From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 08:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 04:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010844.n418iPnY030582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #44 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-01 04:44:21 EDT --- Sorry, there was wrong caches here. and I can see the different result with the test cases at Comment #24 now: 1. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 2. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 3. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> [BAD] WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is used to render ??? 4. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is used to render ??? 5. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --markup --text '??? test' --font "Sans 100" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 6. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --markup --text '??? test' --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 7. LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> [BAD] WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is used to render ??? 8. (bonus)PANGO_LANGUAGE=zh LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is used to render ??? 9. (bonus)PANGO_LANGUAGE=ja LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 08:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 04:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010848.n418mExR031391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-01 04:48:14 EDT --- I just tested also with wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.9.9-9.fc11 and 0.9.9-10.fc11 and got exactly the result as comment 44 both testcases 3 and 7 in comment 24 still fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 09:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 05:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010903.n4193Yxr001610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-01 05:03:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Therefore, either you want to introduce a Japanese specific font config file to > set the preferred font orders for lang=ja, or you simply define VL Gothic as > the default Sans for ja in the vlgothic-fonts config files, just like the file > you proposed for this bug (you do need to replace zh to ja and reset the font > names). Sounds like different things are being talked about: vlgothic-fonts and vlgothic-p-fonts already provide /etc/fonts/conf.d/66-vlgothic-gothic.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/66-vlgothic-pgothic.conf which prepend it as the default for Japanese AFAICT. Qianqian, what more is it that you wish vlgothic's conf to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 09:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 05:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010906.n4196ed2002305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #339961|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 09:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 05:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010919.n419J88L004249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-01 05:19:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Created an attachment (id=339961) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=339961) [details] > proposed fontconfig config > > I've polished a lot from my previous proposal. it won't depends on other fonts. > just works for the desired situation. this should be valid for current our > policy as well. Looks good, clean and simple to me too. Qianqian, could you test it and tell us what problems it causes for you? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 09:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 05:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010923.n419NK8J005128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #48 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-01 05:23:19 EDT --- Aside from adding any rules for the fonts not owned, a rule to fall back the font to AR PL UMing CN for the request out of the supported pixel in WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is broken. basically any expressions in match tag is a AND operation. thus, WenQuanYi Bitmap Song serif 16 AR PL UMing CN would means something like: if (pattern.family.compare("WenQuanYi Bitmap Song") && pattern.family.compare("serif") && pattern.pixelsize > 16.0) { pattern.family.prepend("AR PL UMing CN"); } which never happens. that's why case 3 and 7 didn't work FWIW. I don't understand why you prefer this complex rule rather than my simplest proposal though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Fri May 1 10:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 03:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 20854] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090501101933.0723E13005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Brian Burger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |blurdesign at gmail.com Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NOTOURBUG | --- Comment #4 from Brian Burger 2009-05-01 03:19:32 PST --- https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/338682 Over on Launchpad, Seb Bacher is saying this isn't a Nautilus/file-handling bug. Over here, it's not a mime-type bug. It's got to be one or the other. So which is it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Fri May 1 10:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 03:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 20854] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090501102216.69554130057@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 --- Comment #5 from Brian Burger 2009-05-01 03:22:15 PST --- Copypasta from one of my comments on the Launchpad bug: This is not a problem with the current Gnome Font Viewer, as is easily proven: 1. Find an OTF font file on your system. 2. If you just double-click on it, OpenOffice attempts to open it, and fails. 2. Right-click the OTF, go Open With -> Open With Other Application -> Font Viewer 3. Font Viewer opens and displays the OTF preview just as it should, exactly like a TTF is shown. So I'm not sure how this bug can be Invalid against all three of the targets currently listed. It's should be valid against at least one, if not all. (The above was all done on Ubuntu 9.04) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Fri May 1 12:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 05:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 20854] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090501120032.7CD01130058@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |NOTOURBUG --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera 2009-05-01 05:00:31 PST --- It is a bug in the file managers. File a bug against them. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri May 1 14:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 07:41:40 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011441.n41EfePL009390@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #185 from Greg K Nicholson [:gkn] 2009-05-01 07:40:28 PDT --- Using the 3.5b5pre build from 2009-05-01 on Ubuntu 9.04: In these demos: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2008/webfonts/ , the text renders as unknown-character glyphs (i.e. the character code inside a box), after showing briefly in a local font while the page loads. I assume those fonts are unusable. However, Firefox doesn't fall back to a font with a renderable character. Is this the intended behaviour? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri May 1 14:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 07:46:43 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011446.n41EkhFG023623@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 philippe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phiw at l-c-n.com --- Comment #186 from philippe 2009-05-01 07:45:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #185) > Using the 3.5b5pre build from 2009-05-01 on Ubuntu 9.04: > > In these demos: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2008/webfonts/ , the text > renders as unknown-character glyphs (i.e. the character code inside a box), > after showing briefly in a local font while the page loads. > > I assume those fonts are unusable. However, Firefox doesn't fall back to a font > with a renderable character. Is this the intended behaviour? That is bug 489445, that should land on gecko 1.9.1 (Fx 3.5b) soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 16:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011615.n41GFxvT009261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #6 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-05-01 12:15:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > This isn't a font bug I think. If the preferred family shows "Nafees" then > upstream wants to see the font being called "Nafees" and not "Nafees Web > Naksha". The latter is just the name that has to be displayed when the system > can't handle preferred families. > > The problem should be fixed in the font selectors instead. So, what should I do ? Revert to the ? preferred family ? being ? Nafees ? and reassign the bug to each app having a font selector ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 16:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011622.n41GMugt010881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #7 from Ben Laenen 2009-05-01 12:22:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > So, what should I do ? > > Revert to the ? preferred family ? being ? Nafees ? and reassign the bug to > each app having a font selector ? Yes :-) We've been bugging them for years now to fix it properly once. If more people start the doing that, it may be be fixed one day... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 16:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011634.n41GYpUV013014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-05-01 12:34:51 EDT --- So, how exactly should font selectors behave ? If they don't look at the ? Preferred family ? field, what field should they look at ? (I have no idea how those things work, I'm just trying to understand better the issue before I send it to them :) On another note, isn't there a shared component (GTK ?) where this could be fixed instead of fixing it in each and every app ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 17:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011714.n41HE1Nh021384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #9 from Ben Laenen 2009-05-01 13:14:00 EDT --- I've written down what's going on with (preferred) (sub)families here: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12735 Now, that's for Condensed faces in DejaVu (which are more or less supported by the GTK font selector, but not in Qt). If you move to other kinds of styles they're not supported in any of them (if you get a typeface with 64 styles, you sometimes only see maybe a fourth of them). Font selectors should behave like this: * either read preferred family and preferred subfamily (and make sure your font selector supports different styles besides bold and italic) * or read the family and subfamily (if you don't fully support different styles) But fontconfig will only give the preferred names to the font selectors, and that's why it's going wrong, if the font selector doesn't support it, it has no way to stick with the family and subfamily of a font and discard the preferred ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 18:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011818.n41IIX4e013885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #10 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-05-01 14:18:32 EDT --- Okay, so in your example of DejaVu, we would have: - font family: DejaVu Sans Condensed - font style/subfamily: Bold - preferred font family: DejaVu Sans - preferred font style/subfamily: Condensed Bold A well behaved font selector would then display the font as ? DejaVu Sans ? and in the style selector, it would propose the ? Condensed Bold ? style (along the ? Bold ?, ? Italic ?,... styles). Am I right ? Now, in my case: - font family: Nafees Web Naskh - font style/subfamily: Regular (only one style is provided) - preferred font family: Nafees - preferred font style/subfamily: Regular Those are the values fontforge shows me. Which means that a well behaved font selector would display the font as ? Nafees ? and in the style selector, it would propose the ? Regular ? style. That's not really helpful as other Nafees fonts (for example the Nafees Nastaleeq font) have the same preferred family and preferred style. So, even a well behaved font selector would have troubles with them :-/ Did I get all this right ? (BTW, thanks a lot for your time and explanations :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 18:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011846.n41IkBag008210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #11 from Ben Laenen 2009-05-01 14:46:10 EDT --- OK, I didn't really investigate the Nafees Web Naskh font, but if the preferred subfamily is just "Regular", then that's a mistake there. Obviously the preferred subfamily should be different for all Nafees fonts with preferred family "Nafees". So it looks like the names need to be fixed in the font anyway (but the correct method is changing the preferred subfamily, not by completely dropping the preferred names). Although I can understand that the latter looks more correct since due to those broken font selectors (or rather, broken synergy between fontconfig and font selectors) you may not be able to select all styles if you rename preferred subfamilies... My personal view (which we've normally upheld in DejaVu) is that we don't fix things in the fonts which should be fixed elsewhere (it could open the door for other problems later when things do get fixed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 19:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011901.n41J15VC023598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #12 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-05-01 15:01:04 EDT --- Ok, so I have 2 choices here: 1. change ? preferred family ? to ? Nafees Web Naskh ? and let ? preferred style ? to ? Regular ? (that's what is in the current Rawhide and updates-testing package) 2. let ? preferred family ? to ? Nafees ? and change ? preferred style ? to ? Web Naskh Regular ? Both would be good (admitting that we don't have issues in the font selector). Which one to choose ? I guess only upstream can answer me on this one, and they are not really responsive :-/ I'll let it the way it is currently, if I can get an anwser from upstream, I'll do what they prefer. I'll move the package from updates-testing to updates for F10, but I'll keep this bug open for future reference and for reminding me that this is not closed until I get an answer from upstream. Thanks a lot again for all the explanations Ben. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 19:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011919.n41JJgQv016948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #13 from Ben Laenen 2009-05-01 15:19:41 EDT --- Well, in the end you're the package manager, so you're responsible for making it all work together. So I can understand that you prefer just removing the preferred names if you can maintain it and can keep following this up, whatever upstream does. But upstream (Nafees, fontconfig and font selectors) should fix this anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 02:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 22:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020209.n4229Ixh002106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #4 from A S Alam 2009-05-01 22:09:17 EDT --- 1) while using only qt application (qtconfig-qt4) for check font, it also have problem. 1) Interface (GUI) can be used in english, but input is more important, which is also square box only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021636.n42Gaoj4003991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:36:49 EDT --- nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021636.n42Gas6R006908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 21:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 17:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022137.n42LbYTV023677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-02 17:37:33 EDT --- ping? Spec file seems to contain some unnecessary stuff as well, e.g. Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} in the liberation-sans-fonts package. These should be removed. (The package automatically provides itself and obsoletes any older versions of itself. Conflicts shouldn't be ever used.) The F10 package provides Mono, Sans and Serif fonts. I think the easiest way to fix the upgrade problem is to make liberation-fonts a metapackage that pulls in the font subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030718.n437IxGo005824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 06:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040648.n446m6ex005145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2009-05-04 02:48:05 EDT --- More information: qt-4.5.0-14.fc11 - Not working qt-4.5.0-14.fc10 - Working where only Build tag is different (fc11 or fc10). Can it be depends upon something else? 2) qt-4.5.0-12.fc11 also has problem 3) various language tested (zh_CN, or_IN, ja_JP, ml_IN, ur, kn_IN, ta_IN), all those working fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 10:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041047.n44Alatj019061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-04 06:47:35 EDT --- Suspecting a miscompilation by GCC 4.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041119.n44BJfJ9024517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Parag 2009-05-04 07:19:40 EDT --- sorry but I didn't get meaning of miscompilation here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 12:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 08:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041228.n44CSBuw004462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #8 from Ngo Than 2009-05-04 08:28:11 EDT --- we have new fontconfig in rawhide (F-11), it causes this issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042106.n44L6NuH017827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-04 17:06:22 EDT --- Are we sure it's not a graphics driver issue, e.g. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495323 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 01:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050101.n4511VP9025453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #6 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-04 21:01:30 EDT --- Tested with today's rawhide and the bug is not reproducible: $ uname -a Linux xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx 2.6.29-0.237.rc7.git4.fc11.i586 #1 SMP Wed Mar 11 18:55:21 EDT 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux $ rpm -q fontforge fontforge-20090224-2.fc11.i586 $ rpm -qa | grep cjkuni-fonts cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch cjkuni-fonts-ghostscript-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 01:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050106.n4516AHQ026531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472 --- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-04 21:06:10 EDT --- Tested with updated F10 and the bug is not reproducible: $ uname -a Linux xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 23 23:37:54 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux $ rpm -q fontforge fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 $ rpm -qa |grep cjkuni cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10.noarch cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 01:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050123.n451NPJS029711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #10 from A S Alam 2009-05-04 21:23:25 EDT --- I tested those on 3 machines with Intel, ATI and nvidia graphics and issue remains same. So it may not be graphcis driver. will update about fontconfig today -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue May 5 01:33:01 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 CIDFnmap.zh_CN, 1.2, 1.3 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, 1.2, 1.3 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 cidfmap.zh_CN, 1.2, 1.3 cidfmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 cjkunifonts.spec, 1.25, 1.26 Message-ID: <20090505013301.D5A0770108@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13305 Modified Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: resolves: rhbz#488398 update path name of cidpmaps Index: CIDFnmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/CIDFnmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- CIDFnmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_CN 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-GB1 -/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; -/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) ; +/GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: CIDFnmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/CIDFnmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- CIDFnmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ CIDFnmap.zh_TW 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ % Adobe-CNS1 -/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) ; +/ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; % -/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; % -/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; Index: cidfmap.zh_CN =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cidfmap.zh_CN,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- cidfmap.zh_CN 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ cidfmap.zh_CN 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; -/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; +/GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; Index: cidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- cidfmap.zh_TW 8 Apr 2009 06:24:45 -0000 1.2 +++ cidfmap.zh_TW 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -p -r1.25 -r1.26 --- cjkunifonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 06:29:46 -0000 1.25 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 5 May 2009 01:32:30 -0000 1.26 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: cjkunifonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 12.fc10 +Release: 13.fc10 Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ fi %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog +* Tue May 05 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - + 0.2.20080216.1-13.fc10 +- Resolves: rhbz#488398 Updated path name of cidfmaps. + * Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#488398 Fixed ghostscript files referred to outdated font info. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 02:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050213.n452D2hF005868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #5 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-04 22:13:01 EDT --- What'd you think, Nicolas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 02:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050217.n452HQ9k006006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #9 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-04 22:17:25 EDT --- I guess the cidmaps I back-ported before was referring to new package names used in rawhide (coming up F11 in this case). Please kindly check the following update which target F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=100858 Let me know the results so I could push to F10 once it is proved working. Thanks a lot. It is welcome to test the same on rawhide, or F11 once its released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 05:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050530.n455UP5E006348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-05 01:30:24 EDT --- done http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=96998 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 06:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 02:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050635.n456ZfYC017026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 02:35:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > will update about fontconfig today Thanks - if you could also test F11 Beta and Preview that would be helpful to know when this regression started. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 06:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 02:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050647.n456lBXT019351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #12 from A S Alam 2009-05-05 02:47:10 EDT --- ok, Beta Test. Issue was present in F11-Beta with following version: qt-4.5.0-3.fc11 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050739.n457dMOe028169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 03:39:21 EDT --- Is someone could check 11-Alpha too might be good - we don't seem to have a copy here, otherwise I can download F11Alpha Kde Live. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050944.n459isPr018490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #14 from A S Alam 2009-05-05 05:44:53 EDT --- ok, Alpha-11 Results are here (working fine): qt-4.4.3-14.fc11 fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11 lohit-fonts-punjabi-2.3.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 13:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051315.n45DFVRZ030589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-05 09:15:29 EDT --- Hmmm, a lot of things different there: Qt was 4.4.3, it's 4.5.0 in Beta, fontconfig was 2.6.95, was 2.6.99 in Beta and it's also before the mass rebuild with GCC 4.4. > sorry but I didn't get meaning of miscompilation here. Miscompilation = the C/C++ code gets compiled into invalid assembly due to a GCC bug. If that's indeed what's happening, it'd explain why the same build works on F10. Has anybody tried using the F10 qt-x11-4.5.0-14.fc10 build on F11 (in particular, with the F11 fontconfig)? That said, I think that won't easily work because OpenSSL has a different soname in F11 than F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 14:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051444.n45EitKN020183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #16 from Ngo Than 2009-05-05 10:44:54 EDT --- It's neither graphics driver nor miscompilation by GCC 4.4. It's a regression in fontconfig in F11 that causes this problem. I fixed the pa orthography file and the problem is gone. The new package was built in F11-scratch, you can download from the link. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 14:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051447.n45ElRPc021055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|qt |fontconfig AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 15:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051549.n45FnJlD007924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #18 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-05 11:49:18 EDT --- This is ridiculous. You first say everything other than English renders to squares. Then it turns out it's just one language not working. Someone please give me an update of what the real issue is, before I can take any action. The fact that GNOME works, but not KDE makes it hard to qualify it as a fontconfig bug, even if the issue was introduced by a fontconfig change. Finally, please do a "fc-cache -f" as root and test again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 15:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051545.n45FjcrQ007173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #17 from Parag 2009-05-05 11:45:37 EDT --- yes. fontconfig got many orth files splitted and added new orth files in recent fontconfig releases. so does Punjabi also got splitted from pa.orth to pa_IN.orth and pa_PK.orth. Not sure what where goes wrong in pa orthography. But pa.orth from fontconfig-2.6.95 is same as http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/tree/fc-lang/pa_in.orth. And also from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/commit/?id=4d7412a28b834830d0d1749852115846b3554932, it looks nothing got changed in pa.orth. Will check scratch build rpms tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 16:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051604.n45G4Lfk007700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[qt] Fonts are not showing, |[qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi |while only square in kde, |font showing empty square |gnome working fine... |boxes in kde whereas same | |font works fine in gnome --- Comment #19 from Parag 2009-05-05 12:04:20 EDT --- AFAICS, This bug exists for Punjabi language in KDE only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 23:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052300.n45N0f23007874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(aalam at redhat.com) --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 19:00:40 EDT --- Aalam and Parag, can you please test Than's build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 23:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052359.n45Nx1Sj016264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 00:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 20:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060002.n46020d3017001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 20:01:59 EDT --- The upgrade path is liberation-fonts to liberation-fonts-compat which pulls in the new font subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 23:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052357.n45NvmOp016178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 19:57:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 > Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 > Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} > in the liberation-sans-fonts package. These should be removed. Agreed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 03:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060326.n463Q5gg019682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #21 from Parag 2009-05-05 23:26:04 EDT --- I have tested Than's build and looks Punjabi is working fine. But still question for me remains what change required in orthography file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 03:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060342.n463gqBP022444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(aalam at redhat.com) |needinfo?(than at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 03:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060351.n463pRYD024360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #22 from A S Alam 2009-05-05 23:51:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > This is ridiculous. You first say everything other than English renders to > squares. Then it turns out it's just one language not working. > have you read description? Punjabi (pa_IN) is ONLY mentioned language with Problem. > Someone please give me an update of what the real issue is, before I can take > any action. The fact that GNOME works, but not KDE makes it hard to qualify it > as a fontconfig bug, even if the issue was introduced by a fontconfig change. > Than's build working fine! Thanks Than for help. > Finally, please do a "fc-cache -f" as root and test again. This did not work. forgot to mention before, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060413.n464Dbia027828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #24 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 00:13:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342592) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342592) fontconfig-2.6.99-pa-in.patch Here's the fontconfig-2.6.99-pa-in.patch from Than's SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060412.n464CeVw027698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(than at redhat.com) | --- Comment #23 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 00:12:40 EDT --- You can get the SRPM with Than's fix here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1336938&name=fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-2.fc11.src.rpm See the fontconfig-2.6.99-pa-in.patch in that SRPM. Looking at it, he simply replaced the new pa-in.orth by the original 2004 version of pa.orth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060416.n464GR0i028008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-06 00:16:26 EDT --- I see, thanks - however that still doesn't really answer Behdad's question on why his current fontconfig is breaking pa in KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060417.n464HpD9028750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbhalera at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-06 00:17:50 EDT --- Rahul, could you review the orth changes to see why it would be breaking in qt? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed May 6 04:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 21:26:30 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060426.n464QUOn027062@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #91 from Josh Lee 2009-05-05 21:26:11 PDT --- Just curious, what's the status of this bug? With newer versions of Windows exposing the font scaling setting more prominently to the user, this bug might see more visibility, and it's silly to consider manually overriding laout.css.dpi to be a proper fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060425.n464PlTH030243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #27 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 00:25:46 EDT --- Actually, I compared the file Than's patch added with the new one: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/tree/fc-lang/pa_in.orth They're identical. (I got confused by the copyright notice, but it's still 2004 even in the new file.) So Than's patch doesn't actually revert any changes to the .orth file itself, all it does is rename pa_in.orth to pa_orth. The file name appears to be the magic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060430.n464UatJ031185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 00:30:35 EDT --- Also look at the upstream commit introducing the change: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/commit/?id=4d7412a28b834830d0d1749852115846b3554932 There were no semantic changes between the old pa.orth and the new pa_in.orth, it's the rename which Qt chokes on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060441.n464fktN032414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 00:41:45 EDT --- See the languageForWritingSystem hack in this file: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/qt-copy/src/gui/text/qfontdatabase_x11.cpp?revision=934499&view=markup for what I suspect to be the source of the breakage. In short, AFAICT (and if I'm not mistaken), this tries to look up "pa" in fontconfig, and if the lookup fails, it concludes Gurmukhi script is not supported. Should this be patched to use "pa_IN", "pa_in" or "pa-in" instead of "pa" in that lookup table? