From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100wE2020981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |426752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100N3j020865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |426750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100MSL020833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100vOq020950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:05:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010005.mB105o7j021759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/pac | |kage/X11-xft --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-30 19:05:50 EDT --- Yaakov, do you still have a copy of your .spec file? (Above links are broken.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 06:12:32 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 01:12:32 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Packaging guidelines and macros update In-Reply-To: <1138306688.246091228098979588.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <170781228.268031228111952534.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > I would like to rename %ghc_postinst_script to %ghc_register_pkg and > %ghc_preun_script to %ghc_unregister_pkg. I attach a little patch > which shows the changes needed to macros.ghc and the templates. I think at the same time we might as well drop the trivial %cabal_build and %cabal_haddock macros too. Below is what macros.ghc looks like for me now. If this looks ok and there are no objections I would like to submit the revised packaging guidelines to the Packaging Committee for approval after the end of this week. If you could all take some moments to review https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell this week that would be great. I am building ghc-6.10.1-6.fc11 in koji with these changes so that we can test them. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=965243 Thanks, Jens -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ghc-rpm-macros.ghc Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1287 bytes Desc: not available URL: From petersen at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 06:27:14 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 01:27:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] packaging package? In-Reply-To: <170781228.268031228111952534.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <844133918.270401228112834080.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > I am building ghc-6.10.1-6.fc11 in koji with these changes so that we > can test them. I am starting to think that it might be better to move the packaging files to a separate package: rebuilding the whole of ghc just to fix an rpm macro or tweak cabal2spec say is rather heavy. On the other hand the rpm macros should be getting stable now hopefully so it may be less of an issue there. Maybe haskell-packaging or ghc-packaging? I think I will keep this idea in the back of my head for a little. Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012203.mB1M3rgJ009787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022333.mB2NXWi8010353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:33:31 EDT --- I guess a new package is needed now that we have functional guidelines. The above links seem to be broken in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 09:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 04:23:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040923.mB49NLk8013995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:58:11 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-04 04:23:18 EDT --- Okay finally tested and reproduced this: 1) I installed f10 on a 256M guest vm 2) yum install ghc-gtk2hs 3) run top For (2) package installs but the scripts take "forever" to finish: I suspect the main culprit is libHSgtk.a (20M) -> HSgtk.so. Currently it is using about 330M of swap... (3) shows ld running and using about 357M of vm... Maybe linking from source is more efficiency than relinking from .a? Perhaps you could try running the "ghc-pkg update --auto-ghci-libs" part of the install scripts (rpm -q --scripts ghc-gtk2hs) to confirm this? I guess must be the problem though. Maybe we should just include the .o files in ghc-gtk2hs like we do for other packages: these days 3MB is not considered that big... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 09:52:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050952.mB59qTn8015107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Component|ghc |ghc-gtk2hs Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-05 04:52:26 EDT --- Hmm, it finished for me after within "only" 110 minutes... anyway I think I will just add the .o files to ghc-gtk2hs for now. Also the .o files are tiny I released so really there is no good reason not to ship them... Fixed now in cvs for rawhide: waiting for new haddock package to get built first so that docs can be built there too again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061123.mB6BNbqR032639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Component|ghc-gtk2hs |ghc Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-06 06:23:34 EDT --- Should be in ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.13-6.20081108.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:12:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101112.mBABCNEY000896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 06:12:22 EDT --- The links to the spec/SRPM are not working, therefore nothing can be done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:18:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101118.mBABIlfV008575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #25 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 06:18:44 EDT --- 1.4.5 is out now. Jens, do you also need to be sponsored? Otherwise you should remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR from the blocked bugs list. If you do not need to be sponsored, I will try to review this, soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101152.mBABqxUj008799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 06:52:58 EDT --- Petersen-san is actually one of the sponsors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101300.mBAD0P9i023317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #27 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 08:00:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Petersen-san is actually one of the sponsors. Ok, it seems to be safe to remove the FE_NEEDSPONSOR, then. I also noticed that Michel is already assigned to this, are you planning to review this, soon? Are there any plans to get this also into F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101643.mBAGhofZ018356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 11:43:49 EDT --- I set NEEDINFO to indicate, that this package is not ready for review, yet. Please provide working links to Spec and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120138.mBC1cAXj026258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-11 20:38:08 EDT --- (Needsponsor was for Yaakov, but he seems to be too busy for fedora at the moment...) > Michel is already assigned to this, are you planning to review this, soon? Yeah Michel has not commented since Sept. Michel, if you are not available then I think we should let Till take over the review. :) > Are there any plans to get this also into F10? Sure, why not. :) Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11-1.4.5-1.fc10.src.rpm This needs rawhide ghc to build. (I am kind of hovering on whether the build_doc and build_prof build switches are overkill or not for general libs: sometimes they are useful - they do make the spec file a little more complicated but make clear which parts are for docs and profiling. The current templates I made have them though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:45:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120145.mBC1jYBe006914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-11 20:45:33 EDT --- I think this one is less urgent, but I can provide an updated package later. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=426754&hide_resolved=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150632.mBF6WAwS027017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150632.mBF6WS2w027067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/pac | |kage/ghc-paths -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 23:35:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152335.mBFNZNhj002107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #29 from Till Maas 2008-12-15 18:35:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > (I am kind of hovering on whether the build_doc and build_prof build switches > are overkill or not for general libs: sometimes they are useful - they do make > the spec file a little more complicated but make clear which parts are for docs > and profiling. The current templates I made have them though.) Imho the prof packages do not hurt, but in case the documentation is not big, there is no need to add it to a seperate doc subpackage. Nevertheless I would prefer to use %bcond_without or %bcond_with macros to make it possible to easily define whether or not to build the subpackages on the rpmbuild commandline. Here is a patch: http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghx-X11-buildcond.patch Btw. is there any need to require a certain version of ghc except for making sure that the pkg_libdir exists, i.e. would it be possible to just use a Requires: ghc, given that one can use some spec-fu to automatically build the pkg_libdir path and Requires from the ghc version that was used to build the rpm? Iirc it was only required in previous Fedora releases, to allow parallel installation of different ghc version, which is not supported anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 00:00:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160000.mBG00dUa021715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com --- Comment #30 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-12-15 19:00:38 EDT --- Actually, the prof packages should be seen as mandatory, not optional, so there is no reason that there should be a flag to control whether or not they are built. The reason for this is that if a library is built without profiling, then nothing that depends on it can ever be built *with* profiling enabled. As a result, we require that all libraries be built both in profiling and no-profiling flavours. The issue of whether a -prof RPM is installed on a system is a separate one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:45:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160145.mBG1jVnF022893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-15 20:45:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Actually, the prof packages should be seen as mandatory, not optional, so there > is no reason that there should be a flag to control whether or not they are > built. Bryan is probably right, we can probably drop the prof flag - at least I can't think of any cases profiling has blocked building a package: my reason for having it is really more to save time for debugging builds sometimes (either build time or time downloading ghc-prof), but for small libraries it probably doesn't make sense so I think it is safe to remove from the default template and then big libraries (like gtk2hs) might still have a prof build flag but that would be up to the maintainer. bcond looks better though: so I will use that for docs and other places/packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 02:02:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160202.mBG22WZs008872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:17:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160417.mBG4HdbX017035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-15 23:17:38 EDT --- > but in case the documentation is not big, > there is no need to add it to a separate doc subpackage. Documentation is not actually being subpackaged here: the flag would just be for whether the docs get build or not: generally no reason not to do that, though occasionally docs building can break with certain versions of haddock say. > Here is a patch: > http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghx-X11-buildcond.patch Thanks - will try to fold that into the templates. > Btw. is there any need to require a certain version of ghc except for making > sure that the pkg_libdir exists, i.e. would it be possible to just use a > Requires: ghc, given that one can use some spec-fu to automatically build the > pkg_libdir path and Requires from the ghc version that was used to build the > rpm? Iirc it was only required in previous Fedora releases, to allow parallel > installation of different ghc version, which is not supported anymore. Good question. I see what you're saying, but since ghc libraries change ABI with every minor version I think it is useful to document what version a library has been built with - though I suppose one can also look at the binary package metadata for that. Let's think a little more about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 01:42:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170142.mBH1gOOQ024418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 20:42:23 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says: ghc-paths-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is true, and not a problem. ghc-paths.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/libHSghc-paths-0.1.0.5.a ghc-paths-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/libHSghc-paths-0.1.0.5_p.a which are normal for Haskell packages. The only real complaint I have is that the module description doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I guess it must make sense if you understand Haskell (which I don't); that's not really unheard of when it comes to specialized modules for various languages, so I'm not going to worry about it. Maybe you can think of something more sensible. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: ea9e97425894e3dbd7915e00e107e2e7fc07b6e8293fd2dd66a813f0673cba10 ghc-paths-0.1.0.