From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 01:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010109.n91190iO025082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-30 21:09:00 EDT --- This is my first font package, so please be very thorough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 01:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010131.n911VsRR000530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 --- Comment #3 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-09-30 21:31:53 EDT --- Thanks Denis. Is this patch a proper fix which maintain closer quality with the original TTF delivered from Ascender? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 01:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010138.n911cOof002794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://fedoraproject.org/w | |iki/SMonohand_Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 04:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 00:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010458.n914wo2x001507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-01 00:58:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-prociono-fonts Short Description: A text roman with standard and discretionary ligatures, class-based kerning Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010643.n916hkNc022788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-01 02:43:45 EDT --- hi, As always, I'm not too sure of the fontconfig. The prio seems okay? I'm not sure if its a sans-serif or a fantasy, since I can't decide if this font can be used for long professional texts. It's the Devanagari script, so could be used. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 09:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 05:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010955.n919tE6q029749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(roozbeh at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-01 05:55:13 EDT --- Seeing as ttx simply doesn't work in F-12/rawhide is there any objection if I go ahead and backport the trivial fix from fonttools svn to fix this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011004.n91A49Qe018526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-01 06:04:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > 3. your -fixed subpackage contains font files that declare themselves as > "Console". These should go in a "console" subpackage as it has only console fonts in it dropping this subpackage and will have bitmap-console-fonts subpackage > > 6. why do you add a Requires(pre): fontconfig ? We do not require fontconfig in > font packages. Do you have a special need? > > 7. what do you need xorg-x11-font-utils as BR for ? > > 8. I think you can specify a different LICENSE field per subpackage, can you > check with spot how he'd prefer the licensing reported ? (mixed licensing > packages are a PITA) I feel if it'd be better if each subpackage was tagged > with just the necessary license info (and included the corresponding license > files) > can you guide me little bit about what is exact LICENSES of fangsongati, just test is give but not mention which GPL version etc. > 9. fontconfig will happily use pcf.gz files, please compress your pcf files (if > you're feeling ambitious ask behdad if he intends to support pcf.xz soon) > > That's all for this first partial review, will look more in depth tomorrow ok, so fontdir will contain pcf.gz file, looks ok thanks for first review as we are targeting this for f13 we have some time now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 13:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011347.n91DlMWo009395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2009-10-01 09:47:21 EDT --- The files are not available due to the fedorapeople.org crash. Could you please re-upload them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 16:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011618.n91GIGjH031276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 12:18:15 EDT --- Looks like the restore is now complete, and the files are back there. I didn't even notice the crash! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 19:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910011908.n91J8qXq014765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(roozbeh at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-10-01 15:08:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Seeing as ttx simply doesn't work in F-12/rawhide is there any objection if I > go ahead and backport the trivial fix from fonttools svn to fix this ? No objection. I don't have the time to do anything about this in the next week or so, so please feel free to fix it yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012153.n91LrQr6011681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 17:53:24 EDT --- Thank you for submitting a new font package for review. I hope you'll find the process smooth and friendly, please do not hesitate to tell us what could be made better if something bugs you. Anyway, for the review 1. we use oflb as prefix for openfontlibrary fonts 2. the author claims he created this font in fontforge, so it'd be a good idea to beg for the sfd file upstream and build the font from source in the rpm 3. there is no licensing trace in the ttf file, and web pages are unfortunately not future proof. Please ask upstream to release the font in a zip file that includes a detached .txt licensing file (or at least use the fontforge button that embeds the OFL text in the .ttf) 4. IMHO this font should be classified as "fantasy" not "monospace" (see fontconfig-generics.txt in fontpackages-devel) 5. Why do you reference Droid Sans Mono in your fontconfig file? If that's because you cut and pasted from the Droid file, you have clean and documented fontconfig templates in fontpackages-devel (in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/). The lastest rawhide version is probably the best reference for anything ? F11 (I'll probably push it to F11 if I stop finding things to improve every other week) 6. IMHO it is wrong to alias Chalkboard or Comic Sans MS if you're not sure Smonohand is very close both in looks and metrics. The reason being looks only are not sufficient, if the letters are different sizes documents written will one of the other fonts will end up repaginated with smonohand. Usually when we alias a font is much closer than just 'looks like it' 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) For a first try this is a nice package, you just need to spend some time reading the little documentation we have in fontpackages-devel and you'll be fine. NEEDINFO till this submission progresses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 21:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012156.n91Luslj013217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 17:56:53 EDT --- 8. and I forgot: please use the font package name as .spec name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012208.n91M8npx001213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 18:08:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not > sure if its a sans-serif or a fantasy, since I can't decide if this font can be > used for long professional texts. It's the Devanagari script, so could be used. Well, I don't read Devanagari at all, and the font has no OS/2 metadata, please ask upstream or the i18n for clarification (and as last resort use fantasy as that's the safest choice) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012213.n91MD8ri018968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) | --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 18:13:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you for submitting a new font package for review. I hope you'll find the > process smooth and friendly, please do not hesitate to tell us what could be > made better if something bugs you. > > Anyway, for the review > > 1. we use oflb as prefix for openfontlibrary fonts Ah, thanks. That's why yum search openfont did not find anything of interest > 2. the author claims he created this font in fontforge, so it'd be a good idea > to beg for the sfd file upstream and build the font from source in the rpm I'll contact him and ask. > 3. there is no licensing trace in the ttf file, and web pages are unfortunately > not future proof. Please ask upstream to release the font in a zip file that > includes a detached .txt licensing file (or at least use the fontforge button > that embeds the OFL text in the .ttf) Ditto. > 4. IMHO this font should be classified as "fantasy" not "monospace" (see > fontconfig-generics.txt in fontpackages-devel) > > 5. Why do you reference Droid Sans Mono in your fontconfig file? If that's > because you cut and pasted from the Droid file, you have clean and documented > fontconfig templates in fontpackages-devel (in Em. Guilty as charged. I recently installed it, so when looking for a reference spec, I looked there. Somehow I skipped over the notice at the top of the packaging page. > /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/). The lastest rawhide version is probably the > best reference for anything ? F11 (I'll probably push it to F11 if I stop > finding things to improve every other week) I'm on Rawhide, so that's good. > 6. IMHO it is wrong to alias Chalkboard or Comic Sans MS if you're not sure > Smonohand is very close both in looks and metrics. The reason being looks only > are not sufficient, if the letters are different sizes documents written will > one of the other fonts will end up repaginated with smonohand. Usually when we > alias a font is much closer than just 'looks like it' Ah, OK. > > 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be > fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) Where's this file? I tried looking in fontpackages{,-devel} and fontconfig{,-devel}. I was trying to go for as low a priority as possible, since it looked that 50 is for a user override, and the number goes up from there. > For a first try this is a nice package, you just need to spend some time > reading the little documentation we have in fontpackages-devel and you'll be > fine. > Will do that and reupload an updated spec later today, thanks for the feedback! Actually, one more question: the font filename (TTF) -- is there a naming convention? right now it has the author's name -- dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012221.n91MLxQ7021781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 18:21:57 EDT --- Anyway, thanks a lot for adding a new font package in the review pipe Appart from the CSS classification I can't really help you with, here is some review: 1. non LGC font ? please use a priority ? 65 as per fontconfig-priorities.txt 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) 3. Licensing should be GPLv2+ 4. (non blocking) please ask upstream to add the standard FSF GPL font exception to their licensing 5. (non blocking) description could use some meat Anyway, this package is mostly fine, except for the classification problem. NEEDINFO till this is resolved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012227.n91MRbdZ023649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-01 18:27:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be > > fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) > Where's this file? I tried looking in fontpackages{,-devel} and > fontconfig{,-devel}. /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt fontpackages-devel > Actually, one more question: the font filename (TTF) -- is there a naming > convention? right now it has the author's name -- dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Fontconfig does not care. I'd personnally remove the dalles_-_ stuff as it's junk added by the oflb upload process, but we have no hard convention one way or another PS meld or any other interactive diff tool is your friend to convert fontpackages-devel templates in actual spec/fontconfig files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012242.n91MgZHO029104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 18:42:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > 2. the author claims he created this font in fontforge, so it'd be a good idea > > to beg for the sfd file upstream and build the font from source in the rpm > I'll contact him and ask. > > > 3. there is no licensing trace in the ttf file, and web pages are unfortunately > > not future proof. Please ask upstream to release the font in a zip file that > > includes a detached .txt licensing file (or at least use the fontforge button > > that embeds the OFL text in the .ttf) > Ditto. OFLB's web contact form is currently broken, so I'm not sure whether the message I sent actually got through or not. I'm checking on IRC to see if anyone could fix it. > > 7. 65 is probably too high a prio for a fantasy latin font, 63-64 should be > > fine (see fontconfig-priorities.txt) > Where's this file? I tried looking in fontpackages{,-devel} and > fontconfig{,-devel}. I was trying to go for as low a priority as possible, > since it looked that 50 is for a user override, and the number goes up from > there. Ignore my silliness here. I was typing fontpackage, not fontpackages, and grep swallowed the error. > Actually, one more question: the font filename (TTF) -- is there a naming > convention? right now it has the author's name -- dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Also, presumably the suffix -fonts stays regardless of whether the package contains only one font or more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 22:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910012250.n91MoNpV015422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-01 18:50:22 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/fonts/oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc12.src.rpm This incorporates everything but the build-from-source/documentation issues, which is pending a response from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 05:59:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020559.n925xXIT031435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-02 01:59:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Also, presumably the suffix -fonts stays regardless of whether the package > contains only one font or more. yes the suffix does not depend on the actual number of packaged files. That makes it safer if upstream adds a bold or italic later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From caolanm at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 2 09:41:03 2009 From: caolanm at fedoraproject.org (Caolan McNamara) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools-as.patch, NONE, 1.1 fonttools.spec, 1.18, 1.19 fonttools-uni5.patch, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20091002094103.DB8AB11C01EA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: caolanm Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32514/devel Modified Files: fonttools.spec Added Files: fonttools-as.patch Removed Files: fonttools-uni5.patch Log Message: Resolves: rhbz#525444 as is a reserved keyword in python fonttools-as.patch: ttProgram.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE fonttools-as.patch --- Index: Lib/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py =================================================================== --- Lib/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py (revision 562) +++ Lib/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py (revision 563) @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ p = Program() p.fromBytecode(bc) - as = p.getAssembly() - p.fromAssembly(as) + asm = p.getAssembly() + p.fromAssembly(asm) print bc == p.getBytecode() Index: fonttools.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel/fonttools.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- fonttools.spec 24 Jul 2009 23:01:15 -0000 1.18 +++ fonttools.spec 2 Oct 2009 09:41:03 -0000 1.19 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: fonttools Version: 2.2 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back Group: Development/Tools @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{ve BuildRequires: python-devel numpy Requires: numpy +Patch0: fonttools-as.patch + Provides: ttx = %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ TrueType and OpenType fonts to an XML-ba %prep %setup -q +%patch0 -p0 -b .as %{__sed} -i.nobang '1 d' Lib/fontTools/ttx.py %{__chmod} a-x LICENSE.txt @@ -70,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Oct 02 2009 Caol?n McNamara - 2.2-7 +* Resolves: rhbz#525444 as is a reserved keyword in python + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.2-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild --- fonttools-uni5.patch DELETED --- From caolanm at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 2 09:41:03 2009 From: caolanm at fedoraproject.org (Caolan McNamara) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonttools/F-12 fonttools-as.patch, NONE, 1.1 fonttools.spec, 1.18, 1.19 fonttools-uni5.patch, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20091002094103.D86B511C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: caolanm Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32514/F-12 Modified Files: fonttools.spec Added Files: fonttools-as.patch Removed Files: fonttools-uni5.patch Log Message: Resolves: rhbz#525444 as is a reserved keyword in python fonttools-as.patch: ttProgram.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE fonttools-as.patch --- Index: Lib/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py =================================================================== --- Lib/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py (revision 562) +++ Lib/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py (revision 563) @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ p = Program() p.fromBytecode(bc) - as = p.getAssembly() - p.fromAssembly(as) + asm = p.getAssembly() + p.fromAssembly(asm) print bc == p.getBytecode() Index: fonttools.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/F-12/fonttools.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- fonttools.spec 24 Jul 2009 23:01:15 -0000 1.18 +++ fonttools.spec 2 Oct 2009 09:41:02 -0000 1.19 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: fonttools Version: 2.2 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back Group: Development/Tools @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{ve BuildRequires: python-devel numpy Requires: numpy +Patch0: fonttools-as.patch + Provides: ttx = %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ TrueType and OpenType fonts to an XML-ba %prep %setup -q +%patch0 -p0 -b .as %{__sed} -i.nobang '1 d' Lib/fontTools/ttx.py %{__chmod} a-x LICENSE.txt @@ -70,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Oct 02 2009 Caol?n McNamara - 2.2-7 +* Resolves: rhbz#525444 as is a reserved keyword in python + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.2-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild --- fonttools-uni5.patch DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 09:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 05:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020941.n929f9Kj013739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED AssignedTo|roozbeh at gmail.com |caolanm at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-02 05:41:08 EDT --- oky doky, committed and built as fonttools-2.2-7.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 09:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 05:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020958.n929wLbc017232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-02 05:58:20 EDT --- available in F-12 as 3.1.1-19.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 15:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910021517.n92FHxil028065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-02 11:17:58 EDT --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 18:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526957] New: Fonts are larger than the windows equivalents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fonts are larger than the windows equivalents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526957 Summary: Fonts are larger than the windows equivalents Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: daniel at viseztrance.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora The fonts are larger than their equivalents, thus braking some websites. Having tested websites on windows, macosx and ubuntu, fedora is the only one that breaks the layout because of the font size regardless of the browser used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 15:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031516.n93FGHWP021446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(hedayat at grad.com) | --- Comment #3 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-03 11:16:16 EDT --- All done. This is the koji build link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1725774 Sorry for the mistakes in the previous package. I overlooked some details! Thanks for the offer. I'm already a packager. I hope that this one will pass your filter ;) Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 16:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031631.n93GVmDH001373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #4 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-03 12:31:48 EDT --- Oops! There is something wrong with me! :P SPEC URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-scheherazade-fonts/sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-scheherazade-fonts/sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031855.n93ItYot026390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.7.5-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 18:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031855.n93ItU1u009231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 14:55:28 EDT --- tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031905.n93J5vMw030173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.7.5-1.fc11 |1.7.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031905.n93J5qJR012996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:05:52 EDT --- tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 21:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910032130.n93LUMLG010062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-03 17:30:21 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Oct 4 04:13:48 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 04:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091004041348.7DD1511C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4472/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-prociono-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Oct 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20090715-2 - initial cvs commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2_fc11:F-10:oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254629433 --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Prociono Prociono serif --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-prociono %global fontconf 62-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090715 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A text roman with standard and discretionary ligatures, class-based kerning Group: User Interface/X License: Public Domain URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/chemoelectric/206 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/chemoelectric/chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge,fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A serif font created by Barry Schwartz The name is pronounced "pro-tsee-O-no" and is Esperanto for either "raccoon" or the star Procyon. The author prefers to think of this font as a raccoon. %prep %setup -qc -n chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 20090715-2 - Made changes according to bugzilla #512079 * Thu Jul 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20090715-1 - Initial RPM build. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 3 Oct 2009 21:31:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 4 Oct 2009 04:13:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 3 Oct 2009 21:31:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 4 Oct 2009 04:13:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9348a003073fda8723fc49c921b1efa8 chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Oct 4 04:16:15 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 04:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091004041615.BF23411C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7464/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-prociono-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Oct 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20090715-2 - initial cvs commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2_fc11:F-11:oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254629631 --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Prociono Prociono serif --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-prociono %global fontconf 62-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090715 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A text roman with standard and discretionary ligatures, class-based kerning Group: User Interface/X License: Public Domain URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/chemoelectric/206 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/chemoelectric/chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge,fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A serif font created by Barry Schwartz The name is pronounced "pro-tsee-O-no" and is Esperanto for either "raccoon" or the star Procyon. The author prefers to think of this font as a raccoon. %prep %setup -qc -n chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 20090715-2 - Made changes according to bugzilla #512079 * Thu Jul 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20090715-1 - Initial RPM build. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 3 Oct 2009 21:31:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 4 Oct 2009 04:16:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 3 Oct 2009 21:31:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 4 Oct 2009 04:16:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9348a003073fda8723fc49c921b1efa8 chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 04:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040425.n944PnVF026433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 00:25:49 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Oct 4 04:57:54 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 04:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-12 import.log, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091004045754.D98E311C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26907/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-prociono-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Oct 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - initial cvs commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2_fc11:F-12:oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254632159 --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Prociono Prociono serif --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-prociono %global fontconf 62-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090715 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A text roman with standard and discretionary ligatures, class-based kerning Group: User Interface/X License: Public Domain URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/chemoelectric/206 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/chemoelectric/chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge,fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A serif font created by Barry Schwartz The name is pronounced "pro-tsee-O-no" and is Esperanto for either "raccoon" or the star Procyon. The author prefers to think of this font as a raccoon. %prep %setup -qc -n chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 20090715-2 - Made changes according to bugzilla #512079 * Thu Jul 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20090715-1 - Initial RPM build. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 3 Oct 2009 21:31:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 4 Oct 2009 04:57:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 3 Oct 2009 21:31:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 4 Oct 2009 04:57:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9348a003073fda8723fc49c921b1efa8 chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 05:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 01:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040517.n945HEXL022852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 01:17:14 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 04:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910040426.n944QZ85008748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-04 00:26:34 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Oct 4 04:05:47 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 04:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-prociono-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091004040547.E113811C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14034/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-prociono-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Oct 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20090715-2 - Initial CVS commit for package --- NEW FILE import.log --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2_fc11:HEAD:oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254629011 --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Prociono Prociono serif --- NEW FILE oflb-prociono-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-prociono %global fontconf 62-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090715 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A text roman with standard and discretionary ligatures, class-based kerning Group: User Interface/X License: Public Domain URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/chemoelectric/206 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/chemoelectric/chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge,fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A serif font created by Barry Schwartz The name is pronounced "pro-tsee-O-no" and is Esperanto for either "raccoon" or the star Procyon. The author prefers to think of this font as a raccoon. %prep %setup -qc -n chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 20090715-2 - Made changes according to bugzilla #512079 * Thu Jul 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 20090715-1 - Initial RPM build. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 3 Oct 2009 21:31:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 4 Oct 2009 04:05:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-prociono-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 3 Oct 2009 21:31:24 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 4 Oct 2009 04:05:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +9348a003073fda8723fc49c921b1efa8 chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 22:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042219.n94MJhqq003712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-04 18:19:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363624) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363624) Adobe AIR installer screenshot (with Droid Sans) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 22:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] New: Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 Summary: Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: google-droid-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: With both Adobe AIR and Adobe Reader, using the Droid Sans font as the application font causes rendering problems: all characters are rendered as rectangular boxes Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): google-droid-sans-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.noarch pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.i686 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open GNOME Appearance Preferences 2. Set Application font to "Droid Sans" 3. Start acroread (RPM: AdobeReader_enu) or Adobe AIR installer (RPM: adobeair1.0) both are from Adobe's yum repository: http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm Actual results: Boxes. See screenshots Expected results: Should work fine. Note that using Droid Sans Mono and Droid Serif works perfectly. Additional info: Error messages with AIR installer: (airappinstaller:2968): Pango-WARNING **: failed to create cairo scaled font, expect ugly output. the offending font is 'Droid Sans Bold 11' (airappinstaller:2968): Pango-WARNING **: font_font status is: out of memory (airappinstaller:2968): Pango-WARNING **: scaled_font status is: out of memory (airappinstaller:2968): Pango-WARNING **: failed to create cairo scaled font, expect ugly output. the offending font is 'Droid Sans Bold 11' (airappinstaller:2968): Pango-WARNING **: font_font status is: (airappinstaller:2968): Pango-WARNING **: scaled_font status is: out of memory (airappinstaller:2968): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output. shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='Droid Sans Bold 11', text='The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.' and with Adobe Reader: (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: failed to create cairo scaled font, expect ugly output. the offending font is 'Droid Sans Bold 11' (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: font_font status is: (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: scaled_font status is: out of memory (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output. shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='Droid Sans Bold 11', text='?' (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: failed to create cairo scaled font, expect ugly output. the offending font is 'Droid Sans Bold 11' (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: font_font status is: (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: scaled_font status is: out of memory (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: failed to create cairo scaled font, expect ugly output. the offending font is 'Droid Sans Bold 9.166015625' (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: font_font status is: (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: scaled_font status is: out of memory (acroread:3088): Pango-WARNING **: shaping failure, expect ugly output. shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='Droid Sans Bold 9.166015625', text='Zoom Menu' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 22:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042219.n94MJAof016920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-04 18:19:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363623) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363623) Adobe Reader screenshot (with Droid Sans) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 22:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042251.n94MpUtr030577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-04 18:51:29 EDT --- The Adobe AIR installer is actually here: http://get.adobe.com/air/ It registers itself in RPMDB after installation, but is not part of Adobe's Yum repository -- yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 4 23:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910042314.n94NEDsd022366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-04 19:14:12 EDT --- This problem, interestingly, does not occur on a 32-bit installation, only when running Adobe Reader (a 32-bit app) on a 64-bit install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 07:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 03:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050754.n957sQFE020189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|google-droid-fonts |pango AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tm at openoffice.org Mon Oct 5 08:50:44 2009 From: tm at openoffice.org (tm at openoffice.org) Date: 5 Oct 2009 08:50:44 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091005085044.2886.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User tm changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|tm |hdu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from tm at openoffice.org Mon Oct 5 08:50:44 +0000 2009 ------- TM->HDU: please take over or reassign to the appropiate developer. Thanks in advance. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 09:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 05:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050921.n959L147024901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-05 05:20:59 EDT --- bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc12 successfully moved from dist-f12-updates-candidate into dist-f12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 09:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 05:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050933.n959XNFV027230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-05 05:33:22 EDT --- please reopen if any problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 10:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 06:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051055.n95AtH2s011631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-05 06:55:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, sindhi and kashmiri) There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, space of gargi is more than lohit there are also little bit differences in characters shape but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. between how corss-alias will work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 11:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051113.n95BDKVr015359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 07:13:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) > > while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, > sindhi and kashmiri) > > There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi > i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, > space of gargi is more than lohit > there are also little bit differences in characters shape Ok, that means that they probably were not forked from a common root after all, so no need to cross-alias > but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. > > between how corss-alias will work? cross-alias is when package B tells fontconfig : if app asks for font A, and it is not present, use my font B instead (and the reverse in package A). We do it for DejaVuLGC/DejaVu for example. But this kind of aliasing is only worth it when fonts are very close in style or metrics, typically when two projects took the same origin font and froked it in different ways -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 11:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051116.n95BG3Hm031337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 07:16:03 EDT --- Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit Devanagari so Lohit stays the default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 12:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527214] New: Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 Summary: Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=363657) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363657) alternative approach that self-documents our changes As described in rhbz#461617 we have a modified sazanami-fonts tarball that differs from the original. Apparently to change the 0x7E6B glyph in the Gothic and Mincho fonts according to rhbz##196433 Attached is a suggestion to use the original tarball and modify it during the build to swap in the two desired replacement glyphs using the ttx tool from fontutils. I don't have strong feelings about this one way or the other, but I feel this might be a rather "neater" and self-documenting mechanism to solving the original problem ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 12:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051211.n95CBJCr011411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |527214 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 12:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527214] Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051211.n95CBKep011424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |525444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 13:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051311.n95DBgX8026983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-05 09:11:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Anyway, thanks a lot for adding a new font package in the review pipe > > Appart from the CSS classification I can't really help you with, here is some > review: > > 1. non LGC font ? please use a priority ? 65 as per fontconfig-priorities.txt > I'll check up the prio for the lohit font and fix this.. > 3. Licensing should be GPLv2+ Fixed. Will upload a new build in a day max. > > 4. (non blocking) please ask upstream to add the standard FSF GPL font > exception to their licensing Contacted upstream, no response yet :( > > 5. (non blocking) description could use some meat I copied whatever I got from the font homepage. There's no readme etc to get more from. > Anyway, this package is mostly fine, except for the classification problem. > > NEEDINFO till this is resolved (In reply to comment #6) > Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you > fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit > Devanagari so Lohit stays the default Okay, ill fix up the fontconfig. I cant do much about some of the other bits (stated above) regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 19:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910051933.n95JXlVs018862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-05 15:33:46 EDT --- Problem seems to be in either cairo-ft or freetype. Need someone to debug, to see where the out-of-memory status is coming from. I don't have access to a 64bit machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527141] Using Droid Sans as application font causes problems with Adobe apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052049.n95Knh9N018328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527141 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-05 16:49:42 EDT --- Maddeningly, I cannot reproduce this anymore (it reliably occured yesterday). Feel free to close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052059.n95Kx5Fn004534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 16:59:04 EDT --- Full review: 1. Please add a fontconfig file (fixed is monospace, that's easy) 2. Please correct the licensing tag, I doubt fixed uses 3 different licenses 3. Please remove Requires(pre): fontconfig BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils (or tell me where they are used) 4. Please add a %build section (even if empty). rpm does not like specs without %build 5. Please put the URL in URL not in description (and limit your description line lenght to 80c) 6. Please compress the resulting pcf files 7. Why do you ship the Lucida license file ? 8. It would be neat to edit the readme so it does not references fonts not present in the rpm 9. it seems fontconfig reads the family name in the fonts as "MiscFixed". Please rename yout package ucs-miscfixed-fonts And that should be all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 20:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052059.n95KxJgw020488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052112.n95LCVMS023802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |hedayat at grad.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 17:12:29 EDT --- This one is golden ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 21:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: openfontlibrary-smonohand-font - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910052134.n95LYkf6013164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-05 17:34:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > OFLB's web contact form is currently broken, so I'm not sure whether the > message I sent actually got through or not. I'm checking on IRC to see if > anyone could fix it. The font metadata says the author is stefan.mueller at fgan.de Anyway: you've fixed what you could, the rest depends on upstream, so I'll approve the package now. Please continue to ping upstream, and update this package when he answers. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 02:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527214] Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060248.n962m1bn022001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-05 22:47:58 EDT --- Thanks. to make the process clearer next time, given that I need to modify the font again, I just need to: 1. modify the font on fontforge say 2. convert the font to ttx and diff both the original ttx and the modified ttx and pick up only the glyph updated 3. apply the patch at the build time as you attached Should this process work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 03:02:03 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel uni7E6B-gothic.patch, NONE, 1.1 uni7E6B-mincho.patch, NONE, 1.1 sazanami-fonts.spec, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <20091006030204.3B53311C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12915 Modified Files: sazanami-fonts.spec Added Files: uni7E6B-gothic.patch uni7E6B-mincho.patch Log Message: * Tue Oct 6 2009 Akira TAGOH - 0.20040629-9 - keeps the original timestamps for TTFs. uni7E6B-gothic.patch: sazanami-gothic.ttx | 321 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 176 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE uni7E6B-gothic.patch --- --- sazanami-gothic.ttx.orig 2009-09-30 09:12:32.000000000 +0100 +++ sazanami-gothic.ttx 2009-09-30 09:15:28.000000000 +0100 @@ -851447,168 +851447,199 @@ - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + - - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + uni7E6B-mincho.patch: sazanami-mincho.ttx | 345 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 197 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE uni7E6B-mincho.patch --- --- sazanami-mincho.ttx.orig 2009-09-30 15:56:13.000000000 +0100 +++ sazanami-mincho.ttx 2009-10-01 10:47:28.000000000 +0100 @@ -1429085,15 +1429085,149 @@ - + - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -1429135,144 +1429269,11 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -1429303,16 +1429304,16 @@ - + - + - + @@ -1429331,7 +1429332,7 @@ - + @@ -1429340,7 +1429341,7 @@ - + @@ -1429349,7 +1429350,7 @@ - + @@ -1429358,7 +1429359,7 @@ - + @@ -1429371,6 +1429372,54 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Index: sazanami-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel/sazanami-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8 --- sazanami-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 03:49:16 -0000 1.7 +++ sazanami-fonts.spec 6 Oct 2009 03:01:58 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ -%define fontver 20061016 %define priority 66 %define fontname sazanami -%define archivename %{fontname}-%{fontver} %define fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname} %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d %define common_desc \ @@ -10,22 +8,22 @@ They also contains some embedded Japanes Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.20040629 -Release: 8.%{fontver}%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6 BuildRequires: mkfontdir BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +BuildRequires: fonttools URL: http://efont.sourceforge.jp/ -# original is http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/efont/10087/sazanami-20040629.tar.bz2 -# due to Bug#196433, ttf has been modified and the tarball repacked -Source0: sazanami-%{fontver}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://globalbase.dl.sourceforge.jp/efont/10087/sazanami-20040629.tar.bz2 Source1: fonts.alias.sazanami-gothic Source2: fonts.alias.sazanami-mincho Source3: %{fontname}-gothic-fontconfig.conf Source4: %{fontname}-mincho-fontconfig.conf - +Patch1: uni7E6B-gothic.patch +Patch2: uni7E6B-mincho.patch Summary: Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts License: BSD @@ -73,9 +71,23 @@ Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{ This package contains Japanese TrueType font for Mincho type face. %prep -%setup -q -n sazanami-%{fontver} +%setup -q -n sazanami-20040629 %build +#rhbz#196433: modify the ttfs to change the glyph for 0x7E6B +ttx -i -a -e sazanami-gothic.ttf +patch -b -z .uni7E6B sazanami-gothic.ttx %{PATCH1} +touch -r sazanami-gothic.ttf sazanami-gothic.ttx +rm sazanami-gothic.ttf +ttx -b sazanami-gothic.ttx +touch -r sazanami-gothic.ttx sazanami-gothic.ttf + +ttx -i -a -e sazanami-mincho.ttf +patch -b -z .uni7E6B sazanami-mincho.ttx %{PATCH2} +touch -r sazanami-mincho.ttf sazanami-mincho.ttx +rm sazanami-mincho.ttf +ttx -b sazanami-mincho.ttx +touch -r sazanami-mincho.ttx sazanami-mincho.ttf %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -133,6 +145,13 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Tue Oct 6 2009 Akira TAGOH - 0.20040629-9 +- keeps the original timestamps for TTFs. + +* Mon Oct 05 2009 Caol?n McNamara +- use ttx and rebuild the font by merging the original .ttfs with the + custom replacement uni7E6B glyphs + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.20040629-8.20061016 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 04:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060447.n964lmXG026575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |openfontlibrary-smonohand-f |oflb-smonohand-fonts - A |ont - A handwritten |handwritten monospace font |monospace font | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-10-06 00:47:46 EDT --- Yup, forgot to mention(In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > OFLB's web contact form is currently broken, so I'm not sure whether the > > message I sent actually got through or not. I'm checking on IRC to see if > > anyone could fix it. > > The font metadata says the author is stefan.mueller at fgan.de Yup, forgot to mention that I did install fontforge, found the email, and emailed the author. Have not heard back from him yet. > ??? APPROVED ??? Thanks! > I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package > other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our > organisation on the fonts mailing list. Oh, it was. Quite a model for other SIGs -- I'd have to borrow some of your pages for the Mono and GNUstep SIGs when I get the time. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-smonohand-fonts Short Description: A handwritten monospace font Owners: salimma Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 04:57:03 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel sources,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20091006045703.6003111C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23951 Modified Files: sources Log Message: Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 27 Aug 2007 03:42:29 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 04:57:02 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b312f77829011547b19fc16956dc6f12 sazanami-20061016.tar.bz2 +ceef10579a75c92483171f3bd7f77df2 sazanami-20040629.tar.bz2 From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 04:57:46 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel .cvsignore,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20091006045746.F3FA411C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24084 Modified Files: .cvsignore Log Message: Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 27 Aug 2007 03:42:29 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 04:57:46 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ sazanami-20061016.tar.bz2 +sazanami-20040629.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 05:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 01:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527214] Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060553.n965rurZ028295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-06 01:53:55 EDT --- Fixed in sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-9.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 07:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527214] Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060723.n967NLXu032370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-06 03:23:21 EDT --- re: 1-3: yeah, exactly. That's all that I did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 07:57:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527214] Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060757.n967v7PX006581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-06 03:57:06 EDT --- Great. thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060831.n968V4HC031404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #7 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-06 04:30:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-scheherazade-fonts Short Description: An Arabic script unicode font Owners: hedayat Branches: F10 F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060827.n968Rn4l030596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-06 04:27:48 EDT --- Thanks a lot, I'll go for other steps. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060840.n968e0XN000862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apeter at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-06 04:39:57 EDT --- *** Bug 526420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 08:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060858.n968wWKm020637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 09:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 05:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910060922.n969MvpE009704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-06 05:22:56 EDT --- Can you reproduce with F12? If so can you provide Behdad with access please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061000.n96A0B8F001632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:00:10 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-prociono-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 10:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061006.n96A6EAB020338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:06:13 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-prociono-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10273 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061111.n96BB7v6001537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 --- Comment #4 from Denis Jacquerye 2009-10-06 07:11:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Is this patch a proper fix which maintain closer quality with the original TTF > delivered from Ascender? No, the tables DSIG, hdmx, LTSH and VDMX from the original TTF are not there. Fontforge can generate a DSIG. hdmx, LTSH and VDMX are ignored by Fontforge ; they would have to be included in the generated fonts in post-processing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 11:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061116.n96BGC1x002868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 --- Comment #5 from Denis Jacquerye 2009-10-06 07:16:11 EDT --- As far as I know, no hinting has gone missing and the kern table is the same as in the original font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 14:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525866] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061445.n96EjTFw005744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-06 10:45:29 EDT --- I'm not sure why this blocks FE-Legal. There is no reason why this change cannot (and should not) occur. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 15:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061525.n96FP18Y020457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|smc-fonts |fontconfig AssignedTo|psatpute at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-06 11:25:00 EDT --- about underline presence in the windows title bar.. this is happening with glossy, clearlooks, fedora default theme and curvy looks while digging more on this problem i found that when we remove 90-smc-fonts.conf this problem is not coming, even i tried some other combination of scaling matrix of .conf file but still this problem is happening so changing component to fontconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061602.n96G2mpJ014773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #10 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-06 12:02:47 EDT --- Has nothing to do with fontconfig. I have no idea what the problem is, but it's definitely within 90-smc-fonts.conf as you said. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 16:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061622.n96GMDkK022848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com, | |sandmann at redhat.com Component|fontconfig |metacity AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |sandmann at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-06 12:22:12 EDT --- thanks behdad for quick comment, yep it looks like that while chatting with Matthias Clasen on same issue, we found as problem is not coming with Crux theme but coming with other themes, he shown difference in crux and clearlooks theme one thing I notice that might be relevant (not sure) is that crux seems to have a version-2 metacity theme xml file (metacity-theme-2.xml clearlooks only has version-1 file just do move /usr/share/themes/Crux/metacity-1 folder to somewhere temporarily problem will start occurring with Crux theme as well so looks like we identified where problem is occurring, moving componant to metacity, might be then need to move to gnome-themese for quick fix thanks Matthias but now need to see what will be quick fix for this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061716.n96HGc5j002179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Clasen 2009-10-06 13:16:37 EDT --- What I meant was to go into the folder /usr/share/themes/Crux/metacity-1 and move the file metacity-theme-2.xml to somewhere else, e.g. unused.xml and see if the problem reproduces with the metacity-theme-1.xml thats in the same folder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061728.n96HSIsO018999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:28:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 17:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910061732.n96HWELP019990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-06 13:32:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From salimma at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 19:49:26 2009 From: salimma at fedoraproject.org (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-4 oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091006194926.E6EF011C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: salimma Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-4 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/EL-4 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec Log Message: oflb-smonohand-fonts: initial import --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SMonohand SMonohand fantasy --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-smonohand %global fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090423 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A handwritten monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/dalles/403 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/dalles/dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description SMonohand is a handwritten monospace Latin font with German characters. %prep %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/SMonohand.ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf #doc %changelog * Thu Oct 1 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-2 - Incorporate review feedbacks (bz #526607) * Wed Sep 30 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-4/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 19:49:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-4/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 19:49:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ed57503247413a2ca38cdb12d9477a24 dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf From salimma at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 19:49:27 2009 From: salimma at fedoraproject.org (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-5 oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091006194927.2864611C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: salimma Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-5 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/EL-5 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec Log Message: oflb-smonohand-fonts: initial import --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SMonohand SMonohand fantasy --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-smonohand %global fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090423 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A handwritten monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/dalles/403 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/dalles/dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description SMonohand is a handwritten monospace Latin font with German characters. %prep %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/SMonohand.ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf #doc %changelog * Thu Oct 1 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-2 - Incorporate review feedbacks (bz #526607) * Wed Sep 30 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-5/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 19:49:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-5/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 19:49:27 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ed57503247413a2ca38cdb12d9477a24 dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf From salimma at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 19:49:27 2009 From: salimma at fedoraproject.org (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-10 oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091006194927.8E2DA11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: salimma Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec Log Message: oflb-smonohand-fonts: initial import --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SMonohand SMonohand fantasy --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-smonohand %global fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090423 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A handwritten monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/dalles/403 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/dalles/dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description SMonohand is a handwritten monospace Latin font with German characters. %prep %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/SMonohand.ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf #doc %changelog * Thu Oct 1 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-2 - Incorporate review feedbacks (bz #526607) * Wed Sep 30 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 19:49:27 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 19:49:27 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ed57503247413a2ca38cdb12d9477a24 dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf From salimma at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 19:49:28 2009 From: salimma at fedoraproject.org (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-11 oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091006194928.B3CED11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: salimma Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec Log Message: oflb-smonohand-fonts: initial import --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SMonohand SMonohand fantasy --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-smonohand %global fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090423 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A handwritten monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/dalles/403 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/dalles/dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description SMonohand is a handwritten monospace Latin font with German characters. %prep %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/SMonohand.ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf #doc %changelog * Thu Oct 1 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-2 - Incorporate review feedbacks (bz #526607) * Wed Sep 30 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 19:49:27 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 19:49:28 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ed57503247413a2ca38cdb12d9477a24 dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf From salimma at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 19:49:29 2009 From: salimma at fedoraproject.org (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-12 oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091006194929.01DDD11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: salimma Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec Log Message: oflb-smonohand-fonts: initial import --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SMonohand SMonohand fantasy --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-smonohand %global fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090423 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A handwritten monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/dalles/403 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/dalles/dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description SMonohand is a handwritten monospace Latin font with German characters. %prep %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/SMonohand.ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf #doc %changelog * Thu Oct 1 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-2 - Incorporate review feedbacks (bz #526607) * Wed Sep 30 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 19:49:28 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 19:49:28 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ed57503247413a2ca38cdb12d9477a24 dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf From salimma at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 19:49:29 2009 From: salimma at fedoraproject.org (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <20091006194929.2FC8D11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: salimma Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/devel Added Files: oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec Log Message: oflb-smonohand-fonts: initial import --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SMonohand SMonohand fantasy --- NEW FILE oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec --- %global fontname oflb-smonohand %global fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090423 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A handwritten monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/dalles/403 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/dalles/dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description SMonohand is a handwritten monospace Latin font with German characters. %prep %build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/SMonohand.ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf #doc %changelog * Thu Oct 1 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-2 - Incorporate review feedbacks (bz #526607) * Wed Sep 30 2009 Michel Salim - 20090423-1 - Initial package From salimma at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 19:53:14 2009 From: salimma at fedoraproject.org (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel .cvsignore,1.1,1.2 sources,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20091006195314.E5F3C11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: salimma Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1570 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: Commit font TTF to devel branch Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 19:53:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:32:17 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 19:53:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ed57503247413a2ca38cdb12d9477a24 dalles_-_SMonohand.ttf From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:09:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525866] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062009.n96K9L0l024195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-06 16:09:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not sure why this blocks FE-Legal. There is no reason why this change > cannot (and should not) occur. Lifting FE-Legal. Well, it was more "Debian feels not doing this is a legal problem, do we think the same?" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062028.n96KSk4n028264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 16:28:45 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 20:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062028.n96KSpXH013353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 16:28:50 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 6 22:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910062223.n96MNuV5016712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hedayat at grad.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-06 18:23:55 EDT --- Nothing to say here ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a (please do not forget the wiki and comps bits) Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 6 23:58:16 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091006235816.B859411C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9555/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1_001-2_fc11:HEAD:sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254873370 --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Scheherazade Scheherazade serif Monotype Naskh Scheherazade --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-scheherazade %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=scheherazade_OT_1_001&filename=ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Scheherazade, named after the heroine of the classic Arabian Nights tale, is designed in a similar style to traditional typefaces such as Monotype Naskh, extended to cover the full Unicode Arabic repertoire. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Oct 03 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-2 - Fixed summary to not include font name - Removed some parts of the description - Added fontconfig rules * Mon Sep 28 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 23:58:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 6 Oct 2009 23:58:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c09ced85441dac34930ae661a2e0a6ca ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 7 00:29:58 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091007002958.CCB7C11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24044/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial commit --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1_001-2_fc11:F-10:sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254874978 --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Scheherazade Scheherazade serif Monotype Naskh Scheherazade --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-scheherazade %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=scheherazade_OT_1_001&filename=ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Scheherazade, named after the heroine of the classic Arabian Nights tale, is designed in a similar style to traditional typefaces such as Monotype Naskh, extended to cover the full Unicode Arabic repertoire. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Oct 03 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-2 - Fixed summary to not include font name - Removed some parts of the description - Added fontconfig rules * Mon Sep 28 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Oct 2009 00:29:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 7 Oct 2009 00:29:55 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c09ced85441dac34930ae661a2e0a6ca ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 7 00:35:51 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091007003551.177AD11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26314/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial Import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1_001-2_fc11:F-11:sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254875582 --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Scheherazade Scheherazade serif Monotype Naskh Scheherazade --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-scheherazade %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=scheherazade_OT_1_001&filename=ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Scheherazade, named after the heroine of the classic Arabian Nights tale, is designed in a similar style to traditional typefaces such as Monotype Naskh, extended to cover the full Unicode Arabic repertoire. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Oct 03 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-2 - Fixed summary to not include font name - Removed some parts of the description - Added fontconfig rules * Mon Sep 28 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Oct 2009 00:35:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 7 Oct 2009 00:35:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c09ced85441dac34930ae661a2e0a6ca ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 7 00:44:27 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-12 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091007004427.723DE11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27733/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec Log Message: Initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1_001-2_fc11:F-12:sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11.src.rpm:1254875963 --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Scheherazade Scheherazade serif Monotype Naskh Scheherazade --- NEW FILE sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-scheherazade %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=scheherazade_OT_1_001&filename=ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Scheherazade, named after the heroine of the classic Arabian Nights tale, is designed in a similar style to traditional typefaces such as Monotype Naskh, extended to cover the full Unicode Arabic repertoire. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Oct 03 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-2 - Fixed summary to not include font name - Removed some parts of the description - Added fontconfig rules * Mon Sep 28 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Oct 2009 00:44:22 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 6 Oct 2009 17:28:23 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 7 Oct 2009 00:44:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c09ced85441dac34930ae661a2e0a6ca ScheherazadeRegOT_1.001.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 08:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910070800.n97805WN011756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #9 from CW Lin 2009-10-07 04:00:04 EDT --- This bug can be reproduced with x86_64 F12 too, It is easy to reproduce this bug. Just do the clean installation with the language of "Traditional Chinese". Set DPI to 96. Set font Size to "10, 10, 14, 10, 10" as mentioned in the bug description. Launch the program "gucharmap". Search the character U+7CD3 "?" Change the size to 12, 11 and 10, sequentially. And you will see the messy display. If you are too busy to install F12 with "Traditional Chinese", I can do the installation for you. Please provide a virtual machine with "Fedora-12-Alpha-x86_64-DVD.iso" and let me know how to access it. Thanks for the effort of fixing this annoying bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 08:41:07 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 7 Oct 2009 08:41:07 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091007084107.3083.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 12:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910071208.n97C88SL019845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #13 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-07 08:08:07 EDT --- just moving metacity-theme-2.xml doesn't make any difference -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 7 14:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527740] New: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527740 Summary: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, smc-discuss at googlegroups.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=363982) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363982) Screenshot for chillu conjuncts Description of problem: When chillu conjuncts are followed by any punctuation marks like "!", ".", ",", "'", "?" or SPACE, ie when a word ends with a chillu conjunct, and followed by a punctuation mark or a SPACE, using Backspace to delete the punctuation mark or SPACE results in the deletion of chillu conjunct together with the punctuation mark/SPACE. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango 1.26.0-1.fc12 i686 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit 2. type any of chillu conjunct, eg: 0D28, 0D4D, 200D OR type a word ending with chillu conjunct, eg: 0D05, 0D35, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D 3. type any punctuation marks like "!", ".", ",", "'", "?" or SPACE 4. Press Backspace Actual results: When using Backspace after chillu conjunct followed by punctuation mark or SPACE, instead of deleting punctuation mark or SPACE only, the chillu conjunct also gets deleted. Expected results: When using Backspace after chillu conjunct followed by punctuation mark or SPACE, only the punctuation mark/SPACE should get deleted. Additional info: 1. This does not happen when chillu comes in between a word. eg: ????? (0D28, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D, 0D2E) 2. This issue is not present in oowriter and kwrite. When above steps are reproduced, deletions happens in correct order. Versions used: libicu-4.2.1-6.fc12 i686 qt-4.5.2-22.fc12 i686 3. Screenshot attached for chillu conjuncts and eg of words with chillu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Oct 7 17:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22394] Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091007174519.98F7E13005D@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22394 Kim Xupei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xupei at nm.ru --- Comment #1 from Kim Xupei 2009-10-07 10:45:18 PST --- I would say that this is the same issue as described in Bug# 15149. It would be great to fix this, as it renders Dejavu Serif Condensed pretty much unusable for Mac users. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Oct 7 19:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 22394] Serif condensed italic files have bad metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091007194238.03A4013005E@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22394 Ben Laenen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Ben Laenen 2009-10-07 12:42:37 PST --- Indeed, this is a duplicate of bug #15149. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 15149 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 02:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080255.n982tXQB011551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Component|liberation-fonts |0xFFFF --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-07 22:55:32 EDT --- Denis how did you generate the patch btw? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 03:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080334.n983YMPU026003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-07 23:34:21 EDT --- Changing Desktop Font has no effect on gucharmap for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 04:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 00:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080446.n984kd70015721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-08 00:46:38 EDT --- Done all the changes, not much sure about license, please guide me if any problem SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 05:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910080525.n985PU77025316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-08 01:25:27 EDT --- updated SPEC : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec updated SRPM : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-11.fc11.src.rpm different license for each subpackage is done in smc-fonts, but i am not sure about license of these fonts, please guide if anything -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081332.n98DWqGI016396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-08 09:32:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Licensing > ========== > > * 10x20.bdf, 4x6.bdf, 5x7.bdf, 5x8.bdf, 6x10.bdf, 6x12.bdf, 6x13B.bdf, > 6x13.bdf, 6x9.bdf, 7x14B.bdf, 7x14.bdf, 9x15B.bdf, 9x15.bdf, 9x18B.bdf, > 9x18.bdf : Public Domain > * fangsongti16.bdf, fangsongti24.bdf : MIT > * lutBS*.bdf : Lucida and... lutRS*.bdf : Lucida -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 13:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081332.n98DWOg0005363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-08 09:32:21 EDT --- Licensing ========== * 10x20.bdf, 4x6.bdf, 5x7.bdf, 5x8.bdf, 6x10.bdf, 6x12.bdf, 6x13B.bdf, 6x13.bdf, 6x9.bdf, 7x14B.bdf, 7x14.bdf, 9x15B.bdf, 9x15.bdf, 9x18B.bdf, 9x18.bdf : Public Domain * fangsongti16.bdf, fangsongti24.bdf : MIT * lutBS*.bdf : Lucida -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 8 19:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477444] [pygame] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910081930.n98JUgMU002962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-10-08 15:30:41 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 8 23:47:28 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel .cvsignore, 1.22, 1.23 freetype.spec, 1.75, 1.76 sources, 1.22, 1.23 freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20091008234728.D955A11C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28511 Modified Files: .cvsignore freetype.spec sources Removed Files: freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch Log Message: * Thu Oct 08 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.10-1 - Drop freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch - Update to 2.3.10. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.22 retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -p -r1.22 -r1.23 --- .cvsignore 13 Mar 2009 22:15:14 -0000 1.22 +++ .cvsignore 8 Oct 2009 23:47:28 -0000 1.23 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -freetype-2.3.9.tar.bz2 -freetype-doc-2.3.9.tar.bz2 -ft2demos-2.3.9.tar.bz2 +freetype-doc-2.3.10.tar.bz2 +ft2demos-2.3.10.tar.bz2 +freetype-2.3.10.tar.bz2 Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.75 retrieving revision 1.76 diff -u -p -r1.75 -r1.76 --- freetype.spec 30 Jul 2009 18:04:50 -0000 1.75 +++ freetype.spec 8 Oct 2009 23:47:28 -0000 1.76 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype -Version: 2.3.9 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Version: 2.3.10 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ Patch88: freetype-multilib.patch # Fix crash https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6841 Patch89: freetype-2.2.1-memcpy-fix.patch -# Fix aliasing issue -Patch90: freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch - Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: libX11-devel @@ -100,7 +97,6 @@ popd %patch88 -p1 -b .multilib %patch89 -p1 -b .memcpy -%patch90 -p1 -b .aliasing %build @@ -230,6 +226,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu Oct 08 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.10-1 +- Drop freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch +- Update to 2.3.10. + * Thu Jul 30 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-6 - Add freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch - Resolves: 513582 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.22 retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -p -r1.22 -r1.23 --- sources 13 Mar 2009 22:15:14 -0000 1.22 +++ sources 8 Oct 2009 23:47:28 -0000 1.23 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -d76233108aca9c9606cdbd341562ad9a freetype-2.3.9.tar.bz2 -ddcb766f7c5abab0e7061dcf32a0268f freetype-doc-2.3.9.tar.bz2 -144b4c750e91595154a66709c75fdf0d ft2demos-2.3.9.tar.bz2 +9bdd83c5b6559bdfb68984f0b3d1dc8c freetype-doc-2.3.10.tar.bz2 +e6d762885ecc8222774f5063a1605e45 ft2demos-2.3.10.tar.bz2 +b7a8a26cc137716a32b788664697d727 freetype-2.3.10.tar.bz2 --- freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 00:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 20:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090028.n990SsEu009490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #38 from Thomas Spura 2009-10-08 20:28:45 EDT --- I won't work much on this in the near future, because of the problems above? The one, who wants to continue can start within a new bug report. -> Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 00:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 20:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090048.n990mOhu014491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |505154(FE-SCITECH) | Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 03:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090335.n993ZqeP009339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-08 23:35:50 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-smonohand-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10332 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 03:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090344.n993iIdn013322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-08 23:44:17 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-smonohand-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 04:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090403.n99436rX019835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |dchen at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-09 00:03:02 EDT --- I haven't been able to reproduce this yet: though I saw the gdm issue on dchen's machine. CW Lin: what does "rpm -qa \*fonts\* pango fontconfig | sort" Output for you? With F11 x86_86 install without updates I have: abyssinica-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.noarch bitmap-fonts-0.3-7.fc11.noarch cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch dejavu-fonts-common-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.i586 fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.x86_64 ghostscript-fonts-5.50-20.fc11.noarch jomolhari-fonts-0.003-7.fc11.noarch kacst-fonts-2.0-2.fc11.noarch khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-6.fc11.noarch khmeros-fonts-common-5.0-6.fc11.noarch liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch lklug-fonts-0.2.2-9.fc11.noarch lohit-bengali-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-fonts-common-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-hindi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-kannada-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-oriya-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-tamil-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch padauk-fonts-2.4-3.fc11.noarch paktype-fonts-2.0-3.fc11.noarch pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.x86_64 smc-fonts-common-04.1-6.fc11.noarch smc-meera-fonts-04.1-6.fc11.noarch stix-fonts-0.9-12.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-fonts-common-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-waree-fonts-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch un-core-fonts-dotum-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc11.noarch urw-fonts-2.4-7.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-20090204-3.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-3.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 04:14:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090414.n994EeRF031394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #12 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-10-09 00:14:39 EDT --- On affected machine, gdm login screen: 1. In language selection, select ?? (??), which might shows like comment #6. 2. Login to the system. 3. cat /var/log/gdm/:0-greeter.log, there will be a line, such like: gdm-simple-greeter[7797]: Pango-WARNING: shaping failure, expect ugly output. shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light Oblique 8.33203125', text='?? (??)' Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 04:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090457.n994vsat013065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #21 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-09 00:57:52 EDT --- thanks for clarification bitmap fonts also has Console fonts from fixfont tarball README just says "fonts from kdebase/konsole/fonts from kde 3.5" what will be the License of these fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 04:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090455.n994tf5u012477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-09 00:55:40 EDT --- fixed licensing thing as well as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617#c19 updated SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts-0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 05:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 01:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090555.n995t9Ie029339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Bug 225617 depends on bug 481068, which changed state. Bug 481068 Summary: bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 05:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 01:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090555.n995t7VT029286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-09 01:55:05 EDT --- if any problem reopen bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 06:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 02:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090629.n996TcE6028884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #22 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-09 02:29:37 EDT --- just saw comment #9 , license for Console is given there update files are as follows http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-12.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 08:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090814.n998EWWc025823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #13 from CW Lin 2009-10-09 04:14:30 EDT --- I think you did not select the language "Chinese (Taiwan) - ????". If so, to reproduce this bug, the environment variable LANG has to be changed to "zh_TW.UTF-8". Before you start the program "gucharmap", make sure the following configuration is set: (1) System -> Administration -> Appearance -> Fonts -> Application Font: "Sans 10" (2) System -> Administration -> Appearance -> Fonts -> Details -> Resolutions: "96" dots per inch To see the messy display, enter the following command: $ LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8 gucharmap If you enter "LANG=en_US.UTF-8 gucharmap", this bug will not be reproduced. Also remember to set the font in gucharmap to "Sans". Then change the size in gucharmap to 12, 11, 10 sequentially. Now you should be able to reproduce the bug. By the way, the output of "rpm -qa \*fonts\* pango fontconfig | sort" on my machine is as follows: abyssinica-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.noarch bitmap-fonts-0.3-7.fc11.noarch cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11.noarch cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11.noarch dejavu-fonts-common-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.i586 fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.x86_64 ghostscript-fonts-5.50-20.fc11.noarch jomolhari-fonts-0.003-7.fc11.noarch kacst-fonts-2.0-2.fc11.noarch khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-6.fc11.noarch khmeros-fonts-common-5.0-6.fc11.noarch liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch lklug-fonts-0.2.2-9.fc11.noarch lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-fonts-common-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-telugu-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch openoffice.org-opensymbol-fonts-3.1.1-19.2.fc11.x86_64 padauk-fonts-2.4-3.fc11.noarch paktype-fonts-2.0-3.fc11.noarch pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.x86_64 smc-fonts-common-04.1-6.fc11.noarch smc-meera-fonts-04.1-6.fc11.noarch stix-fonts-0.9-12.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-fonts-common-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-waree-fonts-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch un-core-fonts-dotum-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc11.noarch urw-fonts-2.4-7.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-20090612-1.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-common-20090612-1.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 08:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090833.n998XOj3022470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-09 04:33:23 EDT --- If you can reproduce from a fresh install that would be useful to know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 08:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527740] [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090833.n998XgtY022556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527740 --- Comment #1 from Ani Peter 2009-10-09 04:33:41 EDT --- Bug 597812 is the upstream bug for this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 08:39:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527740] [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090839.n998dN7a024171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527740 --- Comment #2 from Ani Peter 2009-10-09 04:39:21 EDT --- Sorry could not provide the link on previous comment: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 08:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910090842.n998gYop025224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-09 04:42:32 EDT --- upstream bug id https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 17:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910091746.n99HkXJv021723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #15 from CW Lin 2009-10-09 13:46:32 EDT --- This bug can be reproduced from a fresh install too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 18:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910091833.n99IXqlF000738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #16 from CW Lin 2009-10-09 14:33:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364281) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364281) Messy Display from Fresh Install of F11 x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 9 19:44:27 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.12, 1.13 import.log, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20091009194427.CD5BF11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20671/devel Modified Files: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: ttf-ize Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13 --- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 13 Sep 2009 16:56:49 -0000 1.12 +++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 9 Oct 2009 19:44:27 -0000 1.13 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Epoch: 1 Summary: Heuristica font @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Patch0: %{name}-bolditalic.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontforge, fonttools, xgridfit +BuildRequires: fontforge, fonttools, xgridfit, xmlstarlet BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem @@ -40,18 +40,14 @@ done %build -# bug #512504 needs to be fixed in fonttools for plain make to work -# http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512504 - -make %{?_smp_mflags} Heuristica-Regular.otf Heuristica-Bold.otf \ - Heuristica-Italic.otf Heuristica-BoldItalic.otf +make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} @@ -66,12 +62,16 @@ ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontc rm -fr %{buildroot} -%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf +%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog +* Fri Oct 9 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1:0.2-3 +? fonttools has been fixed ? generate TTFs + * Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1:0.2-2 ? make Bold Italic Bold Italic not BoldItalic Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- import.log 13 Sep 2009 16:56:49 -0000 1.9 +++ import.log 9 Oct 2009 19:44:27 -0000 1.10 @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-5_fc11: apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090507-1_fc12:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090507-1.fc12.src.rpm:1247609683 apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-1_fc12:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252262664 apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-2_fc12:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm:1252860982 +apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-3_fc13:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-3.fc13.src.rpm:1255117443 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 20:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528220] Review Request: gfs-ignacio-fonts - A majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092047.n99KlfGw023329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-09 16:47:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GFS_Ignacio_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 20:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092052.n99Kq0t6024100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #9 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-09 16:51:59 EDT --- Thanks Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 20:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092052.n99KqDAf024140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 --- Comment #2 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-09 16:52:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-lateef-fonts Short Description: An Arabic script unicode font Owners: hedayat Branches: F10 F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 20:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092055.n99KtfRo024791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #11 from Jeff Johnston 2009-10-09 16:55:40 EDT --- I'm seeing this with pango-1.26.0-1.fc12 and gtk2-2.18.2-1.fc12 and eclipse-swt-3.5.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 20:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092059.n99KxtSs025556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 21:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092101.n99L1Wh5028664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-09 17:01:32 EDT --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 21:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092101.n99L1igl028749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-09 17:01:44 EDT --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 9 21:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092101.n99L1cZD028697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-09 17:01:38 EDT --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 9 21:17:42 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.13, 1.14 import.log, 1.10, 1.11 Message-ID: <20091009211742.096DA11C00C1@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18438/devel Modified Files: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: de-smp-ize Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 9 Oct 2009 19:44:27 -0000 1.13 +++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 9 Oct 2009 21:17:40 -0000 1.14 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Epoch: 1 Summary: Heuristica font @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ done %build -make %{?_smp_mflags} +make %install @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog * Fri Oct 9 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1:0.2-4 +? not smp-safe upstream makefile - 1:0.2-3 ? fonttools has been fixed ? generate TTFs Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- import.log 9 Oct 2009 19:44:27 -0000 1.10 +++ import.log 9 Oct 2009 21:17:40 -0000 1.11 @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090507-1_fc12: apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-1_fc12:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252262664 apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-2_fc12:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm:1252860982 apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-3_fc13:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-3.fc13.src.rpm:1255117443 +apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-4_fc13:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-4.fc13.src.rpm:1255123023 From cmc at openoffice.org Sat Oct 10 14:35:14 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 10 Oct 2009 14:35:14 -0000 Subject: [Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091010143514.4762.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 User cmc changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |65286) update patch to app | |ly against DEV300_m61 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from cmc at openoffice.org Sat Oct 10 14:35:13 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65286) update patch to apply against DEV300_m61 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 10 14:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528272] Review Request: adf-tribun-fonts - A newsprint-like serif typeface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910101440.n9AEeWHM003145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-10 10:40:31 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1739554 Description: Hirwen Harendal started in 1999 the realization of a first font family, aiming to create another ?Times New Roman?? He does not consider this endeavour a huge success. However, he transformed Tribun progessively since then to give it its own character. The idea was to achieve newsprint-like rendering. To this effect, the glyph bodies, serifs, or even extenders are not normalised and use irregular strokes. This is most visible in italics though those variations stay imperceptible at small sizes. Italics proved time-consuming. They are never an easy thing to draw. Nevertheless, the designer considers them very close to those of ?Times?, with some variations. The medium weight uses a stronger stroke. It can be used for emphasis, or for effects in titles. That being said it has also been used for body copy. It is also slightly expanded to complete the face offerings. The condensed version is a bit unusual, since it stands in for both normal and medium condensed. After several trials, Hirwen decided an intermediate weight rendered much better both for document display and in print. Secondly, he took great care to keep readability excellent, and this even for italics. This font family is particularly well suited for text, display, or presentations. It is also ideal for all Web publications. It can serve as alternative to ?Times New Roman? and other similar fonts. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ADF_Tribun_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 11 05:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] New: [ml_IN]Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN]Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 Summary: [ml_IN]Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, smc-discuss at googlegroups.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=364359) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364359) Comparison of rendering in kde and gnome Description of problem: The lohit font 2.4.4 version gives wrong redering in KDE for cons + virama + ra sequence. See the attached screenshot. The prebase ra sign becomes postbase in KDE applications, while in GNOME applications it is correct. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Lohit 2.4.4 KDE 4.3.2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Compare the rendering of ???????, ??????, ?????? etc in gedit and kate Actual results: See the attached screenshot Expected results: See the attached screenshot Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 11 13:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910111357.n9BDvMgl015776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Minto Joseph 2009-10-11 09:57:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-padauk-fonts Short Description: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Owners: mintojoseph Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 11 18:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528368] New: Duplicate "Provides" entries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Duplicate "Provides" entries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528368 Summary: Duplicate "Provides" entries Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: matt at mattmccutchen.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Each of the packages liberation-mono-fonts, liberation-sans-fonts, liberation-serif-fonts contains a duplicate "provide" for its own name-version-release in addition to the one implicitly generated by rpm. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -q --provides -a 'liberation-*-fonts' | grep '^liberation' Actual results: liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 Expected results: liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 Additional info: It looks like this has already been fixed in rawhide in liberation-fonts-1.04.93-11, according to the spec file in CVS: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec?r1=1.36&r2=1.37 So feel free to mark this CLOSED RAWHIDE if you don't wish to make the fix for Fedora 11. I thought I'd ask because the duplicate provides came up when I was doing some checks on my RPM database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 11 20:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910112052.n9BKq2eF023282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-11 16:52:02 EDT --- 1. 55 as fontconfig priority will preempt the default distro monospace font, don't do that. ? Please read /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt 2. it seems it does need xorg-x11-font-utils as build requires after all + make install DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ucs-miscfixed-fonts-0.3-3.fc13.x86_64 sed 's/\/MiscFixed/' < 4x6.bdf > 4x6.bdf.tmp && bdftopcf 4x6.bdf.tmp > 4x6.pcf && rm 4x6.bdf.tmp || ( rm 4x6.bdf.tmp 4x6.pcf && false ) /bin/sh: bdftopcf: command not found ? please check your package builds in mock or as a koji scratch build before submitting The rest seems ok. Though since xorg seems to maintain and keep updating its own copy of Markus Kuhn's fonts, I suspect its version will be the better one to keep long term http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-October/047606.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 11 21:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910112121.n9BLLFX2000672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-11 17:21:11 EDT --- 1. needs xorg-x11-font-utils as BR 2. You have some stray "fixed" font in bitmap-console-fonts 3. Some of the files in bitmap-console-fonts declare their name as "console8x8.pcf" which is almost certainly a bug 4. The Lucida Typewriter fonts in bitmap-fonts should be pushed in a bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts subpackage 5. It would be nice if each subpackage included its own fontconfig file 6. you can probably kill the common file and put each license %doc in the corresponding subpackage (just put the %doc line after the corresponding %_font_pkg call). You just need to have each subpackage require fontpackages-filesystem direcly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 08:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910120809.n9C89Yva024474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #17 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-10-12 04:09:32 EDT --- We managed to reproduce the bugs with F-11 and Rawhide x86_64 Live iso. It does not have to be in zh_TW.UTF-8, in fact, if the font is sufficient small, (e.g. 10,11), there is quite a good chance this bug will pop up. We also find that this bug appears in gucharmap, gdm, and gnome-menu; but not gnome-terminal, gedit, and pango-view. We are still investigate the cause. However, there are workaround for this bug, you can either: 1) Downgrade cjkunifont packages for F-9, these packages can still be found, for example, in fedora CVS (for building material) and prm.pbone.net (packed rpm). 2) If you don't really want bitmap fonts, remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf. Would you mind trying these? Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 08:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910120811.n9C8BaeZ025176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Suresh P changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psuresh at gmx.com --- Comment #15 from Suresh P 2009-10-12 04:11:06 EDT --- The issue disappeared when the matrix multiplication directive for Meera font has changed.From the entry for edit matrix directive for the font, the 'times' element and its child 'name' with value 'matrix' are removed. I don't know whether this is the right method because haven't seen any documentation regarding this. I think fontconfig is not well-documented about this entry. The directive before change => http://pastie.org/651165 The directive after change => http://pastie.org/651160 BTW, strangely, the changes effected thru' fontconfig is not available in OpenOffice or KDE. suresh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 10:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121013.n9CADODj021520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(xx3nvyxx at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-12 06:13:22 EDT --- Thanks for the bug report. We have reviewed the information you have provided above, and there is some additional information we require that will be helpful in our diagnosis of this issue. Please attach your X server config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf, if available), /var/log/dmesg, and X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.*.log) to the bug report as individual uncompressed file attachments using the bugzilla file attachment link below. Nicolas, please, file a separate bug with the same information attached. We will review this issue again once you've had a chance to attach this information. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 10:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121028.n9CASCAR024997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-12 06:28:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Nicolas, please, file a separate bug with the same information attached. I haven't seen it lately with latest rawhide versions. I'll file a bug if it occurs again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 11:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121108.n9CB8wZ9002496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #16 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-12 07:08:56 EDT --- thanks suresh for pointer http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-meera-fonts-04.2-2.fc11.noarch.rpm please see if things are better with this rpm, if yes i will build smc-meera package again rpm should resolve border bug of gnome-theme as well must not affect meera scaling rule in gedit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 11:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121151.n9CBpBYU015067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #18 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-10-12 07:51:05 EDT --- Sorry prm.pbone.net should be rpm.pbone.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 13:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121353.n9CDroNT012680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Santhosh Thottingal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|metacity |fontconfig --- Comment #17 from Santhosh Thottingal 2009-10-12 09:53:49 EDT --- I can confirm that the fix mentioned by Suresh works fine in gnome applications. I did not use the RPM, but just edited the configuration file. But the changes did not work on KDE and openoffice. I am changing the component to Fontconfig again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 14:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] New: Font corruption over time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Font corruption over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Summary: Font corruption over time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-drv-ati AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com ReportedBy: mathieu-acct at csetco.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: mathieu-acct at csetco.com, xgl-maint at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xx3nvyxx at gmail.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 525827 Created an attachment (id=364464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364464) Xorg log Creating a clone of bug #525827: I'm seeing font corruptions on a Thinkpad T30 laptop: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] There's no xorg.conf on my system, I'm attaching Xorg.0.log and the output of dmesg. +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #525827 +++ Created an attachment (id=362739) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362739) Example of corrupted font Fonts become more and more corrupted over time, starting a few seconds after login. Attachment is this text after an hour of running: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 1234567890 `~!@#$%^&*()_+=-[]{}\|;:'",./<>? Notes: Thinkpad T41 Unknown if reproducible by others, contact me if you need more info. --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-09-26 04:44:34 EDT --- I see it too (x86_64, AMD HD 4850). Plus system crashes --- Additional comment from mcepl at redhat.com on 2009-10-12 06:13:22 EDT --- Thanks for the bug report. We have reviewed the information you have provided above, and there is some additional information we require that will be helpful in our diagnosis of this issue. Please attach your X server config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf, if available), /var/log/dmesg, and X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.*.log) to the bug report as individual uncompressed file attachments using the bugzilla file attachment link below. Nicolas, please, file a separate bug with the same information attached. We will review this issue again once you've had a chance to attach this information. Thanks in advance. --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-10-12 06:28:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Nicolas, please, file a separate bug with the same information attached. I haven't seen it lately with latest rawhide versions. I'll file a bug if it occurs again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 14:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121414.n9CEEL9p018827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 --- Comment #1 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-12 10:14:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364467) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364467) dmesg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 14:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121416.n9CEG0ZQ019457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-12 10:15:59 EDT --- Hello, I've created bug #528496 as I'm still seeing font corruption running an up to date rawhide... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 14:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN]Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121453.n9CErtrg026746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #1 from Ani Peter 2009-10-12 10:53:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364475) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364475) Screenshot for Meera on gedit, kwrite and oowriter (correct) Done some testing on the bug and following are the observations: 1. the issue with cons + virama + ra (ie, cons + 0D4D + 0D30) exists only with Lohit Malayalam 2. Lohit Malayalam works perfect with Gedit (pango), but has issues in Kwrite (Qt) and oowriter (icu). 3. As Lohit Malayalam is a new script font, tested with another new script font - Raghu Malayalam and confirmed that the issue exists only with Lohit Malayalam. Please find attached the screenshots of Meera (traditional script font), Lohit Malayalam and Raghu Malayalam (both new script fonts) on gedit, oowriter and kwrite. Have mentioned the versions of the rendering engine on screenshots. Following are the words used for rendering: 1. ?????????? 2. ????????? 3. ?????? 4. ?????? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 14:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN]Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121456.n9CEu7KT024751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #3 from Ani Peter 2009-10-12 10:56:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364477) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364477) Screenshot for Raghu Malayalam on gedit, kwrite and oowriter (correct) Raghu Malayalam works correctly on gedit, kwrite and oowriter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 14:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN]Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121455.n9CEt0SF024226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #2 from Ani Peter 2009-10-12 10:54:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364476) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364476) Screenshot for Lohit Malayalam on gedit, kwrite and oowriter Lohit Malayalam working correctly on gedit, but have issue with kwrite and oowriter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 16:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121612.n9CGCKrQ009163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #19 from CW Lin 2009-10-12 12:12:19 EDT --- I am glad to know that this bug was reproduced and you are trying to work it out. My personal experience is that this bug also appears in the gnome-terminal and pango-view. I will show it later. Two months ago, I reported a bug 516360 that some Traditional Chinese characters will disappear within Firefox . Now I think it may be a duplicate of this bug. Perhaps you can look into the bug 516360 to see if it can be of any help. For the time being, if some Chinese characters disappear in Firefox, I will try to adjust the font size, pressing Ctrl-+ or Ctrl-- until the missing characters show up. That should be the easiest workaround to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 16:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121626.n9CGQfkh011730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #20 from CW Lin 2009-10-12 12:26:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364487) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364487) Missing Characters in pango-view #! /bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=en_US ???" & LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=zh_TW ???" & -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 16:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121635.n9CGZEQV016971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-12 12:35:13 EDT --- santhoh can you test rpm as well?, so i can push this package for f12 behdad, fontconf scaling rules for meera not working in KDE and openoffice, is there anything more need to do other than adding .conf file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 18:51:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121851.n9CIp33W011029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #19 from Rajeesh 2009-10-12 14:51:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364504) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364504) Gedit with Meera size 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 18:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121854.n9CIs03K011413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #21 from Rajeesh 2009-10-12 14:53:58 EDT --- I have tested the RPM, and can confirm that the fontconfig rule doesn't work with OpenOffice. GNOME apps seems to work ok. But it looks like to me that Meera/Rachana size difference is still present. See the previous two screenshots, each with size 10. Window border theme is Glossy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 18:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121851.n9CIplmg008039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #20 from Rajeesh 2009-10-12 14:51:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364505) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364505) Gedit with Rachana size 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 19:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910121900.n9CJ08Rr010046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-12 15:00:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I have tested the RPM, and can confirm that the fontconfig rule doesn't work > with OpenOffice. GNOME apps seems to work ok. But it looks like to me that > Meera/Rachana size difference is still present. See the previous two > screenshots, each with size 10. Window border theme is Glossy. OO.o is notoriously challenged by non-trivial text rendering; it's probably worth it to open a separate bug on OO.o so the RedHat OO.o maintainers can look at it (QT is also often challenged, though less so, and I don't think anyone @rh is going to work on it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 12 21:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495735] mergerepos results in traceback from yum.packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910122150.n9CLokEs000407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495735 seth vidal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from seth vidal 2009-10-12 17:50:45 EDT --- both patches are in yum in f11 and f12/rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 00:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910130034.n9D0YdrE011582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |dchen at redhat.com Component|fontconfig |pango AssignedTo|dchen at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com Severity|medium |high --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-12 20:34:38 EDT --- Moving to pango. This is x86_64 only and looks serious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 00:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910130051.n9D0pq7k015439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Michael Stoykov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |M.Stoikov at gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Michael Stoykov 2009-10-12 20:51:51 EDT --- I as Jeff am seeing this bug on the same versions. A good way to reproduce this bug is to try to create (java) project. It usually happens when you click finish:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 04:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910130450.n9D4oo9l000779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-13 00:50:49 EDT --- I tried with F11 x86_64 (on a 19" 1280x1024 display): $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=en_US ??" This displays okay for me, but: > LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=zh_TW ??" hangs before rendering the first (smallest) ?. On rawhide with 17" monitor: similar results except LANG=en_US hangs after first ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 05:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910130547.n9D5lF87021621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[ml_IN]Lohit font rendering |[ml_IN] Lohit font |of cons+virama+ra is wrong |rendering of cons+virama+ra |in KDE |is wrong in KDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 06:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910130628.n9D6SsBH009643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dwmw2 at infradead.org | Component|0xFFFF |liberation-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 10:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511668] FTBFS knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910131034.n9DAYAD5000944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511668 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |528675 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 10:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910131034.n9DAY85g000905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |511668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 10:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910131032.n9DAWxqY000720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 16:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910131627.n9DGRkDp031825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-13 12:27:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 17:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910131724.n9DHO7UF023768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-10-13 13:24:05 EDT --- Can someone try whether http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1743496 fixes the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 13 17:37:25 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/libXfont/devel .cvsignore, 1.17, 1.18 libXfont.spec, 1.47, 1.48 sources, 1.18, 1.19 Message-ID: <20091013173725.6708111C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12515 Modified Files: .cvsignore libXfont.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4.1-1 - libXfont 1.4.1 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18 --- .cvsignore 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.17 +++ .cvsignore 13 Oct 2009 17:37:25 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -libXfont-1.4.0.tar.bz2 +libXfont-1.4.1.tar.bz2 Index: libXfont.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/libXfont.spec,v retrieving revision 1.47 retrieving revision 1.48 diff -u -p -r1.47 -r1.48 --- libXfont.spec 25 Jul 2009 05:12:25 -0000 1.47 +++ libXfont.spec 13 Oct 2009 17:37:25 -0000 1.48 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library Name: libXfont -Version: 1.4.0 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Version: 1.4.1 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org @@ -9,12 +9,11 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version Source0: http://www.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +BuildRequires: pkgconfig(fontsproto) BuildRequires: xorg-x11-util-macros -BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel BuildRequires: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel >= 1.0.3-3 BuildRequires: libfontenc-devel BuildRequires: freetype-devel -BuildRequires: autoconf automake libtool %description X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library @@ -23,7 +22,7 @@ X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont development package Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: libfontenc-devel pkgconfig +Requires: libfontenc-devel %description devel X.Org X11 libXfont development package @@ -79,6 +78,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/xfont.pc %changelog +* Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4.1-1 +- libXfont 1.4.1 + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.4.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- sources 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.18 +++ sources 13 Oct 2009 17:37:25 -0000 1.19 @@ -1 +1 @@ -3a8e06b25912ef339d70a8ba003da9b5 libXfont-1.4.0.tar.bz2 +4f2bed2a2be82e90a51a24bb3a22cdf0 libXfont-1.4.1.tar.bz2 From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 13 17:38:41 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/libXfont/F-12 libXfont.spec,1.47,1.48 sources,1.18,1.19 Message-ID: <20091013173841.E77D411C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12788 Modified Files: libXfont.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4.1-1 - libXfont 1.4.1 Index: libXfont.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/F-12/libXfont.spec,v retrieving revision 1.47 retrieving revision 1.48 diff -u -p -r1.47 -r1.48 --- libXfont.spec 25 Jul 2009 05:12:25 -0000 1.47 +++ libXfont.spec 13 Oct 2009 17:38:41 -0000 1.48 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library Name: libXfont -Version: 1.4.0 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Version: 1.4.1 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org @@ -9,12 +9,11 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version Source0: http://www.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +BuildRequires: pkgconfig(fontsproto) BuildRequires: xorg-x11-util-macros -BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel BuildRequires: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel >= 1.0.3-3 BuildRequires: libfontenc-devel BuildRequires: freetype-devel -BuildRequires: autoconf automake libtool %description X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library @@ -23,7 +22,7 @@ X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont development package Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: libfontenc-devel pkgconfig +Requires: libfontenc-devel %description devel X.Org X11 libXfont development package @@ -79,6 +78,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/xfont.pc %changelog +* Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 1.4.1-1 +- libXfont 1.4.1 + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.4.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- sources 18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000 1.18 +++ sources 13 Oct 2009 17:38:41 -0000 1.19 @@ -1 +1 @@ -3a8e06b25912ef339d70a8ba003da9b5 libXfont-1.4.0.tar.bz2 +4f2bed2a2be82e90a51a24bb3a22cdf0 libXfont-1.4.1.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 17:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910131739.n9DHdsXT028180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #14 from Jeff Johnston 2009-10-13 13:39:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Can someone try whether > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1743496 fixes the problem? It works for my scenario which was to go into the New Project menu, select a C/C++ GNU Autotools project type but hit cancel before doing anything. This works now with the 3.5.1 build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 13 19:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910131902.n9DJ2Abb004111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 13 19:59:51 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.13, 1.14 xorg-x11-font-utils.spec, 1.33, 1.34 Message-ID: <20091013195951.4046211C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23781 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources xorg-x11-font-utils.spec Log Message: * Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 7.2-10 - mkfontscale 1.0.7 - mkfontdir 1.0.5 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- .cvsignore 26 Apr 2007 14:44:44 -0000 1.13 +++ .cvsignore 13 Oct 2009 19:59:49 -0000 1.14 @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ fonttosfnt-1.0.3.tar.bz2 mkfontdir-1.0.3.tar.bz2 mkfontscale-1.0.1.tar.bz2 bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2 +mkfontscale-1.0.7.tar.bz2 +mkfontdir-1.0.5.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- sources 26 Apr 2007 14:44:44 -0000 1.13 +++ sources 13 Oct 2009 19:59:49 -0000 1.14 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ b81535f78fe05732931f02841e5ca37b font-util-1.0.1.tar.bz2 b0ebd86029571239b9d7b0c61191b591 fonttosfnt-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -4d0f89a23f77e22f1671a77bf0898955 mkfontdir-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -1e74e68eb9e8e91c6b7b615d80dc5ee1 mkfontscale-1.0.1.tar.bz2 9685fab33d39954ab8a0d22e0969d5a4 bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2 +96ca346f185c0ab48e42bf5bb0375da5 mkfontscale-1.0.7.tar.bz2 +9365ac66d19186eaf030482d312fca06 mkfontdir-1.0.5.tar.bz2 Index: xorg-x11-font-utils.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel/xorg-x11-font-utils.spec,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -p -r1.33 -r1.34 --- xorg-x11-font-utils.spec 27 Jul 2009 08:36:22 -0000 1.33 +++ xorg-x11-font-utils.spec 13 Oct 2009 19:59:49 -0000 1.34 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: xorg-x11-%{pkgname} # IMPORTANT: If package ever gets renamed to something else, remove the Epoch line! Epoch: 1 Version: 7.2 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} License: MIT Group: User Interface/X URL: http://www.x.org @@ -13,20 +13,17 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version Source0: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2 Source1: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/fonttosfnt-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -Source2: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontdir-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -Source3: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontscale-1.0.1.tar.bz2 +Source2: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontdir-1.0.5.tar.bz2 +Source3: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontscale-1.0.7.tar.bz2 Source4: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/font/font-util-1.0.1.tar.bz2 Patch0: font-util-1.0.1-mapdir-use-datadir-fix.patch Patch1: font-util-1.0.1-autoconf-add-with-fontdir-option.patch -BuildRequires: pkgconfig -BuildRequires: libXfont-devel -BuildRequires: libX11-devel +BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xfont) pkgconfig(x11) BuildRequires: libfontenc-devel >= 0.99.2-2 BuildRequires: freetype-devel BuildRequires: zlib-devel - BuildRequires: autoconf Provides: %{pkgname} @@ -116,6 +113,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 7.2-10 +- mkfontscale 1.0.7 +- mkfontdir 1.0.5 + * Mon Jul 27 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:7.2-9 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From ajax at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 13 20:02:37 2009 From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/F-12 sources, 1.13, 1.14 xorg-x11-font-utils.spec, 1.33, 1.34 Message-ID: <20091013200237.9E4A611C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24541 Modified Files: sources xorg-x11-font-utils.spec Log Message: * Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 7.2-10 - mkfontscale 1.0.7 - mkfontdir 1.0.5 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- sources 26 Apr 2007 14:44:44 -0000 1.13 +++ sources 13 Oct 2009 20:02:37 -0000 1.14 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ b81535f78fe05732931f02841e5ca37b font-util-1.0.1.tar.bz2 b0ebd86029571239b9d7b0c61191b591 fonttosfnt-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -4d0f89a23f77e22f1671a77bf0898955 mkfontdir-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -1e74e68eb9e8e91c6b7b615d80dc5ee1 mkfontscale-1.0.1.tar.bz2 9685fab33d39954ab8a0d22e0969d5a4 bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2 +96ca346f185c0ab48e42bf5bb0375da5 mkfontscale-1.0.7.tar.bz2 +9365ac66d19186eaf030482d312fca06 mkfontdir-1.0.5.tar.bz2 Index: xorg-x11-font-utils.