[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 18 13:17:56 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977


Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net |
                   |)                           |




--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-03-18 09:17:53 EDT ---
Fixed 1, 2, 3, and 4.

SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec
SRPM:
http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-8.fc10.src.rpm 

Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font
pacakges?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list