From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 01:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 21:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503430] New: Incorrect Kerning in some applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Incorrect Kerning in some applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 Summary: Incorrect Kerning in some applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: grom358_spamkill at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The kerning is incorrect in some applications. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install the Microsoft Corefonts for comparions (corefonts.sf.net) 2. Load Abiword and type "Test AV fi" on first and second line. Set first line to Arial and second line to Liberation Sans. 3. Repeat step 2 in Openoffice Actual results: The kerning is incorrect in Openoffice Expected results: The kerning should match in Openoffice Additional info: The same problems occurs when using the Liberation fonts with Apache FOP (http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 1 16:24:46 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.86, 1.87 pango.spec, 1.160, 1.161 sources, 1.87, 1.88 Message-ID: <20090601162446.C6B637012C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32410 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.24.2 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.86 retrieving revision 1.87 diff -u -p -r1.86 -r1.87 --- .cvsignore 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.86 +++ .cvsignore 1 Jun 2009 16:24:16 -0000 1.87 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 +pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/F-11/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.160 retrieving revision 1.161 diff -u -p -r1.160 -r1.161 --- pango.spec 18 Apr 2009 12:39:23 -0000 1.160 +++ pango.spec 1 Jun 2009 16:24:16 -0000 1.161 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.24.1 -Release: 1%{?dist}.1 +Version: 1.24.2 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -225,6 +225,10 @@ fi %changelog +* Mon Jun 1 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.24.2-1 +- Update to 1.24.2 +- http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.2.news + * Sat Apr 18 2009 Karsten Hopp 1.24.1-1.1 - autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.87 retrieving revision 1.88 diff -u -p -r1.87 -r1.88 --- sources 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.87 +++ sources 1 Jun 2009 16:24:16 -0000 1.88 @@ -1 +1 @@ -af0beac1dd1825e241c5728081f16acd pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 +7bc6c884d847cabc613e4c6d663771f5 pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 23:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) scrip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012302.n51N2IJW015780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 2 01:56:15 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.43, 1.44 fontconfig.spec, 1.132, 1.133 sources, 1.46, 1.47 Message-ID: <20090602015615.B1D337012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21244 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon June 1 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090601-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090601 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.43 retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u -p -r1.43 -r1.44 --- .cvsignore 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.43 +++ .cvsignore 2 Jun 2009 01:55:45 -0000 1.44 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090601.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.132 retrieving revision 1.133 diff -u -p -r1.132 -r1.133 --- fontconfig.spec 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.132 +++ fontconfig.spec 2 Jun 2009 01:55:45 -0000 1.133 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 +Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090601 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon June 1 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090601-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090601 + * Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 - Resolves #497984 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.46 retrieving revision 1.47 diff -u -p -r1.46 -r1.47 --- sources 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.46 +++ sources 2 Jun 2009 01:55:45 -0000 1.47 @@ -1 +1 @@ -8e04b95bfb69a2dba947dd0cfc61b5f0 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz +03aec10ac95d376ab402e5644196684b fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090601.tar.gz From behdad at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 2 01:58:46 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.133,1.134 Message-ID: <20090602015846.25FFD7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21562 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Log Message: * Mon Jun 1 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090601-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090601 Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.133 retrieving revision 1.134 diff -u -p -r1.133 -r1.134 --- fontconfig.spec 2 Jun 2009 01:55:45 -0000 1.133 +++ fontconfig.spec 2 Jun 2009 01:58:15 -0000 1.134 @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog -* Mon June 1 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090601-1 +* Mon Jun 1 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090601-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090601 * Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458951] [sd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020517.n525H3Wv020734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458951 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:45:55 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #7 from Parag 2009-06-02 01:17:02 EDT --- As Sindhi language translations are not in Fedora yet and this is fixed in rawhide(F11), I think we can close this as RAWHIDE instead to wait for backporting current fontconfig release to F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525R9br032727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Bug 462711 depends on bug 461139, which changed state. Bug 461139 Summary: Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525R73C032677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #38 from Parag 2009-06-02 01:27:03 EDT --- Its almost 7 months and no reply from submitter, I will close this review now. Anyone interested please submit new package review. Subodh, If you are still following this review and want to package this, submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525RnQX022901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497090] [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525RwLg022943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-06-02 01:27:57 EDT --- IMO, this is not wrong semantically, since a syllable can be composed of any number of Consonant+(Halant+Consonant)n sequences. Although this can be a case of not usable syllables or the syllables that are not used in the given language, it may not qualify as a critical issue to be tweaked in the layout engine. @Amit, can you please mention if this is a bug for Assamese language as well or just an unused syllable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525RXfg022810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #8 from Parag 2009-06-02 01:27:32 EDT --- Its almost 7 months and no reply from submitter, I will close this review now. Anyone interested please submit new package review. Subodh, If you are still following this review and want to package this, submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525RwuU000388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020530.n525UMIx000971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) | --- Comment #6 from Parag 2009-06-02 01:30:21 EDT --- Its almost 8 months and no reply from submitter, I will close this review now. Anyone interested please submit new package review. Smallvil, If you are still following this review and want to package this, submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 06:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 02:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499358] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020658.n526wG38017073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-02 02:58:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346195) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346195) This patch will solve this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499360] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020700.n5270Lfm017952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-02 03:00:20 EDT --- above patch will also solve bug 499358, both are same type of bug so closing bug 499358 as a duplicate of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499360] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020701.n527117L007943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-02 03:00:59 EDT --- *** Bug 499358 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499358] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020701.n527109o007910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |psatpute at redhat.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-02 03:00:59 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 499360 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 08:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 04:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497311] Dependent Vowel (0CBC) are Render as Independenet vowel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020856.n528uxcV013430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497311 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-02 04:56:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346213) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346213) This patch will solve this bug making character U+0CBC to _nu [Nukta Type] is missed, may be since Tamil, Telugu and Malayalam script doesn't have this characters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501852] [ml_IN] need extra backspace press to delete this string of characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020923.n529NCfl020404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-02 05:23:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > the bug is against F10, > when I input 0D07 0D28 0D4D 200D 0D38 0D4D 0D31 0D4D 0D31 > 0D4B 0D33 0D4D 200D 0D21 0D4D 0D30 0D48 0D35 0D4D,it will generate > ????????????? , 'pasted string' and 'number of rawcode character' (19) looks different from one which reported in description of problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501852] [ml_IN] need extra backspace press to delete this string of characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020929.n529T2CT010956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbhalera at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-06-02 05:29:01 EDT --- The Unicode character sequences given only in the initial "Description of Problem" are correct. Everywhere else 19 characters are mentioned. The real problem is of split matra. The 10th character U+0D4B, is split into two characters, U+0D47 and U+0D3E at the time of rendering, which is adding to the extra backspace. This does not harm the usability in any way, hence this should not be considered as a bug, unless there is an authentic report of the script behaviour given by any user of the script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Tue Jun 2 22:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 545510] Support user control for OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090602220809.BE27D23F5A6@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510 pango | general | Ver: 1.20.x F Wolff changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |friedel at translate.org.za -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510. From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 2 22:12:13 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.10, 1.11 fontpackages.spec, 1.15, 1.16 import.log, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.10, 1.11 Message-ID: <20090602221213.6AE3D7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30641/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.21 - lightly tested ambitious macro rewrite, here be dragons Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- .cvsignore 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.10 +++ .cvsignore 2 Jun 2009 22:11:42 -0000 1.11 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.21.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16 --- fontpackages.spec 24 Feb 2009 17:50:40 -0000 1.15 +++ fontpackages.spec 2 Jun 2009 22:11:42 -0000 1.16 @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.20 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 1.21 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Group: Development/System @@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig - - %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc license.txt readme.txt @@ -99,8 +97,14 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.20-2 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild +* Tue Jun 2 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.21-1 +??? try to handle more corner naming cases in lua macro ??? expect some fallout + if your spec uses weird naming + +* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 1.20-2 +??? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Feb 18 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.20-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:32:21 -0000 1.12 +++ import.log 2 Jun 2009 22:11:42 -0000 1.13 @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732 fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234998636 fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235377920 +fontpackages-1_21-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.21-1.fc12.src.rpm:1243980659 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- sources 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.10 +++ sources 2 Jun 2009 22:11:43 -0000 1.11 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7 fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 +f4a23a889cdf30b9bdb2eba74c86e6bc fontpackages-1.21.tar.bz2 From aalam at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 3 01:27:16 2009 From: aalam at fedoraproject.org (A S Alam) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/saab-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 saab-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090603012716.D3BC5700DA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: aalam Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5494/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log saab-fonts.spec Log Message: --- NEW FILE import.log --- saab-fonts-0_91-1_fc11:HEAD:saab-fonts-0.91-1.fc11.src.rpm:1243992343 --- NEW FILE saab-fonts.spec --- %global fontname saab Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.91 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Punjabi Unicode OpenType Font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions URL: http://guca.sourceforge.net/typography/fonts/saab/ Source0: http://downloads.sf.net/guca/saab.0.91.zip BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This package provides a free OpenType Punjabi (Gurmukhi) font. Developed by Bhupinder Singh %prep %setup -q -c %build echo "Nothing to do in Build." %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Saab.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg Saab.otf %doc %changelog * Tue Jun 2 2009 A S Alam - 0.91-1 - New Package Build for Punjabi Unicode Font Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 2 Jun 2009 21:30:21 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 3 Jun 2009 01:26:46 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +saab.0.91.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 2 Jun 2009 21:30:21 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 3 Jun 2009 01:26:46 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +73391a1992dc8693f4b9818bde417dd3 saab.0.91.zip From aalam at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 3 03:38:39 2009 From: aalam at fedoraproject.org (A S Alam) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 03:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/saab-fonts/F-11 saab-fonts.spec,NONE,1.1 sources,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090603033839.BB471700DA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: aalam Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30685 Modified Files: sources Added Files: saab-fonts.spec Log Message: Adding saab-fonts.spec file and update sources --- NEW FILE saab-fonts.spec --- %global fontname saab Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.91 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Punjabi Unicode OpenType Font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions URL: http://guca.sourceforge.net/typography/fonts/saab/ Source0: http://downloads.sf.net/guca/saab.0.91.zip BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This package provides a free OpenType Punjabi (Gurmukhi) font. Developed by Bhupinder Singh %prep %setup -q -c %build echo "Nothing to do in Build." %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Saab.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg Saab.otf %doc %changelog * Tue Jun 2 2009 A S Alam - 0.91-1 - New Package Build for Punjabi Unicode Font Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 2 Jun 2009 21:30:21 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 3 Jun 2009 03:38:09 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +73391a1992dc8693f4b9818bde417dd3 saab.0.91.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 10:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] New: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: smaitra at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: smaitra at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB shape with SSA (0C37) and HA (0C39) is showing wrong in the font. Its positioning for the lower part of the composed character, should be below-right aligned which is now aligned as below-middle. As of now The Image that is given to our Internal web page, is hand drawn and partly wrong also. But, the lower part alignment is Perfect there which is showing right-aligned. These specific Combinations are given below : 68. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C37 ??? TA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 70. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C39 ??? TA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 103. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C37 ??? NA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 105. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C39 ??? NA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 140. U+0C2E U+0C4D U+0C39 ??? MA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 175. U+0C2F U+0C4D U+0C39 ??? YA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 208. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C37 ??? RA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 210. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C39 ??? RA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 243. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C37 ??? LA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 245. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C39 ??? LA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 278. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C37 ??? VA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 280. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C39 ??? VA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start system with FC11 or Latest 2. Change the ibus with RAWCODE 3. Open Gedit 4. Type the combination's Unicode as given above. 5. Observe the lower part of the composed character. Actual results: Its showing below-middle alignment. Expected results: It should be below-right alignment. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 10:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504272] New: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: smaitra at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: smaitra at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=346638) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346638) Proper Image Shape of 0C39 - HA. Description of problem: Telugu Character 'HA' (0C39) showing wrong shape when composed with another consonant as a below-base character. One of the example is : U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C39 (there are many like this) The nearest hand-drawn shape image is attached here for primary reference. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11 pango-1-24.1-1.fc11 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start system with FC11 or Latest 2. Change the ibus with RAWCODE 3. Open Gedit 4. Type the combination's Unicode as given above. 5. Observe the lower part of the composed character. Actual results: Its wrongly showing. Expected results: It should be like the image attached here! Additional info: See the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 11:03:28 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605110329.02A9E70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2981 Modified Files: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel/ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 06:52:34 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 11:03:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAGothic + + + + + IPAGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 06:52:34 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 11:03:27 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 11:05:36 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11 ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605110536.1A0CF7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3871 Modified Files: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11/ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:28:18 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 11:05:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAGothic + + + + + IPAGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:28:18 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 11:05:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 11:26:32 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090605112632.638F87011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7666 Modified Files: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/devel/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 11:03:27 -0000 1.2 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 11:26:01 -0000 1.3 @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 11:51:53 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090605115153.808BD7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20387 Modified Files: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-11/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 11:05:05 -0000 1.2 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 11:51:21 -0000 1.3 @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 11:52:19 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10 ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605115219.3791F7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20987 Modified Files: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10/ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:42:26 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 11:51:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAGothic + + + + + IPAGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-10/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:42:26 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 11:51:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -51,10 +51,14 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:01:57 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9 ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-gothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605120157.120EB7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2489 Modified Files: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-gothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9/ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 09:42:05 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:01:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAGothic + + + + + IPAGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-gothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-gothic-fonts/F-9/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 09:42:05 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-gothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:01:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -51,10 +51,14 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:06:46 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605120646.B7ED97011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3663 Modified Files: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel/ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 06:54:12 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:06:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPGothic + + + + + IPAPGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/devel/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 06:54:12 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:06:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -51,10 +51,14 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:09:13 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11 ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605120913.5917070131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4680 Modified Files: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11/ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:32:18 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:08:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPGothic + + + + + IPAPGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-11/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:32:18 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:08:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -51,10 +51,14 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:11:06 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10 ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605121106.1ADA07011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5441 Modified Files: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10/ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:48:02 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:10:35 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPGothic + + + + + IPAPGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-10/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:48:02 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:10:35 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -51,10 +51,14 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:13:12 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9 ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605121312.F2C0A7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5955 Modified Files: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9/ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 09:43:24 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:12:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPGothic + + + + + IPAPGothic + + + false + + Index: ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pgothic-fonts/F-9/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 09:43:24 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:12:42 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -51,10 +51,14 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:17:45 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605121745.DD1367011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7548 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel/ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:00:50 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:17:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAMincho + + + + + IPAMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:00:50 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:17:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:19:21 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11 ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605121921.7213D7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8192 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11/ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:36:05 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:18:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAMincho + + + + + IPAMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:36:05 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:18:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:20:51 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10 ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605122051.D39297011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8707 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10/ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:49:36 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:20:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAMincho + + + + + IPAMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:49:36 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:20:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:22:22 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9 ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605122222.A3E777011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9042 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9/ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 09:44:45 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:21:52 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAMincho + + + + + IPAMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 09:44:45 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:21:52 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:25:44 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605122544.48D0E7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9878 Modified Files: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel/ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:09:37 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:25:13 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPMincho + + + + + IPAPMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:09:37 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:25:13 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:27:27 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11 ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605122727.4FA7E7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10336 Modified Files: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11/ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:38:45 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:26:56 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPMincho + + + + + IPAPMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-11/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:38:45 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:26:56 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:28:48 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10 ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605122848.0872A7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10650 Modified Files: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10/ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 07:56:15 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:28:17 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPMincho + + + + + IPAPMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-10/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 07:56:15 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:28:17 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:30:18 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9 ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090605123018.80FBB7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11076 Modified Files: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 - Disable hinting. Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9/ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 23 Apr 2009 09:46:32 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts-fontconfig.conf 5 Jun 2009 12:29:48 -0000 1.2 @@ -21,5 +21,15 @@ IPAPMincho + + + + + IPAPMincho + + + false + + Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/F-9/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 09:46:32 -0000 1.1 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:29:48 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 003.01 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Group: User Interface/X @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jun 5 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-3 +- Disable hinting. + * Wed Apr 22 2009 Akira TAGOH - 003.01-2 - Correct the source URL. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:49:49 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090605124949.AEBE57011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15591 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/devel/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:17:15 -0000 1.2 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:49:19 -0000 1.3 @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:54:11 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090605125411.CDC777011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16493 Modified Files: ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-pmincho-fonts/devel/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:25:13 -0000 1.2 +++ ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:53:41 -0000 1.3 @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 12:56:40 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090605125640.C7F1B7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16945 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-11/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:18:51 -0000 1.2 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:56:10 -0000 1.3 @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 13:02:03 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090605130203.0CCBA7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18069 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-9/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:21:52 -0000 1.2 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 13:01:32 -0000 1.3 @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 5 13:02:54 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10 ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090605130254.9ECF87011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18313 Modified Files: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: ipa-mincho-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ipa-mincho-fonts/F-10/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 12:20:21 -0000 1.2 +++ ipa-mincho-fonts.spec 5 Jun 2009 13:02:24 -0000 1.3 @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf + %doc Readme_%{archivename}.txt IPA_Font_License_Agreement_v1.0.txt From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Fri Jun 5 20:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 347237] Making Pango use a given cairo_font_face_t In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090605200337.2F35E23F52E@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237 pango | general | Ver: unspecified ------- Comment #17 from Jeffrey Stedfast 2009-06-05 20:03 UTC ------- Unfortunately with Silverlight 2.0, Moonlight now has more requirements in this area :-( Firstly (and most importantly), Silverlight 2 allows you to specify a list of font families that the text renderer needs to use to find a font that will render each glyph. For example, a developer might specify in XAML: FontFamily="Georgia, Arial" In this scenario, the text renderer should use Georgia to render any glyphs that are available in that font, but fallback to using Arial for anything Georgia lacks (like ???? and such). Currently PangoFontDescription does handle this if it is using the FontConfig backend (from what I understand), so some logic is already there for this font fallback, but we'll need it to work for a cairo_font_face_t backend as well. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 06:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060606.n5666QjR024336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Bug 462041 depends on bug 462038, which changed state. Bug 462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 06:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060606.n5666OXE024297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-06 02:06:22 EDT --- I didn't really get much feedback at all on the list. ;( I am going to close this now... Roozbeh: If you think we should look at pushing a F-10 update, feel free to email me or catch me on irc and we can try and come up with a plan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sergiozambrano at openoffice.org Sat Jun 6 14:41:08 2009 From: sergiozambrano at openoffice.org (sergiozambrano at openoffice.org) Date: 6 Jun 2009 14:41:08 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090606144108.20927.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 ------- Additional comments from sergiozambrano at openoffice.org Sat Jun 6 14:41:05 +0000 2009 ------- After MANY tests editing all the font names below for a custom font, it seems OOo doesn't handle more than 4 styles, even when shown in typeface list. Regular Demi Bold Condensed Condensed Bold When you remove some, others work. When you get the names showing up, fonts over 4 look the same. Bottom line: only 4 typefaces work properly and the rest are duplicated in name or shape. OSX 10.5.7 OpenOffice 3.1 (build 9399) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504495] New: New official release available, including Literacy and Literacy Compact Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New official release available, including Literacy and Literacy Compact https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504495 Summary: New official release available, including Literacy and Literacy Compact Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: sil-doulos-fonts AssignedTo: roozbeh at gmail.com ReportedBy: tahder04 at schlaegel.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora http://scripts.sil.org/DoulosSILFont > Doulos SIL 4.106 > 2009-04-29 http://scripts.sil.org/SILEntityFonts > Doulos SIL Literacy 4.106 > 2009-05-19 > Doulos SIL Literacy Compact 4.106 > 2009-05-19 There is a new official release available. Also, there is a literacy version available, and a compact literacy version available. I don't know the font policies, but I would recommend packaging all three separately. Then F10 users could use the new font and have the literacy package pulled in so there is no loss of the literacy font. Note: At SIL upstream, Charis Literacy and Doulos Literacy are combined into a single download. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081400.n58E0WkZ024934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-08 10:00:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Can you please check whether it will work or not? 1. Unless saab is derived from lohit punjabi and they have the same look and metrics I'd really not include Lohit Punjabi Saab 2. The 90 priority is safe, but very conservative. I'd discuss with the Lohit people and i18n if Saab could not be bumped a little. 3. Please cc the fonts list on fonts review so the right people get cc-ed 4. Please also check you didn't miss any step in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081424.n58EOSbS002222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 10:24:27 EDT --- thanks Nicolas for your reply. I will check what you have asked above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Mon Jun 8 15:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 20854] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090608150844.E1FC1130058@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NOTOURBUG | --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-08 08:08:43 PST --- Bastien, we need to add a glob for *.otf to the font mime type too, since the current agreed-on matching algorithm only looks at magic to disambiguate if there is a glob conflict. I tested locally that adding the glob makes otf fonts show up correctly in nautilus. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From xavier_robin at openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 15:11:27 2009 From: xavier_robin at openoffice.org (xavier_robin at openoffice.org) Date: 8 Jun 2009 15:11:27 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090608151127.4611.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from xavier_robin at openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 15:11:22 +0000 2009 ------- Je cherchais justement comment obtenir cette possibilit?. Dommage que ce ne soit pas possible. J'ai vot?, mais le d?veloppement n'?tant pas d?mocratique, ce n'a probablement aucun effet (voir le [url=http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029]le bug sur l'export PDF des polices OpenType[/url] dont la correction est sans cesse repouss?e malgr? les 250 votes). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485746] (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081923.n58JNrOI026705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Tracking --- Comment #1 from John Poelstra 2009-06-08 15:23:52 EDT --- Adding 'Tracking' keyword to be excluded from rawhide rebase to Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081923.n58JNqpu026681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Tracking --- Comment #2 from John Poelstra 2009-06-08 15:23:51 EDT --- Adding 'Tracking' keyword to be excluded from rawhide rebase to Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081923.n58JNpie026647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Tracking --- Comment #2 from John Poelstra 2009-06-08 15:23:49 EDT --- Adding 'Tracking' keyword to be excluded from rawhide rebase to Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) scrip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090616.n596Gx1e009087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090646.n596kALI008251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090645.n596juvx008199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #13 from Parag 2009-06-09 02:45:53 EDT --- Closing now as said earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090646.n596kCx1008322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 Bug 456582 depends on bug 458430, which changed state. Bug 458430 Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090703.n5973CfD018766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |senamirmir-washra-fonts - |senamirmir-washra-fonts - |Fonts for the Ge?ez |Fonts for the Ge?ez |(Ethiopic) scrip |(Ethiopic) script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 22:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230662] Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092229.n59MTEws027763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662 --- Comment #16 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 18:29:12 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 22:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 272521] Handle fonts with many styles gracefully In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092248.n59MmSOE010558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272521 Bug 272521 depends on bug 272481, which changed state. Bug 272481 Summary: Firefox confused by fonts with many styles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272481 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 18:48:28 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 22:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331881] [Indic] ra+halant+ZWNJ is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092256.n59MuoSI013360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331881 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 18:56:49 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 23:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428389] monospace font is strange on gnome-terminal. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092321.n59NLw0Z023468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428389 --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 19:21:57 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 23:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431355] oowriter .odt - Nimbus Roman No9 L linespacing seems to be changed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092329.n59NTOHw017747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431355 --- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 19:29:22 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 23:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433559] Inexact font match produces different results between i386,x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092335.n59NZlka020123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433559 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 19:35:46 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 23:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436505] condensed Nimbus fonts inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092342.n59Ngi3i031516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436505 --- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 19:42:42 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 23:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437689] xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092347.n59NlPVO024186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437689 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 19:47:25 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] different font used for ASCII In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100001.n5A01xPD030232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 --- Comment #21 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 20:01:57 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444240] freetype thinks font hrger.pfa is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100027.n5A0RIR6007309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444240 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 20:27:18 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] different font used for ASCII In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100030.n5A0UN7w020780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #22 from Kevin Kofler 2009-06-09 20:30:21 EDT --- Is this still reproducible in F10 or F11? And do we have any clue which component(s) is/are actually at fault here and what needs to be fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 01:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] different font used for ASCII In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100129.n5A1T4jL012193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 Lawrence Lim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? |needinfo?