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-paths-devel = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-paths = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-paths(x86-64) = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 = /bin/sh ghc = 6.10.1 ghc-paths-prof-0.1.0.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-paths-prof = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-paths-prof(x86-64) = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 = ghc-paths = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-prof = 6.10.1 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (ghc package registration and documentation indexing) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 03:11:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170311.mBH3B8PV006188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 22:11:08 EDT --- This fails to build for me, in a bizarre way: + %cabal_build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CbV8LX: line 32: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CbV8LX (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CbV8LX (%build) This package looks significantly different from the ghc-paths package I just reviewed; I'm guessing this package just needs an update to work with the new set of macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170532.mBH5WWXb029233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 00:32:29 EDT --- Thanks Till - I changed ghc-zlib to use bcond and %(ghc --numeric-version) so far and will do same for ghc-gtk2hs. (I think we should move ghc_version into macros.ghc then.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:15:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170615.mBH6FfU4003316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 01:15:41 EDT --- Ah yes - I will update to "%cabal build" and "%cabal haddock" soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170618.mBH6IRUJ003566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #34 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-12-17 01:18:27 EDT --- Pong, Sorry for the away-ness. I plan on picking this up in a few days, but... I'm having really really weird problems getting Xmonad to work in Gnome, so i'm going to be trying to resolve that first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:21:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:21:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170621.mBH6LJxJ004274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(opensource at till.n | |ame) --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 01:21:18 EDT --- > Btw. is there any need to require a certain version of ghc except for making > sure that the pkg_libdir exists, i.e. would it be possible to just use a > Requires: ghc, given that one can use some spec-fu to automatically build the > pkg_libdir path and Requires from the ghc version that was used to build the > rpm? Iirc it was only required in previous Fedora releases, to allow parallel > installation of different ghc version, which is not supported anymore. Actually this is breaking in mock/koji for me, but perhaps I am not doing it right. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1002891&name=srpm.log Till, could you have look or do you know another package that does something similar? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 15:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171522.mBHFMXbs029153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(opensource at till.n | |ame) | --- Comment #36 from Till Maas 2008-12-17 10:22:30 EDT --- I first looked at how python packages manage to get their python(ABI) = 2.6 dependency. For this rpm has it's own automatic dependency generator. Here is one for ghc that allows to skip the Requires: ghc and Requires: ghc-prof dependencies in the spec, because they will be added automatically. http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghcdeps.sh I am not yet sure, what the impact of %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 is for ghc packages. I guess this can lead to problems in case there are also other files included that need the automatic dependency generator, e.g. python scripts. Maybe the script needs to be adjusted to also call the internal dependency generator somehow, but this should probably take care of this in the ghcdep.sh script: /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdeps --requires $REPLY For the post, postun, preun dependencies, the only way I found is this (inspired by kmodtool): http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghc-script-requires.sh Instead of the Requires(post) etc, this can be used in the spec, if Source2: points to the script: %{expand:%(/bin/bash %SOURCE2 post preun postun)} With this patch to the spec I was then able to build ghc-zlib with proper requires afaics: http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib-automatic-requires.patch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1003560 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212052.mBLKq3tw030358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:52:03 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:52:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212052.mBLKqIB9030416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:52:17 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212053.mBLKr33r012128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:53:02 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:11:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220511.mBM5B5b1008096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Fernando Henrique Sanches changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fernandohsanches at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:10:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220510.mBM5As5s008042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Fernando Henrique Sanches changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fernandohsanches at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220512.mBM5CDvg008247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Fernando Henrique Sanches changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fernandohsanches at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:22:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220522.mBM5MvX2025194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 00:22:54 EDT --- Ok thank you very much that looks very useful: it is quite a bit change to our packaging so I think I would like to leave the automatic dependency scripts for the next update of the guidelines after this one, if that is ok - that will give us a bit more time to test and play with them. Presumbly ghc should own those scripts? > I am not yet sure, what the impact of > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 > is for ghc packages. Naive question: what would be the consequence of leaving _use_internal_dependency_generator turned on? Turning off also disables all C library dependency checking? Anyway from