From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 04:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518161] "contains" expression seems not working on the fontconfig rule In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010412.n814CFq2001227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161 --- Comment #9 from Parag 2009-09-01 00:12:14 EDT --- Thanks and now we can see some more input for further request/bug based on new fontconfig release. we have also got new lohit-fonts with fontconfig rules in rawhide now. So I will test and report back here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 04:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520037] [sd_IN@devanagari] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Sindhi font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010408.n8148wd2000575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520037 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[sd_IN at devanagari] ]Need |[sd_IN at devanagari] Need |fontconfig rules for Lohit |fontconfig rules for Lohit |Sindhi font |Sindhi font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511680] FTBFS fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-20.fc11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010601.n8161sOc007722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511680 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Parag 2009-09-01 02:01:53 EDT --- Fixed in fonts-ISO8859-2-1.0-22.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518161] "contains" expression seems not working on the fontconfig rule In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011808.n81I8Tuv013707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 14:08:27 EDT --- fontconfig-2.7.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fontconfig'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9225 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 03:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518161] "contains" expression seems not working on the fontconfig rule In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020316.n823GS7O015976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518161 --- Comment #11 from Parag 2009-09-01 23:16:27 EDT --- I confirm my comment #4. fc-match command failed to show "Lohit Marathi" in Marathi locale. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506436] [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021005.n82A50NC023862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506436 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com, | |svenkate at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Parag 2009-09-02 06:04:59 EDT --- Shanky, Can you check above bug and give your feedback here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506430] [pa_IN][GPOS]The font doesn't have the right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021000.n82A0wMh021264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506430 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-09-02 06:00:57 EDT --- 1) Please don't forgot to add list 'fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com' to follow proper 2) Shape is ok, when I tried to use with application firefix/gedit. it seems small variant, so we can't say it is bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514158] [bn_IN] pango in not rendering character U+09E2 and U+09E3 due to wrong characters class assignement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021022.n82AMnmp002149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514158 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |GNOME Desktop 593889 CC| |pnemade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021030.n82AU1qW003607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com, | |svenkate at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Parag 2009-09-02 06:29:50 EDT --- shanky, Please provide your feedback on above comment but test it in Fedora 11/12. You have to check rendering of U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500304] [bn_IN][Additional Vowels]U+09E2 U+09E3 font doesn't have right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021031.n82AVpeT004263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500304 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-09-02 06:31:49 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 514158 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514158] [bn_IN] pango in not rendering character U+09E2 and U+09E3 due to wrong characters class assignement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021031.n82AVqK7004281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514158 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kxiong at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-09-02 06:31:49 EDT --- *** Bug 500304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031453.n83Era2p022101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide --- Comment #17 from Jerry James 2009-09-03 10:53:35 EDT --- Do you need help applying the changes to CVS? I'm happy to do that if you'll grant permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From meywer at openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 15:32:08 2009 From: meywer at openoffice.org (meywer at openoffice.org) Date: 3 Sep 2009 15:32:08 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090903153208.5596.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 ------- Additional comments from meywer at openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 15:32:07 +0000 2009 ------- Have a look at the votes for 23402 (closed as a duplicate of this issue). (Why on this issue there is no ?vote for this issue? link?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 16:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518887] FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031611.n83GB82Z010237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 12:11:07 EDT --- Just an update here. I posted to the upstream devel list and it seems this bug is hopefully fixed in cvs: "I think this one really depends on converting OpenType advanced typographic features to Apple ones. At least that's where the crash occurs. This is now fixed in cvs." So, as soon as there is another release I can whip up a package for you to test with, or if you are brave and willing to build from cvs to confirm it's fixed that would be great too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 16:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031614.n83GEoCG010747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 12:14:46 EDT --- It doesn't look like this is going to be fixable... I talked with upstream and the problem here is that if they just exit when they see that they can't get a font, that would hit cases where people could save their work before it crashes. >From upstream: "If you think you can fix it, please do. As you point out it is not really my bug, and as I have been unable to fix it in 10 years I have given up." So, I guess the answer here is to make sure our font cache information is accurate? Can I go ahead and close this now? Or would someone here like to take a stab at patching it? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mmp at openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 17:31:19 2009 From: mmp at openoffice.org (mmp at openoffice.org) Date: 3 Sep 2009 17:31:19 -0000 Subject: [Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090903173119.10571.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 User mmp changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hdu,jeremygha|'fedorafonts,hdu,jeremygha |rrison,meywer,mmp,ssa,us' |rrison,meywer,ssa,us' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 19:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518887] FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031954.n83Js63k026658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887 --- Comment #8 from zhoujingmiller at gmail.com 2009-09-03 15:54:05 EDT --- Thanks, Kevin, for the package, but I just tested the cvs version with "Version: 01:15 GMT 3-Sep-2009(20090903)" and "Library Version: 02:27 GMT 1-Sep-2009" and the TrueType font is generated successfully. So it is confirmed that the issue is fixed in cvs. (So this bug will be closed?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 20:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518887] FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032002.n83K2lCj012100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 16:02:46 EDT --- Up to you. We can close it out now, or wait until the next release and I will close it when that release lands in Fedora. Which would you prefer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 22:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518887] FontForge segfaults while generating TrueType version of Kurier-Regular.otf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032234.n83MYkc2009152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518887 zhoujingmiller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #10 from zhoujingmiller at gmail.com 2009-09-03 18:34:45 EDT --- Since it is fixed already and people encountering similar problem will probably checking out later releases or cvs builds of fontforge, given that the information is still accessible to them, I would prefer to close it so that we get ?less? bugs in total. So I will close it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From aalam at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 4 04:18:28 2009 From: aalam at fedoraproject.org (aalam) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 04:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/saab-fonts/devel saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 saab-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090904041828.DC8DD11C0082@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: aalam Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12394 Modified Files: saab-fonts.spec Added Files: saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: Updating spec file and add conf file --- NEW FILE saab-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Saab Saab serif Index: saab-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel/saab-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- saab-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 03:44:05 -0000 1.2 +++ saab-fonts.spec 4 Sep 2009 04:18:28 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,14 +1,16 @@ %global fontname saab +%global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.91 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Free Punjabi Unicode OpenType Font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions URL: http://guca.sourceforge.net/typography/fonts/saab/ Source0: http://downloads.sf.net/guca/saab.0.91.zip +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel @@ -30,13 +32,24 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Saab.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} + +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} +ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} + %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%_font_pkg Saab.otf +%_font_pkg Saab.otf %{fontconf} %doc %changelog +* Tue Sep 04 2009 A S Alam - 0.91-3 +- Add fontconfig conf file + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.91-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From aalam at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 4 04:49:31 2009 From: aalam at fedoraproject.org (aalam) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 04:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/saab-fonts/devel saab-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090904044931.515FB11C0082@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: aalam Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23340 Modified Files: saab-fonts.spec Log Message: Change font pirority from 66 ->67 Index: saab-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/saab-fonts/devel/saab-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- saab-fonts.spec 4 Sep 2009 04:18:28 -0000 1.3 +++ saab-fonts.spec 4 Sep 2009 04:49:31 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ %global fontname saab -%global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf +%global fontconf 67-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.91 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontc %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%_font_pkg Saab.otf %{fontconf} +%_font_pkg Saab.otf -f %{fontconf} %doc %changelog From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040456.n844uWIS024591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from A S Alam 2009-09-04 00:56:31 EDT --- Build for Rawhide. Closing Bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 06:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040637.n846bv82026267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 06:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040635.n846Zj8o026087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ifelix at redhat.com, | |pnemade at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(ifelix at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #4 from Parag 2009-09-04 02:35:44 EDT --- felix, Can you give correct image for following combination? 1) U+0BB8 U+0BC2 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC2 3) U+0B9C U+0BC2 Or you can just tell us if above(comment#1 and comment#3) attached images are the correct rendering for these combinations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 06:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040638.n846c8f7009160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ifelix at redhat.com, | |pnemade at redhat.com AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(ifelix at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #4 from Parag 2009-09-04 02:38:07 EDT --- felix, Can you give correct image for following combination? 1) U+0BB8 U+0BC1 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC1 3) U+0B9C U+0BC1 Or you can just tell us if above(comment#1 and comment#2) attached images are the correct rendering for these combinations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 06:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506436] [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040652.n846qmud011719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506436 --- Comment #2 from Shankar Prasad 2009-09-04 02:52:47 EDT --- Parag, I don't think that this is any kind of issue. In Kannada, even while writing we won't place the lower letter (small one) exactly below the upper, as this increases the height of the total glyph as a whole. Shanky -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 06:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040655.n846tTVI029819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #7 from Shankar Prasad 2009-09-04 02:55:28 EDT --- Parag, As I commented in similar issue reported in bug #506436, this too is not a bug. Shanky -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 07:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 03:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506436] [kn_IN][GPOS]U+0C9C U+0CC4 font shape is not correct In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040705.n8475GEp013920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506436 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-09-04 03:05:15 EDT --- Thanks for your reply. Closing as NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 07:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 03:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040705.n8475rm9031586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Parag 2009-09-04 03:05:53 EDT --- Thanks for your reply. Closing as NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 08:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 04:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040830.n848Ucik017033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 08:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 04:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500569] [si_LK][GPOS] Delete 0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to press backspace key three times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040830.n848UiW5017066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500569 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 08:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 04:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040850.n848o9iS020413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kxiong at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-09-04 04:50:07 EDT --- provide updated correct and wrong images please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 09:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501683] [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040944.n849iRZY011413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501683 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |apeter at redhat.com, | |pnemade at redhat.com AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(apeter at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-09-04 05:44:26 EDT --- Ani, Can you please check above attachment and give your feedback? We need to know is there any of above combinations rendering wrongly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 10:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 06:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501683] [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041057.n84AvL4F012287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501683 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(apeter at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Ani Peter 2009-09-04 06:57:20 EDT --- Parag, Please note that all 9 combinations in the attached document has correct rendering, but the images are shown wrong. Thanks Ani -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 15:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517620] Xchat wants to install additional font Japanese which fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051513.n85FDk3t001378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517620 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-05 11:13:45 EDT --- 1. If the text stack incorrectly decides to install a japanese font, it's a either a fontconfig (bad definition of japanese glyphs) or pango (bad detection) bug. If there is some japanese to display in (for example in one of the nicks), the autoinstall suggestion is correct 2. However once it has decided to install a japanese font, if it fails, that's clearly a pk bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 15:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051519.n85FJSKL016659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-05 11:19:27 EDT --- Droid packaging has not changed for months, I guess this is fallout from all the CJK rules restructuring in fontconfig (I did ask people to check droid too :() Behdad: do you have an idea on how to restrict this rule properly to Droid Sans and Japanese ? It's not supposed to change the font for non-japanese and non-droid sans (unless the desktop spin people did set the default font to droid sans, in which case all bets are off) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 17:14:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495735] mergerepos results in traceback from yum.packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051714.n85HEYaB021679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495735 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-05 13:14:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Apparently, something in RPM has a non-utf8/non-unicode > lang(some-japanese-characters) foo which causes yum.packages._dump_pco() to > fail. We now export the font names font files declared in rpm metadata for font autoinstallation to work. They can be complex (non ASCII) Unicode. Though IIRC fc-query exports valid UTF-8, something else must be corrupting this data later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 00:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060007.n8607TTh007259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-05 20:07:28 EDT --- Nicolas, can you summarize what's going on? I'm clueless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 02:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 22:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060220.n862KkCp030176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-05 22:20:45 EDT --- Droid fonts are included on the desktop spin. They are not the default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 03:16:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 23:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060316.n863GKI2008704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-05 23:16:19 EDT --- So, we do want them in the default install? Why? Nicolas, you can't match language on target="scan". Lemme check your conf file and get back to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 08:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 04:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060804.n8684mkT009586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-06 04:04:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Nicolas, can you summarize what's going on? I'm clueless. Droid is now installed on more systems and CJK users complain it replaces their default non-latin fonts. But the intent of droid's fontconfig rules is not to set those fonts as default. They should only select droid sans japanese if the font is droid sans and the language japanese, and only use droid sans fallback if the font is droid sans and the language something else. So something is not working as expected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Sep 6 17:53:56 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/adf-accanthis-fonts/devel adf-accanthis-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090906175356.424C611C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-accanthis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19316/devel Modified Files: adf-accanthis-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: upstream stealth update Index: adf-accanthis-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-accanthis-fonts/devel/adf-accanthis-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- adf-accanthis-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 16:35:17 -0000 1.2 +++ adf-accanthis-fonts.spec 6 Sep 2009 17:53:55 -0000 1.3 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Accanthis is well suited to book typeset Name: %{fontname}-fonts # Use the main PS version (as documented in NOTICE) Version: 1.6 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: A ?modernized? garaldic serif typeface, ?Galliard? alternative Group: User Interface/X @@ -126,7 +126,13 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.6-3 +* Sun Sep 06 2009 +- 1.6-4 +? Stealth upstream update + + +* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +? 1.6-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jul 13 2009 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-accanthis-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 16 Jul 2009 18:18:05 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 6 Sep 2009 17:53:56 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ adf-accanthis-fonts-1_6-2_fc12:HEAD:adf-accanthis-fonts-1.6-2.fc12.src.rpm:1247768269 +adf-accanthis-fonts-1_6-4_fc12:HEAD:adf-accanthis-fonts-1.6-4.fc12.src.rpm:1252259605 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/adf-accanthis-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 16 Jul 2009 18:18:05 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 6 Sep 2009 17:53:56 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ 67d95f1e596cccae209c40b67062757d Accanthis-Cat.pdf -8db8f207b4c8dc248d84f7f8af017e51 Accanthis-Std.zip +b03ad3d0fb8b35a0694693d742c5fd12 Accanthis-Std.zip From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Sep 6 18:01:08 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.53, 1.54 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.102, 1.103 import.log, 1.16, 1.17 sources, 1.53, 1.54 Message-ID: <20090906180108.3655111C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21326/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore dejavu-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: 2.30 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.53 retrieving revision 1.54 diff -u -p -r1.53 -r1.54 --- .cvsignore 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.53 +++ .cvsignore 6 Sep 2009 18:01:07 -0000 1.54 @@ -1 +1 @@ -dejavu-fonts-2.29.tar.bz2 +dejavu-fonts-2.30.tar.bz2 Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.102 retrieving revision 1.103 diff -u -p -r1.102 -r1.103 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 20:08:10 -0000 1.102 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 6 Sep 2009 18:01:07 -0000 1.103 @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ original style, using an open collaborat Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.29 -Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Version: 2.30 +Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -205,7 +205,11 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.29-4 +* Sun Sep 6 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.30-1 + +* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 2.29-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Sat May 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17 --- import.log 23 May 2009 13:14:43 -0000 1.16 +++ import.log 6 Sep 2009 18:01:07 -0000 1.17 @@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fon dejavu-fonts-2_29-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-1.fc11.src.rpm:1237057458 dejavu-fonts-2_29-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.src.rpm:1237143073 dejavu-fonts-2_29-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-3.fc11.src.rpm:1243084445 +dejavu-fonts-2_30-1_fc12:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.30-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252259820 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.53 retrieving revision 1.54 diff -u -p -r1.53 -r1.54 --- sources 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.53 +++ sources 6 Sep 2009 18:01:07 -0000 1.54 @@ -1 +1 @@ -4728d26da8daa5b4ebe87c428d745b06 dejavu-fonts-2.29.tar.bz2 +c042e582a83dbc57b3cb49b8a70753af dejavu-fonts-2.30.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 18:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061840.n86IeCsa023729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-06 14:40:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-philostratos-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-philostratos-fonts-20090902-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Griechische Antiqua was one of the historical Greek typefaces of the late 19th and early 20th century. It was designed by ?aurice ?duard Pinder, a German erudite artist and a member of the Academy of Science in Berlin. This is the most popular version which has appeared from 1870 to 1940 in the German speaking philological literature and in many classical and Byzantine editions by publishers like Teubner (in Leipzig) and Weidmann (in Berlin) such as: Anthology of Byzantine Melos by Wilhelm von Christ and Matthaios Paranikas (Leipzig 1871), Epicurea, by Heinrich Usener (Leipzig 1887), Mitrodorous by Alfred Koerte (Leipzig 1890), Pindar by Otto Schroeder (Leipzig 1908), ??? Aeschylus by U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff (Berlin 1910, 1915), Bachylides by Bruno Snell (Leipzig, 1934), The Vulgata by Alfred Rahlfs (Stuttgart 1935), Suidas Lexicon by Ada Adler (Leipzig 1928-1938) etc. E.J. Kenney lamented the abandonment of the type after the 2nd World War as a great loss for Greek typography (?From Script to Print?, Greek Scripts: An illustrated Introduction, Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies, 2001, p. 69). GFS Philostratos was digitized by George D. Matthiopoulos. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GFS_Philostratos_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Sep 6 18:45:44 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11 import.log, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090906184544.1DF7C11C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1976/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: 0.2 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- .cvsignore 14 Jul 2009 22:16:52 -0000 1.4 +++ .cvsignore 6 Sep 2009 18:45:43 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -heuristica-src-20090507.tar.bz2 +heuristica-src-0.2.tar.xz Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 16:57:04 -0000 1.10 +++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 6 Sep 2009 18:45:43 -0000 1.11 @@ -4,14 +4,15 @@ %global archivename heuristica-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20090507 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 0.2 +Release: 1%{?dist} +Epoch: 1 Summary: Heuristica font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/heuristica/ -Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.tar.xz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -27,9 +28,19 @@ font that was released to the TeX Users %prep %setup -q -c +for txt in *.txt ; do + fold -s $txt > $txt.new + sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new + touch -r $txt $txt.new + mv $txt.new $txt +done %build + +# bug #512504 needs to be fixed in fonttools for plain make to work +# http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512504 + make %{?_smp_mflags} Heuristica-Regular.otf Heuristica-Bold.otf \ Heuristica-Italic.otf Heuristica-BoldItalic.otf @@ -59,8 +70,12 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20090507-2 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild +* Sun Sep 6 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1:0.2-1 + +* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 20090507-2 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Jul 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090507-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8 --- import.log 14 Jul 2009 22:16:52 -0000 1.7 +++ import.log 6 Sep 2009 18:45:43 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11: apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235377618 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-5_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-5.fc11.src.rpm:1237147311 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090507-1_fc12:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090507-1.fc12.src.rpm:1247609683 +apanov-heuristica-fonts-0_2-1_fc12:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252262664 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sources 14 Jul 2009 22:16:52 -0000 1.4 +++ sources 6 Sep 2009 18:45:43 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -0c395cbb906b7a82467bd90a88a4671a heuristica-src-20090507.tar.bz2 +eab9b8bdca120ebdbf1ac90cde70eddd heuristica-src-0.2.tar.xz From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Sep 6 19:15:38 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 import.log, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090906191538.509E111C00E5@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9875/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore google-droid-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: upstream stealth update Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- .cvsignore 25 Jul 2009 14:40:50 -0000 1.4 +++ .cvsignore 6 Sep 2009 19:15:37 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ DroidSans-Bold.ttf -DroidSans.ttf DroidSansFallback.ttf -DroidSansJapanese.ttf DroidSansMono.ttf DroidSerif-Bold.ttf DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf DroidSerif-Italic.ttf DroidSerif-Regular.ttf +DroidSans.ttf +DroidSansJapanese.ttf Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 25 Jul 2009 14:40:50 -0000 1.9 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 6 Sep 2009 19:15:37 -0000 1.10 @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ on a mobile handset when rendered in app other screen text. Name: %{fontname}-fonts -# No sane versionning upstream -Version: 20090320 -Release: 3%{?dist} +# No sane versionning upstream, use the date we did a git dump +Version: 20090906 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X @@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Sun Sep 6 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20090906-1 +? upstream stealth update + * Sat Jul 25 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090320-3 ? try to fit Japanese in Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7 --- import.log 25 Jul 2009 14:40:50 -0000 1.6 +++ import.log 6 Sep 2009 19:15:37 -0000 1.7 @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-4_fc11:HEAD:g google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-5_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235379417 google-droid-fonts-20090320-1_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090320-1.fc12.src.rpm:1248519226 google-droid-fonts-20090320-3_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090320-3.fc12.src.rpm:1248532826 +google-droid-fonts-20090906-1_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252264176 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sources 25 Jul 2009 14:40:51 -0000 1.4 +++ sources 6 Sep 2009 19:15:37 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ 2afdf28d5cdd079b41968cdabf1b469e DroidSans-Bold.ttf -6f28ad369fa0f2661cc2de7a7be9977e DroidSans.ttf 4caeadd734f4be9973163bdf02ea6cf5 DroidSansFallback.ttf -8fbc87c7c5089a8e86c670b93a78964f DroidSansJapanese.ttf 3922dfe38a36da7d6edfb1fe77b276fb DroidSansMono.ttf 849a92990a80cbb665bfc74fd03743bd DroidSerif-Bold.ttf a062025df92affc1331a05b7c07793fc DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf a2e7305a0ba8bb7091124f4cd1485fc9 DroidSerif-Italic.ttf bfb2f44a7c1deba39f7f4d39bff18eeb DroidSerif-Regular.ttf +9d83fb20700a3a7c45dc9acd64ab121e DroidSans.ttf +6d7e0d083e3c5e1b504e580b4e2fe7db DroidSansJapanese.ttf From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 02:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070228.n872ShOw020450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-06 22:28:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Nicolas, you can't match language on target="scan". Lemme check your conf file > and get back to you. Thanks I think that summarizes the problem well then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 02:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070229.n872Tr35008870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-06 22:29:52 EDT --- (I might add that for ja desktop Droid replaces even Deja Vu.;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 02:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070242.n872gRfe011141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #12 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-06 22:42:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359939) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359939) WIP sans conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 02:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070241.n872fdjn011041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #11 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-06 22:41:38 EDT --- This is what I wrote to Nicolas in email: Hey, Ok, lets see. A few issues: 1. Why the seemingly random numbers for the conf files? 