(mshao at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 01:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450847] Evince crashes in freetype In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100133.n5A1X9g0014047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450847 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 21:33:08 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 01:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100131.n5A1VDBt013553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #24 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 21:31:09 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 01:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454291] pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100158.n5A1w4S4012445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454291 --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 21:58:03 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 02:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454785] Ardour2 Pango Error. Session crashed and will no longer open. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100200.n5A20SPI013647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454785 --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:00:27 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 02:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454850] Cannot build pango from the SRPM in Fedora repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100201.n5A21BuN025632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454850 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:01:10 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 02:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100206.n5A26DE4027794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 --- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:06:12 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 02:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457094] Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100217.n5A2HCFF000408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457094 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:17:11 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 02:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441213] [i18n] [zh_CN] different font used for ASCII In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100231.n5A2VWqR007442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441213 Yewei Shao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |mshao at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(mshao at redhat.com) | --- Comment #23 from Yewei Shao 2009-06-09 22:31:31 EDT --- I verified this bug in kdebase-4.1.2-5.f10, and I find this bug can not be reproduced now, so I will close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 02:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466029] fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100254.n5A2saCg005959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:54:36 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 02:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100256.n5A2uZsx020848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:56:34 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 03:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478786] xfig: Can't find -urw-nimbus roman no9 l-medium-r-normal--8-*-*-*-*-*-ISO8859-*, using 6x13 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100328.n5A3SD59024537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478786 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 23:28:13 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 09:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437689] xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100925.n5A9PcB6021841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437689 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 09:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 272521] Handle fonts with many styles gracefully In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100927.n5A9RBwe032065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272521 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101102.n5AB2lZU027839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-10 07:02:46 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400997 verified upstream source as 96bd3826de65d96cfc00e1752658a0f20de19e71 washra-fonts-4.1.zip APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101109.n5AB9TKp029743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-triage-list at redhat.c | |om --- Comment #13 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-10 07:09:28 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101113.n5ABDrXi031157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101112.n5ABCKjK030885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 --- Comment #5 from Julian Sikorski 2009-06-10 07:12:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=347200) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347200) Confused gtk font selector in LANG=C locale Still present in Fedora 11. I think the problem might be related to localised names of the narrow font. With LANG=C shown above, the errors are different. Font selection will yield the following (from the top): 4 times narrow, normal, italic, bold and bold italic. Narrow italic, narrow bold and narrow bold italic are still MIA. It's a little improvement over pl_PL locale, but far from a working solution nontheless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101159.n5ABx3hf011443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-10 07:59:02 EDT --- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: senamirmir-washra-font Short Description: Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) script Owners: nim Branches: F11 & devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From twaugh at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 10 13:57:29 2009 From: twaugh at fedoraproject.org (Tim Waugh) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel ghostscript-fonts.spec,1.19,1.20 Message-ID: <20090610135729.BA4917011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: twaugh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10890 Modified Files: ghostscript-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Jun 10 2009 Tim Waugh 5.50-21 - Changed from package review (bug #225794): - Requires xorg-x11-font-utils, not mkfontscale/mkfontdir. - Use macro for /etc. - Don't own catalogue directory. Index: ghostscript-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel/ghostscript-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- ghostscript-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 21:22:52 -0000 1.19 +++ ghostscript-fonts.spec 10 Jun 2009 13:56:59 -0000 1.20 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Summary: Fonts for the Ghostscript PostScript interpreter Name: ghostscript-fonts Version: 5.50 -Release: 20%{?dist} +Release: 21%{?dist} # Contacted Kevin Hartig, who agreed to relicense his fonts under the SIL Open Font # License. Hershey fonts are under the "Hershey Font License", which is not what Fontmap # says (Fontmap is wrong). @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ Source0: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ghostscr Source1: Kevin_Hartig-Font_License.txt Source2: SIL-Open-Font-License.txt Requires: fontconfig -Requires(post): /usr/bin/mkfontscale /usr/bin/mkfontdir +Requires(post): xorg-x11-font-utils Requires(post): fontconfig Requires(postun): fontconfig BuildArchitectures: noarch %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/default/ghostscript -%define catalogue /etc/X11/fontpath.d +%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d %description Ghostscript-fonts contains a set of fonts that Ghostscript, a @@ -63,10 +63,15 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Kevin_Hartig-Font_License.txt SIL-Open-Font-License.txt %{_datadir}/fonts/default/ -%dir %{catalogue} %{catalogue}/default-ghostscript %changelog +* Wed Jun 10 2009 Tim Waugh 5.50-21 +- Changed from package review (bug #225794): + - Requires xorg-x11-font-utils, not mkfontscale/mkfontdir. + - Use macro for /etc. + - Don't own catalogue directory. + * Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 5.50-20 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From twaugh at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 10 14:20:23 2009 From: twaugh at fedoraproject.org (Tim Waugh) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel ghostscript-fonts.spec,1.20,1.21 Message-ID: <20090610142023.222827011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: twaugh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17798 Modified Files: ghostscript-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Jun 10 2009 Tim Waugh 5.50-22 - Further changes from package review (bug #225794): - Don't use umask in scriptlet. - Don't use 'which' in scriptlet. Index: ghostscript-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel/ghostscript-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21 --- ghostscript-fonts.spec 10 Jun 2009 13:56:59 -0000 1.20 +++ ghostscript-fonts.spec 10 Jun 2009 14:19:52 -0000 1.21 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Summary: Fonts for the Ghostscript PostScript interpreter Name: ghostscript-fonts Version: 5.50 -Release: 21%{?dist} +Release: 22%{?dist} # Contacted Kevin Hartig, who agreed to relicense his fonts under the SIL Open Font # License. Hershey fonts are under the "Hershey Font License", which is not what Fontmap # says (Fontmap is wrong). @@ -43,9 +43,8 @@ ln -sf %{fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catal %post { - umask 133 mkfontscale %{fontdir} - `which mkfontdir` %{fontdir} + mkfontdir %{fontdir} fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts } &> /dev/null || : @@ -66,8 +65,13 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{catalogue}/default-ghostscript %changelog +* Wed Jun 10 2009 Tim Waugh 5.50-22 +- Further changes from package review (bug #225794): + - Don't use umask in scriptlet. + - Don't use 'which' in scriptlet. + * Wed Jun 10 2009 Tim Waugh 5.50-21 -- Changed from package review (bug #225794): +- Changes from package review (bug #225794): - Requires xorg-x11-font-utils, not mkfontscale/mkfontdir. - Use macro for /etc. - Don't own catalogue directory. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 18:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101834.n5AIYwqR001717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |belegdol at gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Julian Sikorski 2009-06-10 14:34:55 EDT --- Also happens on F11: Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 14:20 GMT 24-Feb-2009. Library based on sources from 14:18 GMT 24-Feb-2009. Failed to create a fontset for the input method -urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-2,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-3,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-4,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5,-misc-ar pl ukai tw-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-7,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-9,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-10,-misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-15,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-koi8-uni,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 Help! Server claimed font -misc-ar pl ukai cn-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x865c580, as=0xbfffe3a8, ds=0xbfffe3a4, ld=0xbfffe3ac) at gdrawtxt.c:2339 2339 *as = fontinfo->ascent; (gdb) bt #0 GDrawFontMetrics (fi=0x865c580, as=0xbfffe3a8, ds=0xbfffe3a4, ld=0xbfffe3ac) at gdrawtxt.c:2339 #1 0x00d58169 in GXDrawFontMetrics (w=0x0, fi=0xbfffe3ac, as=0xbfffe3a8, ds=0xbfffe3a4, ld=0xbfffe3ac) at gxdraw.c:2773 #2 0x00d054a3 in GDrawWindowFontMetrics (w=0x83f9228, fi=0x865c580, as=0xbfffe3a8, ds=0xbfffe3a4, ld=0xbfffe3ac) at gdraw.c:580 #3 0x00d322fd in GProgressStartIndicator (delay=0, win_title=0x85ec410, line1=0x8431508, line2=0x851a3f8, tot=0, stages=1) at gprogress.c:232 #4 0x00d32787 in GProgressStartIndicator8 (delay=0, title=0xb7d1b27c "Wczytywanie...", line1=0xbfffe4a2 "Wczytywanie fontu z arialn.ttf", line2=0xb7d23c4e "Wczytywanie glif?w", tot=0, stages=1) at gprogress.c:462 #5 0x0040c581 in _ReadSplineFont (file=0x0, filename=0x8542430 "/home/jsikorski/.fonts/arialn/arialn.ttf", openflags=0) at splinefont.c:998 #6 0x0040de8c in ReadSplineFont ( filename=0x8542430 "/home/jsikorski/.fonts/arialn/arialn.ttf", openflags=0) at splinefont.c:1226 #7 0x0040df6d in LoadSplineFont ( filename=0x8542430 "/home/jsikorski/.fonts/arialn/arialn.ttf", openflags=0) at splinefont.c:1299 #8 0x002d272c in ViewPostscriptFont ( filename=0x8542430 "/home/jsikorski/.fonts/arialn/arialn.ttf", openflags=0) ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- at fontviewbase.c:1234 #9 0x0810ae8c in MenuOpen (base=0x0, mi=0x0, e=0x0) at fontview.c:963 #10 0x081a1dbf in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff3e4) at startui.c:1366 (gdb) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 18:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505129] New: dejavu lgc serif condensed italic gets confused with condensed Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: dejavu lgc serif condensed italic gets confused with condensed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505129 Summary: dejavu lgc serif condensed italic gets confused with condensed Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: There are some problems with DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed Italic font, which make it unavailable to gtk font selector and fc-list. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start gedit 2. Go to edit ? preferences ? fonts and colours 3. Uncheck system fonts usage, start font selector 4. Pick dejavu lgc serif Actual results: There are two ?Condensed? entries in the styles box, but there is no condensed italic. Expected results: Condensed and Condensed Italic are both present once. Additional info: [jsikorski at snowball ~]$ rpm -ql dejavu-lgc-fonts | grep Serif /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif-BoldItalic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif-Italic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerif.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed.ttf [jsikorski at snowball ~]$ fc-list | grep LGC | grep Serif DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Italic DejaVu LGC Serif,DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed:style=Condensed,Book DejaVu LGC Serif,DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed:style=Condensed Bold Italic,Bold Italic DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Bold DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Book DejaVu LGC Serif:style=Bold Italic DejaVu LGC Serif,DejaVu LGC Serif Condensed:style=Condensed Bold,Bold nim-nim found out the following: [nim at arekh ~]$ fc-query /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf |grep style: style: "Condensed"(s) "Book"(s) [nim at arekh ~]$ fc-query /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf |grep style style: "Condensed Oblique"(s) "Oblique"(s) He said that this could be some ?Oblique? vs ?Italic? problem. Also, bug #466678 might be related, but I'm not sure about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 18:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101852.n5AIqORg006611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10 14:52:23 EDT --- I'm done reviewing this. There are two minor issues to be resolved: - rpmlint is silent - There are certain files in the source, such as include/lcdf/hashmap.cc include/lcdf/vector.cc include/lcdf/clp.h liblcdf/string.cc liblcdf/error.cc liblcdf/vectorv.cc liblcdf/clp.c liblcdf/straccum.cc that are under MIT license. But since during the compilation, they are linked to GPL parts of the code, and since GPL is stricter than MIT, the overall license as GPLv2+ is acceptable. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403904 * The directory %{_datadir}/lcdf-typetools/ is unowned! This needs attention. * Please include the COPYING file in %doc, as required by the guidelines. Please do these changes before you commit. ------------------------------------------------- This package (lcdf-typetools) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505129] dejavu lgc serif condensed italic gets confused with condensed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101908.n5AJ8IFR032686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505129 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Component|fontconfig |dejavu-fonts Version|10 |rawhide AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-10 15:08:17 EDT --- It seems that while the name and OS/2 bits are correct and similar for both fonts, the TTF Style subfamily for DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic is Book and not Italic (DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique has Oblique there) So it seems to be a font bug after all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 10 19:42:32 2009 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel .cvsignore, 1.25, 1.26 sources, 1.25, 1.26 fontforge.spec, 1.44, 1.45 Message-ID: <20090610194232.DD8AF7011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12382 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources fontforge.spec Log Message: Upgrade to 20090408 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -p -r1.25 -r1.26 --- .cvsignore 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 -0000 1.25 +++ .cvsignore 10 Jun 2009 19:42:02 -0000 1.26 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -fontforge_full-20090224.tar.bz2 -fontforge_htdocs-20090224.tar.bz2 +fontforge_full-20090408.tar.bz2 +fontforge_htdocs-20090408.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -p -r1.25 -r1.26 --- sources 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 -0000 1.25 +++ sources 10 Jun 2009 19:42:02 -0000 1.26 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -5b564437e5e3db660b0202647b6f733b fontforge_full-20090224.tar.bz2 -fdd4420934fe12575e7240642c0ffbe4 fontforge_htdocs-20090224.tar.bz2 +5a85abd05b8dcefcb5e21e24d99299f9 fontforge_full-20090408.tar.bz2 +5b21e4b9630a33d6a989d869178be7ca fontforge_htdocs-20090408.tar.bz2 Index: fontforge.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v retrieving revision 1.44 retrieving revision 1.45 diff -u -p -r1.44 -r1.45 --- fontforge.spec 2 Apr 2009 06:12:28 -0000 1.44 +++ fontforge.spec 10 Jun 2009 19:42:02 -0000 1.45 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} -%global docs_version 20090224 +%global docs_version 20090408 %global gettext_package FontForge Name: fontforge -Version: 20090224 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 20090408 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Outline and bitmap font editor Group: Applications/Publishing @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc %changelog +* Thu Apr 16 2009 Kevin Fenzi - 20090408-1 +- Upgrade to 20090408 + * Sun Apr 02 2009 Kevin Fenzi - 20090224-2 - Apply patch for python modules loading (fixes #489109) - use install -p to fix multiarch issue (fixes #480685) From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Jun 10 19:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22215] New: Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22215 Summary: Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp at keithp.com ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: freedesktop at behdad.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Originally reported in Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 Beginning with the release of Fedora 7 in May 2007, fonts belonging to Arial Narrow group began to be merged with ordinary Arial - there was no longer a separate Arial Narrow family in the font selector, only Arial. The narrow styles were supposed to be added to the Arial family, but the problem is that it is impossible to select the Narrow glyphs afterwards. With LANG=C, the situation is the least broken: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347200 Regular narrow can be selected, but narrow italic, narrow bold and narrow bold italic cannot. With LANG=pl_PL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320146 even narrow regular is gone. Also, please note that the styles are displayed in pretty random languages. fc-list seems to list all eight styles fine: $ fc-list | grep Arial | sort Arial Black:style=Normalny,Normal,oby?ejn?,Standard,????????,Regular,Normaali,Norm?l,Normale,Standaard,???????,Norm?lne,Navadno,Arrunta Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Kursywa,Narrow,Cursiva,kurz?va,kursiv,??????,Italic,Kursivoitu,Italique,D?lt,Corsivo,Cursief,It?lico,??????,?talik,Po?evno,Etzana Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Normalny,Narrow,Normal,oby?ejn?,Standard,????????,Regular,Normaali,Norm?l,Normale,Standaard,???????,Norm?lne,Navadno,Arrunta Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Pogrubiona kursywa,Narrow,Negreta cursiva,tu?n? kurz?va,fed kursiv,Fett Kursiv,?????? ??????,Bold Italic,Negrita Cursiva,Lihavoitu Kursivoi,Gras Italique,F?lk?v?r d?lt,Grassetto Corsivo,Vet Cursief,Halvfet Kursiv,Negrito It?lico,?????????? ??????,Tu?n? kurz?va,Fet Kursiv,Kal?n ?talik,Krepko po?evno,Lodi etzana Arial,Arial Narrow:style=Pogrubiony,Narrow,Negreta,tu?n?,fed,Fett,??????,Bold,Negrita,Lihavoitu,Gras,F?lk?v?r,Grassetto,Vet,Halvfet,Negrito,??????????,Fet,Kal?n,Krepko,Lodia Arial:style=Kursywa,Cursiva,kurz?va,kursiv,??????,Italic,Kursivoitu,Italique,D?lt,Corsivo,Cursief,It?lico,??????,?talik,Po?evno,nghi?ng,Etzana Arial:style=Normalny,Normal,oby?ejn?,Standard,????????,Regular,Normaali,Norm?l,Normale,Standaard,???????,Norm?lne,Navadno,th???ng,Arrunta Arial:style=Pogrubiona kursywa,Negreta cursiva,tu?n? kurz?va,fed kursiv,Fett Kursiv,?????? ??????,Bold Italic,Negrita Cursiva,Lihavoitu Kursivoi,Gras Italique,F?lk?v?r d?lt,Grassetto Corsivo,Vet Cursief,Halvfet Kursiv,Negrito It?lico,?????????? ??????,Tu?n? kurz?va,Fet Kursiv,Kal?n ?talik,Krepko po?evno,nghi?ng ???m,Lodi etzana Arial:style=Pogrubiony,Negreta,tu?n?,fed,Fett,??????,Bold,Negrita,Lihavoitu,Gras,F?lk?v?r,Grassetto,Vet,Halvfet,Negrito,??????????,Fet,Kal?n,Krepko,???m,Lodia The only applications that seem to be able to distinguish between the narrow glyphs are firefox and KDE's font installer. Please let me know if I can provide any other information. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101948.n5AJmLfj023663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |FreeDesktop.org 22215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Jun 10 19:50:30 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22215] Arial Narrow fonts are inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090610195030.7D3D82DC002@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22215 --- Comment #1 from Julian Sikorski 2009-06-10 12:50:29 PST --- For reference, this is on an up-to-date Fedora 10 x86_64, with fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10. I did dome testing with Fedora 11, but unfortunately the situation did not seem to have improved. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:51:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466678] Arial Narrow font is inaccessible to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101951.n5AJpJax024507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466678 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |GNOME Desktop 563862 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102057.n5AKvI0s010592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 16:57:17 EDT --- CVS done. Note, branch names are like "F-11"; don't include characters like '&'. I cannot guarantee that the UTF-8 character made it all the way through the probably 20 tools that handled it on the way into the system, so please double-check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102128.n5ALSWjZ018744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-10 17:28:31 EDT --- Oh, I'm very sorry, we worry about UTF-8 stuff, but miss simple things like the "s" at the end of the package name. It seems I missed it while cut and pasting :( New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: senamirmir-washra-fonts Short Description: Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) script Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102134.n5ALYOPG020224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:34:23 EDT --- CVS done. I'll get an admin to clean up the errant package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From Matt_Domsch at dell.com Wed Jun 10 22:06:50 2009 From: Matt_Domsch at dell.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:06:50 -0500 Subject: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-06-08 x86_64 Message-ID: <20090610220650.GA2143@mock.linuxdev.us.dell.com> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 using the first rawhide of the Fedora 12 development cycle, cut on 6/8/2008. Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ 2 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE: pan: [u'476250'] ruby-rpm: [u'465103'] Total packages: 7807 Number failed to build: 348 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 31 Leaving: 317 Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 313 ---------------------------------- Django-1.0.2-3.fc11 (build/make) salimma,smilner GtkAda-2.10.2-2.fc11 (build/make) gemi Macaulay2-1.2-4.fc12 (build/make) rdieter PyKDE-3.16.2-3.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,jamatos PyQwt-5.1.0-3.fc11 (build/make) tadej R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-5 (build/make) pingou R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51-1.3.1-3 (build/make) pingou R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.3.0-4.fc11 (build/make) pingou R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11 (build/make) spot R-hgu95av2probe-2.0.0-1.fc9 (build/make) pingou ScientificPython-2.8-4.fc11 (build/make) jspaleta SimGear-1.9.1-5.fc12 (build/make) spot,bellet UnihanDb-5.1.0-7.fc11.1 (build/make) dchen,i18n-team almanah-0.5.0-1.fc11 (build/make) lokthare amanda-2.6.0p2-9.fc12 (build/make) dnovotny arts-1.5.10-5.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr asio-1.2.0-2.fc11 (build/make) uwog atlas-3.8.3-4.fc12 (build/make) deji,deji audacious-1.5.1-8.fc12 (build/make) ertzing audacious-plugin-fc-0.3-2 (build/make) mschwendt audacious-plugins-1.5.1-5.fc12 (build/make) ertzing autodir-0.99.9-7.fc11 (build/make) thias awn-extras-applets-0.3.2.1-8.fc11 (build/make) phuang,sindrepb axis-1.2.1-4.1.fc10 (build/make) pcheung bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc12 (build/make) itamarjp,cassmodiah batik-1.7-4.fc11 (build/make) langel,fitzsim beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 (build/make) bigboard-0.6.4-9.fc11 (build/make) walters blacs-1.1-31.fc11 (build/make) spot bmpx-0.40.14-8.fc11 (build/make) akahl,cheese cdrkit-1.1.9-4.fc11 (build/make) rrakus cernlib-2006-32.fc11 (build/make) limb,pertusus chipmunk-4.1.0-6.fc11 (build/make) limb classpathx-jaf-1.0-12.fc10 (build/make) devrim,dwalluck clutter-cairo-0.8.2-3.fc11 (build/make) allisson clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11 (build/make) denis clutter-gst-0.8.0-4.fc11 (build/make) allisson clutter-gtkmm-0.7.4-2.fc11 (build/make) denis cluttermm-0.7.5-2.fc11 (build/make) denis codeblocks-8.02-7.fc11 (build/make) sharkcz compat-db-4.6.21-5.fc10 (build/make) jnovy,pmatilai compat-erlang-R10B-13.11.fc11 (build/make) gemi compat-wxGTK26-2.6.4-7 (build/make) mschwendt conky-1.7.0-1.fc12 (build/make) mlichvar,pertusus,mlichvar couchdb-0.9.0-2.fc12 (build/make) allisson cuetools-1.4.0-0.3.svn305.fc11 (build/make) stingray dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.9-2.fc11 (build/make) pertusus,pertusus dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.8.20090203git13281b3.fc11 (build/make) drago01 ddskk-12.2.0-12.fc11 (build/make) petersen,i18n-team ecl-0.9l-4.fc11 (build/make) gemi eclipse-cdt-5.0.2-2.fc11 (build/make) jjohnstn eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-12.fc11 (build/make) rmyers,overholt eigen2-2.0.52-0.1.20090518.fc12 (build/make) rdieter,kkofler,mathstuf emacs-mew-6.2.51-2.fc11 (build/make) tagoh epiphany-extensions-2.26.1-2.fc12 (build/make) caillon,pgordon eric-4.3.3-1.fc12 (build/make) rdieter,ausil,trasher etherbat-1.0.1-5.fc11 (build/make) limb ettercap-0.7.3-32.fc11 (build/make) limb evolution-brutus-1.2.35-2.fc11 (build/make) bpepple evolution-rss-0.1.2-9.fc12 (build/make) lucilanga evolution-zimbra-0.1.1-6.fc11 (build/make) mbarnes,mmahut fakechroot-2.9-22.fc12 (build/make) athimm,rjones fann-2.0.0-5.1.fc11 (build/make) tsmetana fedora-business-cards-0.2.4-4.fc11 (build/make) ianweller fetchmail-6.3.9-3.fc11 (build/make) vcrhonek,pertusus filesystem-2.4.21-1.fc11 (build/make) pknirsch firewalk-5.0-4.fc11 (build/make) sindrepb fityk-0.8.1-14.fc10 (build/make) jpye fltk-1.1.9-3.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,pertusus fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-20.fc11 (build/make) rbhalera,fonts-sig,i18n-team fonts-hebrew-fancy-0.20051122-5.fc11 (build/make) danken,fonts-sig fpc-2.2.2-3.fc10 (build/make) joost,tbzatek freefem++-3.0-5.5.fc11 (patch_fuzz) rathann frysk-0.4-8.fc11 (build/make) cagney,pmuldoon,swagiaal fusecompress-2.5-1.fc12 (build/make) lkundrak,lmacken gbdfed-1.4-2.fc11 (build/make) spot gc-7.1-7.fc11 (build/make) rdieter gcdmaster-1.2.2-5.fc11 (build/make) denis gdal-1.6.0-8.fc11 (build/make) rezso,pertusus gedit-vala-0.4.1-2.fc11 (build/make) salimma geronimo-specs-1.0-2.M2.fc10 (build/make) fnasser gettext-0.17-11.fc12 (build/make) petersen,i18n-team gflags-1.0-3.fc11 (build/make) rakesh gget-0.0.4-9.fc11 (build/make) ant glob2-0.9.3-2.fc11 (build/make) rafalzaq globus-core-5.15-4.fc12 (build/make) ellert gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc12 (build/make) hubbitus gmfsk-0.7-0.6.pre1.fc11 (build/make) bjensen,bjensen,sindrepb,sconklin,dp67 gmime-2.4.3-3.fc11 (build/make) alexl,thl gmime22-2.2.23-5.fc11 (build/make) bjohnson gmrun-0.9.2-16.fc11 (build/make) gilboa gnome-scan-0.6.2-1.fc11 (build/make) deji gnome-specimen-0.3-4.fc11 (build/make) orphan gnomint-0.9.1-5.fc12 (build/make) verdurin gnuchess-5.07-12.fc11 (build/make) kaboom gnuradio-3.1.3-5.fc11 (build/make) mmahut,astronomy-sig gromacs-4.0.4-2.fc11 (build/make) jussilehtola grub-0.97-51.fc12 (build/make) pjones,lkundrak grub2-1.98-0.5.20080827svn.fc11 (build/make) lkundrak gt-0.4-8.fc11 (build/make) jwrdegoede gwget-1.0.1-2.fc11 (build/make) cwickert hal-0.5.12-26.20090226git.fc11 (build/make) rhughes heartbeat-2.1.4-7.fc12 (build/make) kevin,lon hosts3d-0.98-1.fc11 (build/make) cassmodiah hyphen-hsb-0.20080619-1.fc11 (build/make) caolanm iksemel-1.3-7.fc11 (build/make) jcollie inn-2.4.6-2.fc12 (build/make) ovasik insight-6.8-7.fc11 (build/make) monnerat,jkratoch intuitively-0.7-15.fc11 (build/make) kasal,pertusus ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipsec-tools-0.7.2-1.fc12 (build/make) tmraz irda-utils-0.9.18-7.fc11 (build/make) karsten iverilog-0.9.20090423-4..fc11 (build/make) rezso,chitlesh jasper-1.900.1-10.fc11 (build/make) rdieter java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-23.b16.fc12 (build/make) langel,lkundrak,dbhole,langel,mjw jruby-1.1.6-3.fc11 (build/make) konradm kaya-0.5.1-4.fc11 (build/make) s4504kr kbd-1.15-7.fc11 (build/make) vcrhonek kdebase-runtime-4.2.85-2.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdebase-workspace-4.2.85-4.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,svahl,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdebase3-3.5.10-8.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,svahl,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,jreznik kdelibs3-3.5.10-11.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl kdemultimedia-4.2.85-2.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdepim-4.2.85-2.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdeplasma-addons-4.2.85-4.fc12 (build/make) rdieter,than,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdevelop-3.5.4-3.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl kdewebdev-3.5.10-2.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,jreznik kdnssd-avahi-0.1.3-0.7.20080116svn.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,rdieter,tuxbrewr kguitar-0.5.1-4.926svn.fc11 (build/make) oget kile-2.0.3-3.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr kio_sword-0.3-9.fc11 (build/make) anderson,deji kita-0.177.5-4.fc11 (build/make) mtasaka knetstats-1.6.1-9.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig,i18n-team kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-7.fc11 (build/make) jreznik,rdieter,than,kkofler,ltinkl kpackagekit-0.4.0-7.fc12 (build/make) tuxbrewr,rdieter,rhughes,kkofler,balajig8,ltinkl kpolynome-0.1.2-13.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh ktechlab-0.3.70-1.20090304svn.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh lagan-2.0-4.fc11 (build/make) c4chris lam-7.1.4-7.fc12 (build/make) dledford lasi-1.1.0-4.fc11 (build/make) orion lcdproc-0.5.2-11.fc11 (build/make) kwizart,jwilson ldapvi-1.7-8.fc11 (build/make) orphan levien-inconsolata-fonts-1.01-3.fc11 (build/make) kevin libbeagle-0.3.9-3.fc11 (build/make) mclasen libbonobo-2.24.1-1.fc11 (build/make) rstrode libcaca-0.99-0.7.beta16.fc11 (build/make) thias libchamplain-0.2.9-1.fc11 (build/make) rishi libgnomedb-3.99.7-3.fc11 (build/make) denis,denis,huzaifas libgnomeprint22-2.18.6-1.fc11 (build/make) behdad libguestfs-1.0.41-1.fc12 (build/make) rjones,virtmaint libibumad-1.3.1-1.fc12 (build/make) dledford libprojectM-1.2.0-9.fc11 (build/make) imntreal libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) imntreal libsoup22-2.2.105-4.fc11 (build/make) mbarnes libsx-2.05-16.fc11 (build/make) kasal,pertusus libtar-1.2.11-11.fc10 (build/make) huzaifas,huzaifas linux-libertine-fonts-4.1.8-1.fc11 (build/make) farnold,fonts-sig,kevin maildrop-2.0.4-9.fc11 (build/make) athimm maven2-2.0.4-11.19.fc11 (build/make) dbhole mesa-7.5-0.14.fc11 (build/make) ajax,ajax mhash-0.9.9-7 (build/make) spot,limb mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc12 (build/make) epienbro,rjones mingw32-qt-4.5.0-4.fc11 (build/make) sailer,rjones mingw32-wpcap-4.1.beta5-2.fc11 (build/make) sailer,rjones mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-17.fc12 (build/make) rjones,sailer,berrange,lfarkas,mingwmaint minicom-2.3-4.fc11 (build/make) mlichvar minirpc-0.3.2-3.fc11 (build/make) agoode monafont-2.90-8.fc11 (build/make) mtasaka mono-2.4-19.fc12 (build/make) laxathom,pfj,laxathom,itamarjp monsoon-0.20-2.fc11 (build/make) mpfi-1.3.4-0.5.RC3.fc11 (build/make) konradm mscore-0.9.4-3.fc11 (build/make) oget mugshot-1.2.2-9.fc12 (build/make) otaylor multiget-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) guidoledermann,mtasaka museek+-0.2-1.fc11 (build/make) belegdol mysql-5.1.34-1.fc12 (build/make) tgl nautilus-gdu-0.2-git20090309.1.fc11 (build/make) netcdf-perl-1.2.3-9.fc11 (build/make) orion,perl-sig,pertusus ngspice-18-2.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh nss_ldap-264-2.fc11 (build/make) nalin ntop-3.3.9-5.fc11 (build/make) rakesh,pvrabec nwsclient-1.6.3-3.fc11 (build/make) spot oflb-riordonfancy-fonts-4-2 (build/make) ivazquez opencv-1.1.0-0.1.pre1.fc12.1 (build/make) rakesh,nomis80,kwizart orpie-1.5.1-4.fc10 (build/make) xris orsa-0.7.0-8.fc11 (build/make) mjakubicek,mmahut paraview-3.4.0-4.fc11 (build/make) orion,pertusus pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.8-5.fc11 (build/make) orphan perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.4-1.fc11 (build/make) allisson,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView-0.10-2.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-2.fc11 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex-0.05-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder-0.05-2.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.10-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer-0.05-1.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.03-1.fc11 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.23-1.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP-0.16-5.fc11 (build/make) sxw perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC-0.04-4.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader-0.23-1.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.09-2.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace-0.10-1.fc12 (build/make) sxw perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple-0.21-1.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest-0.13-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-0.91-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-View-JSON-0.25-1.fc12 (build/make) sxw perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-View-TT-0.29-1.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04005-3.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.09-1.fc11 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.085-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Email-MIME-Creator-1.455-1.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-Email-MIME-Modifier-1.443-2.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-Event-Lib-1.03-6.fc11 (build/make) kwizart,perl-sig perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.03007-1.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear-0.03-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-PDL-2.4.4-3.fc11 (build/make) kasal,orion,mmaslano perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.85-3.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-1.48-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-PPI-Tester-0.06-6.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-Padre-0.32-1.fc11 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.11-3.fc11 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig perl-SVN-Mirror-0.75-2.fc11 (build/make) iburrell,perl-sig perl-SVN-Simple-0.27-7.fc11 (build/make) iburrell,perl-sig perl-Template-Plugin-Class-0.13-6.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.2-7.fc11 (build/make) berrange perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-3.fc12 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.11-2.fc11 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig pg_top-3.6.2-4.fc11 (build/make) itamarjp phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc12 (build/make) jsmidt pl-5.7.6-4.fc11 (build/make) gemi,mef procmail-3.22-23.fc11 (build/make) mlichvar projectM-jack-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) imntreal projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) imntreal projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-4.fc11 (build/make) imntreal protobuf-2.0.2-8.fc11 (build/make) abbot pv-1.1.4-2.fc11 (build/make) jhrozek pyclutter-0.8.2-2.fc11 (build/make) allisson pygsl-0.9.3-4.fc11 (build/make) jamatos pysvn-1.6.3-2.fc11 (build/make) ravenoak pytagger-0.5-2.fc11 (build/make) oget python-basemap-0.99.2-3.fc11 (build/make) jspaleta python-docs-2.6-2.fc11 (build/make) james,ivazquez,rrakus python-gtkextra-1.1.0-7 (build/make) mitr python-openhpi-1.1-3.fc11 (build/make) sharkcz python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-5.2582.fc11 (build/make) lmacken python-py-0.9.2-7.fc11 (build/make) thm python-pylons-0.9.7-0.2.rc4.fc11 (build/make) kylev python-reportlab-2.1-4.fc11 (build/make) bpepple python-sqlalchemy-0.5.3-1.fc12 (build/make) toshio,ivazquez,shahms,toshio,lmacken,fschwarz python-tftpy-0.4.6-3.fc11 (build/make) ivaxer qscintilla-2.3.2-2.fc11 (build/make) rdieter qtiplot-0.9-11.fc11 (build/make) frankb qzion-0.4.0-1.fc11 (build/make) john5342,rdieter ratbox-services-1.2.1-2.fc11 (build/make) mmahut rhm-0.5.3153-2.fc11 (build/make) aconway,nsantos rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc12 (build/make) jussilehtola,rjones rsibreak-0.9.0-10.fc11 (build/make) liquidat,rdieter sblim-cmpi-base-1.5.7-3.fc11 (build/make) vcrhonek scalapack-1.7.5-5.fc11 (build/make) spot seahorse-plugins-2.27.1-1.fc12 (build/make) mclasen,tbzatek sems-1.1.0-7.fc12 (build/make) peter,ondrejj showimg-0.9.5-22.fc11 (build/make) abompard sim-0.9.5-0.16.20080923svn2261rev.fc11 (build/make) hubbitus siril-0.8-7.fc11 (build/make) mmahut smart-1.2-64.fc12 (build/make) athimm smartmontools-5.38-11.fc11 (build/make) mhlavink spambayes-1.0.4-7.fc11 (build/make) xulchris squeak-vm-3.10.4-4.fc11 (build/make) gavin,tuxbrewr supertuxkart-0.6.1-2.fc11 (build/make) limb svgalib-1.9.25-6.fc11 (build/make) rakesh,orion svnkit-1.2.3-1.fc11 (build/make) robmv,akurtakov syck-0.61-8.2.fc11 (build/make) oliver t1utils-1.33-2.fc11 (build/make) jamatos tachyon-0.98.1-1.fc11 (build/make) rathann taipeifonts-1.2-7.fc11 (build/make) cchance,fonts-sig,i18n-team tcptraceroute-1.5-0.7.beta7.fc11 (build/make) sindrepb telepathy-idle-0.1.3-2.fc11 (build/make) bpepple tex-musixtex-0.114-6.rev4.fc11 (build/make) oget thunderbird-3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 (build/make) gecko-maint transifex-0.5.1-2.fc11 (build/make) ivazquez,i18n-team translate-toolkit-1.3.0-2.fc11 (build/make) roozbeh,i18n-team,dwayne ucblogo-6.0-4.fc11 (build/make) gemi un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc11 (build/make) smallvil,fonts-sig,i18n-team,petersen unifdef-1.171-8.fc11 (build/make) dwmw2,jaswinder urw-fonts-2.4-7.fc11 (build/make) than,fonts-sig v4l2ucp-1.3-2.fc12 (build/make) jwrdegoede virt-mem-0.3.1-6.fc11 (build/make) rjones,virtmaint w3c-libwww-5.4.1-0.15.20060206cvs.fc11 (build/make) awjb widelands-0-0.13.Build13.fc11 (build/make) karlik wise2-2.