KHYTRN022085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 12:34:27 EDT --- Please close bugs when you're done thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201742.n1KHgXec031256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 12:42:31 EDT --- @oron (In reply to comment #8) > * Someone called my name ;-) [yes, I'm the slow Hebrew l10n coordinator] > * As for naming: Actually the problem is not the naming, we have pretty clear naming rules nowadays, the problem are the summaries/descriptions that need help from people who actually use the fonts to become useful to new users @rahul 1. I'm 100% sure we'll have less maintenance load long term if all our font packages use the same kind of fontconfig rules 2. I think you misunderstood the Obsoleting stuff. The aim is not to have compat obsolete the new packages which should be fine, the aim is to have it obsolete the pre-split culmus-fonts < 0.101-6 to have yum update it automatically -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 18:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201857.n1KIvvY2017562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #12 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 13:57:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Yes, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips should really be > revised, but I can't find the time and no one else seems to bother. FWIW, I have just added a short paragraph about the template files in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/. > Anyway your 4.28-6 seems fine. Thank you for taking the time to fix the > problems > > ??? APPROVED ??? Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201900.n1KJ08PO011555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 14:00:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: terminus-fonts Short Description: Clean fixed width font Owners: ndim Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201940.n1KJeItJ023335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Fran?ois Cami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #40 from Fran?ois Cami 2009-02-20 14:40:14 EDT --- *** Bug 444890 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486641] New: library dependency issues Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: library dependency issues https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486641 Summary: library dependency issues Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: rpmlint pango pango.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11 pango.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext pango.i386: E: explicit-lib-depend