2. Should I add Droid fonts to default fontconfig config? At least just the aliasing to/from generics? 3. You should also alias back "Droid Sans Japanese" and "Droid Sans Fallback" to "Droid Sans" now that we are renaming those. 4. You use "prefer", while you really should use "accept". That's perhaps why the default Japanese font is affected. 5. Lets understand what target="scan" is: It is applied to patterns scanned from the font (that is, what fc-query returns), and can modify it. So any lang you match there is the languages found in the font, not the user-specified language. 6. The renaming is easy. The reordering harder, since now we have three fonts all named "Droid Sans" and we don't have any way to address them separately. I checked the coverages, Fallback and Sans overlap a bit. If we could just delete the lang="ja" from Fallback's coverage, we were mostly done. But that's currently not possible for a stupid reason. I filed a bug about that. In the mean time, this is the solution I came up with: we force a fixed order on the three, by modifying their version tag. So, Japanese gets the highest version number, 3, and Sans gets 2, finally Fallback gets 1. This means, when Fontconfig is matching Droid Sans, it tries Japanese first, if the language coverage is enough (ie, we are looking for Japanese), it's matched, otherwise Sans is tried, and finally Fallback. Voila. Attached config file for that. A bit hacky to override the version tag, but I can't think of a better solution right now. 7. Given this scheme, and for RPM font tagging to work correctly (that is, to tag with "Droid Sans" instead of "Droid Sans Japanese"), we need to switch the RPM hook from calling fc-query to call fc-scan instead. The arguments are the same, the latter also applies the configuration rules. That should do it, except for a but that I just fixed, so next fontconfig release will have it. Can you communicate the change with Panu? Cheers, behdad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 04:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517620] Xchat wants to install additional font Japanese which fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070417.n874HtSx006776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517620 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-07 00:17:54 EDT --- Given that it's a package bug, what would you suggest to get it working? I have only idea to stop subpackaging -common though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 04:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070457.n874vBhE013429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 05:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070507.n8757hO0015225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kxiong at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from koka xiong 2009-09-07 01:07:42 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343739 is the correct image, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343740 is the wrong image -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 05:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517620] Xchat wants to install additional font Japanese which fails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070532.n875WqlI020190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517620 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 01:32:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Given that it's a package bug, what would you suggest to get it working? I have > only idea to stop subpackaging -common though. If manual yum install works but PK font autoinstall does not that's not a package bug that's a packagekit bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 05:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070553.n875rO9x024239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 01:53:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > 1. Why the seemingly random numbers for the conf files? They're not random, droid sans is at 65 because of its wide coverage & CJK otherwise it would have a lower number since it is a high visibility font. If you have a better ordering suggestion I'm all ears. It's not easy to check font priorities, the system is a bit of a blackbox (fc-match is supposed to do it, but no font packager really understands it and it only prints the order for the fonts fond on system hiding the font names that may be defined in the conf files but are not available) > 2. Should I add Droid fonts to default fontconfig config? At least just the > aliasing to/from generics? I'd rather not, it's a complex font to configure and it'd be easier if droid changes are kept in a single package (that can be updated in previous releases if i18n wants it without involving the fontconfig package) > 3. You should also alias back "Droid Sans Japanese" and "Droid Sans Fallback" > to "Droid Sans" now that we are renaming those. That's a really good idea, I don't know why I didn't before, I probably was just afraid of the whole thing > 4. You use "prefer", while you really should use "accept". That's perhaps why > the default Japanese font is affected. That's because we use prefer for the other fonts too. I could change it but I'd rather limit the drift from the patterns used elsewhere (or else please confirm accept is sufficient and safe for the other fonts too) > 5. Lets understand what target="scan" is: It is applied to patterns scanned > from the font (that is, what fc-query returns), and can modify it. So any lang > you match there is the languages found in the font, not the user-specified > language. The problem is we want to change the name found in the font. Is there a way to match the user-specified language and change the name in the font? > 6. The renaming is easy. The reordering harder, since now we have three fonts > all named "Droid Sans" and we don't have any way to address them separately. I > checked the coverages, Fallback and Sans overlap a bit. That's expected Fallback is just a bunch of medium-quality glyphs to fill holes (I suspect a generic Ascender pile of Glyphs thy also use for other fonts). BTW google did an update to the japanese and fallback files those past days, I just pushed it. > If we could just > delete the lang="ja" from Fallback's coverage, we were mostly done. But that's > currently not possible for a stupid reason. I filed a bug about that. > > In the mean time, this is the solution I came up with: we force a fixed order > on the three, by modifying their version tag. So, Japanese gets the highest > version number, 3, and Sans gets 2, finally Fallback gets 1. This means, when > Fontconfig is matching Droid Sans, it tries Japanese first, if the language > coverage is enough (ie, we are looking for Japanese), it's matched, otherwise > Sans is tried, and finally Fallback. Voila. Attached config file for that. A > bit hacky to override the version tag, but I can't think of a better solution > right now. Thanks! I'll look at it in the evening > 7. Given this scheme, and for RPM font tagging to work correctly (that is, to > tag with "Droid Sans" instead of "Droid Sans Japanese"), we need to switch the > RPM hook from calling fc-query to call fc-scan instead. The arguments are the > same, the latter also applies the configuration rules. That should do it, > except for a but that I just fixed, so next fontconfig release will have it. > Can you communicate the change with Panu? That's not a problem the part that defines the hook is in fontpackages-devel I can change it at any time without involving Panu. Though the same hook will be called for every font not just Droid. Also, is it something you want to push to pre-rawhide releases? (will only affect rebuilt packages) BTW there is an interesting aspect I forgot to mention in my mail: we repaint the three fonts as droid sans, and droid sans is in the generic "sans" priority stack. Will that affect the priority of "droid sans japanese" and "droid sans fallback" in this stack too? I'm not quite sure what the correct behaviour would be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 06:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 02:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070629.n876TU4a018759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 Felix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ifelix at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Felix 2009-09-07 02:29:29 EDT --- Attached image is Perfect. So the rendering is not correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 07:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070711.n877BHZm026655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-07 03:11:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1659288 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ee6256e041c4a20487edd7d8cbfe46760e745c18 GFS_PHILOSTRATOS.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 08:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070802.n8782stJ005061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 04:02:52 EDT --- Many thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-philostratos-fonts Short Description: A revival of the ?Griechische Antiqua? Greek typeface Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 10:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521629] New: [pa_IN] Test Bug for Boog Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [pa_IN] Test Bug for Boog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521629 Summary: [pa_IN] Test Bug for Boog Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Desc: Desc for boog with pa-IN Package Version: lohit-fonts-punjabi-2.3.1-1.fc10.noarch Additional Information: SELinux status: disabled Yum Information: 3.2.23 Installed: rpm-4.6.1-1.fc10.x86_64 at 2009-07-24 11:01 Built : Fedora Project at 2009-05-18 11:26 Committed: Panu Matilainen at 2009-05-18 22:00 Installed: yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch at 2009-07-24 11:02 Built : Fedora Project at 2009-05-20 22:30 Committed: Seth Vidal at 2009-05-20 22:00 Installed: yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-10.fc10.x86_64 at 2009-07-24 14:20 Built : Fedora Project at 2008-10-15 13:38 Committed: James Antill at 2008-10-14 22:00 The following files will be attached (if any): -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 10:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521629] [pa_IN] Test Bug for Boog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071059.n87Axclb022866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521629 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 10:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521629] [pa_IN] Test Bug for Boog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071059.n87AxNkU010113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521629 --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-09-07 06:59:22 EDT --- Closing Bug as it is test bug. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 11:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071119.n87BJc1U027665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 07:19:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #11) > > 2. Should I add Droid fonts to default fontconfig config? At least just the > > aliasing to/from generics? > > I'd rather not However, now that I think of it, users requested several times that we do a very similar thing for Arial (use Arial Unicode to extend Arial, transform Arial Narrow and Arial Black in proper sub-styles of Arial), and this should be included in fontconfig's default rules since the fonts themselves are user (not distro) installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 16:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478747] Do not include font files in generated doc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071631.n87GVBE9028788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478747 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Ngo Than 2009-09-07 12:31:10 EDT --- doxygen doesn't include any fonts! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 18:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071826.n87IQtXQ003701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #15 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-07 14:26:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > 2. Should I add Droid fonts to default fontconfig config? At least just the > > > aliasing to/from generics? > > > > I'd rather not > > However, now that I think of it, users requested several times that we do a > very similar thing for Arial (use Arial Unicode to extend Arial, transform > Arial Narrow and Arial Black in proper sub-styles of Arial), and this should be > included in fontconfig's default rules since the fonts themselves are user (not > distro) installed The Vista version of those fonts should work since I assume they have WWS names too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 18:32:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071832.n87IWb63004560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 14:32:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > (In reply to comment #13) > > However, now that I think of it, users requested several times that we do a > > very similar thing for Arial (use Arial Unicode to extend Arial, transform > > Arial Narrow and Arial Black in proper sub-styles of Arial), and this should be > > included in fontconfig's default rules since the fonts themselves are user (not > > distro) installed > > The Vista version of those fonts should work since I assume they have WWS names > too. Sure but there are quite a lot of users that still use the previous versions that do not have the fixed naming metadata -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 18:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071853.n87Irjpu020670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |521697 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 18:54:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521697] Change rpm autodeps command from fc-query to fc-scan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071854.n87IsLS4007787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521697 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 19:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071928.n87JSxXM026841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 15:28:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > > 7. Given this scheme, and for RPM font tagging to work correctly (that is, to > > tag with "Droid Sans" instead of "Droid Sans Japanese"), we need to switch the > > RPM hook from calling fc-query to call fc-scan instead. The arguments are the > > same, the latter also applies the configuration rules. That should do it, > > except for a but that I just fixed, so next fontconfig release will have it. > > Can you communicate the change with Panu? > > That's not a problem Sorry I confused it with scriptlets, the fc-query part is Panu-side indeed. Filled bug #521697 to track the rpm part However, if I understand the logic correctly, you want to replace fc-query with fc-scan to take into account fontconfig rules. That's a great idea *except* the package fontconfig files won't be installed in the build root at this time ! So if that's really the intention, fc-scan needs to grow an argument so we can pass it a set of additional fontconfig files (or a directory containing fontconfig files) explicitely -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 7 19:30:07 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts-2.30-bad-serif-condensed-metadata.patch, NONE, 1.1 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.103, 1.104 import.log, 1.17, 1.18 Message-ID: <20090907193007.D3F0011C043D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24033/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Added Files: dejavu-fonts-2.30-bad-serif-condensed-metadata.patch Log Message: fix serif condensed italic metadata dejavu-fonts-2.30-bad-serif-condensed-metadata.patch: scripts/narrow.pe | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.sfd | 4 +- status.txt | 2 - 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- NEW FILE dejavu-fonts-2.30-bad-serif-condensed-metadata.patch --- diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.30/scripts/narrow.pe dejavu-fonts.trunk/scripts/narrow.pe --- dejavu-fonts-2.30/scripts/narrow.pe 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ dejavu-fonts.trunk/scripts/narrow.pe 2009-09-07 12:15:18.000000000 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env fontforge +# $Id$ + +# script file for FontForge for font narrowing +# usage: fontforge -script narrow.pe scale *.sfd +# created files have suffix .narrow + +# DejaVu Condensed have scale 90 + +if ($version < "20050209") + Error("Your version of FontForge transforms glyphs w/o content"); +endif +if ($argc < 2) + Error("usage: scale sfds...") +endif +scale = Strtol($argv[1]) +i = 2 +while (i < $argc) + Open($argv[i], 1) + SelectAll() + Scale(scale, 100, 0, 0) + # Panose changes are valid only for DejaVu fonts (I guess) + SetPanose(3, 6) + new_fontname = $fontname + old_familyname = $familyname + j = Strstr(new_fontname, "-Roman") + if (j > -1) + new_fontname = Strsub(new_fontname, 0, j) + endif + j = Strstr(new_fontname, "-") + if (j > -1) + new_fontname = Strsub(new_fontname, 0, j) + "Condensed" + Strsub(new_fontname, j) + else + new_fontname = new_fontname + "Condensed" + endif + new_fullname = $fullname + newprefsubfamily = "Condensed" + new_subfamily = $weight + j = Strstr(new_fullname, "Bold") + if (j == -1) + j = Strstr(new_fullname, "Oblique") + endif + if (j == -1) + j = Strstr(new_fullname, "Italic") + endif + if (j > -1) + new_subfamily = Strsub(new_fullname, j) + new_fullname = Strsub(new_fullname, 0, j) + "Condensed " + new_subfamily + newprefsubfamily = newprefsubfamily + " " + new_subfamily + else + new_fullname = new_fullname + " Condensed" + endif + new_familyname = $familyname + " Condensed" + SetFontNames(new_fontname, new_familyname, new_fullname) + SetOS2Value("Width",4) + SetTTFName(1033, 2, new_subfamily) # ttf_subfamily + SetTTFName(1033, 3, new_fullname) # ttf_uniqueid + SetTTFName(1033, 16, old_familyname) # ttf_preffamilyname + SetTTFName(1033, 17, newprefsubfamily) # ttf_prefmodifiers + Save($argv[i] + ".narrow") + i++ +endloop diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.30/src/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.sfd dejavu-fonts.trunk/src/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.sfd --- dejavu-fonts-2.30/src/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.sfd 2009-08-27 16:26:37.000000000 +0200 +++ dejavu-fonts.trunk/src/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.sfd 2009-09-07 12:17:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SplineFontDB: 3.0 FontName: DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic -FullName: DejaVu Serif Italic Condensed +FullName: DejaVu Serif Condensed Italic FamilyName: DejaVu Serif Condensed Weight: Book Copyright: Copyright (c) 2003 by Bitstream, Inc. All Rights Reserved.\nDejaVu changes are in public domain\n @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ 3 1 EndShort -LangName: 1033 "" "" "Book" "DejaVu Serif Italic Condensed" "" "Version 2.30" "" "" "DejaVu fonts team" "" "" "http://dejavu.sourceforge.net" "" "Fonts are (c) Bitstream (see below). DejaVu changes are in public domain.+AAoACgAA-Bitstream Vera Fonts Copyright+AAoA-------------------------------+AAoACgAA-Copyright (c) 2003 by Bitstream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Bitstream Vera is a trademark of Bitstream, Inc.+AAoACgAA-Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of the fonts accompanying this license (+ACIA-Fonts+ACIA) and associated documentation files (the +ACIA-Font Software+ACIA), to reproduce and distribute the Font Software, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sell copies of the Font Software, and to permit persons to whom the Font Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:+AAoACgAA-The above copyright and trademark notices and this permission notice shall be included in all copies of one or more of the Font Software typefaces.+AAoACgAA-The Font Software may be modified, altered, or added to, and in particular the designs of glyphs or characters in the Fonts may be modified and additional glyphs or or characters may be added to the Fonts, only if the fonts are renamed to names not containing either the words +ACIA-Bitstream+ACIA or the word +ACIA-Vera+ACIA.+AAoACgAA-This License becomes null and void to the extent applicable to Fonts or Font Software that has been modified and is distributed under the +ACIA-Bitstream Vera+ACIA names.+AAoACgAA-The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by itself.+AAoACgAA-THE FONT SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED +ACIA-AS IS+ACIA, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT, PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER RIGHT. IN NO EVENT SHALL BITSTREAM OR THE GNOME FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE FONT SOFTWARE OR FROM OTHER DEALINGS IN THE FONT SOFTWARE.+AAoACgAA-Except as contained in this notice, the names of Gnome, the Gnome Foundation, and Bitstream Inc., shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Font Software without prior written authorization from the Gnome Foundation or Bitstream Inc., respectively. For further information, contact: fonts at gnome dot org. +AAoA" "http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/License" "" "DejaVu Serif" "Condensed" +LangName: 1033 "" "" "Italic" "DejaVu Serif Condensed Italic" "" "Version 2.30" "" "" "DejaVu fonts team" "" "" "http://dejavu.sourceforge.net" "" "Fonts are (c) Bitstream (see below). DejaVu changes are in public domain.+AAoACgAA-Bitstream Vera Fonts Copyright+AAoA-------------------------------+AAoACgAA-Copyright (c) 2003 by Bitstream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Bitstream Vera is a trademark of Bitstream, Inc.+AAoACgAA-Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of the fonts accompanying this license (+ACIA-Fonts+ACIA) and associated documentation files (the +ACIA-Font Software+ACIA), to reproduce and distribute the Font Software, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sell copies of the Font Software, and to permit persons to whom the Font Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:+AAoACgAA-The above copyright and trademark notices and this permission notice shall b e included in all copies of one or more of the Font Software typefaces.+AAoACgAA-The Font Software may be modified, altered, or added to, and in particular the designs of glyphs or characters in the Fonts may be modified and additional glyphs or or characters may be added to the Fonts, only if the fonts are renamed to names not containing either the words +ACIA-Bitstream+ACIA or the word +ACIA-Vera+ACIA.+AAoACgAA-This License becomes null and void to the extent applicable to Fonts or Font Software that has been modified and is distributed under the +ACIA-Bitstream Vera+ACIA names.+AAoACgAA-The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by itself.+AAoACgAA-THE FONT SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED +ACIA-AS IS+ACIA, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT, PATEN T, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER RIGHT. IN NO EVENT SHALL BITSTREAM OR THE GNOME FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE FONT SOFTWARE OR FROM OTHER DEALINGS IN THE FONT SOFTWARE.+AAoACgAA-Except as contained in this notice, the names of Gnome, the Gnome Foundation, and Bitstream Inc., shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Font Software without prior written authorization from the Gnome Foundation or Bitstream Inc., respectively. For further information, contact: fonts at gnome dot org. +AAoA" "http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/License" "" "DejaVu Serif" "Condensed Italic" Encoding: UnicodeFull UnicodeInterp: none NameList: AGL without afii diff -uNr dejavu-fonts-2.30/status.txt dejavu-fonts.trunk/status.txt --- dejavu-fonts-2.30/status.txt 2009-08-27 16:55:00.000000000 +0200 +++ dejavu-fonts.trunk/status.txt 2009-08-27 16:43:39.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ This is the status file for DejaVu fonts -($Id: status.txt 2362 2009-08-27 14:43:39Z ben_laenen $) +($Id$) original = present in original Bitstream Vera 1.10 = added in DejaVu fonts Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.103 retrieving revision 1.104 diff -u -p -r1.103 -r1.104 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 6 Sep 2009 18:01:07 -0000 1.103 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 7 Sep 2009 19:30:07 -0000 1.104 @@ -20,13 +20,14 @@ original style, using an open collaborat Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.30 -Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X License: Bitstream Vera and Public Domain URL: http://%{name}.org/ Source0: %{?!alphatag:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{fontname}}%{?alphatag:%{fontname}.sourceforge.net/snapshots}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 +Patch0: %{name}-2.30-bad-serif-condensed-metadata.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) # Older fontforge versions will not work due to sfd format changes @@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ unicode coverage restricted to Latin, Gr %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} - +%patch0 -p1 %build make %{?_smp_mflags} VERSION=%{version} FC-LANG="" \ @@ -205,6 +206,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 7 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.30-2 +? patch to fix bug #505129 Serif Condensed Italic is not Serif Condensed + * Sun Sep 6 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.30-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18 --- import.log 6 Sep 2009 18:01:07 -0000 1.17 +++ import.log 7 Sep 2009 19:30:07 -0000 1.18 @@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_29-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fon dejavu-fonts-2_29-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.src.rpm:1237143073 dejavu-fonts-2_29-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-3.fc11.src.rpm:1243084445 dejavu-fonts-2_30-1_fc12:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.30-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252259820 +dejavu-fonts-2_30-2_fc12:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.30-2.fc12.src.rpm:1252351124 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 19:29:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521697] Change rpm autodeps command from fc-query to fc-scan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071929.n87JTgLh013765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521697 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 15:29:42 EDT --- See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789#c17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 19:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505129] dejavu lgc serif condensed italic gets confused with condensed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071930.n87JUIKU014238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505129 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 7 19:36:14 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, 1.2, 1.3 google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11 import.log, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090907193614.B3A9711C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25795/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: First level fix for Droid CJK problems Index: google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 25 Jul 2009 10:54:37 -0000 1.2 +++ google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 7 Sep 2009 19:36:14 -0000 1.3 @@ -13,27 +13,46 @@ sans-serif - + + Droid Sans Japanese + + Droid Sans + + + + Droid Sans Fallback + + Droid Sans + + - - ja-jp + + Droid Sans + + 3 + + + Droid Sans Japanese Droid Sans + + 2 + - - ja-jp - Droid Sans Fallback Droid Sans + + 1 + Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 6 Sep 2009 19:15:37 -0000 1.10 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 7 Sep 2009 19:36:14 -0000 1.11 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ other screen text. Name: %{fontname}-fonts # No sane versionning upstream, use the date we did a git dump Version: 20090906 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X @@ -138,6 +138,11 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Sun Sep 7 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20090906-2 +? first-level CJK fixes (as suggested by Behdad in bug #517789, complete fix + needs the rpm changes traced in bug #521697) + * Sun Sep 6 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090906-1 ? upstream stealth update Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8 --- import.log 6 Sep 2009 19:15:37 -0000 1.7 +++ import.log 7 Sep 2009 19:36:14 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-5_fc11:HEAD:g google-droid-fonts-20090320-1_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090320-1.fc12.src.rpm:1248519226 google-droid-fonts-20090320-3_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090320-3.fc12.src.rpm:1248532826 google-droid-fonts-20090906-1_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252264176 +google-droid-fonts-20090906-2_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-2.fc12.src.rpm:1252351928 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6 --- sources 6 Sep 2009 19:15:37 -0000 1.5 +++ sources 7 Sep 2009 19:36:14 -0000 1.6 @@ -5,5 +5,5 @@ a062025df92affc1331a05b7c07793fc DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf a2e7305a0ba8bb7091124f4cd1485fc9 DroidSerif-Italic.ttf bfb2f44a7c1deba39f7f4d39bff18eeb DroidSerif-Regular.ttf -9d83fb20700a3a7c45dc9acd64ab121e DroidSans.ttf -6d7e0d083e3c5e1b504e580b4e2fe7db DroidSansJapanese.ttf +6f28ad369fa0f2661cc2de7a7be9977e DroidSans.ttf +8fbc87c7c5089a8e86c670b93a78964f DroidSansJapanese.ttf From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 22:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072215.n87MF4TO012069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 18:15:03 EDT --- Anyway I pushed https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130936 it should have all the fixes that do not depend on changes in rpm (that only matter at package resolution time, not once it's installed) CJK users: please test it does the correct thing for you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 14:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081443.n88EhIrV016941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-08 10:43:17 EDT --- very strange -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Tue Sep 8 15:51:57 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.95, 1.96 pango.spec, 1.177, 1.178 sources, 1.96, 1.97 Message-ID: <20090908155157.44F1211C0082@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2232 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Sep 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.25.6-1 - 1.25.6 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.95 retrieving revision 1.96 diff -u -p -r1.95 -r1.96 --- .cvsignore 24 Aug 2009 21:02:11 -0000 1.95 +++ .cvsignore 8 Sep 2009 15:51:56 -0000 1.96 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.25.5.tar.bz2 +pango-1.25.6.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.177 retrieving revision 1.178 diff -u -p -r1.177 -r1.178 --- pango.spec 24 Aug 2009 21:03:01 -0000 1.177 +++ pango.spec 8 Sep 2009 15:51:56 -0000 1.178 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.25.5 +Version: 1.25.6 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -228,6 +228,9 @@ fi %changelog +* Tue Sep 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.25.6-1 +- 1.25.6 + * Mon Aug 24 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.25.5-1 - 1.25.5 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.96 retrieving revision 1.97 diff -u -p -r1.96 -r1.97 --- sources 24 Aug 2009 21:02:11 -0000 1.96 +++ sources 8 Sep 2009 15:51:56 -0000 1.97 @@ -1 +1 @@ -3f0b5f9b58f951ddaffbdb45b2d12741 pango-1.25.5.tar.bz2 +f578a348fbe5f616d104b3a5ecbd2005 pango-1.25.6.tar.bz2 From behdad at fedoraproject.org Tue Sep 8 15:55:23 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.46, 1.47 fontconfig.spec, 1.138, 1.139 sources, 1.50, 1.51 Message-ID: <20090908155523.3CA9B11C0082@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3696 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Sep 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.7.3-1 - Update to 2.7.3 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.46 retrieving revision 1.47 diff -u -p -r1.46 -r1.47 --- .cvsignore 31 Aug 2009 21:41:48 -0000 1.46 +++ .cvsignore 8 Sep 2009 15:55:22 -0000 1.47 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.7.2.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.7.3.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.138 retrieving revision 1.139 diff -u -p -r1.138 -r1.139 --- fontconfig.spec 31 Aug 2009 21:41:48 -0000 1.138 +++ fontconfig.spec 8 Sep 2009 15:55:22 -0000 1.139 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.7.2 +Version: 2.7.3 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ fi %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Sep 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.7.3-1 +- Update to 2.7.3 + * Mon Aug 31 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.7.2-1 - Update to 2.7.2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.50 retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -p -r1.50 -r1.51 --- sources 31 Aug 2009 21:41:48 -0000 1.50 +++ sources 8 Sep 2009 15:55:23 -0000 1.51 @@ -1 +1 @@ -8d61fa6835c7f4c2398b7f2ee2feb526 fontconfig-2.7.2.tar.gz +747d2c691c66b563c8e8c1784ce8d014 fontconfig-2.7.3.