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) alexlan woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc12 (build/make) spot,fonts-sig wvdial-1.60-8.fc11 (build/make) ovasik wxGTK-2.8.10-1.fc11 (build/make) mattdm,sharkcz xfce4-clipman-plugin-1.0.1-1.fc12 (build/make) cwickert xine-ui-0.99.5-11.fc10 (build/make) jussilehtola xmbdfed-4.7-4.fc11 (build/make) spot xmlcopyeditor-1.1.0.6-4.fc9 (build/make) ivazquez xmp-2.5.1-4.fc11 (build/make) rathann xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.12-36.20090514git9656762.fc11 (build/make) bskeggs,ajax,airlied,bskeggs xorg-x11-server-1.6.1.901-1.fc11 (build/make) xgl-maint xpilot-ng-4.7.2-16.fc11 (build/make) wart xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11 (build/make) mzazrive xqilla10-1.0.2-6.fc11 (build/make) mzazrive yap-5.1.1-13.fc11 (build/make) gemi yersinia-0.7.1-3.fc11 (build/make) fab With bugs filed: 4 ---------------------------------- httping-1.2.9-4.fc11 [u'502430 NEW'] (build/make) fab libFoundation-1.1.3-11.fc9 [u'440564 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) athimm perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9 [u'464964 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig smarteiffel-2.3-2.fc9 [u'464923 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) gemi ---------------------------------- Packages by owner: abbot: protobuf abompard: showimg aconway: rhm agoode: minirpc airlied: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau ajax: mesa,mesa,xorg-x11-drv-nouveau akahl: bmpx akurtakov: svnkit alexl: gmime alexlan: wise2 allisson: clutter-cairo,clutter-gst,couchdb,perl-AnyEvent-XMPP,pyclutter anderson: kio_sword ant: gget arbiter: kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons astronomy-sig: gnuradio athimm: fakechroot,libFoundation,maildrop,smart ausil: eric awjb: w3c-libwww balajig8: kpackagekit behdad: libgnomeprint22 belegdol: museek+ bellet: SimGear berrange: mingw32-zlib,perl-Test-AutoBuild bjensen: gmfsk,gmfsk bjohnson: gmime22 bpepple: evolution-brutus,python-reportlab,telepathy-idle bskeggs: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau,xorg-x11-drv-nouveau c4chris: lagan cagney: frysk caillon: epiphany-extensions caolanm: hyphen-hsb cassmodiah: bareftp,hosts3d cchance: taipeifonts cheese: bmpx chitlesh: iverilog,knetstats,kpolynome,ktechlab,ngspice cweyl: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView,perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex,perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder,perl-Catalyst-Devel,perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer,perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema,perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest,perl-Catalyst-View-TT,perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader,perl-DateTimeX-Easy,perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC,perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear,perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP,perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP,perl-RRD-Simple cwickert: gwget,xfce4-clipman-plugin danken: fonts-hebrew-fancy dbhole: java-1.6.0-openjdk,maven2 dchen: UnihanDb deji: atlas,atlas,gnome-scan,kio_sword denis: clutter-cairomm,clutter-gtkmm,cluttermm,gcdmaster,libgnomedb,libgnomedb devrim: classpathx-jaf dledford: lam,libibumad dnovotny: amanda dp67: gmfsk drago01: dbus-c++ dwalluck: classpathx-jaf dwayne: translate-toolkit dwmw2: unifdef ellert: globus-core epienbro: mingw32-libxslt ertzing: audacious,audacious-plugins fab: httping,yersinia farnold: linux-libertine-fonts fitzsim: batik fnasser: geronimo-specs fonts-sig: fonts-ISO8859-2,fonts-hebrew-fancy,ipa-gothic-fonts,ipa-mincho-fonts,ipa-pgothic-fonts,ipa-pmincho-fonts,knm_new-fonts,linux-libertine-fonts,taipeifonts,un-core-fonts,urw-fonts,woodardworks-laconic-fonts frankb: qtiplot fschwarz: python-sqlalchemy gavin: squeak-vm gecko-maint: thunderbird gemi: GtkAda,compat-erlang,ecl,pl,smarteiffel,ucblogo,yap gilboa: gmrun guidoledermann: multiget hubbitus: gloox,sim huzaifas: libgnomedb,libtar,libtar i18n-team: UnihanDb,ddskk,fonts-ISO8859-2,gettext,knm_new-fonts,taipeifonts,transifex,translate-toolkit,un-core-fonts ianweller: fedora-business-cards iarnell: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext,perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode,perl-Catalyst-View-Email,perl-Catalyst-View-Mason,perl-Data-Dump-Streamer iburrell: perl-SVN-Mirror,perl-SVN-Simple imntreal: libprojectM,libprojectM-qt,projectM-jack,projectM-libvisual,projectM-pulseaudio itamarjp: bareftp,mono,pg_top ivaxer: python-tftpy ivazquez: oflb-riordonfancy-fonts,python-docs,python-sqlalchemy,transifex,xmlcopyeditor jamatos: PyKDE,pygsl,t1utils james: python-docs jaswinder: unifdef jcollie: iksemel jhrozek: pv jjohnstn: eclipse-cdt jkratoch: insight jnovy: compat-db john5342: qzion joost: fpc jpye: fityk jreznik: kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdewebdev,kopete-cryptography jsmidt: phoronix-test-suite jspaleta: ScientificPython,python-basemap jussilehtola: gromacs,rpmdepsize,xine-ui jwilson: lcdproc jwrdegoede: gt,v4l2ucp kaboom: gnuchess karlik: widelands karsten: irda-utils kasal: intuitively,libsx,perl-PDL kevin: heartbeat,levien-inconsolata-fonts,linux-libertine-fonts kkofler: arts,eigen2,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kile,kopete-cryptography,kpackagekit konradm: jruby,mpfi kwizart: lcdproc,opencv,perl-Event-Lib kylev: python-pylons langel: batik,java-1.6.0-openjdk,java-1.6.0-openjdk laxathom: mono,mono lfarkas: mingw32-zlib limb: cernlib,chipmunk,etherbat,ettercap,mhash,supertuxkart liquidat: rsibreak lkundrak: fusecompress,grub,grub2,java-1.6.0-openjdk lmacken: fusecompress,python-peak-rules,python-sqlalchemy lokthare: almanah lon: heartbeat ltinkl: kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kopete-cryptography,kpackagekit lucilanga: evolution-rss mathstuf: eigen2,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons mattdm: wxGTK mbarnes: evolution-zimbra,libsoup22 mclasen: libbeagle,seahorse-plugins mef: pl mhlavink: smartmontools mingwmaint: mingw32-zlib mitr: python-gtkextra mjakubicek: orsa mjw: java-1.6.0-openjdk mlichvar: conky,conky,minicom,procmail mmahut: evolution-zimbra,gnuradio,orsa,ratbox-services,siril mmaslano: perl-PDL,perl-Padre,perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl,perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker,perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream monnerat: insight mschwendt: audacious-plugin-fc,compat-wxGTK26 mtasaka: kita,monafont,multiget mzazrive: xqilla,xqilla10 nalin: nss_ldap nomis80: opencv nsantos: rhm oget: kguitar,mscore,pytagger,tex-musixtex oliver: syck ondrejj: sems orion: lasi,netcdf-perl,paraview,perl-PDL,svgalib orphan: gnome-specimen,ldapvi,pcmanx-gtk2 otaylor: mugshot ovasik: inn,wvdial overholt: eclipse-checkstyle pcheung: axis perl-sig: netcdf-perl,perl-AnyEvent-XMPP,perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView,perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext,perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex,perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder,perl-Catalyst-Devel,perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer,perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl,perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema,perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode,perl-Catalyst-View-Email,perl-Catalyst-View-Mason,perl-Catalyst-View-TT,perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader,perl-Data-Dump-Streamer,perl-DateTimeX-Easy,perl-Email-MIME-Creator,perl-Email-MIME-Modifier,perl-Event-Lib,perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC,perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear,perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP,perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP,perl-PPI-Tester,perl-Padre,perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl,perl-RRD-Simple,perl-SVN-Mirror,perl-SVN-Simple,perl-Template-Plugin-Class,perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker,perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream pertusus: cernlib,conky,dap-hdf4_handler,dap-hdf4_handler,fetchmail,fltk,gdal,intuitively,libsx,netcdf-perl,paraview peter: sems petersen: ddskk,gettext,un-core-fonts pfj: mono pgordon: epiphany-extensions phuang: awn-extras-applets pingou: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2,R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51,R-BufferedMatrixMethods,R-hgu95av2probe pjones: grub pknirsch: filesystem pmatilai: compat-db pmuldoon: frysk pvrabec: ntop rafalzaq: glob2 rakesh: gflags,ntop,opencv,svgalib rathann: freefem++,tachyon,xmp ravenoak: pysvn rbhalera: fonts-ISO8859-2 rdieter: Macaulay2,PyKDE,arts,eigen2,eric,fltk,gc,jasper,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kdnssd-avahi,kdnssd-avahi,kile,kopete-cryptography,kpackagekit,qscintilla,qzion,rsibreak rezso: gdal,iverilog rhughes: hal,kpackagekit rishi: libchamplain rjones: fakechroot,libguestfs,mingw32-libxslt,mingw32-qt,mingw32-wpcap,mingw32-zlib,rpmdepsize,virt-mem rmyers: eclipse-checkstyle robmv: svnkit roozbeh: translate-toolkit rrakus: cdrkit,python-docs rstrode: libbonobo s4504kr: kaya sailer: mingw32-qt,mingw32-wpcap,mingw32-zlib salimma: Django,gedit-vala sconklin: gmfsk shahms: python-sqlalchemy sharkcz: codeblocks,python-openhpi,wxGTK sindrepb: awn-extras-applets,firewalk,gmfsk,tcptraceroute smallvil: un-core-fonts smilner: Django spot: R-RScaLAPACK,SimGear,blacs,gbdfed,mhash,nwsclient,perl-Email-MIME-Creator,perl-Email-MIME-Modifier,perl-PPI-Tester,perl-Template-Plugin-Class,scalapack,woodardworks-laconic-fonts,xmbdfed stingray: cuetools svahl: kdebase-workspace,kdebase3 swagiaal: frysk sxw: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace,perl-Catalyst-View-JSON tadej: PyQwt tagoh: emacs-mew,ipa-gothic-fonts,ipa-mincho-fonts,ipa-pgothic-fonts,ipa-pmincho-fonts,knm_new-fonts tbzatek: fpc,seahorse-plugins tgl: mysql than: arts,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kopete-cryptography,urw-fonts thias: autodir,libcaca thl: gmime thm: python-py tmraz: ipsec-tools toshio: python-sqlalchemy,python-sqlalchemy trasher: eric tsmetana: fann tuxbrewr: arts,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kdnssd-avahi,kile,kpackagekit,squeak-vm uwog: asio vcrhonek: fetchmail,kbd,sblim-cmpi-base verdurin: gnomint virtmaint: libguestfs,virt-mem walters: bigboard wart: xpilot-ng xgl-maint: xorg-x11-server xris: orpie xulchris: spambayes -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux From Matt_Domsch at dell.com Wed Jun 10 22:07:42 2009 From: Matt_Domsch at dell.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:07:42 -0500 Subject: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-06-08 i386 Message-ID: <20090610220742.GA2204@mock.linuxdev.us.dell.com> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 using the first rawhide of the Fedora 12 development cycle, cut on 6/8/2008. Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ 2 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE: pan: [u'476250'] ruby-rpm: [u'465103'] Total packages: 7808 Number failed to build: 355 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 17 Leaving: 338 Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 334 ---------------------------------- Django-1.0.2-3.fc11 (build/make) salimma,smilner GtkAda-2.10.2-2.fc11 (build/make) gemi PyKDE-3.16.2-3.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,jamatos PyQuante-1.6.3-1.fc11 (build/make) jussilehtola PyQwt-5.1.0-3.fc11 (build/make) tadej R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-5 (build/make) pingou R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51-1.3.1-3 (build/make) pingou R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.3.0-4.fc11 (build/make) pingou R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11 (build/make) spot R-hgu95av2probe-2.0.0-1.fc9 (build/make) pingou ScientificPython-2.8-4.fc11 (build/make) jspaleta SimGear-1.9.1-5.fc12 (build/make) spot,bellet UnihanDb-5.1.0-7.fc11.1 (build/make) dchen,i18n-team almanah-0.5.0-1.fc11 (build/make) lokthare amanda-2.6.0p2-9.fc12 (build/make) dnovotny arj-3.10.22-8.fc12 (build/make) robert,lyosnorezel arts-1.5.10-5.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-7.fc11 (build/make) spot,fonts-sig,awjb asio-1.2.0-2.fc11 (build/make) uwog asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.15-1.fc11 (build/make) jcollie atasm-1.06-2.fc11 (build/make) sharkcz atlas-3.8.3-4.fc12 (build/make) deji,deji audacious-1.5.1-8.fc12 (build/make) ertzing audacious-plugin-fc-0.3-2 (build/make) mschwendt audacious-plugins-1.5.1-5.fc12 (build/make) ertzing auriferous-1.0.1-7.fc11 (build/make) jwrdegoede autodir-0.99.9-7.fc11 (build/make) thias awn-extras-applets-0.3.2.1-8.fc11 (build/make) phuang,sindrepb axis-1.2.1-4.1.fc10 (build/make) pcheung baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-21.fc11 (build/make) cchance,fonts-sig,i18n-team,petersen bareftp-0.2.2-2.fc12 (build/make) itamarjp,cassmodiah batik-1.7-4.fc11 (build/make) langel,fitzsim beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 (build/make) bigboard-0.6.4-9.fc11 (build/make) walters blacs-1.1-31.fc11 (build/make) spot bmpx-0.40.14-8.fc11 (build/make) akahl,cheese bug-buddy-2.27.1-2.fc12 (unpackaged_files/python-egg-info?) rstrode ccrtp-1.7.1-1.fc11 (build/make) ixs cdrkit-1.1.9-4.fc11 (build/make) rrakus cernlib-2006-32.fc11 (build/make) limb,pertusus chipmunk-4.1.0-6.fc11 (build/make) limb classpathx-jaf-1.0-12.fc10 (build/make) devrim,dwalluck clutter-cairo-0.8.2-3.fc11 (build/make) allisson clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11 (build/make) denis clutter-gst-0.8.0-4.fc11 (build/make) allisson clutter-gtkmm-0.7.4-2.fc11 (build/make) denis cluttermm-0.7.5-2.fc11 (build/make) denis codeblocks-8.02-7.fc11 (build/make) sharkcz compat-db-4.6.21-5.fc10 (build/make) jnovy,pmatilai compat-erlang-R10B-13.11.fc11 (build/make) gemi compat-wxGTK26-2.6.4-7 (build/make) mschwendt cone-0.75-5.fc11 (build/make) steve conky-1.7.0-1.fc12 (build/make) mlichvar,pertusus,mlichvar couchdb-0.9.0-2.fc12 (build/make) allisson cuetools-1.4.0-0.3.svn305.fc11 (build/make) stingray dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.9-2.fc11 (build/make) pertusus,pertusus dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.8.20090203git13281b3.fc11 (build/make) drago01 ddskk-12.2.0-12.fc11 (build/make) petersen,i18n-team django-tagging-0.3-1.fc11.20080217svnr154 (build/make) ivazquez ecl-0.9l-4.fc11 (build/make) gemi eclipse-cdt-5.0.2-2.fc11 (build/make) jjohnstn eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-12.fc11 (build/make) rmyers,overholt eigen2-2.0.52-0.1.20090518.fc12 (build/make) rdieter,kkofler,mathstuf emacs-mew-6.2.51-2.fc11 (build/make) tagoh ember-0.5.6-1.fc12 (build/make) atorkhov,wart epiphany-extensions-2.26.1-2.fc12 (build/make) caillon,pgordon eric-4.3.3-1.fc12 (build/make) rdieter,ausil,trasher etherbat-1.0.1-5.fc11 (build/make) limb ettercap-0.7.3-32.fc11 (build/make) limb evolution-brutus-1.2.35-2.fc11 (build/make) bpepple evolution-rss-0.1.2-9.fc12 (build/make) lucilanga evolution-zimbra-0.1.1-6.fc11 (build/make) mbarnes,mmahut f-spot-0.5.0.3-8.fc11 (build/make) nigelj,dgoodwin fakechroot-2.9-22.fc12 (build/make) athimm,rjones fann-2.0.0-5.1.fc11 (build/make) tsmetana fedora-business-cards-0.2.4-4.fc11 (build/make) ianweller fetchmail-6.3.9-3.fc11 (build/make) vcrhonek,pertusus filesystem-2.4.21-1.fc11 (build/make) pknirsch firewalk-5.0-4.fc11 (build/make) sindrepb fityk-0.8.1-14.fc10 (build/make) jpye fltk-1.1.9-3.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,pertusus freefem++-3.0-5.5.fc11 (patch_fuzz) rathann frysk-0.4-8.fc11 (build/make) cagney,pmuldoon,swagiaal fusecompress-2.5-1.fc12 (build/make) lkundrak,lmacken gauche-gl-0.4.4-4.fc11 (build/make) gemi gauche-gtk-0.4.1-18.fc11 (build/make) gemi gbdfed-1.4-2.fc11 (build/make) spot gbrainy-1.1-3.fc11 (build/make) sereinit gc-7.1-7.fc11 (build/make) rdieter gcdmaster-1.2.2-5.fc11 (build/make) denis gdal-1.6.0-8.fc11 (build/make) rezso,pertusus gedit-vala-0.4.1-2.fc11 (build/make) salimma geronimo-specs-1.0-2.M2.fc10 (build/make) fnasser gettext-0.17-11.fc12 (build/make) petersen,i18n-team gflags-1.0-3.fc11 (build/make) rakesh gget-0.0.4-9.fc11 (build/make) ant glob2-0.9.3-2.fc11 (build/make) rafalzaq globus-core-5.15-4.fc12 (build/make) ellert gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc12 (build/make) hubbitus gmfsk-0.7-0.6.pre1.fc11 (build/make) bjensen,bjensen,sindrepb,sconklin,dp67 gmime-2.4.3-3.fc11 (build/make) alexl,thl gmime22-2.2.23-5.fc11 (build/make) bjohnson gmrun-0.9.2-16.fc11 (build/make) gilboa gnome-scan-0.6.2-1.fc11 (build/make) deji gnomint-0.9.1-5.fc12 (build/make) verdurin gnuchess-5.07-12.fc11 (build/make) kaboom gnuradio-3.1.3-5.fc11 (build/make) mmahut,astronomy-sig gromacs-4.0.4-2.fc11 (build/make) jussilehtola gt-0.4-8.fc11 (build/make) jwrdegoede gwget-1.0.1-2.fc11 (build/make) cwickert gypsy-0.6-8.fc11 (build/make) pbrobinson hal-0.5.12-26.20090226git.fc11 (build/make) rhughes hdf-4.2r4-2.fc11 (build/make) orion,pertusus heartbeat-2.1.4-7.fc12 (build/make) kevin,lon hosts3d-0.98-1.fc11 (build/make) cassmodiah hyphen-hsb-0.20080619-1.fc11 (build/make) caolanm iksemel-1.3-7.fc11 (build/make) jcollie inn-2.4.6-2.fc12 (build/make) ovasik insight-6.8-7.fc11 (build/make) monnerat,jkratoch intuitively-0.7-15.fc11 (build/make) kasal,pertusus ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-2.fc12 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig ipsec-tools-0.7.2-1.fc12 (build/make) tmraz irda-utils-0.9.18-7.fc11 (build/make) karsten iverilog-0.9.20090423-4..fc11 (build/make) rezso,chitlesh jasper-1.900.1-10.fc11 (build/make) rdieter java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-23.b16.fc12 (build/make) langel,lkundrak,dbhole,langel,mjw jruby-1.1.6-3.fc11 (build/make) konradm junitperf-1.9.1-3.2.fc11 (build/make) mwringe kaya-0.5.1-4.fc11 (build/make) s4504kr kdebase-runtime-4.2.85-2.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdebase-workspace-4.2.85-4.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,svahl,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdebase3-3.5.10-8.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,svahl,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,jreznik kdelibs3-3.5.10-11.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl kdemultimedia-4.2.85-2.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdepim-4.2.85-2.fc12 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdeplasma-addons-4.2.85-4.fc12 (build/make) rdieter,than,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,arbiter,mathstuf,jreznik kdevelop-3.5.4-3.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl kdewebdev-3.5.10-2.fc11 (build/make) than,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr,ltinkl,jreznik kdnssd-avahi-0.1.3-0.7.20080116svn.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,rdieter,tuxbrewr kguitar-0.5.1-4.926svn.fc11 (build/make) oget kile-2.0.3-3.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr kio_sword-0.3-9.fc11 (build/make) anderson,deji kita-0.177.5-4.fc11 (build/make) mtasaka knetstats-1.6.1-9.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11 (build/make) tagoh,fonts-sig,i18n-team kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-7.fc11 (build/make) jreznik,rdieter,than,kkofler,ltinkl kpackagekit-0.4.0-7.fc12 (build/make) tuxbrewr,rdieter,rhughes,kkofler,balajig8,ltinkl kpolynome-0.1.2-13.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh ktechlab-0.3.70-1.20090304svn.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh labrea-2.5.1-2.fc10 (build/make) huzaifas ladspa-cmt-plugins-1.16-1.fc11 (build/make) jwrdegoede,nando,oget lagan-2.0-4.fc11 (build/make) c4chris lam-7.1.4-7.fc12 (build/make) dledford lasi-1.1.0-4.fc11 (build/make) orion lat-1.2.3-7.fc12 (build/make) pghmcfc lcdproc-0.5.2-11.fc11 (build/make) kwizart,jwilson ldapvi-1.7-8.fc11 (build/make) orphan levien-inconsolata-fonts-1.01-3.fc11 (build/make) kevin libbeagle-0.3.9-3.fc11 (build/make) mclasen libbonobo-2.24.1-1.fc11 (build/make) rstrode libcaca-0.99-0.7.beta16.fc11 (build/make) thias libchamplain-0.2.9-1.fc11 (build/make) rishi libgdl-2.26.0-1.fc11 (build/make) rishi libgnome-java-2.12.4-11.fc11 (build/make) kasal libgnomedb-3.99.7-3.fc11 (build/make) denis,denis,huzaifas libgnomeprint22-2.18.6-1.fc11 (build/make) behdad libguestfs-1.0.41-1.fc12 (build/make) rjones,virtmaint libibumad-1.3.1-1.fc12 (build/make) dledford libprojectM-1.2.0-9.fc11 (build/make) imntreal libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) imntreal libsoup22-2.2.105-4.fc11 (build/make) mbarnes libsx-2.05-16.fc11 (build/make) kasal,pertusus libtar-1.2.11-11.fc10 (build/make) huzaifas,huzaifas linux-libertine-fonts-4.1.8-1.fc11 (build/make) farnold,fonts-sig,kevin maildrop-2.0.4-9.fc11 (build/make) athimm mesa-7.5-0.14.fc11 (build/make) ajax,ajax mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc12 (build/make) epienbro,rjones mingw32-qt-4.5.0-4.fc11 (build/make) sailer,rjones mingw32-wpcap-4.1.beta5-2.fc11 (build/make) sailer,rjones mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-17.fc12 (build/make) rjones,sailer,berrange,lfarkas,mingwmaint minicom-2.3-4.fc11 (build/make) mlichvar minirpc-0.3.2-3.fc11 (build/make) agoode monafont-2.90-8.fc11 (build/make) mtasaka mono-2.4-19.fc12 (build/make) laxathom,pfj,laxathom,itamarjp mono-nunit22-2.2.10-9.fc11 (build/make) spot monsoon-0.20-2.fc11 (build/make) mpfi-1.3.4-0.5.RC3.fc11 (build/make) konradm mscore-0.9.4-3.fc11 (build/make) oget mugshot-1.2.2-9.fc12 (build/make) otaylor multiget-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) guidoledermann,mtasaka museek+-0.2-1.fc11 (build/make) belegdol mysql-5.1.34-1.fc12 (build/make) tgl nautilus-gdu-0.2-git20090309.1.fc11 (build/make) netcdf-perl-1.2.3-9.fc11 (build/make) orion,perl-sig,pertusus newt-0.52.10-3.fc11 (build/make) mlichvar ngspice-18-2.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh nqc-3.1.6-5.fc12 (build/make) rvinyard nss_ldap-264-2.fc11 (build/make) nalin ntop-3.3.9-5.fc11 (build/make) rakesh,pvrabec nwsclient-1.6.3-3.fc11 (build/make) spot ocaml-libvirt-0.6.1.0-2.fc12 (build/make) rjones,virtmaint,ocamlmaint oflb-riordonfancy-fonts-4-2 (build/make) ivazquez oorexx-3.2.0-4.fc9 (build/make) gemi opencv-1.1.0-0.1.pre1.fc12.1 (build/make) rakesh,nomis80,kwizart orpie-1.5.1-4.fc10 (build/make) xris orsa-0.7.0-8.fc11 (build/make) mjakubicek,mmahut paraview-3.4.0-4.fc11 (build/make) orion,pertusus pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.8-5.fc11 (build/make) orphan perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.4-1.fc11 (build/make) allisson,perl-sig perl-Bio-Graphics-1.94-1.fc12 (build/make) alexlan,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView-0.10-2.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-2.fc11 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex-0.05-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder-0.05-2.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.10-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer-0.05-1.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.03-1.fc11 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.23-1.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP-0.16-5.fc11 (build/make) sxw perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC-0.04-4.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader-0.23-1.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.09-2.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace-0.10-1.fc12 (build/make) sxw perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple-0.21-1.fc12 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest-0.13-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-0.91-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-View-JSON-0.25-1.fc12 (build/make) sxw perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc12 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-Catalyst-View-TT-0.29-1.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04005-3.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.09-1.fc11 (build/make) iarnell,perl-sig perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.085-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Email-MIME-Creator-1.455-1.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-Email-MIME-Modifier-1.443-2.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.03007-1.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-4.fc11 (build/make) chitlesh perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear-0.03-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-PDL-2.4.4-3.fc11 (build/make) kasal,orion,mmaslano perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.85-3.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-1.48-2.fc11 (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig perl-PPI-Tester-0.06-6.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-Padre-0.32-1.fc11 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.11-3.fc11 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig perl-SVN-Mirror-0.75-2.fc11 (build/make) iburrell,perl-sig perl-SVN-Simple-0.27-7.fc11 (build/make) iburrell,perl-sig perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-2.fc11 (build/make) steve,perl-sig,berrange perl-Template-Plugin-Class-0.13-6.fc11 (build/make) spot,perl-sig perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.2-7.fc11 (build/make) berrange perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-3.fc12 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.11-2.fc11 (build/make) mmaslano,perl-sig pg_top-3.6.2-4.fc11 (build/make) itamarjp phasex-0.11.1-6.fc11 (build/make) green pl-5.7.6-4.fc11 (build/make) gemi,mef procmail-3.22-23.fc11 (build/make) mlichvar projectM-jack-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) imntreal projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) imntreal projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-4.fc11 (build/make) imntreal protobuf-2.0.2-8.fc11 (build/make) abbot pv-1.1.4-2.fc11 (build/make) jhrozek pyclutter-0.8.2-2.fc11 (build/make) allisson pygsl-0.9.3-4.fc11 (build/make) jamatos pysvn-1.6.3-2.fc11 (build/make) ravenoak pytagger-0.5-2.fc11 (build/make) oget python-basemap-0.99.2-3.fc11 (build/make) jspaleta python-docs-2.6-2.fc11 (build/make) james,ivazquez,rrakus python-gtkextra-1.1.0-7 (build/make) mitr python-openhpi-1.1-3.fc11 (build/make) sharkcz python-py-0.9.2-7.fc11 (build/make) thm python-sqlalchemy-0.5.3-1.fc12 (build/make) toshio,ivazquez,shahms,toshio,lmacken,fschwarz python-tftpy-0.4.6-3.fc11 (build/make) ivaxer qscintilla-2.3.2-2.fc11 (build/make) rdieter qtiplot-0.9-11.fc11 (build/make) frankb qzion-0.4.0-1.fc11 (build/make) john5342,rdieter rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc12 (build/make) jussilehtola,rjones rsibreak-0.9.0-10.fc11 (build/make) liquidat,rdieter rtaudio-4.0.5-3.fc11 (build/make) oget ruby-openid-2.1.4-2.fc11 (build/make) allisson sane-frontends-1.0.14-6.fc11 (build/make) nphilipp sblim-cmpi-base-1.5.7-3.fc11 (build/make) vcrhonek scalapack-1.7.5-5.fc11 (build/make) spot seahorse-plugins-2.27.1-1.fc12 (build/make) mclasen,tbzatek sems-1.1.0-7.fc12 (build/make) peter,ondrejj showimg-0.9.5-22.fc11 (build/make) abompard sim-0.9.5-0.16.20080923svn2261rev.fc11 (build/make) hubbitus siril-0.8-7.fc11 (build/make) mmahut smart-1.2-64.fc12 (build/make) athimm smartmontools-5.38-11.fc11 (build/make) mhlavink soprano-2.2.3-1.fc11 (build/make) rdieter,kkofler,arbiter spambayes-1.0.4-7.fc11 (build/make) xulchris squeak-vm-3.10.4-4.fc11 (build/make) gavin,tuxbrewr supertuxkart-0.6.1-2.fc11 (build/make) limb svgalib-1.9.25-6.fc11 (build/make) rakesh,orion svnkit-1.2.3-1.fc11 (build/make) robmv,akurtakov syck-0.61-8.2.fc11 (build/make) oliver t1utils-1.33-2.fc11 (build/make) jamatos tachyon-0.98.1-1.fc11 (build/make) rathann tango-icon-theme-0.8.90-1.fc11 (build/make) pgordon tcptraceroute-1.5-0.7.beta7.fc11 (build/make) sindrepb teamgit-0.0.9-3.20090205.fc11 (build/make) terjeros telepathy-idle-0.1.3-2.fc11 (build/make) bpepple trackballs-1.1.4-9.fc11 (build/make) jwrdegoede transifex-0.5.1-2.fc11 (build/make) ivazquez,i18n-team translate-toolkit-1.3.0-2.fc11 (build/make) roozbeh,i18n-team,dwayne ucblogo-6.0-4.fc11 (build/make) gemi un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc11 (build/make) smallvil,fonts-sig,i18n-team,petersen unifdef-1.171-8.fc11 (build/make) dwmw2,jaswinder v4l2ucp-1.3-2.fc12 (build/make) jwrdegoede varnish-2.0.3-2.fc11 (build/make) ingvar virt-mem-0.3.1-6.fc11 (build/make) rjones,virtmaint w3c-libwww-5.4.1-0.15.20060206cvs.fc11 (build/make) awjb widelands-0-0.13.Build13.fc11 (build/make) karlik wise2-2.2.0-5.fc11 (build/make) alexlan woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc12 (build/make) spot,fonts-sig wvdial-1.60-8.fc11 (build/make) ovasik wxGTK-2.8.10-1.fc11 (build/make) mattdm,sharkcz xfce4-clipman-plugin-1.0.1-1.fc12 (build/make) cwickert xine-ui-0.99.5-11.fc10 (build/make) jussilehtola xmbdfed-4.7-4.fc11 (build/make) spot xmlcopyeditor-1.1.0.6-4.fc9 (build/make) ivazquez xmp-2.5.1-4.fc11 (build/make) rathann xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.12-36.20090514git9656762.fc11 (build/make) bskeggs,ajax,airlied,bskeggs xorg-x11-server-1.6.1.901-1.fc11 (build/make) xgl-maint xpilot-ng-4.7.2-16.fc11 (build/make) wart xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11 (build/make) mzazrive xqilla10-1.0.2-6.fc11 (build/make) mzazrive yap-5.1.1-13.fc11 (build/make) gemi yersinia-0.7.1-3.fc11 (build/make) fab zsh-4.3.9-4.fc11 (build/make) james With bugs filed: 4 ---------------------------------- httping-1.2.9-4.fc11 [u'502430 NEW'] (build/make) fab libFoundation-1.1.3-11.fc9 [u'440564 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) athimm perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9 [u'464964 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) cweyl,perl-sig smarteiffel-2.3-2.fc9 [u'464923 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) gemi ---------------------------------- Packages by owner: abbot: protobuf abompard: showimg agoode: minirpc airlied: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau ajax: mesa,mesa,xorg-x11-drv-nouveau akahl: bmpx akurtakov: svnkit alexl: gmime alexlan: perl-Bio-Graphics,wise2 allisson: clutter-cairo,clutter-gst,couchdb,perl-AnyEvent-XMPP,pyclutter,ruby-openid anderson: kio_sword ant: gget arbiter: kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,soprano astronomy-sig: gnuradio athimm: fakechroot,libFoundation,maildrop,smart atorkhov: ember ausil: eric awjb: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts,w3c-libwww balajig8: kpackagekit behdad: libgnomeprint22 belegdol: museek+ bellet: SimGear berrange: mingw32-zlib,perl-Sys-Virt,perl-Test-AutoBuild bjensen: gmfsk,gmfsk bjohnson: gmime22 bpepple: evolution-brutus,telepathy-idle bskeggs: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau,xorg-x11-drv-nouveau c4chris: lagan cagney: frysk caillon: epiphany-extensions caolanm: hyphen-hsb cassmodiah: bareftp,hosts3d cchance: baekmuk-ttf-fonts cheese: bmpx chitlesh: iverilog,knetstats,kpolynome,ktechlab,ngspice,perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy cweyl: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView,perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex,perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder,perl-Catalyst-Devel,perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer,perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema,perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest,perl-Catalyst-View-TT,perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader,perl-DateTimeX-Easy,perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC,perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear,perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP,perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP,perl-RRD-Simple cwickert: gwget,xfce4-clipman-plugin dbhole: java-1.6.0-openjdk dchen: UnihanDb deji: atlas,atlas,gnome-scan,kio_sword denis: clutter-cairomm,clutter-gtkmm,cluttermm,gcdmaster,libgnomedb,libgnomedb devrim: classpathx-jaf dgoodwin: f-spot dledford: lam,libibumad dnovotny: amanda dp67: gmfsk drago01: dbus-c++ dwalluck: classpathx-jaf dwayne: translate-toolkit dwmw2: unifdef ellert: globus-core epienbro: mingw32-libxslt ertzing: audacious,audacious-plugins fab: httping,yersinia farnold: linux-libertine-fonts fitzsim: batik fnasser: geronimo-specs fonts-sig: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts,baekmuk-ttf-fonts,ipa-gothic-fonts,ipa-mincho-fonts,ipa-pgothic-fonts,ipa-pmincho-fonts,knm_new-fonts,linux-libertine-fonts,un-core-fonts,woodardworks-laconic-fonts frankb: qtiplot fschwarz: python-sqlalchemy gavin: squeak-vm gemi: GtkAda,compat-erlang,ecl,gauche-gl,gauche-gtk,oorexx,pl,smarteiffel,ucblogo,yap gilboa: gmrun green: phasex guidoledermann: multiget hubbitus: gloox,sim huzaifas: labrea,libgnomedb,libtar,libtar i18n-team: UnihanDb,baekmuk-ttf-fonts,ddskk,gettext,knm_new-fonts,transifex,translate-toolkit,un-core-fonts ianweller: fedora-business-cards iarnell: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext,perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode,perl-Catalyst-View-Email,perl-Catalyst-View-Mason,perl-Data-Dump-Streamer iburrell: perl-SVN-Mirror,perl-SVN-Simple imntreal: libprojectM,libprojectM-qt,projectM-jack,projectM-libvisual,projectM-pulseaudio ingvar: varnish itamarjp: bareftp,mono,pg_top ivaxer: python-tftpy ivazquez: django-tagging,oflb-riordonfancy-fonts,python-docs,python-sqlalchemy,transifex,xmlcopyeditor ixs: ccrtp jamatos: PyKDE,pygsl,t1utils james: python-docs,zsh jaswinder: unifdef jcollie: asterisk-sounds-core,iksemel jhrozek: pv jjohnstn: eclipse-cdt jkratoch: insight jnovy: compat-db john5342: qzion jpye: fityk jreznik: kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdewebdev,kopete-cryptography jspaleta: ScientificPython,python-basemap jussilehtola: PyQuante,gromacs,rpmdepsize,xine-ui jwilson: lcdproc jwrdegoede: auriferous,gt,ladspa-cmt-plugins,trackballs,v4l2ucp kaboom: gnuchess karlik: widelands karsten: irda-utils kasal: intuitively,libgnome-java,libsx,perl-PDL kevin: heartbeat,levien-inconsolata-fonts,linux-libertine-fonts kkofler: arts,eigen2,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kile,kopete-cryptography,kpackagekit,soprano konradm: jruby,mpfi kwizart: lcdproc,opencv langel: batik,java-1.6.0-openjdk,java-1.6.0-openjdk laxathom: mono,mono lfarkas: mingw32-zlib limb: cernlib,chipmunk,etherbat,ettercap,supertuxkart liquidat: rsibreak lkundrak: fusecompress,java-1.6.0-openjdk lmacken: fusecompress,python-sqlalchemy lokthare: almanah lon: heartbeat ltinkl: kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kopete-cryptography,kpackagekit lucilanga: evolution-rss lyosnorezel: arj mathstuf: eigen2,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons mattdm: wxGTK mbarnes: evolution-zimbra,libsoup22 mclasen: libbeagle,seahorse-plugins mef: pl mhlavink: smartmontools mingwmaint: mingw32-zlib mitr: python-gtkextra mjakubicek: orsa mjw: java-1.6.0-openjdk mlichvar: conky,conky,minicom,newt,procmail mmahut: evolution-zimbra,gnuradio,orsa,siril mmaslano: perl-PDL,perl-Padre,perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl,perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker,perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream monnerat: insight mschwendt: audacious-plugin-fc,compat-wxGTK26 mtasaka: kita,monafont,multiget mwringe: junitperf mzazrive: xqilla,xqilla10 nalin: nss_ldap nando: ladspa-cmt-plugins nigelj: f-spot nomis80: opencv nphilipp: sane-frontends ocamlmaint: ocaml-libvirt oget: kguitar,ladspa-cmt-plugins,mscore,pytagger,rtaudio oliver: syck ondrejj: sems orion: hdf,lasi,netcdf-perl,paraview,perl-PDL,svgalib orphan: ldapvi,pcmanx-gtk2 otaylor: mugshot ovasik: inn,wvdial overholt: eclipse-checkstyle pbrobinson: gypsy pcheung: axis perl-sig: netcdf-perl,perl-AnyEvent-XMPP,perl-Bio-Graphics,perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView,perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext,perl-Catalyst-Controller-BindLex,perl-Catalyst-Controller-FormBuilder,perl-Catalyst-Devel,perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer,perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl,perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema,perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode,perl-Catalyst-View-Email,perl-Catalyst-View-Mason,perl-Catalyst-View-TT,perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader,perl-Data-Dump-Streamer,perl-DateTimeX-Easy,perl-Email-MIME-Creator,perl-Email-MIME-Modifier,perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC,perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear,perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP,perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP,perl-PPI-Tester,perl-Padre,perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl,perl-RRD-Simple,perl-SVN-Mirror,perl-SVN-Simple,perl-Sys-Virt,perl-Template-Plugin-Class,perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker,perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream pertusus: cernlib,conky,dap-hdf4_handler,dap-hdf4_handler,fetchmail,fltk,gdal,hdf,intuitively,libsx,netcdf-perl,paraview peter: sems petersen: baekmuk-ttf-fonts,ddskk,gettext,un-core-fonts pfj: mono pghmcfc: lat pgordon: epiphany-extensions,tango-icon-theme phuang: awn-extras-applets pingou: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2,R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51,R-BufferedMatrixMethods,R-hgu95av2probe pknirsch: filesystem pmatilai: compat-db pmuldoon: frysk pvrabec: ntop rafalzaq: glob2 rakesh: gflags,ntop,opencv,svgalib rathann: freefem++,tachyon,xmp ravenoak: pysvn rdieter: PyKDE,arts,eigen2,eric,fltk,gc,jasper,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kdnssd-avahi,kdnssd-avahi,kile,kopete-cryptography,kpackagekit,qscintilla,qzion,rsibreak,soprano rezso: gdal,iverilog rhughes: hal,kpackagekit rishi: libchamplain,libgdl rjones: fakechroot,libguestfs,mingw32-libxslt,mingw32-qt,mingw32-wpcap,mingw32-zlib,ocaml-libvirt,rpmdepsize,virt-mem rmyers: eclipse-checkstyle robert: arj robmv: svnkit roozbeh: translate-toolkit rrakus: cdrkit,python-docs rstrode: bug-buddy,libbonobo rvinyard: nqc s4504kr: kaya sailer: mingw32-qt,mingw32-wpcap,mingw32-zlib salimma: Django,gedit-vala sconklin: gmfsk sereinit: gbrainy shahms: python-sqlalchemy sharkcz: atasm,codeblocks,python-openhpi,wxGTK sindrepb: awn-extras-applets,firewalk,gmfsk,tcptraceroute smallvil: un-core-fonts smilner: Django spot: R-RScaLAPACK,SimGear,artwiz-aleczapka-fonts,blacs,gbdfed,mono-nunit22,nwsclient,perl-Email-MIME-Creator,perl-Email-MIME-Modifier,perl-PPI-Tester,perl-Template-Plugin-Class,scalapack,woodardworks-laconic-fonts,xmbdfed steve: cone,perl-Sys-Virt stingray: cuetools svahl: kdebase-workspace,kdebase3 swagiaal: frysk sxw: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP,perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace,perl-Catalyst-View-JSON tadej: PyQwt tagoh: emacs-mew,ipa-gothic-fonts,ipa-mincho-fonts,ipa-pgothic-fonts,ipa-pmincho-fonts,knm_new-fonts tbzatek: seahorse-plugins terjeros: teamgit tgl: mysql than: arts,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kopete-cryptography thias: autodir,libcaca thl: gmime thm: python-py tmraz: ipsec-tools toshio: python-sqlalchemy,python-sqlalchemy trasher: eric tsmetana: fann tuxbrewr: arts,kdebase-runtime,kdebase-workspace,kdebase3,kdelibs3,kdemultimedia,kdepim,kdeplasma-addons,kdevelop,kdewebdev,kdnssd-avahi,kile,kpackagekit,squeak-vm uwog: asio vcrhonek: fetchmail,sblim-cmpi-base verdurin: gnomint virtmaint: libguestfs,ocaml-libvirt,virt-mem walters: bigboard wart: ember,xpilot-ng xgl-maint: xorg-x11-server xris: orpie xulchris: spambayes -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 04:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110402.n5B42rfb018320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-06-11 00:02:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! I will take care those issues at time of cvs import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lcdf-typetools Short Description: The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts Owners: pnemade Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 04:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110425.n5B4Phch024933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Platform|All |powerpc Version|10 |11 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #41 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-11 00:25:39 EDT --- Old issue is back with F-11 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/garbled_fonts.f11.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 04:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up on F-11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110426.n5B4QYxA004781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|font rendering is messed up |font rendering is messed up |after 20081007 changes |on F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 04:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up on F-11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110452.n5B4qEjr011827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #42 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-11 00:52:13 EDT --- I just tried to rebuild driver from git at fd.o - while isssue with completely unuseable fonts (See screenshot above) was gone, the other issue with slight font corruption is still here: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/garbled_fonts_yellow_stripes.f11.png Note the yellow noise at the right side of some text. BTW I just tried to start glxgears using driver from F-11 - it just locks my machine (Apple Mac Mini G4). And if I start glxgears using driver from git, then I saw the coppupted colors (already seen before - http://peter.fedorapeople.org/glxgears.png from this ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473440 ) I also encountered strange behavior with input fields (such as this one, where I'm writing this text) - sometimes they are completely filled by black, and I need to overlap them with some other window (xterm) to make them visible again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110800.n5B80QaU016495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 04:00:25 EDT --- cvs done Summary should not repeat package name - suggest "Tools for manipulating OpenType fonts". Also added fonts-sig to cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Jun 11 13:45:54 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 11 Jun 2009 13:45:54 -0000 Subject: [Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090611134554.28244.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466029] fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111952.n5BJqCsD030722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029 G?ran Uddeborg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |11 --- Comment #2 from G?ran Uddeborg 2009-06-11 15:52:11 EDT --- The problem is exactly the same in Fedora 11 (fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-11.fc11.noarch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kpalagin at openoffice.org Fri Jun 12 03:58:47 2009 From: kpalagin at openoffice.org (kpalagin at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Jun 2009 03:58:47 -0000 Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090612035847.10323.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 User kpalagin changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hdu,nmailhot,|'fedorafonts,hdu,kpalagin, |pagalmes,pl,pmike,tessarak|nmailhot,pagalmes,pl,pmike |t' |,tessarakt' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from kpalagin at openoffice.org Fri Jun 12 03:58:46 +0000 2009 ------- kstribley, do we have an integration target for this feature? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 05:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120542.n5C5gu7V026151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-12 01:42:55 EDT --- Ping Nicolas? Can we close this bug now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pnemade at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 12 09:06:23 2009 From: pnemade at fedoraproject.org (pnemade) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel Makefile, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, NONE, 1.1 lcdf-typetools.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7 dead.package, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090612090623.9326C7010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pnemade Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9806/devel Added Files: Makefile import.log lcdf-typetools.spec sources Removed Files: dead.package Log Message: - Initial import for devel Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: Makefile diff -N Makefile --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ Makefile 12 Jun 2009 09:05:53 -0000 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Makefile for source rpm: lcdf-typetools +# $Id$ +NAME := lcdf-typetools +SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) + +define find-makefile-common +for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done +endef + +MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) + +ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) +# attept a checkout +define checkout-makefile-common +test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 +endef + +MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) +endif + +include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE import.log --- lcdf-typetools-2_78-1_fc10:HEAD:lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10.src.rpm:1244797675 Index: lcdf-typetools.spec =================================================================== RCS file: lcdf-typetools.spec diff -N lcdf-typetools.spec --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ lcdf-typetools.spec 12 Jun 2009 09:05:53 -0000 1.8 @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +Name: lcdf-typetools +Version: 2.78 +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Tools for manipulating OpenType fonts +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2+ +URL: http://www.lcdf.org +Source0: http://www.lcdf.org/type/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + +BuildRequires: kpathsea-devel + +%description +The LCDF Typetools package contains several programs for manipulating +PostScript Type 1, Type 1 multiple master, and PostScript-flavored OpenType +fonts. LCDF Typetools includes the mmafm and mmpfb programs, which were +formerly distributed as part of a different package (mminstance) + +%prep +%setup -q + + +%build +%configure +make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} + + +%install +rm -rf %{buildroot} +make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" + +%clean +rm -rf %{buildroot} + + +%files +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc COPYING NEWS ONEWS README +%{_bindir}/cfftot1 +%{_bindir}/mmafm +%{_bindir}/mmpfb +%{_bindir}/otfinfo +%{_bindir}/otftotfm +%{_bindir}/t1dotlessj +%{_bindir}/t1lint +%{_bindir}/t1reencode +%{_bindir}/t1testpage +%{_bindir}/ttftotype42 +%{_bindir}/t1rawafm +%{_mandir}/man*/* +%{_datadir}/lcdf-typetools + +%changelog +* Thu May 21 2009 Parag Nemade - 2.78-1 +- Initial specfile for Fedora + + Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: sources diff -N sources --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ sources 12 Jun 2009 09:05:53 -0000 1.7 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +88418a4aca055f9911f7bb9035491feb lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz --- dead.package DELETED --- From pnemade at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 12 09:09:17 2009 From: pnemade at fedoraproject.org (pnemade) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel .cvsignore,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090612090917.CBB437010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pnemade Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10973 Added Files: .cvsignore Log Message: - added .cvsignore Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: .cvsignore diff -N .cvsignore --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ .cvsignore 12 Jun 2009 09:08:47 -0000 1.7 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz From eroshin at openoffice.org Fri Jun 12 12:04:28 2009 From: eroshin at openoffice.org (eroshin at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Jun 2009 12:04:28 -0000 Subject: [Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090612120428.14370.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 ------- Additional comments from eroshin at openoffice.org Fri Jun 12 12:04:28 +0000 2009 ------- Please, try to rebuild font cache with fc-cache. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From kpalagin at openoffice.org Fri Jun 12 15:56:19 2009 From: kpalagin at openoffice.org (kpalagin at openoffice.org) Date: 12 Jun 2009 15:56:19 -0000 Subject: [Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090612155619.27772.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 User kpalagin changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts' |'fedorafonts,kpalagin' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 01:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130120.n5D1KC38023673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 Christopher Beland changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |11 --- Comment #10 from Christopher Beland 2009-06-12 21:20:11 EDT --- I believe this is the new feature that was mentioned: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller With Fedora 11 and firefox-3.5-0.20.beta4.fc11.x86_64, I'm still seeing undisplayable glyphs at: http://www.wikipedia.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenician_alphabet#Encoding I didn't get any popup or anything saying that an additional font was necessary to display these glyphs; shouldn't I have? I Googled "freefont sans", but it's unclear to me what I'm supposed to be looking for, Behdad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 08:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130831.n5D8VkI6018273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 04:31:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > 4) Not an issue, but I will mention it upfront. Upstream includes the MS > TrueType fonts The licensing of those fonts does not comply with our guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Legal_considerations We basically require the same freedom to distribute and modify of our fonts than of our software. Also, even if they did, we'd ask to locate the font upstream and package it separately http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts Bundling fonts is prohibited. Fonts must be split out cleanly so they can be installed separately and reused by other packages Also, when a project relies on default fonts from another OS or Linux distribution, you have to ask yourself if the look, feel and metrics of those fonts is required before hunting for the closest substitute. If the software does not rely on some exact font characteristic, reconfiguring it to use Fedora default fonts instead is much preferred. The Liberation fonts are metrically-equivalent to some MS fonts. However they are *not* our default font, so forcing their use will make your application stand out in Fedora. Also they have a lot less Unicode coverage than Dejavu Fonts. GNU free fonts are not installed at all by default in Fedora and are not present on liveCDs and other physical distribution media. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F A lot of the symbols in symbol.ttf have long been attributed standard unicode values. If this software properly references those symbols by their unicode codepoint (and not the old legacy symbol-specific codepoint) any unicode font with coverage of the associated unicode blocks will work for you (DejaVu includes most common symbols). If this is not good enough for you, you can look at openoffice's opensymbol (and open a bug dejavu-side to request the missing symbol). Lastly, if you have all those problems, that's probably because this software does not use fontconfig. Fontconfig has been the default font management stack for many years on modern Unixes and anything using X. It will locate for you the most appropriate installed font transparently. Using something else is broken by design nowadays, and you'll have no end of font-related problems till the software is switched to use fontconfig (unlike under windows, the font complement varies from Unix to Unix and release to release, Unix font Unicode coverage is not and won't ever be exactly the same as windows fonts, etc). The only correct mid-term solution is getting this software ported to fontconfig, usually using a higher-level library like pango-cairo. (and if it manages PDFs is should probably take a look at poppler too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 08:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130839.n5D8dOxq019740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 04:39:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I believe this is the new feature that was mentioned: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller This feature mostly works for gnome-based apps nowadays. Not sure what firefox uses. You should ask in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 08:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130846.n5D8kTR9021499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gecko-bugs-nobody at fedorapro | |ject.org, | |walters at verbum.org Component|dejavu-fonts |firefox AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |gecko-bugs-nobody at fedorapro | |ject.org --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 04:46:28 EDT --- Moving to Firefox component as we do have fonts supporting Ph?nician in the distro nowadays so it should plug in the autofonts install framework and propose to install them (@ben: adding Ph?nician to dejavu would be nice though) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Sat Jun 13 08:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22268] New: [RFE] =?utf-8?q?_Add_Ph=C5=93nician_support?= Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22268 Summary: [RFE] Add Ph?nician support Product: DejaVu Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: General AssignedTo: dejavu-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com See http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131524.n5DFOxCw009873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505758] New: inconsistent opentype font label Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: inconsistent opentype font label https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505758 Summary: inconsistent opentype font label Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file identifies OTF font files as "OpenType font data " (trailing space) when the label for TTF font files is "TrueType font data" (no trailing space) Please make them consistent Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505759] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with groff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131533.n5DFXF5g021737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|file does not identify |file does not identify |properly some pfa files |properly some pfa files | |shipped with groff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505759] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa files in groff-1.18.1.4-17.fc11.x86_64.rpm are "PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0" They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505762] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are "PostScript document text" (for example hrscc.pfa) They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505759] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with groff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131549.n5DFnuQU015080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 11:49:55 EDT --- Full list: ./usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/font/devps/symbolsl.pfa PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0 groff-1.18.1.4-17.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/font/devps/zapfdr.pfa PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0 groff-1.18.1.4-17.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131550.n5DFojWa015599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|file does not identify |file does not identify |properly some pcf.gz files |properly some pcf.gz files | |shipped in | |japanese-bitmap-fonts --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 11:50:44 EDT --- Full list ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/kaname-latin1.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knm12p.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knm12pb.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knmzn12x.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knmzn12xb.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505762] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131549.n5DFnSCX015011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 11:49:28 EDT --- Full list ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrgrr.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hritr.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrpld.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrpldi.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrplt.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrplti.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrscc.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrscs.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:54:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505764] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are "PostScript document text" They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 Full list: ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrb-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrbo-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrr-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrro-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvb-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvbo-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvr-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvro-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmb-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmbi-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmr-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmri-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 16:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505765] New: file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks some pfb files in texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm are "8086 relocatable (Microsoft)" They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font program data" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 Full list: ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcb10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx5.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx6.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbxsl1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbxti1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmccsc10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmccsc8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmccsc9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcinch7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcitt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsltt1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssbx1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssdc1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssq8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssqi8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcti10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcti12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcti7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcti8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcti9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmctt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmctt12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmctt8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmctt9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcu10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr5.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr6.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcyr9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csb10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbx10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbx12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbx5.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbx6.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbx7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbx8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbx9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbxsl10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csbxti10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cscsc10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csdunh10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csff10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csfi10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csfib8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csinch.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csitt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr5.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr6.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csr9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cssl10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cssl12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cssl8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cssl9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cssltt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csss10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csss12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csss17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csss8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csss9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssbx10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssdc10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssi10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssi12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssi17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssi8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssi9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssq8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csssqi8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstcsc10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 16:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505765] file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131603.n5DG3eF2028190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 12:03:39 EDT --- ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csu10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csvtt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 17:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa file in enscript-1.6.4-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is a "PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0, type EPS" It should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 Full list: ./usr/share/enscript/afm/matrix.pfa PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0, type EPS enscript-1.6.4-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From fropeter at openoffice.org Sat Jun 13 20:34:06 2009 From: fropeter at openoffice.org (fropeter at openoffice.org) Date: 13 Jun 2009 20:34:06 -0000 Subject: [Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090613203406.2608.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 ------- Additional comments from fropeter at openoffice.org Sat Jun 13 20:34:06 +0000 2009 ------- I reverted the name of the directory to it's old one, including underscore characters. As before, OO Writer didn't show those fonts. Then I ran fc-cache as my normal user. The fonts now show up as they should. The problem is solved. I don't understand, though, why I can add a directory without underscore characters in the name, and the fonts in it are found, whereas directories _with_ underscore in their names are not read. Should this still be considered a bug? If so, is it a Fedora or OOo bug? Thanks for the help in solving my problem. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From kpalagin at openoffice.org Sun Jun 14 05:20:27 2009 From: kpalagin at openoffice.org (kpalagin at openoffice.org) Date: 14 Jun 2009 05:20:27 -0000 Subject: [Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090614052027.2596.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 User kpalagin changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,kpalagin' |'eroshin,fedorafonts,kpala | |gin,pmike' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505911] New: Intel 3945abg wireless bandwidth Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Intel 3945abg wireless bandwidth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505911 Summary: Intel 3945abg wireless bandwidth Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: mac at matt7.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa at redhat.com, andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: bandwith limited to around 1mb/s on intel wireless 3945abg card in fedora 11. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot fedora 11 with an intel 3945abc wireless card 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: tested on dell xps m1530 laptop & inspiron 9400 laptop. problem not present in fedora 10/xp triboot on same laptops. on intital connection to the wireless network all bandwidth is availble for a few minutes before it gets limited. issue is present in some versions of other distros maybe something kernel/driver related breaking? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505911] Intel 3945abg wireless bandwidth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141734.n5EHYLdl011708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505911 Matt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net Component|artwiz-aleczapka-fonts |iwl3945-firmware -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141745.n5EHjKil014061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-14 13:45:19 EDT --- hi, redone.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts.spec all results from the mock build are at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pnemade at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 15 05:11:06 2009 From: pnemade at fedoraproject.org (pnemade) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 lcdf-typetools.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <20090615051106.2DA40700D9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pnemade Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29286 Added Files: .cvsignore lcdf-typetools.spec sources Log Message: - Initial release for F-11 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: .cvsignore diff -N .cvsignore --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jun 2009 05:10:35 -0000 1.7 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz Index: lcdf-typetools.spec =================================================================== RCS file: lcdf-typetools.spec diff -N lcdf-typetools.spec --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ lcdf-typetools.spec 15 Jun 2009 05:10:35 -0000 1.8 @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +Name: lcdf-typetools +Version: 2.78 +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Tools for manipulating OpenType fonts +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2+ +URL: http://www.lcdf.org +Source0: http://www.lcdf.org/type/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + +BuildRequires: kpathsea-devel + +%description +The LCDF Typetools package contains several programs for manipulating +PostScript Type 1, Type 1 multiple master, and PostScript-flavored OpenType +fonts. LCDF Typetools includes the mmafm and mmpfb programs, which were +formerly distributed as part of a different package (mminstance) + +%prep +%setup -q + + +%build +%configure +make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} + + +%install +rm -rf %{buildroot} +make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" + +%clean +rm -rf %{buildroot} + + +%files +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc COPYING NEWS ONEWS README +%{_bindir}/cfftot1 +%{_bindir}/mmafm +%{_bindir}/mmpfb +%{_bindir}/otfinfo +%{_bindir}/otftotfm +%{_bindir}/t1dotlessj +%{_bindir}/t1lint +%{_bindir}/t1reencode +%{_bindir}/t1testpage +%{_bindir}/ttftotype42 +%{_bindir}/t1rawafm +%{_mandir}/man*/* +%{_datadir}/lcdf-typetools + +%changelog +* Thu May 21 2009 Parag Nemade - 2.78-1 +- Initial specfile for Fedora + + Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: sources diff -N sources --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ sources 15 Jun 2009 05:10:35 -0000 1.7 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +88418a4aca055f9911f7bb9035491feb lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz From pnemade at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 15 05:13:30 2009 From: pnemade at fedoraproject.org (pnemade) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11 Makefile,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090615051330.F16FE700D9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pnemade Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30079 Added Files: Makefile Log Message: - Adding missing Makefile Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: Makefile diff -N Makefile --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ Makefile 15 Jun 2009 05:13:00 -0000 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Makefile for source rpm: lcdf-typetools +# $Id$ +NAME := lcdf-typetools +SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) + +define find-makefile-common +for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done +endef + +MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) + +ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) +# attept a checkout +define checkout-makefile-common +test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 +endef + +MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) +endif + +include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) From pnemade at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 15 05:22:29 2009 From: pnemade at fedoraproject.org (pnemade) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 Makefile, 1.2, 1.3 lcdf-typetools.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7 branch, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090615052229.83AB6700D9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pnemade Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv468 Modified Files: branch Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile lcdf-typetools.spec sources Log Message: - Initial release for F-10 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: .cvsignore diff -N .cvsignore --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jun 2009 05:21:58 -0000 1.7 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: Makefile diff -N Makefile --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ Makefile 15 Jun 2009 05:21:58 -0000 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Makefile for source rpm: lcdf-typetools +# $Id$ +NAME := lcdf-typetools +SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) + +define find-makefile-common +for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done +endef + +MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) + +ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) +# attept a checkout +define checkout-makefile-common +test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 +endef + +MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) +endif + +include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) Index: lcdf-typetools.spec =================================================================== RCS file: lcdf-typetools.spec diff -N lcdf-typetools.spec --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ lcdf-typetools.spec 15 Jun 2009 05:21:59 -0000 1.8 @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +Name: lcdf-typetools +Version: 2.78 +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Tools for manipulating OpenType fonts +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2+ +URL: http://www.lcdf.org +Source0: http://www.lcdf.org/type/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + +BuildRequires: kpathsea-devel + +%description +The LCDF Typetools package contains several programs for manipulating +PostScript Type 1, Type 1 multiple master, and PostScript-flavored OpenType +fonts. LCDF Typetools includes the mmafm and mmpfb programs, which were +formerly distributed as part of a different package (mminstance) + +%prep +%setup -q + + +%build +%configure +make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} + + +%install +rm -rf %{buildroot} +make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" + +%clean +rm -rf %{buildroot} + + +%files +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc COPYING NEWS ONEWS README +%{_bindir}/cfftot1 +%{_bindir}/mmafm +%{_bindir}/mmpfb +%{_bindir}/otfinfo +%{_bindir}/otftotfm +%{_bindir}/t1dotlessj +%{_bindir}/t1lint +%{_bindir}/t1reencode +%{_bindir}/t1testpage +%{_bindir}/ttftotype42 +%{_bindir}/t1rawafm +%{_mandir}/man*/* +%{_datadir}/lcdf-typetools + +%changelog +* Thu May 21 2009 Parag Nemade - 2.78-1 +- Initial specfile for Fedora + + Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: sources diff -N sources --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ sources 15 Jun 2009 05:21:59 -0000 1.7 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +88418a4aca055f9911f7bb9035491feb lcdf-typetools-2.78.tar.gz Index: branch =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lcdf-typetools/F-10/branch,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- branch 11 Jun 2009 07:57:57 -0000 1.1 +++ branch 15 Jun 2009 05:21:59 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1 @@ -F-10 +F-11 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 05:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150554.n5F5sEFX023031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 01:54:14 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 05:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150553.n5F5rNwK022895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 01:53:23 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kstribley at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 06:58:39 2009 From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Jun 2009 06:58:39 -0000 Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090615065839.1107.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 User kstribley changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from kstribley at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 06:58:37 +0000 2009 ------- I hope for 3.2. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 10:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505764] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151037.n5FAb7dN022835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-15 06:37:06 EDT --- Adobe fonts, to be properly identified as fonts, have to have the right header, for example %!PS-AdobeFont-1.1 The files you list have just "%!" header, which identifies them as generic PostScript files so file does nothing wrong: without the proper header it cannot tell you anything closing this: the files were created by ogonkify, so you can reassign this to this component, if you think ogonkify should generate the files with the header -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 10:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151042.n5FAgenN024288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-15 06:42:39 EDT --- Adobe fonts, to be properly identified as fonts, have to have the right header, for example %!PS-AdobeFont-1.1 This file has a generic PostScript header "%!PS-Adobe-3.0". so file does nothing wrong: it identifies the file according to the header closing this: the file is a part of the package "enscript", so you can reassign this to this component, if you think the file format is wrong -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 15 11:21:40 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.3, 1.4 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090615112140.5232A700D9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5676 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:00:27 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jun 2009 11:21:07 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 13:00:27 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 15 Jun 2009 11:21:08 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +2ae45ffcaf4fd75331eb582cfee6cc54 VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:00:27 -0000 1.4 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 15 Jun 2009 11:21:08 -0000 1.5 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090422 +Version: 20090612 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/40480/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} %changelog +* Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 +- New upstream release. + * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 11:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151148.n5FBmbRY007509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #34 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-15 07:48:27 EDT --- The software does use fontconfig so the X side is OK AFAIK, the problem is in GL/postscript output. The major places that ttf files are requested directly that I can see are in: http://root.cern.ch/viewvc/trunk/graf2d/graf/src/TTF.cxx where freetype is used to load a font by path/name or number (MS with fallback to Free fonts). http://root.cern.ch/viewvc/trunk/graf3d/gl/src/TGLText.cxx where ftgl is used to load a font by fontnumber (table uses only MS fonts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 11:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151153.n5FBrnfJ032045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |atkac at redhat.com Component|file |enscript Resolution|NOTABUG | AssignedTo|dnovotny at redhat.com |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 11:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505764] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151156.n5FBuD9f010091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |pertusus at free.fr, | |twaugh at redhat.com Component|file |a2ps Resolution|NOTABUG | AssignedTo|dnovotny at redhat.com |twaugh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 15 11:59:01 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.3, 1.4 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090615115901.F389F700D9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12762 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:02:06 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jun 2009 11:58:31 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 13:02:06 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 15 Jun 2009 11:58:31 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +2ae45ffcaf4fd75331eb582cfee6cc54 VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-11/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:02:06 -0000 1.4 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 15 Jun 2009 11:58:31 -0000 1.5 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090422 +Version: 20090612 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/40480/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} %changelog +* Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 +- New upstream release. + * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 15 12:25:56 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.3, 1.4 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090615122556.BD2F2700D9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18129 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:09:03 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jun 2009 12:25:23 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 13:09:03 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 15 Jun 2009 12:25:23 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +2ae45ffcaf4fd75331eb582cfee6cc54 VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:09:03 -0000 1.2 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 15 Jun 2009 12:25:23 -0000 1.3 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090422 +Version: 20090612 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/40480/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} %changelog +* Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 +- New upstream release. + * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151224.n5FCOWwn017714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #35 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-15 08:24:30 EDT --- sorry I was wrong root uses freetype but not fontconfig, so as I see it the plan should be * quick solution: point root to the DejaVu fonts and check that it still works OK * add fontconfig support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Mon Jun 15 12:39:15 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.3, 1.4 vlgothic-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090615123915.CCA3B700D9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20475 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources vlgothic-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 - New upstream release. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- .cvsignore 23 Apr 2009 13:32:06 -0000 1.3 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jun 2009 12:38:44 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 23 Apr 2009 13:32:06 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 15 Jun 2009 12:38:44 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -dcc9a788a47554344a47926211208473 VLGothic-20090422.tar.bz2 +2ae45ffcaf4fd75331eb582cfee6cc54 VLGothic-20090612.tar.bz2 Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- vlgothic-fonts.spec 23 Apr 2009 13:32:06 -0000 1.2 +++ vlgothic-fonts.spec 15 Jun 2009 12:38:44 -0000 1.3 @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ but some have also been improved by the project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090422 +Version: 20090612 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Japanese TrueType font License: mplus and BSD Group: User Interface/X URL: http://dicey.org/vlgothic -Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/38942/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/vlgothic/40480/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} %changelog +* Mon Jun 15 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090612-1 +- New upstream release. + * Thu Apr 23 2009 Akira TAGOH - 20090422-1 - New upstream release. From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:42:50 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Jun 2009 13:42:50 -0000 Subject: [Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090615134250.23939.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'eroshin,fedorafonts,kpala|'eroshin,fedorafonts,hdu,k |gin,pmike' |palagin,pmike' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |INVALID -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:42:49 +0000 2009 ------- > Should this still be considered a bug? If so, is it a Fedora or OOo bug? Looks like an issue for fontconfig. A very low priority issue though because fontconfig has the very reasonable expectation that fc-cache?gets run whenever its directory structure or directory contents were changed. Not an issue for OOo though => adjusting status accordingly --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:55:21 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Jun 2009 13:55:21 -0000 Subject: [Issue 54944] Provide way to mark forced font replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090615135521.3136.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54944 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:55:19 +0000 2009 ------- Fixed dependency to issue 45128, thanks meywer! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:53:27 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Jun 2009 13:53:27 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090615135327.29632.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:53:26 +0000 2009 ------- *** Issue 102449 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160234.n5G2YpVE014097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:34:50 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160235.n5G2Z0tX014282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.7.7-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 04:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485873] [ml_IN] Malayalam fonts not available in Fedora 11-Alpha (leonidas) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160400.n5G40ZvR003705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485873 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, psatpute at redhat.com, | |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com Component|i18n |smc-fonts QAContact| |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-16 00:00:34 EDT --- Hopefully ok in GA? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 06:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160655.n5G6tqpd013597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|rbhalera at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 06:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160656.n5G6uLtY013741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|rbhalera at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 06:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160655.n5G6tPTl005189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|rbhalera at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 06:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160659.n5G6x9oO014251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|rbhalera at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:17:49 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:17:49 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] bitmap-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616071749.6048310F861@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package bitmap-fonts in Fedora 7 was orphaned by rbhalera To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bitmap-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:18:36 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:18:36 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-ISO8859-2 ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616071836.A7E1710F894@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-ISO8859-2 in Fedora devel was orphaned by rbhalera To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-ISO8859-2 From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:19:35 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:19:35 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-arabic ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616071935.DE46F10F802@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-arabic in Fedora devel was orphaned by rbhalera To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-arabic From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:19:50 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:19:50 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] bitmap-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616071950.0EC9210F802@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package bitmap-fonts in Fedora devel was orphaned by rbhalera To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bitmap-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:20:02 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:20:02 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-hebrew ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616072002.B98B410F802@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-hebrew in Fedora devel was orphaned by rbhalera To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-hebrew From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:20:17 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:20:17 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-indic ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616072017.63FDF10F802@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-indic in Fedora devel was orphaned by rbhalera To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-indic From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:20:57 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:20:57 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] bitmap-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616072057.4443410F861@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package bitmap-fonts in Fedora devel is now owned by pnemade To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bitmap-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:33:33 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:33:33 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-arabic ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616073333.2443010F894@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-arabic in Fedora devel is now owned by pnemade To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-arabic From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:33:35 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:33:35 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-sinhala ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616073336.070E210F8A2@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-sinhala in Fedora devel was orphaned by rbhalera To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-sinhala From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:34:05 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:34:05 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-hebrew ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616073405.5D64910F861@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-hebrew in Fedora devel is now owned by pnemade To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-hebrew From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:39:43 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:39:43 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-ISO8859-2 ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616073943.D00FC10F802@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-ISO8859-2 in Fedora devel is now owned by pnemade To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-ISO8859-2 From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 16 07:43:04 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:43:04 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-indic ownership updated Message-ID: <20090616074304.069B610F8A8@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-indic in Fedora devel is now owned by pravins To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-indic From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 07:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499357] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160755.n5G7tvcB027340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from koka xiong 2009-06-16 03:55:56 EDT --- Both the font and image are acceptable,so I close it as not a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505759] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with groff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160923.n5G9NhYk007020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 05:23:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348066) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348066) a patch added the appropriate magic for the header -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505758] inconsistent opentype font label In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160926.n5G9QTAm015866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505758 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 05:26:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348068) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348068) a patch made consistent (this is a patch for 3 font issues put together) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505765] file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160924.n5G9OhVw015189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 05:24:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348067) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348067) a patch added the appropriate magic for the header -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505765] file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160942.n5G9gcaM019148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 05:42:37 EDT --- fixed in file-5.03-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505758] inconsistent opentype font label In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160942.n5G9gqUI011140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505758 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 05:42:51 EDT --- fixed in file-5.03-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505759] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with groff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160943.n5G9h7aR019330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 05:43:06 EDT --- fixed in file-5.03-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505762] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161021.n5GALPkY019654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 06:21:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348077) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348077) a patch added magic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505762] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161031.n5GAVs4u021710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 06:31:52 EDT --- fixed in file-5.03-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From es at openoffice.org Tue Jun 16 11:24:56 2009 From: es at openoffice.org (es at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Jun 2009 11:24:56 -0000 Subject: [Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090616112456.6650.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 User es changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from es at openoffice.org Tue Jun 16 11:24:55 +0000 2009 ------- closed --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161206.n5GC6ObK017745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 James Cloos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cloos at jhcloos.com --- Comment #2 from James Cloos 2009-06-16 08:06:23 EDT --- matrix.pfa is a type3 font, not a type1. As such, file(1)?s current output is exactly what is desired from that file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161232.n5GCWjaA023596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-16 08:32:45 EDT --- (Though the upper F in Font for PCF is an annoyance) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161231.n5GCVrqt023457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-16 08:31:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > matrix.pfa is a type3 font, not a type1. > > As such, file(1)?s current output is exactly what is desired from that file. If file's output does not include "font" the file won't be recognized by apps that rely on libmagic to identify fonts. Right now labels for font files are: Clean: TTF : TrueType font data TTC : TrueType font collection data OTF : OpenType font data Not: the PS and PCF font labels are a mess but they at least include "font" somewhere" (Though the upper) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 13:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] New: X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 Summary: X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=348110) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348110) xorg.log Description of problem: X server crashes while using it... FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/X(xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x4e89b6] 1: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x6f) [0x47d63f] 2: /lib64/libc.so.6 [0x7f6271639370] 3: /usr/bin/X(FindGlyphRef+0x2c) [0x51e90c] 4: /usr/bin/X(FindGlyphByHash+0x28) [0x51ef78] 5: /usr/bin/X [0x52b279] 6: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x384) [0x446ee4] 7: /usr/bin/X(main+0x3b5) [0x42d0d5] 8: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7f6271624a2d] 9: /usr/bin/X [0x42c559] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc error: file /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: No such file or directory Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.1.901-1.fc11.