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/F-12/xorg-x11-font-utils.spec,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -p -r1.33 -r1.34 --- xorg-x11-font-utils.spec 27 Jul 2009 08:36:22 -0000 1.33 +++ xorg-x11-font-utils.spec 13 Oct 2009 20:02:37 -0000 1.34 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: xorg-x11-%{pkgname} # IMPORTANT: If package ever gets renamed to something else, remove the Epoch line! Epoch: 1 Version: 7.2 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} License: MIT Group: User Interface/X URL: http://www.x.org @@ -13,20 +13,17 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version Source0: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.bz2 Source1: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/fonttosfnt-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -Source2: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontdir-1.0.3.tar.bz2 -Source3: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontscale-1.0.1.tar.bz2 +Source2: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontdir-1.0.5.tar.bz2 +Source3: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/app/mkfontscale-1.0.7.tar.bz2 Source4: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/font/font-util-1.0.1.tar.bz2 Patch0: font-util-1.0.1-mapdir-use-datadir-fix.patch Patch1: font-util-1.0.1-autoconf-add-with-fontdir-option.patch -BuildRequires: pkgconfig -BuildRequires: libXfont-devel -BuildRequires: libX11-devel +BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xfont) pkgconfig(x11) BuildRequires: libfontenc-devel >= 0.99.2-2 BuildRequires: freetype-devel BuildRequires: zlib-devel - BuildRequires: autoconf Provides: %{pkgname} @@ -116,6 +113,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Tue Oct 13 2009 Adam Jackson 7.2-10 +- mkfontscale 1.0.7 +- mkfontdir 1.0.5 + * Mon Jul 27 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:7.2-9 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 01:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140134.n9E1Ybc6006918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-13 21:34:36 EDT --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 01:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140134.n9E1Ygfb006958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.001-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 01:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140146.n9E1kOsm022631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-13 21:46:23 EDT --- sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 01:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140146.n9E1kURP022673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.001-2.fc10 |1.001-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 14 05:06:12 2009 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-padauk-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091014050612.30E7711C0296@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28496/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-padauk-fonts.spec Log Message: Committing in . Modified Files: devel/.cvsignore devel/sources Added Files: devel/import.log devel/sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf devel/sil-padauk-fonts.spec ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-padauk-fonts-2_4-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11.src.rpm:1255496374 --- NEW FILE sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Padauk sans-serif sans-serif Padauk --- NEW FILE sil-padauk-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-padauk %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/Padauk # The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: padauk-fonts < 2.4-6 %description Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters in the Myanmar block. The font aims to cover all minority language needs. At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. The font is a smart font using a Graphite description. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in doc/*.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc doc/*.txt %changelog * Mon May 26 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-6 - Changed the URL * Mon May 25 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-5 - Cleaned up the spec file - Used Obsoletes for upgrade path from padauk-fonts * Tue Mar 24 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-4 - Cleaned up the spec file as per new font packaging guidelines - Replaced padauk-src.ttf and padaukbold-src.ttf with Padauk.ttf and Padauk-Bold.ttf [490583] - Renamed the package to sil-padauk-fonts * Sun Feb 22 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-3 - Changed the package as per new font packaging guidelines * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-2 - Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules - Changed fontconfig prefix * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-1 - Changed versioning - Added configuration file - Added more description - Added license file * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph - 20080617-1 - initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Oct 2009 16:26:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 14 Oct 2009 05:06:11 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Oct 2009 16:26:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 14 Oct 2009 05:06:11 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 14 05:10:09 2009 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-padauk-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091014051010.0E1DC11C02A2@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29392/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-padauk-fonts.spec Log Message: Committing in . Modified Files: F-11/.cvsignore F-11/sources Added Files: F-11/import.log F-11/sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf F-11/sil-padauk-fonts.spec --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-padauk-fonts-2_4-6_fc11:F-11:sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11.src.rpm:1255496615 --- NEW FILE sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Padauk sans-serif sans-serif Padauk --- NEW FILE sil-padauk-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-padauk %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/Padauk # The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: padauk-fonts < 2.4-6 %description Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters in the Myanmar block. The font aims to cover all minority language needs. At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. The font is a smart font using a Graphite description. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in doc/*.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc doc/*.txt %changelog * Mon May 26 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-6 - Changed the URL * Mon May 25 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-5 - Cleaned up the spec file - Used Obsoletes for upgrade path from padauk-fonts * Tue Mar 24 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-4 - Cleaned up the spec file as per new font packaging guidelines - Replaced padauk-src.ttf and padaukbold-src.ttf with Padauk.ttf and Padauk-Bold.ttf [490583] - Renamed the package to sil-padauk-fonts * Sun Feb 22 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-3 - Changed the package as per new font packaging guidelines * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-2 - Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules - Changed fontconfig prefix * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-1 - Changed versioning - Added configuration file - Added more description - Added license file * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph - 20080617-1 - initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Oct 2009 16:26:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 14 Oct 2009 05:10:09 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Oct 2009 16:26:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 14 Oct 2009 05:10:09 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz From mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 14 05:11:39 2009 From: mintojoseph at fedoraproject.org (Minto Joseph) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-12 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-padauk-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091014051139.BCC5711C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29904/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-padauk-fonts.spec Log Message: Committing in . Modified Files: F-12/.cvsignore F-12/sources Added Files: F-12/import.log F-12/sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf F-12/sil-padauk-fonts.spec --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-padauk-fonts-2_4-6_fc11:F-12:sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11.src.rpm:1255496709 --- NEW FILE sil-padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Padauk sans-serif sans-serif Padauk --- NEW FILE sil-padauk-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-padauk %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A font for Burmese and the Myanmar script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/Padauk # The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: padauk-fonts < 2.4-6 %description Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters in the Myanmar block. The font aims to cover all minority language needs. At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. The font is a smart font using a Graphite description. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in doc/*.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build # Nothing there %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc doc/*.txt %changelog * Mon May 26 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-6 - Changed the URL * Mon May 25 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-5 - Cleaned up the spec file - Used Obsoletes for upgrade path from padauk-fonts * Tue Mar 24 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-4 - Cleaned up the spec file as per new font packaging guidelines - Replaced padauk-src.ttf and padaukbold-src.ttf with Padauk.ttf and Padauk-Bold.ttf [490583] - Renamed the package to sil-padauk-fonts * Sun Feb 22 2009 Minto Joseph - 2.4-3 - Changed the package as per new font packaging guidelines * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-2 - Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules - Changed fontconfig prefix * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph - 2.4-1 - Changed versioning - Added configuration file - Added more description - Added license file * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph - 20080617-1 - initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Oct 2009 16:26:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 14 Oct 2009 05:11:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-padauk-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Oct 2009 16:26:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 14 Oct 2009 05:11:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 14 05:30:02 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/F-12 bug-523454.patch, NONE, 1.1 smc-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20091014053002.BE00511C02A2@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4068 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Added Files: bug-523454.patch Log Message: * Wed Oct 14 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.2-2 - bugfix 523454 bug-523454.patch: malayalam-fonts.conf | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE bug-523454.patch --- diff -rup malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf malayalam-fonts-04_mod/malayalam-fonts.conf --- malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf 2008-06-30 00:46:25.000000000 +0530 +++ malayalam-fonts-04_mod/malayalam-fonts.conf 2009-10-12 16:30:00.000000000 +0530 @@ -32,13 +32,11 @@ Meera - matrix 1.20 01.2 - Index: smc-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/F-12/smc-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- smc-fonts.spec 18 Aug 2009 15:46:31 -0000 1.9 +++ smc-fonts.spec 14 Oct 2009 05:30:02 -0000 1.10 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ traditional and new Malayalam Script. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 04.2 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Source: http://download.savannah.nongnu BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +Patch1: bug-523454.patch %description %common_desc @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ traditional Malayalam Scripts. %prep %setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-04 +%patch1 -p1 -b .1-conffile %build echo "Nothing to do in Build." @@ -152,6 +154,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Wed Oct 14 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.2-2 +- bugfix 523454 + * Tue Aug 18 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar 04.2-1 - bugfix 484536 for Meera From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 14 05:43:10 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20091014054310.4858F11C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6429 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Oct 14 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.2-2 - bugfix 523454 Index: smc-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- smc-fonts.spec 18 Aug 2009 15:46:31 -0000 1.9 +++ smc-fonts.spec 14 Oct 2009 05:43:10 -0000 1.10 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ traditional and new Malayalam Script. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 04.2 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Source: http://download.savannah.nongnu BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +Patch1: bug-523454.patch %description %common_desc @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ traditional Malayalam Scripts. %prep %setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-04 +%patch1 -p1 -b .1-conffile %build echo "Nothing to do in Build." @@ -152,6 +154,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Wed Oct 14 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.2-2 +- bugfix 523454 + * Tue Aug 18 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar 04.2-1 - bugfix 484536 for Meera From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 14 05:46:36 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel bug-523454.patch,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20091014054636.8306B11C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7130 Added Files: bug-523454.patch Log Message: added patch bug-523454.patch: malayalam-fonts.conf | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE bug-523454.patch --- diff -rup malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf malayalam-fonts-04_mod/malayalam-fonts.conf --- malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf 2008-06-30 00:46:25.000000000 +0530 +++ malayalam-fonts-04_mod/malayalam-fonts.conf 2009-10-12 16:30:00.000000000 +0530 @@ -32,13 +32,11 @@ Meera - matrix 1.20 01.2 - From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140618.n9E6IuYc021823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-14 02:18:56 EDT --- sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140618.n9E6IgWj021759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-14 02:18:41 EDT --- sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140618.n9E6Imtg012148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-14 02:18:46 EDT --- sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140618.n9E6Iq2K012166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-14 02:18:52 EDT --- sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140655.n9E6tivk021979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apeter at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Ani Peter 2009-10-14 02:55:43 EDT --- I have done testing with two more new script fonts - Kalyani and Samyak Malayalam These fonts also face similar problems in qt, icu and works perfect with gedit. Screenshots attached. Conclusion: 1. The problem reported in this bug is about Lohit Malayalam with KDE (qt) 2. The same problem exists for Lohit Malayalam with oowriter (icu) 3. Two other fonts - (i) Samyak Malayalam and (ii) Kalyani also has similar issue with both qt and icu Hence please advise how to go about with this bug and against which components above bugs should be filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140656.n9E6uarm032561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #5 from Ani Peter 2009-10-14 02:56:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364702) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364702) Screenshot for Kalyani on gedit, kwrite and oowriter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140657.n9E6v8ql032673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #6 from Ani Peter 2009-10-14 02:57:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364703) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364703) Screenshot for Samyak Malayalam on gedit, kwrite and oowriter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 07:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140741.n9E7fQr3000343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-14 03:41:25 EDT --- IMO this is not a font bug Malayalam script require reordering of OD4d OD30 (rakar) by rendering engine, same is handled in pango, looks something is changed in Harfbuzz and ICU. Same thing working in RaghuMalayalam fonts since it provided ligature (complete glyph) for rakar combination. try some other rakar combination you will understand difference -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 07:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140744.n9E7i2PC000781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #23 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-14 03:44:00 EDT --- built smc-fonts-04.2-2.fc12 requested releng for adding same in F12 Final, hope so will get that as suggested by Nicholas, Better to open new bug for OO.o and QT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 07:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910140746.n9E7kKkL001556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 03:46:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hence please advise how to go about with this bug and against which components > above bugs should be filed. Please open a qt or kde bug (here and upstream) and an OO.o but (here and upstream) cc-ing fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com You should also test java (jedit) as it's the third major component that tends to have text rendering problems. (it would of course be interesting to find a workaround in lohit, but when 3 different fonts fail the same way, that means the text libraries have a big problem) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 10:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141021.n9EAL9T7012308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-14 06:21:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > (it would of course be interesting to find a workaround in lohit, but when 3 > different fonts fail the same way, that means the text libraries have a big > problem) we can fix this in lohit as well but i think need to add something around 60 ligature i.e 37 (cons) + [0d4d + 0d30] = ligature + 37 (cons)+ 0d4d + 37 (cons) + [0d4d + 0d30] = ligature some or many out of these will be not require. I have tested with some font on windows, Uniscribe is doing reordering for this. sometime i feel we should have at least one font for each language with AAT, which will make rendering independent of rendering engine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 10:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524883] cpi setting not used accurately In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141050.n9EAowA7021600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524883 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-14 06:50:56 EDT --- Should be fixed in paps-0.6.8-11.fc13. please test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 11:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Lohit font rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141113.n9EBDPT3028275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #10 from Ani Peter 2009-10-14 07:13:24 EDT --- Based on all discussions, I understand the issue is with the rendering engines. Hence, (i) changing the component of this bug to Qt (ii) changing summary accordingly and (iii) opening another bug for icu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 11:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141118.n9EBITdH007427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #15 from Mat Booth 2009-10-14 07:18:27 EDT --- That 3.5.1 build seems to be working for me too, nice one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 11:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141118.n9EBIKeQ029714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, | |ltinkl at redhat.com, | |rdieter at math.unl.edu, | |than at redhat.com Component|lohit-malayalam-fonts |qt AssignedTo|psatpute at redhat.com |than at redhat.com Summary|[ml_IN] Lohit font |[ml_IN] Rendering of |rendering of cons+virama+ra |cons+virama+ra is wrong in |is wrong in KDE |KDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 11:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528220] Review Request: gfs-ignacio-fonts - A majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141129.n9EBTk6b010329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-14 07:29:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1745793 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is silent + source files match upstream url(sha1sum) c44714394d7261db5f08ff6e164267db333bf64f GFS_IGNACIO.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 11:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528272] Review Request: adf-tribun-fonts - A newsprint-like serif typeface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141129.n9EBTJaG010225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-10-14 07:29:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1739554 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is silent + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 9ece09207df593ef0d606f10afd56f9ed0c40c3f Tribun-Cat.pdf 35d260a53d0fb00513fe08b544e7f61eb9c5de48 Tribun-Std.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From georgios.giannakis.stavros at gmail.com Wed Oct 14 13:25:07 2009 From: georgios.giannakis.stavros at gmail.com (GEORGIOS GIANNAKIS) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:25:07 +0300 Subject: [Bug 524883] cpi setting not used accurately In-Reply-To: <200910141050.n9EAowA7021600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> References: <200910141050.n9EAowA7021600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Message-ID: <2add652f0910140625y510c1ef4hb8c51a79b889d36e@mail.gmail.com> 2009/10/14, bugzilla at redhat.com : > Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional > comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524883 > > > Akira TAGOH changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED > > > > > --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-14 06:50:56 EDT > --- > Should be fixed in paps-0.6.8-11.fc13. please test. > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list > Fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list > From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 13:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141343.n9EDhbAu012971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-14 09:43:37 EDT --- CC the fedora fonts bugs list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 14:18:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141418.n9EEI8pB014163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Component|firefox |pango AssignedTo|gecko-bugs-nobody at fedorapro |besfahbo at redhat.com |ject.org | --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-14 10:18:07 EDT --- Looks like a pango issue to me. Reassigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 14:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141430.n9EEUjQs017866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|pango |xorg-x11-drv-intel AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 10:30:44 EDT --- If it fails with one GPU and works with another, keeping the same software versions, that's clearly a GFX driver bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 15:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141528.n9EFSQU8015846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 15:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141528.n9EFSPOF004074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 15:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141532.n9EFWmCc016966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-14 11:32:47 EDT --- William, are you still able to reproduce this with the currently updated Rawihide, please? We would need information requested in the comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 15:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141539.n9EFdilM008130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-14 11:39:44 EDT --- and please when you try to reproduce it, tell us what version of these packages you have installed, please. Thank you again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 15:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141538.n9EFckPD007992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mathieu-acct at cset | |co.com) --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-14 11:38:45 EDT --- Could you please upgrade xorg-x11-server, xorg-x11-drv-ati, mesa, and kernel with packages from koji, and retest? There was a merge of new upstream version of radeon driver in Rawhide, which might fix your problem. Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 17:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141701.n9EH1bCJ030741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mathieu-acct at cset | |co.com) | --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-14 13:01:35 EDT --- Upgraded the following packages: kernel-firmware-2.6.31.4-80.fc12.noarch.rpm kernel-headers-2.6.31.4-80.fc12.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-2.6.31.4-80.fc12.i686.rpm xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.0-0.10.20091006git457646d73.fc12.i686.rpm xorg-x11-server-common-1.7.0-3.fc12.i686.rpm xorg-x11-server-Xephyr-1.7.0-3.fc12.i686.rpm xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.7.0-3.fc12.i686.rpm xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.7.0-3.fc12.i686.rpm Didn't touch mesa as the latest in koji is mesa-7.6-0.13.fc12 ajax 2009-09-21 21:32:47 which I already have. I'm rebooting, will let you know how it goes... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 17:59:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528272] Review Request: adf-tribun-fonts - A newsprint-like serif typeface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141759.n9EHxVhH012819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 13:59:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: adf-tribun-fonts Short Description: A newsprint-like serif typeface Owners: nim Branches: F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 18:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528220] Review Request: gfs-ignacio-fonts - A majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141801.n9EI17IK025307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 14:01:06 EDT --- Thanks++ New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-ignacio-fonts Short Description: A majuscule Greek font Owners: nim Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 18:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141833.n9EIXePM002216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 14:33:39 EDT --- 1. technically each file here is a "font" so the summary should probably be 12x12 JIS X 0208 bitmap fonts 2. JIS X 0208 is a character set that contains Kanji characters mostly often used. ? The JIS X 0208 character set contains the most often used Kanji glyphs. 3. your provides/obsoletes are probably too complex, rpmlint complains knm-new-fonts.noarch: W: self-obsoletion knm_new <= 1.1-16 obsoletes knm_new = 1.1-16 IMHO you should drop Provides completely, repoquery says nothing requires knm_new or knm-new-fonts in Fedora 4. you should put /etc/X11/fontpath.d/knm-new and /usr/share/fonts/knm-new/fonts.dir in a separate legacy subpackage 5. The fonts declare themselves as "fixed", therefore please rename the package knm-new-fixed-fonts (we want the font name to appear in the package name). Not sure if using the same name as many other fonts is a good idea, but I guess I don't care a lot 6. fc-query complains Can't query face 0 of font file /usr/share/fonts/knm_new/knm12pb.pcf.gz Can't query face 0 of font file /usr/share/fonts/knm_new/knm12p.pcf.gz Can't query face 0 of font file /usr/share/fonts/knm_new/knmzn12xb.pcf.gz Can't query face 0 of font file /usr/share/fonts/knm_new/knmzn12x.pcf.gz You should open a bug against fontconfig to have it investigated. This is not normal. 7. It would be nice to include a fontconfig file for the font 8. I don't think it's good style to mix macros for some commands (%{__ln_s}, %{_bindir}/mkfontdir) and not others. The current convention seems to write plain unmacroized commands with no explicit path Anyway that's all for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 19:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141900.n9EJ0MLf031234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 15:00:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 4. you should put > /etc/X11/fontpath.d/knm-new > and > /usr/share/fonts/knm-new/fonts.dir > in a separate legacy subpackage Or maybe not, it seems we tolerate those files right now, so I won't insist on this one, doing the rest is sufficient to make this package disappear from problem reports -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 19:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141929.n9EJTU9T006396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |oflb-Widelands-fonts --- Comment #2 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-14 15:29:29 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1746547 $ rpmlint SRPMS/oflb-Widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/oflb-Widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 19:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141954.n9EJsk3M022433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 19:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910141954.n9EJsTqr022381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 15:54:28 EDT --- Please only use lowercase in the package name. Before F12 that's a packaging guidelines error, starting from F12 it'll also cause the build to fail (since new code assumes packages respect naming guidelines) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy#Naming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 20:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142029.n9EKTDhW018535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 16:29:13 EDT --- That being said, let's do a more thorough review 1. when creating a new file (such as the fontconfig rules one) it's better to use SourceX instead of patch, that produces a simple patch in the vcs people can look at or import. Using patch only adds lots of not-really useful +s before each line 2. likewise for simple operations such as re-wrapping text files it's better to script them instead of creating a trivial patch that will need to be rebased every few releases I often use something like for txt in *.txt; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new &&\ sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new &&\ touch -r $txt $txt.new &&\ mv $txt.new $txt done (you can remove the sed if you don't need to fix DOS EOLs, and add an iconv if necessary) 3. We sadly do not seem to have a standard script to invoque fontforge. So I can't say if your way is better or worse than others. It's probably a good idea to write a small makefile and get it included upstream so upstream at least will check it's happy with the way we generate the font. Someday we'll need to codify this so all our packages have the same bugs :) 4. you can put multiple files on a single %doc line The rest seems fine (but I'll need a package buildable in rawhide to run our full battery of tests Thank you for submitting this package, it's not perfect but it's also not too bad and you were awfully quick :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 20:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142042.n9EKgSP3021895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 16:42:27 EDT --- And lastly (I'm not very efficient today, sorry) it's good style not to repeat the package name (or something similar) in the summary, since GUI and CLI tools already print the package name next to it. So you need to be a bit more creative -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 21:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142130.n9ELUcK7019179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) | --- Comment #6 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-14 17:30:36 EDT --- Renamed, patches replaced with SourceX's, Makefile used for conversion, %docs combined. Summary updated. Waiting to hear back from upstream; will pass the updates on when I do. $ rpmlint oflb-widelands-fonts.spec oflb-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-2.fc11.src.rpm oflb-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SPEC: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/oflb-widelands-fonts.spec Koji scratch build against f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1746690 Thanks for the review and helpful suggestions - I learned a few things. Any suggestions on getting a rawhide buildable package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 21:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142137.n9ELbOXV022228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #7 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-14 17:37:23 EDT --- Fuedal->Feudal SPEC replaced, Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1746712 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 21:54:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142154.n9ELsvuQ018261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-14 17:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Thanks for the review and helpful suggestions - I learned a few things. Any > suggestions on getting a rawhide buildable package? lowercasing the package name should have been sufficient, I'll check it tomorrow (my time is up today) Another point: oflb- in a font context means "a font downloaded from www.openfontlibrary.org" Since that does not seem the case for this package, you need to define another prefix You have some documented examples here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy#Naming We prefix font package names by foundry to group packages with the same origin in package management tools, since an entity that produced good fonts will tend to publish other good fonts, and an entity that produced average fonts unfortunately rarely gets much better (or improves its old fonts at the same time). So this is useful to the user. Other SIGs maye have made similar choices (or not) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 22:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142200.n9EM0R24031868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 --- Comment #5 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-14 18:00:26 EDT --- Well I'm afraid to say I still see corruptions... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 22:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142201.n9EM1N5n032229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #364467|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-14 18:01:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364821) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364821) dmesg dmesg after upgrade to latest builds in koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 22:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142202.n9EM2WV5021568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #364464|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-14 18:02:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364822) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364822) Xorg.0.log after latest koji updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 22:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910142222.n9EMMVWv026642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 --- Comment #8 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-14 18:22:30 EDT --- There's one interesting behaviour when I change the font rendering options under the "Appearance Preferences" dialog box. For instance, right now I have 'subpixel smoothing' enabled and in my gnome bar, the title entry for this firefox window is barely readable. Now if I switch to 'Best shapes' (or any other), corruption disappears. But if I switch back to 'subpixel smoothing' it comes back up. Well I guess it's not just a matter of font corruption: I just restarted the 'Appearance Preferences' program again and the background color of the app was all black... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 06:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910150630.n9F6UHRZ027919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|text/x-log |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 06:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910150630.n9F6UHiM027913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|text/x-log |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 11:31:08 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 11:31:08 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015113108.6423.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |REMIND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target milestone|--- |OOo Later -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 11:31:07 +0000 2009 ------- To be done when fontconfig support for that becomes available --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 12:02:42 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 12:02:42 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015120242.23082.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|REMIND | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 12:02:41 +0000 2009 ------- This is a funny argument, the mechanism was coded by the upstream fontconfig maintainer, and lead to the creation of new fontconfig commands. He'd be very surprised to learn he had ignored fontconfig aspects while doing so. IIRC this is one of the bits that justified the fontconfig 2.7 major release --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 12:34:04 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 12:34:04 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015123404.7975.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|REOPENED |STARTED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 12:34:04 +0000 2009 ------- Good to know as it is not very obvious from the fc27 release announcement: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2009-June/003177.html Looking at the new APIs it is still not clear to me: how does an app decide when the substitution font suggested by fontconfig is not good enough so it should request AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller to search for other fonts and install them? Example: "Segoe" is not available but "Frutiger" is. FC suggests the latter as a fallback. Should OOo use "Frutiger" or should it ask AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller to search the internet for "Segoe"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cmc at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 12:51:16 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 12:51:16 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015125116.15966.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 ------- Additional comments from cmc at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 12:51:15 +0000 2009 ------- Earlier (I haven't read any recent docs) on the first version of this support was that only to search when there is a failure on *glyph* substitution to return a usable font. i.e. take the returned fontnames on faith, e.g. Liberation Serif for Times New Roman or whatever, but if there isn't any installed coverage for a script then fire it off to search for some font that can display the text. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 12:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151257.n9FCv1D5025420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:10:22 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 13:10:22 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015131022.27950.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 ------- Additional comments from nmailhot at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:10:21 +0000 2009 ------- IIRC (I may be wrong) part of the decision for GNOME apps happens at pango-level Now OO.o has a much heavier font use that your average app, and I wouldn't be surprised that investigating auto-font-installer support for OO.o resulted in a set of RFEs for the current auto-font-installer. But that will only happen if OO.o people look at the initial implementation and identify areas that need improvement (however even limited support at first is better than no support at all) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:42:05 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 13:42:05 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015134205.20252.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:42:04 +0000 2009 ------- Ok, doing it as a last level resort for glyph fallback looks like a reasonable first step. The resulting modal dialog may be annoying though e.g. when something with an invalid encoding is pasted resulting in gazillions of weird codepoints. Regarding RFEs for this feature I already have an idea: make FC interact with AFAMI directly. If an app asks for a font with support for a specific codepoint and FC does not find a good answer, it should ask AFAMI for help. IMHO it should be configurable whether FC does this asynchronously, synchronously (using a modal) dialog or if the feature is disabled, globally or application specific or as part of the font pattern. OOo already does the right thing when the equivalent of a WM_FONTCHANGED comes along. I would prefer it to be asynchronous by default. And having a patterns like FC_AUTOFONT_REQUIRED, FC_AUTOFONT_SUGGESTED, FC_AUTOFONT_MAYBE or FC_AUTOFONT_DONTCARE would help to distinguish important use cases such as idle formating or UI-text. IMHO most external observers overestimate the number of "OO.o people" working on stuff like this... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cmc at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:50:26 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 13:50:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015135026.28480.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 ------- Additional comments from cmc at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:50:25 +0000 2009 ------- a) "resulting in gazillions of weird codepoints.", yup. get it with accidental binary goo in gnome-terminal b) "overestimate the number of OO.o people", yup, I'd hoped to pick up this myself by F-12, I might try again to do this myself by F-13 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 14:07:01 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Oct 2009 14:07:01 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091015140701.7944.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 14:07:00 +0000 2009 ------- > I'd hoped to pick up this myself by F-12, I might try again to do this myself by F-13 Thanks! I still think you should concentrate on a FC<->AFAMI interaction and then making sure that apps such OOo gets notified when they succeeded in installing new fonts. OOo will happily reformat then. Having FC negotiate with AFAMI would have so many benefits... as I already said in #desc5 FC has the full picture of what is going on, what is missing etc. And as a central configuration entity for font-related questions it will better know the relationships between different fonts, where to get them directly, where to get nice substitutions. Managing the font autoinstallation from a module other than FC just calls for trouble, useless extra work, annoying modal dialogs, etc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 15:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151543.n9FFh3EU007429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liana at ellipsis.cx | |) --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-15 11:43:02 EDT --- Thanks for the bug report. We have reviewed the information you have provided above, and there is some additional information we require that will be helpful in our diagnosis of this issue. Please attach your X server config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf, if available), /var/log/dmesg, and X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.*.log) to the bug report as individual uncompressed file attachments using the bugzilla file attachment link below. We will review this issue again once you've had a chance to attach this information. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 16:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151638.n9FGcG1S027592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #7 from Sara L. Uckelman 2009-10-15 12:38:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364963) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364963) Xorg log #1 Attaching the first of three files named Xorg.*.log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 16:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151638.n9FGcnLj027697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #8 from Sara L. Uckelman 2009-10-15 12:38:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364964) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364964) Xorg log #2 Attaching the second of three files named Xorg.*.log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 16:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151639.n9FGdALs020768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #9 from Sara L. Uckelman 2009-10-15 12:39:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364965) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364965) Xorg log #3 Attaching the third of three files named Xorg.*.log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 16:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151637.n9FGbP5A020532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Sara L. Uckelman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liana at ellipsis.cx | |) | --- Comment #6 from Sara L. Uckelman 2009-10-15 12:37:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364959) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364959) /var/log/dmesg Attaching /var/log/dmesg as requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 16:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151639.n9FGdf83028109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #10 from Sara L. Uckelman 2009-10-15 12:39:41 EDT --- I didn't attach the file X server config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf) because I couldn't find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 17:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151716.n9FHGs3L029783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-15 13:16:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 17:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528220] Review Request: gfs-ignacio-fonts - A majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151723.n9FHNliu031015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-15 13:23:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 17:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528272] Review Request: adf-tribun-fonts - A newsprint-like serif typeface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151724.n9FHOVvk031102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-15 13:24:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 15 20:59:19 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091015205919.362E811C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13983/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy GFS Ignacio GFS Ignacio fantasy --- NEW FILE gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gfs-ignacio %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename GFS_IGNACIO Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090923 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. This font has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new &&\ sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new &&\ touch -r $txt $txt.new &&\ mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Fri Oct 9 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090923-1 ? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1_fc13:HEAD:gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255640340 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:23:53 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 20:59:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_IGNACIO.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:23:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 15 Oct 2009 20:59:19 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ec397b1199ca79404adec355eeb5c163 GFS_IGNACIO.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 15 21:01:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20091015210149.ECA3711C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14478/devel Modified Files: import.log Log Message: initial import Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 15 Oct 2009 20:59:19 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Oct 2009 21:01:49 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1_fc13:HEAD:gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255640340 +gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1_fc13:HEAD:gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255640488 From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 15 21:13:18 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-11 gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091015211318.EEC3011C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17041/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gfs-ignacio %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename GFS_IGNACIO Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090923 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. This font has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new &&\ sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new &&\ touch -r $txt $txt.new &&\ mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Fri Oct 9 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090923-1 ? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1_fc13:F-11:gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255640933 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:23:53 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 21:13:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_IGNACIO.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:23:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 15 Oct 2009 21:13:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ec397b1199ca79404adec355eeb5c163 GFS_IGNACIO.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 15 21:13:53 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-12 gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091015211353.EB3E111C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17207/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE gfs-ignacio-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy GFS Ignacio GFS Ignacio fantasy --- NEW FILE gfs-ignacio-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gfs-ignacio %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename GFS_IGNACIO Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090923 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A majuscule Greek font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces_majuscules.html Source0: http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/%{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description As it is known, the Greek alphabet was used in majuscule form for over a millennium before the minuscule letters gradually replaced it until they became the official script in the 9th century A.D. Thereafter, majuscule letters were confined to sparse use as initials or elaborate titles until the Italian Renaissance. The new art of Typography, as well as the need of the humanists to mimic the ancient Greco-Roman period brought back the extensive use of the majuscule letter-forms in both Latin and Greek typography. Greek books of the time were printed using the contemporary Byzantine hand with which they combined capital letters modelled on the Roman antiquity, i.e. with thick and thin strokes and serifs. At the same time the Byzantine majuscule tradition, principally used on theological editions, remainned alive until the early 19th century. This font has been designed by George D. Matthiopoulos. %prep %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} chmod 0644 *.txt for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new &&\ sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new &&\ touch -r $txt $txt.new &&\ mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Fri Oct 9 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090923-1 ? initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1_fc13:F-12:gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255640822 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:23:53 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 21:13:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +GFS_IGNACIO.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ignacio-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:23:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 15 Oct 2009 21:13:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ec397b1199ca79404adec355eeb5c163 GFS_IGNACIO.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 15 21:15:16 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/devel adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 adf-tribun-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091015211516.C3C7F11C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18113/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf adf-tribun-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Tribun ADF Std Med Medium Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Tribun ADF Std Med Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Italic Tribun ADF Std Med Bold Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Tribun ADF Std Med Bold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Italic Tribun ADF Std Med Tribun ADF Std Tribun ADF Std Cond Regular Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Tribun ADF Std Cond Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Italic Tribun ADF Std Cond Bold Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Tribun ADF Std Cond Bold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Italic Tribun ADF Std Cond Tribun ADF Std serif Tribun ADF Std Tribun ADF Std serif --- NEW FILE adf-tribun-fonts.spec --- %global fontname adf-tribun %global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename Tribun-Std Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.13 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A newsprint-like serif typeface Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions URL: http://arkandis.tuxfamily.org/adffonts.html Source0: http://arkandis.tuxfamily.org/fonts/%{archivename}.zip Source1: http://arkandis.tuxfamily.org/docs/Tribun-Cat.pdf Source11: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Hirwen Harendal started in 1999 the realization of a first font family, aiming to create another ?Times New Roman?? He does not consider this endeavour a huge success. However, he transformed Tribun progessively since then to give it its own character. The idea was to achieve newsprint-like rendering. To this effect, the glyph bodies, serifs, or even extenders are not normalised and use irregular strokes. This is most visible in italics though those variations stay imperceptible at small sizes. Italics proved time-consuming. They are never an easy thing to draw. Nevertheless, the designer considers them very close to those of ?Times?, with some variations. The medium weight uses a stronger stroke. It can be used for emphasis, or for effects in titles. That being said it has also been used for body copy. It is also slightly expanded to complete the face offerings. The condensed version is a bit unusual, since it stands in for both normal and medium condensed. After several trials, Hirwen decided an intermediate weight rendered much better both for document display and in print. Secondly, he took great care to keep readability excellent, and this even for italics. This font family is particularly well suited for text, display, or presentations. It is also ideal for all Web publications. It can serve as alternative to ?Times New Roman? and other similar fonts. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} . for txt in NOTICE */COPYING ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new &&\ sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new &&\ touch -r $txt $txt.new &&\ mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p TTF/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc NOTICE TTF/COPYING *.pdf %changelog * Sat Oct 10 2009 - 1.13-1 ? Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- adf-tribun-fonts-1_13-1_fc13:HEAD:adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255641299 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:24:37 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 21:15:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Tribun-Cat.pdf +Tribun-Std.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:24:37 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 15 Oct 2009 21:15:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +d7bcba4e405765cde2755666e80a3a20 Tribun-Cat.pdf +46f08319ae8b6c49454cfc36555471a5 Tribun-Std.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 15 21:26:35 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/F-12 adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 adf-tribun-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091015212635.3E84611C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21909/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf adf-tribun-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE adf-tribun-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- Tribun ADF Std Med Medium Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Tribun ADF Std Med Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded DemiBold Italic Tribun ADF Std Med Bold Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Tribun ADF Std Med Bold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiExpanded Black Italic Tribun ADF Std Med Tribun ADF Std Tribun ADF Std Cond Regular Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Tribun ADF Std Cond Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed Medium Italic Tribun ADF Std Cond Bold Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Tribun ADF Std Cond Bold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Italic Tribun ADF Std SemiCondensed ExtraBold Italic Tribun ADF Std Cond Tribun ADF Std serif Tribun ADF Std Tribun ADF Std serif --- NEW FILE adf-tribun-fonts.spec --- %global fontname adf-tribun %global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename Tribun-Std Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.13 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A newsprint-like serif typeface Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions URL: http://arkandis.tuxfamily.org/adffonts.html Source0: http://arkandis.tuxfamily.org/fonts/%{archivename}.zip Source1: http://arkandis.tuxfamily.org/docs/Tribun-Cat.pdf Source11: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Hirwen Harendal started in 1999 the realization of a first font family, aiming to create another ?Times New Roman?? He does not consider this endeavour a huge success. However, he transformed Tribun progessively since then to give it its own character. The idea was to achieve newsprint-like rendering. To this effect, the glyph bodies, serifs, or even extenders are not normalised and use irregular strokes. This is most visible in italics though those variations stay imperceptible at small sizes. Italics proved time-consuming. They are never an easy thing to draw. Nevertheless, the designer considers them very close to those of ?Times?, with some variations. The medium weight uses a stronger stroke. It can be used for emphasis, or for effects in titles. That being said it has also been used for body copy. It is also slightly expanded to complete the face offerings. The condensed version is a bit unusual, since it stands in for both normal and medium condensed. After several trials, Hirwen decided an intermediate weight rendered much better both for document display and in print. Secondly, he took great care to keep readability excellent, and this even for italics. This font family is particularly well suited for text, display, or presentations. It is also ideal for all Web publications. It can serve as alternative to ?Times New Roman? and other similar fonts. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} . for txt in NOTICE */COPYING ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new &&\ sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new &&\ touch -r $txt $txt.new &&\ mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p TTF/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc NOTICE TTF/COPYING *.pdf %changelog * Sat Oct 10 2009 - 1.13-1 ? Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- adf-tribun-fonts-1_13-1_fc13:F-12:adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255641364 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:24:37 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 21:26:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Tribun-Cat.pdf +Tribun-Std.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-tribun-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:24:37 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 15 Oct 2009 21:26:35 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +d7bcba4e405765cde2755666e80a3a20 Tribun-Cat.pdf +46f08319ae8b6c49454cfc36555471a5 Tribun-Std.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 21:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528220] Review Request: gfs-ignacio-fonts - A majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910152125.n9FLPgG7022871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-15 17:25:41 EDT --- gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfs-ignacio-fonts-20090923-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 21:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528272] Review Request: adf-tribun-fonts - A newsprint-like serif typeface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910152134.n9FLYhEu025322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-15 17:34:41 EDT --- adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adf-tribun-fonts-1.13-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 22:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910152222.n9FMMCN5001804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 22:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910152221.n9FMLvWO001753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-15 18:21:56 EDT --- This one is good technically I'd simplify the summary to ?A Latin typeface inspired by feudal calligraphy? Also technically "glyph" is a better term than "char" You didn't keep the touch after the fold, it's used to keep the original file timestamp (but that do not matter as much in recent rpm as it used to before, so this is just FYI) But this is really nitpicking on my part. Ignore me if you don't want to bother So the only remaining problem is the naming. Since the author publishes two other fonts, that may be packaged someday, finding a nice prefix to identify him is necessary (unfortunately renaming packages is one thing the Fedora infra is very bad at, so if you make a mistake here you'll be stuck with it quite a long time). pschwanemann- would be consistent with apanov- but a bit long. Feel free to use this or invent a better one (or ask upstream for a better handle) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 22:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910152236.n9FMa3Hp013582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-15 18:36:02 EDT --- sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sil-padauk-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 22:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910152235.n9FMZw6J013530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-15 18:35:57 EDT --- sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sil-padauk-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 00:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910160028.n9G0S3qV016962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |airlied at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 08:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910160835.n9G8ZRs4002784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 09:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910160953.n9G9rtMq031139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-16 05:53:53 EDT --- hi, Sorry for the delay, got stuck in bed wid flu :( Fixed up whatever I could, - fontconfig - given prio as 69 (lowest?, hope that isnt tooo low) - fixed license to gplv2+, no response from upstream about it yet, - no idea what to write in there to juice up the description, sorry. spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/gargi-fonts.spec srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm the rest: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 13:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910161336.n9GDamwo018844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 13:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910161336.n9GDamGw018847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 13:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910161336.n9GDam5K010701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 13:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910161336.n9GDamiA010702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 13:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910161352.n9GDqBuE023041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) | --- Comment #10 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-16 09:52:09 EDT --- Waiting on a response from upstream. I would ideally like them to incorporate the font-building Makefile and either update the release on oflb or give their preferred foundry name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 16:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910161659.n9GGxPIT024697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #11 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-16 12:59:23 EDT --- Heard from upstream. This attempt changes the name as suggested, adds the touch, and updates the font conversion to add .ttf output abilities in addition to .otf. We don't actually use the .ttf stuff, but upstream may want it. SPEC: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1750409 This is a little premature - I'm waiting on a final confirmation from upstream before calling it official. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 20:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910162029.n9GKTFap011453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |dave at adsllc.