[Bug 481279] New: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 23 12:11:24 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279
Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for
%{fontname}-common-fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
ReportedBy: quentin at armitage.org.uk
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Attempting yum update of baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common fails sating conflict against
baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts 2.2.13
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.2.15
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum update
2.
3.
Actual results:
Reports conflict eror described above
Expected results:
Successful update
Additional info:
in the %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common section of the .spec file, should
there be an obsoletes %{fontname}-common-fonts < 2.2.13(or is it 2.2.14 -
common-fonts was last in version 2.2.13).
I also noticed that when I had 2.2.13 installed, there was a
baekmuk-fonts-common version 2.2.10 still installed, and presumably that should
have been obsoleted by a previous update?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-fonts-bugs-list
mailing list