[Fedora-packaging] Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] Revised Haskell Guidelines 2008.08.13

[Bryan O'Sullivan]

Frankly, I think that the current version of the guidelines is fine.
It's much better to have something not quite perfect where we can make
progress than to be permanently stuck. So moving forwards with what we
have suits me.

On 8/27/08, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>>> Because the draft was submitted to us as complete, and we voted on it.
>>
>> I understood that it was submitted as a draft for comments...
>
> Long ago, i got tired of submitting drafts for comments to have to
> wait.  I took spot's advice and just submitted them for review and
> comment simultaneously.  The principle idea was that I put a deadline
> on the commenting period, and if there were no comments by a certain
> time, then it would go straight to review. This way, two groups of
> people got a chance to look at the drafts at the same time.
>
> Finally, it went for a review by the Committee, and they made their
> comments.  We also discussed your comments.  I addressed their
> comments, which was the final request for review.
>
> Like I said (accidentally offlist), it's not set in stone either, I'm
> still listening.
>
> -Yaakov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-haskell-list mailing list
> Fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-haskell-list
>