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060442.n464gnwe032636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #30 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 00:42:48 EDT --- Setting NEEDINFO on Behdad, but maybe one of the i18n folks is also qualified to answer this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 04:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060449.n464nRjU001542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #31 from Parag 2009-05-06 00:49:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Also look at the upstream commit introducing the change: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/commit/?id=4d7412a28b834830d0d1749852115846b3554932 > > There were no semantic changes between the old pa.orth and the new pa_in.orth, > it's the rename which Qt chokes on. Kevin, Thanks. Thought its scratch build and I will not able to see SRPM. Actually, I already got that thing that the only way to have Than got working his build is to revert back to pa.orth from pa_IN.orth. As I already given my analysis on comment #17, pa.orth and pa_IN.orth are identical. So question remains now where the problem exists?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060504.n4654iWU004373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #32 from Parag 2009-05-06 01:04:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > See the languageForWritingSystem hack in this file: > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/qt-copy/src/gui/text/qfontdatabase_x11.cpp?revision=934499&view=markup > for what I suspect to be the source of the breakage. > > In short, AFAICT (and if I'm not mistaken), this tries to look up "pa" in > fontconfig, and if the lookup fails, it concludes Gurmukhi script is not > supported. I think it should succeed as [parag at rawhide ~]$rpm -q --provides lohit-punjabi-fonts font(:lang=pa) font(lohitpunjabi) lohit-fonts-punjabi = 2.3.8-1.fc11 lohit-punjabi-fonts = 2.3.8-1.fc11 > > Should this be patched to use "pa_IN", "pa_in" or "pa-in" instead of "pa" in > that lookup table? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060507.n4657hma005122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 01:07:42 EDT --- > So question remains now where the problem exists?? Please see comment #29: search for languageForWritingSystem in the linked file (which is src/gui/text/qfontdatabase_x11.cpp from Qt 4.5.1, but that code has been in Qt for ages) and I think you'll realize what's going on... At least I'm fairly sure the problem is there (it looks for "pa", so if fontconfig only knows "pa_IN", it won't find it and conclude the Gurmukhi script is not available). The RPM Provides are irrelevant, it's what fontconfig finds on lookups which is important. (And rebuilding the font package might actually change the Provides.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060515.n465F5sw006502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #34 from Parag 2009-05-06 01:15:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > > So question remains now where the problem exists?? > > Please see comment #29: search for languageForWritingSystem in the linked file > (which is src/gui/text/qfontdatabase_x11.cpp from Qt 4.5.1, but that code has > been in Qt for ages) and I think you'll realize what's going on... At least I'm > fairly sure the problem is there (it looks for "pa", so if fontconfig only > knows "pa_IN", it won't find it and conclude the Gurmukhi script is not > available). Yes. I see that code. And you are right that code has been in Qt for ages. I even tested few new Indic languages based on Devanagari script successfully in QT where that code file has no mention for those new Indic languages like maithili language. Ok. your point looks also right that it looks for "pa" and fontconfig currently knows only pa_IN. > > The RPM Provides are irrelevant, it's what fontconfig finds on lookups which is > important. (And rebuilding the font package might actually change the > Provides.) Ok. Lets wait for Than and Behdad then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed May 6 06:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:38:42 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060638.n466cgp7013434@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #92 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2009-05-05 23:38:29 PDT --- Please file a new bug for Windows. This patch was fixed as originally reported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 07:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 03:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060750.n467oZLV031865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Hin-Tak Leung changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #338816|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #338817|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-05-06 03:50:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342605) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342605) new log, showing finding font files successful After http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=100858 , it now works correctly on f10. There seems to be a new harmless message compared to previous: Can't find (or can't open) font file /usr/share/ghostscript/8.64/Resource/Font/NimbusSanL-Regu. Can't find (or can't open) font file NimbusSanL-Regu. Querying operating system for font files... Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.pfb... 3652904 2149080 21225716 19825545 3 done. So please close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 09:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] New: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In rhel 5.3,in gedit input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with RAW CODE,the font has error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit and input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE 2.The font is different from http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html 205 3.All other fonts from U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95----to U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0CB9 all have errors compared with http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html from 205 to 238. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the result created in gedit. Please compare them with http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html from 205 to 238. They are different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061021.n46ALhX0029320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-06 06:21:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342626) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342626) kn_IN error of 205-238 in gedit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499349] New: "Backspace" has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: "Backspace" has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 Summary: "Backspace" has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: "Backspace" has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.You should press it twice to delete the word. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open a gedit and select the "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge. 2.Input "09CB", "09CC","09DC","09DD","09DF" in gedit. 3.Press "Backspace" to delete each word (Make sure the cursor should be at the right of the each word). Actual results: Each word should be deleted totally when you press "Backspace" once. Expected results: Each word isn't deleted when you press "Backspace" once,you should press the "Backspace" again to delete it totally. Additional info: You can get the more information by accessing http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseCodepoint-Assamese.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499349] "Backspace" has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061028.n46ASqwa000654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-06 06:28:51 EDT --- The version of pango : pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061038.n46AcSKU000786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-06 06:38:27 EDT --- the Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable) on f10 i386 should be pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 please ignore the el5 component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061046.n46AkvLf002573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #12 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-05-06 06:46:56 EDT --- I have already tried fc-cache -f and also manually blowing away fontconfig's cache everywhere... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499357] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061045.n46Ajr2L002422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-06 06:45:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342628) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342628) the correct font image -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061046.n46Ak1Y0002438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #11 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-05-06 06:46:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342629) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342629) font encoding(?) problem The new font files seem to have some font encoding problem with X? Anyway, here is firefox screenshot, plus url. configuring firefox to use Sazanami Gothic (a japanese font) for tradtional chinese explicitly shows how the page should look for most parts - obviously using a japanese font (with missing code points) is not ideal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499357] New: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 with RAW CODE,the font has error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit and input U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE 2.The font ??? is different from http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html 61 Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the correct font snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499358] New: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Input "09E2" with "RAW CODE" in gedit, the word has error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge. 2.Input "09E2" in gedit. Actual results: The result is ? and is different from the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E2.jpg Expected results: The word is same with the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E2.jpg Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499360] New: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Input "09E3" with "RAW CODE" in gedit, the result has error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge. 2.Input "09E3" in gedit. Actual results: The result is ? and is different from the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E3.jpg Expected results: The result is same with the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E3.jpg Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061431.n46EVVW5023047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 --- Comment #5 from seth vidal 2009-05-06 10:31:30 EDT --- I updated gtk2 and pango which pulled in glib2 and libXrandr. I then killed the gnome-terminal I had running and started a new one Then I ran yum update fontconfig urw-fonts and it did the same as before. Should I test it again restarting X and gnome after upgrading gtk2 and pango? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPZXx012089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:25:34 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPdvZ012119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20030323-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NUwJ4013906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:30:58 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NV377013938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20030323-1.fc10 |20030323-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062339.n46Nd1AQ018004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #35 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-06 19:39:00 EDT --- Yep, that's it. Very ugly. I suggest patching Qt and filing a bug upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062342.n46Ng7Gb018676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #36 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 19:42:06 EDT --- What's the correct way to look up the language? pa_IN (the locale's official name)? pa_in (the name of the .orth file)? Or pa-in (like zh-cn and zh-tw which appear to work)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070007.n47072sh019966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #37 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-06 20:07:02 EDT --- "pa-in" is fine. I'll think about this later and see if renaming it back in fontconfig makes sense. Here's the bug that introduced the change: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070029.n470TEjR023759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-06 20:29:13 EDT --- So pa_IN.orth should be renamed to pa-in.orth? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070035.n470ZZDV024919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #39 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-06 20:35:34 EDT --- No. Either Qt patched to use "pa-in" instead of "pa", or pa-in.orth renamed back to pa.orth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070043.n470hTlO028534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #40 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 20:43:28 EDT --- Maybe renaming it back in fontconfig is the best solution? This is a compatibility issue, and while I can easily patch our Qt, it won't help for third-party stuff statically linked against upstream Qt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 01:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 21:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070155.n471tcAZ008619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #3 from koka xiong 2009-05-06 21:55:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342755) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342755) correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 01:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 21:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070159.n471xceV009768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-06 21:59:37 EDT --- FYI, Qt 3 appears not affected, no hardcoded languages there: http://websvn.kde.org/branches/qt/3.3/qt-copy/src/kernel/qfontdatabase_x11.cpp?revision=763238&view=markup But that's not surprising, as Qt 3 doesn't properly support Indic and other hard-to-render languages at all. So this is only about Qt 4. (But most of the Qt stuff nowadays is Qt 4, of course.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070327.n473RFSe024606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #42 from Parag 2009-05-06 23:27:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > No. Either Qt patched to use "pa-in" instead of "pa", or pa-in.orth renamed > back to pa.orth. I see its pa_in.ort in fontconfig. Correct me if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070334.n473Ylbj025717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #43 from Parag 2009-05-06 23:34:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > (In reply to comment #39) > > No. Either Qt patched to use "pa-in" instead of "pa", or pa-in.orth renamed > > back to pa.orth. > > I see its pa_in.ort in fontconfig. Correct me if I am wrong. sorry should be read as pa_in.orth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070404.n4744Egi031413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #44 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 00:04:13 EDT --- Patched qt here (4.5.0-15.fc11): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=101155 Should we get this tagged into dist-f11 (if it's not too late yet)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070411.n474BcG7031979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #45 from Parag 2009-05-07 00:11:37 EDT --- Ahh! I already have updated qt-4.5.1 from build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=99514 Do I need to forcefully remove qt rpms to have your build installed in f11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070414.n474EOsF032270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #46 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 00:14:23 EDT --- You can use rpm -Uvh --oldpackage to downgrade. I could also build a new 4.5.1-based build, but 4.5.0-15.fc11 is the most likely candidate to make it into dist-f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070423.n474NcDJ002027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #47 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 00:23:37 EDT --- I submitted a qt-4.5.1-3.fc11.1 build too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340046 (still running). Most likely we'll also want to sync the changes from Rawhide, but at this point I wanted to get a build with what's currently in F-11 CVS first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070454.n474skXf007098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #48 from A S Alam 2009-05-07 00:54:45 EDT --- Bug fixed with 4.5.0-15.fc11 package. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070522.n475MZIk010354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #49 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 01:22:34 EDT --- Tag request for qt-4.5.0-15.fc11 here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1754 So, should we treat this as fixed or is a fontconfig change (back to pa.orth) still being considered? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070530.n475U0N6012793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #50 from A S Alam 2009-05-07 01:29:59 EDT --- fontconfig (which is build by than) need to rollback. I used rawhide fontconfig (fontconfig-2.6.99.behdada.20090318-1.fc11) then only this build package (qt-4.5.0-15.fc11) was working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070547.n475lRJf015978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #52 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 01:47:27 EDT --- Re comment #50: I'm not sure I understand you. Do you mean that the patched Qt will NOT work with a fontconfig which uses pa.orth? (I need to know this because it means I have to conditionally apply the patch only on F11 and above.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070544.n475ilmR015380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|fontconfig |qt AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |than at redhat.com --- Comment #51 from Parag 2009-05-07 01:44:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > You can use rpm -Uvh --oldpackage to downgrade. > > I could also build a new 4.5.1-based build, but 4.5.0-15.fc11 is the most > likely candidate to make it into dist-f11. Thanks. That worked. Tested successfully fix for this bug using qt-4.5.0-15.fc11 and fontconfig-2.6.99.behdada.20090318-1.fc11 (In reply to comment #49) > Tag request for qt-4.5.0-15.fc11 here: > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1754 > > So, should we treat this as fixed or is a fontconfig change (back to pa.orth) > still being considered? Fixed in qt. no change needed to fontconfig for now. Thanks for tag request. Added comment there for tagging F11-final. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070602.n4762KaJ018423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #53 from Parag 2009-05-07 02:02:19 EDT --- 1)The fontconfig build I tested is fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.x86_64 2) I checkout its source and looked into fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318/fc-lang/ 3) I found following files starting pa_* pa_in.orth pa_pk.orth 4) so with this new qt-4.5.0-15.fc11 build we are using pa_in.orth to see Punjabi font. And yes the patched Qt will NOT work with a fontconfig which uses pa.orth. Actually when you gave this new qt build, I was already using Than's fontconfig build. Then I found after updating qt to 4.5.0-15.fc11, I still see empty square boxes not only while giving input in Punjabi but also its translated strings in kate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070608.n4768WRS019664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #54 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 02:08:32 EDT --- Ugh, this means there's no way that patch can be upstreamed. Qt needs to support older fontconfig as well. Maybe a safer solution would be to use the "sample character" trick Qt is using for some other languages? At this stage I'm not sure tagging that patched Qt build into dist-f11 is a good idea at all, I wonder if I shouldn't withdraw my tag request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070611.n476Bq8v018380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #55 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 02:11:52 EDT --- (I think fontconfig should change to pa.orth instead, and ASAP, to prevent stuff from starting to expect the new name and breaking when it's changed back.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:26:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070826.n478QWRW013267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #56 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 04:26:31 EDT --- What further confuses these matters is that most speakers of Punjabi are in Pakistan, but making pa_pk.orth the default pa.orth is also going to break Qt, as Qt expects a lookup of "pa" in fontconfig to find the Gurmukhi script, whereas pa_PK is written in the Arabic script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070846.n478kGCw019238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #57 from Parag 2009-05-07 04:46:15 EDT --- Thats what I already got and dunno what to say. But afaik pa is actually pa_IN and not pa_PK. I need someone to confirm me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 09:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 05:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070948.n479mhoh029434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #58 from Ngo Than 2009-05-07 05:48:42 EDT --- the patch breaks the compatibility with old fontconfig. I don't think it's good idea to have it in qt. IMO it's a regression in fontconfig and should be fixed in fontconfig. Kevin could you please withdraw your tag request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071000.n47A03o1031724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|qt |fontconfig AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #59 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-07 06:00:02 EDT --- Tag request withdrawn. Bouncing back to fontconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071231.n47CVRj7004261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #60 from A S Alam 2009-05-07 08:31:26 EDT --- Unicode Bug: http://www.unicode.org/cldr/bugs/locale-bugs?findid=1300 said "Change the default content in the metadata so that pa_IN is the default content for pa." so 'pa' can be just link or copy of 'pa-IN' safely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 14:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499634] New: ghostscript files point to nonexisting files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghostscript files point to nonexisting files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499634 Summary: ghostscript files point to nonexisting files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: japanese-bitmap-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: After mass renaming/repackaging of font packages on F-11 development cycle, now /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.ja files point to non-existing files. Example: In CIDFnmap.ja: --------------------------------------------------------- 48 /Sazanami-Mincho (/usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts-mincho/sazanami-mincho.ttf) ; 49 /Sazanami-Gothic (/usr/share/fonts/sazanami-fonts-gothic/sazanami-gothic.ttf) ; 50 /VL-Gothic (/usr/share/fonts/VLGothic/VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf) ; --------------------------------------------------------- Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch How reproducible: 100% -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 15:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499661] New: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499661 Summary: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora $ rpmls -p freetype-devel-2.3.9-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm|grep pkg|grep ^d drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/pkgconfig Your package must not include this directory, because this directory belongs into the pkgconfig package(s). This hides broken dependencies in other packages, which expect to pull in pkgconfig by depending on %{_libdir}/pkgconfig. Note: I haven't checked whether the ownership of directories other than %_libdir/pkgconfig is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 17:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 13:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071759.n47HxYGC015909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-07 13:59:32 EDT --- 481009 looks stalled-ish. Steven, have you begun work on this yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ousia at openoffice.org Thu May 7 20:16:46 2009 From: ousia at openoffice.org (ousia at openoffice.org) Date: 7 May 2009 20:16:46 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090507201646.13387.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from ousia at openoffice.org Thu May 7 20:16:23 +0000 2009 ------- Since version 3.1 has already been released, the next stable version 3.2 will have this issue solved, won't it? Thanks for your help, Pablo --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Thu May 7 21:28:31 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel freetype.spec,1.72,1.73 Message-ID: <20090507212831.DAE1370100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6654 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.72 retrieving revision 1.73 diff -u -p -r1.72 -r1.73 --- freetype.spec 27 Mar 2009 21:58:58 -0000 1.72 +++ freetype.spec 7 May 2009 21:28:01 -0000 1.73 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.9 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -219,13 +219,16 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_includedir}/*.h %{_libdir}/libfreetype.so %{_bindir}/freetype-config -%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ +%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc %doc docs/design %doc docs/glyphs %doc docs/reference %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu May 7 2009 Matthias Clasen 2.3.9-4 +- Don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig + * Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-3 - Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Thu May 7 21:33:14 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/F-11 freetype.spec,1.72,1.73 Message-ID: <20090507213314.AF3B470100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7618 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: Don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/F-11/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.72 retrieving revision 1.73 diff -u -p -r1.72 -r1.73 --- freetype.spec 27 Mar 2009 21:58:58 -0000 1.72 +++ freetype.spec 7 May 2009 21:32:44 -0000 1.73 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.9 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -219,13 +219,16 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_includedir}/*.h %{_libdir}/libfreetype.so %{_bindir}/freetype-config -%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ +%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc %doc docs/design %doc docs/glyphs %doc docs/reference %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu May 7 2009 Matthias Clasen 2.3.9-4 +- Don't own /usr/lib/pkgconfig + * Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-3 - Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 21:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499661] Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072133.n47LXKOR028454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499661 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-07 17:33:20 EDT --- Fixed in devel, not sure its really worth an update. I've put it in F-11 cvs anyway, so it'll show up when we do an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 23:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072334.n47NYYje011054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #49 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-07 19:34:32 EDT --- sorry, have been working on a bunch of things. I will look into these config files and confirm on all the tests. >From what you wrote, the results looks normal to me. If wqy-zenhei-fonts is not installed, wqy-bitmap-song is perhaps the best candidate for Sans anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 23:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072348.n47Nm9Lo013152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #50 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-07 19:48:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > > Sounds like different things are being talked about: > vlgothic-fonts and vlgothic-p-fonts already provide > > /etc/fonts/conf.d/66-vlgothic-gothic.conf > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/66-vlgothic-pgothic.conf > > which prepend it as the default for Japanese AFAICT. > > Qianqian, what more is it that you wish vlgothic's conf to do? I think I misread your comment#21 in Big#476459, and did not check if vlgothic have conf files or not. I think the key problem is when wqy-zenhei is installed, the vlgothic rules are overwritten. I believe a fair test for this and Bug#476459 would be to have all Uming, wqy-zenhei and wqy-bitmapfont installed, where uming is expected to be the default serif, zenhei is the default sans, and bitmapsong (Han glyphs) should overwrite both at smaller sizes. Most of the tests above do not have zenhei installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 23:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072351.n47NpfAi013852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #51 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-07 19:51:40 EDT --- Indeed, I don't mind taking wqy-bitmap-fonts out from the default Chinese font list, and replaced by wqy-zenhei-fonts instead, since zenhei already embedded all the bitmaps and is smaller in size (disabled by default). Then the key question is how to fix the overwritten problem between wqy-zenhei and vlgothic config files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From arielch at openoffice.org Fri May 8 01:27:26 2009 From: arielch at openoffice.org (arielch at openoffice.org) Date: 8 May 2009 01:27:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090508012726.11417.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User arielch changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'bahein,benjamin_schallar,|'arielch,bahein,benjamin_s |bernd_schoeler,ceplm,chrul|challar,bernd_schoeler,cep |lrich,ckolivas,cwoollard,f|lm,chrullrich,ckolivas,cwo |edorafonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,|ollard,fedorafonts,iorsh,j |masayan,msundman,simos' |eongkyu,masayan,msundman,s | |imos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from arielch at openoffice.org Fri May 8 01:27:13 +0000 2009 ------- . --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 02:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 22:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080255.n482tbaj016461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #52 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-07 22:55:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > sorry, have been working on a bunch of things. I will look into these config > files and confirm on all the tests. > > From what you wrote, the results looks normal to me. If wqy-zenhei-fonts is not > installed, wqy-bitmap-song is perhaps the best candidate for Sans anyway. You better read the above comments carefully. wqy-zenhei-fonts is irrelevant for this issue and either of fonts shouldn't affects anything else. that's why adding no own fonts to the fontconfig rule is a bad idea. actually my simpler rule works fine with the above testcases. To be sane, here is a result of pango-view with Serif, without wqy-zenhei-fonts. 1. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 2. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 3. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Chinese outline font 4. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [BAD] outline font is still used. 5. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --markup --text '??? test' --font "Sans 100" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 6. LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --markup --text '??? test' --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font 7. LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 100" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Chinese outline font 8. (bonus)PANGO_LANGUAGE=zh LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [BAD] outline font is still used 9. (bonus)PANGO_LANGUAGE=ja LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "Sans 12" --> [GOOD] rendering is ok with Japanese font This result would means the fallback rule by the size doesn't work which I've pointed out at comment #48. (In reply to comment #51) > Indeed, I don't mind taking wqy-bitmap-fonts out from the default Chinese font > list, and replaced by wqy-zenhei-fonts instead, since zenhei already embedded > all the bitmaps and is smaller in size (disabled by default). > > Then the key question is how to fix the overwritten problem between wqy-zenhei > and vlgothic config files. Again, it's a separate issue. please stop mixing up multiple bugs here. and I'm still waiting for your explanation what exactly you faced with my simpler fontconfig rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 03:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 23:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080304.n48341eO012864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |fangqq at gmail.com --- Comment #26 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-07 23:04:00 EDT --- >From Bug #492510: (In reply to comment #51) > Indeed, I don't mind taking wqy-bitmap-fonts out from the default Chinese font > list, and replaced by wqy-zenhei-fonts instead, since zenhei already embedded > all the bitmaps and is smaller in size (disabled by default). > > Then the key question is how to fix the overwritten problem between wqy-zenhei > and vlgothic config files. As the suspicious was pointed out the above, I've confirmed getting rid of WenQuanYi ZenHei from 65-nonlatin.conf fixes this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 03:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 23:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080321.n483LSiC015989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #53 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-07 23:21:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Indeed, I don't mind taking wqy-bitmap-fonts out from the default Chinese font > list Yes we really need a proper fix for this for f11, ASAP. The serious issue in this bug is about wqy-bitmap overriding fonts for Kanji (and Hanja). > replaced by wqy-zenhei-fonts instead, since zenhei already embedded > all the bitmaps and is smaller in size (disabled by default). Too late now for f11 and a separate issue - but happy to consider that for f12 once bug 476459 is addressed. > Then the key question is how to fix the overwritten problem between wqy-zenhei > and vlgothic config files. Akira already solved it in a simple way - please check it carefully and provide some real feedback on his .conf. Otherwise we will have to make the changes or drop bitmap as a default in the chinese-support yum group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080405.n48453Id023323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #13 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-05-08 00:05:02 EDT --- downgrading to -11 reverts to correct behavior... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080422.n484Mp6U026135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #14 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-05-08 00:22:50 EDT --- I have tried forward/backward a few times (close firefox, install package , fc-cache -r as root and user, start firefox), and it seems that something in -13 is different and broken compared to -11 ; url as in the screenshot . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080453.n484r64o030782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #54 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-08 00:53:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #52) > Again, it's a separate issue. please stop mixing up multiple bugs here. and I'm > still waiting for your explanation what exactly you faced with my simpler > fontconfig rule. ok, let me first reply your above question. Test environment: rawhide with today's update, installed Uming, wqy-bitmap-fonts, and the Japanese fonts, and NOT installed wqy-zenhei-fonts (I will discuss about this later). I used your proposed config file, referred to "NEW" and the 61-wqy-bitmapfont.conf in the current wqy-bitmap-fonts package, referred to "OLD". * Test set 1, pango-view tests I ran all 9 tests listed in Comment#52, for NEW, tests 1-2,4-6,8-9 got expected results. test 3: the "sans 100" was rendered by outline font UMing; test 7, the "sans 100" was rendered by bitmap song. For OLD, same results for 1-2,4-6,8-9; both tests 3 and 7, it uses bitmap song for Chinese rendering (notice these two tests are for zh and en locales, not for ja). Conclusion: the only difference between these two tests is test 3, which I can not say which one is better. Clearly, no Japanese fonts were overwritten by the current version of wqy-bitmap-fonts, under any test locales. * Test set 2, browser/terminal and desktop font rendering My standard test page is http://wenq.org/?WQYTest . I set one of the NEW and OLD file as the active setting and made screen captures under ja/zh/en desktops. The results were uploaded to this album: http://picasaweb.google.com/fangqq/ConfigScreenshot you can click into each screenshot and click magnify. Basic conclusions: 1. the rendering for ja desktops are identical (ignore those simplified Chinese characters that are not defined in JIS); all Han glyphs were rendered with the preferred Japanese Gothic or Mincho fonts in both browser, desktop menu and terminal. 2. the rendering for en desktop are different. NEW config renderings is bad for 2.1 it uses a mixture of Mincho with bitmap song to render the H1/H2 titles, 2.2 it renders Han glyphs in terminals with a mixture of UKai and Gothic, 2.3 and for Sans, Hanzi at all sizes were rendered by Japanese Gothic 2.4 for serif and mono, 13pt and 14 pt still uses bitmap to render 3. for zh desktop, the rendering are identical. However, both are different from what was configured for F8~F10, which you can see in the last screenshot. in the past, all bitmaps in the web/terminal are from wqy-bitmap-fonts, but now, the web/terminal bitmaps are from Uming, which is inferior in quality. However, this is a separate issue. Perhaps some config files of Uming changed the priority. To summarize: the two config files performs pretty much the same for zh and ja, but the OLD config file more consistent selection of fonts for en (and all non-CJK locales) desktops. So, I don't see the benefit of switching to the new file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:10:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080510.n485AfuC001002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #55 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-08 01:10:40 EDT --- I hope the above comparison is clear. Now let's talk about the next question, which involves ZenHei. The comparisons we have done so far are unfair. Because Japanese fonts have both vector sans (Gothic) and serif (Mincho) installed, but for Chinese, only vector serif (UMing) were installed. As I said, ZenHei is the proper vector Chinese sans font. Without ZenHei, Chinese sans font has to fallback. Given the missing of Chinese sans vector font, Bitmap Song is indeed the most proper choice for Chinese sans (Uming will cross the lines from sans to serif). Therefore, in your tests 3 and 7, it picked Bitmap Song to render Sans, I think it is the right choice. The only better solution is to install ZenHei by default. In that case, for larger size sans glyphs, it will use ZenHei as the first choice, and bitmap Song as the second choice. If ZenHei needs to be installed, the config files of zenhei and VL Gothic should be "coordinated" (either you change your 66-vlgothic* or I changed my 41-wqy-zenhei.conf), in order to make both working, but we should not say which one is "correct" or "wrong". This is basically the concern of Bug#476459. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080532.n485WVCj009216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #27 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-08 01:32:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > As the suspicious was pointed out the above, I've confirmed getting rid of > WenQuanYi ZenHei from 65-nonlatin.conf fixes this issue. This id definitely not a right fix. Rename your 66-vlgothic config files to 44 or other numbers will also fix it. But as I said, the only solution is to coordinate between our config files, not to eliminate the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499775] New: [or_IN][pango] =?utf-8?q?_GSUB_Delete_U+0B3E_by?= =?utf-8?q?_backspace_will_delete_other_letters_except_=E0=AC=BE?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B3E by backspace will delete other letters except ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499775 Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B3E by backspace will delete other letters except ? Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB Delete U+0B3E by backspace will delete other letters before it except ? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input abc? 2.Press backspace key to delete the font "?" 3. Actual results: It will delete both letter "c" before it and font "?" Expected results: It will only delete font "?" Additional info: 1. U+0B3E ? 2. U+0B3F ? 3. U+0B40 ? 4. U+0B41 ? 5. U+0B42 ? 6. U+0B43 ? 7. U+0B47 ? 8. U+0B48 ? 9. U+0B4B ? 10. U+0B4C ? 11. U+0B56 ? 12. U+0B57 ? 13. U+0B01 ? 14. U+0B02 ? 15. U+0B03 ? 16. U+0B3C ? 17. U+0B4D ? 18. U+0B56 ? 19. U+0B57 ? these fonts all have similar problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 06:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 02:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499777] New: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D need pressing Backspace key twice Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D need pressing Backspace key twice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499777 Summary: [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D need pressing Backspace key twice Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D by Backspace key,we need pressing Backspace key twice to delete the font Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit press 0B5C ? 2.Press Backspace key to delete it 3. Actual results: User must press Backspace key twice to delete it Expected results: User should press Backspace key only once to delete it. Additional info: 0B5D also has this problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080713.n487D7BN026130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #28 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-08 03:13:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > As the suspicious was pointed out the above, I've confirmed getting rid of > > WenQuanYi ZenHei from 65-nonlatin.conf fixes this issue. > > This id definitely not a right fix. Rename your 66-vlgothic config files to 44 > or other numbers will also fix it. But as I said, the only solution is to > coordinate between our config files, not to eliminate the other. No. remember that vlgothic fonts' fontconfig rule is only applied when lang == ja now. if I get rid of it, this numeral prefix race will breaks Chinese rendering. it doesn't solve ANYTHING. furthermore as you suggested the above, the language-selector idea also applies the rules at the same priority for CJK. I thought we have agreed that the difference is it's done by inside fontconfig or outside. if you're right, that would also means that idea won't solve anything then. I don't think so. and actually it works properly if it's gone from 65-nonlatin.conf. What's the issue you mind when it's gone from 65-nonlatin.conf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499790] New: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499790 Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB press Delete key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3. I think it is a regression bug. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C15 U+0C4D U+0C15 2.Press Delete key to delete the char 3. Actual results: It can't delete the whole char,it will delete part of the char Expected results: It will delete the whole char. Additional info: All of chars in [te_IN][GSUB] has the same problem. But in rhel 5.3 they work well. So I think it is a regression problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 10:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 06:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499804] New: [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499804 Summary: [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input daben? 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char ? Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: Dependent Vowels 1. U+0C3F ? 2. U+0C40 ? 3. U+0C41 ? 4. U+0C42 ? 5. U+0C43 ? 6. U+0C44 ? 7. U+0C46 ? 8. U+0C47 ? 9. U+0C48 ? 10. U+0C4A ? 11. U+0C4B ? 12. U+0C4C ? all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 10:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 06:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499806] New: [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499806 Summary: [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input daben? 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char ? Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: 1.U+0C01 ? 2. U+0C02 ? 3. U+0C03 ? 4. U+0C4D ? 5. U+0C55 ? 6. U+0C56 ? all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 10:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 06:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499807] New: [te_IN][codepoint]Press right arrow key it can't move to the right of the char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][codepoint]Press right arrow key it can't move to the right of the char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499807 Summary: [te_IN][codepoint]Press right arrow key it can't move to the right of the char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press right arrow key,it can't move to the right of the char Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C4D 2.Press right arrow key to move to the right of the char Actual results: It can't move to the right of the char Expected results: It should move to the right of the char Additional info: 0C4D 0C3F 0C40 0C46 0C47 0C48 all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 11:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 07:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499790] [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081121.n48BLxNg030178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499790 Lawrence Lim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |llim at redhat.com Summary|[te_IN][pango]GSUB delete |[te_IN][pango]GSUB delete |key can't delete the whole |key can't delete the whole |char in f10,but works well |char in f10 |in rhel5.3 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 14:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 10:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081411.n48EBWLV028700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 --- Comment #2 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-05-08 10:11:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343092) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343092) An image which shows what happens in Eclipse in fa locale -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081747.n48HlXhI007510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com, | |oliver at linux-kernel.at, | |overholt at redhat.com Component|pango |eclipse AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |overholt at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:53:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081753.n48HrFUo008648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(hedayat at grad.com) --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-08 13:53:13 EDT --- Hedayat, have you tried with a download from eclipse.org? If you can, grab one of the builds from here for your architecture: http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M7-200904302300/index.php Then, do something like: tar zxf eclipse-*.tar.gz cd eclipse ./eclipse -data /tmp/testFontStuff and see if you can reproduce there. We don't do any patching to our Eclipse packages in this area so I suspect it is an upstream thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081832.n48IWYMm016725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #61 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-08 14:32:33 EDT --- Update on this. No qt changes needed. I'll fix in fontconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499902] Restructure the fontconfig settings for CJK languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081917.n48JHERI025573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499902 --- Comment #1 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-08 15:17:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343148) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343148) language specific fontconfig settings for Chinese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499902] Restructure the fontconfig settings for CJK languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081917.n48JHdFd025642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499902 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://picasaweb.google.com | |/fangqq/ProposalForFontconf | |igSettingsForCJKLanguages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499902] New: Restructure the fontconfig settings for CJK languages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Restructure the fontconfig settings for CJK languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499902 Summary: Restructure the fontconfig settings for CJK languages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: fangqq at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, petersen at redhat.com, nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=343146) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343146) language specific fontconfig settings for Japanese The CJK language fontconfig settings has been a long-standing issue ever since the beginning of using fontconfig. There hasn't been a good solution yet. The major difficulties for causing this problem, IMO, include 1. the default 65-nonlatin.conf was badly outdated with unoptimized font orders 2. there are no CJK language-specific fontconfig files, therefore, to override the default orders, one has to add font prefer list in the fontconfig settings shipped with individual CJK font package. 3. because these settings were scattered into many font packages, this further makes the problem complex, and the conflict between different CJK font packages became more and more frequent. To solve this issue, I propose the following solution 1. update 65-nonlatin.conf and setup an optimized and up-to-date font list 2. add language specific fontconfig settings, defining font preferred orders with for a given lang tag, and assign these files a lower number than 65 3. remove all font order settings from all CJK related font packages For solution step 1, I proposed a completely updated 65-nonlatin.conf at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911 . My rationale of the font orders was also explained in details. For solution step 2, I created two default settings for ja and zh locales (that for ko can be done similarly) as examples, and you can find them in the attachments. Because I used lang tag matching in the rules, these files can be installed concurrently (in this sense, it is better than the language-selector in Ubuntu, which needs to run fontconfig-voodoo to link a set of active config under a given language). I did the following to test this proposal. From what I saw for zh-*, ja and en locales, all the wanted features were working properly. Here are the details of my test: First, I did this test with rawhide updated this morning. On the system, I installed chinese-support and japanese-support, including wqy-bitmap-fonts, wqy-zenhei-fonts, arphic-uming, vlgothic-fonts and some mincho Japanese font. To clean up all the font config settings, I "su" to root, and run the following cd /etc/fonts/conf.d/ mkdir cjk mv *wqy* cjk mv *vlgo* cjk mv *arphic* cjk mv *gothic* cjk This is just a quick way to get rid of all the font-wise preference settings. In the future, most of these files can stay, as long as they remove the blocks to set or prepend family names. The second step is to update (of course, make a backup first) the 65-nonlatin.conf by downloading from the attachment at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911 Then, download the 55-language_fonts_ja-jp.conf and 55-language_fonts_zh-cn.conf from this thread and save them under /etc/fonts/conf.d/ . This completes the settings. For Chinese users, some of them prefer bitmap glyphs for Han characters (35%), some prefer vectors (65%). This is controlled by installing wqy-bitmap-fonts or uninstalling the bitmap fonts. I tested my proposed settings for English, Japanese and Chinese languages, with bitmap preferred settings and vector preferred settings. My screenshots for all combination can be found at this online album: http://picasaweb.google.com/fangqq/ProposalForFontconfigSettingsForCJKLanguages When bitmap font is installed, for en and zh desktops, fonts at sizes 9pt ~ 12pt will be rendered as bitmaps for all font aliases (sans,serif, mono); otherwise, it will be rendered by the respective vector fonts. Particularly, for en desktop, no more font-mosaic problems caused by high priority of Japanese fonts (such as http://picasaweb.google.com/fangqq/ConfigScreenshot#5333302146968242258) . When one remove the bitmap fonts, all Hanzi glyphs were rendered by the preferred vector fonts, as expected (some remaining ones are from UMing, which I did not disable). For ja desktop, all fonts were rendered by their preferred vector fonts, no matter bitmap Chinese fonts installed or not (please ignore "?" and "?" as they are not defined in JIS). I believe this approach greatly simplifies the CJK font settings by centralizing the related settings to language specific files. All the expected basic rendering order were achieved with the current proposed config files. Of course one can fine-tune them further. For Korean users, a 55-language-fonts-ko.conf file can be made similarly. It will be really great if this proposal can be tested and agreed by all CJK font package maintainers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081928.n48JSRpH027376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #29 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-08 15:28:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > What's the issue you mind when it's gone from 65-nonlatin.conf? Because it is going completely to the other direction as what I was proposing: I hope to centralize all CJK font order settings into 1) 65-nonlatin and 2) a set of language-specific files. Removing font settings from theses centralized places and scatter these settings into multiple font packages will only increase the chance of conflict. Indeed, I tested my proposal and things are working perfectly. You can find my latest proposal at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499902 and I love to know what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri May 8 20:00:56 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 20:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.42, 1.43 fontconfig.spec, 1.131, 1.132 sources, 1.45, 1.46 Message-ID: <20090508200056.47ED070108@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20888 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 - Resolves #497984 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.42 retrieving revision 1.43 diff -u -p -r1.42 -r1.43 --- .cvsignore 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.42 +++ .cvsignore 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.43 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.131 retrieving revision 1.132 diff -u -p -r1.131 -r1.132 --- fontconfig.spec 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.131 +++ fontconfig.spec 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.132 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 +Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 +- Resolves #497984 + * Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 - Resolves #490888 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.45 retrieving revision 1.46 diff -u -p -r1.45 -r1.46 --- sources 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.45 +++ sources 8 May 2009 20:00:25 -0000 1.46 @@ -1 +1 @@ -6f2ecfcd695f3f7ec32ae7bdfe438b33 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz +8e04b95bfb69a2dba947dd0cfc61b5f0 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri May 8 20:20:24 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 20:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/F-11 fontconfig.spec,1.131,1.132 sources,1.45,1.46 Message-ID: <20090508202024.C548870108@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23046 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.99.behdad.20090508???-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 - Resolves #497984 Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/F-11/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.131 retrieving revision 1.132 diff -u -p -r1.131 -r1.132 --- fontconfig.spec 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.131 +++ fontconfig.spec 8 May 2009 20:19:54 -0000 1.132 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 +Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue May 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090508 +- Resolves #497984 + * Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 - Resolves #490888 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.45 retrieving revision 1.46 diff -u -p -r1.45 -r1.46 --- sources 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.45 +++ sources 8 May 2009 20:19:54 -0000 1.46 @@ -1 +1 @@ -6f2ecfcd695f3f7ec32ae7bdfe438b33 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz +8e04b95bfb69a2dba947dd0cfc61b5f0 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082039.n48Kdmkr013707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #62 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-08 16:39:47 EDT --- Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1.fc11. Can someone request tagging it please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082109.n48L9uRG015492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #15 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-05-08 17:09:55 EDT --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW seems to refer to /usr/share/fonts/chinese/{cjkunifonts-ukai,cjkunifonts-uming} rather than /usr/share/fonts/{cjkunifonts-ukai,cjkunifonts-uming} But please close when that's fixed. I think my firefox problem is unrelated (it seems to come and go, and not depending on which version - I unpacked both src rpm and can't see how the difference affect the x server) - so I probably should file a different bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 22:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082204.n48M4DP0031675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #63 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-08 18:04:12 EDT --- Tag request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 22:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082204.n48M4UaE027252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 23:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 19:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499921] New: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499921 Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts" Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com ReportedBy: tim at tim-landscheidt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora The description for xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-6.fc9.noarch does not list "Greek". Therefore, yum searches for "greek bitmap fonts" fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 23:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 19:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082353.n48NrKdA011144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 Arjuna Rao Chavala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Arjuna Rao Chavala 2009-05-08 19:53:19 EDT --- Closing, as I found the problem to be with Pango as it doesnot do lookups at syllable level as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223170 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 01:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 21:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090122.n491MALp022309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #16 from Hin-Tak Leung 2009-05-08 21:22:09 EDT --- Please ignore comment 11,12,13,14 - I think it is due to the radeon X driver. "MOZ_DISABLE_IMAGE_OPTIMIZE=1 firefox" works around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090342.n493gqgt011537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-08 23:42:52 EDT --- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090414.n494EJwd019748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:14:19 EDT --- wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.9.9-10.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:14:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090414.n494EQgc019789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.9-10.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:10:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101610.n4AGA2jK009274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-10 12:10:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > No. upgrading path from F-10 -> F-11 MUST be preserved. > This is not related to font packaging policy. The upgrade path DOES work within Fedora. (see comment #7) That third party packages fail is none of our problem. And a metapackage is certainly not needed. In fact a large part of the liberation spec ugly-ness is due to mixing in metapackage patterns. However even though this mixing makes it difficult to understand it should still work ok. Anyway, 1. re: Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 ? request by the yum folks to workaround a groupupdate yum misbehaviour 2. re: Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} ? totally unnecessary, though harmless Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < xxxx would have made sense if it had ever been pushed to users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101623.n4AGNAwQ017292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 12:23:10 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages "If a package is being renamed without any functional changes, or is a compatible enough replacement to an existing package (where "enough" means that it includes only changes of magnitude that are commonly found in version upgrade changes), provide clean upgrade paths and compatibility with: Provides: oldpackagename = $provEVR Obsoletes: oldpackagename < $obsEVR" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:53:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101653.n4AGrXF2015561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-10 12:53:32 EDT --- The upgrade path is not broken so your point is moot. Fix your third-party package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500099] New: [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500099 Summary: [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input daben? 2.Press the cursor to the right and press Backspace key to delete the whole char ? Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: Dependent Vowels all have same problem 1 U+0D3E ? 2 U+0D3F ? 3 U+0D40 ? 4 U+0D41 ? 5 U+0D42 ? 6 U+0D43 ? 7 U+0D46 ? 8 U+0D47 ? 9 U+0D48 ? 10 U+0D4A ? 11 U+0D4B ? 12 U+0D4C ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500100] New: [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500100 Summary: [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input daben? 2.Press the cursor to the right and press Backspace key to delete the whole char ? It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char Additional info: 1.U+0D02 ? 2.U+0D03 ? 3.U+0D4D ? 4.U+0D57 ? all have similar problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110613.n4B6DsMw010872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-11 02:13:53 EDT --- This is all done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110613.n4B6DtxZ010894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477401, which changed state. Bug 477401 Summary: [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500105] New: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Unicode 0952/0953/0954 don't have the right font shape Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Unicode 0952/0953/0954 don't have the right font shape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500105 Summary: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Unicode 0952/0953/0954 don't have the right font shape Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input 0952/0953/0954 with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input 0952/0953/0954 with RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500100] [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110637.n4B6b4os014658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500100 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500105] [hi_IN][Various Sign]Unicode 0952/0953/0954 don't have the right font shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110635.n4B6ZSdk006706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500105 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 02:35:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343313) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343313) the error font shape in gedit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499804] [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110638.n4B6cpBb007234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499804 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500099] [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110637.n4B6bq1b007110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500099 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500105] [hi_IN][Various Sign]Unicode 0952/0953/0954 don't have the right font shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110637.n4B6bSEt007032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500105 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499790] [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110639.n4B6dPo8015146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499790 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499807] [te_IN][codepoint]Press right arrow key it can't move to the right of the char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110638.n4B6c6GC014862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499807 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499806] [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110638.n4B6cPhZ014906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499806 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499358] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110642.n4B6gCo4015929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 --- Comment #2 from A S Alam 2009-05-11 02:42:11 EDT --- Description of problem: Input "09E2" with "RAW CODE" in gedit, the word has error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge. 2.Input "09E2" in gedit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:39:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499775] [or_IN][pango] =?utf-8?q?_GSUB_Delete_U+0B3E_by_back?= =?utf-8?q?space_will_delete_other_letters_except_=E0=AC=BE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110639.n4B6ddQX015205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499775 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499360] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110641.n4B6fTmJ015824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 --- Comment #2 from A S Alam 2009-05-11 02:41:28 EDT --- Description of problem: Input "09E3" with "RAW CODE" in gedit, the result has error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge. 2.Input "09E3" in gedit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499349] "Backspace" has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110643.n4B6hJjJ008207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 --- Comment #3 from A S Alam 2009-05-11 02:43:18 EDT --- Description of problem: "Backspace" has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.You should press it twice to delete the word. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open a gedit and select the "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge. 2.Input "09CB", "09CC","09DC","09DD","09DF" in gedit. 