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 18:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081854.n88IsHgZ028171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-08 14:54:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #11) > > 3. You should also alias back "Droid Sans Japanese" and "Droid Sans Fallback" > > to "Droid Sans" now that we are renaming those. > > That's a really good idea, I don't know why I didn't before, I probably was > just afraid of the whole thing BTW we use two different patterns for aliasing right now: 1. "use font Y to complete font X" (for a font which is installed bug with limited coverage): X Y 2. "use font Y when asked for font X" (for fonts that may not be installed) X Y Which pattern is more appropriate for this case? Also, can we use the same logic to fixup at fontconfig level fonts with bad naming metadata (all the stuff that fails WWS and takes ages to be fixed in the font files upstream)? For example would the following pattern be something that could be generalised? Or do you have objections/better ideas? Letters Laughing at their Execution Letters Laughing at their Execution Regular Letters Laughing at their Execution Fantasy Letters Laughing Ethiopic WashRa serif Ethiopic WashRa Ethiopic WashRa serif Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/senamirmir-washra-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 10 Jun 2009 21:48:27 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 13 Sep 2009 17:09:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ senamirmir-washra-fonts-4_1-1_fc12:HEAD:senamirmir-washra-fonts-4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm:1244670473 +senamirmir-washra-fonts-4_1-3_fc12:HEAD:senamirmir-washra-fonts-4.1-3.fc12.src.rpm:1252861746 Index: senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/senamirmir-washra-fonts/devel/senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 04:08:59 -0000 1.2 +++ senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec 13 Sep 2009 17:09:39 -0000 1.3 @@ -11,18 +11,21 @@ Eritrean languages (Amharic, Blin, Ge?e Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.1 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) script Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.senamirmir.org/projects/typography/typeface.html Source0: http://www.senamirmir.org/downloads/%{archivename}.zip +# Problems reported upstream +# https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-June/msg00002.html +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf # We need upstream or someone who knows local Ethiopian usage to suggest a -# classification we could relay to fontconfig. In the meanwhile, only two +# classification we could relay to fontconfig. In the meanwhile, only three # font families classified -Source1: %{name}-yigezu-bisrat-goffer-fontconfig.conf -Source2: %{name}-yigezu-bisrat-gothic-fontconfig.conf +Source2: %{name}-yigezu-bisrat-goffer-fontconfig.conf +Source3: %{name}-yigezu-bisrat-gothic-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -32,7 +35,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc -%_font_pkg washrab.ttf washrasb.ttf +%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf washrab.ttf washrasb.ttf %package common Summary: Common files of %{name} @@ -181,11 +184,14 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontco # No info available to classify the other fonts install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-yigezu-bisrat-goffer.conf + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-yigezu-bisrat-goffer.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-yigezu-bisrat-gothic.conf -for fconf in %{fontconf}-yigezu-bisrat-goffer.conf \ +for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf \ + %{fontconf}-yigezu-bisrat-goffer.conf \ %{fontconf}-yigezu-bisrat-gothic.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf @@ -202,9 +208,13 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.1-2 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild - +* Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 4.1-3 +? Fix WashRa Bold and SemiBold naming + +* Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 4.1-2 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Jun 2 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 4.1-1 From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Sep 13 18:07:36 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.4, 1.5 ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf, 1.3, 1.4 ecolier-court-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11 import.log, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <20090913180736.EF18811C0099@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23401/devel Modified Files: ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf ecolier-court-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: naming tweaks Index: ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 09:45:04 -0000 1.4 +++ ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,14 +1,28 @@ + + + Ecolier_court + + + ?colier court + + + + Ecolier_court + + ?colier court + + cursive - Ecolier_court + ?colier court - Ecolier_court + ?colier court cursive Index: ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 09:45:12 -0000 1.3 +++ ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,14 +1,28 @@ + + + Ecolier_lignes_court + + + ?colier lignes court + + + + Ecolier_lignes_court + + ?colier lignes court + + fantasy - Ecolier_lignes_court + ?colier lignes court - Ecolier_lignes_court + ?colier lignes court fantasy Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- ecolier-court-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 21:00:17 -0000 1.10 +++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.11 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ this package. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070702 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -107,11 +107,18 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20070702-10 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild - -* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20070702-9 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild +* Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070702-11 +? Fix the font naming to something more user friendly (remove PS1 legacy + limitations) + +* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 20070702-10 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild + +* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 20070702-9 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070702-8 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:31:12 -0000 1.7 +++ import.log 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232192497 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7.fc11.src.rpm:1232193736 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8.fc11.src.rpm:1235377848 +ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-11_fc12:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-11.fc12.src.rpm:1252865221 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 19:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131935.n8DJZXur016176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-13 15:35:30 EDT --- Well, I tried it in an actual package and fontconfig errors on the style lines Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-senamirmir-washra.conf", line 43: unknown element "style" Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-senamirmir-washra.conf", line 46: unknown element "style" Ethiopic WashRa SemiBold ? 43 Ethiopic WashRa ? 46 Behdad: how is one supposed to alias a specific style in fontconfig? In the meanwhile I also pushed a tweaked droid package that takes Behdad's latest advice into account. I'd be surprised if it had any effect on japanese priority, but who knows. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=131757 Someone please test on a CJK system (and report back, detailing the test he used if it does not work) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 20:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132011.n8DKBWNG022527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 20:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132011.n8DKBMwP022491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Alias| |mvaliyav at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-13 16:11:21 EDT --- Renaming would be very fine indeed. Some trivial nitpicking: 1. it seems we're not supposed to use the package name in the summary anymore, so I'd suggest rewriting it to ?A font for Burmese/Myanmar script? 2. you're missing a space after ?Myanmar block.? in the description Otherwise the package itself is fine ??? APPROVED ??? ( but really I had already approved it there https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436#c13 ) Please do not forget to update comps and get the old package blacklisted and do the other admin stuff documented in the wiki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140441.n8E4ff2t028027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mvaliyav at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140445.n8E4jZOF011755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 00:45:33 EDT --- Hiran is promising a new release and an new website in October. Meanwhile on the packaging side since he created multiple fonts it would be nice to use a common prefix on the packages (similar to the apanov- prefix we use in packaging Andrey Panov's fonts) to mark they have the same origin (as required by guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140445.n8E4jw5C028795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 00:45:56 EDT --- Hiran is promising a new release and an new website in October. Meanwhile on the packaging side since he created multiple fonts it would be nice to use a common prefix on the packages (similar to the apanov- prefix we use in packaging Andrey Panov's fonts) to mark they have the same origin (as required by guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140515.n8E5FbGv017715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140514.n8E5Ev0A017243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kkrothap at redhat.com, | |psatpute at redhat.com Component|lohit-fonts |lohit-telugu-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490373] Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140518.n8E5InWN018607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-14 01:18:48 EDT --- fixed in rawhide please note that lohit-fonts is now split in lohit--fonts and bug is fixed in split packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140516.n8E5GG2h002241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|lohit-fonts |lohit-telugu-fonts Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 08:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140818.n8E8IGpt006390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-14 04:18:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=131757 google-droid-fonts-20090906-4.fc12 > Someone please test on a CJK system I just tried and no change unfortunately. > (and report back, detailing the test he used if it does not work) Test: 1) LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 gucharmap 2) search for '?' Cases: A) with google-droid-sans-fonts installed B) without google-droid-sans-fonts Results: A) glyph rendered in Droid Sans B) glyph rendered in IPAPGothic (Of course if you are running a running a japanese desktop (or use LANG instead of LC_CTYPE) you will see whole desktop (application) change too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 08:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140834.n8E8YVkE028390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-14 04:34:29 EDT --- A simpler test is probably just: $ LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 fc-match lang=ja DroidSansJapanese.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular" So at least it is using DroidSansJapanese now for Japanese, but we don't want to make it the default font for Japanese. $ LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 fc-match sans:lang=ja DroidSansJapanese.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular" $ LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 fc-match sans:lang=ja DroidSansJapanese.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular" $ LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 fc-match sans:lang=zh uming.ttc: "AR PL UMing HK" "Light" $ LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 fc-match sans:lang=zh uming.ttc: "AR PL UMing HK" "Light" $ LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 fc-match lang=zh DroidSansFallback.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140906.n8E96AuP005227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 05:06:09 EDT --- Well, assuming you have no other fontconfig file referencing droid on-system, I guess that it all a fontconfig problem for Behdad. The droid package does not declare any japanese-specific rule, so the "if japanese, use me first" rules in the ipa packages should take precedence (didn't check they were actually there, I just know they're not in droid) Does it change if you try LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 fc-match lang=ja_JP or LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 fc-match lang=ja-JP ? I don't think ja is a complete fontconfig locale, and fontconfig does not allow matching on a partial locale sanely (ie it matches any substring, does not really parse the format, so would trip on en-ja or jas-foo etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140935.n8E9Zn3E013372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 --- Comment #1 from Ani Peter 2009-09-14 05:35:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360911) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360911) Scrrenshot for the correct glyphs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] New: Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 Summary: Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=360910) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360910) Scrrenshot for the wrong glyphs Description of problem: Three consonants 0D24, 0D2B and 0D35, when combined with 0D4D and 0D32 gives wrong result. ie, (i) 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (ii) 0D2B + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (iii) 0D35 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.3.8-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2. (i)Type 0D24, 0D4D and 0D32. (ii)Type 0D2B, 0D4D and 0D32. (iii)Type 0D35, 0D4D and 0D32. Actual results: When the above steps are done, results of three combinations (i), (ii) and (iii) are wrong. They appear as a glyph just in the same order of the keys typed. Wrong glyphs screenshot attached. Expected results: When the above steps are done, results of three combinations (i), (ii) and (iii) must be three below based glyphs. Correct glyphs screenshot attached. Additional info: Above three results are same type of bugs formed with three consonants 0D24, 0D2B and 0D35. Hence fined under the same bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] New: Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 Summary: Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=360913) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360913) Screenshot for the wrong glyph Description of problem: When 0D34 is combined with 0D4D and 0D35, gives a wrong result. ie, 0D34 + 0D4D + 0D35 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.3.8-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2.Type 0D34, 0D4D and 0D35 Actual results: When the above steps are done, result is wrong. It appears as a wrong glyph. Screenshot for the wrong glyph is attached Expected results: When the above steps are done, results must be a combination in the same order of the keys typed. Screenshot for the correct glyph is attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140949.n8E9n9qD031075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 --- Comment #1 from Ani Peter 2009-09-14 05:49:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360914) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360914) Screenshot for the correct glyph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] New: Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 Summary: Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=360915) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360915) Screenshot for the wrong glyph Description of problem: When 0D36 is combined with 0D31 using 0D4D, result is a wrong glyph. 0D36 + 0D4D + 0D31 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.3.8-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2.Type 0D36, 0D4D and 0D31 Actual results: When the above steps are done, results is wrong. It appears as a wrong glyph. Screenshot of wrong glyph attached. Expected results: When the above steps are done, result must be combination of the characters in the order they are typed. Screenshot of correct glyph attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140958.n8E9w29c000620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 --- Comment #1 from Ani Peter 2009-09-14 05:58:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360916) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360916) Screenshot for the correct glyph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140959.n8E9x4bj017960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 15:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141518.n8EFIDVR030857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 --- Comment #2 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-14 11:18:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360958) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360958) Correct rendering of required combinations. >From Comment #1, The required combinations are fixed in pango-1.25.5-1, qt-4.5.2-13 and libicu-4.2.1-6: (i) 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (ii) 0D2B + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (iii) 0D35 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 15:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141533.n8EFXL7F018923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 --- Comment #2 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-14 11:33:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360961) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360961) Correct rendering of required combination. >From Comment #1, The required combination is fixed in pango-1.25.5-1, qt-4.5.2-13 and libicu-4.2.1-6: 0D36 + 0D4D + 0D31 => ? + ? + ? = ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141601.n8EG1aSK027010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth 2009-09-14 12:01:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360967) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360967) OpenJDK Client VM Droppings I am seeing this using the current OpenJDK in Rawhide too about every quarter of an hour or so. java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.i686 pango-1.25.5-1.fc12.i686 Its making Eclipse pretty unusable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141615.n8EGFg9Q030462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473303(F12Blocker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141731.n8EHViMQ018212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 13:31:43 EDT --- tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141731.n8EHVnMu018246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 13:31:48 EDT --- tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142023.n8EKN68H017663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 16:23:05 EDT --- When you have any licensing doubt just block FE-LEGAL and let spot sort it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142037.n8EKbD4x021828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 16:37:13 EDT --- Review: 1. please do not put changelog-like info in a package description (what's new in the latest version). The description is supposed to be stable over time so l10 does not struggle with it 2. attribution to Barry Shwartz is better done in the description than in the summary 3. the rest of the spec mostly follows the standard template and thus is ok 4. the fontconfig rule is ok too, and the prio seems sane 5. oflb-prociono-fonts.src: W: uncompressed-zip chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip is not your problem, that just means upstream forgot to compress its zip, so it wastes space So the technical part of package is good, just clear your licensing doubts with Spot and I'll approve it all (sorry I was not available in august to look at this fine package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518928] all English text in Japanese KDE apps looks double-spaced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142353.n8ENqxhY026007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518928 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473302(F12Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518928] all English text in Japanese KDE apps looks double-spaced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150003.n8F03Nkc029486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518928 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-14 20:03:22 EDT --- Still see this with current rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150025.n8F0PSgr023946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-14 20:25:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Does it change if you try > LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 fc-match lang=ja_JP or > LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 fc-match lang=ja-JP ? No, they also give: DroidSansJapanese.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 04:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150414.n8F4EnmE026371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|lohit-fonts |lohit-nepali-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150508.n8F58CtY021087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-15 01:08:11 EDT --- >From Comment #2 Oops!! I realized that smc-meera-fonts is the preferred font (as per the 90-smc-fonts.conf) over lohit-malayalam. Thereby, the required combination: 0D36 + 0D4D + 0D31 => ? + ? + ? = ??? breaks in lohit-malayalam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150512.n8F5CcSr003845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-15 01:12:37 EDT --- >From Comment #2 Oops!! I realized that smc-meera-fonts is the preferred font (as per the 90-smc-fonts.conf) over lohit-malayalam. Thereby, the required combinations: (i) 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (ii) 0D2B + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (iii) 0D35 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? breaks in lohit-malayalam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150519.n8F5J5Le022685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 --- Comment #4 from Ani Peter 2009-09-15 01:19:05 EDT --- I confirm that this bug is filed for lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.3.8-1 as mentioned in the description. The combination works fine with all smc fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150519.n8F5JVYU022760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 --- Comment #4 from Ani Peter 2009-09-15 01:19:25 EDT --- I confirm that this bug is filed for lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.3.8-1 as mentioned in the description. The combinations works fine with all smc fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491976] [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150541.n8F5fPpm026693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491976 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |225764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518928] all English text in Japanese KDE apps looks double-spaced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150546.n8F5kEic010112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518928 --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-15 01:46:13 EDT --- I'm asking upstream this issue and waiting for a reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150549.n8F5nZJb010437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477374, which changed state. Bug 477374 Summary: [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150549.n8F5nYE7010409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Parag 2009-09-15 01:49:31 EDT --- I think this is already fixed. If still any problem exists then either reopen this bug or create new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 06:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521697] Change rpm autodeps command from fc-query to fc-scan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150619.n8F6JsoM015992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521697 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen 2009-09-15 02:19:53 EDT --- Given your worry about fontconfig files not being in buildroot in that comment, to which I don't see a response from Behdad so far... are you guys really sure this change should go in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521697] Change rpm autodeps command from fc-query to fc-scan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150718.n8F7Ii7m027789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521697 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-15 03:18:43 EDT --- I'm only relaying Behdad's instructions there, so if you needinfo, needinfo him :) >From what I understand of fontconfig changing fc-query to fc-scan now is low impact and will at least take make rpm take into account the fontconfig rules shipped within the fontconfig package itself. Then once Behdad adds some way to point fc-scan to fontconfig files outside fontconfig default paths, it we can improve the system more by adding an argument to the fontconfig files in the buildroot to the fc-scan call Of course, Behdad may have better ideas than me here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522056] wrong match of fonts (non-)proportional In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150749.n8F7nT21005377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522056 David Tardon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OpenOffice.org 66922 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|dtardon at redhat.com |caolanm at redhat.com Component|fontconfig |openoffice.org AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |dtardon at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from David Tardon 2009-09-15 03:49:28 EDT --- It's actually a bug in openoffice.org: not all font attributes are transferred through DrawingLayer, so font match will find wrong font later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150752.n8F7qn38022624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:52:48 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7rAB5022725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.6.4-1.fc11 Resolution|NOTABUG |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7r5po022713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.6.4-1.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150752.n8F7qsgq007085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:52:54 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522056] wrong match of fonts (non-)proportional In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7r1k1007142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522056 --- Comment #4 from David Tardon 2009-09-15 03:53:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361046) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361046) test case The first line uses "Courier 10 Pitch", the second one "DejaVu Sans" and the third "DejaVu Sans Mono". If the font package specified in description is not installed, the font of the first line is (incorrectly) matched to "DejaVu Sans" instead of "DejaVu Sans Mono" as it should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150757.n8F7vKT7024569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.4-1.fc11 |1.6.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:57:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150757.n8F7v0Eg024498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:56:59 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150757.n8F7vGUb009245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.4-1.fc11 |1.6.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150757.n8F7v5wp009187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:57:05 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:12:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522056] wrong match of fonts (non-)proportional In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150812.n8F8Cmu6028583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522056 David Tardon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OpenOffice.org 64671 External Bug ID|OpenOffice.org 66922 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 08:19:01 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Sep 2009 08:19:01 -0000 Subject: [Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090915081901.28838.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'aw,dtardon,hdu,pl,thb' |'aw,dtardon,fedorafonts,hd | |u,pl,thb' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522056] wrong match of fonts (non-)proportional In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150820.n8F8KoZl015055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522056 David Tardon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from David Tardon 2009-09-15 04:20:49 EDT --- Fix checked in, will be in >= 3.1.1-19.8 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150937.n8F9bgdX031180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-15 05:37:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361056) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361056) patch for handling 0D36 + 0D4D + 0D31 combination in lohit-malayalam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From aw at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 09:45:03 2009 From: aw at openoffice.org (aw at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Sep 2009 09:45:03 -0000 Subject: [Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090915094503.25061.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 ------- Additional comments from aw at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 09:45:02 +0000 2009 ------- AW: Took a look at the patch. Is okay from my POV. Maybe an enum as member would be more future safe (are there only two modes?), but when a bool will do currently... I want to mention that the step of transporting this info over the MetaFile would be obsolete when Slideshow would change to get it's data from primitives directly, though. Just a remider to change slideshow to primitive usage (please) which would enable removal of MANY hacks. OTOH it shows that is was good not to define an UNO API for the LowLevel primitives from the beginning; there are still new members coming down the drain. Just my 2c... +1 from me --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From dtardon at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 10:04:30 2009 From: dtardon at openoffice.org (dtardon at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Sep 2009 10:04:30 -0000 Subject: [Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090915100430.11192.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 ------- Additional comments from dtardon at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 10:04:29 +0000 2009 ------- dtardon->aw: VCL specifies three values of FontPitch: PITCH_DONTKNOW, PITCH_VARIABLE and PITCH_FIXED; I followed the example of mbItalic that compresses four (ITALIC_NONE, ITALIC_OBLIQUE, ITALIC_NORMAL and ITALIC_DONTKNOW) possible values of VCL's FontItalic to two. There would be problem to express any additional values in panose anyway. I'm going to look at transporting FontWidthType next. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From dtardon at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 12:10:00 2009 From: dtardon at openoffice.org (dtardon at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Sep 2009 12:10:00 -0000 Subject: [Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090915121000.21943.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 User dtardon changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |90439 is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 15:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] New: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Summary: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com, smc-discuss at googlegroups.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Meera font has a scaling property defined in /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-smc-fonts.conf file. It has a 1.2 times size scaling. But in Fedora 11 this scaling is not working properly. When Meera font is selected with size say, 12 for the applications, window titles etc, the entire desktop get ugly with expanded and overlapped titlebars or strings in application. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open abiword, type two words(english/malayalam), set the font of first word as Meera 12, second as Rachana 12 and compare the size. Meera font is bigger than Rachana font OR 2. System->Preferences->Appearance->Fonts, , select the fonts for all types as Meera 12. Select theme as Clearlooks. See the panel width, window title width, the big close buttons etc. Repeat the same with Rachana 12 and see the difference Actual results: Meera font size is big and takes more spaces in application making the application look bad Expected results: Setting font size 12 should set the size as 12 and the size should be same as other fonts with same size. Additional info: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 17:17:24 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Sep 2009 17:17:24 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090915171724.2517.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'mru' |'fedorafonts,mru' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 17:19:33 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Sep 2009 17:19:33 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105085] math: OpenSymbol font overhaul will require code changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090915171933.3911.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105085 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152100.n8FL0vtv008930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 17:00:56 EDT --- tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tuxtype2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9643 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152100.n8FL0MML008788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 17:00:21 EDT --- tuxtype2-1.7.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tuxtype2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9638 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kamataki at openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 02:02:08 2009 From: kamataki at openoffice.org (kamataki at openoffice.org) Date: 16 Sep 2009 02:02:08 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090916020208.20694.