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-16 16:29:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Koji: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1750409 > > This is a little premature - I'm waiting on a final confirmation from upstream > before calling it official. Well, this one is good ??? APPROVED ??? (Note that I'm not asking you to push it at once, just confirming this particular version is good enough for Fedora, and that you can push it or something similar when you feel ready. You can still wait for upstream confirmation or ask new questions here. But I don't think I should block you from now on) When you feel ready, you can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 20:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910162055.n9GKtoxF016614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-16 16:55:48 EDT --- Ankur, I hope you've recovered completely and are well now There is absolutely no problem with a review sleeping some time, what's not ok is making someone work on a review then vanishing, but as long as you come back in a reasonable delay everything is fine. This version is good. If you hear from upstream make them write a better description. ??? APPROVED ??? You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 21:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910162153.n9GLr4Je001039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-16 17:53:03 EDT --- Wow, you don't know how long I've waited for someone to pick up this review request (Antiquity is cool!) Review: 1. don't really know if it's better to hang this on George Douros (gdouros-) or Unicode Fonts for Ancient Scripts (ufas-). Probably a good idea to ask upstream what they prefer. Please sync the wiki page name with the choice you make in the rpm 2. You have a typo in the description (Aegea) 3. It'd be a good idea to convince the author to put his licensing info in the zip (as a detached txt file). If his web site ever disappears the "Fonts in this site are offered free for any use; they may be opened, edited, modified, regenerated, posted, packaged and redistributed." statement will be lost (it's in the "License" font metadata field but sadly our font viewers seem not to display it right now so users will miss it 4. Since this is a non-standard licensing statement, please confirm with spot that "Freely redistributable without restriction" is the right licensing string to use The rest of the package is pretty clean and was a pleasure to review, thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 02:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910170205.n9H2544u008681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #8 from William Washco 2009-10-16 22:05:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365108) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365108) /var/log/dmsg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 02:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910170204.n9H24Sp3008215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #7 from William Washco 2009-10-16 22:04:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365107) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365107) xorg.star.log contains all 6 log files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 02:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910170202.n9H22s3e007808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 William Washco changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(xx3nvyxx at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from William Washco 2009-10-16 22:02:53 EDT --- I am still able to reproduce this with the latest updates. I am adding the files now. Note, the Xorg log file is actually all 6 concatenated together. (0,1,2,3,4,5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 02:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910170212.n9H2Cjs1018071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #9 from William Washco 2009-10-16 22:12:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365109) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365109) same text as before, most recent update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 08:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910170814.n9H8EwQ8024461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #16 from Michael Stoykov 2009-10-17 04:14:56 EDT --- it doesn't for me : $ rpm -ql eclipse* package eclipse* is not installed [mstoikov at ltm ~]$ rpm -qa eclipse* eclipse-subclipse-1.6.5-1.fc12.noarch eclipse-swt-3.5.1-1.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-changelog-2.6.7-3.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-jdt-3.5.1-1.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-cdt-6.0.0-10.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-dtp-1.7.0-5.fc12.noarch eclipse-valgrind-0.3.0-1.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-cdt-sdk-6.0.0-10.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-rse-3.1-2.fc12.noarch eclipse-gef-3.5.0-3.fc12.noarch eclipse-svnkit-1.3.0-1.fc12.noarch eclipse-platform-3.5.1-1.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-linuxprofilingframework-0.3.0-2.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-rpmstubby-0.3.0-1.fc12.noarch eclipse-birt-2.5-1.fc12.noarch eclipse-emf-2.5.0-4.fc12.noarch eclipse-pydev-1.4.7-3.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-rpm-editor-0.4.3-1.fc12.x86_64 eclipse-rcp-3.5.1-1.fc12.x86_64 $ rpm -qa *pango* pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.i686 pangomm-2.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 pango-devel-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 ruby-pango-0.19.3-2.fc12.x86_64 pangomm-devel-2.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 $ eclipse # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007fc278920dfa, pid=4144, tid=140473951749904 # # JRE version: 6.0-b16 # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (14.0-b16 mixed mode linux-amd64 ) # Distribution: Custom build (Thu Sep 10 17:06:47 EDT 2009) # Problematic frame: # C [libpango-1.0.so.0+0x24dfa] pango_layout_new+0x2a # # An error report file with more information is saved as: # /home/mstoikov/hs_err_pid4144.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please include # instructions how to reproduce the bug and visit: # http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla # The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code. # See problematic frame for where to report the bug. # The same way of testing this time the buttons didn't get highlighted and nothing happens but a second after I create the project and it shows in the left it crashes.And I am on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 08:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910170818.n9H8IaGR018730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #17 from Michael Stoykov 2009-10-17 04:16:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365116) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365116) the last log with 3.5.1 THis is the last log I get with 3.5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 15:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171505.n9HF5w1g024823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #11 from Sara L. Uckelman 2009-10-17 11:05:57 EDT --- I just discovered that I have the same rendering problems when I view the page in Firefox 3.5.3 on Windows Vista SP2 (on the same thinkpad X200-S with an Intel Mobile Intel GM45 Express Chipset). The same problem also occurs on a different page in the same subdirectory: http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/francois/pelican.html. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 15:08:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171508.n9HF8Agp000785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #12 from Sara L. Uckelman 2009-10-17 11:08:09 EDT --- When I save them from Firefox, I can view them locally (on Vista) without the same rendering problems. (I haven't tried on linux yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 15:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171513.n9HFDYKC001845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-17 11:13:33 EDT --- Upstream has confirmed - let's make it official. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drehatlas-widelands-fonts Short Description: A Latin typeface inspired by feudal calligraphy Owners: adsllc Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 15:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171553.n9HFr7HB008297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 11:53:05 EDT --- *** Bug 529369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 16:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171619.n9HGJ6G4004097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(ozamosi at flukkost. | |nu) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 12:19:04 EDT --- Very nice submission, please do more! 1. spec is ok 2. you need to use ?Anonymous Pro? and not ?AnonymousPro? in your fontconfig file (use fc-query to check the name exported by a font file) 3. you've reversed the substitution rule. Since you're installing ?Anonymous Pro? you want to say ?if an app asks for ? Anonymous ?, and it is not available, use the installed ? Anonymous Pro ? instead? and not the reverse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 16:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171620.n9HGKcHH013206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 12:20:38 EDT --- 4. also please write a summary that does not include the font name ? it's already part of the package name, and CLI or GUI package management tools will always display it next to the summary" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 16:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171624.n9HGOAXC005000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 12:24:08 EDT --- If upstream does not fix its ?Decorative? buglet please do not change upstream's zip ? write a fontforge script to patch the font, or look at /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/remapping-font-template.* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 16:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warenderbibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171626.n9HGQnBi014058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 17:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171721.n9HHL60f014439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ozamosi at flukkost. | |nu) | --- Comment #4 from Robin Sonefors 2009-10-17 13:21:04 EDT --- Ok, the above complaints have been fixed: Spec URL: http://flukkost.nu/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://flukkost.nu/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 17:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171755.n9HHtNvv028897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 13:55:21 EDT --- It is with great pleasure that I can declare this version golden. Nice work! ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a If you need sponsorship in the packager group, you can ping me after another of your submissions reaches the ?approved? stage. I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 18:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warenderbibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171816.n9HIGQtc032525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 14:16:25 EDT --- 1. you can use - as separator in package name, drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts would be more human-friendly 2.(not blocking) if you can convince upstream to provide a direct download link to the zip, fedora infra will warn you when it changes; otherwise you'll have to monitor it for new releases manually 3. [Pedantic hat on] "normal text" should be "body text" in the description (in typographic jargon) The rest is fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 19:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171936.n9HJaZEK006184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #13 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-17 15:36:32 EDT --- OK, go to that site and use Help/Report Broken Web Site. Apparently, there is something wrong with the page itself, not with Firefox (or maybe there is something wrong with all versions of Firefox). Closing as NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 19:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warenderbibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910171946.n9HJkABQ016727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dave at adsllc.com) | --- Comment #2 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-17 15:46:09 EDT --- 1 & 3 - Done. 2 - Noted. Upstream has me on a list of people to update on new releases, though a direct link would be nice too. SPEC: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1751940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172022.n9HKMKv3023496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #10 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-17 16:22:19 EDT --- *** Bug 528496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172019.n9HKJtan022785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172019.n9HKJtSM022800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528496] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172022.n9HKMKPe023468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528496 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-17 16:22:19 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 525827 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528220] Review Request: gfs-ignacio-fonts - A majuscule Greek font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172028.n9HKSYwS024828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528220 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528272] Review Request: adf-tribun-fonts - A newsprint-like serif typeface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172028.n9HKShdX024884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528272 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warenderbibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172027.n9HKRliL015993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |dave at adsllc.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 16:27:45 EDT --- This one is golden ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please to not forget to update this ticket title with the final package name. I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation and documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437689] xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172038.n9HKckDV027051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437689 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-17 16:38:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > 3. The package only contains the Goha-Tibeb Zemen font. It would be more > user-friendly if it was renamed goha-tibeb-zemen-fonts Or xorg-goha-tibeb-zemen-fonts if you want to keep the origin clear (recommended nowadays) If you don't care about the X core fonts backend the current basic template is sufficient, otherwise you get to play with fonts.foo and symlinking the font dir in /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172040.n9HKe1ma027262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-17 16:40:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172043.n9HKhK0s028354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 --- Comment #11 from Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer 2009-10-17 16:43:19 EDT --- If you're closing the other one, please change the assignee too... ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 20:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437689] xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic is not exposed correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172042.n9HKg9vM028098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437689 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-17 16:42:07 EDT --- Whole package is just in terrible shape. Closing as duplicate of the Merge Review. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226639 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 21:05:37 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/devel 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.widelands, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017210537.BE74311C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14723/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf Makefile.widelands drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Initial CVS checkin --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf --- fantasy Widelands Widelands fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.widelands --- BASENAME=Widelands all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-widelands %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf # This is a highly-stylized titling font, so picking an ideal substitute with # fontconfig is pointless Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.2.2 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface inspired by feudal calligraphy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: widelands-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.widelands BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann as a logo for the Widelands project, but has since been enhanced. The font is decorative and not really usable for real texts, but it looks nice for logos, banners or similar stuff. All normal latin glyphs and arabic numbers are included and usable. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} Widelands.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-6 - Remove "Preferred Family" data via a fontforge script instead of ugly hack * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-5 - Prevent font from being called 'Decorative' instead of 'Widelands' * Fri Oct 16 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Rename from olfb-widelands to drehatlas-widelands - Update conversion Makefile to be more general * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-3 - Update for Fedora packaging guidelines * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1_0_2_2-6_fc11:HEAD:drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11.src.rpm:1255813424 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 21:05:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +widelands-1.0.2.2.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 21:05:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fff7953388ffe152a242e368c3bc42de widelands-1.0.2.2.zip From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 21:06:54 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-12 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.widelands, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017210654.0E25411C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15561/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf Makefile.widelands drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Initial F-12 CVS checkin --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf --- fantasy Widelands Widelands fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.widelands --- BASENAME=Widelands all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-widelands %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf # This is a highly-stylized titling font, so picking an ideal substitute with # fontconfig is pointless Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.2.2 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface inspired by feudal calligraphy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: widelands-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.widelands BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann as a logo for the Widelands project, but has since been enhanced. The font is decorative and not really usable for real texts, but it looks nice for logos, banners or similar stuff. All normal latin glyphs and arabic numbers are included and usable. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} Widelands.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-6 - Remove "Preferred Family" data via a fontforge script instead of ugly hack * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-5 - Prevent font from being called 'Decorative' instead of 'Widelands' * Fri Oct 16 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Rename from olfb-widelands to drehatlas-widelands - Update conversion Makefile to be more general * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-3 - Update for Fedora packaging guidelines * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1_0_2_2-6_fc11:F-12:drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11.src.rpm:1255813580 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 21:06:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +widelands-1.0.2.2.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 21:06:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fff7953388ffe152a242e368c3bc42de widelands-1.0.2.2.zip From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 21:08:47 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-11 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.widelands, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017210848.008EE11C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16013/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf Makefile.widelands drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Initial F-11 CVS checkin --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf --- fantasy Widelands Widelands fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.widelands --- BASENAME=Widelands all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-widelands %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf # This is a highly-stylized titling font, so picking an ideal substitute with # fontconfig is pointless Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.2.2 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface inspired by feudal calligraphy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: widelands-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.widelands BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann as a logo for the Widelands project, but has since been enhanced. The font is decorative and not really usable for real texts, but it looks nice for logos, banners or similar stuff. All normal latin glyphs and arabic numbers are included and usable. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} Widelands.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-6 - Remove "Preferred Family" data via a fontforge script instead of ugly hack * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-5 - Prevent font from being called 'Decorative' instead of 'Widelands' * Fri Oct 16 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Rename from olfb-widelands to drehatlas-widelands - Update conversion Makefile to be more general * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-3 - Update for Fedora packaging guidelines * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1_0_2_2-6_fc11:F-11:drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11.src.rpm:1255813651 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 21:08:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +widelands-1.0.2.2.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 21:08:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fff7953388ffe152a242e368c3bc42de widelands-1.0.2.2.zip From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 21:09:57 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-10 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.widelands, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017210957.4FBC311C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16686/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf Makefile.widelands drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Initial F-10 CVS checkin --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-widelands.conf --- fantasy Widelands Widelands fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.widelands --- BASENAME=Widelands all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe # Remove the inappropriate en_US Preferred Font Famly = Decorative attr echo "SetTTFName(0x409,16,'')" >> convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-widelands-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-widelands %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf # This is a highly-stylized titling font, so picking an ideal substitute with # fontconfig is pointless Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.2.2 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface inspired by feudal calligraphy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: widelands-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.widelands BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann as a logo for the Widelands project, but has since been enhanced. The font is decorative and not really usable for real texts, but it looks nice for logos, banners or similar stuff. All normal latin glyphs and arabic numbers are included and usable. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} Widelands.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-6 - Remove "Preferred Family" data via a fontforge script instead of ugly hack * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-5 - Prevent font from being called 'Decorative' instead of 'Widelands' * Fri Oct 16 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-4 - Rename from olfb-widelands to drehatlas-widelands - Update conversion Makefile to be more general * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-3 - Update for Fedora packaging guidelines * Wed Oct 14 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.2.2-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1_0_2_2-6_fc11:F-10:drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11.src.rpm:1255813755 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 21:09:56 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +widelands-1.0.2.2.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-widelands-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 17 Oct 2009 20:40:07 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 21:09:57 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fff7953388ffe152a242e368c3bc42de widelands-1.0.2.2.zip From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 21:59:51 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017215951.7B9BB11C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5933/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-lateef-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-lateef-fonts-1_001-1_fc11:HEAD:sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255815801 --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Lateef Lateef serif --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-lateef %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=Lateef_OT_1_001&filename=LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Lateef is named after Shah Abdul Lateef Bhitai, the famous Sindhi mystic and poet. It is intended to be an appropriate style for use in Sindhi and other languages of the South Asian region. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Tue Oct 06 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 21:59:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 21:59:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c060ab84ab33ae8f991103258b8e7f22 LateefRegOT_1.001.zip From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 22:07:04 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-12 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017220704.E6D5111C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9769/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-lateef-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-lateef-fonts-1_001-1_fc11:F-12:sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255817092 --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Lateef Lateef serif --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-lateef %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=Lateef_OT_1_001&filename=LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Lateef is named after Shah Abdul Lateef Bhitai, the famous Sindhi mystic and poet. It is intended to be an appropriate style for use in Sindhi and other languages of the South Asian region. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Tue Oct 06 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 22:07:04 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 22:07:04 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c060ab84ab33ae8f991103258b8e7f22 LateefRegOT_1.001.zip From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 22:14:25 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017221426.66E8C11C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10951/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-lateef-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-lateef-fonts-1_001-1_fc11:F-11:sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255817294 --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Lateef Lateef serif --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-lateef %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=Lateef_OT_1_001&filename=LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Lateef is named after Shah Abdul Lateef Bhitai, the famous Sindhi mystic and poet. It is intended to be an appropriate style for use in Sindhi and other languages of the South Asian region. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Tue Oct 06 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 22:14:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 22:14:24 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c060ab84ab33ae8f991103258b8e7f22 LateefRegOT_1.001.zip From hedayat at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 17 22:19:24 2009 From: hedayat at fedoraproject.org (Hedayat Vatankhah) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-lateef-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091017221924.0279C11C00EC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: hedayat Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16374/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-lateef-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-lateef-fonts-1_001-1_fc11:F-10:sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255817897 --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Lateef Lateef serif --- NEW FILE sil-lateef-fonts.spec --- %global fontname sil-lateef %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: An Arabic script unicode font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/ArabicFonts # The file complete URL is as follows: # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=Lateef_OT_1_001&filename=LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source0: LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Lateef is named after Shah Abdul Lateef Bhitai, the famous Sindhi mystic and poet. It is intended to be an appropriate style for use in Sindhi and other languages of the South Asian region. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build for docfile in *.txt; do fold -s $docfile > $docfile.new && \ sed -i "s|\r||g" $docfile.new && \ touch -r $docfile $docfile.new && \ mv $docfile.new $docfile done %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Tue Oct 06 2009 Hedayat Vatankhah - 1.001-1 - Initial version Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Oct 2009 22:19:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +LateefRegOT_1.001.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-lateef-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Oct 2009 17:17:00 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 17 Oct 2009 22:19:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c060ab84ab33ae8f991103258b8e7f22 LateefRegOT_1.001.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 22:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172255.n9HMtoTQ021867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-10-17 18:55:49 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 22:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172257.n9HMv31u031369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-17 18:57:02 EDT --- sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 22:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172257.n9HMvCTh022440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-17 18:57:12 EDT --- sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 17 22:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910172257.n9HMv8pB022391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-17 18:57:07 EDT --- sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 02:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910180246.n9I2k9qU030056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-17 22:46:06 EDT --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 02:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910180246.n9I2kIID006916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-17 22:46:17 EDT --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 02:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: oflb-Widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910180246.n9I2kQRL030238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-17 22:46:26 EDT --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 03:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910180324.n9I3O0uX020593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |drehatlas-warenderbibliothe |drehatlas-warender-biblioth |k-fonts - A decorative, |ek-fonts - A decorative, |hairy font |hairy font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 03:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: drehatlas-widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910180325.n9I3PmtU021836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |oflb-Widelands-fonts - |drehatlas-widelands-fonts - |Widelands font |Widelands font Alias|oflb-Widelands-fonts | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 12:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910181248.n9ICmnk7026980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 Joel Uckelman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |uckelman at nomic.net --- Comment #14 from Joel Uckelman 2009-10-18 08:48:46 EDT --- The problem is not the page: It is valid HTML 4.01. It contains no scripting. The CSS validates. The page displays properly on machines other than Sara's laptop. This bug should be reopened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:11:56 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:11:56 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-theokritos-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221156.GA26454@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your gfs-theokritos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 gfs-theokritos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Packages with localized metadata but no English variant ? Some font files in the package declare localized metadata, but do not include an English variant. They need to be fixed to also declare metadata in English. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-theokritos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-theokritos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 1732 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:11:55 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:11:55 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the dejavu-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221155.GA26446@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your dejavu-fonts package: SRPM RPM 10 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts 2 dejavu-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts 2 ? Total 4 10. Font faces duplicated within a package ? Face duplication within a package is almost certainly a bug, except for special symbol font families. Fonts that were split because of the limitations of legacy font formats (PCF, Type 1?) should be converted to modern OpenType (TT, CFF or bitmap) containers. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dejavu-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dejavu-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 4040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:12:24 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:12:24 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-theokritos-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221224.GA26545@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your gfs-theokritos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 gfs-theokritos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Packages with localized metadata but no English variant ? Some font files in the package declare localized metadata, but do not include an English variant. They need to be fixed to also declare metadata in English. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-theokritos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-theokritos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 1732 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:12:23 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:12:23 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the dejavu-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221223.GA26537@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your dejavu-fonts package: SRPM RPM 10 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts 2 dejavu-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts 2 ? Total 4 10. Font faces duplicated within a package ? Face duplication within a package is almost certainly a bug, except for special symbol font families. Fonts that were split because of the limitations of legacy font formats (PCF, Type 1?) should be converted to modern OpenType (TT, CFF or bitmap) containers. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dejavu-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dejavu-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 4040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:14:10 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:14:10 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the dejavu-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221410.GA26580@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your dejavu-fonts package: SRPM RPM 10 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts 2 dejavu-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts 2 ? Total 4 10. Font faces duplicated within a package ? Face duplication within a package is almost certainly a bug, except for special symbol font families. Fonts that were split because of the limitations of legacy font formats (PCF, Type 1?) should be converted to modern OpenType (TT, CFF or bitmap) containers. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dejavu-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dejavu-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 4040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:14:11 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:14:11 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-theokritos-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221411.GA26589@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your gfs-theokritos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 gfs-theokritos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Packages with localized metadata but no English variant ? Some font files in the package declare localized metadata, but do not include an English variant. They need to be fixed to also declare metadata in English. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-theokritos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-theokritos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 1732 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:14:36 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:14:36 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-theokritos-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221435.GA26614@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your gfs-theokritos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 gfs-theokritos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Packages with localized metadata but no English variant ? Some font files in the package declare localized metadata, but do not include an English variant. They need to be fixed to also declare metadata in English. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-theokritos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-theokritos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 1732 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:14:35 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:14:35 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the dejavu-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221435.GA26607@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your dejavu-fonts package: SRPM RPM 10 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts 2 dejavu-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts 2 ? Total 4 10. Font faces duplicated within a package ? Face duplication within a package is almost certainly a bug, except for special symbol font families. Fonts that were split because of the limitations of legacy font formats (PCF, Type 1?) should be converted to modern OpenType (TT, CFF or bitmap) containers. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dejavu-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dejavu-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz Size: 4040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fontpackages-owner at fedoraproject.org Sun Oct 18 22:17:43 2009 From: fontpackages-owner at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:17:43 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the dejavu-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221743.GA26841@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your dejavu-fonts package: SRPM RPM 10 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts 2 dejavu-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts 2 ? Total 4 10. Font faces duplicated within a package ? Face duplication within a package is almost certainly a bug, except for special symbol font families. Fonts that were split because of the limitations of legacy font formats (PCF, Type 1?) should be converted to modern OpenType (TT, CFF or bitmap) containers. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dejavu-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dejavu-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/octet-stream Size: 4040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fontpackages-owner at fedoraproject.org Sun Oct 18 22:17:43 2009 From: fontpackages-owner at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:17:43 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-theokritos-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018221743.GA26849@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T220923Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your gfs-theokritos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 gfs-theokritos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Packages with localized metadata but no English variant ? Some font files in the package declare localized metadata, but do not include an English variant. They need to be fixed to also declare metadata in English. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-theokritos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-theokritos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1732 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:38:58 2009 From: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com (repo-font-audit) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:38:58 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the dejavu-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018223858.GA9999@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T223615Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your dejavu-fonts package: SRPM RPM 10 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts 2 dejavu-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts 2 ? Total 4 10. Font faces duplicated within a package ? Face duplication within a package is almost certainly a bug, except for special symbol font families. Fonts that were split because of the limitations of legacy font formats (PCF, Type 1?) should be converted to modern OpenType (TT, CFF or bitmap) containers. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dejavu-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dejavu-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 4040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 22:38:58 2009 From: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com (repo-font-audit) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:38:58 +0200 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-theokritos-fonts package! Message-ID: <20091018223858.GA10008@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091018T223615Z, while scanning the test repository located at: file:///tmp/test ? I have identified the following problems in your gfs-theokritos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 gfs-theokritos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Packages with localized metadata but no English variant ? Some font files in the package declare localized metadata, but do not include an English variant. They need to be fixed to also declare metadata in English. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-theokritos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-theokritos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 1740 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 00:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528368] Duplicate "Provides" entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190011.n9J0BNUs002119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528368 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 00:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190017.n9J0HYYX027149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Component|liberation-fonts |0xFFFF -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 00:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190034.n9J0YTbK032504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|0xFFFF |liberation-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 00:45:28 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (cchance) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.43,1.44 Message-ID: <20091019004528.19E3611C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3403 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Oct 19 2009 Caius kaio Chance - 1.05.2.20091019-1.fc12 - Resolves: rhbz#525498 - wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000. Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.43 retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u -p -r1.43 -r1.44 --- liberation-fonts.spec 25 Jul 2009 05:34:08 -0000 1.43 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 19 Oct 2009 00:45:26 -0000 1.44 @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ New. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts -Version: 1.05.1.20090721 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 1.05.2.20091019 +Release: 1%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Oct 19 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 1.05.2.20091019-1.fc12 +- Resolves: rhbz#525498 - wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000. + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.05.1.20090721-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 01:19:01 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (cchance) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.12, 1.13 liberation-fonts.spec, 1.44, 1.45 sources, 1.16, 1.17 Message-ID: <20091019011901.1E85A11C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18092 Modified Files: .cvsignore liberation-fonts.spec sources Log Message: rebuilt Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13 --- .cvsignore 21 Jul 2009 02:30:24 -0000 1.12 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 01:19:00 -0000 1.13 @@ -1 +1 @@ -liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090721.tar.gz +liberation-fonts-1.05.2.20091019.tar.gz Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.44 retrieving revision 1.45 diff -u -p -r1.44 -r1.45 --- liberation-fonts.spec 19 Oct 2009 00:45:26 -0000 1.44 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 19 Oct 2009 01:19:00 -0000 1.45 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ New. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.05.2.20091019 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -112,7 +112,10 @@ mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog -* Mon Oct 19 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 1.05.2.20091019-1.fc12 +* Mon Oct 19 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 1.05.2.20091019-2.fc13 +- Rebuilt. + +* Mon Oct 19 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 1.05.2.20091019-1.fc13 - Resolves: rhbz#525498 - wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000. * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.05.1.20090721-2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17 --- sources 21 Jul 2009 02:30:24 -0000 1.16 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 01:19:00 -0000 1.17 @@ -1 +1 @@ -64d10e33c4f7e7553ae220c0e85c00b9 liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090721.tar.gz +89cd7e13588da4ca14a523233b3352f0 liberation-fonts-1.05.2.20091019.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 01:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190149.n9J1nOob022802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-10-18 21:49:23 EDT --- patch is applied on rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 03:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] New: Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Summary: Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.7.3-1.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 03:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190359.n9J3xhIE004017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #1 from Peng Huang 2009-10-18 23:59:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365193) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365193) gedit screenshot The @ chars are form different fonts for zh_CN.UTF-8 locale -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 04:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190404.n9J44OJY005806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #2 from Peng Huang 2009-10-19 00:04:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365194) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365194) screenshot of gnome-terminal Numbers and puncts are from bitmap fonts. I think it should pickup same fonts of letters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 04:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190434.n9J4Y4ZY024429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 00:34:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=365193) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365193) [details] > gedit screenshot > The @ chars are form different fonts for zh_CN.UTF-8 locale I think this is a duplicate of pango bug 129541 (I am having trouble locating the fedora equivalent bug - there should be one upstream, but it has been labelled wontfix for better or worse). One way to fix might be to default to native font for ASCII when available - perhaps we can explore that under fontconfig? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 04:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] Fontconfig can not pick up correct font file for 'Monospace' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190435.n9J4ZV4P016557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 00:35:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365196) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365196) clearer gnome terminal screenshot Here is a clearer screenshot at a larger size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 04:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [zh] gnome-terminal mixing fonts for ascii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190437.n9J4bQpU025835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com, | |dchen at redhat.com Summary|Fontconfig can not pick up |[zh] gnome-terminal mixing |correct font file for |fonts for ascii |'Monospace' | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 04:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [zh] gnome-terminal mixing fonts for ascii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190439.n9J4dsA6018196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|fontconfig |gnome-terminal --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 00:39:53 EDT --- (A workaround of course is to set a Chinese font in the g-t profile.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 05:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [zh] gnome-terminal mixing fonts for ascii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190512.n9J5CbFe006629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #6 from Peng Huang 2009-10-19 01:12:36 EDT --- BTW, I added a new conf file (99-zh_CN.conf) to let fontconfig pick up glyphs from "DejaVu Sans Mono" for Monospace. But it doesn't work. =============== 99-zh_CN.conf ============== serif Bitstream Vera Serif DejaVu Serif AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni WenQuanYi Bitmap Song AR PL UMing CN AR PL UKai CN AR PL ZenKai Uni sans-serif Bitstream Vera Sans DejaVu Sans WenQuanYi Zen Hei AR PL UMing CN AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni WenQuanYi Bitmap Song AR PL UKai CN AR PL ZenKai Uni monospace Bitstream Vera Sans Mono DejaVu Sans Mono WenQuanYi Zen Hei AR PL UMing CN AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni WenQuanYi Bitmap Song AR PL UKai CN AR PL ZenKai Uni -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 06:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190647.n9J6leff031608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|gnome-terminal |pango Summary|[zh] gnome-terminal mixing |[CJK] pango uses different |fonts for ascii |fonts for ASCII letters vs | |punctutaion and numbers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 06:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190656.n9J6uVq2010224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 02:56:31 EDT --- A few testcases: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my at ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my at ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") LANG=ko_KR.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my at ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 07:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190713.n9J7DTQP015397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 fujiwara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tfujiwar at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from fujiwara 2009-10-19 03:12:07 EDT --- I think it's better to always use CJK fonts for the CJK locales. The following is my previous patch. http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/jds/spec-files/trunk/patches/pango-03-solaris-cjk-font-table.diff I'll try to upstream the patch later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 07:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524883] cpi setting not used accurately In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190755.n9J7tAuD018872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524883 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-19 03:55:09 EDT --- If it looks good, I'll propose the fix for f12-final too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 07:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524883] cpi setting not used accurately In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190754.n9J7sXjR018514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524883 --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-19 03:54:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365205) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365205) Fixed screenshot on evince -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190806.n9J86Bxw021717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #9 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-10-19 04:06:10 EDT --- Temporary measure: Use other mono space font such as "DejaVu Sans Mono" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485566] [CJK] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering ASCII glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190810.n9J8A1U3022583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phuang at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 04:09:59 EDT --- *** Bug 529594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190810.n9J8A08e022542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 04:09:59 EDT --- I think this is a duplicate of bug 485566. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 485566 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485566] [CJK] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering ASCII glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190809.n9J89TNQ022465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Summary|Fontconfig should select |[CJK] Fontconfig should |DejaVu font for rendering |select DejaVu font for |English, even in Japanese |rendering ASCII glyphs |locale. | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485566] [CJK] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering ASCII glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190815.n9J8FO3k030999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 04:15:22 EDT --- Some simple testcases from bug 529594: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my at ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my at ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") LANG=ko_KR.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my at ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") also good without --font option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190817.n9J8H5TQ031263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 James Ni changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jni at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from James Ni 2009-10-19 04:17:04 EDT --- I try to add some clauses as below to my wqy-zenhei.conf under conf.d. And then WenQuanYi Zen Hei will be used for mono space. zh monospace WenQuanYi Zen Hei -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190817.n9J8HhIn024612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-19 04:17:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Ankur, > > This version is good. If you hear from upstream make them write a better > description. I'll recontact them. Lets hope for a reply this time. > > ??? APPROVED ??? > > You can continue from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a > Continuing from here. > I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other > fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our > organisation on the fonts mailing list. > Yup, it was pleasant and I'm going to continue packaging fonts :) . You're taking good care of the fonts-sig, I really have no improvements to point out yet. :) > Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. > > ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190820.n9J8K7sb032022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha 2009-10-19 04:20:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gargi-fonts Short Description: A Free Unicode OpenType Font Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-12 F-11 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190824.n9J8OX41025982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-19 04:24:33 EDT --- , even. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 08:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190823.n9J8NF8c025818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-19 04:23:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 4. you should put > /etc/X11/fontpath.d/knm-new > and > /usr/share/fonts/knm-new/fonts.dir > in a separate legacy subpackage Is there any template or the proposed subpackage name for that? knm-new-fixed-legacy-fonts? or knm-new-fixed-fonts-legacy? > 7. It would be nice to include a fontconfig file for the font I'm not quite sure if this kind of the bitmap fonts only available for some pt. really helps though. hmm, I haven't tested but something like this? Fixed monospace ja-jp monospace 12 Fixed FWIW I don't think Japanese people wants to see the bitmap glyphs for the desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 09:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] New: fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 Summary: fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Requesting a font in gu_IN locale which can render '1' returns Lohit Gujarati which doesn't have a glyph for 1 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.7.3-1.fc12 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc `pkg-config --cflags --libs fontconfig` fontconfigdemo.c 2. ./a.out Actual results: "Lohit Gujarati" Expected results: A font which contains a glyph for 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 09:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190921.n9J9Lorv013757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-19 05:21:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365219) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365219) demo Am I missing something obvious here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 09:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190927.n9J9RBiK006790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #63 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-19 05:27:08 EDT --- @Baif: so this is ok now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 10:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524883] cpi setting not used accurately In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191030.n9JAUd1U029475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524883 --- Comment #10 from Tim Waugh 2009-10-19 06:30:38 EDT --- Yes, looks perfect. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 13:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191311.n9JDBfZM021432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #15 from Matej Cepl 2009-10-19 09:11:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > The problem is not the page: It is valid HTML 4.01. It contains no scripting. > The CSS validates. The page displays properly on machines other than Sara's > laptop. > > This bug should be reopened. Not in our bugzilla (obviously it is not Red Hat-only bug), and I told you how to send a message to people who actually may help with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 13:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528345] Firefox display problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191321.n9JDL7ak023601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528345 --- Comment #16 from Joel Uckelman 2009-10-19 09:21:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > The problem is not the page: It is valid HTML 4.01. It contains no scripting. > > The CSS validates. The page displays properly on machines other than Sara's > > laptop. > > > > This bug should be reopened. > > Not in our bugzilla (obviously it is not Red Hat-only bug), and I told you how > to send a message to people who actually may help with it. Aha, I didn't realize that "Report Broken Web Site" would sent a report to the Firefox devs; I thought it would just send a report to the webmaster, which would be useless. We'll do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 13:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191355.n9JDtn42031538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|xorg-x11-drivers |xorg-x11-drv-ati AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |airlied at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 13:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191359.n9JDxYog032044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-19 09:59:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts Short Description: A Latin typeface that is decorative, surreal, and hairy Owners: adsllc Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 14:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191436.n9JEaM8L008859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-19 10:36:20 EDT --- "Copyright only" would be the appropriate licensing string to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 15:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191530.n9JFUQgq031960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 --- Comment #3 from Robin Sonefors 2009-10-19 11:30:26 EDT --- > 1. don't really know if it's better to hang this on George Douros (gdouros-) or > Unicode Fonts for Ancient Scripts (ufas-). Probably a good idea to ask upstream > what they prefer. Please sync the wiki page name with the choice you make in > the rpm > Upstream prefers gdouros. > 2. You have a typo in the description (Aegea) > Fixed. > 3. It'd be a good idea to convince the author to put his licensing info in the > zip (as a detached txt file). If his web site ever disappears the "Fonts in > this site are offered free for any use; they may be opened, edited, modified, > regenerated, posted, packaged and redistributed." statement will be lost (it's > in the "License" font metadata field but sadly our font viewers seem not to > display it right now so users will miss it > Upstream said he'd try to do that, but has not done so yet. I'm assuming he'll do that once he makes a new release. > 4. Since this is a non-standard licensing statement, please confirm with spot > that "Freely redistributable without restriction" is the right licensing string > to use > Changed according to spot's comment. Spec URL (still): http://flukkost.nu/gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://flukkost.nu/gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 15:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191554.n9JFsPKO006335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-19 11:54:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 16:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191627.n9JGRnAE014368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-19 12:27:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 17:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191726.n9JHQdtg018321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-19 13:26:38 EDT --- This one is golden ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 18:36:06 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gargi-fonts/devel gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gargi-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019183606.45B1411C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5567/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf gargi-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Tue Oct 20 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-2 - first cvs commit --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans Gargi Gargi sans --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gargi %global fontconf 69-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.9 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A Devanagari font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/gargi Source0: http://mirror.vocabbuilder.net/savannah/gargi/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A Free Unicode OpenType Font %prep %setup -q -n %{fontname}-%{version} sed 's/\r//' Changelog > Changelog.new touch -r Changelog Changelog.new mv Changelog.new Changelog %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 1.9-2 - Corrections based on bug #526633 * Thu Oct 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-1 - Initial RPM build --- NEW FILE import.log --- gargi-fonts-1_9-2_fc11:HEAD:gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm:1255977191 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 18:36:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +gargi-1.9.