3.Press "Backspace" to delete each word (Make sure the cursor should be at the right of the each word). Actual results: Each word should be deleted totally when you press "Backspace" once. Expected results: Each word isn't deleted when you press "Backspace" once,you should press the "Backspace" again to delete it totally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110645.n4B6jWMb016758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2009-05-11 02:45:31 EDT --- Description of problem: In rhel 5.3,in gedit input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with RAW CODE,the font has error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit and input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497311] Dependent Vowel (0CBC) are Render as Independenet vowel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110647.n4B6l2tO016861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497311 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Bug 497311 depends on bug 497292, which changed state. Bug 497292 Summary: Dependent Vowel (0CBC) are Render as Independenet vowel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497292 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500105] [hi_IN][Various Sign]Unicode 0952/0953/0954 don't have the right font shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110653.n4B6rDkm017726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500105 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 02:53:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343319) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343319) the correct font shape -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499357] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110701.n4B71jV1011202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 03:01:44 EDT --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 with RAW CODE,the font has error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit and input U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape has error. Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the correct font snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499790] [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110704.n4B74E3x011471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499790 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 03:04:13 EDT --- Description of problem: GSUB press Delete key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char in f10 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C15 U+0C4D U+0C15 2.Press Delete key to delete the char 3. Actual results: It can't delete the whole char,it will delete part of the char Expected results: It will delete the whole char. Additional info: All of chars in [te_IN][GSUB] has the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] New: [hi_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 Summary: [hi_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input daben? 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char ? Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: 1. U+093E ? 2. U+093F ? 3. U+0940 ? 4. U+0941 ? 5. U+0942 ? 6. U+0943 ? 7. U+0944 ? 8. U+0945 ? 9. U+0946 ? 10. U+0947 ? 11. U+0948 ? 12. U+0949 ? 13. U+094B ? 14. U+094C ? in Dependent Vowels all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500112] New: [te_IN][Consonants]Press backspace key it can't delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][Consonants]Press backspace key it can't delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500112 Summary: [te_IN][Consonants]Press backspace key it can't delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U 0929 with Raw code,it will show ? 2.Press backspace key to delete the whole char Actual results: It can't delete the whole char Expected results: It should can delete the whole chare Additional info: U+0929 ? U+0931 ? U+0934 ? U+0958 ? U+0959 ? U+095A ? U+095B ? U+095C ? U+095D ? U+095E ? U+095F ? all have the same problem in Consonants. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 08:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500116] New: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500116 Summary: [hi_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input daben? 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: U+0901 ? U+0902 ? U+0903 ? U+093C ? U+094D ? all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 08:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500117] New: [hi_IN][Additional Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][Additional Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500117 Summary: [hi_IN][Additional Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it delete both the whole char and the letter before it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input daben? 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char ? Actual results: It delete the whole char and the letter n when pressing the Backspace key. Expected results: It should only delete the whole char. Additional info: 1 U+0962 ? 2 U+0963 ? All have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 08:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] New: [hi_IN][Additional Consonants]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][Additional Consonants]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 Summary: [hi_IN][Additional Consonants]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit press Backspace key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U 0958 with Raw code,it will show ? 2.Press backspace key to delete the whole char Actual results: It can't delete the whole char Expected results: It should can delete the whole chare Additional info: 1. U+0958 ? 2. U+0959 ? 3. U+095A ? 4. U+095B ? 5. U+095C ? 6. U+095D ? 7. U+095E ? 8. U+095F ? in Additional Consonants all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111016.n4BAG7px025919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[hi_IN][Dependent |[Indic]Press backspace key |Vowels]Press backspace key |it delete the whole char |it delete the whole char |and letter before it |and letter before it | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111020.n4BAKq0S026934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:20:51 EDT --- [te_IN][Dependent Vowels] also the same problem 1. U+0C3F ? 2. U+0C40 ? 3. U+0C41 ? 4. U+0C42 ? 5. U+0C43 ? 6. U+0C44 ? 7. U+0C46 ? 8. U+0C47 ? 9. U+0C48 ? 10. U+0C4A ? 11. U+0C4B ? 12. U+0C4C ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499804] [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111022.n4BAMWN4018781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499804 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:22:32 EDT --- I have include all similar problem of different locales in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 for easy track. So I close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:25:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111025.n4BAPqav027805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #3 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:25:51 EDT --- [te_IN][Various Signs] also have the same problem. 1.U+0C01 ? 2. U+0C02 ? 3. U+0C03 ? 4. U+0C4D ? 5. U+0C55 ? 6. U+0C56 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499804] [te_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111023.n4BANGJi027186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499804 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:23:15 EDT --- I have include all similar problem of different locales in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 for easy track. So I close this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111023.n4BANHbW027206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:23:15 EDT --- *** Bug 499804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111026.n4BAQxlH019951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #4 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:26:58 EDT --- *** Bug 499806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499806] [te_IN][Various Signs]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111026.n4BAQxoi019931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499806 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:26:58 EDT --- I have include all similar problem of different locales in the same bug,so close this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111029.n4BATqXX020278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111038.n4BAcNtU022216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #5 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:38:22 EDT --- [hi_IN][Various Sign] also has the same problem U+0901 ? U+0902 ? U+0903 ? U+093C ? U+094D ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111040.n4BAeTMZ022873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #6 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:40:27 EDT --- *** Bug 500116 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500116] [hi_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111040.n4BAeSHm022860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500116 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 06:40:27 EDT --- I have included all of the similar problem of different locales into bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110,so I close this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 17:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481423] [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111707.n4BH7Hgn016955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 17:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111707.n4BH7ITq016985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481423, which changed state. Bug 481423 Summary: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120152.n4C1qBFQ012181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #7 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 21:52:11 EDT --- [hi_IN][Additional Vowels] also has the same problem 1 U+0962 ? 2 U+0963 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120153.n4C1r3pl027026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #8 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 21:53:02 EDT --- *** Bug 500117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500117] [hi_IN][Additional Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120153.n4C1r2ej027013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500117 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 21:53:01 EDT --- I have reported the similar problem in bug 500110 for easy track.So close this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120157.n4C1vCL1012931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #9 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 21:57:12 EDT --- [or_IN][pango] has the same problem 1. U+0B3E ? 2. U+0B3F ? 3. U+0B40 ? 4. U+0B41 ? 5. U+0B42 ? 6. U+0B43 ? 7. U+0B47 ? 8. U+0B48 ? 9. U+0B4B ? 10. U+0B4C ? 11. U+0B56 ? 12. U+0B57 ? 13. U+0B01 ? 14. U+0B02 ? 15. U+0B03 ? 16. U+0B3C ? 17. U+0B4D ? 18. U+0B56 ? 19. U+0B57 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120158.n4C1wEgA027891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #10 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 21:58:12 EDT --- *** Bug 499775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499775] [or_IN][pango] =?utf-8?q?_GSUB_Delete_U+0B3E_by_back?= =?utf-8?q?space_will_delete_other_letters_except_=E0=AC=BE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120158.n4C1wDKV027865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499775 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 21:58:12 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499775] [or_IN][pango] =?utf-8?q?_GSUB_Delete_U+0B3E_by_back?= =?utf-8?q?space_will_delete_other_letters_except_=E0=AC=BE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120157.n4C1voK9013007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499775 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 21:57:49 EDT --- I have reported the similar problem in 500110,so close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120200.n4C20abM013648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #11 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:00:36 EDT --- [ml_IN][Various Sign] 1.U+0D02 ? 2.U+0D03 ? 3.U+0D4D ? 4.U+0D57 ? also has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120201.n4C21t6c028720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #12 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:01:53 EDT --- *** Bug 500100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500100] [ml_IN][Various Sign]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120201.n4C21snL028696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500100 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:01:53 EDT --- I have reported the similar problem in bug 500110 for easy track,so close this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120206.n4C26eEF014637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #14 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:06:38 EDT --- *** Bug 500099 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120204.n4C24GQB013985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #13 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:04:16 EDT --- [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]all have same problem 1 U+0D3E ? 2 U+0D3F ? 3 U+0D40 ? 4 U+0D41 ? 5 U+0D42 ? 6 U+0D43 ? 7 U+0D46 ? 8 U+0D47 ? 9 U+0D48 ? 10 U+0D4A ? 11 U+0D4B ? 12 U+0D4C ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500099] [ml_IN][Dependent Vowels]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120206.n4C26dDB014613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500099 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:06:38 EDT --- I have reported the same problem in one bug for easy track. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] [Indic]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120213.n4C2DjaX015706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[hi_IN][Additional |[Indic]Press backspace key |Consonants]Press backspace |can't delete the whole char |key can't delete the whole | |char | --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:13:44 EDT --- [or_IN][Additional Consonant] U+0B5C ? U+0B5D ? have all the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] [Indic]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120215.n4C2FlCQ031331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:15:45 EDT --- *** Bug 499777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499777] [or_IN][pango] GSUB Delete U+0B5C/U+0B5D need pressing Backspace key twice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120215.n4C2Fkd1031319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499777 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:15:45 EDT --- I have reported the similar bug in bug 500119 for easy track. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500119 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] [Indic]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120224.n4C2OfBb000668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 --- Comment #3 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:24:40 EDT --- [te_IN][Consonants] U+0929 ? U+0931 ? U+0934 ? U+0958 ? U+0959 ? U+095A ? U+095B ? U+095C ? U+095D ? U+095E ? U+095F ? have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] [Indic]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120225.n4C2PPBB001082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 --- Comment #4 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:25:24 EDT --- *** Bug 500112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500112] [te_IN][Consonants]Press backspace key it can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120225.n4C2PPxP001069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500112 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-11 22:25:24 EDT --- I have reported the same problem in bug 500119 for easy track,so close this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500119 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 02:38:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120238.n4C2crV9021202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #30 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-11 22:38:51 EDT --- that idea is hard to maintain the rule. as you are aware, even current rule is outdated. maintaining it in the font packages with the accurate policy would rather be better than centralized management. aside from that, it just reflects your favorite someone may not likes. one could do modify it any time, but it may breaks after updating or causes the unwanted file creation on the packaging management system. applying the necessary rules with installing the package would be easier and intuitive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120432.n4C4WhHD012557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #31 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-12 00:32:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > that idea is hard to maintain the rule. as you are aware, even current rule is > outdated. maintaining it in the font packages with the accurate policy would > rather be better than centralized management. I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream (which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, we can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely equivalent. > aside from that, it just reflects > your favorite someone may not likes. one could do modify it any time, but it > may breaks after updating or causes the unwanted file creation on the packaging > management system. applying the necessary rules with installing the package > would be easier and intuitive. Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said, they are simply equivalent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120455.n4C4tbir031815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #32 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-12 00:55:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream > (which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only > include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, we > can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is > not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely > equivalent. I have never been saying about fontconfig upstream but the centralized management is painful to maintain. > Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said, > they are simply equivalent. Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:05:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] [Indic]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120505.n4C551eR000736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 --- Comment #5 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 01:05:00 EDT --- [ta_IN][Independent Vowels] U+0B94 ? also has this problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120507.n4C579bX001297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #15 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 01:07:08 EDT --- [ta_IN][Dependent Vowels] 1. U+0BBE ? 2. U+0BBF ? 3. U+0BC0 ? 4. U+0BC1 ? 5. U+0BC2 ? 6. U+0BC6 ? 7. U+0BC7 ? 8. U+0BC8 ? 9. U+0BCA ? 10. U+0BCB ? 11. U+0BCC ? all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120509.n4C59DTR018090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #33 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-12 01:09:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then? To activate rules when installing font package is still possible with centralized approach. Just check out how WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is configured in Bug#499902. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:12:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500284] New: [ta_IN][Various Sign] 0B82/0B83 the font shape has error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][Various Sign] 0B82/0B83 the font shape has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500284 Summary: [ta_IN][Various Sign] 0B82/0B83 the font shape has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input 0B82/0B83 with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input 0B82/0B83 with RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:15:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500284] [ta_IN][Various Sign] 0B82/0B83 the font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120515.n4C5FRI9002700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500284 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 01:15:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343534) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343534) error font of 0B82/0B83 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500284] [ta_IN][Various Sign] 0B82/0B83 the font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120520.n4C5KD44020065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500284 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 01:20:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343535) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343535) the first column of correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120523.n4C5NDa2004057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #16 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 01:23:12 EDT --- [ta_IN][Various Signs] 1. U+0B82 ? 2. U+0B83 ? 3. U+0BCD ? 4. U+0BD7 ? all have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 06:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 02:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120642.n4C6gGHb000725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #17 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 02:42:15 EDT --- [si_LK][Dependent Vowels] Dependent Vowels 1. U+0DCF ? 2. U+0DD0 ? 3. U+0DD1 ? 4. U+0DD2 ? 5. U+0DD3 ? 6. U+0DD4 ? 7. U+0DD6 ? 8. U+0DD8 ? 9. U+0DD9 ? 10. U+0DDA ? 11. U+0DDB ? 12. U+0DDC ? 13. U+0DDD ? 14. U+0DDE ? 15. U+0DDF ? 16. U+0DF2 ? 17. U+0DF3 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 06:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 02:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120643.n4C6hivr000909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #18 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 02:43:43 EDT --- [si_LK][Various Signs] 1. U+0D82 ? 2. U+0D83 ? 3. U+0DCA ? also have the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120716.n4C7GcOD007501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #20 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 03:16:38 EDT --- [bn_IN][Consonants] U+0982 ? U+0983 ? U+0981 ? has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120713.n4C7DRBw006786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #19 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 03:13:26 EDT --- [bn_IN][Dependent Vowels] has the same problem 1. U+09BE ? 2. U+09BF ? 3. U+09C0 ? 4. U+09C1 ? 5. U+09C2 ? 6. U+09C3 ? 7. U+09C7 ? 8. U+09C8 ? 9. U+09CB ? 10. U+09CC ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] [Indic]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120720.n4C7KEmK024703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 --- Comment #6 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 03:20:13 EDT --- [bn_IN][Consonants] U+09DC ? U+09DD ? U+09DF ? has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120722.n4C7M6Gw025021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #21 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 03:22:06 EDT --- [bn_IN][Various Signs] 1. U+09CD ? 2. U+09BC ? 3. U+0982 ? 4. U+0983 ? 5. U+0981 ? has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120725.n4C7Pw2j009858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #34 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-12 03:25:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then? > > To activate rules when installing font package is still possible with > centralized approach. Just check out how WenQuanYi Bitmap Song is configured in > Bug#499902. It just works for your desired packages. but not for someone's. that's not a neutral solution. we can suggest the default font in comps. but someone may not likes that. the centralized management for the rule would prevents to use the preferred font packages for users. I'm afraid you can't maintain/update it without painful for you and everyone nor without any notice from the font package maintainers. The point I'm saying is: * Do not make any changes that affects to the other font packages. -> this can be solved to apply the rule for the specific language. * Do not make any changes that depends on the other font packages. otherwise it must has certain dependencies in the package. * Maintaining all of the font packages available on Fedora at the centralized fontconfig rule isn't realistic. as fontconfig is capable to read the rule from each fonts, maintaining it in each font packages with the certain policy would works enough. Right now some font packages doesn't follow even current policy. we have to mass-file a bug for them in F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500304] New: [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500304 Summary: [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input 09E2/09E3 with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input 09E2/09E3 with RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500304] [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120731.n4C7Vr91026957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500304 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 03:31:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343548) the error font shape in gedit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 07:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500304] [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120733.n4C7Xg8k011173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500304 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 03:33:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343549) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343549) the first column of correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120809.n4C891Ds002099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #24 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 04:09:00 EDT --- [gu_IN][Dependent Vowels] 1. U+0ABE ? 2. U+0ABF ? 3. U+0AC0 ? 4. U+0AC1 ? 5. U+0AC2 ? 6. U+0AC3 ? 7. U+0AC4 ? 8. U+0AC5 ? 9. U+0AC7 ? 10. U+0AC8 ? 11. U+0AC9 ? 12. U+0ACB ? 13. U+0ACC ? has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120807.n4C877gG001904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #22 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 04:07:06 EDT --- [gu_IN][Dependent Vowels] 1. U+0ABE ? 2. U+0ABF ? 3. U+0AC0 ? 4. U+0AC1 ? 5. U+0AC2 ? 6. U+0AC3 ? 7. U+0AC4 ? 8. U+0AC5 ? 9. U+0AC7 ? 10. U+0AC8 ? 11. U+0AC9 ? 12. U+0ACB ? 13. U+0ACC ? has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120808.n4C88Ffx018302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #23 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 04:08:15 EDT --- [gu_IN][Consonants] U+0A81 ? U+0A82 ? U+0A83 ? U+0ACD ? U+0ABC ? has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120810.n4C8AZBL002866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #25 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 04:10:34 EDT --- [gu_IN][Various Signs] 1. U+0A81 ? 2. U+0A82 ? 3. U+0A83 ? 4. U+0ABC ? 5. U+0ACD ? has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500307] New: [gu_IN][Additional Vowels]U0AE2/U0AE3 font doesn't have right shape Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [gu_IN][Additional Vowels]U0AE2/U0AE3 font doesn't have right shape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500307 Summary: [gu_IN][Additional Vowels]U0AE2/U0AE3 font doesn't have right shape Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input 0AE2/0AE3 with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input 0AE2/0AE3 with RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500307] [gu_IN][Additional Vowels]U0AE2/U0AE3 font doesn't have right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120825.n4C8PtJt006024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500307 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 04:25:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343551) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343551) first column of correct image -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500307] [gu_IN][Additional Vowels]U0AE2/U0AE3 font doesn't have right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120825.n4C8PC14005930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500307 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-12 04:25:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343550) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343550) error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic][CodePoint]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120829.n4C8Tuu8022760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[Indic]Press backspace key |[Indic][CodePoint]Press |it delete the whole char |backspace key it delete the |and letter before it |whole char and letter | |before it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 08:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 04:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500119] [Indic[Codepoint]Press backspace key can't delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120830.n4C8UP3t006944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500119 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[Indic]Press backspace key |[Indic[Codepoint]Press |can't delete the whole char |backspace key can't delete | |the whole char -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From awagner_mainz at openoffice.org Tue May 12 08:44:15 2009 From: awagner_mainz at openoffice.org (awagner_mainz at openoffice.org) Date: 12 May 2009 08:44:15 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090512084415.15860.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User awagner_mainz changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arielch,bahein,benjamin_s|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah |challar,bernd_schoeler,cep|ein,benjamin_schallar,bern |lm,chrullrich,ckolivas,cwo|d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric |ollard,fedorafonts,iorsh,j|h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor |eongkyu,masayan,msundman,s|afonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masa |imos' |yan,msundman,simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 12:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121222.n4CCMQ4B021116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-12 08:22:25 EDT --- So let's fix this properly: (In reply to comment #9) > Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 > Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} > ? totally unnecessary, though harmless > Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < xxxx would have made sense if it had ever > been pushed to users liberation-fonts-1.04.93-3.fc11 is the only build I see with liberation-fonts-sans. I think we need just: Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4 and similarly for mono and serif. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 12:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331881] [Indic] ra+halant+ZWNJ is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121238.n4CCcNft023903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331881 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-12 08:38:21 EDT --- Does this still exist in F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 14:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121443.n4CEhl4K021392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #35 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-12 10:43:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > It just works for your desired packages. but not for someone's. that's not a > neutral solution. But you do realize, in the end, there only exists one font order, no matter which way you set it. It is impossible for two fonts to be both preferred if they are both installed. If you want to control the orders by the presence of fonts, you can do exactly the same thing with a centralized conf file. The only difference is that a single config file gives you a master fallback list, and what you suggested determines this list ad-hoc, which is more difficult to predict and debug. > we can suggest the default font in comps. but someone may not > likes that. the centralized management for the rule would prevents to use the > preferred font packages for users. I'm afraid you can't maintain/update it > without painful for you and everyone nor without any notice from the font > package maintainers. > > > The point I'm saying is: > > * Do not make any changes that affects to the other font packages. > -> this can be solved to apply the rule for the specific language. IMHO, this is impossible. If you set or use prepend/prepend_first, you ARE affecting other font packages. Indeed, that's how fontconfig works. Again, for a given system state, there is only one priority list for each language, no matter you set it from a single file, or by a bunch of font-specific files. > > * Do not make any changes that depends on the other font packages. otherwise it > must has certain dependencies in the package. It's not dependency, it is fallback relationship. If you set priority as A>B>C and some of them do not present, fontconfig will pick up the next one with the highest priority. I think that's how fontconfig was designed. > > * Maintaining all of the font packages available on Fedora at the centralized > fontconfig rule isn't realistic. as fontconfig is capable to read the rule from > each fonts, maintaining it in each font packages with the certain policy would > works enough. If you check my old posts, I used to be a supporter to font-specific config files, because I know the fonts I maintained are good, but other high priority fonts prevent the use of these good one but I have no control (for exp. 65-nonlatin). I endured a lot of troubles in order to set my own list. Now I am suggesting to get things right from the very beginning, and save time of the font maintainers. In you really want to insist, you can still do what you have been doing, but having a up-to-date default language-specific font list will greatly reduce the amount of work you need to do. > > Right now some font packages doesn't follow even current policy. we have to > mass-file a bug for them in F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From scottchiefbaker at openoffice.org Tue May 12 17:28:36 2009 From: scottchiefbaker at openoffice.org (scottchiefbaker at openoffice.org) Date: 12 May 2009 17:28:36 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090512172836.23269.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User scottchiefbaker changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah |ein,benjamin_schallar,bern|ein,benjamin_schallar,bern |d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric|d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric |h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor|h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor |afonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masa|afonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masa |yan,msundman,simos' |yan,msundman,scottchiefbak | |er,simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From scottchiefbaker at openoffice.org Tue May 12 17:29:44 2009 From: scottchiefbaker at openoffice.org (scottchiefbaker at openoffice.org) Date: 12 May 2009 17:29:44 -0000 Subject: [Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090512172944.25308.