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 User kamataki changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,mru' |'fedorafonts,kamataki,mru' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160608.n8G68Hsi029108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #2 from Manilal 2009-09-16 02:08:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361191) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361191) OpenOffice document using Meera, rachana and suruma fonts with size 12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160606.n8G66Vsn011694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Manilal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |libregeek at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Manilal 2009-09-16 02:06:30 EDT --- Confirmed this bug in OpenOffice.org. Please find the attached screenshots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160612.n8G6Cjou029882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #3 from Manilal 2009-09-16 02:12:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361193) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361193) Desktop with Meera font as default (size 12) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161030.n8GAUk2o019265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-16 06:30:43 EDT --- *** Bug 504272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504272] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - Character 'HA' showing wrong shape in Composition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161030.n8GAUikq019223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504272 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-16 06:30:43 EDT --- same issue is addressed in bug 504270 as well so closing as a DUPLICATE *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 504270 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161035.n8GAZarf002230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161035.n8GAZ8f5002149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-16 06:35:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361228) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361228) Telugu fonts with fix for this bug please test this for above error, if any problem let me know. if everything file, i will build package for f12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161758.n8GHwfWX030523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-16 13:58:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361342) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361342) ttf file for Lohit-Malayalam handling the required combination Please, check for any regressions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161757.n8GHv3MW018222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 --- Comment #6 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-16 13:57:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361341) ttf file for Lohit-Malayalam handling the required combination -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 18:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161800.n8GI0WNl019010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 --- Comment #2 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-16 14:00:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361343) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361343) ttf file for Lohit-Malayalam handling the required combination Please, check for regressions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452357] The mathml-fonts package needs some cleaning up In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170230.n8H2U1V9014366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452357 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 22:29:59 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.el5, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 09:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523933] New: Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523933 Summary: Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: missing many codepoints class data information Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.25.6-1.fc12 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: No support for those characters whose class data is not defined in pango Expected results: should support all characters included in and till Unicode 5.1 Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 04:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180436.n8I4axBg010527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Wrong rendering when 0D24, |[ml_IN] Wrong rendering |0D2B, 0D35 combined with |when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 |0D4D and 0D32 |combined with 0D4D and 0D32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 04:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180437.n8I4bOR6010568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Wrong rendering when 0D36 |[ml_IN] Wrong rendering |combined with 0D4D and 0D31 |when 0D36 combined with | |0D4D and 0D31 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 04:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180437.n8I4bEZS032259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Wrong rendering when 0D34 |[ml_IN] Wrong rendering |combined with 0D4D and 0D35 |when 0D34 combined with | |0D4D and 0D35 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180615.n8I6F7Qx017940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 --- Comment #6 from Ani Peter 2009-09-18 02:15:07 EDT --- Have tested Lohit-Malayalam. All the three combinations are working perfect. (i) 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (ii) 0D2B + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (iii) 0D35 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Thanks Sandeep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180615.n8I6FgBf029264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 --- Comment #3 from Ani Peter 2009-09-18 02:15:41 EDT --- Have tested Lohit-Malayalam. The combination is working perfect. 0D34 + 0D4D + 0D35 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Thanks Sandeep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180616.n8I6G04g029323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 --- Comment #7 from Ani Peter 2009-09-18 02:15:59 EDT --- Have tested Lohit-Malayalam. The combination is working perfect. 0D36 + 0D4D + 0D31 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Thanks Sandeep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524148] New: [kn_IN] 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN] 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524148 Summary: [kn_IN] 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-kannada-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: svenkate at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=361600) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361600) Actual and correct rendering of laa+la+halantha (0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD) Description of problem: upstream bug id https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595243 shankar [reporter] 2009-09-15 08:08:00 UTC Created an attachment (id=143212) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=143212) [details] Actual and correct rendering of laa+la+halantha (0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD) The combination of 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly. The actual and the correct rendering are shown in the attached image Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD 2. 3. Actual results: see attachment Expected results: see attachment Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524149] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180638.n8I6c3VO001533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 --- Comment #1 from Ani Peter 2009-09-18 02:38:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361604) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361604) Screenshot for the wrong glyph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524148] [kn_IN] 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180636.n8I6akhE001198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524148 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-18 02:36:45 EDT --- committed solution in lohit upstream, will be available in lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4 release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524149] New: [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=361603) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361603) Screenshot for the correct glyph Description of problem: When 0D31 is combined with 0D4D and 200D, gives a wrong glyph. ie, 0D31 + 0D4D + 200D => ? + ? + 200D = ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.3.8-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit/kwrite. 2. Type 0D31, 0D4D and 200D Actual results: When the above steps are done, result is wrong. Wrong glyph screenshot attached. Expected results: When the above steps are done, result must be a combination in the same order of the keys typed. Correct glyph screenshot attached. Additional info: (i) The wrong glyph formed currently with the above combination is the actual result of following combination: 0D30 + 0D4D + 200D => ? + ? + 200D = ??? (ii) Bug exists only in Lohit-Malayalam, all smc fonts work perfect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] New: [ml_IN] Size of the below glyph for 0D2E, 0D4D, 0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] Size of the below glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 Summary: [ml_IN] Size of the below glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=361605) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361605) Screenshot for the actual glyph Description of problem: The size of the shape of the below based glyph of the following combination needs to be made smaller. 0D2E + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.3.8-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2.Type 0D2E, 0D4D and 0D32 Actual results: The size of the shape of the below based glyph of the above combination is larger than the consonant 0D2E. Screenshot for the current glyph is attached. Expected results: When the above steps are done, the resulting size of the glyph must be in proportion to the consonant 0D2E. Screenshot for the correct glyph is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180720.n8I7KpJc031826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[ml_IN] Size of the below |[ml_IN] Size of the below |glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 |based glyph for |must be in proportion to |0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in |the size of 0D2E |proportion to the size of | |0D2E -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below glyph for 0D2E, 0D4D, 0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180719.n8I7JTHi011242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 --- Comment #1 from Ani Peter 2009-09-18 03:19:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361606) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361606) Screenshot for the expected/correct glyph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180755.n8I7tXue006861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 --- Comment #7 from Krishna Babu K 2009-09-18 03:55:32 EDT --- Hi Pravin, Thank you for your great effort. I have tested the following word list for this patch and it is working fine. 0c39+0c30+0c4d+0c37+0c2e+0c41 ==> ?????? 0c18+0c30+0c4d+0c37+0c23 ==> ????? 0c39+0c30+0c4d+0c37+0c3e+0c24+0c4d+0c2e ==> ???????? 0c39+0c30+0c4d+0c37+0c3e+0c15+0c4d+0c37 ==> ???????? 0c2c+0c4d+0c37+0c41+0c37+0c4d+0c35+0c2e+0c41 ==> ????????? Thank you for this fix. Regards, Krishnababu k. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 08:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180857.n8I8vBIR031682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 --- Comment #2 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-18 04:57:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361613) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361613) ttf file for Lohit-Malayalam handling the required combination Please, check for any regressions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 08:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524149] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180857.n8I8vxgd020806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 --- Comment #2 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-18 04:57:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361614) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361614) ttf file for Lohit-Malayalam handling the required combination Please, check for regressions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 09:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180938.n8I9cN99008395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 --- Comment #3 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-18 05:38:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361619) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361619) patch for following lohit-malayalam bugs patch for bug 523163, bug 52167, bug 52166, bug 524149, bug 524156. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 09:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180943.n8I9hL1a031314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 --- Comment #5 from Ani Peter 2009-09-18 05:43:20 EDT --- Have tested the patch and the size of glyph is in proportion with 0D2E. Thanks Sandeep for the quick fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 09:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180941.n8I9fDG4030984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-18 05:41:12 EDT --- >From Comment #3, OOps!! its patch for bug 523167 and bug 523166. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 09:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524149] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180944.n8I9iGPP009981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 --- Comment #3 from Ani Peter 2009-09-18 05:44:15 EDT --- Have tested the patch and now the combination of 0D31, 0D4D and 200D works perfect. Thank you Sandeep for the quick fix. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504270] [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181058.n8IAwkl4014437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-18 06:58:45 EDT --- done commit in lohit upstream fix will be available with next upstream release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495735] mergerepos results in traceback from yum.packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181334.n8IDYLC7015968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495735 --- Comment #12 from Josh Boyer 2009-09-18 09:34:19 EDT --- I've hit this same issuing running kojira/koji-builders using F11. The newRepo task trying to run is for dist-f12, using a local mirror of yesterday's rawhide. I had to block the following packages: un-core-fonts wqy-zenhei-fonts hanazono-fonts vlgothic-fonts sazanami-fonts ipa-mincho-fonts ipa-pgothic-fonts ipa-pmincho-fonts ipa-gothic-fonts baekmuk-ttf-fonts apanov-edrip-fonts apanov-heuristica-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 14:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495735] mergerepos results in traceback from yum.packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181401.n8IE1DDa002181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495735 Mike Bonnet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikeb at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Mike Bonnet 2009-09-18 10:01:12 EDT --- These two patches (which have been applied to yum upstream) should fix the problems with unicode Provides: causing mergerepos to fail: http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2009-August/005714.html http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2009-August/005719.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495735] mergerepos results in traceback from yum.packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181612.n8IGCbkx019102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495735 --- Comment #14 from Josh Boyer 2009-09-18 12:12:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > These two patches (which have been applied to yum upstream) should fix the > problems with unicode Provides: causing mergerepos to fail: > > http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2009-August/005714.html > > http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2009-August/005719.html I applied the second listed here locally and it does indeed seem to clear up the mergerepo failures I was seeing. I did not need to block packages any longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495735] mergerepos results in traceback from yum.packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181755.n8IHtNAQ024097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495735 --- Comment #15 from Josh Boyer 2009-09-18 13:55:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > These two patches (which have been applied to yum upstream) should fix the > > problems with unicode Provides: causing mergerepos to fail: > > > > http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2009-August/005714.html > > > > http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2009-August/005719.html > > I applied the second listed here locally and it does indeed seem to clear up > the mergerepo failures I was seeing. I did not need to block packages any > longer. Correcting myself, both patches are needed. I ran into other issues with a later newRepo task. The last line in the first patch should be ignored though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 10:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501683] [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201051.n8KAprEN004568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501683 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-20 06:51:52 EDT --- >From Comment #1, The character classes for the aforementioned characters (forming respective cluster/combination) are defined correctly in pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386. Thereby, it is the incorrectly defined GSUB rules within the font, leading to formation of wrong glyphs/shapes. I doubt, this bug really qualifies as a pango bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 13:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] New: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-tamil-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: sshedmak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=361820) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361820) Correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 (i.e. without "abvm"). Description of problem: glyphs 0BC1 and OBC2 should not have Anchor Point class as "abvm". Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit 2. Input "U+0BB8" + "U+0BC1" 3. Input "U+0BB8" + "U+0BC2" Actual results: 0BB8 + 0BC1 ==> ?? 0BB8 + 0BC2 ==> ?? Expected results: see attachment Additional info: 1) As per http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0B80.pdf, OBC1 == TAMIL VOWEL SIGN U OBC2 == TAMIL VOWEL SIGN UU 2) Declaring 0BC1 and OBC2 as "abvm" causes syllable formation "above" the base-glyph (which is wrong behaviour). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 13:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201352.n8KDqBi4018393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 --- Comment #1 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-20 09:52:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361822) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361822) ttf file handling correct behaviour of 0BC1 & 0BC2 based syllables -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 14:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201415.n8KEFPSo006756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-20 10:15:24 EDT --- >From Comment #1 and #2 The character classes for the aforementioned characters (forming respective syllable combination) are defined correctly in pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386. Additionally, I noticed "serafettin-cartoon-fonts" yields correct/desired results for following combination: 1) U+0BB8 U+0BC1 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC1 3) U+0B9C U+0BC1 Whereas, lohit-tamil-fonts fails to give correct results for above combination. I have filed a bug against lohit-tamil-fonts (see bug 524457). I have attached corrected font file in the same bug, which yields the expected results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 14:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201420.n8KEKxo1023332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-20 10:20:58 EDT --- The character classes for the aforementioned characters (forming respective syllable combination) are defined correctly in pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386. Additionally, I noticed "serafettin-cartoon-fonts" yields correct/desired results for following combination: 1) U+0BB8 U+0BC2 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC2 3) U+0B9C U+0BC2 Whereas, lohit-tamil-fonts fails to give correct results for above combination. I have filed a bug against lohit-tamil-fonts (see bug 524457). I have attached corrected font file in the same bug, which yields the expected results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 04:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210421.n8L4LtfJ019150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ifelix at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 00:21:54 EDT --- hi felix, can you confirm this thing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 21 04:37:08 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (cchance) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.12,1.13 Message-ID: <20090921043708.4780311C0043@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20366 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Caius kaio Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-27.fc12 - Merged from F-11 tree. - Obsoleted cjkuni-fonts-common. - Resolves: rhbz#507637 (using font.{dir,scale} from upstream source) Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 18:59:15 -0000 1.12 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 04:37:07 -0000 1.13 @@ -4,21 +4,25 @@ CJK Unifonts are Unicode TrueType fonts available by Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by \ the CJK Unifonts project. -%define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d -%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d +%define umingdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-uming +%define ukaidir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkuni-ukai -%define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} -%define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} +%define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d +%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d -%define _cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN -%define _twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW -%define cncompatdir %{_cncompatdir}/TrueType -%define twcompatdir %{_twcompatdir}/TrueType +%define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} +%define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} +%define cncompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType +%define twcompatdir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType + +%define _transdir %{_datadir}/fonts/cjkunifonts- +%define umingtransdir %{_transdir}uming +%define ukaitransdir %{_transdir}ukai Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 26%{?dist} +Release: 27%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -46,7 +50,7 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= %package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts-common Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts @@ -54,9 +58,7 @@ Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20 CJK Unifonts in Ming face. -%_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc - -# remaining uming files +%files -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/license %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.odt @@ -67,11 +69,21 @@ CJK Unifonts in Ming face. %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/README %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/TODO +%dir %{umingdir} +%dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir} +%dir %{_fontconfig_confdir} +%dir %{catalogue} +%{umingdir}/uming.ttc +%{umingdir}/fonts.dir +%{umingdir}/fonts.scale +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming %package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts-common Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-ukai < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts @@ -79,9 +91,7 @@ Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-ukai < 0.2.200 CJK Unifonts in Kai face. -%_font_pkg -n ukai -f *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf ukai.ttc - -# remaining ukai files +%files -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/license %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.odt @@ -92,6 +102,16 @@ CJK Unifonts in Kai face. %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO +%dir %{ukaidir} +%dir %{_fontconfig_templatedir} +%dir %{_fontconfig_confdir} +%dir %{catalogue} +%{ukaidir}/ukai.ttc +%{ukaidir}/fonts.dir +%{ukaidir}/fonts.scale +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font ghostscript files. @@ -101,7 +121,7 @@ Requires: ghostscript >= 8.63-4 Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-ukai-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: cjkuni-fonts-common <= 0.2.20080216.1-19 -Obsoletes: cjkuni-fonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-20 +Obsoletes: cjkuni-fonts-common %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript %common_desc @@ -110,6 +130,7 @@ CJK Unifonts ghostscript files. %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{gsdir} %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -117,33 +138,6 @@ CJK Unifonts ghostscript files. %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common -Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font common files. -Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 -Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 -Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 -Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 -Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 - -%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common -%common_desc - -CJK Unifonts common files. - -%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%dir %{_fontdir} -%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN -%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN -%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale -%{catalogue}/%{name} - %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font compatibility files. Group: User Interface/X @@ -157,12 +151,12 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%dir %{_cncompatdir} -%dir %{_twcompatdir} %dir %{cncompatdir} %dir %{twcompatdir} -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf +%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf +%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf +%{umingtransdir} +%{ukaitransdir} %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} @@ -177,15 +171,27 @@ CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %install %__rm -rf %{buildroot} -# *.ttc(ttf) -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} -%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ - -# fonts.{scale,dir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} \ - -o %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/fonts.scale -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +# *.ttc(ttf) and font.{dir,scale} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ + +# fonts.{scale,dir} # use upstream included one instead +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.dir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/fonts.scale %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/ +#cd %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +#%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{umingdir} \ +# -o %{buildroot}%{umingdir}/fonts.scale +#%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{umingdir} +#cd - +#cd %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +#%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} \ +# -o %{buildroot}%{ukaidir}/fonts.scale +#%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{ukaidir} +#cd - # *.conf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} @@ -217,18 +223,28 @@ cd - # catalogue %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -%__ln_s %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} +%__ln_s %{umingdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming +%__ln_s %{ukaidir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai # backward compat to obsoleted ttf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir} -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf -%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{cncompatdir}/zysong.ttf +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{twcompatdir}/bsmi00lp.ttf + +# backward compt to transition dir +%__ln_s %{umingdir}/ %{buildroot}%{umingtransdir} +%__ln_s %{ukaidir}/ %{buildroot}%{ukaitransdir} %clean %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 21 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-27.fc12 +- Merged from F-11 tree. +- Obsoleted cjkuni-fonts-common. +- Resolves: rhbz#507637 (using font.{dir,scale} from upstream source) + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.2.20080216.1-26 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 04:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507637] Missing fontset info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210447.n8L4lD2A005642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #19 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-09-21 00:47:11 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=132881 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210802.n8L82pAc010493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 --- Comment #3 from Felix 2009-09-21 04:02:50 EDT --- >From Comment #1 With the attached font file now it is looking fine and perfect. Eg. the below combination are looking fine: 0BB8 + 0BC1 ==> ?? 0BB8 + 0BC2 ==> ?? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210811.n8L8B442031737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |524457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210811.n8L8B69K031765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501422 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210812.n8L8CMwY013022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |524457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210812.n8L8CNmH013047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501424 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210822.n8L8Mq2J015506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-21 04:22:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > ok, i will work on this next week ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 09:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210936.n8L9aBx9018667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 05:36:09 EDT --- http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc11.src.rpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec i think it need review as it is very basic package and its merge-review is also pending can someone review it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 09:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210939.n8L9dkrC019300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 09:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210941.n8L9fkdH032745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 09:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210954.n8L9stYP022157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-21 05:54:54 EDT --- I'll look at it this evening -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 10:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211006.n8LA6rit025257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 06:06:52 EDT --- felix thanks, sandeep can you put submit patch here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 10:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211018.n8LAI7J3027704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-21 06:18:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361905) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361905) patch handling correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 based syllables -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 21 12:03:45 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-kannada-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090921120345.DB69411C0043@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9223 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-kannada-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball - added Makefile in upstream tar ball Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 11 Sep 2009 10:09:54 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 21 Sep 2009 12:03:45 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ lohit-kannada-2.4.3.tar.gz +lohit-kannada-2.4.4.tar.gz Index: lohit-kannada-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel/lohit-kannada-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-kannada-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:09:54 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-kannada-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:03:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ %global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.4.3 +Version: 2.4.4 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Kannada font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ -Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/kannada/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ This package provides a free Kannada tru %build -./generate.pe *.sfd +make %install rm -fr %{buildroot} @@ -54,5 +54,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 +- upstream release of 2.4.4 +- updated url for upstream tarball +- added Makefile in upstream tar ball + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 11 Sep 2009 10:09:54 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 21 Sep 2009 12:03:45 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -a5a3d4367ebf8f68388bd9c75f82e8a0 lohit-kannada-2.4.3.tar.gz +51977f80be46413b99d7c78c31c157a5 lohit-kannada-2.4.4.tar.gz From pravins at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 21 12:07:13 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090921120713.5D2DF11C0043@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11083 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball - added Makefile in upstream tar ball Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 11 Sep 2009 10:41:05 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 21 Sep 2009 12:07:13 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ lohit-malayalam-2.4.3.tar.gz +lohit-malayalam-2.4.4.tar.gz Index: lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel/lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:41:05 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:07:13 -0000 1.2 @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ #%global fontconf 67-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.4.3 +Version: 2.4.4 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Malayalam font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ -Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/malayalam/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ This package provides a free Malayalam t %build -./generate.pe *.sfd +make %install rm -fr %{buildroot} @@ -54,5 +54,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 +- upstream release of 2.4.4 +- updated url for upstream tarball +- added Makefile in upstream tar ball + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 11 Sep 2009 10:41:05 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 21 Sep 2009 12:07:13 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -3dca42cc0169ce2146d4c5ea74054bb3 lohit-malayalam-2.4.3.tar.gz +a18f132fdd15f616bd9b5c9fd3716a20 lohit-malayalam-2.4.4.tar.gz From pravins at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 21 12:13:15 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-telugu-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090921121315.13B5011C0043@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13791 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-telugu-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball - added Makefile in upstream tar ball Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 11 Sep 2009 10:56:36 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 21 Sep 2009 12:13:14 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ lohit-telugu-2.4.3.tar.gz +lohit-telugu-2.4.4.tar.gz Index: lohit-telugu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel/lohit-telugu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-telugu-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:56:36 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-telugu-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:13:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ %global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.4.3 +Version: 2.4.4 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Telugu font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ -Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/telugu/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ This package provides a free Telugu true %build -./generate.pe *.sfd +make %install rm -fr %{buildroot} @@ -54,5 +54,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 +- upstream release of 2.4.4 +- updated url for upstream tarball +- added Makefile in upstream tar ball + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 11 Sep 2009 10:56:36 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 21 Sep 2009 12:13:14 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -848f59611b73a92aaa6de3e2e0311883 lohit-telugu-2.4.3.tar.gz +da2bd6b204af0575ecf0d26b3497c463 lohit-telugu-2.4.4.tar.gz From pravins at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 21 12:13:20 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-tamil-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090921121320.5F99111C0043@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13844 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-tamil-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball - added Makefile in upstream tar ball Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 11 Sep 2009 10:54:14 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 21 Sep 2009 12:13:20 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ lohit-tamil-2.4.3.tar.gz +lohit-tamil-2.4.4.tar.gz Index: lohit-tamil-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel/lohit-tamil-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-tamil-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:54:14 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-tamil-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:13:20 -0000 1.2 @@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ %global fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.4.3 +Version: 2.4.4 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Tamil font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ -Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/tamil/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ This package provides a free Tamil truet %build -./generate.pe *.sfd +make %install rm -fr %{buildroot} @@ -54,5 +54,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 +- upstream release of 2.4.4 +- updated url for upstream tarball +- added Makefile in upstream tar ball + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 11 Sep 2009 10:54:14 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 21 Sep 2009 12:13:20 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7d0ba57a033024c6336e773968da41fb lohit-tamil-2.4.3.tar.gz +5ca4933b344fca080c013c2f572351df lohit-tamil-2.4.4.