[Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383


Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(fedora-fonts-bugs
                   |                            |-list at redhat.com)




--- Comment #10 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com>  2009-02-19 05:38:41 EDT ---
After I got fontforge working (bug #466404 and bug #450709), I looked into the
font metadata:

It says that the font family is "PaperCuts 2.0". Would the resultant, compliant
package name be "extremetuxracer-papercuts2_0-fonts"?

Two font files are included which have the same font in what I think is bold
and outline weight. Still, the outline file says it is "bold" in its metadata.
Should I fix this? Can you help me to do this properly?

The license for both files is this:
- "Names/Copyright": "Made for ETR by cpicon92. Based on Paper Cuts Daniel
Poeira, licensed under the GPL. Czech alphabet and U+00A0, U+2009 and U+202f by
Petr Pisar, 2007."
- "TTF Names/License": "The use of this font is granted subject to GNU General
Public License."
- "TTF Names/Descriptor": "A combination of Free Sans Bold Oblique and Paper
Cuts, made by cpicon92 for Extreme Tux Racer"
I know that GPL isn't an ideal license for a font, but is that acceptable?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.