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 18:36:06 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +211283db5be5a257b15f57c3ca76b9ef gargi-1.9.tar.gz From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 18:39:01 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gargi-fonts/F-10 gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gargi-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019183901.E74C011C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6826/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf gargi-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Tue Oct 20 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-2 - first cvs commit --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans Gargi Gargi sans --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gargi %global fontconf 69-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.9 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A Devanagari font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/gargi Source0: http://mirror.vocabbuilder.net/savannah/gargi/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A Free Unicode OpenType Font %prep %setup -q -n %{fontname}-%{version} sed 's/\r//' Changelog > Changelog.new touch -r Changelog Changelog.new mv Changelog.new Changelog %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 1.9-2 - Corrections based on bug #526633 * Thu Oct 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-1 - Initial RPM build --- NEW FILE import.log --- gargi-fonts-1_9-2_fc11:F-10:gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm:1255977400 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 18:39:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +gargi-1.9.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 18:39:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +211283db5be5a257b15f57c3ca76b9ef gargi-1.9.tar.gz From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 18:41:53 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gargi-fonts/F-11 gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gargi-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019184153.9F1AF11C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7491/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf gargi-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Tue Oct 20 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-2 - first cvs commit --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans Gargi Gargi sans --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gargi %global fontconf 69-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.9 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A Devanagari font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/gargi Source0: http://mirror.vocabbuilder.net/savannah/gargi/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A Free Unicode OpenType Font %prep %setup -q -n %{fontname}-%{version} sed 's/\r//' Changelog > Changelog.new touch -r Changelog Changelog.new mv Changelog.new Changelog %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 1.9-2 - Corrections based on bug #526633 * Thu Oct 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-1 - Initial RPM build --- NEW FILE import.log --- gargi-fonts-1_9-2_fc11:F-11:gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm:1255977578 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 18:41:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +gargi-1.9.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 18:41:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +211283db5be5a257b15f57c3ca76b9ef gargi-1.9.tar.gz From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 18:44:14 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gargi-fonts/F-12 gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gargi-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019184414.972D611C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8287/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf gargi-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Tue Oct 20 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-2 - first cvs commit --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans Gargi Gargi sans --- NEW FILE gargi-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gargi %global fontconf 69-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.9 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A Devanagari font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/gargi Source0: http://mirror.vocabbuilder.net/savannah/gargi/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A Free Unicode OpenType Font %prep %setup -q -n %{fontname}-%{version} sed 's/\r//' Changelog > Changelog.new touch -r Changelog Changelog.new mv Changelog.new Changelog %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd < - 1.9-2 - Corrections based on bug #526633 * Thu Oct 1 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.9-1 - Initial RPM build --- NEW FILE import.log --- gargi-fonts-1_9-2_fc11:F-12:gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm:1255977730 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 18:44:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +gargi-1.9.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gargi-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 16:24:15 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 18:44:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +211283db5be5a257b15f57c3ca76b9ef gargi-1.9.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191900.n9JJ08sT016984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-19 15:00:07 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191907.n9JJ7Xs7018392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-19 15:07:32 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 19:12:03 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/devel 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.warender-bibliothek, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019191203.4ED7F11C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15986/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf Makefile.warender-bibliothek drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Mon Oct 19 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial devel checkin --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf --- fantasy Warender Bibliothek Warender Bibliothek fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.warender-bibliothek --- BASENAME=WarenderBibliothek all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-warender-bibliothek %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.1.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface that is decorative, surreal, and hairy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.warender-bibliothek BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann and originally based on a hand drawn font created for a Pen & Paper RPG. Nowadays the font gets more and more complete and should give the possibility of creating fantasy and/or decorative logos, headings and other texts. The font was not created to be used in body texts, as it is too complex and not as easy to read as a simple sans serif font. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} WarenderBibliothek.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1_0_1_1-1_fc11:HEAD:drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255979443 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 19:12:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 19:12:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +43591cfe34b1b8ba9df7fac1f51fa33b ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 19:14:25 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-12 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.warender-bibliothek, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019191425.9E2E411C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17047/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf Makefile.warender-bibliothek drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Mon Oct 19 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial checkin for F12 --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf --- fantasy Warender Bibliothek Warender Bibliothek fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.warender-bibliothek --- BASENAME=WarenderBibliothek all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-warender-bibliothek %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.1.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface that is decorative, surreal, and hairy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.warender-bibliothek BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann and originally based on a hand drawn font created for a Pen & Paper RPG. Nowadays the font gets more and more complete and should give the possibility of creating fantasy and/or decorative logos, headings and other texts. The font was not created to be used in body texts, as it is too complex and not as easy to read as a simple sans serif font. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} WarenderBibliothek.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1_0_1_1-1_fc11:F-12:drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255979605 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 19:14:25 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 19:14:25 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +43591cfe34b1b8ba9df7fac1f51fa33b ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 19:15:31 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-11 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.warender-bibliothek, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019191531.DCB2711C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17544/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf Makefile.warender-bibliothek drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Mon Oct 19 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial checkin for F11 --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf --- fantasy Warender Bibliothek Warender Bibliothek fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.warender-bibliothek --- BASENAME=WarenderBibliothek all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-warender-bibliothek %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.1.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface that is decorative, surreal, and hairy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.warender-bibliothek BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann and originally based on a hand drawn font created for a Pen & Paper RPG. Nowadays the font gets more and more complete and should give the possibility of creating fantasy and/or decorative logos, headings and other texts. The font was not created to be used in body texts, as it is too complex and not as easy to read as a simple sans serif font. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} WarenderBibliothek.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1_0_1_1-1_fc11:F-11:drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255979707 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 19:15:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 19:15:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +43591cfe34b1b8ba9df7fac1f51fa33b ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191915.n9JJFon9011476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-19 15:15:48 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From adsllc at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 19:16:32 2009 From: adsllc at fedoraproject.org (Dave Ludlow) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-10 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.warender-bibliothek, NONE, 1.1 drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091019191632.2048F11C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: adsllc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17838/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf Makefile.warender-bibliothek drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Mon Oct 19 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial checkin for F10 --- NEW FILE 61-drehatlas-warender-bibliothek.conf --- fantasy Warender Bibliothek Warender Bibliothek fantasy --- NEW FILE Makefile.warender-bibliothek --- BASENAME=WarenderBibliothek all: $(BASENAME).otf $(BASENAME).ttf $(BASENAME).ttf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-ttf.pe fontforge -script convert-ttf.pe convert-ttf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-ttf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).ttf')" >> convert-ttf.pe $(BASENAME).otf: $(BASENAME).sfd convert-otf.pe fontforge -script convert-otf.pe convert-otf.pe: echo "Open('$(BASENAME).sfd')" > convert-otf.pe echo "Generate('$(BASENAME).otf')" >> convert-otf.pe --- NEW FILE drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.spec --- %global fontname drehatlas-warender-bibliothek %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0.1.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A Latin typeface that is decorative, surreal, and hairy Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.drehatlas.de/ Source0: ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-%{version}.zip Source1: %{fontconf} Source2: Makefile.warender-bibliothek BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font was created by Peter Schwanemann and originally based on a hand drawn font created for a Pen & Paper RPG. Nowadays the font gets more and more complete and should give the possibility of creating fantasy and/or decorative logos, headings and other texts. The font was not created to be used in body texts, as it is too complex and not as easy to read as a simple sans serif font. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} # Wrap the license file at 80 chars fold -s LICENSE > LICENSE.new touch -r LICENSE LICENSE.new mv LICENSE.new LICENSE %build # A .ttf file is included, but .otf is preferred. make -f %{SOURCE2} WarenderBibliothek.otf %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf %doc LICENSE FONTLOG %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Dave Ludlow 1.0.1.1-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1_0_1_1-1_fc11:F-10:drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm:1255979769 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 19:16:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 15:54:28 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 19:16:32 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +43591cfe34b1b8ba9df7fac1f51fa33b ofl-font-warenderbibliothek-1.0.1.1.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191919.n9JJJd1D020560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Robin Sonefors 2009-10-19 15:19:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts Short Description: A coding-friendly monospace font Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191922.n9JJMKDH012820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Robin Sonefors 2009-10-19 15:22:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-aegean-fonts Short Description: A font for ancient scripts in the greater Aegean vicinity Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191930.n9JJUsd3014980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-19 15:30:53 EDT --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191930.n9JJUmiv014938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-19 15:30:48 EDT --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 19:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910191930.n9JJUhHt023341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-19 15:30:43 EDT --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 21:23:32 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.17, 1.18 fontpackages.spec, 1.23, 1.24 import.log, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.17, 1.18 Message-ID: <20091019212332.3CF9B11C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20991/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.28 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18 --- .cvsignore 28 Sep 2009 09:05:15 -0000 1.17 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 21:23:31 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.23 retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -p -r1.23 -r1.24 --- fontpackages.spec 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.23 +++ fontpackages.spec 19 Oct 2009 21:23:32 -0000 1.24 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.27 +Version: 1.28 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Oct 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.28-1 +? Rework repo-font-audit to also generate individual packager nagmails + * Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.27-1 ? Brownpaper bag release ?2 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- import.log 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.19 +++ import.log 19 Oct 2009 21:23:32 -0000 1.20 @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ fontpackages-1_24-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.25-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254072286 fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.26-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254091733 fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698 +fontpackages-1_28-1_fc13:HEAD:fontpackages-1.28-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255987394 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18 --- sources 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.17 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 21:23:32 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -c2987bf1553807157ad681c253335dfd fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz +0702fe5a2cc4d16df807003fe0c40ae2 fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 21:24:56 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-12 .cvsignore, 1.17, 1.18 fontpackages.spec, 1.23, 1.24 import.log, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.17, 1.18 Message-ID: <20091019212456.C2E5B11C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21803/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.28 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18 --- .cvsignore 28 Sep 2009 09:05:15 -0000 1.17 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.23 retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -p -r1.23 -r1.24 --- fontpackages.spec 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.23 +++ fontpackages.spec 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.24 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.27 +Version: 1.28 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Oct 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.28-1 +? Rework repo-font-audit to also generate individual packager nagmails + * Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.27-1 ? Brownpaper bag release ?2 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- import.log 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.19 +++ import.log 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.20 @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ fontpackages-1_24-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.25-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254072286 fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.26-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254091733 fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698 +fontpackages-1_28-1_fc13:F-12:fontpackages-1.28-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255987476 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18 --- sources 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.17 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.18 @@ -1 +1 @@ -c2987bf1553807157ad681c253335dfd fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz +0702fe5a2cc4d16df807003fe0c40ae2 fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 19 21:25:33 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.10, 1.11 fontpackages.spec, 1.15, 1.16 import.log, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.10, 1.11 Message-ID: <20091019212533.EA45911C00DC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22316/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.28 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- .cvsignore 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.10 +++ .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 21:25:33 -0000 1.11 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-11/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16 --- fontpackages.spec 24 Feb 2009 17:50:40 -0000 1.15 +++ fontpackages.spec 19 Oct 2009 21:25:33 -0000 1.16 @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.20 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 1.28 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Group: Development/System @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Group: Development/System # license of the packages they're inserted in License: LGPLv3+ URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ -Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ including the correct permissions for th Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontconfig +Requires: fontconfig, rpmlint %description devel This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to @@ -66,10 +66,12 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontba %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} \ - %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates \ + %{buildroot}%{_bindir} install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} +install -m 0755 -p bin/* %{buildroot}%{_bindir} cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) @@ -86,8 +88,6 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig - - %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc license.txt readme.txt @@ -96,11 +96,50 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt +%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* %changelog -* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.20-2 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild +* Mon Oct 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.28-1 +? Rework repo-font-audit to also generate individual packager nagmails + +* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.27-1 +? Brownpaper bag release ?2 + +* Sun Sep 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.26-1 +? Brownpaper bag release +- 1.25-1 +? Add short test summary to repo-font-audit + +* Sat Sep 26 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.24-1 +? improve repo-font-audit (make WWS check more accurate, support file:// + local repositories?) + +* Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.23-1 +? cleanups + add merging/remapping templates + +* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 1.22-2 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sat Jun 20 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.22-1 +? workaround rpm eating end-of-line after %%_font_pkg calls +? add script to audit font sanity of yum repositories + +* Tue Jun 2 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.21-1 +? try to handle more corner naming cases in lua macro ? expect some fallout + if your spec uses weird naming + +* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 1.20-2 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Feb 18 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.20-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-11/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:32:21 -0000 1.12 +++ import.log 19 Oct 2009 21:25:33 -0000 1.13 @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732 fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234998636 fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235377920 +fontpackages-1_28-1_fc13:F-11:fontpackages-1.28-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255987473 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- sources 19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000 1.10 +++ sources 19 Oct 2009 21:25:33 -0000 1.11 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7 fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2 +0702fe5a2cc4d16df807003fe0c40ae2 fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 21:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910192139.n9JLdECg018983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-19 17:39:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > 4. you should put > > /etc/X11/fontpath.d/knm-new > > and > > /usr/share/fonts/knm-new/fonts.dir > > in a separate legacy subpackage > > Is there any template or the proposed subpackage name for that? > knm-new-fixed-legacy-fonts? or knm-new-fixed-fonts-legacy? There are not conventions here because I try very hard to forget core fonts exist, and new packages are not supposed to register in the core fonts system. So that's only a problem for old packages. Technically, you only have to put this stuff in a separate subpackage for multi-font srpms (because fonts.dir can only be provided by a single package), so in your case that's not absolutely needed. Sorry about this, should not have bothered you with it > > 7. It would be nice to include a fontconfig file for the font > > I'm not quite sure if this kind of the bitmap fonts only available for some pt. > really helps though. The fontconfig file should not change the font visibility, and apps that can use them will be happy > hmm, I haven't tested but something like this? > > > > > > Fixed > > monospace > > > > > ja-jp > > > monospace > > > 12 > > > Fixed > > > Please take /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/l10n-font-template.conf as model (adding maybe the size tweak) > FWIW I don't think Japanese people wants to see the bitmap glyphs for the > desktop. Some people say yes, others no, people have tried to write CJK rules in fontconfig for years without making everyone happy, at this stage let's not try to be creative and just use our standard template. Behdad is the only one that can hope untangling this mess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 19 21:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910192141.n9JLfI5T020154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-19 17:41:17 EDT --- Take a look at the l10n-font-template.conf in fontpackages-devel That's the best we have right now and I wouldn't advise inventing anything else without blessing from Behdad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 00:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200038.n9K0cEdD013655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #13 from fujiwara 2009-10-19 20:38:13 EDT --- If the lang tag works, this is not duplicate of bug 485566 and should modify the fontconfig. I don't talk about the fontconfig bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 05:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524883] cpi setting not used accurately In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200510.n9K5AXYR002755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524883 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-20 01:10:30 EDT --- pushed to F-12 and tagged for f12-final now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 05:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200509.n9K59NW6002074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X |knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 |0208 Bitmap font |JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-20 01:09:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > There are not conventions here because I try very hard to forget core fonts > exist, and new packages are not supposed to register in the core fonts system. > So that's only a problem for old packages. Sure. that sounds sane ;) > > > 7. It would be nice to include a fontconfig file for the font > > > > I'm not quite sure if this kind of the bitmap fonts only available for some pt. > > really helps though. > > The fontconfig file should not change the font visibility, and apps that can > use them will be happy Even if there are no fontconfig file, they can find it out yes? > Please take /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/l10n-font-template.conf as model > (adding maybe the size tweak) That looks similar except the size testing. does fontconfig not try to scale up/down for non-supported size but try to pick up for the exact size right? then guess I don't need to check what size is being requested. > > > FWIW I don't think Japanese people wants to see the bitmap glyphs for the > > desktop. > > Some people say yes, others no, people have tried to write CJK rules in > fontconfig for years without making everyone happy, at this stage let's not try > to be creative and just use our standard template. Behdad is the only one that > can hope untangling this mess. Sure - I meant there is other Japanese bitmap fonts that has a good quality and the variety of the size with the same glyph design and styles, so getting the different of the looks according to the font size sounds not good to me, but anyway. Since emacs doesn't require the X core fonts now, I personally don't need the X core fonts anymore though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 06:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200642.n9K6grrc004222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-20 02:42:52 EDT --- Updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm-new-fixed-fonts/knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm-new-fixed-fonts/knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-8.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 07:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200701.n9K71nhV017566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-20 03:01:47 EDT --- how about 66 as fontconfig priority? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 07:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200759.n9K7xWTv002570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-20 03:59:30 EDT --- 66 should be safe enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 08:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200803.n9K83QO9029098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #14 from Peng Huang 2009-10-20 04:03:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365314) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365314) Always use Latin fonts for ascii charactors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 08:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200803.n9K83pv6029192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Peng Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 08:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200804.n9K84RYI004149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Peng Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|pango |cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 08:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200830.n9K8Ub4b010514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-20 04:30:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Created an attachment (id=365314) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365314) [details] > Always use Latin fonts for ascii charactors Please do not propose fontconfig rules that make assumptions about the system default latin fonts. A CJK font can bump its priority on certain locales but never assume it knows the non-CJK fonts to use. If you want to change fontconfig rules, start from our default fontconfig templates, and if they are not good enough for you, discuss changes on the fonts list and with the fontconfig maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 09:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200903.n9K93Wto016828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh at redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-20 05:03:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Created an attachment (id=365314) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365314) [details] [details] > > Always use Latin fonts for ascii charactors > > Please do not propose fontconfig rules that make assumptions about the system > default latin fonts. A CJK font can bump its priority on certain locales but > never assume it knows the non-CJK fonts to use. > > If you want to change fontconfig rules, start from our default fontconfig > templates, and if they are not good enough for you, discuss changes on the > fonts list and with the fontconfig maintainer. FWIW it would be better looking back all of the fontconfig file available in Fedora now for Fedora 13 and correct as needed to be sane. Though cjkuni-*-fonts provides a lot of the fontconfig files, I just wonder if all of them are really accepted - who knows that? it may be a good idea if we have any exception list of the fontconfig files for the packages. having any figures for the relationship would be good too. that would makes easier to understand how the fontconfig file affects when adding new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 09:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529818] New: Unable to query PCF/BDF fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unable to query PCF/BDF fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529818 Summary: Unable to query PCF/BDF fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: fc-query fails with the PCF/BDF fonts. % fc-query /usr/share/fonts/knm_new/knm12p.pcf.gz Can't query face 0 of font file /usr/share/fonts/knm_new/knm12p.pcf.gz Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.7.3-1.fc12.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 09:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529818] Unable to query PCF/BDF fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200913.n9K9DRA0009754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529818 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-20 05:13:26 EDT --- I've attached the proposed patch to upstream bugzilla fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 09:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200936.n9K9aIwO014126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Jerome Glisse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clone Of| |529081 CC| |jglisse at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Jerome Glisse 2009-10-20 05:36:16 EDT --- This is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 09:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910200946.n9K9kD9N015947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Jerome Glisse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #13 from Jerome Glisse 2009-10-20 05:46:12 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 529081 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 10:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201027.n9KARMWq001967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #12 from Suresh P 2009-10-20 06:27:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365322) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365322) Lookup table for Lohit Malayalam font Lookup table to be merged with Lohit Malayalam font is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 10:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201024.n9KAOXB2001271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 Suresh P changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psuresh at gmx.com --- Comment #11 from Suresh P 2009-10-20 06:24:31 EDT --- I have prepared a lookup table for Lohit Malayalam which can sort out some issues connected with xRA forms which can be merged with feature info of the font. The remaining things are related to the incorrectly substituted post-base RA form for bases like LA,YA,LLA etc. There is no xRA forms for these consonants as per the orthography. Re-ordering the RA form as pre-base makes the text readable even though it goes against orthographic rules. But Harfbuzz and ICU are not doing this. These issues can be solved if the new version of Opentype specs are implemented correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Tue Oct 20 10:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091020103254.1522213005E@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com AssignedTo|keithp at keithp.com |freedesktop at behdad.org QAContact|freedesktop at behdad.org |keithp at keithp.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 10:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201042.n9KAgdmP027794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #17 from Peng Huang 2009-10-20 06:42:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Created an attachment (id=365314) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365314) [details] [details] > > Always use Latin fonts for ascii charactors > > Please do not propose fontconfig rules that make assumptions about the system > default latin fonts. A CJK font can bump its priority on certain locales but > never assume it knows the non-CJK fonts to use. What's your suggestion to modify the patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 11:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201140.n9KBeg5n015235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-20 07:40:41 EDT --- Try to make the tests for the prepend rule more fine-grained. Alternatively, if this is a behaviour needed for all CJK fonts, modify fontconfig and/or pango code to make this decision by default for all cjk fonts. But fontconfig kludges that assume CJK packagers know the right ordering for latin fonts are plain wrong, CJK people have been injecting variants on them in the system for years, they always caused no end of unintended side-effects, and never actually fixed CJK problems. As a case in point your patch does not even respect the current Fedora latin font priority order, and even if it did no one will notify you when it will change (as has happened several times in the past), so even if this patch was fixed now it will cause problems one day or another. And latin is the easy part, you also have cyrillic, greek, and all the other stuff needlessly duplicated in CJK fonts to take into account. A basic fontconfig sanity rule is to never try to change the ordering of fonts external to the package, because they are the responsibility of other maintainers, not yours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 11:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for ASCII letters vs punctutaion and numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201154.n9KBstdB017650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-20 07:54:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > FWIW it would be better looking back all of the fontconfig file available in > Fedora now for Fedora 13 and correct as needed to be sane. Sure it would be better; but I don't have the cycles myself. All I can do right now is to try to make sure no new dubious files make it in the distro. The basic rule is: if a fontconfig pattern is not documented in fontpackages-devel it is wrong for Fedora, and no pattern gets in fontpackages-devel without approval from Behdad and eventually discussion on the fonts list. That's the only way to make everyone converge and avoid different packagers making conflicting decisions. In an ideal world someone would write the xslt rules to check that existing files conform to documented patterns, and integrate them in repo-font-audit (and packagers would actually act on repo-font-audit reports). Also, it would be nice if somehow wrote a xslt script or another command that actually displayed in human-readable form the priority stack configured on a system (fc-list output unfortunately depends on the fonts installed on-system, so depending on local fonts the same conf will yield different results. Which is not a way to do reliable QA) Interested people can send me fontpackages patches or ask for fontpackages git access. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 17:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529905] [ml_IN] Rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in oowriter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201731.n9KHVUYp002049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529905 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |smc-discuss at googlegroups.co | |m -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 17:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528303] [ml_IN] Rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201733.n9KHX3SS025082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528303 --- Comment #13 from Ani Peter 2009-10-20 13:33:02 EDT --- Have filed Bug 529905 reporting the same issue with icu. Will test in jedit asap and do the needful. thanks (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Hence please advise how to go about with this bug and against which components > > above bugs should be filed. > > Please open a qt or kde bug (here and upstream) and an OO.o but (here and > upstream) cc-ing fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com > > You should also test java (jedit) as it's the third major component that tends > to have text rendering problems. > > (it would of course be interesting to find a workaround in lohit, but when 3 > different fonts fail the same way, that means the text libraries have a big > problem) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 20 19:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529905] [ml_IN] Rendering of cons+virama+ra is wrong in oowriter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910201900.n9KJ0o4m023274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529905 --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-20 15:00:50 EDT --- Various implementations are doing things differently and some happen to give results that look good and some not, often by pure luck and silly font-specific hackery. The only sane thing to do is to follow the spec of http://www.microsoft.com/typography/OpenType%20Dev/malayalam/intro.mspx exactly and standardize on that behaviour. (e.g. once in harfbuzz and stick everything on top of that). Get a screenshot from a uniscribe enabled application for reference :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: drehatlas-widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210039.n9L0dwr2030194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:39:58 EDT --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drehatlas-widelands-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210043.n9L0hvJE006701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090423-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528949] Review Request: drehatlas-widelands-fonts - Widelands font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210039.n9L0dljF003887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528949 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:39:46 EDT --- drehatlas-widelands-fonts-1.0.2.2-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drehatlas-widelands-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210042.n9L0gwEh032721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:42:57 EDT --- sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210043.n9L0hqTC000775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:43:51 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210043.n9L0h2Jh000313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.001-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210048.n9L0mX6s009965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:48:30 EDT --- sil-lateef-fonts-1.001-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527406] Review Request: sil-lateef-fonts - An Arabic script unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210048.n9L0mePE010022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.001-1.fc10 |1.001-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210050.n9L0odob011530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:50:38 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gargi-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210049.n9L0ndNZ010751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:49:38 EDT --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10653 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:58:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210058.n9L0wUGE015267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20090423-2.fc10 |20090423-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526607] Review Request: oflb-smonohand-fonts - A handwritten monospace font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210058.n9L0wL14008761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:58:20 EDT --- oflb-smonohand-fonts-20090423-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210057.n9L0vQTa008485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:57:25 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gargi-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10712 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 00:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210057.n9L0vKTp008432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-20 20:57:19 EDT --- drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts-1.0.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10710 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 01:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529975] New: ghostscript files referred to outdated font info Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghostscript files referred to outdated font info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529975 Summary: ghostscript files referred to outdated font info Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: htl10 at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 488398 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #488398 +++ Description of problem: The /usr/share/ghostscript/config.d/*map* files just need to match exactly the locations and naming of the fonts. Issue refered in the old bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398#c7) is recurring again, with a different variation: config refers to "/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc", but the location on rawhide and f11 are both "/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni-uming/uming.ttc" (note the extra bits "-uming"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 08:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529975] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210801.n9L81Xfc032349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529975 --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-10-21 04:01:33 EDT --- I am considering to dynamic generating those cid files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 11:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910211108.n9LB8svF012305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 --- Comment #4 from sandeep shedmake 2009-10-21 07:08:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365487) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365487) Lohit-Telugu.ttf handling improper "k+sh" akhand combination Reopening this bug as per https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579398#c19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 11:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910211109.n9LB9jhR010425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 13:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530085] New: [or_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [or_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530085 Summary: [or_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 526396 Created an attachment (id=365513) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365513) or_IN Screenshot with gedit, kwrite, and gnome-terminal, Bug is clone because of Nature for Bug is same, Actually Bug for Ref is Bz #523454 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #526396 +++ Created an attachment (id=363117) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363117) The affected theme snapshot with meera font Description of problem: For any editor e.g. oowriter, gedit, when smc-meera-font is selected, its showing underline below the Title, making the editor look ugly. Seems a clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme bug. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): metacity-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login system with malayalam locale. (ml_IN) 2. Go to System --> Preferences --> Appearance 3. Select Theme as "Clearlooks" 4. Open and Observe any editor or the theme window title itself. Actual results: The Underline appears on the Title Window with meera font and clearlooks combination. Expected results: Underline should not appear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 14:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530085] [or_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910211402.n9LE2BtI018087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530085 --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-10-21 10:02:10 EDT --- Detail Language: Oriya (or_IN) Font: lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch fontconfig-2.7.3-1.fc12.x86_64 Fedora: Rawhide (20Oct2009) Installation: Fresh installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 14:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530085] [or_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for Oriya Lohit Fonts (Default Fonts) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910211403.n9LE3B4R018197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530085 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[or_IN] - Editor's Title |[or_IN] - Editor's Title |appearing with Underline |appearing with Underline |for smc-meera-font |for Oriya Lohit Fonts | |(Default Fonts) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 14:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497648] Points on graphs represented as 'q' not points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910211427.n9LERPAe024180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497648 Marek Ka??k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, mkasik at redhat.com Component|poppler |fontconfig AssignedTo|krh at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Marek Ka??k 2009-10-21 10:27:24 EDT --- After reading of http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21395, it seems that this is a problem of the 'fontconfig' package. => reassigning Marek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 16:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910211630.n9LGUV9N024156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 --- Comment #5 from Arjuna Rao Chavala 2009-10-21 12:30:29 EDT --- This bug can be closed, as Akhand where special form of second letter is no longer present with the fix. The fix is required in pango. Regret the feedback on initial one combination fix at the pango bug page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 20:20:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910212020.n9LKKfgC018882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 --- Comment #1 from Robin Sonefors 2009-10-21 16:20:41 EDT --- The author has been contacted about the lack of a separate license file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 20:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910212017.n9LKHNRq018149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Oct 21 22:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091021225342.17B37130076@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freedesktop at behdad.org --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-21 15:53:40 PST --- Reading the comment before that block of code suggests that the code is correct in its current form: /* * Skip over PCF fonts that have no encoded characters; they're * usually just Unicode fonts transcoded to some legacy encoding * FT forces us to approximate whether a font is a PCF font * or not by whether it has any BDF properties. Try PIXEL_SIZE; * I don't know how to get a list of BDF properties on the font. -PL */ if (FcCharSetCount (cs) == 0) { #if HAVE_FT_GET_BDF_PROPERTY if(FT_Get_BDF_Property(face, "PIXEL_SIZE", &prop) == 0) goto bail2; #endif } Indeed, in the pattern you got after modifying that line, you see that charset is empty, that is, fontconfig could not recognize any character in the font and hence the face is useless. That's why fontconfig skips it. Sounds like NOTABUG to me. What kind of font is this? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 00:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220046.n9M0kOfm011164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|cjkuni-fonts |pango AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com Summary|[CJK] pango uses different |pango uses different fonts |fonts for ASCII letters vs |for LATIN and COMMON glyphs |punctutaion and numbers | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 22 01:28:51 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (cchance) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20091022012852.013A611C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21847 Modified Files: .cvsignore cjkuni-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Thu Oct 22 2009 Caius kaio Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-28.fc13 - Resolves: 529975 - Make ghostscript address to be dynamic generated. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 01:28:51 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ ttf-arphic-ukai_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz ttf-arphic-uming_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz +cjkuni-fonts-gscid-0.1.tgz Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 04:37:07 -0000 1.13 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 22 Oct 2009 01:28:51 -0000 1.14 @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. %define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} %define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} +%define gsbuilddir %{fontname}-fonts-gscid-0.1 %define cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType %define twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType @@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 27%{?dist} +Release: 28%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -30,19 +31,14 @@ URL: http://www.freedesktop.org/ Source1: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-arphic-uming/ttf-arphic-uming_%{version}.orig.tar.gz Source2: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-arphic-ukai/ttf-arphic-ukai_%{version}.orig.tar.gz -Source3: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW -Source4: FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN -Source5: cidfmap.zh_TW -Source6: cidfmap.zh_CN -Source7: CIDFnmap.zh_TW -Source8: CIDFnmap.zh_CN +Source3: cjkuni-fonts-gscid-0.1.tgz Patch1: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch Patch2: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch Patch3: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir +#BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir %description %common_desc @@ -164,6 +160,7 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %patch2 -p1 -b .2-rhbz475743 %patch3 -p1 -b .3-rhbz459680 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{ukaibuilddir} +%setup -q -c -T -a3 -n %{gsbuilddir} %build %{nil} @@ -171,17 +168,20 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %install %__rm -rf %{buildroot} +cd ../ + # *.ttc(ttf) and font.{dir,scale} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} -%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ # fonts.{scale,dir} # use upstream included one instead -%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ -%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{umingbuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{umingbuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ + #cd %{buildroot}%{umingdir} #%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} \ # -o %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/fonts.scale @@ -196,35 +196,40 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. # *.conf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -cd ../%{umingbuilddir} + +cd %{umingbuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done -cd ../%{ukaibuilddir} +cd ../ + +cd %{ukaibuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done -cd - +cd ../ # ghostscript +cd %{gsbuilddir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{gsdir} -%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ +for gscid in `ls` +do + cat $gscid | sed --expression='s/###ukailoc###/\/usr\/share\/fonts\/cjkuni-ukai/g' --expression='s/###umingloc###/\/usr\/share\/fonts\/cjkuni-uming/g' > tmp_gs + mv tmp_gs $gscid + %__install -m 0644 $gscid %{buildroot}%{gsdir} +done +cd ../ # catalogue %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -%__ln_s %{umingdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming -%__ln_s %{ukaidir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/ %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming +%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/ %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai # backward compat to obsoleted ttf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir} @@ -240,6 +245,9 @@ cd - %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Thu Oct 22 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-28.fc13 +- Resolves: 529975 - Make ghostscript address to be dynamic generated. + * Mon Sep 21 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-27.fc12 - Merged from F-11 tree. - Obsoleted cjkuni-fonts-common. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 22 Oct 2009 01:28:51 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ 4d3beb55db000bfedd18c9c7d6e631d8 ttf-arphic-ukai_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz d219fcaf953f3eb1889399955a00379f ttf-arphic-uming_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz +003dd4b7da513993dd43b01157cdd410 cjkuni-fonts-gscid-0.1.tgz From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 22 01:36:59 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (cchance) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.14,1.15 Message-ID: <20091022013659.770E111C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24066 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: rebuilt Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 22 Oct 2009 01:28:51 -0000 1.14 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 22 Oct 2009 01:36:57 -0000 1.15 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ the CJK Unifonts project. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 28%{?dist} +Release: 29%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Patch3: cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1- BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -#BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir %description %common_desc @@ -245,6 +245,9 @@ cd ../ %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Thu Oct 22 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-29.fc13 +- Rebuilt. + * Thu Oct 22 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-28.fc13 - Resolves: 529975 - Make ghostscript address to be dynamic generated. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 03:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529975] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220341.n9M3fJpI008064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529975 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-10-21 23:41:18 EDT --- fixed on rawhide it will be generated according to current locations and naming of the fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 04:47:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220447.n9M4lu4A000386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-22 00:47:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 04:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220449.n9M4nBN5029898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-22 00:49:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Oct 22 06:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091022063731.2DFC213008C@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-21 23:37:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Indeed, in the pattern you got after modifying that line, you see that charset > is empty, that is, fontconfig could not recognize any character in the font and > hence the face is useless. That's why fontconfig skips it. Sounds like > NOTABUG to me. What kind of font is this? It's a Japanese bitmap font. so fontconfig is just checking to skip the broken BDF/PCF fonts highly likely not having any charset detected? I see - I don't still see there are any useful cases not skipping non-BDF/PCF fonts that has no charsets though. However the assumption as described at that comment isn't necessarily true. Since it was available before we are moving to Unicode, most BDF/PCF fonts available in the world should be encoded by "none". but just put glyphs with the glyph IDs for the charset. in fact, it does in this case. FreeType is (internally) capable to add any CMaps that is used to look up the glyph ID from the character code though, no exported FT_CMap structure. if adding the own CMap to transcode Unicode to the charset, it may works as expected without modifying the application code. but I guess fontconfig won't support such fonts so far, because fontconfig and other rendering library focuses on Unicode only and using the internal APIs doesn't make sense? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Oct 22 07:31:47 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091022073147.CBB47130090@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 00:31:46 PST --- The correct solution is probably to write a filter that adds the freetype info to the font files, so they become normal unicody fonts any font libe can use. Then the fc-query error can be modified to just point people to this filter. I don't think Fedora should ship fonts that can not be used in fontconfig at this stage. If they can't be fixed easily, I'd say just drop them. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 07:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530285] New: Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global font settings' GUI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global font settings' GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530285 Summary: Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global font settings' GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=365660) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365660) Screenshot for the font GUI showing "Sans" Description of problem: (this cannot be termed as a "bug") The default font for Malayalam in Fedora is smc-meera-fonts. When logging into Malayalam locale, the font details appearing on the GUI (System->Preferences->Appearance->Font) is as shown in screenshot. It says "Sans" instead of "Meera". This does not give any information to the normal user about which font he is currently viewing on his desktop. I understand there are ways to get the font information from command line interface. But how to get this information on GUI? Please advise how this can be done and thus the purpose of GUI can be better served in a more useful way to the user. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login to Malayalam (ml_IN) locale 2. Select System->Preferences->Appearance->Font) 3. Check the font information displayed on GUI Actual results: font appear as "Sans" Expected results: >From user point of view I feel this must be shown as "Meera", as "Sans" does not give any information about the default font used in Malayalam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 07:46:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530285] Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global font settings' GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220746.n9M7ktpW027675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530285 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 03:46:54 EDT --- This is not specific to Malayalam and is just the way the Linux font system works. We use synthetic fonts (not mere aliases) composed of many different fonts IIRC Microsoft has been copying this design in its new .Net stack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 08:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 527214] Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220802.n9M82uhS003740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 09:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220907.n9M97JSq014697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-22 05:07:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > > 2. You have some stray "fixed" font in bitmap-console-fonts yep console9x15.pcf has written fontname FixedMedium in that case i think we will require Fixed subpackage, with this file included > 3. Some of the files in bitmap-console-fonts declare their name as > "console8x8.pcf" which is almost certainly a bug you are talking about fontname, or file name i did not found this in fontname, please provide bit more info. > > 4. The Lucida Typewriter fonts in bitmap-fonts should be pushed in a > bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts subpackage in that case, bitmap-fonts rpm will be empty? > > 6. you can probably kill the common file and put each license %doc in the > corresponding subpackage (just put the %doc line after the corresponding > %_font_pkg call). You just need to have each subpackage require > fontpackages-filesystem direcly so here we suppose to remove common package, also README will not require and put files for each subpackage in %doc, but we dont have any for console what to do for it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 09:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910220927.n9M9Rdg4019694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 05:27:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > 3. Some of the files in bitmap-console-fonts declare their name as > > "console8x8.pcf" which is almost certainly a bug > you are talking about fontname, or file name I'm talking about fontname as used by fontconfig (fc-query with the pkgkit format as used to generate rpm font metadata) > > 4. The Lucida Typewriter fonts in bitmap-fonts should be pushed in a > > bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts subpackage > in that case, bitmap-fonts rpm will be empty? It is perfectly possible to have a srpm that only generates subpackages with different names. rpm will only generate a bitmap-fonts rpm from the bitmap-fonts srpm if you put some files in it > > 6. you can probably kill the common file and put each license %doc in the > > corresponding subpackage (just put the %doc line after the corresponding > > %_font_pkg call). You just need to have each subpackage require > > fontpackages-filesystem direcly > > so here we suppose to remove common package, also README will not require > and put files for each subpackage in %doc, but we dont have any for console > what to do for it? If you don't have any doc for console, I guess it will be a doc-less subpackage :) The main use of -common if when you have bulky shared documentation (very often, big pdf files in the font world) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 10:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221002.n9MA20N6027075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-22 06:01:59 EDT --- updated package link http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts-0.3-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ozamosi at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 22 12:29:48 2009 From: ozamosi at fedoraproject.org (Robin Sonefors) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091022122948.A9A9E11C008C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ozamosi Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19493 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: .cvsignore and sources entries for source Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 04:48:01 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 12:29:48 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +AnonymousPro.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Oct 2009 04:48:01 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 22 Oct 2009 12:29:48 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3cdcfc1979242670410e26ce42d226b0 AnonymousPro.zip From ozamosi at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 22 12:44:39 2009 From: ozamosi at fedoraproject.org (Robin Sonefors) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <20091022124439.3857E11C008C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ozamosi Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25401 Added Files: msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-fontconfig.conf msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec Log Message: Add missing files --- NEW FILE msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- monospace Anonymous Pro Anonymous Pro monospace Anonymous Anonymous Pro --- NEW FILE msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec --- %global fontname msimonson-anonymouspro %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename AnonymousPro Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A coding-friendly monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.ms-studio.com/FontSales/anonymouspro.html Source0: http://www.ms-studio.com/FontSales/AnonymousPro.