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211215.n8LCFWbx001300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 08:15:31 EDT --- build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 will be available in wed. rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211216.n8LCG7Yd022007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 08:16:06 EDT --- build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 will be available in wed. rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524149] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211217.n8LCHEMZ022231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 08:17:13 EDT --- build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 will be available in wed. rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211216.n8LCGbrd022080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 08:16:36 EDT --- build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 will be available in wed. rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524148] [kn_IN] 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211218.n8LCIx5Q002007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524148 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 08:18:58 EDT --- build lohit-kannada-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 will be available in wed. rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211218.n8LCIOZZ001912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 08:18:23 EDT --- build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 will be available in wed. rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211217.n8LCHilX001806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 08:17:43 EDT --- build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 will be available in wed. rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 21 21:26:25 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.96, 1.97 pango.spec, 1.178, 1.179 sources, 1.97, 1.98 Message-ID: <20090921212625.B5E5411C0043@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5902 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.26.0-1 - 1.26.0 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.96 retrieving revision 1.97 diff -u -p -r1.96 -r1.97 --- .cvsignore 8 Sep 2009 15:51:56 -0000 1.96 +++ .cvsignore 21 Sep 2009 21:26:25 -0000 1.97 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.25.6.tar.bz2 +pango-1.26.0.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.178 retrieving revision 1.179 diff -u -p -r1.178 -r1.179 --- pango.spec 8 Sep 2009 15:51:56 -0000 1.178 +++ pango.spec 21 Sep 2009 21:26:25 -0000 1.179 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.25.6 +Version: 1.26.0 Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -228,6 +228,9 @@ fi %changelog +* Mon Sep 21 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.26.0-1 +- 1.26.0 + * Tue Sep 8 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.25.6-1 - 1.25.6 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.97 retrieving revision 1.98 diff -u -p -r1.97 -r1.98 --- sources 8 Sep 2009 15:51:56 -0000 1.97 +++ sources 21 Sep 2009 21:26:25 -0000 1.98 @@ -1 +1 @@ -f578a348fbe5f616d104b3a5ecbd2005 pango-1.25.6.tar.bz2 +74ce18cfcc3ad0008a6ad56cfc535061 pango-1.26.0.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 21:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212142.n8LLg3Xl012475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-21 17:42:02 EDT --- Well fc-scan shows that most of the bdf files declare themselves as "Fixed", two of them think they are "Fangsong ti" and the others are not parsable by fc-scan. So you need at minimum a 1. a foo-fixed-fonts subpackage, 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, 3. and get Behdad to look at the other files and tell you if it's a bug his side or if the files need some form of fixing. Fontconfig won't be able to use them if it can't read the font name inside. The readme says they are Lucida but fontconfig does not read readmes. Also - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package - the licensing of Fangsong ti needs to be extracted from the fonts in a .txt people can actually read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212203.n8LM3Cgj028508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 05:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220542.n8M5gicv024275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-22 01:42:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, bitmap-cjk-fonts has only fansongti fonts file, should we change it name? like bitmap-cjk-fangsongti-fonts > > Also > - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts > package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package can you elaborate more on this, which font exactly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 05:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220548.n8M5miLo019387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-22 01:48:42 EDT --- I am not sure about the importance of this package though it has been in the distro for a long time. Most of the fonts seem to be duplicated in xorg-x11-fonts. At least the ucs-fonts and lucidatypewriter are AFAICT. $ cd bitmap-fonts/devel/bitmap-fonts-0.3 $ find -name "*.bdf" | wc -l 33 $ for i in *.bdf; do find xorg-x11-fonts/devel/xorg-x11-fonts-7.2/font-misc-misc-1.0.0 -name $i ; done | wc -l 44 which only seems to really leave fangsongti. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 05:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220551.n8M5prNS026038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-22 01:51:53 EDT --- As I commented in the merge review (and this still needs proper checking) but most bdf fonts already seem to be in xorg-x11-fonts - so I am starting wonder if this package could just be dropped become fangsongti-fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 05:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220555.n8M5tZ86020888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-22 01:55:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, > bitmap-cjk-fonts has only fansongti fonts file, should we change it name? > like bitmap-cjk-fangsongti-fonts I'd not mention the cjk bit at all > > Also > > - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts > > package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package > > can you elaborate more on this, which font exactly? The readme says fixed is a copy of http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html If we packaged it today it'd end up in a ucs-fonts or ucs-fixed-fonts srpm, not something else entirely. Also as Jens wrote we need to de-duplicate with xorg-x11-fonts, but xorg-x11-fonts is another package that needs reorganisation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 06:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220638.n8M6cKsL029388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-22 02:38:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > 3. and get Behdad to look at the other files and tell you if it's a bug his > side or if the files need some form of fixing. Fontconfig won't be able to use > them if it can't read the font name inside. The readme says they are Lucida but > fontconfig does not read readmes. BTW due to a mock bug I checked the files in the srpm, not the files in the built rpm, so it may be that this is already fixed as part of the current build process (need to check the existing repo-font-audit tool for what it says about this package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230533.n8N5XGYM019151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:33:15 EDT --- >From Comment #6, Correct behaviour of following combination: 1) U+0BB8 U+0BC1 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC1 3) U+0B9C U+0BC1 can now be obtained from build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230533.n8N5X6nW026368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ifelix at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:33:05 EDT --- >From Comment #5, Correct behaviour of following combination: 1) U+0BB8 U+0BC2 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC2 3) U+0B9C U+0BC2 can now be obtained from build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230534.n8N5YBEU019320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 Bug 501422 depends on bug 524457, which changed state. Bug 524457 Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230534.n8N5YCpR019348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 Bug 501424 depends on bug 524457, which changed state. Bug 524457 Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230534.n8N5YA14019287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:34:09 EDT --- >From Comment #6, Correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 based syllables can now be obtained from build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). Hence, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230552.n8N5qvkh022630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|501424 | --- Comment #9 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:52:55 EDT --- *** Bug 501424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230552.n8N5quaG022593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, psatpute at redhat.com Component|pango |lohit-tamil-fonts Depends on|524457 | Resolution| |DUPLICATE AssignedTo|pnemade at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:52:55 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 524457 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230552.n8N5qget029755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|501422 | CC| |xinsun at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:52:40 EDT --- *** Bug 501422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230552.n8N5qfOx029719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, psatpute at redhat.com Component|pango |lohit-tamil-fonts Depends on|524457 | Resolution| |DUPLICATE AssignedTo|pnemade at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 01:52:40 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 524457 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523167] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D36 combined with 0D4D and 0D31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230630.n8N6UwGr004117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523167 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 02:30:57 EDT --- >From Comment #8, Following combination: 0D36 + 0D4D + 0D31 => ? + ? + ? = ??? can now be obtained from build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). Thereby, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523166] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230630.n8N6ULha029672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 02:30:20 EDT --- >From Comment #4, Combination: 0D34 + 0D4D + 0D35 => ? + ? + ? = ??? can now be obtained from build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). Thereby, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230631.n8N6VCeJ029833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 02:31:11 EDT --- >From Comment #6, 0D2E + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? Resulting size of the glyph is now in proportion to the consonant 0D2E. Expected results can now be obtained from build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). Thereby, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230630.n8N6Ufhh029777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 02:30:39 EDT --- >From Comment #7, Following combination: (i) 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (ii) 0D2B + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? (iii) 0D35 + 0D4D + 0D32 => ? + ? + ? = ??? can now be obtained from build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). Thereby, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524149] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230631.n8N6VZYo004312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 02:31:34 EDT --- >From Comment #4, Combination: 0d31 + 0d4d + 200d + space => ??? can now be obtained from build lohit-malayalam-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide). Thereby, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 10:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522056] wrong match of fonts (non-)proportional In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231049.n8NAnIIV022700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522056 David Tardon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.1.1-19.8.fc12 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 15:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231528.n8NFSFKt009620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473303(F12Blocker) --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:00:10 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 15:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231550.n8NFog6h012446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-23 11:50:40 EDT --- It would also be worth testing with the dev version of OO.o, since it is supposed to correct many OO.o OpenType problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524148] [kn_IN] 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240455.n8O4tRVL031450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524148 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501683] [ml_IN][GSUB] U+0D[1-3][5-E] U+0D4D U+0D33 font shape has error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240534.n8O5YALv022349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501683 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 06:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523933] Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240611.n8O6BLxk029320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523933 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |GNOME Desktop 594101 CC| |aalam at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 06:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523933] Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240625.n8O6P4jn018928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523933 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240804.n8O846Ks019073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #7 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-24 04:04:05 EDT --- This issue is unaffected by the additional opentype support and other OOo-dev changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 10:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514158] [bn_IN] pango in not rendering character U+09E2 and U+09E3 due to wrong characters class assignement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241047.n8OAlEbQ010054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514158 --- Comment #3 from A S Alam 2009-09-24 06:47:13 EDT --- still present with following version: pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501910] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241114.n8OBEmO8016395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501910 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525424 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525424] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525424 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xinsun at redhat.com Depends on: 501910 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501910 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501910 +++ Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key five times to delete the whole char. U+0929 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0929 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0929 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0934 ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input the above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key five times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. ----------- Bug Exist on Rawhide (f-12) with following version lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 Bug is not present for QT qt-4.5.2-19.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501910] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241116.n8OBG0re029786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501910 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-09-24 07:15:58 EDT --- Bug is not exist for qt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241121.n8OBLNIQ018130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-09-24 07:21:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362472) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362472) error log, after crash. I'm also experiencing those pango/java/crahs problems with eclipse. Also attaching a log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241125.n8OBPRbM019021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-24 07:25:26 EDT --- just tried the latest fontforge in rawhide to re-export ttf without any updates. I can still see this issue. I'm not really sure what exactly causes this but apparently fontforge has a problem with the default options in exporting ttf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] New: [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 Summary: [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:3b17aec5 Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonttools AssignedTo: roozbeh at gmail.com ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- abrt detected a crash. How to reproduce ----- 1. 2. 3. Comment ----- cp /usr/share/fonts/sazanami/gothic/sazanami-gothic.ttf /tmp cd /tmp ttx sazanami-gothic.ttf Additional information ====== Attached files ---- backtrace cmdline ----- /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/ttx sazanami-gothic.ttf component ----- fonttools executable ----- /usr/bin/ttx kernel ----- 2.6.31-2.fc12.x86_64 package ----- fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 uuid ----- 3b17aec5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241230.n8OCU1hr017085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-24 08:30:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362481) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362481) File: backtrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241235.n8OCZxWI006163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #362481|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241232.n8OCWGoO005233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-24 08:32:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362482) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362482) here the fix for this "as" is a reserved keyword in python The rpmbuild process also lists the same error: SyntaxError: ('invalid syntax', ('/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py', 397, 3, '\tas = p.getAssembly()\n')) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525444] [abrt] crash detected in fonttools-2.2-6.fc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241239.n8OCd1Bo019238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525444 --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-24 08:39:00 EDT --- abrt attached the wrong backtrace, so ignore the content of that. The crash is real though and the fix attached is good. Upstreamed now as well as https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2865692&group_id=29196&atid=395374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 14:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241445.n8OEjj5m023790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #9 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-24 10:45:44 EDT --- hmm, I also see this using the fonttools ttx, i.e. ttx -i -a -e original-sazanami-gothic.ttf ttx -b original-sazanami-gothic.ttf also generates output which exhibits the behaviour that the original doesn't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241520.n8OFKmIE019117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com, | |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Mat Booth 2009-09-24 11:20:47 EDT --- CC'ing the Eclipse brothers to see if they know anything about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] New: wrongly encoding glyphs after U+10000 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: wrongly encoding glyphs after U+10000 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Summary: wrongly encoding glyphs after U+10000 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: moyogo at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Since 1.04 the codepoints U+10000...U+10013 in Liberation Sans, U+10000...U+1000B in Liberation Serif, and U+10000...U+1000E in Liberation Mono, are filled with characters that used to be out of bound. The glyph don't actually match the codepoints. For example U+10005 LINEAR B SYLLABLE B001 DA is a fraction four in LiberationSans-Regular. The error was probably introduced when the font encoding went from Unicode BMP to Unicode Full. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241529.n8OFTdUG021224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-24 11:29:38 EDT --- I saw this in my rawhide VM (been having a hard time installing it on bare metal) and was going to try to reproduce. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241545.n8OFjskF006920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Denis Jacquerye changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|wrongly encoding glyphs |wrongly encoded glyphs |after U+10000 |after U+10000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241753.n8OHrO07022530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-24 13:53:22 EDT --- How is this package in the distribution when this ticket is still blocking FE-Legal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241852.n8OIqOQx017833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #362472|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492900] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - Extended and improved version of MgOpen Cosmetica font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJhCau016212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242000.n8OK0IKd002014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #13 from Clint Savage 2009-09-24 16:00:17 EDT --- That block should have been removed some time ago. The author changed the license to a free license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242037.n8OKbkkv009680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-24 16:37:45 EDT --- It would probably be a good idea to notify ttx and fontforge authors about this problem, maybe they can teach their tools to work around such buggy font files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242230.n8OMUoKA016206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #14 from Nathan G. Grennan 2009-09-24 18:30:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362577) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362577) Xorg log file with backtrace of the crash I just ran into this bug on fully up to date Fedora 11 x86_64. I saw this when using konsole when holding down the page up key while looking at a .sql file with binary data in it. I recently switched to konsole from gnome-terminal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 00:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525592] New: lohit-hindi-fonts, etc should not obsolete itself Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: lohit-hindi-fonts, etc should not obsolete itself https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525592 Summary: lohit-hindi-fonts, etc should not obsolete itself Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-hindi-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When I yum updated rawhide today I see that some new lohit fonts package are obsoleting themselves. This seems wrong: no reason to do this IMHO as there is no name change. Please drop the self-obsoletes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12 Steps to Reproduce: 1. install lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.2-1.fc12 in rawhide 2. yum update Actual results: yum says installing lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12 replacing lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.2-1.fc12 Expected results: It should just be a normal transparent update with no visible change of package to users. Additional info: I assume similar problem for all the other lohit-*-fonts. The source url is also wrong: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/gujarati/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz ^^^^^^^^ Please take care. Are you going to move the packages back to fedorahosted too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 00:55:49 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (cchance) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/taipeifonts/devel taipeifonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090925005549.D18EA11C00DB@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/taipeifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4293 Modified Files: taipeifonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Caius kaio Chance - 1.2-9.fc12 - rebuild on dist-f12 Index: taipeifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/taipeifonts/devel/taipeifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6 --- taipeifonts.spec 27 Jul 2009 05:30:40 -0000 1.5 +++ taipeifonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 00:55:49 -0000 1.6 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: taipeifonts Version: 1.2 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Bitmap Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ fi %{catalogue}/%{name} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Caius 'kaio' Chance - 1.2-9.fc12 +- rebuild on dist-f12 + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.2-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250140.n8P1eWx5029939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-09-24 21:40:31 EDT --- Would you have any suggestions on the conversion? I have done my best to preserve that but seems at your feedback it was failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 02:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250235.n8P2ZlJk016384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|473303(F12Blocker) |473302(F12Target) --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-24 22:35:45 EDT --- I have commented out google-droid-*-fonts from Desktop Live .ks and moving this to F12Target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520361] move google-droid-fonts to @gnome-desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250328.n8P3S9RB032079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520361 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-24 23:28:08 EDT --- No progress on the Japanese problem unfortuantely despite nim-nim's efforts. For now I dropped the droid fonts from the desktop live spin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 04:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525592] lohit-hindi-fonts, etc should not obsolete itself In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250418.n8P4It6F010353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525592 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-25 00:18:54 EDT --- yes, i have started moving source package to fedorahosted.org, i moved recent version of malayala, tamil, tegulu and kannada 2.4.4, to fedorahosted so now only obsolute will be only lohit-fonts-common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250539.n8P5dIM3025102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp --- Comment #23 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-25 01:39:16 EDT --- As Kevin mentioned already, proposed fix has a side effect that GCC finds a cast between incompatible pointers. Although current git head of FreeType2 includes it, I want to revert it. In my investigation, the crashing behaviour was supposed to be introduced by Richard Guenther's inline optimizer for GCC-4.4 branch, committed on 2008-08-09. For detail, see https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?27441 I propose another fix to pass the problem, aslike: diff --git a/src/cache/ftccache.h b/src/cache/ftccache.h index 2082bc4..5e932b7 100644 --- a/src/cache/ftccache.h +++ b/src/cache/ftccache.h @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ FT_BEGIN_HEADER \ \ error = 0; \ - node = NULL; \ + /* node = NULL; */ \ _idx = _hash & _cache->mask; \ if ( _idx < _cache->p ) \ _idx = _hash & ( _cache->mask*2 + 1 ); \ @@ -246,7 +246,8 @@ FT_BEGIN_HEADER error = FTC_Cache_NewNode( _cache, _hash, query, &_node ); \ \ _Ok: \ - node = _node; \ + _pnode = (FTC_Node*)(void*)&(node); \ + *_pnode = _node; \ FT_END_STMNT #else /* !FTC_INLINE */ I want to revert the fix that current FC11 uses and apply this patch. Anybody can test if this fix works well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250543.n8P5hgp6025941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #24 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-25 01:43:41 EDT --- if you throw out a scratch build, I will check it. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501903] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250558.n8P5wlGc009187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501903 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525620 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501905] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250554.n8P5slkv008382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501905 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525618 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525618] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525618 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xinsun at redhat.com Depends on: 501905 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501905 Clone for Rawhide (fedora 12) Exist in follogig version ---- pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501905 +++ Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. U+0915 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0916 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0917 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0918 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0919 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091A U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091B U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091C U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091D U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091E U+094D U+0934 ??? U+091F U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0920 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0921 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0922 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0923 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0924 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0925 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0926 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0927 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0928 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092A U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092B U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092C U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092D U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092E U+094D U+0934 ??? U+092F U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0930 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0932 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0933 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0935 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0936 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0937 U+094D U+0934 ??? U+0939 U+094D U+0934 ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input the above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. --- Additional comment from xinsun at redhat.com on 2009-05-21 05:48:46 EDT --- [hi_IN][GSUB] U+0934 U+094D U+0915 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0916 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0917 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0918 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0919 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091A ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091B ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091C ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091D ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091E ??? U+0934 U+094D U+091F ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0920 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0921 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0922 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0923 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0924 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0925 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0926 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0927 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0928 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092A ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092B ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092C ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092D ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092E ??? U+0934 U+094D U+092F ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0930 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0932 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0933 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0935 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0936 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0937 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0938 ??? U+0934 U+094D U+0939 ??? also have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525620] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525620 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xinsun at redhat.com Depends on: 501903 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501903 Clone for Rawhide (Fedora 12) with following Package: ---- pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch ----- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501903 +++ Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. U+0915 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0916 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0917 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0918 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0919 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091A U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091B U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091C U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091D U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091E U+094D U+0931 ??? U+091F U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0920 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0921 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0922 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0923 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0924 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0925 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0926 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0927 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0928 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092A U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092B U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092C U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092D U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092E U+094D U+0931 ??? U+092F U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0930 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0932 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0933 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0935 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0936 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0937 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0938 U+094D U+0931 ??? U+0939 U+094D U+0931 ??? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input Tthe above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. --- Additional comment from xinsun at redhat.com on 2009-05-21 05:34:29 EDT --- [hi_IN][GUSB] U+0931 U+094D U+0915 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0916 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0917 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0918 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0919 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091A ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091B ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091C ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091D ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091E ??? U+0931 U+094D U+091F ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0920 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0921 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0922 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0923 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0924 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0925 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0926 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0927 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0928 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092A ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092B ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092C ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092D ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092E ??? U+0931 U+094D U+092F ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0930 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0932 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0933 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0935 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0936 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0937 ??? U+0931 U+094D U+0938 ??? also have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525620] [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0931" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250602.n8P62NdU029474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525620 --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-09-25 02:02:22 EDT --- One More combination U+0915 U+094D U+0929 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250607.n8P67tWN030466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #25 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-25 02:07:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362615) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362615) source rpm including the patch proposed by mpsuzuki Here is the source rpm including the patch proposed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582#c23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501417] [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250627.n8P6ROEe014757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501417 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525624 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:27:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525624] New: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525624 Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CBC" has error result. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xinsun at redhat.com Depends on: 501417 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501417 Clone for Rawhide (Fedora 12) with following Package: ---- pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.4-1.fc12.noarch ----- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501417 +++ Created an attachment (id=344549) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344549) 0CBC.jpg Description of problem: When inputing "U+0CBC" in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0CBC"in gedit. Actual results: U+0CBC ? and is different from the correct image. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0CBC.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501416] [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250636.n8P6axlc016542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501416 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501277] [pa_IN][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250637.n8P6bPCA016641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501277 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525628 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501277] [pa_IN][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250634.n8P6YfjA015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501277 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com Summary|[Indic][CodePoint]"U+0A33" |[pa_IN][CodePoint]"U+0A33" |need press backspace key |need press backspace key |twice to delete the whole |twice to delete the whole |char |char -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525628] New: [pa_IN][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [pa_IN][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525628 Summary: [pa_IN][CodePoint]"U+0A33" need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, aalam at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xinsun at redhat.com Depends on: 501277 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501277 Clone for Rawhide (Fedora 12) with following Package: ---- pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch ----- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501277 +++ Description of problem: When input U+0A33 ? in gedit, we need to press Backspace key twice to delete the whole char. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input U+0A33 in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key twice to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key only one time to delete the whole char. Additional info: U+0A33 ? --- Additional comment from xinsun at redhat.com on 2009-05-18 07:00:19 EDT --- [pa_IN][CodePoint] U+0A36 ? U+0A59 ? U+0A5A ? U+0A5B ? U+0A5E ? have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525627] New: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525627 Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xinsun at redhat.com Depends on: 501416 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501416 Clone for Rawhide (Fedora 12) with following Package: ---- pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch ----- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501416 +++ Description of problem: When inputing "U+0CE2" ? or "U+0CE3" ? in gedit, the results were wrong. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0CE2" or "U+0CE3" in gedit. Actual results: The result are U+0CE2 ? U+0CE3 ? and they are different from the correct image. Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0CE2.png and U+0CE3.png --- Additional comment from xinsun at redhat.com on 2009-05-18 23:03:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344547) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344547) 0CE2.png --- Additional comment from xinsun at redhat.com on 2009-05-18 23:03:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344548) 0CE3.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ih at openoffice.org Fri Sep 25 09:51:35 2009 From: ih at openoffice.org (ih at openoffice.org) Date: 25 Sep 2009 09:51:35 -0000 Subject: [Issue 105084] OpenSymbol font: Math related changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090925095135.14042.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105084 User ih changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|NEW |STARTED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from ih at openoffice.org Fri Sep 25 09:51:34 +0000 2009 ------- started --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 11:46:51 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-hindi-fonts/devel lohit-hindi-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925114651.6DC1411C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-hindi-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29034 Modified Files: lohit-hindi-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 23 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-hindi-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-hindi-fonts/devel/lohit-hindi-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-hindi-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:06:35 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-hindi-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:46:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,19 +3,18 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Hindi font Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ -Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/gujarati/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/hindi/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -53,6 +52,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %doc ChangeLog COPYRIGHT COPYING AUTHORS README ChangeLog.old %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 11:49:53 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-assamese-fonts/devel lohit-assamese-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925114953.7E85F11C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-assamese-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30285 Modified Files: lohit-assamese-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-assamese-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-assamese-fonts/devel/lohit-assamese-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-assamese-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 09:13:50 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-assamese-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:49:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Assamese font Group: User Interface/X @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -56,5 +55,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Wed Sep 09 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 11:52:08 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-bengali-fonts/devel lohit-bengali-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925115208.1554B11C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-bengali-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31056 Modified Files: lohit-bengali-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-bengali-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-bengali-fonts/devel/lohit-bengali-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-bengali-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 09:21:05 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-bengali-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:52:07 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Bengali font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,6 +53,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Wed Sep 09 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 11:54:41 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925115441.B931111C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32138 Modified Files: lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-gujarati-fonts/devel/lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:04:36 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:54:41 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Gujarati font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,6 +53,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 11:56:34 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel lohit-kannada-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090925115634.71D7111C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv318 Modified Files: lohit-kannada-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-kannada-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel/lohit-kannada-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- lohit-kannada-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:03:45 -0000 1.2 +++ lohit-kannada-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:56:34 -0000 1.3 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.4 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Kannada font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,6 +53,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-2 +- updated specs + * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 11:58:02 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-kashmiri-fonts/devel lohit-kashmiri-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925115802.D17C211C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kashmiri-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1379 Modified Files: lohit-kashmiri-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-kashmiri-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kashmiri-fonts/devel/lohit-kashmiri-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-kashmiri-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:13:56 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-kashmiri-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:58:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Kashmiri Devanagari Script Font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,5 +53,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 11:59:47 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-konkani-fonts/devel lohit-konkani-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925115948.0149611C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-konkani-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2651 Modified Files: lohit-konkani-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-konkani-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-konkani-fonts/devel/lohit-konkani-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-konkani-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:21:08 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-konkani-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:59:47 -0000 1.2 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Konkani Font Group: User Interface/X @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -55,6 +54,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:02:01 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-maithili-fonts/devel lohit-maithili-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925120201.AC41711C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-maithili-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3486 Modified Files: lohit-maithili-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-maithili-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-maithili-fonts/devel/lohit-maithili-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-maithili-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:40:25 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-maithili-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:02:01 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Maithili font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,5 +53,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:03:45 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090925120345.B2EAF11C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4857 Modified Files: lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel/lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:07:13 -0000 1.2 +++ lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:03:45 -0000 1.3 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.4 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Malayalam font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,6 +53,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-2 +- updated specs + * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:05:19 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-marathi-fonts/devel lohit-marathi-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925120519.A623611C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-marathi-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5755 Modified Files: lohit-marathi-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-marathi-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-marathi-fonts/devel/lohit-marathi-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-marathi-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:44:09 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-marathi-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:05:19 -0000 1.2 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Marathi font Group: User Interface/X @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -55,6 +54,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %doc ChangeLog COPYRIGHT COPYING AUTHORS README ChangeLog.old %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:07:01 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-nepali-fonts/devel lohit-nepali-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925120701.09BF811C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-nepali-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6253 Modified Files: lohit-nepali-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-nepali-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-nepali-fonts/devel/lohit-nepali-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-nepali-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:44:25 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-nepali-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:07:00 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Nepali font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,5 +53,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:09:20 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-oriya-fonts/devel lohit-oriya-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925120920.CB35411C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-oriya-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7758 Modified Files: lohit-oriya-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-oriya-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-oriya-fonts/devel/lohit-oriya-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-oriya-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:47:25 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-oriya-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:09:19 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Oriya Font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,5 +53,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:11:02 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-punjabi-fonts/devel lohit-punjabi-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925121102.CEB2D11C0423@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-punjabi-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8991 Modified Files: lohit-punjabi-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-punjabi-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-punjabi-fonts/devel/lohit-punjabi-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-punjabi-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:48:11 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-punjabi-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:11:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Punjabi font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,5 +53,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:13:15 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-sindhi-fonts/devel lohit-sindhi-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090925121315.846B011C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-sindhi-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10679 Modified Files: lohit-sindhi-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-sindhi-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-sindhi-fonts/devel/lohit-sindhi-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- lohit-sindhi-fonts.spec 11 Sep 2009 10:54:11 -0000 1.1 +++ lohit-sindhi-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:13:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Sindhi font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,5 +53,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +- updated specs + * Fri Sep 11 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 - first release after lohit-fonts split in new tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:14:48 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel lohit-tamil-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090925121448.04A7C11C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11581 Modified Files: lohit-tamil-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-tamil-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel/lohit-tamil-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- lohit-tamil-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:13:20 -0000 1.2 +++ lohit-tamil-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:14:47 -0000 1.3 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.4 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Tamil font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,6 +53,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-2 +- updated specs + * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:19:18 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel lohit-telugu-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090925121918.4030A11C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13737 Modified Files: lohit-telugu-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-2 - updated specs Index: lohit-telugu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel/lohit-telugu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- lohit-telugu-fonts.spec 21 Sep 2009 12:13:14 -0000 1.2 +++ lohit-telugu-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:19:10 -0000 1.3 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.4 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Free Telugu font Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20080429 BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} %description @@ -54,6 +53,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-2 +- updated specs + * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 - updated url for upstream tarball From pravins at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 25 12:21:13 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-bengali-fonts/devel lohit-bengali-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090925122113.D37BC11C00E8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-bengali-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15274 Modified Files: lohit-bengali-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-3 - updated specs Index: lohit-bengali-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-bengali-fonts/devel/lohit-bengali-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- lohit-bengali-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 11:52:07 -0000 1.2 +++ lohit-bengali-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:21:13 -0000 1.3 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.4.3 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Free Bengali font Group: User Interface/X @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog -* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-2 +* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-3 - updated specs * Wed Sep 09 2009 Pravin Satpute - 2.4.3-1 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251806.n8PI6I6T013565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #26 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-25 14:06:17 EDT --- my incarnation of this problem (navit failing to run) does not happen with the build from comment #25, so I have no problem with this change. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251834.n8PIY2CE013000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #27 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-25 14:34:00 EDT --- Thank you very much for testing! I will replace previous fix for ftccache.h by new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 02:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260221.n8Q2L32q006552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #28 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-25 22:21:01 EDT --- As far as I understand, the proposed fix still violates C aliasing rules, even if gcc currently is not smart enough for it. One fix I can imagine is to introduce a union that has both pointer types as members, the assing to one, read from the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 02:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] New: Font corruption over time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Font corruption over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Summary: Font corruption over time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com ReportedBy: xx3nvyxx at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=362739) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362739) Example of corrupted font Fonts become more and more corrupted over time, starting a few seconds after login. Attachment is this text after an hour of running: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 1234567890 `~!@#$%^&*()_+=-[]{}\|;:'",./<>? Notes: Thinkpad T41 Unknown if reproducible by others, contact me if you need more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 04:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260406.n8Q46cQq010032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-26 00:06:37 EDT --- There's no way a legit crash can happen in pango_layout_new(). Here's the code for that function: PangoLayout * pango_layout_new (PangoContext *context) { PangoLayout *layout; g_return_val_if_fail (context != NULL, NULL); layout = g_object_new (PANGO_TYPE_LAYOUT, NULL); layout->context = context; g_object_ref (context); return layout; } So, either context passed to it is NULL, or this is a memory corruption happening somewhere else. I can't do anything about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 06:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260623.n8Q6Nnxh023735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-26 02:23:48 EDT --- Behdad is right, mpsuzuki's "fix" is NOT correct, please DO NOT use this! Every "fix" using that pnode hack will always be an aliasing rule violation. Even if it happens to work with the current GCC, it may break at any point in the future. Please read comment #19 if you really want to be able to compile this C code with C++ (which I don't give a darn about, and which shouldn't take priority over making it actually VALID C ? that aliasing violation is not valid C++ either, by the way; you'd use inheritance to do this properly in C++, if this were actually C++ code, which it isn't). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 06:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260644.n8Q6ieJ8026962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #30 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-26 02:44:39 EDT --- Thanks Behdad & Kevin, My fix in #25 just disables the problematic optimization in GCC-4.4.x, I know it does not fix the strict aliasing issue (I thought it was different issue). I will try another fix following to comment #19. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 08:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525827] Font corruption over time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260844.n8Q8iZ7d014145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525827 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|xorg-x11-fonts |xorg-x11-drivers --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-26 04:44:34 EDT --- I see it too (x86_64, AMD HD 4850). Plus system crashes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 10:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490941] fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261010.n8QAAA99005955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490941 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|dejavu-fonts |fontconfig AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 10:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261027.n8QARoxS031927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-26 06:27:48 EDT --- Reassigning to Behdad, since any progress on this bug depends on him (I'll happily take the bug back once he tells us how to make the fontconfig rules work as expected) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 11:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524883] cpi setting not used accurately In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261112.n8QBCXPc007141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524883 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261202.n8QC2xxQ024656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #31 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-26 08:02:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362757) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362757) Patch to introduce the unions to the parts violating strict aliasing. Behdad, Following is what you suggested? Attached is a patch to do similar modifications for all part warned as violating strict aliasing. diff --git a/src/cache/ftccmap.c b/src/cache/ftccmap.c index 50a6189..8fb3387 100644 --- a/src/cache/ftccmap.c +++ b/src/cache/ftccmap.c @@ -283,11 +283,15 @@ { FTC_Cache cache = FTC_CACHE( cmap_cache ); FTC_CMapQueryRec query; - FTC_CMapNode node; FT_Error error; FT_UInt gindex = 0; FT_UInt32 hash; FT_Int no_cmap_change = 0; + union + { + FTC_Node node; + FTC_CMapNode cmap; + } ftc_unode; if ( cmap_index < 0 ) @@ -371,20 +375,20 @@ #if 1 FTC_CACHE_LOOKUP_CMP( cache, ftc_cmap_node_compare, hash, &query, - node, error ); + ftc_unode.node, error ); #else - error = FTC_Cache_Lookup( cache, hash, &query, (FTC_Node*) &node ); + error = FTC_Cache_Lookup( cache, hash, &query, &(ftc_unode.node) ); #endif if ( error ) goto Exit; - FT_ASSERT( (FT_UInt)( char_code - node->first ) < FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ); + FT_ASSERT( (FT_UInt)( char_code - ftc_unode.cmap->first ) < FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ); /* something rotten can happen with rogue clients */ - if ( (FT_UInt)( char_code - node->first >= FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ) ) + if ( (FT_UInt)( char_code - ftc_unode.cmap->first >= FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ) ) return 0; - gindex = node->indices[char_code - node->first]; + gindex = ftc_unode.cmap->indices[char_code - ftc_unode.cmap->first]; if ( gindex == FTC_CMAP_UNKNOWN ) { FT_Face face; @@ -392,7 +396,7 @@ gindex = 0; - error = FTC_Manager_LookupFace( cache->manager, node->face_id, &face ); + error = FTC_Manager_LookupFace( cache->manager, ftc_unode.cmap->face_id, &face ); if ( error ) goto Exit; @@ -413,7 +417,7 @@ FT_Set_Charmap( face, old ); } - node->indices[char_code - node->first] = (FT_UShort)gindex; + ftc_unode.cmap->indices[char_code - ftc_unode.cmap->first] = (FT_UShort)gindex; } Exit: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261205.n8QC591i015726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #32 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-26 08:05:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362758) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362758) source rpm including the 2nd patch proposed by mpsuzuki Here is new source rpm including my 2nd patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261210.n8QCAPbr016722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-26 08:10:24 EDT --- This one should now work with GCC and other real-world compilers. It's still not valid C because the C standard explicitly does not require a union to be 100% overlapping storage (if you assign one member, the value of the other is undefined), in fact handling "union" as "struct" would still be a compliant implementation of "union". But GCC *does* guarantee that you can use "union" that way and other compilers in practical use do as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261224.n8QCO6aS018764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #34 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-26 08:24:05 EDT --- Thank you very quick reply. Hmm, I should rework. You suggested to pass FTC_Node variable to FTC_CACHE_LOOKUP_CMP() and cast it to FTC_CMapNode by caller. It is safer than using union? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525866] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonttools AssignedTo: roozbeh at gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa at redhat.com, roozbeh at gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license Please rebuild the Fedora fonttool using those resources (packaged separately as they can be used by other packages) FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 13:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525870] New: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dbhole at redhat.com, mark at klomp.org, langel at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, lkundrak at v3.sk Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately. Samplers such as http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml collect incomplete info Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Get a F11 or rawhide system 2. Install our fonts # yum -y install $(repoquery --whatprovides "font(*)") 3. List them $ fc-list : family |sort 4. Open http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml 5. Let the applet run, check its result Actual results: The java-detected font list is incomplete (for example it's missing STIX) and does not use the same names at fontconfig Expected results: The same list in both cases Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 13:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525871] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525871 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gnuplot AssignedTo: varekova at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: varekova at redhat.com, pertusus at free.fr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license This data is embeded in many packages, including yours Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data package FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 13:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: qt AssignedTo: than at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rdieter at math.unl.edu, than at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, ltinkl at redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license This data is embeded in many packages, including yours Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data package FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261447.n8QEljOx020101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-26 10:47:44 EDT --- As for the font bugs, it would be great if these bug reports included a list of the offending files in the specific package. You obviously must have scanned the packages for offending files to know they're affected, so it shouldn't be too hard to come up with such a list and it'd make it much easier to fix the issue and to be sure we fixed it completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261509.n8QF9uC4023564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-26 11:09:55 EDT --- Oh, and did you scan the source package or the binary package? The source package includes copies of some third-party libraries like freetype which we don't ship (we build Qt against the system freetype). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261538.n8QFcqPN028241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-26 11:38:51 EDT --- At this stage, I just relied on the google searches pabs linked to So maybe they're not accurate in this case -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261541.n8QFfARm028860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-26 11:41:10 EDT --- The keywords he used are: ? aglfn.txt ? aglfn13.txt ? glyphlist.txt ? afii64937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261603.n8QG3gRF023462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-26 12:03:41 EDT --- confirmed hits on src/3rdparty/freetype only, which we don't use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261606.n8QG6Oxk024226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-26 12:06:23 EDT --- I get several hits in src/3rdparty/freetype, which isn't really a problem for Qt as we don't ship its copy of freetype, but I guess you'll want to file a bug against freetype (and I'll clone the fix into freetype-freeworld as soon as freetype has it fixed). There's also a hit for afii64937 inside src/gui/text/qfontsubset.cpp in the static const char * const agl array. That array appears to contain a processed copy of the data with no Adobe copyright notice. What should I do with it? Add a copy of the new copyright notice and the BSD license in a patch? (I guess it'll also need to show up somewhere in "supporting documentation" to really comply with the license and to actually make sense to patch for.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261606.n8QG6Wxs001027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261613.n8QGD5MY002099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-26 12:13:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > As for the font bugs, it would be great if these bug reports included a list of > the offending files in the specific package Well for reports like http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-September/msg00005.html it just can't be done there is too much data collected, I tried to post it the first time and the lists refused to let the attached data pass (too big) However it is always possible to ask me in PM for the data, or to run the test yourself. It takes a simple bog-standard repo as argument, so if you don't want to wait for a full rawhide run, just put the packages you're interested in a dir, run createrepo on it, and point repo-font-audit there (the current version only understands http:// and ftp:// URIs, I'm testing a version that works with file:// too. Will probably publish it today) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261616.n8QGGSN7025811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-26 12:16:27 EDT --- That said, I'm not sure whether that list in qfontsubset.cpp is copyrightable at all, especially given that it is not even presented in the same format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261618.n8QGIIRs025969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-26 12:18:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I get several hits in src/3rdparty/freetype, which isn't really a problem for > Qt as we don't ship its copy of freetype, but I guess you'll want to file a bug > against freetype (and I'll clone the fix into freetype-freeworld as soon as > freetype has it fixed). Yes. I'm also thinking of pointing Spot to this mess, as those files seems duplicated pretty much everywhere, and this is the kind of cleanup op he did before > There's also a hit for afii64937 inside src/gui/text/qfontsubset.cpp in the > static const char * const agl array. That array appears to contain a processed > copy of the data with no Adobe copyright notice. What should I do with it? Add > a copy of the new copyright notice and the BSD license in a patch? (I guess > it'll also need to show up somewhere in "supporting documentation" to really > comply with the license and to actually make sense to patch for.) I suppose the clean solution would be to make it process a canonical copy of the data at build time (that will make the licensing appear in rpm deps checks, and make sure QT uses the same values as others). Dunno about the licensing patch. To be honest my primary interest is to make sure all our software uses the same values, and the legal angle is just here to make people interested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525881] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525881 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license This data is embeded in many packages, including yours Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data package FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal check Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261636.n8QGacnq006023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #35 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-26 12:36:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362766) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362766) Patch to cast the pointers allocated by FTC_XXX_LOOKUP_CMP() in the callers. Kevin, This is what you suggested in comment #19? diff --git a/src/cache/ftccmap.c b/src/cache/ftccmap.c index 50a6189..428cebb 100644 --- a/src/cache/ftccmap.c +++ b/src/cache/ftccmap.c @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ { FTC_Cache cache = FTC_CACHE( cmap_cache ); FTC_CMapQueryRec query; - FTC_CMapNode node; + FTC_Node node; FT_Error error; FT_UInt gindex = 0; FT_UInt32 hash; @@ -373,18 +373,18 @@ FTC_CACHE_LOOKUP_CMP( cache, ftc_cmap_node_compare, hash, &query, node, error ); #else - error = FTC_Cache_Lookup( cache, hash, &query, (FTC_Node*) &node ); + error = FTC_Cache_Lookup( cache, hash, &query, &node ); #endif if ( error ) goto Exit; - FT_ASSERT( (FT_UInt)( char_code - node->first ) < FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ); + FT_ASSERT( (FT_UInt)( char_code - FTC_CMAP_NODE( node )->first ) < FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ); /* something rotten can happen with rogue clients */ - if ( (FT_UInt)( char_code - node->first >= FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ) ) + if ( (FT_UInt)( char_code - FTC_CMAP_NODE( node )->first >= FTC_CMAP_INDICES_MAX ) ) return 0; - gindex = node->indices[char_code - node->first]; + gindex = FTC_CMAP_NODE( node )->indices[char_code - FTC_CMAP_NODE( node )->first]; if ( gindex == FTC_CMAP_UNKNOWN ) { FT_Face face; @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ gindex = 0; - error = FTC_Manager_LookupFace( cache->manager, node->face_id, &face ); + error = FTC_Manager_LookupFace( cache->manager, FTC_CMAP_NODE( node )->face_id, &face ); if ( error ) goto Exit; @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ FT_Set_Charmap( face, old ); } - node->indices[char_code - node->first] = (FT_UShort)gindex; + FTC_CMAP_NODE( node )->indices[char_code - FTC_CMAP_NODE( node )->first] = (FT_UShort)gindex; } Exit: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261644.n8QGiMwx030426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #36 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-26 12:44:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362768) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362768) source rpm including the 3rd patch proposed by mpsuzuki The source rpm including patch in comment #35. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 17:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506430] [pa_IN][GPOS]The font doesn't have the right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261727.n8QHRTqH014730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506430 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(kxiong at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #2 from sandeep shedmake 2009-09-26 13:27:28 EDT --- kxiong, Which font was used for obtaining Actual results ? Please, provide Actual results & Expected Results in the bug (currently missing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 18:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261835.n8QIZIkf026331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #37 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-26 14:35:17 EDT --- Yeah, that was my idea and I think that's the safest solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Sep 26 21:00:06 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 fontpackages.spec, 1.19, 1.20 import.log, 1.15, 1.16 sources, 1.13, 1.14 Message-ID: <20090926210006.42EC311C0423@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8187/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.24 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- .cvsignore 13 Sep 2009 13:36:13 -0000 1.13 +++ .cvsignore 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.14 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.23.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.24.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.19 retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20 --- fontpackages.spec 13 Sep 2009 13:36:13 -0000 1.19 +++ fontpackages.spec 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.20 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.23 +Version: 1.24 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Sat Sep 26 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.24-1 +? improve repo-font-audit (make WWS check more accurate, support file:// + local repositories?) + * Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.23-1 ? cleanups + add merging/remapping templates Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16 --- import.log 13 Sep 2009 13:36:13 -0000 1.15 +++ import.log 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.16 @@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_21-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.21-1.fc12.src.rpm:1243980659 fontpackages-1_22-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.22-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245574642 fontpackages-1_23-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.23-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252848946 +fontpackages-1_24-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.24-1.fc12.src.rpm:1253998725 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- sources 13 Sep 2009 13:36:13 -0000 1.13 +++ sources 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.14 @@ -1 +1 @@ -508caf81a8cffd7bbd3ee3208720d19b fontpackages-1.23.tar.xz +5faa75d10ad961c34b71d67201f3ebc7 fontpackages-1.24.tar.xz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 21:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525872] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262139.n8QLdDwE031629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-26 17:39:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > As for the font bugs, it would be great if these bug reports included a list of > the offending files in the specific package. If you see a way to improve this http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-September/msg00031.html while staying within list limitations (size limit, wrapping, plain text) please say how -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 23:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262305.n8QN5Wnc014911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #38 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-26 19:05:31 EDT --- Adam, Could you test the new source rpm in comment #36? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 02:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506430] [pa_IN][GPOS]The font doesn't have the right shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270214.n8R2EhMe012362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506430 koka xiong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(kxiong at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from koka xiong 2009-09-26 22:14:40 EDT --- I have retested it again,now the shape and font is the same. So I close it as not a bug. If I meet the same problem,will reopen the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Sep 27 17:25:07 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.14, 1.15 fontpackages.spec, 1.20, 1.21 import.log, 1.16, 1.17 sources, 1.14, 1.15 Message-ID: <20090927172507.4A22911C00E6@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24539/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.25 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15 --- .cvsignore 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.14 +++ .cvsignore 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.15 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.24.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.25.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21 --- fontpackages.spec 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.20 +++ fontpackages.spec 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.21 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.24 +Version: 1.25 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Sun Sep 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.25-1 +? Add short test summary to repo-font-audit + * Sat Sep 26 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.24-1 ? improve repo-font-audit (make WWS check more accurate, support file:// Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17 --- import.log 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.16 +++ import.log 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.17 @@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ fontpackages-1_21-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_22-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.22-1.fc12.src.rpm:1245574642 fontpackages-1_23-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.23-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252848946 fontpackages-1_24-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.24-1.fc12.src.rpm:1253998725 +fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.25-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254072286 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15 --- sources 26 Sep 2009 21:00:05 -0000 1.14 +++ sources 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.15 @@ -1 +1 @@ -5faa75d10ad961c34b71d67201f3ebc7 fontpackages-1.24.tar.xz +04f9517f577d0fd806276daeed14b844 fontpackages-1.25.tar.xz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 22:09:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525881] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272209.n8RM9pNx017604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525881 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-27 18:09:51 EDT --- Might be helpful to state what package is intended to provide those shared data files... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 22:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525881] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272224.n8RMOKXf010724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525881 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-27 18:24:19 EDT --- poppler-data has some of that stuff, but I think not all of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Sep 27 22:49:18 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.15, 1.16 fontpackages.spec, 1.21, 1.22 import.log, 1.17, 1.18 sources, 1.15, 1.16 Message-ID: <20090927224919.236DA11C00E6@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25826/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.26 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16 --- .cvsignore 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.15 +++ .cvsignore 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.16 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.25.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.26.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -p -r1.21 -r1.22 --- fontpackages.spec 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.21 +++ fontpackages.spec 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.22 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.25 +Version: 1.26 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog * Sun Sep 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.26-1 +? Brownpaper bag release - 1.25-1 ? Add short test summary to repo-font-audit Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18 --- import.log 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.17 +++ import.log 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.18 @@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ fontpackages-1_22-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_23-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.23-1.fc12.src.rpm:1252848946 fontpackages-1_24-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.24-1.fc12.src.rpm:1253998725 fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.25-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254072286 +fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.26-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254091733 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.15 retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16 --- sources 27 Sep 2009 17:25:06 -0000 1.15 +++ sources 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.16 @@ -1 +1 @@ -04f9517f577d0fd806276daeed14b844 fontpackages-1.25.tar.xz +04432ee25dd0b907504bb0a7aacf0724 fontpackages-1.26.tar.xz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 23:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272350.n8RNo8dj012741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 --- Comment #15 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-09-27 19:50:07 EDT --- $ rpm -ql cjkuni-ukai-fonts |grep ukai.ttc /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni-ukai/ukai.ttc $ rpm -q cjkuni-ukai-fonts cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11.noarch Please update the location of ukai.ttc. IMHO, any app shouldn't hard-core the location of font files. Hence, I don't think it's appropriate to create any symlinks between old and the latest location. Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 28 07:24:38 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch, NONE, 1.1 apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9 import.log, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090928072438.CB10B11C00E4@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19520/devel Modified Files: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log Added Files: apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch Log Message: fix bolditalic apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch: Edrip-BoldItalic.sfd | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts-bolditalic.patch --- --- orig/Edrip-BoldItalic.sfd 2008-10-06 14:27:35.000000000 +0200 +++ new/Edrip-BoldItalic.sfd 2009-09-28 08:53:05.292888804 +0200 @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ 68 1297 EndShort -LangName: 1033 "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "Copyright (c) 2007-2008, Andrey V. Panov (panov at canopus.iacp.dvo.ru),+AAoA-with Reserved Font Name Edrip.+AAoACgAA-This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.+AAoA-This license is copied together with this font package in OFL.txt, +AAoA-and is also available with a FAQ at:+AAoA-http://scripts.sil.org/OFL" "http://scripts.sil.org/ofl" LangName: 1049 "" "+BBUENARABDgEPwAA" +LangName: 1033 "" "" "Bold Italic" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "Copyright (c) 2007-2008, Andrey V. Panov (panov at canopus.iacp.dvo.ru),+AAoA-with Reserved Font Name Edrip.+AAoACgAA-This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.+AAoA-This license is copied together with this font package in OFL.txt, +AAoA-and is also available with a FAQ at:+AAoA-http://scripts.sil.org/OFL" "http://scripts.sil.org/ofl" Encoding: UnicodeBmp Compacted: 1 UnicodeInterp: none Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9 --- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 16:56:50 -0000 1.8 +++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 28 Sep 2009 07:24:37 -0000 1.9 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081007 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ URL: ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/edr Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Patch0: %{name}-license.patch +Patch1: %{name}-bolditalic.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ Latin alphabets. %prep %setup -q -c %patch0 -p1 +%patch1 -p1 %build make %{?_smp_mflags} all @@ -61,14 +63,21 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %doc *.txt README %changelog -* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20081007-9 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild +* Mon Sep 25 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20081007-10 +? fix BoldItalic naming + +* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 20081007-9 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild -* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081007-8 +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20081007-8 ? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge -* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20081007-7 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild +* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 20081007-7 +? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081007-6 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6 --- import.log 15 Mar 2009 19:16:03 -0000 1.5 +++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 07:24:37 -0000 1.6 @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD: apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235299600 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235377546 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-8_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-8.fc11.src.rpm:1237144512 +apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-10_fc12:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-10.fc12.src.rpm:1254122643 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 07:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525881] Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280729.n8S7TIq5029999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525881 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-28 03:29:17 EDT --- maintenance-wise, I think the simpler solution is to create a separate package for the Adobe stuff and have the miriad other packages that use it require or buildrequire it. This way at least the legal bits will be traced properly and we'll be sure all our apps use the same CID values -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 28 08:29:37 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/senamirmir-washra-fonts/devel import.log, 1.2, 1.3 senamirmir-washra-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090928082937.6CAD011C00E4@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/senamirmir-washra-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8741/devel Modified Files: import.log senamirmir-washra-fonts-fontconfig.conf senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec Log Message: tweak fontconfig fixing Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/senamirmir-washra-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 13 Sep 2009 17:09:39 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 08:29:35 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ senamirmir-washra-fonts-4_1-1_fc12:HEAD:senamirmir-washra-fonts-4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm:1244670473 senamirmir-washra-fonts-4_1-3_fc12:HEAD:senamirmir-washra-fonts-4.1-3.fc12.src.rpm:1252861746 +senamirmir-washra-fonts-4_1-5_fc12:HEAD:senamirmir-washra-fonts-4.1-5.fc12.src.rpm:1254126506 Index: senamirmir-washra-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/senamirmir-washra-fonts/devel/senamirmir-washra-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- senamirmir-washra-fonts-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 17:09:39 -0000 1.1 +++ senamirmir-washra-fonts-fontconfig.conf 28 Sep 2009 08:29:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -9,7 +9,10 @@ Bold - Ethiopic WashRa + Ethiopic Washra + + + Ethiopic Washra Bold 700 @@ -18,7 +21,7 @@ Ethiopic WashRa Bold - Ethiopic WashRa + Ethiopic Washra @@ -29,31 +32,32 @@ Bold - Ethiopic WashRa + Ethiopic Washra DemiBold + + Ethiopic Washra DemiBold + 600 Ethiopic WashRa SemiBold - - Ethiopic WashRa - + Ethiopic Washra serif - Ethiopic WashRa + Ethiopic Washra - Ethiopic WashRa + Ethiopic Washra serif Index: senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/senamirmir-washra-fonts/devel/senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4 --- senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec 13 Sep 2009 17:09:39 -0000 1.3 +++ senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec 28 Sep 2009 08:29:36 -0000 1.4 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Eritrean languages (Amharic, Blin, Ge?e Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.1 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) script Group: User Interface/X @@ -208,7 +208,13 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 4.1-5 +? Tweak fontconfig fixing + * Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 4.1-4 +? Kill camelcase WashRa capitalization too - 4.1-3 ? Fix WashRa Bold and SemiBold naming From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 28 08:34:33 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.5, 1.6 ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf, 1.4, 1.5 ecolier-court-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 import.log, 1.8, 1.9 Message-ID: <20090928083433.B91B111C00E4@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10331/devel Modified Files: ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf ecolier-court-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: tweak fontconfig fixing Index: ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6 --- ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.5 +++ ecolier-court-fonts-fontconfig.conf 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 -0000 1.6 @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ ?colier court + + ?colier court + Ecolier_court Index: ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5 --- ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.4 +++ ecolier-court-fonts-lignes-fontconfig.conf 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 -0000 1.5 @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ ?colier lignes court + + ?colier lignes court + Ecolier_lignes_court Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12 --- ecolier-court-fonts.spec 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.11 +++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 -0000 1.12 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ this package. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070702 -Release: 11%{?dist} +Release: 12%{?dist} Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20070702-12 +? Tweak the fontconfig fixing + * Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20070702-11 ? Fix the font naming to something more user friendly (remove PS1 legacy Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9 --- import.log 13 Sep 2009 18:07:36 -0000 1.8 +++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 08:34:33 -0000 1.9 @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7.fc11.src.rpm:1232193736 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8.fc11.src.rpm:1235377848 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-11_fc12:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-11.fc12.src.rpm:1252865221 +ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-12_fc12:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-12.fc12.src.rpm:1254126844 From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 28 08:49:02 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, 1.6, 1.7 google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.13, 1.14 import.log, 1.10, 1.11 Message-ID: <20090928084903.1ACF111C00E4@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14525/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: tweak fontconfig fixing Index: google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7 --- google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 13 Sep 2009 13:41:26 -0000 1.6 +++ google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 28 Sep 2009 08:49:01 -0000 1.7 @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ Droid Sans + + Droid Sans + 2 @@ -27,6 +30,9 @@ Droid Sans + + Droid Sans + 1 Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 13 Sep 2009 13:41:26 -0000 1.13 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 28 Sep 2009 08:49:01 -0000 1.14 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ other screen text. Name: %{fontname}-fonts # No sane versionning upstream, use the date we did a git dump Version: 20090906 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X @@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 20090906-5 +? Tweak the fontconfig fixing + * Sun Sep 13 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090906-4 ? follow the fontpackages template more closely Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11 --- import.log 13 Sep 2009 13:41:26 -0000 1.10 +++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 08:49:01 -0000 1.11 @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ google-droid-fonts-20090906-1_fc12:HEAD: google-droid-fonts-20090906-2_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-2.fc12.src.rpm:1252351928 google-droid-fonts-20090906-3_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-3.fc12.src.rpm:1252833055 google-droid-fonts-20090906-4_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-4.fc12.src.rpm:1252849244 +google-droid-fonts-20090906-5_fc12:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-20090906-5.fc12.src.rpm:1254127710 From nim at fedoraproject.org Mon Sep 28 09:05:16 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (nim) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.16, 1.17 fontpackages.spec, 1.22, 1.23 import.log, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.16, 1.17 Message-ID: <20090928090516.5907D11C00E4@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20285/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.27 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17 --- .cvsignore 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.16 +++ .cvsignore 28 Sep 2009 09:05:15 -0000 1.17 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.26.tar.xz +fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.22 retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -p -r1.22 -r1.23 --- fontpackages.spec 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.22 +++ fontpackages.spec 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.23 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %global rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.26 +Version: 1.27 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Sep 28 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.27-1 +? Brownpaper bag release ?2 + * Sun Sep 27 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.26-1 ? Brownpaper bag release Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19 --- import.log 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.18 +++ import.log 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.19 @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ fontpackages-1_23-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackag fontpackages-1_24-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.24-1.fc12.src.rpm:1253998725 fontpackages-1_25-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.25-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254072286 fontpackages-1_26-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.26-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254091733 +fontpackages-1_27-1_fc12:HEAD:fontpackages-1.27-1.fc12.src.rpm:1254128698 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.16 retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17 --- sources 27 Sep 2009 22:49:17 -0000 1.16 +++ sources 28 Sep 2009 09:05:16 -0000 1.17 @@ -1 +1 @@ -04432ee25dd0b907504bb0a7aacf0724 fontpackages-1.26.tar.xz +c2987bf1553807157ad681c253335dfd fontpackages-1.27.tar.xz From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 12:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281202.n8SC2WAm017805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-28 08:02:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362881) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362881) Screenshot on ghostscript I still need to investigate further more and this may mislead to get the right thing perhaps but just tried the vertical writing on ghostscript-8.70-1.fc12. and it looks good to me. Coming questions would be: 1. How OOo render for the vertical writing. e.g. referring the vert table in TTF or anything else 2. How about gs? just for updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 12:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281204.n8SC4Cp6018061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-28 08:04:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362883) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362883) testcase that I tried on ghostscript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cl at openoffice.org Mon Sep 28 13:37:20 2009 From: cl at openoffice.org (cl at openoffice.org) Date: 28 Sep 2009 13:37:20 -0000 Subject: [Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090928133720.4824.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 User cl changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|thb |af -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|STARTED |NEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target milestone|OOo 3.2 |OOo 3.x -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from cl at openoffice.org Mon Sep 28 13:37:19 +0000 2009 ------- reassigned as there is no progress on this issue --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281511.n8SFBO25003339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281518.n8SFILor028328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #1 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-09-28 11:18:21 EDT --- As stated in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Scheherazade_fonts, aliasing of Monotype Naskh should be added (the current package doesn't provide any fontconfig rules). What else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281737.n8SHbKjx026067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #39 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-28 13:37:17 EDT --- yup, seems OK, navit runs without errors, nothing else seems to have any problems. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281750.n8SHoS88029052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #40 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-28 13:50:27 EDT --- Thank you! I will "add" the patch proposed in comment #35 to next release of freetype, 2.3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281810.n8SIAxxI009513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #7 from Mark 2009-09-28 14:10:58 EDT --- After updating to rawhide on 28.09.2009 I have not noticed previous behaviour since then. I cannot reproduce any more Java (Eclipse) crash with these new rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281848.n8SImL9k010702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #31 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-28 14:48:18 EDT --- Lets get back to this after f12... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490941] fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282009.n8SK9i5m005318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490941 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-28 16:09:43 EDT --- What makes you think 'fc-match "times roman"' should match a serif font? There are two relevant names, one is "times", the other is "times new roman". There is no such family named "times roman". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 05:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525592] lohit-hindi-fonts, etc should not obsolete itself In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290500.n8T50n4N004011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525592 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-29 01:00:48 EDT --- built corresponding packages for rawhide thanks for notifying same :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 05:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518928] all English text in Japanese KDE apps looks double-spaced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290534.n8T5YuoG010394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518928 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-29 01:34:55 EDT --- Tomorrow's rawhide should revert to vlgothic which help with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522648] glyphs cut-off below "baseline" in firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290902.n8T92E5W019594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522648 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |MoveUpstream Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-29 05:02:07 EDT --- This issue has been forwarded to "upstream" and there are no way of fixing that in house (apparently fontforge is a bit buggy), I'll leave this to upstream and visit again when they have a new release in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518928] all English text in Japanese KDE apps looks double-spaced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290905.n8T95XR8020266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518928 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |MoveUpstream Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-29 05:05:31 EDT --- This issue has been forwarded to "upstream" and there are no way of fixing that in house (apparently fontforge is a bit buggy), I'll leave this to upstream and visit again when they have a new release in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290929.n8T9T59l017331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #13 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-29 05:29:03 EDT --- sorry for bit late update fc-scan works fine on all *.pcf files i have done suggested changes updated spec and srpm are as follows http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts-0.3-10.fc11.src.rpm also created a new package request for ucs-fixed-fonts bug 526204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291122.n8TBMwQw024852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-29 07:22:57 EDT --- It will be nice if you update this bug with version of following packages fontconfig smc-meera-fonts and metacity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291138.n8TBc7WA028617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-09-29 07:38:06 EDT --- Versions: fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.i586 metacity-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586 smc-meera-fonts-04.1-6.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 13:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291356.n8TDuYYB003217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2009-09-29 09:56:33 EDT --- hi, Updated spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/prociono/oflb-prociono-fonts.spec updated srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/prociono/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc12.src.rpm more info on the mock build here: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/prociono/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 15:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291529.n8TFTSY7030511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-29 11:29:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > Meera font has a scaling property defined in > /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-smc-fonts.conf file. It has a 1.2 times size scaling. But > in Fedora 11 this scaling is not working properly. When Meera font is selected > with size say, 12 for the applications, window titles etc, the entire desktop > get ugly with expanded and overlapped titlebars or strings in application. IMHO reason behind this is font metrics of Meera Rachana: Ascent: 1638, Descent: 410 Meera: Ascent: 1147, Descent: 901 Lohit: Ascent: 650, Descent: 374 looking at this Meera requires bit more vertical length of title bar for proper rendering as compared to Lohit. With compared to Rachana it requires bit more space below the character. this Descent values is proper for Meera as there are some ligature required this much below space see http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Meera/meera_with_characters_below_base_extending.png about Panel menus getting overlap is because SPACE character 0x0020, Meera : width = 563 Lohit : width = 350 Rachana : width = 466 see http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Meera/lohit_space.png http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Meera/meera_space.png so obviously Meera required more horizontal space as well, and panel menus getting overlapped, it will be nice if we can reduce its space value little bit There is problem with OpenOffice, it is somehow not using .conf file, i am looking into it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 15:45:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291545.n8TFjhro002442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #13 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-29 11:45:41 EDT --- So, on the ttx front I have some findings anyway... upstream .ttf $ ttx -l sazanami-gothic.ttf |grep GDEF tag checksum length offset GDEF 0x00293516 30 3654796 $ od -Ax -j 3654796 -t x1 sazanami-gothic.ttf -N 30 37c48c 00 01 00 00 00 0c 00 00 00 16 00 00 00 02 00 01 37c49c 00 03 35 0f 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 02 00 00 37c4aa unpacked and repacked with ttx as above and we get... $ ttx -l sazanami-gothic.ttf |grep GDEF tag checksum length offset GDEF 0x00293515 30 7701068 [root at Nom tmp]# od -Ax -j 3804688 -t x1 sazanami-gothic.ttf -N 30 75824c 00 01 00 00 00 0c 00 00 00 16 00 00 00 02 00 01 75825c 00 03 35 0f 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 01 00 00 75826a which also gives the weirdness If I now tweak the "CoverageFormat" bit (where the two above differ) for the GDEF from Format 1 to Format 2 within ttx then it works fine. e.g. original .ttf unpacked and repacked with my custom ttx ttx -l sazanami-gothic.ttf |grep GDEF GDEF 0x00293516 30 7701068 od -Ax -j 7701068 -t x1 sazanami-gothic.ttf -N 30 75824c 00 01 00 00 00 0c 00 00 00 16 00 00 00 02 00 01 75825c 00 03 35 0f 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 02 00 00 75826a So there is likely at least one route to solving this by e.g. extending ttx to support an additional flag like the existing -b which says not to recalculate bounding boxes with another one that says not to recalculate which CoverageFormat is more efficient and turn the changes of bug 196433 into a patch to the .ttx output of ttx. I'll have a poke at this to see if that would work in theory at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:48:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513582] segfault in FTC_CMapCache_Lookup() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291748.n8THmNGC029605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513582 --- Comment #41 from mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp 2009-09-29 13:48:21 EDT --- The patch in comment #35 is applied to git head. freetype-2.3.10 will include it. Thanks to everybody helped me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291750.n8THoCEr030079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-29 13:50:11 EDT --- Could you reproduce them reliably before that update ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291832.n8TIWJfk020294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #9 from Mark 2009-09-29 14:32:18 EDT --- Tell me what do you need. I have been updating every day but I did not check every day if all is ok with Java and Eclipse. I am sure that before that update Eclipse crashed but after that update doing the same things as I described above does not crash Eclipse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522187] Java (so Eclipse too) crashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292017.n8TKHLSn015014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-29 16:17:20 EDT --- Sounds good to me. I'm sure you'll open another bug if it starts crashing again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 02:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300223.n8U2N4qu032210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-29 22:23:02 EDT --- Thanks for analysing. here is more details in TTF spec: GDEF Header 0000: 00 01 00 00 : Version of GDEF table 0004: 00 0c : offset to GlyphClassDef table 0006: 00 00 : offset to AttachList table 0008: 00 16 : offset to LigCaretList table 000A: 00 00 : offset to Mark Attachment Class Definition table GlyphClassDef table 000C: 00 02 : ClassFormat 000E: 00 01 : ClassRangeCount : ClassRangeRecord[0] 0010: 00 03 : Start 0012: 35 0f : End 0014: 00 01 : Class, 1 = base glyphs LigCaretList table 0016: 00 04 : offset to Coverage table 0018: 00 00 : LigGlyphCount Coverage table 001A: 00 02 : CoverageFormat 001C: 00 00 : GlyphCount In either case, there are actually no glyph definitions in the coverage table. I'm really wondering why it affects to this. Is it freetype or HarfBuzz bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 03:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512504] syntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as = p.getAssembly() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300306.n8U36fdd000533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512504 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-09-29 23:06:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363113) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363113) simple patch to fix this I see the same issue with ttx. just attached a simple patch. modified ttx works fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523454] [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300601.n8U61nXn015241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b.rahul.pm at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-09-30 02:01:48 EDT --- Has the ascent-descent values for meera been changed recently? If so, please revert back to last working values if the change was not deliberate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Sep 30 07:26:47 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/bitmap-fonts/F-12 bitmap-fonts.spec,1.20,1.21 Message-ID: <20090930072647.AE18611C00E6@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/F-12 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21578 Modified Files: bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Sep 30 2009 Pravin Satpute - 0.3-9 - updating as per new packaging guidelines - bugfix 481068 Index: bitmap-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/F-12/bitmap-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21 --- bitmap-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 18:07:05 -0000 1.20 +++ bitmap-fonts.spec 30 Sep 2009 07:26:47 -0000 1.21 @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ +#%global fontname bitmap +%define common_desc \ +The bitmap-fonts package provides a number of bitmap fonts selected\ +from the xorg package designed for use locations such as\ +terminals. + Name: bitmap-fonts Version: 0.3 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} License: Lucida and MIT and Public Domain Source0: bitmap-fonts-%{version}.tar.bz2 Source1: fixfont-3.5.tar.bz2 @@ -10,25 +16,40 @@ Group: User Interface/X Summary: Selected set of bitmap fonts Requires(pre): fontconfig BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description -The bitmap-fonts package provides a number of bitmap fonts selected -from the xorg package designed for use locations such as -terminals. +%common_desc + +%package common +Summary: Common files for bitmap-fonts +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -%package cjk +%description common +%common_desc + +This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. + +%_font_pkg lut* con* [0-9]* + +%package -n bitmap-cjk-fonts Summary: Selected CJK bitmap fonts for Anaconda Group: Applications/System Requires(pre): fontconfig +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name}-cjk = %{version}-%{release} -%description cjk +%description -n %{fontname}-cjk-fonts bitmap-fonts-cjk package contains bitmap fonts used by Anaconda. They are selected from the xorg packages, and the font encoding are converted from native encoding to ISO10646. They are only intended to be used in Anaconda. +%_font_pkg -n cjk fangsongti* + %prep %setup -q -a 1 + %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -38,44 +59,25 @@ cd fixfont-3.5 make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT +mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/fonts/bitmap-fonts %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +#install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + # %%ghost the fonts.cache-1 file -touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 +#touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%post -fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%post cjk -fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - -%postun cjk -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%files +%files common %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README LU_LEGALNOTICE -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/lut* -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/con* -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/[0-9]* -%ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 - -%files cjk -%defattr(-,root,root) -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fangsongti* -%ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 %changelog +* Wed Sep 30 2009 Pravin Satpute - 0.3-9 +- updating as per new packaging guidelines +- bugfix 481068 + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From pravins at fedoraproject.org Wed Sep 30 07:36:14 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel bitmap-fonts.spec,1.20,1.21 Message-ID: <20090930073614.AD38011C00E6@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24980 Modified Files: bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Sep 30 2009 Pravin Satpute - 0.3-9 - updating as per new packaging guidelines - bugfix 481068 Index: bitmap-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel/bitmap-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21 --- bitmap-fonts.spec 24 Jul 2009 18:07:05 -0000 1.20 +++ bitmap-fonts.spec 30 Sep 2009 07:36:13 -0000 1.21 @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ +#%global fontname bitmap +%define common_desc \ +The bitmap-fonts package provides a number of bitmap fonts selected\ +from the xorg package designed for use locations such as\ +terminals. + Name: bitmap-fonts Version: 0.3 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} License: Lucida and MIT and Public Domain Source0: bitmap-fonts-%{version}.tar.bz2 Source1: fixfont-3.5.tar.bz2 @@ -10,25 +16,40 @@ Group: User Interface/X Summary: Selected set of bitmap fonts Requires(pre): fontconfig BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description -The bitmap-fonts package provides a number of bitmap fonts selected -from the xorg package designed for use locations such as -terminals. +%common_desc + +%package common +Summary: Common files for bitmap-fonts +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -%package cjk +%description common +%common_desc + +This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. + +%_font_pkg lut* con* [0-9]* + +%package -n bitmap-cjk-fonts Summary: Selected CJK bitmap fonts for Anaconda Group: Applications/System Requires(pre): fontconfig +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name}-cjk = %{version}-%{release} -%description cjk +%description -n %{fontname}-cjk-fonts bitmap-fonts-cjk package contains bitmap fonts used by Anaconda. They are selected from the xorg packages, and the font encoding are converted from native encoding to ISO10646. They are only intended to be used in Anaconda. +%_font_pkg -n cjk fangsongti* + %prep %setup -q -a 1 + %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -38,44 +59,25 @@ cd fixfont-3.5 make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT +mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/fonts/bitmap-fonts %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +#install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + # %%ghost the fonts.cache-1 file -touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 +#touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%post -fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%post cjk -fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - -%postun cjk -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%files +%files common %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README LU_LEGALNOTICE -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/lut* -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/con* -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/[0-9]* -%ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 - -%files cjk -%defattr(-,root,root) -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts -%{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fangsongti* -%ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1 %changelog +* Wed Sep 30 2009 Pravin Satpute - 0.3-9 +- updating as per new packaging guidelines +- bugfix 481068 + * Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.3-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 07:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300741.n8U7flOE003774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-30 03:41:46 EDT --- i have build bitmap-fonts-0_3-9_fc12, with spec submitted in comment #6 better to do update bitmap-fonts with merge review for F13 and also looks good to close this f12-blocker bug and do discussion on Merge Review on bug 225617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From dtardon at openoffice.org Wed Sep 30 07:57:22 2009 From: dtardon at openoffice.org (dtardon at openoffice.org) Date: 30 Sep 2009 07:57:22 -0000 Subject: [Issue 64671] Verdana font messes up letter spacing in Impress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090930075722.2060.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64671 User dtardon changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Issue type|DEFECT |PATCH -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 08:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525498] wrongly encoded glyphs after U+10000 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300828.n8U8SJLd014115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 --- Comment #2 from Denis Jacquerye 2009-09-30 04:28:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363148) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363148) path reajusting encodings The patch does several things: - clears duplicates of .notdef, .null and nonmarkingreturn - renames the out-of-bound glyphs to previous names - adjusts glyph id and references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 08:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300859.n8U8x2Gb008522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-30 04:58:59 EDT --- pasting review comment from bug 481068, pasting only important one --------------------------------------------------- Comment #8 From Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net) 2009-09-21 17:42:02 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Private Well fc-scan shows that most of the bdf files declare themselves as "Fixed", two of them think they are "Fangsong ti" and the others are not parsable by fc-scan. So you need at minimum a 1. a foo-fixed-fonts subpackage, 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, 3. and get Behdad to look at the other files and tell you if it's a bug his side or if the files need some form of fixing. Fontconfig won't be able to use them if it can't read the font name inside. The readme says they are Lucida but fontconfig does not read readmes. Also - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package - the licensing of Fangsong ti needs to be extracted from the fonts in a .txt people can actually read. Comment #13 From Pravin Satpute (psatpute at redhat.com) 2009-09-29 05:29:03 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Private sorry for bit late update fc-scan works fine on all *.pcf files i have done suggested changes updated spec and srpm are as follows http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts-0.3-10.fc11.src.rpm also created a new package request for ucs-fixed-fonts bug 526204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 09:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300934.n8U9Y8Je017068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 05:34:07 EDT --- I'll look at it this evening. Please make sure the font name appears in the package name (ucs-fixed-fonts, bitmap-fangsong-ti-fonts, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301116.n8UBGgf0006275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-30 07:16:40 EDT --- yep, font name appearing just instead of bitmap-fangsong-ti-fonts it is bitmap-fangsongti-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301118.n8UBImYa018460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-30 07:18:47 EDT --- also as commented by Jens in comment #11 IMO we should plan from that direction also, otherwise it looks bad two Packages providing same Set of Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301146.n8UBkncE024997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caolanm at redhat.com Component|sazanami-fonts |openoffice.org Version|10 |rawhide AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |caolanm at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-30 07:46:47 EDT --- I'm now back to very suspicious about OOo itself. Both fontforge and ttx are preferring the type 2 coverage format when saving this font as its more compact in this case that the original fonts type 1 coverage table. Presuming that both ttx and fontforge are re-encoding as type 2 correctly then it would be OOo that's handling them incorrectly. http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/CHAPTER2.htm has "Coverage Index (GlyphID) = StartCoverageIndex + GlyphID - Start GlyphID" which *plausibly* is somewhere we're going wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 14:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461617] modified Sazanami-Gothic font showing vertical text rendering glitches not seen in the original In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301405.n8UE50Rm010113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461617 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #16 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-30 10:04:59 EDT --- I think I have this as a bug in OOo after all :-) It'd probably be a good idea if we were to use ttx to build our modified font so that we could take the original source and made the modifications during our build process to make it transparent what the changes are being made. I might play around with that as a separate thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302114.n8ULEtvM032482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(hedayat at grad.com) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 17:14:53 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this font! SIL fonts are usually high quality, it's a shame we do not package all of them yet like other distros do (hint hint) Package review: 1. current best practice is to avoid using the package name in the summary, please reword it without "SIL Scheherazade" (I know it was not always like this, and we haven't changed evey previous package yet). The reason is that package tools already display the package name next to the summary 2. (minor) you don't really have to use Caps Before Every Word (though that's a matter of preference) 3. (minor) I'm not sure it's a good idea to include your second description ?. All this technical mumbo-jumbo is likely to frighten normal users 4. it's not a good idea to depend on dos2unix for txt file conversion, you can usually attain the same results using just sed and iconv. Your package does not build as a result in mock, since dos2unix is not present in the buildroot + dos2unix FONTLOG.txt OFL-FAQ.txt OFL.txt /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BzkuMA: line 29: dos2unix: command not found http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 If you intend to maintain more packages later it's a good idea to setup a mock instance on your system to test for this kind of mistake http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock 5. And lastly, please add some fontconfig rules. Just the default set + Monotype Naskh should be enough, unless there is something else you feel would help users. You have standard templates and documentation in fontpackages-devel (though the F11 version may be a little old, install the latest one it will work just fine in F11 too) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7288 And that's all for now NEEDINFO till you answer those (PS if you're not member of the packaging group yet, I can sponsor you, but I'll require 2-3 good font package submissions before; we've streamlined the process so much a single submission is not enough to judge if someone will become a good packager anymore) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302125.n8ULPiJb002498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302124.n8ULOLS1016202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 17:24:20 EDT --- This one is good. Just need spot to chime in now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302127.n8ULRQ2W003511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-30 17:27:26 EDT --- Public Domain declaration in the license looks fine. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302134.n8ULY6di006034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 17:34:05 EDT --- Therefore, this package is now ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging another font in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302240.n8UMefmB010990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 18:40:37 EDT --- I need to look at it some more (got distracted by other bug requests, and this is a complex package), however here are some remarks 1. rpm will evaluate your %global even with # (why did you want to comment it out?) 2. common_desc should be a global too 3. your -fixed subpackage contains font files that declare themselves as "Console". These should go in a "console" subpackage 4. not too sure if it'd be better to move console8x8 in its own subpackage or just rename or remap it (cf remapping template) 5. You can drop the duplicated Group: Applications/System lines, the main one will be inherited in modern rpm 6. why do you add a Requires(pre): fontconfig ? We do not require fontconfig in font packages. Do you have a special need? 7. what do you need xorg-x11-font-utils as BR for ? 8. I think you can specify a different LICENSE field per subpackage, can you check with spot how he'd prefer the licensing reported ? (mixed licensing packages are a PITA) I feel if it'd be better if each subpackage was tagged with just the necessary license info (and included the corresponding license files) 9. fontconfig will happily use pcf.gz files, please compress your pcf files (if you're feeling ambitious ask behdad if he intends to support pcf.xz soon) That's all for this first partial review, will look more in depth tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.