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. use X server Actual results: Crash Expected results: No crash Additional info: Sorry for report missing any details but I'm unsure how to reproduce and what caused crash... I'll update it if I'll find something useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 14:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161425.n5GEP60d013906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, tagoh at redhat.com Component|file |japanese-bitmap-fonts AssignedTo|dnovotny at redhat.com |tagoh at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 10:25:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > When gunziped manually it correctly identifies them as X11 Portable Compiled > Font data. seems this is not the case [danny at f11 tmp]$ cp /usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/kaname-latin1.pcf.gz . [danny at f11 tmp]$ file kaname-latin1.pcf.gz kaname-latin1.pcf.gz: gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Fri Mar 27 08:05:07 2009, max compression [danny at f11 tmp]$ file -z kaname-latin1.pcf.gz kaname-latin1.pcf.gz: empty (gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Fri Mar 27 08:05:07 2009, max compression) [danny at f11 tmp]$ gunzip kaname-latin1.pcf.gz [danny at f11 tmp]$ file kaname-latin1.pcf kaname-latin1.pcf: empty [danny at f11 tmp]$ reassigning to japanese-bitmap-fonts owner: is this normal? zero-length fonts seem a bit strange... p.s. there are also some fonts in the directory, which do not gunzip to empty files, and those are correctly identified by "file -z" as fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 14:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161449.n5GEnX6t019260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-16 10:49:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > > When gunziped manually it correctly identifies them as X11 Portable Compiled > > Font data. > > seems this is not the case Did you try knmhn12x.pcf ? I know I tested this one and gunziping manually did make a difference on my system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 15:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161506.n5GF6p1T023961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-16 11:06:50 EDT --- > > Did you try knmhn12x.pcf ? I know I tested this one and gunziping manually did > make a difference on my system [danny at f11 ~]$ file -z /usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knmhn12x.pcf.gz /usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knmhn12x.pcf.gz: X11 Portable Compiled Font data (gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Fri Mar 27 08:05:07 2009, max compression) [danny at f11 ~]$ but I have a 32bit system and I see you have x86_64 packages: I can try 64bit test tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 15:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161545.n5GFj8ZZ001700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 --- Comment #5 from James Cloos 2009-06-16 11:45:07 EDT --- But which apps on the system can handle type3 fonts? They are only useful for embedding in PostScript files, since a full PS interpreter is required to render them. (There may be some ???ware in the wild which can handle the subset of type3 fonts which dvips will produce from mf bitmaps, but not vector-style type3s.) As such, the file in question should be handled like any eps file ? which is probably why it is declared as eps ? rather than like a font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 23:08:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506373] New: Fontforge crashes after selecting options in start menu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontforge crashes after selecting options in start menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506373 Summary: Fontforge crashes after selecting options in start menu Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: darkworldsawake at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: After Fontforge is opened, a menu is displayed that prompts you to choose a font to edit or create a new font. After selecting one of these, the program crashes. When run from the command line, the following text is shown: Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 14:20 GMT 24-Feb-2009. Library based on sources from 14:18 GMT 24-Feb-2009. Failed to create a fontset for the input method -urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-2,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-3,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-4,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5,-misc-ar pl ukai tw-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-7,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-9,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-10,-misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-15,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-koi8-uni,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 Help! Server claimed font -misc-ar pl ukai tw-medium-r-normal--13-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault Is there any way to fix this? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): I have tried both the most recent version from the Fontforge website (http://fontforge.sourceforge.net), fontforge-20090408 and the version in the repositories, fontforge-20090224. How reproducible: It happens every time, no matter what choice you make at the prompt. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Type "fontforge" into the command line 2. 3. Actual results: Fontforge encountered a "Segmentation error." Expected results: Fontforge should have opened a font or created a new one. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 23:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162347.n5GNliOh023197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Component|cjkuni-fonts |xorg-x11 AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |xgl-maint at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | Flag| |needinfo?(jreznik at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-16 19:47:43 EDT --- The ukai is now contained by cjkuni-ukai-fonts package. Please update .spec file of X to reflect that. Also, sorry that I have reassigned to xorg.x11 because I have no idea which package is responsible to 'Requires' the font package. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 03:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170357.n5H3v9wh009256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |darkworldsawake at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-16 23:57:07 EDT --- *** Bug 506373 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 03:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506373] Fontforge crashes after selecting options in start menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170357.n5H3v87r009239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506373 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-16 23:57:07 EDT --- This looks like a duplicate/variant of bug 466404. Can you try the workaround there to recreate font caches and see if it works? Lets continue debugging this over on that bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466404 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506430] New: [pa_IN][GPOS]The font doesn't have the right shape Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [pa_IN][GPOS]The font doesn't have the right shape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506430 Summary: [pa_IN][GPOS]The font doesn't have the right shape Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Some fonts in [pa_IN][GPOS] don't have right shape Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0A13 U+0A02 ?? 2.The fonts shape is not correct compared with the image Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Other fonts also have the same problem.I will attach the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506436] New: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506436 Summary: [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C9C U+0CC4 ?? 2.The font shape is not correct. Actual results: The font shape is not correct Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the correct font image -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 10:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502290] [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171003.n5HA3Ta5019005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502290 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-06-17 06:03:28 EDT --- It is because of image problem,so close it as not a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 10:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171047.n5HAlEt1027678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-17 06:47:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > But which apps on the system can handle type3 fonts? That's not the point, libmagic should identify files accurately and then apps can decide it they want to process them or not. Pretending a Type3 font is an EPS file does not help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 17 15:28:25 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:28:25 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-sinhala ownership updated Message-ID: <20090617152825.A028210F892@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-sinhala in Fedora devel is now owned by aalam To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-sinhala From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 17 15:29:48 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:29:48 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-sinhala ownership updated Message-ID: <20090617152948.25AF210F894@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-sinhala in Fedora devel was orphaned by aalam To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-sinhala From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171551.n5HFpKel007031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 --- Comment #8 from James Cloos 2009-06-17 11:51:19 EDT --- > Of course, I can only debate. And hit the wrong button, it seems. ? That was supposed to say ?only opine and debate?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171549.n5HFnlgC006337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 --- Comment #7 from James Cloos 2009-06-17 11:49:46 EDT --- > Pretending a Type3 font is an EPS file does not help But that is not what it is doing. The file really *is* an encapsulated postscript file. That the eps contains a ps type3 font is secondary to what it is. Also, there is no such thing as magic for a ps type3. It is just postscript code. It is really no different that a pattern dictionary. I presume the bug report was essentially automated based on the file?s .pfa filename extension, but it is really an eps file with a funny name. Of course, I can only debate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505775] enscript ships with files that use a pfa font extension but are really eps files ; the files should be renamed to foo.eps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171821.n5HILuW2032024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|file does not identify |enscript ships with files |properly some pfa files |that use a pfa font |shipped with enscript |extension but are really | |eps files ; the files | |should be renamed to | |foo.eps --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-17 14:21:55 EDT --- This bug was not automated but is based on steps that are being automated right now. If ps3 is really different and not identifiable via magic I suppose this particular bug is really enscript using the pfa extension for eps code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Jun 17 22:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:05:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22338] New: Make fc-query warn about non-WWS compliant fonts Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22338 Summary: Make fc-query warn about non-WWS compliant fonts Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: freedesktop at behdad.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: keithp at keithp.com CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com (it would be nice if there was a fc-query component in fontconfig BTW) Since MS' WWS naming model makes stuff simpler for application authors, and will be required in new window code, it would be mighty nice if fc-query warned in its general report if a font file didn't respect this model. Respecting the WWS model is declaring fields 21 and 22 or 16 in 17 in ways that respect WWS (only weight, width and slant in sytles) This way we can point FLOSS authors to fc-query as linting tools and promote font naming our apps can handle easily -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 23:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172317.n5HNHAgK031146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 23:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172318.n5HNIGtr009203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |high Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|xorg-x11 |xorg-x11-server AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |ajax at redhat.com QAContact| |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 06:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485873] [ml_IN] Malayalam fonts not available in Fedora 11-Alpha (leonidas) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180616.n5I6Gf6w023731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485873 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-18 02:16:40 EDT --- tested with F11 live cd, its working fine now there was some problem with anaconda i guess, which is solved long time back closing for now, feel free to open if any other problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 06:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485873] [ml_IN] Malayalam fonts not available in Fedora 11-Alpha (leonidas) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180633.n5I6XDor016103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485873 --- Comment #4 from Manilal 2009-06-18 02:33:12 EDT --- Tested Fedora 11 GA and works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 06:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485873] [ml_IN] Malayalam fonts not available in Fedora 11-Alpha (leonidas) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180638.n5I6cueK027609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485873 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-06-18 02:38:55 EDT --- Thanks!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 10:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483391] [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181049.n5IAnfxI006863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 10:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490373] Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181051.n5IApDbW007689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487061] Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181101.n5IB1cm0010220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 --- Comment #4 from Akihiro Nomura 2009-06-18 07:01:37 EDT --- In fedora 11, CJK ambiguous width ideograms are rendered and treated as zenkaku(full-width) in gnome-terminal. It renders these ideograms without error that I mentioned in Comment #1. But rendering them as Zenkaku(full-width) makes vim confused. In F11's default setting, default value of ambiwidth option in vim is always single, vim assumes these ideograms are rendered as Hankaku(half-width). If this setting is wrong, cursor position in vim gets wrong and hard to edit the files including these ideograms. This behaviour makes all Japanese F11 & vim user confusing. There are 2 ways to solve this problem: A: Put a vim script that detects accurate ambiwidth option in /etc/vimrc (change vim) B: Make default width of these ideograms to Hankaku (change fontconfig/vlgothic) I don't know whether this buggy behaviour is vim's bug or fontconfig/vlgothic's bug, but I think solution B is better for users, because changing /etc/vimrc may bring another additional error to the people who don't use CJK characters and these buggy behaviour is brought by fontconfig/vlgothic changes. If I should open another bug for this problem, please let me know so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181151.n5IBpEjp032145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:51:13 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181151.n5IBpK47032204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.78-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181154.n5IBs6j0000609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:54:05 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181154.n5IBsB8V000669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.78-1.fc10 |2.78-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181339.n5IDdT5S028861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-18 09:39:28 EDT --- knmhn12x.pcf.gz: the same for 64bit /root/knmhn12x.pcf.gz: X11 Portable Compiled Font data (gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Fri Mar 27 08:05:07 2009, max compression) so the files, which were deemed "empty" by file(1) are really empty files packed into pcf.gz: I don't understand purpose of empty fonts, maybe japanese-bitmap-fonts' package maintainer will tell us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181419.n5IEJeco007951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-06-18 10:19:39 EDT --- Hmm, it may be just a packaging bug. the original bitmap font from upstream is the bdf format and need to convert to the pcf format at the build time. let me see what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181755.n5IHtbQU006955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506840] New: Problem in freetype causes navit to crash unless freetype is built with -fno-strict-aliasing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Problem in freetype causes navit to crash unless freetype is built with -fno-strict-aliasing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506840 Summary: Problem in freetype causes navit to crash unless freetype is built with -fno-strict-aliasing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: awilliam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora I encountered a problem running SVN navit (a GPS navigation app) on F11 and then Rawhide; it would crash as soon as it tried to render any text. I reported this upstream, and the upstream developer Martin Schaller very kindly investigated this extensively. He was able to isolate it to a problem in freetype. I quote: "I think I got something Can you find out what compiler flags are used to compile freetype on redhat? Because it seems freetype exibits a bug when compiled without -fno-strict-aliasing ... OK...so this is really a bug in freetype we should report and get fixed, building with -fno-strict-aliasing is just a workaround, right? Well... Hmm... without -fno-strict-aliasing gcc makes some optimizations which are probably not expected by freetype. Hard to say where the bug is yes! that does the trick indeed ok, so...file a bug on freetype. can you give me some more details to include? do you know exactly where it goes wrong? I can only tell that it crashes in ftccmap.c line 382 at FT_ASSERT( (FT_UInt)( char_code - node->first ) < FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ); because node seems to be corrupted or NULL or at line cmap = face->charmaps[cmap_index]; because face->charmaps seems to be corrupted Should have been line 406 in the second part" So, that's what we know about the problem. Please ask if you need any more details. A .src.rpm for navit which you can rebuild to reproduce the problem can be found at http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.1-0.1.2347.aw_fc12.src.rpm . Run it with a stock Fedora freetype, and it fails. Run it with stock Rawhide freetype unchanged except by adding -fno-strict-aliasing to CFLAGS, and it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506840] Problem in freetype causes navit to crash unless freetype is built with -fno-strict-aliasing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182056.n5IKuLMg004833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506840 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin-s at users.sourceforge. | |net --- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 16:56:21 EDT --- Adding Martin to CC, he can provide any further details that might help. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 00:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190053.n5J0r2i5029919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fitzsim at fitzsim.org --- Comment #9 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-06-18 20:53:01 EDT --- I noticed the same behaviour in Emacs 23. It couldn't display some Chinese characters (specifically: BIG5(??,??) and Cantonese (??,???) ??, ?? in the HELLO file). I also noticed the line: FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 repeated a bunch of times in /var/log/Xorg.0.log. yum install /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc fixed both problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 01:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190114.n5J1EJ2H022714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-18 21:14:18 EDT --- But uming should be used by default for Chinese IMHO and that is what we install by default in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 01:17:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190117.n5J1HlBx002040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-18 21:17:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Java application like Netbeans cannot display Chinese character because chinese > fonts package changed You need to file a bug against netbeans or cjkuni-fonts to get this fixed. I think for F10 maybe we need a compat symlink in cjkuni, Caius? If not already? (In reply to comment #9) > I noticed the same behaviour in Emacs 23. It couldn't display some Chinese > characters (specifically: Well missing font and changed font path are different issues. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 01:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190122.n5J1M8WW003017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|FutureFeature |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 01:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190121.n5J1Lf4Q002938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|java-1.6.0-openjdk |cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo|langel at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 01:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190121.n5J1L4Fk024181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-18 21:21:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Java application like Netbeans cannot display Chinese character because chinese > > fonts package changed > > You need to file a bug against netbeans or cjkuni-fonts to get this fixed. I > think for F10 maybe we need a compat symlink in cjkuni, Caius? If not already? Actually not F10, but for rawhide and f11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 01:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190133.n5J1XhAa004908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #13 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-18 21:33:42 EDT --- AFAIK according to Mailhot, this is planned to let all packagers to aware the latest Font Packaging Changes (i.e. package name and path change in this case). I could always create such symlinks to cjkuni-fonts-compat quickly. However, if packagers are not aware that cjkuni-fonts-compat is needed for symlinks, situation will not be resolved still. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 03:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506840] Problem in freetype causes navit to crash unless freetype is built with -fno-strict-aliasing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190320.n5J3KJTI026602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506840 udo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |udovdh at xs4all.nl --- Comment #2 from udo 2009-06-18 23:20:18 EDT --- Problem also seen here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 19 06:09:51 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20090619060951.B5B8C700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15179 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: resolves: rhbz#468193 (backward compatibility of transition location) Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 03:28:23 -0000 1.9 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 19 Jun 2009 06:09:19 -0000 1.10 @@ -4,21 +4,24 @@ CJK Unifonts are Unicode TrueType fonts available by Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by \ the CJK Unifonts project. -%define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d -%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d +%define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d +%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d -%define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} -%define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} +%define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} +%define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} %define _cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN %define _twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW %define cncompatdir %{_cncompatdir}/TrueType %define twcompatdir %{_twcompatdir}/TrueType +%define _transdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkunifonts- +%define umingtransdir %{_transdir}uming +%define ukaitransdir %{_transdir}ukai Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 23%{?dist} +Release: 24%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -161,8 +164,16 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %dir %{_twcompatdir} %dir %{cncompatdir} %dir %{twcompatdir} +%dir %{umingtransdir} +%dir %{ukaitransdir} %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingtransdir}/uming.ttf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingtransdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingtransdir}/fonts.scale +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaitransdir}/ukai.ttf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaitransdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaitransdir}/fonts.scale %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} @@ -225,10 +236,23 @@ cd - %__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf %__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf +# backward compt to transition dir +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir} +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/uming.ttf +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.dir +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.scale +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/ukai.ttf +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.dir +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.scale + %clean %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Jun 19 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#468193 (Compatibility to previous installed location.) + * Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#483320 (Declared ownership of compatibility directories.) From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 06:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190627.n5J6RtPT027183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 02:27:54 EDT --- cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 06:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190634.n5J6YlgI017180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #15 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-19 02:34:47 EDT --- To test: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=107011 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190747.n5J7llqq010197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-19 03:47:46 EDT --- Actually, this kind of symlink does not belong in the font package IMHO, it's apps that do not use fontconfig that should carry the burden of pointing to the actual file on the filesystem. That will hopefully motivate them to move to our primary font stack. I'll release soonish a repo audit script that detects when such symlinks are broken (I've been tweaking it those past two weeks) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 10:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499634] ghostscript files point to nonexisting files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191012.n5JAC0M9009620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499634 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 06:11:59 EDT --- japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 10:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191012.n5JAC4Xj009645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 06:12:04 EDT --- japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 10:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499634] ghostscript files point to nonexisting files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191008.n5JA8wqm008821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499634 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-06-19 06:08:56 EDT --- Fixed in japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 10:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191008.n5JA8KKi008715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-06-19 06:08:19 EDT --- Fixed in japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Jun 19 12:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:01:52 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191201.n5JC1qrn009706@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #189 from Ian Kennedy 2009-06-19 05:00:47 PDT --- If you are downloading a font via @font-face Firefox will first render the text with a standard font before downloading and then re-rendering the text using the correct font. This is pretty ugly and doesn't happen in Safari, it would also seem to be a waste of CPU time to render things twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 18:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191853.n5JIrlZu008748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-06-19 14:53:46 EDT --- The freetype thing is a red herring, FindGlyphRef doesn't call into freetype at all. 3: /usr/bin/X(FindGlyphRef+0x2c) [0x51e90c] % echo 0x51e90c | eu-addr2line -e /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/Xorg.debug /usr/src/debug/xorg-server-1.6.1.901/render/glyph.c:152 That line is: CARD32 tableSize = hash->hashSet->size; Which suggests that either hash or hashSet are NULL somehow; almost certainly hashSet, since hash is a pointer to a global array. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Jun 20 04:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:33:08 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906200433.n5K4X8DC012994@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #190 from Patrick Garies 2009-06-19 21:32:30 PDT --- @Comment #189: I would hope that Mozilla doesn't follow the Safari approach. It's very bad when you're on dial-up and have to sit there waiting for content just because someone feels that function should follow form. (And, contrary to an apparently popular misconception, not everyone in the world has broadband or even has it available.) For an example of what I mean, try looking at the examples at on a dial-up connection in Safari. You sit there staring at a blank box for a long time (i.e., up to 10 seconds) while you wait for a very small amount of text to display. In terms of rendering time, that's ridiculous. (And, to top it off, the fonts are less readable than the standard system fonts.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Jun 20 04:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:58:54 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906200458.n5K4wsjl007954@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 WulfTheSaxon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wulf.bugmail at yahoo.com --- Comment #191 from WulfTheSaxon 2009-06-19 21:58:11 PDT --- @Comment #189 and comment #190 The current behavior seems reasonable to me. It's not that much different than alt text being shown before images load or an interlaced PNG/GIF. I wouldn't be averse to an about:config pref, though. (On the author side, JavaScript should be able to handle it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Sun Jun 21 07:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22393] Make the font naming WWS-clean In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090621072127.B2E49130016@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22393 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Sun Jun 21 07:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22394] New: Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata Message-ID: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22394 Summary: Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata Product: DejaVu Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Serif AssignedTo: dejavu-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Dejavu Serif Condensed Italic (lgc) files have bad metadata, causing fontconfig to think they are "Condensed" only, and inducing font selectors in error -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 07:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507129] New: Please update font links and deps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please update font links and deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507129 Summary: Please update font links and deps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mapserver AssignedTo: cristian.balint at gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cristian.balint at gmail.com, devrim at gunduz.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: mapserver links to Bitstream Vera It is a good idea to make the symlinks symlinks point to the corresponding DejaVu (full) packages. DejaVu (full) is the most complete fork of Bitstream Vera. It should include all the material present in Vera and its other derivatives, plus multiple fixes. Since we install the DejaVu (full) packages by default, dependencies on them will usually not pull in new packages on user systems. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0:5.4.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 07:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507131] New: Please update font links and deps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please update font links and deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131 Summary: Please update font links and deps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pokerth AssignedTo: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: pokerth links to Bitstream Vera It is a good idea to make the symlinks symlinks point to the corresponding DejaVu (full) packages. DejaVu (full) is the most complete fork of Bitstream Vera. It should include all the material present in Vera and its other derivatives, plus multiple fixes. Since we install the DejaVu (full) packages by default, dependencies on them will usually not pull in new packages on user systems. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0:0.7-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 07:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507132] New: Please update font links and deps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please update font links and deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507132 Summary: Please update font links and deps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: php-ZendFramework AssignedTo: akahl at iconmobile.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: akahl at iconmobile.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: php-ZendFramework-tests links to Bitstream Vera It is a good idea to make the symlinks point to the corresponding DejaVu (full) packages. DejaVu (full) is the most complete fork of Bitstream Vera. It should include all the material present in Vera and its other derivatives, plus multiple fixes. Since we install the DejaVu (full) packages by default, dependencies on them will usually not pull in new packages on user systems. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0:1.7.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Jun 21 08:58:16 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.11, 1.12 fontpackages.spec, 1.16, 1.17 import.log, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.11, 1.12 Message-ID: <20090621085816.D4D6870102@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12517/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.22 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12 --- .cvsignore 2 Jun 2009 22:11:42 -0000 1.11 +++ .cvsignore 21 Jun 2009 08:57:44 -0000 1.12 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.21.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.22.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17 --- fontpackages.spec 2 Jun 2009 22:11:42 -0000 1.16 +++ fontpackages.spec 21 Jun 2009 08:57:45 -0000 1.17 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.21 +Version: 1.22 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ including the correct permissions for th Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontconfig +Requires: fontconfig, rpmlint %description devel This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to @@ -66,10 +66,12 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontba %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} \ - %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates \ + %{buildroot}%{_bindir} install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} +install -m 0755 -p bin/* %{buildroot}%{_bindir} cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) @@ -94,9 +96,15 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt +%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* %changelog +* Sat Jun 20 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.22-1 +??? workaround rpm eating end-of-line after %%_font_pkg calls +??? add script to audit font sanity of yum repositories + * Tue Jun 2 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.21-1 ??? try to handle more corner naming cases in lua macro ??? expect some fallout Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- import.log 2 Jun 2009 22:11:42 -0000 1.13 +++ import.log 21 Jun 2009 08:57:45 -0000 1.14 @@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234998636 fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235377920 fontpackages-1_21-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.21-1.fc12.src.rpm:1243980659 +fontpackages-1_22-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.22-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245574642 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12 --- sources 2 Jun 2009 22:11:43 -0000 1.11 +++ sources 21 Jun 2009 08:57:45 -0000 1.12 @@ -1 +1 @@ -f4a23a889cdf30b9bdb2eba74c86e6bc fontpackages-1.21.tar.bz2 +9c010dccfc942b3b06859d324c299d2c fontpackages-1.22.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 08:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507144] New: [RFE] repo-font-audit should handle TTC files properly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should handle TTC files properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507144 Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should handle TTC files properly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontpackages AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora repo-font-audit should handle TTC files properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 08:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507131] Please update font links and deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210859.n5L8x8wC004786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA Fixed In Version| |pokerth-0.7-4 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 04:59:07 EDT --- I can't find any other VeraBd.ttf with $ yum provides */VeraBd.ttf Anyway, I changed the link to /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf provided by dejavu-sans-fonts. I hope this is what you meant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 09:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507145] New: [RFE] repo-font-audit should check fontconfig files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should check fontconfig files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507145 Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should check fontconfig files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontpackages AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora repo-font-audit should 1. check for the presence of fontconfig files 2. validate them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 09:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507146] New: [RFE] repo-font-audit should test all the Opentype ID fields Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should test all the Opentype ID fields https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507146 Summary: [RFE] repo-font-audit should test all the Opentype ID fields Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontpackages AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora repo-font-audit should test all the Opentype ID fields See http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 09:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507131] Please update font links and deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210948.n5L9moAK000537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21 05:48:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I can't find any other VeraBd.ttf with > $ yum provides */VeraBd.ttf > > Anyway, I changed the link to /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf provided > by dejavu-sans-fonts. I hope this is what you meant. You probably want the bold file fc-query /usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.ttf |grep style -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211007.n5LA7Is5017034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211011.n5LAB8lm017869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507131] Please update font links and deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211057.n5LAvVcA026067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 06:57:30 EDT --- pokerth-0.7-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pokerth-0.7-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211929.n5LJTncr023675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21 15:29:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to distinguish with the > license oflb not ofl, sorry for the typo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211929.n5LJTFUq023597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21 15:29:14 EDT --- 1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to distinguish with the license 2. you should tell upstream the fullname of the regular font is "NotCourier" not "NotCourierSans", this is likely to confuse a few apps 2. if the font is monospace (as a Nimbus Mono is likely to be) the right fontconfig family is probably mono 3. "This is a new release of the NotCourier-sans, with its bold. The OSP frog, the "IJ","ij", numero and trademark ligatures are now encoded in the discretionary ligatures. " that seems release-specific. Probably not a good idea to include it in the summary 4. I'd have named the font at lease notcourier-sans, since notcouriersans is a bit long, but that's a personal preference Only the first point is a blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211934.n5LJYqSm024687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477450, which changed state. Bug 477450 Summary: [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211934.n5LJYpw9024667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21 15:34:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ping Nicolas? Can we close this bug now? You've done most of the work so I'll close There is tills some work to do upstream, their font style naming does not conform to WWS specs: http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf Also you should make the font subpackages noarch https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-June/msg00001.html So those packages trigger a few tests in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-June/msg00001.html Otherwise, it seems fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 02:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220223.n5M2NYnJ021839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-21 22:23:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > IIRC the conflicts are needed to help yum in some obscure upgrade cases. If you > want to drop them, do check with skvidal he's ok with it Ok if they are really needed there needs to be some documentation in the spec file explaining that - I didn't find any in the changelog either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 02:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507261] New: Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261 Summary: Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ipa-gothic-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: t.matsuu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Now sazanami-fonts-common, sazanami-gothic-fonts, and sazanami-mincho-fonts packages are generated by single sazanami-fonts SRPM package. Other hand, ipa-gothic-fonts, ipa-mincho-fonts, ipa-pgothic-fonts, and ipa-pmincho-fonts are generated by separated SRPMs. I suppose kinds of bundled files between two font families are not different. So all IPA fonts should be generated from single SRPM package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 02:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507261] Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220245.n5M2jmRR026238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-06-21 22:45:48 EDT --- The main reason why those SRPMs are packaged separately or all together is whether or not upstream ships it separately. and basically these 4 IPA fonts are different font families. thus, it's not the certain reason to contain multiple tarballs from upstream into one SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 03:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507261] Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220356.n5M3uxUr007278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261 --- Comment #2 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-06-21 23:56:58 EDT --- But upstream calls these four fonts as "IPA font" and they also provide 4 fonts package. So I think they are one family. IPA says at http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontspec.html IPA Font provides totally four fonts: Mincho style, Gothic (Sans serif) style and fixed width style and proportional style for each. I suppose this follows four fonts are belong to the one "IPA font" family. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 04:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507261] Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220421.n5M4LpXh011991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261 --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-06-22 00:21:50 EDT --- >From the definition of font family in our policy http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy It doesn't meet the requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 04:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220427.n5M4RdqR013126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #25 from seth vidal 2009-06-22 00:27:39 EDT --- 1. did the package get renamed? If so - then there needs to be an obsoletes 2. What is the conflicts allowing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479521] Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220542.n5M5gRDu006870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-22 01:42:26 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220547.n5M5lRo4008028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 01:47:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428526 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 21689ad7d921f83a012e354d0f8563a6bee653c0 GFS_DECKER.