what you say we can tweak the scripts to do the write thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220538.mBM5cntP011872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 00:38:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review. :) I will improvement the description of the package when importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-paths Short Description: Interface to ghc's install directories Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 07:16:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220716.mBM7GsMR009226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ghc |ghc-gtk2hs --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 02:16:50 EDT --- Will leave this open until it is fixed for f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221151.mBMBpXY3006371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #38 from Till Maas 2008-12-22 06:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Ok thank you very much that looks very useful: it is quite a bit change to our > packaging so I think I would like to leave the automatic dependency scripts for > the next update of the guidelines after this one, if that is ok - that will > give us a bit more time to test and play with them. Sure. > Presumbly ghc should own those scripts? Yes or maybe better in a separate small package that is required by ghc to make it easier to update them. > > I am not yet sure, what the impact of > > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 > > is for ghc packages. > > Naive question: what would be the consequence of leaving > _use_internal_dependency_generator turned on? Turning off also disables all C > library dependency checking? Anyway from what you say we can tweak the scripts > to do the write thing. If it is turned on, then __find_requires is not used. According to this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies instead of rpmdeps maybe /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires should be used. I will ask about this on fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:33:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230133.mBN1Xfcv020926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 20:33:40 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:55:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:55:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230155.mBN1tH3g024168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 20:55:17 EDT --- Package imported and built ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 04:32:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:32:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230432.mBN4WE4o022692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 23:32:14 EDT --- Thanks Jason - sorry was too busy last week to update. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Dec 23 2008 Jens Petersen - 3001.1.5-1 - update to 3001.1.5 - use bcond for doc and prof - minor tweaks for latest packaging guidelines (A little comment: this package is no longer the latest version, but 4000.0.0 seems to be too new for the current release of cabal-install - I am not quite sure how we can deal with multiple library versions inside Fedora, but it may be a problem we have to face at some point. Though hopefully the coming Haskell (library) Platform will help with this kind for basic packages like this one.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 18:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231853.mBNIrg6e009535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-23 13:53:41 EDT --- My advice would be to simply not attempt multiple library versions. If you find yourself in a case where you have to maintain something backrevved, you're already lost to a certain degree. This package looks fine to me. rpmlint says: ghc-HTTP.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/HTTP-3001.1.5/libHSHTTP-3001.1.5.a ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/HTTP-3001.1.5/libHSHTTP-3001.1.5_p.a which are all normal for Haskell packages. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e34d9f979bafbbf2e45bf90a9ee9bfd291f3c67c291a250cc0a6378431578aeb HTTP-3001.1.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-HTTP-devel = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 = /bin/sh ghc = 6.10.1 ghc-HTTP-prof-3001.1.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-HTTP-prof = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP-prof(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 = ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-prof = 6.10.1 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (ghc package registration and documentation indexing) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 20:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232018.mBNKIUOZ009930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #39 from Till Maas 2008-12-23 15:18:26 EDT --- %preun and %post use undefined macros: %ghc_postinst_script instead of %ghc_register_pkg %ghc_preun_script instead of if [ "$1" -eq 0 ] ; then %ghc_unregister_pkg fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 20:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232022.mBNKMe5g027654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #40 from Till Maas 2008-12-23 15:22:39 EDT --- Also there is a changelog entry missing for 1.4.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 17:13:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] New: ghci does not handle backspace correctly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghci does not handle backspace correctly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 Summary: ghci does not handle backspace correctly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos at serpentine.com ReportedBy: greenrd at greenrd.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, bos at serpentine.com, loupgaroublond at gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ghci does not handle the backspace key correctly. Presumably this is because ghc is not (according to ldd) linked with either readline or editline. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-6.10.1-6.fc11.i386 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ghci 2. Type something 3. Press backspace Actual results: ^? appears Expected results: character deleted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 19:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301934.mBUJYsC4029862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 19:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301934.mBUJYgYt029815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #1 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-12-30 14:34:42 EDT --- I've no idea what's wrong here. I saw the same problem building ghc via koji on x86_64, but it has since vanished with Jens's most recent build. If I use mock to do a build on my laptop, the problem doesn't occur either. It's clearly somehow related to the koji build environment, but it is strenuously resisting debugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.