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User scottchiefbaker changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli |vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo |rafonts,goranrakic,haktar,|rafonts,goranrakic,haktar, |hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev|hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev |esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma|esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma |sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu|sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu |sorn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ral|sorn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ral |phie,samphan,silverex,simo|phie,samphan,scottchiefbak |s,utomo99' |er,silverex,simos,uto -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 18:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495252] Texts/Fonts are crappy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121832.n4CIWAds009842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495252 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com Blocks|497399(F11XorgBlocker) |446451(F11Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From obr at openoffice.org Tue May 12 18:54:06 2009 From: obr at openoffice.org (obr at openoffice.org) Date: 12 May 2009 18:54:06 -0000 Subject: [Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090512185406.29823.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User obr changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli |vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo |rafonts,goranrakic,haktar,|rafonts,goranrakic,haktar, |hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev|hdu,hin,iorsh,jbfaure,jeev |esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma|esbond,jlp,kami_,manens,ma |sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu|sayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nu |sorn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ral|sorn,ousia,rabauke,ralphie |phie,samphan,scottchiefbak|,samphan,scottchiefbaker,s |er,silverex,simos,uto |ilverex,simos,utomo99 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 19:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121952.n4CJqRqM027113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-12 15:52:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > So let's fix this properly: > > (In reply to comment #9) > > Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 > > Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} > > ? totally unnecessary, though harmless > > Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < xxxx would have made sense if it had ever > > been pushed to users > > liberation-fonts-1.04.93-3.fc11 is the only build I see with > liberation-fonts-sans. > > I think we need just: > > Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4 > > and similarly for mono and serif. No, you don't need that since it's already automatically done by rpm. You can remove those lines altogether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 20:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122024.n4CKOt6l021288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Mathieu Bridon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | AssignedTo|mathieu.bridon at gmail.com |bochecha at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #15 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-05-12 16:24:53 EDT --- Just reopening the bug, so that I don't forget it and go on trying to fix this upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 21:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499921] xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122146.n4CLkxfX018067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499921 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |sandmann at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 02:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130227.n4D2R2ku002524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #36 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-12 22:27:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > But you do realize, in the end, there only exists one font order, no matter > which way you set it. It is impossible for two fonts to be both preferred if > they are both installed. If you want to control the orders by the presence of > fonts, you can do exactly the same thing with a centralized conf file. The only > difference is that a single config file gives you a master fallback list, and > what you suggested determines this list ad-hoc, which is more difficult to > predict and debug. That's the policy to not mess up. > IMHO, this is impossible. If you set or use prepend/prepend_first, you > ARE affecting other font packages. Indeed, that's how fontconfig works. Again, > for a given system state, there is only one priority list for each language, no > matter you set it from a single file, or by a bunch of font-specific files. Right. I meant language, but not font packages. sorry. > It's not dependency, it is fallback relationship. If you set priority as A>B>C > and some of them do not present, fontconfig will pick up the next one with the > highest priority. I think that's how fontconfig was designed. At least you should do as long as you expect them to get it working. otherwise you just leave it to outside your rule. If you have a dependency in the package, the referred font package owner or that package owner can realizes any attentions is needed when something is changed. you can prevent the font naming issue you've faced in wqy-bitmap-fonts say. > If you check my old posts, I used to be a supporter to font-specific config > files, because I know the fonts I maintained are good, but other high priority > fonts prevent the use of these good one but I have no control (for exp. > 65-nonlatin). I endured a lot of troubles in order to set my own list. Now I am > suggesting to get things right from the very beginning, and save time of the > font maintainers. In you really want to insist, you can still do what you have > been doing, but having a up-to-date default language-specific font list will > greatly reduce the amount of work you need to do. Yes, but what you are suggesting is actually the same thing what fontconfig does because both are centralized management. why you feel it's comfortable is, you're about to get an control of it. it's not necessarily a happy solution for everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 04:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130416.n4D4GxWY021946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-13 00:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > No, you don't need that since it's already automatically done by rpm. You can > remove those lines altogether. Huh? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130611.n4D6BTcN008737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #57 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-13 02:11:28 EDT --- I install rawhide (current pre-f11) with CJK support - login in to a Japanese desktop and see wqy-bitmap for Chinese glyphs in gucharmap. I think we should not install wqy-bitmap-fonts by default for zh in F11 until this is resolved properly. I would appreciate comments and feedback from other Fedora CJK users/testers on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 07:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 03:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130702.n4D72UhK005760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-13 03:02:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343714) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343714) Patch to spec file to remove redundant provides and obsoletes Patch to remove unnecessary Provides: and Obsoletes:, since those are automatically done by rpm. Patch also modifies spec file so that liberation-fonts-common gets removed if no font packages are installed (currently if you install e.g. liberation-fonts-sans and then remove it, you are left with unnecessary liberation-fonts-common package on your system). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 07:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 03:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130739.n4D7doho024302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-13 03:39:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > I think we need just: > > > > Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4 > > > > and similarly for mono and serif. > > No, you don't need that since it's already automatically done by rpm. You can > remove those lines altogether. Read again. As for your patch, I'm strongly against it. 1. you're introducing a common provides while making sure packagers had to take into account the different fonts was an explicit packaging goal 2. as far as I understand, you're relying on undocumented yum behaviour the yum developpers never committed to If you want to change the way we package fonts, go the full public consultation => FPC review => FESCO review => months of QA like was done for F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 07:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 03:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130751.n4D7pQH5026900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-13 03:51:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #13) > > (In reply to comment #12) > > > > I think we need just: > > > > > > Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4 > > > > > > and similarly for mono and serif. > > > > No, you don't need that since it's already automatically done by rpm. You can > > remove those lines altogether. > > Read again. > > As for your patch, I'm strongly against it. > 1. you're introducing a common provides while making sure packagers had to take > into account the different fonts was an explicit packaging goal > 2. as far as I understand, you're relying on undocumented yum behaviour the yum > developpers never committed to 1. What are you saying? I consider a support package that is not removed when the main package is removed a packaging mishap. %{fontname}-common should not exist in the system if there is no %{fontname}-fonts package installed. 2. What "undocumented yum behaviour" might you be referring to? The thing that a package automatically provides itself with its own version, and yum updates packages with newer versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 08:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130819.n4D8Jkta021831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-13 04:19:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > 1. What are you saying? I consider a support package that is not removed when > the main package is removed a packaging mishap. %{fontname}-common should not > exist in the system if there is no %{fontname}-fonts package installed. This is not a realistic expectation. Large parts of the distro violate this rule today and have for a long as Fedora and RHL existed. > 2. What "undocumented yum behaviour" might you be referring to? The thing that > a package automatically provides itself with its own version, and yum updates > packages with newer versions? You make different packages, that can be installed simultaneously, have the same provides. This has always been a case the dependency engines didn't handle very well. And you don't even have a strong reason to do so, your fix is at best cosmetic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 09:23:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 05:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130923.n4D9NikY016535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-13 05:23:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > > 1. What are you saying? I consider a support package that is not removed when > > the main package is removed a packaging mishap. %{fontname}-common should not > > exist in the system if there is no %{fontname}-fonts package installed. > > This is not a realistic expectation. Large parts of the distro violate this > rule today and have for a long as Fedora and RHL existed. Status quo is not a valid argument IMHO. > > 2. What "undocumented yum behaviour" might you be referring to? The thing that > > a package automatically provides itself with its own version, and yum updates > > packages with newer versions? > > You make different packages, that can be installed simultaneously, have the > same provides. This has always been a case the dependency engines didn't handle > very well. And you don't even have a strong reason to do so, your fix is at > best cosmetic. Okay; I've just seen the same sort of thing with other packages, e.g. xfig comes first to my mind. You can do the dropping of the unnecessary Provides: and Obsoletes, though (even if it is just a cosmetic change). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 10:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500560] New: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB font shape has error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB font shape has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500560 Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB font shape has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U0DA2+U0DDB with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U0DA2+U0DDB with RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 10:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500560] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131002.n4DA2bDn024926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500560 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-13 06:02:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343735) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343735) corret font shape -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 10:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500560] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131006.n4DA6l95013344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500560 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Summary|[si_LK][GPOS] U0DA2 U0DDB |[si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA |font shape has error |font shape has error --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-13 06:06:46 EDT --- I have retested it again on f10,it is correct.So close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 10:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500563] New: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=343739) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343739) corret font shape Description of problem: In gedit input 0DB8+0DDA with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U0DB8+U0DDA with RAW CODE Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 10:12:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131012.n4DACYX4014458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-13 06:12:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343740) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343740) the error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 10:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500569] New: [si_LK][GPOS] Delete 0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to press backspace key twice Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] Delete 0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to press backspace key twice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500569 Summary: [si_LK][GPOS] Delete 0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to press backspace key twice Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0D9A U+0DDA ??,we need to press Backspace key three times to delete the whole char Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D9A U+0DDA ?? 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char Actual results: We need press backspce key three times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key twice to delete the whole char. Additional info: 1. U+0D9A U+0DDA ?? 2. U+0D9C U+0DDA ?? 3. U+0DAD U+0DDA ?? 4. U+0DA7 U+0DDA ?? 5. U+0DA9 U+0DDA ?? 6. U+0DA0 U+0DDA ?? 7. U+0DA2 U+0DDA ?? 8. U+0DAB U+0DDA ?? 9. U+0DB4 U+0DDA ?? 10.U+0DAF U+0DDA ?? 11.U+0DB3 U+0DDA ?? 12.U+0DB0 U+0DDA ?? 13.U+0DB6 U+0DDA ?? 14.U+0DB8 U+0DDA ?? 15.U+0DC0 U+0DDA ?? 16.U+0DC4 U+0DDA ?? 17.U+0DBB U+0DDA ?? 18.U+0DC6 U+0DDA ?? 19.U+0DC5 U+0DDA ?? 20.U+0DBD U+0DDA ?? 21.U+0DBA U+0DDA ?? 22.U+0DC3 U+0DDA ?? 23.U+0DC1 U+0DDA ?? 24.U+0DC2 U+0DDA ?? 25.U+0DB9 U+0DDA ?? 26.U+0DB5 U+0DDA ?? 27.U+0DAE U+0DDA ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 14:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131437.n4DEb8AD013243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #58 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-13 10:37:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #57) > I install rawhide (current pre-f11) with CJK support - login in to a Japanese > desktop and see wqy-bitmap for Chinese glyphs in gucharmap. > screen shot please. which code points you saw bitmaps? did you install wqy-zenhei-fonts? if your Han glyphs are before 0x4E00 (for example KangXi radicals, or CJK unicode extension A), wqy-bitmap-fonts is the only zh font that covers that range, so, showing with bitmaps is expected. if you DID NOT install wqy-zenhei-fonts, and your fonts selected "sans", showing with bitmaps is also reasonable, because wqy-bitmap-fonts is closer to sans than Uming. If you really want to use vector fonts to display despite the sans/serif differences, open 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf, change the last two sans-serif blocks to the following: WenQuanYi Bitmap Song sans-serif 16 WenQuanYi Zen Hei AR PL UMing CN WenQuanYi Bitmap Song sans-serif 10 WenQuanYi Zen Hei AR PL UMing CN this will match zenhei first and fallback to UMing; again, I prefer the current solution because uming is not as "sans" as bitmap song. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462531] text of highlighted button in dialog goes black In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131838.n4DIc31J015594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-13 14:38:02 EDT --- Closing as this is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 00:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500751] gnome-terminal does not display in bold with Terminus as font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140000.n4E00XpL003051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500751 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de Component|gnome-terminal |terminus-font AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-13 20:00:32 EDT --- terminus at 8px has the same glyphs for Medium and Bold. -> font bug But srsly, at that size what do you want them to do? Now, IF that bold font is removed, vte will use freetype's emboldening I guess. In previous releases (F10 and older I guess) we were always using emboldening and never tried to use the bold typeface. So it "worked" before. But I'm not sure emboldened 8px font is any readable. Anyway, it's out of my jurisdiction. Reassigning to terminus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 00:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140043.n4E0har2009891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #59 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-13 20:43:34 EDT --- That may be the expected behaviour for you as you do in your fontconfig rule though, current behaviour isn't ideal and no one is happy with it. this would be true since you asked if wqy-zenhei-fonts is installed. I'd say again, what you should take an action to fix this completely would be: 1. have a dependency in wqy-bitmap-fonts to ensure if wqy-zenhei-fonts is installed. 2. stop to depend on any other fonts in your rule and just leave it to other rules. Your suggestion at comment #58 is just a workaround but not a solution. and you might see the same issue in the future. I'm afraid it's not a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 01:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140127.n4E1RwQN029406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #60 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-13 21:27:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #59) > That may be the expected behaviour for you as you do in your fontconfig rule > though, current behaviour isn't ideal and no one is happy with it. What do you mean by "no one is happy"? You don't speak for all CJK users I believe. Only a few Japanese users were bothered previously, but with my current fix, all Japanese Han glyphs were displayed properly with your preferred vector fonts. The remaining characters should be decided by their respective users. > this would be true since you asked if wqy-zenhei-fonts is installed. I'd say again, what > you should take an action to fix this completely would be: > > 1. have a dependency in wqy-bitmap-fonts to ensure if wqy-zenhei-fonts is > installed. Please install wqy-zenhei-fonts by default then. As I said, I don't mind removing wqy-bitmap-fonts in order to install wqy-zenhei, because ZenHei is the "official" sans for Chinese, and SHOULD be installed. > > 2. stop to depend on any other fonts in your rule and just leave it to other > rules. I said it already, it is NOT dependency! it is fallback! if you look into all the current fontconfig files, many of the font names are not present by default. By your logic, all of these should be removed, as they are dependent to the the missing font package. Indeed, if you want to make a synthetic font with your preferred fonts, you HAVE TO explicitly mention other font's name. That is exactly what wqy-bitmap-fonts is. By the way, you should really blaming changing font names, rather than blaming citing font names in config files. Changing a commonly used font name should be done with extreme caution. > > Your suggestion at comment #58 is just a workaround but not a solution. and you > might see the same issue in the future. I'm afraid it's not a good idea. Then, the best solution to me is my proposal in Bug#499902, but you don't like either. The only solution is to follow exactly what you suggested. I don't think we can work out this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500751] gnome-terminal does not display in bold with Terminus as font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140202.n4E22YhY003011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500751 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller 2009-05-13 22:02:33 EDT --- thanks for clearing up which package has the problem. the emboldened version at the font sizes i mentioned looked just fine, was still quite readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500569] [si_LK][GPOS] Delete 0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to press backspace key three times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140704.n4E74oTS016243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500569 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[si_LK][GPOS] Delete |[si_LK][GPOS] Delete |0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to |0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to |press backspace key twice |press backspace key three | |times -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500772] New: [te_IN][GPOS] U0C[1-3][0-F]+0C48 need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][GPOS] U0C[1-3][0-F]+0C48 need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500772 Summary: [te_IN][GPOS] U0C[1-3][0-F]+0C48 need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0C15 U+0C48 ??,we need to press Backspace key three times to delete the whole char Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C15 U+0C48 ?? 2.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char Actual results: We need press backspce key three times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key twice to delete the whole char. Additional info: 1 U+0C15 U+0C48 ?? 2 U+0C16 U+0C48 ?? 3 U+0C17 U+0C48 ?? 4 U+0C18 U+0C48 ?? 5 U+0C19 U+0C48 ?? 6 U+0C1A U+0C48 ?? 7 U+0C1B U+0C48 ?? 8 U+0C1C U+0C48 ?? 9 U+0C1D U+0C48 ?? 10 U+0C1E U+0C48 ?? 11 U+0C1F U+0C48 ?? 12 U+0C20 U+0C48 ?? 13 U+0C21 U+0C48 ?? 14 U+0C22 U+0C48 ?? 15 U+0C23 U+0C48 ?? 16 U+0C24 U+0C48 ?? 17 U+0C25 U+0C48 ?? 18 U+0C26 U+0C48 ?? 19 U+0C27 U+0C48 ?? 20 U+0C28 U+0C48 ?? 21 U+0C2A U+0C48 ?? 22 U+0C2B U+0C48 ?? 23 U+0C2C U+0C48 ?? 24 U+0C2D U+0C48 ?? 25 U+0C2E U+0C48 ?? 26 U+0C2F U+0C48 ?? 27 U+0C30 U+0C48 ?? 28 U+0C31 U+0C48 ?? 29 U+0C32 U+0C48 ?? 30 U+0C33 U+0C48 ?? 31 U+0C35 U+0C48 ?? 32 U+0C36 U+0C48 ?? 33 U+0C37 U+0C48 ?? 34 U+0C38 U+0C48 ?? 35 U+0C39 U+0C48 ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 10:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141000.n4EA06f7022771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #61 from Akira TAGOH 2009-05-14 06:00:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #60) > What do you mean by "no one is happy"? You don't speak for all CJK users I > believe. Only a few Japanese users were bothered previously, but with my > current fix, all Japanese Han glyphs were displayed properly with your > preferred vector fonts. The remaining characters should be decided by their > respective users. For those who wants to use different outlined font other than the above two. I don't know who exactly is. > > 1. have a dependency in wqy-bitmap-fonts to ensure if wqy-zenhei-fonts is > > installed. > > Please install wqy-zenhei-fonts by default then. As I said, I don't mind > removing wqy-bitmap-fonts in order to install wqy-zenhei, because ZenHei is the > "official" sans for Chinese, and SHOULD be installed. Installing by default doesn't matter and it doesn't help for upgrading. otherwise we don't need any dependencies in GNOME packages and so on in that sense. this is to ensure the sane packaging but ain't talking about something after the packages is installed here. this is the right way under the package management system to help out the insane thing. This is a suggestion to settle though. > > 2. stop to depend on any other fonts in your rule and just leave it to other > > rules. > > I said it already, it is NOT dependency! it is fallback! Again, appearing WenQuanYi Bitmap Song for outside 10~16px is the expected behaviour for current logic right. however it's not the expected behaviour for users. I'm saying that and that logic is wrong then. Even though you have taken responsibility for fallback, causing not working due to no fallback fonts available is a bug and not desirable. it's nearly equivalent to nothing. then why don't you just leave that responsibility to others or just take the above suggestion 1? > By your logic, all of these should be removed, as they are dependent > to the the missing font package. I meant to that. if something doesn't work as expected after getting rid of them then, we should have the certain thing in fontconfig or somewhere to support fallback with something rather than describing the font name not owned by the package. > Indeed, if you want to make a synthetic font with your preferred fonts, you > HAVE TO explicitly mention other font's name. That is exactly what > wqy-bitmap-fonts is. I have already demonstrated to apply WenQuanYi Bitmap Song for the desired size only rather than fallback to others for outside though. you can use the preferred fonts for other sizes without modifying fontconfig rules at all. > By the way, you should really blaming changing font names, rather than blaming > citing font names in config files. Changing a commonly used font name should be > done with extreme caution. For instance, would you blame someone who decided to change Chinese font to new one say because it has better quality than current font? that makes no sense. that situation is most likely to happen when we have any chance. > > Your suggestion at comment #58 is just a workaround but not a solution. and you > > might see the same issue in the future. I'm afraid it's not a good idea. > > Then, the best solution to me is my proposal in Bug#499902, but you don't like > either. The only solution is to follow exactly what you suggested. I don't > think we can work out this way. Heh, I just like the sane solution for long term but not ugly hack or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 11:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468565] Checkbox won't select on fillable PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141121.n4EBLtnx018711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468565 --- Comment #4 from Martin J?rgens 2009-05-14 07:21:52 EDT --- *** Bug 418651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141440.n4EEeYNw032012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #62 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-14 10:40:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #61) > Again, appearing WenQuanYi Bitmap Song for outside 10~16px is the expected > behaviour for current logic right. however it's not the expected behaviour for > users. I'm saying that and that logic is wrong then. Even though you have > taken responsibility for fallback, causing not working due to no fallback fonts > available is a bug and not desirable. it's nearly equivalent to nothing. then > why don't you just leave that responsibility to others or just take the above > suggestion 1? If there is no other Chinese fonts cover those code points, for example, any thing between U3400~U4FD5, the best you can get is to display them with bitmaps as wqy-bitmap-fonts covers them. Even for U4E00~U9FA5, UMing have a few thousands missing, those missing ones will still be displayed by bitmaps. Without installing wqy-zenhei, what you suggested is simply not possible. > Heh, I just like the sane solution for long term but not ugly hack or so. Seriously, I don't have time to argue with you. If you have the authority to modify cvs, go ahead, I don't care. If you believe you can convince me your "long term" solution is better, go write one that works for all the tests in Comment#54, particularly the English desktop. I will commit it without a single more word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141443.n4EEhuee023126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #63 from Qianqian Fang 2009-05-14 10:43:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > If you believe you can convince me your > "long term" solution is better, go write one that works for all the tests in > Comment#54, particularly the English desktop. I will commit it without a single > more word. and of course, if there is anything wrong in the future with this, it would have to be your responsibility to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Thu May 14 17:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 378338] Deal with X servers which misreport the screen's dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090514174322.26DF323F543@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338 gnome-control-center | settings-daemon | Ver: trunk Jeremy Nickurak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnome- | |bugs at atrus.rifetech.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142035.n4EKZYpM009130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(hedayat at grad.com) | --- Comment #4 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-05-14 16:35:32 EDT --- Yes, the same problem exists with the latest eclipse M7 build. I don't know why the line appears in the wrong position, but it worked fine in Fedora 9. I had the problem started with Fedora 10, with the same eclipse version as what I used in Fedora 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142049.n4EKnWmd014180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 16:49:32 EDT --- Thanks for trying with upstream. To ensure the highest chance of this getting fixed, it will be best to file a bug at bugs.eclipse.org. If you do so, please add a reference to it on this bug under "External Bugs" above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 00:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150020.n4F0Kxqf022062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 01:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 21:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150100.n4F10WZ5028739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-05-14 21:00:31 EDT --- Pretty sure we're good now, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 02:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500941] [si_LK][GSUB]U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA shape font has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150230.n4F2U1iM012600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500941 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-14 22:30:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344071) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344071) the correct font shape -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 02:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500941] New: [si_LK][GSUB]U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA shape font has error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [si_LK][GSUB]U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA shape font has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500941 Summary: [si_LK][GSUB]U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA shape font has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0DB9 U+0DCA U+200D U+0DBA with RAW CODE,it shows ???? Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: Please see the attachment of correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri May 15 05:19:16 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.2, 1.3 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20090515051916.113DC70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv848 Modified Files: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: resoles: rhbz#488398 (fixed ghostscript referred to oudated location) Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000 1.2 +++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW 15 May 2009 05:18:45 -0000 1.3 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % -/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; -/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; % -/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; +/Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 8 Apr 2009 03:28:23 -0000 1.9 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 15 May 2009 05:18:45 -0000 1.10 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 23%{?dist} +Release: 24%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ cd - %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#488398 (Fixed ghostscript referred to outdated font location.) + * Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#483320 (Declared ownership of compatibility directories.) From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri May 15 05:38:28 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11 Message-ID: <20090515053828.B271F70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6100 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: rebuilt Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 15 May 2009 05:18:45 -0000 1.10 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 15 May 2009 05:37:58 -0000 1.11 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 24%{?dist} +Release: 25%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -229,7 +229,10 @@ cd - %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc11 +* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-25.fc12 +- Rebuilt. + +* Fri May 15 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-24.fc12 - Resolves: rhbz#488398 (Fixed ghostscript referred to outdated font location.) * Wed Apr 08 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150642.n4F6gCjj025061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-15 02:42:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Please ignore comment 11,12,13,14 - I think it is due to the radeon X driver. > "MOZ_DISABLE_IMAGE_OPTIMIZE=1 firefox" works around it. Thanks for info. I have fixed comment #15 and rebuilt: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=102212 It will be on current rawhide and F11 soon. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150900.n4F90oAS021270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Eclipse Project 276455 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500971] New: [Indic][GSUB]"U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][GSUB]"U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500971 Summary: [Indic][GSUB]"U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When input U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF ??? in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. Additional info: U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500971] [Indic][GSUB]"U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150920.n4F9KncC030855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500971 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-15 05:20:48 EDT --- [bn-IN][GSUB]: U+09DC U+09CD U+0997 ??? has the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499360] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150953.n4F9r82k005897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-15 05:52:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344108) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344108) Expected result of "U+09E2" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499360] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150954.n4F9sYWe006080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 --- Comment #4 from XinSun 2009-05-15 05:54:33 EDT --- Description of problem: Input "09E3" with "RAW CODE" in gedit, the result has error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge. 2.Input "09E3" in gedit. Actual results: The result is ? and is different from the attachment. Expected results: Please see the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500971] [Indic][GSUB]"U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151004.n4FA4ILZ008172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500971 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kxiong at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-15 06:04:17 EDT --- [or_IN][GSUB] U+0B30 U+0B4D U+0B5C ??? U+0B30 U+0B4D U+0B5D ??? U+0B5C U+0B4D U+0B30 ??? U+0B5D U+0B4D U+0B30 ??? has the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499360] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151007.n4FA7Zb3008986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 --- Comment #5 from XinSun 2009-05-15 06:07:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344110) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344110) Expected result of "U+09E3" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499358] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151010.n4FAA8MM009648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 --- Comment #4 from XinSun 2009-05-15 06:10:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344111) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344111) Expected result of "U+09E2" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499358] [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151009.n4FA9jA0009295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-15 06:09:44 EDT --- Actual result: he result is ? and is different from the attachment. Expected result: Please see the attachment "Expected result of 09E2.PNG". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri May 15 11:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 04:10:26 -0700 Subject: [Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151110.n4FBAQpG027955@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #93 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) 2009-05-15 04:09:57 PDT --- Filed bug 493202 on comment #53. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479673] Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151228.n4FCSfRh006781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 08:28:40 EDT --- Thanks, Hedayat. Closing as upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151911.n4FJBoUc000316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|476459 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151912.n4FJCTjB000566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151912.n4FJCS4h000517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492510 --- Comment #38 from Bill Nottingham 2009-05-15 15:12:27 EDT --- Whoops, wrong bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151913.n4FJDIM8000682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com Blocks|446452(F11Blocker) | --- Comment #64 from Bill Nottingham 2009-05-15 15:13:14 EDT --- This font is no longer installed by default, so removing from the blocker list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151911.n4FJBnMT032739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com Blocks|492510 | --- Comment #37 from Bill Nottingham 2009-05-15 15:11:46 EDT --- This font is no longer installed by default, so removing from the blocker list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From meywer at openoffice.org Fri May 15 20:38:21 2009 From: meywer at openoffice.org (meywer at openoffice.org) Date: 15 May 2009 20:38:21 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090515203821.27375.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 ------- Additional comments from meywer at openoffice.org Fri May 15 20:38:20 +0000 2009 ------- Once more I want to say, that its really not nice, to get awful nasty boxes instead of letters printing a document, which is shown nice at the screen without any warning!!! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Sat May 16 00:28:02 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 00:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.86, 1.87 pango.spec, 1.160, 1.161 sources, 1.87, 1.88 Message-ID: <20090516002802.DB6D470128@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv780 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.24.2 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.86 retrieving revision 1.87 diff -u -p -r1.86 -r1.87 --- .cvsignore 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.86 +++ .cvsignore 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.87 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 +pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.160 retrieving revision 1.161 diff -u -p -r1.160 -r1.161 --- pango.spec 18 Apr 2009 12:32:33 -0000 1.160 +++ pango.spec 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.161 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.24.1 -Release: 1%{?dist}.1 +Version: 1.24.2 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ fi %changelog +* Fri May 15 2009 Karsten Hopp 1.24.2-1 +- Update to 1.24.2 +- See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.2.news + * Sat Apr 18 2009 Karsten Hopp 1.24.1-1.1 - autoconf uses ibm-linux not redhat-linux (s390x) - * Mon Apr 13 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.24.1-1 - Update to 1.24.1 - See http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-1.24.1.news Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.87 retrieving revision 1.88 diff -u -p -r1.87 -r1.88 --- sources 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 -0000 1.87 +++ sources 16 May 2009 00:27:32 -0000 1.88 @@ -1 +1 @@ -af0beac1dd1825e241c5728081f16acd pango-1.24.1.tar.bz2 +7bc6c884d847cabc613e4c6d663771f5 pango-1.24.2.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 09:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 05:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160925.n4G9PSHp015167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-16 05:25:26 EDT --- This package is currently a bundle of fonts collected from different sources with different licenses. Our font packaging guidelines would call for some splitting here (terminus-fonts is an example of mono-bitmap-font package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 18:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 14:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171808.n4HI8Sw1013811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #5 from Johan Cwiklinski 2009-05-17 14:08:27 EDT --- Apperently, fonts shipped in the package are never used, if I have understand shipped fonts are only used if 'dist_with_fonts' make flag is set, which is not the case here. Well, so, I've rebuild the whole package to the latest version, with fonts removed ; it builds and runs correctly under F-10 ; I'll attach the patch for specfile here ; hope that will help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 18:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 14:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171809.n4HI9qCu021980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #6 from Johan Cwiklinski 2009-05-17 14:09:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344341) SPECFILE patch for upgrade to 1.7.4 and removing fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 21:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 17:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465074] FTBFS libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905172138.n4HLcCxt024170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465074 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Fixed In Version| |libXfontcache-1.0.4-5.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:24:02 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-05-17 17:38:11 EDT --- Fixed long time ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 09:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 05:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500971] [Indic][GSUB]"U+09DC U+09CD U+09AF" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180958.n4I9wcul008812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500971 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 05:58:37 EDT --- [pa_IN][GSUB] U+0A33 U+0A4D U+0A2F ??? U+0A36 U+0A4D U+0A2F ??? U+0A59 U+0A4D U+0A2F ??? U+0A5A U+0A4D U+0A2F ??? U+0A5B U+0A4D U+0A2F ??? U+0A36 U+0A4D U+0A30 ??? U+0A59 U+0A4D U+0A30 ??? U+0A5A U+0A4D U+0A30 ??? U+0A5B U+0A4D U+0A30 ??? U+0A33 U+0A4D U+0A35 ??? U+0A36 U+0A4D U+0A35 ??? U+0A59 U+0A4D U+0A35 ??? U+0A5A U+0A4D U+0A35 ??? U+0A5B U+0A4D U+0A35 ??? U+0A5E U+0A4D U+0A35 ??? U+0A33 U+0A4D U+0A39 ??? U+0A36 U+0A4D U+0A39 ??? U+0A59 U+0A4D U+0A39 ??? U+0A5A U+0A4D U+0A39 ??? U+0A5E U+0A4D U+0A39 ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 10:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 06:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501267] New: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501267 Summary: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When input U+0A33 U+0A70 ?? in gedit, we need to press Backspace key three times to delete the whole char. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input U+0A33 U+0A70 in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key three times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key twice to delete the whole char. Additional info: U+0A33 U+0A70 ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 10:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 06:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501267] [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181024.n4IAOFHF023534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501267 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 06:24:14 EDT --- [kn_IN][GPOS]: the follows have the same problem. U+0C95 U+0CC7 ?? U+0C97 U+0CC7 ?? U+0C9C U+0CC7 ?? U+0C9F U+0CC7 ?? U+0CA4 U+0CC7 ?? U+0C96 U+0CC7 ?? U+0C95 U+0CC8 ?? U+0C97 U+0CC8 ?? U+0C9C U+0CC8 ?? U+0C9F U+0CC8 ?? U+0CA4 U+0CC8 ?? U+0C96 U+0CC8 ?? U+0C95 U+0CCA ?? U+0C97 U+0CCA ?? U+0C9C U+0CCA ?? U+0C9F U+0CCA ?? U+0CA4 U+0CCA ?? U+0C96 U+0CCA ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 10:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 06:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501271] [Indic][GPOS]"U+0C95 U+0CCB" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181031.n4IAVikP024969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501271 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 06:31:43 EDT --- [ka-IN][GPOS] U+0C97 U+0CCB ?? U+0C9C U+0CCB ?? U+0C9F U+0CCB ?? U+0CA4 U+0CCB ?? U+0C96 U+0CCB ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 10:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 06:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501271] New: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0C95 U+0CCB" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0C95 U+0CCB" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501271 Summary: [Indic][GPOS]"U+0C95 U+0CCB" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When input U+0C95 U+0CCB ?? in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input U+0C95 U+0CCB in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key twice to delete the whole char. Additional info: U+0C95 U+0CCB ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 10:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 06:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic][CodePoint]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181049.n4IAnicI028059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 XinSun changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xinsun at redhat.com --- Comment #26 from XinSun 2009-05-18 06:49:43 EDT --- [pa_IN][CodePoint][Dependent Vowels] U+0A3E ? U+0A3F ? U+0A40 ? U+0A41 ? U+0A42 ? U+0A47 ? U+0A48 ? U+0A4B ? U+0A4C ? [pa_IN][CodePoint][Various Sign] U+0A01 ? U+0A02 ? U+0A03 ? U+0A3C ? U+0A4D ? [pa_IN][CodePoint][Digit] U+0A70 ? U+0A71 ? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 10:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 06:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501277] New: [Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501277 Summary: [Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When input U+0A33 ? in gedit, we need to press Backspace key twice to delete the whole char. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input U+0A33 in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key twice to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key only one time to delete the whole char. Additional info: U+0A33 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 11:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 07:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501277] [Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181100.n4IB0Ki2030307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501277 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 07:00:19 EDT --- [pa_IN][CodePoint] U+0A36 ? U+0A59 ? U+0A5A ? U+0A5B ? U+0A5E ? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:37 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 18 May 2009 11:10:37 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090518111037.17536.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:11 +0000 2009 ------- Childworkspace "otf01" looks good for a OOo 3.2 target. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:37 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 18 May 2009 11:10:37 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090518111037.17536.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:11 +0000 2009 ------- Childworkspace "otf01" looks good for a OOo 3.2 target. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 12:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472695] exa-master-upgrade breaks glyph rendering with OLPC XO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181200.n4IC04MR011427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472695 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-18 08:00:02 EDT --- Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Mon May 18 16:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:02:38 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181602.n4IG2c5d000508@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #187 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd 2009-05-18 09:01:14 PDT --- The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some point fairly recently. Can someone take a look at it and let me know what's wrong with it? http://tinyurl.com/brohuv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue May 19 00:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:22:59 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190022.n4J0MxOI017090@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #188 from philippe 2009-05-18 17:21:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #187) > The sample for @font-face on MDC used to work but stopped working at some point > fairly recently. Can someone take a look at it and let me know what's wrong > with it? > > http://tinyurl.com/brohuv The test case uses Vera Serif bold, which seems to have bad checksums. See bug 483459. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic][CodePoint]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190233.n4J2XAlb014711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #27 from XinSun 2009-05-18 22:33:09 EDT --- [kn_IN][CodePoint] U+0CBE ? U+0CBF ? U+0CC0 ? U+0CC1 ? U+0CC2 ? U+0CC3 ? K U+0CC4 ? U+0CC6 ? U+0CC7 ? U+0CC8 ? U+0CCA ? U+0CCB ? U+0CCC ? U+0C82 ? U+0C83 ? U+0CBC U+0CCD ? U+0CCD ? U+0CD5 ? U+0CD6 ? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501414] New: [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501414 Summary: [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When moving cursor to the right hand of the total char, the cursor stays in the middle location. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input U+0CC4 in gedit.(or "U+0CBE", "U+0CCC", "U+0CCD") 3.Press right arrow key to move cursor to right hand of the char. Actual results: Cursor stays in the middle location.It didn't move to the right of the total char. Expected results: Cursor can move to the right of the total char. Additional info: U+0CC4 ? U+0CBC U+0CCC ? U+0CCD ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501414] [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190249.n4J2nqjm018673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501414 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 22:49:51 EDT --- [kn_IN][GPOS]: U+0C95 U+0CC4 ?? U+0C97 U+0CC4 ?? U+0C9C U+0CC4 ?? U+0C9F U+0CC4 ?? U+0CA4 U+0CC4 ?? U+0C96 U+0CC4 ?? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501416] New: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501416 Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When inputing "U+0CE2" ? or "U+0CE3" ? in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0CE2" or "U+0CE3" in gedit. Actual results: The result are U+0CE2 ? U+0CE3 ? and they are different from the correct image. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0CE2.png and U+0CE3.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501416] [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190303.n4J33WN3021592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501416 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:03:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344548) 0CE3.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501416] [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190303.n4J338ku021558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501416 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:03:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344547) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344547) 0CE2.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501417] New: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501417 Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=344549) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344549) 0CBC.jpg Description of problem: When inputing "U+0CBC" in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0CBC"in gedit. Actual results: U+0CBC ? and is different from the correct image. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0CBC.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Tue May 19 03:11:57 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.36,1.37 Message-ID: <20090519031157.86B9870114@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10466 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: remove redundant obsoletes, provides and conflicts from new subpackages Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.36 retrieving revision 1.37 diff -u -p -r1.36 -r1.37 --- liberation-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 14:32:20 -0000 1.36 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 19 May 2009 03:11:27 -0000 1.37 @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ New. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 10%{?dist} -# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two +Release: 11%{?dist} +# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. -# The second exception is an anti-lockdown clause somewhat like the one in +# The second exception is an anti-lockdown clause somewhat like the one in # GPLv3. This license is Free, but GPLv2 and GPLv3 incompatible. License: Liberation Group: User Interface/X @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= %description %common_desc -Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace +Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace families. %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %common_desc @@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ Meta-package for installing all three fo Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc @@ -84,9 +81,6 @@ This is Sans-serif TrueType fonts that r Summary: Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Obsoletes: liberation-serif-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Provides: liberation-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc @@ -100,9 +94,6 @@ Roman. Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Obsoletes: liberation-mono-fonts < 1.04.93-8 -Provides: liberation-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts %common_desc @@ -134,6 +125,9 @@ mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue May 19 2009 Jens Petersen - 1.04.93-11 +- remove redundant obsoletes, provides and conflicts from new subpackages + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.04.93-10 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild @@ -169,7 +163,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} * Thu Jul 17 2008 Caius Chance - 1.04.90-1.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#258592 - (Incorrect glyph points and missing hinting instructions for U+0079, U+03BC, + (Incorrect glyph points and missing hinting instructions for U+0079, U+03BC, U+0431, U+2010..2012.) * Thu Jul 17 2008 Caius Chance - 1.04-1.fc10 @@ -217,7 +211,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} - Change the license tag to "GPL + font exception" * Mon May 14 2007 Matthias Clasen 0.1-7 -- Correct the source url +- Correct the source url * Mon May 14 2007 Matthias Clasen 0.1-6 - Incorporate package review feedback From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501418] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501418 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501418] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190324.n4J3ORL2025692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501418 XinSun changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501420] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=344550) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344550) 0BB8-0BC1.jpg Description of problem: When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC" in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC" in gedit. Actual results: The result are U+0BB8 U+0BC ?? U+0BB9 U+0BC ?? and they are different from the correct images. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC1.jpg and 0BB9-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190326.n4J3QeNP026396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:26:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344551) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344551) 0BB9-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190328.n4J3SqoD016223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:28:51 EDT --- "U+0B9C U+0BC1" has the same problem. Actural results: "U+0B9C U+0BC1" ?? Expected results: Please see the attachment 0B9C-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190329.n4J3TNwY016316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:29:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344552) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344552) 0B9C-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190337.n4J3bC9Y028557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:37:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344555) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344555) 0B9C-0BC2.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190335.n4J3ZYdZ028173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:35:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344554) 0BB9-0BC2.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190336.n4J3aVRN028350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:36:30 EDT --- "U+0B9C U+0BC2" has the same problem. Actural results: "U+0B9C U+0BC2" ?? Expected results: Please see the attachment 0B9C-0BC2.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501420] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190337.n4J3bfxO028603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501420 XinSun changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=344553) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344553) 0BB8-0BC2.jpg Description of problem: When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit. Actual results: The result are U+0BB8 U+0BC2 ?? U+0BB9 U+0BC2 ?? and they are different from the correct images. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC2.jpg and 0BB9-0BC2.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190340.n4J3eMaq018981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:40:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344558) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344558) 0B9C-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190341.n4J3fZ4F019116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 23:41:35 EDT --- liberation-fonts-1.04.93-11.fc12 to be clear. (The conflicts were not wrong per se but unnecessary I think.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190340.n4J3ebV4019028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:40:37 EDT --- "U+0B9C U+0BC1" has the same problem. Actural results: "U+0B9C U+0BC1" ?? Expected results: Please see the attachment 0B9C-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] New: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=344556) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344556) 0BB8-0BC1.jpg Description of problem: When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC1" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC1" in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC1" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC1" in gedit. Actual results: The result are U+0BB8 U+0BC1 ?? U+0BB9 U+0BC1 ?? and they are different from the correct images. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC1.jpg and 0BB9-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190339.n4J3dk40029099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-18 23:39:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344557) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344557) 0BB9-0BC1.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190340.n4J3e4kh029452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 23:40:04 EDT --- I dropped the provides, obsoletes and conflicts from the latest build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500110] [Indic][CodePoint]Press backspace key it delete the whole char and letter before it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190834.n4J8YPx1019599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500110 --- Comment #28 from XinSun 2009-05-19 04:34:24 EDT --- [Assamese][CodePoint] U+09BE ? U+09BF ? U+09C0 ? U+09C1 ? U+09C2 ? U+09C3 ? U+09C7 ? U+09C8 ? U+09CB ? U+09CC ? U+0982 ? U+0983 ? U+0981 ? U+09E2 U+09E3 U+09CD ? U+09BC ? U+0982 ? U+0983 ? U+0981 ? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501267] [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190841.n4J8fmA2013524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501267 --- Comment #3 from XinSun 2009-05-19 04:41:47 EDT --- Sorry , these are [hi_IN][GPOS]: U+0929 U+0945 ?? U+0931 U+0945 ?? U+0934 U+0945 ?? U+0929 U+0946 ?? U+0931 U+0946 ?? U+0934 U+0946 ?? U+0929 U+0947 ?? U+0931 U+0947 ?? U+0934 U+0947 ?? U+0929 U+0948 ?? U+0931 U+0948 ?? U+0934 U+0948 ?? U+0929 U+0901 ?? U+0931 U+0901 ?? U+0934 U+0901 ?? U+0929 U+0941 ?? U+0931 U+0941 ?? U+0934 U+0941 ?? U+0929 U+0942 ?? U+0931 U+0942 ?? U+0934 U+0942 ?? U+0929 U+0943 ?? U+0931 U+0943 ?? U+0934 U+0943 ?? U+0929 U+0944 ?? U+0931 U+0944 ?? U+0934 U+0944 ?? U+0929 U+094D ?? U+0931 U+094D ?? U+0934 U+094D ?? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501267] [Indic][GPOS]"U+0A33 U+0A70" need press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190838.n4J8cA8q012695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501267 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-19 04:38:10 EDT --- [hi_IN][GSUB]: U+0929 U+0945 ?? U+0931 U+0945 ?? U+0934 U+0945 ?? U+0929 U+0946 ?? U+0931 U+0946 ?? U+0934 U+0946 ?? U+0929 U+0947 ?? U+0931 U+0947 ?? U+0934 U+0947 ?? U+0929 U+0948 ?? U+0931 U+0948 ?? U+0934 U+0948 ?? U+0929 U+0901 ?? U+0931 U+0901 ?? U+0934 U+0901 ?? U+0929 U+0941 ?? U+0931 U+0941 ?? U+0934 U+0941 ?? U+0929 U+0942 ?? U+0931 U+0942 ?? U+0934 U+0942 ?? U+0929 U+0943 ?? U+0931 U+0943 ?? U+0934 U+0943 ?? U+0929 U+0944 ?? U+0931 U+0944 ?? U+0934 U+0944 ?? U+0929 U+094D ?? U+0931 U+094D ?? U+0934 U+094D ?? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190839.n4J8dboD020588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-19 04:39:36 EDT --- IIRC the conflicts are needed to help yum in some obscure upgrade cases. If you want to drop them, do check with skvidal he's ok with it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 15:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191514.n4JFEncS025002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #14 from Chris Lumens 2009-05-19 11:14:48 EDT --- I changed out a lot of font package names for F11. Is this any better now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:09:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200509.n4K59nQN005477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 10:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501683] New: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501683 Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D33 with RAW CODE,the font shape is not correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D33 with RAW CODE,it shows ??? Actual results: The font shape is not correct. Expected result: The font shape should be correct. Additional info: U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D17 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2A U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2B U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2C U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D2E U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D36 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D33 U+0D39 U+0D4D U+0D33 all have errors I will attach an attachment for error font and correct font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 10:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501683] [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201015.n4KAFsJZ006078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501683 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-20 06:15:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344773) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344773) correct and error font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 02:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501847] New: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D delete key can't delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D delete key can't delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501847 Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D delete key can't delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- DDescription of problem: In gedit input U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW CODE,then press delete key,it can delete the whole char Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW CODE,press delete key once Actual results: It can't delete the whole char when pressing once Expected result: It should can delete the whole char when pressing once Additional info: U+0D05 U+0D2A U+0D4D U+0D21 U+0D47 U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D05 U+0D2A U+0D4D U+0D17 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D47 U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D35 U+0D4D U+0D2F U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D24 U+0D02 U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D also has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 02:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501849] New: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D move to the right of the font need pressing right arrow key many times Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D move to the right of the font need pressing right arrow key many times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501849 Summary: [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D move to the right of the font need pressing right arrow key many times Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW CODE,then press right arrow key,we need press right arrow key many times to move to the right of the font Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW CODE,then press right arrow key Actual results: we need press right arrow key many times to move to the right of the font Expected result: We need only press one time to move to the right of the font Additional info: U+0D05 U+0D2A U+0D4D U+0D21 U+0D47 U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D05 U+0D2A U+0D4D U+0D17 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D47 U+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D35 U+0D4D U+0D2F U+0D15 U+0D4D U+0D24 U+0D02 U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D also has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 02:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501852] New: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- DDescription of problem: In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D with RAW CODE,then press backspace key,it needs press 14 times Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW CODE,press backspace key Actual results: It need press 14 times backspace key to delete the char Expected result: It should delete the char with 13 times backspace key Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 03:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501852] [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210337.n4L3bH1s032238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-20 23:37:17 EDT --- Can you paste the utf8 string into a comment here, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 03:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501852] [ml_IN] need extra backspace press to delete this string of characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210338.n4L3curP000767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 |[ml_IN] need extra |U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D |backspace press to delete |U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B |this string of characters |U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press | |backspace key need 14 times | --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-20 23:38:55 EDT --- The bug is against F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 05:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 01:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501414] [kn_IN]Cursor stays in the middle of char when moving it to the right hand of the char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210501.n4L51sH1013340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501414 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kxiong at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from koka xiong 2009-05-21 01:01:53 EDT --- 1. U+0AB2 U+0AC2 ?? 