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Anonymous Pro is a family of fixed-width fonts designed especially with coding in mind. Characters that could be mistaken for one another (O, 0, I, l, 1, etc.) have distinct shapes to make them easier to tell apart in the context of source code. It has support for most Western and European Latin-based languages, Greek, and Cyrillic. It also includes special ?box drawing? characters. Anonymous Pro is based on an earlier font, Anonymous, which is a TrueType version of Susan Lesch and David Lamkins? font Anonymous 9, a freeware Macintosh bitmap font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} for txt in "OFL.txt" "OFL-FAQ.txt"; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Robin Sonefors - 1.001-2 - Change summary, fix fontconfig file * Thu Oct 15 2009 Robin Sonefors - 1.001-1 - Initial packaging From ozamosi at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 22 13:57:47 2009 From: ozamosi at fedoraproject.org (Robin Sonefors) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/F-11 msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091022135748.03C2311C008C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ozamosi Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13048 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-fontconfig.conf msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec Log Message: Version 1.001 --- NEW FILE msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- monospace Anonymous Pro Anonymous Pro monospace Anonymous Anonymous Pro --- NEW FILE msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts.spec --- %global fontname msimonson-anonymouspro %global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %global archivename AnonymousPro Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A coding-friendly monospace font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.ms-studio.com/FontSales/anonymouspro.html Source0: http://www.ms-studio.com/FontSales/AnonymousPro.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Anonymous Pro is a family of fixed-width fonts designed especially with coding in mind. Characters that could be mistaken for one another (O, 0, I, l, 1, etc.) have distinct shapes to make them easier to tell apart in the context of source code. It has support for most Western and European Latin-based languages, Greek, and Cyrillic. It also includes special ?box drawing? characters. Anonymous Pro is based on an earlier font, Anonymous, which is a TrueType version of Susan Lesch and David Lamkins? font Anonymous 9, a freeware Macintosh bitmap font. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} for txt in "OFL.txt" "OFL-FAQ.txt"; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %changelog * Sat Oct 17 2009 Robin Sonefors - 1.001-2 - Change summary, fix fontconfig file * Thu Oct 15 2009 Robin Sonefors - 1.001-1 - Initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 04:48:01 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 13:57:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +AnonymousPro.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Oct 2009 04:48:01 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 22 Oct 2009 13:57:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3cdcfc1979242670410e26ce42d226b0 AnonymousPro.zip From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Oct 22 15:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 24613] fc-query can't query face 0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091022150509.83D1E1300A4@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24613 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |NOTOURBUG -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 15:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221511.n9MFBJlA009635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-22 11:11:18 EDT --- msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ozamosi at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 22 15:52:24 2009 From: ozamosi at fedoraproject.org (Robin Sonefors) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/devel gdouros-aegean-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091022155224.5E05C11C008C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ozamosi Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16603 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gdouros-aegean-fonts-fontconfig.conf gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec Log Message: First version --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegean-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Aegean Aegean fantasy --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gdouros-aegean %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 3.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A font for ancient scripts in the greater Aegean vicinity Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ Source0: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Aegean.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Aegean covers the following scripts and symbols supported by The Unicode Standard 5.2: Basic Latin, Greek and Coptic, Greek Extended, some Punctuation and other Symbols, Linear B Syllabary, Linear B Ideograms, Aegean Numbers, Ancient Greek Numbers, Ancient Symbols, Phaistos Disc, Lycian, Carian, Old Italic, Ugaritic, Old Persian, Cypriot Syllabary, Phoenician, Lydian, and Archaic Greek Musical Notation. Aegean also covers the following scripts and symbols not yet supported by Unicode: Cretan Hieroglyphs, Cypro-Minoan, Linear A, the Arkalochori Axe, Ancient Greek and Old Italic variant alphabets. These are allocated in the Supplementary Private Use Plane 15. It was created by George Douros. %prep %setup -q -c %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Aegean.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} Aegean.otf %doc Aegean.txt %changelog * Mon Oct 19 2009 Robin Sonefors - 3.01-1 - Fix description, License string * Thu Oct 15 2009 Robin Sonefors - 3.01-1 - Initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 04:49:14 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 15:52:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Aegean.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Oct 2009 04:49:14 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 22 Oct 2009 15:52:24 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +36201de0f8a523a3c002bb8619fc9da9 Aegean.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 15:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508899] Monospace no more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221557.n9MFvisR027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508899 --- Comment #12 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-22 11:57:43 EDT --- I believe this is fixed in freetype 2.3.10. Building in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 17:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511580] FTBFS fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-11.fc11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221748.n9MHmRkE021086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511580 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Matt Domsch 2009-10-22 13:48:26 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=117606 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 19:05:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221905.n9MJ51Gh004259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #20 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-22 15:04:59 EDT --- Maybe someone can first describe what the problem is, without jumping to patching... My best guess so far is: "In CJK locales, the Latin glyphs should be selected from the same font as the CJK glyphs, if the font supports that." If that's the problem, it's an old one, and one that we don't have a solution for just yet. Requires this before it can be fixed: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17311 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Thu Oct 22 19:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 17311] Add a FC_LOCALE_LANG element In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091022191554.42B12130072@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17311 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 19:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511668] FTBFS knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221948.n9MJmJNn015125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511668 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com --- Comment #13 from Matt Domsch 2009-10-22 15:48:18 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=118901 was the last build, which failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 19:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511668] FTBFS knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221954.n9MJsibK016837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511668 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 15:54:43 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 528675 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 19:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910221954.n9MJsjak016866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ftbfs at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 15:54:43 EDT --- *** Bug 511668 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 22 20:07:58 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel freetype-2.3.11-more-demos.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.23, 1.24 freetype.spec, 1.76, 1.77 sources, 1.23, 1.24 Message-ID: <20091022200758.73B8E11C008C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4329 Modified Files: .cvsignore freetype.spec sources Added Files: freetype-2.3.11-more-demos.patch Log Message: * Thu Oct 22 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.11-1 - Update to 2.3.11. - Add freetype-2.3.11-more-demos.patch - New demo programs ftmemchk, ftpatchk, and fttimer CVS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- freetype-2.3.11-more-demos.patch: Makefile | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE freetype-2.3.11-more-demos.patch --- diff -up freetype-2.3.11/ft2demos-2.3.11/Makefile.more-demos freetype-2.3.11/ft2demos-2.3.11/Makefile --- freetype-2.3.11/ft2demos-2.3.11/Makefile.more-demos 2009-10-22 16:02:26.000000000 -0400 +++ freetype-2.3.11/ft2demos-2.3.11/Makefile 2009-10-22 16:02:32.000000000 -0400 @@ -288,10 +288,10 @@ else # Note that ttdebug only works if the FreeType's `truetype' driver has # been compiled with TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER defined. # - # EXES += ftchkwd - # EXES += ftmemchk - # EXES += ftpatchk - # EXES += fttimer + EXES += ftchkwd + EXES += ftmemchk + EXES += ftpatchk + EXES += fttimer # EXES += testname # EXES += ttdebug Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.23 retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -p -r1.23 -r1.24 --- .cvsignore 8 Oct 2009 23:47:28 -0000 1.23 +++ .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 20:07:57 -0000 1.24 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -freetype-doc-2.3.10.tar.bz2 -ft2demos-2.3.10.tar.bz2 -freetype-2.3.10.tar.bz2 +freetype-doc-2.3.11.tar.bz2 +ft2demos-2.3.11.tar.bz2 +freetype-2.3.11.tar.bz2 Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.76 retrieving revision 1.77 diff -u -p -r1.76 -r1.77 --- freetype.spec 8 Oct 2009 23:47:28 -0000 1.76 +++ freetype.spec 22 Oct 2009 20:07:58 -0000 1.77 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype -Version: 2.3.10 +Version: 2.3.11 Release: 1%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ Patch21: freetype-2.3.0-enable-spr.patc # Enable otvalid and gxvalid modules Patch46: freetype-2.2.1-enable-valid.patch +# Enable additional demos +Patch47: freetype-2.3.11-more-demos.patch # Fix multilib conflicts Patch88: freetype-multilib.patch @@ -94,6 +96,7 @@ popd %endif %patch46 -p1 -b .enable-valid +%patch47 -p1 -b .more-demos %patch88 -p1 -b .multilib %patch89 -p1 -b .memcpy @@ -127,7 +130,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %makeinstall gnulocaledir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/locale { - for ftdemo in ftbench ftchkwd ftdump ftlint ftmemchk ftvalid ; do + for ftdemo in ftbench ftchkwd ftmemchk ftpatchk fttimer ftdump ftlint ftmemchk ftvalid ; do builds/unix/libtool --mode=install install -m 755 ft2demos-%{version}/bin/$ftdemo $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} done } @@ -196,6 +199,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %defattr(-,root,root) %{_bindir}/ftbench %{_bindir}/ftchkwd +%{_bindir}/ftmemchk +%{_bindir}/ftpatchk +%{_bindir}/fttimer %{_bindir}/ftdump %{_bindir}/ftlint %{_bindir}/ftmemchk @@ -226,6 +232,11 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu Oct 22 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.11-1 +- Update to 2.3.11. +- Add freetype-2.3.11-more-demos.patch +- New demo programs ftmemchk, ftpatchk, and fttimer + * Thu Oct 08 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.10-1 - Drop freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch - Update to 2.3.10. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.23 retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -p -r1.23 -r1.24 --- sources 8 Oct 2009 23:47:28 -0000 1.23 +++ sources 22 Oct 2009 20:07:58 -0000 1.24 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -9bdd83c5b6559bdfb68984f0b3d1dc8c freetype-doc-2.3.10.tar.bz2 -e6d762885ecc8222774f5063a1605e45 ft2demos-2.3.10.tar.bz2 -b7a8a26cc137716a32b788664697d727 freetype-2.3.10.tar.bz2 +c9d75b659382aef80a8f86efcde08629 freetype-doc-2.3.11.tar.bz2 +7e3df8813fdbad22e996a5dfed7f7361 ft2demos-2.3.11.tar.bz2 +519c7cbf5cbd72ffa822c66844d3114c freetype-2.3.11.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 20:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910222018.n9MKIccX022885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com Blocks| |511348(F12FTBFS) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 20:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910222029.n9MKTZZx026503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 --- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch 2009-10-22 16:29:34 EDT --- This package failed to build in Koji for Fedora 12, and at this point in the release cycle (Beta is out), we'll have to live with the F11 build of the package unless there is another bug in your package which would prevent the release of Fedora 12. If your package is now obsolete and should be removed from Fedora 12 and future, please follow the End of Life instructions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life If your package is not obsolete, and you wish it to remain in the distribution for Fedora 13, please update your package's devel branch in CVS so that it builds, build it in koji, and close this bug as "CLOSED RAWHIDE", including the link to the koji build that succeeded. You can do this now, while final touches are being placed on Fedora 12 without affecting F12. Shortly after F12 is out, but before the F13 Alpha release, all F12FTBFS-blocking bugs will be re-evaluated. At that time, if progress has not been made to fix the package, it will be removed from the distribution for F13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 21:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910222114.n9MLEODj004675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ozamosi at flukkost.nu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 17:14:22 EDT --- Nothing to say here, it's a good package ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 21:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910222132.n9MLWMxr008340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tagoh at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 17:32:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Updated. > > Spec URL: > http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm-new-fixed-fonts/knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec > SRPM URL: > http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm-new-fixed-fonts/knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-8.fc13.src.rpm The packaging is sane and the current package FTBS therefore I'm going to approve it. However that does not change the fact that fontconfig can not parse 4 of the font files. IMHO you should either fix them, or drop them But this can be done as a maintainer of the new package, and the old knm_new-fonts package is no better in this regard, therefore I'll won't block on it Please check the fontconfig priorities, when you're not using the l10n template, bigger prefix means lower prio, but with the l10n locale override, bigger prefix means bigger prio, so 69 will trump any ja font with a <69 prefix (IIRC) ??? APPROVED ??? Thank you for cleaning up this historic package, I know that's not the most exciting activity :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 22 22:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910222207.n9MM7dN1021066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |psatpute at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-22 18:07:38 EDT --- Please remove the \ in the %description Nothing else seems obviously wrong to me ??? APPROVED ??? Thank you for cleaning up the packaging of those old files. Should you want to register them in the legacy core font system, you can take a look at bug #528675 which is similar (but that's no obligation, core fonts need to die) ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 02:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230216.n9N2GPZf002537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Peng Huang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #21 from Peng Huang 2009-10-22 22:16:22 EDT --- Hi Behdad, At the begin, I reported this bug is about pango render common script with different fonts in one document. Especially in Chinese fedora desktop, pango mixes truetype and bitmap common script chars together (Please see the attach in comment #1). It looks very weird. I created a fontconf http://phuang.fedorapeople.org/63-zh_CN.conf. it can force pango always use Latin (DejaVu) fonts to render common script in Chinese desktop. It works very well, and will not affect other languages. But it will override Latin fonts priority of system for Chinese language, it seems the conf breaks fedora font config rules. I also tried another way to fix this problem in pango. the modified pango is in http://github.com/phuang/pango/commits/master. It will process PANGO_SCRIPT_COMMON as a real script. And we can modify the pango_script_for_lang to decide which language fonts can support common script, and which fonts can not support common script. For zh-*, we could just put PANGO_SCRIPT_HAN in the table, and then pango will only use Chinese fonts to render HAN script. It works too. It is current situation. Please give us some suggestions. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 05:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230509.n9N595Mn000375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #26 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-23 01:09:01 EDT --- updates spec and srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-13.fc11.src.rpm yeah, fc-scan is giving wrong o/p for console8*8 font family name, looks some problem. we dont a source file for console8*8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 05:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230557.n9N5v6FC017298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-23 01:57:04 EDT --- I think this is a duplicate of bug 228804 (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481210). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 06:05:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230605.n9N65uDU020198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-23 02:05:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > "In CJK locales, the Latin glyphs should be selected from the same font as the > CJK glyphs, if the font supports that." This is one possible solution yes. Though I think that would change English webpages to render in a Chinese font say which is less attractive. > If that's the problem, it's an old one, and one that we don't have a solution > for just yet. Requires this before it can be fixed: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17311 I wish we can come up with a workaround via fontconfig say if necessary in the meantime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 06:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230607.n9N670JM020650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|pango uses different fonts |[CJK] pango uses different |for LATIN and COMMON glyphs |fonts for LATIN and COMMON | |glyphs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 07:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230731.n9N7VAT8017562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Robin Sonefors 2009-10-23 03:31:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts Short Description: A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs Owners: ozamosi Branches: F11 F12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 08:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494902] [te_IN] Incorrect glyph substitution for telugu letter ka followed by dep vowel AA then consonant sha and then viram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230811.n9N8BSVE029586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494902 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 08:40:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230840.n9N8eLsk002960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-23 04:40:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > yeah, fc-scan is giving wrong o/p for console8*8 font family name, looks some > problem. we dont a source file for console8*8 Well, your choices for that file are : 1. drop it, wait for complains, ask whoever complains to fix the file 2. write a fontforge (or other) script to fix the file yourself at build time 3. enhance fontconfig to read the real font name (assuming it is present at all in the font file) 4. remap the font name in a fontconfig rule (see the remapping-font-template). But this is still a workaround, not a complete solution, and you'll get nagged every time the font audit scripts run Continuing to deploy a file that does not work in fontconfig is not acceptable, that sends the wrong message to third-parties. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 09:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530518] New: [ne_NP]Remove unnecessary characters from font file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ne_NP]Remove unnecessary characters from font file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530518 Summary: [ne_NP]Remove unnecessary characters from font file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-nepali-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Remove unnecessary characters U090C, U090D, U090E from lohit nepali font file Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-nepali-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.type Unicode characters U090C, U090D, U090E 2. 3. Actual results: Those characters are present in font file and one should type it using Lohit Nepali. Expected results: Those characters should not be present in font file and one should not type it using Lohit Nepali. Additional info: http://www.panl10n.net/english/Outputs%20Phase%202/CCs/Nepal/MPP/Papers/2007/0702/mpp_reports_pdf/report_character_encoding_constraints_nepali.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 11:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530518] [ne_NP]Remove unnecessary characters from font file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910231101.n9NB1pdG002651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530518 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-23 07:01:47 EDT --- it is always good to have a more characters in font, so in text they can match with particular style of font etc and no need to import characters from other font. There is no harm in keeping more characters in font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 11:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530085] [or_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for Oriya Lohit Fonts (Default Fonts) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910231129.n9NBTU51007544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530085 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Component|fontconfig |gnome-themes AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-23 07:29:28 EDT --- here we dont have a scaling rules, like we have for meera fonts so dont looks like fontconfig bug, i guess there is some problem in fedora default theme only reassigning to gnome-theme while testing this bug, after login in or_IN locale, bug appears with Kwrite and firefox application if we set window title font Lohit-Hindi, then everything works fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 17:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910231709.n9NH90xv021605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com Blocks|473303(F12Blocker) |473302(F12Target) --- Comment #18 from Adam Williamson 2009-10-23 13:08:58 EDT --- This was discussed at the blocker review meeting today. As it seems clear this is a bug (or bugs) in Eclipse, not Pango or Java, we can't consider it a blocker for the final release, as it's not critical functionality and can just as easily be fixed as an update. Releng will accept a tag request to have a build included in F12 final to try and address these issues if you would like to do that, though. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 18:56:58 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20091023185658.C25BD11C01EA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17253/F-11 Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: - Fix FTBFS: renaming back to fonts-hebrew-fancy, you need to proceed as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure if you really want to rename your package! Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 27 Feb 2009 15:01:18 -0000 1.7 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 18:56:57 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ The %{name} package contains fancy (non-standard) Hebrew fonts \ from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh. -Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy Version: 0.20051122 Release: 6%{?dist} License: GPLv2 From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 18:57:01 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20091023185702.8018B11C01EA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17253/F-12 Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: - Fix FTBFS: renaming back to fonts-hebrew-fancy, you need to proceed as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure if you really want to rename your package! Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 24 Jul 2009 23:00:56 -0000 1.8 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 18:56:58 -0000 1.9 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ The %{name} package contains fancy (non-standard) Hebrew fonts \ from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh. -Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy Version: 0.20051122 Release: 7%{?dist} License: GPLv2 From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 18:57:09 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20091023185709.0F75411C01EA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17253/devel Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: - Fix FTBFS: renaming back to fonts-hebrew-fancy, you need to proceed as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure if you really want to rename your package! Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 24 Jul 2009 23:00:56 -0000 1.8 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 18:57:00 -0000 1.9 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ The %{name} package contains fancy (non-standard) Hebrew fonts \ from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh. -Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy Version: 0.20051122 Release: 7%{?dist} License: GPLv2 From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 19:05:19 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20091023190520.037E911C01EA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25182 Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: bump release Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 18:56:57 -0000 1.8 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:05:19 -0000 1.9 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh. Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy Version: 0.20051122 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} License: GPLv2 Source0: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/comix.tar.gz Source1: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/dorian.tar.gz @@ -191,6 +191,10 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Fri Oct 23 2009 Milos Jakubicek 0.20051122-7 +- Rename back to fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec, renaming must follow +http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure + * Fri Feb 27 2009 Dan Kenigsberg 0.20051122-6 - Follow new font packaging guidelines. From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 19:20:28 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20091023192028.27A2011C02A2@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29467/F-12 Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: bump release Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 18:56:58 -0000 1.9 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:20:26 -0000 1.10 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh. Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy Version: 0.20051122 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} License: GPLv2 Source0: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/comix.tar.gz Source1: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/dorian.tar.gz @@ -191,6 +191,10 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Fri Oct 23 2009 Milos Jakubicek 0.20051122-8 +- Rename back to fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec, renaming must follow + http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.20051122-7 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 19:20:29 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20091023192029.6CE9F11C02A2@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29467/devel Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: bump release Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 18:57:00 -0000 1.9 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:20:28 -0000 1.10 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh. Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy Version: 0.20051122 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} License: GPLv2 Source0: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/comix.tar.gz Source1: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/dorian.tar.gz @@ -191,6 +191,10 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Fri Oct 23 2009 Milos Jakubicek 0.20051122-8 +- Rename back to fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec, renaming must follow + http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.20051122-7 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 19:37:40 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.10,1.11 Message-ID: <20091023193740.22DA511C01EA@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3096/F-12 Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: - Rename fontname back too Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:20:26 -0000 1.10 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:37:39 -0000 1.11 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -%define fontname culmus-fancy +%define fontname fonts-hebrew-fancy %define fontconf 62-%{fontname} %define common_desc \ From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 19:37:40 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20091023193740.22EAA11C0260@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3096/F-11 Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: - Rename fontname back too Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-11/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:05:19 -0000 1.9 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:37:39 -0000 1.10 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -%define fontname culmus-fancy +%define fontname fonts-hebrew-fancy %define fontconf 62-%{fontname} %define common_desc \ From mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org Fri Oct 23 19:37:40 2009 From: mjakubicek at fedoraproject.org (=?utf-8?b?TWlsb8WhIEpha3Viw63EjWVr?=) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.10,1.11 Message-ID: <20091023193740.E3B8111C0264@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mjakubicek Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3096/devel Modified Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec Log Message: - Rename fontname back too Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:20:28 -0000 1.10 +++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 23 Oct 2009 19:37:40 -0000 1.11 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -%define fontname culmus-fancy +%define fontname fonts-hebrew-fancy %define fontconf 62-%{fontname} %define common_desc \ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 20:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910232022.n9NKMTmr003161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-23 16:22:28 EDT --- $ fc-match ':lang=gu-IN' --verbose Pattern has 30 elts (size 32) family: "Lohit Gujarati"(s) familylang: "en"(s) style: "Regular"(s) stylelang: "en"(s) fullname: "Lohit Gujarati"(s) fullnamelang: "en"(s) slant: 0(i)(s) weight: 80(i)(s) width: 100(i)(s) size: 12(f)(s) pixelsize: 12.5(f)(s) foundry: "unknown"(s) hintstyle: 3(i)(s) hinting: FcTrue(s) verticallayout: FcFalse(s) autohint: FcFalse(s) globaladvance: FcTrue(s) file: "/usr/share/fonts/lohit/lohit_gu.ttf"(s) index: 0(i)(s) outline: FcTrue(s) scalable: FcTrue(s) dpi: 75(f)(s) scale: 1(f)(s) charset: 0000: 00000000 ffffffff f8000001 78000001 00000000 00000004 00000000 00800000 0009: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000030 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 000a: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 fffbbfee f3edfdff 00013bbf 0002ffcf 0020: 33183000 00000040 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0022: 00040000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0025: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00001000 00000000 (s) lang: gu(s) fontversion: 157286(i)(s) capability: "otlayout:gujr"(s) fontformat: "TrueType"(s) embeddedbitmap: FcTrue(s) decorative: FcFalse(s) The charset element suggests that fontconfig thinks the font covers ASCII digits (those are one bit per char). So the problem is not with your code. Well, checking the font in fontforge, it does have glyphs for ASCII digits. Something's wrong with the cmap. Normally you don't see them mapped, but select "Compact" encoding in fontforge and you see that glyphs ids 125 on are the digits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 24 19:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530760] New: fontlint can not parse ./ relative paths Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fontlint can not parse ./ relative paths https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530760 Summary: fontlint can not parse ./ relative paths Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: $ fontlint $PWD/./fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. This font contains both a 'kern' table and a 'GPOS' table. The 'kern' table will only be read if there is no 'kern' feature in 'GPOS'. Use-my-metrics flag set on at least two components in glyph 685 The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. A point in uni0651064C is outside the font bounding box data. A point in uni0651064F is outside the font bounding box data. Validation DejaVuSans-Bold ...Failed Self Intersecting Glyph Wrong Direction Missing Points at Extrema Bad 'glyf' or 'loca' table Bad 'CFF ' table $ fontlint ./fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. The requested file, DeejaVuSans-Bldd.ttf, does not exist Open: Failed to open: ./fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf Called from... /usr/bin/fontlint: line 15 (if you can convince upstream to use a bugzilla I can ask behdad to open a fontforge product on bugzilla.freedesktop.org and I will file bugs directly upstream next time; I don't have the time to do mailing-list bug reporting) fontforge-20090622-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From henrich_d at openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 22:46:07 2009 From: henrich_d at openoffice.org (henrich_d at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Oct 2009 22:46:07 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091024224607.19825.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from henrich_d at openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 22:46:06 +0000 2009 ------- Hi. I'm IPAfont package maintainer in Debian. I want to clearfy that this is not font specific issue, but OpenOffice.org's one. With some different Japanese fonts, similar issue would happen (I'll attache test case). And I saw that printing expert folks triaged this issue at Printing-japan (Japanese discussions on printing under Linux) and its conclution is OpenOffice.org embeds font data into PS file wrongly. See https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/printing-japan/2009-October/002465.html With newer versions of CUPS that have PDF workflow, this bug would appear. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From henrich_d at openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 22:48:45 2009 From: henrich_d at openoffice.org (henrich_d at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Oct 2009 22:48:45 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091024224845.21065.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User henrich_d changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts' |'fedorafonts,henrich_d' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From henrich_d at openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 22:51:26 2009 From: henrich_d at openoffice.org (henrich_d at openoffice.org) Date: 24 Oct 2009 22:51:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091024225126.22049.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from henrich_d at openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 22:51:25 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65579) test case with some Japanese font --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Oct 25 11:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 04:01:52 -0700 Subject: [Bug 421317] Thunderbird's default-font options shows only one member of the font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910251101.n9PB1q3o030997@pm-app-bugs01.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421317 (:Aureliano Buend?a) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ulysse at email.it Component|General |Preferences QAContact|general at thunderbird.bugs |preferences at thunderbird.bug | |s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 25 15:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530846] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910251522.n9PFMQ4U022541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530846 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-25 11:22:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366032) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366032) File: backtrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 25 15:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530846] New: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530846 Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:319bfaf0333b32e137fcda44c1c4d088e5d8b6e2 Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora abrt detected a crash. How to reproduce ----- 1. 2. 3. Additional information ====== Attached files ---- backtrace cmdline ----- /usr/bin/fontforge -lang=ff /usr/bin/fontlint usr/share/fonts/myanmar3-unicode/mm3.ttf component ----- fontforge executable ----- /usr/bin/fontforge kernel ----- 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.x86_64 package ----- fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 reason ----- Process was terminated by signal 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 25 16:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530853] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910251648.n9PGme8p004307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530853 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-25 12:48:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366036) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366036) File: backtrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 25 16:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530853] New: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530853 Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:d1efa21952ee28a507adc40fca836c7bc1196658 Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora abrt detected a crash. How to reproduce ----- 1. 2. 3. Additional information ====== Attached files ---- backtrace cmdline ----- /usr/bin/fontforge -lang=ff /usr/bin/fontlint usr/share/X11/fonts/cyrillic/crox3t.pcf.gz component ----- fontforge executable ----- /usr/bin/fontforge kernel ----- 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.x86_64 package ----- fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 reason ----- Process was terminated by signal 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 25 17:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910251737.n9PHbIHp011851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 25 20:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910252000.n9PK0GOH006759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530880 TK009 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |john.brown009 at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From naruoga at openoffice.org Mon Oct 26 02:26:36 2009 From: naruoga at openoffice.org (naruoga at openoffice.org) Date: 26 Oct 2009 02:26:36 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091026022636.21093.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from naruoga at openoffice.org Mon Oct 26 02:26:35 +0000 2009 ------- Hi, I'm a member of OpenPrinting, the standardize organization of *nix printing. Printing-Japan ML is our discussion ML in Japanese. I'll roughly translate the e-mail henrich_d attached. This e-mail is written by Koji Otani, implementer of the PDF workflow. ---------------------------------------------------------------- OOo make wrong PS data with embedded font, but this problem caused only in PDF workflow. (Translator Remark: PDF workflow is OpenPrinting's new printer workflow. Final goal is all of applications creates PDF instead of PS, and CUPS filters handles PDF, because PDF is light, Page-oriented, any other good feature from printing point of view. Currently, some distribution, especially Debian Lenny (or later) and Ubuntu 8.10 (or later) have supported this workflow) Problem 1. ========== OpenOffice.org has wrong login when it creates PS with embedded fonts. In this case, OOo embed Type 42 (Truetype) fonts, however, some glyphs of unprinterble characters (e.g. ??? of IPA P Gothic) put with GID == 0 (for .notdef glyph only). This output is wrong. And also Encoding is wrong. For example, when ???is assigned in code == 1, Encoding[1] should be related glyph name (glyph1), but OOo put the name to Encoding[0]. Encoding[1] leave as .notdef. Problem 2. ========== Ghostscript can proceed that kind wrong PS (maybe it's a kind of bug). ??( code --> .notdef -->?GID==0) So we have no problem without PDF workflow. In the PDF workflow, PS data with problem 1 translated to PDF by Ghostscript without any changes about font feature, then the PDF translated to PS. In this process, this issue caused. PDF workflow is need newer CUPS, so this issue depends on the CUPS version. And we only have the problem in Debian Lenny (or later) / Ubuntu 8.10 (or later), that's why only the two distros supports PDF workflow now. ---------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From naruoga at openoffice.org Mon Oct 26 02:27:09 2009 From: naruoga at openoffice.org (naruoga at openoffice.org) Date: 26 Oct 2009 02:27:09 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091026022709.21306.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User naruoga changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,henrich_d' |'fedorafonts,henrich_d,nar | |uoga' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 04:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530846] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910260441.n9Q4fPuC002380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530846 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-26 00:41:22 EDT --- Sadly, abrt doesn't install debuginfo... can you 'debuginfo-install fontforge' and re-do whatever you were doing when it crashed, then attach the full backtrace? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 04:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530853] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910260441.n9Q4fRR4003070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530853 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-26 00:41:26 EDT --- Sadly, abrt doesn't install debuginfo... can you 'debuginfo-install fontforge' and re-do whatever you were doing when it crashed, then attach the full backtrace? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 06:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530518] [ne_NP] Remove unnecessary characters from font file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910260609.n9Q69cV8002700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530518 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[ne_NP]Remove unnecessary |[ne_NP] Remove unnecessary |characters from font file |characters from font file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 06:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530853] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910260646.n9Q6kAhJ015701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530853 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-26 02:46:07 EDT --- I did this before generating the abrt trace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 08:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910260831.n9Q8VnX0019400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |530943 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 08:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] [gu_IN]fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910260842.n9Q8gMRS023459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|fontconfig suggests "Lohit |[gu_IN]fontconfig suggests |Gujarati" when requesting a |"Lohit Gujarati" when |font that supports '1', but |requesting a font that |Lohit Gujarati doesn't have |supports '1', but Lohit |that glyph |Gujarati doesn't have that | |glyph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 20:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910262011.n9QKB467007370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-26 16:11:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 21:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] [gu_IN]fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910262144.n9QLiS06013567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 22:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] New: Useless font auto-installer calls Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Useless font auto-installer calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Summary: Useless font auto-installer calls Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora The font stack triggers the PK font auto-installer for stuff like N'ko or Ancient Persian for which fontconfig has no orthography Therefore, those calls will never succeed and the user is bothered for no good reason fc-query/cache should also generate PK metadata for unicode blocks, so that when the font stack needs a glyph which is not part of an orthography, PK can search for fonts that cover the corresponding unicode block (stuff like symbols will probably never make it in an orth) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 22:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910262217.n9QMHGx5024806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |richard at hughsie.com, | |smparrish at gmail.com Component|fontconfig |PackageKit AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |richard at hughsie.com --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-26 18:17:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > The font stack triggers the PK font auto-installer for stuff like N'ko or > Ancient Persian for which fontconfig has no orthography > > Therefore, those calls will never succeed and the user is bothered for no good > reason This is surely a bug. And easy to fix, in at least two ways on the PK side: 1) Only show a dialog if there's any font supporting that language. This was supposed to be the default. Not sure why it wasn't implemented this way. 2) In the GTK+ module, use FcLangGetCharset() to check whether fc knows about the language. IMO both of them should be done. > fc-query/cache should also generate PK metadata for unicode blocks, so that > when the font stack needs a glyph which is not part of an orthography, PK can > search for fonts that cover the corresponding unicode block (stuff like symbols > will probably never make it in an orth) Not a huge fan of this. Lets add orth's where missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 22:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910262235.n9QMZla2002965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-26 18:35:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > The font stack triggers the PK font auto-installer for stuff like N'ko or > > Ancient Persian for which fontconfig has no orthography > > > > Therefore, those calls will never succeed and the user is bothered for no good > > reason > > This is surely a bug. And easy to fix, in at least two ways on the PK side: > > 1) Only show a dialog if there's any font supporting that language. This was > supposed to be the default. Not sure why it wasn't implemented this way. PK asks for permission to search for fonts, and since it has not searched yet, it does not know if there's any font supporting that language yet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 00:47:32 2009 From: maho at openoffice.org (maho at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 00:47:32 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027004732.9567.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User maho changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,nar|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,mah |uoga' |o,naruoga' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 00:48:50 2009 From: maho at openoffice.org (maho at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 00:48:50 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027004850.9992.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User maho changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|issues at ja |hdu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ja |gsl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QA contact|issues at ja |issues at gsl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 00:48:49 +0000 2009 ------- hdu: Could you please re-assign to appropriate person? change component gsl as this is not a ja issue. many many thanks! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 02:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270225.n9R2PvmE010553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #24 from fujiwara 2009-10-26 22:25:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366194) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366194) Patch for pango-script.c My understanding is, the problem is ASCII alphabet uses the latin fonts but ASCII number and sign(e.g. '@') use the different fonts. Probably it's a good idea to use the same font for ASCII for all languages. However fontconfig is better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 04:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] [gu_IN]fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270433.n9R4XBEV016566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |psatpute at redhat.com Component|fontconfig |lohit-gujarati-fonts Resolution|NOTABUG | AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-27 00:33:10 EDT --- yep, numerals have a wrong encoding values thats why this bug is coming i will fix this in next version of lohit-gujarati-fonts, thanks Caolan for notifying this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 05:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530085] [or_IN] - window titles appearing with Underline for default Oriya Lohit Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270537.n9R5bqAZ009891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530085 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[or_IN] - Editor's Title |[or_IN] - window titles |appearing with Underline |appearing with Underline |for Oriya Lohit Fonts |for default Oriya Lohit |(Default Fonts) |Font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 05:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530085] [or_IN] window titlebar has horizontal line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270545.n9R5jV2q016328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530085 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[or_IN] - window titles |[or_IN] window titlebar has |appearing with Underline |horizontal line |for default Oriya Lohit | |Font | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 06:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270628.n9R6SWqp000692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-27 02:28:31 EDT --- msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 06:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270628.n9R6SdYY000751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.001-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 06:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270637.n9R6boJb008958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090715-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 06:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270637.n9R6bi17005074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-27 02:37:43 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 06:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270648.n9R6miIB015083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20090715-2.fc11 |20090715-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 06:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270648.n9R6mYSq010493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-27 02:48:33 EDT --- oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:17:50 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 09:17:50 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027091750.28184.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:17:48 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65663) ps-result for the second sample document --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 09:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531201] New: Spacing problem in Telugu [te_IN] text, required more space between words. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Spacing problem in Telugu [te_IN] text, required more space between words. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531201 Summary: Spacing problem in Telugu [te_IN] text, required more space between words. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: kkrothap at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=366224) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366224) Represents bug acutal result. Description of problem: The normal space between the words in telugu text is very low, required more space between words. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Open gedit and select telugu input method to enter telugu text. Then check the space between the words, it is very low that should be increased. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit, and go to edit to select the Lohit telugu font under font&colors tab. 2.Select the telugu input method from ibus to input telugu text. 3.Now check the space between words that is very low, should be more. Actual results: Follow the steps in reproduce section, and now examine the text, space should be more than the present. Expected results: I am giving the both Actual and Expected results screen shots here, please go through them. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 09:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531201] Spacing problem in Telugu [te_IN] text, required more space between words. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270922.n9R9MoqC001235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531201 --- Comment #1 from Krishna Babu K 2009-10-27 05:22:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366225) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366225) Represents bug expected result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:26:20 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 09:26:20 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027092620.4597.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:26:20 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65664) screenshot from a ps-viewer --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:37:27 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 09:37:27 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027093727.13895.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,mah|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,mah |o,naruoga' |o,naruoga,pl' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |STARTED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:37:27 +0000 2009 ------- I'm not sure that I understand the problem yet: 1. On which milestones was the problem confirmed? If it was DEV300_m56 or older then please check again with something newer (e.g. DEV300_m6x or OOO320_m0x) 2. Does the problem exist in the ps-export I attached (created with DEV300_m60 and IPA2.03 fonts)? 3. Would the problem be visible in the screenshot of a postscript-viewer? I attached a screenshot. If the problems are visible there please highlight them and attach the resulting image. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:41:51 2009 From: maho at openoffice.org (maho at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 09:41:51 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027094151.16601.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:41:50 +0000 2009 ------- hdu: Thanks for your looking into this issue. Please see the .png file you attached. In the fourth line and tenth line, two ???s are missing. Please compare the fourth line and tenth line the .ps file you attached. You will see ???in fourth line and tenth line. thanks! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:46:12 2009 From: maho at openoffice.org (maho at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 09:46:12 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027094612.19248.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:46:10 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65665) Missing ?? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:46:35 2009 From: maho at openoffice.org (maho at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 09:46:35 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027094635.19787.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:46:34 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65666) Missing ??? is highlighted --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:50:15 2009 From: maho at openoffice.org (maho at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 09:50:15 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027095015.21195.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from maho at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:50:14 +0000 2009 ------- hdu: > 1. On which milestones was the problem confirmed? If it was DEV300_m56 or older then please check again with something newer (e.g. DEV300_m6x or OOO320_m0x) sorry not for this time. > 2. Does the problem exist in the ps-export I attached (created with DEV300_m60 and IPA2.03 fonts)? to me, it's okay. http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/65663/i105631_fontcheck.ps > 3. Would the problem be visible in the screenshot of a postscript-viewer? I attached a screenshot. If the problems are visible there please highlight them and attach the resulting image. http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/65664/i105631_psviewed.png visible, I highlighted where are the missing chars in http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/65666/i105631_psviewed_maho.png thanks! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 09:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531201] Spacing problem in Telugu [te_IN] text, required more space between words. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270957.n9R9vD77004501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531201 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 10:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910271032.n9RAWQrF019747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #3 from Richard Hughes 2009-10-27 06:32:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1) Only show a dialog if there's any font supporting that language. This was > supposed to be the default. Not sure why it wasn't implemented this way. We're working with the yum guys to make this possible. > 2) In the GTK+ module, use FcLangGetCharset() to check whether fc knows about > the language. At what point should the module call FcLangGetCharset? Somewhere like http://cgit.freedesktop.org/packagekit/tree/contrib/gtk-module/pk-gtk-module.c#n229 ? Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 10:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910271058.n9RAwf8k024408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-27 06:58:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > fc-query/cache should also generate PK metadata for unicode blocks, so that > > when the font stack needs a glyph which is not part of an orthography, PK can > > search for fonts that cover the corresponding unicode block (stuff like symbols > > will probably never make it in an orth) > > Not a huge fan of this. Lets add orth's where missing. So if I submitted a fontconfig rfe to add an .orth for math symbols, engineering symbols, dingbats, ancient persian, etc would it be accepted? If yes what namespace should be used for those orths? I think ancient scripts have standardised ids ISO-side, but symbols? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From than at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 27 13:07:52 2009 From: than at fedoraproject.org (Than Ngo) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/urw-fonts/F-12 urw-fonts.spec,1.34,1.35 Message-ID: <20091027130752.9FCCD11C00E6@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: than Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/urw-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6129 Modified Files: urw-fonts.spec Log Message: fix #77314, invalid URL Index: urw-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/urw-fonts/F-12/urw-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.34 retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -p -r1.34 -r1.35 --- urw-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 06:38:46 -0000 1.34 +++ urw-fonts.spec 27 Oct 2009 13:07:52 -0000 1.35 @@ -5,16 +5,15 @@ Summary: Free versions of the 35 standard PostScript fonts. Name: urw-fonts Version: 2.4 -Release: 8%{?dist} -Source: ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/urw-fonts-%{filippov_version}.tar.bz2 -URL: ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/ +Release: 9%{?dist} +Source: %{name}-%{filippov_version}.tar.bz2 +URL: http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/ # URW holds copyright # No version specified License: GPL+ Group: User Interface/X -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildArchitectures: noarch - +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) +BuildArch: noarch Requires(post): fontconfig Requires(postun): fontconfig @@ -73,6 +72,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{fontdir}/*.pfb %changelog +* Tue Oct 27 2009 Than Ngo - 2.4-9 +- fix #77314, invalid URL + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.4-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From than at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 27 13:19:58 2009 From: than at fedoraproject.org (Than Ngo) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/urw-fonts/devel urw-fonts.spec,1.34,1.35 Message-ID: <20091027131958.D1CB911C00E6@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: than Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/urw-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8336 Modified Files: urw-fonts.spec Log Message: fix #77314, invalid URL Index: urw-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/urw-fonts/devel/urw-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.34 retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -p -r1.34 -r1.35 --- urw-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 06:38:46 -0000 1.34 +++ urw-fonts.spec 27 Oct 2009 13:19:58 -0000 1.35 @@ -5,16 +5,15 @@ Summary: Free versions of the 35 standard PostScript fonts. Name: urw-fonts Version: 2.4 -Release: 8%{?dist} -Source: ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/urw-fonts-%{filippov_version}.tar.bz2 -URL: ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/ +Release: 9%{?dist} +Source: %{name}-%{filippov_version}.tar.bz2 +URL: http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/ # URW holds copyright # No version specified License: GPL+ Group: User Interface/X -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildArchitectures: noarch - +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) +BuildArch: noarch Requires(post): fontconfig Requires(postun): fontconfig @@ -73,6 +72,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{fontdir}/*.pfb %changelog +* Tue Oct 27 2009 Than Ngo - 2.4-9 +- fix #77314, invalid URL + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.4-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 14:06:24 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 14:06:24 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027140624.18265.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,mah|'fedorafonts,hdu,henrich_d |o,naruoga,pl' |,maho,naruoga,pl' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assigned to|hdu |pl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|STARTED |NEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|Linux |Unix, X11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 14:06:23 +0000 2009 ------- So the problem ares the lines with "Encoding 0 /glyph1 put" in the postscript file. The problem is reproducible with the old versions such as OOo31. AFAIK this is supposed to be prevented by http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300/file/75b77d6c0e63/vcl/unx/source/fontmanager/fontmanager .cxx#l3661 which seems to come directly from http://gsl.openoffice.org/source/browse/gsl/psprint/source/fontmanager/fontmanager.cxx? r1=1.30&r2=1.31 I'm not exactly sure how this is supposed to work. Reassigning to the author. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From henrich_d at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 14:28:09 2009 From: henrich_d at openoffice.org (henrich_d at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 14:28:09 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027142809.597.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from henrich_d at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 14:28:08 +0000 2009 ------- Hi, I've add comment with png file that maho attached one. Not only missing "?" with IPA P Gothic/Mincho but also missing "?" with VL Gothic/VL P Gothic and MS P Mincho and "?" with Sazanami Gothic. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From henrich_d at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 14:30:00 2009 From: henrich_d at openoffice.org (henrich_d at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 14:30:00 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027143000.2256.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from henrich_d at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 14:29:59 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65680) missing glyph "?" "?" and "?" is highlighted --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 15:35:23 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 15:35:23 -0000 Subject: [Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027153523.13933.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105631 is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From hdu at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 15:35:26 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 15:35:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027153526.14401.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ IssuesThisDependsOn| |104050 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 15:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910271551.n9RFpEgC001692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-27 11:51:13 EDT --- can i put cvs request here now? how to register these fonts in legacy core font system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 16:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910271602.n9RG2N6e025697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-27 12:02:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > can i put cvs request here now? the fedora-review flag was set to yes > how to register these fonts in legacy core font system? take a look at bug #528675 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 16:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910271651.n9RGpU6l016663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ben at bagu.org --- Comment #19 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-27 12:51:28 EDT --- *** Bug 531186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 16:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910271650.n9RGojT6016502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oliver at linux-kernel.at Component|pango |eclipse AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |overholt at redhat.com Summary|Java (so Eclipse too) |SWT crash (in theory in |crashes |pango but more likely in | |GTK) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pl at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 17:39:03 2009 From: pl at openoffice.org (pl at openoffice.org) Date: 27 Oct 2009 17:39:03 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091027173903.847.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User pl changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from pl at openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 17:39:03 +0000 2009 ------- target --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 20:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910272047.n9RKlRQa014447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-27 16:47:26 EDT --- For information, upstream and Ubuntu bugs related to this: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=285749 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/174759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 20:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910272046.n9RKkuUw000394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(M.Stoikov at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #20 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-27 16:46:53 EDT --- This puzzles me: /home/mstoikov/.eclipse/793567567/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/594/1/.cp/libswt-gnome-gtk-3555.so The SWT .so files should be extracted into /usr/lib{,64}/eclipse and not get extracted (or re-extracted) at runtime. Michael, did you happen to try with an eclipse.org download expanded into a read-only (to the running user) location at some point? Can you try to see if you can duplicate with a clean ~/.eclipse? Ben, do you have any SWT .so files in ~/.eclipse? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 27 22:49:33 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.18, 1.19 fontpackages.spec, 1.24, 1.25 import.log, 1.20, 1.21 sources, 1.18, 1.19 Message-ID: <20091027224933.72F3F11C00E6@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16289/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.29 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 21:23:31 -0000 1.18 +++ .cvsignore 27 Oct 2009 22:49:32 -0000 1.19 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.24 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -p -r1.24 -r1.25 --- fontpackages.spec 19 Oct 2009 21:23:32 -0000 1.24 +++ fontpackages.spec 27 Oct 2009 22:49:32 -0000 1.25 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.28 +Version: 1.29 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ This package contains spec templates, rp create font packages. +%package tools +Summary: Tools used to check fonts and font packages + +Requires: fontforge, fontconfig, mutt + +%description tools +This package contains tools used to check fonts and font packages + + %prep %setup -q @@ -88,6 +97,7 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig + %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc license.txt readme.txt @@ -96,10 +106,16 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt -%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* +%files tools +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* %changelog +* Tue Oct 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.29-1 +? Split out tools as repo-font-audit requirements grow + * Mon Oct 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.28-1 ? Rework repo-font-audit to also generate individual packager nagmails Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21 --- import.log 19 Oct 2009 21:23:32 -0000 1.20 +++ import.log 27 Oct 2009 22:49:32 -0000 1.21 @@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.26-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254091733 fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698 fontpackages-1_28-1_fc13:HEAD:fontpackages-1.28-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255987394 +fontpackages-1_29-1_fc13:HEAD:fontpackages-1.29-1.fc13.src.rpm:1256683739 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 21:23:32 -0000 1.18 +++ sources 27 Oct 2009 22:49:33 -0000 1.19 @@ -1 +1 @@ -0702fe5a2cc4d16df807003fe0c40ae2 fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz +481b29bf3e4410848ba2aaf01b25d80e fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Oct 27 22:50:18 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-12 .cvsignore, 1.18, 1.19 fontpackages.spec, 1.24, 1.25 import.log, 1.20, 1.21 sources, 1.18, 1.19 Message-ID: <20091027225018.429EB11C02BB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16534/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.29 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- .cvsignore 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.18 +++ .cvsignore 27 Oct 2009 22:50:17 -0000 1.19 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.24 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -p -r1.24 -r1.25 --- fontpackages.spec 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.24 +++ fontpackages.spec 27 Oct 2009 22:50:18 -0000 1.25 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.28 +Version: 1.29 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ This package contains spec templates, rp create font packages. +%package tools +Summary: Tools used to check fonts and font packages + +Requires: fontforge, fontconfig, mutt + +%description tools +This package contains tools used to check fonts and font packages + + %prep %setup -q @@ -88,6 +97,7 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig + %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc license.txt readme.txt @@ -96,10 +106,16 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf %{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt -%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* +%files tools +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* %changelog +* Tue Oct 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.29-1 +? Split out tools as repo-font-audit requirements grow + * Mon Oct 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.28-1 ? Rework repo-font-audit to also generate individual packager nagmails Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21 --- import.log 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.20 +++ import.log 27 Oct 2009 22:50:18 -0000 1.21 @@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.26-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254091733 fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698 fontpackages-1_28-1_fc13:F-12:fontpackages-1.28-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255987476 +fontpackages-1_29-1_fc13:F-12:fontpackages-1.29-1.fc13.src.rpm:1256683797 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- sources 19 Oct 2009 21:24:56 -0000 1.18 +++ sources 27 Oct 2009 22:50:18 -0000 1.19 @@ -1 +1 @@ -0702fe5a2cc4d16df807003fe0c40ae2 fontpackages-1.28.tar.xz +481b29bf3e4410848ba2aaf01b25d80e fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 06:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520051] [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910280608.n9S680aj010345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #359012|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #359012|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 06:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520051] [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910280610.n9S6ACJ0027684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 06:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520051] [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910280626.n9S6Qaq4000956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-28 02:26:35 EDT --- Hi nicholas, there is no templete in /usr/share/fontconfig/template for signle font supporting multiple language. do we need to replease below block for each lang? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 07:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910280721.n9S7Lfs7019441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 28 07:38:26 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel 67-samyak-devanagari.conf, NONE, 1.1 67-samyak-gujarati.conf, NONE, 1.1 67-samyak-oriya.conf, NONE, 1.1 67-samyak-tamil.conf, NONE, 1.1 69-samyak-malayalam.conf, NONE, 1.1 samyak-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11 Message-ID: <20091028073826.B402711C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19279 Modified Files: samyak-fonts.spec Added Files: 67-samyak-devanagari.conf 67-samyak-gujarati.conf 67-samyak-oriya.conf 67-samyak-tamil.conf 69-samyak-malayalam.conf Log Message: * Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-7 - added fontconf files for each subpackage --- NEW FILE 67-samyak-devanagari.conf --- hi serif Samyak Devanagari Samyak Devanagari serif --- NEW FILE 67-samyak-gujarati.conf --- gu serif Samyak Gujarati Samyak Gujarati serif --- NEW FILE 67-samyak-oriya.conf --- or serif Samyak Oriya Samyak Oriya serif --- NEW FILE 67-samyak-tamil.conf --- ta serif Samyak Tamil Samyak Tamil serif --- NEW FILE 69-samyak-malayalam.conf --- ml serif Samyak Malayalam Samyak Malayalam serif Index: samyak-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- samyak-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 03:47:48 -0000 1.10 +++ samyak-fonts.spec 28 Oct 2009 07:38:25 -0000 1.11 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ %define fontname samyak +%global fontconf 67-%{fontname} %define langlist "devanagari gujarati tamil malayalam oriya" # Common description @@ -8,12 +9,17 @@ Scripts Devanagari, Gujarati, Malayalam, Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.2.1 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions URL: https://sarovar.org/projects/samyak/ Source: samyak-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz +Source1: 67-samyak-devanagari.conf +Source2: 67-samyak-tamil.conf +Source3: 69-samyak-malayalam.conf +Source4: 67-samyak-gujarati.conf +Source5: 67-samyak-oriya.conf BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ Obsoletes: %{name}-devanagari < 1.2.1-3 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Devanagari. -%_font_pkg -n devanagari %{fontname}-devanagari/Samyak-*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n devanagari -f %{fontconf}-devanagari.conf %{fontname}-devanagari/Samyak-*.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Tamil script @@ -54,7 +60,7 @@ Obsoletes: %{name}-tamil < 1.2.1-3 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Tamil. -%_font_pkg -n tamil %{fontname}-tamil/*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n tamil -f %{fontconf}-tamil.conf %{fontname}-tamil/*.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script @@ -67,7 +73,7 @@ Obsoletes: %{name}-malayalam < 1.2.1-3 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Malayalam. -%_font_pkg -n malayalam %{fontname}-malayalam/*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n malayalam -f 69-samyak-malayalam.conf %{fontname}-malayalam/*.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Gujarai script @@ -80,7 +86,7 @@ Obsoletes: %{name}-gujarati < 1.2.1-3 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Gujarati. -%_font_pkg -n gujarati %{fontname}-gujarati/*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n gujarati -f %{fontconf}-gujarati.conf %{fontname}-gujarati/*.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Oriya script @@ -93,7 +99,7 @@ Obsoletes: %{name}-oriya < 1.2.1-3 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ Scripts Oriya. -%_font_pkg -n oriya %{fontname}-oriya/*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n oriya -f %{fontconf}-oriya.conf %{fontname}-oriya/*.ttf %prep @@ -111,6 +117,35 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdi install -m 0644 -p $i/* %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/samyak-$i done +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} + +# Repeat for every font family +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-devanagari.conf + +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-tamil.conf + +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/69-samyak-malayalam.conf + +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE4} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gujarati.conf + +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE5} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-oriya.conf + + +for fconf in %{fontconf}-devanagari.conf \ + %{fontconf}-tamil.conf \ + 69-samyak-malayalam.conf \ + %{fontconf}-gujarati.conf \ + %{fontconf}-oriya.conf ; do + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf +done + %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} @@ -121,6 +156,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-7 +- added fontconf files for each subpackage + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.2.1-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 08:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910280829.n9S8TdN0009905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635 Bug 517635 depends on bug 520051, which changed state. Bug 520051 Summary: [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 08:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520051] [deva] Need fontconfig rules for Samyak Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910280829.n9S8TcIu009884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520051 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-28 04:29:37 EDT --- spell replease->repeat in previous comment fixed samyak-fonts-1.2.1-7.fc13 for rawhide closing for now please reopen if any problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 08:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910280853.n9S8rCt8015196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-28 04:53:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #10) > Please check the fontconfig priorities, when you're not using the l10n > template, bigger prefix means lower prio, but with the l10n locale override, > bigger prefix means bigger prio, so 69 will trump any ja font with a <69 prefix > (IIRC) Sure. will update. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: knm-new-fixed-fonts Short Description: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-12 F-11 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 10:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531431] Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281008.n9SA8Mo3014548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431 --- Comment #2 from DmD Ljungmark 2009-10-28 06:08:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366411) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366411) lspci output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 10:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531431] Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281007.n9SA7m2e014424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431 --- Comment #1 from DmD Ljungmark 2009-10-28 06:07:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366410) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366410) xorg log file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 10:07:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531431] New: Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431 Summary: Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: spider at takeit.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=366409) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366409) Screenshot of the problem Description of problem: Fonts "disappear" in a cloud of pixels, mostly it's in certain fatness/fonts and it is reproducible, always the same letters. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Rawhide, updated Wed 28, 2009 fontconfig-2.7.3-1.fc12.i686 cairo-1.8.8-3.fc12.i686 pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.i686 package xorg is not installed xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.7.0-1.fc12.i686 xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.0-0.10.20091006git457646d73.fc12.i686 kernel-2.6.31.5-96.fc12.i686 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.start x 2. start emacs 3. shudder at fonts Actual results: Broken letters in Firefox, Metacity, Emacs, gedit and other applications Expected results: Smooth and beautifully hinted fonts Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 10:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531431] Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281055.n9SAtSuW008100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431 --- Comment #3 from DmD Ljungmark 2009-10-28 06:55:27 EDT --- Fixed with the latest kernel (2.6.31.5-104.fc12) from : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=138707 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 28 12:07:27 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/F-12 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20091028120727.9D2D311C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9962 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release wuth bugfix 529637 - update in upstream url Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 11 Sep 2009 10:04:36 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 28 Oct 2009 12:07:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ lohit-gujarati-2.4.3.tar.gz +lohit-gujarati-2.4.4.tar.gz Index: lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/F-12/lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:54:41 -0000 1.2 +++ lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec 28 Oct 2009 12:07:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ %global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 2.4.4 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Gujarati font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ -Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/gujarati/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 +- upstream release wuth bugfix 529637 +- update in upstream url + * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 11 Sep 2009 10:04:36 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 28 Oct 2009 12:07:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -92dacc86836abbf69bfcc47c3e9ae669 lohit-gujarati-2.4.3.tar.gz +9a3775f24e9772c365986dbd7cef2b94 lohit-gujarati-2.4.4.tar.gz From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Oct 28 12:11:46 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20091028121146.C1F2711C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11062 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release wuth bugfix 529637 - update in upstream url Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 11 Sep 2009 10:04:36 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 28 Oct 2009 12:11:46 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ lohit-gujarati-2.4.3.tar.gz +lohit-gujarati-2.4.4.tar.gz Index: lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel/lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:54:41 -0000 1.2 +++ lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec 28 Oct 2009 12:11:46 -0000 1.3 @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ %global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 2.4.4 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Gujarati font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ -Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/gujarati/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Wed Oct 28 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 +- upstream release wuth bugfix 529637 +- update in upstream url + * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 11 Sep 2009 10:04:36 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 28 Oct 2009 12:11:46 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -92dacc86836abbf69bfcc47c3e9ae669 lohit-gujarati-2.4.3.tar.gz +9a3775f24e9772c365986dbd7cef2b94 lohit-gujarati-2.4.4.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 12:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] [gu_IN]fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281216.n9SCGFLY023514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-28 08:16:13 EDT --- fixed problem built lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.4-1 for F12 as well devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 12:17:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520041] [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281217.n9SCHK7I007148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-28 08:17:19 EDT --- for this bug we need to first fix font priorities of default font Meera need to file bug for that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 12:56:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531431] Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281256.n9SCuCtD030926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431 --- Comment #4 from DmD Ljungmark 2009-10-28 08:56:11 EDT --- Scratch the "Fixed" and replace it with "Greatly improved" I still see the same kind of error, but not in as many places. Currently on the B and F in bold text in metacity and a few other places. Oh, and capital D in the bug reports and this text field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From naruoga at openoffice.org Wed Oct 28 14:24:33 2009 From: naruoga at openoffice.org (naruoga at openoffice.org) Date: 28 Oct 2009 14:24:33 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091028142433.17476.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 ------- Additional comments from naruoga at openoffice.org Wed Oct 28 14:24:32 +0000 2009 ------- We, OpenPrinting recommends all of applications (and all of distros) will change their print workflow from Postscript workflow to PDF workflow. So we hope OOo also shift to PDF workflow. In distros with PDF workflow already supported (e.g. Ubuntu and Debian stable), these kind of bug will be gone and we'll have a better performance. However, we're not sure that we have any problem to use PDF print data in distros with PS workflow (e.g. Fedora right now). Technically it should work fine, but we can't know about hidden issues. So now our rational choice is OOo (or any other applications) have a switch to select print format. This switch don't need UI, just packager of each distros can be select which is suitable. We know this proposal needs big change, so if we need another process not only issue tracker but also some kind of feature request system, please let me know. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 14:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281441.n9SEfBFG022336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-28 10:41:08 EDT --- Jim Hayward reports on fedora-devel-java-list [1]: > I cannot reproduce that bug at all on a fully updated F12(rawhide) x86 > system. I don't currently have an x86_64 install to try. Eclipse 3.5.1 > has been working great since the dialog issue was fixed. I have been > using 3.5.1 daily for Java/C/C++ projects with no issues at all. I'm in the process on setting up an x86_64 system to see if I can track it down. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2009-October/msg00052.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 15:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531431] Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281508.n9SF845M013084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com, | |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|pango |xorg-x11-drv-ati AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |xgl-maint at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-10-28 11:08:04 EDT --- Almost certainly a driver bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 15:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281528.n9SFSpsS018768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #23 from Ben Konrath 2009-10-28 11:28:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Ben, do you have any SWT .so files in ~/.eclipse? No, the SWT shared libraries aren't in ~/.eclipse on my system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 16:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531510] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281620.n9SGKuM0030730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531510 --- Comment #1 from V??ctor Daniel 2009-10-28 12:20:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366463) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366463) File: backtrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 16:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531510] New: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531510 Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:556f6012c2d8bc210f86b461aee30dbb9756b41f Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: bombayvdmo at yahoo.com.mx QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora abrt detected a crash. How to reproduce ----- 1. 2. 3. Comment ----- Opening a file Additional information ====== Attached files ---- backtrace cmdline ----- fontforge /home/familia/Documentos/Font Faces/LinLibertineFont/Biolinum_Bd-0.4.1.otf component ----- fontforge executable ----- /usr/bin/fontforge kernel ----- 2.6.31.5-96.fc12.i686 package ----- fontforge-20090622-2.fc12 reason ----- Process was terminated by signal 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 18:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281830.n9SIUVww002196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #24 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-28 14:30:30 EDT --- I *finally* got rawhide x86_64 installed. So far, I can't duplicate the problem. I've tried adding the Pydev update site and it didn't crash (it didn't add the content but that's another issue :). I've also created and deleted a bunch of Java projects and haven't had any issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 18:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281844.n9SIiTWW005749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #25 from Mat Booth 2009-10-28 14:44:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > I *finally* got rawhide x86_64 installed. So far, I can't duplicate the > problem. I've tried adding the Pydev update site and it didn't crash (it > didn't add the content but that's another issue :). I've also created and > deleted a bunch of Java projects and haven't had any issues. Does the test case attached to the upstream Eclipse ticket work on Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 18:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281855.n9SItA33023240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #26 from Ben Konrath 2009-10-28 14:55:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > I *finally* got rawhide x86_64 installed. So far, I can't duplicate the > problem. The crash happened for me on i686 so it may not be a 64-bit issue. > I've tried adding the Pydev update site and it didn't crash (it > didn't add the content but that's another issue :). I had problems adding update sites too. Is there a bug report for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 18:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281858.n9SIwdHb009560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #27 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-28 14:58:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #24) > > I *finally* got rawhide x86_64 installed. So far, I can't duplicate the > > problem. > > The crash happened for me on i686 so it may not be a 64-bit issue. Odd. > > I've tried adding the Pydev update site and it didn't crash (it > > didn't add the content but that's another issue :). > > I had problems adding update sites too. Is there a bug report for this? No, I'd appreciate you filing one. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 19:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281942.n9SJgUv6020144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Eclipse Project 285749 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 19:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] SWT crash (in theory in pango but more likely in GTK) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910281941.n9SJfwLQ020044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #28 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-28 15:41:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > I *finally* got rawhide x86_64 installed. So far, I can't duplicate the > > problem. I've tried adding the Pydev update site and it didn't crash (it > > didn't add the content but that's another issue :). I've also created and > > deleted a bunch of Java projects and haven't had any issues. > > > Does the test case attached to the upstream Eclipse ticket work on Fedora? No. I've commented there. Thanks for pointing that out, Mat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 28 20:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531431] Font rendering is broken on Rawhide (radeon chipset) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910282004.n9SK416o025980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531431 Jerome Glisse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org, | |jglisse at redhat.com Component|xorg-x11-drv-ati |0xFFFF Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Jerome Glisse 2009-10-28 16:04:00 EDT --- Duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529081 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 529081 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 28 20:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:46:24 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910282046.n9SKkO3g018676@pm-app-bugs01.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #200 from David E. Ross 2009-10-28 13:41:34 PDT --- In which Gecko version has this been fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Oct 28 20:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:49:57 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910282049.n9SKnvIE000939@pm-app-bugs02.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #201 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd 2009-10-28 13:48:17 PDT --- @font-face is in Gecko 1.9.1. Were you asking about something more specific? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 00:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290007.n9T07us9032081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-28 20:07:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 00:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290054.n9T0s3jd028942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-28 20:54:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366524) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366524) Untested patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 00:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290055.n9T0tNth029579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 --- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-28 20:55:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > > fc-query/cache should also generate PK metadata for unicode blocks, so that > > > when the font stack needs a glyph which is not part of an orthography, PK can > > > search for fonts that cover the corresponding unicode block (stuff like symbols > > > will probably never make it in an orth) > > > > Not a huge fan of this. Lets add orth's where missing. > > So if I submitted a fontconfig rfe to add an .orth for math symbols, > engineering symbols, dingbats, ancient persian, etc would it be accepted? > If yes what namespace should be used for those orths? I think ancient scripts > have standardised ids ISO-side, but symbols? Oh, that's what you meant. I believe there's a bug upstream about it? That's a separate issue and we need to figure it out, yeah. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 00:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290059.n9T0xtn5030413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #25 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-28 20:59:53 EDT --- I've said multiple times, that approach is not acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 01:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290134.n9T1Yp3q024201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #26 from fujiwara 2009-10-28 21:34:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > I've said multiple times, that approach is not acceptable. I know it's not acceptable but I tried to clarify the problem above. This problem is, how we use the common script. It seems zh-cn people like to use the common ASCII script with latin fonts in monospace/sans/serif. Currently I'm thinking if a feature in fontconfig could be an approach. I noticed pango_engine_shape_real_covers() checks gunichar coverage. E.g. 0x00-0x7f in fontconfig would be an idea? I'll have a look at fontconfig next week. On the other hand, I'd like to use ja fonts for common script, latin script and other covered scripts in monospace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 06:03:12 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091029060312.4FB0111C0265@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25094/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- knm-new-fixed-fonts-1_1-8_fc13:HEAD:knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-8.fc13.src.rpm:1256794568 --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp monospace Fixed Fixed monospace --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec --- %global priority 69 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPL+ ## the following upstream URL is a dead link anymore. #URL: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/ #Source0: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/knm_new.tar.gz Source0: knm_new.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: mkfontdir fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-11.fc8 Obsoletes: knm_new <= 1.1-16 knm_new-fonts < 1.1-7 %description This package provides 12x12 Japanese bitmap fonts for JIS X 0208. The JIS X 0208 character set contains the most often used Kanji glyphs. %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} install -m 0644 -p fonts/*.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}/ install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} # Install catalogue symlink ln -s -f %{_fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{fontname} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.pcf.gz %lang(ja) %doc fonts/readme fonts/changes %doc fonts/gtkrc.sample %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{catalogue}/* %changelog * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. * Tue Oct 13 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-7 - Renaming to satisfy the naming schema in the fontpackages policy. * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-5 - Clean up a spec file. - Rebuild to correct autoprovides (#491966) * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Oct 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-3 - Remove the upstream's dead link from the spec file. (#353941) * Fri Sep 7 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-2 - clean up * Thu Aug 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-1 - Split up from fonts-japanese. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 00:08:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 06:03:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +knm_new.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Oct 2009 00:08:09 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 29 Oct 2009 06:03:10 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +065920714d022cfd225feb6d80b03238 knm_new.tar.gz From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 06:37:08 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12 import.log, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091029063708.F3F1511C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16040/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- knm-new-fixed-fonts-1_1-8_fc13:F-12:knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-8.fc13.src.rpm:1256796979 --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp monospace Fixed Fixed monospace --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec --- %global priority 69 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPL+ ## the following upstream URL is a dead link anymore. #URL: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/ #Source0: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/knm_new.tar.gz Source0: knm_new.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: mkfontdir fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-11.fc8 Obsoletes: knm_new <= 1.1-16 knm_new-fonts < 1.1-7 %description This package provides 12x12 Japanese bitmap fonts for JIS X 0208. The JIS X 0208 character set contains the most often used Kanji glyphs. %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} install -m 0644 -p fonts/*.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}/ install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} # Install catalogue symlink ln -s -f %{_fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{fontname} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.pcf.gz %lang(ja) %doc fonts/readme fonts/changes %doc fonts/gtkrc.sample %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{catalogue}/* %changelog * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. * Tue Oct 13 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-7 - Renaming to satisfy the naming schema in the fontpackages policy. * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-5 - Clean up a spec file. - Rebuild to correct autoprovides (#491966) * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Oct 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-3 - Remove the upstream's dead link from the spec file. (#353941) * Fri Sep 7 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-2 - clean up * Thu Aug 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-1 - Split up from fonts-japanese. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 00:08:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 06:37:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +knm_new.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Oct 2009 00:08:09 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 29 Oct 2009 06:37:08 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +065920714d022cfd225feb6d80b03238 knm_new.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 06:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290643.n9T6h5h7019924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #24 from Ani Peter 2009-10-29 02:43:03 EDT --- Tested latest rawhide (smc-fonts-04.2-2.fc12) and here are the results with Meera 10, Meera 12, comparing with Rachana 10 and Rachana 12 on Fedora default desktop: Meera 10 -> underline appears on the gui and gedit title bar Meera 12 -> underline appears on the gui and gedit title bar and the close buttons become too larger in size. (above issues applicable to OO, FF and Qt as mentioned earlier) Rachana 10 -> works well with no underline Rachana 12 -> works well with no underline and buttons are normal in size. Relevant screenshots attached for Meera 10, Meera 12, Rachana 10, Rachana 12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 06:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290645.n9T6jRaF005822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #25 from Ani Peter 2009-10-29 02:45:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366559) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366559) Screenshot with Meera 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 06:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290646.n9T6kK72021283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #26 from Ani Peter 2009-10-29 02:46:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366560) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366560) Screenshot with Meera 12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 06:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290648.n9T6mpW6007075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #28 from Ani Peter 2009-10-29 02:48:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366562) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366562) Screenshot with Rachana 12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 06:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290647.n9T6lvuG006744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #27 from Ani Peter 2009-10-29 02:47:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366561) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366561) Screenshot with Rachana 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 06:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290657.n9T6v351010272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 07:19:56 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091029071956.3CAA911C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2720/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- knm-new-fixed-fonts-1_1-8_fc13:F-11:knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-8.fc13.src.rpm:1256799623 --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp monospace Fixed Fixed monospace --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec --- %global priority 69 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPL+ ## the following upstream URL is a dead link anymore. #URL: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/ #Source0: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/knm_new.tar.gz Source0: knm_new.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: mkfontdir fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-11.fc8 Obsoletes: knm_new <= 1.1-16 knm_new-fonts < 1.1-7 %description This package provides 12x12 Japanese bitmap fonts for JIS X 0208. The JIS X 0208 character set contains the most often used Kanji glyphs. %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} install -m 0644 -p fonts/*.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}/ install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} # Install catalogue symlink ln -s -f %{_fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{fontname} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.pcf.gz %lang(ja) %doc fonts/readme fonts/changes %doc fonts/gtkrc.sample %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{catalogue}/* %changelog * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. * Tue Oct 13 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-7 - Renaming to satisfy the naming schema in the fontpackages policy. * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-5 - Clean up a spec file. - Rebuild to correct autoprovides (#491966) * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Oct 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-3 - Remove the upstream's dead link from the spec file. (#353941) * Fri Sep 7 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-2 - clean up * Thu Aug 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-1 - Split up from fonts-japanese. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 00:08:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 07:19:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +knm_new.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Oct 2009 00:08:09 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 29 Oct 2009 07:19:55 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +065920714d022cfd225feb6d80b03238 knm_new.tar.gz From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 07:29:45 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091029072945.EEBF311C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7007/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- knm-new-fixed-fonts-1_1-8_fc13:F-10:knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-8.fc13.src.rpm:1256800878 --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ja-jp monospace Fixed Fixed monospace --- NEW FILE knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec --- %global priority 69 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPL+ ## the following upstream URL is a dead link anymore. #URL: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/ #Source0: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/knm_new.tar.gz Source0: knm_new.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: mkfontdir fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-11.fc8 Obsoletes: knm_new <= 1.1-16 knm_new-fonts < 1.1-7 %description This package provides 12x12 Japanese bitmap fonts for JIS X 0208. The JIS X 0208 character set contains the most often used Kanji glyphs. %prep %setup -q -T -c -a 0 %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} install -m 0644 -p fonts/*.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}/ install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} # Install catalogue symlink ln -s -f %{_fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{fontname} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.pcf.gz %lang(ja) %doc fonts/readme fonts/changes %doc fonts/gtkrc.sample %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{catalogue}/* %changelog * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. * Tue Oct 13 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-7 - Renaming to satisfy the naming schema in the fontpackages policy. * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-5 - Clean up a spec file. - Rebuild to correct autoprovides (#491966) * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Oct 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-3 - Remove the upstream's dead link from the spec file. (#353941) * Fri Sep 7 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-2 - clean up * Thu Aug 30 2007 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-1 - Split up from fonts-japanese. Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 00:08:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 07:29:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +knm_new.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Oct 2009 00:08:09 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 29 Oct 2009 07:29:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +065920714d022cfd225feb6d80b03238 knm_new.tar.gz From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 07:33:44 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20091029073344.3BBA311C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8591 Modified Files: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 - change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. Index: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/devel/knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 06:03:10 -0000 1.1 +++ knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 07:33:43 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -%global priority 69 +%global priority 65 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 +- change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. + * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 07:46:36 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel Makefile,1.1,NONE sources,1.2,NONE Message-ID: <20091029074636.E43FF11C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14190 Removed Files: Makefile sources Log Message: dead package --- Makefile DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 07:47:09 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20091029074709.3B89511C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14668 Added Files: dead.package Log Message: dead package --- NEW FILE dead.package --- This package has been renamed to knm-new-fixed-fonts. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 07:47:33 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12 knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20091029074733.56CCD11C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14959 Modified Files: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 - change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. Index: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-12/knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 06:37:08 -0000 1.1 +++ knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 07:47:32 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -%global priority 69 +%global priority 65 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 +- change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. + * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:03:48 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-12 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE branch, 1.1, NONE knm_new-fonts.spec, 1.6, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20091029080348.9C36011C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21194 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile branch knm_new-fonts.spec sources Log Message: dead package --- NEW FILE dead.package --- This package has been renamed to knm-new-fixed-fonts. --- Makefile DELETED --- --- branch DELETED --- --- knm_new-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:12:51 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11 knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20091029081251.5DDBF11C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24865 Modified Files: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 - change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. Index: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-11/knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 07:19:55 -0000 1.1 +++ knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 08:12:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -%global priority 69 +%global priority 65 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 +- change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. + * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:24:51 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10 knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20091029082451.4C79F11C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28603 Modified Files: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 - change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. Index: knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm-new-fixed-fonts/F-10/knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 07:29:45 -0000 1.1 +++ knm-new-fixed-fonts.spec 29 Oct 2009 08:24:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -%global priority 69 +%global priority 65 %global fontname knm-new-fixed %global fontconf %{priority}-%{fontname}.conf %global catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Thu Oct 29 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-9 +- change the priority to 65 to make this the less priority. + * Tue Oct 20 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-8 - Improve the spec file etc to pass the package review. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:25:50 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-11 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE branch, 1.1, NONE knm_new-fonts.spec, 1.5, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20091029082550.AD2CE11C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28981 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile branch knm_new-fonts.spec sources Log Message: dead package --- NEW FILE dead.package --- This package has been renamed to knm-new-fixed-fonts. --- Makefile DELETED --- --- branch DELETED --- --- knm_new-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:49:20 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-10 Makefile, 1.1, NONE branch, 1.1, NONE knm_new-fonts.spec, 1.2, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20091029084920.B8BDF11C008B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4803 Removed Files: Makefile branch knm_new-fonts.spec sources Log Message: dead package --- Makefile DELETED --- --- branch DELETED --- --- knm_new-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:23 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:23 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20091029085424.0AD2710F85D@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora devel was orphaned by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:24 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:24 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts (un)retirement Message-ID: <20091029085424.1921210F87F@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora devel has been retired by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:31 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:31 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20091029085432.0689B10F85D@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 10 was orphaned by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:31 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:31 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts (un)retirement Message-ID: <20091029085432.1EAC910F87E@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 10 has been retired by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:35 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:35 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20091029085435.9F9D810F85D@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 11 was orphaned by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:35 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:35 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts (un)retirement Message-ID: <20091029085435.B397A10F89A@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 11 has been retired by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:41 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:41 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20091029085441.9D68C10F85D@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 12 was orphaned by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 08:54:41 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:54:41 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] knm_new-fonts (un)retirement Message-ID: <20091029085441.AF23C10F87F@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package knm_new-fonts in Fedora 12 has been retired by tagoh To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/knm_new-fonts From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 08:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511668] FTBFS knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290859.n9T8xMUl031214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511668 Bug 511668 depends on bug 528675, which changed state. Bug 528675 Summary: Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 08:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fixed-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290859.n9T8xJXH031140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH 2009-10-29 04:59:17 EDT --- Thanks. pushed the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 11:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910291102.n9TB2hVs029479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Richard Hughes 2009-10-29 07:02:42 EDT --- Please can you try the build of PackageKit here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1776157 You will need to reboot your computer to ensure the packagekitd process has been restarted. Please provide feedback to whether this build fixes this bug. Thanks. Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ikuya at openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 11:18:41 2009 From: ikuya at openoffice.org (ikuya at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Oct 2009 11:18:41 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091029111841.27340.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User ikuya changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hdu,henrich_d|'fedorafonts,hdu,henrich_d |,maho,naruoga,pl' |,ikuya,maho,naruoga,pl' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 19:04:00 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20 fontpackages.spec, 1.25, 1.26 import.log, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.19, 1.20 Message-ID: <20091029190400.B3B0811C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv357/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.30 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- .cvsignore 27 Oct 2009 22:49:32 -0000 1.19 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 19:03:59 -0000 1.20 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.30.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -p -r1.25 -r1.26 --- fontpackages.spec 27 Oct 2009 22:49:32 -0000 1.25 +++ fontpackages.spec 29 Oct 2009 19:04:00 -0000 1.26 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.29 +Version: 1.30 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* %changelog +* Thu Oct 29 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.30-1 +? Bugfix release + * Tue Oct 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.29-1 ? Split out tools as repo-font-audit requirements grow Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -p -r1.21 -r1.22 --- import.log 27 Oct 2009 22:49:32 -0000 1.21 +++ import.log 29 Oct 2009 19:04:00 -0000 1.22 @@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698 fontpackages-1_28-1_fc13:HEAD:fontpackages-1.28-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255987394 fontpackages-1_29-1_fc13:HEAD:fontpackages-1.29-1.fc13.src.rpm:1256683739 +fontpackages-1_30-1_fc13:HEAD:fontpackages-1.30-1.fc13.src.rpm:1256843017 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- sources 27 Oct 2009 22:49:33 -0000 1.19 +++ sources 29 Oct 2009 19:04:00 -0000 1.20 @@ -1 +1 @@ -481b29bf3e4410848ba2aaf01b25d80e fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz +b480c95f0072225764f6c9d6170806f8 fontpackages-1.30.tar.xz From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 19:05:40 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-12 .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20 fontpackages.spec, 1.25, 1.26 import.log, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.19, 1.20 Message-ID: <20091029190540.2811011C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv910/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.30 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- .cvsignore 27 Oct 2009 22:50:17 -0000 1.19 +++ .cvsignore 29 Oct 2009 19:05:39 -0000 1.20 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.30.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -p -r1.25 -r1.26 --- fontpackages.spec 27 Oct 2009 22:50:18 -0000 1.25 +++ fontpackages.spec 29 Oct 2009 19:05:39 -0000 1.26 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.29 +Version: 1.30 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* %changelog +* Thu Oct 29 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.30-1 +? Bugfix release + * Tue Oct 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.29-1 ? Split out tools as repo-font-audit requirements grow Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -p -r1.21 -r1.22 --- import.log 27 Oct 2009 22:50:18 -0000 1.21 +++ import.log 29 Oct 2009 19:05:39 -0000 1.22 @@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698 fontpackages-1_28-1_fc13:F-12:fontpackages-1.28-1.fc13.src.rpm:1255987476 fontpackages-1_29-1_fc13:F-12:fontpackages-1.29-1.fc13.src.rpm:1256683797 +fontpackages-1_30-1_fc13:F-12:fontpackages-1.30-1.fc13.src.rpm:1256843115 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- sources 27 Oct 2009 22:50:18 -0000 1.19 +++ sources 29 Oct 2009 19:05:39 -0000 1.20 @@ -1 +1 @@ -481b29bf3e4410848ba2aaf01b25d80e fontpackages-1.29.tar.xz +b480c95f0072225764f6c9d6170806f8 fontpackages-1.30.tar.xz From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910292131.n9TLV6ts009554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910292130.n9TLUZpY009459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dave at adsllc.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-29 17:30:34 EDT --- Review: 1. typo in the description: orginaly 2. I don't think we go as far as asking to convert .ttf to .otf when upstream chose .ttf. When upstream does both, we prefer .otf, but it's fine keeping .ttf if it's upstream's choice. I doubt that for this particular font this will change anything, ttf vs otf is mostly relevant for complex fonts (this is not a criticism, the package is fine as is, just an informational note) 3. repo-font-audit notes this font could easily be extended to cover more scripts with just a little effort (many scripts are less than ten glyphs away). I'll attach the report if you want to relay it upstream ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the wiki gardening. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:18 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:18 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the adf-accanthis-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213918.GA19364@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your adf-accanthis-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 adf-accanthis-fonts adf-accanthis-2-fonts 4 4 adf-accanthis-fonts adf-accanthis-3-fonts 4 4 adf-accanthis-fonts adf-accanthis-fonts 4 4 ? Total 12 12 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the adf-accanthis-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: adf-accanthis-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 20488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:17 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:17 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the abyssinica-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213917.GA19357@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your abyssinica-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 abyssinica-fonts abyssinica-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ Please take the appropriate measures to fix the abyssinica-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: abyssinica-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19908 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:19 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:19 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the baekmuk-bdf-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213919.GA19421@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your baekmuk-bdf-fonts package: SRPM RPM 4 16 19 baekmuk-bdf-fonts baekmuk-bdf-fonts 42 42 42 ? Total 42 42 42 4. Fonts in packages that do not declare font metadata ? Font-specific rpm metadata is required for automatic font installation to work. If you apply our font packaging templates, it will be generated at package creation time. 16. Fonts fc-query can not parse ? fc-query could not parse some font files in the package. The files may be malformed and in need of fixing, or fc-query has a bug (in that case, please report the problem so it is fixed). Any font file rejected by fc-query will be useless in fontconfig and most applications. If it can not be fixed drop it. 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the baekmuk-bdf-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: baekmuk-bdf-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19932 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:19 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:19 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the asana-math-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213919.GA19415@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your asana-math-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 asana-math-fonts asana-math-fonts 1 1 1 ? Total 1 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the asana-math-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: asana-math-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18444 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:19 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:19 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the apanov-heuristica-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213919.GA19401@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your apanov-heuristica-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 apanov-heuristica-fonts apanov-heuristica-fonts 4 4 ? Total 4 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the apanov-heuristica-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: apanov-heuristica-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19660 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:19 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:19 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the apanov-edrip-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213919.GA19395@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your apanov-edrip-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 apanov-edrip-fonts apanov-edrip-fonts 4 ? Total 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig Please take the appropriate measures to fix the apanov-edrip-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: apanov-edrip-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18792 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:19 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:19 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the artwiz-aleczapka-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213919.GA19408@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your artwiz-aleczapka-fonts package: SRPM RPM 4 7 11 17 19 artwiz-aleczapka-fonts artwiz-aleczapka-fonts 48 3 48 48 48 ? Total 48 3 48 48 48 4. Fonts in packages that do not declare font metadata ? Font-specific rpm metadata is required for automatic font installation to work. If you apply our font packaging templates, it will be generated at package creation time. 7. Fonts that declare non-WWS compliant styles ? This WWS-like test checks if font styles use the ?Width Weight Slant? naming convention?. As noted by Adobe the CSS family model is less than ideal, but it's a standard and applications expect it?. Since our applications do not workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics, achieving consistent style naming that can be used in CSS/web oriented applications requires fixing face naming directly in the font files. For this reason we test font style naming separately from font family naming, and do not support complex weight abbreviations and suffixes?. To pass this test make sure your style names do not include any qualifier not defined in the WWS whitepaper?, and that ?Width?, ?Weight? or ?Slant? are defined only once. Any other qualifier belongs in the font family name. If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its naming so it does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd form) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem?. ? http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf ? http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf ? As defined in the end of the WWS renaming algorithm described in the Microsoft whitepaper. ? cf the ?fontpackages? remapping template; unfortunately this workaround won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating with other systems. 