[Fedora-haskell-list] Re: Test package - Cabal-126.96.36.199 (using cabal_* macros). was: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Revised Haskell Guidelines 2008.08.13
petersen at redhat.com
Fri Aug 29 00:03:36 UTC 2008
Rajesh Krishnan さんは書きました:
> For Hackage packages that contain only libraries, or a single executable, the
> package building specification is clear (name the RPM for library only
> package xyz as ghc-xyz, and name the RPM for a single executable package xyz
> as just xyz without the ghc prefix).
The example corresponding to xmonad (which has both an executable and
library) is given in the guidelines: the base package name in that case
should be just "xmonad".
> What would be the RPM name for a Hackage package xyz that contains multiple
> libraries and multiple executables? Is it OK to create a single RPM called
> xyz in for such a package, or do they necessarily need to be split up into
> multiple package fragments? Please explain if you could. Note that the
> number of such fragmented RPMs would multiply fast (creation of perhaps -prof
> and -doc etc. if applicable for each subpackage) .
So do you have a specific package in mind? It is easier to discuss
concrete examples than hypothetical cases. :)
More information about the Fedora-haskell-list