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220547.n5M5lmXC008089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 01:47:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428601 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c6da481a25176411fa4bcfd6964d6230056bd5dd GFS_PYRSOS.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220603.n5M63ZqT031164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 02:03:35 EDT --- Awesome lighting-fast review, thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-pyrsos-fonts Short Description: GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507261] Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220607.n5M67A0b011871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261 --- Comment #4 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-06-22 02:07:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Hmm, I can now see both "4 fonts package" and separate zip archive are available from the official site. I have never found separate zip archives in early time when IPA font 00301 has been released. In this case, do we have to separate ghostscript files if we will fix bug 507262 with my suggestion? It's too inconvenience. Number 1 of "Package layout for fonts" in the URL mentioned in comment #3 should be updated like the following: Fonts released upstream in separate archives MUST be packaged in separate source packages (src.rpm), unless they belong to the same font family. If fonts released upstream are also released as a merged archive, this rule will not applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220605.n5M657vW031662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 02:05:06 EDT --- Awesome lighting-fast review++, thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-decker-fonts Short Description: GFS Decker Greek fonts Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507261] Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220627.n5M6RX1M015847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 02:27:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Number 1 of "Package layout for fonts" in the URL mentioned in comment #3 > should be updated like the following: > > Fonts released upstream in separate archives MUST be packaged in separate > source packages (src.rpm), unless they belong to the same font family. If fonts > released upstream are also released as a merged archive, this rule will not > applied. Due to how rpm dependency resolution work that would make impossible to implement multi-criterium font search & auto-installation (whichi is a mid-term Fedora goal). So I would oppose this change (of course you're free to try your luck FPC and FESCO side) Also those fonts clearly belong do different font families as per Microsoft WWS specs so trying to join them will only result in pain mid-term. As Adobe's Thomas Phinney wrote WWS is essentially making font naming CSS compatible (you want them to work in browsers, right?) http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf Your main problem seems to be ghostscript requires a separate set of configuration files than the rest of the system. I suggest you spend your energy convinving the ghostscript people to use fontconfig like everyone else to find fonts. That will fix any future problem of this kind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 07:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220750.n5M7owhT019681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 03:50:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > 1. did the package get renamed? If so - then there needs to be an obsoletes There are very few packages depending directly on font packages, and converting to font guidelines does not necessarily produce compatible packages. It replaces a lot of manual steps with automation, making new file location & naming predictible. However they do not necessarily match whatever the packager did manually before (and actually most often they don't). So it's better not to pretend we provide the old package, to make deps on the old package break, and have packagers actually check the paths they use are all right. The main reason to add a dep on a font package is because an app does not use fontconfig and relies on exact file placement (which is argually a bug in the app since we've been converting to fontconfig for ~ 7 years now, but that's another problem) > 2. What is the conflicts allowing? There is not trace of it in bugzilla, because you gave advice over IRC, but IIRC they were added to the update pattern in the course of solving bug #474514. If you think it's not needed we'll be happy not to have to bother with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] New: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: rpm AssignedTo: pmatilai at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pmatilai at redhat.com, jnovy at redhat.com, ffesti at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora (this is mostly a yum-level RFE, but it would be nice if we kept the same depsolving logic in both apps) The problem: Selecting a font is a multi-criterium operation. We need to match on font family, font style, language support, unicode support, etc. At any time all of just some of those selection criterii can be provided by the user or applications. To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs to extend to the package database Right now rpm is only allowing to specify atomic provides, so we can have a font package that Provides font(dejavusans) and Provides font(:lang=el) but there is no warranty both those provides are belonging to the same font. There is no way to distinguish between a package that includes an actual greek dejavusans and a package that includes a dejavusans greek-less file and another totally different greek font To workaround this rpm limitation we've been asking packagers to put font files belonging to different font families in different packages. However: 1. many still don't 2. it's not technically possible for all font formats, for example the ttc font format allows mixing of fonts with different characteristics in a single file The ideal solution: Ability to have Provides like: font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining) And have deps like (dejavu|*|el) work in rpm (yes a font can declare many different names, be available in many different styles, cover many different languages) For ttc files we'd then generate one Provides for each font included in the ttc bundle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507294] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220829.n5M8T1bf029359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507294 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 04:29:00 EDT --- See also bug #507294 opened against yum -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507294] New: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507294 Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: yum AssignedTo: skvidal at sethdot.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: james.antill at redhat.com, pmatilai at redhat.com, jnovy at redhat.com, tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com, ffesti at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, skvidal at sethdot.org Classification: Fedora (this is the sister bug of ##507292 which was opened against rpm) The problem: Selecting a font is a multi-criterium operation. We need to match on font family, font style, language support, unicode support, etc. At any time all of just some of those selection criterii can be provided by the user or applications. To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs to extend to the package installation selection logic Right now rpm is only allowing to specify atomic provides, so we can have a font package that Provides font(dejavusans) and Provides font(:lang=el) but there is no warranty both those provides are belonging to the same font. There is no way to distinguish between a package that includes an actual greek dejavusans and a package that includes a dejavusans greek-less file and another totally different greek font To workaround this rpm limitation we've been asking packagers to put font files belonging to different font families in different packages. However: 1. many still don't 2. it's not technically possible for all font formats, for example the ttc font format allows mixing of fonts with different characteristics in a single file The ideal solution: Ability to have Provides like: font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining) And have package selectors like (dejavu|*|el) that work in yum (yes a font can declare many different names, be available in many different styles, cover many different languages) For ttc files we'd then generate one Provides for each font included in the ttc bundle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 10:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221019.n5MAJita023013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-22 06:19:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to distinguish with the > license > - changed > 2. you should tell upstream the fullname of the regular font is "NotCourier" > not "NotCourierSans", this is likely to confuse a few apps > - I tried contacting upstream, their contact link does not work (right now) > 2. if the font is monospace (as a Nimbus Mono is likely to be) the right > fontconfig family is probably mono > - I had kept it as a sans-serif because the tags on the home page were : tags: media, font, OFL, graphic, otf, image, png, archive, zip, **sans_serif**, courier, rugular, bold Anyway, you're a better judge at that. > 3. "This is a new release of the NotCourier-sans, with its bold. The OSP frog, > the "IJ","ij", numero and trademark ligatures are now encoded in the > discretionary ligatures. " that seems release-specific. Probably not a good > idea to include it in the summary > - removed > 4. I'd have named the font at lease notcourier-sans, since notcouriersans is a > bit long, but that's a personal preference > Wouldn't notcourier-sans sound as if its a sans and not mono? I think the name the upstream's given is "notcouriersans". Anyway, I'm unable to contact them to clarify. > Only the first point is a blocker ah, great .. rebuilding.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 10:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221058.n5MAwxMc011584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 06:58:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > - I had kept it as a sans-serif because the tags on the home page were : > > tags: media, font, OFL, graphic, otf, image, png, archive, zip, **sans_serif**, > courier, rugular, bold > > Anyway, you're a better judge at that. A font can be monospace and serif or sans-serif. They're two different ways to classify the font (monospace is about having the same size for all letters, sans-serif/serif is about having squiggles at the end of bars). However monospace is usually seen as "more specific", so it takes precedence https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_fontconfig_generic_family_should_I_put_my_font_in.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 11:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221144.n5MBiRPj023381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-22 07:44:26 EDT --- hi, src rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts.spec regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 12:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221223.n5MCNKdo000848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #27 from seth vidal 2009-06-22 08:23:15 EDT --- Nicolas: was there a package in common use or in fedora that was renamed when it came into fedora? If so, then it needs to have an obsolete and 474514 involves adding some obsoletes checking to part of yum. So far This isn't a yum bug this is a packaging issue. Just add the obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 12:43:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221243.n5MChh20025059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 08:43:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Nicolas: was there a package in common use or in fedora that was renamed when > it came into fedora? If so, then it needs to have an obsolete This entry has derived massively from the original subject. The original report was: Fedora upgrade path is broken because a Fedora package has been split, and a third-party package depended on it => NOTOURBUG, we've fixed our packages, and have no control of what third-parties do. If our upgrade path was broken for a package as massively deployed as liberation bugzilla would overflow with problem reports. Third-party packages should not expect Fedora font package names to live forever, and a release change is the right moment to break compat on this front Then someone noticed the spec declared some explicit conflicts. As far as I know they were added to help yum during groupinstalls (in the course of resolving bug #474514). If you confirm they are not actually needed we'll remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 15:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507294] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221516.n5MFGEOq004115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507294 --- Comment #2 from James Antill 2009-06-22 11:16:13 EDT --- > font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated > lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining) Very much so, for instance given: font(bar,blah|foo,fu|lang=en,lang=el) ...you couldn't match the above for arbitrary points with just wildcards. > To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs > to extend to the package installation selection logic I think what you want to do is put all this inside some PK API. So the provides would look something like: Provides: font(dejavusans:style=bar:lang=el) ...then PK just looks through font(dejavusans*) or whatever. Because I don't think anyone is going to be running "yum install font(dejavusans:*:lang=el)" or whatever from the cmd line. Obviously if rpm decides to start processing wildcards on requires, then we'll have to follow along for the ride ... but that doesn't seem like the best solution (and I'm going to guess rpm isn't going to do that). Doing wildcards on the install cmd line, is certainly possible ("yum provides" does them) ... I'm just not sure how awesome an idea that is, and I don't see a usecase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 15:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507294] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221553.n5MFr50P016178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507294 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 11:53:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated > > lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining) > > Very much so, for instance given: > > font(bar,blah|foo,fu|lang=en,lang=el) > > ...you couldn't match the above for arbitrary points with just wildcards. yep sure, the point is, I don't really care how it ends up looking like, the main need is to be able to group properties in some way. It may be that the only way to do it reliably is to pass on wildcards and go regexp. Or standardise the way multi-valued provides are written, so simple wildcards can be processed in consistent ways regardless of the namespace. Maybe something like: namespace(label1:list-of-values|label2:list-of-values) etc ? font(family:bar,blah|style:foo,fu|lang:en,fr,el) > > To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs > > to extend to the package installation selection logic > > I think what you want to do is put all this inside some PK API. So the > provides would look something like: To be honest I'm not really sure about the need to have rpm understand this syntax (I suspect someone would find uses for it, for example we could add a dep to the fontconfig package on font(style=regular|lang=en) to make sure we always install at least one fallback font by default) but I'm quite sure it should be exposed at the yum level at least. Having apps auto-install fonts when they find the need in a document is great, but sometimes users want to install fonts before they've started typing their document :p. > Because I don't > think anyone is going to be running "yum install font(dejavusans:*:lang=el)" or > whatever from the cmd line. Actually, I'm quite sure people will do. The internet is littered with yum recipes to install particular fonts (either "here is how to install dejavu lgc", or "here is how to install every available thai font"). They're all brittle and break from release to release because packages get renamed, fonts get replaced, and people have to match on package names instead of what they really want (a particular font, or fonts for a language, etc) Now, I know the functional need, but I don't know actual rpm/yum/pk innards, so I'm not the best person to suggest how the technical part should look like. So far we've done what the current tools made possible, but we're hitting tooling limitations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507294] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221753.n5MHrlwr027180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507294 --- Comment #4 from James Antill 2009-06-22 13:53:46 EDT --- > but I'm quite sure it should be exposed at the yum level at least. Having > apps auto-install fonts when they find the need in a document is great, > but sometimes users want to install fonts before they've started typing > their document Then open-office writer can hook in and ask to install some fonts. Or people can just look for a font name they recognise in PK or yum. I find it really hard to believe people are going to think "Oh, I need to write a document. Oh I don't have any fonts. Oh let's just install all English fonts with 'yum install fonts(*;lang=en;*)'. ". > Actually, I'm quite sure people will do. The internet is littered with yum > recipes to install particular fonts (either "here is how to install dejavu > lgc", or "here is how to install every available thai font"). You are implying that people need weird specific subsets, in the above two cases I'd suggest: yum install dejavu\* yum install \*-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 18:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221804.n5MI4RGK024975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 14:04:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I know ghostscript now supports fontconfig but I cannot find the document for > setup. Well, if ghoscript now support font config we should certainly not add new cruft to its old font setup but on the contrary remove it and use fontconfig directly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 18:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507294] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221808.n5MI8sOt026029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507294 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 14:08:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > but I'm quite sure it should be exposed at the yum level at least. Having > > apps auto-install fonts when they find the need in a document is great, > > but sometimes users want to install fonts before they've started typing > > their document > > Then open-office writer can hook in and ask to install some fonts. Or people > can just look for a font name they recognise in PK or yum. I find it really > hard to believe people are going to think "Oh, I need to write a document. Oh I > don't have any fonts. Oh let's just install all English fonts with 'yum install > fonts(*;lang=en;*)'. ". just open google, the internet is full of yum install instructions for fonts also many new users do not know Linux font names, but they know how to type instructions taken from an howto > > Actually, I'm quite sure people will do. The internet is littered with yum > > recipes to install particular fonts (either "here is how to install dejavu > > lgc", or "here is how to install every available thai font"). > > You are implying that people need weird specific subsets, in the above two > cases I'd suggest: > > yum install dejavu\* This will work for dejavu because the package has sane naming. It won't work for other fonts > yum install \*-fonts That won't help to install 'all greek fonts" available for example, which is what people do (replace greek with any langage) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221926.n5MJQIcH026104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 Jeff Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |n3npq at mac.com --- Comment #1 from Jeff Johnson 2009-06-22 15:26:17 EDT --- FYI: Permitting a '*' wild card in Requires: version/release with the well-defined semantic Match everything else (i.e. return 0 from rpmvercmp) is quite straightforward and handles most of what is commonly desired without the implementation cost (and semantic definitions) that need to be defined for a full blown *RE dependency matching compatible with existing legacy RPM and *.rpm implementations. For the record: Attaching new interpretations to a '*' character will be treated by older RPM implementations as any other non-alpha, non-digit, punctuation character would be treated. If the '*' is permitted only at the end of release/version, then legacy rpm would treat the '*' when encountered just like any pucnctuation character like '.' or "+". Since the character is at the end of the comparison, adding a well-defined Return 0 == match from rpmvercmp is almost certainly not change any prior comparison. I'll leave it to you to guess where an implementation for '*" wildcarding in dependency comparisons might be found. And having RE's on Provides: is exactly the same effect as adding multiple Provides:. Write a macro if you want a compact way to generate multiple alternative Provides: without the bother of typing separate Provides:. That just isn't that hard to do, nor is there any need to invent alternate Provides: syntax that forces rpm to implement regexp EVR comparison that I'm aware of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221929.n5MJT091018163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 15:28:59 EDT --- Please use "monospace" not "mono" in the fontconfig file, I don't think fontconfig understands "mono" Appart from that, the package is fine and clean; great work, thank you very much for packaging a new font for Fedora (please continue :)) ??? APPROVED ??? The next steps as usual start at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221951.n5MJprED023959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 15:51:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > And having RE's on Provides: is exactly the same effect as adding multiple > Provides:. Generating multiple provides is trivial. For a very common font such as DejaVu Sans, for example, which exports two names, 7 faces, and 185 languages, that would mean generating 4463 Provides instead of one And that's assuming we never expose other parameters (such as default CSS family) in the packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 20:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222014.n5MKEGUE029303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Johnson 2009-06-22 16:14:15 EDT --- There's no particular reason why all the multiple explicit font attributes need to be re-mapped into Provides:. For starters, generating multiple Provides:, even if *lots* of those provides are generated and never used, really hurts nothing but Bloat! Requires: is where the real pain with dependencies starts. But if you order the most important criteria according to what is likely top be used by packagers, then a trailing '*' wild card achieves whatever you want. And with only a single Provides: with the same carefully ordered string. Or wait for RPM to change to implement RE's within EVR comparison. Bring your ice skates, Hell is slippery turf when frozen over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 20:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222022.n5MKMSHx031081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #3 from Martin Nad 2009-06-22 16:22:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348992) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348992) Xorg.0.log I can reproduce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 20:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222033.n5MKXPfg011442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-22 16:33:25 EDT --- Brother Yahoo! Search sees this only on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 21:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222109.n5ML9tAI009339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 17:09:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > There's no particular reason why all the multiple > explicit font attributes need to be re-mapped into > Provides:. Please. I didn't remap all the explicit font attributes. There are 22 different attribute fields in opentype alone, not counting the OS/2, Panose, Type1, etc metadata fields that were defined before and that apps still use. I only wrote about the three main attributes people care about and that they commonly use to choose which font to install. *After* fontconfig massaged them to remove any redundant or useless info. If it was that easy to reduce the problem to "just generate a few atomic fields and be done" I wouldn't open this RFE. Modern font files are incredibly rich and compact data stores. They don't cost millions to create for nothing. And the tech evolution is to increase wealth of features in single font files, not to decrease it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 21:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222141.n5MLftfe016153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Johnson 2009-06-22 17:41:55 EDT --- I'm well aware of the attributes of modern font families, having studied fonts privately as a very complex data set to automate dependency generation and classification for packaging usages. But this is about packaging dependencies, not font attributes. There's literally no compelling usage case to map every detail of font attributes into rpm dependencies. Can you do that? Sure you can. But its not gonna work for many reasons, not the least of which you've already reported *repeatedly* is that packagers are not using the font attribute dependency framework you have devised. And -- if the font dependency framework needs RE pattern matching implemented into RPM dependencies -- well, skate on bro! I've suggested the following as likelier to "work": 1) order your font attributes in a single string L -> R by "importance". Consider "importance" as that which is most likely to be used by packagers or easiest to automate. Yes, this will not be perfect, but some means to track fonts in packaging is better than no means to track font dependencies in packaing. 2) If you've chosen the L->R "importance" ordering carefully enough, then a trailing '*' wiild card (which is entirely feasible afaik, unlike full blown RE pattern matching, within existing EVR comparisons) will allow a single axis of comparison that will map from less specific to more specific. All depends on getting the L->R ordering correct. If you miss that, I suspect that font dependencies will be DOA. JMHO, YMMV, everyone's does. Have fun! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 00:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230027.n5N0RpfC016026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 --- Comment #9 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-06-22 20:27:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Well, if ghoscript now support font config we should certainly not add new > cruft to its old font setup but on the contrary remove it and use fontconfig > directly Yes.? I absolutely agree with you.? When we can set config files for ghostscript with fontconfig support and it works fine, we should remove config files for ghostscript from font packages. ghostscript-8.64 have "--disable-fontconfig" option for configure script and ghostscript on F11 is compiled with fontconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 00:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230049.n5N0nIlJ020469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #18 from Victor Bogado 2009-06-22 20:49:17 EDT --- Hi, once again sorry for the BIIIG delay, as I said my life is going throgh a lot of changes right now, so my free time is limited. I followed the font template on fedora 11 and got this result, could you check to see if it's all right? http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.3-6.bog11.src.rpm http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 01:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230106.n5N16kZK024171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #19 from Victor Bogado 2009-06-22 21:06:45 EDT --- I just made a minor update on the files above, so if you happen to have them downloaded please re-download them, and sorry for the mess. Another point the rpmlint tool gives me a warning 'dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/cave9/hud.ttf ../../../usr/share/fonts/cave9/mutante.ttf' but this is only dangling if the required font package is not installed, otherwise the link is perfectly fine, I'm not sure how can I fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 01:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230123.n5N1NvOk027603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-06-22 21:23:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > I know ghostscript now supports fontconfig but I cannot find the document for > > setup. > > Well, if ghoscript now support font config we should certainly not add new > cruft to its old font setup but on the contrary remove it and use fontconfig > directly I'm afraid it may breaks some situations like PS requires the font with CMap. I see current gs supports fontconfig but it doesn't work as alternatives for them. % gs GPL Ghostscript 8.64 (2009-02-03) Copyright (C) 2009 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved. This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details. GS>/IPAGothic-UniJIS-UTF8-H findfont Can't find (or can't open) font file /usr/share/ghostscript/8.64/Resource/Font/IPAGothic-UniJIS-UTF8-H. Can't find (or can't open) font file IPAGothic-UniJIS-UTF8-H. Querying operating system for font files... Can't find (or can't open) font file /usr/share/ghostscript/8.64/Resource/Font/IPAGothic-UniJIS-UTF8-H. Can't find (or can't open) font file IPAGothic-UniJIS-UTF8-H. Didn't find this font on the system! Substituting font Courier for IPAGothic-UniJIS-UTF8-H. Loading NimbusMonL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022003l.pfb... 3430216 1981599 7283800 5136677 1 done. GS<1>clear GS>/IPAGothic findfont Loading IPAGothic font from /usr/share/fonts/ipa-gothic/ipag.otf... 3723064 2259574 13540108 11131402 1 done. GS<1> I don't think having aliases in fontconfig config for all of CMaps is realistic. it could be a bug in gs but we shouldn't go without fixing this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230202.n5N22Pkd002105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-22 22:02:25 EDT --- Well I already removed the conflicts so it is more a case of "do we need to re-instate them?" ;) I guess we can leave this for now or open another bug if I reintroduced a regression? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230208.n5N28eY8003402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-22 22:08:39 EDT --- (I am reminded of a good apt phrase: "Do what we document, document what we do." [perhaps by Paul Gampe]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230226.n5N2Q7UN008134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:26:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230225.n5N2PNod008002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:25:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 03:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230343.n5N3hnDE024284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-22 23:43:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Then someone noticed the spec declared some explicit conflicts. Well, I was mostly annoyed about the subpackages Obsoleting and Providing themselves: %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} but if the conflicts are needed it would be good to know why and I can bring them back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 05:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230662] Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230538.n5N5c9kH024498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-23 01:38:06 EDT --- still happening -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 06:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230602.n5N62jdB029762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jim Radford changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 23 06:11:08 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/devel gfs-decker-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-decker-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090623061108.6C5EC70105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25293/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-decker-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-decker-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-decker-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans GFS Decker GFS Decker sans --- NEW FILE gfs-decker-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gfs-decker %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename GFS_DECKER Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090618 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Decker Greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces19th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This typeface is a product of Deckersche Schriftgie??ere typefoundry owned by Rudolf Ludwig Decker (1804-1877) in Berlin, but it was frequently used in Greek editions by both Oxford and Cambridge University Press during the last decades of the 19th century. It was designed and cut before 1864, according to John Bowman, when a set of matrices was bought by OUP, although the type was not cast and used in England until 1882. The typeface is an uncial design containing a case of capitals, and small capitals, too. The letters lack any sherifs although they retain their thick and thin strokes. It appeared as an alternate type of Byzantine tradition in mostly patristic texts. The font was digitally designed by George D. Matthiopoulos and is freely available by GFS. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sun Jun 21 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090618-1 ??? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1_fc12:HEAD:gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245737415 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 02:25:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 06:10:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_DECKER.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Jun 2009 02:25:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Jun 2009 06:10:38 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +52e129c5aa90f10de1b6c9c789b8240c GFS_DECKER.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 23 06:12:52 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/devel gfs-pyrsos-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-pyrsos-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090623061252.5A53B70105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26020/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-pyrsos-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-pyrsos-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-pyrsos-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif GFS Pyrsos GFS Pyrsos serif --- NEW FILE gfs-pyrsos-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gfs-pyrsos %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename GFS_PYRSOS Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090618 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces20th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This typeface first appeared in the late 20s and was used as an alternative italic type to the most commonly used Greek italics at the time, coming from Germany (Leipsig). The name commemorates the edition of the Greek encyclop??dia Pyrsos (1927-1933) from which the types were taken. The font was digitally designed by George D. Matthiopoulos and is freely available by GFS. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Jun 21 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090618-1 ??? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1_fc12:HEAD:gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245737497 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 02:26:15 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 06:12:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_PYRSOS.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Jun 2009 02:26:15 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Jun 2009 06:12:22 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +09d5d592facbe0b62c19f935817af4bc GFS_PYRSOS.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 06:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230615.n5N6Fqvc021034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 02:15:51 EDT --- I guess the bug then is that gs fontconfig support is incomplete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 06:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428389] monospace font is strange on gnome-terminal. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230622.n5N6Mqjm022384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428389 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n, MoveUpstream --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-23 02:22:51 EDT --- I think this is a vte limitation: you could try using another Korean font on gnome-terminal - probably better to report this upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 23 06:37:12 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090623063712.47EFF70105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv326/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: initial import Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 23 Jun 2009 06:12:22 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 23 Jun 2009 06:36:40 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1_fc12:HEAD:gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245737497 +gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1_fc12:HEAD:gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245737571 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 23 06:37:24 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/F-11 gfs-decker-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-decker-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090623063724.83D7570105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv402/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-decker-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-decker-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-decker-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans GFS Decker GFS Decker sans --- NEW FILE gfs-decker-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gfs-decker %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename GFS_DECKER Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090618 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Decker Greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces19th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This typeface is a product of Deckersche Schriftgie??ere typefoundry owned by Rudolf Ludwig Decker (1804-1877) in Berlin, but it was frequently used in Greek editions by both Oxford and Cambridge University Press during the last decades of the 19th century. It was designed and cut before 1864, according to John Bowman, when a set of matrices was bought by OUP, although the type was not cast and used in England until 1882. The typeface is an uncial design containing a case of capitals, and small capitals, too. The letters lack any sherifs although they retain their thick and thin strokes. It appeared as an alternate type of Byzantine tradition in mostly patristic texts. The font was digitally designed by George D. Matthiopoulos and is freely available by GFS. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sun Jun 21 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090618-1 ??? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1_fc12:F-11:gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245737549 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 02:25:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 06:36:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_DECKER.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-decker-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Jun 2009 02:25:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Jun 2009 06:36:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +52e129c5aa90f10de1b6c9c789b8240c GFS_DECKER.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 23 06:45:07 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/F-11 gfs-pyrsos-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-pyrsos-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090623064507.65CB370105@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2494/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-pyrsos-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-pyrsos-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-pyrsos-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif GFS Pyrsos GFS Pyrsos serif --- NEW FILE gfs-pyrsos-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gfs-pyrsos %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename GFS_PYRSOS Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090618 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces20th.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This typeface first appeared in the late 20s and was used as an alternative italic type to the most commonly used Greek italics at the time, coming from Germany (Leipsig). The name commemorates the edition of the Greek encyclop??dia Pyrsos (1927-1933) from which the types were taken. The font was digitally designed by George D. Matthiopoulos and is freely available by GFS. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Jun 21 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090618-1 ??? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1_fc12:F-11:gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245739459 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 02:26:15 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Jun 2009 06:44:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_PYRSOS.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-pyrsos-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 23 Jun 2009 02:26:15 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Jun 2009 06:44:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +09d5d592facbe0b62c19f935817af4bc GFS_PYRSOS.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230707.n5N77amU032083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-23 03:07:32 EDT --- Is this still an issue with F10, F11 and later? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428389] monospace font is strange on gnome-terminal. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230733.n5N7XAxi015731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428389 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-23 03:33:09 EDT --- (Workaround is to use dejavu font explicitly btw.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230758.n5N7wlFh011797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-23 03:58:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Please use "monospace" not "mono" in the fontconfig file, I don't think > fontconfig understands "mono" > Made the change > Appart from that, the package is fine and clean; great work, thank you very > much for packaging a new font for Fedora (please continue :)) > > ??? APPROVED ??? > > The next steps as usual start at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a continuing from here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230901.n5N91SSX026693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 05:01:27 EDT --- (though as I wrote before, I'm not 100% convinced multi-attribute dep de-muxing needs to be done at the rpm level, though the need starts at the cli package manager level, and having yum & rpm process the same deps differently could be a problem, no?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 08:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230858.n5N8wr8v025978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 04:58:52 EDT --- That wouldn't work, there are very different use cases that demand different attribute L->R (depending if the user knows the font name he wants, for example), and even if we could reduce to a single use case the main contributor to the dep complexity is the languages a font support and language preference ordering is definitely locale/user specific -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230948.n5N9mf3N007032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-23 05:48:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-notcouriersans-fonts Short Description: NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 11:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479521] Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231103.n5NB3XmO024271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 --- Comment #6 from Pander 2009-06-23 07:03:32 EDT --- Has the second bug also been fixed and available for download? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 11:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231142.n5NBg5LC000455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #26 from Nils Philippsen 2009-06-23 07:42:02 EDT --- On my F-11 system, I inserted a fake font entry in fonts.dir, fonts.scale, re-ran the xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 %post script and it was removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 13:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231342.n5NDg0FB012117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 --- Comment #8 from Jeff Johnson 2009-06-23 09:41:59 EDT --- Well I hope you've brought your ice skates. Adding regexp's to existing RPM EVR dependency comparisons is unlikely to happen (beyond the trailing '*' that I've mentioned that you consider "de-muxing"). I've looked at the issues at length. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 15:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231513.n5NFDkdY005915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |489145 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 15:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] New: Missing fontset info Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing fontset info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 Summary: Missing fontset info Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: At least one Kai font is missing a fontset info field. See bz 489145 comment #27 for a description of how this problem was tracked down. Also, try this: $ xlsfonts -fn "-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ISO8859-13" -misc-ar pl ukai cn-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl ukai cn-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl ukai hk-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl ukai hk-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl ukai tw mbe-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl ukai tw mbe-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl ukai tw-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl ukai tw-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming cn-light-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming cn-light-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming hk-light-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming hk-light-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming tw mbe-light-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming tw mbe-light-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-iso8859-13 -misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--17-120-100-100-c-0-iso8859-13 $ xlsfonts -l -fn "-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ISO8859-13" xlsfonts: pattern "-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ISO8859-13" unmatched The "-l" option fails because of the missing info. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Use the xlsfonts commands above. Actual results: xlsfonts without "-l" lists matching font names, but xlsfonts with "-l" errors out because of the missing fontset info, causing it to print no matches. Expected results: "xlsfonts -l" should print information about each matching font. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231716.n5NHGU0V022275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 13:16:28 EDT --- gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231715.n5NHFJn1022041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 13:15:18 EDT --- gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231748.n5NHmUts030932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:48:29 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 20:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232057.n5NKv48Q025664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(radford at blackbean | |.org) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 16:57:03 EDT --- Quick review: 1. The licensing code for OFL, is OFL, not SIL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#Approved_font_licenses W: invalid-license SIL 2. Please do not rename the ttf, it makes cross-distro checks easier when everyone is using the unmodified upstream filename 3. I don't think you win a lot by creating the fontconfig file dynamically instead of putting it as Source1. So I'd advise against it. But I won't block the review on this 4. Please use a leading capital A in the summary inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized a clean and usable latin fantasy font 5. Please correct the documentation end of lines inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/OFL.txt inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/FONTLOG.txt 6. Please correct the documentation encoding file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/FONTLOG.txt You have examples of encoding and EOL fixup in the andika spec http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/sil-andika-fonts/sil-andika-fonts.spec (of course you need to adapt the source encoding passed to iconv to your file) Apart from that, the spec seems clean and fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232102.n5NL2NHl027069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 17:02:22 EDT --- You don't have permission to access /spec/vemana2000-fonts.spec on this server (same for the srpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232108.n5NL89fM028641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 17:08:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I just made a minor update on the files above, so if you happen to have them > downloaded please re-download them, and sorry for the mess. NP > Another point the rpmlint tool gives me a warning 'dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/share/cave9/hud.ttf ../../../usr/share/fonts/cave9/mutante.ttf' but this > is only dangling if the required font package is not installed, otherwise the > link is perfectly fine, I'm not sure how can I fix this. You can ignore the dangling symlink warning since there's not really any way around it in your case (BTW in Fedora we accept absolute symlinks so you don't need to play the ../.. game) Looking at the files now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232126.n5NLQh6X000810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 17:26:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I followed the font template on fedora 11 and got this result, could you check > to see if it's all right? > > http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.3-6.bog11.src.rpm > http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec 1. since the font licensing info is in the data README.txt, this file should be included as %doc in the font subpackage (just add a %doc myfile.txt after the %_font_pkg line) 2. you don't need to explicitely own the font directory, the macro will do it for you (and do it in the subpackage, which is the right place) 3. Your fontconfig file is bad. Start from the template in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.conf and use /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.txt for instructions In your case the generic family will likely be fantasy That being said you've already done 80% of the work (thank you!), just the last mile to go now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232130.n5NLUitC019574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 17:30:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Reopening. The tvtimeSansBold can't be dropped -- the menu lacks the check > ticks. This is too big regression from the user's point of view. > > If anybody had an idea how to fix this without annoying users too much, I would > love to hear some suggestions. Sorry for the delay, I was buried in Fedora 11 post-mortem status report writing I don't really know what the "check ticks" are (could you attach a screenshot?) but the ideal solution would be to find out how to represent them with unicode glyphs, and use them directly if they're in dejavu, or get them merged dejavu-side if they aren't Of course that requires for the ticks not to be something completely non-standard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 23:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232307.n5NN7GTZ021143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jim Radford changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(radford at blackbean | |.org) | --- Comment #2 from Jim Radford 2009-06-23 19:07:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. The licensing code for OFL, is OFL, not SIL Fixed. > 2. Please do not rename the ttf, it makes cross-distro checks easier when > everyone is using the unmodified upstream filename Ok. Fixed. > 3. I don't think you win a lot by creating the fontconfig file dynamically > instead of putting it as Source1. So I'd advise against it. But I won't block > the review on this It's simpler for me to have a single file, so I'll leave that as is. > 4. Please use a leading capital A in the summary Fixed. > 5. Please correct the documentation end of lines Fixed. > 6. Please correct the documentation encoding Fixed. > Apart from that, the spec seems clean and fine Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts-20070624-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 23:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479521] Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232344.n5NNiXua014745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 --- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-23 19:44:32 EDT --- pong, in progress -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 23:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232349.n5NNnv8O015939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-23 19:49:56 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=107011 Have you updated the cjkuni-fonts-common, cjkuni-ukai-fonts, and cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript? ukai and any info of ukai should be not contained in cjkuni-uming-fonts package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 00:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240040.n5O0eraT007478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-23 20:40:50 EDT --- Thanks Nils - I am assuming that is ok then with newer fedora and closing out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 01:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240139.n5O1d5Wi003259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #22 from Victor Bogado 2009-06-23 21:39:04 EDT --- There you are, I supose that now it should be ok. :p http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.3-7.bog11.src.rpm http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240601.n5O61XFV023018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 02:01:32 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/vemana2000-fonts.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241011.n5OABGS5012386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 Takanori MATSUURA changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |twaugh at redhat.com Component|japanese-bitmap-fonts |ghostscript --- Comment #12 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-06-24 06:11:14 EDT --- Change component from japanese-bitmap-fonts to ghostscript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 11:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241109.n5OB9lW0024598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 Takanori MATSUURA changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Ghostscript 690564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507131] Please update font links and deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241916.n5OJGlLd030442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:16:46 EDT --- pokerth-0.7-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507131] Please update font links and deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241916.n5OJGuVe030506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507131 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|pokerth-0.7-4 |0.7-5.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 24 19:25:31 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.44, 1.45 fontconfig.spec, 1.134, 1.135 sources, 1.47, 1.48 Message-ID: <20090624192531.4362E700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10635 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Jun 24 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.7.0 - Update to 2.7.0 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.44 retrieving revision 1.45 diff -u -p -r1.44 -r1.45 --- .cvsignore 2 Jun 2009 01:55:45 -0000 1.44 +++ .cvsignore 24 Jun 2009 19:25:00 -0000 1.45 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090601.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.7.0.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.134 retrieving revision 1.135 diff -u -p -r1.134 -r1.135 --- fontconfig.spec 2 Jun 2009 01:58:15 -0000 1.134 +++ fontconfig.spec 24 Jun 2009 19:25:00 -0000 1.135 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090601 +Version: 2.7.0 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon Jun 24 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.7.0 +- Update to 2.7.0 + * Mon Jun 1 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090601-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090601 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.47 retrieving revision 1.48 diff -u -p -r1.47 -r1.48 --- sources 2 Jun 2009 01:55:45 -0000 1.47 +++ sources 24 Jun 2009 19:25:00 -0000 1.48 @@ -1 +1 @@ -03aec10ac95d376ab402e5644196684b fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090601.tar.gz +7a9b3f53a7cf431d0acac13aab7573f7 fontconfig-2.7.0.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499634] ghostscript files point to nonexisting files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241925.n5OJPEOP023763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499634 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:25:13 EDT --- japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241925.n5OJPJlg023869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:25:18 EDT --- japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241925.n5OJPTZs023945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.20080710-7.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499634] ghostscript files point to nonexisting files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241925.n5OJPOWf002547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499634 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.20080710-7.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Jun 24 19:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 13019] add fc-query In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090624193606.90AA613005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-06-24 12:36:06 PST --- I believe I've fixed this in 2.7.0. Please reopen otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241939.n5OJdsch030089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:39:53 EDT --- cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cjkuni-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Wed Jun 24 20:10:21 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.87, 1.88 pango.spec, 1.161, 1.162 sources, 1.88, 1.89 Message-ID: <20090624201021.5A645700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25237 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: Update to 1.24.3 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.87 retrieving revision 1.88 diff -u -p -r1.87 -r1.88 --- .cvsignore 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.87 +++ .cvsignore 24 Jun 2009 20:09:50 -0000 1.88 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2 +pango-1.24.3.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.161 retrieving revision 1.162 diff -u -p -r1.161 -r1.162 --- pango.spec 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.161 +++ pango.spec 24 Jun 2009 20:09:50 -0000 1.162 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.24.2 +Version: 1.24.3 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ fi %changelog +* Wed Jun 24 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.3-1 +- Update to 1.24.3 + * Fri May 15 2009 Karsten Hopp 1.24.2-1 - Update to 1.24.2 - See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.2.news Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.88 retrieving revision 1.89 diff -u -p -r1.88 -r1.89 --- sources 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.88 +++ sources 24 Jun 2009 20:09:50 -0000 1.89 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7bc6c884d847cabc613e4c6d663771f5 pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2 +63979efe16fe5abaa93c8ea48959e8f3 pango-1.24.3.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242017.n5OKHEuF008858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-24 16:17:12 EDT --- 1. you forgot to remove the %dir %{_fontdir} line (though at this stage it's harmless, just spec pollution) 2. Please use a fontconfig prefix in the 60-64 range, 50 would be a high-priority font ("fantasy" can be pretty much anything, but it'd be a shame to put a font with no bold and no italic first) 3. is there a reason you only use half of /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.conf ??? I know the two blocks in there seem very similar, but they have different affects and are not redundant. 4. you should put data_README.txt as doc in both packages, since it covers licensing for files that will end up in cave9-mutante-fonts and cave9 packages Though 1 and 4 do not precisely concern the font subpackage, so you may ignore me there :p I'm a terrible perfectionist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242043.n5OKh3H8025511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |radford at blackbean.org Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-24 16:43:02 EDT --- 1. For multiarch packages you'll find out it's better not to change the timestamp of txt files during encoding conversion (that's why the other spec had a touch). But for a noarch package, in %doc, I guess no one cares a lot 2. Please do include OFL-FAQ.txt as %doc too, even though OFL.txt is the main legal document the FAQ has some legal value. And it's not big I won't force another back-and-forth for 2. but do fix it before cvs import ??? APPROVED ??? The review is finished and you're now on you own to build, push and register your package everywhere it matters. Your next steps are documented on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 21:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242122.n5OLMOq7024345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sshedmak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-24 17:22:24 EDT --- 1. not sure if it should be classified as sans-serif, I guess it's up for Telugu users to decide 2. Please work a bit more on the package summary (at minimum, start with "A free OpenType font" not "Its Free OpenType font") 3. Fontforge complains a lot about this TTF file. It seems it was created by copying Pothana2000, and it still declares Pothana2000 all over the place. Please ask politely upstream to clean up the font metadata (remove the restricted bit, change the Pothana2000 strings to Vemana2000, change the font style to Regular or whatever standard style is appropriate). You can even do it yourself with Fedora's fontforge and send the fixed file upstream if the author agrees (I see I had noted the non-standard style for Pothana2000 too, even though it's less broken metadata-side than Vemana200). However, none of this is strictly speaking rpm packaging, so I'll approve the package and let you deal with the TTF bugs as the font Fedora packager :p ??? APPROVED ??? This review is finished and you're now on you own to build, push and register your package everywhere it matters. Your next steps are documented on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! Do it again please :) If you still need sponsoring, apply to the Packager group in FAS and post your login here, so I can sponsor you. If you have questions or need more help, don't hesitate to ask questions in ##fonts or ##fedora-devel or on the fonts sig mailing list http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_mailing_lists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 21:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242153.n5OLrPZN030443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jim Radford changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jim Radford 2009-06-24 17:53:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1. For multiarch packages you'll find out it's better not to change the > timestamp of txt files during encoding conversion (that's why the other spec > had a touch). But for a noarch package, in %doc, I guess no one cares a lot I agree it doesn't matter for noarch, but I preserved them anyway. > 2. Please do include OFL-FAQ.txt as %doc too, even though OFL.txt is the main > legal document the FAQ has some legal value. And it's not big I agree. Fixed. > Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! You're welcome. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: inkboy-fonts Short Description: A clean and usable latin fantasy font Owners: radford Branches: F-11 InitialCC: font-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 23:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242300.n5ON0dL0021550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #24 from Victor Bogado 2009-06-24 19:00:38 EDT --- When I first picked '50' I thought it was a low priority. The problem is that I just that I don't understand this configuration file, this was the reason for removing the other half also, I thought it was redundant, silly me. Perfectionism is good, the quality of fedora depends on this, that's why I'm making sure that everything is Ok before building and publishing the package. :-) I think I got it now : http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.3-8.bog11.src.rpm http://static.bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 08:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250837.n5P8boc9012942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-25 04:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > When I first picked '50' I thought it was a low priority. The problem is that I > just that I don't understand this configuration file, this was the reason for > removing the other half also, I thought it was redundant, silly me. There are several short and to-the-point txt files in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ (fontpackages-devel) that try to explain the fontconfig aspects relevant to the average packager. If they're not sufficient or unclear, do not hesitate to complain on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com (or open a fontpackages bug) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 09:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250911.n5P9BonW020608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #17 from Parag 2009-06-25 05:11:48 EDT --- can this bug be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 09:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250920.n5P9KAQm022745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #18 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-06-25 05:20:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > can this bug be closed now? As I said in comment #12, I'd rather keep it open, just to not forget about it. I didn't really fixed the bug, I worked around it. Fixing it requires getting in touch with upstream, and have it fixed there. I tried to contact them, but I got no reply. I'll go on trying, I'm afraid that if I close this bug I'll forget about this issue. Is it really a problem to have it remain open ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 09:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250942.n5P9g1SZ019256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-25 05:42:00 EDT --- BTW, with regard to naming, it'd be a very good idea to check the new naming conforms to the WWS spec (making it WPF and CSS compatible) http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 10:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251005.n5PA5Jgg031997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #20 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-06-25 06:05:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > BTW, with regard to naming, it'd be a very good idea to check the new naming > conforms to the WWS spec (making it WPF and CSS compatible) > > http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx > http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf Do you mean the package should be renamed ? Or some of the font attributes should be renamed ? Could you open a new bug for that please ? Please note that I am not really fonts-savvy, so if you could include as much details as possible about the request, that would be really appreciated :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 11:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251108.n5PB84tH012361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-25 07:08:03 EDT --- I means the names declared in the font metadata should conform to the WWS spec. You have all the gory details in the documents I linked, with standard values for style names, the order attributes should appear in, what to put in font name, what to put in style name, what to put in preferred name (and what is their relationship), etc So it's really the same bug you want to keep open, except the 'maybe dropping the preferred name is a good idea' replaced by 'here is the spec MS published that describes the naming that will work in most apps' Do remember Adobe and MS are the entities writing the opentype spec, so their opinion should be listened to carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 11:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251134.n5PBYdoj010721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #22 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-06-25 07:34:39 EDT --- Ok, that's more clear now :) I'll try to have a look at it when I find the time to. I'll also notify upstream about this and see if they are more responsive this time. Thanks for the heads up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 12:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251206.n5PC6WPJ018016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #26 from Victor Bogado 2009-06-25 08:06:29 EDT --- Well according to the document you pointed out, it seems to me that for all fantasy fonts there should not be the second half of the file. "? the second one tells fontconfig it can complete the font named [fontname] with glyphs taken from fonts registered under [genericname]." The argument is simple, fantasy fonts are generally used for their looks and the computer will not be able to guess witch is the best "compatible look" for the current project. So in my point of view, for fantasy fonts, the computer should display a missing glyph to the user instead of choosing another font that will probably surprise the user. But I guess that this should be part of a larger policy, what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 12:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251238.n5PCc1fg032164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-25 08:38:00 EDT --- fontconfig will always try to complete the fonts and display something to the user. It's better if the user can read what you wanted to display than the user not being able to read computer messages at all (esp when those messages require action on his part). What this rule does is help fontconfig choose the best class of fonts to pick from when it needs to complete. CSS works the same way in browsers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252010.n5PKAZnd006805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-25 16:10:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252050.n5PKos3h020934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-06-25 16:50:53 EDT --- I had cjkuni-fonts-common and cjkuni-uming-fonts installed. I just installed cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript and cjkuni-ukai-fonts. My system is fully updated as of this morning. It makes no difference. The xlsfonts problem reported above and the problem reported in bz #489145 still persist. The cjkuni-fonts-common package installs /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/fonts.{dir,scale}, both of which contain references to both the ukai and uming fonts, even if one or both is not installed. This is how I wound up with a reference to a ukai font while only having the uming fonts installed. Anyway, installing more fonts didn't help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252110.n5PLA562020639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-25 17:10:04 EDT --- inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252114.n5PLExVl027104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #28 from Victor Bogado 2009-06-25 17:14:58 EDT --- So you're saying that even without this fontconfig will try to complete. While I disagree that this is the way to go, I think that it is better that the system show me the error than trying to hide it, but this is more a philosophical issue. But anyway, what did you think about the last version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 22:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252207.n5PM7IAI032305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 --- Comment #13 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-25 18:07:16 EDT --- The only language which doesn't work for me out of the box on www.wikipedia.org is http://cu.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (which is Old Church Slavonic ... the language has not been actively used since 13th Century). bradford:~$ rpm -qa \*deja\* firefox xulrunner dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch xulrunner-1.9.1-0.20.beta4.fc11.x86_64 dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-fonts-common-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch firefox-3.5-0.20.beta4.fc11.x86_64 bradford:~$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 22:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252211.n5PMBG40006565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 --- Comment #14 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-25 18:11:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > The only language which doesn't work for me out of the box on www.wikipedia.org > is http://cu.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (which is Old Church Slavonic ... the language > has not been actively used since 13th Century). Sorry, 11th Century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Church_Slavonic :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 00:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260014.n5Q0EDqS024866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #3 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-25 20:14:12 EDT --- Okay, I should let uming and ukai in two separate dir for them to have their own font.{dir,scale} then. I am creating a test sample rpm now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 02:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507262] Separate Japanese font configuration files for ghostscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260251.n5Q2pKt4025518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507262 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |twaugh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 03:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260348.n5Q3mjGV009374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 23:16:17 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-25 23:48:44 EDT --- Actually it is worse that that since currently the main packages also contain the bold (and light) fonts... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 26 03:50:50 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11 Message-ID: <20090626035050.A753A70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9158 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jun 26 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-25.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#507637 (Missing fontset info: fixed by subpackaged -common.) Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 19 Jun 2009 06:09:19 -0000 1.10 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 03:50:20 -0000 1.11 @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. %define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} %define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} +%define umingdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-uming +%define ukaidir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-ukai + %define _cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN %define _twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW %define cncompatdir %{_cncompatdir}/TrueType @@ -21,7 +24,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 24%{?dist} +Release: 25%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -49,7 +52,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= %package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts @@ -57,9 +60,7 @@ Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20 CJK Unifonts in Ming face. -%_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc - -# remaining uming files +%files -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/license %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.odt @@ -70,11 +71,17 @@ CJK Unifonts in Ming face. %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/README %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/TODO +%dir %{umingdir} +%dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir} +%dir %{_fontconfig_confdir} +%{umingdir}/uming.ttc +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf %package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-ukai < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts @@ -82,9 +89,7 @@ Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-ukai < 0.2.200 CJK Unifonts in Kai face. -%_font_pkg -n ukai -f *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf ukai.ttc - -# remaining ukai files +%files -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/license %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.odt @@ -95,6 +100,11 @@ CJK Unifonts in Kai face. %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO +%dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir} +%dir %{_fontconfig_confdir} +%{ukaidir}/ukai.ttc +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ghostscript files. @@ -136,16 +146,43 @@ CJK Unifonts common files. %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%dir %{_fontdir} -%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN -%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN -%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale -%{catalogue}/%{name} +%dir %{catalogue} +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{name}-uming +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai + +%package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font uming common files. +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 + +%description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common +%common_desc + +CJK Unifonts uming common files. + +%files -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{umingdir} +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingdir}/fonts.scale + +%package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ukai common files. +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 + +%description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common +%common_desc + +CJK Unifonts ukai common files. + +%files -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{ukaidir} +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaidir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaidir}/fonts.scale %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font compatibility files. @@ -189,14 +226,22 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %__rm -rf %{buildroot} # *.ttc(ttf) -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} -%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ # fonts.{scale,dir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} \ - -o %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/fonts.scale -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +cd %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} \ + -o %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/fonts.scale +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +cd - +cd %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} \ + -o %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/fonts.scale +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +cd - # *.conf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} @@ -228,28 +273,32 @@ cd - # catalogue %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -%__ln_s %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} +%__ln_s %{umingdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming +%__ln_s %{ukaidir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai # backward compat to obsoleted ttf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir} -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf # backward compt to transition dir %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir} -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/uming.ttf -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.dir -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.scale -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/ukai.ttf -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.dir -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.scale +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/uming.ttf +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.dir +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.scale +%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/ukai.ttf +%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.dir +%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.scale %clean %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Jun 26 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-25.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#507637 (Missing fontset info: fixed by subpackaged -common.) + * Fri Jun 19 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#468193 (Compatibility to previous installed location.) From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 03:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260359.n5Q3xJZ4005557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smallvil at get9.net |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466672] Missing fontconfig scriplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260422.n5Q4MTE5010239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466672 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:48:50 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] over-enthusiastic subpackaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260421.n5Q4Lr71015510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Summary|A bit over-enthusiastic |over-enthusiastic |splitting |subpackaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 26 04:31:15 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/devel un-core-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090626043115.B041270125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18698 Modified Files: un-core-fonts.spec Log Message: fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795) Index: un-core-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel/un-core-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- un-core-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 22:47:57 -0000 1.3 +++ un-core-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 04:30:45 -0000 1.4 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Core ??????: \ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.2 -Release: 0.7.%{alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 0.8.%{alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ fi\ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \ \ %dir %{fontdir} \ -%{fontdir}%(echo %2)*.ttf +%{fontdir}%(echo %2).ttf %un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? %un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ??????????????? @@ -271,6 +271,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Jun 26 2009 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.8.080608 +- fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0.2-0.7.080608 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260433.n5Q4Xfb6017575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 Fyva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |menenem at bk.ru --- Comment #2 from Fyva 2009-06-26 00:33:40 EDT --- The kerning of Liberation Serif font version 1.04 is not working neither on Linux, nor on Windows. Tested with OpenOffice.org. Liberation Serif Version 1.00 works OK on Linux. Liberation Serif Version 1.03 works OK on Windows. Liberation Serif Version 1.04 does not work neither on Linux nor on Windows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496795] UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260433.n5Q4XtG9012206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|smallvil at get9.net |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-26 00:33:54 EDT --- un-core-fonts subpackages were using wildcards to list .ttf which was pulling in Bold to the non-bold package which might be related to this problem? That should be fixed in un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 26 04:39:43 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/F-11 un-core-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090626043943.1A3EE70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20955 Modified Files: un-core-fonts.spec Log Message: fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795) Index: un-core-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-11/un-core-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- un-core-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 22:47:57 -0000 1.3 +++ un-core-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 04:39:12 -0000 1.4 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Core ??????: \ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.2 -Release: 0.7.%{alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 0.8.%{alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ fi\ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \ \ %dir %{fontdir} \ -%{fontdir}%(echo %2)*.ttf +%{fontdir}%(echo %2).ttf %un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? %un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ??????????????? @@ -271,6 +271,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Jun 26 2009 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.8.080608 +- fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0.2-0.7.080608 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260444.n5Q4itGW014175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 --- Comment #3 from Fyva 2009-06-26 00:44:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349507) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349507) 1.04 in comparison with 1.00 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496795] UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260458.n5Q4wpaU016962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 00:58:50 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 26 05:03:22 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/F-10 un-core-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090626050322.155A570125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27046 Modified Files: un-core-fonts.spec Log Message: fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795) Index: un-core-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/F-10/un-core-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- un-core-fonts.spec 15 Oct 2008 06:07:54 -0000 1.2 +++ un-core-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 05:02:51 -0000 1.3 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Core ??????: \ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.2 -Release: 0.6.%{alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 0.8.%{alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ fi\ %config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \ \ %dir %{fontdir} \ -%{fontdir}%(echo %2)*.ttf +%{fontdir}%(echo %2).ttf %un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? %un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ??????????????? @@ -271,6 +271,12 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Jun 26 2009 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.8.080608 +- fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795) + +* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0.2-0.7.080608 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild + * Tue Oct 14 2008 Dennis Jang - 1.0.2-0.6.080608 - fixed subpackage description and fontconfig. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 26 05:18:01 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12 Message-ID: <20090626051801.2CE4B70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32000 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: refined .spec before rebuild Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 03:50:20 -0000 1.11 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 05:17:30 -0000 1.12 @@ -4,19 +4,17 @@ CJK Unifonts are Unicode TrueType fonts available by Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by \ the CJK Unifonts project. +%define umingdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-uming +%define ukaidir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-ukai + %define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d %define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} %define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} -%define umingdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-uming -%define ukaidir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-ukai - -%define _cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN -%define _twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW -%define cncompatdir %{_cncompatdir}/TrueType -%define twcompatdir %{_twcompatdir}/TrueType +%define cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType +%define twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType %define _transdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkunifonts- %define umingtransdir %{_transdir}uming @@ -52,7 +50,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= %package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-25 Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts @@ -74,14 +72,18 @@ CJK Unifonts in Ming face. %dir %{umingdir} %dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir} %dir %{_fontconfig_confdir} +%dir %{catalogue} %{umingdir}/uming.ttc +%{umingdir}/fonts.dir +%{umingdir}/fonts.scale %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming %package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-25 Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-ukai < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts @@ -100,11 +102,16 @@ CJK Unifonts in Kai face. %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO +%dir %{ukaidir} %dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir} %dir %{_fontconfig_confdir} +%dir %{catalogue} %{ukaidir}/ukai.ttc +%{ukaidir}/fonts.dir +%{ukaidir}/fonts.scale %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ghostscript files. @@ -123,6 +130,7 @@ CJK Unifonts ghostscript files. %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{gsdir} %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -130,60 +138,6 @@ CJK Unifonts ghostscript files. %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common -Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font common files. -Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 -Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 -Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 -Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 -Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 - -%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common -%common_desc - -CJK Unifonts common files. - -%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%dir %{catalogue} -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{name}-uming -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai - -%package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common -Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font uming common files. -Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 - -%description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common -%common_desc - -CJK Unifonts uming common files. - -%files -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts-common -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%dir %{umingdir} -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingdir}/fonts.scale - -%package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common -Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ukai common files. -Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 - -%description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common -%common_desc - -CJK Unifonts ukai common files. - -%files -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-common -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%dir %{ukaidir} -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaidir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaidir}/fonts.scale - %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font compatibility files. Group: User Interface/X @@ -197,20 +151,12 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%dir %{_cncompatdir} -%dir %{_twcompatdir} %dir %{cncompatdir} %dir %{twcompatdir} -%dir %{umingtransdir} -%dir %{ukaitransdir} -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingtransdir}/uming.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingtransdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingtransdir}/fonts.scale -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaitransdir}/ukai.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaitransdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaitransdir}/fonts.scale +%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf +%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf +%{umingtransdir} +%{ukaitransdir} %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} @@ -283,14 +229,8 @@ cd - %__ln_s %{umingdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf # backward compt to transition dir -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir} -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir} -%__ln_s %{umingdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/uming.ttf -%__ln_s %{umingdir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.dir -%__ln_s %{umingdir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir}/fonts.scale -%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/ukai.ttf -%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.dir -%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir}/fonts.scale +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/ %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir} +%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/ %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir} %clean %__rm -fr %{buildroot} From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496795] UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260620.n5Q6Ko2e004355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260624.n5Q6OGdG004814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED AssignedTo|smallvil at get9.net |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-26 02:24:15 EDT --- Ok I think I reworked the packaging in un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.9.080608. Needs testing but hopefully I didn't break too much. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468618] over-enthusiastic subpackaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260625.n5Q6PIJJ005250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-26 02:25:17 EDT --- Should be fixed in 1.0.2-0.9.080608. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496795] UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260629.n5Q6TbP3001317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 02:29:36 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260638.n5Q6c4U0007356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #4 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-26 02:38:03 EDT --- I have checked the whole process of rpm installation. I found that iso8859-13 line in font.{dir,cache} created by ttmkfdir was not correctly reflected the available encoding. Submitted inquiry to author ArneGoetje in regard of this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Fri Jun 26 06:46:10 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/devel Makefile, 1.1, 1.2 un-core-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090626064610.66F4B70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22237 Modified Files: Makefile un-core-fonts.spec Log Message: - update to new fonts packaging and naming (#477474) - moved bold (and light) weights into main subpackages (#468618) - add obsoletes for renaming and former bold subpackages (#468618) Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- Makefile 23 Aug 2008 18:09:49 -0000 1.1 +++ Makefile 26 Jun 2009 06:45:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Makefile for source rpm: un-core-fonts # $Id$ NAME := un-core-fonts -SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) +SPECFILE = $(NAME).spec define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done Index: un-core-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel/un-core-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- un-core-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 04:30:45 -0000 1.4 +++ un-core-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 06:45:39 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,22 +1,21 @@ -%define fontname un-core -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}/ -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/ +%global fontname un-core +%global fontconf 65-%{fontname} -%define archivename un-fonts-core -%define alphatag 080608 +%global alphatag 080608 +%global archivename un-fonts-core-%{version}-%{alphatag} -%define common_desc_en \ +%global common_desc \ The UN set of Korean TrueType fonts is derived from the HLaTeX Type1 fonts \ made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with \ FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. \ The Un Core set is composed of: \ \ -- UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif \ -- UnDinaru, UnDinaruBold, UnDinaruLight: fantasy \ -- UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif \ -- UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style \ +- UnBatang: serif \ +- UnDinaru: fantasy \ +- UnDotum: sans-serif \ +- UnGraphic: sans-serif style \ - UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke \ -- UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script \ +- UnPilgi: script %define common_desc_ko \ ????????? ???????????? HLaTex??????????????? ??????????????? 1998?????? ????????? ???????????????. \ @@ -24,207 +23,152 @@ The Un Core set is composed of: \ ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????????. \ \ Core ??????: \ -- ?????????, ???????????????: serif \ -- ????????????, ??????????????????, ??????????????????: fantasy \ -- ?????????, ???????????????: sans-serif \ -- ????????????, ??????????????????: sans-serif style \ +- ?????????: serif \ +- ????????????: fantasy \ +- ?????????: sans-serif \ +- ????????????: sans-serif style \ - ?????????: cursive, brush-stroke \ -- ?????????, ???????????????: script \ +- ?????????: script -Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 1.0.2 -Release: 0.8.%{alphatag}%{?dist} -Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - -Group: User Interface/X -License: GPLv2 -URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ -Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz -Source1: %{name}-batang-fontconfig.conf -Source2: %{name}-batangbold-fontconfig.conf -Source3: %{name}-dinaru-fontconfig.conf -Source4: %{name}-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf -Source5: %{name}-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf -Source6: %{name}-dotum-fontconfig.conf -Source7: %{name}-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf -Source8: %{name}-graphic-fontconfig.conf -Source9: %{name}-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf -Source10: %{name}-gungseo-fontconfig.conf -Source11: %{name}-pilgi-fontconfig.conf -Source12: %{name}-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 1.0.2 +Release: 0.9.%{alphatag}%{?dist} +Summary: Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? + +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv2 +URL: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts/ +Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/%{archivename}.tar.gz +Source1: %{name}-batang-fontconfig.conf +Source2: %{name}-batangbold-fontconfig.conf +Source3: %{name}-dinaru-fontconfig.conf +Source4: %{name}-dinarubold-fontconfig.conf +Source5: %{name}-dinarulight-fontconfig.conf +Source6: %{name}-dotum-fontconfig.conf +Source7: %{name}-dotumbold-fontconfig.conf +Source8: %{name}-graphic-fontconfig.conf +Source9: %{name}-graphicbold-fontconfig.conf +Source10: %{name}-gungseo-fontconfig.conf +Source11: %{name}-pilgi-fontconfig.conf +Source12: %{name}-pilgibold-fontconfig.conf +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel + +%package common +Summary: Common files of Un Core fonts +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -BuildArch: noarch +%description common +%common_desc +This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. +# un_subpkg 1:name 2:Name 3:Hangul [4:obsolete] [5:obsolete] %define un_subpkg() \ -%package %1 \ -Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %2) \ -Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %3) \ -Group: User Interface/X \ +%package -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts \ +Summary: Un Core fonts - %(echo %2) \ +Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ?????? - %(echo %3) \ +Group: User Interface/X \ +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} \ +Obsoletes: un-core-fonts-%1 < 1.0.2-0.9, %{?4:un-core-fonts-%{1}%{4} < 1.0.2-0.9}, %{?5:un-core-fonts-%{1}%{5} < 1.0.2-0.9} \ \ \ -%post %1 \ +%post -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts \ if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_fontdir} || : \ fi \ \ \ -%postun %1 \ +%postun -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts \ if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || : \ + %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_fontdir} || : \ fi\ \ \ -%files %1 \ +%files -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts \ %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) \ -%doc COPYING README \ -\ -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-%(echo %1).conf \ -\ -%dir %{fontdir} \ -%{fontdir}%(echo %2).ttf - -%un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? -%un_subpkg batangbold UnBatangBold ??????????????? -%un_subpkg dinaru UnDinaru ???????????? -%un_subpkg dinarubold UnDinaruBold ?????????????????? -%un_subpkg dinarulight UnDinaruLight ?????????????????? -%un_subpkg dotum UnDotum ????????? -%un_subpkg dotumbold UnDotumBold ??????????????? -%un_subpkg graphic UnGraphic ???????????? -%un_subpkg graphicbold UnGraphicBold ?????????????????? +%config(noreplace) %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-%(echo %1)*.conf \ +%config(noreplace) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}-%(echo %1)*.conf \ +%dir %{_fontdir} \ +%{_fontdir}/%(echo %2)*.ttf + +%un_subpkg batang UnBatang ????????? bold +%un_subpkg dinaru UnDinaru ???????????? bold light +%un_subpkg dotum UnDotum ????????? bold +%un_subpkg graphic UnGraphic ???????????? bold %un_subpkg gungseo UnGungseo ????????? -%un_subpkg pilgi UnPilgi ????????? -%un_subpkg pilgibold UnPilgiBold ??????????????? +%un_subpkg pilgi UnPilgi ????????? bold %description -%common_desc_en +%common_desc %description -l ko %common_desc_ko -%description batang -%common_desc_en +%description -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts +%common_desc This package includes UnBatang, a serif font. -%description -l ko batang +%description -l ko -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts %common_desc_ko ??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%description batangbold -%common_desc_en - -This package includes UnBatangBold, a serif font. - -%description -l ko batangbold -%common_desc_ko - -??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. - -%description dinaru -%common_desc_en +%description -n %{fontname}-dinaru-fonts +%common_desc This package includes UnDinaru, a fantasy font. -%description -l ko dinaru +%description -l ko -n %{fontname}-dinaru-fonts %common_desc_ko ??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%description dinarubold -%common_desc_en -This package includes UnDinaruBold, a fantasy font. - -%description -l ko dinarubold -%common_desc_ko - -??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. - -%description dinarulight -%common_desc_en - -This package includes UnDinaruLight, a fantasy font. - -%description -l ko dinarulight -%common_desc_ko - -??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. - -%description dotum -%common_desc_en +%description -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts +%common_desc This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. -%description -l ko dotum +%description -l ko -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts %common_desc_ko ??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%description dotumbold -%common_desc_en - -This package includes UnDotum, a sans-serif font. - -%description -l ko dotumbold -%common_desc_ko - -??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. - -%description graphic -%common_desc_en +%description -n %{fontname}-graphic-fonts +%common_desc This package includes UnGraphic, a sans-serif font. -%description -l ko graphic +%description -l ko -n %{fontname}-graphic-fonts %common_desc_ko ??? ??????????????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%description graphicbold -%common_desc_en - -This package includes UnGraphicBold, a sans-serif font. - -%description -l ko graphicbold -%common_desc_ko - -??? ??????????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. - -%description gungseo -%common_desc_en +%description -n %{fontname}-gungseo-fonts +%common_desc This package includes UnGungseo, a cursive font. -%description -l ko gungseo +%description -l ko -n %{fontname}-gungseo-fonts %common_desc_ko ??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%description pilgi -%common_desc_en +%description -n %{fontname}-pilgi-fonts +%common_desc This package includes UnPilgi, a script font. -%description -l ko pilgi +%description -l ko -n %{fontname}-pilgi-fonts %common_desc_ko ??? ??????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. -%description pilgibold -%common_desc_en - -This package includes UnPilgiBold, a script font. - -%description -l ko pilgibold -%common_desc_ko - -??? ??????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????. - %prep %setup -q -n un-fonts @@ -236,41 +180,55 @@ This package includes UnPilgiBold, a scr %install rm -rf %{buildroot} -install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -pm 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -install -dm 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batang.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-batangbold.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE3}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinaru.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE4}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarubold.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE5}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dinarulight.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE6}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotum.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE7}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-dotumbold.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE8}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphic.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE9}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-graphicbold.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE10}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-gungseo.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE11}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgi.conf -install -pm 0644 -p %{SOURCE12}\ - %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}65-%{fontname}-pilgibold.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-batang.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-batangbold.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-dinaru.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE4}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-dinarubold.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE5}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-dinarulight.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE6}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-dotum.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE7}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-dotumbold.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE8}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-graphic.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-graphicbold.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gungseo.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pilgi.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12}\ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pilgibold.conf + +ln -s $(echo %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*.conf | sed -e "s!%{buildroot}!!g") %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} +%files common +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%doc COPYING README + + %changelog +* Fri Jun 26 2009 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.9.080608 +- update to new fonts packaging and naming (#477474) +- moved bold (and light) weights into main subpackages (#468618) +- add obsoletes for renaming and former bold subpackages (#468618) + * Fri Jun 26 2009 Jens Petersen - 1.0.2-0.8.080608 - fix filelist to only include specific font (#496795) From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 08:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260850.n5Q8olIt003741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-26 04:50:46 EDT --- BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 09:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260900.n5Q90ooP005924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-26 05:00:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Okay, I should let uming and ukai in two separate dir for them to have their > own font.{dir,scale} then. > > I am creating a test sample rpm now. Please keep the packages most users will install clean. If you need some special processing for legacy core X font system, do it in a separate subpackage (for example a -xldl subpackage that requires all the cjk*fonts packages, symlink their font files in a separate directory, and includes pre-generated or generated on install fonts.dir* files there) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 09:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260913.n5Q9DaAk008773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-26 05:13:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (for example a -xldl subpackage -xlfd sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261708.n5QH8NlY018499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #8 from Jim Radford 2009-06-26 13:08:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging Thanks for the reminder. I was waiting for the package it be added to F11 or at least to hit the rawhide mirrors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500751] gnome-terminal does not display in bold with Terminus as font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261752.n5QHqNij002865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500751 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Ian Weller 2009-06-26 13:52:22 EDT --- Closing own bug as not a bug, I assume you agree :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270250.n5R2oF5l009818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090618-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270250.n5R2oAcT012170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:50:09 EDT --- gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270300.n5R30DKc016494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 23:00:12 EDT --- gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:00:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270300.n5R30H2v016644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090618-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500284] [ta_IN][Various Sign] 0B82/0B83 the font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270754.n5R7s3Ie004343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500284 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from sandeep shedmake 2009-06-27 03:54:01 EDT --- The problem of improper rendering is only with U+0B83 and not with U+0B82. The fix for U+0B83 is already been provided upstream at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481223. In that case, this bug becomes duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288901. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500284] [ta_IN][Various Sign] 0B82/0B83 the font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270756.n5R7uuW5032700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500284 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from sandeep shedmake 2009-06-27 03:56:55 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 288901 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503430] Incorrect Kerning in some applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270821.n5R8LQBO005634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 Fyva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OpenOffice.org 103157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 09:14:58 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Jun 2009 09:14:58 -0000 Subject: [Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 without kerning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090627091458.14571.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'kpalagin' |'fedorafonts,kpalagin' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From fyva at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 09:47:51 2009 From: fyva at openoffice.org (fyva at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Jun 2009 09:47:51 -0000 Subject: [Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 without kerning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090627094751.330.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 ------- Additional comments from fyva at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 09:47:50 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=63243) Liberation 1.00, 1.03 and 1.04 comparison on Linux with Abiword and OpenOfice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From dixix57 at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 12:32:22 2009 From: dixix57 at openoffice.org (dixix57 at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Jun 2009 12:32:22 -0000 Subject: [Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 without kerning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090627123222.5575.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 ------- Additional comments from dixix57 at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 12:32:22 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=63244) Another font kerning comparison of AbiWord and OpenOffice Writer --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From dixix57 at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 12:50:51 2009 From: dixix57 at openoffice.org (dixix57 at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Jun 2009 12:50:51 -0000 Subject: [Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 without kerning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090627125051.12159.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 ------- Additional comments from dixix57 at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 12:50:50 +0000 2009 ------- OpenOffice Writer was created pdf file also without kerning, but AbiWord was created good. And is it OpenOffice bug or font bug? The same problems occurs when using the Liberation fonts with Apache FOP (by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ show_bug.cgi?id=503430) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From kpalagin at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 17:02:59 2009 From: kpalagin at openoffice.org (kpalagin at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Jun 2009 17:02:59 -0000 Subject: [Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 without kerning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090627170259.8133.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 User kpalagin changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Ever confirmed| |1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from kpalagin at openoffice.org Sat Jun 27 17:02:59 +0000 2009 ------- Confirming as per dixix57. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 00:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475233] pango update i386 conflicts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280004.n5S04ndR012135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475233 Philippe Troin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|phil at fifi.org | --- Comment #3 from Philippe Troin 2009-06-27 20:04:48 EDT --- Fixed in F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281921.n5SJLiw1023445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-28 15:21:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > So you're saying that even without this fontconfig will try to complete. Yes > While > I disagree that this is the way to go, I think that it is better that the > system show me the error than trying to hide it, but this is more a > philosophical issue. Showing the error would be eating some text the computer directed at the user, which is not nice (TM) > But anyway, what did you think about the last version? Oh, sorry, I don't see any other problem with this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 23:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282334.n5SNYV2J002157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-28 19:34:30 EDT --- I am thinking if I should apply for making cjkuni-fonts into cjkuni-uming-fonts and cjkuni-ukai-fonts as they have two separated source tarball now? Also, the font.{dir,scale} generated are not right (missing iso8859-13). There are scale.{dir,scale} provided inside the tarballs. I am still trying to contact upstream about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Sun Jun 28 23:51:29 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.12,1.13 Message-ID: <20090628235129.9C1667012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24261 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: used upstream provided fonts.{dir,scale} Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/F-11/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 26 Jun 2009 05:17:30 -0000 1.12 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 28 Jun 2009 23:50:58 -0000 1.13 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 25%{?dist} +Release: 26%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -171,23 +171,27 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %install %__rm -rf %{buildroot} -# *.ttc(ttf) +# *.ttc(ttf) and font.{dir,scale} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} %__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ %__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ -# fonts.{scale,dir} -cd %{buildroot}%{umingdir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} \ - -o %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/fonts.scale -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{umingdir} -cd - -cd %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} \ - -o %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/fonts.scale -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} -cd - +# fonts.{scale,dir} # use upstream included one instead +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ +#cd %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +#%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} \ +# -o %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/fonts.scale +#%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +#cd - +#cd %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +#%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} \ +# -o %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/fonts.scale +#%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +#cd - # *.conf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} @@ -236,8 +240,11 @@ cd - %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Jun 29 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11 +- Used upstream provided fonts.{dir,scale}. + * Fri Jun 26 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-25.fc11 -- Resolves: rhbz#507637 (Missing fontset info: fixed by subpackaged -common.) +- Factorized spec file. (rh#507637) * Fri Jun 19 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#468193 (Compatibility to previous installed location.) From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 00:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290004.n5T04Au6007623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-28 20:04:09 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112032 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 06:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290618.n5T6IWei010505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 06:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290618.n5T6IX0t010532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 06:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497090] [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290618.n5T6IWvE010474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 06:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290659.n5T6xrnk015048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|b.rahul.pm at gmail.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 06:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290659.n5T6xs69015077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|b.rahul.pm at gmail.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 06:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497090] [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290659.n5T6xqq7015016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|b.rahul.pm at gmail.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497090] [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290702.n5T72RGo015853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com, | |petersen at redhat.com Component|fonts-indic |lohit-fonts AssignedTo|psatpute at redhat.com |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290701.n5T71N5q015675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com, | |petersen at redhat.com Component|fonts-indic |lohit-fonts AssignedTo|psatpute at redhat.com |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-29 03:01:22 EDT --- Please file Lohit bugs against lohit-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290703.n5T730Lc018853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com, | |petersen at redhat.com Component|fonts-indic |lohit-fonts AssignedTo|psatpute at redhat.com |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290706.n5T760qP019652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 --- Comment #4 from Satyabrata Maitra 2009-06-29 03:05:59 EDT --- H Rahul Good to see you here taking care of this bug again. Please resolve the issue asap stealing some time from your busy academic schedule! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290710.n5T7AqrA020829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 --- Comment #3 from Satyabrata Maitra 2009-06-29 03:10:51 EDT --- Hi Jens Is this bug now again assigned to rahul? I see some info like this, in history where his gmail id has been given. Just curious! :) Satya -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:24:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290724.n5T7OmYN023584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290725.n5T7PW0k024013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|b.rahul.pm at gmail.com |pnemade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290730.n5T7UTH7024983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491976] [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290730.n5T7UHXT024940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491976 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 07:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290746.n5T7kpej028115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-29 03:46:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I am thinking if I should apply for making cjkuni-fonts into cjkuni-uming-fonts > and cjkuni-ukai-fonts as they have two separated source tarball now? If upstream releases the fonts in separate tarballs now and if that can simplify the specs this is certainly the right thing to do (this is why guidelines recommend splitting) Experience shows maintenance of complex multi-spec fonts is a lot more expensive than that of simple spec files. > Also, the font.{dir,scale} generated are not right (missing iso8859-13). There > are scale.{dir,scale} provided inside the tarballs. I am still trying to > contact upstream about this issue. mkfontdir & friends have always been unreliable and broken. core fonts usage just needs to die, it is pretty much hopeless reliability-wise. Therefore it's usually a better investment to ask people who complain of core fonts brokeness to port their apps to fontconfig than try to fix a system that has been failing consistently for more than a decade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kstribley at openoffice.org Mon Jun 29 08:32:46 2009 From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Jun 2009 08:32:46 -0000 Subject: [Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090629083246.304.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 User kstribley changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|hdu |kstribley -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|STARTED |NEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from kstribley at openoffice.org Mon Jun 29 08:32:45 +0000 2009 ------- The graphite module is present and working in the graphite01 CWS. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From kstribley at openoffice.org Mon Jun 29 08:33:29 2009 From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Jun 2009 08:33:29 -0000 Subject: [Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090629083329.1014.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 User kstribley changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |FIXED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from kstribley at openoffice.org Mon Jun 29 08:33:29 +0000 2009 ------- Fixed in graphite01 CWS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From kstribley at openoffice.org Mon Jun 29 08:33:31 2009 From: kstribley at openoffice.org (kstribley at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Jun 2009 08:33:31 -0000 Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090629083331.1235.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 This issue depends on issue 93645, which changed state: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |FIXED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 08:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507132] Please update font links and deps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290838.n5T8cAV6007213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507132 Alexander Kahl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kahl 2009-06-29 04:38:09 EDT --- Sounds reasonable, will handle this together with the next ZF update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 15:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291519.n5TFJnq6005417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2009-06-29 11:19:49 EDT --- In reply to comment #9, XEmacs has a complex redisplay engine, as well as complex rules for matching up coding systems and character sets with fonts. Porting that (very old) redisplay engine to use fontconfig is extremely nontrivial. Nevertheless, work has already been underway for a few years to make this happen. It is currently suffering from a lack of knowledgeable developers to move it to completion. Help would be gratefully accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 05:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480461] [mapnik] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300518.n5U5ImSX014202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 01:18:47 EDT --- mapnik-0.5.2-0.13.svn780.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mapnik-0.5.2-0.13.svn780.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 30 07:17:25 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 liberation-fonts.spec, 1.37, 1.38 sources, 1.12, 1.13 Message-ID: <20090630071725.C2B5A7011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27360 Modified Files: .cvsignore liberation-fonts.spec sources Log Message: Updated source from upstream. Latest upstream sources has changed to SFD from TTF format. Removed unwanted -compat package. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9 --- .cvsignore 3 Dec 2008 00:59:50 -0000 1.8 +++ .cvsignore 30 Jun 2009 07:16:53 -0000 1.9 @@ -1 +1 @@ -liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz +liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090630.tar.gz Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.37 retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -p -r1.37 -r1.38 --- liberation-fonts.spec 19 May 2009 03:11:27 -0000 1.37 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 30 Jun 2009 07:16:53 -0000 1.38 @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ New. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts -Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 11%{?dist} +Version: 1.05.1.20090630 +Release: 1%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -19,11 +19,12 @@ Release: 11%{?dist} License: Liberation Group: User Interface/X URL: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ -Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz +Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090630.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils +BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20090224 %description %common_desc @@ -35,6 +36,8 @@ families. Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-compat <= 1.05.1.20090630 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc @@ -49,22 +52,6 @@ Shared common files of Liberation font f %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name} -%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat -Summary: Compatibility files of Liberation font families. -Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 - -%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat -%common_desc - -Meta-package for installing all three font families: Sans, Serif, Mono. - -%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat -%{nil} - %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X @@ -104,16 +91,16 @@ New. %_font_pkg -n mono LiberationMono-*.ttf %prep -%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}.devel +%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} %build -%{nil} +%__make build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} # fonts .ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p ttf/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} # catalogue install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} ln -sf %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13 --- sources 9 Dec 2008 06:31:21 -0000 1.12 +++ sources 30 Jun 2009 07:16:53 -0000 1.13 @@ -1 +1 @@ -01e9083d6e55f83ae9344521f8a9739a liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz +ea3af6af7ee0a54d829e545e6198dbb3 liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090630.tar.gz From hdu at openoffice.org Tue Jun 30 08:22:03 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 30 Jun 2009 08:22:03 -0000 Subject: [Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090630082203.20223.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Tue Jun 30 08:21:54 +0000 2009 ------- Great job, thanks! I hope to get around to testing this when OOo3.1.1 and CWS otf01 are done. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 13:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508899] New: Monospace no more Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Monospace no more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508899 Summary: Monospace no more Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=349951) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349951) buggy monospace Description of problem: The new liberaion-mono font from liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090630-1.fc12 , no longer appears monospaced in verious applications (firefox, gedit). Attached a composite of the new and old monospaced font rendering of the same thing in gedit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 18:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301838.n5UIcGkH010871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-06-30 14:38:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > The only language which doesn't work for me out of the box on www.wikipedia.org > > is http://cu.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (which is Old Church Slavonic ... the language > > has not been actively used since 13th Century). > > Sorry, 11th Century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Church_Slavonic :) Nah, this is Church Slavonic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Slavonic), was used until 17th century and is still used today in church :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301942.n5UJgv18023430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 Kyle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kylepablo at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Kyle 2009-06-30 15:42:56 EDT --- I get this error. See attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301944.n5UJi06q023673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #6 from Kyle 2009-06-30 15:44:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=350016) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=350016) Xorg.0.log.old -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496795] UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302120.n5ULKc7R016317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:20:37 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update un-core-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7060 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULVsfM020907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20070624-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULVnaS025091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:31:49 EDT --- inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 23:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302328.n5UNScG2019354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-30 19:28:37 EDT --- I do not agree to keep creating symlinks for backward compatibility. Package maintainer would be more appropriate to, make the package looking for the latest location of required fonts. It might be more applicable to do with fontconfig than hard coding path name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Jun 30 23:48:46 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.88, 1.89 pango.spec, 1.162, 1.163 sources, 1.89, 1.90 Message-ID: <20090630234846.8DCB67011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31297 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.24.4 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.88 retrieving revision 1.89 diff -u -p -r1.88 -r1.89 --- .cvsignore 24 Jun 2009 20:09:50 -0000 1.88 +++ .cvsignore 30 Jun 2009 23:48:16 -0000 1.89 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.24.3.tar.bz2 +pango-1.24.4.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.162 retrieving revision 1.163 diff -u -p -r1.162 -r1.163 --- pango.spec 24 Jun 2009 20:09:50 -0000 1.162 +++ pango.spec 30 Jun 2009 23:48:16 -0000 1.163 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.24.3 +Version: 1.24.4 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ fi %changelog +* Tue Jun 30 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.24.4-1 +- Update to 1.24.4 + * Wed Jun 24 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.3-1 - Update to 1.24.3 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.89 retrieving revision 1.90 diff -u -p -r1.89 -r1.90 --- sources 24 Jun 2009 20:09:50 -0000 1.89 +++ sources 30 Jun 2009 23:48:16 -0000 1.90 @@ -1 +1 @@ -63979efe16fe5abaa93c8ea48959e8f3 pango-1.24.3.tar.bz2 +f2eeaf183930e00ed28fca3a6ed1deb0 pango-1.24.4.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 23:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302358.n5UNw0ji021047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-06-30 19:57:59 EDT --- ukai.ttc is packed in cjkuni-ukai-fonts which will be installed to /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni-ukai/ . Hence, please kindly update to the latest path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.