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the artwiz-aleczapka-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 24160 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:21 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:21 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the bpg-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213921.GA19463@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your bpg-fonts package: SRPM RPM 6 17 bpg-fonts bpg-algeti-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-courier-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-courier-s-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-elite-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-excelsior-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-glaho-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-ingiri-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts 1 1 bpg-fonts bpg-nino-medium-fonts 1 1 bpg-fonts bpg-sans-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-sans-medium-fonts 1 1 bpg-fonts bpg-sans-modern-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-sans-regular-fonts 1 1 bpg-fonts bpg-serif-fonts ? 1 bpg-fonts bpg-serif-modern-fonts ? 1 ? Total 4 16 6. Fonts that declare style attributes in family names ? To be properly processed by applications face qualifiers need to be declared in style names. Some application stacks such as Microsoft WPF will try to workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics?, but heuristics are brittle and pose interoperability problems with applications that do not use them. If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its naming so it respects WWS conventions and does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd format) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem?. There may be a few false positives in this test as some common face qualifiers can be used with a different meaning in family names. ? http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf ? cf the ?fontpackages? remapping template; unfortunately this workaround won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating with other systems. 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig Please take the appropriate measures to fix the bpg-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bpg-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 23320 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:20 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:20 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the bitmap-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213920.GA19443@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your bitmap-fonts package: SRPM RPM 7 9 11 17 19 bitmap-fonts bitmap-cjk-fonts ? ? ? 2 2 bitmap-fonts bitmap-fonts 14 15 32 32 32 ? Total 14 15 32 34 34 7. Fonts that declare non-WWS compliant styles ? This WWS-like test checks if font styles use the ?Width Weight Slant? naming convention?. As noted by Adobe the CSS family model is less than ideal, but it's a standard and applications expect it?. Since our applications do not workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics, achieving consistent style naming that can be used in CSS/web oriented applications requires fixing face naming directly in the font files. For this reason we test font style naming separately from font family naming, and do not support complex weight abbreviations and suffixes?. To pass this test make sure your style names do not include any qualifier not defined in the WWS whitepaper?, and that ?Width?, ?Weight? or ?Slant? are defined only once. Any other qualifier belongs in the font family name. If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its naming so it does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd form) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem?. ? http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf ? http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf ? As defined in the end of the WWS renaming algorithm described in the Microsoft whitepaper. ? cf the ?fontpackages? remapping template; unfortunately this workaround won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating with other systems. 9. Font faces duplicated by different packages ? Face duplication wastes resources infrastructure and user side. Very often an upstream that copied some fonts will forget to keep them up to date, and the duplication will result in the distribution of old buggy data. Even when some duplicated font faces are a genuine fork with different features from the original, applications won't be able to select them reliably because of naming collision. We should always ship only one version of a font face in the repository, and use fontconfig or symlinks to share it accross packages. 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the bitmap-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bitmap-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 29692 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:20 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:20 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the beteckna-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213920.GA19436@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your beteckna-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 beteckna-fonts beteckna-fonts 1 1 beteckna-fonts beteckna-lower-case-fonts 4 4 beteckna-fonts beteckna-small-caps-fonts 1 1 ? Total 6 6 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the beteckna-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: beteckna-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 20012 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:22 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:22 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213922.GA19513@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig Please take the appropriate measures to fix the chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17828 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:20 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:20 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the baekmuk-ttf-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213920.GA19428@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your baekmuk-ttf-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 baekmuk-ttf-fonts baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts 1 1 1 baekmuk-ttf-fonts baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts 1 1 1 baekmuk-ttf-fonts baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts 1 1 1 baekmuk-ttf-fonts baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts 1 1 1 ? Total 4 4 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the baekmuk-ttf-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 23740 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:22 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:22 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the cf-bonveno-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213922.GA19492@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your cf-bonveno-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 cf-bonveno-fonts cf-bonveno-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig Please take the appropriate measures to fix the cf-bonveno-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cf-bonveno-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17860 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:20 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:20 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the bitstream-vera-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213920.GA19450@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your bitstream-vera-fonts package: SRPM RPM 8 9 17 19 bitstream-vera-fonts bitstream-vera-sans-fonts 4 4 4 4 bitstream-vera-fonts bitstream-vera-sans-mono-fonts 4 4 4 4 bitstream-vera-fonts bitstream-vera-serif-fonts 2 2 2 2 ? Total 10 10 10 10 8. Exact font duplication ? Several packages duplicate font files with the same checksum. This needlessly wastes resources. 9. Font faces duplicated by different packages ? Face duplication wastes resources infrastructure and user side. Very often an upstream that copied some fonts will forget to keep them up to date, and the duplication will result in the distribution of old buggy data. Even when some duplicated font faces are a genuine fork with different features from the original, applications won't be able to select them reliably because of naming collision. We should always ship only one version of a font face in the repository, and use fontconfig or symlinks to share it accross packages. 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the bitstream-vera-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bitstream-vera-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 20032 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:21 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:21 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the brettfont-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213921.GA19472@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your brettfont-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 brettfont-fonts brettfont-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig Please take the appropriate measures to fix the brettfont-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: brettfont-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18264 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:23 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:23 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the conakry-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213922.GA19525@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your conakry-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 conakry-fonts conakry-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ Please take the appropriate measures to fix the conakry-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: conakry-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18576 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:24 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:24 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the dejavu-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213924.GA19572@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your dejavu-fonts package: SRPM RPM 9 17 18 19 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts ? 1 9 9 dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts ? 4 ? ? dejavu-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts ? 8 ? 8 dejavu-fonts dejavu-sans-fonts 3 5 9 9 dejavu-fonts dejavu-sans-mono-fonts ? 4 2 2 dejavu-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts ? 8 ? 8 ? Total 3 30 20 36 9. Font faces duplicated by different packages ? Face duplication wastes resources infrastructure and user side. Very often an upstream that copied some fonts will forget to keep them up to date, and the duplication will result in the distribution of old buggy data. Even when some duplicated font faces are a genuine fork with different features from the original, applications won't be able to select them reliably because of naming collision. We should always ship only one version of a font face in the repository, and use fontconfig or symlinks to share it accross packages. 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dejavu-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dejavu-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 31544 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:22 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:22 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the cjkuni-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213922.GA19519@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your cjkuni-fonts package: SRPM RPM 3 12 14 17 19 cjkuni-fonts cjkuni-fonts-compat ? 2 ? ? ? cjkuni-fonts cjkuni-ukai-fonts 1 ? ? 1 1 cjkuni-fonts cjkuni-uming-fonts 1 ? 1 1 1 ? Total 2 2 1 2 2 3. Fonts in packages that contain non-font data ? Please do not mix font files with non-font data in packages. Fonts are usually useful outside of the package that deploys them and should be installable without pulling in other material. 12. Font linking ? Symlinking is a way for non-font packages to avoid duplicating font files, but it is also a symptom of missing or incomplete fontconfig support. Fontconfig has been our default font system for a long time, and accessing fonts by other means will cause behaviour inconsistencies and many other problems (since fontconfig is much more than a file locating library) Please ask the package upstream to add fontconfig support to their code (possibly, via a higher-level library such as pango-cairo). 14. Fonts rpmlint errors on ? Check rpmlint output to fix those packages (using the -i flag if you don't understand it). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the cjkuni-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cjkuni-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 25592 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:22 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:22 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213922.GA19507@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts package: SRPM RPM 7 17 chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts 3 3 ? Total 3 3 7. Fonts that declare non-WWS compliant styles ? This WWS-like test checks if font styles use the ?Width Weight Slant? naming convention?. As noted by Adobe the CSS family model is less than ideal, but it's a standard and applications expect it?. Since our applications do not workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics, achieving consistent style naming that can be used in CSS/web oriented applications requires fixing face naming directly in the font files. For this reason we test font style naming separately from font family naming, and do not support complex weight abbreviations and suffixes?. To pass this test make sure your style names do not include any qualifier not defined in the WWS whitepaper?, and that ?Width?, ?Weight? or ?Slant? are defined only once. Any other qualifier belongs in the font family name. If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its naming so it does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd form) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem?. ? http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf ? http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf ? As defined in the end of the WWS renaming algorithm described in the Microsoft whitepaper. ? cf the ?fontpackages? remapping template; unfortunately this workaround won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating with other systems. 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig Please take the appropriate measures to fix the chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18744 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:28 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:28 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-ambrosia-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213928.GA19720@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-ambrosia-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-ambrosia-fonts gfs-ambrosia-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-ambrosia-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17532 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:31 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:31 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-garaldus-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213930.GA19796@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-garaldus-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gfs-garaldus-fonts gfs-garaldus-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-garaldus-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-garaldus-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18016 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:25 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:25 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the dustin-dustismo-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213925.GA19614@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your dustin-dustismo-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 dustin-dustismo-fonts dustin-dustismo-roman-fonts 4 ? ? dustin-dustismo-fonts dustin-dustismo-sans-fonts 4 4 4 ? Total 8 4 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dustin-dustismo-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dustin-dustismo-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 20872 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:26 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:26 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the ecolier-court-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213926.GA19635@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your ecolier-court-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 ecolier-court-fonts ecolier-court-fonts 1 1 ecolier-court-fonts ecolier-court-lignes-fonts 1 1 ? Total 2 2 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the ecolier-court-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ecolier-court-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18608 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:31 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:31 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-ignacio-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213931.GA19808@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-ignacio-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gfs-ignacio-fonts gfs-ignacio-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-ignacio-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-ignacio-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18164 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:25 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:25 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the drehatlas-widelands-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213925.GA19602@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your drehatlas-widelands-fonts package: SRPM RPM 14 17 19 drehatlas-widelands-fonts drehatlas-widelands-fonts 1 1 1 ? Total 1 1 1 14. Fonts rpmlint errors on ? Check rpmlint output to fix those packages (using the -i flag if you don't understand it). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the drehatlas-widelands-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: drehatlas-widelands-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18412 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:30 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:30 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-eustace-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213930.GA19776@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-eustace-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gfs-eustace-fonts gfs-eustace-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-eustace-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-eustace-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17940 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:29 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:29 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-baskerville-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213929.GA19732@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-baskerville-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-baskerville-fonts gfs-baskerville-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-baskerville-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-baskerville-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17724 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:30 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:30 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-fleischman-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213930.GA19790@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-fleischman-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gfs-fleischman-fonts gfs-fleischman-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-fleischman-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-fleischman-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17940 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:25 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:25 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the dustin-domestic-manners-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213925.GA19608@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your dustin-domestic-manners-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts dustin-domestic-manners-fonts 1 ? Total 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig Please take the appropriate measures to fix the dustin-domestic-manners-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18204 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:29 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:29 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213929.GA19738@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18048 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:28 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:28 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the fonts-KOI8-R rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213928.GA19700@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your fonts-KOI8-R package: SRPM RPM 4 5 16 19 fonts-KOI8-R fonts-KOI8-R 16 16 16 16 fonts-KOI8-R fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi 60 60 60 60 fonts-KOI8-R fonts-KOI8-R-75dpi 114 114 114 114 ? Total 190 190 190 190 4. Fonts in packages that do not declare font metadata ? Font-specific rpm metadata is required for automatic font installation to work. If you apply our font packaging templates, it will be generated at package creation time. 5. Fonts in packages that do not respect font naming conventions ? Please respect font package naming conventions and provide consistent packages to users. Some scripts may depend on strict package naming. 16. Fonts fc-query can not parse ? fc-query could not parse some font files in the package. The files may be malformed and in need of fixing, or fc-query has a bug (in that case, please report the problem so it is fixed). Any font file rejected by fc-query will be useless in fontconfig and most applications. If it can not be fixed drop it. 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the fonts-KOI8-R package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fonts-KOI8-R.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 32920 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:26 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:26 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the efont-unicode-bdf rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213926.GA19641@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your efont-unicode-bdf package: SRPM RPM 5 9 11 17 19 efont-unicode-bdf efont-unicode-bdf 60 45 60 60 60 ? Total 60 45 60 60 60 5. Fonts in packages that do not respect font naming conventions ? Please respect font package naming conventions and provide consistent packages to users. Some scripts may depend on strict package naming. 9. Font faces duplicated by different packages ? Face duplication wastes resources infrastructure and user side. Very often an upstream that copied some fonts will forget to keep them up to date, and the duplication will result in the distribution of old buggy data. Even when some duplicated font faces are a genuine fork with different features from the original, applications won't be able to select them reliably because of naming collision. We should always ship only one version of a font face in the repository, and use fontconfig or symlinks to share it accross packages. 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the efont-unicode-bdf package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: efont-unicode-bdf.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 33792 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:27 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:27 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the fonts-hebrew-fancy rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213927.GA19688@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your fonts-hebrew-fancy package: SRPM RPM 4 5 11 19 fonts-hebrew-fancy fonts-hebrew-fancy 9 9 9 1 ? Total 9 9 9 1 4. Fonts in packages that do not declare font metadata ? Font-specific rpm metadata is required for automatic font installation to work. If you apply our font packaging templates, it will be generated at package creation time. 5. Fonts in packages that do not respect font naming conventions ? Please respect font package naming conventions and provide consistent packages to users. Some scripts may depend on strict package naming. 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the fonts-hebrew-fancy package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18764 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:18 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:18 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213918.GA19387@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ Please take the appropriate measures to fix the apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18856 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:24 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:24 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213924.GA19595@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18296 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:29 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:29 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-complutum-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213929.GA19752@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-complutum-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-complutum-fonts gfs-complutum-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-complutum-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-complutum-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17636 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:30 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:30 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-didot-classic-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213930.GA19764@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-didot-classic-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-didot-classic-fonts gfs-didot-classic-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-didot-classic-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17688 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:23 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:23 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the ctan-musixtex-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213923.GA19553@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your ctan-musixtex-fonts package: SRPM RPM 11 17 19 ctan-musixtex-fonts ctan-musixtex-fonts 71 60 70 ? Total 71 60 70 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the ctan-musixtex-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ctan-musixtex-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 27604 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:28 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:28 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gargi-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213928.GA19713@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gargi-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gargi-fonts gargi-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gargi-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gargi-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17744 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:31 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:31 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-gazis-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213931.GA19802@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-gazis-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-gazis-fonts gfs-gazis-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-gazis-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-gazis-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17740 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:31 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:31 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-jackson-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213931.GA19814@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-jackson-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gfs-jackson-fonts gfs-jackson-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-jackson-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-jackson-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17924 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:27 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:27 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the fonts-ISO8859-2 rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213927.GA19694@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your fonts-ISO8859-2 package: SRPM RPM 3 4 5 14 16 19 fonts-ISO8859-2 fonts-ISO8859-2 15 15 15 15 15 15 fonts-ISO8859-2 fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi 190 190 190 190 190 190 fonts-ISO8859-2 fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi 190 190 190 190 190 190 ? Total 395 395 395 395 395 395 3. Fonts in packages that contain non-font data ? Please do not mix font files with non-font data in packages. Fonts are usually useful outside of the package that deploys them and should be installable without pulling in other material. 4. Fonts in packages that do not declare font metadata ? Font-specific rpm metadata is required for automatic font installation to work. If you apply our font packaging templates, it will be generated at package creation time. 5. Fonts in packages that do not respect font naming conventions ? Please respect font package naming conventions and provide consistent packages to users. Some scripts may depend on strict package naming. 14. Fonts rpmlint errors on ? Check rpmlint output to fix those packages (using the -i flag if you don't understand it). 16. Fonts fc-query can not parse ? fc-query could not parse some font files in the package. The files may be malformed and in need of fixing, or fc-query has a bug (in that case, please report the problem so it is fixed). Any font file rejected by fc-query will be useless in fontconfig and most applications. If it can not be fixed drop it. 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the fonts-ISO8859-2 package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fonts-ISO8859-2.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 46788 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:18 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:18 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the adf-tribun-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213918.GA19371@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your adf-tribun-fonts package: SRPM RPM 6 11 17 19 adf-tribun-fonts adf-tribun-fonts 4 12 12 12 ? Total 4 12 12 12 6. Fonts that declare style attributes in family names ? To be properly processed by applications face qualifiers need to be declared in style names. Some application stacks such as Microsoft WPF will try to workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics?, but heuristics are brittle and pose interoperability problems with applications that do not use them. If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its naming so it respects WWS conventions and does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd format) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem?. There may be a few false positives in this test as some common face qualifiers can be used with a different meaning in family names. ? http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf ? cf the ?fontpackages? remapping template; unfortunately this workaround won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating with other systems. 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the adf-tribun-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: adf-tribun-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 20324 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:33 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:33 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-theokritos-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213933.GA19867@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-theokritos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 20 gfs-theokritos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 20. Fonts with localized metadata but no English variant ? Some font files in the package declare localized metadata, but do not include an English variant. They need to be fixed to also declare metadata in English. Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-theokritos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-theokritos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18148 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:28 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:28 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-artemisia-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213928.GA19726@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-artemisia-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 gfs-artemisia-fonts gfs-artemisia-fonts 4 4 4 ? Total 4 4 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-artemisia-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-artemisia-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19576 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:30 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:30 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-didot-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213930.GA19770@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-didot-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 gfs-didot-fonts gfs-didot-fonts 4 4 4 ? Total 4 4 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-didot-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-didot-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19516 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:29 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:29 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-bodoni-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213929.GA19744@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-bodoni-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 gfs-bodoni-fonts gfs-bodoni-fonts 4 4 4 ? Total 4 4 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-bodoni-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-bodoni-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19676 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:32 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:32 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-porson-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213932.GA19848@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-porson-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-porson-fonts gfs-porson-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-porson-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-porson-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17656 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:32 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:32 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-neohellenic-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213931.GA19823@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-neohellenic-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 gfs-neohellenic-fonts gfs-neohellenic-fonts 4 4 4 ? Total 4 4 4 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-neohellenic-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19592 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:32 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:32 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-olga-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213932.GA19835@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-olga-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-olga-fonts gfs-olga-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-olga-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-olga-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17640 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:30 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:30 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-decker-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213929.GA19758@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-decker-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-decker-fonts gfs-decker-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-decker-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-decker-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17644 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:33 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:33 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-pyrsos-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213932.GA19855@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-pyrsos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-pyrsos-fonts gfs-pyrsos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-pyrsos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-pyrsos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17716 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:33 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:33 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-solomos-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213933.GA19861@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-solomos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 19 gfs-solomos-fonts gfs-solomos-fonts 1 ? Total 1 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-solomos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-solomos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17668 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:32 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:32 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-nicefore-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213932.GA19829@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-nicefore-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gfs-nicefore-fonts gfs-nicefore-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-nicefore-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-nicefore-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 17944 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:35 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:35 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213934.GA19920@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts package: SRPM RPM 7 17 19 hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts 1 4 4 hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts ? 1 1 ? Total 1 5 5 7. Fonts that declare non-WWS compliant styles ? This WWS-like test checks if font styles use the ?Width Weight Slant? naming convention?. As noted by Adobe the CSS family model is less than ideal, but it's a standard and applications expect it?. Since our applications do not workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics, achieving consistent style naming that can be used in CSS/web oriented applications requires fixing face naming directly in the font files. For this reason we test font style naming separately from font family naming, and do not support complex weight abbreviations and suffixes?. To pass this test make sure your style names do not include any qualifier not defined in the WWS whitepaper?, and that ?Width?, ?Weight? or ?Slant? are defined only once. Any other qualifier belongs in the font family name. If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its naming so it does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd form) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem?. ? http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf ? http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf ? As defined in the end of the WWS renaming algorithm described in the Microsoft whitepaper. ? cf the ?fontpackages? remapping template; unfortunately this workaround won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating with other systems. 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 19136 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:32 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:32 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the gfs-philostratos-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213932.GA19841@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your gfs-philostratos-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 19 gfs-philostratos-fonts gfs-philostratos-fonts 1 1 ? Total 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the gfs-philostratos-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gfs-philostratos-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 18356 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:34 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:34 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the google-droid-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213934.GA19901@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your google-droid-fonts package: SRPM RPM 8 9 11 17 18 19 google-droid-fonts google-droid-sans-fonts 1 1 4 3 4 ? google-droid-fonts google-droid-sans-mono-fonts ? ? ? 1 1 1 google-droid-fonts google-droid-serif-fonts ? ? ? 4 4 ? ? Total 1 1 4 8 9 1 8. Exact font duplication ? Several packages duplicate font files with the same checksum. This needlessly wastes resources. 9. Font faces duplicated by different packages ? Face duplication wastes resources infrastructure and user side. Very often an upstream that copied some fonts will forget to keep them up to date, and the duplication will result in the distribution of old buggy data. Even when some duplicated font faces are a genuine fork with different features from the original, applications won't be able to select them reliably because of naming collision. We should always ship only one version of a font face in the repository, and use fontconfig or symlinks to share it accross packages. 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the google-droid-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: google-droid-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 28692 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:36 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:36 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the ipa-mincho-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213936.GA19963@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your ipa-mincho-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 ipa-mincho-fonts ipa-mincho-fonts 1 1 1 ? Total 1 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the ipa-mincho-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ipa-mincho-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 38492 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:36 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:36 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the ipa-gothic-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213936.GA19957@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your ipa-gothic-fonts package: SRPM RPM 17 18 19 ipa-gothic-fonts ipa-gothic-fonts 1 1 1 ? Total 1 1 1 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 18. Fonts with partial unicode block coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to fully cover an Unicode block. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. The Unicode consortium revises its tables regularly, and therefore a font may need to be extended to maintain its full coverage when a new Unicode revision is published?. To check a font file unicode coverage, run the ttfcoverage command. It only works for modern SFNT fonts (.otf, .ttf). ? http://www.unicode.org/charts/ 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the ipa-gothic-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ipa-gothic-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 29804 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com Thu Oct 29 21:39:33 2009 From: nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:33 +0100 Subject: Problems detected in the ghostscript-fonts rawhide package! Message-ID: <20091029213933.GA19873@arekh.okg> Dear packager, At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/ I have identified the following problems in your ghostscript-fonts package: SRPM RPM 4 6 8 9 11 17 19 ghostscript-fonts ghostscript-fonts 17 2 4 8 17 17 17 ? Total 17 2 4 8 17 17 17 4. Fonts in packages that do not declare font metadata ? Font-specific rpm metadata is required for automatic font installation to work. If you apply our font packaging templates, it will be generated at package creation time. 6. Fonts that declare style attributes in family names ? To be properly processed by applications face qualifiers need to be declared in style names. Some application stacks such as Microsoft WPF will try to workaround bad font naming with dynamic renaming heuristics?, but heuristics are brittle and pose interoperability problems with applications that do not use them. If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its naming so it respects WWS conventions and does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch it (if it is available in sfd format) or add a fontconfig rule to your package to hide the problem?. There may be a few false positives in this test as some common face qualifiers can be used with a different meaning in family names. ? http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf ? cf the ?fontpackages? remapping template; unfortunately this workaround won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when interoperating with other systems. 8. Exact font duplication ? Several packages duplicate font files with the same checksum. This needlessly wastes resources. 9. Font faces duplicated by different packages ? Face duplication wastes resources infrastructure and user side. Very often an upstream that copied some fonts will forget to keep them up to date, and the duplication will result in the distribution of old buggy data. Even when some duplicated font faces are a genuine fork with different features from the original, applications won't be able to select them reliably because of naming collision. We should always ship only one version of a font face in the repository, and use fontconfig or symlinks to share it accross packages. 11. Packages that mix different font families ? Reliable font auto-installation requires shipping only one font family per font package. (If you've remapped some font names at the fontconfig level your package may appear here pending some fontconfig fixes upstream is aware of). 17. Fonts with partial script coverage ? Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they could be made useful to more people with only a little effort. To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and look for lines like: script-id?(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints } For example ?mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }? means fontconfig will accept the tested file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added. If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary for a particular script, report the problem upstream?. ? http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig 19. Fonts that do not pass fontlint sanity checks ? Fontforge's fontlint? test suite found problems in some files included in the package. Those problems may not be obvious and only manifest as strange behaviour in specific applications (making them hard to debug). For that reason it is recommanded to report those problems upstream and get them fixed, even if the font file seems to work fine most of the time. You can ask help about specific fontlint errors on: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fontforge-users ? http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontlint.html Please take the appropriate measures to fix the ghostscript-fonts package. I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran. Your friendly QA robot, -- repo-font-audit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ghostscript-fonts.tar.xz Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar Size: 20268 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 21:53:13 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:53:13 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-hebrew-fancy ownership updated Message-ID: <20091029215314.14EAE10F87E@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-hebrew-fancy in Fedora devel was orphaned by danken To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-hebrew-fancy From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 21:53:14 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:53:14 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-hebrew-fancy (un)retirement Message-ID: <20091029215314.324DE10F88B@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-hebrew-fancy in Fedora devel has been retired by danken To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-hebrew-fancy From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 21:57:11 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:57:11 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-hebrew-fancy ownership updated Message-ID: <20091029215711.E93B610F8B7@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-hebrew-fancy in Fedora 12 was orphaned by danken To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-hebrew-fancy From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 21:57:11 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:57:11 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] fonts-hebrew-fancy (un)retirement Message-ID: <20091029215712.108BA10F8BA@bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package fonts-hebrew-fancy in Fedora 12 has been retired by danken To make changes to this package see: /pkgdb/packages/name/fonts-hebrew-fancy From danken at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 21:58:18 2009 From: danken at fedoraproject.org (Dan Kenigsberg) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 dead.package, NONE, 1.1 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec, 1.11, NONE sources, 1.3, NONE Message-ID: <20091029215818.A65DF11C02BC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: danken Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7141 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec sources Log Message: fonts-hebrew-fancy end of life --- NEW FILE dead.package --- due to strict font packaging rules, fonts-hebrew-fancy has to be replaced by culmus-fancy-anka-fonts culmus-fancy-comix-no2-fonts culmus-fancy-dorian-fonts culmus-fancy-gan-fonts culmus-fancy-gladia-fonts culmus-fancy-ktav-yad-fonts culmus-fancy-ozrad-fonts as described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913#c2 unfortunately, this has not yet been done (oct 2009) --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From danken at fedoraproject.org Thu Oct 29 21:58:42 2009 From: danken at fedoraproject.org (Dan Kenigsberg) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec, 1.11, NONE sources, 1.3, NONE Message-ID: <20091029215842.C56B511C02BC@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: danken Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7234 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec sources Log Message: fonts-hebrew-fancy end of life --- NEW FILE dead.package --- due to strict font packaging rules, fonts-hebrew-fancy has to be replaced by culmus-fancy-anka-fonts culmus-fancy-comix-no2-fonts culmus-fancy-dorian-fonts culmus-fancy-gan-fonts culmus-fancy-gladia-fonts culmus-fancy-ktav-yad-fonts culmus-fancy-ozrad-fonts as described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913#c2 unfortunately, this has not yet been done (oct 2009) --- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 22:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910292217.n9TMHxmV024159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-10-29 18:17:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366726) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366726) repo-font-audit report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 30 04:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230662] Faulty text-wrapping for Asian languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910300401.n9U41i6v021168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230662 --- Comment #18 from Runa Bhattacharjee 2009-10-30 00:01:39 EDT --- Tested for xchat-gnome-0.26.1-5.fc12 and the bug still exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 30 04:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910300410.n9U4Aip3023761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Dave Ludlow 2009-10-30 00:10:44 EDT --- Thanks, as usual, Nicolas. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts Short Description: A Latin typeface that is sharp and angular Owners: adsllc Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 30 10:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529637] [gu_IN]fontconfig suggests "Lohit Gujarati" when requesting a font that supports '1', but Lohit Gujarati doesn't have that glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910301039.n9UAdmiM030435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529637 --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2009-10-30 06:39:46 EDT --- *** Bug 529521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ih at openoffice.org Fri Oct 30 16:43:12 2009 From: ih at openoffice.org (ih at openoffice.org) Date: 30 Oct 2009 16:43:12 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091030164312.19492.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 ------- Additional comments from ih at openoffice.org Fri Oct 30 16:43:11 +0000 2009 ------- I have adapted almost all topics of TL's Req. Document. New Version of the font is attached. Please not that some things will still be "strange" (e.g. some capital greek letters) - until TL changes the Math code. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From ih at openoffice.org Fri Oct 30 16:44:45 2009 From: ih at openoffice.org (ih at openoffice.org) Date: 30 Oct 2009 16:44:45 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20091030164445.20972.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 ------- Additional comments from ih at openoffice.org Fri Oct 30 16:44:43 +0000 2009 ------- Created an attachment (id=65806) new Version (1.99) of OpenSymbol Font --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Oct 31 04:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:19:17 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910310419.n9V4JHcL027091@pm-app-bugs01.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #202 from David E. Ross 2009-10-30 21:18:04 PDT --- Then this capability should be in SeaMonkey 2.0, which uses Gecko 1.9.1.4. Is that correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Oct 31 04:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:29:23 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910310429.n9V4TNN7028621@pm-app-bugs01.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #203 from Kyle Huey 2009-10-30 21:28:31 PDT --- (In reply to comment #202) > Then this capability should be in SeaMonkey 2.0, which uses Gecko 1.9.1.4. Is > that correct? Yes. See http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0b1/changes (Ctrl-F for "font-face") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 04:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 531105] Useless font auto-installer calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910310432.n9V4Wloh004967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531105 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-10-31 00:32:46 EDT --- Tag has been requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ozamosi at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 31 12:58:07 2009 From: ozamosi at fedoraproject.org (Robin Sonefors) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/F-11 gdouros-aegean-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091031125807.3C74E11C0086@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ozamosi Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv541 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gdouros-aegean-fonts-fontconfig.conf gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec Log Message: Version 3.01 --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegean-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Aegean Aegean fantasy --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gdouros-aegean %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 3.01 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A font for ancient scripts in the greater Aegean vicinity Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ Source0: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Aegean.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Aegean covers the following scripts and symbols supported by The Unicode Standard 5.2: Basic Latin, Greek and Coptic, Greek Extended, some Punctuation and other Symbols, Linear B Syllabary, Linear B Ideograms, Aegean Numbers, Ancient Greek Numbers, Ancient Symbols, Phaistos Disc, Lycian, Carian, Old Italic, Ugaritic, Old Persian, Cypriot Syllabary, Phoenician, Lydian, and Archaic Greek Musical Notation. Aegean also covers the following scripts and symbols not yet supported by Unicode: Cretan Hieroglyphs, Cypro-Minoan, Linear A, the Arkalochori Axe, Ancient Greek and Old Italic variant alphabets. These are allocated in the Supplementary Private Use Plane 15. It was created by George Douros. %prep %setup -q -c %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Aegean.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} Aegean.otf %doc Aegean.txt %changelog * Mon Oct 19 2009 Robin Sonefors - 3.01-1 - Fix description, License string * Thu Oct 15 2009 Robin Sonefors - 3.01-1 - Initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Oct 2009 04:49:14 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 31 Oct 2009 12:58:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Aegean.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegean-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Oct 2009 04:49:14 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 31 Oct 2009 12:58:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +36201de0f8a523a3c002bb8619fc9da9 Aegean.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 15:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910311544.n9VFijrn019994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-31 11:44:44 EDT --- gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ozamosi at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 31 16:10:15 2009 From: ozamosi at fedoraproject.org (Robin Sonefors) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/devel gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091031161015.DE9F611C0380@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ozamosi Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1227 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-fontconfig.conf gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec Log Message: Version 2.52 --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Aegyptus Aegyptus fantasy --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gdouros-aegyptus %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.52 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ Source0: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Aegyptus.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Aegyptus encodes over 7000 hieroglyphs. There is no standard for Egyptian Hieroglyphs or Meroitic, so they are allocated in the Supplementary Private Use Plane 15. The font also covers Basic Latin, Egyptian Transliteration characters, some Punctuation and other Symbols, and the Gardiner set of 1071 Egyptian Hieroglyphs, now suppored by The Unicode Standard 5.2 in the new SMP block 13000 - 1342F. It was created by George Douros, mainly based on the book Hieroglyphica, PIREI I?, 2000. %prep %setup -q -c %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Aegyptus.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} Aegyptus.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Wed Oct 21 2009 Robin Sonefors 2.52-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Oct 2009 20:11:30 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 31 Oct 2009 16:10:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Aegyptus.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Oct 2009 20:11:30 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 31 Oct 2009 16:10:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c063380062974eb8cb36c8db329ec8ef Aegyptus.zip From ozamosi at fedoraproject.org Sat Oct 31 16:57:23 2009 From: ozamosi at fedoraproject.org (Robin Sonefors) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/F-11 gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20091031165723.0CB6911C00EF@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ozamosi Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14513 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-fontconfig.conf gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec Log Message: Version 2.52 --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Aegyptus Aegyptus fantasy --- NEW FILE gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec --- %global fontname gdouros-aegyptus %global fontconf 65-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.52 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs Group: User Interface/X License: Copyright only URL: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ Source0: http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Aegyptus.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Aegyptus encodes over 7000 hieroglyphs. There is no standard for Egyptian Hieroglyphs or Meroitic, so they are allocated in the Supplementary Private Use Plane 15. The font also covers Basic Latin, Egyptian Transliteration characters, some Punctuation and other Symbols, and the Gardiner set of 1071 Egyptian Hieroglyphs, now suppored by The Unicode Standard 5.2 in the new SMP block 13000 - 1342F. It was created by George Douros, mainly based on the book Hieroglyphica, PIREI I?, 2000. %prep %setup -q -c %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Aegyptus.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} Aegyptus.otf %doc *.txt %changelog * Wed Oct 21 2009 Robin Sonefors 2.52-1 - Initial package Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Oct 2009 20:11:30 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 31 Oct 2009 16:57:22 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Aegyptus.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/F-11/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Oct 2009 20:11:30 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 31 Oct 2009 16:57:22 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c063380062974eb8cb36c8db329ec8ef Aegyptus.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 17:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530190] Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910311719.n9VHJwh5021554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-31 13:19:58 EDT --- gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-2.52-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-2.52-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 18:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 532231] Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910311801.n9VI1ZTf030458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231 Robin Sonefors changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 18:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910311843.n9VIh2cK022880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-31 14:43:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366959) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366959) Snapshot with knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 18:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 532237] New: gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 Summary: gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: knm-new-fixed-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=366958) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366958) Very simple test case Description of problem: With knm_new-fonts replaced by knm-new-fixed-fonts gedit shows bitmap fonts by default on gedit, this is very bad. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-9.fc12 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. display the attached text with gedit 2. 3. Actual results: See attached Expected results: See attached Additional info: Why does such a thing happen NOW??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 18:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 532237] gedit defaults to bitmap fonts with kanji In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910311843.n9VIheVX006606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-10-31 14:43:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366960) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366960) snapshot with knm-new-fixed-fonts-1.1-9.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 31 23:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 530857] Review Request: drehatlas-xaporho-fonts - latin typeface inspired by a hobby rock band logo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910312342.n9VNgBWo017648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530857 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-31 19:42:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.