2. U+0AB3 U+0AC2 ?? 3. U+0AB5 U+0AC2 ?? 4. U+0AB6 U+0AC2 ?? 5. U+0AB7 U+0AC2 ?? 6. U+0AB8 U+0AC2 ?? 7. U+0AB9 U+0AC2 ?? also has the same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 07:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 03:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501852] [ml_IN] need extra backspace press to delete this string of characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210749.n4L7nRoL013805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 --- Comment #3 from koka xiong 2009-05-21 03:49:26 EDT --- the bug is against F10, when I input 0D07 0D28 0D4D 200D 0D38 0D4D 0D31 0D4D 0D31 0D4B 0D33 0D4D 200D 0D21 0D4D 0D30 0D48 0D35 0D4D,it will generate ????????????? , I need press 14 times backspace key to delete it.I should use 13 times backspace key to delete it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 08:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 04:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210844.n4L8i4x7025286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501900] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501900 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When "U+0915 U+094D U+0929" in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0915 U+094D U+0929" in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. Additional info: U+0915 U+094D U+0929 ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501900] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210925.n4L9PJ8w001368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501900 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-21 05:25:18 EDT --- [hi_IN][GSUB] U+0916 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0917 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0918 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0919 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+091A U+094D U+0929 ??? U+091B U+094D U+0929 ??? U+091C U+094D U+0929 ??? U+091D U+094D U+0929 ??? U+091E U+094D U+0929 ??? U+091F U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0920 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0921 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0922 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0923 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0924 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0925 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0926 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0927 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0928 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+092A U+094D U+0929 ??? U+092B U+094D U+0929 ??? U+092C U+094D U+0929 ??? U+092D U+094D U+0929 ??? U+092E U+094D U+0929 ??? U+092F U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0930 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0932 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0933 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0936 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0935 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0937 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0938 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0939 U+094D U+0929 ??? also have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501900] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210929.n4L9TDHv001869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501900 --- Comment #2 from XinSun 2009-05-21 05:28:41 EDT --- [hi_IN][GSUB]: U+0929 U+094D U+0915 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0916 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0916 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0917 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0918 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0919 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+091A ??? U+0929 U+094D U+091B ??? U+0929 U+094D U+091C ??? U+0929 U+094D U+091D ??? U+0929 U+094D U+091E ??? U+0929 U+094D U+091F ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0920 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0921 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0922 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0923 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0924 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0925 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0926 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0927 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0928 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+092A ??? U+0929 U+094D U+092B ??? U+0929 U+094D U+092C ??? U+0929 U+094D U+092D ??? U+0929 U+094D U+092E ??? U+0929 U+094D U+092F ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0930 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0932 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0933 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0935 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0936 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0937 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0938 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0939 ??? also have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501903] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210934.n4L9YTBk003375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501903 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-21 05:34:29 EDT --- [hi_IN][GUSB] U+0931 U+094D U+0915 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0916 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0917 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0918 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0919 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091A ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091B ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091C ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091D ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091E ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091F ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0920 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0921 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0922 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0923 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0924 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0925 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0926 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0927 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0928 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092A ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092B ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092C ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092D ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092E ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092F ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0930 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0932 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0933 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0935 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0936 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0937 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0938 ??? also have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501903] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501903 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. U+0915 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0916 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0917 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0918 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0919 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091A U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091B U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091C U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091D U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091E U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091F U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0920 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0921 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0922 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0923 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0924 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0925 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0926 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0927 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0928 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092A U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092B U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092C U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092D U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092E U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092F U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0930 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0932 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0933 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0935 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0936 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0937 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0938 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0939 U+094D U+0931 ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input Tthe above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501905] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501905 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. U+0915 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0916 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0917 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0918 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0919 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091A U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091B U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091C U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091D U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091E U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091F U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0920 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0921 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0922 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0923 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0924 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0925 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0926 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0927 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0928 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092A U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092B U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092C U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092D U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092E U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092F U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0930 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0932 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0933 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0935 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0936 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0937 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0939 U+094D U+0934 ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input the above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501905] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210948.n4L9mk9E005804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501905 --- Comment #1 from XinSun 2009-05-21 05:48:46 EDT --- [hi_IN][GSUB] U+0934 U+094D U+0915 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0916 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0917 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0918 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0919 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091A ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091B ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091C ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091D ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091E ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091F ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0920 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0921 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0922 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0923 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0924 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0925 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0926 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0927 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0928 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092A ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092B ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092C ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092D ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092E ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092F ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0930 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0932 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0933 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0935 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0936 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0937 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0938 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0939 ??? also have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501910] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501910 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key five times to delete the whole char. U+0929 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0934 ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input the above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key five times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501852] [ml_IN] need extra backspace press to delete this string of characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211002.n4LA2d2H009224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-21 06:02:38 EDT --- So F11 is ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 12:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 08:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478634] Have upstream use fontconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211211.n4LCB2TU005954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478634 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tosta at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-21 08:11:00 EDT --- *** Bug 501835 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478634] wesnoth upstream should use fontconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211342.n4LDgCaB001982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478634 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Have upstream use |wesnoth upstream should use |fontconfig |fontconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211639.n4LGd9Jt004556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-21 12:39:07 EDT --- Seems I'm a slacker at heart. Sorry for the delay. Anyway: 1. the source is in macosx zip format. Since the people in charge of rpm and unzip refused to fix their support for osx zip archives, you need to perform the un-zipping manually to avoid leaving a stray __MACOSX directory behind in the build root (annoys people doing full-distro rebuilds). Use something like: %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} (the gfs font packages have the same problem) 2. Microsoft considers faces in modern font families should only differ on weight, width or slope) and a lot of software is confused by anything else. Therefore, the shadow face should be split in a woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts subpackage IMHO, making it a multi-family package. 3. the font is definitely sans-serif, your fontconfig file should declare it there The rest of the packaging seems fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211719.n4LHJ0uG016654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-21 13:18:59 EDT --- First review: 1. W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt ? please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging guidelines 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is really needed 5. your URL does not work 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) 7. I'd drop the first ? of your description 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig file. For version 1.1, it will be "NotCourierSans" 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211724.n4LHOR5g018430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-21 13:24:26 EDT --- If your package does not include any font anymore I have certainly nothing to say about it. Though if some of them were not available in Fedora, it'd be nice to get them packaged separately. It's all documented pretty extensively in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Technical_implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211752.n4LHqlFS026883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2009-05-21 13:52:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > First review: > > 1. W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt > ? please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil > andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) > > 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging > guidelines > > 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name > > 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is > really needed > > 5. your URL does not work > > 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real > version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) > > 7. I'd drop the first ? of your description > > 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has > already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) > > 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig > file. For version 1.1, it will be "NotCourierSans" > > 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in > fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better > > Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts bah... they edited it all on may 17.. I'll redo the package.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu May 21 18:12:29 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sil-charis-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090521181229.7371A70114@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22328/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sil-charis-fonts.spec sources Log Message: 4.106 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 21 May 2009 18:11:58 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -CharisSIL4.104.zip +CharisSIL4.106.zip Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:01:05 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224 sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642 +sil-charis-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1242929489 Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sil-charis-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 00:59:58 -0000 1.4 +++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.5 @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ %global archivename CharisSIL Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 4.104 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Version: 4.106 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Group: User Interface/X @@ -66,10 +66,14 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf -%doc *.txt *.pdf +%doc *.txt %changelog +* Fri May 21 2009 +- 4.106-1 +??? This version supports Unicode 5.1 and adds support for Small capitals + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.104-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -acc153c243b90e3e5d0bb53476ab894e CharisSIL4.104.zip +045aea5116c6c20e5b84e165d9727f0c CharisSIL4.106.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212102.n4LL29Vt016079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |CommonBugs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494046] updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212304.n4LN4Ohb013463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |https://fedoraproject.org/w | |iki/Common_F11_bugs#fontcon | |fig-update-issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 08:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 04:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502290] New: [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502290 Summary: [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C,the font shape is not same with image. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C ??? Actual results: The font is not the same with image Expected results: The font is the same with image. Additional info: U+0B15 U+0B4D U+0B2C ??? U+0B15 U+0B4D U+0B30 ??? all have the problem I will attach the error and correct font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 08:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 04:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502290] [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230815.n4N8FriO009804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502290 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong 2009-05-23 04:15:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345182) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345182) error and correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat May 23 13:07:36 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.15, 1.16 import.log, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090523130736.63A2E70114@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11538/devel Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: clean up pre-F11 compatibility metapackage goo Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16 --- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 04:53:12 -0000 1.15 +++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 23 May 2009 13:07:05 -0000 1.16 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ at %{url} for details. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.10 -Release: 16%{?dist} +Release: 17%{?dist} Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -25,21 +25,10 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %common_desc -%package compat -Summary: Bitstream Vera, compatibility - -Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts < 1.10-9 -Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts, %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts - -%description compat -This package only exists to help transition pre 1.10-9 Bitstream Vera users to -the new package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, -please do not reference it or depend on it in any way. - - %package common -Summary: Common files of the Bitstream Vera font set -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Summary: Common files of the Bitstream Vera font set +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Obsoletes: %{name}-compat < 1.10-17 %description common %common_desc @@ -106,16 +95,19 @@ install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_ rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files compat - - %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.TXT %changelog -* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.10-16 +* Sat May 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.10-17 +??? remove pre-F11 compatibility metapackage + + +* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 1.10-16 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:28:35 -0000 1.4 +++ import.log 23 May 2009 13:07:05 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-12_fc11:HEAD:b bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-13_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-13.fc11.src.rpm:1231979242 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-14_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-14.fc11.src.rpm:1232062969 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-15_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-15.fc11.src.rpm:1235377691 +bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-17_fc12:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-17.fc12.src.rpm:1243083967 From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat May 23 13:15:13 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 13:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.100, 1.101 import.log, 1.15, 1.16 Message-ID: <20090523131513.907C870114@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13129/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: clean up pre-F11 compatibility metapackage goo Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.100 retrieving revision 1.101 diff -u -p -r1.100 -r1.101 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 18:51:58 -0000 1.100 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 23 May 2009 13:14:43 -0000 1.101 @@ -17,18 +17,10 @@ The DejaVu font set is based on the ???B purpose is to provide a wider range of characters, while maintaining the \ original style, using an open collaborative development process. -# Compat description -%global compat_desc \ -This package only exists to help transition pre 2.26-3 DejaVu users to the new\ -package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please\ -do not reference it or depend on it in any way.\ -\ -It can be safely uninstalled. - Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.29 -Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -50,38 +42,13 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %common_desc -%package compat -Summary: DejaVu fonts compatibility package - -Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 -Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 - -Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts -Requires: %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts -Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts - -%description compat -%compat_desc - - -%package lgc-compat -Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility package - -Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 - -Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts -Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts -Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts - -%description lgc-compat -%compat_desc - - %package common Summary: Common files for the Dejavu font set Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-doc < 2.26-6 +Obsoletes: %{name}-compat < 2.29-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-compat < 2.29-3 %description common %common_desc @@ -231,10 +198,6 @@ done rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files compat -%files lgc-compat - - %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README @@ -242,7 +205,12 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.29-2 +* Sat May 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.29-3 +??? remove pre-F11 compatibility metapackage + +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.29-2 ??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge * Sat Mar 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16 --- import.log 15 Mar 2009 18:51:59 -0000 1.15 +++ import.log 23 May 2009 13:14:43 -0000 1.16 @@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fon dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235377773 dejavu-fonts-2_29-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-1.fc11.src.rpm:1237057458 dejavu-fonts-2_29-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.src.rpm:1237143073 +dejavu-fonts-2_29-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-3.fc11.src.rpm:1243084445 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 14:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 10:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231403.n4NE3nbO002745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 14:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 10:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231417.n4NEH7rk029298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-23 10:17:06 EDT --- Have you tried to coordinate with the people working on bug #458430 ? They seem to have done quite a lot of work already (but stalled :() -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241216.n4OCGr5F011975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-24 08:16:52 EDT --- I guess that Nicolas' message really wasn't clear enough after all. The -compat packages have indeed gone now and once again, rrdtool is broken. As before, this is breaking builds in rawhide for anything depending on rrdtool. DEBUG util.py:256: rrdtool-1.3.8-1.fc12.ppc from build has depsolving problems DEBUG util.py:256: --> Missing Dependency: dejavu-fonts-lgc-compat is needed by package rrdtool-1.3.8-1.fc12.ppc (build) DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: dejavu-fonts-lgc-compat is needed by package rrdtool-1.3.8-1.fc12.ppc (build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 04:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250403.n4P43Orb005017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-25 00:03:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1375245 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3d6f4a0b716c834fa5236762c0fc0ec20517311a CharisSILCompact4.106.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed fonts packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 04:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250453.n4P4rHUG008204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Parag 2009-05-25 00:53:14 EDT --- Ok. So no progress here and meantime I also forgot to look at new package queue and now I have submitted new package request for lcdf-typetools in review bug 501854. If submitter still interested then I will drop my request otherwise I will be happy to maintain this package. Hmm. Not much used TEX but I just want to have this package in fedora so if someone interested and knowing well TEX, he can maintain or co-maintain this package in review 501854. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 09:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 05:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250914.n4P9ELmk013569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-25 05:14:19 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-charis-compact-fonts Short Description: A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing Owners: nim Branches: F11 & devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 12:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251248.n4PCmnov002772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Minto Joseph 2009-05-25 08:48:47 EDT --- Hello, Please check. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/sil-padauk-fonts.spec http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-5.fc11.src.rpm Regards, Mintos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 20:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252054.n4PKsc3t007329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-25 16:54:38 EDT --- BTW you can use http://scripts.sil.org/Padauk as URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 20:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252053.n4PKrfWo007272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-25 16:53:40 EDT --- This one is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 01:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260142.n4Q1gcxc028487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #64 from A S Alam 2009-05-25 21:42:36 EDT --- fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1.fc11.x86_64 Package is available and FIXED the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 01:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260143.n4Q1hmJH028652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 02:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260246.n4Q2kLMx001216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #12 from Minto Joseph 2009-05-25 22:46:20 EDT --- Hello, Changed the URL. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/sil-padauk-fonts.spec http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11.src.rpm Regards, Mintos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 06:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 02:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260629.n4Q6TvAP026372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-26 02:29:56 EDT --- APPROVED. You can do the administrative bits in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Source_package_naming_changes now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 06:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 02:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260656.n4Q6uZYL032686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #12 from Parag 2009-05-26 02:56:32 EDT --- If no response received in next 15 days, I will close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 08:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 04:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] New: CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 Summary: CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: freetype1 AssignedTo: ajax at redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: ajax at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in all affected branches. You should *not* refer to this bug publicly, as it is a private "Fedora Project Contributors" bug. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in "Blocks" field. bug #484437: CVE-2006-1861 freetype: multiple integer overflow vulnerabilities bug #240200: CVE-2007-2754 freetype integer overflow Please close this bug with RAWHIDE (referencing appropriate N-V-R in Fixed In field if possible) once is it fixed in devel branch. Do *not* include the bug id of this bug in the RPM changelog and the commit message. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 08:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 04:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260809.n4Q89WTm017300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 Tomas Hoger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484437(CVE-2006-1861), | |240200(CVE-2007-2754) --- Comment #1 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-26 04:09:30 EDT --- These old issues were previously fixed in FT2, but parts apply to FT1 as well. The fixes were included in RHEL freetype packages update (which contain both FT1 and FT2 on RHEL-2.1 - RHEL-4): http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0329.html All current Fedora branches should contain same FT1 version with identical patches, so this should apply to all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 08:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 04:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260816.n4Q8GLEm012927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #3 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-26 04:16:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345397) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345397) FT1 CVE-2007-2754 patch as used in RHSA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 08:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 04:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260815.n4Q8FkDs012769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #2 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-26 04:15:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345396) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345396) FT1 CVE-2006-1861 patch as used in RHSA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:06:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502577] CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260906.n4Q96PSh029193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502577 Tomas Hoger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491384(CVE-2009-0946) --- Comment #1 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-26 05:06:24 EDT --- As mentioned in the parent bug, not yet fixed in any upstream release. Should affect all current Fedora versions F9 - F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502577] New: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502577 Summary: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in all affected branches. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in "Blocks" field. bug #491384: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product. Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available and only close this bug once all affected Fedora versions are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502582] CVE-2009-1194 pango: pango_glyph_string_set_size integer overflow In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260929.n4Q9TZjP029201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502582 Tomas Hoger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496887(CVE-2009-1194) --- Comment #1 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-26 05:29:34 EDT --- F11 / F12 are already updated to fixed upstream version (1.24+), F9 and F10 are affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502582] New: CVE-2009-1194 pango: pango_glyph_string_set_size integer overflow Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2009-1194 pango: pango_glyph_string_set_size integer overflow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502582 Summary: CVE-2009-1194 pango: pango_glyph_string_set_size integer overflow Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in all affected branches. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in "Blocks" field. bug #496887: CVE-2009-1194 pango: pango_glyph_string_set_size integer overflow When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product. Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available and only close this bug once all affected Fedora versions are fixed. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=496887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 14:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261451.n4QEpi5v021632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-26 10:51:42 EDT --- New Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 16:02:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473551] Fix dejavu-* dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261602.n4QG2XqQ005407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473551 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Jarod Wilson 2009-05-26 12:02:32 EDT --- Fixed yet again for the font package name dependency of the week. rrdtool-1.3.8-2 should get spit out of the build system shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 18:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261846.n4QIkck9027922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-26 14:46:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345498) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345498) laconic shadow fontconfig rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 18:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261850.n4QIoiQJ020139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-26 14:50:44 EDT --- ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 18:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261849.n4QInuC0019676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-26 14:49:55 EDT --- Behdad suggests the rules in the attached file for laconic shadow. (20:31:14) behdad: nim-nim: yes. in target="scan" (20:31:16) behdad: I suggest: (20:31:34) behdad: 1) in target="scan" append "LaconicShadow" as family name (not replace). (20:31:56) behdad: humm. then add LaconicShadow to decorative queue ? (20:42:43) behdad: nim-nim: I believe so. I never used target="scan" myself though... (20:42:43) behdad: so test The rest of the packaging is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue May 26 20:11:37 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype1/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 freetype-1.3.1-1.4pre.patch, 1.1, NONE freetype-1.4-disable-ft1-bci.patch, 1.1, NONE freetype-1.4pre-CVE-2008-1808.patch, 1.1, NONE freetype1.spec, 1.6, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20090526201137.E3D6770114@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25451 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: freetype-1.3.1-1.4pre.patch freetype-1.4-disable-ft1-bci.patch freetype-1.4pre-CVE-2008-1808.patch freetype1.spec sources Log Message: Unused in Fedora, and unmaintained upstream. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Unused in Fedora, and unmaintained upstream. --- freetype-1.3.1-1.4pre.patch DELETED --- --- freetype-1.4-disable-ft1-bci.patch DELETED --- --- freetype-1.4pre-CVE-2008-1808.patch DELETED --- --- freetype1.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue May 26 20:28:54 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype1/F-11 freetype1.spec,1.6,1.7 Message-ID: <20090526202854.B4C6170114@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29325 Modified Files: freetype1.spec Log Message: * Tue May 26 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4-0.8.pre - cve-2006-1861.patch, cve-2007-2754.patch: Port of freetype2 fixes. (#502565) Index: freetype1.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/F-11/freetype1.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7 --- freetype1.spec 24 Feb 2009 18:30:12 -0000 1.6 +++ freetype1.spec 26 May 2009 20:28:24 -0000 1.7 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: freetype1 Version: 1.4 -Release: 0.7.pre%{?dist} +Release: 0.8.pre%{?dist} Summary: Free TrueType font rendering engine, compatibility version Group: System Environment/Libraries License: FTL @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ Source: http://downloads.sourcef Patch0: freetype-1.3.1-1.4pre.patch Patch1: freetype-1.4-disable-ft1-bci.patch Patch2: freetype-1.4pre-CVE-2008-1808.patch +Patch3: cve-2006-1861.patch +Patch4: cve-2007-2754.patch + BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: zlib-devel libXt-devel gettext @@ -61,6 +64,8 @@ developing applications that use %{name} %endif %patch2 -p1 +%patch3 -p1 +%patch4 -p1 iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 docs/i18n.txt > docs/i18n.txt.tmp touch -r docs/i18n.txt docs/i18n.txt.tmp @@ -125,6 +130,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Tue May 26 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4-0.8.pre +- cve-2006-1861.patch, cve-2007-2754.patch: Port of freetype2 fixes. (#502565) + * Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.4-0.7.pre - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue May 26 20:29:58 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype1/F-11 cve-2006-1861.patch, NONE, 1.1 cve-2007-2754.patch, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <20090526202958.9530B70114@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29730 Added Files: cve-2006-1861.patch cve-2007-2754.patch Log Message: * Tue May 26 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4-0.8.pre - cve-2006-1861.patch, cve-2007-2754.patch: Port of freetype2 fixes. (#502565) cve-2006-1861.patch: --- NEW FILE cve-2006-1861.patch --- diff -up freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.freetype-pre1.4-CVE-2006-1861-null-pointer freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c --- freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.freetype-pre1.4-CVE-2006-1861-null-pointer 2009-05-12 19:40:52.000000000 -0400 +++ freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c 2009-05-12 19:41:03.000000000 -0400 @@ -270,6 +270,10 @@ j = 0; flag = exec->pts.touch; + /* CVE-2006-1861 */ + if ( flag == NULL ) + return TT_Err_Invalid_Composite; /* for lack of a better err code */ + while ( j < n_points ) { Byte c, cnt; cve-2007-2754.patch: --- NEW FILE cve-2007-2754.patch --- diff -up freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.ttf-overflow freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c --- freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.ttf-overflow 2009-05-12 19:25:25.000000000 -0400 +++ freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c 2009-05-12 19:28:15.000000000 -0400 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ FORGET_Frame(); - if ( n_points > left_points ) + if ( n_points < 0 || n_points > left_points ) { PTRACE0(( "ERROR: Too many points in glyph %ld\n", subg->index )); return TT_Err_Too_Many_Points; From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue May 26 20:31:32 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype1/F-10 cve-2006-1861.patch, NONE, 1.1 cve-2007-2754.patch, NONE, 1.1 freetype1.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090526203132.34F5670128@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30111 Modified Files: freetype1.spec Added Files: cve-2006-1861.patch cve-2007-2754.patch Log Message: * Tue May 26 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4-0.8.pre - cve-2006-1861.patch, cve-2007-2754.patch: Port of freetype2 fixes. (#502565) cve-2006-1861.patch: --- NEW FILE cve-2006-1861.patch --- diff -up freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.freetype-pre1.4-CVE-2006-1861-null-pointer freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c --- freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.freetype-pre1.4-CVE-2006-1861-null-pointer 2009-05-12 19:40:52.000000000 -0400 +++ freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c 2009-05-12 19:41:03.000000000 -0400 @@ -270,6 +270,10 @@ j = 0; flag = exec->pts.touch; + /* CVE-2006-1861 */ + if ( flag == NULL ) + return TT_Err_Invalid_Composite; /* for lack of a better err code */ + while ( j < n_points ) { Byte c, cnt; cve-2007-2754.patch: --- NEW FILE cve-2007-2754.patch --- diff -up freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.ttf-overflow freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c --- freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c.ttf-overflow 2009-05-12 19:25:25.000000000 -0400 +++ freetype-pre1.4/lib/ttgload.c 2009-05-12 19:28:15.000000000 -0400 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ FORGET_Frame(); - if ( n_points > left_points ) + if ( n_points < 0 || n_points > left_points ) { PTRACE0(( "ERROR: Too many points in glyph %ld\n", subg->index )); return TT_Err_Too_Many_Points; Index: freetype1.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/F-10/freetype1.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6 --- freetype1.spec 14 Jun 2008 08:41:03 -0000 1.5 +++ freetype1.spec 26 May 2009 20:31:01 -0000 1.6 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: freetype1 Version: 1.4 -Release: 0.6.pre%{?dist} +Release: 0.8.pre%{?dist} Summary: Free TrueType font rendering engine, compatibility version Group: System Environment/Libraries License: FTL @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ Source: http://downloads.sourcef Patch0: freetype-1.3.1-1.4pre.patch Patch1: freetype-1.4-disable-ft1-bci.patch Patch2: freetype-1.4pre-CVE-2008-1808.patch +Patch3: cve-2006-1861.patch +Patch4: cve-2007-2754.patch + BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: zlib-devel libXt-devel gettext @@ -61,6 +64,8 @@ developing applications that use %{name} %endif %patch2 -p1 +%patch3 -p1 +%patch4 -p1 iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 docs/i18n.txt > docs/i18n.txt.tmp touch -r docs/i18n.txt docs/i18n.txt.tmp @@ -125,6 +130,12 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Tue May 26 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4-0.8.pre +- cve-2006-1861.patch, cve-2007-2754.patch: Port of freetype2 fixes. (#502565) + +* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.4-0.7.pre +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild + * Sat Jun 14 2008 Hans de Goede 1.4-0.6.pre - Backport fixes for CVE-2008-1806, CVE-2008-1807 and CVE-2008-1808 to freetype 1 (where applicable, bz 450773, 450774) From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 20:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262055.n4QKt8LD030498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 16:55:07 EDT --- freetype1-1.4-0.8.pre.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype1-1.4-0.8.pre.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 20:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262055.n4QKts67030686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 16:55:53 EDT --- freetype1-1.4-0.8.pre.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype1-1.4-0.8.pre.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 21:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262126.n4QLQJtp004788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 Alexei Podtelezhnikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apodtele at ucsd.edu --- Comment #6 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-05-26 17:26:18 EDT --- Would you please fix a typo ("obsolote") in the package description and make it more obvious that it is an old-old library by moving the second paragraph upfront? I am curious which package still uses it and why we cannot drop this old library. Nobody should use it any longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262230.n4QMULvT008961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:30:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 06:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270644.n4R6i3Nc010279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-27 02:44:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I am curious which package still uses it and why we cannot drop this old > library. $ repoquery -q --whatrequires 'libttf.so.2()(64bit)' freetype1-0:1.4-0.6.pre.fc10.x86_64 freetype1-utils-0:1.4-0.6.pre.fc10.x86_64 MagicPoint-0:1.11b-7.fc10.x86_64 freetype1-devel-0:1.4-0.6.pre.fc10.x86_64 Looks like only MagicPoint now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 06:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270646.n4R6kmwB011020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #8 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-27 02:46:47 EDT --- Ah, looks like Ajax already did few steps to get rid of that last dependency either: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/MagicPoint/devel/MagicPoint.spec#rev1.11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Wed May 27 07:02:06 2009 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20090527070206.476AF70110@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27139 Added Files: dead.package Log Message: Added Files: dead.package --- NEW FILE dead.package --- The padauk-fonts has been renamed to sil-padauk-fonts following: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Wed May 27 07:05:14 2009 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/devel Makefile, 1.1, NONE import.log, 1.1, NONE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, NONE padauk-fonts.spec, 1.2, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20090527070514.EC97770110@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28612 Removed Files: Makefile import.log padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf padauk-fonts.spec sources Log Message: Committing in . Removed Files: Makefile import.log padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf padauk-fonts.spec sources --- Makefile DELETED --- --- import.log DELETED --- --- padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf DELETED --- --- padauk-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 12:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271249.n4RCnJbR006885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Qiao <29551030 at qq.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #8 from Qiao <29551030 at qq.com> 2009-05-27 08:49:18 EDT --- Java application like Netbeans cannot display Chinese character because chinese fonts package changed file /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc in package cjkuni-uming-fonts have moved to /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc file /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc in package cjkuni-ukai-fonts have moved to /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271534.n4RFYwGx026766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 11:34:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: woodardworks-laconic-fonts Short Description: An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271638.n4RGcjjt010021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:38:44 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:38:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271638.n4RGcoxk014479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:38:49 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271638.n4RGceYm014419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:38:40 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271724.n4RHOQKL026981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #9 from Adam Jackson 2009-05-27 13:24:24 EDT --- freetype1 is a dead package in F12. We could remove it in F11 without too much hassle but I didn't think it was worth it given how close to release we are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed May 27 19:06:30 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel import.log, 1.3, 1.4 sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 sil-charis-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090527190630.DF8AF70110@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32276/devel Modified Files: import.log sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-charis-fonts.spec Log Message: prepare for charis sil compact import Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.3 +++ import.log 27 May 2009 19:06:00 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224 sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642 sil-charis-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1242929489 +sil-charis-fonts-4_106-2_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc12.src.rpm:1243451099 Index: sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.1 +++ sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf 27 May 2009 19:06:00 -0000 1.2 @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ + Charis SIL Compact + + Charis SIL + + + Charis SIL Literacy Charis SIL Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6 --- sil-charis-fonts.spec 21 May 2009 18:11:59 -0000 1.5 +++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 27 May 2009 19:06:00 -0000 1.6 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.106 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Group: User Interface/X @@ -70,11 +70,16 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Wed May 27 2009 +- 4.106-2 +??? Propose Charis SIL as substitute to Charis SIL Compact when it's not available + * Fri May 21 2009 - 4.106-1 ??? This version supports Unicode 5.1 and adds support for Small capitals -* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.104-8 +* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 4.104-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed May 27 19:10:50 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 sil-charis-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090527191050.D019070110@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1143/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-charis-fonts.spec sources Log Message: prepare for charis sil compact import Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 27 May 2009 19:10:20 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -CharisSIL4.104.zip +CharisSIL4.106.zip Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:01:05 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 27 May 2009 19:10:20 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224 sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642 +sil-charis-fonts-4_106-2_fc12:F-11:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc12.src.rpm:1243451246 Index: sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.1 +++ sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf 27 May 2009 19:10:20 -0000 1.2 @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ + Charis SIL Compact + + Charis SIL + + + Charis SIL Literacy Charis SIL Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sil-charis-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 00:59:58 -0000 1.4 +++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 27 May 2009 19:10:20 -0000 1.5 @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ %global archivename CharisSIL Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 4.104 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Version: 4.106 +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Group: User Interface/X @@ -66,11 +66,20 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf -%doc *.txt *.pdf +%doc *.txt %changelog -* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.104-8 +* Wed May 27 2009 +- 4.106-2 +??? Propose Charis SIL as substitute to Charis SIL Compact when it's not available + +* Fri May 21 2009 +- 4.106-1 +??? This version supports Unicode 5.1 and adds support for Small capitals + +* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 4.104-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 27 May 2009 19:10:20 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -acc153c243b90e3e5d0bb53476ab894e CharisSIL4.104.zip +045aea5116c6c20e5b84e165d9727f0c CharisSIL4.106.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed May 27 19:11:15 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090527191115.62A0F70110@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1263/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-charis-compact-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1243451404 --- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Charis SIL Compact Charis SIL Compact serif Bitstream Charter Charis SIL Compact Charis SIL Charis SIL Compact Charis SIL Literacy Charis SIL Compact --- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-charis-compact %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename CharisSILCompact Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.106 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/CharisSILFont # Actual download URL # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=%{archivename}.zip&filename=%{archivename}%{version}.zip Source0: %{archivename}%{version}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles ??? regular, italic, bold, bold italic ??? and so is more useful in general publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font optimized for readability in long printed documents. The Charis SIL Compact fonts were derived from Charis SIL using SIL TypeTuner, by setting the ???Line spacing??? feature to ???Tight???, and they cannot be TypeTuned again. They may exhibit some diacritics clipping on screen (but should print fine). %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat May 23 2009 - 4.106-1 ??? Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 May 2009 22:29:34 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 27 May 2009 19:10:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +CharisSILCompact4.106.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 May 2009 22:29:34 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 May 2009 19:10:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +d48c3a1c191891f0347764d1a005b7a3 CharisSILCompact4.106.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed May 27 19:12:11 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090527191211.B52F270110@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1854/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-charis-compact-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:F-11:sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1243451470 --- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Charis SIL Compact Charis SIL Compact serif Bitstream Charter Charis SIL Compact Charis SIL Charis SIL Compact Charis SIL Literacy Charis SIL Compact --- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-charis-compact %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename CharisSILCompact Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.106 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/CharisSILFont # Actual download URL # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=%{archivename}.zip&filename=%{archivename}%{version}.zip Source0: %{archivename}%{version}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles ??? regular, italic, bold, bold italic ??? and so is more useful in general publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font optimized for readability in long printed documents. The Charis SIL Compact fonts were derived from Charis SIL using SIL TypeTuner, by setting the ???Line spacing??? feature to ???Tight???, and they cannot be TypeTuned again. They may exhibit some diacritics clipping on screen (but should print fine). %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat May 23 2009 - 4.106-1 ??? Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 May 2009 22:29:34 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 27 May 2009 19:11:41 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +CharisSILCompact4.106.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 May 2009 22:29:34 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 May 2009 19:11:41 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +d48c3a1c191891f0347764d1a005b7a3 CharisSILCompact4.106.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271924.n4RJOLTh023304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:24:20 EDT --- sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11,sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11,sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271921.n4RJLsxL022951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-27 15:21:53 EDT --- Pushed. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 22:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272240.n4RMeqXt032074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-27 18:40:51 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 22:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444563] [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272240.n4RMesRc032107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-27 18:40:53 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 22:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 402331] [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct ' =?utf-8?b?4LSo4LWN4oCN4LSx?= ' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272240.n4RMeniv031994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-27 18:40:48 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 22:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 402321] [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for the conjunct ' =?utf-8?b?4LSo4LWN4LSq?= ' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272240.n4RMemRB031965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402321 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-27 18:40:46 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 22:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431029] [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct ' =?utf-8?b?4LSo4LWN4oCN4LSx?= ' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272240.n4RMeowk032024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029 Bug 431029 depends on bug 402331, which changed state. Bug 402331 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct '????' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280801.n4S812dt016121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:00:59 EDT --- freetype1-1.4-0.8.pre.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280804.n4S848ED017255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |4.106-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280801.n4S819tG016260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4-0.8.pre.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280803.n4S83t3Q017193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |001.001-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280803.n4S83osp018876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:03:49 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280804.n4S843dg018933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:04:02 EDT --- sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11, sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280810.n4S8AMd1021481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:10:22 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:10:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280810.n4S8A2SQ021322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|001.001-3.fc11 |001.001-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280809.n4S89vTA020184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:09:57 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280810.n4S8ARsJ020566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|001.001-3.fc9 |001.001-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280817.n4S8H7QJ023597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4-0.8.pre.fc10 |1.4-0.8.pre.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280817.n4S8H3X1023103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:17:02 EDT --- freetype1-1.4-0.8.pre.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 09:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 05:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280924.n4S9OjKZ006491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from A S Alam 2009-05-28 05:24:43 EDT --- *** Bug 491604 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 09:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 05:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491604] [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280924.n4S9OiMi006454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491604 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from A S Alam 2009-05-28 05:24:43 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 490888 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503145] New: New BPG Excelsior font released Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New BPG Excelsior font released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503145 Summary: New BPG Excelsior font released Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: bpg-fonts AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Upstream has released a new free/libre font: http://besariongugushvili.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!2B325D7BF5367FE3!496.entry Could it be integrated to the existing srpm? (or a new one if you prefer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291443.n4TEhBB6029759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 03:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 23:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502582] CVE-2009-1194 pango: pango_glyph_string_set_size integer overflow In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300303.n4U33Dwt032155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502582 zouxiaogang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zxcd82 at vip.sina.com --- Comment #2 from zouxiaogang 2009-05-29 23:03:12 EDT --- that F9 and F10 are updated,what time? pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 (now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 11:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 07:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311154.n4VBsTu2020725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477473, which changed state. Bug 477473 Summary: [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 11:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 07:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311154.n4VBsSxB020702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Tomas Smetana changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #9 from Tomas Smetana 2009-05-31 07:54:27 EDT --- Reopening. The tvtimeSansBold can't be dropped -- the menu lacks the check ticks. This is too big regression from the user's point of view. If anybody had an idea how to fix this without annoying users too much, I would love to hear some suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 23:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503427] New: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503427 Summary: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: dcantrell at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- I installed the i586 pango package on my system to try out picasa. Didn't like it, so I removed picasa and the required i586 packages. Removing pango generated this message: Erasing : pango 13/27 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7R5mvR: line 24: /etc/pango/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/pango.modules: No such file or directory I only have /etc/pango/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu on my system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.